Lab Report HPLC Complete
Lab Report HPLC Complete
TOTAL MARKS
Lab Technical Report
Course code/name
Methodology:
Using a suitable flowchart, state the steps involve in this lab work.
5. leave it under
vacuum until no 6.filter the degas soda
more bubbles appears through 45L filter syringe.
in the soda sample.
Result/ Discussion:
Based on these experiment, the level of concentration of caffeine in beverages was determined using
HPLC. A chromatogram was obtained for each analysis for each concentration. The response is
displayed on a graph where the x-axis is the retention time and the y-axis is a measure of the intensity
of the response. The size of the peak is proportional to the concentration of the analyte was obtained
after calibration and necessary computations have been made. There are different concentration area
for volumetric flask. Based on table 2, the results obtain for 5ppm is 63326, 15ppm is 168125, 25ppm
is 47770, 50ppm is 526737 and 100ppm is 1046985.
The Beer-Lambert law states that the quantity of light absorbed by a substance dissolved in a fully
transmitting solvent is directly proportional to the concentration of the substance and the path length
of the light through the solution. Reversed phase chromatography employs a polar (aqueous)
mobile phase. As a result, hydrophobic molecules in the polar mobile phase tend to adsorb to the
hydrophobic stationary phase, and hydrophilic molecules in the mobile phase will pass through the
column and are eluted first. Using the law, the concentration of the chemical to the amount of UV
absorption can be relate.
Based on graph 1: Peak area vs Concentration, it shows that the results obtained was not accurate
since all the point are not met with the straight line where it does affect the value of R 2 where the
value is 0.94493. The obtained was not statifying because the value was not even near to 1 where it
shows there are wrong steps during preparation of solution. Peaks that are tall, sharp, and relatively
narrow indicate that separation method efficiently removed a component from a mixture; high
efficiency. Efficiency is very dependent upon the HPLC column and the HPLC method used.
However, the peak hasn't shown a good peak separation, the wider the peaks, the poorer the
separation. Efficiency factor is synonymous with plate number, and the 'number of theoretical plates'.
Based on table, at retention time of 1.541 at concentration of 7.097 mg/L it shows the presence of
caffeine in sample (carbonate drink).
Some errors might occur during the experiment. The inefficiency could also come from the column
such as ineffective capping of silanol residues, packing of silica particles, uniformity of C18 coating.
In conclusion, during experiment was conducted there might have some errors occur since the value
of R2 is too far from value of 1.0000, which is in the inefficiency of calibration, measurement of
chemicals in the preparation of standards or in the injection volume which is very vital in external
calibration.
Result:
1000000
y = 9841.3x + 72765
R² = 0.9443
800000
AREA
600000 526737
477705
400000
168125
200000
63326
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
CONCENTRATION
Table 3: Peak
Peak Retention time Concentration
1 1.541 7.097
2 1.980 0.000
Conclusion:
High performance liquid chromatography is a powerful tool for separation, purification and
analysis of analytes in the sample. It is relatively simple to use and the necessary computations
needed for analysis are fairly basic. The main objectives of operating the High Performance Liquid
Chromatography (HPLC) is to determine caffeine content in coke. Caffeine standard with
concentration of 5ppm, 15ppm, 25ppm, 50ppm and 100ppm were prepared. HPLC is a form of liquid
chromatography used to separate compounds that are dissolved in solution. The type of column used
in this experiment is reverse phase. In this column the packing material is relatively non-polar and
the solvent is polar with respect to the sample. Caffeine is a polar molecule. The result obtained
shows that r2 is quite far from 1.000 and the peak hasn't shown a good peak separation. It is therefore
recommended that the procedure be re-evaluated and optimized for the determination of caffeine in
the beverage samples. Other than that, the column should be washed and equilibrated thoroughly as
well as assessed for its efficiency prior to analysis.
References :
2) Internet
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016792449780011X/pdf?md5=19826bfeda
7b807d70899ff247f3c9dc&pid=1-s2.0-S016792449780011X-main.pdf&_valck=1
[accessed on 10.35 pm, 9 April 2018]
https://laboratoryinfo.com/hplc/
[accessed on 8:12 pm, 8 April 2018]
Appendices :
Equation:
M1V1 = M2V2
1. 5 ppm concentration
M1V1 = M2V2
(1000)V1 = (100)(5)
V1 = 0.5ml
2. 15 ppm concentration
M1V1 = M2V2
(1000)V1 = (100)(15)
V1 = 1.5ml
3. 25 ppm concentration
M1V1 = M2V2
(1000)V1 = (100)(25)
V1 = 2.5ml
4. 50 ppm concentration
M1V1 = M2V2
(1000)V1 = (100)(50)
V1 = 5.0ml