Scribd
Upload
43 views

Regression: Descriptive Statistics

A multiple linear regression was conducted to predict customer satisfaction based on time required, taste, and price of a product. Time required, taste, and price together explained 17% of the variance in satisfaction. In the model, only taste approached statistical significance as a predictor of satisfaction. Collinearity diagnostics indicated no problematic multicollinearity among the predictor variables.

Uploaded by

Siddharth Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
43 views

Regression: Descriptive Statistics

A multiple linear regression was conducted to predict customer satisfaction based on time required, taste, and price of a product. Time required, taste, and price together explained 17% of the variance in satisfaction. In the model, only taste approached statistical significance as a predictor of satisfaction. Collinearity diagnostics indicated no problematic multicollinearity among the predictor variables.

Uploaded by

Siddharth Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

REGRESSION

/DESCRIPTIVES MEAN STDDEV CORR SIG N


/MISSING LISTWISE
/STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA COLLIN TOL CHANGE
/CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)
/NOORIGIN
/DEPENDENT satisfaction
/METHOD=ENTER timeconsuming taste price
/SAVE PRED ZPRED RESID ZRESID.

Regression

[DataSet0]

Descriptive Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

satisfaction 3.7917 .84949 48


timeconsuming 3.8333 1.03827 48
taste 4.0000 .61885 48
price 3.6875 .82916 48

Correlations

satisfaction timeconsuming taste price

satisfaction 1.000 -.281 .283 -.125

timeconsuming -.281 1.000 -.132 -.012


Pearson Correlation
taste .283 -.132 1.000 .166

price -.125 -.012 .166 1.000


satisfaction . .026 .026 .199
timeconsuming .026 . .185 .467
Sig. (1-tailed)
taste .026 .185 . .130
price .199 .467 .130 .
satisfaction 48 48 48 48

N timeconsuming 48 48 48 48
taste 48 48 48 48
price 48 48 48 48

Variables Entered/Removeda

Model Variables Variables Method


Entered Removed

price,
1 timeconsuming, . Enter
tasteb

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction


b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summaryb

Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the Change Statistics


Square Estimate R Square F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
Change

1 .413a .170 .114 .79974 .170 3.010 3 44 .040

a. Predictors: (Constant), price, timeconsuming, taste


b. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 5.775 3 1.925 3.010 .040b


1 Residual 28.142 44 .640

Total 33.917 47

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction


b. Predictors: (Constant), price, timeconsuming, taste

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig. Collinearity Statistics


Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

(Constant) 3.688 1.012 3.645 .001


1
timeconsuming -.202 .113 -.247 -1.780 .082 .982 1.018
taste .384 .193 .280 1.990 .053 .955 1.047

price -.178 .143 -.174 -1.250 .218 .972 1.028

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

Collinearity Diagnosticsa

Model Dimension Eigenvalue Condition Index Variance Proportions

(Constant) timeconsuming taste price

1 3.896 1.000 .00 .00 .00 .00

2 .063 7.849 .00 .73 .03 .15


1
3 .031 11.160 .03 .05 .26 .78

4 .009 20.842 .97 .22 .71 .07

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

Residuals Statisticsa

Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N

Predicted Value 2.9350 4.8460 3.7917 .35052 48


Residual -2.67888 1.29767 .00000 .77380 48
Std. Predicted Value -2.444 3.008 .000 1.000 48
Std. Residual -3.350 1.623 .000 .968 48

a. Dependent Variable: satisfaction

You might also like