Epilog

And he said, Unto you (Jesus is saying this to His Apostles) it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in
parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand. (Luke 8:10)

Have you ever really tried reading the bible? Did you find it as difficult to understand as I did? Well, don’t feel bad! I believe that
most of us in one way or another have always regarded the Bible as a collection of short stories depicting numerous literal accounts of
the lives of a particular group of people that descended from Adam and Eve. Further, many of us believed that these “stories” having
been passed down through the ages have somehow been twisted or skewed since we well know that the more a story is passed on, the
more convoluted it gets! And we all must agree that the stories seem quite nonsensical at times and are downright hard to swallow.
This is understandable given that it was God’s intention that we would not understand it until the appointed time for it was revealed to
Daniel that the prophecies concerning the last times should be closed up and sealed until the time of the end: But then the wise should
understand, and knowledge should be increased (Daniel 12:4,9,10).
"If they are never to be understood, to what end did God reveal them? Certainly he did it for the edification of the church. And if so
then it is certain that the church shall at length attain to the understandings thereof. I don’t mean all that call themselves Christians,
but a remnant, a few scattered persons which God hath chosen, such as without being led by interest, education, or human authorities,
can set themselves sincerely and earnestly to search after truth. For Daniel hath said that the wise shall understand, so he said also that
none of the wicked shall understand" - Sir Isaac Newton
In a moment you will see that this time is now and you, the reader have been called to receive this food at the proper time!
The Bible is an ambiguous book, which is why there are so many Christian churches around today. But the bible can be turned from
an ambiguous ocean of doctrinal confusion into a precise river of truth by exploiting the fundamental hidden meanings that are veiled
throughout its pages. For not only do these “hidden manna” enable us to accurately see the literal meaning of bible accounts and the
straight symbolic meaning of symbolic bible accounts, but, it also enables us to see the hidden symbolic meanings of the many bible
accounts which have them. Most bible accounts do have extra hidden symbolic meanings in addition to their first meanings. The bible
is prophetic in nature and every word has meaning.
18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass
away from the Law by any means and not all things take place (Matthew 5).
Further, “Indeed, it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one particle of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled (Luke
16:17).
There are no wasted words in the bible. So repetitions have power, double descriptions have power. Seemingly trivial details have
power. Every tense of every verb, every case of every word has power:
12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and
spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).
What I would like to demonstrate to you today is that the bible (The Word of God) is in fact still alive exerting power.

SO, hold on and brace your mind for activity, for what you are about to behold will change your life forever!

First lesson – Hidden Manna & Genesis

We will begin with some scriptures that tell us that there are hidden meanings within the bible. This is an important step
that will help you through the rest of this lesson.

33 So with many illustrations of that sort he would speak the word to them, as far as they were able to listen. 34 Indeed,
without an illustration he would not speak to them, but privately to his disciples he would explain all things (Mark 4).

So Jesus opened up his symbolic parables for his disciples only, but not for the public at large. By speaking symbolically,
those who did not want to believe that he was God’s son, could write off his speech as meaningless ramblings about farm
animals and horticulture. They would therefore never get to know God’s plans for men. So those who do not believe in
God do not want to believe in him because they do not want God to exist. They do not want him to exist, because if he
does exist then they fear that they will have to serve him and obey him, rather than serving and obeying their own desires.
They do not know that God is a kinder master to them than their own desires are. Dear reader, do not make this mistake.
God gave you your desires to enjoy them whilst controlling them! He did not give you them to replace him!

These people, who do not believe in the great finesse of our God, unwittingly are their own worst enemies because God is
their friend and means of life and salvation. Without him they have no future. They are choosing not to believe in their own
future. But they are free to choose such a course if they wish, and most people do so choose. So it is because mankind
has one main enemy, a lying murderer, Satan, and it is because this fraud has many unwitting followers, that God's book,
the bible is written in parables and illustrations. Satan has been trying to persuade God to wipe out the whole human race
for nearly 6,000 years in order to justify his murderous act on Eve. He is trying to cheat us out of our inheritance, which is
to be ageless humans on earth in the Kingdom of God after Armageddon, and to be angels in heaven, and eventually to
be God's ourselves, just like our Father. I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High (Psalms
82). I know that most of you regard yourselves as Christians and may be asking why am I being told this...I already
believe in God? Well, soon I will show you just how methodical Satan has been in his world of deception.

Jesus said in his sermon on the mount:

8 Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God (Matthew 5).
The pure in heart do not see God physically, because no man can see God and yet live. They see him with their minds,
for he is one short step of reason away. But what does it mean to have a pure heart? Well everyone has impure thoughts,
immoral thoughts, and hateful thoughts. And every man utters impure words, immoral words and hateful words. James
tells us:
2 If anyone does not stumble in word, this one is a perfect man (James 3).
And there are no perfect men amongst the sons of Adam. So plainly a pure heart does not mean that we only think sinless
thoughts. No, a pure heart is one that can divorce the truth from any preconceived personal consequences to our status
that the truth may have. It is simply a true academic heart, an honest heart. If you are willing to admit you may be wrong
about something even if it means losing your job or your status or even your own humility, you have a pure heart.

God has intentionally written the bible so that His enemies will find it boring and unproductive for learning. All of the praise in the
bible is not because God has a big ego and needs a whole lot of it!! It is there merely to sort the sheep from the goats. He has given to
everybody a book about his past dealings with his friends, who lived thousands of years ago, who had many camels and lived in tents
and had children and basically did the sort of things that everybody else did back then. This is of no great consequence to the enemies
of God. It just looks like an out of date soap opera, written by someone who they do not like. Of what interest to a 20th or 21st century
currency speculator is it that Esau lost his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of soup, or that he crossed the Jabbok with 200 female sheep
and 20 rams? This sort of information is hardly the sort of thing that would come up on his Reuters screen.

But hidden in amongst all of the banal, mundane and everyday tribulations of these friends of God, is the whole of his military plan for
saving mankind from sin and death and removing Satan as the God of this world. The plan for men to regain the birthright that Adam
lost, namely everlasting human and angelic life as we will demonstrate for you.

22 He is revealing the deep things and the concealed things, knowing what is in the darkness; and with him the light does dwell
(Daniel 2).

We are looking at the whole book as being effectively written by one person, because Paul tells us that it was:

16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in
righteousness (2 Timothy 3).

And Peter tells us:

21 For prophecy was at no time brought by man’s will, but men spoke from God as they were borne along by holy spirit (2 Peter 1).

So now that we know God was the writer of the bible where does this all lead us? What about these parables and illustrations?
Solomon said:

2 The Glory of God is the keeping of a matter secret, and the glory of kings is the searching through a matter (Proverbs 25).
4 If you keep seeking for it as for silver, and as for hid treasures you keep searching for it,
5 in that case you will understand the fear of Jehovah, and you will find the very knowledge of God (Proverbs 2).
So this knowledge is hidden. And it is hidden in the bible, for Paul says of Jesus:
3 Carefully concealed in him are all the treasures of wisdom and of knowledge (Colossians 2).
Well, these treasures are not stuffed up his shirt or down his trousers, although in a sense, they are in his body, which is his church.
Basically they are hidden in the information we have on him. This information is the bible. For we know and understand that Jesus is
the word of God, which is also 'the bible'. Paul describes how it is hidden and revealed:
7 But we speak God's wisdom in a sacred secret, the hidden wisdom, which God foreordained before the systems of things for our
glory (1 Corinthians 2).
10 For it is to us God has revealed them through his spirit, for the spirit searches into all things, even the deep things of God (1
Corinthians 2).
So again we see that wisdom is hidden in this book, concealed or for lack of a better word, coded. For a code is defined as hidden
written information. This is why Jesus says:
2 There is nothing carefully concealed that will not be revealed, and secret that will not become known (Luke 12).
7 Keep on asking, and it will be given you; keep on seeking, and you will find; keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you
(Matthew 7).
And really you do not have to look that far. But you do have to look, yourself! For God said to Adam:
19 In the sweat of your face you will eat bread (Genesis 3)
And Jesus said to Satan:
4 But in reply he said: It is written, 'Man must live, not on bread alone, but on every utterance coming forth through God's mouth'
(Matthew 4)
From the two of which it is not hard to deduce that we will digest God's word in the sweat of our faces as well as digesting bread in
this way.
Gabriel said to Daniel:
4 And as for you, O Daniel, make secret the words and seal up the book, until the time of [the] end. Many will rove about, and the
[true] knowledge will become abundant (Daniel 12).
We are now in this time; this website is the proof as we will soon open up the scriptures for you. Daniel said to Nebuchadnezzar:
28 However, there exists a God in the heavens who is a Revealer of secrets, and he has made known to King Nebuchadnezzar what is
to occur in the final part of the days (Daniel 2).
And not only to him! But also to Jesus, who opened up the minds of his disciples:
45 Then he opened up their minds fully to grasp the meaning of the Scriptures (Luke 24).
It is quite a task.
25 The woman said to him: I know that Messiah is coming, who is called Christ. Whenever that one arrives, he will declare all things
to us openly.
26 Jesus said to her: I who am speaking to you am he (John 4).
So the scriptures do not declare things openly, but the Christ opened them up. So the scriptures have hidden meanings and there is a
bible within the bible! Jesus opened up these scriptures to their minds.
Paul describes one particular account in Genesis as a symbolic drama:
22 For example, it is written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman;
23 but the one by the servant girl was actually born in the manner of flesh, the other by the free woman through a promise.
24 These things stand as a symbolic drama; for these [women] mean two covenants, the one from Mount Sinai , which brings forth
children for slavery, and which is Hagar.
25 Now this Hagar means Sinai, a mountain in Arabia, and she corresponds with the Jerusalem today, for she is in slavery with her
children.
26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4).
Hagar stood for the Law covenant mediated by Moses and Sarah for the new covenant mediated by Jesus, described as Paul’s
mother. But what is so special about this particular account in Genesis? Is it the only one to be a symbolic drama? And what is so
special about Genesis in the Old Testament. Might there not be some symbolic dramas in Exodus? In fact, we know that the bible is a
consistent book having but one ghost writer - if you will pardon the metaphor! So we know the whole book, the bible, stands as one
giant symbolic drama.
I would also like to show you the shortest parable in the bible which is:

33 Another illustration he spoke to them: The kingdom of the heavens is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three large
measures of flour, until the whole mass was fermented/leavened (Matthew 13).

Ok, you young paduan learners! If it is the most insignificant and smallest of the parables in the whole bible, then what does this tell
you about its spiritual meaning in this upside down world in which we live?

Yes, it is the greatest of them all in meaning. Well, the event symbolic meaning is as follows:

The woman is the Holy Spirit, the leaven is the hidden meanings in the bible, and the three lumps of flour are the literal, event
symbolic and the account (or word) symbolic meanings of the bible. When the whole mass is fermented/leavened (deduced), then we
can truly eat the whole book and see the hidden meanings and the truth and God and the true religion and his plan and his love and his
humor and his righteousness, and our total and utter pretentiousness and stupidity stretching over 3500 years. The greater meaning
however is in the Word Symbolic meaning which relates to the three master covenants and how they apply to our entrance into the
Kingdom of God. This will be addressed in more detail later!

This leaven is not the wicked teachings of the Pharisees but is rather the good teachings of the true priesthood of God. This website is
the result of such leaven. We are expanding the bread of heaven to make it fully digestible.

I struggled in my effort to determine where to begin with this undertaking in revealing the hidden manna since the bible is so big and
so tall, and after careful thought it occurred to me, why not start in the beginning by opening some of Genesis. After all, it is one of
the most controversial sections of the book! So without further ado……

27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God’s image he created him, male and female he created them (Genesis 1).

26 And he made out of one [man] every nation of men, to dwell upon the entire surface of the earth, and he decreed the appointed
times and the set limits of the dwelling of [men] (Acts 17).

The conflict has always been that the Fundamental Christian says that Adam was the first man and so Archaeology is
rubbish. The Archeologist says mankind has for a fact been around for 30,000 years and we have good evidence that he
has been around for over 2 million years, so the concept that we began with Adam 6,000 years ago (according to biblical
chronology) is rubbish and therefore Genesis is rubbish.

How do we resolve this conflict between Science and Religion? They both cannot be right! Traditionally religious people
just throw away their reasoning capability and say, my faith tells me that the bible is right and that is the end of it. This is a
very dangerous thing to do, it is a lazy idolatry of an illogical church doctrine, and it is selling God and his book, the bible,
short. It happens because people in general do not have the courage of their deductions. They do not believe that they
have the mental power to climb out of the trap that has been laid for them. It has always been easier to just shrug our
shoulders and say, boy, I will never understand this bible stuff. I better leave that up to my priest and blindly follow what
he tells me!

This demonstrates how easy it is persuade others to believe doctrines that have no biblical (scriptural) basis. The Muslim
suicide bombers of the last days are busy showing us just how dangerous religious brainwashing can be. Most, if not all
people with faith, throw away their reason when they join a religion and just accept the doctrine of their church or mosque
or synagogue etc. But Jesus did not command us to become brainwashed idolaters of the lame spiritual understandings
of priests or rabbis or imams that only want to control us for their own purposes. He said:

37 You must love Jehovah your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind (Matthew
22).

And the first living stone that Jesus laid in the Christian church (Peter), said...

13 Hence brace up your minds for activity, keep your senses completely; set your hope upon the undeserved kindness
that is to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ (1 Peter 1).

This Revelation requires brain power and of course the world is being dumbed down further and further every day at the
very time that the Revelation is occurring because there is a battle between the holy angels and the deadly demons and
we humans are the victims in the middle. But we can avoid being a casualty of this war if we open our minds' eyes and
seek these matters out as we have been commanded to do!

So what is the resolution to this fundamental question?

Jesus said that we should scrutinize every little detail of every scripture...

17 Do not think I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I came, not to destroy, but to fulfill.

18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a
letter to pass away from the Law [of God, the whole bible] by any means and not all things take place (Matthew 5).

Let us therefore apply this kind of scrutiny to the account of the creation of mankind in Genesis 1. (If you are using the
King James version of the bible to authenticate this, some of it may not follow to a tee since we used the Westcott-Hort
text in an interlinear bible that includes Strong's concordance. This helps to remove the ambiguity and preserves the
original text that has been lost in the translation.)
26 And God went on to say: Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness, and let them have in subjection the
fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic animals and all the earth and every moving
[animal] that is moving upon the earth.

27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image he created him; male and female he created them

28 Further, God blessed them and God said to them: Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it, and
have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving upon
the earth (Genesis 1).

Now at first sight this looks like a rather repetitive account of the creation of mankind. But let us examine these verses a
bit closer since they may just hold the secret to our very existence within them.

26 Let us make man in our image according to our likeness (Genesis 1).

 man

 in our image

 according to our likeness

Where  means 'in' and  means 'as', and the root  means: Shade, shadow, image, likeness, and the root 
means: Likeness.

27 And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image he created him, male and female he created them
(Genesis 1)

 the man

 in his image

 in image of God.

So ‘man’ was created by 'us' in 'our image' according to 'our likeness', an image of several beings, but 'the man' was
created by 'God' in God's image, an image of one being, not in 'our image' and not according to any likeness. This is
precisely the distinction that we have just made above. Namely, 'man' is generic, made by a plurality of Gods and made in
the image of a plurality of Gods, 'our image', whereas Adam, is unique, made by Jehovah God himself and made in the
image of the one and only God, Jehovah. So 'man' stands for mankind, which was Homo sapiens, and 'the man' stands
for the one off Adam.

Taking this knowledge a step further, here is a comparative table of the two successive accounts of our creation. This
breaks the two accounts down in an illustrative way to show the power of the omission principal of biblical
understandings...(Also, scrutinize every word for they differ somewhat.)

Action Verse 26 Verse 27

Who does the creating? Us (God and the holy angels) God himself
In whose image? In our image (the image of the angels) The image of God himself
Name Man The Man
Blessed? No Yes
Be fruitful become many fill the
No Yes
earth?
Fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the fish of the sea and the flying
heavens and the domestic animals and all the creatures of the heavens and every
What do they have in subjection?
earth and every moving [animal] that is living [being] that is moving upon the
moving upon the earth earth
So verse 27 and 28 are not merely a repetition of the creative act of verse 26. Verses 27 and 28 are the creation of
something different from verse 26. Verse 26 is the creation of 'man', of mankind, of pre-adamic man. He was created by
the angels in the image of the angels, whereas verse 27 is the creation of 'the man', Adam, he was created by God in the
image of God. God is perfect, the angels are not, and these are two different images and therefore two different creations.
Pre-adamic man was not blessed, Adam was. Adam was blessed because he was spiritual; the blessing truly is the
everlasting inheritance as a son of God. Adam was God's son, pre-adamic man were sons of the angels. Pre-adamic man
never did fill the earth. Adamic man, the sons of Adam certainly have - almost to capacity right now! Adam had in
subjection every living being moving upon the earth, whereas pre-adamic man had in subjection every moving animal that
is moving upon the earth. In other words Adam was to have pre-adamic man, who was a moving non-spiritual being
(animalistic) in his subjection.

Modern Archaeology has advanced to the point where we can trace the history of man back to an origin around 2.8 million
years ago. So God introduced himself to mankind through Adam and Eve, around 6,000 years ago, when mankind had
developed spiritually to the point where he was ready to learn directly from God. When mankind was ready for spiritual
nursery school, God introduced himself to us through Adam and Eve.

So who were Adam and Eve? Many folks believe that Adam stands for 'all prehistoric men' and Eve stands for 'all
prehistoric women' and that these two evolved into modern man but with some help from God. In fact Pope Paul
apparently had a similar belief, the belief that God in some way helped out with evolution. This was because the biblical
story of Adam and Eve seems at first sight to be too naive and too simplistic to be literally true. Modern sophisticated man
who believes that we arrived here through evolution and who knows that mankind existed before Adam finds the biblical
account of our creation somewhat lacking in credibility.

But such a view is incorrect for the following two reasons at the least. Firstly God is more intelligent than us, so it is
inconceivable that we would know more about our creation than he does, so his book must reflect this knowledge gap.
Secondly, God evidently requires us to work for our physical food and likewise he requires us to work for our spiritual
food. In other words we need to decode Genesis; we need to unravel it, to fully understand our beginning as a species.

We are now going to take you through 3 realizations.

[A] Adam and Eve were real people, a man and a woman.

[B] Adam was created in precisely the same way that Jesus was created.

[C] Eve was created from a fully grown pre-adamic woman (outside the Garden)

[A] Adam and Eve were real people, a man and a woman

23 Furthermore, Jesus himself, when he commenced [his work], was about 30 years old, being the son, as the opinion
was, of Joseph, [son] of Heli, [who was Mary's father] 24 [son] of Matthat, [Mary's mother's father] [son] of Levi, [Mary's
mother's mother's father] [son] of Melchi, [This is the maternal line] [son] of Jannai, [son] of Joseph,25 [son] of
Mattathias,[son] of Amos,[son] of Nahum,[son] of Esli,[son] of Naggai,26 [son] of Maath,[son] of Mattathias,[son] of
Semein,[son] of Josech,[son] of Joda,27 [son] of Joanan,[son] of Rhesa,[son] of Zerubbabel,[son] of Shealtiel,[son] of
Neri,28 [son] of Melchi,[son] of Addi,[son] of Cosam,[son] of Elmadam,[son] of Er,29 [son] of Jesus, [son] of Eliezer,[son]
of Jorim,[son] of Matthat,[son] of Levi,30 [son] of Symeon,[son] of Judas,[son] of Joseph,[son] of Jonam,[son] of
Eliakim,31 [son] of Melea,[son] of Menna,[son] of Mattatha,[son] of Nathan,[son] of David [maternal and paternal lines
merge],32 [son] of Jesse,[son] of Obed,[son] of Boaz,[son] of Salmon,[son] of Nahshon,33 [son] of Amminadab,[son] of
Arni,[son] of Hezron,[son] of Perez,[son] of Judah,34 [son] of Jacob,[son] of Isaac,[son] of Abraham, [son] of Terah,[son]
of Nahor,35 [son] of Serug,[son] of Reu,[son] of Peleg,[son] of Eber,[son] of Shelah,36 [son] of Cainan, [son] of
Arpachshad,[son] of Shem,[son] of Noah,[son] of Lamech,37 [son] of Methuselah,[son] of Enoch,[son] of Jared, [son] of
Mahalaleel,[son] of Cainan,38 [son] of Enosh,[son] of Seth,son] of Adam,[son] of God (Luke 3).

All of these ancestors were real human beings (except God of course), so Adam was a real human being. This line has 77
characters in it from Jesus to God inclusive. This is actually the maternal line, with each woman represented by her
husband. The maternal line merges with the paternal line at King David .

The Paternal line from Abraham to Jesus is described in Matthew 1...

1 The book of the history of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of Abraham:
2 Abraham became father to Isaac; Isaac became father to Jacob; Jacob became father to Judah and his brothers;
3 Judah became father to Perez and to Zerah by Tamar; Perez became father to Hezron; Hezron became father to Ram;
4 Ram became father to Amminadab; Amminadab became father to Nahshon; Nahshon became father to Salmon;
5 Salmon became father to Boaz by Rahab; Boaz became father to Obed by Ruth; Obed became father to Jesse;
6 Jesse became father to David the king. David became father to Solomon by the wife of Uriah...

15 Eliud became father to Eleazar. Eleazar became father to Matthan. Matthan became father to Jacob.
16 Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ (Matthew 1).

Obviously this proves that Adam was a real human. Her are some other shorter biblical proofs

45 It is even so written: The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit (1 Corinthians
15).

1 Now Adam had intercourse with Eve his wife and she became pregnant. In time she gave birth to Cain and said: I have
produced a man with the aid of Jehovah (Genesis 4).

[B] Adam was created in precisely the same way that Jesus was created

7 And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life,
and the man came to be a living soul.
8 Further, Jehovah God planted a garden in Eden, toward the east, and there he put the man whom he had formed.

So 'the man' was formed before he was put into the garden. Where was he before this? Was he all by himself - nowhere?
Well we know from Genesis 4 & 5 that outside the garden were the pre adamic humans. So the formation process for
Adam was rather more involved than the brief description above.

14 Nevertheless, death ruled as king from Adam down to Moses, even over those who had not sinned after the likeness of
the transgression by Adam, who bears a resemblance to him that was to come [Jesus] (Romans 5:14).

A striking resemblance in fact! Notice that Paul did not say who 'bore' a resemblance, he said who 'bears' present tense, a
resemblance. This means that Adam is living to Paul for Jesus used this very verbal tense argument to the Sadducees to
show that Abraham was living to God.

31 As regards the resurrection of the dead, did you not read what was spoken to you by God, saying,
32 I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob? He is the God, not of the dead, but of the living
(Matthew 22).

Now Paul called Jesus, the last Adam...

45 It is even so written: The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit (1 Corinthians
15).

Now if Jesus was the last Adam, then Adam was the first Jesus. Therefore Adam was born to a surrogate mother and
father as was Jesus. Paul says further that Jesus gave himself a corresponding ransom for all...

6 Who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all [this is] what is to be witnessed to at its own particular times (1
Timothy 2:6).

Jesus corresponded to Adam, the one whom he ransomed, thereby realizing all of his children from the one and only
death sentence on them. We are all under the death sentence passed and eventually executed upon Adam.

The first Adam was God's son born by Immaculate Conception to pre adamic parents just as Jesus was to Mary &
Joseph, the last Adam, was God's son born to Adamic parents. The first Adam was weaned and brought up until the age
of 11 by pre adamic human parents. These guys were not Neanderthals, but modern man (homo-sapiens). However they
had not invented writing or the wheel and had not domesticated the horse and had not achieved very much at that time.
However God took over the schooling of Adam once he was 11 years old, when he entered the Garden of Eden and was
commissioned to build the temple of his aging body which we all inhabit today.

Jesus on the other hand appeared before the Pharisees aged 11 by our reckoning but aged 12 by Hebrew reckoning and
his parents lost him for 3 days, whereas Adam's parents lost him for 22½ years, because Adam sinned and left the garden
and was returned to his parents again aged 33½ years, the same age that Jesus was when he was murdered and paid for
Adam's sin. This is the full correspondence between Adam who sinned when he was 33½ years old and Jesus who paid
for that sin when he was 33½ years old. This will be explained in detail in a later lesson.

41 Now his parents were accustomed to go from year to year to Jerusalem for the festival of the passover.
42 And when he became twelve years old, they went up according to the custom of the festival
43 and completed the days. But when they were returning, the boy Jesus remained behind in Jerusalem , and his parents
did not notice it.
44 Assuming that he was in the company traveling together, they covered a day's distance and then began to hunt him up
among the relatives and acquaintances.
45 But, not finding him, they returned to Jerusalem, making a diligent search for him.
46 Well, after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the teachers and listening to them and
questioning them (Luke 2).

[C] Eve was created from a fully grown pre-adamic woman

The situation with Eve is slightly more complicated. The giveaway scripture is this, Adam said:

This is at last bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh this one will be called Woman, because from Man this one was
taken (Genesis 2:23)

We know that God took Adam's rib and formed into Eve. But here we are told that she was taken not from 'the man' who
is Adam, but from 'man' who is mankind in general (outside the Garden).

Now we know that Eve appeared before Adam as a fully formed woman. So what must have happened was that God
formed Eve in a surrogate mother as Adam had been formed and gave her the same genetic makeup as Adam had in that
she too had an indefinitely lasting body. He actually gave her the body that she will have in the Kingdom of God. Some
body huh? No wonder Adam fell for her! Although the particulars are slightly more complicated this, the time for them will
come later.

So as Paul would say, Just as Eve resulted from the temporary death of Adam, so the first century church, the bride of
Christ, resulted from the temporary death of Jesus.

Here is a nice table of correspondence between the birth of Eve, Adam's wife and the birth of the New covenant saints,
Jesus' wife:

Adam Jesus
Deep Sleep Death and Resurrection
Judas, one of the 12 (ribs, pillars), of Jesus' body (the church), leaves the last supper before the
Rib out
New Covenant is made. He is left out.
God closes his flesh
The Law covenant ends before the rib is replaced by the twelfth apostle Matthias (Acts 1)
over its place
Eve brought to Adam
The New Covenant Saints (Jesus' collective bride) are resurrected to Jesus in Heaven.
by God

There are two incredible and beautiful deep understandings relating to this creation section that will be opened for you at
another time. Right now we are simply demonstrating that hidden manna does exist. I truly hope that these basic steps
have enabled you to see that there are in fact deep hidden meanings veiled throughout the pages of the bible. And I
can't stress enough that it is up to each and every one of us to seek these matters out. If you feel ready, you should
move on to the Second Lesson. I recommend that you try to get through one lesson each day so you have time to digest
what you eat before moving on, however, you know your own pace so go for it when you are ready! What you have just
read is just the beginning!

Second Lesson - Who is the Holy Spirit

In an effort to show you just how important scriptures are, we will use them to answer some of those fundamental questions that we all
wonder about but never really have taken the time to research. The reason I bring this up is to show you that you have the power
within you to seek these matters out on your own. We must never get into the habit of blindly following those who profess to know
God yet have little or no understanding of scriptures. There are many wolves in sheep's clothing who would rather have you live in
darkness in order to keep them in business than those who appreciate seeking the truth.

The Holy Spirit is God's Wife!

The holy spirit is described by John as the helper:

26 But the helper, the holy spirit, which the Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things and bring back to your
minds all the things I told you (John 14).

But Adam's wife was described in the same way:

18 And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a
complement of him (Genesis 2).

This is not a coincidence. Just as Eve was a complement and helper to Adam so the holy spirit is God's helper, and a complement to
him. It is his wife. It is Jesus' mom sort of speak. The four are a family. The holy spirit however was not mentioned much in the old
testament. Here are all the explicit references to it as 'the holy spirit'...(Aren't word processors wonderful?)

11 Do not throw me away from before your face; And your holy spirit O do not take away from me (Psalm 51).

10 But they themselves rebelled and made his holy spirit feel hurt. He now was changed into an enemy of theirs; he himself warred
against them (Isaiah 63).
11 And one began to remember the days of long ago, Moses his servant: Where is the One that brought them up out of the sea with the
shepherds of his flock? Where is the One that put within him His own holy spirit? (Isaiah 63).

But it was referred to more in other ways...

9 And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom, for Moses had laid his hand upon him; and the sons of Israel began to
listen to him and they went doing just as Jehovah had commanded Moses (Deuteronomy 34).

17 the spirit of the truth, which the world cannot receive, because it neither beholds it nor knows it. You know it, because it remains
with you and is in you (John 14) [this is a new testament reference, both wisdom and truth are fruitages of the holy spirit].

31 And he proceeded to fill him with the spirit of God in wisdom, in understanding and in knowledge and in every sort of
craftsmanship (Exodus 35).

Since the holy spirit imparts wisdom it must be an intelligent being or beings. Likewise we can deduce that the holy spirit is a living
intelligent thing because it can plead for us:

26 In like manner the spirit also joins in with help for our weakness; for the [problem of] what we should pray for as we need to we do
not know, but the spirit itself pleads/intercedes for us with groanings unuttered (Romans 8).

So since it is a living spirit, so it must consist either of an angel or of a group of them. We know that there is more than one holy
angel...

4 Making his angels [his messengers] spirits, his ministers a devouring fire (Psalm 104).

13 But with reference to which one of the angels has he ever said: Sit at my right hand, until I place your enemies as a stool for your
feet?
14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth on behalf of those who are going to inherit salvation? (Hebrews 1).

The holy spirit does God's ministering and contains ministers, who are holy spirits plural. So the holy spirit is a group of angels. But
why would any holy angel be excluded? So it must be the group of all the angels who are holy, all the angels who are married to God,
all the angels who are in a covenant with God. Hence Paul said:

26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4).

The Jerusalem above is God's heavenly administration which is all of the loyal angels, which is all of the holy spirits. Paul explicitly
states that these angels are our Mother, for they give birth to all the new angels. Now mother's plead with father's not to be too hard on
errant sons. And that is precisely the meaning of Romans 8:26, the holy spirit interceding with God for the sanctified ones, she is the
mother interceding with the father for her sons.

God does refer to a whole nation of people as one person...

22 And you must say to Pharaoh: This is what Jehovah has said: Israel is my son, my firstborn (Exodus 4).

He also refers to the entire church as Jesus' wife, one person in the singular...

22 Let wives be in subjection to their husbands as to the Lord,

23 because a husband is head of his wife as the Christ also is head of the congregation, he being a savior of [that] body.
24 In fact, as the congregation is in subjection to the Christ, so let wives also be to their husbands in everything (Ephesians 5).

So the whole congregation is regarded as being one body, one wife. Here is a table of greater or lesser husbands and wives...

Husbands Wives
Joseph Mary
President First Lady
King Queen
Christian
Jesus
church
Priest Congregation
Board of
Managing Director
directors
All the vice
President of corporation presidents as
a group
Manager of sports team Sports Team
Field Marshal His Army
Prime Minister Cabinet
Holy Spirit,
God all the holy
angels

The very word 'corporation', or 'incorporated' means a lot of people regards as one body.

Now the Holy Spirit is the Mother of everyone living spiritually whereas Adam called his wife Eve because:

20 After this Adam called his wife's name Eve, because she had to become the mother of everyone living (Genesis 3).

So God does have a family, and in this family he is the father, the holy spirit is the mother, God's wife, and Jesus is now
the firstborn son. So there it is. There is nothing mystical or indecipherable about it, we are just talking about your regular
family (well OK they are a rather powerful example!). This is why you cannot blaspheme against God or against his wife,
who wears his name but you could blaspheme against Jesus, before he was resurrected...

31 On this account I say to you: Every sort of sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the spirit
will not be forgiven.
32 For example, whoever speaks a word [in blasphemy] against the Son of man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever
speaks [in blasphemy] against the holy spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, not in this system of things nor in that to come
(Matthew 12).

So the holy spirit has the same status as God, being his wife, so it cannot just be one angel, for if it was, then that angel
would also be a God to be worshipped with the same status as Jehovah.
Incidentally the holy spirit, or helper or comforter, the spirit of the truth, the spirit of wisdom, sent by God, is always
referred to in the neuter in scripture. However, the spirit of truth, sent by Jesus, which is also called a helper is referred to
in the masculine...

26 When the helper arrives that I will send you from the Father, the spirit of the truth, which proceeds from the Father, that
one will bear witness about me (John 15).

7 Nevertheless, I am telling you the truth. It is for your benefit I am going away. For if I do not go away, the helper will by
no means come to you, but if I do go my way, I will send him to you (John 16).

13 However, when that one arrives, the spirit of the truth, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak of his
own impulse, but what things he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things coming (John 16).

This 'spirit of the truth', the one sent by Jesus, as opposed to the one sent by Jehovah, is the angel of Revelation that
presented Revelation in signs to John...

1 A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he
sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John (Revelation 1).

So all of the holy angels together, as the holy spirit, are feminine. But each individual angel is masculine.

13 But with reference to which one of the angels has he ever said: Sit at my right hand, until I place your enemies as a
stool for your feet?
14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth [as the holy spirit] on behalf of those who are going to inherit salvation?
(Hebrews 1).

The holy spirit itself is the helper, the ministering spirit for all of us, and so are these angels. So the one is the sum of the
others.

Hopefully you are starting to see the beauty in scriptures and are beginning to understand what is meant by the
statement:

22 He is revealing the deep things and the concealed things, knowing what is in the darkness; and with him the light does
dwell (Daniel 2).

Now may be a good time to take a little break and reflect on this lesson a bit. After you feel ready to move on, please do
so!

Third Lesson - Who is the Ruler of This World

Many of today's Christians are pretty sure about who the ruler of this world is. The important thing is understanding why and what we
should do about it!

Satan is the ruler of this system of things

When Adam sinned and was thrown out of the garden, Satan was given rulership over mankind. Paul says...

14 Nevertheless, death ruled as king from Adam down to Moses, even over those who had not sinned after the likeness of the
transgression by Adam, who bears a resemblance to him that was to come (Romans 5).

17 For if by the trespass of the one [man] death ruled as king through that one, much more will those who receive the abundance of
the undeserved kindness and of the free gift of righteousness rule as kings in life through the one [person], Jesus Christ (Romans 5).

Death is Satan's name since he brought it about. Jesus is called 'the life', and Satan is called 'the death', or perhaps just plain 'death' to
his friends. So he ruled from Adam down to Moses over everyone because of the trespass of the one man Adam. God himself ruled the
Jews once they agreed to obey the Law Covenant. Satan is still ruling us all today physically. He is referred to in scripture as the God
of this system of things...
3 If, now, the good news we declare is in fact veiled, it is veiled among those who are perishing,
4 among whom the god of this system of things has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the illumination of the glorious good
news about the Christ, who is the image of God, might not shine through (2 Corinthians 4).

He is 'the ruler of the world' for Jesus said, just before he died:

30 I shall not speak much with you anymore, for the ruler of the world is coming. And he has no hold on me (John 14).

This world therefore began at Adam's trespass. But this ruler will be chucked out:

31 Now there is a judging of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out (John 12).

In fact he is locked up for the entire duration of the kingdom of God, as we shall see below. He is deposed immediately before the
battle of Armageddon and incarcerated immediately after it.

So the end of the world, is the end of his world, not the end of the planet. It is the end of his system of things which is the current
system of things, a system which started at the founding of the world (i.e. the day Adam sinned). The founding of the world was the
trespass of Adam and the start of the 7th creative day of Genesis, when God rested from his creative works:

3 For we who have exercised faith do enter into the rest, just as he has said: So I swore in my anger, They shall not enter into my rest,
although his works were finished from the founding of the world.
4 For in one place he has said of the seventh day as follows: And God rested on the seventh day from all his works,
5 and again in this place: They shall not enter into my rest (Hebrews 4).

God's last creative act was to make some clothes for Adam and Eve at the time of their sin:

21 And Jehovah God proceeded to make long garments of skin for Adam and for his wife and to clothe them (Genesis 3).

This scripture is literally true, God did make them both clothes. But it also has a greater meaning, a cryptic meaning that relates to the
long life spans of people prior to the flood. So Adam's sin was the founding of the World, the beginning of the current system of
things. And the God of this system of things, the ruler of this world is Satan, whose name is death. This is how Satan was able to offer
all the kingdoms of the world to Jesus, if he would perform one act of worship to him:

5 So he brought him up and showed him all the kingdoms of the inhabited earth in an instant of time.
6 And the Devil said to him: I will give you all this authority and the glory of them, because it has been delivered to me, and to
whomever I wish I give it.
7 You, therefore, if you do an act of worship before me, it will all be yours.
8 In reply Jesus said to him: It is written, It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred
service (Luke 4).

Jesus did not say, who are you kidding? You do not own any kingdoms! He knew that Satan did have these kingdoms to give. He also
knew that Satan had the practice of giving them to various people. Having received them at the founding of the world. But Jesus was
not interested in status, or in the glory of men, and did not want to be first lieutenant to a lying murderer.

It is of course a huge realization that Satan is the god of this system of things and the ruler of the world. And we appreciate that if this
concept is new to you it may cause some serious consternation. But remember that Satan can only act within prescribed limits set by
God. God is the referee here, and Satan is just a very dirty team captain, he is not the head of the corporation (although some might
disagree). But he does have a lot of supporters.

God only allows Satan's continued existence and authority in order that we can learn from him without having ourselves to become
like him. But nonetheless the world is the Titanic and Satan is the captain, and God is the iceberg, but Jesus is the lifeboat. However in
his case it will not be the rich ones who get in first, whilst the poor are locked in below, in fact quite the reverse. Anyone and everyone
who wants to get in and be saved will be, and the rich, because they falsely believe that they have got it made already, will, in general
find it harder to leave their comfort zone. They can be trapped by their own physical success. Come on guys, wake up!! In fact the
scripture says

19 We know we originate with God, but the whole world is lying in the [power of the] wicked one (1 John 5).

Please heed these words and use what God has given you through His Son, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, that being a roadmap to
salvation. You have been called or you wouldn't be here right now! Please continue with the next lesson.....
 Fourth Lesson - The Way the Bible is Written

Genesis 4, John 3 and the sons of Jacob

Here is a simple rhetorical question for the reader. Is mankind more intelligent than God or is God more intelligent than mankind?

We have seen in the first few lessons, that the bible is written in a very intelligent way, and of course Jesus said that it was so written...

18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass
away from the Law [of God, the whole bible] by any means and not all things take place (Matthew 5).

Since the bible is written intelligently and diligently, we have to read it intelligently and diligently. Here are 3 examples of how
intelligently it is written and how intelligently we need to read it. First impressions of bible accounts are often incorrect. The holy
spirit will confound you if you do not think about every word in the account and put the entire jigsaw together. Our experience is that
pretty much every time you revisit an account you see something in it that you didn't see before.

[A] Cain and Abel

[B] The first 6 sons of Jacob

[C] No man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven

[A] Cain and Abel

2 And Abel came to be a herder of sheep, but Cain became a cultivator of the ground.
3 And it came about at the expiration of some time that Cain proceeded to bring some fruits of the ground as an offering to Jehovah.
4 But as for Abel, he too brought some firstlings of his flock, even their fatty pieces. Now while Jehovah was looking with favor upon
Abel and his offering,
5 he did not look with any favor upon Cain and upon his offering. And Cain grew hot with great anger, and his countenance began to
fall.
6 At this Jehovah said to Cain: Why are you hot with anger and why has your countenance fallen?
7 If you turn to doing good, will there not be an exaltation? But if you do not turn to doing good, there is sin crouching at the entrance,
and for you is its craving; and will you, for your part, get the mastery over it?
8 After that Cain said to Abel his brother: Let us go over into the field. So it came about that while they were in the field Cain
proceeded to assault Abel his brother and kill him.
(Genesis 4).

This account is typical of the way in which the bible is written. Please therefore listen to the classroom lesson from the Word of God:

Cain was a cultivator of the ground, so he brought some fruits of the ground. Abel was a herder of sheep so he brought a sheep. The
question that the reader is supposed to ask is: What on earth was wrong with Cain’s sacrifice?

The account is written so that at first sight it looks like God favored Abel over Cain out of partiality, having no good reason in justice.
If that were the case then there would be no point in serving him, so if you like you can just write God off in Genesis chapter 4 (if you
haven’t already done so as a result of his claims in Genesis 1 and 2 that is).

Q: Why did God accept Abel’s sacrifice and yet reject Cain’s sacrifice?

Most theologians give the following answers:

A: Because Abel offered his sacrifice with faith, but Cain had the wrong attitude and offered his sacrifice without faith.

Or even worse an answer of the type:

A: Obviously Cain did not have any faith because look what he did after his sacrifice!

Both of these answers are entirely wrong and all modern churches to our knowledge have spectacularly failed to answer this holy
poser from God. This question is easy to answer if you understand what sacrifice is all about. In fact the question could just as well be
phrased as: What is a sacrifice? To answer this, consider the famous words of Samuel:
22 To obey is better than a sacrifice, to pay attention than the fat of rams (1 Samuel 15).

Obviously avoiding the sin that requires the sacrifice is better than sinning and then making a sacrifice to pay for that sin. So sacrifice
comes about because of disobedience. So sacrifices existed to teach us about obedience. With this in mind ask yourself this next
question...

Q: How many unspecified sacrifices did God ever prescribe for the Jews?

Or ask yourself this question...

Q: Did God ever say to the sons of Israel bring along whatever you like and I’ll judge your offering on its merit?

A: None and No.

Every sacrifice under the Law was precisely prescribed by God as to the offering itself, the day of offering and even the method of
making the offering. Take for example the regulations for the festival of Weeks under the Law of Moses...

16 To the day after the seventh sabbath you should count, 50 days, and you must present a new grain offering to Jehovah.
17 Out of your dwelling places you should bring 2 loaves as a wave offering. Of 2 tenths of an ephah of fine flour they should prove to
be. They should be baked leavened, as first ripe fruits to Jehovah.
18 And you must present along with the loaves 7 sound male lambs, each a year old, and one young bull and 2 rams. They should
serve as a burnt offering to Jehovah along with their grain offering and their drink offerings as an offering made by fire, of a restful
odor to Jehovah.
19 And you must render up one kid of the goats as a sin offering and 2 male lambs, each a year old, as a communion sacrifice.
20 And the priest must wave them to and fro along with the loaves of the first ripe fruits, as a wave offering before Jehovah, along
with the 2 male lambs. They should serve as something holy to Jehovah for the priest (Leviticus 23).

As you can see the sacrifice was defined precisely by God. This was because he was trying to teach obedience through sacrifice, he
was not trying to teach sacrifice itself.

For example if God specified a kid of the goats, and someone brought along a whole herd of cattle, would that be acceptable? Or if
God stipulated an unblemished lamb, and someone presented a Picasso, a Ferrari and a prize winning Dalmatian to the high priest,
how far would that get him? If God stipulated a turtle dove and someone brought along the rights to the whole Beatles back catalogue,
would that work for God?

The reason that God does not explicitly say why he rejected Cain’s sacrifice and accepted Abel’s sacrifice is that if you understand
what sacrifice is supposed to be about, and if you credit God with being fair, you will work out for yourself that Cain offered the
wrong sacrifice. The point is that God wants you to think about it and work it out for yourself. And if you are not prepared to do that,
then he does not want to show you his true love and he does not want to show you his true justice. God does not want to explain
himself to his enemies, he wants to explain himself only to his friends. Because his enemies abuse divine knowledge for their own
benefit. So he keeps them in the dark to lessen their destructive effects. This was also why Jesus said to his disciples at one point: You
can either drink my blood or take a hike!

53 Accordingly Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you: Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have
no life in yourselves (John 6).

He knew that such a statement was revolting to the Jews under Law, but he made no qualification that in fact they would have only to
drink wine which represents his blood, because he was testing them to weed out those who had seen all of his miracles but continued
to put no faith in him. John 6 was a faith test by Jesus of his disciples. Genesis 4 is a love test by God of the reader.

Now modern churches do not understand sacrifice to God. They understand self sacrifice, which is giving God what they want to give
him, but they do not understand sacrifice to God, which is giving God want he wants to be given.

God could not possibly have accepted Abel’s sacrifice unless Abel had offered him precisely what he had prescribed, and on the
correct day. So since God did accept Abel’s sacrifice, we know that he must have stipulated to the pair of them that they should both
bring:

4 Some firstlings of the flock even their fatty pieces (Genesis 4).
Cain brought 'some fruits of the ground'. That was not what God asked for, so he rejected it. That is the end of the matter. But in fact
the ground was cursed due to Adam, so Cain added insult to disobedience and offered to God the fruits of his father’s disobedience!

17 And to Adam he said: Because you listened to your wife's voice and took to eating from the tree concerning which I gave you this
command, 'You must not eat from it,' cursed is the ground on your account. In pain you will eat its produce all the days of your life
(Genesis 3).

One might also have a look at Genesis 5, the subsequent chapter, in one's attempts to understand Genesis 4. If so then one will find:

29 And he proceeded to call his name Noah, saying: This one will bring us comfort from our work and from the pain of our hands
resulting from the ground which Jehovah has cursed (Genesis 5).

Aha! So Cain offered fruits of the ‘cursed’ ground to be precise. This does not mean that the fruits themselves were cursed. For sons
of Adam were all vegetarians, eating these very fruits, until after the flood when God said to Noah (since there wasn’t much
vegetation around):

3 Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for you. As in the case of green vegetation, I do give it all to you (Genesis 9).

When Noah came out of the ark he made a sacrifice of some of the clean beasts to God, who responded as follows:

21 And Jehovah began to smell a restful odor, and so Jehovah said in his heart: Never again shall I call down evil upon the ground on
man's account, because the inclination of the heart of man is bad from his youth up; and never again shall I deal every living thing a
blow just as I have done (Genesis 8).

At this point sons of Adam became carnivorous. After the flood the earth was no longer cursed, the flood baptized the earth as it were.

So Cain’s sacrifice was not cursed but it was seriously substandard, for the poor quality of the produce of the ground was in fact a
punishment on men, and a cause of suffering and pain for them, and here Cain is offering what God was using to punish him
personally, back to God!!

But that blooper was not why the sacrifice was rejected. It was rejected quite simply because it was the wrong sacrifice.

Furthermore men are incapable of judging faith, we can only judge works. So we are simply not in a position to judge either Cain or
Abel as to their faith. In fact under the law of works, if you absolutely hated God and the high priest and your brother and had just
finished bullying your entire family yet brought along the correct sacrifice, possibly to show off to your peers, then your sins were
forgiven.

The purpose of Sacrifice to God is to humiliate the sacrificer and to glorify God. One does not bring to the altar of God one’s latest
screenplay or the fruits of one’s commercial success, in order to get a pat on the back or an Oscar or the Queens award for industry or
the medal of freedom from the High Priest. One brings instead something pointing forward to the sacrifice of Jesus, so that God can
give him the Oscar that he deserves. As for our efforts, they are not worthy of consideration when compared to the sacrifice and love
and righteousness of the Christ and his father.

[B] The first 6 sons of Jacob

Here is the Genesis account of the birth of the first 6 sons of Jacob.

31 When Jehovah came to see that Leah was hated, he then opened her womb, but Rachel was barren.
32 And Leah became pregnant and brought a son to birth and then called his name Reuben, for she said: It is because Jehovah has
looked upon my wretchedness, in that now my husband will begin to love me.
33 And she became pregnant again and brought a son to birth and then said: It is because Jehovah has listened, in that I was hated and
so he gave me also this one. Hence she called his name Simeon.
34 And she became pregnant yet again and brought a son to birth and then said: Now this time my husband will join himself to me,
because I have borne him 3 sons. His name was therefore called Levi.
35 And she became pregnant once more and brought a son to birth and then said: This time I shall laud Jehovah. She therefore called
his name Judah. After that she left off giving birth (Genesis 29).
1 When Rachel came to see that she had borne nothing to Jacob, Rachel got jealous of her sister and began to say to Jacob: Give me
children or otherwise I shall be a dead woman.
2 At this Jacob's anger burned against Rachel and he said: Am I in the place of God, who has held back the fruit of the belly from you?
3 So she said: Here is my slave girl Bilhah. Have relations with her, that she may give birth upon my knees and that I, even I, may get
children from her.
4 With that she gave him Bilhah her maidservant as wife, and Jacob had relations with her.
5 And Bilhah became pregnant and in time bore Jacob a son.
6 Then Rachel said: God has acted as my judge and has also listened to my voice, so that he gave me a son. That is why she called his
name Dan.
7 And Bilhah, Rachel's maidservant, became pregnant once more and in time bore a second son to Jacob.
8 Then Rachel said: With strenuous wrestlings I have wrestled with my sister. I have also come off winner! So she called his name
Naphtali.
9 When Leah came to see that she had left off giving birth, she proceeded to take Zilpah her maidservant and to give her to Jacob as
wife (Genesis 30).

At first sight it looks like Leah gave birth to Reuben, Simeon, Levi and Judah, then Bilhah, Rachel's maidservant, gave birth to Dan
and Naphtali. As a result all Jewish theologians and all Christian churches today have the birth order of these sons as Reuben, Simeon,
Levi, Judah, Dan and Naphtali.

But there is one little piece of the puzzle that this interpretation misses. When Bilhah gave birth to her second son Rachel said: With
strenuous wrestlings I have wrestled with my sister. I have also come off winner!

Agreed, most but not all bible interpretations are made by men, and we are not normally that interested in the noises women make
when they are giving birth, or in the things that they say during that process, which may not be very complimentary. But it was not
Bilhah who called her second born child Naphtali, it was Rachel. And Rachel herself did not give birth being unable at that time to
conceive. Incidentally according to the law back then (before the law of Moses), Bilhah, the maidservant, was owned by Rachel, and
so Rachel also owned her children, and so could name them herself.

So here is the 64 million dollar question: Why would Rachel think that she was the winner in the procreation race with her sister at the
birth of Naphtali?

Answer: She had one more child than Leah at that time.

Obviously Rachel would have realized that she was losing the baby race straight after Reuben was born. She would not have needed to
see 4 children from Leah before she started competing with her sister. So the birth order must have been...

Reuben, Dan, Naphtali, Simeon, Levi, Judah.

In this way Rachel drew level at one all with the birth of Dan, and then went one baby ahead at 2:1 with the birth of Naphtali. At this
point she was in the lead, she was the winner for a while. But then Leah came back with Simeon, the equalizer and it was 2 all. Then
with the births of Levi and Judah, Leah went 4:2 ahead. These are the kinds of details we must look for in the bible for even the
omissions tell a story!

[C] No man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven

13 Moreover, no man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man.

If no man has ascended into heaven except the son of man who descended, then the son of man had already ascended before Jesus said
this statement. So Jesus, the son of man, had ascended to heaven before he descended as Jesus. But if he had ascended to heaven
before he descended as Jesus, then he must have descended as someone else before that ascension in order that he could actually
ascend. For it is impossible to ascend into heaven without first descending from heaven. So Jesus had descended from heaven before
and then ascended back and then he descended again and made the statement above.

In other words, when Jesus came to preach to the Jews and to give his life for all mankind, this was at least his second visit to us. In
other words he had come here before as someone else, before Jesus. We will provide the secrets to this understanding for you later.

This information is an earthquake, but it is merely one step of logic away from John 3:13 above. Why has mankind been unable to
take that step? Because we throw away our logic when we join a church. We believe the lie perpetrated by control freak priests, that
faith involves taking things on trust from a priest. It most certainly does not. It involves serving God with one's God given mind.

Search and see if any church other than the Lords' Witnesses has ever understood this one sentence!

Conclusion
The bible is brilliantly written and every little detail does contain a great spiritual gem, hidden for thousands of years. As Solomon
said in his second Proverb...

4 if you keep seeking for it as for silver, and as for hid treasures you keep searching for it,
5 in that case you will understand the fear of Jehovah, and you will find the very knowledge of God (Proverbs 2).

The point is that you have to dig, you have to think logically about every scripture. God did not explicitly say why he rejected Cain's
sacrifice, he did not directly list the birth order of Jacob's first 6 kids and Jesus did not flatly say that he had been down here before as
somebody else, but the bible does say all three of these things if you read it with your whole mind.

Hopefully this section will help the reader to lay bare the exuberance of the literary genius of our God. Hopefully he will begin to
grasp the extent of the linguistic dexterity employed in his perfect book. For the king of love is a teacher whose moral finesse breaks
your heart whilst his incisive metaphors wrench your neurons into divine activity. The very activity that Adam first taught to pre-
adamic man, whom he was sent to save.

So the inescapable conclusion is that God wants us to think really hard and really deeply about every word of his book. He wants us to
look behind the scriptures, to look through the scriptures, to look ahead of the scriptures to look beneath the scriptures and to look
above the scriptures, to misquote General Norman Schwarzkopf in the first Gulf War. This is what a spiritual being is (not Stormy
Norman, but a person who sees through the physical to the underlying spiritual truth). Spirituality is looking behind the physical with
the eyes of the mind to the spiritual cause. The bible, by its very construction, is teaching us to see beyond the physical.

This divine teaching method does not only apply to the holy book. It applies to the entirety of creation as Isaac Newton believed. Let
us therefore present you with two key examples from nature of this type of thinking here.

Why did God create Cancer?

Why does God permit the terrible disease of Cancer to torture to mutilate and to kill his children whom he loves so much? Is it
because God is a sick and cruel murderer? Is it because God is not very good at genetic engineering and made a few mistakes in our
construction so that our DNA goes haywire occasionally? Or is it because any form of corruption (financial, moral, political etc) is
ultimately terminal to society, if not eradicated completely. And we all know someone who has died of cancer, which is cellular
corruption, but have we really learned this lesson! Does corruption have a future? So please understand that the death of a loved one to
this disease is not a waste. In fact it is just as heroic and significant as a soldier dying in battle. The soldier died for his country or for
his beliefs. The cancer victim dies for your beliefs and for the future of your society, which future is the Kingdom of God. That is the
big picture. It is our understanding that God wishes to turn your memories of such deaths and of such suffering into an unforgettable
moral lesson that will prevent you having any part in cancerous activity in the future.

For the cancer victim himself, when he is resurrected, he will know for a fact that corruption is terminal. Whenever he sees it in others
and whenever he is tempted to indulge in it himself, he will recall its effect on his first body and say. I am not going there ever again!

Fifth Lesson - What Exactly is Baptism?

What exactly is Baptism?

In Christian churches all over the world they say:

I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

This is taken from Jesus' famous last words to his apostles recorded by Matthew:

19 Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the
holy spirit (Matthew 28 NWT).

How many times have we heard or read this? Many, many, many times. We have heard it in English from Protestants and
in Latin from Catholics. But how many times have we understood what it is saying? Never yet once. Because, as in the
case of Matthew 24:36 (The classic mistranslation which has prevented sincere Christians believing that God would tell
them when this system ends). The above is an incorrect translation. It was corrupted by Catholic theologians to support
their false trinity doctrine which will be proven in a later lesson. Every single existing Greek Manuscript of the bible
containing this verse (the Siniaticus, the Alexandrinus, The Vatican B, The Codex Rescriptus the Codex Bezae and all the
relevant Papyri) has the Greek word '' meaning 'into' rather than the Greek word '' meaning 'in'. Any Greek Interlinear
Bible (Such as Kingdom Interlinear Bible, from the Watchtower or the Greek-English Interlinear of Brown and Comfort),
translates verse 19 as below:

19 Having gone your way therefore, make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of
the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 28 KI).


Baptizing them into the name of the father and of the son

(Matthew 28:19, KI from Wescott & Hort, and Nestle Aland 26th ed.)
and of the holy spirit

The Greek preposition for ‘in’ is , and it takes the dative . The Greek preposition for ‘into’ is and it takes
the accusative 

The Literal bible (J P Green, www.sovgracepub.com) also available from this site as a download translates this verse as:

19 Then, having gone, disciple all nations, baptizing them into the name of the father and of the son and of the Holy spirit
(Matthew 28 - Green's Literal Translation - GLT).

May J P Green be blessed for his unpresumptuous fidelity. Now baptizing someone in the name of Jesus, is very different
from baptizing someone into the name of Jesus. Baptizing in the name of Jesus is an action done with Jesus' authority.
For example the statement, 'in the name of the President I command you to open this door', is a command made with the
authority of the President. But the statement, I have entered into the name of the President, means you have either
become the first lady or been adopted into his immediate family. In the former case it is an action with his authority, in the
latter case it is the entry into his family name.

So in fact in the latter case of 'into' we are talking about three different baptisms, into three different family names,
whereas, in the former case of 'in' it could be one baptism with the authority of all three of the names. In fact this one
baptism three name authority interpretation is how the whole Christian world currently regards this scripture, and all of us
believe that we are baptized in water, in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, rather like Inspector
Clouseau arrests people in the name of the law.

In the case of Clouseau his incompetence was hysterical. In the case of all Christians the incompetence is lamentable and
it is unforgivable. For example, we read:

5 He is the one whom God has chosen out of all your tribes, to stand to minister in the name of Jehovah (Deuteronomy
18).

32 And he went on to build the stones into an altar in the name of Jehovah and to make a trench, of about the area sowed
with two seah measures of seed, all around the altar (1 Kings 18).

So it is apparent that 'in the name of' has the meaning of ‘in the authority of’ or 'with the authority of', but 'into the name of'
has a very narrow meaning, namely that the candidate ends up wearing that name as a family name. The candidate takes
that name for himself as a kind of spiritual surname. As you will see in the section on who Jesus is, being baptized into the
name of Jehovah makes you a God to be worshipped. And only Jesus has achieved this baptism so far. Whereas any one
of us can do something with Jehovah's authority. In fact Paul says:

17 Whatever it is that you do, in word or in work, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, thanking God the Father
through him (Colossians 3).

In other words keep his law in all you do. Incidentally this does not mean that when we thank God we should do it through
Jesus. It means that whatever we do, we should bear in mind that we are doing it in the name of Jesus, and act
accordingly, and acting in this way is thanking God through Jesus.

So of course we do baptize people in water in the name of Jesus, just like we do the preaching work in his name, just like
we wash our dishes in his name. We make cups of tea in the name of Lord Jesus. But this however is not what Jesus
commanded at Matthew 28:19, he was commanding baptisms into 3 different names. Therefore he was commanding 3
different baptisms.
This is the point where the light turns on and the veil of negligence is lifted. For being baptized into someone's
name is gaining another surname which is getting married spiritually which is entering into a covenant. So now
from one tiny word 'into' rather than the mistranslation 'in' we have related baptisms to covenants. A baptism is a
cleansing for entrance into a covenant.

There is no instance in the bible of the phrase 'in the name of the holy spirit', no one said: I order you in the name of the
holy spirit to get up and walk, or suchlike. Only God can do this, because the holy spirit is his wife, and not anybody else's
wife. So he alone has authority over her and men do not. No Christian is recorded as doing anything and verbally
proclaiming it to be in the name of the holy spirit. In fact both Peter and Paul did do something in the name of the holy
spirit (they resurrected a dead man), but neither one of them is recorded as being presumptuous enough to verbalize this.

39 At that Peter rose and went with them. And when he arrived, they led him up into the upper chamber; and all the
widows presented themselves to him weeping and exhibiting many inner garments and outer garments that Dorcas used
to make while she was with them.
40 But Peter put everybody outside and, bending his knees, he prayed, and, turning to the body, he said: Tabitha, rise!"
She opened her eyes and, as she caught sight of Peter, she sat up.
41 Giving her his hand, he raised her up, and he called the holy ones and the widows and presented her alive (Acts 9).

9 Seated at the window, a certain young man named Eutychus fell into a deep sleep while Paul kept talking on, and,
collapsing in sleep, he fell down from the third story and was picked up dead.
10 But Paul went downstairs, threw himself upon him and embraced him and said: Stop raising a clamor, for his soul is in
him.
11 He now went upstairs and began the meal and took food, and after conversing for quite a while, until daybreak, he at
length departed.
12 So they took the boy away alive and were comforted beyond measure (Acts 20).

These resurrections were performed by the holy spirit, with the authority of God through the prayers of Peter and Paul.
Neither of the two said to God's wife: Resurrect this one for me love! They begged Jesus in prayer who then asked his
father's wife, the holy spirit, to resurrect.

For completeness we now consider all the other 7 (4 then 3 below) references in the bible to baptism in or into or upon the
name of somebody or something, are as follows (The Greek preposition for ‘upon’ is  and it takes the dative
):


Let him be baptized each of you in the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38 Kingdom Interlinear from the Wescott and Hort
Greek manuscript, based upon the oldest know large Greek text, the Vatican B).


Let him be baptized each of you upon the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:38, Nestle Aland 26, based on the majority of
known texts, not the oldest text).


but having been baptized they were into the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 8:16 KI & NA26)


He commanded but them in the name Jesus Christ to be baptized (Acts 10:48 KI & NA26)


Having heard but they were baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 19:5 KI & NA26)

The reader will notice that there is a discrepancy between the oldest Greek text which reads: In the name of Jesus Christ,
and the newer texts which read: Upon the name of Jesus Christ. The two reading mean more or less the same thing
however.

In Acts 2 and Acts 8, the proselytes and the Samaritans respectively were baptized in water, not in spirit, so they were not
baptized into the name of Jesus, which is a spirit baptism, but they were baptized with his authority in water - actually into
the name of John the baptist, the father of the water baptism of the first church.

The context of the last one above in Acts 19 is:

2 And he said to them: Did you receive holy spirit when you became believers? They said to him: Why we have never
heard whether there is a holy spirit.
3 And he said into what therefore () were you baptized. They said into the baptism of John.
4 Paul said: John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is
in Jesus.
5 Having heard this, they were baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 19).

The Revised Standard Version (RSV) provides a fascinating insight into the trinity inspired mistranslation of in and into. It
evidently needs a little more revision. it actually says:

2 And he said to them: Did you receive the holy spirit when you believed? And they said: No, we have never even heard
that there is a holy spirit.
3 And he said into what then () were you baptized. They said into () John's baptism.
4 And Paul said: John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come
after him, that is Jesus.
5 On hearing this, they were baptized in () the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 19 - RSV).

So the RSV correctly translates the first two incidences of the Greek word () as 'into' in circumstances which have little
doctrinal significance to simple Christian belief, but then mistranslate the third incidence as 'in', in the phrase 'baptized in
the name of the Lord Jesus which has great doctrinal significance to simple Christian belief.

The Ephesians in Acts 19 were not actually baptized by Paul into the name of Jesus, because Paul was not a new
covenant saint. Paul merely conferred the gifts of the spirit upon them by laying his hands on them. They were baptized
into his name by the angels as soon as they heard about Jesus, and so were able to put faith in him. One cannot be
baptized into the name of Jesus without putting faith in him

17 For Christ dispatched me, not to go baptizing, but to go on declaring the good news (1 Corinthians 1).

Now there is a scripture which looks like it is contradicting this, namely:

12 Furthermore, there is no salvation in anyone else, for there is not another name under () heaven that has been
given among men by which we must get saved (Acts 4).

This scripture appears to be saying, that there is only one name into which we can ever be baptized. But the situation is
more complex than that. Everlasting salvation is all dependant on Jesus' ransom sacrifice. He saves us all everlastingly,
being the mediator of the angelic ransom covenant (ARC) which is the master covenant for angelic life between God and
mankind which we will demonstrate for you in a later lesson. Jesus is the father of all who are saved. Because if you are
saved temporarily by the master covenants into the new system, but then, through sin, you die, you end up not saved. We
all end up either baptized into his name or dead.

But he is not the only name into which we can be baptized, because the angelic ransom covenant has many
subcovenants. And so do the other master covenants. For example, the sons of Israel who left Egypt were baptized into
the name of Moses:


and all into the Moses they were baptized in the cloud and in the sea (1 Corinthians 10:2 KI).


and all into the Moses they were baptized in the cloud and in the sea (1 Corinthians 10:2 NA26)

Paul mentions a baptism into his name with sarcasm...

13 The Christ exists divided. Paul was not impaled for you, was he? Or were you baptized into the name of Paul?
14 I am thankful I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius,
15 so that no one may say that you were baptized into my name.
16 Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas. As for the rest, I do not know whether I baptized anybody else (1
Corinthians 1).
In the literal meaning, no people were baptized into Paul's name in this account. But in the greater meaning people were
baptized into Paul's name for Paul actually mediated a covenant. The point here is that Paul used words showing that
baptism is into a name.

Jesus becomes our eternal father, rather than Adam. Jesus regains what Adam lost, for us:

6 For there has been a child born to us; there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his
shoulder. And his name will be called: Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. (Isaiah 9)

The Mighty God, Jesus, is a Prince to the King who is the almighty God Jehovah. Jehovah is king (to be) of the kingdom
of God, as one can easily infer from the kingdom's name. Jesus is a prince who became a King in 1914Tishri at the end of
the Gentile Times. He rules over the sons of the ICC for 93½ years in this system which ends on 2008Nisan14 as you will
see in the seventh lesson. Then he sits on his father's throne ruling as King, throughout the 1,000 year Kingdom of God.
His eternal fathering is effected through the ARC which is referred to by Paul in the literal meaning when he says:

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus,
6 who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all (1 Timothy 2).

So people are baptized into the name of the mediator of a covenant, becoming sons of this mediator as regards their
spiritual life, their angelic life, their everlasting life, their second life. And this process, baptism, is a cleansing for entrance
into the covenant mediated by the mediator whose name one is baptized into.

The Disgrace of the Christian Churches and the Lies and Corruption of Athanasius

It is the trinity doctrine, that has denied mankind any knowledge of the relationship between baptisms and covenants
disclosed above. One does not need to be a Greek Scholar to see that the Greek word '' Matthew 28:19 should be
translated as 'into'. It is truly a disgrace that this nonsense doctrine has fooled us all for 1,700 years. Here is the definition
of the 3rd century logical con trick which has blinded Christianity...

The Trinity is the term employed to signify the central doctrine of the Christian religion -- the truth that in the unity of the Godhead
there are Three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, these Three Persons being truly distinct one from another. Thus, in
the words of the Athanasian Creed:

"The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God."

In this Trinity of Persons the Son is begotten of the Father by an eternal generation, and the Holy Spirit proceeds by an eternal
procession from the Father and the Son. Yet, notwithstanding this difference as to origin, the Persons are co-eternal and co-equal: all
alike are uncreated and omnipotent. This, the Church teaches, is the revelation regarding God's nature which Jesus Christ, the Son of
God, came upon earth to deliver to the world: and which she proposes to man as the foundation of her whole dogmatic system.

This is a false doctrine adopted by the council of churches at Nicea in 325 AD.

The Catholic Enclyclopedia http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15047a.htm, says regarding it's 'proof' that the 'trinity' is
correct:

II. PROOF OF DOCTRINE FROM SCRIPTURE

A. New Testament

The evidence from the Gospels culminates in the baptismal commission of Matthew 28:20. It is manifest from the narratives of the
Evangelists that Christ only made the great truth known to the Twelve step by step. First He taught them to recognize in Himself the
Eternal Son of God. When His ministry was drawing to a close, He promised that the Father would send another Divine Person, the
Holy Spirit, in His place. Finally after His resurrection, He revealed the doctrine in explicit terms, bidding them go and teach all
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" (Matthew 28:18). The force of this passage
is decisive. That "the Father" and "the Son" are distinct Persons follows from the terms themselves, which are mutually exclusive. The
mention of the Holy Spirit in the same series, the names being connected one with the other by the conjunctions "and ... and" is
evidence that we have here a Third Person co-ordinate with the Father and the Son, and excludes altogether the supposition that the
Apostles understood the Holy Spirit not as a distinct Person, but as God viewed in His action on creatures. The phrase "in the name"
(eis to onoma) affirms alike the Godhead of the Persons and their unity of nature.
So the Catholic 'proof' relies on Matthew 28:19 meaning: baptizing them in the name of... But it does not mean this. What
we find very distasteful is that the catholics even quote the Greek scripture: (eis to onoma) yet still mistranslate it as "in
the name", when it says "into the name". So please beloved reader, pick up a Greek Dictionary, ask your favorite Greek
Scholar. Keep on seeking and ye shall find. A Shorter Greek Lexicon by Liddell and Scott is the famous one, but the
Analytical Lexicon of the New Testament by William Mounce is better for New Testament Greek in our opinion. You will
find that 'eis', meaning 'into' takes the accusative case and 'en' meaning 'in' takes the dative case and 'onoma' is in the
accusative case. That really is the end of the trinity, not that it even had a beginning because it is defined in such a way as
to be non-existent. You will see how inane this whole concept is as you progress through these pages. You will also note
that there is absolutely no mention of the trinity throughout the entire bible except the italicized sections that have been
added to the scriptures by those who espouse it!

May we draw the readers attention to the last sentence in the quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia above, which reveals
that the mistranslation of Matthew 28:19 (sic) supports 'the Godhead of persons and their unity of nature'. This is Catholic
theobabble dreamt up in support of the trinity doctrine. A doctrine which condemns mankind to be ignorant idolaters of a
non existent contrivance of crafty theologians, who have succeeded in playing God with the vast majority of 'Christians' for
1,700 years, by using this cunning diversion.

Sixth Lesson - How is One Born Again?

How is one born again...without dying?

Nicodemus, a faithful and courageous Pharisee, came to visit Jesus one night. He put his faith in the son of God and here
is some of the conversation that resulted...

3 In answer Jesus said to him: Most truly I say to you, Unless anyone is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a second
time and be born, can he?
5 Jesus answered: Most truly I say to you, unless anyone is born from water and spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom
of God.
6 What has been born from the flesh is flesh, and what has been born from the spirit is spirit.
7 Do not marvel because I told you, you people must be born again (John 3).

8 I baptized you with water, but he will baptize you with holy spirit (Mark 1).

Being born from water is a water baptism. Being from spirit is a spirit baptism, a baptism in holy spirit, which is being born
again. A water baptism does not immediately give you a new physical body, since you are stuck with the one you have
until you die. But it leads to a rebirth in the flesh, when one enters the Kingdom of God as a human, in a new body.
Whereas referring to the spirit birth, being 'born from the spirit', Nicodemus asks how this can possibly happen? But his
very question is the answer...

4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born again when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a
second time and be born can he? (John 3)

Well literally, no, of course he cannot. But symbolically, yes, that is precisely how one is born again. We are born again
from the womb of our heavenly mother, God’s wife, the holy spirit. Born as an angel. The spirit woman, gives birth to
angels. When you are born again, God creates an angel in heaven through his wife, the holy spirit, for your spirit to inhabit
in the future, Amen. For we are the little brothers of the angels. The spirit birth can happen immediately on baptism in holy
spirit since we have no spiritual body prior to such a baptism.

When Adam was created the scripture says...

7 And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life,
and the man came to be a living soul (Genesis 2).

The breath of life was not from the ground, it was from the heaven. God blew into two nostrils, two vessels for the breathy
of life, two vessels for your life. The vessel of dust, the human body, and the vessel of spirit, the angel. Adam was born
again when he was born. In fact in all humans our two nostrils and our two lungs are declaring the two vehicles for the
spirit of life which we can possess. All those who are born again whilst alive as humans have both vehicles, after their
birth. Although of course the latter is invisible and undetectable. Hence we read in the next verse of John 3...
8 The wind blows where it wants to, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from and where it is
going. So is everyone that has been born from the spirit (John 3).

The born again have their own empty angel upstairs with their name on it. So they are truly spirit sons of God.

17 Consequently if anyone is in union with Christ, he is a new creation. The old things have passed away. Look! new
things [new earthly body at earthly resurrection and new heavenly body at baptism] have come into existence (2
Corinthians 5).

Seventh Lesson - Time to Leave Kindergarten

Prepare yourselves for the greatest Passover since 14Nisan33 AD when Christ Jesus Himself atoned for our sins through
his ultimate sacrifice!

14Nisan2008 (21 March 2008) will mark the beginning of the Kingdom of God on earth!!!!

The following pages will open up the scriptures for you to prove our dates are correct.

The date of Armageddon – scriptural witnesses

Before I begin, we must clear something up….this has been a stumbling block for many for a long time.
Matthew 24, Mark 13: Concerning that day and hour, nobody knows.
36 Concerning that day and hour nobody knows, neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father
(Matthew 24).
32 Concerning that day or the hour nobody knows, neither the angels in heaven nor the Son, but the Father. Keep
looking, keep awake, for you do not know when the appointed time is (Mark 13).
Most bibles translate these two verses more or less as above. But the Greek does not say this at all. The Greek word translated
'knows' is . This is the 3rd person singular perfect tense of , which means 'I see' like the Latin 'Video'. The perfect
tense is used for completed actions in the past. So  literally means 'he has seen'. Now either this Greek word
'' is in the present tense or it is in the past tense.
To quote Liddell & Scott Greek Lexicon under 'Eido':
'To know:- the perfect tense "", I have seen, as a present tense verb, in the sense I know, for what one has seen
one knows.'
What this means is that: 'Concerning that day or the hour nobody knows' is a linguistically possible sense of the Greek, and this is
where the confusion has arisen. But it is not what the Greek actually says, no, the exact literal translation is: 'Concerning that day or
the hour nobody has seen (with his mind)' this being meant in the sense of 'Concerning that day or the hour nobody has
known.' Young's Literal Translation of the bible has: 'Nobody has known', and ironically the Greek Interlinear Translation of the
Watchtower has 'Nobody has known'. The false translation and misinterpretation found in most bibles originates from the first
millennium AD when the Christian churches were trying to stifle Armageddon date speculation.
'Nobody has seen' has a whole different connotation from 'nobody knows', because it is actually saying 'nobody has
known in the past'. So with the exact translation, it is evident that Jesus was simply saying that no creation had yet been
granted a knowledge of the day or the hour from time indefinite up to that time, which was Nisan 11, 33 CE. In any event
these two scriptures, seeing as they are written in the past tense cannot be a prohibition on future knowledge of that
'day' and that 'hour'.
a. No statement about past knowledge can be a prohibition on future knowledge
b. No man knows for certain the date of his marriage until he has become engaged
c. Jesus likewise did not know the date of Armageddon, which is the date of his marriage to his new covenant
bride until he had proposed to them on 33Nisan14. This is why he said what he did on 33Nisan11.
7 Let us rejoice and be overjoyed and let us give him the glory because the marriage of the lamb has arrived and his wife
has prepared herself....
9...Happy are those invited to the evening meal of the lambs marriage (Revelation 19).
Members of the new covenant are these happy ones; the evening meal of the lamb's marriage is the coronation of the
kings in the kingdom of God, on the last day of this system.
As Paul said:
1 Now as for the times and the seasons, brothers, you need nothing to be written to you.
2 For you yourselves know quite well that the Lord's day is coming exactly as a thief in the night.
3 Whenever it is that they are saying: Peace and security! then sudden destruction is to be instantly upon them just as
the pang of distress upon a pregnant woman; and they will by no means escape.
4 But you, brothers, you are not in darkness, so that that day should come upon you as it would thieves (who operate
under a cloak of darkness),
5 for you are all sons of light and sons of day. We belong neither to night nor to darkness.
So Jehovah's day which in this context is the one that lasts 1,000 years, comes as a thief in the night to those in the
darkness. But to those in the light it does not come as a thief in the night, it comes in the day, so they can see it coming.
It does not come upon them as the day comes upon thieves, because they do not operate under the cover of darkness,
they have nothing to hide. So those who walk in the light plainly see this day coming. That is all of us that are seeing this
right now! In other words you too are seeing this if you choose to.
Today we can prove the date in a couple of sentences as follows:
First Witness – Short synopsis
In Revelation 13, the beast is the UN. This beast has 10 horns and 7 heads. The 10 horns are 10 years of military power
without kingship, and the 7 heads are 7 years of Kingship over the entire world. We all know that the UN got this military
power during the first Gulf War as it was the first time in which all of the nations agreed through the UN body to attack
another country. This war ended in March 1991, 10 years after this is 2001when the UNICC was inaugurated making it
the head of every nation signed up to it. 7 years after this is 2008. Amen. I know this is oversimplified, but it will be
explained in detail later.
An even simpler proof of the date of Armageddon can be found in Isaiah 30:25,26.
Second Witness – Isaiah Explains

25 And upon every high mountain and upon every elevated hill, there must come to be streams, water ditches, in the day of the big
slaughter when the towers fall.

26 And the light of the full moon must become as the light of the glowing [sun] and the very light of the glowing [sun] will become 7
times as much, like the light of 7 days, in the day that Jehovah binds up the breakdown of his people and heals even the severe wound
resulting from the stroke by him (Isaiah 30).

The last day of Armageddon is 7 years after 9/11. This attack was the wakeup call to God’s people and they will stream to his
mountain in the 7 succeeding years, which years are both the day of the big slaughter and the day that Jehovah binds the breakdown of
his people. The stroke to the shepherd, which scatters the sheep, is the fall of the faithful discreet slave (the 3rd actually) of Mathew 25
who is now the wicked and sluggish slave. This is the rejection of the 3rd true Christian Church. But the last true religion (the 4th) will
shine brightly as ever for these last 7 times, which are just 7 years. This is the word symbolic meaning of Isaiah 30. Although we have
sixteen independent witnesses in scripture that confirm our dates surrounding Armageddon, and I have just given you a couple of
simplified version of them, I would like to start off with what is believed to be the most beautiful of understandings regarding this date
which actually denotes the beginning of the Kingdom of God…we call this the “Midst Prophesy” and you will see why! It is a
beautiful example of how our eternal Father operates and how his scriptures can come alive for us.

Third Witness - Jesus died in the exact center of the First Abrahamic Covenant, the mid point between its inauguration and
Armageddon.

This can be generalized to: Jesus is temporally central in his 'salvation activities'

Some religions believe that the First Abrahamic Covenant of Genesis 12 lasts into the Kingdom of God . Well it is true that its
blessing, which is to be a citizen of the Kingdom of God, continues through the kingdom of God , but it is not possible to enter into
the covenant once the Kingdom of God has started. For it is a covenant of faith. The sons of the 1AC (First Abrahamic Covenant) are
the sons of the faith of Abraham. They must put faith in a kingdom that has not yet arrived.

12 and a father of circumcised offspring, not only to those who adhere to circumcision, but also to those who walk orderly in the
footsteps of that faith while in the uncircumcised state which our father Abraham had (Romans 4).

And faith is the evident demonstration of realities which are not beheld (Hebrews 11:1). So once they are beheld, faith is no longer
necessary to see them!
14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death
he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

15 And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

16 For verily he took not on [him the nature of] angels; but he took on [him] the seed of Abraham.

17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto [his] brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in
things [pertaining] to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. (Heb 2)

So clearly His brothers were those who were part of the Abrahamic Covenant.

In any event Abraham crossed the Euphrates leaving the land of the Chaldeans, the land of Babylonia and entering the promised land.
He stopped getting wet when he set foot on the promised land of Greater Canaan, on the other side of the Euphrates. So once we
enter the Kingdom of God, we can no longer enter into the 1AC (First Abrahamic Covenant).

The Hebrew and Greek words: and  andall mean: midst, middle, center, mid-point, among or within
depending on the context.
Here is a collection of scriptures referring to Jesus coming in the middle of something.
2 In the midst () of the years Oh bring it to life! In the midst () of the years may you make it known (Habakkuk 3).

In the middle of a period of years, something is resurrected, something is made known!

15 A prophet from your own midst (), from your brothers, like me, is what Jehovah your God will raise up for you .........
18 A prophet I shall raise up for them from the midst () of their brothers, like you, and I shall indeed put my words in his mouth
(Deuteronomy 18).

This prophet was Jesus; he was raised up in the middle of his brothers!
3 And he said to the man with the withered hand: Get up and come to the center () (Mark 3).

Jesus cured sicknesses in ‘the center’ of something.

27 I am in your midst () as the one ministering (Luke 22).

Jesus ministered ‘in the midst’ of something.

26 John answered them, saying: I baptize in water. In the middle () of you one is standing whom you do not know (John 1).

It is important to note here that John baptized into the First Abrahamic Covenant. John the Baptist said:
9 And do not presume to say to yourselves, 'As a father we have Abraham.' For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to
Abraham from these stones (Matthew 3).

John meant that God can make children of faith of Abraham, sons of the 1AC, from the stones of the church, who can
baptize people in water as John did. The stones of a Christian church are not made of rock but are humans who if
sanctified in holy spirit are living stones, and if merely water baptized, are dead stones. But everyone in the church is a
stone! And every church stone can make children to Abraham. This procreative capability is in fact the very definition of a
true Christian religion.

So John tells us that Jesus stands in the middle of the sons of the 1AC. And Habakkuk tells us that, 'in the midst of the
years' something is brought to life and something is made known. Well Jesus was brought to life and God’s plan for
salvation was made known by him, so he is the ‘something’. So Jesus was resurrected and he made something known in
the middle of a period of years to do with the sons of the 1AC. Plainly these years are the years of the 1AC. The climax of
Jesus’ ministry, was his death, and in fact Jesus died in the middle of the years of the 1AC. Of course he was raised 3
days later inclusively. But Habakkuk said in the midst of the years bring it to life, so he was speaking in years not in days.

Now we know that the 1AC started in 1943Nisan, when Abraham Crossed the Euphrates, and that Jesus died and was
resurrected in 33 Nisan, precisely Hebrew 1975 years later, so Armageddon is a further 1975 years after Jesus' death, i.e.
2008Nisan.
But we know that Immanuel who was called Jesus, the 30 year old non adamic human, was transferred so as not to see
death at his baptism on 29Tishri10, with the entrance of Michael. His body was actually the validation sacrifice for the
1AC, see I29. He died 3½ years after his baptism on 33Nisan14. This was when his fleshly body validated the 1AC. His
angelic body validated something much greater; ransoming Adam's angelic body, see I28. We know that the Jews left
Egypt on 1513Nisan14 for the promised land, so it would be likely that Abraham left Mesopotamia for crossing the
Euphrates into greater Canaan, the promised land, on the same day, since we know it was the same month.

Not only that but Armageddon is the greatest passover of them all, wherein the firstborn sons of the Kingdom are not
killed but the rest of mankind is. So really Nisan14 is going to be the last day of this system, and therefore the last day of
possible entrance into the 1AC for any man. So this Midst Prophecy is exact to the day of the BLC. Abraham crossed the
Euphrates on 1943Nisan14, Jesus died on 33Nisan14 and this system together with entrance into the 1AC ends on
2008Nisan14.

Now beloved reader, can you see the great symbolism of this prophecy? For God's plan to save man rests entirely on the
shoulders of one man, Jesus Christ, and in the case of those born after 1943, all are blessed through the 1AC. The1AC
rests entirely on the validation sacrifice that Jesus made as Michael. So given that the whole covenant is supported by
one man, where should we place him underneath it to balance it all upon his shoulders? Obviously 'dead' centre by the
principle of the see saw. So here it is:

Nisan 14, 1943 BCE Nisan 14, 33CE Nisan14, 2008 CE

Covenant inaugurated Jesus' sacrifice End of this system
X________________________________________________X
1975 BLC Years X 1975 BLC Years

And if this is not amazing enough for you, have another sign...

Jesus died dead center of the 1AC measured by both the true solar and the ancient lunar calendar. This is a
significant discovery!

Fourth Witness – Solar Calendar Confirmation

If we look at the First Abrahamic Covenant from the Solar Calendar (Gregorian) point of view we have 1943Nisan14 being
April10 and 33Nisan14 being March31 and 2008Nisan14 being March21. So each half of the covenant is 1975 Solar
years less 10 days. So Jesus died in the middle of the Abrahamic covenant to the day, as measured both by the BLC and
the Gregorian (True Solar) Calendar!!

Nisan 14, 1943 BCE Nisan 14, 33CE Nisan14, 2008 CE

April 10 1943 BCE March 31 33CE March 21 2008 CE
Covenant inaugurated Jesus' sacrifice End of this system
X________________________________________________X
1975 Years less 10 days X 1975 Years less 10 days
721,344 Solar days 721,344 Solar days

Both half periods of the covenant are 10 days less than 1975 years with 493 Leap years and 20 Century years and 5
Quadra century years. The Gregorian calendar has an extra day (a leap year) if the year is divisible by 4 but not if the year
is a Century year unless it is a Quadra century year. So the total number of Solar days in the 1975 Gregorian years in
question, in both cases is:

1975x365+494(Leap years 36 to 2008AD) - 20 (Century years) + 5(Quadra century years) = 721,354 days
1975x365+494(Leap years 32 to 1941BC) - 20 (Century years) + 5(Quadra century years) = 721,354 days

To get a true Solar calendar BC, since there was no 0BC, we take 1BC as 0, and 101BC as -100 etc. So we just move the
leap years one year back BC.

25 Also, there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth anguish of nations, not knowing the way
out because of the roaring of the sea and [its] agitation (Luke 21).

So Jesus' death is dead centre of the 1AC as measured by the Biblical lunar Calendar and as measured by a true Solar
calendar. That is astonishing. Presumably there is some astral centeredness going on here too??
Here is a table of Passover dates showing you how unlikely it is that a central lunar day is also a central solar
day...Occurrences in blue

No of Solar days in these 1975 BLC - 1975 BLC years + 1975 BLC years No solar days in these 1975 BLC
Date
years (BC) (AD) years
721,344 1943Nisan14 33Nisan14 2008Nisan14 721,344
721,345 1942Nisan14 34Nisan14 2009Nisan14 721,373
721,345 1941Nisan14 35Nisan14 2010Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1940Nisan14 36Nisan14 2011Nisan14 721,373
721,374 1939Nisan14 37Nisan14 2012Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1938Nisan14 38Nisan14 2013Nisan14 721,343
721,343 1937Nisan14 39Nisan14 2014Nisan14 721,373
721,373 1936Nisan14 40Nisan14 2015Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1935Nisan14 41Nisan14 2016Nisan14 721,345
721,344 1934Nisan14 42Nisan14 2017Nisan14 721,374
721,345 1933Nisan14 43Nisan14 2018Nisan14 721,344
721,345 1932Nisan14 44Nisan14 2019Nisan14 721,373
721,374 1931Nisan14 45Nisan14 2020Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1930Nisan14 46Nisan14 2021Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1929Nisan14 47Nisan14 2022Nisan14 721,373
721,373 1928Nisan14 48Nisan14 2023Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1927Nisan14 49Nisan14 2024Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1926Nisan14 50Nisan14 2025Nisan14 721,374
721,374 1925Nisan14 51Nisan14 2026Nisan14 721,345
721,345 1924Nisan14 52Nisan14 2027Nisan14 721,344
721,345 1923Nisan14 53Nisan14 2028Nisan14 721,373
721,345 1922Nisan14 54Nisan14 2029Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1921Nisan14 55Nisan14 2030Nisan14 721,373
721,373 1920Nisan14 56Nisan14 2031Nisan14 721,344
721,343 1919Nisan14 57Nisan14 2032Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1918Nisan14 58Nisan14 2033Nisan14 721,373
721,374 1917Nisan14 59Nisan14 2034Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1916Nisan14 60Nisan14 2035Nisan14 721,345
721,345 1915Nisan14 61Nisan14 2036Nisan14 721,373
721,374 1914Nisan14 62Nisan14 2037Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1913Nisan14 63Nisan14 2038Nisan14 721,373
721,373 1912Nisan14 64Nisan14 2039Nisan14 721,343
721,343 1911Nisan14 65Nisan14 2040Nisan14 721,344
721,343 1910Nisan14 66Nisan14 2041Nisan14 721,374
721,373 1909Nisan14 67Nisan14 2042Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1908Nisan14 68Nisan14 2043Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1907Nisan14 69Nisan14 2044Nisan14 721,374
721,374 1906Nisan14 70Nisan14 2045Nisan14 721,344
721,345 1905Nisan14 71Nisan14 2046Nisan14 721,343
721,374 1904Nisan14 72Nisan14 2047Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1903Nisan14 73Nisan14 2048Nisan14 721,343
721,343 1902Nisan14 74Nisan14 2049Nisan14 721,373
721,372 1901Nisan14 75Nisan14 2050Nisan14 721,344
721,343 1900Nisan14 76Nisan14 2051Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1899Nisan14 77Nisan14 2052Nisan14 721,373
721,373 1898Nisan14 78Nisan14 2053Nisan14 721,344
721,344 1897Nisan14 79Nisan14 2054Nisan14 721,344
721,345 1896Nisan14 80Nisan14 2055Nisan14 721,373
721,374 1895Nisan14 81Nisan14 2056Nisan14 721,343
721,344 1894Nisan14 82Nisan14 2057Nisan14 721,373

To download the BLC and check this for yourself - see Download. The Metonic cycle (discovered by the Greek
mathematician - Meton) reveals that every 19 years, lunar and solar cycles/calendars coincide. In the table above we
have 3 in 50 years (i.e. 1 in 16.666 years). But we started with a coinciding day so this pretty much confirms Meton's
theory. So the Passover will be central in both the lunar and the solar calendars around 1 in every 19 years. So there was
a 1 in 19 chance of that happening in the middle of the years of the Abrahamic Covenant and it did.

So the end of the world is 2008 March 21st. Actually the Kingdom of God starts on the 3rd day counting inclusively, as in
the case of all system changes of God, this being 2008 March 23rd. And Armageddon is the first 200 days of the Kingdom
of God - see U154, U163. For the Kingdom of God is the 1,000 year 'day' of destruction of ungodly men and judgment of
many of those who enter it.

7 But by the same word the heavens and the earth that are now stored up for fire and are being reserved to the day of
judgment and of destruction of the ungodly men.
8 However, let this one fact not be escaping your notice, beloved ones, that one day is with Jehovah as 1,000 years and
1,000 years as one day (2 Peter 3).

The central position of Jesus’ death in the midst of the Abrahamic covenant represents his pivotal and sole role as savior
of mankind through the Abrahamic covenant. Because if one wishes to support something by only one support then one
has to put that support exactly in the centre of the thing. In other words the whole plan to save men is resting upon the
shoulders of just one man, Jesus, and therefore he must be in the middle of this plan by a spiritual application of the
principle of a see-saw. Is this not a wonderful symbolism? Jesus is always temporally central in his activities; this
discovery is quite a powerful tool in bible Chronology. Here are some further examples of the Midst Prophecy

70th Week of Daniel 9:27

Tishri10, 29CE Nisan 14, 33CE Tishri18, 36CE

Jesus Baptized Jesus' sacrifice 2nd Abrahamic Covenant ends
X________________________________________________X
1264 days X 1264 days

Also……………

3950 years in 1AC

1943Nisan14 Nisan 14, 33CE 2008Nisan14

3950 years in 1AC start God's true people Exodus to Kingdom
enter ‘Christian’ system God's system
X________________________________________________X
1975 years X 1975 years

430 years in Egypt

1943Nisan14 1728Nisan 1513Nisan14

430 years in ' Egypt ' start Jacob enters Egypt Exodus
X________________________________________________X
215 years X 215 years
7 year famine of Joseph in Egypt

1724Tishri 1728Nisan 1731Tishri

7 year famine starts Jacob enters Egypt 7 year Famine ends
X________________________________________________X
3.5 years X 3.5 years

The Abrahamic Covenant lasts for 3950 years or 11 years of years (years wherein each of the 360 days is itself a year
(based on the true biblical lunar calendar) less 10 years [3950 = 11x360 -10]. This is witnessed to in the tent cloths on the
tabernacle. There is a further witness to the temporal centeredness of Jesus, in the Arrival of Jacob in Egypt .

Jesus' body in Judea

2Tishri10 BC 33Nisan16 66Tishri22 (Cestius at Gabao)

Jesus' body enters Jesus' body enters Body flees Judea to mountains of Perea
Bethlehem of Judea ‘Christian’ system in Judea Jerusalem surrounded by encamped armies
X_____________________________________________X
33½ years 6 days X 33½ years 6 days

Jesus' body in Jerusalem

2 Heshvan 33 Iyyar 66Heshvan

Jesus' body in temple on Jesus' spirit ascends Cestius enters temple and leaves
41st day, firstborn offering from human in Jerusalem Disgusting thing in holy place
X________________________________________________X
33½ years X 33½ years

20 Furthermore, when you see Jerusalem surrounded by encamped armies, then know that the desolating of her has
drawn near.
21 Then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains, and let those in the midst of her withdraw, and let those in the
country places not enter into her (Luke 21).

15 Therefore, when you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation, as spoken of through Daniel the
prophet, standing in a holy place, (let the reader use discernment,)
16 then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains (Matthew 24).

So as deduced by the fundamental pattern that Jesus was born on 2Tishri10 we can use Jesus’ body as another example
of the temporal centeredness of the Christ. Because the temple of Jesus’ body, which is the congregation of living new
covenant saints became exclusive as the true religion on 33Nisan16, at the mid point of the existence of Jesus’ body
(physical and spiritual) in Judea. Alternatively we can apply the midst prophecy to Jesus’ body in Judea and deduce that
he must have been born on 2Tishri10.

As regards the timing of Jacob's entrance into the land of Egypt in the middle of the 430 years, consider:

17 At this Abraham fell upon his face and began to laugh and to say in his heart: Will a man 100 years old have a child
born, and will Sarah, yes, will a woman 90 years old give birth? (Genesis 17).

26 And after that his brother came out and his hand was holding onto the heel of Esau; so he called his name Jacob. And
Isaac was 60 years old at her giving them birth (Genesis 25).

9 So Jacob said to Pharaoh: The days of the years of my alien residences are 130 years. Few and distressing the days of
the years of my life have proved, and they have not reached the days of the years of the lives of my fathers in the days of
their alien residences (Genesis 47).

So Isaac was born when Abraham was 100 i.e. 25 years after 1943 BC, i.e.1918 BC, and Jacob was born 60 years later
in 1858 BC and he entered Egypt 130 years later in 1728 BC (things count backwards BC!).

Well, the greater exodus out of the greater Egypt occurs at Armageddon, thanks to the efforts of the greater Jacob who is
representing Jesus Christ. So, just as Jacob and his family came into the land of Egypt in the middle of the 430 year
period starting from the validation of the first Abrahamic covenant and ending with the Exodus from Egypt. Jesus and his
family came into the Christian administration in the middle of the 3950 year period starting from the validation of the first
Abrahamic covenant and ending with the Exodus from this system at Armageddon.

In other words, just as physical Jacob came into Egypt in the middle of the dwelling of the physical sons of Israel in the
'land' of physical Egypt, so Jesus Christ, the spiritual Jacob, came into spiritual Egypt (the world) in the middle of the
dwelling of the spiritual seed, the true seed of Abraham, therein. This dwelling started with Abraham himself, when he
crossed the river, being baptized, and inaugurating the 1AC, and ends at Armageddon.

9 It is like Moses said: Thus Jehovah God made to grow out of the ground every tree desirable to one's sight and good for
food, and also the tree of life in the middle of the Garden (Genesis 2).

This is our gift to you the reader, to convince you that there is a newer covenant and a new baptism following after the first
'new' covenant and the baptism of the heavenly brothers. It is a covenant of gifts and a covenant of sacrificial smoke and
a covenant of knots and difficult questions (Keturah means sacrificial smoke or knots, difficult questions).

1 Furthermore, Abraham again took a wife, and her name was Keturah (Genesis 25).

6 But to the sons of the concubines that Abraham had Abraham gave gifts. Then he sent them away from Isaac his son,
while he was still alive, eastward, to the land of the East (Genesis 25).

Fifth Witness - The Corresponding Ransom

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus,
6 who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all -- [this is] what is to be witnessed to at its own particular times (1
Timothy 2).

5 For One God [there is], one [who is] also a mediator of God and of men, a man Christ Jesus
6 The [one] having given himself a corresponding ransom, over all [ones], the witness to appointed due time (1 Timothy 2
- Interlinear translation).

45 It is even so written: 'The first man Adam became a living soul.' The last Adam became a life-giving spirit (1
Corinthians 15).

The ransom of Jesus did not correspond with 'all ones' for a ransom is soul for soul. So it corresponded with Adam. But
how did Jesus' ransom correspond with Adam?

Certainly the ransom did not correspond in sacrificial value, for Adam did not have everlasting life before he sinned,
whereas Jesus did have everlasting life before he paid for that sin...

14 how much more will the blood of the Christ, who through an everlasting spirit offered himself without blemish to God,
cleanse our consciences from dead works that we may render sacred service to [the] living God? (Hebrews 9).

14 For it is quite plain that our Lord has sprung up out of Judah, a tribe about which Moses spoke nothing concerning
priests.
15 And it is still more abundantly clear that with a similarity to Melchizedek there arises another priest,
16 who has become such, not according to the law of a commandment depending upon the flesh, but according to the
power of an indestructible life,
17 for in witness it is said: You are a priest forever according to the manner of Melchizedek (Hebrews 7).

So the correspondence is not judicial, because the ransomer had more to give than the ransomee had to lose. We used to
think that in some way Jesus had to resist sin for the same period of time that Adam lived before he sinned but there is no
judicial significance to the length of time Jesus resisted sin for at all. He could have ransomed Adam on the first day of his
ministry or 1,000 years later, a payment is a payment and a ransom is a ransom.

But 1 Timothy 2 tells us that this correspondence involved particular times, and therefore was a temporal correspondence.
Furthermore it says that it is a witness to appointed times. So the ransomer and the ransomee have a temporal
correspondence which is witnessed to repeatedly at various appointed times. What is this temporal correspondence? Well
the significant dates in Jesus life are...

Jesus was born on 2Tishri10 BC (October 9) and he died on 33Nisan14 (April 1)

So really if Adam is going to correspond to Jesus temporally he must have had a corresponding life of course. So Jesus’
life up to his ransom corresponded temporally with Adam's up to his sin requiring a ransom. Now Jesus died 33½ years
after he was born. So Adam sinned 33½ years after he was born. It is as simple as that. This temporal correspondence
acts as a witness to Jesus' life being a ransom for Adam. This we shall see gives us another way to calculate the date of
Armageddon.

Now the society has Adam as being born in '4026 BC'. But before the calendar was changed at the Passover in the days
of Moses, the year ran from Tishri to Tishri, not Nisan to Nisan. We know this because the ancient bible calendar (before
the flood and before the Exodus) started then, and in fact all very ancient calendars started in Tishri because this was
when Adam was born - see Ancient Calendars - U90. Now if you count back very carefully from Noah to Adam you find
that Adam was born in the Old Hebrew Year, the BLC year from 4027Tishi to 4026Elul - see U96. So actually since he
was born in Tishri, he was born in 4027Tishri. So he sinned 33½ years later in 3993Nisan. So Armageddon is 6,000 years
after that, i.e. it is in 2008Nisan.

To sum up, here are some of the reasons why Adam was born in Tishri and sinned in Nisan

[1] Early human calendars began in Tishri

[2] Jesus was born in Tishri and died in Nisan.

[3] Adam was actually passed over when he sinned. His associated angel was killed yet his fleshly body was preserved
albeit on death row.

[4] Adam's sin was an archetype for Jesus' death which occurred on the passover.

So let us now credit our brilliant God with the perfection Moses declared he had, shall we?

4 The Rock, perfect is his activity, for all his ways are justice (Deuteronomy 32).

So no, he did not make a correspondence that was a few days out. The lives of Adam and of Jesus, the last Adam, correspond
perfectly, to the very day. Adam was born on 4027Tishri10 and he died 1264 BLC days later on 3993Nisan14 and Jesus was born on
2Tishri10 BC and he died 1264 BLC days later on 33Nisan14. There is a part of the pattern of wisdom and beauty that Satan has been
sealing up...

12 Son of man, lift up a dirge concerning the king of Tyre [Satan, the king of commercialism - rule by self interest], and you must
say to him, 'This is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah has said: You are sealing up a pattern, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
13 In Eden , the garden of God, you proved to be. Every precious stone was your covering, ruby, topaz and jasper; chrysolite, onyx
and jade; sapphire, turquoise and emerald; and of gold was the workmanship of your settings and your sockets in you. In the day of
your being created they were made ready.
14 You are the anointed cherub that is covering, and I have set you. On the holy mountain of God you proved to be. In the midst of
fiery stones you walked about.
15 You were faultless in your ways from the day of your being created until unrighteousness was found in you (Ezekiel 28).

Here it is diagrammatically...

Adam Born Adam Sins Jesus Born Jesus Pays for Sin World Ends Kingdom ends
4027Tishri10 3993Nisan14 2 Tishri10 BC 33 Nisan 14 2008Nisan14 3008Nisan
X__________X X___________X X__________X
33½ years 33½ years 1,000 years
X_______________________________________X
6,000 years

Sixth Witness - 2008Nisan14, The last day of this world, falls on the Vernal Equinox and Adam was born on
4027Tishri10, the Autumnal Equinox

25 Also, there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth anguish of nations, not knowing the way out because of the
roaring of the sea and [its] agitation (Luke 21).

2008Nisan14 is March 21st, 2008 which is the Vernal Equinox in that year. It is quite rare for the Passover to be co-incident with the
Vernal Equinox (when night and day are the same length as day overtakes night).
Now the BLC program that we have written does not go back before 1999BC, but if we use the metonic cycle (which
states that every 19 years the solar and lunar cycles coincide) and count back in say 380 year chunks (20 x 19 years)
from say 3800 years before Adam was born, i.e. 227Tishri10 BC, then one can see from the pattern of which Gregorian
days Tishri10 falls on in the Gregorian calendar that Adam was born on September 20th 4027 plus or minus 1 or 2 days.
But this period contained the autumnal equinox when the moon starts to dominate over the sun (normally on September
21st).

So Adam's birth on 4027Tishri10 was more than likely on the autumnal equinox around September 21, 4027, when the
moon begins to dominate the sun. Jesus is the sun, the light of the world, and Satan is the moon, the poor and dead
reflection of the sun. So at the birth of Adam, God declared in the heavens that the moon would start to dominate the sun,
the lesser luminary of Satan would start to dominate the greater luminary, the light of the world, Jesus Christ. But on the
last day of this system, things are reversed and the Sun begins to dominate the moon. Amen!

Seventh Witness – 1.1 Million Men Drawing Sword

We know that Solomon’s temple was inaugurated in 1026Tishri, at the festival of booths because...

38 And in the 11th year, in the lunar month of Bul [Heshvan], that is, the 8th month, the house was finished as regards all
its details and all its plan; so that he was 7 years at building it (1 Kings 6).

2 So all the men of Israel congregated themselves to King Solomon in the lunar month of Ethanim [Tishri] in the festival,
that is, the 7th month.
3 So all the older men of Israel came, and the priests began to carry the Ark.
4 And they came bringing up the ark of Jehovah and the tent of meeting and all the holy utensils that were in the tent; and
the priests and the Levites came bringing them up (1 Kings 8).

The first regnal year of Solomon was 1036, the 11th was 1026. The temple was fully functional in 1026Heshvan and
inaugurated the month before in 1026Tishri. Had it not been ready in the 7th month then it would have been inaugurated at
the Passover. But this did not occur so it must have been ready then.

Every temple is commissioned 22½ years before it is inaugurated, see U41. This is why Jesus was in the temple teaching
the Pharisees aged 11, 22½ years before he died and completed the temple worship system of the living stones of the
body of his wife, the 1NC saints. With a physical temple you need to get all the stones in place before you start
worshipping in it. With a spiritual temple, you start worshipping once you have a foundation cornerstone. The worship is
actually the construction of the temple! So Solomon was commission to build his physical temple in 1048Nisan, 22½ years
before 1026Tishri when it was inaugurated.

There is another really cute proof that David purchased Ornan's threshing floor and Solomon was commissioned to build
his temple in 1048Nisan and it is this.

10 Go, and you must speak to David , saying: This is what Jehovah has said: There are 3 things that I am directing
against you. Choose for yourself one of them, that I may do it to you.
11 Accordingly Gad went in to David and said to him: This is what Jehovah has said: Take your pick,
12 whether for 3 years there is to be a famine; or for 3 months there is to be a sweeping away from before your
adversaries and for the sword of your enemies to overtake [you], or for 3 days there is to be the sword of Jehovah, even
pestilence, in the land, with Jehovah's angel bringing ruin in all the territory of Israel.' And now see what I should reply to
the One sending me (1 Chronicles 21).

Three possible punishments all of which David and his sons actually suffered - see U40. Each penalty involves the
concept of 3 times, be they 3 days, 3 months or 3 years. This is the Holy Spirit getting cryptic with us. The whole thing is a
witness to 3 Prophetic Times, or 3 x 360 years, which is 1080 years. These years run from 1048Nisan, when David
purchased the threshing floor of Solomon's temple from Ornan to 33Nisan when Jesus purchased and laid the foundation
stone of the temple of the body of his wife, by dying sacrificially. We call this period of 1080 years the Temple Times .

The prelude to this purchase was David 's registration sin...

1 And Satan proceeded to stand up against Israel and to incite David to number Israel .
2 So David said to Joab and the chiefs of the people: Go, count Israel from Beer-sheba to Dan and bring it to me that I
may know their number.
3 But Joab said: May Jehovah add to his people a hundred times as many as they are. Do they not, O my lord the king, all
of them belong to my lord as servants? Why does my lord seek this? Why should he become a cause of guilt to Israel ?
4 The king's word, however, prevailed over Joab, so that Joab went out and walked through all Israel , after which he
came to Jerusalem.
5 Joab now gave the number of the registration of the people to David ; and all Israel amounted to 1,100,000 men drawing
sword, and Judah 470,000 men drawing sword (1 Chronicles 21:1-5).

Not a particularly accurate census by Joab who hated the whole enterprise. Please notice that there is a lot of drawing of
swords that goes on in this account:

16 When David raised his eyes, he got to see Jehovah’s angel standing between the earth and the heavens with his
drawn sword in his hand extended toward Jerusalem (1 Chronicles 21).

27 Moreover, Jehovah said the word to the angel, who accordingly returned his sword to its sheath (1 Chronicles 21).

Now Joseph has told us that 7 cows stand for 7 years. And he has told us that 3 baskets of bread stand for 3 days in the
case of inspired dreams. But is the whole bible not an inspired dream in the sense that inspired writing comes not only
from the conscious mind but also from the subconscious mind which God works upon to give the writing, since we are
certainly not conscious of how he inspires us? So a dream comes from our subconscious and so does inspired writing.

So here is another aspect of the bible code. Number of animals or number of things can stand for time periods. So what
about 1.1 million men drawing sword then? What time period might they represent in the greater meaning of 1 Chronicles
21. For whom are we having given Daniel 4 and Genesis 4 a greater meaning, to deny the same prophetic power to the
writings of Samuel?

Well in order for them to fit into the time span of this system of things they must be 1.1 million BLC days or 3055 years
200 days. They end when the passover angel himself, Michael, puts his sword back in his sheath at the end of
Armageddon, on 2008Heshvan6. We know that the battle of Armageddon lasts for 5 months from the greater meaning of
the account of the destruction of Sodom in Genesis 19, see U154.

They start 1.1 million days earlier which is 1049Shebat26 BC. But this is 50 days before 1048Nisan16 when the 3 day
plague ended and David purchased the threshing floor of Ornan. This was 22.5 years before Solomon’s temple was
inaugurated because all temples are commissioned 22.5 years before they are inaugurated. And Solomon’s was
inaugurated in 1026Tishri, see above. So Solomon was commissioned and the foundation was purchased on
1048Nisan16. 50 days is a reasonable period for Joab to return to Jerusalem, David to start feeling bad, and eventually
pray to God for forgiveness, then God to come and tell him about his penalty choices, then the 3 day plague to occur. But
we can actually confirm this 50 day period using the Numerical Principle again in the parallel account of this registration,
plague and temple site purchase in 2 Samuel 24:

22 But Ornan said to David : Let my lord the king take it and offer up what is good in his eyes. See the cattle for the burnt
offering and the threshing sledge and the implements of the cattle for the wood.
23 Everything Ornan, Oh king, does give to the king. And Ornan went on to say to the king: May Jehovah your God show
pleasure in you.
24 However, the king said to Ornan: No, but without fail I shall buy it from you for a price; and I shall not offer up to
Jehovah my God burnt sacrifices without cost. Accordingly David bought the threshing floor and the cattle for 50 silver
shekels (2 Samuel 24).

Whereas in the 1 Chronicles 21 account we read:

24 However, King David said to Ornan: No, but without fail I shall make the purchase for the money in full, because I shall
not carry what is yours to Jehovah to offer up burnt sacrifices without cost.
25 So David gave Ornan for the place gold shekels to the weight of 600 (1 Chronicles 21).

These two accounts look contradictory at first sight. But they aren’t. The 600 gold shekels represent the price for the real
estate, ‘the place’. The 50 silver shekels represents the price for the threshing floor equipment (all wood) and the cattle, all
of which was used for the first sacrifice of cattle burnt over wood, by David which halted the plague:

26 Then David built there an altar to Jehovah and offered up burnt sacrifices and communion sacrifices, and he
proceeded to call upon Jehovah, who now answered him with fire from the heavens upon the altar of burnt offering.
27 Moreover, Jehovah said the word to the angel, who accordingly returned his sword to its sheath (1 Chronicles 21).

If you go into a florist's shop and say: How much for the whole shop? They will take it that you wish to purchase all of their
stock, not the shop. This is the distinction being made between the 50 shekels of silver and the 600 shekels of gold.
Now 50 shekels of silver was the cost of pacifying the true God by this sacrifice. But the period during which God was
upset, started the moment that Joab handed the result of the registration to David (this being when he had actually
completed the registration - he could have stopped it before then) and ended with the fire from the heavens. Now we
apply the ideas of Joseph to the 50 shekels, and take them as a day for a shekel, i.e. God was upset for 50 days. So our
date for Joab’s finishing of the registration, 1049Shebat26, 50 days before 1048Nisan16, which we calculated by
subtracting 1,100,000 days from 2008Elul16, the last day of Armageddon, is confirmed as being correct.

That's what we call symbolism! The 470,000 men of Judah , are 470,000 days or 1305 years 200 days. They count
backwards to 2354Elul26 BC when the first separation between good and bad 16 years after the flood occurred, incited of
course by Satan, as was the registration. The bible describes how Ham, or his son Canaan , looked upon his father
Noah’s nakedness and told his brothers. Whereas Shem and Japheth covered their father’s nakedness by walking in
backwards with a mantle into the tent where the naked intoxicated Noah lay without looking. Ham did not honor his father.
The other two sons did (Genesis 9). The final separation is 470,000 plus 1,100,000 days later. So in the symbolic
meaning, the greater registration is of the time period of God’s people after the flood, from when the first distinction
between the true and the false seed is made in Noah’s tent, and the fight begins and the swords are unsheathed until the
last distinction at Armageddon in the greater Noah’s ark when the fight ends and the sword of the passover angel Michael
himself, is sheathed.

So here it is, the only history book with no dates. There is of course no such thing, so the dates must be coded. Many can
be decoded using Joseph's interpretation. Here is a pictorial summary of the above:

2354Elul26 1048Nissan16 2008Heshvan6

Ham dishonors Noah Joab completes Census Last day of Armageddon
Satan's seed appears 470,000 of Judah end Satan's seed disappears
Swords are drawn 1,100,000 of Israel start Swords sheathed
X___________________X____________________________X
470,000 days 1,100,000 days

So we can use 1 Chronicles 21 to deduce that Armageddon ends 1,100,000 BLC days after Joab completed his
Census!!!!

Eighth Witness – The 10 Prophetic Times of Pharos Times

Moses died on 1474Adar1 and was born on 1593Adar1, see U31. Shortly after Moses was born Pharaoh ordered that all
newborn sons should be drowned:

22 Finally Pharaoh commanded all his people, saying: Every newborn son you are to throw into the river Nile , but every
daughter you are to preserve alive (Exodus 1).

This command was from Satan as can be seen more directly from Revelation 2, where he does it again!

15 And the serpent disgorged water like a river from its mouth after the woman, to cause her to be drowned by the river.
16 But the earth came to the woman's help, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed up the river that the dragon
disgorged from its mouth (Revelation 2).

We then read that:

2 And the woman became pregnant and brought a son to birth. When she saw how good-looking he was, she kept him
concealed for 3 lunar months.
3 When she was no longer able to conceal him, she then took for him an ark of papyrus and coated it with bitumen and
pitch and put the child in it and put it among the reeds by the bank of the river Nile (Exodus 2).

So this period of concealment must have started after the midwives were ordered to kill the baby boys. And it must have
ended after the people were commanded to drown them. We know that Moses was born in 1594Adar, so the period
ended in 1593Sivan. So the command to drown baby boys occurred between 1594Adar and 1593Sivan.

The beautiful story, the triumph of love and compassion over callous self interest (which is the whole deal in human terms)
then continues, with Pharaoh's daughter rescuing the child, who is described by Stephen as 'Divinely beautiful':
19 This one used statecraft against our race and wrongfully forced the fathers to expose their infants, that they might not
be preserved alive.
20 In that particular time Moses was born, and he was divinely beautiful. And he was nursed three months in [his] father's
home.
21 But when he was exposed, the daughter of Pharaoh picked him up and brought him up as her own son (Acts 7).
Then we read in Exodus that Pharaoh's daughter said to Moses' mother:

9 Pharaoh's daughter then said to her: Take this child with you and nurse him for me, and I myself shall give you your
wages. Accordingly the woman took the child and nursed him (Exodus 2).

We now apply what we call the 'No Coincidences Principle' of the bible code, to this seemingly irrelevant financial
transaction. We discover that all of the previous occurrences of the word 'wages', and there are 9 in the bible previous to
Exodus 2, are in the account of Jacob's battles with Laban for his flock and his wives (Genesis 29,30,31). Two of these
states:

7 And your father has trifled with me and he has changed my wages 10 times, but God has not allowed him to do me
harm (Genesis 31).

41 This makes 20 years for me in your house. I have served you 14 years for your 2 daughters and 6 years for your flock,
and you kept changing my wages 10 times (Genesis 31).

Now we again ask the question, if Daniel 4 and if Genesis 4 and if 1 Chronicles 21 have greater meanings, then why
cannot Genesis 31 have a greater meaning too? And if the phrase 7 Times means 2520 years in these greater meanings,
would not the phrase 10 Times mean 3600 years in the greater meaning? We actually call this the 'Times Principle' of the
Bible Code. It is not hard to see that Jacob prefigures Jesus, God's shepherd, in Genesis 29-3, and Laban prefigures
Satan, the ruler of this world:

31 Now there is a judging of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out (John 12).
30 I shall not speak much with you anymore, for the ruler of the world is coming. And he has no hold on me (John 14).

So in the greater meaning, Satan is interfering with God's people, changing Jesus' wages. Well obviously this interference
stops at the end of the world. So when did it start? Well the first bible account of any member or members of Physical
Jacob's seed, which by covenant became the true physical seed of Abraham, to be killed by an outsider, is the drowning
of the baby boys in the Nile . The boys were the seed. God himself killed 'Er', Judah 's firstborn:

7 But Er, Judah 's firstborn, proved to be bad in the eyes of Jehovah; hence Jehovah put him to death (Genesis 38).

This account is written as if the true God just kills guys who are bad. Nothing could be further from the truth. Satan is still
alive is he not? Cain was not put to death as a result of his murder was he?

There is no son of Jacob recorded as being killed by any outsider until the command of Pharaoh. So we now interpret
these 10 Prophetic Times as 3,600 years during which Satan's seed are killing Abraham's true seed. This period starts
between 1594Adar and 1593Sivan and ends at Armageddon. So Armageddon must be between 2007Adar and
2008Sivan.

These are the 10 Times of Pharaoh's Times. In fact we know that the last member of Abraham's true seed to be killed by
Satan dies on 2008Nisan14, since Satan himself loses all authority to rule or to kill on that day. So from this we can tell
that the first baby boy to drown in the Nile , died in 1593Nisan.

But look! 3,600 years after Satan started killing God's people, Abraham's seed, in Egypt , in 1593Nisan, Michael, the
passover angel, will kill all of Satan's people, his seed, at Armageddon after 2008Nisan.

Ninth Witness – The Chronology of the UN Beast of Revelation 13 & 17.

1 And I saw a wild-beast ascending out of the sea, with 10 horns and 7 heads, and upon its horns 10 diadems, but upon
its heads blasphemous names
2 Now the wild-beast that I saw was like a leopard, but its feet were as those of a bear, and its mouth was as a lion's
mouth. And the dragon gave to [the beast] its power and its throne and great authority.
3 And I saw one of its heads as though slaughtered to death, but its death-stroke got healed, and all the earth followed the
wild-beast with admiration (Revelation 13).
1990 November 29, 1990Chislev8, UN Security Council Resolution 678 Authorizes all member states to use: All
necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 and subsequent resolutions to restore international peace and
security in the area of Kuwait .

1991 January 17, 1990Tebbeth27, Allied air attack begins

1991 February 24th, 1990Adar5, Ground attack begins

1991 February 28th, 1990Adar9, Cease fire takes effect

1991 March 2, 1990Adar11, Massive motor vehicle retreat from Kuwait city, 600 vehicles incinerated

1991 March 2, 1990Adar11, UN Security Council Resolution 686: Relating to the suspension of combat operations and
the importance of Iraq taking measures to end definitively the hostilities.

1991 March 3, 1990Adar12, Iraqi general’s surrender to Schwarzkopf. Saddam not present

1991 April 3, 1991Nisan18, UN Security Council Resolution 687 Relating to the Restoration of Sovereignty,
independence and territorial integrity to Kuwait and the return of its legitimate government, and to the status of sanctions.

2002 July 1, 2002Tammuz18, The ICC is established, giving the UN power over military personnel of every nation of the
earth whilst these troops are operating in a nation which has signed up to it (The US and Israel have not yet). But their
troops are subject to it, if they are operating in a nation which has signed up to it.

2002 July 1/2, 2002Tammuz19, The first regnal day of the UN, through the UNICC. Its first day of judicial authority over
all the world's militaries. The US accepted its authority, but negotiated an exemption for a year. The law maker behind the
UNICC is the UN. Kings make laws. So the UN became the world's military king through the UNICC on 2002July1.

2002 July 12, 2002Tammuz30, US backs down. They agree to the jurisdiction of the ICC effective in one year’s time
unless the UN Security Council votes against it. Of course the UN Security Council can always vote against it at any time.
Security Council Resolution SC7540.

2003 Tuesday March 18th, 2002Veadar9, GW Bush gives Saddam a 48 hour ultimatum. No UN authority for such an
ultimatum. This is the beginning of the sword stroke to the second head, the second year of headship, of the UN Beast.

2003 Thursday March 20th, 2002Veadar11, the War on Iraq starts. The sword stroke (unauthorized war on Iraq ) is
delivered to the UN Beast by the two horned UK/US beast.

2003 May 22, 2003Iyyar19, UNSC resolution 1483 legitimizing the coalition as the occupying power in Iraq . The US/UK
by asking for and by accepting the UN authorization, has now accepted the UN as their authorizer, and so have given
their authority to the UN. Also the second head of the UN (which runs from 2002Elul to 2003Elul) has now recovered from
the sword stroke.

17 years of the UN Beast

1991Elul1 year start 2001Elul1 year start Death stroke to 2nd head UN Beast destroyed
1st power year of UN 1st regnal year of UN GWB warns Iraq Last day of Armageddon
Gulf war won UNICC inaugurated No UN authority Everyone left melted by lava
1990March3 2002July1 2003March18 2008October9
1989Adar12 2002Tammuz18 2002Veadar9 2008Heshvan6
X________________X_________________X______________________X
10 years of power 7 years of headship

The UN Beast got its head put back on by virtue of UN Security Council Resolution 1483 of May 22nd 2003. this
resolution legitimized the coalition as the occupying power in Iraq .

So 10 horns are 10 years of military power over the governments of the world and 7 heads are 7 years of military
headship over the governments of the world. And at the end of the 7th year of military headship, the UN is destroyed at
the end of Armageddon. So the First Gulf War, the UNICC, the unauthorized US/UK ultimatum to Saddam and UNSC
resolution 1483 are all historical points on this timeline which confirm that end date as being 2008Heshvan.
Tenth Witness – The Chronology of the Image of the Beast of Revelation 13.

14 It tells those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast that had the sword stroke and yet revived
(Revelation 13).

This image is simply a reduction in size by a factor of 12. In other words we take years in the Beast as months in the
image of the Beast.

2005 July7/8, 2005Tammuz29. The G8, Gleneagles summit. The World Leaders agree to form an Image of the UN called
the UNPBC, but does not publicize it yet. The image of the beast is born in fulfillment of Revelation 13:14 but spirit is not
yet given to it by the US/UK beast. The temporal image of the UN, reduced in size by a factor of 12, lives for 17 months
until 2006Chislev29. Then the UNGA, the 4th incarnation of the UN Beast rules for 616 days of Revelation 13
(oxyrhynchus papyrus), until 2008Elul15 when the last of God's people are raptured. Then 50 days later all is destroyed.

2005 September 13, 2005Tishri6. The 60th Session of the UNGA begins. The creation of the UNPBC is announced in the
World Summit Draft Outcome Document. The US/UK beast breathes spirit into the UNPBC, the image of the beast (and a
clone of the UNSC) in fulfillment of Revelation 13:15. The UN is now saying through the existence of the UNSC and its
clone the UNPBC: Peace and Security!! This is fulfillment of 1 Thessalonians 5:3.

2006 May 27/28, 2006Iyyar29. UN10, the UNPBC, takes headship of the UN for the 7 months of its 7 heads. The 2
horned beast, the UK/US coalition ceases to exercise all of its authority.

2006 July 12, 2006Tammuz14. Israel invades Lebanon without UN mandate. The UN loses its world military headship.
The second head of the image of the beast of Revelation 13 gets a death stroke.

2006 August 11, 2006Ab15. Friday evening, the UNSC passes resolution 1701 calling for an immediate ceasefire
between Israel and Lebanon . This is the UNSC re-asserting its headship over Israel . The death stroke gets healed. The
second head of the image of the beast runs from 2006Sivan29 to 2006Tammuz29 and the third head runs from
2006Tammuz29 to 2006Ab29. So the UN had to get its military headship back before 2006Ab29.

2006 December 23/24, 2006Chislev29. UN10 gives its kingdom to the UNGA, the beast. This is the 4th and last
incarnation of the UN. It rules for the 616 days of Revelation 13 (not 666 days), from 2006Chislev29 until 2008Elul15,
when the rapture occurs. However 666 days after 2006Chislev29 is 2008Heshvan6 when Armageddon ends!

17 months of the Image of the of the UN Beast (12x smaller)

UNPBC conceived UNBPC takes UN headship Death stroke to 2nd head 10 kings give kingdom
G8 Summit Gleneagles US Bush/Blair summit Israel invades Lebanon etc UNGA takes over from UNPBC
2005July7/8 2006 May27/28 July 12, 2006 2006December23/24
2005Tammuz29 2006Iyyar29 2006Tammuz14/15 2006Chislev29
X__________________X______________________X_______________________X
10 months of power 7 months of headship

The Image of the Beast got its head put back on by virtue of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 of August 11th 2006.
This resolution called for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon .

Again the historical events at Gleneagles and the unauthorized UN invasion of Lebanon and the ceasefire resolution 1701
all confirm this chronology which has the image of the beast handing over headship of the UN to the General Assembly
(the Beast itself) on 2006Chislev29. Then the UNGA has power for the 616 days of Revelation 13...

16 And it puts under compulsion all persons, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free and the slaves, that they
[those who dwell on the earth] should give these a mark upon the hand of them, the right or upon their forehead,
17 and that nobody might be able to buy or sell except a person having the mark, the name of the wild-beast [the mark is the name
of the Beast, the UN Logo, used by UN affiliated NGOs] or the number of its name [Individual UN ID number].
18 Here is the wisdom: The [one] having intelligence let him calculate the number of the wild-beast, for it is a man's number; and its
number is 616 [For 616 days it exists as sole authority over mankind, this is the number of days of undisputed sovereignty of
the UNGA, the 4th incarnation of the LON/UN Beast. The Beast becomes its own rider, hence it's number is a man's number,
the man being the 3rd horseman of the apocalypse. So 616 is the number of days during which the UN Beast, which is the 3rd
horse of the apocalypse, is also the 3rd horseman of the apocalypse.] (Revelation 13).
The 616 days end on 2008Elul16, when the rapture occurs, the day that the UN is destroyed as a governing body.

Although most bibles show that the number of the beast is 666, it actually calculates to 616. We had calculated this using the cryptic
counting method of the code and thought we had made a mistake until we ran across this evidence (second link) a couple of years
later. Now we are pretty confident in our counting methods! We actually have a segment in our research website that demonstrates
the Catholic Churches reasons for hiding this. The incredible thing though is that even the number 666 has meaning in that even
though the UNGA has power for 616 days, the end of the world and the complete destruction of ungodly men is 50 days after that
being 666 days total!

Eleventh Witness – The Generation of the Signs of the Times Shall Not Pass Away Before the End

Here is Jesus' description of the Sign of his presence and of the conclusion of the system of things...

3 While he was sitting upon the Mount of Olives , the disciples approached him privately, saying: Tell us, When will these things be,
and what will be the sign of your presence and of the conclusion of the system of things?
4 And in answer Jesus said to them: Look out that nobody misleads you;
5 for many will come on the basis of my name, saying, 'I am the Christ,' and will mislead many.
6 you are going to hear of wars and reports of wars; see that you are not terrified. For these things must take place, but the end is not
yet.
7 For nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be food shortages and earthquakes in one place after
another.
8 All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress.
9 Then people will deliver you up to tribulation and will kill you, and you will be objects of hatred by all the nations on account of my
name.
10 Then, also, many will be stumbled and will betray one another and will hate one another.
11 And many false prophets will arise and mislead many;
12 and because of the increasing of lawlessness the love of the greater number will cool off.
13 But he that has endured to the end is the one that will be saved.
14 And this good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then the end will
come.

15 Therefore, when you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation, as spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in
a holy place, let the reader use discernment,
16 then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains.
17 Let the man on the housetop not come down to take the goods out of his house;
18 and let the man in the field not return to the house to pick up his outer garment.
19 Woe to the pregnant women and those suckling a baby in those days!
20 Keep praying that your flight may not occur in wintertime, nor on the sabbath day;
21 for then there will be great tribulation such as has not occurred since the world's beginning until now, no, nor will occur again.
22 In fact, unless those days were cut short, no flesh would be saved; but on account of the chosen ones those days will be cut short.
23 Then if anyone says to you, 'Look! Here is the Christ,' or, 'There!' do not believe it.
24 For false Christ’s and false prophets will arise and will give great signs and wonders so as to mislead, if possible, even the chosen
ones.
25 Look! I have forewarned you.
26 Therefore, if people say to you, 'Look! He is in the wilderness,' do not go out; 'Look! He is in the inner chambers,' do not believe it.
27 For just as the lightning comes out of eastern parts and shines over to western parts, so the presence of the Son of man will be.
28 Wherever the carcass is, there the eagles will be gathered together.
29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall
from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken.
30 And then the sign of the Son of man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will beat themselves in lamentation,
and they will see the Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he will send forth his angels with a great trumpet sound, and they will gather his chosen ones together from the 4 winds, from
one extremity of the heavens to their other extremity.
32 Now learn from the fig tree as an illustration this point: Just as soon as its young branch grows tender and it puts forth leaves, you
know that summer is near.
33 Likewise also you, when you see all these things, know that he is near at the doors.
34 Truly I say to you that this generation will by no means pass away until all these things occur. (Matthew 24 - New World
Translation)
Matthew 24:1-25:46 and Mark 13:1-37 and Luke 21:5-38 are parallel accounts of the same events. The disciples asked Jesus 4 things.

1. When will the physical temple fall down

2. What is the sign of your presence (first or second)
3. What is the sign of the end of everything (Matthew)
4. What is the sign of the end of the Jewish system (Mark and Luke)

Matthew asks 1,2 and 3. Mark asks 1 and 4. Luke asks 1 and 4. But since these are parallel literal accounts of the same events, all 4
questions were asked of Jesus and the answer given by Jesus was in fact all three answers, which apply to all 4 questions. But the end
of the Jewish system of things physically caused by Titus in 70 CE lies in the first presence, and the end of the world, caused by
corrupt politicians, lies at the end of the second presence. So really Jesus is being asked: What sign (singular) is the sign of your first
presence which contains the end of the Jewish system, and is also the sign of your second presence which ends with Armageddon.

All three answers in Matthew, Mark and Luke, apply to the first presence containing the end of the Mosaic system and to the second
presence which ends on the last day of this world and is followed by Armageddon which is the total conclusion of this age.

So not only will there be earthquakes and physical famines at the end of the world (of which we are already seeing in increasing
numbers), but Jerusalem, the city in Israel on the West Bank, will be surrounded by encamped armies, and when it is, the inhabitants
thereof with faith in God (be they Arab, Jew, Christian or Muslim) are advised to flee to the mountains yet again.

Now Jesus said in answer that: 'this generation will by no means pass away until all these things occur'. He was literally referring to a
generation alive at the time he told them about these signs. This generation survived until the end of the Jewish system of things, and
they survived until John received the Revelation. They actually survived until the end of the first presence which was in 123Tishri, see
I45. So they survived for 90½ years after Jesus gave the sign in 33Nisan.

Now the equivalent of this period in the second presence would start 1918Nisan, which is the antitype of Jesus resurrection, being the
first resurrection of the 1NC saints, the anointed remnant in the second presence - see U42. It would end at the end of the second
presence in 2008Nisan, see I45. This is a period of 90 years.

So we can argue that the phrase 'this generation will by no means pass away until all these things occur' applies also to the generation
who see Jesus' second presence through the signs of the times. So 'this generation' would just be those who see the sign in each
presence. With this interpretation, the signs of the times in the second presence really began with the First World War in 1914. So
there must be a person who was old enough to understand that WW1 was a part of the signs of the times who is still alive at the end of
presence which is the start of Armageddon. Such a person would surely have to be at least 10 years old in 1914 in order to have the
necessary spiritual comprehension of what is quite a hard piece of scripture. One could well argue that he should be more like 14. So
for argument's sake let’s consider both ages. Then he would be either 104 years old or 108 years old in 2008. Well the oldest living
man is presently around 110 and the oldest living woman in presently 112 years old. So really we do not have a lot of room left to
maneuver in! Really Armageddon must come before 2012 at which time our 10 year old would be 108 and our 14 year old would be
112! So that would be really pushing it. It is apparent that 2008 is a more realistic date for us to still have a reasonable fragment of the
Generation who saw and understood all of WW1 to be a part of the signs of the time still with us at the end!

Footnote on Times

There are two other very interesting verses in Leviticus 26, which probably confused Franz:
24 I, yes I, shall then have to walk in opposition to you, and I even I shall strike you seven times for your sins (Leviticus
26)
28 I shall then have to walk in heated opposition to you and I, yes I, shall have to chastise you 7 times for your sins
(Leviticus 26).
So here we have the phrase 7 times appearing in this account not multiplicatively as in verses 18 and 21, but just as 7
times, in a form similar to the form it takes in Daniel 4. So now we have two chapters in the bible where the phrase 7 times
has to do with 2520 years. This was enough for Gordon and Tony to ask the following question...
If 7 times means 2520 years in Daniel 4, and if 7 times also means 2520 years in Leviticus 26, then does it mean 2520
years in some other chapters of the bible?
This then leads to the more general question...
Does the phrase 3 times or 5 times or 7 times or indeed any other number of times, mean 1260 years or 1800 years or
2520 years or that number of 360 year units all over the bible?
The answer was yes. This lead to our charging through the scriptures and substituting 360 years for the word ‘times’
everywhere. We found the Prophetic Times periods:
 Period Time Start Finish Effect Bible /
s [TBC
Section]
Exedenic 7x 3993Nisan16 1473Nisan15 Promised Land Genesis 4
Times Malediction [133]
Evicted from Eden Jews ate food in
Promised Land
Alienation 7x 2488Sivan, God gets 33Sivan6 Priesthood Leviticus 4
Times upset with men, tells Pentecost Malediction, no [129]
Noah to build the ark sealing in Holy
Spirit.
Gentile Times 7x 607Tishri, first 1914Tishri, Jesus Kingship Daniel 4,
agricultural year of no becomes vassal king Malediction Leviticus
vassal king of God of God over sons of 26
1AC [120,121,1
23]
New Covenant 5x 95Tishri, first 1895Tishri, second No 1NC baptism John 5
Times presence 1NC presence 1NC [191]
baptism ends baptism starts
Temple Times 3x 1048Nisan16, 33Nisan16, temple of The first fixed 1
Solomon Jesus ’ body is built. Physical temple Chronicles
commissioned to build until the first fixed 21 [40]
temple spiritual temple.
Pharaoh’s 10x 1593Nisan, Pharaoh 2008Nisan16, The first Abraham’s seed Genesis 31
(Deadly) Times orders God’s baby day of the Kingdom of killed by their [31]
sons into the Nile God on earth, Jesus enemies.
orders Satan’s
children into the fire
Lamech’s 11x 3928Nisan, Cain, the 33Nisan14, Satan, the The first human- Genesis 4
Times first born of Adam kills firstborn of God kills human murder until Matthew 18
Abel, the second born Michael (the second the first angel-angel (77x
of Adam born who became the murder. Satan compared
firstborn) killing Michael. to 7x) [133]

The Kingdom of God and Armageddon

If this system is the grade school then the next system is college. All Christians know that the kingdom of God is coming
for we pray as follows...

Our father who art in heaven

Hallowed be thy name
Thy Kingdom come....

This kingdom is just as real as the united kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or the kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Just because it has not yet begun on earth does not mean that it will never begin on earth. The past does not restrict the
future. Ask any financial speculator! Every boom has a bust and every system ends and is replaced with another system -
ask any politician or historian! The Romans had an empire once, and so did Britain!

Armageddon is the war at the end of this system and the beginning of the kingdom of God. It is not hard to see just from
the direction of world events that Armageddon is almost upon us. Paul describes the last days as follows...

1 But know this, that in the last days critical times hard to deal with will be here.
2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, self-assuming, haughty, blasphemers, disobedient to parents,
unthankful, disloyal,
3 having no natural affection, not open to any agreement, slanderers, without self-control, fierce, without love of
goodness,
4 betrayers, headstrong, puffed up [with pride], lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God,
5 having a form of godly devotion but proving false to its power; and from these turn away (2 Timothy 3).
Several of the hideous behavioral traits that Paul describes above have become prevalent in the last 30 years. Children
are more disobedient to parents that they ever were. This is not the fault of parents or of children, so much as it is the fault
of governments who have destroyed the power of the family head, the man, whilst representing that they are promoting
family values. They hand over the children to the wife or the state whenever there is a contest. This decapitates every
family head and renders the husband obsolete. This in turn destroys the family leadership and we end up with family
discipline which is worse than that in an inner city school classroom.

Never before have people been less grateful than they are today. In England when you stop in a car to let someone cross
a road, they do not even look at you to acknowledge your kindness. In fact most of them just walk straight out in front of
you deliberately looking in the other direction and expect you to accept that their time and their journey by foot are so
much more important than your time and your journey by car. This did not happen 20 years ago. It happens today in
London due to awful political motivated transport policies which have relegated the car driver to a mass murdering polluter
who has no rights at all and does not deserve any respect, and is very lucky if he is not killed by a bus which is so large
that the bus driver would not even know if he had hit the car.

No New Yorker will need to be told how things have moved in the direction that Paul foretold 1950 years ago. So we are
for a fact in the last days.

Now the grand finale of the last days occurs when man's technology finally gets the better of his morality and we wipe
ourselves out. This is how the bible describes that time...

3 For you know this first, that in the last days there will come ridiculers with their ridicule, proceeding according to their
own desires
4 and saying: Where is this promised presence of his? Why, from the day our forefathers fell asleep [in death], all things
are continuing exactly as from creation's beginning.
5 For, according to their wish, this fact escapes their notice, that there were heavens from of old and an earth standing
compactly out of water and in the midst of water by the word of God;
6 and by those [means] the world of that time suffered destruction when it was deluged with water.
7 But by the same word the heavens and the earth that are now are stored up for fire and are being reserved to the day of
judgment and of destruction of the ungodly men.
8 However, let this one fact not be escaping your notice, beloved ones, that one day is with the Lord as 1,000 years and
1,000 years as one day (2 Peter 3).

The day of judgment, is in fact the 1,000 year long kingdom of God. During this period all those with faith are resurrected
and then they live according to a set of laws which actually prevents a society from destroying itself. For, in the final
analysis, that is all that Christianity is. It is the minimum set of laws which prevent a society of free willed beings from
destroying ourselves. If those in the Kingdom of God break these laws enough times and sufficiently gravely to become a
danger to society, they will go to hell and join those who had no faith (in most cases).

It is not hard to see that this fire that destroys us this time round, it is not entirely nuclear fire however. This is where Al
Gore's film comes in!!

The account of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is well known to be archetypical for the destruction of the world at
Armageddon. The key phrase in the account from this standpoint is...

24 Then Jehovah made it rain sulphur and fire from Jehovah, from the heavens, upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah
(Genesis 19).

The Hebrew nouns translated as: Fire, Sulphur and Heavens; only appear once in the account. The bible code tells us
from this that they only take one meaning in both the literal thread and the symbolic thread of that account. So
Armageddon real fire and real sulphur from God rain down at Armageddon. In fact it is a deluge just like the flood of Noah
of which we read...

11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the 17th day of the month, on this day all the springs
of
the vast watery deep were broken open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened (Genesis 7).

So waters came from both above and below during the flood of Noah. And similarly fiery lava comes from above and
below during Armageddon. But this is not just a question of God getting angry and throwing a very destructive fireworks
party. For Peter relates the deluge with water to the deluge with fire, and explains the modus operandi of God in the
process...
5 For, according to their wish, this fact escapes their notice, that there were heavens from of old and an earth standing
compactly out of water and in the midst of water by the word of God;
6 and by those [means] the world of that time suffered destruction when it was deluged with water.
7 But by the same word the heavens and the earth that are now are stored up for fire and are being reserved to the day of
judgment and of destruction of the ungodly men (2 Peter 3).

The earth is stored up for fire in this sense. It has an abuse limit. If we abuse it too much, by burning fossil fuels in huge
quantities and by firing nuclear bombs at various parts of it, then it will eventually vomit us out. Armageddon is when the
planet refuses to take any more abuse from us. And God designed it that way. But it is entirely our fault. At the end, there
is a huge volcanic eruption that covers the whole planet with lava in much the same way that the flood covered it with
water. Presumably all the seas evaporate and then re-condense and come down later after every living thing has been
fried. Peter goes on to say...

12 awaiting and keeping close in mind the presence of the day of Jehovah, through which [the] heavens being on fire will
be dissolved and [the] elements being intensely hot will melt!
13 But there are new heavens and a new earth that we are awaiting according to his promise, and in these righteousness
is to dwell (2 Peter 3).

The melting of the crust of the earth is the baptism of the planet with fire. It evicts us and all life and then cools and
reforms itself ready for the Kingdom of God. So Global warming and nuclear bombs are the two largest enemies of
mankind today.

We do not as a race have the moral maturity to handle nuclear bombs. Gorbachov was right. We should get rid of them
all. In fact if we had any moral maturity that is what we would have done already. Mutually assured destruction is just that.
And it comes at Armageddon. There are many ways to see physically that Armageddon is not far off. One of them is to
consider all of the organs of state in the world and to realize that like the British home office that recently let 1,000 illegal
immigrant criminals go free, and them mistakenly gave a whole bunch of them passports, they are all corrupt. And when
every organ in a body has cancer what is the prognosis for that person? Well that is the state of our national and local
governments. They are all riddled with corruption at every level and the physical disease cancer teaches us that unless
that corruption is quickly dealt with, and cut out or blasted with radiation or chemotherapy, it spreads everywhere. And
once it has spread everywhere, the patient is finished.

Likewise consider Global warming. If our bodies are heated up by 3 degrees centigrade we die. Recently, and
unsurprisingly, a scientific study showed that if the environment is heated up by 3 decrees it will no longer be able to
support human life. This is because the one was designed for the other. We have already heated up the planet by around
1 decree centigrade. So the planet is sick, it has a temperature. And global warming is ever advancing. So to cut a long
story short, there are several human behavioral patterns which are competing with one another to be the one that
destroys us. It is just a question of which one will do it first. From our new understanding of Genesis 19, the one triggers
the other.

Now those of you who believe in God must also believe in Satan. Satan is a free willed angel who chose the path of hard
hearted power seeking selfishness. He is rather like many of today's politicians. You know the type. They are the sort of
people who would send thousands of people to their deaths in order to get another 24 hours of political power for
themselves.

Satan is the ultimate control freak. He knows the date when he is to lose the power over this planet that he presently
enjoys. For he is the king of the world, subject to some rules set by God. We can see this from the conversation he had
with Jesus when he tempted him...

8 Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their
glory,
9 and he said to him: All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.
10 Then Jesus said to him: Go away, Satan! For it is written, 'It is the Lord your God you must worship, and it is to him
alone you must render sacred service (Matthew 4).

Jesus, did not say, who are you kidding Satan? You do not control any kingdom of the world. He accepted that Satan
controlled them but refused to worship him in order to get them. If Satan did not control them then Jesus would have
known it and this would not have been any sort of test. I mean if Meat Loaf offered Jesus all the kingdoms of the world,
this would not be a test of Jesus, since Meat Loaf does not have any of these kingdoms. Elvis on the other hand might
have been different.
So Satan holds all the kingdoms of the world in the palm of his hand and he controls them from this unusually high
mountain. Now which mountain is high enough to see all the kingdoms of the world from? Everest? Nope. There is no
physical mountain that high. So Matthew is talking symbolically here. In bible symbolism a mountain stands for an
administration, in that it towers over the land, which stands for the people under that administration. So Satan took Jesus
up to his heavenly mission control, from which he can see everything going on down here. Now in the days of Jesus that
would have been considered a technologically impossible miracle but today with CIA spy satellites which can read a
newspaper from orbit, we have some idea of what capabilities Satan's heavenly control centre might have.

Now Satan knows that a day is set when he will lose his kingship over mankind. And being the ultimate control freak he is
very upset about this, notwithstanding the complete mess he has made of mankind and this planet under his kingship. So
just as Saddam Hussein, one of his very promising understudies, torched Kuwait when the coalition took it away from him.
So Satan will torch the planet at Armageddon when his kingship over us is ended. He will do this by inciting us to nuke
each other. Jesus will save everyone with faith before we do that, by coming down here as a human with his apostles and
all the other saints of the first new covenant, and sorting out the sheep from the goats and then rapturing the sheep into
heaven as angels. We shall then watch our brothers in Adam down here destroying themselves and we shall see Satan
manipulating them into doing that from heaven.

Now many churches understand that since the 1,000 year kingdom of God is a sabbath over which Jesus is Lord, which is
the 7th of 7 equally long 'days', then there must be a 6,000 year long working week that precedes it, a working week of six
1,000 year long days. This 6,000 year week is the period during which Satan is our king. And he works us like slaves to
sin. But we are freed by Jesus on the 7th day. Now Satan took over as king when Adam sinned, and Adam sinned when
he was 33½ years old, and was evicted from God's garden into Satan's world. He was the precise same age as Jesus
was when he paid from that sin on good Friday 33 CE. For Jesus was 33½ years old when he died. Now if you add up all
the ages of the patriarchs in Genesis very carefully and if you accurately calculate the chronology of the Kings of Israel
and Judah, you can work out that Adam was born in the Hebrew month of 4027Tishri BC (August/September). So he
sinned 33½ years later on 3993Nisan BC. In fact he sinned on 3993Nisan14 BC, the same day in the Hebrew Calendar
that Jesus died. Jesus died on 33Nisan14, Friday April 1st 33 AD. The bible is written in a Hebrew lunar calendar which
we call the Biblical Lunar Calendar

Now if we add 6,000 years to 3993Nisan14, then we end up on 2008Nisan14 (March 21st 2008). And that is the last day
of this world. The Kingdom of God begins on the 3rd day inclusively thereafter i.e. 2008Nisan16 (2008 March 23rd), and
then Armageddon lasts 150 days and is over by 2008Elul15 (August 19/20). Jesus comes down on 2008Iyyar29 (May5/6)
to sort out the sheep from the goats, and the faithful are raptured on 2008Tammuz1 (June 6/7).

Nuclear Bombs and Birth Pangs

At Armageddon, those with faith are saved physically and enter into the kingdom of God as humans with indefinitely long
living bodies, perfect human bodies if you will, perfect versions of their present bodies. For God did not fail with Adam, he
just suffered a 6,000 year blip in the inexorable progress of his program to bring mankind to loving perfection. And those
without faith die physically and go to hell for up to 1,000 years. Armageddon is the all out nuclear holocaust that mutually
assured destruction assures will happen. But each nuclear bomb prior to Armageddon is a mini Armageddon for those
within its reach. And just as God will save the faithful himself, through Jesus at Armageddon. So he will save the faithful
from each nuclear bomb that goes off prior to Armageddon through the holy spirit and through warnings such as this. Of
course the holy spirit can just incite anyone it wants to leave New York City for all sorts of reasons on September 8/9.

But God likes mankind to do as much as he can to help him achieve his goals. God is not a control freak, he is a love
freak. He is happy for us to do as much as we can do to help each other. He will give us as much of his action as we can
take. So this understanding is why we are appealing to those with faith to leave NYC on Oct 5th/6th. For just as God will
save the faithful at Armageddon, so too will he save them from every nuclear bomb prior to Armageddon. No nuclear
bomb will go off without his true church knowing when and where so that the faithful can have a chance to act on their
faith and be saved. We deduce this from the fractal modus operandi of God and the philosophy of Armageddon and from
the symbolic meaning of the pillar of cloud and fire which protected the Israelites as they left Egypt, and which never left
them but was always in front of them leading them and protecting them. The greater meaning of this pillar of cloud and fire
is foreknowledge of nuclear bombs, the modern day pillars of cloud and fire. We also deduce it from our symbolic
interpretation of 1 Kings 18.

Now each nuclear bomb is an unimaginable physical tragedy for those affected by it. The pain and suffering caused will
be just too much to bear from a physical perspective. But that is the whole point. You need to take a spiritual perspective
to these events. God does not cause any of these nuclear attacks. He does permit them, but it is Satan manipulating
mankind towards self annihilation, who causes them to occur through terrorists. But God uses Satan's wickedness to
teach us. That is actually what this whole system is about. The only way to come to terms with the colossal tragedies that
await us in the near future is to realize that this world is a construct. It is a nursery school. When you die you do not
disappear forever, you merely go to the next school or to a rather long detention. The nuclear bombs will shake people's
faith in this construct and direct them to God if they seek good, and to wickedness and revenge if they seek bad.

Each bomb will be a birth of more true Christians into the true Christian church and a spiritual awakening for many more
people, for as a race we are blinded by status and power and fame and celebrity and we pursue these things, which are a
fake currency and a vacuous goal, a worthless prize. They are an Oscar statuette which sits in a cupboard gathering dust
for 50 years and then goes into the garbage. The real currency is righteousness, a knowledge of how to behave in such a
way as to not be a threat to yourself or anyone else. A person's net worth is his grasp of righteousness, and love is the
motivation to be righteous, and righteousness is the soil is which love grows, so really love and righteousness are a horse
and carriage respectively. They are the horse and carriage that will get us through the rest of our everlasting lives. This
world is dead already, it is finished, it is terminally ill. Most people can see this but refuse to accept it since they have
young children etc, and have almost everything they consider to be real invested in the status quo. But if you lost money
in the dot com bust that is nothing compared to what you will lose if you do not take your investment out of this corrupt
world. Look what happened to Lot's wife in the archetypical destruction of Sodom by fire...

26 And his wife began to look around from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt (Genesis 19).

She was too focused on the everyday trivialities of life. She could not stay focused on the big picture, which was that
Sodom was toast and she needed to move on to the next system. She was still thinking about the curtain material for her
master bedroom. Jesus therefore said these haunting words which apply today...

32 Remember the wife of lot (Luke 17).

Incidentally Lot's wife stands symbolically for the saints in the congregation of the last true Christian church, and Lot is the
administration of that church (the saints in authority in the LWs), the head of his wife. She become a pillar of salt,
someone still supporting the church (pillar) but without the ability to water baptize anyone new (dehydrated). Lot's firstborn
daughter is those water baptized non saints in the LWs, who are raptured, for she is the firstborn rapture covenant. Lot's
second born daughter is those with faith who never joined the LWs, who are raptured, for she is the second born rapture
covenant. Zoar is therefore the heavenly kingdom over the sons of the 1AC between the start of the Kingdom of God on
2008Nisan16 and the rapture on 2008Tammuz1. The LWs must lose their ability to water baptize new people when the
1AC ends on 2008Nisan14, since one cannot be a covenant son of Isaac (the mediator of the ICC, the system covenant
for water baptism), without being a covenant son of Abraham (the mediator of the 1AC, the system covenant for faith - see
I29). But all those in the church on that day will have finished their water baptism test, and so they personally have a
completed water baptism. Technically they are sealed in the flesh and sons of the CRC - see I28 if you like covenants.
The Kingdom of Zoar only lasts for 75 days, a very small but totally crucial part of the 1,000 year kingdom of God - hence
we read of the water baptism...

10 So Lot raised his eyes and saw the whole District of the Jordan, that all of it was a well-watered region before Jehovah
brought Sodom and Gomorrah to ruin, like the garden of Jehovah, like the land of Egypt [the world] as far as Zoar
(Genesis 13).

And we read of the temporal size of Zoar...

20 Please, now, this city is nearby to flee there and it is a small thing. May I, please, escape there - is it not a small thing?
And my soul will live on.
21 So he said to him: Here I do show you consideration to this extent also, by my not overthrowing the city of which you
have spoken.
22 Hurry! Escape there, because I am not able to do a thing until your arriving there! That is why he called the name of
the city Zoar (Genesis 19).

We all enter into the kingdom of God on earth on 2008Nisan16, but the faithful then come under the care of the heavenly
administration of Zoar, and the wicked do not. Then Jesus comes down physically collects the faithful, the sons of Zoar,
and raptures them via the two rapture covenants (one for the last church and the other for the faithful ones who never
joined it). The 2NC saints do not need a rapture covenant, they already have associated angelic bodies. The 1NC saints
die in their sleep on 2008Nisan14 in the antitype of Jesus' death for the scripture says...

23 The sun had gone forth over the land when Lot arrived at Zoar (Genesis 19).

And the Sun, the light of the world represents Jesus, present through his wife, the 1NC saints on earth.
So we must remember not to be like Lot's wife who was behind Lot when she was turned into a pillar of salt, she loses her
water baptism before she got to Zoar on 2008Nisan14. We must not be like her. We must focus on the beauty of the baby
being born, not on the pain of the birth pangs. For each bomb is a momentous disaster of biblical proportions physically
but God through foreknowledge and warning turns them into a salvation physically for those with faith and an awakening
spiritually for those with insight. They therefore are birth pangs for the true church and for the Kingdom of God, hence
Jesus says...

7 For nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be food shortages and earthquakes in
one
place after another.
8 All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress (Matthew 24)

For every physical disaster that rocks the boat of this world, drives more people into the lifeboats.

Eighth Lesson - The End of Satan's Greatest Deception - The Trinity

Jesus often referred to his true church as his "little flock". Now it doesn't take a genius to understand what the term "little"
means.

32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom. (LK 12)

He also made it clear that the world would not know his disciples.

1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore
the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. (1Jn 3)

Jesus also tells us that whomever He reveals it will come to know the Father and the Son.

22 All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father
is, but the Son, and [he] to whom the Son will reveal [him]. (Lk 10)

So I must ask you, the reader a couple of questions.

Do you belong to a church that holds fast to a common doctrine that has nearly 2 billion adherents to it?

Do you belong to a large incorporated church that is known to the world (i.e. registered as an NGO with the UN)?

If you answered yes to either of these you must now realize that you are not part of Jesus' 'little flock" nor one of His
disciples.

Can you honestly say the you have come to know the Father and the Son?

As with all bible research, it is imperative that you release yourself from all of the stumbling blocks that have been set
before you. You must open your heart and your mind and examine all scriptures in order to come to the real truth as was
made known from the beginning.

A Pure Heart

8 Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God (Matthew 5).
The pure in heart do not see God physically, because no man can see God and yet live. They see him with their minds,
for he is one short step of reason away. But what does it mean to have a pure heart? Well every man has impure
thoughts, immoral thoughts, and hateful thoughts. And every man utters impure words, immoral words and hateful words.
James tells us:
2 If anyone does not stumble in word, this one is a perfect man (James 3).
And there are no perfect men amongst the sons of Adam. So plainly a pure heart does not mean that we only think sinless
thoughts. No, a pure heart is one that can divorce the truth from any preconceived personal consequences to our status
that the truth may have. It is simply a true academic heart, an honest heart. If you are willing to admit you may be wrong
about something even if it means losing your job or your status or even your own humility, you have a pure heart.
But any damage to your status will come not from your knowledge of the truth, but from your actions based on that
knowledge. The truth is made to appear damaging by Satan, but of course it is not damaging, it is healing. Have the
courage and the confidence that after seeing what we have to offer you, that you can still refuse to act on it if you like. You
can be spiritually healed and yet not physically act on the truth if you like.
32 Know the truth and the truth will set you free (John 8).
It is no secret that most people would rather believe a convenient lie than an inconvenient truth. Mostly because is is just
plain easier. Confrontation is something we all like to avoid. But this can be a dangerous habit and will become more so
as apathy grows within the masses. But that is not the issue here. The question we have to ask is why, why do we do
this?
Well, the fact of the matter is, God deliberately built us in that way, and appeared to us behind a thin wall of reason, in
order that only those who wish to believe in him would actually believe. Our penchant to accept convenient lies is how
God tests our faith. For if we love God, then we will punch through the deception and accept a truth, however
inconvenient Satan makes that truth appear. No barrier will prevent us from returning home. This is the test that many
have failed for Isaiah has said:
10 Upon you men Jehovah has poured a spirit of deep sleep. And he closes your eyes, the prophets, and he has covered
even your heads, the visionaries.
11 And for you men the vision of everything becomes like the words of the book that has been sealed up (Isaiah 29).
So it is up to each and every one of us to seek Him out by the "sweat of our own brow" and with "our whole heart".

The Death of the Trinity

The Origin of Doctrine

There was a fantastic episode of Star Trek Next Generation (Season 6, Episode 11, Chain of command II), where Captain
Jean Luc Picard was captured by the Cardassians and tortured for information by Gul Madred. The procedure that the
Cardassians employed was very simple. They shone 4 lights at him and asked him: How many lights do you see? He
said: Four. Gul Madred falsely represented that there were 5. The aliens would then give him pain and torture every time
Picard said that there were 4 lights, and then ask him the question again. To cut a long story short he never broke and
continued to represent throughout the entire process that there were precisely four lights. When he was rescued by his
ship mates they all congratulated him on his unbreakable will power and strength and told him what a great captain he
was, and what a wonderful example to the crew he had set. But Jean Luc confided to one of the crew just how much he
desperately wanted to convince himself that there were 5 lamps. He said that he was minutes away from cracking and
agreeing that 4 was 5. Of course once he agrees to that, he has lost his objectivity and it is game over. You can get
anything you want from him. The plot is an adaptation of George Orwell's 1984 where O'Brien tortures Winston by holding
up 4 fingers in front of his face and then insisting that there are 5.

The Trinity Doctrine that began with the Catholic church and spread to many other churches is just that process. The
trinity is the abolition of the number 2. The victim is asked to accept that 1 is 3 and 3 is 1. The Catholic Encyclopedia, the
trinity section of which can be found at: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15047a.htm defines the trinity as follows:

The Trinity is the term employed to signify the central doctrine of the Christian religion -- the truth that in the unity of the
Godhead there are Three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, these Three Persons being truly distinct one
from another. Thus, in the words of the Athanasian Creed:

"The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God."

In this Trinity of Persons the Son is begotten of the Father by an eternal generation, and the Holy Spirit proceeds by an
eternal procession from the Father and the Son. Yet, notwithstanding this difference as to origin, the Persons are co-
eternal and co-equal: all alike are uncreated and omnipotent. This, the Church teaches, is the revelation regarding God's
nature which Jesus Christ, the Son of God, came upon earth to deliver to the world: and which she proposes to man as
the foundation of her whole dogmatic system.
This is illogically defined and therefore not defined and therefore non existent. For any reader trained in Pure Mathematics
that is the end of the matter, there is no Trinity. But for the sake of the less logically experienced among us, please read
on. There are 3 inconsistencies in the definition:

1. That God is three independent beings who are one being, so that 3 is 1 and 1 is 3.
2. Jesus is God and the father is God. So the Father is the Son
3. The Son is uncreated

1 It is not possible for three oranges to be one orange.

It is not possible for a Father to be a Son, this contradicts the definitions of both father and son. The son is defined as
2
an offspring of a father not an 'onspring' as it were.
3 Sons are by definition created by their fathers, a son cannot be uncreated.

Basically the Trinity is defined as a number that is both less than two and more than two. Obviously there is no such
number. The Trinity is like a hotel in North London which is situated South of the Thames. Obviously there is no such
hotel. But when the poor uneducated, logically uninitiated, spiritually naive, churchgoer complains, saying: How can this
be? He is told by his priest: Aha! that is the mystery of God. God can put a hotel which is in North London in a South
London postcode. God can make a number that is larger than 2 actually be less than 2. At which point the poor naive
churchgoer gives up and says to himself. Wow! I will never understand God, I had better leave the understanding of him
to my priest. I can never have a relationship with a God like that, whom I simply cannot understand. I had better have a
relationship with the priest instead. This is of course precisely the effect that the priest wants. Now he can continue to play
God to his congregation. So the churchgoer becomes an idolater of his priest rather than a worshipper of God. It is not
possible to have a relationship with a person who cannot be known. So the churchgoer is prohibited by the trinity doctrine
from having a relationship with his dad.

The Hook

The trinity is therefore a con-mans "Hook". If the victim is prepared to believe that one is three and that a father is his own
son and that a son is uncreated, then he is prepared to believe anything at all and so he is fully "hooked" or brainwashed.
Once he is in this condition, his logic is removed, his objectivity has gone, he is mentally defenseless, so he or his family
can be pumped for money, sex, status, worship, whatever the priest wants.

So by making the trinity doctrine the central doctrine of the Roman Catholic faith, that church was auto selecting
brainwashed people. The control freak only wants brainwashed people. He cannot permit free thinkers to enter the
congregation, they might see through his little game and liberate his brainwashed victims. It is a pleasure to be able to
reveal the truth behind this despicable mind game that the Roman Catholic Church has relied on for 1700 years.

Now before hitting your with the "Trinity Busters" I would like to show you a very important piece to the proof of the Trinity
Doctrine that the Catholic Church uses.

II. PROOF OF DOCTRINE FROM SCRIPTURE

A. New Testament

The evidence from the Gospels culminates in the baptismal commission of Matthew 28:20. It is manifest from the
narratives of the Evangelists that Christ only made the great truth known to the Twelve step by step. First He taught them
to recognize in Himself the Eternal Son of God. When His ministry was drawing to a close, He promised that the Father
would send another Divine Person, the Holy Spirit, in His place. Finally after His resurrection, He revealed the doctrine in
explicit terms, bidding them go and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Ghost" (Matthew 28:18). The force of this passage is decisive. That "the Father" and "the Son" are distinct Persons
follows from the terms themselves, which are mutually exclusive. The mention of the Holy Spirit in the same series, the
names being connected one with the other by the conjunctions "and ... and" is evidence that we have here a Third Person
co-ordinate with the Father and the Son, and excludes altogether the supposition that the Apostles understood the Holy
Spirit not as a distinct Person, but as God viewed in His action on creatures. The phrase "in the name" (eis to onoma)
affirms alike the Godhead of the Persons and their unity of nature.

So the Catholic 'proof' relies on Matthew 28:19 meaning: baptizing them in the name of... But it does not mean this. What
we find very distasteful is that the Catholics even quote the Greek scripture: (eis to onoma) yet still mistranslate it as "in
the name", when it clearly says "into the name". So please beloved reader, pick up a Greek Dictionary, ask your favorite
Greek Scholar. Keep on seeking and ye shall find. A Shorter Greek Lexicon by Liddell and Scott is the famous one, but
the Analytical Lexicon of the New Testament by William Mounce is better for New Testament Greek in our opinion. You
will find that 'eis', meaning 'into' takes the accusative case and 'en' meaning 'in' takes the dative case and 'onoma' is in the
accusative case. That really is the end of the trinity, not that it even had a beginning because it is defined in such a way as
to be non-existent. You will see how inane this whole concept is as you progress through these pages. You will also note
that there is absolutely no mention of the trinity throughout the entire bible except the italicized sections that have been
added to the scriptures by those who espouse it!

This is Catholic theobabble dreamt up in support of the trinity doctrine. A doctrine which condemns mankind to be ignorant
idolaters of a non existent contrivance of crafty theologians, who have succeeded in playing God with the vast majority of
'Christians' for 1,700 years, by using this cunning diversion.

This deception has profound implications regarding the truth about baptism that can be research here after you finish this
section (Baptism)

Just for fun, we list a number of scriptures that prove that Jesus was not God and that the Holy spirit was not Jesus and
not God...

Top Trinity Busters

Buster 1

32 For example, whoever speaks a word against the Son of man, it will be forgiven him, but whoever speaks against the
holy spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, not in this system of things nor in that to come (Matthew 12).

So the holy spirit and the Son are not co-equal and are different beings.

Buster 2

15 He said to them: You, though, who do you say I am?

16 In answer Simon Peter said: You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.
17 In response Jesus said to him: Happy you are, Simon, son of Jonah, because flesh and blood did not reveal [it] to you,
but my Father who is in the heavens did (Matthew 16).

So God revealed it not Jesus, so they are two different spirits.

Buster 3

23 He said to them: You will indeed drink my cup, but this sitting down at my right hand and at my left is not mine to give,
but it belongs to those for whom it has been prepared by my Father (Matthew 20).

So God and Jesus have separate possessions.

Buster 4

18 Jesus said to him: Why do you call me good? Nobody is good, except one, God (Mark 10).

19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none [is] good, save one, [that is], God. (Lk18)

17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? [there is] none good but one, [that is], God: but if thou wilt enter into
life, keep the commandments. (Mt 19)

So Jesus did not teach people that he was God. If Jesus had been telling people that he was God, he would have
complimented the man for recognizing this fact. Instead, Jesus rebuked him, denying he was good, that is, Jesus denied
he was God. In fact he made it clear in this verse:

19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what
he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. (Jo 5)
So the son cannot do anything of himself...do you really think YHWH would be restricted to this????

So God is good and Jesus is not, so they are different people with different characters and different levels of
righteousness.

Buster 5

God as we know is the creator of all things, is all knowing, all powerful and not held by time or space. However Jesus is
not as explained in these scriptures:

52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man. (Lk 2)

8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; (He 5)

28 Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am [he], and [that] I do
nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things. (Jo 8)

So Jesus had to learn obedience and wisdom and be taught by his Father demonstrating that he had limited knowledge,
however God's knowledge was infinite and all-encompassing as we learned in Mark:

32 But of that day and [that] hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the
Father. (Mk 13)

36 Concerning that day and hour nobody knows, neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father
(Matthew 24).

So God knows things that Jesus does not know. So they have no 'unity of Godhead'.

Buster 6

1 Do not let your hearts be troubled. Exercise faith in God. Exercise faith also in me (John 14).

Two different beings to put your faith in.

Buster 7

28 You heard that I said to you, I am going away and I am coming [back] to you. If you loved me, you would rejoice that I
am going my way to the Father, because the Father is greater than I am (John 14).

So it is plainly obvious by Jesus' proclamation the two of them are not co-equal. If you say they are equal then you bear
false witness to Jesus' statement.

Buster 8

42 saying: Father, if you wish, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, let not my will, but yours take place (Luke 22).

So God and Jesus have two different wills. So there is no 'unity of Godhead'. In fact if it were not for Jesus' own will or
volition to make a vow to sacrifice for our sins, none of this would have taken place!

Buster 9

41 Therefore they took the stone away. Now Jesus raised his eyes heavenward and said: Father, I thank you that you
have heard me.
42 True, I knew that you always hear me; but on account of the crowd standing around I spoke, in order that they might
believe that you sent me forth (John 11).

It is further exemplified by this scripture:

3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. (Jo 17)
So when Jesus spoke to God while on the earth (sent forth), God himself remained entirely in heaven.

Buster 10

9 You must pray, then, this way: Our Father in the heavens, let your name be sanctified (Matthew 6).

Jesus himself was entirely on earth and God was entirely in heaven when he said this!

Buster 11

46 About the 9th hour Jesus called out with a loud voice, saying: Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is, My God, my God, why
have you forsaken me? (Matthew 27).

One cannot easily forsake oneself can one! The Father was God of the son. The son was not God of the father. This was
one of Sir Isaac Newton's anti trinity arguments.

Buster 12

1Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.
2And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward and hungered.
3 and when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.
4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the
mouth of God.
5 Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,
6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge
concerning thee: and in [their] hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.
7 Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the
glory of them;
9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
10 Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only
shalt thou serve.

Now it is painfully obvious that Satan did not temp Jehovah here as he knows full well he cannot do that. He was
tempting the Christ in an effort to retain his position as the firstborn son of God. The only way Satan could do this is to get
Jesus to either tempt God, or to worship Satan directly.

Buster 13

14 That thou keep [this] commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ:
15 Which in His times He shall shew, [who is] the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;
16 Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can
see: to whom [be] honor and power everlasting. Amen. (1 Tim)

Now if you truly have an honest heart you would be able to understand that if our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus is the one
who will show us the blessed and only Potentate, the King of Kings, etc...whom no man hath seen (duh) that Jesus cannot
possibly be Jehovah God as the Trinitarians would have you believe! Think about it....no man hath seen him, nor can see
him! Many have see the Christ! In fact even Moses had the Word of God transmitted to him by angels. He did not
actually see God.

Buster 14 - OK, Maybe were going farther that we need to but the next few will put an end to the insanity!

27 For [God] subjected all things under his feet. But when he says that 'all things have been subjected,' it is evident that it
is with the exception of the one who subjected all things to him.
28 But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who
subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone (1 Corinthians 15).

All I can say is that if you cannot understand this one, please, go into a private room, get on your knees, raise your open
palms up to the sky and ask God in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus to forgive you and to bestow His undeserved
kindness upon you so that you may see with your eyes and hear with your ears and get the sense of it! Stop blindly
following the traditions of men and seek the truth in scriptures.
Buster 15

9 I will not execute the fierceness of mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim: for I [am] God, and not man; the Holy
One in the midst of thee: and I will not enter into the city. (Hos 11)

So YHWH is not man and will not enter into the city (the church). However the bible refers to Jesus as man many times
and he does enter many cities:

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham do.
(John 8)

22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders
and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know: (Acts 2)

31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by [that] man whom he hath
ordained; [whereof] he hath given assurance unto all [men], in that he hath raised him from the dead. (Acts 17)

5 For [there is] one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (1 Tim)

So God is clearly not a man, but Jesus was a man, therefore, Jesus was not God.

Buster 16

The bible also says that God is NOT a Son of Man:

19 God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do
[it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? (Num 23)

However Jesus is referred to as the "Son of man" in numerous scriptures:

40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three
nights in the heart of the earth. (Mt 12)

27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according
to his works. (Mt 16)

10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,) (Mk 2)

27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. (Jo 27)

God would not confuse the issue as Satan has through the Roman Catholic church and the tragedy at the council of
nicaea. Numerous scriptures in Ezekiel make reference to humans who are "son of man" specifically in an effort to make
a distinction between God and "son of man".

Buster 17

When Jesus was in a weekend state he called upon his Father for help.

22 And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him. (Lk 22)

13 And he was there in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan; and was with the wild beasts; and the angels
ministered unto him. (Mk 1)

So again, we know that Jesus is not God for YHWH is all powerful and certainly does not need to be strengthened by the
angels He created! How hard can this be people!!!!
Buster 18

Let's take this argument to the fullest for a moment shall we. Are we not told that the testimony of two is true.

17 It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is true. (Jo 8)

If that is the case how would you explain this?

18 I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father that sent me beareth witness of me. (Jo 8)

If Jesus was God, He would have not have belabored the point to regard God's testimony as separate from his own. If
they were one and the same, then Jesus would be a liar by this statement and we know that can not be!!!!!

Buster 19

Jesus tells us that powers were given to him:

18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. (Mt 28)

God certainly needed no one to give power unto Him! If Jesus was God, just who was it that gave power unto him???
And as an added witness....

18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].
(Jn 1)

12 No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us. (1Jn 4)

So Jesus is not God because he can be seen. In fact just the statement that Jesus is the only one to have seen the Father
tells us that He is not the Father.

Buster 20

If it is true that Jesus and God are the same person, then Jesus talked to himself in public, and prayed to himself in
private and so was in fact a schizophrenic. This is plainly false and an insult both to God and to his Son. Don't make this
mistake!

Now let's look at one of the most important scriptures of the bible. This is the one that verifies the fact that Jesus does
become a God to be worshipped just as His Father. This does not make Him part of a triune being in fact it proves that
Jesus' very nature has changed due to His unconditional love and sacrifice for us.

Where The Confusion Comes In - Jesus is a God

I believe it’s important first and foremost to find agreement on some things before we can continue with this section so
without further ado….

We probably can agree that there are two kinds of beings. There are those who are mortal, and those who are immortal.
But this needs to be clarified a bit by asking what do these mean and how are they different?

Mortal is defined as: Liable or subject to death

Immortal is defined as: Not subject to death (everlasting?)

So now that we know the difference we must go the next step and that is to ask what this means to us in biblical terms.

If we are mortal and subject to death it means that our life is provided to us by another source. In other words we do not
possess life for ourselves and are subject to death by the hand of He who that holds that life.
If we are immortal and not subject to death it means that our life belongs to us and that we possess it for ourselves, we
are not subject to death by another hand and therefore cannot die or be killed.

As it was explained to me once, if you were a diamond and an outside light source shined upon you, you would be able to
reflect that light back to others in a brilliant and significant way. In fact, it would appear that the light is actually emanating
from you but in reality, if you take the outside light source away, you fade and become “darkness” again.

The same analogy can be used to describe those of us who have the light of Christ shining upon us. We are able to
reflect that light as long as it continues to shine upon us. However, if His light is removed, we have none of our own to
emit anymore and are then thrust back into “darkness”. So we do not possess it for ourselves.

Both of these describe the fundamental elements of what mortal man is.

An immortal man on the other hand would actually possess the original light source or "life force" in him so it could not
simply be removed by an outside source. This is sometimes described as a “divine nature” however, this term is used a bit
too loosely for our purposes.

The source of all life and divinity is Jehovah Himself. He is the great fountain of life from which all springs are provided
and therefore must possess a quality that transcends immortality (life). This is the quality that Jesus possessed and
demonstrated for us while here in our midst and that quality is best described in our limited intelligence as “Love”. It is
this quality that allowed Him to “overcome” and sit at the “right hand of the Father” and to receive immortality as I will soon
demonstrate to you.

So now that we understand the difference between mortal and immortal we have to understand the natures of being.

Neither angels nor man were ever created immortal as is evidenced by numerous scriptures. Although Adam was
originally created in a perfect body (in Jehovah’s image), he was only able to continue living this way if he were to follow
Jehovah’s commandments by eating only of the trees that would sustain life in this way.

However, when Adam ate of the forbidden fruit, dying, he died. So he did not possess life of his own but the life he was
given by another (Jehovah).

Consequently the angles are only able to sustain the life they are given by following Jehovah’s commandments as they do
not possess immortality either as we are told in Timothy:

14 That thou keep [this] commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ:

15 Which in his times he shall shew, [who is] the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;

16 Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can
see: to whom [be] honor and power everlasting. Amen. (1 Tim 6)

So the scriptures plainly state that only Jehovah has immortality (in biblical terms). No other being therefore possessed
their own life.

In fact the reason they are waiting for Jesus to "shew the king of Kings and Lord of Lords" (Jehovah) to the rest of us is
because no one has seen Him before this future date as He is in an “unapproachable light”. (His own light - His own life)

So it goes without saying that while Jesus was here, He was still mortal and subject to death (as evidenced by what
happened to Him). I say still, because even before He was made a “little lower than angels”, Christ was mortal and had
everlasting life only as long as He obeyed Jehovah’s commandments.

It was not until He ascended to the Father and accomplished what He had vowed to do that He was given this
immortality! The next few scriptures will plainly explain that so pay close attention to them!!

2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made
the worlds;
3 Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his
power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.

5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to
him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

Just the fact that He will become these things proves He wasn't always this way!

6 And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.

25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God:
and they that hear shall live.

26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;

27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. (Jo 5)

So Jehovah God (Yahweh Elohim) So “the Father” gave “the Son” (Christ Jesus) life in himself! In other words, Christ
now possesses immortality just as His Father!

This would not have happened had He not “overcome” by His unconditional love for us and His sacrifice. This is why
Thomas said “my Lord and my God” to Jesus when He came to visit them after the resurrection. It was only after that
Jesus was “crowned” with this glory and received the name that was higher than any other enabling Him to become a true
God to be worshipped.

Stumbling Blocks

9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me
hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou [then], Shew us the Father?

In other words Jesus is the exact image of the Father in every way. It is His Character that personifies the Father to His
disciples.

10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself:
but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

He is not saying He is the Father, only that He is IN the Father and the Father is IN him, just as those IN Christ have the
Christ IN them. It is repeated for your benefit...

11 Believe me that I [am] in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.

It is telling us in no uncertain terms that those who are resurrected in the body of Christ, the 1st New Covenant Saints, will
also have life in them just as He does! They too will be higher than the angels because they followed after the Jesus!

12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater [works] than
these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. (Jn 14)

So Jesus qualified the verses above with verse 12 to confirm to you that He is not the Father by saying "I go unto my
Father."

Are you starting to get the point? I do not know how much more evidence you need to remove the scales from your eyes
but I will certainly not give up trying to convince you through scriptures. This is why we now have two Gods to be
worshipped! This is why Jesus is mistaken for Jehovah by those who are still in darkness. They are not the same “being”
anymore than Jesus and His wife (the Saints) are the same “being”. Yes, they are one in the body, but Jesus is still the
head. Just as Jehovah is the head of Jesus and all:

1Cor 15:27
For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under [him, it is] manifest that he is excepted,
which did put all things under him.

1Cor 15:28

And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things
under him, that God may be all in all.

So Jehovah is still head of all things including Jesus, however everything else is subjected to His Son now!!!!!! He has
pretty much taken over the Fathers business! This however does not make him equal to the Father like Satan tried to
elevate himself to be, as they are all still in subjugation to the Father!!!!

One more thing, the KJV version of the scripture in Philippians 2:6 reads:

6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: (Phil 2)

This is a far cry from the true meaning of this text as it reads:



Who in [the] form [of] God, began not [this is a primary word of an absolute negative] seizing to go before [or] to be equal
to God.

The following NIW translation is closer to how it should read:

6 who, although he was existing in God's form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to
God. (Phil 2)

Unlike Satan who did make such a mistake!

This next one has also stumbled many because of how it is translated. The King James version shown here is a possible
use of the grammar however it is not correct.

AV Ac 20:28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you
overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.

It would have you believe that it was God's blood that was poured out, but this is not the case. The Concordant Literal
version has it as it should read: “thru the blood of His own.” as it is rendered in the original Greek text. The scripture
means His own Son. If you are still puzzled at this, please have a look at a further witness and clarification in Revelation
1:5-6.

AV Re 1:5 And from Jesus Christ, [who is] the faithful witness, [and] the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the
kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,

AV Re 1:6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him [be] glory and dominion for ever and
ever. Amen.

So it is plain that it was the blood of His Son, not His own as the KJV falsely depicts. God did not die for your sins, His
Son, Christ Jesus did.

More Deception

I leave you with these fundamental points to ponder with regard to the KJ scriptures:

7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. (1 Jo
5)

Do not be deceived! The original scriptures actually say:

7 seeing that three there are that are testifying, (1 Jo 5)

So the rest is a fraudulent addition by those who would perpetuate the trinity doctrine...woe to them who did it!

Even though we are all part of the body of Christ who is part of the body of YHWH in spirit. It does not make us an equal
part of Him. The doctrine of the trinity is one of Satan’s greatest accomplishments as it has stifled/stumbled nearly 2
billion people effortlessly. In fact saying "there are three that bear witness" in itself proves that they are not one but three.
They are one in the body yes, but not equal by any means.

If you as a Christian do not shake the trinity concept from your bowels, you may be one of those who John warned us
about.

22 who is the liar, if not he who is denying, saying that "Jesus is not the Christ"? This one is the antichrist, who is
disowning the Father and the Son. (1 Jo 2)

3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of
antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. (1 Jo 4)

7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver
and an antichrist. (2 Jo 1)

We are being warned over and over that if you continue to believe that Jehovah came in the flesh (whom no man has
seen and cannot die), that you are an antichrist for John is plainly informing us it was the Christ who came in the flesh.
This brings to mind one other fraudulent interpretation of the scriptures:

16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of
angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. (1 Ti 3)

The underlined word God was fraudulently inserted (translated) by those same people from the Greek which means
who. How you get God out of who is beyond me!

Very few know these truths to be evident mostly due to their lack of personal effort to seek these matters out, however the
"great deception" was designed to stifle such activities by the congregation. Those who made these fraudulent
translations would rather play God to their congregations. In other words, they are unbelievers who pose as believers in
order to deceive even the very elect. However they will not go unpunished!

52 Woe to you who are learned in the law! for you take away the key of knowledge--you yourselves do not enter, and
those who are entering you prevent." (Lk 11)

Jesus was speaking unto the Pharisees and scribes who are perpetuating this lie. It is saying that they will not get into the
Kingdom, and are preventing the members of their congregation from entering too. As I close this section on the trinity
doctrine I again leave you with a couple of final thoughts.....

Who Is The True Church

22 All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father
is, but the Son, and [he] to whom the Son will reveal [him]. (Lk 10)

So the distinction being made here is clearly a very special one. The truth is only revealed to those who are chosen as
vessels unto Him. Do you really think that the Son revealed this important fact to over a billion Catholics residing in a
church that is considered the mother of all harlots? Me thinks not! The fact that you are learning of these things means
that you may be one of these chosen vessels!

And remember, It is not the church with the greatest numbers that Jesus keeps referring to. It is the one that earnestly
seeks the Word of God for the truth

32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom. (LK 12)
1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the
world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. (1 Jn 3)

So if you belong to one of those mega-congregations who are part of the corporate "world", ask yourself this,

"Does the world knoweth you?" If the world does know you, then you are not a son of God but a son of the world, a son of
Babylon.

It just may be that you have found the 4th and last faithful slave, discrete and wise. The true church of Christ.

The Truth About Jesus - And The Kingdom of God

Alright, then who is Jesus….who is the Christ?? What was His sacrifice really about? Well, we only need to focus on the
scriptures to find the answer to that question!

In the beginning the Word was and the Word was with God and the Word was [a] God. This one was in the beginning with
God.

For those of you that have a problem with the interpretation [a] before God, our reasoning is simple; this passage contains an example
of a noun without an article as explained earlier. Here is another example:

Grammatically, there are three possible ways to interpret in this verse:

definite
"And the word was God" - the translation found in most traditional Bibles.
indefinite
"And the word was a god"
qualitative
"And the word was divine"

Since Greek grammar permits each of these meanings, the whole premise of how it is interpreted is usually based on a
belief system (church doctrine). If you do not understand the relationship between God and His Son, you will probably find
it easier to remove the [a] and continue happily on your way. The problem with this approach is that it causes
interpretational problems with a multitude of other scriptures as you will see. These are paramount to understanding what
the bible is trying to tell us. In fact to blindly follow system based interpretations of Greek or Hebrew text will limit our
ability to harmonize them with other scriptures. Continuing:

All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence. What has come
into existence by means of him was life, and the life was the light of men (John 1:1,4).

If only we could understand just these four verses of the bible completely, then we could begin to say that we are
approaching the spiritual comprehension of the apostle John. For even though prophets in general do not understand
what they are saying, We believe that John did in these verses (and we may of course be wrong).

We have tried and failed many times before with this one. But now, we think we have it right thanks to Gordon and his
efforts, the Holy Spirit for guidance and of course God for His loving kindness and mercy, for none of this would be
available without His help! The first scriptures to consider are these:

27 For [God] subjected all things under his feet. But when he says that 'all things have been subjected,' it is evident that it
is with the exception of the one who subjected all things to him.
28 But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who
subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone (1 Corinthians 15).

4 What is mortal man that you keep him in mind, And the son of earthling man that you take care of him?
5 You also proceeded to make him a little less than godlike ones, And with glory and splendor you then crowned him.
6 You make him dominate over the works of your hands. Everything you have put under his feet (Psalm 8).

From these two it is apparent that the global phrases 'everything', or 'all things', need to be taken in context. The reader
must remember that Hebrew has no word for 'except'. So that if everyone in a city celebrated except the Chelsea
supporters, then the bible would say: And everyone in the city celebrated. But those in the city who supported Chelsea did
not celebrate. In other words one has to qualify the phrase 'everyone' with the surrounding context.

Returning now to John 1:1; it is apparent for example that God did not come into existence through the Word. OK, now we
make the big connection which Gordon had been struggling with for 9 years, ever since he tried to persuade a Rabbi that
he was no longer one of God's chosen people with an argument similar to the one below. This is a great example of Gods
modus operandi!

Adam's firstborn son Cain lost his birthright to Seth, a son born much later.

Noah's firstborn son Ham lost his birthright to Shem (proved later in the section)

Abraham's firstborn son Ishmael lost his birthright to the second born Isaac

Isaac's firstborn son Esau lost his birthright (for a bowl of soup) to the second born Jacob

Jacob's firstborn son Reuben, lost his birthright (due to his taking his father's concubine) to the 11th born Joseph

Joseph's firstborn son Manasseh lost his birthright to the second born Ephraim.

So to cut a long story short, every major patriarch in the bible had a firstborn son who lost his birthright to a more
deserving later born son. So what does all of this mean in the greatest fulfillment??

Well, did God not say: Israel is my son, my firstborn (Exodus 4:22)?

But Israel was not originally the firstborn of Isaac (whose father was Abraham whose father was ... whose father was
Adam whose father was God). Israel was Jacob who was the second born. But Israel became the firstborn of Isaac and of
God due to his spirituality. Likewise did his prophet not say:

9 For I have become to Israel a Father; and as for Ephraim, he is my firstborn (Jeremiah 31)?

But of course Ephraim was not the firstborn or Israel or of Joseph, Manasseh was.

So the question being begged is: Did this thing that happened with all of the patriarchs in the Old Testament happen also
with the great Patriarch himself, HYWH?? Why the elaborate plan to demonstrate this concept throughout the bible unless
the point needed to be driven home!

So then, just who is the Messiah? Who is God’s son? Who is this mystery entity we are always talking about? Well there
are a number of scriptures that give us this answer if we are willing to search the matter out. Have you forgotten God’s
commandment; keep on seeking and you shall find, keep on looking and it will be given to you, keep on knocking and the
door will be opened. Consider the following two groups of scriptures, one group set before Jesus died and the other after:

17 Look! Also, there was a voice from the heavens that said: This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved
(Matthew 3).

5 While he was yet speaking, look! a bright cloud overshadowed them, and, look! a voice out of the cloud, saying: This is
my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved; listen to him. (Matthew 17).

11 And a voice came out of the heavens: You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you (Mark 1).

7 And a cloud formed, overshadowing them, and a voice came out of the cloud: This is my Son, the beloved; listen to him.
(Mark 9).

22 And the holy spirit in bodily shape like a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: You are my Son,
the beloved; I have approved you (Luke 3).

Nowhere in the gospels or before this did the true God say of Jesus: You are my firstborn son, the beloved, I have
approved you...

And what about what the Jews murmured about Jesus when He said He was the bread coming down out of heaven:
42 And they said, Is this not Jesus the son of Joseph, of whom we know the father and the mother? How does this One
now say, I have come down out of Heaven?

43 Then Jesus answered and said to them, Do not murmur with one another (John 6)

Yes, Immanuel/Jesus was the son of Mary and Joseph; however, the Christ who came down out of heaven was someone
else! Who was this Spirit that descended like a dove into Jesus at his baptism as described by John.

30 This is He about whom I said, After me comes a Man who has been before me, for He was preceding me.
31 And I did not know Him; but that He be revealed to Israel, for this reason I came baptizing in water.
32 And John witnessed, saying, I have seen the Spirit coming down as a dove out of Heaven, and He abode on Him.
33 And I did not know Him, but the One sending me to baptize in water, that One said to me, On whomever you see the
Spirit coming down and abiding on Him, this is the One baptizing in the Holy Spirit.
34 And I have seen and have witnessed that this One is the Son of God. (John 1)

After me….he was preceding me??? What does all of this mean??? Let’s harmonize more of the scriptures and try to
figure this out….

5 Hence when he comes into the world he says: 'Sacrifice and offering you did not want, but you prepared a body for me
(Hebrews 10).

Prepared a body? Are we not told in John:

It is the spirit that is life-giving; the flesh is of no use at all. (John 6:63)

Well one thing is certain, Jesus has certainly given us an abundance of clues to help us piece it together if we really want
to use our minds! After Jesus spoke to them of these things at Capernaum, his disciples said "This speech is shocking;
who can listen to it!" (John 6:60)

And what an incredible answer from Christ when His disciples murmured about what He was saying to them:

61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said to them, Doth this offend you?

62 [What] and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? (John 6)

For no one has ascended that hasn't descended first! Is it beginning to get any clearer for you? Maybe this next scripture
will help?

3 For the Law being powerless, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful
flesh, and concerning sin, condemned sin in the flesh,
4 so that the righteous demand of the Law might be fulfilled in us, those not walking according to flesh, but according to
Spirit.

So we know that God sent someone (His own Son)…now let’s get this strait, first a body was prepared for Him (the body
of Immanuel) then this scripture says He sent His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh! The question is: Who is that
someone, who is His Son? Let’s piece it together.

15 For we say this to you in the Word of the Lord, that we the living who remain to the coming of the Lord will not at all go
before those who have fallen asleep.
16 Because the Lord Himself shall come down from Heaven with a commanding shout of an archangel's voice, and with
God's trumpet. And the dead in Christ will rise again first. (Thes 4)

An archangels voice indeed!

15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation (Colossians 1).
18 And he is the head of the body, the congregation. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that he might
become the one who is first in all things (Colossians 1).
So it is obvious that He was not first in all things in the beginning. He has become the firstborn in all things not by his
human ransom but by His angelic ransom as you will soon come to understand. We again harmonize the scriptures with
Hebrews:

6 But when he again brings his Firstborn into the inhabited earth, he says: And let all God's angels do obeisance to him
(Hebrews 1).

And again this change in authority is explained in Acts.

20 For it has been written in the scroll of Psalms, Let his estate become forsaken, and he not be living in it. And, "Let
another take his overseership." LXX-Psa. 68:26; Psa. 108:8; MT-Psa. 69:25; Psa. 109:8 (Acts 1)

Can you not see the beauty in all of this? "his estate" is in reference to Satan who was first in all things until
"unrighteousness was found in him". It was Satan's deceptive works in the Garden of Eden of which he was covering that
kicked of the "founding of the world", the one we now are living in. So the one taking his (Satan's) "overseership" is the
archangel with the "commanding shout". So, who is this archangel? Well, it is given to us in a number of scriptures:

7 And war occurred in Heaven, Michael and his angels making war against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels
made war, (Rev 12)

Of course Michael and his angels represent the Christ and and all the the holy angels who follow Him and the dragon and
his angels presents Satan and the fallen angels who follow him. This war took place already as "occurred" is past tense
and in fact it happened when they were cast out to the earth where Satan is to rule until the Kingdome of God is
established. But we also know that when the Kingdom is established our "great ruler" will stand up and deliver us from
evil.

1 ¶ And at that time, Michael shall stand up, the great ruler who stands for the sons of your people. And there shall be a
time of distress, such as has not been from the being of a nation until that time. And at that time, your people shall be
delivered, everyone that shall be found written in the Book.
2 And many of those sleeping in the earth's dust shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to reproaches and to
everlasting abhorrence. (Dan 12)

This symbolic drama is described for us in Ecclesiastes. the foolish king is Lucifer who we know was the first born son
(angel) of God. After the battle described above in Rev 12, he was imprisoned for a 1,000 years but was let loose again
hence:

13 Better [is] a poor and a wise child than an old and foolish king, who will no more be admonished.
14 For out of prison he cometh to reign; whereas also [he that is] born in his kingdom becometh poor.
15 I considered all the living which walk under the sun, with the second child that shall stand up in his stead. (Ecl 4)

This second child is Michael who stands up in his stead in Jesus! Now you are only beginning to see and understand the
real and incredible magnitude of His sacrifice. Jesus (Michael), however did not become "first in all things" until he had
sacrificed, died, and ascended to the Father. This is evident in Jude when Michael was still considered the "chief
messenger" of God.

9 But Michael the archangel, when contending with the Devil, he argued about the body of Moses; he dared not bring a
judgment of blasphemy, but said, "Let the Lord rebuke you!" Zech. 3:2 (Jud 1)

Now this event of course happened before Michael had entered Jesus, before he became first in all things. In Hebrew,
Michael means He who is like God! Before this He dared not bring a judgment, but afterwards he had authority to do just
that!

To ease your thoughts on angelic possession of men consider this: After Jesus gave the morsel to Judas, we all know
that Satan entered him. It was then that Jesus told him to do what he was going to do more quickly. Jesus knew that
Satan was going to have him tortured and killed. So in effect,

So, now that we have grown up a bit and have come to realize that Michael (Jesus) has now become the firstborn in all
things…we must clarify Lucifer as being the original firstborn. Immanuel and Judas were both surrogate human bodies for
the spirit beings that came into them as a means of accomplishing God's plan.
We know that Lucifer was God’s original firstborn from Genesis, Ezekiel and Isaiah. Lucifer was the anointed Cherub
covering Eden!

13 In Eden, the garden of God, you proved to be. Every precious stone was your covering, ruby, topaz and jasper;
chrysolite, onyx and jade; sapphire, turquoise and emerald; and of gold was the workmanship of your settings and your
sockets in you. In the day of your being created they were made ready.
14 You are the anointed cherub that is covering, and I have set you. On the holy mountain of God you proved to be. In the
midst of fiery stones you walked about.
15 You were faultless in your ways from the day of your being created until unrighteousness was found in you (Ezekiel
28).

After Lucifer fell from heaven he lost not only his original position but his name as well (now Satan).

12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning [meaning first]! [how] art thou cut down to the ground,
which didst weaken the nations! (Isa 14)

Basically, Lucifer's biggest mistake was trying to be equal to or higher than God, however his treatment of Adam who was
also God's own son, was the final straw. Adam was a son created by God alone and the most important addition to the
family. Satan had the top job of looking after him because this job was the right of the firstborn through whom everything
would have been done according to the Modus operandi of God, who gives his firstborn covenanted rights to be his CEO.
Michael and Gabriel were also cherubs, but were not covering Eden since neither of them was the firstborn.

20 And the cherubs must be spreading out their two wings upward, screening over the cover with their wings, with their
faces one toward the other. Toward the cover the faces of the cherubs should be (Exodus 25).

These two were later covering the Ark of the Covenant. Daniel reveals this great secret:

13 But the prince of the royal realm of Persia [Satan] was standing in opposition to me for 21 days, and, look! Michael,
one of the foremost princes, came to help me; and I, for my part, remained there beside the kings of Persia (Daniel 10).

One of the foremost princes? yes, but the foremost prince? no. Paul explicitly declares it:

18 and he is the head of the body, the congregation. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that he might
become the one who is first in all things (Colossians 1).

He became the firstborn angel of God at his resurrection from the dead! Again, we must harmonize this with proverbs:

22 Jehovah himself produced me as the beginning of his way, the earliest of his achievements of long ago.
23 From time indefinite I was installed, from the start, from times earlier than the earth (Proverbs 8).

The beginning of his way, and the earliest of his achievements relates to the creation of a loyal and righteous character
not to creation itself it would appear, hence we read:

30 then I came to be beside him as a master worker, and I came to be the one he was especially fond of day by day, I
being glad before him all the time (Proverbs 8).

Had Michael been the firstborn then he would not have come to be the one he was especially fond of, he would have
always been that one.

9 For this very reason also God exalted him to a superior position and kindly gave him the name that is above every
[other] name (Philippians 2).

There is no position superior to God's firstborn angel. So Jesus (Michael) earned this position by his sacrifice. In order
that you may know that the paramount sacrifice was Michaels angelic soul and not Jesus' physical body (although that too
was used to sacrifice for those with faith but are not baptized into a true church) consider this scripture:

23 That Christ should suffer, [and] that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto
the people, and to the Gentiles. (Acts 26)
5 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the first-born out of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth; to him
who did love us, and did bathe us from our sins in his blood, (Rev 1)

Well, we all know that Jesus wasn't the first resurrected from the dead physically because during his ministry he himself
resurrected Lazarus! So to understand the "deep things of God" we must use our powers of reason without prejudice. So
Yes Michael became the first resurrected angel of God. The first to be "born out of the dead" in angelic terms. It is further
emphasized in Colossians.

18 And himself is the head of the body-the assembly-who is a beginning, a first-born out of the dead, that he might
become in all things-himself-first, (Col 1)

So He did not become first in all things until after he was resurrected as an angelic being. It was then that He became a
God to be worshipped. This occurred when he received a name higher that any other and was given to have life in
himself, just as the Father does!

26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; (Jon 5).

14 And to the angel of the congregation in Laodicea write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true
witness, the beginning of the creation by God (Revelation 3).

This is the same statement as: Israel is my firstborn. This is: Jesus (Michael) is the firstborn. He is, but not by birth. He is
the beginning of creation by God, but not by originally being the beginning of creation by God, rather by becoming this
beginning.

We are given another witness to this event and when it took place in Acts:

32 And we are declaring unto you the good news, about the promise which was made unto the fathers,

33 God hath fully fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that he hath raised up Jesus; even as it is written in the
second psalm, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee.

34 'And that He did raise him up out of the dead, no more to return to corruption, he hath said thus-I will give to you the
faithful kindnesses of David; (Ac 13)

So again, we are reminded that it was not until after He was raised up from the dead that He fulfilled this covenant He
made when He agreed to sacrifice for us. That is the day Jesus was begotten and became a God like His Father

Yes, the two cherubs covered the Ark of the Covenant, and two sons of Noah walked in backwards and covered the
nakedness of their father the builder of an ark. So let's consider now the order of Noah's sons. Actually there is a really
awful film historical comedy called 'Noah's ark' starring Jon Voight and Mary Steamvirgin. This films screws up the entire
history of Genesis and misrepresents God's character completely, however, for some reason beyond our comprehension
(perhaps from Josephus), the script correctly recognizes that Ham was the firstborn.

32 And Noah got to be 500 years old. After that Noah became father to Shem, Ham and Japheth (Genesis 5).
6 And Noah was 600 years old when the deluge of waters occurred on the earth (Genesis 7).
10 Shem was 100 years old when he became father to Arpachshad 2 years after the deluge (Genesis 11).

From these 3 scriptures it is apparent that Shem was 100 years old when Noah was 602, at which time his firstborn son
would have been 102 years old so Shem wasn't the firstborn. But Shem got the blessing of the firstborn:

26 Blessed be Jehovah, Shem's God, And let Canaan become a slave to him.
27 Let God grant ample space to Japheth, And let him reside in the tents of Shem. Let Canaan become a slave to him
also (Genesis 9).

So Shem was blessed as the firstborn, so either Ham or Japheth lost this right, but Japheth was also blessed and Ham's
son Canaan was cursed so Ham must have lost the firstborn right this is why the order of their listing is: Shem Ham
Japheth. The final firstborn, the original firstborn, and the third born. Since the pre flood humans took at least twice as
long before they procreated it is reasonable to assume that their gestation period was twice as long as well. So Shem
must have been the second born since he was born 2 years after Ham. So Japheth was the 3rd born. This is yet again the
Holy Spirit telling us that Michael earned his firstborn covenant by his self sacrifice and righteousness.
So now we can revisit the majestic words of John

In the beginning the Word was and the Word was with God and the Word was [a] god. This one was in the
beginning with God.

All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.
What has come into existence by means of him was life, and the life was the light of men (John 1:1,4).

Incidentally, the fact that 'was' is used everywhere in John 1:1, indicates that the status of 'the Word' has changed since
the 'beginning' referred to by John. And since the status of God almighty cannot change, the Word cannot be God
almighty himself.

In the literal meaning we have the Word of God, who is Michael (Jesus). 'In the beginning' he is said to be 'with God'. But
what 'beginning' is John referring to here? Is it the beginning of creation by God? Is it the beginning of Genesis 1:1 in the
literal meaning? Well it cannot be the beginning of creation by God or the beginning of Genesis 1:1 because 'All things'
did not come into existence through Jesus after those beginnings. All things came into existence through Satan after
those beginnings. The only beginning after which all things came into existence by means of Jesus was the beginning of
the world. The beginning of the world is when Adam sinned.

Once Adam had sinned, then without Jesus' agreement to the ARC (Angelic Ransom Covenant), everything would have
ground to a halt. So after the fall of Adam, everything came into existence through Jesus. What came into existence by
means of him, by means in fact of his agreement to the ARC, was life, everlasting life in fact. So now we finally
understand John 1:1. Jesus was the way the truth and the life, and the life is the light of men today. Jesus is our light, for
he is the word of God.

So to understand John 1:1, one has to realize that the Michael/Jesus is the word, that the beginning is the beginning of
the world, and that the world would have ended as soon as it began were it not for the ARC. The ARC gave the world a
permanent future. So everything, after the world began, came into existence through the ARC, which is through the
mediation of Jesus (Michael). This is why the scripture says both that all things came into existence through him and that
what came into existence by means of him was life. His giving us the opportunity for everlasting life was necessary in
order that the World would have a purpose.

If you say that Jesus was the firstborn angel and everything in the whole universe came into existence through him, since
he had the firstborn master covenant, then you nullify the scripture which says: What has come into existence by means
of him was life. But once you realize that Satan was the firstborn, and that everything physical came into existence
through him, including the whole world, but that the world only continued in existence because of Jesus' (Michael’s)
agreement to the ARC, then the scripture: What came into existence by means of him was life, is simply a correct
explanation of the scripture: All things came into existence through him. Of course, what came into existence by means of
Satan was death.

The word symbolic meaning of these verses is as follows:

Michael was born but had demonstrated no allegiance and held no position,
In the beginning the Word was
at the beginning of space time
This is the point where Michael demonstrated allegiance to God more than
Satan, but God was still covenanted to do everything thru Satan. This is the
In the beginning the Word was with God beginning of the World, Adam's sin, when God made a covenant with Jesus
(Michael) to ransom us. 'With' refers to the ARC, the Master ransom
covenant made between God and Jesus.
This is Jesus' resurrection, now he has become the firstborn of God and
God covenants to do everything through him. But this covenant is
everlasting so effectively Jesus is a God. Hence the Word was God. In fact
In the beginning the Word was [a] God
he today is to be worshipped by his sons, who owe their life to him. This is
why Thomas said to the resurrected Jesus, My Lord and My God (John
20:28). It has taken a long time to understand that one.
Satan was originally loyal to God, and of course God was acting exclusively
thru Satan. 'With' here refers to the covenant of the firstborn held by Satan,
This one was in the beginning with God
that God should do everything thru him, until time indefinite. He was
however NOT the "Word".
All things came into existence thru him Everything physical, everything temporary, came into existence thru Satan.
 Every animal, every star, even man himself. Now can you see where his
pride and arrogance come from? And how beautiful he once was and how
much God must have loved him? What pain God must have gone thru in
giving freedom to his sons and in staying loyal to his covenant with Satan.
Apart from him not even one thing came into Everything spiritual, everything permanent came into existence thru Michael,
existence our eternal father. Satan has been our temporary father.
What came into existence by means of him Yes and what came into existence by means of Satan was death. Which is
was life why his name is 'death', the 4th horseman.

So in the literal meaning, Jesus was a God, but in the word symbolic meaning, Jesus is God, in the sense that he has the
firstborn master covenant, so God does everything thru Jesus (the only begotten God). The scripture is deliberately
ambiguous, so as to work in both the literal and the word symbolic meanings. It is also written to mislead those who follow
the teachings of men, and who will not use their own minds on the teachings of God.

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the
dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart
(Hebrews 4).

The power of the bible to discern the intentions of the hearts lies in its deliberate ambiguity. It is written so that if you wish
to play God, and just assign your own interpretation to a scripture, then you can. But those who love God continually work
at improving their understandings. They do not assign meanings until they have pieced together the whole jigsaw, as far
as they are able.

5 And the light is shining in the darkness, but the darkness has not overpowered it (John 1) Amen.

The darkness, the evening, Satan, comes first the Hebrew day and in the day of Genesis 1. The light, the morning star,
Michael, comes second.

We have applied the Successive Descriptions Principle of the bible code to John 1:1 to deduce 3 beginnings for the Word.
So there is a second and a third beginning for the Word in addition to his first beginning when God created him before he
created space time. Then we applied the same principle again to see the 'The Word' and 'This one' are two different
angels.

This is why Jesus was able to say to his disciples after his resurrection:

18 And Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying: All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth
(Matthew 28).

Whereas before his death he said:

1 Jesus spoke these things, and, raising his eyes to heaven, he said: Father, the hour has come; glorify your son, that
your son may glorify you
2 according as you have given him authority over all flesh, that, as regards the whole [number] whom you have given him,
he may give them everlasting life (John 17).

Before he died he had a limited authority over all flesh, but after he died he had total authority over all creation. Satan was
originally God's CEO, God's executive vice president; God did not move other than through Satan before Adam's sin.
After this sin, Satan lost his firstborn right, but Michael did not gain it until after his death. At this point Jesus was God from
an action point of view, hence Thomas said to him: My Lord and My God (John 20:28).

So now that we have grown up, we can understand what Michael meant when he said:

23 Be going away behind me Satan (Matthew 16)

33 Be going under behind me Satan (Mark 8)

He meant give your firstborn rights to me, like we agreed. And now we understand the words of Bildad to Job:

13 It will eat the pieces of his skin. The firstborn of death will eat his limbs (Job 18).
"The firstborn of death" is Satan. Satan in the sense that he was the first to be condemned to death yes, but also in the
sense that Jesus is the firstborn of life, and Satan is the firstborn of death. Both are firstborns of God, but they champion
rather different outcomes for their followers. Whereas John blessed the 7 congregations and called Jesus Christ:

5 The firstborn from the dead (Revelation 1).

As pointed out earlier, Jesus was not the first man ever to be resurrected, for he himself resurrected Lazarus. Jesus
became the firstborn of God through his angelic resurrection. He was the first angel to die and be resurrected, and Satan
was the second after he died in Judas. So Jesus became God's firstborn from the dead. But Satan was the firstborn
originally which is why we read in Revelation:

9
And was thrown the dragon, the great [one], the serpent, the archaic [one], the [one] called [the] Devil and the Satan
(Revelation 12).

He was the most archaic angel and he was the greatest angel until Adam's fall. This promise is described by our Lord:

27 All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man
the Father, save the Son, and [he] to whomsoever the Son will reveal [him]. (Mat 11)

Yes! The Son will reveal to those of us who seek Him with our whole hearts, our whole minds and our whole souls! He will
make it know to us who He (the Messiah) really is and who His Father is and who the Holy Spirit is! This document and
our website is proof of that and you have been called to learn this from the Highest God!

If that isn’t enough, how about this!

8 But if we died with Christ, we believe that also we shall live with Him,
9 knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dies no more; death no longer lords it over Him.
10 For in that He died, He died to sin once for all; but in that He lives, He lives to God. (Rom 6)

It is obvious from this scripture that Jesus is not the Most High God for we read in Daniel 4:

34 ¶ And at the end of the days, I, Nebuchadnezzar, lifted up my eyes to the heaven, and my understanding returned to
me, and I blessed the Most High. And I praised and honored Him who lives forever, whose kingdom is an everlasting
kingdom, and His rule from generation to generation. (Dan 4)

Yes, God does not die, however his only begotten Son Christ Jesus (Michael) did die as a ransom for Adam and all of his
offspring! But He has overcome death by His selfless act as an angel. He is now a God to be worshipped just as His
Father! Hence again we read after the resurrection:

28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. (Jo 20)

Before this, Jesus was only referred to as Lord!

Jesus is the ruler of the next system of things, the Kingdom of God

The Kingdom of God is the Kingdom that Jesus preached about and that we all pray for in the Lord's prayer:

9 Our father which art in heaven

Hallowed be thy name
10 Thy kingdom come (Matthew 6 - King James Version)

There is no point in praying for it to come if you do not know what it is. It also helps to know when it actually does come!
Jesus gave his disciples and us the signs of the times in Matthew 24, to alert us to the general period in which it would
come. He describes these signs in answer to the questions below:

3 While he was sitting upon the Mount of Olives, the disciples approached him privately, saying: Tell us, when will these
things be, and what will be the sign of your presence and of the conclusion of the system of things? (Matthew 24).
Just that one word 'privately' and that demand 'Tell us' shows that only his disciples will know when these things will be.
So being blunt, if only we, the LWs, know precisely when these things will be, then only we, the LWs, are his disciples at
this time. Although in truth, many Christians have recognized that the signs of the times are currently being exhibited. Part
of his answer was:

14 And this good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then
the end will come (Matthew 24).

The 'end', in the largest meaning of this scripture, is the end of 'this system of things', which obviously is the start of the
next system of things. And the next or coming system of things is the Kingdom of God.

29 He said to them: Truly I say to you, There is no one who has left house or wife or brothers or parents or children for
the sake of the kingdom of God
30 who will not in any way get many times more in this period of time, and in the coming system of things everlasting life
(Luke 18).

So when Jesus was asked by Pontius Pilate, are you a King? God's favorite son replied:

36 My kingdom is no part of this world. If my kingdom were part of this world, my attendants would have fought that I
should not be delivered up to the Jews. But, as it is, my kingdom is not from this source (John 18).

Whereas his apostle, John, said:

17 Furthermore, the world is passing away and so is its desire, but he that does the will of God remains forever (1 John
2).

So the world passes away to make room for the Kingdom of God. It was Eve's desire for Satan's status that kicked off
'The World', and Adam's desire for Eve's body kicked off death. But this new Kingdom of God is the final whistle on the
World. And the end of the Kingdom of God is the final whistle on death. Here we have the first and the second Eden, the
problem, and the resolution. 'The World' is the period between the two. The World is the primary school, the Kingdom of
God is the secondary school. And although the Kingdom of God will have much more glory than the World ever had, the
scripture remains saying:

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten son, in order that everyone exercising faith in him might not
be destroyed but have everlasting life (John 3).

Everlasting life in the Kingdom of God and thereafter.

What will the Kingdom of God be like?

To see what this kingdom will be like we have the prophecy of Isaiah 65:

17 For here I am creating a new heavens and a new earth…

20 no more will there come to be a suckling a few days old from that place, neither an old man that does not fulfill his
days, for one will die as a mere boy although a hundred years of age. And as for the sinner, although a hundred years of
age he will have evil called down upon him (Isaiah 65)

This is very carefully worded. Babies and old men will not die during this kingdom, but sinners will. In other words people
will not die of old age, and they will not die of illness, sickness, frailty, but they may die due to sin. Humans of 100 years
old will be considered boys and will die not of old age but for life abusing sins. ‘New heavens’ does not mean a new
physical universe, it means rather a new heavenly rulership for men. A new set of angels ruling over us.

21 And they will certainly build houses and have occupancy, and they will certainly plant vineyards and eat their fruit.
22 They will not build and someone else have occupancy, they will not plant and someone else do the eating. For like the
days of a tree will the days of my people be (Isaiah 65).
Trees can live for thousands of years (The sequoia tree lives for 2,000). There will be no economic slavery in this
kingdom. A man will taste the fruits of his own labor himself. Furthermore every miracle that Jesus performed is an advert
for our capabilities in the Kingdom. We will cure the injured, the lame and the blind. We will even raise the dead as Peter
did with Dorcas and Paul did with Eutychus. So accidents will not be problems for long in the Kingdom. There will be no
personal injury litigation!

These are just a few words but they describe one hell of a kingdom (if you’ll pardon the metaphor). The apostle Peter says
of this kingdom:

3 For you know this first, that in the last days there will come ridiculers with their ridicule, proceeding according to their
own desires
4 and saying: Where is this promised presence of his? Why, from the day our forefathers fell asleep [in death], all things
are continuing exactly as from creation's beginning.
5 For, according to their wish, this fact escapes their notice, that there were heavens from of old and an earth standing
compactly out of water and in the midst of water by the word of God;
6 and by those [means] the world of that time suffered destruction when it was deluged with water.
7 But by the same word the heavens and the earth that are now stored up for fire and are being reserved to the day of
judgment and of destruction of the ungodly men.
8 However, let this one fact not be escaping your notice, beloved ones, that one day is with [the] Lord as 1,000 years and
1,000 years as one day.
9 [The] Lord is not slow respecting his promise, as some people consider slowness, but he is patient with you because he
does not desire any to be destroyed but desires all to attain to repentance.
10 Yet [the] Lord’s day will come as a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a hissing noise, but the elements
being intensely hot will be dissolved, and earth and the works in it will be discovered.
11 Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of persons ought you to be in holy acts of conduct and deeds
of godly devotion,
12 awaiting and keeping close in mind the presence of the day of Jehovah, through which [the] heavens being on fire will
be dissolved and [the] elements being intensely hot will melt!
13 But there are new heavens and a new earth that we are awaiting according to his promise, and in these righteousness
is to dwell (2 Peter 3).

So just as the world was destroyed by the flood of Noah, so it will be again by the fire of Armageddon. Neither of these
destructions are planetary, they are both systemic. In fact the heavens were effected then too, because the demons who
had come down to the earth to procreate with the women before the flood, were thrown into Tartarus.

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast [them] down to Tartarus, and delivered [them] into chains of
darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; (Pe 2)

Also since Peter refers to the Lord (a term which can mean either God or Jesus, but here means God) as not being slow
respecting his promise, it is apparent that a day has been set when these things will occur. Now Peter refers to a day of
judgment, and then says that a ‘day’ to God is a 1,000 years. From which we deduce that the day of judgment, the
judgment day is 1,000 years long. The destruction of the ungodly men by fire is Armageddon and this battle kicks off the
1,000 year judgment day. We have already seen from Isaiah 65 above that people will die only due to their sins in the
Kingdom of God, so the kingdom of God is a day of judgment. But the confirmation of the length of this Kingdom, and the
fulfillment of both Isaiah 65 and the words of Peter is seen by the Apostle John in his visions of Revelation 20 and 21.

The Kingdom of God lasts for 1,000 years

1 And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven with the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he seized the dragon, the original serpent, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for 1,000 years.
3 And he hurled him into the abyss and shut [it] and sealed [it] over him, that he might not mislead the nations/ethic
groups anymore until the 1,000 years were ended. After these things he must be let loose for a little while.
4 And I saw thrones, and there were those who sat down on them, and power of judging was given them. Yes, I saw the
souls of those executed with the axe for the witness they bore to Jesus and for speaking about God, and those who had
worshiped neither the wild beast nor its image and who had not received the mark upon their forehead and upon their
hand. And they came to life and ruled as kings with the Christ for a 1,000 years.
5 The rest of the dead did not come to life until the 1,000 years were ended. This is the first resurrection.
6 Happy and holy is anyone having part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no authority, but they
will be priests of God and of the Christ, and will rule as kings with him for the 1,000 years.
7 Now as soon as the 1,000 years [of Satan's imprisonment, not of the Kingdom of God] have been ended, Satan will
be let loose out of his prison.
8 and he will go out to mislead the nations, the [ones] in the 4 corners of the earth, [ This cannot be in the kingdom of
God, as the 'earth' is the political administration of this world - see 'kings of the earth' in 19:19, and the 'nations'
are of this world] the [antitypical] Gog [he is] and [the antitypical] Magog [is his land/administration], to gather them
together for the war [Gog the chieftain of the land of Magog launched a disastrous attack on Israel and got
pestilence, blood, flooding downpour, hailstones, fire and sulphur from Jehovah who sanctified himself at Gog's
expense in Ezekiel 38,39 - In the final part of the years you will come to the land - In the final part of the days it
will occur and I shall certainly bring you against my land - the prophets of Israel who were prophesying in those
days, years as to bringing you in upon them]. The number of these is as the sand of the sea.
9 And they advanced over the breadth of the earth and encircled the camp of the holy ones and the city, the [one] having
been loved. But fire came down out of heaven and devoured them. (Revelation 20).

All we need to take from the above 9 verses of Revelation, is that the Kingdom of God lasts for 1,000 years. It is of course
apparent from the scriptures that Satan is also locked up for 1,000 years. Now many churches equate these two periods.
But reading the verses carefully reveals that Satan is let out of prison, to mislead earthly nations (a feature of this system
and not a feature of the next) before the battle of Armageddon, 'the war' of verse 9. Whereas the 1,000 year Kingdom
happens during and after Armageddon. When the Kingdom of God starts, 'the Devil', is thrown into the figurative lake of
fire and Sulphur. But 'The Devil' here does not mean Satan. For in verse 2 above we read...

2 And he seized the dragon, the original serpent, who is the Devil and Satan, and bound him for 1,000 years.

The dragon and the original serpent both had a head and a body. Now just as the church is one body, the congregation,
with one head Jesus Christ, so Satan's administration has one body, the body initially of the serpent in Eden but today of
the dragon in Revelation, and one head, Satan himself. But both creatures are defined above as being both 'The Devil
and Satan'. So Satan is being used to describe the head of both creatures and 'the Devil' is being used to describe the
body of each creature. The word 'Devil' means slanderer, whereas the word 'Satan' means resister, or apposer. So it is
Satan's entire organization which is permanently destroyed in the lake of fire and sulphur. The sulphur symbolizes
everlasting fire...

10 And the Devil, the [one] deceiving them [Satan's heavenly slandering organization, but not its individual
members] was hurled into the lake of the fire and sulphur [everlasting destruction], where both the wild-beast [the UN
as an organization, but not its members] and the false prophet [already were] [the US/UK world power, but not their
citizens]. And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever [no more false prophets, wild beasts or heavenly
slanderers]

This is the everlasting destruction in the eyes of every reasoning being of the credibility of any government run in the way
Satan has run this planet. It is not the everlasting destruction of any of the individual demons that were involved in Satan's
disastrous attempt to run mankind.

14 And death and Hades were hurled into the lake of fire. This means the second death, the lake of fire.
15 Furthermore, whoever was not found written in the book of life was hurled into the lake of fire (Revelation 20).

This lake stands for the garbage dump at Gehenna (the Greek word for the Hebrew Geh Hinnom, which means the 'valley
of Hinnom'). This valley was outside Jerusalem, and was where the dead bodies of criminals were burnt with fire and
sulphur. It was Jerusalem's criminal crematorium. It stands figuratively for the second death, which is the death of the
angelic soul but not of the spirit. It is a sin bin for spirits, and is referred to as the lake of fire only. It is the perfect prison,
for how can one escape it without a soul?

Who is resurrected into the Kingdom of God?

The ‘dead’ who come to life after the 1,000 years have ended is a reference to those who will be physically alive in the
1,000 year kingdom but still be under the death sentence that God passed on Adam, and so will still be condemned to
death judicially, but not actually physically dead. Every one is judicially dead, until they are baptized in holy spirit. The holy
spirit baptism is the only way to lift the Adamic death penalty indefinitely - see I34. Jesus used the same symbolism when
he said:

22 Jesus said to him: Keep following me, and let the dead bury their dead (Matthew 8).
Since corpses cannot dig graves, the ‘dead’ grave diggers, must have been dead spiritually but alive physically. They
were dead in the sense that they had not been ransomed, so they were still under the death sentence of Adam.

The apostle Paul tells us...

15 and I have hope toward God, which hope these [men] themselves also entertain, that there is going to be a
resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous (Acts 24).

The righteous ones are resurrected into the Kingdom of God, and are declared righteous by virtue of the various salvation
covenants described in I26 in this website and U9 in the research site. The unrighteous are resurrected from the first
death (which death is unconsciousness, which is existence in a sleeping angel) into the second death (which death is
Gehenna, consciousness without a soul). Hence Jesus said in the parable of the sheep and the goats...

46 And these will depart into indefinitely lasting cutting-off, but the righteous ones into indefinitely lasting life (Matthew 25).

The Sea is No More

John sees this Kingdom in a vision, in the next chapter of Revelation:

1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the former heaven and the former earth had passed away, and the sea is
no more.
2 I saw also the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God and prepared as a bride adorned for her
husband.
3 With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them,
and they will be his peoples. And God himself will be with them.
4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be
anymore. The former things have passed away (Revelation 21).

The sea stands for uncoordinated, unruly, structureless mankind. It is those of mankind who do not want to accept
authority (which can be from God). The earth stands for those with structure, who do accept administration and authority
(which can be from God).. But at the end of the day, the earth does set the boundaries for and guides the waters, however
fluid they may be. To see this consider the below scriptures..

12 Ha for the commotion of many peoples, who are boisterous as with the boisterousness of the seas! And for the noise
of national groups, who make a din just like the noise of mighty waters! (Isaiah 17).

15 And he says to me: The waters that you saw, where the harlot is sitting, mean peoples and crowds and nations and
tongues (Revelation 17).

6 He who is building in the heavens his stairs, and his structure over the earth that he founded; he who is calling for the
waters of the sea, that he may pour them out upon the surface of the earth, Jehovah is his name (Amos 9).

So boisterous, unruly mankind ends at Armageddon. But the surface of the earth is 71% water and 29% land - see
www.physicalgeography.net. This design is living, it is prophetic, it is saying that 29% survive Armageddon and 71% do
not. We already know that more are killed than survive at the end of the World from Jesus’ words:

13 Go in through the narrow gate; because broad and spacious is the road leading off into destruction, and many are the
ones going in through it.
14 Whereas narrow is the gate and cramped the road leading off into life, and few are the ones finding it (Matthew 7).

So those saved would have to be considerably less than 50%.

The Animals and the Food in the Kingdom of God

In the garden of Eden and until after the flood, the sons of Adam were vegetarians - see U1 in the research site. The
animals in the garden of Eden were vegetarians as well, existing in an enclosed environment protected from the rest of
the carnivores and omnivores see also - U1. This garden was an archetype for the kingdom of God. In this kingdom man
is a vegetarian and so is the Lion. What the Lion is going to do with his claws remains to be seen, unless God is creating
fast moving vegetables in the Kingdom. In fact the way that animals interact in nature today is a prophetic declaration from
God as to how mankind will treat each other. We know of many sharks, mad dogs, hermit crabs, lemmings, armies of ants
and even snakes, worms and vultures, amongst the sons of Adam. And what is worse just as one animal will eat up
everything that another animal is and has been, today, for every creative step that the idealist makes, there lies an
opportunist waiting to steal his glory, his art, his science, his revolution from him without conscience, and to devour it for
his own benefit, either destroying it or possessing it or exploiting it as if he had created it himself. This will not happen in
the next system where one man will not eat the life or the works of another. Yes, the way that animals interact in the next
system, which is the kingdom of God, will again declare man's treatment of his brothers. In this new Kingdom we will not
eat each other for breakfast. Isaiah prophetically declares:

23 They will not toil for nothing, nor will they bring to birth for disturbance; because they are the offspring made up of the
blessed ones of Jehovah, and their descendants with them.
24 And it will actually occur that before they call out I myself shall answer; while they are yet speaking, I myself shall
hear.
25 The wolf and the lamb themselves will feed as one, and the lion will eat straw just like the bull; and as for the serpent,
his food will be dust. They will do no harm nor cause any ruin in all my holy mountain, Jehovah has said (Isaiah 65).

6 And the wolf will actually reside for a while with the male lamb, and with the kid the leopard itself will lie down, and the
calf and the maned young lion and the well-fed animal all together; and a mere little boy will be leader over them.
7 And the cow and the bear themselves will feed; together their young ones will lie down. And even the lion will eat straw
just like the bull.
8 And the sucking child will certainly play upon the hole of the cobra; and upon the light aperture of a poisonous snake will
a weaned child actually put his own hand (Isaiah 11).

The literal meaning of this is that the Lion will be a vegetarian, and the serpent (those who used to be in Satan's
organization, they will be incarcerated and watch a learn from us human dust bags. There will be snakes in the Kingdom
of God but they will not damage humans.

Summary

[1] The Kingdom of God is a 1,000 year kingdom, starting with the destruction of ungodly men (the sea) by fire (which is
Armageddon).

[2] Satan is deposed before Armageddon and imprisoned in Tartarus after Armageddon.

[3] The earthly subjects of this 1,000 year Judgment day do not die of age, and so do not age, and they do not die of
disease, and so do not get sick, but they can be killed as a result of sin. These subjects make up the new earth. All of
them accept God’s authority, and entrance is either by resurrection, or by being raptured at Armageddon.

[4] 29% survive Armageddon. The other 71% are not killed because they are not good enough, they are killed because
they are not interested. Actually 10% of mankind are in the true religion at the end, God's farming tax percentage, the
tithe, and the other 19% are, the citizens, saved by the rapture.

[5] God's creatures do not eat each other in the Kingdom of God - This does not mean that we should be vegetarians now
however. In fact quite the reverse, Jesus was not a vegetarian, and Christians follow him.

[6] You will reap the benefit of your own hard work not someone else's hard work.

[7] There will be no money in the Kingdom of God. Things will get done out of love in response to needs, not out of greed
in response to financial inducements.

44 All those who became believers were together in having all things in common,
45 and they went selling their possessions and properties and distributing the [proceeds] to all, just as anyone would have
the need (Acts 2).

In a sense the Kingdom is perfect capitalism and perfect communism. More accurately it is perfect centrist politics with a
fully functional safety net (social services) and a fully operational ladder (business opportunities).

Incidentally, every human who has ever lived after Adam (who passed or failed a spiritual test) is resurrected into the
Kingdom of God or into Gehenna. They are resurrected in the reverse order to how they died. So that the children receive
their parents into the Kingdom. This is a beautiful way that we can say thanks to them, for what they did for us in this
system. This is one of the many meanings of Jesus' famous words: The last will be first and the first last (Matthew 20:16).

More indications of scriptural tampering

What of the Anti-Christ?

Much of our understandings of the Antichrist come from the book of Daniel. It is not only detailed by his own interpretations but also
is evidentiary of the second presence of Christ. What I have detailed for you here is only the event symbolic interpretations of Daniel 7
and how it relates to the antics of the Roman Catholic Church. All of this information is verifiable and available for you to research if
you wish.

We all know that the event symbolism of Daniel’s dream has the four beasts as being the Babylonian, Medo-Persian, Greek, and
Roman powers over God’s people after God Himself ceased being their King. We also know that although the Beasts and the metals
follow each other sequentially, the entire image (including the head of gold, the arms of silver and the thigh of bronze) is destroyed
when the stone strikes the feet. The Medo-Persians conquered Babylon, but the Babylonian system of worship was not destroyed,
merely refined. Similarly, when Greece conquered the Medo-Persian Empire, the names of the gods changed but the system of
worship remained essentially the same, and the same deities were worshipped in Rome under a different auspice. The final apostate
power to control world events would thus incorporate aspects and refinements of all the religious systems of history. They would be so
clothed and disguised to deceive, if possible, the very elect.

24 And as for the 10 horns, out of that kingdom there are 10 kings that will rise up; and still another one will rise up after them, and he
himself will be different from the first ones, and 3 kings he will humiliate. (Dan 7)

Although this scripture relates to both earthly (geographical) kingdoms and heavenly (spiritual) kingdoms, we will focus our attention
on the spiritual aspects of this scripture since it supports our understandings of the true relationship of our heavenly family. Bear in
mind that there is a first and second presence fulfillment of this event. We are only covering the first presence fulfillment in this paper.

The 10 horns, or kings that rise up are the 10 Christian Roman Emperors as follows:

http://www.roman-emperors.org/impindex.htm

306-37: Constantine I (Nicene Christian)

337-40: Constantine II (Christian who freed Athanasius - Nicene sympathies)
337-61: Constantius II (Arian Christian)
337-50: Constans (Athanasian/Nicene Christian
[361-63: Julian the apostate (not a Christian at all)]
363-64: Jovian (Nicene Christian)
364-75: Valentinian I (Nicene Christian)
364-78: Valens (Arian Christian)
375-83: Gratian (Nicene Christian)
375-92: Valentinian II (Arian Christian)
379-95: Theodosius (Nicene Christian)

...there was another horn, a little one, coming up among them, before whom three of the first horns were plucked out by the roots. And
there, in this horn, were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking pompous words. Daniel 7: 8 NKJV

In this verse, we again have the reference to a man just as we had the reference to a man associated with the lion that had eagle wings
representing Babylon. It was Babylon that deceived the ancient world with its system of worship (representing the type), and the little
horn power would have the same elements as Babylon but on a universal scale (representing the great antitype). It was the power that
would blaspheme God and speak pompous words and deceive the nations at the end of time. The NIV study Bible identifies this
power as the antichrist and the footnote in the Douay Version (Roman Catholic Bible) on verse 8 says:

"This is commonly understood of Antichrist."

The little horn power, as we shall see, grows to become greater than all the others and should be seen rather as a horn growing from
littleness to great stature. Since the little horn power represents the antichrist, it is essential that we correctly identify this power. Our
method should continue to be that of Scripture harmonized by other Scripture. It is also important to note that 'anti' has two meanings
in the Greek. It can mean 'against' or it can mean 'in the place of', and in 75% of cases where it is used, it refers to 'in the place of',
rather than 'against'. There are very precise identifying features of the horn power, and every single one must apply in order to make
an accurate identification possible. Remember, we are only relating the spiritual aspects of this not the earthly!

1. It arose out of the fourth beast.

The description of the little horn power is in connection with the fourth beast. This is very important, since there are many who adopt
a prêt eristic view of the antichrist and would like to associate the antichrist with Antiochus Epiphanes IV, a Greek king who
persecuted the Jews and desecrated the temple. This would, however, not fit the prophecy, as the antichrist is to arise out of the fourth
beast, which is Rome.

Papal Rome arose out of the ashes of Pagan Rome. The Historian C.C. Eckhardt says:

"When the Roman empire had disintegrated and its place had been taken by a number of rude, barbarous kingdoms, the Roman
Catholic Church not only became independent of the state in religious affairs but dominated secular affairs as well."

Every single historian agrees that papal Rome emerged out of the ruins of the ancient pagan Roman Empire. Thomas Hobbes,
English Historian says:

"If a man considers the original of this great ecclesiastical dominion, he will easily perceive that the Papacy is no other than the ghost
of the deceased Roman Empire, sitting crowned upon the grave thereof." 3 Leviathan, page 457.

2. It came up "among" the ten horns. Verse 8

I considered the ten horns and, behold, there came up among them another little horn. Daniel 7:8

The antichrist was to come up among the ten horns, growing from a small power to one which would eventually become greater than
all the other powers. This is indeed true of the papacy. After the initial fusing of Christianity with the pagan religions of the time, the
bishop of Rome increased in power whilst the emperors of the Roman Empire supported him.

As you know Constantine was the first emperor to embrace Christianity, but he only cloaked himself with a veneer of Christianity. In
the year 533 AD, the emperor Justinian decreed that the bishop of Rome was the spiritual leader of the Christian world.

To qualify as a horn, this power must have the attributes of a kingdom, which indeed applies to the Vatican, which to this day is an
independent state. Also, it arose amongst the powers of fallen Rome. The Europe that we know today is the remnant of the horns of
Rome. Not only that, but it is different from all the rest!

3. It came up "after" the ten horns had been established in the first presence and continues to this day!

And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise; and another shall arise after them....Daniel 7:24

The rise of the little horn power must be sought after the subdivision of Rome into ten powers, which means it must have been after
476 AD that this power, that had been growing from littleness, became firmly established in order to qualify as a 'horn', which is a
king or a kingdom.

The Roman Catholic church grew in power after Constantine accepted Christianity, but it did not control secular affairs until the
Justinian decrees went into effect. The power of the bishop of Rome steadily increased and papal authority in secular affairs arose
after the division of Rome in 476 AD by the Barbarians. The American Catholic Quarterly Review, April 1911, says:

Long ages ago, when Rome through the neglect of the Western emperors was left to the mercy of the barbarous hordes, the Romans
turned to one figure for aid and protection, and asked him to rule them; ... and thus ...commenced the temporal sovereignty of the
popes. So, meekly stepping to the throne of Caesar, the vicar of Christ took up the scepter to which the emperors and kings of Europe
were to bow in reverence through so many ages.

A further quote from The Papal Monarchy, states the following:

"The Pax Romana has ceased. It is universal confusion. But wherever a bishop holds
court, religion protects all that is left of the ancient order. A new Rome ascends
slowly above the horizon. It is the heir of religion, the emperor is no more... but the
Pontifex Maximus abides...He is now the vicar of Christ, offering the old civilization
to the tribes of the north. He converts them to his creed, and they serve him as their father and judge supreme. This is the papal
monarchy, which in its power and its decline overshadows the history of Europe for a thousand years". 4

"The Vicar of the Incarnate Son of God, Anointed High Priest and Supreme Temporal Ruler, (the Pope) sat in his tribunal impartially
to judge between nation and nation, between people and prince, between sovereign and subject". 5

Luther wrote:

It is a horrible thing to behold the man who styles himself Christ's vicegerent, displaying a magnificence that no emperor can equal . . .
He is, say they, the Lord of the World; but Christ Himself has said, "My kingdom is not of this world." Can the dominions of a
vicar extend beyond those of his Superior? 6

Who is the Lord of this world? Well we only have to look as far as St Paul for the answer:

3 If, now, the good news we declare is in fact veiled, it is veiled among those who are perishing,
4 among whom the God of this system of things has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the illumination of the glorious good
news about the Christ, who is the image of God, might not shine through (2 Corinthians 4).

The papacy has always considered its right to interfere in the affairs of states. Countries were divided by papal decrees, and kings
enthroned or dethroned by papal decrees.

4. It was to "uproot three horns". Verse 8

...Before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots....

Three of the ten kingdoms were to be destroyed by the establishment of the little horn power. Since it made its appearance after the
subdivision of Rome into ten different states, (after 476 AD), but before the destruction of three of them (because it arises among all
ten), we now have a very definite time frame for the rise of the Antichrist power.

Only the papacy answers this description of three of the Roman divisions being uprooted. This is known in the history books as the
Arian controversy, because three kingdoms, which did not accept the papal mandates regarding Christ's divinity, were literally
uprooted and mercilessly destroyed. The Heruli were completely scattered in 493 AD, the Vandals in 534 AD and the Ostrogoths in
538 AD. These conquests strengthened the hand of the papacy and helped to get her established by the year 538 AD, in which year the
bishop of Rome ascended the papal throne under the protection of the Roman general Vigilus. The date for the establishment of papal
Rome as an independent power can thus be pinned at 538 AD.

5. It was to be greater than its fellows.

...Whose look was more stout than its fellows.... Daniel 7:20

The power depicted by the little horn was greater than that of the other states. This implies a position of political superiority. Although
it grew from littleness, it was to become greater than all the other powers.

"More stout than its fellows" refers to the greater power which the papacy wielded in the affairs of Europe more than any of the other
powers. From 800 AD when Charlemagne received his crown from the Pope, the papacy was to assume power over kings and nations.
The "Humiliation of Canossa" is depicted in St. Peters, Rome, when in 1077, Henry IV, King of Germany, stood for three days, a
penitent in the snow, before being permitted an audience with Pope Gregory VII. Likewise, King John of England in 1213 stood naked
on a cold marble floor waiting for admission to the Pope's presence in order to apologize to him. Note the testimony of a Catholic
functionary again:

The Vicar of the Incarnate Son of God, Anointed High Priest and Supreme Temporal
Ruler, (the Pope) sat in his tribunal impartially to judge between nation and nation,
between people and prince, between sovereign and subject. 5

6. It was to be "different" from all the others.

...And he shall be diverse from the first.... Daniel 7:24

As "a horn" is a king or a kingdom, the little horn must represent a king or a kingdom
different from all the previous horns, which were secular kingdoms. The precise manner in which the horn was different can be
deducted from the sum total of all its attributes that will follow.

The papacy was different from the pagan kingdoms before it, because it was not only a political power, but a religio-political power as
well. With regard to the political aspect of the papacy, it is a recognized state. Its seat is the Vatican, complete with a traditional guard
and its own postal service. The Vatican is the smallest state in the world, occupying a mere 100 acres, but it has one of the strongest
diplomatic corps in the world. Papal representatives sit in the capitals of the world and in turn, these countries have their
representatives in the Vatican. The Pope is not only head of the Church, but also temporal sovereign of the papal state? The Vatican.

7. It was to have "Eyes like the eyes of a man and speaking great words against God". Daniel 7: 8,25

.. behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things....And he shall speak great words against the
Most High. Daniel 7:8,25

We have already discussed the reference to the man and its connotation with Babylon. The little horn power is man rising up against
God and speaking great words against God. It refers to a system that defies God directly and sets itself up in opposition to God. In
ancient Babylon, the king of Babylon was referred to as the head of gold. All power was vested in the king. His word was law, and he
was considered [a] god. Similarly, in the great antitype, all power will once again be vested in one man who as the spokesman for the
system will utter blasphemies and claim a status not due to mortal man. The Bible identifies blasphemy in the New Testament. We
read in the Gospel accounts that the Jews twice wanted to stone Jesus for blasphemy.

'..Son, be of good cheer, your sins are forgiven you.' And at once some of the scribes said within themselves, 'This Man blasphemes! '
Matthew 9:2,3 NKJV

'Son, your sins are forgiven you.'... 'Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?' Mark 2:5-7

'...For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.' John 10:33 NAS

Unlike Jesus, who is the Son of God and therefore can forgive sins, the little horn power is a power that claims to be able to forgive
sins, and then has the effrontery to claim the position of God. Paul, writing to the Thessalonians, reiterates this point with regard to the
antichrist.

Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God,
shewing himself that he is God. 2 Thessalonians 2:4

Many of the Roman catholic churches antics can be summed up in their doctrine as demonstrated here.

Catechism #8 – Priests have the title "Father". "In the great era of the Fathers of the Church, saintly bishops devoted an important
part of their ministry to catechesis."

Is this warning not sound enough for you….

8 But do not you be called Rabbi, for One is your Leader, the Christ, and you are all brothers.
9 And call no one your father on earth, for One is your Father, the One in Heaven.
10 Nor be called leaders, for One is your Leader, the Christ. (Mat 23)

Canon Law 1251 - Abstinence from meat, or from some other food as determined by the Episcopal Conference, is to be observed on
all Fridays, unless a solemnity should fall on a Friday. Abstinence and fasting are to be observed on Ash Wednesday and Good
Friday.

Catechism 1580 - In the East as in the West a man who has already received the sacrament of Holy Orders can no longer marry.

Both of these are the teachings of demons as explained by Timothy!

1 But the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, cleaving to deceiving spirits and teachings of
demons,
2 in lying speakers in hypocrisy, being seared in their own conscience,
3 forbidding to marry, saying to abstain from foods, which God created for partaking with thanksgiving by the believers and those
knowing the truth. (1 Tim 4)
Catechism #2131 - Basing itself on the mystery of the incarnate Word, the seventh ecumenical council at Nicaea (787) justified
against the iconoclasts the veneration of icons - of Christ, but also of the Mother of God, the angels, and all the saints. By becoming
incarnate, the Son of God introduced a new "economy" of images.

Catechism #2132 - The Christian veneration of images is not contrary to the first commandment which proscribes idols. Indeed, "the
honor rendered to an image passes to its prototype," and "whoever venerates an image venerates the person portrayed in it." The honor
paid to sacred images is a "respectful veneration," not the adoration due to God alone:

"Religious worship is not directed to images in themselves, considered as mere things, but under their distinctive aspect as images
leading us on to God incarnate. The movement toward the image does not terminate in it as image, but tends toward that whose image
it is." (CCC, 516-517; see also p. 299-300 under "Holy Images")

Talk about theobable!!!! Dear Lord open the eyes of our lost brothers!

Indeed, the Roman catholic church is "speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron" (1 Timothy
4:2). What is described above is classic idolatry. God strictly forbade the Israelites from doing this exact thing (i.e. making an image
that would represent Himself or something else and paying homage to it).

15 Take careful heed to yourselves, for you saw no form when the Lord spoke to you at Horeb out of the midst of the fire,

16 lest you act corruptly and make for yourselves a carved image in the form of any figure: the likeness of male or female.
(Deuteronomy 4).

8 You shall not make for yourself a carved image-any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or
that is in the water under the earth;

9 you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me. (Deuteronomy 5).

When Aaron made a golden calf for the Israelites, the golden calf represented Yahweh (translated, "the LORD" in the NKJV), the true
God. The Israelites identified this golden calf as the God who brought them out of the land of Egypt (Exodus 32:4), which was
Yahweh (Exodus 3:14-17).

And Aaron made a proclamation and said, "Tomorrow is a feast to the LORD." (Exodus 32:5).

God's response to the Israelites idolatry was severe anger (Exodus 32:7-35).

Catechism #971 - "All generations will call me blessed": "The Church's devotion to the Blessed Virgin is intrinsic to Christian
worship." The Church rightly honors "the Blessed Virgin with special devotion. From the most ancient times the Blessed Virgin has
been honored with the title of 'Mother of God,' to whose protection the faithful fly in all their dangers and needs. . . . This very special
devotion . . . differs essentially from the adoration which is given to the incarnate Word and equally to the Father and the Holy Spirit,
and greatly fosters this adoration." The liturgical feasts dedicated to the Mother of God and Marian prayer, such as the rosary, an
"epitome of the whole Gospel," express this devotion to the Virgin Mary.

Although Catholics may deny they worship Mary, they nonetheless do worship her. And, being that she is not God, this is therefore
idolatry (worship of someone or something other than God, (Deuteronomy 5:7; Psalm 96:5) and demonic (Leviticus 17:7;
Deuteronomy 32:17; 2 Chronicles 11:15; Psalm 106:37; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21; Revelation 9:20). Pope John Paul II epitomized this
Mary worship. In the book, Crossing The Threshold Of Hope, by "His Holiness John Paul II," the chapter entitled, "The Mother of
God" begins and ends with these two paragraphs.

"The renewal of Marian Theology and devotion - in continuity with Catholic tradition - is another distinctive characteristic of the
teaching and pastoral activity of John Paul II. Totus Tuus ("I am completely yours, O Mary") is the motto you chose for your papacy."
(p. 212)

"I think what I have said sufficiently explains the Marian devotion of the present Pope and, above all, his attitude of total
abandonment to Mary - his Totus Tuus." (p. 215)

Catechism # 969 - . . . "Taken up to heaven she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring
us the gifts of eternal salvation. . . . Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper,
Benefactress, and Mediatrix."Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper,
Benefactress, and Mediatrix."

Mary is given the title of "Advocate", a title only Christ (Yahushua) is given in Scripture:

1 My little children, I write these things to you so that you do not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus
Christ the righteous. (1 john 2)

Also in the same section she is stated to be one who not only intercedes, but also brings "gifts of eternal salvation" (ibid.). Acts 4:12
says,

12 Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved. (Acts 4)

What is this name? It is Yahushua (Christ Jesus) of Nazareth (Acts 4:10; Philippians 2:9-11), not Mary (Mark 3:31-35; Luke 11:27-
28).

Is the cloud of darkness beginning to lift? Are the scales being removed from your eyes? Let’s take this a step further….

What about infant baptism?

The Catholic Church teaches that infants become children of God once they are baptized. This is a hellish and damning lie. This
encourages a trust in a ritual rather than a trust (an on going faith, 1 Corinthians 15:2; Hebrews 3:14) in the living Savior for re-birth
(Romans 3:21-22; 1 Peter 1:3-5; 3:21).

Catechism #1250 - …"The Church and the parents would deny a child the priceless grace of becoming a child of God were they not
to confer Baptism shortly after birth."

The above misrepresentation regarding infant baptismal regeneration is nowhere taught in the scriptures. Only God can do this. All
human baptisms accomplish (if done by properly anointed priests – which I might add is also foreordained by God and God alone) is
to cleans the flesh of past, present, or future sins. One can only cleanse another with the cleanliness they themselves possess. In other
words, any priest claiming to clean an infant should have his head examined!

3 Jesus answered and said to him, Truly, truly, I say to you, If one is not generated from above, he is not able to see the kingdom of
God. (John 3)

Basically, the roman catholic church is doing as the Jews of old by teaching "as doctrines the commandments of men" (Matthew
15:9).

The list of pharisaical practices goes on and on, however I cannot spend any more time on this right now. We will come back to some
of this later. We are only touching the fringes of scriptural understanding here. If you want all of the details you may want to peruse
our websites at your leisure. Getting back to our earlier exposing of the Anti-Christ…..

More of their antics…..

8. It was to "make war on God's saints."

... the same horn was making war against the saints, and prevailing against them. Daniel 7:21 NKJV

The little horn power was thus to be a persecuting power that would war against God's people, and have success against them.

It is a fact of history that the great wars of Europe were fought on religious grounds. The Protestants of Europe were relentlessly
persecuted by Rome. Europe was plunged into the 'Thirty-year war' and the 'Hundred-year war' with the sole purpose of destroying the
Protestant Reformation. The Waldenses, the Albigensers, the Huguenots were all relentlessly persecuted, and the Inquisition ordered
the cruelest of punishments to be executed by the princes of Europe upon all those who refused to bow to the supremacy of Rome. In
1200 AD Pope Innocent III ordered the king of France to exterminate the Albigensers because they refused to accept the papal
teachings and regarded the Bible, not the papacy as the ultimate Word of God. Historians D'Augbigné and Wylie say that more than a
million of these innocent people were massacred in one single campaign.

9. It would "think to change times and laws"

And shall think to change times and law. Daniel 7:25

Which times and laws would God be particularly concerned about? Surely this must refer to laws that God Himself has established
and times which God Himself has set. We know that the Law is the whole Bible, but in particular this may be referring to the Laws of
Moses, the Ten Commandments since they are well known. Changing the times and the laws must therefore refer to the attempt to
tamper with God's law itself and tampering with times set by God.

Has the papacy made an attempt to change the law of God and to interfere in the set times? The answer is indeed 'yes'. Any Catholic
catechism will show that the law of God has been changed by the papacy. A comparison with the Bible will show that the Ten
Commandments have been tampered with. The second commandment, which refers to images and idols, is absent in the Catholic
catechism. And to make up for the loss of one commandment, the tenth is divided into two. The fourth commandment concerning the
Sabbath day (the only commandment dealing with time) becomes the third commandment in the Catholic catechism, and the day of
worship is shifted by papal decree from the seventh to the first day of the week (Saturday to Sunday). The great papistical debater, Dr.
Eck, who on encountering Luther in 1553, said:

"There is no mention of the cessation of the Sabbath and the institution of Sunday in the gospels or in Paul's writings? Or in all the
Bible; therefore, this has taken place by the apostolic Church instituting it without scripture." 20

Catholic World says:

"The church took the pagan philosophy and made it the buckler of faith against the heathen. She took the pagan Sunday and made it
the Christian Sunday. There is in truth something royal, something kingly about the sun, making it a fitting emblem of Jesus, the Sun
of justice. Hence the church in these countries would seem to have said, 'keep the old pagan name, it shall remain consecrated,
sanctified.' And thus the pagan Sunday, dedicated to Balder, became the Christian Sunday, sacred to Jesus." 21

The Catholic Mirror, Sept. 23, 1893 says:

"The Christian Sabbath is therefore to this day the acknowledged offspring of the Catholic Church, as a spouse of the Holy Ghost,
without a word of remonstrance from the Protestant world."

Father Enright, Sentinel, June 1893 says and I find this to be most unsettling:

"The Bible says 'Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath day'. The Catholic church says 'No! By my divine power, I abolish the
Sabbath day, and command you to keep holy the first day of the week, and lo, the entire civilized world bows down in reverent
obedience to the command of the Holy Catholic Church."

Catechismus Romanus, 1867, Chap. 3 quotes Pope Pius in 1566:

"It pleased the church of God that the religious celebration of the Sabbath day should be transferred to the Lord's day (Sunday)'".

Papal Rome thus tampered with the law of God and changed the ordinances, although the Bible declares of God: "For I am the
LORD, I change not ...." Malachi 3:6

Here for your perusal is more on the catholic churches apostate actions regarding the Ten Commandments.

The deception surrounding the Ten Commandments

The Conflicting Arrangement of the Ten Commandments as Revealed by a Comparison of the Protestant, Catholic and
Hebrew Versions (much of this material taken from a book by Joseph Lewis)

This information compiled for you, and subsequent facts will prove, that not all the religions which accept these Commandments as
the revealed words of God condense them in the same manner or interpret them the same way. They are arranged to suit the exigencies
of the particular creed and to fit the ritual of the particular form of worship. This is an affront to the Word of God!

We are told by religious leaders that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and that man must not presume to pit his finite intelligence
against it. Yet that is exactly what the religionists have done with so important a part of the Bible as the Ten Commandments -- God's
supposed words written with his own finger!
We are told that regardless of other differences that might exist among these three religions, they are in perfect accord on the Ten
Commandments!

If there is any place where perfect accord should exist in Biblical matters among the sects, it should be in the Decalogue. If they do not
agree about the only message that God is supposed to have delivered himself, how can we expect to find them in agreement on matters
about which they admit there exists much doubt and speculation?

Although the Protestant, Catholic and Hebrew Bibles vary but slightly and then only textually, the listing to follow reveals a deliberate
change made by those responsible for the arrangement of the Commandments.

The Decalogue According to the The Decalogue According to the The Decalogue According to the
Protestant Version [**13] Catholic Version [**14] Hebrew Version [**15]

First Commandment First Commandment First Commandment

Thou shalt have no other gods before I am the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not I am the Lord thy God, who brought
me. have strange gods before me. thee out of the land of Egypt, out of
the house of slavery.

In the First Commandment, the reader will note that the words "I am the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land of
Egypt, out of the house of bondage," is left out of the Protestant version completely, and partially from the Catholic. It
forms the First Commandment according to the Hebrews.

In the Catholic and Protestant versions, the reference to being "brought out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of
bondage," was left out for very good and sufficient reasons! That part of the Commandment has absolutely nothing
whatever to do with Protestants or Catholics. When the Commandments were written, they were not in existence. They
were never in Egypt, and the Lord had no occasion to free them from the yoke of bondage; by this very omission the Ten
Commandments are stamped as a purely provincial code, applicable, if at all, only to the Children of Israel. In this respect
both the Catholics and the Protestants have judiciously, yet deceitfully, refrained from using it, despite the incontrovertible
fact that it is part of the Decalogue, and just as vital as the other parts.

In some editions of the Hebrew Bible, the word "bondage" has been substituted for "slavery." The explanation given for
this change by the best Biblical authorities is that the Jews do not want to characterize Egypt as a place of slavery while
the Jews living in Egypt are enjoying liberty there. Was the integrity of the text sacrificed for the sake of expediency?

In wording this Commandment, however, the Catholics were cleverer than the Protestants. They used the first five words
of the Commandment but left out the succeeding damaging phrase, and have added, though in a corrupted form, the first
part of the Second Commandment. The Protestants, unable to use the First Commandment as biblically recorded, have
daringly taken the first sentence of the Second Commandment as the first one in the arrangement of the Decalogue!

In an address over radio station WEAF, the second of a series dealing with the Ten Commandments, the Rev. James M.
Gillis, C.S.P., made this statement: "On the tablets of Moses, the First Commandment read: 'I am the Lord thy God, thou
shalt not have strange Gods before me.'"

Joseph Lewis challenged this statement of the Rev. James M. Gillis, C.S.P., and state categorically: No such words
appeared on the tablets of Moses as biblically recorded, and in making that statement he either deliberately falsified the
text or is ignorant of the facts. If the former, it invalidates his right to discuss this question; and if the latter, it reveals his
incompetence.

Lewis also stated, "If the Rev. James M. Gillis does not accept my indictment, perhaps he will abide by the following
quotation taken from the Douay Version of the Bible, "published with the imprimatur and approbation of His Eminence
John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York."

I quote Exodus, Chapter 20, verses 1 and 2:

1. And the Lord spoke all these words;

2. I am the Lord thy God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Why did the Rev. James M. Gillis fail to include the words, "who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of
bondage," particularly when he states that "the Ten Commandments are not the voice of man -- they are the revelations of
the mind and will of the Almighty," and "whether He whisper or whether He thunder, the message is the same, the
infallible, everlasting moral law, in brief, the Ten Commandments"?

In the course of his discussion of the Ten Commandments, the Rev. James M. Gillis states that "a lie is a lie, whether it
come out of the mouth, or off the page," and that "if to the lie is added fraud, restitution must be made otherwise, in the
Catholic system absolution for the sin cannot be obtained." According to his own standard, James M. Gillis himself is
placed in the category of those doomed by the dogma of his own Church.

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Second Commandment Second Second Commandment

Commandment [**21]
4. Thou shalt not make unto thee 3. Thou shalt have no other gods
any graven image, or any likeness Thou shalt not take the before Me.
of any thing that is in heaven above, name of the Lord thy God
or that is in the earth beneath, or in vain. 4. Thou shalt not make unto thee a
that is in the water under the earth: graven image, nor any manner of
likeness, of any thing that is in
5. Thou shalt not bow down thyself heaven above, or that is in the earth
to them, nor serve them: for I the beneath, or that is in the water
Lord thy God am a jealous God, under the earth;
visiting the iniquity of the fathers
upon the children unto the third and 5. Thou shalt not bow down unto
fourth generation of them that hate them, nor serve them; for I the Lord
me; thy God am a jealous God, visiting
the iniquity of the fathers upon the
6. And showing mercy unto children unto the third and fourth
thousands of them that love me, generation of them that hate Me;
and keep my commandments.
6. And showing mercy unto the
thousandth generation of them that
love Me and keep My
commandments.

In addition to the italicized words which differentiate the Protestant and Hebrew versions of the Second Commandment,
we find that the Catholics leave out the entire Second Commandment. They omit it because it would interfere with the
most lucrative part of their ritual -- the worship and adoration of saints and of their coveted "Mother of God" Mary.
Catholics not only make "graven images" in direct prohibition and violation of the Second Commandment, but they also
worship these images in defiance of an angry and vengeful God. That the Roman Catholic Church has practiced this
defiance with impunity for centuries indicates either the impotence of the Bible God or the falsity of the Commandments.

Catholic historical records show that the Church has continuously, since the fourth century, published a mutilated set of
Commandments and maintained it as the true version by prohibiting anyone from reading the Bible! In fact, this is the very
reason Tyndale, who translated the Bible into English, was strangled and burned at the stake.

Since the Seventh General Council, 787 A.D., the Second Commandment has either been omitted or falsely explained
away. In fact, so cleverly did the Catholic Church perpetrate this fraud that up to and even after the Reformation it was not
discovered, and formed the Decalogue as accepted by the Anglican Church as late as 1563. So strongly was this
mutilated version of the Commandments entrenched that even Martin Luther did not discover the imposition until several
decades after his schism with Rome, and accounts for the Lutherans accepting the Catholic version of the Decalogue.

Lewis is constrained to refer to the text of the Decalogue in Exodus of the Douay Version of the Bible for additional
evidence of the perfidy of the Catholic Church in omitting the Second Commandment. The heading at the beginning of the
chapter is "The Ten Commandments." As explained in Chapter 20, verses 4, 5 and 6:

4. Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the
earth beneath, nor of those things that are in the waters under the earth.
 5. Thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them: I am the Lord thy God, mighty, jealous, visiting the iniquity of the
fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me:

6. And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

In order to omit the Second Commandment from the Decalogue, not only must verses 8, 9 and 10 be eliminated from
Chapter 5 of the Book of Deuteronomy, but the above verses 4, 5 and 6 must also be deleted from this chapter as well as
from other portions of the Bible.

While the Catholic Catechism omits this Commandment from its arrangement of the Decalogue, the Catholic
Encyclopedia admits its validity as part of the Ten Commandments and even its application to the prohibitions of making
and worshiping graven images!

The Catholic Church stands convicted not only by evidence taken from its own records, but by its own authorities. The
listing of the Ten Commandments as they appear in the Douay Version of the Bible has additional value to us besides
furnishing incontrovertible evidence in indicting the Catholic Church for deliberate deception in omitting the Second
Commandment from the Decalogue.

That image worship is a degrading superstition and was condemned by the early Church Fathers in scathing terms, is one
of the amazing contradictions of Catholicism. St. Augustine, undoubtedly the foremost of the group, said: "He who
worships an image turns the truth of God unto a lie." Even the crucifix, which is worshiped and adored today, is as much
an idolatrous instrument as the image of a man or woman. It was introduced as part of the worship of the Church only in
the latter part of the sixth century, and finally authorized by the Council of Constantinople, 692 A.D. The crucifix
was unknown until the sixth century, and liberal Protestants still abhor its use as being beneath the dignity of an intelligent
person.

The Christians of France, Germany and England condemned the action of the Seventh General Council authorizing the
worship of images, and foremost among the opponents was Charlemagne.

It would require too lengthy an analysis to give the complete reason why the Roman Catholic Church violates this
Commandment and omits it from its version of the Decalogue. Suffice it to say that when Constantine embraced
Christianity, he found that the incurably superstitious would not relinquish their idols, and so the Church, after a feeble and
unsuccessful effort, merely incorporated image worship as part of its ritual. The financial returns more than justified the
compromise with "God's Word."

In order to make up for the omission of the Second Commandment, the Catholic Church moved up the third and made it
the second. It will be interesting, as we continue this comparison, to see for ourselves how they schemingly provided for
the "ten."

With the exception of using the first sentence of this Commandment as the first of the Decalogue, the Protestants and the
Hebrews differ only slightly in the wording, which is not particularly important in this comparison.

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Third Commandment Third Commandment Third Commandment

7. Thou shalt not take the name of Remember thou keep the Sabbath 7. Thou shalt not take the name of
the Lord thy God in vain: for the Day. the Lord thy God in vain; for the
Lord will not hold him guiltless that Lord will not hold him guiltless that
taketh his name in vain. taketh His name in vain.

For the first time there is perfect accord between the Protestants and Hebrews on one of the Commandments. The
Catholics, however, in order to make up for the omission of the Second Commandment, merely move up the next one,
making the fourth the third. There seems to be no justification for the mutilated form in which they express it, nor can I find
a reason for its mutilation, except to avoid the embarrassing question of why it is to be observed.
Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Fourth Commandment Fourth Commandment Fourth Commandment

Remember the sabbath day, to Honor thy Father and thy Mother. Remember the sabbath day to keep
keep it holy. it holy. Six days shalt thou labour,
and do all thy work. But the seventh
Six days shalt thou labor, and do all day is the sabbath in honour of the
thy work: Lord thy God; on it thou shalt not do
any work, neither thou, nor thy son,
But the seventh day is the sabbath nor thy daughter, thy manservant
of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle,
not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy stranger that is within thy
nor thy daughter, thy manservant, gates; For in six days the Lord
nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, made the heavens and the earth,
nor thy stranger that is within thy the sea, and all that is in them, and
rested on the seventh day;
gates:
therefore the Lord blessed the
sabbath day, and hallowed it.
For in six days the Lord made
heaven and earth, the sea, and all
that in them is, and rested the
seventh day: wherefore the Lord
blessed the sabbath day, and
hallowed it.

While the difference between the Protestant and Hebrew versions is mostly italicized words, we find that again the
Catholic Church has misplaced the Fifth Commandment and listed it as the fourth, with the same omissions.

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Fifth Commandment Fifth Commandment Fifth Commandment

Honor thy father and thy mother: Thou shalt not kill. Honour thy father and thy mother; in
that thy days may be long upon the order that thy days may be
land which the Lord thy God giveth prolonged upon the land which the
thee. Lord thy God giveth thee. [*26]

Again the Catholics have moved the sixth to the place of the fifth, whereas the Protestant and Hebrew differ only
textually.

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Sixth Commandment Sixth Commandment Sixth Commandment

Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not commit adultery. Thou shalt not kill.

In this Commandment, the Protestants and the Hebrews are also in accord, while the Catholics have placed the Seventh
Commandment in the position of the sixth. It is a notorious fact that when the Catholics wish to admonish their adherents
against the violation of this Commandment, they never refer to it by number.

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Seventh Commandment Seventh Commandment Seventh Commandment

Thou shalt not commit adultery. Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Once more the Protestants and the Hebrews are in accord, while the Catholics continue to move up a Commandment in
order to provide for the omission of the second.
In passing, I should like to mention that this Commandment was once placed before the one referring to killing because at
one time adultery was considered the greater offense. In fact, in the oldest Biblical manuscript, a parchment known as the
"Nash Manuscript," the prohibition of adultery precedes that of killing.

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Eighth Commandment Eighth Commandment Eighth Commandment

Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not bear false witness Thou shalt not steal.
against thy neighbor.

The agreement between the Protestant and Hebrew versions of this Commandment only emphasizes the falsity of the
Catholic arrangement.

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Ninth Commandment Ninth Commandment Ninth Commandment

Thou shalt not bear false witness Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's Thou shalt not bear false witness
against thy neighbor. wife. against thy neighbor.

The significance here lies in the fact that the Catholics have taken a part of the Tenth Commandment and made it the
ninth! Refer again to the 17th verse of the 20th Chapter of Exodus of the Douay Bible, and it will be plainly seen that this
Commandment is in one complete sentence and does not lend itself to a division such as the Catholic Church made in
order to cover up its duplicity by omitting the Second Commandment. I quote for the convenience of the reader:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house: neither shalt thou desire his wife, nor his servant, nor his
handmaid, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is his.

If the Tenth Commandment were divided into two verses or two sentences in the Bible, its separation could have been
defended on that score; but even such a flimsy excuse cannot be resorted to as a defense in this monumental piece of
brazen deceit and hypocrisy. Certainly the Tenth Commandment does not admit of separation. It deals with but one
human trait -- covetousness -- expressed in one complete sentence. In addition, the first line of the Commandment, in
both the Hebrew and Protestant versions, reads, "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house..." The Catholic arrangement
of the Decalogue makes "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife" the Ninth Commandment, and coveting the
neighbour's property the tenth. Catholics apparently use the Deuteronomy version as the source for the Ninth and Tenth
Commandments. By doing this, they are placed in the position of accepting the reason for the observance of the Sabbath
as the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt. "Confusion worse confounded!"

Protestant Catholic Hebrew

Tenth Commandment Tenth Commandment Tenth Commandment

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's
house, thou shalt not covet thy goods. house; thou shalt not covet thy
neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, neighbour's wife, nor his
nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor manservant, nor his maidservant,
his ass, nor any thing that is thy nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any
neighbor's. thing that is thy neighbour's.

While the Protestants and Hebrews agree as to the Tenth Commandment, the Catholic version continues with a mutilated
arrangement, leaving out vital details of the Biblical text, essential to the understanding of this Commandment.

Before turning our attention to an analysis of the ethical, moral and philosophical value of the Commandments, I should
like to mention an incident which occurred just before a former mayor of the City of New York, James J. Walker, departed
for an extended European trip. The Grand Street Boys' Association held a dinner in his honor. At its conclusion, as a
token of the good will and harmony among those present, who comprised Protestants, Jews and Catholics, Supreme
Court Justice Edward Riegelman presented to Mr. Walker, on behalf of the association, a golden scroll of the Ten
Commandments written in Hebrew, with the following remark: "This is presented by Hebrews, through a Protestant, to a
Catholic as an expression of the plane upon which all hope to stand."
If "the plane upon which all hope to stand" is no better than their agreement on the Ten Commandments, then they are all
doomed to fall!

I apologize for the distraction but it seemed to fit at the time…now back to the Anti-Christ!

10. The saints were to be handed over to him for a time, times and half a time. Daniel 7:25 NKJV

.... and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. Daniel 7:25

After the number of the days in which ye searched the land, even forty days, each day for a year, shall ye bear your
iniquities, even forty years. (See also Ezekiel 4:6)

The papacy would be supreme in its persecution of the saints for 1260 years. The legally recognized supremacy of the
Pope began in 538 AD when the Emperor Justinian elevated the Bishop of Rome to the position of Head of all Churches.
This is known as the Edict of Justinian. Adding 1260 years to 538 AD brings us to 1798, which is the year the Pope was
deposed when the French General Berthier, under Napoleon, led him into captivity. Napoleon apparently tried to crush the
papacy and about eighteen months later the Pope died in exile in Valence, France. This act ended papal power in terms
of enforcing papal decrees.

The papal system has placed itself in the place of Jesus Christ on earth, and claims to be able to mediate between man
and God. The great reformers were all united in their recognition of papal Rome as the antichrist power, and the
reformation was the result of this recognition. By separating from Rome, the Bible was made available again to mankind,
and many a reformer was willing to die rather than to deny its sacred pages. But the Bible also predicts that this same
power will continue to reign until the end and will again enforce its decree contrary to the dictates of God.

11. It shall devour the whole earth

Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall
devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. Daniel 7:23

Papal Rome was to receive the same supremacy it enjoyed in the Middle Ages over the nations of Europe on an
international scale at the end of time. This amazing prophecy is being fulfilled to the letter, and in the corridors of
diplomacy and through the resolutions adopted by the world governing bodies, papal standards and decrees will once
again be accepted as laws of nations. The leaders of the world have granted Rome the recognition she desires and have
hailed her as the "moral superpower." They have credited Rome with bringing communism to an end and religious bodies
are accepting papal supremacy in religious affairs.

However, Pagan Rome did not fulfill this prophecy to the letter. As seen in the sixth identifying feature, the little horn
power was that component arising out of the Roman Empire which was to be different from all the others, and it is this
different power which was eventually to devour the whole earth. The prophecy predicts that the little horn would obtain
power over all the kings of the world, referring to all the political entities existing at the end of time.

12. It shall reign until the Ancient of Days comes

... until the Ancient of Days came, and a judgment was given to the saints of the Most High, and the time came that the
saints possessed the kingdom. Daniel 7:22

This is one of the most profound prophecies concerning the antichrist. The antichrist was to arise before 538 AD (the final
date for the uprooting of three of the ten initial kingdoms arising out of the Roman Empire), and was to prevail until the
Ancient of Days came - a reference to the second coming of Christ and His battle with Satan. No individual could
therefore fulfill this prophecy, and only a power could achieve such longevity. Since it is identified as a horn, or a king or
kingdom according to the Biblical definition, we must be dealing with a kingdom and its rulers that has been around for
more than a millennium and a half.

Papal supremacy in the Middle Ages was temporarily suppressed in 1798 when Napoleon invaded Rome, and the pope
was taken captive and exiled. Rome lost its sovereignty, but regained it again in 1929, when Mussolini returned the papal
states to the papacy. The Bible predicts that the little horn power would again reach the supremacy that it enjoyed in the
Middle Ages. The fact that the little horn power was to exist until the Ancient of Days comes makes it impossible for the
commonly accepted view that Antiochus Epiphanes, a king from the Selucid Dynasty of Greece who desecrated the
temple at Jerusalem, could have been the antichrist. This commonly accepted view of preterists is further made
impossible in that Jesus, Paul, and John all speak of the antichrist as a future power. Only the papacy spans the time
frame outlined in Daniel 7.

13. Its dominion will be taken away

But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end. Daniel 7:26

The good news is that we are all acutely aware of is that God will triumph. When Christ returns, this power will be
destroyed and God will set up His kingdom which will never be destroyed and in which there will no longer be any
persecution. There will be no more sickness and God will wipe away every tear.

The 2 Presences of the Christ

We start with the famous question that the disciples put to Jesus on the Mount of Olives :

1 Departing now, Jesus was on his way from the temple, but his disciples approached to show him the buildings of the
temple.
2 In response he said to them: Do you not behold all these things? Truly I say to you, By no means will a stone be left
here upon a stone and not be thrown down.
3 While he was sitting upon the Mount of Olives, the disciples approached him privately, saying: Tell us, When will these
things be, and what will be the sign of your presence and of the conclusion of the system of things? (Matthew 24).

This is of course a sign of a future presence, since Jesus was clearly present when he was being asked the question. As
a matter of logic, if a sign of a future presence is required, then there must be a period of absence preceding both this
sign and the future presence itself. This second presence must be hard to see and missed by many of Jesus' disciples
because it is not seen directly but requires a sign to identify it.

Jesus says to his disciples: Do you not behold these things? Referring to the buildings of the temple. This is a Yes/No
Question. In the literal meaning of course the disciples could see these buildings; they were showing them to Jesus.
Therefore in the symbolic meaning they could not see these buildings. The temple buildings in the symbolic meaning are
invisible physically just like his second presence. Now 'buildings' means that there are several true Christian religions, in
the temple with the 4 cornerstones, for the scripture does not say 'building' of the temple. But the building, the true
religion, and the stones of the (buildings of) the temple are physically invisible in the symbolic meaning because they are
living stones, sanctified men and women. These true Christians do not look any different to any other human, and some of
them do not behave any differently either.

19 Certainly, therefore, you are no longer strangers and alien residents, but you are fellow citizens of the holy ones and
are members of the household of God,
20 and you have been built up upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, while Christ Jesus himself is the
foundation cornerstone.
21 In union with him the whole building, being harmoniously joined together, is growing into a holy temple in [the] Lord.
22 In union with him you, too, are being built up together into a place for God to inhabit by spirit (Ephesians 2 - NWT
adapted from Greek).

4 Coming to him as to a living stone, rejected, it is true, by men, but chosen, precious, with God.
5 You yourselves also as living stones are being built up a spiritual house for the purpose of a holy priesthood, to offer up
spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.
6 For it is contained in Scripture: Look! I am laying in Zion a stone, chosen, a foundation cornerstone, precious; and no
one exercising faith in it will by any means come to disappointment (1 Peter 2).

19 In answer Jesus said to them: Break down this temple, and in 3 days I will raise it up.
20 Therefore the Jews said: This temple was built in 46 years, and will you raise it up in three days?
21 But he was talking about the temple of his body.
22 When, though, he was raised up from the dead, his disciples called to mind that he used to say this; and they believed
the Scripture and the saying that Jesus said (John 2).

19 What! Do you not know that the body of you people is temple of the holy spirit within you, which you have from God? (1
Corinthians 6).
5 You yourselves also as living stones are being built up a spiritual house for the purpose of a holy priesthood, to offer up
spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2).

One or more of the buildings of this grand temple of all Christianity must contain the living stones of Jesus' very body, the
new covenant saints, his fiancé; his wife as far as Hebrew custom was concerned. Now if they are present, then so is he:

30 We are members of his body (Ephesians 5).

18 He is the head of the body, the congregation (Colossians 1).

23 Because a husband is head of his wife, as the Christ also is head of the congregation, he being a saviour of [this] body
(Ephesians 5).

The Marriage here is the new covenant. The New covenant saints collectively are Jesus' bride, engaged to him through
this covenant. Hence we read in Revelation:

7 Let us rejoice and be overjoyed, and let us give him the glory, because the marriage of the Lamb has arrived and his
wife has prepared herself.
8 Yes, it has been granted to her to be arrayed in bright, clean, fine linen, for the fine linen stands for the righteous acts of
the holy ones (Revelation 19).

Jesus is the lamb here:

29 The next day he beheld Jesus coming toward him, and he said: See, the Lamb of God that takes away the sin of the
world! (John 1).

This marriage takes place on 2008Nisan16 the first day of the Kingdom of God, it being the inauguration of that Kingdom,
and the investiture of the New covenant saints as Kings over it. After the marriage in Revelation 19, Jesus and the saints
go off to fight Armageddon. But even when the new covenant saints were merely his fiancé, having entered into the
covenant, they are still regarded as Jesus flesh, his body, under Law:

23 In case there happened to be a virgin girl engaged to a man, and a man actually found her in the city and lay down
with her,
24 You must also bring them both out to the gate of that city and pelt them with stones, and they must die, the girl for the
reason that she did not scream in the city, and the man for the reason that he humiliated the wife of his fellowman. So you
must clear away what is evil from your midst (Deuteronomy 22).

18 But the birth of Jesus Christ was in this way. During the time his mother Mary was promised in marriage to Joseph, she
was found to be pregnant by holy spirit before they were united.
19 However, Joseph her husband, because he was righteous and did not want to make her a public spectacle, intended
to divorce her secretly (Matthew 1).

So Jesus’ fiancé is treated in all respects as his wife, because in those days there was no question of either a man or a
woman breaking their agreement with each other (things have changed a bit since then). And like Adam said:

24 That is why a man will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh
(Genesis 2).

6 So that they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore, what God has yoked together let no man put asunder (Matthew
19).

OK so the new covenant saints are Jesus' flesh, his body, his wife, and they are the living stones of one or more of the
buildings of the spiritual temple. And now we can see clearly that they are split into two presences, two temples. Because
we know that Jesus is absent for a period (for otherwise there he would not have given a sign of his future presence). We
have already seen this is the case of the children of Leah, being split 4 and 2. We can also see it in the case of the temple
curtain that was rent in two from top to bottom at Jesus' death.

Two presences from the temple curtain being rent in two

St. Paul describes the temple curtain as Jesus’ flesh.

19 Therefore, brothers, since we have boldness for the way of entry into the holy place by the blood of Jesus,
20 which he inaugurated for us as a new and living way through the curtain, that is, his flesh,
21 and since we have a great priest over the house of God,
22 let us approach with true hearts in the full assurance of faith, having had our hearts sprinkled from a wicked
conscience and our bodies bathed with clean water (Hebrews 10).

Hearts sprinkled with Jesus’ blood, cleansing the conscience for everlasting life, and bodies bathed with clean water
cleansing the flesh for resurrection. Two different baptisms. Now when Jesus died, this curtain, which divided the holy part
from the most holy part in the sanctuary of the temple, was rent in two:

50 Again Jesus cried out with a loud voice, and yielded up [his] spirit.
51 And, look! the curtain of the sanctuary was rent in two, from top to bottom, and the earth quaked, and the rock-masses
were split (Matthew 27).

33 And you must put the curtain under the hooks and bring the ark of the testimony there within the curtain; and the
curtain must make a division for you between the Holy and the Most Holy (Exodus 26).

Since Paul has told us that the curtain is Jesus’ flesh, and since his wife, the new covenant saints as a group, who eat his
flesh and drink his blood, are also his flesh, they are obviously split in two as well. Paul explains further:

6 After these things had been constructed this way, the priests enter the first tent [compartment] at all times to perform the
sacred services;
7 but into the second [compartment] the high priest alone enters once a year, not without blood, which he offers for
himself and for the sins of ignorance of the people (Hebrews 9).

11 However, when Christ came as a high priest of the good things that have come to pass, through the greater and more
perfect tent not made with hands, that is, not of this creation,
12 he entered, no, not with the blood of goats and of young bulls, but with his own blood, once for all time into the holy
place and obtained an everlasting deliverance [for us] (Hebrews 9).

Jesus entered into heaven with his blood, so the curtain that prevented him from doing this was obviously his fleshly body.
So now we understand how Paul deduced this symbolism. But his fleshly body is also his wife, and so his wife is split in
two making two presences. Whilst he was alive, the temple curtain of his flesh was in one piece, namely his body, after he
died his body became that of his wife and it was split in two.

What this means is that the baptism into the name of Jesus for the New covenant saints ended before the end of the first
presence, which ended when the last New covenant saint died. Then the baptism restarted at the beginning of the second
presence, with the baptism of the first of the second group of new covenant saints, Leah's second group of children
(Issachar and Zebulun). This is an enormously significant discovery for all Christians since Jesus' day. This gap in time
between the buildings (plural) of the spiritual temple, the presences, is prefigured by the gap in time between the two
physical stone temples of the Jews, between Solomon's temple and Zerubbabel's temple. Don't forget that the Jews were
not under law in Babylon. One cannot be under law without a temple!! It was Ezra who took them back under law, he was
a second Moses if you like - see Nehemiah 8-10.

The importance of this is that a lot of people over the last 2,000 years who have claimed to be new covenant saints, by
their partaking of the bread and the wine have been badly mislead. If they had listened to Jesus they would have known,
because it is like he said:

11 You will always have the poor with you but you will not always have me (Matthew 26 adapted from Greek).

This response was made to the disciple’s indignation at a woman pouring expensive oil on Jesus' head. The woman is the
new covenant, the expensive oil is the baptism in Holy Spirit, and the head is the collection of new covenant saints who
are to be the Kings of the Kingdom of God in heaven. So the response, in the symbolic meaning, means you will not
always have the new covenant saints. It means, I will not always be present. In the literal meaning of course Jesus died.

Jesus' Comings and his Presences

It is important to realize first of all that Jesus came to the physical and true temple in his first century ministry to chuck out
the bad guys:
1 And suddenly there will come to his temple the Lord, whom you people are seeking, and the messenger of the covenant
in whom you are delighting. Look! He will certainly come, Jehovah of armies has said (Malachi 3).

15 So, after making a whip of ropes, he drove all those with the sheep and cattle out of the temple, and he poured out the
coins of the money changers and overturned their tables (John 2).

The greater meaning of this is that he can come to inspect his temple during his presence. This is quite a conundrum if
not fully understood. It seems ridiculous that Jesus can come during his presence, but he can do this, coming to inspect
the temple of the new covenant saints.

Before we go any further with this we must invoke Manchester United Football Club in the glory days which ended with
the exit of Beckham, to explain the activities of God and Jesus and all true Religions in terms that everyone understands
(except possibly Manchester City fans)

God Chairman Martin Edwards

Jesus (Michael) Manager Alex Ferguson
Gabriel Assistant Manager Steve Maclaren
Coach and Scout for new
Melchizedek ??
players
Head of true religion on earth Captain Roy Keane
New Covenant Saints Regular 1st team players Beckham, Gigs etc.
True church, true congregation Other team members Substitutes

Fill in you least favorite football team

Satan Chairman
details here!
Satan (he is a control freak) Manager
A demon prince Assistant Manager
Coach and Scout for new
A Demon corruptor
players
The Governments of the World soon to unite
Captain
as the UN
Mankind who hate God and other men Regular 1st team players
Mankind who are not interested in God or
Other team members
anyone else other than themselves

With this analogy a presence of the Christ is the existence of New covenant saints which has to be within a true
congregation in order that the saints are clean in the flesh. So if Jesus is present then we have a team.

A coming of the Christ is when there is a game on, a test of spiritual/footballing capability so Alex Ferguson comes to the
match to see how his players are doing.

The captain of the team (Roy Keane) is the head of the true church containing the true new covenant saints. The first
captain was Jesus himself, then Peter, then John, etc etc.

Now hopefully the reader can understand that when Jesus came physically to ransom Adam, to die sacrificially, he
actually came as a player manager (more like Keagan or Dalgleish). But when he came the first time in the second
presence, he came as a manager (Alex Ferguson) but not as a player (Beckham, Gigs) or as the team captain (Roy
Keane). In fact at that time the team captains were Charles Russell and then Joseph Rutherford, and the team was the
International bible Students, now known as the Jehovah's Witnesses. As the reader will have seen from his/her own
experience, a good manager can achieve more off the field than he can on the field.

This is why Jesus' first coming in the second presence (which is colloquially referred to as his second coming, but actually
his 10th coming to earth, and his 3rd coming after his sacrifice) did not involve a further personal appearance.

Every time Jesus comes within a presence, he replaces the whole team, and picks another team captain, thereby creating
an entirely new Christian religion. He is a bit more radical than Alex Ferguson. And Gordon must say that in his personal
opinion Alex Ferguson is a lot closer to Jesus Christ than Martin Edwards is to God, a lot closer. It is a shame about the
split with Beckham in 2003. Knowing nothing about the details there is normally a jealous woman involved in the
breakdown of an outstandingly successful and creative male/male partnership (Lennon/McCartney and Yoko Ono). Just
as there is normally a jealous man involved in the breakdown of a successful male/female partnership (Whitney
Houston/Manager Bobby Brown). The ones who suffer are always the fans, the children of the successful partnership.
The ones who gain financially are always the jealous wreckers. But in this world, no beautiful flower blossoms for long.
And in the next world, those who trash love have no place.

The bible splits up his presence and his comings by using the terms day and hour. The coming occurs at an hour and the
presence defines a day. There is no coming to start a presence, the presence starts through the existence of a new
covenant saint, but this is not regarded as a coming because you have to get the team together before you play the first
match. Hence we read referring to the start of the presence of the Lord:

37 For just as the days of Noah were, so the presence of the Son of man will be...
42 Keep on the watch, therefore, because you do not know on what day your Lord is coming (Matthew 24).

But as regards a coming during the presence of the Lord:

43 But know one thing, that if the householder had known in what watch the thief was coming, he would have kept awake
and not allowed his house to be broken into.
44 On this account you too prove yourselves ready, because at an hour that you do not think to be it, the Son of man is
coming (Matthew 24).

Obviously just as an hour is a part of a day so a coming can be a part of a presence.

In fact in the greater fulfillment when Jesus comes during his presence to inspect the temple of his wife, he not only
throws out the bad guys but he knocks down the whole temple! We know that the spiritual temple of the new covenant
saints is destroyed, actually by Jesus, whilst they are still around, i.e. during his presence, because as we have read
above:

2 By no means will a stone be left here upon a stone and not be thrown down (Matthew 24).

A scripture which not only applies to the physical stones in the literal meaning, but also applies to the living stones, the
new covenant saints in the symbolic meaning using the Symbolic Structure Principle of the Code.

Look! The broken down temple in Jerusalem today is a prophecy that the spiritual temple of the New covenant saints will
likewise be destroyed! And it is destroyed from 2001Nisan - 2004Tishri.

Paul informs us that:

22 For just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive.
23 But each one in his own rank: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who belong to the Christ during his presence.
24 Next, the end, when he hands over the kingdom to the God and Father, when he has brought to nothing all
government and all authority and power (1 Corinthians 15 NWT adapted from Greek).

Christ is called a plural firstfruits as regards his resurrection, because he was resurrected on Nisan16, the day of the Jewish festival of
the firstfruits of the barley harvest. The Greek word (aparch) translated as 'firstfruits' is in the singular. But actually, there were two
resurrections of Jesus, and there are two presences of the Christ, both of which Paul refers to as one generic presence. But the new
covenant saints, those who belong to Christ (as his wife), during his presence, actually define his presence. And these are resurrected
first, before the Kingdom of God is handed to God by Jesus, he having won the battle of Armageddon. It is impossible for all of the
new covenant saints to be resurrected during his presence, because one of them still has to be alive on the earth to define the presence.
In fact they are resurrected in 5 “tranches”, 4 of which occur during the presence and the last of which occurs on the 3rd day after the
last one dies. This happens in both the first and the second presences.

But having seen that the New covenant saints float off to heaven not long after they die we can now understand the words
of the two angels at Jesus' ascension to heaven:

9 And after he had said these things, while they were looking on, he was lifted up and a cloud caught him up from their
vision.
10 And as they were gazing into the sky while he was on his way, also, look! two men in white garments stood alongside
them,
11 and they said: Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven [KI]? This Jesus who was received up from you
into heaven will come thus in the same manner as you have beheld him going into heaven [KI] (Acts 1).
 Members of the first true church of a presence, Galilee was where the
Men of Galilee
first disciples came from.
First true church gets better understandings (higher) than all other
Jesus lifted up
churches
God's presence in a temple was via his cloud, so God accepts a
Jesus caught up from their vision by cloud second true church and gives this church even higher understandings
that the first true church cannot see.
Jesus was present in a body that he did not walk Jesus' presence is through his wife, the new covenant saints, who are
around in during his first century ministry, which his body but not the body he walked around in during his first century
body floated off to heaven on 33Iyyar25 ministry, and they float off to heaven during the presence.

Each Presence lasts for 120 years

As regards the length of each presence we have:

37 For just as the days of Noah were, so the presence of the Son of man will be.
38 For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in
marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark;
39 and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away, so the presence of the Son of man will be
(Matthew 24).

Using the code. The ‘presence of the son of man’ is repeated, so there is a greater presence, or a second presence. The
days of Noah where people took no note and then got washed away were 120 years:

3 After that Jehovah said: My spirit shall not act toward man indefinitely in that he is also flesh/they have erred.
Accordingly his days shall amount to 120 years. (Genesis 6).

13 And God said to Noah: The end of all flesh has come before me, because the earth is full of violence as a result of
them; and here I am bringing them to ruin together with the earth.
14 Make for yourself an ark out of wood of a resinous tree. You will make compartments in the ark, and you must cover it
inside and outside with tar (Genesis 6).

7 By faith Noah, after being given divine warning of things not yet beheld, showed godly fear and constructed an ark for
the saving of his household; and through this [faith] he condemned the world, and he became an heir of the righteousness
that is according to faith (Hebrews 11).

5 And he did not hold back from punishing an ancient world, but kept Noah, a preacher of righteousness, safe with seven
others when he brought a deluge upon a world of ungodly people (2 Peter 2).

So these 120 years of the days of Noah are also the length of each of the two presences of the son of man. In fact the
decree was made in 2488Sivan and the flood began in 2371Heshvan17, and in 2368Sivan, 120 years to the month after
the decree, mankind’s max lifespan was reduced from 960 to 480 years.

Also after Moses the maximum lifespan for men was 120 years. Moses lived for 120 exactly years. So since Jesus is
present through his fiancé, then this ‘woman’ should not live for more than 120 years as a human in each presence. This
maximum lifespan is not just a deduction of ours from the scriptures, it is also an observation of the Jewish Historian
Josephus, the contemporary of Jesus. There is no record of anyone living more than 120 years in recent times except one
French woman who claimed to be 120 years old but was walking around on TV like an 80 year old in around 1995 - she is
now dead (actually there has been other claims too).

When did the 120 year second presence start ?

We have shown in section [123] on the Daniel 4 determination of the Gentile Times that in the case of the first of the two
witnesses of Revelation 11, the 1260 days of prophesying in sackcloth ran from 1914Heshvan26 to 1918Iyyar25
inclusively. And that this is a direct antetype of Jesus' 1260 day ministry. Both being periods wherein the heavens were
shut up and no rain fell:
6 These have the authority to shut up heaven that no rain should fall during the days of their prophesying, and they have
authority over the waters to turn them into blood and to strike the earth with every sort of plague as often as they wish
(Revelation 11).

25 For instance, I tell you in truth, There were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah, when the heaven was shut up 3
years and 6 months, so that a great famine fell upon all the land,
26 yet Elijah was sent to none of those [women], but only to Zarephath in the land of Sidon to a widow (Luke 4).

17 Elijah was a man with feelings like ours, and yet in prayer he prayed for it not to rain; and it did not rain upon the land
for 3 years and 6 months.
18 And he prayed again, and the heaven gave rain and the land put forth its fruit (James 5).

We have also seen that Adam's first 33½ years followed the same pattern as the first 33½ years of Jesus' first presence,
and we have seen that the second presence is the same length as the first presence, both being 120 years long. Now we
have discovered a precise correspondence between the ministry of Jesus in the first presence and the ministry of the first
of the two witnesses of Revelation 11, the Jehovah's witnesses, in the second presence. The symbolism of Revelation 11
is explained in section [123]. The Lord's witnesses are the second of the two witnesses of Revelation 11.

So we just thread on the rest of this 33½ year pattern to the second presence and the result is that it starts in 1884Tishri,
30 years before the first witness is appointed to feed in 1914Tishri, as in the case of Jesus, being present 30 years before
his baptism. Here is the correspondence that we deduced in section [123].

Appointed over all Stopped

Witness Appointed to feed Started Feeding Duration
belongings feeding
1260 days
33Iyyar25
Jesus' ministry to 29Heshvan22 (Peter (3 days in
29Tishri10 (Baptism) 33Nisan16 (Jesus ascends,
Jews called) heart of
ministry ends)
Earth)
1918Iyyar25
Watchtower ministry 1914Tishri15 (Gentile (Governing 1260 days
1914Heshvan26 1918Nisan16
to Christendom Times ends) Body locked up inclusively
in Prison)
1994Ab2 (3rd day
1992Elul11 First
1994Nisan15 (day after
Lord's Witnesses book: [Letter to 1995Adar11
after rejected 1994Tammuz30, 1260 days
ministry to Society] hand Gordon
memorial - see which was 3½ exclusively
Watchtower delivered to disfellowshipped
[History7] months after
Watchtower HQ
1994Nisan15)

Now we can extend the 33½ year correspondence as follows:

Appointed Duration
Started Stopped
Presence starts Appointed to feed over all of
Feeding feeding
belongings feeding
33Iyyar25 1260
(Jesus days (3
29Heshvan22
Jesus Born, Tishri10, 2BC 29Tishri10 (Baptism) 33Nisan16 ascends, days in
(Peter called)
ministry heart of
ends) Earth)
1918Iyyar25
(Governing 1260
Charles Russell Born Again, baptized 1914Tishri15 (Gentile
1914Heshvan26 1918Nisan16 Body locked days
into New covenant 1884Tishri15 Times ends)
up in inclusively
Prison)
In fact since Jesus' wife although a composite body, is living after Moses who lived exactly 120 years to the Hebrew day
(1594Adar1 to 1474Adar1), and since as Josephus observed, Moses' age at his death is the upper limit for the age of any
man today or any composite woman, we know that the presence must last at most 120 years.

So, since the second presence lasts for 120 years, it must end in 2004 one would think. But there is one further piece of
the jigsaw....

Each Presence has a gap in it

But there is one further piece of the Jigsaw which we must consider. Each presence contains two true religions, and the
first one falls, losing its water baptism, and then the faithful members of that religion join the second true religion of the
presence - see [34]. Now the question is: Is Jesus present if all of the 1NC saints are in the first true religion of a
presence, and they have lost their water baptism because that religion has been rejected? Obviously not, because Jesus
cannot be one flesh with a person who is unclean in their flesh. So there may be a gap in each presence, between the
rejection of the first true religion of the presence and the first 1NC saint joining the second true religion. Well there are
scriptures that show that such a gap does exist:

7 Exercise patience, therefore, brothers, until the presence of the Lord. Look! The farmer keeps waiting for the precious
fruit of the earth, exercising patience over it until he gets the early rain and the late rain.
8 You too exercise patience; make your hearts firm, because the presence of the Lord has drawn close (James 5).

James said this in the first century whilst 1NC saints were around. Yet he was waiting for the presence of the Lord. But he
talks about the early rain and the late rain. These therefore are the two water baptisms of the two true religions of a
presence. James is waiting for the 1NC saints from the fallen first true religion to enter the second. James was in the
second true religion (started by Paul) at the time that he wrote this.

13 to the end that he may make your hearts firm, unblamable in holiness before our God and Father at the presence of
our Lord Jesus with all his holy ones (1 Thessalonians 3).

His holy ones are the 1NC saints. They are present as his wife, his flesh, only if that flesh is clean, water baptized.

23 May the very God of peace sanctify you completely. And sound in every respect may the spirit and soul and body of
you [brothers] be preserved in a blameless manner at the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Thessalonians 5).

This presence they wait for is just the second half of the first presence. It occurs when the 1NC saints from the first true
church, join the second true church. Paul describes things as follows:

1 However brothers, respecting the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we request
of you
2 not to be quickly shaken from your reason nor to be excited either through an inspired expression or through a verbal
message or through a letter as though from us to the effect that the day of the Lord is here.
3 Let no one seduce you in any manner, because it will not come unless the apostasy comes first and the man of
lawlessness gets revealed, the son of destruction.
4 He is set in opposition and lifts himself up over everyone referred to as god or as an object of reverence, so that he sits
down in the temple of the God, publicly showing himself to be [a] god.
5 Do you not remember that while I was yet with you I used to tell you these things?
6 And so now you know the thing that acts as a restraint, with a view to his being revealed in his own due time.
7 True, the mystery of this lawlessness is already at work, but only until he who is right now acting as a restraint gets to be
out of the way.
8 Then indeed, the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will do away with by the spirit of his mouth and
bring to nothing by the manifestation of his presence (2 Thessalonians 2 NWT adapted from Greek).

Again we have a situation where Paul is writing to the Thessalonians but he is not writing in the Lord's day, the day of the
presence of the Lord. So he is writing the letter in the gap between the two parts of the first presence.

So how long are the gaps in the two presences? Well the vision of Daniel 12 defines a river which in the event symbolism
is the water baptism of FDS1 and in the word symbolism in the water baptism of FDS3. This river has banks (which are
dry and stand for periods of no water baptism) which are 3½ times long or 1260 days long in the event symbolism. The far
bank of the river defines the time between the end of the water baptism of FDS1/3 and the start of the rebaptism of 1NC
saints into FDS4.
Now we know from the book of Revelation which is a vision for the Lord's day, which is the day of the presence of the
Lord. Since vision of the messages to the 7 congregation is for the Lord's day, we know that this day must cover all of the
information in Revelation 2,3 about the 7 congregations. This means that it must stretch beyond the vomiting out of Jesus
mouth of FDS4, its fall from his guidance. So the 1NC saints must continue right up to 2008Nisan14. The last one dies on
2008Nisan14 and then gets resurrected and married immediately on 2008Nisan16 on the first day of the kingdom of God
presumably! Of course their honeymoon is Armageddon! Hopefully the reader had a less combative honeymoon!

Now the second presence started on 1884Tishri15 as we shall see in the next section, so given that it lasts 120 years to
the day, and given that is ends on 2008Nisan14, and given that the first part ends on 2001Sivan1, 1260 days before
2004Chislev1, this being the far bank of the river, it must restart on 2004Elul14. The whole second presence looks like
this:

1884Tishri15 - 2001Sivan1 (116 years and 8 months)

2004Chislev1 - 2008Nisan14 (3 years and 4 months)

This means that the last 1NC saint dies on 2008Nisan14.

In the first presence too the far bank is the end of the 2300 solar days of Daniel 8, wherein the army (the sons of the 2AC)
and the holy place (the sons of the 1NC) are trampled on. But the sanctuary of FDS2 is restored at the end of this period
which means that 1NC saints have by then joined FDS2. Now we can deduce from John 21 that Peter is mislead by the
first true religion for 10 years...

18 Most truly I say to you, When you were younger, you used to gird yourself and walk about where you wanted. But
when you grow old you will stretch out your hands and another [man] will gird you and bear you where you do not wish.
19 This he said to signify by what sort of death he would glorify God. So, when he had said this, he said to him: Continue
following me (John 21).

Stretching out ones hands is a witness to 10 full years, or 10 years to the month, or possibly even to the day. We will find
out from the pattern of all true religions, that FDS2 was appointed over all of Jesus' belongings (the sanctified ones) in
67Tishri, and so FDS1 fell on that day from its appointment over these. It actually became the Wicked and Sluggish Slave
of Matthew 25 and the evil slave of Matthew 24 on that day. 10 years later in 77Tishri Peter joined the congregation of
FDS2. In the absence of any more detail we take this to be the end of the far bank of Daniel 12. It is possible that other
joined before Peter, but unlikely since he jumped out of the boat first to meet Jesus earlier in John 21. So the gap in the
first presence runs from 74Nisan to 77Tishri. And FDS1 lost its appointment over Gabriel's belongings, the water baptized
ones, in 74Nisan, on which day the WSS1 became the good for nothing slave of Matthew 25 (GNS1).

We know that the first presence started with the birth of Jesus, because he was obviously present at that time. So since
he was born on Tishri10 2BC, the first presence ends in 123 CE. The whole first presence looks like this:

2Tishri10 - 74Nisan (74 years and 6 months precisely)

77Tishri - 123Nisan (45 years and 6 months precisely)

This means that there were no first new covenant saints alive as humans after 123Nisan.

The pattern of Jesus' ministry

Elijah
Coming
Man of lawlessness starts operating
Elijah
Coming
Man of lawlessness revealed to closest disciples
Shepherd struck in Jerusalem & flock scattered
Jesus is absent for 3 days in the heart of the earth
Man of lawlessness destroyed
Jesus manifested in Galilee to the chosen ones
Sealing and outpouring of gifts of the spirit in Jerusalem.

The above pattern is the pattern of Jesus 3½ year first century ministry as we shall see . It is also the template which
reveals to us the pattern of events in both of his two 120 year presences. For God operates in a fractal manner.
[1] Elijah comes first (John the baptist).

10 However, the disciples put the question to him: Why, then, do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?
11 In reply he said: Elijah, indeed, is coming and will restore all things.
12 However, I say to you that Elijah has already come and they did not recognize him but did with him the things they
wanted. In this way also the Son of man is destined to suffer at their hands.
13 Then the disciples perceived that he spoke to them about John the Baptist (Matthew 17).

This also shows that Elijah will come again to restore all things.

[2] Then Jesus' first coming to the temple to throw out abusers in 30Nisan:

13 Now the passover of the Jews was near, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
14 And he found in the temple those selling cattle and sheep and doves and the money brokers in their seats.
15 So, after making a whip of ropes, he drove all those with the sheep and cattle out of the temple, and he poured out the
coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.
16 And he said to those selling the doves: Take these things away from here! Stop making the house of my Father a
house of merchandise! (John 2).

[3] Then Judas, the archetypical man of lawlessness, went sour:

70 Jesus answered them: I chose you twelve, did I not? Yet one of you is a slanderer.
71 He was, in fact, speaking of Judas [the son] of Simon Iscariot; for this one was going to betray him, although one of the
twelve (John 6).

[4] Then Elijah comes a second time. This Elijah sent his disciples to question Jesus:

19 So John summoned a certain two of his disciples and sent them to the Lord to say: Are you the coming one or are we
to expect a different one?
20 When they came up to him the men said: John the Baptist dispatched us to you to say: Are you the coming one or are
we to expect another? (Luke 7).

Quite obviously this cannot be the chap who baptized Jesus, because he kept crying out: See the lamb of God that
takes away the sins of the world (John 1:29). He was in no doubt as to who was the coming one! So how can this be??

Well Jesus Christ was not baptized by John the Baptist, the son of Zechariah. To see why, see [229]. It was Gabriel who
baptized Jesus, because he is God's high priest and he sacrificed Jesus and presided over the entry of Michael on behalf
of God. This new Jesus would validate the first Abrahamic covenant with his human body and ransom Adam with his
angelic soul. This is the meaning of his words:

4 It is not possible for the blood of bulls and of goats to take sins away.
5 Hence when he comes into the world he says: Sacrifice and offering you did not want, but you prepared a body for me
(Hebrews 10).

For it is not possible for a priest such as Michael, a cherub, the holder of a master covenant with God to enter into a non
priestly human vehicle. And no son of Israel under law could become a priest until he was 30 years old...

3 From 30 years old upward to 50 years old, all those going into the service group to do the work in the tent of meeting
(Numbers 4).

Jesus was 30 years old when Michael entered his body. Gabriel said to Zechariah, John's dad...

19 In reply the angel said to him: I am Gabriel, who stands near before God, and I was sent forth to speak with you and
declare the good news of these things to you (Luke 1).

Standing near before God means God's high priest, it is a Euphemism.

15 And as for the Levitical priests, the sons of Zadok, who took care of the obligation of my sanctuary when the sons of
Israel wandered away from me, they themselves will come near to me to minister to me, and they must stand before me
to present to me fat and the blood, is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah (Ezekiel 44).
Look! Gabriel is telling us that he is going to act as a priest before God.

The point of Luke 7:19,20 is that a second Elijah had now come, namely the original John the baptist himself, back in his
own body, which was shortly to be decapitated to please a condemned woman, as a result of a promise for half a
kingdom. It was this original John who did not know who Jesus was ! He was a second Elijah, albeit in the same body as
the first Elijah who was Gabriel.

This is why John the baptist said to the Pharisees that he was not Elijah, whereas Jesus said that he was Elijah. Both
statements were true.

21 And they asked him: What, then? Are you Elijah? And he said: I am not. Are you The Prophet? And he answered: No!
22 Therefore they said to him: Who are you? that we may give an answer to those who sent us. What do you say about
yourself?
23 He said: I am a voice of someone crying out in the wilderness: Make the way of Jehovah straight, just as Isaiah the
prophet said.
24 Now those sent forth were from the Pharisees.
25 So they questioned him and said to him: Why, then, do you baptize if you yourself are not the Christ or Elijah or The
Prophet? (John 1). Good question, this is a Reader Question.

13 For all, the Prophets and the Law, prophesied until John;
14 and if you want to accept it, He himself is Elijah who is destined to come (Matthew 11).

[5] Then Jesus made a second coming to the temple to throw out abusers on 33Nisan10:

45 And he entered into the temple and started to throw out those who were selling,
46 saying to them: It is written: And my house will be a house of prayer, but you have made it a cave of robbers (Luke 19).

15 Now they came to Jerusalem. There he entered into the temple and started to throw out those selling and buying in the
temple, and he overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves
16 and he would not let anyone carry a utensil through the temple,
17 but he kept teaching and saying: Is it not written: My house will be called a house of prayer for all the nations? But you
have made it a cave of robbers (Mark 11).

12 And Jesus entered into the temple and threw out all those selling and buying in the temple, and overturned the tables
of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves.
13 And he said to them: It is written: My house will be called a house of prayer, but you are making it a cave of robbers
(Matt 21).

[6] Then the son of destruction, the man of lawlessness, Judas was revealed, at the last supper, to Peter and John.

[7] Jesus enters the heart of the earth. He becomes the focus of all of God's heavenly organization, for 3 days and 3
nights (being in trouble the whole time, so he did not sleep in death - having no angelic status unit - he went to Tartarus to
preach to them and then to Gehenna to preach to them - see U251.

41 And he himself drew away from them about a stone's throw, and bent his knees and began to pray,
42 saying: Father, if you wish, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, let, not my will, but yours take place.
43 Then an angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him (Luke 22).

[8] Then Jesus is impaled and the apostles become scared, stumbled, scattered and confused

31 Then Jesus said to them: All of you will be stumbled in connection with me on this night, for it is written, 'I will strike
the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered about.'
32 But after I have been raised up, I will go ahead of you into Galilee (Matthew 26).

33 Therefore Jesus said: I continue a little while longer with you before I go to him that sent me.
34 You will look for me, but you will not find me, and where I am you cannot come.
35 Therefore the Jews said among themselves: Where does this [man] intend going, so that we shall not find him? He
does not intend to go to the [Jews] dispersed among the Greeks and teach the Greeks, does he?
36 What does this saying mean that he said, 'You will look for me, but you will not find me, and where I am you cannot
come'? (John 7).

Literally Jesus was impaled, and went to Galilee after his resurrection and then went to heaven to meet his Father who
sent him. In the greater first presence fulfillment of this, God struck FDS1, and after its fall, Peter (in FDS2) and James (of
FDS2) both wrote to the 12 tribes 'scattered about', whilst Jesus was with FDS2 in the greater Galilee teaching the Greeks
(binary question – by the power principle, the wrong answer must have some validity).

1 James, a slave of God and of [the] Lord Jesus Christ, to the 12 tribes that are scattered about: Greetings! (James 1).
1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the temporary residents scattered about in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and
Bithynia, to the ones chosen (1 Peter 1).

[9] Then Judas then committed suicide

3 Then Judas, who betrayed him, seeing he had been condemned, felt remorse and turned the 30 silver pieces back to
the chief priests and older men, 4 saying: I sinned when I betrayed righteous blood. They said: What is that to us? You
must see to that!
5 So he threw the silver pieces into the temple and withdrew, and went off and hanged himself (Matthew 27).

[10] Then Jesus was resurrected and he manifested himself to his disciples:

1 After these things Jesus manifested himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias; but he made the manifestation
in this way (John 21).

This pattern holds true for both of his 120 year presences, the presences of his body, his wife, the living stones of the
temple of the new covenant saints, as follows...

[11] Then the holy spirit was poured out at Pentecost. The apostles were sealed and the physical gifts of the spirit of the
first century were received.

The Pattern of Jesus' physical ministry and the 2 Presences

First Presence through water baptized Second Presence through

Physical Presence
1NC saints water baptized 1NC saints
John the baptist start baptizing John starts baptizing in water Russell starts baptizing in water
Jesus comes to temple in Jerusalem to Jesus appoints FDS3, Babylon
Jesus appoints FDS1, the law falls
throw out abusers, makes a whip of ropes falls
Judas starts stealing money from the FDS1 starts to become corrupt in the 4th FDS3 starts to become corrupt
money box watch, of Epaphras in the 3rd watch of Knorr
John (no longer possessed by Gabriel)
Gordon is clean to start water
sent to Jesus, asking him: Are you the one Paul is clean to start water baptizing into the
baptizing into the congregation
or are we to expect a different one? (binary congregation of FDS2, he is the different one
of FDS4, he is the different one
question)
Jesus comes again to the temple which Jesus rejects FDS1, it becomes WSS1, he Jesus rejects FDS3, it becomes
has become a cave of robbers appoints FDS2 WSS2, he appoints FDS4
The traitor Judas is made known to Peter Paul identifies Jude as running WSS1, from Gordon identifies Henschel as
and John scripture. running WSS2 from scripture.
Gordon becomes the focus of
Paul becomes the focus of all heavenly all heavenly attention for the 3
attention for the 3 days of the 5th watch of days of the 5th watch of FDS3,
Jesus enters the heart of the earth,
FDS1, WSS1 and GNS1. When WSS1 falls, WSS2 and GNS2. When WSS2
becoming the focus of all the attention of
becoming the excommunicated GNS1, Jesus falls, becoming the
God's heavenly organization. But is absent
is no longer present. All 1NC saints lose their disfellowshipped GNS2, Jesus
from humans
water baptism, until they join FDS2, if they is no longer present. All 1NC
do. saints lose their water baptism,
until they join FDS4, if they do.
 Gordon is disfellowshipped, the
Paul is excommunicated; the governing body governing body of WSS2 is
Jesus is impaled and the apostles are
of WSS1 is stumbled by their jealousy of his stumbled by their jealousy of
stumbled
understandings. Cain kills Abel again. his understandings. Cain kills
Abel again.
Many in GNS2 start feeling
Many in GNS1 start feeling repentant and
Judas feels remorse and hangs himself repentant and internal divisions
internal divisions begin to appear, GNS1 is
and bursts in his midst begin to appear, GNS2 is about
about to be cut in two
to be cut in two
The manifestation of the
Jesus is resurrected and made manifest to The manifestation of the first presence, just
second presence, from January
his disciples after 109 AD
2000 onwards
The 1NC saints join FDS4, and
The 1NC saints join FDS2, and see all the
Pentecost, the apostles are sealed and the see all the new understandings.
new understandings. Those who join are the
gifts of the spirit are poured out Those who join are the sealed
sealed ones.
ones.

We can see that there was a second coming in the first presence because Jesus said to Peter respecting John:

21 Accordingly, when he caught sight of him, Peter said to Jesus: Lord, what will this [man do]?
22 Jesus said to him: If it is my will for him to remain until I come, of what concern is that to you? You continue following
me.
23 In consequence, this saying went out among the brothers, that that disciple would not die. However, Jesus did not say
to him that he would not die, but: If it is my will for him to remain until I come, of what concern is that to you?
24 This is the disciple that bears witness about these things and that wrote these things, and we know that the witness he
gives is true (John 21).

The apostle John was still alive at this second coming which was actually to knock down the first Christian temple of the
New covenant saints, which had Jesus as the cornerstone and as the foundation rock mass, and to build a second
Christian temple, under the covenant of Bilhah, with Paul as the foundation stone, in temple buildings symbolism and as
the second of the 4 cornerstones in overall temple symbolism. Paul was the second Elijah, who came first, being baptized
in 34Nisan.

The manifestation of the first presence did not occur until the last hour, because John says:

18 Young children, it is the last hour, and, just as you have heard that antichrist is coming, even now there have come to
be many antichrists; from which fact we gain the knowledge that it is the last hour (1 John 2).

28 So now, little children, remain in union with him, that when he is made manifest we may have freeness of speech and
not be shamed away from him at his presence (1 John 2).

The last hour was the last twelfth of the 120 year presence, i.e. the last 10 years, from 109Tishri to 119Elul.

The manifestation in the first presence was possibly the visions given to John, the book of Revelation, we think. In
particular the solving in Revelation 17 of the mystery of the man of lawlessness, who is identified as being related to the
mystery of the woman on the beast. The woman is the corrupt true church, the man is her head, the president of this
church. This man of lawlessness, who leads this woman of fornication, is brought to nothing by the spirit of Jesus' mouth
at the manifestation of the presence, as we shall see below.

8 Then, indeed, the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will do away with by the spirit of his mouth and
bring to nothing by the manifestation of his presence (2 Thessalonians 2).

Whenever Jesus comes during a presence it is to appoint a new religion. Since we now know that he comes twice in each
presence, we know that he appoints 4 new Christian religions in total, 2 in each presence. It is the spirit of Jesus' mouth,
or scriptural understanding that does away with FDS1 and FDS3 and this understanding is given to FDS2 and FDS4.

There was a small gap in the first presence, when the 1NC saints in GNS1 were excommunicated, before they joined
FDS2 and were baptized again in water. This is why James and Paul advise Christians to be patient waiting for the
presence of the Lord.
New Covenant saints are sealed before the Manifestation of the presence (which results in the restarting of the
Presence)

4 And when the chief shepherd has been made manifest, you will receive the unfadable crown of glory (1 Peter 5).

The sealing of the new covenant saints occurs at or before the manifestation.

14 That you observe the commandment in a spotless and irreprehensible way until the manifestation of our Lord Jesus
Christ.
15 This [manifestation] the happy and only Potentate will show in its own appointed times, the King of those who rule as
kings and Lord of those who rule as lords,
16 the one alone having immortality, who dwells in unapproachable light, whom not one of men has seen or can see. To
him be honor and might everlasting. Amen (1 Timothy 6).

If you keep faithful until the manifestation, then you are sealed, baptized into the name of the holy spirit - see [13].

19 For what is our hope or joy or crown of exultation--why, is it not in fact you?--before our Lord Jesus at his presence? (1
Thessalonians 2).

13 To the end that he may make your hearts firm, unblamable in holiness before our God and Father at the presence of
our Lord Jesus with all his holy ones (1 Thessalonians 3).

23 May the very God of peace sanctify you completely. And sound in every respect may the spirit and soul and body of
you [brothers] be preserved in a blameless manner at the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Thessalonians 5).

8 From this time on there is reserved for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me
as a reward in that day, yet not only to me, but also to all those who have loved his manifestation (2 Timothy 4).

He meant his physical manifestation. But the greater meaning applies to the manifestation of his presence. New covenant
saints who remain faithful until then, get the crown of righteousness themselves.

It is most apparent from Matthew 24, that at least one faithful and discreet slave is appointed during each presence, since
its definition is in the response to the question: what will be the sign of your presence? So the existence of an FDS is a
'sign of the times', just like wars, famines and earthquakes. The slave is a feature of a presence, not of the absence of
Christ. It is not true however that no presence means no FDS. But a Presence means the existence of an FDS, and since
existence of a FDS is a sign of a presence, the FDS does not exist all the time. So there is at least one period of non
existence of the FDS between the two presences. It's like the parable says:

34 When the season of the fruits came, he dispatched his slaves to the cultivators to get his fruits (Matthew 21).

His faithful and discreet slaves appear in the seasons of fruits. Why, does not nature declare the impossibility of a
continuous new covenant saint baptism? Which tree produces fruit all year round?

For an exposition of all of the 6 Comings of Jesus after his birth - see [505].

The man of Lawlessness

1 However, brothers, respecting the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together to him, we
request of you 2 not to be quickly shaken from your reason nor to be excited either through an inspired expression or
through a verbal message or through a letter as though from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord is here.
3 Let no one seduce you in any manner, because it will not come unless the apostasy comes first and the man of
lawlessness gets revealed, the son of destruction.
4 He is set in opposition and lifts himself up over everyone who is called "god" or an object of reverence, so that he sits
down in the temple of The God, publicly showing himself to be a god.
5 Do you not remember that, while I was yet with you, I used to tell you these things?
6 And so now you know the thing that acts as a restraint, with a view to his being revealed in his own due time.
7 True, the mystery of this lawlessness is already at work; but only till he who is right now acting as a restraint gets to be
out of the way.
8 Then, indeed, the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will do away with by the spirit of his mouth and
bring to nothing by the manifestation of his presence.
9 But the lawless one's presence is according to the operation of Satan with every powerful work and lying signs and
portents 10 and with every unrighteous deception for those who are perishing, as a retribution because they did not
accept the love of the truth that they might be saved (2 Thessalonians 2).

The manifestation of the presence is the decoding. This reveals the lawless one. Love of the truth, which the decoding
tests, is the path to salvation. The 'man of lawlessness' is in the temple of God, the previous true religion, claiming to be a
saint (for saints have associated angels, being born again of the spirit, and therefore have a divine constitution) and he is
following Satan. He appears in each presence.

The man of lawlessness must be a king, a law giver who is abusing his position. So he was a head of the Christian
congregation. Gordon has to say, that at first sight one might well apply this scripture to him, since he has sent exciting
letters to the Governing Body, he is the head of a tiny Christian congregation and some would say he has manufactured
his own temple. But he does not falsely set himself up as a saint as Milton Henschel did. And Gordon did not sit down in
the temple, he was thrown out of the temple, for attempting to wake up its stones! Neither does Gordon act as a restraint,
quite the opposite in fact. He acts as a rocket engine. He is the earthly means of the gathering together again of all things
in the Christ in the final presence of the Lord, which follows the manifestation of the presence.

The man of lawlessness is a restraint on bible understanding, a stultifier, a spiritual prison warden, an emotional and
intellectual straight jacket. Whereas Gordon is the messenger and mediator of a second new covenant, he is the last
cornerstone of the temple. His message in a this letter/speech is, the day of the Lord is not here, not until the 1NC saints
get rebaptized in water.

The man of Lawlessness is actually the president of the Wicked and Sluggish Slave of Matthew 25 in each presence, who
is the 5th president of FDS1 (Jude) and the 5th president of FDS3 (Henschel). The presidents who succeed Jude and
Henschel are running the Good for Nothing slave of Matthew 25 in each presence.

7 True, the mystery of this lawlessness is already at work; but only till he who is right now acting as a restraint gets to be
out of the way (2 Thessalonians 2).

5 And upon her forehead was written a name, a mystery: Babylon the Great, the mother of the harlots and of the
disgusting things of the earth (Revelation 17).

These are the only two incidences of ‘mystery' () in the bible (other than Revelation 17:7). So we apply the No
Coincidences Principle and deduce that the man of lawlessness is also a woman, a harlot church. Rotten new covenant
saints.

The Lord's Day can mean the 1,000 year Sabbath day over which Jesus is Lord

The Lord's day is mentioned elsewhere in the bible by Paul in connection with a man who committed loose conduct
fornication:

5 Hand such a man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh in order that the spirit be saved in the day of the Lord (1
Corinthians 5).

This scripture incidentally answers the question, will any of those who were judicially killed in the day of the flood or in the
day of the destruction of Sodom, or due to the death penalty under the law of Moses, actually be resurrected? The answer
is yes. The destruction of the flesh on judicial grounds does not condemn the spirit. Of course the man referred to by Paul
was not physically killed, but Paul was using the symbolism of the Law of Moses in his condemnation of this man. Gordon
has always believed that a man who committed murder or adultery under law, and who of his own volition owned up to the
high priest knowing that this would mean certain death, and was indeed stoned by the people as a result, would certainly
be resurrected. For his confession was the triumph of his faith over his sin (it seems to him). The physical is so often the
very antithesis of the spiritual.

Peter also mentions the Lord's day saying:

10 Yet the Lord's day will come as a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a hissing noise, but the elements
being intensely hot will be dissolved, and [the] earth and the works in it will be discovered.
11 Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of persons ought you to be in holy acts of conduct and deeds
of godly devotion,
12 awaiting and keeping close in mind the presence of the day of the Lord, through which [the] heavens being on fire will
be dissolved and [the] elements being intensely hot will melt (2 Peter 3).

Repetitive or what? See the Repetitions Principle of the code. The Lord's day means the 1,000 years sabbath over which
Jesus is Lord, in the cases of 2 Peter 3 and 1 Corinthians 5.

The Antichrists

18 Young children, it is the last hour, and, just as you have heard that antichrist is coming, even now there have come to
be many antichrists; from which fact we gain the knowledge that it is the last hour.
19 They went out from us, but they were not of our sort; for if they had been of our sort, they would have remained with
us. But [they went out] that it might be shown up that not all are of our sort.
20 And you have an anointing from the holy one; all of you have knowledge....
22 Who is the liar if it is not the one that denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one that denies the
Father and the Son.
23 Everyone that denies the Son does not have the Father either. He that confesses the Son has the Father also...
26 These things I write you about those who are trying to mislead you....
28 So now, little children, remain in union with him, that when he is made manifest we may have freeness of speech and
not be shamed away from him at his presence (1 John 2).

7 For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is
the deceiver and the antichrist (2 John 7).

So John was writing this in the last hour but before the manifestation and before the second part of the presence, in fact
during the gap in the first presence. Now in order for it to be the last hour of the 120 year 'day' of the first presence, John
must have been 11/12ths into the presence, i.e. 110 years into the presence i.e. after 113Nisan AD (remembering the 3½
year gap). So 1 John was written between 113Nisan and 123Nisan AD. This is 13 years later than 'bible scholars' put it
today.

Definition: The antichrists were anointed brothers who were Denying the Father and the Son. Some of these denied that Jesus was
the Christ. Saying this another way, they did not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is denying both the Son and the
Father who said: This is my Son, the beloved, who I have approved.

These people must have been either Jews or Binitarians, the antecedents to Trinitarians who descend from Athanasius
(325 AD council of Nicea) who must have been 'the antichrist' who was coming. Binitarians and Trinitarains do not
confess the Father and the Son they confess a non existent combination of the two of them.

Today however, contrary to ludicrously ill informed internet speculation by bible belt Christians, some of whom believe that
HRH Prince Charles is the antichrist! Antichrists today are still anointed Christians who deny the son. The thing is that
there are other sons! For there are three parallel accounts of the dove descending on Jesus and God speaking:

16 After being baptized Jesus immediately came up from the water, and, look! the heavens were opened up, and he saw
descending like a dove God's spirit coming upon him.
17 Look! Also, there was a voice from the heavens that said: This is the Son of me, the beloved, in whom I have
delighted [or whom I have approved] (Matthew 3).

10 And immediately on coming up out of the water he saw the heavens being parted, and, like a dove, the spirit coming
down upon him.
11 And a voice came out of the heavens: You are the Son of me, the beloved. In you I have delighted [or I have
approved you] (Mark 1).

21 Now when all the people were baptized, Jesus also was baptized and, as he was praying, the heaven was opened up
22 and the holy spirit in bodily shape like a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: You are the Son
of me, the beloved. In you I have delighted [or I have approved you] (Luke 3).

In the literal meaning, all three are Jesus and the holy spirit in bodily shape like a dove represents the angelic possession
by Michael of the human body of Jesus.

In the first word symbolic thread the three sons are Paul, Russell and Ritchie, the other 3 cornerstones of the temple of all
Christianity. We too have associated angels, being born again at our commissioning by God to build the 2nd, 3rd and 4th
true Christian religions. The son of Matthew is Ritchie since God is speaking to everyone when he says: This is my son,
whereas he is speaking to the son himself when he says: You are my son in Mark and Luke. The son of Luke is Paul
because for Paul and Ritchie the heavens were opened up, but for Russell, the second part of Jesus' wife, the heavens
were parted, just as the temple curtain was torn in two. So Russell is the son of Mark.

In the second word symbolic thread, the beloved of Matthew are those sanctified who enter the 4th true Christian church
(TCC4), the sons of the 2NC and the Great Crowd Covenant (GCC). The beloved of Mark are the second presence 1NC
saints in TCC3. The beloved of Luke are the sanctified who enter TCC2, the sons of the 2NCH and the 1NCH.

So in all there are 3 more beloved sons who are cornerstones with three more groups of beloved sanctified sons who are
living stones. The antichrist is anyone who denies Jesus as the son and Christ of Jehovah and anyone who denies Paul
or Russell or Ritchie as Sons and anointed ones of Jesus, the foundation stone and chief cornerstone. In particular today,
anyone who denies that Gordon is the mediator of the 2NC, from whence his filial relationship with Jesus comes, is an
antichrist who denies the son (Gordon) and therefore is denying the father (Jesus) and therefore is denying the father
(Jehovah).

The 5/6 earthly identities of Michael, Gabriel and Melchizedek

Enoch was Michael

We read of Enoch that:

23 So all the days of Enoch amounted to 365 years.

24 And Enoch kept walking with the [true] God. Then he was no more, for God took him (Genesis 5).

So God took him at the end of his life and he was no more. But Paul further informs us:

15 By faith Enoch was transferred so as not to see death, and he was nowhere to be found because God had transferred
him; for before his transference he had the witness that he had pleased God well (Hebrews 11).

So when God took him, so that his days ended, he was transferred so as not to see death. Well the only other place he
could have been, if his days had ended on this earth, was heaven. So Enoch ascended to heaven, without dying.

Now the question is did God make some kind of exception in the case of Enoch amongst the sons of Adam, that he would
not apply the death penalty to him because he was such a good chap? Moses answers:

4 The Rock, perfect is his activity,

For all his ways are justice.
A God of faithfulness, with whom there is no injustice;
Righteous and upright is he (Deuteronomy 32).

So he did not break his own justice in the case of Enoch. So if Enoch did not die, then Enoch was not under a death
sentence. And if Enoch was not under a death sentence then he was not a son of Adam. And if he was not a son of Adam
then he was a son of God. Just like Jesus was. Now we turn to the words of Peter:

21 Then Peter came up and said to him: Lord, how many times is my brother to sin against me and am I to forgive him?
Up to 7 times?
22 Jesus said to him: I say to you, not, Up to 7 times, but, Up to 77 times (Matthew 18 NWT).
The Greek Interlinear is:

22 Not I am saying to you until 7 times, but until seventy times seven (Matthew 18 - KI)

The KJV and the GLT translate this verse as above. But this is dodging the issue of whether it is to be understood as:

Seventy times seven times, i.e. 490 times or just 77 times

i.e. or whether a further 'times' is to be understood and a multiplication is to be expected. Nowhere else in the bible in the
literal meaning as far as we are aware is there such a multiplication.
No bible translates this as 490 times. Actually the Greek is:

(seventy times) (seven), and the Greek for 7 times is The Greek for 77 is
(seventy)  (seven). The Greek for 70 lots of 7 times would be:

(seventy) (7 times) which is 70 lots of 7 times we think.

We can get help from the words of a certain Lamech to his wives:

23 Hear my voice, you wives of Lamech; Give ear to my saying:

A man I have killed for wounding me, Yes, a young man for giving me a blow.
24 If seven times Cain is to be avenged, Then Lamech seventy times and seven (Genesis 4)

So in this case where 7 times is compared to a larger number of times involving 70 and 7, it is 77 times. Now the LXX
translation of this, which is a Greek translation of the old testament made for the Greek speaking world about 300 years
before Jesus, has:

(seventy times) (seven) for the Hebrew which we translate seventy times and seven.

So that ends that matter and the NWT has got this right. It is 77 times.

Now the great thing to realise at this point is that Jesus was the 77th in line from God through Adam, Seth etc. Please
indulge us whilst we describe the excitement that Massoud and Gordon had when they first saw the identity of Enoch.

Massoud rang Gordon and said, how many generations was it from Adam to Jesus. Gordon said I think it was 66 or 77
(sic). Massoud said: So was it 77 (sic)? Gordon said it might have been. Massoud then quoted Jude:

14 Yes, the 7th one [in line] from Adam, Enoch, prophesied also regarding them, when he said: Look! Jehovah came with
his holy myriads,
15 to execute judgment against all, and to convict all the ungodly concerning all their ungodly deeds that they did in an
ungodly way, and concerning all the shocking things that ungodly sinners spoke against him (Jude).

He said that Lamech was the 7th in line through Cain, the guy who was to be avenged for 7 times, and Enoch was the 7th
in line through Seth, and Jesus was the 77th in line from Adam (sic), so there seems to be some kind of relationship
between Enoch and Jesus, being implied by Lamech's song to his wives here.

At this point we both got very excited and Gordon drove over to Massoud's place in Kensington. We then counted the
descendents from Adam to Jesus as in Luke, the maternal line, and there were 76, so there were 77 in line from God to
Jesus. So a comparison was definitely being made in the scriptures between Enoch being the 7th in line from Adam and
Jesus being the 77th in line from God. And whereas the vengeance penalty on Cain ended after 7 times, the greater
meaning of the vengeance penalty on Lamech ended after 77 generations with the death of Jesus, which was the
forgiveness of Adam's sin, the end of Vengeance from God on the sons of Adam.

Then we considered Peter's words about forgiveness, and we see that there was a forgiveness 77 generations after God
in the case of Jesus, but there weren't 7 generations after Adam in the case of Enoch. Now why would the bible make
such a comparison? Massoud postulated that this was because Enoch was 'Jesus', by which he meant possessed by
Michael. We already knew that Enoch was not a son of Adam. The only other example that we had at that time of a non
adamic man was Jesus, who was possessed by Michael.

At this point we both started pacing around the room in a state of disbelief and well, ecstasy really. Then Gordon sat down
and said:

'Before Abraham came into existence I have been' quoting Jesus' words from:

57 Therefore the Jews said to him: You are not yet 50 years old, and still you have seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been (John 8).
He has been here, Gordon exclaimed, that's what the scripture means. He has been here before!! (In fact he saw
Abraham as Isaac as we shall see later in the section).

Then Gordon freaked out, because basically mankind had killed one of its patriarchs (although Enoch procreated before
Michael entered him)! When Jesus said at his death: Father forgive them for they know not what they do, they were killing
their own ancestor. They were killing the father of Noah and of Abraham in a sense. This was really something.

Then later we realised that the Hebrew word 'Enoch' means 'one trained up' or 'initiated'. So here was Michael's training to
be the Messiah!! Then we understood this logically contorted scripture:

13 Moreover, no man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man (John 3).

This requires a clear thinking head. It is saying that the Son of man has descended, and he is the one who has ascended.
It is saying that the Son of man has both ascended and descended. But this statement was made at the beginning of
Jesus' ministry. So he had ascended before he died. We took this at the time as referring to his ascension as Enoch. In
fact he may have been referring to his ascension during the 40 days in the wilderness, which was also 40 days up the
mountain as in the case of Moses, for the scripture says:

8 Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their
glory (Matthew 4).

Some mountain. There is no earthly mountain high enough for this. It was a heavenly mountain that Satan took Jesus to.

The other angelic visits

12 Look! I am coming quickly, and the reward I give is with me, to render to each one as his work is.
13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end (Revelation 22).

By the Immediate Repetition Principle, there is a greater meaning to Alpha and Omega and a greater meaning to the
concept of first and last. The clue is in the verse above: I am coming quickly! Jesus was the first to come to this world as
Enoch, the one transferred so as not to see death. And he is the last to come in this system to appoint FDS4, and finally
after this system as Abbadon the passover angel of Armageddon.

11 They have over them a king, the angel of the abyss. In Hebrew his name is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name
Apollyon (Revelation 9).

The greater meaning of Alpha and Omega, more than merely first and last, is that there are 24 letters in the Greek
alphabet and there are 24 comings of Michael, Gabriel and Melchizedek in all to mankind. Beginning with Enoch and
ending with Abaddon, these both being comings of Michael. This is a big understanding. This is another reason why the
'hour' of a coming is often used, there being 24 hours in the whole Hebrew day, and Gregorian day.

So we need to go on a treasure hunt and find a few more angels in the bible!

Jared, Methuselah and Jehoiada

We know from section [235] that as regards the sons of Adam, the maximum lifespan before the flood was 960, then after
the flood it was 480, then after Peleg it was 240, then after Moses it was 120. So we can now scour the bible to see who
outlived these age limits. The results of our searches are:

20 So all the days of Jared amounted to 962 years and he died (Genesis 5).

27 So all the days of Methuselah amounted to 969 years and he died (Genesis 5).

15 And Jehoiada got to be old and satisfied with years and gradually died, being a 130 years old at his death (Chronicles
24).
Cainan was Melchizedek

Discovering the human identity of Melchizedek is not an easy task, Paul says:

11 Because he has been specifically called by God a high priest according to the line-up (lit) of Melchizedek. Concerning
him we have much to say and hard to interpret (lit), since you have become dull of hearing (Hebrews 5).

This ‘him’ could be either Jesus or Melchizedek, the scripture is deliberately ambiguous. After the reader has read this
section, he will understand that Paul is referring to Melchizedek in one meaning. Melchizedek is described thus:

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having
been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

6 But the man who did not trace his genealogy from them took tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the
promises (Hebrews 7).

So Melchizedek is without Genealogy, in the sense that he is fatherless and motherless, but he is with Genealogy, one
which he does not trace from the sons of Abraham. He is also made like the Son of God. Well Melchizedek was a human,
so the only way that he could have been made like Jesus, the human son of God, is that he was born by holy spirit in the
same way that Jesus was. Luke says of Jesus:

23 Furthermore, Jesus himself, when he commenced, was about thirty years old, being the son, as the opinion was, of
Joseph (Luke 3).

But of course Luke is bearing witness that he was not the son of Joseph, so he was fatherless, and he was motherless.
He was non-adamic, he was a genetic descendent of neither his mother nor his father, for such descendency would have
made him a son of Adam. But then he could trace his genealogy back to David - see U46, since God said to King David...

12 When your days come to the full, and you must lie down with your forefathers, then I shall certainly raise up your seed
after you, which will come out of your inward parts; and I shall indeed firmly establish his kingdom (2 Samuel 7).

So how do we reconcile these two seemingly contradictory characteristics of the Christ? Well, Jesus was not born of
Adultery, so he was conceived in sin as a true son of Joseph and Mary by the process that we now know as in vitro
fertilization (although God may have done it in vivo in Mary actually). Then, once conception had occurred, God zapped
his genes so that they became non adamic but remained Davidic and Jesus became sin free. One suspects that whatever
gene therapy God gave Jesus did not alter his physical appearance all. But after the gene therapy, Jesus was fatherless
and motherless, without genealogy from Adam. Although he did have genealogy from God, and from David.

We can therefore see that Melchizedek was non-adamic too, this is how he was without genealogy, that is adamic
genealogy. But he could trace his genealogy to his father God, and his mother, the heavenly woman, the holy spirit.

So now we have to find a further non-adamic human in the scriptures with a non-adamic genealogy. Well there is a chap
who has a very strange genealogy in the scriptures and he is Cainan. Luke says of him that Shelah was the son of
Cainian who was the Son of Arpachshad (Luke 3). Whereas Moses describes Shelah as the son not of Cainan but of
Arpachshad (Genesis 11). Whereas the LXX has Shelah the son of Cainan the son of Arpachshad (Genesis 11).

35 Son of Eber
Son of Shelah
36 Son of Cainan
Son of Arpachshad
Son of Shem
Son of Noah (Luke 3)

24 And Arpachshad became father to Shelah, and Shelah became father to Eber (Genesis 10).

12 And Arpachshad lived 35 years. Then he became father to Shelah.

13 And after his fathering Shelah Arpachshad continued to live 403 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and
daughters.
14 And Shelah lived 30 years. Then he became father to Eber
15 And after his fathering Eber Shelah continued to live 403 years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters
(Genesis 11).

What is going on here? Well the first thing to do is to remember that God is perfect and we are imperfect. So just because
two scriptures look to us to be contradictory, this doesn’t mean that the mistake is God’s. It means that we are not
intelligent enough to see what God is saying. If you have faith in God, that he can raise the dead, and that he created you,
then he can for a fact arrange for Moses and Luke to write two accounts about Cainan which are non-contradictory.

So how could Shelah be the son of Aprachshad and of Cainan, who was actually Shelah’s brother? The situation is that
Shelah has two different physical fathers. One cannot say that one of these fathers was a spiritual father, and he baptized
Shelah in holy spirit, becoming mediator of judicial life, because Luke and Moses in the New Testament Greek and the
BHS are both giving us physical genealogies. Well, if Shelah and Cainan were both sons of Arpachshad, and Shelah dies,
and Cainan resurrected him, then Cainan would become a second physical father to Shelah. The statement that Cainan
fathered Shelah would be true, because a physical resurrection is a mediation of physical life from God to a human, and
this is fatherhood as we know it.

In this way Lazarus had two physical fathers, his genetic father and Jesus. Because his genetic father did not father the
second body of Lazarus, Jesus mediated the creation of that body. It was actually a non-adamic body, because Lazarus,
having died, was no longer under an adamic death sentence. No doubt Lazarus’ second body looked exactly like the first,
but his second father was the eternal father, Jesus Christ. You may ask then why did Lazarus die a second time? The
answer is physically that he was in an ageing non-adamic body as was Jesus. But judicially, Lazarus actually died
sacrificially as do the rest of the remnant, the new covenant saints. They give their physical life up, not because of Adam’s
sentence, because this is lifted at their sanctification in Jesus’ blood, which is their baptism into the name of the son. They
give their physical life actually as a ransom for the great crowd, in order that these ones can walk through Armageddon
and never die at all - see [160].

If Cainan resurrected Shelah then he would need to be clean to do this. A resurrection is different from being a fleshly
father. Peter and Paul were used to create life, when they resurrected Eutychus and Dorcas. This is a very high form of
priesthood. You cannot create life on behalf of God without possessing your own. And the possession of your own life, is
the righteous decree in the spirit, which is the baptism into the name of the holy spirit. This is what Paul declared that he
had when he said:

8 From this time on there is reserved for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me
as a reward in that day, yet not only to me, but also to those who have loved his manifestation (2 Timothy 4).

James and Jesus refer to it as the crown of life:

12 Happy is the man that keeps on enduring trial, because on becoming approved he will receive the crown of life, which
Jehovah promised to those who continue loving him (James 1).

10 Do not be afraid of the things you are about to suffer. Look! The Devil will keep throwing some of you into prison that
you may be fully put to the test, and that you may have tribulation ten days. Prove yourself faithful even to death, and I will
give you the crown of life (Revelation 2).

The process by which this crown is reserved is the baptism in holy spirit, which starts with the sanctification, this being the
baptism into the name of the son. Then there is the period of test, this being a test of faith perfected by works. Then it
ends with the sealing, which is the righteous decree from God, in the spirit, which is the baptism into the name of the holy
spirit - see [12], [13].

15 And it is still more abundantly clear that with a similarity to Melchizedek there arises another priest,
16 who has become such, not according to the law of a commandment depending upon the flesh, but according to the
power of an indestructible life,
17 for in witness it is said: You are a priest forever according to the manner of Melchizedek (Hebrews 7).

So Cainan would have had to have been sealed, declared righteous in spirit, i.e. possessing his own life, in order to have
been clean to resurrect anybody, as were Peter and Paul. But it was impossible for an Adamic man to be sealed in the
Alienation times, a period of 7 times, 2520 years, which ran from 2488Sivan, when God made the decree in Genesis 6:3,
to Pentecost 33Sivan6 when the first post flood adamic humans were sealed - see [128], [129].
Therefore Cainan must have been non-adamic. So he fulfils the criteria of Hebrews 7:3 and Hebrews 7:6 , for
Melchizedek:

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having
been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

6 But the man who did not trace his genealogy from them took tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the
promises (Hebrews 7).

Furthermore he lived long enough to see Abraham. The LXX has him as living for 330 years after fathering Shelah. So if
the LXX can be trusted, then Cainan was alive when Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek. So we could now deduce that
Cainan was Melchizedek, and he was a non adamic son of Arpachshad.

What is the Status of the LXX ?

Is the LXX an inspired account? Well, most of the New Testament quotes of the old testament are actually from the LXX,
so certainly in these cases the quoted parts are inspired, but this does not mean that the original words were inspired. But
in many places the new testament writers do not follow the LXX but supply a doctored version which is closer to a
translation of the BHS. So is the LXX inspired? The answer to this question is provided by the holy spirit in Numbers 11 of
the BHS:

25 Then Jehovah came down in a cloud and spoke to him and took away some of the spirit that was upon him and put it
upon each of the 70 older men. And it came about that as soon as the spirit settled down upon them, then they proceeded
to act as prophets; but they did not do it again (Numbers 11).

These 70 are the 70 men who translated the Law of Moses into Greek at Alexandria in the 3rd century BCE in the
symbolic meaning we would suggest. In fact there may have been 72 men who translated the LXX into Greek in
Alexandria between 284 and 247BC (According to Sir Lancelot Brenton LXX). But thereagain there was Eldad and Medad
in Numbers 11:

24 After that Moses went out and spoke to the people the words of Jehovah. And he went gathering seventy men from
the older men of the people and proceeded to have them stand round about the tent.
25 Then Jehovah came down in a cloud and spoke to him and took away some of the spirit that was upon him and put it
upon each of the 70 older men. And it came about that as soon as the spirit settled down upon them, then they proceeded
to act as prophets; but they did not do it again.
26 Now there were two of the men remaining in the camp. The name of the one was Eldad, and the name of the other
was Medad. And the spirit began to settle down upon them, as they were among those written down, but they had not
gone out to the tent. So they proceeded to act as prophets in the camp.
27 And a young man went running and reporting to Moses and saying: Eldad and Medad are acting as prophets in the
camp!
28 Then Joshua the son of Nun, the minister of Moses from his young manhood on, responded and said: "My lord Moses,
restrain them!
29 However, Moses said to him: Are you feeling jealous for me? No, I wish that all of Jehovah's people were prophets,
because Jehovah would put his spirit upon them! (Numbers 11).

It is truly amazing that the ambiguity in Numbers 11 as to whether Eldad and Medad are to be taken in addition to the 70
men is reflected in our current historical uncertainty as to whether it was 70 or 72 men who translated the LXX.

There is evidence that the law was translated first by the 70 and then the rest of the old testament was translated by
others at a later date. This corresponds with the inspired statement that God took some of the spirit that was upon him
[Moses] and put it upon each of the 70 older men, indicating that the LXX is inspired only in the law of Moses. We are
saying that Numbers 11 is a prophecy that the law of Moses will be witnessed to by a further 70 men. We say this
because the concept that the true God somehow did not have enough holy spirit to go around and so he had to remove
some from Moses in order to have enough for the 70 older men is ridiculous. Since the true God ‘spoke to him and took
away some of the spirit’, we must assume that by removing this spirit, he is then going to speak to the 70 men in the way
that he spoke to Moses. Therefore the removing from Moses must mean that the inspired word of God through Moses
needs to be completed by the words of a further 70 men [For Moses is now incomplete in holy spirit - Ed.]. These men
therefore have to be the translators of the LXX, because we know of no other 70 who are candidates for speaking in an
inspired way as a complement to Moses. So we deduce that the Pentateuch of the LXX is inspired, in one codex at the
least.at

Which Codex of the LXX is inspired, the LXX Codex Vaticanus or the LXX Codex Alexandrinus (in the British
Museum) ?

We compare the BHS with the LXXv (Vaticanus) and the LXXa (Alexandrinus) as regards the History of Shem in Genesis
11. We put the LXXv in [brackets].

Shem was 100 years old when he begat Arpachshad 2 years after the flood. And Shem lived after he had begat
Arpachshad 500 years and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Arpachshad lived 135 years and begat Cainan. And Arpachshad lived after he begat Cainan 430 [400] years and
begat sons and daughters and died.
And Cainan lived 130 years and begat Sala (Shelah) and Cainan lived after he begat Shelah 330 years and begat sons
and daughters and died.
And Shelah lived 130 years and begat Heber (Eber). And Shelah lived after he begat Eber 330 years and begat sons and
daughters and died.
And Eber lived 134 years and begat Peleg. And Eber lived after he begat Peleg 370 [270] years and begat sons and
daughters and died.
And Peleg 130 years and begat Ragau (Reu). And Peleg lived after he begat Reu 209 years and begat sons and
daughters and died.
And Reu lived 132 years and begat Seruch (Serug). And Reu lived after he begat Serug 207 years and begat sons and
daughters and died.
And Serug lived 130 years and begat Nahor. And Serug lived after he begat Nahor 200 years and begat sons and
daughters and died.
And Nahor lived 79 years [179] years and begat Tarrha (Terah). And Nahor lived after he begat Terah 129 years [125]
and begat sons and daughters and died.
And Terah lived 70 years and begat Abram Nahor and Haran.

LXXa [LXXv]
LXXa [LXXv] Years after Year of Birth of
BHS Father’s age BHS Years after
Son Generators age at Generating son (Tishri to
at birth of son fathering
'birth' of son physically (p) or Elul)
spiritually (s)
Arpachshad 100 100p 500 500p 2369
Cainan 135s 430p [400p] 2343 - 2338
Shelah 35p 130s 403 330s 2334
Eber 30p 130s 403 330s 2304
Peleg 34p 134s 430 370s [270s] 2270
Reu 30p 130s 209 209p/s 2240
Serug 32p 132s 207 207p/s 2208
Nahor 30p 130s 207 207p/s 2178
Terah 29p 79s [179s] 119 125s [129s] 2149
Abram, Nahor,
70p 70p 205-70=135 135 2079
Haran

We know from Stephen that:

4 Then he went out from the land of the Chaldeans and took up residence in Haran. And from there, after his father died,
[God] caused him to change his residence to this land in which you now dwell (Acts 7).

We also know from the BHS that Terah died aged 205 years.

32 And the days of Terah came to be 205 years. Then Terah died in Haran (Genesis 11).
The LXXv has Nahor living for 308 years, which would mean that he was non adamic.
The LXXa has Eber living for 504 years, which would mean that he was non adamic.

In the table above:

p = Physical generation, fathering

s = Holy spirit baptism, generation, being born again as an angel

We resolve the apparent contradiction between the two accounts by realizing that the priest of the family was the father, in
the patriarchal times of Genesis 11, so he would baptize his sons. For the baptism into the name of the son, which is the
sanctification in holy spirit, which is the gift of a clean conscience, a cleanliness of spirit, a temporary forgiveness of sins in
the future, as opposed to a cleanliness of flesh, which is achieved by the bath of the flesh, and is a permanent forgiveness
of sins in the past, is in fact the creation of an angel. This is how one becomes a son of God, literally - see [190]. This
generation from above, is the generation that the LXX is referring to where it differs from the BHS. The next thing to
realize is that whereas the BHS has ‘continued to live for x years’, the LXX has ‘and he died’. So it suffices for the total
age in the BHS to be less than or equal to the total age in the LXX, because the father did not necessarily die at the end
of the period as defined in the BHS, but he did at the end of the period as defined in the LXX.

Eber physically lived for at least 34+430=464 years according to the BHS. So the LXX Alexandrinus must be the inspired
text, because 134+270=404 of the LXX Vaticanus, is too short. Furthermore the 370 years that Eber lived after he
fathered/generated Peleg must be consecutive with the 134 years, the period before the spiritual generation, because
34+370=404 is again too short. So we know that Eber lived actually for 370 years after he baptised Peleg, which he did
when he was 134 years old, so he lived for 504 years.

So the LXX Vaticanus is corrupt, as one might imagine from its location. Just this one discrepancy is enough given that
one or other of the Alexandrinus and the Vaticanus is inspired and therefore perfect (for God must preserve one good
copy it seems to us).

In the case of Shem, he lived for 500 years not after the baptism in holy spirit of Arpachshad, but after the physical birth of
Arpachshad. So the living after the ‘generation’ in the LXX translation can be either after the physical generation or the
spiritual generation. We have marked which one is which using ‘p’ and ‘s’ in the column.

The above reconciles the two accounts. And Cainan was a son, probably the firstborn, of Arpachshad. We know this
because since Arpachshad baptised him when he was 135, he must have been his physical father, since the father was
the family priest. Now Cainan must have resurrected Shelah before Shelah fathered Eber, which he did aged 30, in order
that the genealogy of Luke holds true. Furthermore it is a divine principle that one cannot act as a priest until one is 30
years old. This is the law at Numbers 4 and was obeyed by both John the Baptist and Jesus, both of whom were non
adamic priests. So Cainan would have to have been 30 before Shelah was 30. Since Arpachshad had Shelah when we
was 35, and since nobody was fathering anybody much before they were 30 in the days of Shem, we can deduce that
Arpachshad gave birth to Cainan when he was between 29 and 34, so Arpachshad did not live to be older than 480 years.
For argument's sake we will assume he was 30. In which case Cainan was 5 years older than Shelah, so he could have
resurrected Shelah when Shelah was 25, this would have been in the year starting 2309Tishri.

Now Cainan was non-adamic but he was not sanctified until Arpachshad was 135 years old, which would be too late for
him to resurrect Shelah. Because to resurrect someone, you have to be declared righteous, and own your own life.
Therefore we deduce that Cainan was possessed by an angel and this combination resurrected Shelah. This is in fact
why Cainan was born non adamic, because he was going to be possessed by an angel.

So we now know that Cainan was Melchizedek and that Eber was non adamic and therefore possessed by either Michael
or Gabriel (Melchizedek was in Cainan at the time).

Incidentally even though the LXXa is inspired as far as the Torah is concerned, the first 5 books of Moses, this does not
necessarily mean that it is written in the bible code. It may just have a true literal meaning.

Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael, the triple act

We know that Gabriel as John before Michael came as Jesus in the first century. We know that Melchizedek came as
Cainan before either Gabriel or Michael came as Eber after the flood. We know that Jared, Enoch's father, housed either
Melchizedek or Gabriel before Enoch housed Michael. And Methuselah, Enoch's son housed the other one after Enoch.
So a pattern is emerging here of three appearances of Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael, in that order, with them all
being around, or at least all three of their human vehicles being a round at the same time at some point. Now 'Jared' in
Hebrew  means 'descent' and 'Methuselah' means 'man of the missile', or 'man of the dart'. The former could apply
either to Gabriel who descended as an angel or to Melchizedek, since he would have descended as an embryo. By
'Melchizedek', we mean the non adamic human in the pre flood system, who re-appeared as Melchizedek in the post flood
system. Joseph and the first horseman of the apocalypse are both men of darts, having bows. Michael is a man of a
sword, the second horseman. Joseph and Gordon have a priesthood related to Gabriel. Methusaleh died in the year of the
flood.

Now we know from Jesus' baptism by John, that an angel cannot just 'enter' a non adamic human, there must be a non
adamic priest present. So Jared cannot have housed Gabriel, Melchizedek must have come first. So Jared was
Melchizedek, and Methuselah housed Gabriel, after he had finished procreating. Holy angels do not procreate inside
humans. And truly Jared was the first after Adam to be born from God after the manner of Adam, motherless, fatherless
and without genealogy in the sense that he did not have true human parents, he would have had surrogate parents like
Jesus. For Jesus is not called the SECOND ADAM, he is called the LAST ADAM. So Jesus was not the second Adam -
Jared/Melchizedek was!!

For the same reason that Gabriel cannot just posses a human without a priest presiding over his entrance, neither can
Melchizedek. So in his appearances after Jared, Melchizedek just appears as himself in adult form one presumes, in
order that he can preside over the entrance of Gabriel into his next non adamic host. In this way too, Melchizedek is
fatherless, motherless and without genealogy. In fact Melchizedek keeps descending all by himself, hence the Hebrew
name Jared. Now when the scripture say that Melchizedek had no beginning of days nor end of life it means that he did
have a beginning of life and will have an end of days. His life began when he possessed Cainan, but this was not when
his days began, they began in the pre-flood system in Jared. So Melchizedek in the peri-flood system had no beginning of
days. Melchizedek lives forever, and in particular he lives longer than the earth does and so he does have an end of days
(which days are defined by the earth) but not an end of life.

So who was the third of them at the time of Cainan and Eber? Well in the case of John the baptist we realized that anyone
who is named by God before he is conceived in the womb is a son of God and not a son of Adam or his fleshly father.

21 Now when eight days came to the full for circumcising him, his name was also called Jesus, the name called by the
angel before he was conceived in the womb (Luke 2).

But Isaac fulfils this criterion:

15 And God went on to say to Abraham: As for Sarai your wife, you must not call her name Sarai, because Sarah is her
name.
16 And I will bless her and [so] definitely give you a son from her; and I will bless her and [so] she shall become nations;
kings of peoples will come from her.
17 At this Abraham fell upon his face and began to laugh and to say in his heart: Will a man 100 years old have a child
born, and will Sarah, yes, will a woman 99 years old give birth?
18 After that Abraham said to the [true] God: O that Ishmael might live before you!
19 To this God said: Sarah your wife is indeed bearing you a son, and you must call his name Isaac. And I will establish
my covenant with him for a covenant to time indefinite to his seed after him.
20 But as regards Ishmael I have heard you. Look! I will bless him and will make him fruitful and will multiply him very,
very much. He will certainly produce 12 chieftains, and I will make him become a great nation.
21 However, my covenant I shall establish with Isaac, whom Sarah will bear to you at this appointed time next year
(Genesis 17).

1 And Jehovah turned his attention to Sarah just as he had said, and Jehovah now did to Sarah just as he had spoken.
2 And Sarah became pregnant and then bore a son to Abraham in his old age at the appointed time of which God had
spoken to him.
3 Accordingly Abraham called the name of his son who had been born to him, whom Sarah had borne to him, Isaac
(Genesis 21).

So Jehovah called Abraham's son to be Isaac before Sarah became pregnant. So Isaac was non adamic. Isaac was born
in 1918, and so was a contemporary of Cainan who lived for around 460 years and was born around 2340 so died around
1880 after Abraham as good as offered up Isaac. So Isaac was Michael after he had given birth to the twins. This is why
Abimelech said to him:

29 You now are the blessed of Jehovah (Genesis 26).

In this case who was Melchizedek at the time of John and Jesus?

25 And, look! there was a man in Jerusalem named Simeon, and this man was righteous and reverent, waiting for Israel's
consolation, and holy spirit was upon him.
26 Furthermore, it had been divinely revealed to him by the holy spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the
Christ of Jehovah.
27 Under the power of the spirit he now came into the temple; and as the parents brought the young child Jesus in to do
for it according to the customary practice of the law,
28 he himself received it into his arms and blessed God and said:
29 Now, Sovereign Lord, you are letting your slave go free in peace according to your declaration;
30 because my eyes have seen your means of saving
31 that you have made ready in the sight of all the peoples,
32 a light for removing the veil from the nations and a glory of your people Israel.
33 And its father and mother continued wondering at the things being spoken about it.
34 Also, Simeon blessed them, but said to Mary its mother: Look! This one is laid for the fall and the rising again of many
in Israel and for a sign to be talked against.
35 Yes, a long sword will be run through the soul of you yourself, in order that the reasonings of many hearts may be
uncovered (Luke 2).

Some Priest this Simeon. He didn't receive any pigeons after the manner of Aaron (the stipulated redemption sacrifice for
a poor person under law in the case of a firstborn son on the 41st day, the 33rd after the circumcision) he received Jesus
into his arms. He was a slave of God. One cannot help thinking that the one who sent John baptizing was Simeon:

33 Even I did not know him, but the very one who sent me to baptize in water said to me: Whoever it is upon whom you
see the spirit coming down and remaining, this is the one that baptizes in holy spirit (John 1).

The way this all works is that Melchizedek presides over the entrance of Gabriel and Gabriel presides over the entrance of
Michael. Except the in first case when Melchizedek presided over the entrance of Michael into Enoch and then Enoch
presided over the entrance of Gabriel into Methuselah.

Paul says of this great and amazingly complicated priest Melchizedek:

1 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the
kings and blessed him and to whom Abraham apportioned a tenth from all things, is first of all, by translation:
2 King of Righteousness, and is then also king of Salem, that is: King of Peace.
3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having
been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.
4 Behold, then, how great this man was to whom Abraham, the family head, gave a tenth out of the chief spoils (Hebrews
7).

So here are 4 designations for him. And the King of Salem was the one who received one tenth of everything from
Abraham. A prophetic gesture if ever there was one - see [43]. So the King of Righteousness was Jared, and the King of
Peace, well, this must be a designation for the Kingdom of God. We will be seeing this one again, surely as the earthly
King of the Kingdom of God.

Jehoida, Elijah and Elisha

We know that Jehoida was non adamic and was a priest. Now both Elijah and Elisha resurrected sons of Adam during the
Alienation Times.

21 And he proceeded to stretch himself upon the child 3 times and call to Jehovah and say: O Jehovah my God, please,
cause the soul of this child to come back within him.
22 Finally Jehovah listened to Elijah's voice, so that the soul of the child came back within him and he came to life (1
Kings 17).

32 At last Elisha came into the house, and there the boy was dead, being laid upon his couch.
33 Then he came in and closed the door behind them both and began to pray to Jehovah.
34 Finally he went up and lay down upon the child and put his own mouth upon his mouth and his own eyes upon his
eyes and his own palms upon his palms and kept bent over him, and gradually the child's flesh grew warm.
35 Then he began walking again in the house, once this way and once that way, after which he went up and bent over
him. And the boy began to sneeze as many as 7 times, after which the boy opened his eyes (2 Kings 4).

It is not possible to resurrect a son of Adam, mediating life to him, unless you possess your own, which means that you
are sealed in spirit, declared righteous in the spirit. This is what Paul declared that he had when he said:

8 From this time on there is reserved for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will give me
as a reward in that day, yet not only to me, but also to those who have loved his manifestation (2 Timothy 4).

James and Jesus refer to it as the crown of life:

12 Happy is the man that keeps on enduring trial, because on becoming approved he will receive the crown of life, which
Jehovah promised to those who continue loving him (James 1).

And it was not possible for sons of Adam to get this declaration which is the baptism into the name of the holy spirit during
the Alienation Times, which ran from 2488Sivan to 33Sivan - [128], [129]. So Elijah and Elisha were non adamic. We
know that Elijah came first and handed over to Elisha when he ascended in the windstorm recorded in an incredibly
prophetic account:

11 And it came about that as they were walking along, speaking as they walked, why, look! a fiery war chariot and fiery
horses, and they proceeded to make a separation between them both; and Elijah went ascending in the windstorm to the
heavens.
12 All the while Elisha was seeing it, and he was crying out: My father, my father, the war chariot of Israel and his
horsemen!
And he did not see him anymore. Consequently he took hold of his own garments and ripped them into two pieces (2
Kings 2).

Jehoiada ordered the killing of Athaliah in 898, and Elijah was told to anoint both Jehu and Elisha in 905:

16 And Jehu the grandson of Nimshi you should anoint as king over Israel; and Elisha the son of Shaphat from Abel-
meholah you should anoint as prophet in place of you (1 Kings 19).

For the chronology of this period see [91]. So Jehoida, Elijah and Elisha were contemporaries. So Jehoida was
Melchizedek, Elijah was Gabriel and Elisha was Michael.

Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel

This is what God said to Jeremiah:

5 Before I was forming you in the belly I knew you, and before you proceeded to come forth from the womb I sanctified
you. Prophet to the nations I made you (Jeremiah 1).

So Jeremiah had a previous existence, a previous soul in fact, either angelic or human. He was sanctified before he was
born, so he was born again before he was born! This is only the case with non adamic humans. So Jeremiah was one of
the three. The Gospels give us a clue as to which one:

13 Jesus went asking his disciples: Who are men saying the Son of man is?
14 They said: Some say John the Baptist, others Elijah, still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets (Matthew 16).

We know that Gabriel was in both Elijah and John, so we are presumably being told that Gabriel was in Jeremiah too. And
that Gabriel was in another one of the prophets. There is a further reference to this in Luke:

7 Now Herod the district ruler heard of all the things happening, and he was in great perplexity because of its being said
by some that John had been raised up from the dead,
8 but by others that Elijah had appeared, but by still others that a certain one of the ancient prophets had risen (Luke 9).
So there must have been two contemporaries of Jeremiah who were Melchizedek and Michael. These are the only two
prophets said to be 'son of man' not by men, but by God and by Gabriel:

17 Son of man, a watchman is what I have made you to the house of Israel, and you must hear from my mouth speech
and you must warn them from me (Ezekiel 3).

17 So he came beside where I was standing, but when he came I got terrified so that I fell upon my face. And he
proceeded to say to me: Understand, Oh son of man, that the vision is for the time of [the] end (Daniel 8).

The only other 'son of man' in the bible is Jesus. So what does it mean to be a 'son of man' ? Or like the crowd said:

Therefore the crowd answered him: We heard from the Law that the Christ remains forever; and how is it you say that the
Son of man must be lifted up? Who is this Son of man? (John 12:34).
In our best understanding, 'son of man' means one who provides offspring in the form of man before he sinned, i.e. a
further uncondemned Adam. Someone who provides indefinitely living human offspring. Michael certainly can do this,
being the eternal father, as opposed to Adam, the temporary father:

6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his
shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9).

Melchizedek, being non adamic himself can also do this, one presumes. So we have Daniel and Ezekiel as Melchizedek
and Michael. But if Gabriel in Jeremiah is the prophet to the nations, then it must be Michael in Ezekiel who is the
watchman to the house of Israel, for he was the prince of Israel according to Gabriel:

21 However, I shall tell you the things noted down in the writing of truth, and there is no one holding strongly with me in
these [things] but Michael, the prince of you people (Daniel 10).

So Daniel was Melchizedek, and Ezekiel was Michael.

The 24 appearances of the three leading actors

So we have the 12 comings of the Christ as described in section [505], and we can enlarge this now to 24 comings in this
system of Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael.

Coming As Function Date

1st Enoch Train up for role as Christ After 3340 BC
2nd Isaac Patriarch After 1858 BC
Fight for the sons of Israel as they took the
3rd Prince of the army of Jehovah to Joshua 1473Nisan BC
promised land by the sword.
4th Elisha Prophesy Anointing of Jehu 905 BC
5th Ezekiel Prophesy 5th year of exile of Jehoiachin, 592 BC
Jesus Born to Mary and Joseph, who died at
6th Jesus Christ the son of Joseph 2Tishri10 (BC) -29Tishri10 AD
his baptism by John.
Messiah, validation sacrifice for the 1AC.
7th Michael in Jesus Ministry and Ransom. Appoint FDS1 29Tishri10-33Nisan16
exclusively at Resurrection
8th Jesus Appoint FDS2 64Nisan - 67Tishri
9th Jesus Remove FDS2 200-450 AD ??
10th Jesus Appoint FDS3 1914Tishri - 1918Nisan
11th Jesus Appoint FDS4 1994Nisan - 1994Tammuz30
Jesus with Gabriel and Melchizedek and the
12th 288,000 New covenant and 2nd New Final revealing of God to mankind 2008Tammuz1
covenant saints, in fact the whole cast
Triple appearance Melchizedek Gabriel Michael
1st Jared Methuselah Enoch
2nd Cainan Eber Isaac
3rd Jehoiada Elijah Elisha
4th Daniel Jeremiah Ezekiel
5th Simeon John the Baptist Jesus
6th during Armageddon Melchizedek Gabriel Michael

So we have 6 triple appearances and 6 more comings of the Christ making 24 appearances in all.

In fact Michael in Enoch was transferred so as not to see death in the first triple appearance in this system, and Gabriel in
John the Baptist, was transferred so as not to see death in the last triple appearance in this system (the 6th triple
appearance is in the Kingdom of God).

Covenants – The Master Plan

The 1st, 2nd and 3rd Ransom Covenants, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Righteousness Covenants, and the 1st, 2nd and
3rd Abrahamic Covenants, the 1AC, 2AC, 3AC

Definition: A covenant is an agreement between two parties.

Definition: A Mediator of a covenant with God is man/angel with whom God (directly or indirectly) has made a covenant,
who subcovenants with a third party group of men/angels in order that they too may enter into a covenant with God
through him.

Bible reading: Genesis 12 -15,17,22, Galatians 3, Romans 4

The ARC the HARC and the PARC, the 3 Master Covenants

Adam's sons are born condemned to death under the death penalty passed and eventually executed on Adam. Adam can
only pass on to his sons the life that he has, he cannot pass on everlasting life to them, because he himself only had a
finite life. In fact really it is Eve who cannot pass on everlasting life to her sons and daughters because women give life
physically, and she only had a finite life due to the death sentence on her. This reasoning is an example of what we call
the 'Dirty Water Principle', which is not a principle of the bible code, but is a principle of common sense. One cannot clean
anything with dirty water. Likewise a priest cannot pass on to his congregation a cleanliness that he does not himself
possess. Now women are the physical priests, they give birth physically; God has chosen them to give physical life on his
behalf. But men give birth spiritually; God has chosen them to give life after death on his behalf, or to give life through
Armageddon. Make no mistake it is as unnatural for a woman to baptize as it is for a man to give birth. Men and women
have equal value, and men and women have equal rights, but we do not have identical roles to play and we do not have
equal authority. The man has authority over the woman. Men love making decisions and especially love bossing women
about. Men make decisions easily, women find it harder, and love being indecisive. But men make better decisions if they
listen to women who love to correct them. Women have better all round vision (rods) and men have better focus (cones).
We are designed to act as a pair in making decisions. If we do act as a pair with the woman recognizing the man's better
focus and the man recognizing the woman's better all round vision, then we make the best decisions we can. If we act in
competition to each other recognizing nothing for ourselves but soaking up soap opera relationship values of pride and
status wherein both parties wish to be the boss and two people are wrenching at the same steering wheel then we make
the worst decisions we can.

Just because men make the decisions does not mean they should exclude women, on the contrary they should consult
women just as the chairman of the board consults the other board members. For women are the diplomats of this world.
They advise the men and can change a man's decision without having the authority to change his decision. And a woman
will see the fault in any man's decision every time if she cares about him, because her peripheral vision is better than his.
So if he listens to her, then his decisions will be the better for it. We two are perfect compliments for each other if we co-
operate in wisdom and in love. But we destroy each other if we compete in political correctness and in blind power games.
Eve of course failed to consult her husband and therefore got lead down the garden path (out of the garden). And Adam
of course chose Eve over God. Women have not changed today and neither have men as regards their basic characters,
but our experience if turned into wisdom through accurate knowledge of God can overcome our flawed and animalistic
basic instincts. Indeed overcoming these is our work in progress as junior members of God's family.

The overwhelming majority of men today put women or a woman or being attractive to women before God as Adam did.
The overwhelming majority of women today choose status over both their husband and God as did Eve.

Now both Adam and Eve had life subject to a death penalty when they had Cain. So by the dirty water principle, Eve, the
physical priestess of life, was not able to pass on to her children life without a death penalty.

5 Look! With error I was brought forth with birth pains, and in sin my mother conceived me (Psalms 51).

So all of her sons and daughters likewise have life subject to the same death penalty. In fact we all exist today only due to
the stay of execution granted to Adam and Eve by God, and we all die today, due to that one same penalty. This death
penalty is enforced and exists only in our bodies, which age and die as a result.

God will not make a legal agreement directly with humans in this condition. For we are condemned to death and are only
alive by means of a stay of execution on our sentence, so God has nothing with a future to make any agreement with.
Instead he makes the effort to solve this problem whilst still obeying his own principles, by choosing one man for each
covenant or subcovenant, whom he knows will turn out good, and be saved, and by lifting the death penalty on him (if
necessary). Of course he cannot just lift his own death penalty. He does it on the basis that either Jesus' (Michael's) or
Gabriel's or Melchizedek's ransom sacrifice is going to occur or has already occurred, depending on when this man lived
(we will explain these three ransoms shortly). This person then becomes a mediator of the legal agreement, or covenant,
which God wishes to make with mankind. The mediation works by God making a covenant with this person, and this
person then making the same covenant with the rest of us. So that the mediator is a subcovenanter with God. Although
very few men or angels covenant directly with God, because St. Paul has told us literally:

5 One for God, one and mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus (1 Timothy 2 - Literal translation).

The above is a deliberately ambiguously written scripture. In the literal meaning, which applies at the time Paul wrote this
scripture. The correct translation is:

5 For one God [there is], one [who is] also a mediator of God and of men, [a] man, Christ, Jesus (1 Timothy 2 - Literal
translation)

This translation is forced by the order of the words 'one and'. Nearly all bibles incorrectly translate the above as:

5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2 - NWT).

The mistranslation arises from the words of Paul's statement that...

20 Now there is no mediator where only one person is concerned, but God is only one (Galatians 3).

So God cannot mediate a covenant between himself and someone (which is obvious from the definition of a mediator as
being a sub covenanter).

Although the mistranslation is also contrary to the wording in Greek. For it would only be the correct translation if the
Greek read 'and one' rather than 'one and'. Jesus is a God, and was of course a man, but he is not the only God, if one
takes God to mean 'of divine constitution' (i.e. an angel). He is not the only angel who has mediated between Jehovah
and man as we shall see. But he is presently the only angel permitted to perform such mediation, because since his
death, he has been the firstborn angel of Jehovah, and so has the firstborn rights, which we call the Firstborn Master
Covenant. He has also been since his death the only God requiring worship, who is also a mediator between God and
man. Jesus was elevated in status from an angel, to a God requiring worship, after he died and was given the name
above every other name named, which name is Jehovah.

9 For this very reason also God exalted him to a superior position and kindly gave him the name that is above every
[other] name (Philippians 2).

20 with which he has operated in the case of the Christ when he raised him up from the dead and seated him at his right
hand in the heavenly places,
21 far above every government and authority and power and lordship and every name named, not only in this system of
things, but also in that to come (Ephesians 1).

5 For example, to which one of the angels did he ever say: You are my son; I, today, I have become your father? And
again: I myself shall become his father, and he himself will become my son?
6 But when he again brings his Firstborn into the inhabited earth, he says: And let all God's angels do obeisance to him.
7 Also, with reference to the angels he says: And he makes his angels spirits, and his public servants a flame of fire.
8 But with reference to the Son: God is your throne forever and ever, and [the] scepter of your kingdom is the scepter of
uprightness.
9 You loved righteousness, and you hated lawlessness. That is why God, your God, anointed you with [the] oil of
exultation more than your partners (Hebrews 1).

So at the time Paul wrote to Timothy, Jesus was a Mighty God, a God requiring worship like Jehovah, but he was not
Almighty God, who is Jehovah himself...

6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his
shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9).

Now Jesus earned this increased status together with the rights of the firstborn angelic son of God, when he gave his life
for us and to prove God correct. Satan lost these rights when he killed Adam and Eve. The right of the firstborn angelic
son of God is that God will do everything through him. In fact Satan was the first angel born to God, the first angel to be
created by God. So if Satan had not lost his firstborn rights at Adam's sin, then God would not have been able to
covenant directly with anyone other than Satan. But since Michael did not earn these rights for himself until he died on the
stake/cross, there was a period between Adam's sin and Jesus' ransom during which God was free to covenant with any
of his angels. But after Jesus died, since he then had the firstborn rights, all covenants had to be master mediated by him.
This is the logic behind Paul's words to Timothy, penned after Jesus died.

5 For one God, one also a mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus.
6 The one having given himself corresponding ransom over all ones (1 Timothy 2).

The full literal meaning is therefore:

For there is one God requiring worship, one who is also a mediator (of a ransom covenant) between Jehovah and men,
someone who was a man but now is an angel, and who became a God to be worshipped after he died, Jesus Christ.

The 3 Master Covenants between God and Man without using the Successive Designations Principle of the Code

We all know about the New Covenant (1NC), that Jesus made at the last supper, and we all know about the First
Abrahamic Covenant (1AC) of Genesis 12. But the angelic salvation offered by the 1NC did not just appear with Jesus.
Neither did the blessing of Abraham, the benefit to the sons of the 1AC, which is the resurrection into the kingdom of God
on earth, just appear with Abraham. Both of these covenants have superior covenants, which we call Master covenants.
There are in fact 3 Master covenants for the salvation of our species. We discovered them by applying the bible code to
the scripture that the NWT mistranslates as:

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, [a] man, Christ, Jesus (1 Timothy 2)

This scripture has 3 successive designations for the mediator between God and men. He is called ‘[a] man’, ‘[a] Christ’,
and ‘Jesus’. Using the Successive Designations Principle of the code, this means that in the word symbolic meaning,
there are 3 mediators between God and men. However we have not yet covered all of the code, so we will instead deduce
their existence from the literal meaning of other scriptures.

We know from 1 Timothy 2:5 quoted above that Michael ransomed Adam in some way, so let us examine the ransoming
blood of Jesus’ Master covenant, the ARC. It is not possible for Jesus to Ransom Adam and then for his blood only to
apply to people who lived after Abraham. His blood must actually apply to the forefathers of Abraham as well, so there
must be a covenant above any Abrahamic Covenant, which passes on the ransoming value of Jesus’ blood. Taking the
argument to its limit, there must be a Master Ransom Covenant, which Abraham and the mediators of the Pre flood and
peri-flood systems sit below. We call the Master Covenant between Jesus and God, the Angelic Ransom Covenant; we
call the immediately inferior Universal Righteousness Covenant between Jesus and Adam, the 3rd Righteousness
Covenant, the 3RC, because Jesus died to give us everlasting angelic life which is the righteous decree in the spirit from
God.
22 However, now, because you were set free from sin but became slaves to God, you are having your fruit in the way of
holiness, and the end everlasting life.
23 For the wages sin pays is death, but the gift God gives is everlasting life by Christ Jesus our Lord (Romans 6).

14 how much more will the blood of the Christ, who through an everlasting spirit offered himself without blemish to God,
cleanse our consciences from dead works that we may render sacred service to [the] living God? (Hebrews 9).

11 And yet that is what some of you were. But you have been washed clean, but you have been sanctified, but you have
been declared righteous in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and with the spirit of our God (1 Corinthians 6).

The righteous decree in the spirit is the end of the spirit baptism. This is the point where one gets everlasting life - U13. So
the blood of Michael gives everlasting life, which is a completed spirit baptism, which is entry into the ARC, which entry is
for ever and cannot be revoked. This is how Jesus becomes our eternal father.

6 For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us, and the princely rule will come to be upon his
shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9).

5 For one God, one also a mediator of God and of men [i.e. between God and men], man, Christ, Jesus.
6 The one having given himself corresponding ransom over all ones,
7 which is witnessed to at its own appointed times (1 Timothy 2 - Literal translation).

Jesus corresponded to Adam and ransomed him. This ransom is said to be 'over all ones'. This does not mean that Jesus'
ransom of Adam covers all of Adam's genetic sons.

28 Just as the Son of man came, not to be ministered to, but to minister and to give his soul a ransom in exchange for
many [not all, but many] (Matthew 20).

As we shall soon see in the case of the first abrahamic covenant, covenants do not cover the mediator's genetic
descendents, they cover those who enter the covenant being mediated. The 1AC does not cover to those with the genes
of Abraham, but rather it covers those with the faith of Abraham, for it was a covenant given as a result of the faith of
Abraham which therefore had faith as an entrance criterion. By entering the 1AC one became a son of Abraham's faith
rather than a son of his loins.

The corresponding ransom for Adam by the Master Mediator/Covenanter/Ransomer Jesus is over, or covers, all those
who enter into the 3RC which Adam, his ransomee mediates. These people may be genetic sons of Adam or may be pre-
adamic or non adamic! They may have lived in the pre-flood, the peri-flood or the post-flood systems. They are the men of
1 Timothy 2:5.

15 But it is not with the gift as it was with the trespass. For if by one man's trespass many died, the undeserved kindness
of God and his free gift with the undeserved kindness by the one man Jesus Christ abounded much more to many.
16 Also, it is not with the free gift as it was with the way things worked through the one [man] that sinned. For the
judgment resulted from one trespass in condemnation, but the gift resulted from many trespasses in a declaration of
righteousness.
17 For if by the trespass of the one [man] death ruled as king through that one, much more will those who receive the
abundance of the undeserved kindness and of the free gift of righteousness rule as kings in life through the one [person],
Jesus Christ (Romans 5).

10 For [the death] that he died, he died with reference to sin once for all time. But [the life] that he lives, he lives with
reference to God (Romans 6).

So Jesus is the Master Mediator of the ARC with God and his ransomee Adam is the Universal Mediator of the 3RC with
us.

But Paul relates Jesus, the high priest of the ARC, to Melchizedek as follows.

20 This hope we have as anchor for the soul, both sure and firm, and it enters within the curtain, where a forerunner has
entered on our behalf, Jesus, who has become a high priest according to the manner of Melchizedek (Hebrews 6).

But how did Jesus enter within the curtain?

11 However, when the Christ came as high priest of the good things that have come to pass, through the greater and
more perfect tent, not made with hands, that is not of this creation,
12 he entered no, not with the blood of goats, and of young bulls, but with his own blood, once for all time, into the holy
place and obtained an everlasting deliverance (Hebrews 9).

Now if Jesus is a high priest according to the manner of Melchizedek, then Melchizedek is a high priest according to the
manner of Jesus. So Melchizedek also entered into some kind of holy place with his own blood and performed a ransom,
which was the covenant basis of his priesthood. In other words he was also a master covenanter between God and men.
But Melchizedek started life as a non adamic man, as Jared in fact, the Father of Enoch - U506. Now there were two
cherubs on the Ark of the Covenant in the most holy place, not one. And Solomon himself built two huge Cherubs for the
holy place where the ark was to be kept.

23 Further, he made in the innermost room two cherubs of oil-tree wood, ten cubits being the height of each one (1 Kings
6).

But the ark itself is symbolizing the angelic body of Jesus - because this body is the validation sacrifice of the Angelic
Ransom Covenant which we all are eventually saved by - U509. So neither of the two Cherubs on the ark or in the most
holy place are Michael who is Jesus - U14b So who are they? Well, we know that Gabriel is one, since the two Cherubs
guarding the way to the tree of life must have been Michael and Gabriel. And we know that there are three Cherubs in all
from Ezekiel 10 where a Cherub who is also a man clothed with linen thrusts his hand in between the two Cherubs of the
Chariot of Jehovah which has 4 wheels (One needs to read Ezekiel 10 carefully to see that there are 2 Cherubs and 4
Wheels in the chariot). So who is the third Cherub? Well since Cherubs are involved in God's interactions with man, and
since Melchizedek is a high priest according to the manner of Jesus, he is the third Cherub. Having started life as a
human, he is the 'most human' of the three. Satan himself used to be a Cherub...

14 You are the anointed cherub that is covering, and I have set you. On the holy mountain of God you proved to be. In the
midst of fiery stones you walked about.
15 You were faultless in your ways from the day of your being created until unrighteousness was found in you (Ezekiel
28).

Satan was the firstborn angel of God - U243. God created him first. God gave him the Firstborn Master Covenant, he
agreed to act only through Satan, his firstborn, this is why he was the angelic overseer of the Garden of Eden. He lost his
firstborn right when he sinned, lying to Eve and deceiving her into killing Adam (who was not deceived, but who loved his
wife more than he loved God's laws). At this point Satan ceased being a Cherub. So a Cherub is an angel who covenants
directly with God. So Gabriel and Melchizedek must also covenant directly with God as Michael does with the ARC.

But how does Gabriel's priesthood work? Well, when Gabriel appeared to Zechariah, he was standing at the right side of
the incense altar, and he said:

19 I am Gabriel, who stands near before God (Luke 1).

Now God, although he is almighty, never breaks his own laws, for he is not a hypocrite like powerful men down here.
Likewise, Gabriel, the angel of the Lord, will not break God’s laws. So he had a right to be standing in the holy place. In
fact ‘standing near before God’ is a euphemism for being a priest of God. Yet even Gabriel himself was not in the most
holy place with the Ark. He was in the holy place with the incense altar.

So Gabriel has also entered into the first compartment of the holy place as a priest and he is sitting upon the Ark of the
Covenant next to Melchizedek in the second compartment in statue. So plainly he is also a priest to God similar to Jesus.
He cannot of course be a priest after the manner of Aaron, since he does not trace his genealogy to Levi. But being a
cherub, and having entered himself physically into the holy place (but not the most holy place), the blood of his priesthood
must also enter into the first tent but not into the second.

Now only the blood of Michael enters into the second compartment, the most holy place, to give an everlasting
deliverance, since it is he who baptizes in Holy Spirit and fire, not Gabriel or Melchizedek. So the blood of Gabriel enters
into the first compartment, where he stood with Zechariah. And the blood of Melchizedek enters into another holy place of
some sort. It appears that Melchizedek is outside in the courtyard in this symbolism.

Now Gabriel was in John who started a water baptism - U506, and Michael was in Jesus who started a spirit baptism (by
baptizing only Peter, who he renamed). And in fact every time the three of them, Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael
appear, they perform the following baptism routine.
Melchizedek presides over the entrance of Gabriel, and then Gabriel presides over the entrance of Michael. Every time,
that is, except the first time, when Melchizedek presided over the entrance of Michael and then later presided over the
entrance of Gabriel - U506. And yet here is Gabriel standing by the incense altar right where Michael enters into the Most
Holy.

If you put this whole Jigsaw together you have Gabriel as the master covenanter of a water baptism (the holy place), and
Michael as the Master Covenanter of a spirit baptism (the most holy place). You also have Melchizedek having a
covenant that must exist outside of baptism (since there are no other baptisms performed by men). This is the covenant of
God’s love, the covenant of faith. For the order of progression of every Jew and every Christian, is Faith, Water, Spirit, or
Faith, Spirit, Water. In other words it is Melchizedek, Gabriel, Michael, or it is Melchizedek, Michael Gabriel, the very two
orders that these three Cherubs appear in when they possess humans - U506.

Now Adam lost two souls when he sinned, he lost his associated angelic soul (for he was born as both an angel and a
human, he was born again when he was born if you like, since he was a son of God without sin and such sons are angels)
and he lost his edenic human soul. His indefinitely lasting edenic human soul was converted into a 960 year long ageing
human soul by God, as his last act of creation at the very end of the 6th creative 'day' of Genesis 1.

Well, Michael ransomed the one soul, the angelic soul, for Adam and his sons, and Gabriel ransomed the other soul, the
human soul, for Adam and his sons. Melchizedek actually ransomed Adam's dad, who was obviously pre-adamic. Pre-
adamics as a race were fatherless, motherless and without genealogy, like Melchizedek (who was the second incarnation
of Jared and who appeared in the peri-flood system) and those of Adam's sons with faith but without water or spirit
baptism, who again have no visible spiritual genealogy (no visible baptism path). For Paul says of Melchizedek...

3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having
been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

The ransom covenant for Michael, by which he becomes our angelic father, is the ARC and the universal righteousness
covenant for his ransomee (the associated angel of Adam) we call the 3RC (3rd Righteousness Covenant).

The ransom covenant for Gabriel, by which he becomes our edenic father we call the HARC (Human Adamic Ransom
Covenant), and the universal righteousness covenant for his ransomee (the human soul of Adam) we call the 2RC.

The ransom covenant for Melchizedek, by which he becomes the edenic father of the pre adamics, and the non baptized
sons of Adam, we call the Pre-adamic Ransom covenant (the PARC), and the universal righteousness covenant for his
ransomee, we call the 1RC (1st Righteousness Covenant).

Melchizedek actually ransomed Adam's human 'father' U13, (in the same sense that Joseph was Jesus' father). He
became the father in faith of the pre-adamics. We call this man Abadam (This is Hebrew for the father of Adam).

So now we can finally understand the deep things of Hebrews 9 that Paul was not speaking in detail about!

2 For there was constructed a first tent in which were the lampstand and also the table and the display of the
loaves. And it is called: The Holy Place.
3 But behind the second curtain was the tent called: The Most Holy.
4 This had a golden censer and the ark of the covenant overlaid all around with gold, in which were the golden jar having
the manna and the rod of Aaron that budded and the tablets of the covenant.
5 But up above it were the glorious cherubs overshadowing the propitiatory [cover]. But now is not the time to speak in
detail concerning these things (Hebrews 9).

For the first compartment is the HARC, for the sons of water, and the second compartment is the ARC, and the temple
courtyard is the PARC for the pre adamics, and the unbaptized sons of Adam with true faith in Jehovah (before
33Nisan16) or in Jesus and Jehovah (after 33Nisan16) or with a good conscience or with a good community conscience
(sighing and groaning over the detestable things happening and translating this pain into selfless acts). For more details of
the temple symbolism see - U509.

If you like, Melchizedek is the father of the orphans. He fathers those who God himself adopts, due to their faith in him or
in Jesus, or due to their good conscience which is their faith in goodness, even though they never join a true religion.

15 They are the very ones who demonstrate the matter of the law to be written in their hearts, while their conscience is
bearing witness with them and, between their own thoughts; they are being accused or even excused (Romans 2).
4 And Jehovah went on to say to him: Pass through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and you must
put a mark on the foreheads of the men that are sighing and groaning over all the detestable things that are being done in
the midst of it (Ezekiel 9). So in summary...

All those with true faith or with a good conscience but no baptism are ransomed by Melchizedek via the PARC.
The water baptized are ransomed by Gabriel via the HARC.
The spirit baptized are ransomed by Michael via the ARC.

Let us be absolutely clear about the PARC. Christians who believe in the Trinity and Jews who do not believe in Jesus,
and Kabala mystics who do not believe in Jesus, and Muslims who believe in the Koran and Hindus who believe in
Brahman who is ‘more than the universe’ but not a person, and Buddhists who believe in enlightenment apart from a God
etc., and the followers of the Dali Lama who believe in re-incarnation and Sheikhs who believe in one true God but not in
his son, all have a worthless and misplaced faith from a salvation point of view. They have fallen for the snares of Satan,
who delights in providing unseaworthy lifeboats full of gaping holes, and watching sincere people jumping into them and
drowning. Many of them of course are genuine in their love for God, and would have had a true faith were they not being
deceived as Eve was. However, these ones are saved, and become sons of the PARC, not because of their misplaced
faith, but because of their good conscience or because of their selfless acts.

So the sons of the PARC are in fact sons of true faith in God or sons of true faith in goodness. Incidentally we shall see
later due to the wording of the first Abrahamic covenant, that anyone who changes religion because they are sincerely
searching for God, is a son of the 1AC even if they change from one false religion to the next, or even if they change from
a true religion to a false religion! The effort to leave the religion of your father, your family, you community or your country
and to go to the land, the religious administration, that you believe God to be showing you makes you a son of Abraham
by faith even if God was actually trying to show you another land entirely!

The PARC, the HARC and the ARC, the 3 Master Covenants between God and Man, and the 1RC, the 2RC and the
3RC, the 3 Universal Righteousness Covenants from the Successive Designations Principle of the Code

5 For one God, one also a mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus.
6 The one having given himself corresponding ransom over all ones (1 Timothy 2 - Literal translation)

The phrase: A man, Christ, Jesus is a triple successive designation, since the word 'Christ' is used here as a noun - see
the Successive Designation Principle of the code. The word 'God' is repeated twice and so must take a different symbolic
meaning in one of the three word symbolic threads to its literal meaning - see the Repetition Principle of the code. The 3
word symbolic meanings of Paul's words are:

Melchizedek's Ransom

For there is one angel, one who is also a mediator between Jehovah and men, a man (Melchizedek). Who gave himself a
corresponding human soul ransom for Adam's father, covering all pre-adamic and adamic sons of true faith and all pre-
adamic and adamic men of good conscience, without water or spirit baptisms.

By believing 'pre-adamic' humans we mean humans who lived after Adam, and heard about Jehovah through Adam's
sons, and believed in true faith, but were not themselves sons of Adam. For Adam was the first human priest. It was
through him that mankind, pre-adamic mankind, learned about God. This Master Covenant for the ransomer we call the
PARC and this universal righteousness covenant for the ransomee we call the 1RC. Melchizedek was Jared, the father of
Enoch - U506. We do not know precisely how pre-adamic man got started. Anthropology tells us it was around 2.8 million
years ago. But we do believe that they had a life span similar to our 120 year maximum lifespan today - see [235].
Presumably God picked Adam's father on his good conscience. This man would be a kind of Abraham to the pre-adamics.
Then Melchizedek would have ransomed him. And then all men of faith, regardless of their genealogy could come into the
1RC. What we are saying is that Adam's dad was the real, the archetyptical, Abraham. He fathered everyone with a
future, both quasi genetically in the case of Adam and his sons and through a covenant of faith in the case of them and
the pre-adamics.

Melchizedek would not have ransomed Neanderthals, Homo Habilis or any other early type of human that had become
extinct by the time of Adam, because they were not subject to any spiritual test (another way of looking at this is they had
no knowledge of bad from Satan). Adam did not appear until Homo Sapiens (Cro-Magnon man) was able to think
spiritually, by which we mean that he was able to discern with his mind the existence of things that he could not detect
with his senses, or as an alternative definition, he was able to perform a two step thought process, he was able to walk
mentally, to think logically.
3 In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having
been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually (Hebrews 7).

This description of Melchizedek's lineage, applies to a large extent to pre-adamic man as well. 7 pairs of pre-adamics
(clean, i.e. baptized, non sons of Adam) came through the ark with the 8 adamic souls. These interbred with Adam's kids
bringing down the lifespan of man from 960 years to 120 years. Statistically it is inordinately unlikely that any were left by
the time of Jesus who had not interbred to such an extent that they were effectively adamic. But actually it does not matter
whether they were or they weren't for just as in the case of Abraham, one does not have to be a son genetically to be a
son by covenant. So the pre-adamics could benefit from both Gabriel’s adamic ransom and Michael's adamic ransom.

Melchizedek (his name in the peri-flood system) started life as Jared in the pre flood system - U506. Jared fathered Enoch
who fathered Methuselah. Jared it was that ransomed the pre adamic humans. These humans were obviously under a
death sentence (since they died like we do). But their sentence was not due to a sin, we assert, it was due to their being
created as aspiritual beings. Only when they had developed spirituality, did God introduce himself to them through Adam,
and begin the process of saving them from death. Since the pre adamics were not born with judicial life, they needed to
be ransomed in order to gain it.

It is perfectly possible that there were pre-adamic men and women around at the time of King David or even at the time of
the exile to Babylon, but not much later than that. They are not Neanderthals; they just have a different lineage. One
thinks of Goliath and Og and Ishbi-benob for example. Adam and Eve were taken from pre-adamic man in any event in
the same surrogate way that Jesus was taken from Joseph and Mary...

45 It is even so written: The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit (1 Corinthians
15).

Gabriel's Ransom

For there is one angel, one who is also a mediator between Jehovah and Adam's sons, a Christ (Gabriel). Who gave
himself a corresponding human soul ransom for Adam's human soul covering all water baptized sons of Adam and all
water baptized pre-adamics.

This master ransom covenant for Gabriel we call the HARC and the universal righteousness covenant of the ransomee
(Adam) we could call the 2RC (This has nothing to do with Roman Catholics!) We use the acronym HARC because of a
certain hymn. Gabriel did not die as an angel in this ransom, but his first human host (Methuselah) did, with Gabriel inside
him at the time, in the year of the flood, 2371BC. He would have died during the 40 days of rain of the flood itself, between
2371Heshvan17 and 2371Chislev27, in order to save those from the true religion in the Great Crowd during the greater
flood of Armageddon. Methuselah was non adamic - U506. He would not have died judicially during the flood; he was not
in need of any judicial execution by God. The sons of the HARC have all been in a true religion, they are all priests as
Adam was, they get their edenic human bodies courtesy of Gabriel through Methuselah's body, the longest living human
to date (he lived 969 years). Furthermore there has never been more water around than in the flood and the HARC is
entered through 'water' baptism. Pre-adamics could enter the HARC and become sons of Adam under his subcovenant of
the HARC. And sons of Adam who did not get water baptized into the true religion at the time but had faith, could enter
the PARC.

In fact, let’s reboot our brains shall we? Why is it that entry to the 2AC is through water baptism? True a bath cleans away
physical dirt from the past which symbolizes fleshly sins committed in the past. But surely all water baptisms point back to
the flood? Surely Methuselah died by the waters of the flood so that we might live through the waters of the Jordan, the
bath of the flesh.

Michael's Ransom

For there is one angel, one who is also a mediator between Jehovah and Adam's sons, Jesus (Michael). Who gave
himself a corresponding angelic soul ransom for Adam covering all spirit baptized sons of Adam and all spirit baptized
pre-adamics.

This master ransom covenant we call the Angelic Ransom Covenant (the ARC) and its universal righteousness covenant
for Adam, we call the 3RC. In all three covenant explanations above, and in many places in this website and in the bible,
'sons' means 'sons and daughters'.

The three master covenants above were made after Satan sinned and so were made directly with God, without the
Firstborn Master Covenant, which Satan lost when he sinned. But after Jesus' death, any new covenant made with God,
must be made through Jesus, since he then became God's firstborn taking the firstborn right which is to have the Firstborn
Master Covenant which stipulates that God must do everything through the firstborn. Since the word 'God' is recited twice
in the scripture...

5 For one God, one also a mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus.

it must take a different meaning somewhere in the word symbolism, to the meaning it takes in the literal interpretation.
This is why we take 'One God' to mean one God requiring worship in the literal meaning, and to mean 'one angel' in the
word three symbolic meanings of the scripture.

The Blessings of the PARC the HARC and the ARC

Melchizedek's ransom provides a non ageing human soul for pre-adamic men and for adamic sons of true faith or good
conscience in the new system. The Blessing of the PARC is a human resurrection into the Kingdom of God with a perfect
edenic body.

Gabriel's ransom provides a non ageing human soul for the pre-adamics and for Adam’s sons in the new system. The
blessing of this covenant of water baptism and of true religion is that one is a priest in this system, for every Jew with faith
would have evangelized about his God and could take people into his household and have them circumcised, and one is
a priest in the next system, and one gets a human resurrection into the Kingdom of God with a perfect edenic body. From
a salvation standpoint, the PARC and the HARC provide the same blessing. But they provide it to different groups and the
HARC is a priestly covenant, a covenant for those in the true religion. A priesthood is a non genetic fathering, by providing
entrance into a salvation covenant.

Michael's ransom provides an everlasting angelic body for pre-adamics and for Adam's sons in the new system.

If Gabriel's ransom is applied during the Kingdom, which is the same statement as, if Adam is resurrected into the
Kingdom of God and since the first will be last, he must be so resurrected, then those in Gehenna will not benefit from this
ransom, being under the second death, and so not entitled to any body (human or angelic) at the time the ransom is
carried out. This appears to mean that all those in Gehenna can never be humans again! But they can be angels again
and if they are sons of Adam this will be through the ARC - U13a.

Technical Note: If Abraham's ransom by the human soul of Jesus, which we look at later, was applied today, then all of his genetic
descendants as well as all those in the 1AC would be resurrected (other than those in Gehenna). Gehenna is the means which prevents
resurrection when ransoms are applied. Likewise when Adam is finally ransomed and thereby resurrected, all of his genetic and
covenant descendents who are not in Gehenna are resurrected. This is why he is resurrected last after his sons.

Fatherhood

Before Adam died, he had an indefinitely lasting human soul and an associated angelic soul, since he was an
uncondemned son of God - U190. He lost both of these when he sinned. He therefore lost the right to pass these souls to
his kids through procreation. Michael ransomed Adam's angelic soul, and Gabriel (in Methuselah) ransomed his
indefinitely lasting human soul. By Michael giving his angelic soul in death to God, he then liberated and actually
purchased Adam's angelic soul from God. In any event this procedure gave Michael the right to father angelic sons to
Adam, the right that Adam had lost. But since it was a ransom of Adam, it was Adam's re-instatement as an angelic father.
So Jesus effectively gave Adam his fatherhood rights back and reclaimed the procreative capability that Adam had lost.
Jesus became Adam's angelic father by covenant and he became his son in the sense that he could provide him with
angelic offspring. Hence his name 'the son of man'. Gabriel on the other hand, by giving the non adamic human soul of
Methuselah (with Gabriel in it at the time), took Adam's human soul as a possession, 'as his own'. He then became
Adam's human soul father and purchased the rights to father Edenic human souls to Adam's sons, the other right that
Adam had lost; hence he is also a 'son of man'.

So in the Kingdom of God, our edenic human bodies are thanks to Melchizedek or Gabriel and our angelic bodies are
thanks to Michael, and the whole exercise is thanks to our brilliant God. A God whose mercy is a matter of heavenly
legislation. Wouldst that we had such legislation in this system, but there again it has a different God, so we have cruelty
as a matter of legislation instead.

Michael died as an angel in Jesus going first to Tartarus, where all the disembodied ex angelic souled spirits are - U251.
Gabriel did not die as an angel but died as a human in Methuselah, Gabriel's spirit was preserved without being sent to
Tartarus. It was simply transferred into his angelic vehicle, his angelic soul, when the human soul of Methuselah expired.
So God covenanted with Michael first, when Satan sinned, and then later with Gabriel and Melchizedek. God covenants
with the Angelic Master Mediator (Michael, Gabriel, Melchizedek) who then covenants with the human universal
righteousness mediator (Adam or his father) who then covenants with the various system mediators (Enosh, Noah,
Abraham etc) who then covenants with a submediator (Moses, Ezra, John the Baptist, Jesus, Paul, Russell, Gordon etc.)
who then covenants with mankind. This arrangement of covenants reflects the role of Jesus/Michael and of the two other
master mediators, making the three Cherubs. Seeing this clearly, Jesus made an agreement at the time of Adam's sin
with God that he would give his soul as a ransoming sacrifice, actually his ever-living angelic soul. This was the basis of
all of God's legal dealings with mankind thereafter. This was 'The Covenant', and his angelic soul is 'The Ark'. Had Jesus
not made this agreement with God, then God would have been unable to make any agreement with us at all, because
none of us would ever have had the capability of being his sons, because God's sons are angelic. God could not have
lifted the death penalty on any of us in the absence of the ARC.

So all mediators between God and men are made possible by Jesus' master mediation which was of the agreement, the
covenant that he made to come here and die for us, the ARC. It is all thanks to Jesus, the entire legal plan from God rests
squarely upon his shoulders. And just as all sacrifices under the law of Moses pointed forward to his sacrifice, so all
mediators of all covenants between God and his people point backwards to Jesus' agreement to mediate for all of us. He
stepped in to save us from the murderous intentions of Satan at short notice when we needed him. And we still do need
him. It's like the scripture says:

24 Then he favors him and says, Let him off from going down into the pit! I have found a ransom!...
29 Look! All these things God performs, 2 times, 3 times, in the case of an able-bodied man (Job 33)

These words were spoken by Elihu, Job's friend, who said that God favors man and says the above. But we deduce that this is in fact
what God said when Jesus agreed to give his soul for us. And below is what Jesus said when God asked the angels who would do this
for mankind:

8 And I began to hear the voice of Jehovah saying: Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? And I proceeded to say:
Here I am! Send me.
9 And he went on to say: Go, and you must say to this people, Hear again and again, O men, but do not understand; and
see again and again, but do not get any knowledge.
10 Make the heart of this people unreceptive, and make their very ears unresponsive, and paste their very eyes together,
that they may not see with their eyes and with their ears they may not hear, and that their own heart may not understand
and that they may not actually turn back and get healing for themselves (Isaiah 6).

Isaiah is speaking as Jesus here. Jesus said: Here I am send me, to God. And when he came to visit us he quoted the rest of the
scripture as prophesied (He quoted it in Greek, translated from Hebrew, and so the English translation of the Hebrew of Isaiah is not
precisely the same as the English translation of the Greek translation of the Hebrew spoken by Jesus as recorded by Matthew!)

14 And toward them the prophecy of Isaiah is having fulfillment, which says: By hearing, you will hear but by no means
get the sense of it; and, looking, you will look but by no means see.
15 For the heart of this people has grown unreceptive, and with their ears they have heard without response, and they
have shut their eyes; that they might never see with their eyes and hear with their ears and get the sense of it with their
hearts and turn back, and I heal them (Matthew 13).

So when Jesus' parable states:

34 Then the king will say to those on his right, Come, you who have been blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom
prepared for you from the founding of the world (Matthew 25).

The preparation was his agreement to give his soul as a ransom, made at the founding of the world, which was Adam's sin. The apostle
John says in Revelation, referring to the wild beast, which is the United Nations:

8 And all those who dwell on the earth will worship it; the name of not one of them stands written in the scroll of life of the
Lamb who was slaughtered, from the founding of the world (Revelation 13).

The lamb, Jesus, was slaughtered a long time after the founding of the world, but the agreement for his slaughter was part
of that founding. The scroll of life was started at the founding of the world, which also was the beginning of death for Adam
and his sons. Obviously a scroll of life is unnecessary before death becomes an issue. And this scroll was dependant on
Jesus' agreement to ransom Adam. As St Paul says:
21 For since death is through a man, resurrection of the dead is also through a man.
22 For just as in Adam all are dying, so also in the Christ all will be made alive (1 Corinthians 15).

Moses is a typical example of how God deals with his people. When the sons of Israel agreed to obey the 10
commandments and the Law of Moses, God did not covenant directly with the sons of Israel, he covenanted with Moses,
who covenanted with the sons of Israel. We are all made alive in Jesus, because all three covenants are part of the same
redemption process. You may start with the PARC or the HARC, but either you end up in the ARC or you end up in
Gehenna (for a long time).

System Mediators

The Master Mediators, Michael, Gabriel and Melchizedek, then form covenants with the Universal Mediators (Adam and
his dad, Abadam). These then form covenants with System Mediators. A System Mediator is merely a man who makes a
covenant with a Universal Mediator (in fact there are 9 System Mediators in all, 3 for each salvation covenant, and 3 for
each of the pre-flood, peri-flood and post flood systems. All System Mediators need to be non adamic or need to be
ransomed so as to be non adamic (actually they all need to be ransomed whether adamic or non adamic it would appear).
Then the System Mediators make covenants with sub-mediators, who merely need to be born again. As regards the post
flood system, the Abrahamic system, there were 9 covenants made between God and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, we
state these here, they are explained and proven from the scriptures later in this section:

With Abraham:
The 1AC, the 1st Abrahamic Covenant, the Abrahamic Faith Covenant, the AFC
The LCC, the Land and Circumcision Covenant
The 2AC, the 2nd Abrahamic Covenant, the Abrahamic Church Covenant, the ACC
The 3AC, the 3rd Abrahamic Covenant, the Abrahamic Angelic Covenant, the AAC

With Isaac:
The ILLC, the Isaaic Land and Circumcision Covenant
The Isaaic Church Covenant, the ICC
The Isaaic Angelic Covenant, the IAC

With Jacob:
The JLLC, the Jacobian Land and Circumcision Covenant
The Jacobian Angelic Covenant, the JAC

Abraham is the System Mediator of the PARC for the post Abrahamic system. The AFC, the covenant of Faith, the
covenant of human resurrection into the kingdom of God for those who never join a true religion, is his main covenant.
Isaac is the System Mediator of the HARC for the post Abrahamic system. The ICC, the covenant of human resurrection
as priests in the Kingdom of God for everyone who enters a true religion, is his main covenant.
Jacob is the System Mediator of the ARC for the post Abrahamic system. The JAC, the covenant of angelic resurrection
into the Kingdom of God, is his main covenant.

One race does not need 3 fathers!

So now we finally know why one race, the Jews, needed 3 fathers. The ancestry of the Jews explains the salvation of the
Christians. Abraham is the father of those with faith, Isaac is the father of those in the true religion, and Jacob is the father
of those resurrected as angels. The order of progression is faith, truth, spirit. In fact the Macro Symbolism of the
Patriarchs of the Jews is as follows:

Abraham Father of all those with faith

Isaac Father of all those with faith who get water baptized into the true religion
Ishmael Father of all those with faith who do not get water baptized into the true religion
Jacob Father of all those with faith and with water baptism who get spirit baptized
Esau Father of all those with faith and with water baptism who do not get spirit baptized
Jacob's children The various calls into spirit baptism into the various subcovenants of the JAC
Jacob's 4 wives Leah is the 1NC, Bilhah is the 2NCH, Zilpah is the 1NCH, Rachel is the 2NC
Isaac was non adamic - U506 and Sarah had stopped menstruating anyway. But Abraham and Jacob were adamic. In
fact Abraham was ransomed by the non adamic human Jesus Christ, and Jacob was angelically ransomed by the
associated angelic soul of the non adamic human John the baptist. Isaac was ransomed by the human soul of John the
baptist (although we are not sure why this was necessary).

15 So that is why he is a mediator of a new covenant, in order that, because a death [of John the Baptist as a human, the
mediator of the 1EC and the seemingly unnecessary validation sacrifice for the ICC] has occurred for [their] release by
ransom [of Isaac] from the transgressions [not of the conscience but of the flesh] under the former covenant [the law
subcovenant of the ICC], the ones who have been called [into the 1NC subcovenant of the JAC] might receive the
promise of the everlasting inheritance [this being the promise of the ARC] (Hebrews 9).

We had thought that Jesus validated the 1AC and John validated the 3AC. But one does not need two souls to ransom
one man. Jesus validated the 1AC by ransoming its System Mediator, Abraham. John validated the JAC by angelically
ransoming its System Mediator Jacob. John also validated the ICC by human ransoming Issac. The JAC is a main
covenant and is a subcovenant of the ARC, and of the IAC which was a subcovenant of the 3AC. But the 3AC was not a
subcovenant of the ARC; it was a promise that one of Abraham's seed would be a System Mediator of the ARC. Abraham
was angelically ransomed by the ARC (through a system covenant with Arpachsahd presumably). In fact all of the angelic
visits of Michael and Gabriel in non adamic humans, have to do with ransoming Adam or System Mediators in the pre
flood system, the peri flood system, or the post flood system of Abraham. One can logically deduce that the ARC carried
obligations on Michael to turn up in various non adamic bodies and die ransoming various System Mediators. And
likewise the HARC did with Gabriel. Here is a diagrammatic attempt to explain the covenant tree of the ARC as it applies
to the post flood system.

ARC (Master Covenant)

|
3RC (Universal Righteousness Covenant)
|
3AC - IAC - JAC (System Covenant or Main Covenant)
| | | |
| | | 1NC (First New Covenant - Leah - Heavenly Kings)
| | |
| | 2NCH (First New Covenant Helpers - Bilhah - Earthly Priests)
| |
| 1NCH (First New Covenant Helpers - Zilpah - Heavenly Priests)
|
2NC (Second New Covenant - Rachel - Earthly Kings)

Here is an isomorphic diagrammatic representation of the Mediator family tree of the ARC as it applies to the post flood
system.

Michael (Master Mediator)

|
Adam (Universal Mediator)
|
Abraham - Isaac - Jacob (System Mediator)
| | | |
| | | Jesus (Mediator of the 1NC)
| | |
| | Paul (Mediator of the 2NCH)
| |
| Don't Know (Mediator of the 1NCH, possibly James the 2nd president of FDS2 - see [233])
|
Gordon (Mediator of the 2NC)

Please see sections [11] and [32] for a fuller explanation of these trees.

In this way every System Mediator is a new Adam, being non adamic either by birth or by an individual ransom in the form
of a non adamic human validation sacrifice. He is also a 'son of man'. He is then clean to pass on the ransoming value of
the ARC or the HARC to his kids by covenant.
If a System Mediator was ransomed by the HARC directly, rather than by a personal validation sacrifice, then he would
terminate that line of salvation. But being ransomed himself he can pass the salvation of the covenant on to a covenanted
group, so he is the beginning of a line of salvation rather than the end of it. He is the originator of a family, rather than the
last in a line of covenanted ancestors. He is a link in the chain rather than an end of the chain. Every member of the
covenanted group is an end of the chain. System Mediators start a covenant for a race, just as Adam started a race. A
System Mediator's salvation genealogy starts with him, not with someone above him in covenant genealogy. Abraham
was ransomed by Jesus, Isaac was ransomed by John and Jacob was angelically ransomed by John, so that they could
all start off their own families. Abraham started the family of all those who lived during and after him who are saved into
the Kingdom of God in human bodies. Isaac started the family of true worshippers in this system who become human
priests in the next. Jacob started the sub family of those of Abraham's sons who were to become heavenly kings and
God's angelic sons.

The 3 Abrahamic Covenants and the Land and Circumcision Covenant (the 1AC, 2AC, 3AC and LCC)

The 4 covenants were made by God with Abraham as promises, so they are also referred to as 'the promises' in the
scriptures. None of these 4 covenants can be subcovenants of each other because they all have the same mediator
(Abraham). Neither are any of these 4 covenants further clauses in each other, because there must be at least three
promises/covenants since St. Paul tells us...

17 By faith Abraham, when he was tested, as good as offered up Isaac, and the man that had gladly received the
promises attempted to offer up [his] only-begotten [son] (Hebrews 11).

This shows that at least 2 promises had been made before God made the 3AC, which was made after he attempted to
offer up Isaac. Since the covenants apply to 4 different groups (the genetic sons of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and the
main covenant sons of Abraham, the main covenant sons of Isaac and the main covenant sons of Jacob), there must be 4
covenants. God says as much...

24 In time God heard their groaning and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Exodus 2).

42 And I shall indeed remember my covenant with Jacob, and even my covenant with Isaac and even my covenant with
Abraham I shall remember, and the land I shall remember (Leviticus 26).

The Covenant of Exodus 2, with all three patriarchs, is the LCC, or 'the land' in the terms of Leviticus 26. 'My covenant
with Jacob' is the main covenant of the JAC, 'my covenant with Isaac' is the main covenant of the ICC and 'my covenant
with Abraham' is the main covenant of the AFC.

Covenants are not just boring biblical legal agreements, like the European Union regulations on cucumbers. They are the
legal basis for God's dealings with mankind, which lead to his salvation, which is his resurrection into the Kingdom of God,
or his survival through Armageddon (which is actually a living resurrection, called the rapture). They are the means by
which God adopts us as sons, enabling us to have the two souls and the that Adam lost and his priesthood.

We shall discover that God made a First Abrahamic Covenant (1AC), a Second Abrahamic Covenant (2AC), a Third
Abrahamic Covenant (3AC) and a promised land and seed like dust of the earth and exclusivity on being God's people
covenant with a circumcision obligation (LDEGPCC?), let's call this the Land and Circumcision Covenant, the LCC.

For the story of the 6 subcovenants of each of the 2AC, the 3AC, and the LCC please see section [32]. It is very important
to realize that no group of men have any exclusivity on God, but the sons of the LCC were exclusively God's people for a
time. One of the hardest things to get right in interpreting the scriptural statements of these covenants is the various
meanings of the ambiguous phrase 'your seed'. Here are the meanings...

'Your seed' is a singular seed, such as a firstborn son to a father or a submediator to a System Mediator
'Your seed after you' is all genetic descendants
'Your seed after you according to your generations' is the immediate descendant chain.

We must also remember that 'Abraham', to God can mean 'Abraham himself', or 'Abraham and his sons' depending on
the context. 'Your seed' changes with time, being genetically Isaac, and then Jacob for example.

12 Then God said to Abraham: Do not let anything that Sarah keeps saying to you be displeasing to you about the boy
and about your slave girl. Listen to her voice, because it is by means of Isaac that what will be called your seed [Jacob],
will be (Genesis 21).
16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. It says, not: And to seeds, as in the case of many such,
but as in the case of one: And to your seed, who is Christ (Galatians 3).

The words 'And to your seed' are in the Genesis 13 land promise to Abraham, the Genesis 26 land promise to Isaac and
the Genesis 28 land promise to Jacob. So Paul is saying that the final seed as regards the land promise, the seed of
Jacob as regards the land promise, is Jesus. So Jesus will be given the Promised Land. He does not have it now of
course. But he is given it in 2008 after this system ends.

So here are the recitals of the patriarchal covenants in Genesis. They are understated in the extreme. They have no
advanced publicity, no preceding media campaign, no fanfare, not so much as an introduction, and yet they are the
foundation of the entire future of mankind. For this is the modus operandi of our God - no Oscar ceremony, no medal
presentation, no orchestral chorus, no status enhancing procedure to impress women or to impress men or to impress the
press, just true love:

With Abraham...
The Definition of the 1AC is simply Genesis 12:1-3, it has no additional clauses or subcovenants.

1 And Jehovah proceeded to say to Abram: Go your way out of your land () and from your relatives and from the
house of your father to the land () that I shall show you;
2 and I shall make a great nation out of you and I shall bless you and I will make your name great; and prove yourself a blessing.
3 And I will bless those who bless you, and him that calls down evil upon you I shall curse, and all the families () of the
ground/earth () will certainly bless themselves by means of you [the 1AC] (Genesis 12).

7 Jehovah now appeared to Abram and said: To your seed [Isaac and his sons] I am going to give this land () [under
the LCC] (Genesis 12).

14 And Jehovah said to Abram after Lot had separated from him: Raise your eyes, please, and look from the place where
you are, northward and southward and eastward and westward,
15 because all the land at which you are looking, to you [Abram and his sons] and and [then] to your seed [Isaac, then
Jacob, then Jesus - each new seed being defined by an LCC covenant subcovenant] I am going to give it until time
indefinite.
16 And I will constitute your seed [Isaac and his sons, then Jacob and his sons, then Jesus and his sons] like the dust
particles of the earth, so that, if a man could be able to count the dust particles of the earth, then your seed could be
numbered.
17 Get up, go about in the land through its length and through its breadth, because to you I am going to give it (Genesis
13).

5 Look up please to the heavens and count the stars if you are possibly able to count them. And he went on to say to him:
So your seed [through the 3AC] will become (Genesis 15).

17 The sun was now setting and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace and a fiery torch that passed in
between these pieces.
18 On that day Jehovah cut/concluded/made/ratified/validated with Abram a covenant [the LCC], saying: To your seed
[Isaac and his sons, then Jacob and his sons then Jesus and his sons, each new seed being defined by an LCC
subcovenant] I will give this land ( (), from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates.
19 the Kenites and the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites
20 and the Hittites and the Perizzites and the Rephaim
21 and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Girgashites and the Jebusites (Genesis 15).

1 When Abram got to be 99 years old, then Jehovah appeared to Abram and said to him: Walk before me and prove
yourself faultless,
2 And I will give my covenant [the 3AC] between me and you, that I may multiply you very, very much.
3 And Abram fell upon his face [hidden covenant], and God continued to speak with him saying:
4 As for me, look! my covenant [the 1AC] is with you [already, having been made in Genesis 12], and you will certainly be
made into a father of a crowd of nations [in fulfillment of the promise of the 1AC].
5 And your name will not be called Abram anymore, and your name must become Abraham, because a father of a crowd
of nations I have made you [in Genesis 12].
6 And I will make you very, very fruitful and will make you become nations [under the 3AC], and kings will come out of you
[under the 3AC].
7 And I will carry out my covenant [LCC] between me and you [Abraham himself] and your seed after you [the genetic
descendants of Abraham] according to their generations [Isaac, Jacob, Levi, Kohath, Amram, Aaron - the 6 submediators
of the LCC] for a covenant to time indefinite, to prove myself God to you and to your seed after you [Abraham's genetic
children, sons of Hagar, Sarah and Keturah].
8 And I will give to you [Abraham] and to your seed after you [Abraham's genetic children] the land of your alien
residences, even the entire land of Canaan [Nile to Euphrates, 'greater Canaan'], for a possession to time indefinite; and I
will prove myself God to them.
9 And God said further to Abraham: As for you, you are to keep my covenant, you and your seed after you according to
their generations [Isaac, Jacob, Levi, Kohath, Amram, Aaron - the 6 submediators of the LCC].
10 This is my covenant [LCC] that you men will keep, between me and between you men and between your seed after
you [all of Abraham's genetic descendants and all the male members of his household] Every male of yours must get
circumcised.
11 And you must get circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it must serve as a sign of the covenant between me
and you (Genesis 17).

17 And Jehovah said: Am I keeping covered from Abraham what I am doing?

18 Why, Abraham is surely going to become a nation great and mighty [the sons of Israel], and all the nations of the
land/earth () must bless themselves by means of him

16 By myself I do swear, is the utterance of Jehovah, that by reason of the fact that you have done this thing and you
have not withheld your son, your only one [I shall not withhold from you my son, my only one],
17 I shall surely bless you and I shall surely multiply your seed [Isaac, then Jacob, then Jesus, then Paul, then the 1NCH
mediator, then Gordon] like the stars of the heavens [3AC] and [Isaac, then Moses, then John, then Paul, then Russell,
then Gordon] like the grains of sand that are on the seashore [2AC - adhere to the land, Gods true administration - 1AC
has no extra clauses or subcovenants]. And your seed [each submediator of the 2AC and the 3AC] will take possession of
the gate of his [singular] enemies.
18 And by means of your seed [Isaac, Moses, John, Paul, Russell, Gordon] all nations () of the land/earth () will
certainly bless themselves due to the fact that you have listened to my voice

With Isaac...
3 Do not go down to Egypt. Tabernacle in the land that I designate to you. Reside as an alien in this land, and I shall
continue with you and bless you, because to you (you and your sons) and to your seed (Jacob and his sons) I shall give
all these lands (The whole promised land, the whole of Greater Canaan, displacing or having dominion over Ishmael and
his sons who settled the place first), and I will carry out the sworn statement that I swore to Abraham your father.
4 And I will multiply your seed [of the 3AC] like the stars of the heavens. And I will give to your seed [Jacob and his sons,
by displacement of dominion] all these lands [The whole promised land, the whole of Greater Canaan, displacing or
having dominion over Ishmael and his sons who settled the place first and Esau and his sons who settled the place
second]. And by means of your seed [Moses, then John, then Paul, then Russell, then Gordon] all nations () of the land/earth
() will certainly bless themselves [with the blessing of the 2AC],
5 due to the fact that Abraham listened to my voice and continued to keep his obligations to me, my commands, my
statutes, and my laws (Genesis 26).

24 And Jehovah proceeded to appear to him during that night and to say: I am the God of Abraham your father. Do not be
afraid, because I am with you, and I will bless you and multiply your seed on account of Abraham my servant (Genesis
26).

With Jacob...
13 I am Jehovah the God of Abraham your father and the God of Isaac. The land/earth upon which you are lying [he was
at Bethel in what was to become the land of Ephraim, the son of Joseph, but this promise is for the whole promised land
not just the land of Ephraim], to you [Jacob and his sons] I am going to give it and to your seed [Not Joseph, who through
his son Ephraim got that particular bit of the promised land through his firstborn land inheritance, but Jesus as defined by
Paul in Galatians 3, who gets it in the Kingdom of God].
14 And your seed [Jesus and his sons] will certainly become like the dust particles of the earth, and you will certainly
spread abroad to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south and by means of you [Jacob and his sons]
and by means of your seed [Jesus and his sons] all the families 13 I am Jehovah the God of Abraham your father and the
God of Isaac. The land/earth upon which you are lying [he was at Bethel in what was to become the land of Ephraim, the
son of Joseph, but this promise is for the whole promised land not just the land of Ephraim], to you [Jacob and his sons] I
am going to give it and to your seed [Not Joseph, who through his son Ephraim got that particular bit of the promised land
through his firstborn land inheritance, but Jesus as defined by Paul in Galatians 3, who gets it in the Kingdom of God].
14 And your seed [Jesus and his sons] will certainly become like the dust particles of the earth, and you will certainly
spread abroad to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south and by means of you [Jacob and his sons]
and by means of your seed [Jesus and his sons] all the families 13 I am Jehovah the God of Abraham your father and the
God of Isaac. The land/earth upon which you are lying [he was at Bethel in what was to become the land of Ephraim, the son of
Joseph, but this promise is for the whole promised land not just the land of Ephraim], to you [Jacob and his sons] I am going to give it
and to your seed [Not Joseph, who through his son Ephraim got that particular bit of the promised land through his firstborn land
inheritance, but Jesus as defined by Paul in Galatians 3, who gets it in the Kingdom of God].
14 And your seed [Jesus and his sons] will certainly become like the dust particles of the earth, and you will certainly spread abroad to
the west and to the east and to the north and to the south and by means of you [Jacob and his sons] and by means of your seed [Jesus
and his sons] all the families () of the ground/earth () will certainly bless themselves [with the blessing of the
1AC due to their faith in the bible produced by the sons of Jacob and the Christian works produced by Jesus and his sons
under the 3AC - this is not a subcovenant of the 1AC, the 1AC had no blessings for seed]
15 And here I am with you and I will keep you in all the way you are going and I will return you [Jacob and his sons, but
not 'your seed' which is Jesus and his sons] to this ground, because I am not going to leave you until I have actually done
what I have spoken to you (Genesis 28).

10 And God went on to say to him: Your name is Jacob. No longer is your name to be called Jacob, but Israel will your
name become. And he began to call his name Israel.
11 And God said further to him: I am God Almighty. Be fruitful and become many. Nations [Israel and Judah] and a
congregation of nations [the sons of the 3AC] will proceed out of you, and kings will come out of your loins [the sons of the
1NC and the 2NC].
12 As for the land that I have given to Abraham and to Isaac, to you [Jacob] I shall give it, and to your seed after you
[Jacob's genetic descendants] I shall give the land (Genesis 35).

One might think that the seed in Genesis 35 could be David, since he and Solomon became the Kings over the entire
Promised Land. But the LCC provides either for displacement or total domination (slavery) by the seed and his sons over
everyone else in the Promised Land. It is the case that the sons of Jacob dominated the Hivites; it is not the case the sons
of David dominated the sons of Israel or displaced them:

20 As for all the people remaining over from the Amorites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, who
were no part of the sons of Israel,
21 their sons who had been left over after them in the land whom the sons of Israel had been unable to devote to
destruction, Solomon kept levying them for slavish forced labor until this day.
22 And there were none of the sons of Israel that Solomon constituted slaves; for they were the warriors and his servants
and his princes and his adjutants and chiefs of his charioteers and of his horsemen (1 Kings 9).

The blessing on 'all the families of the ground' through Abraham and through Jacob is the blessing of the 1AC, the AFC,
the reward for true faith. The slightly less universal blessing on 'all the nations of the earth', through Abraham and through
Isaac, is the blessing of the 2AC, the ACC, the blessing of all those who join a true religion, a true church. For this
blessing occurred because: You/Abraham listened to my voice. And those who listen to the voice of God join the true
church. And the true churches are the 'nations of the earth', where earth means God's administration. In fact, even in the
literal meaning, 'earth' means 'true religious administration' in the patriarchal covenants. The salvation blessings of the
1AC and the 2AC are both a human resurrection into the Kingdom of God in an edenic (indefinitely lasting) human
body. But the 2AC also provides entry to the true religion in this system and gives a priesthood in the next.

To see that the 1AC is a covenant of faith consider Paul's explanations in Galatians 3 in Romans 3 and in Romans 4.
Here is Paul's explanation in Galatians 3 of the man with faith who was not said to be in a true religion:

6 Just as Abraham was faithful to the God, and it was counted to him as righteousness [this being what the PARC is all
about].
7 Surely you know that those [who act] out of faith are the ones who are sons of Abraham [through the 1AC].
8 Now the Scripture, seeing in advance that God would declare people of the nations righteous out of/due to faith,
declared the good news beforehand to Abraham, namely: By means of you all the nations will be blessed [paraphrased
1AC - nations are the families of the earth in a sense].
9 Consequently those [who act] out of faith are being blessed together with the faithful Abraham.
10 For all those who depend upon works of law are under a curse; for it is written: Cursed is every one that does not
continue in all the things written in the scroll of the Law in order to do them.
11 Moreover, that by law no one is declared righteous with God is evident, because the righteous one will live by reason
of faith.
12 Now the Law is not out of faith, but he that does them shall live by means of them.
13 Christ by purchase released us from the curse of the Law by becoming a curse instead of us, because it is written:
Accursed is every man hanged upon a stake.
14 The purpose was that the blessing of Abraham [the blessing of the 1AC] might come to be by means of Jesus Christ
[the human validation sacrifice of the 1AC] for the nations, that we might receive the promised spirit through our faith.
15 Brothers, I am speaking in human terms: A validated covenant [The 1AC validated by Jesus hanging on a stake and
giving his human soul - a human illustration - a subcovenant of the PARC], though it is a man's, no one sets aside or
attaches additions to it [like God did with LCC].
16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed [various individuals sequentially]. It says, not: And to
seeds, as in the case of many such, but as in the case of one: And to your seed [who was Isaac in the case of Abraham
and Jacob in the case of Isaac and Jesus in the case of Jacob, all relating to the LCC], who is Christ [today - Jesus gets
the promised land in the next system].
17 Further, I say this: As to the covenant previously validated by God [The LCC validated by the furnace and the torch in
Genesis 15 before it was actually made unlike the 1AC, 2AC and 3AC which were validated after the covenant was
made], the Law that has come into being 430 years later does not invalidate it, so as to abolish the promise [The law was
a subcovenant of the 2AC. So the 2AC must have been promised to Abraham around 1943 BC. Presumably on
1943Nisan14, when he crossed the Euphrates, 430 years, Tishri to Tishri, before 1513Sivan3, when the law covenant
was made].
18 For if the inheritance is due to law, it is no longer due to promise; whereas God has kindly given it to Abraham through
a promise (Galatians 3).

Paul himself says in the next chapter that the law was made at Mount Sinai in Arabia (and therefore on 1513Sivan3), not
in Egypt at the time of the passover (around 1513Nisan10) when the sons of Israel bowed low in acceptance of the
passover festival statutes...

24 These things stand as a symbolic drama for these [women] mean two covenants, the one from Mount Sinai, which
brings forth children for slavery, and which is Hagar (Galatians 4).

Here is Paul's explanation in Romans 3:

22 Yes, God's righteousness through the faith in Jesus Christ, for all those having faith. For there is no distinction
[between Jew or Greek, between true religion or false religion when it comes to faith].
23 For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
24 and it is as a free gift that they are being declared righteous by his undeserved kindness through the release by the
ransom [paid] by Christ Jesus [the non adamic human].
25 God set him forth as an offering for propitiation through faith in his blood [the blood of the 1AC]. This was in order to
exhibit his own righteousness, because he was forgiving the sins that occurred in the past while God was exercising
forbearance,
26 so as to exhibit his own righteousness in this present season, that he might be righteous even when declaring
righteous the man that has faith in Jesus (Romans 3).

Here is Paul's explanation in Romans 4:

6 Just as David also speaks of the happiness of the man to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:
7 Happy are those whose lawless deeds have been pardoned and whose sins have been covered [under the 1AC, the
AFC].
8 Happy is the man whose sin Jehovah will by no means take into account [spirit baptized into the 3AC].
9 Does this happiness, then, come upon circumcised people or also upon uncircumcised people? For we say: His faith
was counted to Abraham as righteousness.
10 Under what circumstances, then, was it counted? When he was in circumcision or in uncircumcision? Not in
circumcision, but in uncircumcision.
11 And he received a sign, namely, circumcision, as a seal of the righteousness by the faith he had while in his
uncircumcised state, that he might be the father of all those having faith while in uncircumcision [through the 1AC], in
order for righteousness to be counted to them;
12 and a father of circumcised offspring [through the Law into the 1AC - to get the happiness], not only to those who
adhere to circumcision, but also to those who walk orderly in the footsteps of that faith while in the uncircumcised state
which our father Abraham had.
13 For it was not through law that Abraham or his seed had the promise that he should be heir of a world, but it was
through the righteousness by faith.
14 For if those who adhere to law are heirs, faith has been made useless and the promise has been abolished.
[through the 1AC],
17 just as it is written: I have appointed you a father of many nations. This was in the sight of the One in whom he had
faith, even of God, who makes the dead alive and calls the things that are not as though they were.

So everyone who has true faith (or actually a good conscience) is in the AFC (the 1AC) under the PARC and has the first
happiness of David through faith not works. These then are the sons of Abraham through his main covenant. Those of this
group who act on true faith by joining the true congregation of God, which is the congregation of those who have gained
entry to the 2AC, the ACC, through the ICC, are the sons of Isaac. They attain righteousness in the flesh through
abstaining from bad works according to the rules of the true congregation. Those in the 1AC or in the 2AC can then go on
to attain the second happiness of David, which is to have a clean conscience, to have all ones sins forgiven until time
indefinite. Such people are born again and have gained entry into the 3AC (the AAC) through the JAC. These then are the
sons of Jacob by covenant and the sons of Jesus the eternal father through the ARC.

Just as Melchizedek presides over the entry of Gabriel into his host, who then presides over the entry of Michael into his
host - U506 (although once, the first time, it went Melchizedek Michael Gabriel as it sometimes does with the PARC the
ARC and the HARC). So Melchizedek mediated the master covenant of faith (PARC) and he provides entry to the true
Christian congregation, who are the beneficiaries of the ransom of Gabriel, the master mediator of the covenant for all true
religions (the HARC), through the main covenant of the second blessing of Abraham (the 2AC, the ACC). And the
Christian congregation provides entry into God's family by being born again and gaining a new angelic body as a host for
the spirit, this being the blessing of the 3AC, the AAC, through the JAC, thanks to the ransom of Michael under the ARC.

So this really is the largest understanding that the LWs have at this time. The prophetic drama enacted by Melchizedek,
Gabriel and Michael, each time the three of them appear, is symbolically describing the detail of God's legal plan for
man's salvation through the PARC, the HARC and the ARC or for those in the post Abrahamic system through the 1AC,
the 2AC and the 3AC respectively. For example it was Simeon, who was Melchizedek, who presided over the entry of
Gabriel into John the Baptist, and it was Gabriel in John's body who presided over the entrance of Michael into Jesus'
body at his baptism - U506.

25 And, look! there was a man in Jerusalem named Simeon, and this man was righteous and reverent, waiting for Israel's
consolation, and holy spirit was upon him.
26 Furthermore, it had been divinely revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen
the Christ of Jehovah.
27 Under the power of the spirit he now came into the temple; and as the parents brought the young child Jesus in to do
for it according to the customary practice of the law,
28 he himself received it into his arms and blessed God and said... (Luke 2).

Whereas Melchizedek said: Blessed be the most high God (Genesis 14:20).

The 1AC covers faith outside the true religion, the 2AC covers all true religions

The Second Abrahamic Covenant, the Abrahamic Church Covenant, is the means for all men and women (who became
20 years old after the covenant came into force) officially to gain citizenship of the Kingdom of God, and is the legal basis
of every true religion, from the time of Abraham until today. Abraham is effectively the Ambassador of the Kingdom of God
on earth. He can grant us a visa to immigrate into that Kingdom, through his second covenant. Entrance to the 2AC
(Second Abrahamic Covenant) is through baptism in water in the Christian congregation, and was through the 20th
passover for the Jewish congregation. It is a cleansing of the flesh, a forgiveness of the sins in the past. This is why
Genesis 24, the account of Isaac's marriage to Rebekah, and Genesis 26 which defines the ICC are all about water and
wells. 'Water' is mentioned 18 times in Genesis 24 and 4 times in Genesis 26, and 'well' is mentioned twice in Genesis 24
and 7 times in Genesis 26. Paul says, referring to those in the first True Christian Congregation (TCC1)...

28 Now we, brothers, are children belonging to the promise the same as Isaac was (Galatians 4).

This promise was the 2AC, the ACC, the Abrahamic Church Covenant, that all the nations of the earth should be blessed
through Abraham's seed, who was Isaac in this case. The ACC was a promise for the main covenant of Isaac, the ICC,
the Isaaic Church Covenant.

Zechariah, John’s dad, prophesied about his son saying:

70 Just as he, through the mouth of his holy prophets from of old, has spoken
71 of a salvation from our enemies and from the hand of all those hating us.
72 To perform the mercy in connection with our forefathers and to call to mind his holy covenant,
73 the oath that he swore to Abraham our forefather,
74 to grant us, after we have been rescued from the hands of enemies, the privilege of fearlessly rendering sacred service
to him
75 with loyalty and righteousness before him all our days (Luke 1).

The holy covenant sworn to Abraham referred to here must involve 'forefathers' plural. It was the Second Abrahamic
Covenant for a priesthood in the Kingdom of God (rendering sacred service fearlessly), through Isaac - U9. One cannot
fearlessly render service to God in this system, because becoming a true Christian involves persecution which will of
necessity involve an element of fear. Jesus confirms this saying:

38 And whoever does not accept his torture stake and follow after me is not worthy of me (Matthew 10).

Therefore this fearless service is occurring in the Kingdom of God after we have been rescued from the hands of our
enemies, the chief one of whom is Satan. Our rescue from him is the battle of Armageddon, wherein Satan tries to kill us
all because if he can't rule us then no one will rule us as far as he is concerned. This battle is the entrance into God’s
kingdom which last’s 1,000 years during which time Satan is dead! Thank God one might say.

So the 2AC is the covenant by which the true people of God are officially given a new non ageing human body in the
Kingdom of God and have a priesthood in that Kingdom under which they can render sacred service to God fearlessly.
They get this honor because they render sacred service to him fearfully in this system in a true religion. So the 2AC is a
subcovenant of the HARC mediated by Gabriel who 'Stands near before God' (Luke 1:19), and therefore is one serious
priest!.

But in every nation on this earth there are the illegal immigrants. These people are in such a dire situation in their own
nations or are so desperate, or so keen to advance themselves that they find a way into a new country without the proper
papers. Nearly all the nations of this earth permit this to some extent, although it is a source of great public debate. God,
who is certainly more merciful than human governments, also permits this. But of course he cannot condone
unrighteousness, so there is a legal provision for these 'illegal immigrants' (illegal only in the sense that they never joined
any true religion). This is actually the PARC and for the post Abrahamic system the 1AC, its subcovenant. The PARC
provides entrance into the Kingdom for mislead believers, those who make themselves God's people by a sincere but
misplaced or unfulfilled faith. They do want to gain entry to the Kingdom of God as all illegal immigrants do, but their faith
either in humanity itself (which is a form of faith in God) which gives them a good conscience or their true faith, is not
acted upon in such a way that they join a true religion if that is possible during the time that they live. Let us be clear about
this, the test on mankind is a spiritual test. No one is saved who does not have some type of faith. For the existence and
the development of faith is the spiritual test. For your faith reveals your hearts true desire.

These anabaptized believers are prefigured by the Sons of Israel in the LCC. Incidentally this book/site uses the term
'Jew' to mean a 'true' son of Abraham, 'true seed' through one or other of the Abrahamic covenants (as do the scriptures).
Strictly a Jew is a citizen of the Southern Kingdom of Israel, the Kingdom of Judah, or a member of the tribes of Judah or
Benjamin, the two tribes in the Southern Kingdom of Israel.

The sons of Israel were a people all chosen by God, but they did not all get into the Kingdom of God. They were all in the
LCC, but they were not all in the 2AC. Every Jew entered the 2AC at his/her 20th passover celebration. But to stay in the
2AC one had to keep the law of Moses, or at least make the right sacrifice when one did not. Most of the citizens of Israel
failed to do this. But many of those who never stayed in the 2AC, by adhering to the Law of Moses as administered by the
human priests in the temple, will still be saved. These ones were saved by the angels, who continually watched their faith
and belief and works and permitted Satan to test them, and chose those who demonstrated the required qualities. These
guys were invisibly saved. In this sense they are the illegal immigrants from the Jewish system. They were good guys but
unrighteous. Good soil for hearts, good hearted, but not fine soil, which is righteous hearted - see [70]. Really they were
the rough diamonds. The same is true today. The believers, who fail to join a true religion, are saved through the 1AC
under the PARC. If you like, they follow after Winston Churchill, who declared himself to be more of a buttress than a pillar
to the church. He supported it from the outside. No uncircumcised man could enter the 2AC until the conversion of
Cornelius.

Today the 'Jew' is the believer (in God or mankind), and the 'Gentile' is the unbeliever, and the circumcision is no longer of
the foreskin, but of the heart. It is as Paul said, referring to the 1AC:

25 Circumcision is, in fact, of benefit only if you practice law but if you are a transgressor of law, your circumcision has
become uncircumcision.
26 If, therefore, an uncircumcised person keeps the righteous requirements of the Law, his uncircumcision will be counted
as circumcision, will it not?
27 And the uncircumcised [person] that is such by nature will, by carrying out the Law, judge you who with its written code
and circumcision are a transgressor of law.
28 For he is not a Jew who is one on the outside, nor is circumcision that which is on the outside upon the flesh.
29 But he is a Jew who is one on the inside, and [his] circumcision is that of the heart by spirit, and not by a written code.
The praise of that one comes, not from men, but from God (Romans 2).
Paul wrote this after the LCC had been set aside, it had ended, in the sense that one could no longer enter it. But the 1AC
did not end when circumcision ended. The LCC ended with the conversion of Cornelius, a Roman, in 36Tishri. The Law
covenant ended when Jesus nailed it to the stake, in the sense Jews were no longer required to enter the Law covenant
at that time, and in the sense that those in the Law could leave it through baptism into the 2AC, and in the sense the Law
became a false religion. Although the Law was still in force over those circumcised ones and women who entered it before
Jesus died, until the temple was destroyed in 70 CE by General Titus (unless these people chose to get baptized in the
water baptism of John, which was their release from the law). After the LCC ended one could have Jehovah as one's God
officially, without actually being a Jew, and the Jews lost their right to the promised land. Actually they were denied
occupation of the promised land until 1917 through the curse of the law of Moses on Leviticus 26 - U121.

God's people then became the believers in the two new commandments of his son, namely that we should love God and
love our neighbor as our self. God's people became simply the good guys, the loving guys, the two step thinking guys, the
guys who act in the common interest rather than those who act in their own self interest. People who understand that the
big picture affects the little picture. People who realize that our only hope as a community is to act in the interest of the
community. For those who take the narrow path to salvation need broad vision or they will fall off it, whereas those who
take the broad road to destruction need only have narrow vision and they are the majority in this system.

The 1AC is all about the circumcision of the heart, but this hidden covenant had a temporary physicalization in the LCC in
the case of the genetic sons of Abraham. It is a subcovenant of the PARC and the 1RC

The 2AC covers all those who enter the true church (those who kept the law, or those who were water baptized into a true
Christian church and kept the law of that church). It is a subcovenant of the HARC and the 2RC

The 3AC covers all those after Abraham who are born again, those who are baptized in holy spirit. It is a subcovenant of
the ARC and the 3RC.

Not everyone who enters the 1AC gets saved, not everyone who enters the 2AC gets saved and not everyone who enters
the 3AC gets saved. All three covenants involve an entrance, a test, and a pass or a fail. In the case of the 1AC and the
3AC the test is one of faith, and once you fail, by permanently losing your faith, as judged by the angels, you are finished,
it's Gehenna for you. But in the case of the 2AC, the test is one of works, which are judged by men in a true religion. In the
case of the 2AC, if you screw up, you get chucked out, but can come back in later, if repentant. So failure is not
necessarily terminal. But a circumcision cannot be done twice!! Anything judged by men cannot be terminal. This is why
the physical death penalty is not appropriate today; our legal systems are just not accurate enough for such a terminal
penalty. The 2AC is the mechanism whereby men get a piece of God's salvation action, which is what a true religion is all
about.

The Word Symbolism of the Land Promise of Genesis 13

14 And Jehovah said to Abram after Lot had separated from him: Raise your eyes, please, and look from the place where
you are, northward and southward and eastward and westward,
15 because all the land at which you are looking, to you [Abram and his sons] and and [then] to your seed [Isaac, then
Jacob - each new seed being defined by an LCC covenant] I am going to give it until time indefinite.
16 And I will constitute your seed [Isaac and his sons, then Jacob and his sons] like the dust particles of the earth, so that,
if a man could be able to count the dust particles of the earth, then your seed could be numbered.
17 Get up, go about in the land through its length and through its breadth, because to you I am going to give it (Genesis
13).

In the word symbolism [land (1), dust (2), seed (3)], another seed becomes the greater dust particles (Edenic dust
particles) and gets the same land (in the Kingdom of God). In the Kingdom of God one can see north, south, east and
west, all over the whole planet! The promised land is not given to Jesus during this system, but it ceases belonging to the
sons of Jacob when the LCC ends.

The nations destroyed when the sons of Israel took the Promised Land the blessing of the LCC

17 The sun was now setting and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace and a fiery torch that passed in
between these pieces.
18 On that day Jehovah cut/concluded/made/ratified/validated with Abram a covenant, saying: To your seed [Isaac and
his sons] I will give this land (), from the river of Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates.
19 the Kenites and the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites
20 and the Hittites and the Perizzites and the Rephaim
21 and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Girgashites and the Jebusites (Genesis 15).
When the sons of Israel took the promised land they destroyed 6 of these nations and the Hivites:

1 When Jehovah your God at last brings you into the land to which you are going so as to take possession of it, he must
also clear away populous nations from before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites
and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations more populous and mighty than you are
(Deuteronomy 7).

The Hivites were friendly to the sons of Israel and concluded a covenant with them to be their servants. The account is in
Joshua 9. Here are some highlights:

7 At this the men of Israel said to the Hivites: Perhaps it is in our vicinity that you are dwelling. So how could we conclude
a covenant with you?

15 And Joshua went making peace with them and concluding a covenant with them to let them live, and so the chieftains
of the assembly swore to them.

17 Then the sons of Israel pulled out and came to their cities on the third day, and their cities were Gibeon and Chephirah
and Beeroth and Kiriath-jearim (Joshua 9).

23 And now you are cursed people, and a slave's position and being gatherers of wood and drawers of water for the
house of my God will never be cut off from you (Joshua 9).

The Kenites, the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites (we presume) were also friendly to the sons of Israel:

6 Meanwhile Saul said to the Kenites: Go depart, go down from the midst of the Amalekites, that I may not sweep you
away with them. As for you, you exercised loving-kindness with all the sons of Israel at the time of their coming up out of
Egypt. So the Kenites departed from the midst of Amalek (1 Samuel 15:6).

Caleb, one of the two courageous and loyal spies was the son of Jephunneh a Kenizzite. Kadmonites do not appear to be mentioned
anywhere else in the bible. The Rephaim, were not completely destroyed as a nation. Moses destroyed the Rephaim before the
promised land was entered:

12 All the royal realm of Og in Bashan, who reigned in Ashtaroth and in Edrei he it was who remained of what was left of
the Rephaim and Moses went striking them and dispossessing them (Joshua 13).

So the promised land was not all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates at all, it was merely the lands occupied by
the 10 nations recited in Genesis 15. These lands presumably stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates.

1 And it came about after the death of Moses the servant of Jehovah that Jehovah proceeded to say to Joshua the son of
Nun, the minister of Moses:
2 Moses my servant is dead; and now get up, cross this Jordan, you and all this people, into the land that I am giving to
them, to the sons of Israel.
3 Every place upon which the sole of your foot will tread, to you people I shall certainly give it, just as I promised to
Moses.
4 From the wilderness and this Lebanon to the great river, the river Euphrates, that is, all the land of the Hittites, and to
the Great Sea toward the setting of the sun your territory will prove to be (Joshua 1).

Ishmael and Esau inhabited this land:

4 Then to Isaac I gave Jacob and Esau. Later to Esau I gave Mount Seir to take possession of it; and Jacob and his sons
went down to Egypt (Joshua 24).

17 And these are the years of Ishmael's life, 137 years. Then he expired and died and was gathered to his people.
18 And they took up tabernacling from Havilah near Shur, which is in front of Egypt, as far as Assyria. In front of all his
brothers he settled down (Genesis 25).

The wilderness of Shur is in the Sinai Peninsular somewhere. 'In front of' is meant in the sense of temporally before. So Ishmael
settled the entire promised land before the seed of Isaac did. This settlement by Ishmael was in accordance with the LCC. But the
ILLC changes things as we shall see.
Now Paul tells us by comparison with the 1AC, which was validated by God and does not have any additional or set aside
clauses, that another covenant, which must be the LCC, has additional clauses and is later set aside entirely:

15 Brothers, I speak with a human illustration: A validated covenant, though it is a man's, no one sets [it] aside or attaches
additions to it (Galatians 3).

The LCC was validated by God in Genesis 15, with a fiery furnace. The 1AC, which Paul is referring to by contrast was
validated by Jesus and has no additions and is not set aside. Neither does the 3AC have additions, nor neither is it set
aside. It appears that Ishmael and Abraham's non Jacobian seed, who had the obligation to be circumcised but had no
law so they got some of the greater promised land (Edom etc) but they had no earthly administration (symbolic land) and
hence they could behave like wild asses. But they too were God's covenanted people and he was their God until the LCC
ended. After this they mainly became Muslims it would appear. There is no point in being circumcised and being a Muslim
(or indeed in being circumcised any more since that covenant has ended).

All scriptures were written by Jews

Jacob then Jesus are the two descendants/seeds in the 3AC, and of course the scriptures, every single holy word of
them, were through Jesus and through Jacob:

1 What, then, is the superiority of the Jew, or what is the benefit of the circumcision?
2 A great deal in every way. First of all, because they were entrusted with the sacred pronouncements of God (Romans
3).

Summary

The three ransom provisions for mankind made in the PARC and HARC and the ARC are passed on to all men by the 3
righteousness covenant for their ransomees, the 1RC, 2RC and 3RC. Then in the post flood system they are passed on
through the 1AC, the 2AC and the 3AC respectively. Those with true faith or a good conscience enter the PARC and the
1RC through the 1AC. Those who act on their true faith in the right circumstances enter a true religion which is the
entrance into the 2AC, which is a subcovenant of the 2RC which is the universal righteous covenant of the HARC. Those
who continue to act on their faith in the right circumstances are born again, by entering the 3AC which is a subcovenant of
the 3RC which is the subcovenant of the ARC. One can be born again directly from the PARC without entering a true
religion. But everyone who is sanctified in holy spirit, born again, does have to enter a true religion during their test and
before they are sealed for everlasting life, being declared righteous in spirit. If a born again person does not find the true
religion he finds Gehenna.

The pre-adamics interbred sufficiently to become adamic as regards the covenants by the time that the LCC ended. The
LCC is the covenant described by Paul as having additions and being set aside. The LCC was promised in Genesis12:7 a
few months after 1943Nisan14, when Abraham crossed the Euphrates to put the first promise into force. This was 430
years before the law covenant was made on 1513Sivan3, so presumably it was promised in 1943Sivan..

The Legal Status of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob

Abraham himself is angelically ransomed by the ARC, and is human soul ransomed by the human body Jesus, the
validation sacrifice for the 1AC. He mediates the human soul ransom of Jesus through the 1AC which is a subcovenant of
the PARC.

Isaac was non adamic and needed no ransom. He mediates/fathers his edenic human soul to the sons of the ICC, which
is a subcovenant of the HARC. He again is angelically ransomed by the ARC

Jacob is angelically ransomed by the associated angelic soul of John the baptist, the validation sacrifice of the JAC. He
mediates the angelic soul ransom of the ARC through the JAC.

When God said: I am God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, he meant that they were all three his sons as Adam was.

The LCC ended with the conversion of Cornelius, Jesus will own the Promised Land in the Kingdom of God

We know that the LCC was to be 'set aside' since it is compared to the 1AC which is not set aside in Galatians 3. This
obviously occurred when the first uncircumcised man became one of God's people, being baptized by Peter in water after
the gifts of the spirit fell upon him and his house in the presence of Peter. This was the conversion of the Roman officer
Cornelius in Acts 10, the apostle Peter said:

34 At this Peter opened his mouth and said: For a certainty I perceive that God is not partial,
35 but in every nation the man that fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him (Acts 10).

48 With that he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they requested him to remain for
some days (Acts 10).

This marked the end of the LCC, which was an exclusive deal to be God's people for Abraham's genetic descendants subject to a
fleshly circumcision. This is also referred to in one meaning of Daniel 9:

27 And he must keep [the] covenant in force for the many for one 7 and at the half of the 7 he will cause sacrifice and gift
offering to cease (Daniel 9).

The seven here is 7 years from 29Tishri to 36Tishri, in the middle of which Jesus died and ended all valid sacrifices under
the law of Moses.

1AC, First Abrahamic All the Families of the Ground blessed through Abraham (not through his seed)
Covenant. More descriptively I will make a great Nation out of you
the Abrahamic Faith I will seriously bless you
Covenant, the AFC. (No additions made to the Genesis 12 statement of this promise)
Become a father of a crowd of nations
Name will be Abraham
LCC Land and Circumcision Abraham's seed get Promised Land, defined as the land of 10 peoples and stretching from the
Covenant Nile to Euphrates
Seed (Isaac and his sons) to become like the dust particles of the earth (addition)
Jehovah is their God over Abraham's seed exclusively (addition)
Circumcision obligation for Abraham's seed (addition)
This covenant was set aside in 36Tishri at the conversion of Cornelius
2AC, Second Abrahamic Seed (Isaac then Moses then John then Paul then Russell then Ritchie) multiplied like the sand on
Covenant, the Abrahamic the seashore
Church Covenant, the ACC. All the Nations of the Earth (the true religious administration) blessed through seed (Isaac then
Moses then John then Paul then Russell then Ritchie)
3AC Third Abrahamic Seed (Isaac then Jacob then Jesus then Paul then 1NCH mediator then Ritchie) multiplied like the
Covenant. More descriptively stars of the heavens
the AAC, Abrahamic Angelic Seed (submediators of the 2AC and the 3AC) will take possession of the gate of his enemies
Covenant Kings will come out of you (sons of the 1NC and the 2NC)
God will multiply Abraham very much

ILLC, Isaaic Land and Seed (Jacob then Jesus) to get the promised land.
Circumcision Covenant
ICC Isaaic Church Covenant. All the Nations of the Earth (the true religious administration) blessed through Isaac's seed
(Moses then John then Paul the Russell then Ritchie)
IAC, Isaaic Angelic Covenant Isaac's seed (Jacob then Jesus then Paul then 1NCH mediator then Ritchie) multiplied like the
stars of the heavens
JLLC, Jacobian Land and Jacob will return to the promised land.
Circumcision Covenant. Jacob and his sons and then Jesus and his sons get the promised land (and in the greater meaning
the administration of the first true Christian church) then Jesus and his sons get the next
administrations of the other 3 true Christian churches.
Jacob and his sons and Jesus and his sons (born agains) to become like dust particles of the earth,
they spread North, South, East, West, (4 true Christian churches in the greater meaning)
God will leave Jacob and his sons (but not his seed, of Jesus and his sons)
JAC, Jacobian Angelic Nations and a congregation of Nations from you
Covenant. Kings from your loins
Jacob is fruitful and becomes many
Name will be Israel
[[All the Families of the Ground (which make up the nations of the earth) blessed through Jacob
and his sons and Jesus and his sons. - This is not a subcovenant of the 1AC, which had no
blessing for seed. It is a promise that the path to faith and to the AFC is through the sons of Israel
(who produced the bible) and through the born agains who spread the bible message properly]]
 The First Abrahamic Covenant

Abraham was chosen by God to be the physical progenitor of the race of people to whom his son Jesus would be born.
The race of people known later as the Jews. He was also chosen by God to be the mediator of the covenant (the biblical
name for a binding agreement) between God and mankind through which all the families of the ground would bless
themselves:

1 And Jehovah proceeded to say to Abram: Go your way from your land/country () and from your relatives and from
the house of your father to the land/country () that I shall show you;
2 and I shall make a great nation out of you and I shall bless you and I will make your name great; and prove yourself a
blessing.
3 And I will bless those who bless you, and him that calls down evil upon you I shall curse, and all the families of the
ground/earth () will certainly bless themselves by means of you (Genesis 12).

This is an ambiguously written scripture. Obviously the ‘great nation’ were the sons of Israel in the literal meaning. But this
scripture, since the word 'land' appears twice in it, has a greater word symbolic meaning by the Symbolic Structure
Principle. There is a further fulfillment of a 'great nation' out of Abraham. This is the Great Crowd of Revelation 7:9 who
are the survivors of Armageddon, the greater Exodus, not out of Egypt, but out of this system of things.

The country that Abraham left was actually Mesopotamia. The country that God showed him was Canaan, the promised
land. The account of this vital covenant is written very similarly to the account of Cain and Abel in Genesis 4. It just look’s
like God, for no apparent reason at all, arbitrarily decided that he was going to bless this chap Abraham to the limit. There
are two questions therefore that are begging to be asked:

[1] Why did God choose Abraham in particular?

[2] What was this blessing that all the families of the ground would get through him?

The answer to the first question is seen by Abraham’s actions after he was chosen. He was a very spiritual man. When he
was asked by God to kill his firstborn son Isaac, he reasoned that God could raise him from the dead so he went ahead
with the request (although God stopped him at the last minute). It is important to realize that Isaac went along voluntarily
out of love for God, love for his dad, and his own spiritual vision, so at the worst this was an assisted suicide.

17 By faith Abraham, when he was tested, as good as offered up Isaac, and the man that had gladly received the
promises attempted to offer up [his] only-begotten [son],
18 although it had been said to him: What will be called 'your seed' will be through Isaac.
19 But he reckoned that God was able to raise him up even from the dead; and from there he did receive him also in an
illustrative way (Hebrews 11).

Abraham used his powers of reason to see, with the eyes of his mind, things that were invisible. His sons today have the
same foresight and hence the same faith, that God did raise another of his sons, Jesus, from the dead. St. Paul described
Abraham as follows:

10 For he was awaiting the city having real foundations, the builder and maker of which [city] is God (Hebrews 11).

The answer to the second question is found by the application of the Jigsaw Principle:

What is the blessing that all of the families of the ground would get from the 1AC and the Nations of the earth will
get from the 2AC?

Well we already know the answer to these questions because the 1AC is a subcovenant of the PARC and the 2AC is a
subcovenant of the HARC. But let us examine these blessings in more detail. The significance of God’s first covenant
(sometimes called his first promise) with Abraham is described by St. Paul in Galatians 3:3-29. We only need to look at a
few aspects of his explanation at this point:

7 Surely you know that those who adhere to faith are the ones who are sons of Abraham.
8 Now the Scripture, seeing in advance that God would declare people of the nations righteous due to faith, declared the
good news beforehand to Abraham, namely: By means of you all the nations will be blessed (Galatians 3).

This blessing of all the nations, is the blessing referred to in the First Abrahamic Covenant. Parties to this covenant are called 'sons of
Abraham'. So this blessing is a righteous declaration from God. When God declares a person to be righteous, then obviously his sin is
forgiven, and so he is guaranteed a resurrection if he dies, or he is guaranteed to be spared at Armageddon. In fact, having been
declared righteous by God he will receive the resurrection of the righteous:

13 But when you spread a feast, invite poor people, crippled, lame, blind;
14 and you will be happy, because they have nothing with which to repay you. For you will be repaid in the resurrection of
the righteous ones (Luke 14).

For God does not resurrect some righteous ones and forget to resurrect others. He resurrects all whom he has declared to be righteous.
Paul goes on to explain that:

14 The purpose was that the blessing of Abraham might come to be by means of Jesus Christ for the nations, that we
might receive the promised spirit through our faith (Galatians 3).

The blessing of Abraham is the resurrection into the Kingdom of God on earth through the 1AC and the PARC.

As an example of the 1AC in action consider the repentance of Zaccheus:

8 But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord: Look! The half of my belongings, Lord, I am giving to the poor, and
whatever I extorted from anyone by false accusation I am restoring fourfold.
9 At this Jesus said to him: This day salvation has come to this house, because he also is a son of Abraham (Luke 19).

He was a son of Abraham physically before the day when he gave half of his belongings to the poor. He could not have
become again a son of the Second Abrahamic Covenant by repenting and obeying the law of Moses, since the law lost
water baptism power in 25Tishri. So his salvation was that he completed his test of faith under the 1AC. So being a party
to the First Abrahamic Covenant (1AC) means that you gain salvation, which means that you have (an unofficial from a
true religion standpoint) visa to enter the Kingdom of God, which means that either you will be resurrected into it if you die
before Armageddon, or you will survive Armageddon.

So now we can understand what St. Paul meant when he said:

29 Moreover, if you belong to Christ [he is your father, you are spirit baptized, born again], you are really Abraham's seed,
heirs with reference to a promise [the 3AC] (Galatians 3).

Heirs of Jesus’ sacrifice are in Jesus’ will if you like, having the inheritance from his death, which is of course life, the
second life, in the Kingdom of God. The promise in this case is the Third Abrahamic Covenant, because the blessing is
through seed not through Abraham. But all of Abraham’s seed are:

‘Heirs with reference to a promise’

Those in the 1AC are heirs of the PARC and of Jesus' validation sacrifice (Jesus' human body died when he was impaled.
This death validated the 1AC and bisected it - see [15]. They are heirs with reference to the 1AC promise.

Those in the LCC are heirs of the Abraham himself with reference to the land promise.

Those in the 2AC are heirs of the HARC with reference to the second promise.

Those in the 3AC are heirs of the ARC with reference to the third promise.

Abraham’s ‘sons’ through his 3rd covenant get the same blessing as Abraham himself got through his faith, namely they
are living to God (i.e. they are dead to us but actually alive in angelic bodies but asleep awaiting a resurrection). Their
angels look to God just like our children look to us in the middle of the night. For more on this - see [190]:

37 But that the dead are raised up even Moses disclosed, in the account about the thornbush, when he calls Jehovah 'the
God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob.'
38 He is a God, not of the dead, but of the living, for they are all living to him (Luke 20).

All three are to be resurrected, because they are spiritually living to God (living as spirit creatures, living as sleeping
angels), though physically dead to us.
In summary, those who enter the first Abrahamic covenant, and remain in it, are declared righteous (in the flesh) by God,
and so are resurrected, and this means that they gain citizenship of the Kingdom of God on earth. Those who enter the
2nd Abrahamic covenant, and remain in it, are declared righteous in the flesh by God and gain citizenship of the kingdom
of God on earth as priests. Those who enter the 3rd Abrahamic covenant, and remain in it, are declared righteous in the
spirit by God and have everlasting life. All of these sons of Abraham enter the Kingdom of God (whether in heaven or on
earth) by resurrection. Even those who enter it through Armageddon get a living resurrection, in the form of the rapture of
1 Thessalonians 4, when they are converted into angels without dying, on the fly, as it were. So being resurrected is how
one becomes a citizen of the kingdom of God.

Abraham’s true seed by the 1AC, 2AC and the 3AC covenants are God’s true people, God’s true children, just as
the sons of the LCC were:

Now that we have all 4 Abrahamic covenants in perspective, we see that a son of the 1AC, 2AC or 3AC is just as much a
son of Abraham as a son of the LCC was. Of course the former are sons by faith and the latter are sons by genetics. But
all 4 are sons by covenant, and that is the big picture. So a 'Jew' today, taking the term' Jew' to mean true child of God,
which means a true Christian, is still in fact a son of Abraham just as the original Jews were, but by Covenant.

Le plus ca change the plus c'est la meme chose.

Paul then confirms that Abraham is the father of all of God's children saying:

16 ....He is the father of us all,

17 just as it is written: I have appointed you a father of many nations (Romans 4).

This fatherhood is through the 1AC, the covenant of faith for us all.

So 'Jew' just means any child of Abraham by any of his 3 covenants. Now we can understand Jesus' words in Revelation:

9 I know your tribulation and poverty--but you are rich--and the blasphemy by those who say they themselves are Jews,
and yet they are not but are a synagogue of Satan (Revelation 2).

9 Look! I will give those from the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews, and yet they are not but are lying--look! I will
make them come and do obeisance before your feet and make them know I have loved you (Revelation 3).

These scriptures do not refer to literal Jews, but to Abraham's true children, God's true people.

How does one enter into the First and the Second Abrahamic Covenants?

Abraham left Haran in Mesopotamia, and set off for the promised land of Greater Canaan, which extended from the
Euphrates to the Nile (as we can see from the LCC). So when he crossed the Euphrates he did not validate the 1AC but
he inaugurated it, since the promise was conditional upon him making that trip:

2 He said: Men, brothers and fathers, hear. The God of glory appeared to our forefather Abraham while he was in
Mesopotamia, before he took up residence in Haran, and he said to him:
3 'Go out from your land and from your relatives and come on into the land I shall show you.'
4 Then he went out from the land of the Chaldeans and took up residence in Haran. And from there, after his father died,
[God] caused him to change his residence to this land in which you now dwell (Acts 7).

2 And Joshua went on to say to all the people: This is what Jehovah the God of Israel has said, It was on the other side of
the River that your forefathers dwelt a long time ago, Terah the father of Abraham and the father of Nahor, and they used
to serve other gods.
3 In time I took your forefather Abraham from the other side of the River and had him walk through all the land of Canaan
and made his seed many. So I gave him Isaac (Joshua 24).

17 The sun was now setting and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace and a fiery torch that passed in
between these pieces.
18 On that day Jehovah concluded with Abram a covenant, saying: To your seed I will give this land, from the river of
Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates (Genesis 15).
So the river of Joshua 24 was the Euphrates, the northern boundary of the promised land. Symbolically we are being told
by Abraham's actions that one enters the 1AC by crossing a river, which is the symbolism of baptism. But God did not
conclude the LCC with Abraham until after he had entered Canaan. So he entered Canaan and he inaugurated the 1AC in
uncircumcision. So he was walking by faith without being in any kind of true Abrahamic religion at that time. He was in fact
in the true religion that had Melchizedek as its priest as can be seen from Genesis 14.

18 And Melchizedek, King of Salem, brought out the bread and wine, and he was priest of the Most High God.
19 Then he blessed him and said: Blessed be Abram of the Most High God. Producer of heaven and earth.
20 And blessed be the Most High God, who has delivered your oppressors into your hand!
At that Abram gave him a tenth of everything (Genesis 14).

Also we have no reason to believe that Abraham even got wet when he crossed the Euphrates. One imagines that he
used a bridge for his household. So the 1AC is just entered into by having faith and permanently grasped by acting on that
faith. This faith is not the faith of your homeland or of your relatives or of your father, it is your faith, unique to you. Most
people choose the religion of their nation, or of their relatives or of their father. The true son of Abraham under the 1AC
chooses the religion that he believes God is showing him. This does not have to be the true church in the case of the
1AC.

Now John the baptist on the other hand baptized people into the 2AC, the true religion. These people were already
genetic sons of Abraham and therefore in the LCC.

7 When he caught sight of many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to the baptism, he said to them: You offspring
of vipers, who has intimated to you to flee from the coming wrath?
8 So then produce fruit that befits repentance.
9 And do not presume to say to yourselves, 'As a father we have Abraham.' For I say to you that God is able to raise up
children to Abraham from these stones.
10 Already the axe is lying at the root of the trees; every tree, then, that does not produce fine fruit is to be cut down and
thrown into the fire.
11 I, for my part, baptize you with water because of your repentance; but the one coming after me is stronger than I am,
whose sandals I am not fit to take off. That one will baptize you people with holy spirit and with fire (Matthew 3).

John was raising up children to Abraham by baptism. Children through the 2AC into which he was baptizing but also through the 1AC
for a baptism means faith so if you are not in the 1AC before you are water baptized, then you enter both covenants at once. The trees
were the spiritual rulers, the spiritual feeders of the Jews, the Pharisees. For trees gave Adam food in the garden. Jesus explains:

16 The Law and the Prophets were until John. From then on the kingdom of God is being declared as good news, and
every sort of person is pressing forward toward it (Luke 16).

12 But from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of the heavens is the goal toward which men press, and
those pressing forward are seizing it (Matthew 11).

So John was starting a process through which men press forward into the kingdom of God and eventually seize it. John
was producing 'stones'. Stones make up a temple, a temple of true worship. So this process is the baptism into the 2AC,
the Abrahamic Church Covenant, the ACC, and then the completion of the baptism, the sealing, which is in fact a
righteous decree or declaration from God in the flesh - see [12,13]. Because the 2AC is the only way to get the blessing of
Abraham (officially), which is citizenship of the Kingdom of God. John was in fact producing dead stones, judicially dead,
because none of them had yet been born again. Later Jesus built another temple with living stones, those who had been
born again.

5 You yourselves also as living stones are being built up a spiritual house for the purpose of a holy priesthood, to offer up
spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2).

Unofficial salvation through the 1AC under the PARC

The Second Abrahamic Covenant is the true God’s way of granting a visa to allow immigration into the Kingdom of God.
Those who enter into that covenant with God and do not break it are the 'legal' immigrants into the new system. There are
also the 'illegal' immigrants if you like. Those who are saved by the angels on the basis of their faith or their conscience, or
their love, or their distaste for the rotten things of the world without ever joining any true religion, for St. Paul has said:

14 For whenever people of the nations that do not have law do by nature the things of the law, these people, although not
having law are a law to themselves.
15 They are the very ones who demonstrate the matter of the law to be written in their hearts, while their conscience is
bearing witness with them and, between their own thoughts, they are being accused or even excused.
16 This will be in the day when God through Christ Jesus judges the secret things of mankind, according to the good
news I declare (Romans 2).

15 And I have hope toward God, which hope these [men] themselves also entertain, that there is going to be a
resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous (Acts 24).

For more on the resurrection of the unrighteous see - Resurrection Timetables for the Kingdom of God.

It is very important to realize that one does not have to join any religion in order to be saved by God. In fact more are
saved who have never joined a true religion than are saved who have. This understanding destroys the Catholic and the
Jehovah's Witness and many other religions' scare tactics that you will burn in hell (Catholic - although they are dropping
this tactic presently), or at least not be resurrected (JW) if you do not join us! Lies, lies lies! What man is there who can
restrict the mercy of God? However if you deny his existence then how are you entitled to his mercy?

Technical note

The circumcised Jews in the LCC were automatically entered into the Second Abrahamic Covenant through the Law
covenant at the passover in their 20th year once the promised land had been entered. Rather than being baptized in
water, as a symbolic representation of being washed in the blood of Abraham, they were baptized with the blood of the
passover lamb, one for each house, symbolically representing a washing with the blood of Moses. The priest for this
baptism was the head of the household. Under law, having defiled one's flesh, i.e. broken one's baptism, one was washed
again in the blood of Moses, which was symbolically represented through the blood of the animal that was sacrificed. John
the baptist was achieving the same cleanliness through washing in water. Although both are just symbolic representations
for a washing in the blood of a mediator, which is what a baptism is. John was actually washing people in the blood of
Isaac, who was the validation sacrifice for the 1AC, Jehovah - Jireh (God will provide). He died of old age but was non
adamic - see U506. John started baptizing 4 years before the human blood of Jesus was available. Those who left Egypt
aged 20 years old or more were baptized into Moses by means of the cloud and the sea, this was a baptism into the name
of Father Abraham too, since the Law of Moses was a subcovenant of the ICC and the 2AC. But those who failed to keep
the law then fell out of the ACC.

The Date of the First Abrahamic covenant

For a full explanation of this Chronology - see [91]. The simplest way one can get to this date (that we are aware of) is by
starting with either the date of the fall of Jerusalem to Nebuchadnezzar in the 19th year of his reign, which was 586 BC, a
date which is relatively undisputed amongst historians - see [99], and counting back to the first year of Jehoiakim the king
of Judah, which was 607. We then use Ezekiel's prophetic 390 year siege of Jerusalem in Ezekiel chapter 4 to count back
to the last year of Solomon in 997 - see [121].

We then count back to the first year of Solomon as being 1036 since he reigned for 40 years, so that his 40th was 997.
Then we calculate that his 4th regnal year was 1033, and we use:

1 And it came about in the 480th year after the sons of Israel came out from the land of Egypt, in the 4th year, in the
month of Ziv, that is, the second month, after Solomon became king over Israel, that he proceeded to build the house to
Jehovah (1 Kings 6).

So the 4th year of Solomon was the 480th after the Exodus, so 1033 was the 480th year after the exodus so 1513 was
the zeroth year after the exodus which is the year of the exodus. From this we deduce the original passover in Egypt, the
last of the 10 plagues where the firstborn sons of every Egyptian man, and the firstborn or every beast of theirs died, was
on 1513Nisan14 (30th March 1513 BC). (The passover is always on Nisan14, Nisan is the first month of the Hebrew year
- see BLC). Actually it is quite amazing but the passover in the year 33 AD when Jesus died started at 6pm on March 31st
Gregorian, and the BLC program can be up to 11 hours out in terms of Lunar phase data back at 1513 BC.

It can be up to 15 hours out in 1943BC and up to 2½ hours out in 33CE - http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/phase. The
new moon was at 16:46 GMT according to Fred Espinak of Nasa on March 30th Julian or March 16th Gregorian in
1513BC. If we move it forwards by 11 hours, then it would be at 3:46 on March 17th GMT or 5:46 Jerusalem Time, and 30
hours later is 11:46 am on March 18th, meaning that Nisan1 would start at 6pm on March 18th so Nisan14 would start at
6pm on March 31st. So it is possible that both passovers were on the same solar day (March 31st)!

We then consider the following chronological scriptures:

17 Further, I say this: As to the covenant previously validated by God (LCC), the Law that has come into being 430 years
later (430 years after the land promise of Genesis 12) does not invalidate it, so as to abolish the promise (Galatians 3).

The passover but not the law came into being in Exodus 12, on 1513Nisan14:

24 And you must keep this thing as a regulation for you and your sons to time indefinite.
25 And it must occur that when you come into the land that Jehovah will give you, just as he has stated, then you must
keep this service.
26 And it must occur that when your sons say to you: What does this service mean to you?
27 then you must say: It is the sacrifice of the passover to Jehovah, who passed over the houses of the sons of Israel in
Egypt when he plagued the Egyptians, but he delivered our houses. Then the people bowed low and prostrated
themselves (Exodus 12).

The bowing low was an implicit agreement. The full law was agreed initially on 1513Sivan3. So 1513Nisan14 was the birth
of the Jewish passover, but the law was not agreed to as a covenant until 1513Sivan3 (18th May 1513 BC) after the ten
commandments were given. So 430 years before this puts us in the years from 1944Tishri to 1943Tishri. Now Moses said
at the first passover:

40 And the dwelling of the sons of Israel who had dwelt in Egypt was 430 years.
41 And it came about at the end of the 430 years, it even came about on this very day, that all the armies of Jehovah went
out of the land of Egypt (Exodus 12).

So since in 1513Nisan there was an exodus from Egypt that occurred after 430 years 'on this very day', we know that
there was an entrance into Egypt in 1943Nisan14, on the same very day 430 years earlier, by the armies of Jehovah,
which at that time was Abraham and Lot and their households. So presumably Egypt was ruling south of the Euphrates at
that time in what was to become the promised land. Josephus, the Jewish Historian who was a contemporary of Jesus,
counts the Abrahamic covenant as starting with Abraham crossing the Euphrates 430 years before the Exodus. But one
can deduce this from the following scriptures too:

17 The sun was now setting and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace and a fiery torch that passed in
between these pieces.
18 On that day Jehovah concluded with Abram a covenant, saying: To your seed I will give this land, from the river of
Egypt to the great river, the river Euphrates (Genesis 15).

2 And Joshua went on to say to all the people: This is what Jehovah the God of Israel has said, It was on the other side of
the River that your forefathers dwelt a long time ago, Terah the father of Abraham and the father of Nahor, and they used
to serve other gods.
3 In time I took your forefather Abraham from the other side of the River and had him walk through all the land of Canaan
and made his seed many. So I gave him Isaac (Joshua 24).

For more on this - see [100]. 1943Nisan14 was April 10th 1943 BC.

Technical note:

One can also deduce the date of the last year of Solomon by counting backward through the kings of Israel and Judah
either from Josiah, whose last year we know was 608, which we deduce from the scriptures:

1 The word that occurred to Jeremiah concerning all the people of Judah in the 4th year of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah,
the king of Judah, that is, the first year of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon;
2 which Jeremiah the prophet spoke concerning all the people of Judah and concerning all the inhabitants of Jerusalem,
saying:
3 From the 13th year of Josiah the son of Amon, the king of Judah, and down to this day, these 23 years the word of
Jehovah has occurred to me, and I kept speaking to you people, rising up early and speaking, but you did not listen
(Jeremiah 25).

8 years old was Josiah when he began to reign, and for 31 years he reigned in Jerusalem (2 Kings 22:1).

Or we can count back through the kings to Solomon starting from the date of the fall of Samaria to Shalmanezer, known
by historians (Cambridge Ancient History) to be in the year 723Nisan to 722Nisan.

Melchizedek's Bread And Wine

18 And Melchizedek, King of Salem, brought out the bread and wine, and he was priest of the Most High God.
19 Then he blessed him and said: Blessed be Abram of the Most High God. Producer of heaven and earth.
20 And blessed be the Most High God, who has delivered your oppressors into your hand!
At that Abram gave him a tenth of everything (Genesis 14).

Abraham gave Melchizedek a 10th of all things because the 2AC gives a 10th of mankind to the King of the Kingdom of
God, the King of Peace, Melchizedek. The Bread and Wine were for the 1AC, the PARC, because the 2AC was not
promised until Genesis 18. Melchizedek is said to have blessed Abraham and God and really everything except the bread
and wine. But since he brought them out and since he was the priest, he would have blessed them too. The two of them
celebrated the 1AC with all those present. This would have been done on Nisan14, for as we shall see in U15 Jesus
celebrated the 1AC at the last supper. Abraham could take these emblems even though Jesus had not died yet, since the
apostles also ate this bread and drank this wine before he died at the last supper and in theory at least he might have
failed the test.

_____________________________

Writer's Notes

Incidentally the 6 water jars into wine at Cana are those in the 2AC subcovenants of Isaac, Moses, and the 4 Elijah's.

PARC and HARC are the righteous decree in the flesh; the ARC is the righteous decree in the spirit (everlasting life).

23 Not only that, but we ourselves also who have the firstfruits, namely, the spirit, yes, we ourselves groan within
ourselves, while we are earnestly waiting for adoption as sons, the release from our bodies by ransom [an angelic ransom
actually of the associated angel of John the baptist, the validation sacrifice of the JAC for Jacob] (Romans 8).

13 For if the blood of goats and of bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who have been defiled sanctifies to
the extent of cleanness of the flesh [being a cleanliness resulting from the true religion is a baptism into the 2AC],
14 how much more will the blood of the Christ [the blood of the ARC], who through an everlasting spirit offered himself
without blemish to God, cleanse our consciences from dead works that we may render sacred service to [the] living God?
15 So that is why he is a mediator of a new covenant, in order that, because a death [of John the Baptist as a human, the
mediator of the 1EC and the seemingly unnecessary validation sacrifice for the ICC] has occurred for [their] release by
ransom [of Isaac] from the transgressions [not of the conscience but of the flesh] under the former covenant [the law
subcovenant of the ICC], the ones who have been called [into the 1NC subcovenant of the JAC] might receive the
promise of the everlasting inheritance [this being the promise of the ARC] (Hebrews 9).

Jesus died to give everlasting life to Adam, so his Master Covenant imparts everlasting life and so entrance into it is the
end of the test that a sanctified Christian undergoes.

26 And to Seth also there was born a son and he proceeded to call his name Enosh. At that time a start was made of
calling on the name of Jehovah (Genesis 4).

So if Enosh is 'Abraham' then his son Kenan is 'Isaac' and his son Mehalalel is 'Jacob'. This is a patriarchal society and
these guys were all alive so things have to work like this. Jared was Melchizedek to start with. Noah, Shem and
Arpachshad are the trio of the peri-flood system. Since Cainan was Melchizedek, who comes after the trio. You can
baptize someone in the blood of a covenant before that blood arrives but you cannot give someone the blessing of the
covenant until the blood of the covenant arrives. Jared ransomed Adam's Dad for the PARC. Because Adam senior was
the real Abraham hence his 'seed' became Adam.

The Law was a subcovenant of the 2AC and the New Covenant, the 1NC, is a subcovenant of the JAC which is a
subcovenant of the 3AC, the AAC

22 For example, it is written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman,
23 but the one by the servant girl was actually born in the manner of flesh, the other by the free woman through a
promise.
24 These things stand as a symbolic drama; for these [women] mean two covenants, the one from Mount Sinai, which
brings forth children for slavery, and which is Hagar.
25 Now this Hagar means Sinai, a mountain in Arabia, and she corresponds with the Jerusalem today, for she is in
slavery with her children.
26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4).
So Hagar symbolized the law covenant and Sarah was the mother of the new covenant saints, i.e. the new covenant
according to Paul. But neither the Law nor the 1NC were Abraham's wives. Rather the main covenant of the Law, the
2AC, and the promise for the main covenant (the JAC) of the new covenant, the 3AC, were the wives of Abraham.

Paul is referring to the marriage of the Law to Abraham through the 2AC and the marriage of the New Covenant to
Abraham through the JAC and the 3AC, which was the promise for the JAC.

It was possible to be declared righteous by God by means of the law of Moses:

13 For the hearers of law are not the ones righteous before God, but the doers of law will be declared righteous (Romans
2).

This happened in the cases of Zechariah and Elizabeth, John the baptist's parents:

5 In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there happened to be a certain priest named Zechariah of the division of Abijah,
and he had a wife from the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth.
6 They both were righteous before God because of walking blamelessly in accord with all the commandments and legal
requirements of Jehovah (Luke 1).

So since people under law were being declared righteous, they were getting the blessing of Isaac for those in the true
religion, since the true religion was the law at the time, so the law was a subcovenant of the 2AC. The blessing of Isaac is
a resurrection into the Kingdom of God on earth as an edenic human priest. It is the blessing of Gabriel, the blessing of
Methuselah, the blessing of the HARC. It is the same from a salvation standpoint as the blessing of Abraham, the blessing
of the 1AC, which is the blessing of Melchizedek, the blessing of Jared, the blessing of the PARC. The righteous decree in
the spirit, the resurrection into the Kingdom of God in heaven, the resurrection as an angel, is the blessing not of
Abraham, but of Michael through the ARC by way of his seed, Jacob (JAC) and of Jesus (1NC).

The New covenant was a sub covenant of the 3AC which was a promise leading to the JAC, the main covenant for being
born again. For the full story of Genesis 16 and Galatians 4 see [210].

But really, how could the Jews have so many covenants and the Christians have only one??

The Second New Covenant, The Covenant of Keturah and of Rachel

Sections to read first: 1 to 10

On the night before his death, Thursday night, March 31st 33 AD (Gregorian), Nisan14 according to the BLC, Jesus
celebrated the passover meal with his 12 apostles. The passover meal was a celebration, a festival of the Jews; it was not
a commiseration or a funeral service. It was inaugurated on the night of the last plague of Egypt, the 10th plague
(1513Nisan14 or 30th/31st March 1513 BC). This plague killed the firstborn son in every household of the Egyptians, but
passed over the household of every Jew who celebrated it. After the Jews left Egypt, God made a covenant with them
called the Law Covenant, or the Law of Moses. Moses was the mediator of this covenant. His mediation was that God
made a covenant with Moses and then Moses made a covenant with the sons of Israel:

27 And Jehovah went on to say to Moses: Write down for yourself these words, because it is in accordance with these
words that I do conclude a covenant with you and Israel (Exodus 34).

1 These are the words of the covenant that Jehovah commanded Moses to conclude with the sons of Israel in the land of
Moab aside from the covenant that he had concluded with them in Horeb (Deuteronomy 29).

At the last supper Jesus made a new covenant with eleven of his apostles (Judas left after the meal and before Jesus
made the new covenant). His mediation was that God made a covenant with him for a kingdom and he made a covenant
with the 11 for that kingdom:

29 And I make a covenant with you, just as my Father has made a covenant with me, for a kingdom (Luke 22).

As we saw in section [10], the Law covenant is a subcovenant of the 2AC and the New covenant is a subcovenant of the 3AC and the
JAC. Paul is referring to subcovenant marriages to Abraham through their superior covenants in Galatians 4. Hagar is the Law, Sarah
is the 1NC, and these two women are married to Abraham through the 2AC and the JAC/3AC respectively.
But was the New covenant the last covenant to be made between God and his people, Abraham's true seed, before
Armageddon? In this section we consider 5 ways of seeing that there were to be more subcovenants of the 2AC and of
the 3AC/JAC made after the law and the new covenants. These are:

[1] The wording of Jeremiah 31:31-33

[2] The Symbolism of Keturah, Abraham's third wife

[3] The Symbolism of the wife of Lot.

[4] One race does not need three fathers

[5] The symbolism of Rachel, Jacob's 4th wife

Jeremiah 31:31-33

The new covenant itself takes its name from the prophecy of Jeremiah:

31 Look! There are days coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of Israel and with the
house of Judah a new covenant;
32 not one like the covenant that I concluded with their forefathers in the day of my taking hold of their hand to bring them
forth out of the land of Egypt, which covenant of mine they themselves broke, although I myself had husbandly ownership
of them, is the utterance of Jehovah.
33 For/But this is the covenant that I shall conclude with the house of Israel after those days, is the utterance of Jehovah. I
will put my law within them, and in their heart I shall write it. And I will become their God, and they themselves will become
my people
34 And they will no more teach each one his companion and each one his brother, saying, 'Know Jehovah!' for they will all
of them know me, from the least one of them even to the greatest one of them, is the utterance of Jehovah. For I shall
forgive their error, and their sin I shall remember no more (Jeremiah 31).

In an unprecedented re-iteration, this whole covenant recital is repeated by Paul in Hebrews8:

6 But now he has obtained a more excellent public service, so that he is also the mediator of a correspondingly better
covenant, which has been legally established upon better promises.
7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second.
8 For he does find fault with the people when he says: Look! There are days coming, says Jehovah, and I will conclude
with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant,
9 not according to the covenant that I made with their forefathers in [the] day of my taking hold of their hand to bring them
forth out of the land of Egypt, because they did not continue in my covenant, so that I stopped caring for them, says
Jehovah.
10 For this is the covenant that I shall covenant with the house of Israel after those days, says Jehovah. I will put my laws
in their mind, and in their hearts I shall write them. And I will become their God, and they themselves will become my
people.
11 And they will by no means teach each one his fellow citizen and each one his brother, saying: Know the Lord! For they
will all know me, from [the] least one to [the] greatest one of them.
12 For I shall be merciful to their unrighteous deeds, and I shall by no means call their sins to mind anymore.
13 In his saying a new [covenant] he has made the former one obsolete. Now that which is made obsolete and growing
old is near to vanishing away (Hebrews 8).

Since Paul has recited the whole thing again Verbatim, with a few explanatory notes, we should consider every word in
this scripture very carefully.

The first thing to realize is that normally agreements are made on one day, not on two days. How many times has the
reader signed an agreement made on the blank day of blank? You fill in the date of the agreement. One hardly ever fills in
two dates for an agreement. Only when a further clause is added at a later date would there be two dates involved in an
agreement.

Now the new covenant itself was made on one day, namely 33Nisan14, the day of the last supper. But God says:
Days (plural) are coming when he will make a new covenant with two houses. Since the new covenant was made only on one
day, there must be a further day of covenant making, and therefore a further covenant in addition to the new covenant.

But things do not stop there, because the new covenant was not made with the literal houses of Judah and Israel. It was
made with Gentiles too. Therefore God is using the house of Judah and the house of Israel more generally here. Now the
New covenant saints are to be kings in the heavens and we know that the Kingly line belongs to the tribe of Judah, and
we know that Jerusalem was in Judah. So the new covenant, begin royal, was made with the greater house of Judah. So
we have found a further new covenant that is made with a greater house of Israel on a separate day to the new covenant.

But neither do things stop here, because we then read that God will make a covenant not with two houses, but with one
house, the house of Israel, and he will make it 'after those days'. After which days? Well certainly not after the day
(singular) of his taking hold of the hand of their forefathers to bring them out of Egypt, since that day is singular. So he
makes this covenant with the house of Israel after the days upon which he makes the two covenants with the greater
houses of Judah and Israel of verse 8. So now we have 3 covenants, one with a greater house of Judah, and two with
greater houses of Israel.

Pause for thought

These two further new covenants are so incredibly significant from a theological standpoint, that we are going to deduce
their existence all over again [read it all again or rewind the video]. They mean for one thing that there has been or will be
more than one true Christian church.

They mean that the Catholic assertion, that there is a true religious line from Peter to today is wrong. The Catholics are
indeed the true descendants of the first Christian church, FDS1, which was a church of the first new covenant, they do
trace their ancestry to Peter, yes, but the church which Peter was the first president of actually fell in 67Tishri - see [40],
[41].

The missing 4th new covenant

For symmetry there is likely to be a 4th new covenant that is not explicitly mentioned in the literal meaning of Hebrews 8.
It is made with a second house of Judah, and it relates to the second house of Israel (for one cannot have an Israel
without a Judah). It will be a royal covenant since it is with a greater house of Judah.

Now many religions (including the JWs) know that the New covenant saints are to be Kings in heaven and that 'some
other Christians will end up on earth' in the Kingdom of God after Armageddon in a second Eden, in an earthly paradise
that lasts for 1,000 years. The JWs have ‘The Abrahamic Covenant’ as saving these ones. We know the true God does
nothing without a covenant. For Moses said of him:

4 The rock, perfect is his activity, all his ways are justice (Deuteronomy 32).

But we must not be naive about this sort of thing. If God has heavenly kings over the kingdom of God then he will also
have earthly kings. And if his heavenly kings have a covenant then so will his earthly kings have a covenant. Since this
earthly covenant will be a royal covenant, it will be made with a greater house of Judah. So really we have 4 new
covenants, made with a heavenly Judah, a heavenly Israel, an earthly Judah and an earthly Israel.

Furthermore it is apparent from the administrative structure of the physical nation of Israel that there was a King who had
princely deputies and administrators and subjects and that there was a high priest who had Aaronic Priests under him
who had levitical priests under him who had the people under their care. We know that our Lord combined the two offices
of King and Priest, for the house of God is not divided and there is no real authority anywhere on earth or in the heavens
apart from Jehovah. So we would expect to find a King/Priest a group of royal aaronic priestly administrators and a group
or non royal, levitical, priestly administrators and subjects in the Kingdom of God, since God's works are fractal. But this
Kingdom is split in two into an earthly and a heavenly part, just a Jerusalem itself was split by the two mountains of Zion
and Moriah. For its very name means 'foundation of twofold peace'.

So imposing the Pattern of God's physical people onto both the heavenly and the earthly halves of the Kingdom of God
we get a King, a Royal priesthood covenant, a priesthood covenant and subjects upstairs, and the same thing downstairs.
The new covenant is the royal priesthood covenant for the heavens. The two covenants with the greater houses of Israel
are the two covenants for the non royal priests of the heavens and of the earth. The missing second covenant with the
house of Judah is the covenant for a royal priesthood on the earth in the Kingdom. Pictorially we have the following:
Heaven Earth
King and High Priest (Jesus) King and High Priest (Melchizedek)
Royal Priesthood (First new Covenant saints, first house of Royal Priesthood (Second New Covenant saints, second
Judah, 1NC) house of Judah, 2NC)
Non Royal Priesthood (First new covenant helpers, first Non Royal Priesthood (Second New Covenant helpers,
house of Israel, 1NCH) second house of Israel, 2NCH)
Subjects Subjects

We call these 4 covenants the 1NC, the 2NC, the 1NCH and the 2NCH. The Helper/Priestly covenants are made with
Israel and the royal covenants are made with Judah.

The Word Symbolic Meaning of Hebrews 8

The literal meaning has given us 3 new covenants and has hinted at a 4th. In the Word symbolic meaning of Hebrews 8,
the new covenant is the 2NC, which is actually made with two houses on two days. It was made with Gordon for the
house of Judah, the 144,000 earthly kings on 1992Elul16, we call this the 2NC (k), for 2NC Kings, and it was made with
Gordon for the house of Israel, the earthly priests (further 2NCH saints like the sons of Bilhah) in 1995Elul (Genesis 25,
16 sons from Keturah as wife, and 1 Chronicles 1, 13 sons from Keturah as concubine), we call this the 2NC (a), for 2NC
administrators. We have in the past incorrectly called the 2NC (a) the Great Crowd Covenant, the GCC. The covenant
made after those days, with the house of Israel is actually the 2BRC, the second born rapture covenant, the covenant of
Lot's second daughter of Genesis 18 - U154. Incidentally those saved by the 2BRC include the Zoar Class, which is
everyone in the 1AC but not the 2AC or 3AC who survives Armageddon. The 1BRC and the 2BRC (the two daughters of
Lot) offer salvation through an angelic soul and are therefore subcovenants of the ARC. Manasseh is the 2NC (k) saints in
the Watchtower; Ephraim is the 2NC (a) saints from the world and Benjamin is the Great Crowd. The Great Crowd is
everyone who is raptured by the two rapture covenants.

Jesus is the mediator of a correspondingly better covenant than the law in the literal meaning (the 1NC), and Gordon is
the mediator of a correspondingly better covenant that the law in the word symbolic meaning (the 2NC).

Keturah, Abraham's 3rd wife

St. Paul describes the first two wives of Abraham, Hagar, and Sarah, as standing symbolically for the Law Covenant and
the New Covenant. He is literally telling us that Genesis 16, the account of these wives, is written in a symbolic code - see
[Bible Code] (although in Genesis 16, Sarah is the 2AC and the 3AC in the two word symbolic meanings - see [210]).
However, we do not need to employ the bible code to deduce the existence of a further covenant after the New covenant;
we just have to follow the symbolism explained by St. Paul and apply it not to Genesis 16 but rather to Genesis 25.

1 Furthermore, Abraham again took a wife, and her name was Keturah (Genesis 25).

Keturah was initially a slave of Abraham, but she finally became his wife (Hagar was given as Abraham's wife, but is not
said to have become his wife; rather she is still referred to as the maidservant of Sarah). Now one might think that God is
condoning procreative sex outside marriage here. But one forgets that Abraham owned Sarah as his wife, and Sarah
owned Hagar as her maidservant, so Abraham owned Hagar as his wife's maidservant. So Abraham had obligations to
look after Hagar and their children, through the agreement/mechanism of slavery or servanthood. So his actions with
Hagar were not irresponsible or sinful.

So Abraham's 3rd wife Keturah must stand for a further covenant in addition to the Law (Hagar) and the New Covenant
(Sarah) if we follow the symbolic interpretation of Paul. Now since we know that there are no new covenants before the
Law of Moses or before the new covenant itself, this further covenant must come after the new covenant. So we call it the
second new covenant. In fact nowhere in the scriptures, neither in Jeremiah, in Hebrews or in Luke, is what churches call
the new covenant ever referred to as the new covenant. It is always referred to as a new covenant. It is only the cup of the
new covenant itself that Jesus calls 'The new covenant'.

20 Also, the cup in the same way after they had the evening meal, he saying: This cup means the new covenant by virtue
of my blood, which is to be poured out in your behalf (Luke 22).
25 He did likewise respecting the cup also, after he had the evening meal, saying: This cup means the new covenant by
virtue of my blood. Keep doing this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me (1 Corinthians 11).
31 Look! There are days coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of Israel and with the
house of Judah a new covenant (Jeremiah 31).
6 who has indeed adequately qualified us to be ministers of a new covenant, not of a written code, but of spirit; for the
written code condemns to death, but the spirit makes alive (2 Corinthians 3).
8 for he does find fault with the people when he says: Look! There are days coming, says Jehovah, and I will conclude
with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant (Hebrews 8).
13 In his saying a new [covenant] he has made the former one obsolete. Now that which is made obsolete and growing
old is near to vanishing away (Hebrews 8).
15 So that is why he is a mediator of a new covenant, in order that, because a death has occurred for [their] release by
ransom from the transgressions under the former covenant, the ones who have been called might receive the promise of
the everlasting inheritance (Hebrews 9)
24 and Jesus the mediator of a new covenant, and the blood of sprinkling, which speaks in a better way than Abel's
[blood] (Hebrews 12).

If 'the' new covenant is merely 'a' new covenant, then there is at least one further new covenant. It is as simple as that.
We can find out a bit about the covenant of Keturah from the next verses of Genesis 25:

2 And she bore to him (Corrected - NWT) Zimran and Jokshan and Medan and Midian and Ishbak and Shuah.
3 And Jokshan became father to Sheba and Dedan, And the sons of Dedan became Asshurim and Letushim and
Leummim.
4 And the sons of Midian were Ephah and Epher and Hanoch and Abida and Eldaah.
All these were the sons of Keturah.
5 Later on Abraham gave everything he had to Isaac,
6 but to the sons of the concubines that Abraham had Abraham gave gifts. Then he sent them away from Isaac his son,
while he was still alive, eastward, to the land of the East (Genesis 25).

That’s 16 sons, although Asshurim and Letushim and Leummim could be generic plural names for the sons of Asshur,
Letush and Leum. However Dedan himself obviously only had the 3 sons. Actually Hebrew men did have plural names on
occasion, for example Kittim, Dodanim, Mizraim and Mizraim's 7 sons: Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, Pathrusim,
Casluhim and Caphtorim (Genesis 10). Also Muppim and Huppim were sons of Benjamin and Hushim was a son of Dan
(Genesis 46).

However these 3 names: Asshurim and Letushim and Leummim leave us with an ambiguity. But the holy spirit uses
ambiguities to say something, for it is very aware of its own ambiguities, they are not mistakes, they are not oversights,
they are designed ambiguities. Consider the other appearance of Keturah in the bible:

32 As for the sons of Keturah, Abraham's concubine, she gave birth to:
Zimran and Jokshan and Medan and Midian and Ishbak and Shuah
And the sons of Jokshan were Sheba and Dedan
33 And the sons of Midian were Ephah and Epher and Hanoch and Abida and Eldaah
All these were the sons of Keturah (1 Chronicles 1).

The sons of Dedan with the plural names are missing!! Here we only have 13 sons of Keturah as a concubine but we
have 16 sons of hers as a wife! So basically Abraham married Keturah after giving him the 13 sons mentioned above and
then had 3 more sons, these being Asshurim, Letushim and Leummim. But this further procreative arrangement of
Keturah being Abraham's concubine stands for a further covenant which since she is not a wife but a slave has a
dependency on one of the other covenants. In other words it is a slave covenant of one of the other covenants which was
made after Sarah, the new covenant, and before Keturah was actually married. But since the same woman Keturah was
both a slave and a wife, this slave covenant must be slaving for the covenant symbolized by Keturah as a wife, i.e. the
second new covenant. So we have found a second new covenant with a further slave covenant made in advance of it, but
after the first new covenant.

What is this covenant of Keturah and who is it between?

The Hebrew word for Keturah is  and is from the root  which means either:

i. Incense or sacrificial smoke

ii. Knots, difficult questions (Ben Davidson Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon)

God used to enjoy the smoke rising from sacrifices made to him:
20 And Noah began to build an altar to Jehovah and to take some of all the clean beasts and of all the clean flying
creatures and to offer burnt offerings upon the altar.
21 And Jehovah began to smell a restful odor, and so Jehovah said in his heart: Never again shall I call down evil upon
the ground on man's account, because the inclination of the heart of man is bad from his youth up; and never again shall
I deal every living thing a blow just as I have done (Genesis 8:20,21).

But sacrifices ended with Jesus' sacrifice before the covenant of Keturah was made. So the meaning for the covenant
which she symbolizes must be the difficult questions and knots. This meaning does not relate to the more difficult
questions in trivia game shows, it is the difficult questions and knots in the bible, many of which are tackled in this
website/book. Today Jehovah gets pleasure from our consideration of the difficult questions and knots in his holy book.
Holy posers is what he has given us. This is a restful thing for our God, however, superficial, lobotomized devotion to a
meeting time or a meeting place or a doctrine or a religious leader, on the other hand, is not a restful thing to him.

5 Later on Abraham gave everything he had to Isaac, but to the sons of the concubines that Abraham had Abraham gave
gifts.
6 Then he sent them away from Isaac his son, while he was still alive, eastward, to the land of the East (Genesis 25).

Abraham gave the sons of Keturah gifts, and he sent them away from Isaac his son (by Sarah) eastward, to the land of
the east! Whilst he was still alive. So before the Abrahamic covenant ends we know that the sons of Sarah and the sons
of Keturah will be split up. The sons of Keturah who go eastwards to the land of the east are going to Eden, the new
Eden, the Kingdom of God on earth. So these sons are the last congregation of true Christians who carry on to the end
and gain entry to the Kingdom of God, the second Eden.

The gifts are the modern day gifts of the spirit, which are basically the likes of the things in this work, which are deduced
by untying knots, as the Queen of Babylon recognized in the case of Daniel the prophet:

12 Forasmuch as an extraordinary spirit and knowledge and insight to interpret dreams and the explanation of riddles and
the untying of knots had been found in him, in Daniel, whom the king himself named Belteshazzar. Now let Daniel himself
be called, that he may show the very interpretation (Daniel 5).

For there was a prophet who said:

28 And after that it must occur that I shall pour out my spirit on every sort of flesh, and your sons and your daughters will
certainly prophesy. As for your old men, dreams they will dream. As for your young men, visions they will see (Joel 2).

And Peter at Pentecost in 33 AD explained that the 'tongues as if of fire' (Acts 2:3), which plainly relate to a decoded
biblical knowledge of the details Armageddon...

3 And tongues as if of fire became visible to them and were distributed about, and one sat upon each one of them,
4 and they all became filled with holy spirit and started to speak with different tongues, just as the spirit was granting them
to make utterance (Acts 2).

was a fulfillment of the words of Joel above which he quoted as follows:

17 And in the last days, God says: I shall pour out some of my spirit upon every sort of flesh, and your sons and your
daughters will prophesy and your young men will see visions and your old men will dream dreams;
18 and even upon my men slaves and my women slaves I will pour out some of my spirit in those days and they will
prophesy (Acts 2).

But having quoted it himself he makes it the holy word again. And so there is to be a further fulfillment to Acts 2:17, 18 in
the last days not of the physical Jewish system of things but of the World itself. And here it is!! Here they are the gifts from
God. And as a result of these gifts the following situation will pertain:

12 And they will by no means teach each one his fellow citizen and each one his brother, saying: Know Jehovah! For they
will all know me, from [the] least one to [the] greatest one of them.
For I shall be merciful to their unrighteous deeds, and I shall by no means call their sins to mind anymore (Hebrews 8).

Now if there is a newer covenant then there is a newer messenger of that covenant and a newer mediator of that
covenant. In the case of the Law covenant, the Messenger was Moses, who came down from the mountain with the
tablets, and the Mediator was Moses, for God said:
27 Write to you namely the words, the these, because upon account of the words, the these, I made with you covenant,
and with Israel (Exodus 34 NIVHEOT).

1 These are the words of the covenant that Jehovah commanded Moses to conclude with the sons of Israel in the land of
Moab aside from the covenant that he had concluded with them in Horeb (Deuteronomy 29).

For the newer mediator is the covenanter (indirectly) with God actually through Michael and Abraham. Through Abraham
because all the families of the earth will bless themselves through him, and any blessings follow from covenants with God.
And through Michael because God saying: and I shall by no means call their sins to mind anymore, means that those in
the covenant have the gift of a clean conscience, which means that they are in the ARC. Paul said:

5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2).

This statement does not preclude Moses from being a mediator. It precludes Moses from mediating directly between God
and men at the time 1 Timothy was written. Jesus is the master mediator of the ARC. Abraham and Moses were master
covenanters or sub mediators of various master covenants.

19 Why, then, the Law? It was added to make transgressions manifest, until the seed should arrive to whom the promise
had been made; and it was transmitted through angels by the hand of a mediator (Galatians 3).

6 But now [Jesus] has obtained a more excellent public service, so that he is also the mediator of a correspondingly better
covenant, which has been legally established upon better promises (Hebrews 8).

If Jesus was also the mediator of a (correspondingly better) covenant, then Moses too was a mediator. So Behold how
great this man Jesus is, for he is not only a prince of princes and a Lord of Lords and a King of Kings, but also a mediator
of mediators!

Likewise in the case of the New covenant the messenger was Jesus, and the Mediator was Jesus for he himself said:

29 And I make a covenant with you just as my father has made a covenant with me, for a kingdom (Luke 22).

And Paul said:

6 But now [Jesus] has obtained a more excellent public service, so that he is also the mediator of a correspondingly better
covenant, which has been legally established upon better promises.
7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second (Hebrews 8).

Again not 'the' second covenant, but 'a' second covenant.

15 So that is why he is a mediator of a new covenant, in order that, because a death has occurred for [their] release by
ransom from the transgressions under the former covenant, the ones who have been called might receive the promise of
the everlasting inheritance (Hebrews 9:15).

Again not 'the new covenant', but 'a new covenant' - see [13]. And Malachi cries out at the end of the old testament:

1 Look! I am sending my messenger, and he must clear up a way before me. And suddenly there will come to his temple
the [true] Lord, whom you people are seeking, and the messenger of the covenant in whom you are delighting. Look! He
will certainly come, Jehovah of armies has said (Malachi 3:1).

The literal fulfillment of this was Jesus Christ. The messenger and mediator of the new covenant. So likewise with the
Second new covenant, the messenger will be the mediator. You have just been given the Message.

Technical Note on cups and covenants:

Gordon first informed the Watchtower about the second new covenant on 1993Adar17, in a letter to them about the
forthcoming memorial which he wanted to partake of in a different way (He was mistaken about partaking in that
memorial). James and John, the sons of Zebedee prefigure two new mediators of two further new covenants:
23 He said to them: You will indeed drink my cup, but this sitting down at my right hand and my left is not mine to give, but
it belongs to those for whom it has been prepared by my father.
24 When the 10 others heard this, they became indignant at the two brothers (Matt 20).

38 But Jesus said to them: You do not know what you are asking for. Are you able to drink the cup which I am drinking, or
to be baptized with the baptism with which I am being baptized?
39 They said to him: We are able - (Amen!)
At that Jesus said to them: The cup which I am drinking you will drink, and the baptism with which I am being baptized,
you will be baptized.
40 However this sitting down at my right or at my left is not mine to give, but belongs to those for whom it has been
prepared.
41 Well, when the 10 others heard about it, they started to be indignant at James and John (Mark 10).

The '10 others' are the ten watches of spiritual Israel in FDS1 and FDS3 - see [34], [35], [36]. James is Paul and John is
Gordon here. And both Paul and Gordon drink a cup which represents a new covenant between God and each of them
through Jesus and Abraham, for they are brothers in Jacob, sons of the JAC. For Jesus accepted a cup:

17 And accepting the cup, he gave thanks and said: Take this and pass it from one to another among yourselves (Luke
22).

20 This cup means the new covenant by virtue of my blood (Luke 22).

Jesus’ cup was not merely to drink his own blood but rather to pour it out to his father for the sake of all of us, and for the
sake of Adam in particular. Hence he prayed in Gethsemane:

36 And he went on to say: Abba, Father, all things are possible to you; remove this cup from me. Yet not what I want, but
what you want (Mark 14).

This cup that Jesus asked to be removed from him was the cup of the ARC through which covenant Jesus would die as
an angel and go to Tartarus initially. And he did not want to drink it (who would), but he did it. He did it for God and for
Adam and for Adam’s sons. This was the greatness of his sacrifice! Total selflessness. Now since the cup of Jesus was a
covenant, the ARC, and since both James and John also drink the cup which Jesus drinks, they are symbolically standing
for two other new covenants, which are subcovenants of the ARC. These are the 2NC and the 2NCH.

Remember the wife of Lot

Before Jesus died he left us with the haunting words: 'Remember the wife of Lot. The context of his words was:

29 But on the day that Lot came out of Sodom it rained fire and sulphur from heaven and destroyed them all.
30 The same way it will be on that day when the Son of man is to be revealed.
31 On that day let the person that is on the housetop but whose movable things are in the house not come down to pick
these up, and the person out in the field, let him likewise not return to the things behind.
32 Remember the wife of Lot (Luke 17).

Jesus is telling us here that the day of the destruction of Sodom by fire is an archetype for the day when the son of man is
revealed. But quite obviously the day of the destruction of Sodom by fire from heaven symbolically represents the day of
the fiery destruction of Armageddon. From this we can deduce that the son of man (Jesus) is revealed during the 'day' of
Armageddon.

19 For the eager expectation of the creation is waiting for the revealing of the sons of God (Romans 8).
This is referring to the same revealing, of the son of man and the sons of God.

What is this 'son of man' the reader might ask? Well, a son in biblical times was a means of continuing your seed. Now
Adam, having been sentenced to death, was no longer able to continue seed who were sons of God, like he was. But
Jesus, having ransomed him, was now able to procreate in the way that Adam had lost the capability of doing. So Jesus
can now provide judicially living children for Adam, and therefore is his 'procreative son'. But Adam means 'man' in
Hebrew. So Jesus, the procreative son of Adam is the procreative son of 'man' i.e. the son of man. Jesus was the son of
'Adam before he sinned' in this sense. We covered this in section [7] on the ransom. Jesus having ransomed Adam earns
the Fatherhood rights that Adam would have had, had he not sinned.
We have seen above from Paul's inspired interpretation of the symbolic meanings of Hagar and Sarah, Abraham's wives,
in Galatians 4, that wives can stand for covenants in the scriptures. So Lot's wife could stand for a covenant too, following
the inspired leading of Paul, although we are effectively using the Symbolic Structure Principle of the bible code here. In
the account of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 19, God sent two angels to Sodom and they saved Lot
and his two daughters and his wife leading them out of Sodom by their hands. God told Lot and his family:

17 And it came about that, as soon as they had brought them forth to the outskirts, he began to say: Escape for your soul!
Do not look behind you and do not stand still in all the District! Escape to the mountainous region for fear you may be
swept away! (Genesis 19)

Now Lot's wife did not listen to this admonition:

26 And his wife began to look around from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt (Genesis 19).

It is important to understand that this occurred in the literal meaning. A God who can resurrect Lazarus, a man who had been dead for
4 days, a God who can part the Red Sea, who can kill all of the firstborn sons of the Egyptians, man and beast in one night, such a God
would have no problem in dehydrating one woman. But there is a symbolic meaning to all of this, following the lead of St. Paul or
from the Symbolic Structure Principle of the Code. Lot survived the destruction of Sodom with his two daughters as humans.

Lot, his wife, his two daughters, the two angels and the inhabitants of Zoar and the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah
stand for angels and people and groups of people at Armageddon - U154. Briefly:

Lot is the administration of FDS4

Lot's wife is the LWs, all of whom are individually subject to the administration of FDS4
Lot's wife becoming a pillar of salt is the disfellowshipping of the LWs who lose their 2AC capability but retain their 1AC
capability when Jesus vomits them out of his mouth in 2007Elul. At this time their water baptism ends, so they become
dehydrated into salt, but they remain the true religion, hence they are a pillar (holding up a temple) and they still preserve
flesh (1AC capability) as salt does.
The two angels are Melchizedek and Michael; saving the LWs through the PARC and the ARC (the LWs have lost their
water baptism under the HARC).
Zoar is all those in the 1AC who were never in the LWs (the good guys from Christendom and from Babylon)
Sodom is Christendom with Lot in their gate, judging them
Gomorrah is non Christian false religion (the rest of Babylon).
The firstborn daughter of Lot is the 1BRC for sons of the 3AC
The second born daughter of Lot is the 2BRC for sons of the or the 1AC but not the 3AC
Lot's sons in law are intended administrations for those raptured (i.e. people who think they will run the Kingdom of God)
Wine given to Lot: The blood of the 1BRC on the first night of incest and the blood of the 2BRC on the second night.
The men of Sodom trying to have intercourse with Michael and Melchizedek (but not Gabriel), is their trying to enter the
PARC and the ARC illegally.

19 All the holy contributions, which the sons of Israel will contribute to Jehovah, I have given to you and your sons and
your daughters with you, as an allowance to time indefinite. It is a covenant of salt to time indefinite before Jehovah for
you and your offspring with you (Numbers 18:19).

But not only to them, there was also such a covenant given to David and his sons:

5 Is it not for you to know that Jehovah the God of Israel himself gave a kingdom to David over Israel to time indefinite, to him and to
his sons, by a covenant of salt? (2 Chronicles 13:5).

So there are two covenants of salt one to Moses and one to David. Lot's wife is some kind of a greater covenant of salt
because the offices of king and priest were combined at Jesus' death. For he has become our high priest and our king.

One race does not need 3 fathers!

It is a simple observation. The physical sons of Israel had three fathers, namely, Jacob (whose name was changed to
Israel), Isaac, and Abraham. This is quite obviously symbolizing 3 races of people, in the greater meaning. So there are 3
main categories of Abraham's greater seed. These are the sons of the 1AC, the sons of the PARC, the sons of Abraham,
and the sons of the 2AC, the sons of Isaac, the sons of the HARC, and the sons of the 3AC, the sons of Jacob, the sons
of the ARC. So there are three types of God's people, those with faith, those with a water baptism and those with a spirit
baptism.
The 4 wives of Jacob

We have discovered from Jesus' words, that John and James were mediators of two further new covenants, drinking the
same 'cup' that Jesus 'drank'. In fact it is not hard to see that the two robbers impaled or crucified either side of Jesus, two
men who certainly died the same death as him, also prefigures the two further mediators of two further new covenants.
We also know that Keturah was both a slave and then a wife, so she represents two new covenants. So as things stand
we have 3 new covenants in all.

Covenant Cup Crucifixion

The new heavenly covenant Sarah Jesus Jesus
The new earthly slave covenant Keturah as slave John Left hand robber
The new earthly covenant Keturah as wife James Right hand robber

We do not know how you, the reader, feel about these two extras at Jesus' death. What were they doing there? This is the
singular most important event in the whole of the history of man, since Adam's sin, and we have two co-stars being
nominated in the category of best supporting crucifixion. Why on earth would God countenance such a thing? What was
the relationship between these 3 deaths? Well it is described above in one meaning...

We know that Keturah was a slave before she became a wife, and she had kids for Abraham after Sarah did. So the order
of these 3 covenants is as above. But is there any advance on 3? This is where the big picture begins. Can you think of a
descendant of Abraham who had at least three wives??

The answer is Jacob; he had four, two free and two slaves. So far we have 3, two free and one slave, so there is one
more slave covenant, a slave covenant to the new (heavenly) covenant.

Genesis 30 tells us that the order of procreation from Jacob, who stands for Jesus here, was as follows:

Sons Wife/Maid of Jacob Wife/Maid of Abraham Covenant

Reuben, Simeon, Levi,
4 sons of Leah Sarah New covenant (1NC)
Judah
New earthly slave covenant
Dan, Naphtali 2 sons of Bilhah (Rachel's slave) Keturah as slave (2NCH) second new
covenant helpers
New slave covenant (1NCH)
Gad, Asher 2 sons of Zilpah (Leah's slave) Hagar (Sarah's slave)
First new covenant helpers
Issachar, Zebulun 2 further sons of Leah Sarah New covenant (1NC)
New earthly covenant (2NC)
Joseph, Benjamin 2 sons of Rachel Keturah as wife
second new covenant.

Here, Hagar and Sarah without Keturah symbolize the Law and the New covenant. But with Keturah, Hagar symbolizes
another slave covenant, for she was Sarah’s slave.

Now you can see a very, very, important thing. There is a gap in the procreation of Leah. This is a gap in the new
covenant saints. In fact this gap was 1800 years long, or '5 times' of no new covenant saint baptism, see - [The Times
Principle], [Intermission Times]. This is more or less the gap between the two presences of the Christ. He is present in
body through his bride who is the new covenant saints as a group. But when there are no new covenant saints around, he
is absent. You can also see 5 true Christian peoples (as regards spirit baptism), although we only have 4 true Christian
religions as we understand it (from 4 Elijah's with 4 baptisms into the 2AC). In fact Bilhah and Zilpah were in the same
religion, FDS2 - see [34]. John and James prefigure the mediators of Bilhah and Rachel, who were Paul and Gordon. We
do not know who mediated Zilpah at this point.

Technical note:

The more inquisitive reader might be asking: "Fine so what do all their sons symbolize?" The answer is: Calls to be
baptized into the various covenants. Reuben was the call to the men of Judah to be baptized into the new covenant; Peter
was the first of these, baptized after Jesus came down from the 40 days in the wilderness. Simeon was the call to the
proselytes to be baptized into the new covenant, which was made at Pentecost 33 CE (Acts 2:5-10). Levi was the
Samaritan call (Acts 8) and Judah was the Gentile call (Acts 10). These 12 sons are the 12 pearl gates of heavenly
Jerusalem, which are 12 calls to be baptized into 4 covenants.

21 Also, the 12 gates were 12 pearls; each one of the gates was made of one pearl. And the broad way of the city was
pure gold, as transparent glass (Revelation 21).

The validation sacrifice for the second new covenant John the baptist, it is a covenant for half a kingdom, the earthly half,
as Herod Antipas said to Herodias' daughter.

Now that we have grasped the fundamentals of God’s Covenants, we must address what we must do to become part of
these covenants and if we don’t, what effect it may have on our salvation.

Surviving Armageddon

50% Survive Armageddon and 50% do not

'Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side. My great concern is to be on God's side' - Abraham Lincoln

Why would God kill 50% of mankind the reader asks? The answer is that he offers them citizenship of the Kingdom of
God and they do not accept his offer. This offer will be very real and unambiguous before Armageddon when Jesus' bride
(the 1NC saints) appears visibly, by which time it is too late to be saved. The 50% who do not want to know about his
kingdom, and who reject both God and Jesus and the kingdom, plainly will not gain entry. Satan's kingdom on the other
hand ends on 2008Nisan14 (March 21st) so they have nowhere to go. They basically commit suicide, although many will
not see it as that, because a man sees what he wants to see, as does a woman. This emphatically does not mean that
one has to actually join the true religion at that time in order to be saved. In fact more are saved who have not joined than
who have joined! Such is the ineptitude of the true religion and such is the mercy of God.

500 Million in the Great Crowd

29 Jesus said: Truly I say to you men, No one has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields
for my sake and for the sake of the good news
30 who will not get a hundredfold now in this period of time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children
and fields, with persecutions, and in the coming system of things everlasting life (Mark 10).

This refers to those who leave FDS3, which had 5 - 5.5 million at it’s fall when it losts its water baptism on 2001Tishri30,
and join FDS4, which will have 100x more or 500 to 550 million.

30 And every tenth part of the land, out of the seed of the land and the fruit of the tree, belongs to Jehovah. It is
something holy to Jehovah (Leviticus 27).

13 And there will still be in it a tenth, and it must again become something for burning down, like a big tree and like a
massive tree in which, when there is a cutting down [of them], there is a stump; a holy seed will be the stump of it (Isaiah
6).

19 Then he blessed him and said: Blessed be Abram of the Most High God, Producer of heaven and earth.
20 And blessed be the Most High God, Who has delivered your oppressors into your hand!
At that Abram gave him a tenth of everything (Genesis 14).

The LWs have one tenth of the population of the world in the true church on 2008Nisan14 when we celebrate the 1AC
and the 1NC on the last day of this system. This tenth is a holy seed. Now 10% of 5/5.5 billion is 500/550 million. So the
LWs will be around 500/550 million in size on 2008Nisan14.

8 And I saw, and, look! a pale horse; and the one seated upon it had the name Death. And Hades was closely following
him. And authority was given them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with a long sword and with food shortage and
with deadly plague and by the wild beasts of the earth (Revelation 6).

This is physical death (Hades). In fact Death, who is Satan, is standing for Gehenna which is the second death. Hades,
(the grave) is standing for temporary death, from which there is a resurrection. This scripture plainly shows there are two
types of death. The first death is a physical death, and the second death is a soul-less spectator punishment. In the first
case you lose your fleshly body, in the second case you lose your angelic body. But neither death is permanent - see
[13a]. The earth here is the physical earth because the spiritual earth, namely God's administration, does not physically
kill people. So 25% of humans die prematurely before Armageddon, so 5 billion is about right in 2008 given that it would
have been 6.5 billion were it not for 25% of us been wiped out by the above, which is directly from Satan, the lying
manslayer.

50% are Saved and 50% Killed at Armageddon

2.5 BILLION SAVED! 2.5 BILLION KILLED!

(Read all about it!)

We already know that more are killed than get 'life' at the end of the World from Jesus’ words...

13 Go in through the narrow gate; because broad and spacious is the road leading off into destruction, and many are the
ones going in through it.
14 Whereas narrow is the gate and cramped the road leading off into life, and few are the ones finding it (Matthew 7).

So those gaining judicial life are few and therefore would have to be considerably less than 50%. But many are saved
without having judicial life. In fact the majority of those saved are judicially dead in the Kingdom of God (having no
associated angels, not being spirit sons of God), although they must be born again to enter the Kingdom, they borrow a
temporary angelic vehicle for that purpose. This has taken us a long time to understand - too long! For Jesus was asked...

23 Now a certain man said to him: Lord, are those who are being saved few? He said to them:
24 Exert yourselves vigorously to get in through the narrow door, because many, I tell you, will seek to get in but will not
be able,
25 when once the householder has got up and locked the door, and you start to stand outside and to knock at the door,
saying, 'Sir, open to us.' But in answer he will say to you, 'I do not know where you are from.'
26 Then you will start saying, 'We ate and drank in front of you, and you taught in our broad ways.'
27 But he will speak and say to you, 'I do not know where you are from. Get away from me, all you workers of
unrighteousness!'
28 There is where [your] weeping and the gnashing of [your] teeth will be, when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob
and all the prophets in the kingdom of God, but yourselves thrown outside.
29 Furthermore, people will come from eastern parts and western, and from north and south, and will recline at the table
in the kingdom of God (Luke 13).

But then Matthew gives the game away saying...

11 But I tell you that many from eastern parts and western parts will come and recline at the table with Abraham and Isaac
and Jacob in the kingdom of the heavens;

12 whereas the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the darkness outside. There is where [their] weeping and the
gnashing of [their] teeth will be (Matthew 8).

So the answer is no, those being saved are many! But those going through the narrow gate into judicial life, i.e. those
being born again in spirit other than through a rapture covenant are few. Now the percentage of people saved in the end
is very plain from the Gospels. Matthew 24 refers to the invisible presence of the bride of Christ before Armageddon...

38 For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in
marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark;
39 and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away, so the presence of the Son of man will be.
40 Then 2 will be in the field: one [male] will be taken along and the other [male] will be abandoned [in the old true
church];
41 2 will be grinding at the hand mill: one [female] will be taken along and the other [female] will be abandoned [in the old
true church] (Matthew 24).

50% of those men and women working in the old true church enter into the new true church. But Luke 17 refers to the
visible presence of his bride at the start of the kingdom and the rapture...
28 Likewise, just as it occurred in the days of Lot: they were eating, they were drinking, they were buying, they were
selling, they were planting, they were building.
29 But on the day that Lot came out of Sodom it rained fire and sulphur from heaven and destroyed them all.
30 The same way it will be on that day when the Son of man is to be revealed.
31 On that day let the person that is on the housetop but whose movable things are in the house not come down to pick
these up, and the person out in the field, let him likewise not return to the things behind.
32 Remember the wife of Lot.
33 Whoever seeks to keep his soul safe for himself will lose it, but whoever loses it will preserve it alive.
34 I tell you, In that night [the night of the rapture] 2 will be in one bed; the one [male] will be taken along, but the other
[male] will be abandoned [to the fire of Armageddon, the lava of an extinction level volcanic event].
35 There will be 2 grinding at the same mill; the one [female] will be taken along [the day of the rapture, a simultaneous
event across all time zones??], but the other [female] will be abandoned [to the fire of Armageddon, the lava of an
extinction level volcanic event] (Luke 17).

So Luke 17 tells us that 50% of men and 50% of women are saved and 50% are saved at day and 50% are saved at night
during the rapture. So this is an instantaneous thing across all time zone, half of which will be in the night and the other
half of which will be in the day.

I must close with this….all of us are free to choose how we live. That right of “free will” is a God given right. It is up to us
what we do with it however, so bear in mind, you only have one life in the flesh and you better do the right thing with it!
It’s not hard to see from the pages of this book that many of the deep and hidden meanings of the Word are being freely
fed at the appointed time. This is by the grace of God and he deserves all of the glory for what is on these pages and in
our website. What you have witnessed here is only the tip of the biblical iceberg as far as understandings go. At the end
of this book is a list as of the date of publishing, of all of our current understandings. These are changing rapidly as we
near the end of this system of things…just as prophesized. I implore all of you to use your heartfelt courage to test your
interpretations not against doctrines of churches or man but against all other scriptures relating to the subject matter of
your interpretation. When you have harmonized them all then you have God’s interpretation

This courage can really only come from love. Love for God, love for Jesus, or love for the truth. It is like the apostle John
said, the one whom Jesus loved especially:

18 There is no fear in love, but perfect love throws fear outside, because fear exercises a restraint. Indeed, he that is
under fear has not been made perfect in love (1 John 4).

So do you love your religion more than you love God? The Pharisees who killed Jesus did. That was why they killed him.
But Jesus said:

37 He that has greater affection for father or mother than for me is not worthy of me; and he that has greater affection for
son or daughter than for me is not worthy of me (Matthew 10).

He said this not because he wanted to split up families but because he wanted people to understand that in the case
where a family is already divided over God or over following Jesus, that family members would have a choice to make.
But he furnished a pretty comprehensive guarantee to us in this regard saying:

29 Jesus said: Truly I say to you men, No one has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields
for my sake and for the sake of the good news.
30 Who will not get a hundredfold now in this period of time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children
and fields, with persecutions, and in the coming system of things everlasting life (Mark 10).

But this division of the physical family also applies in the case of the spiritual family, the congregation of your religion. So
do you love Jesus more than you love your church? If you do not then you are not a true Christian, you are a churchian.
And most church goers fall into this latter category, because this is what most priests want them to do. It is a case of the
blind following the blind. These 'Christians' are therefore 'Blindians'. Spirituality is an individual thing; it is not a herd
phenomenon. One must decide for oneself with one's God given power of reason whether it was God indeed who gave us
this power. And if God did create our intelligence, then we should show our gratitude to him, by using it to search for him,
until we have for a fact discovered him.

7 Keep on asking, and it will be given you; keep on seeking, and you will find; keep on knocking, and it will be opened to
you (Matthew 7).

Because he is not so far away:

26 And he made out of one [man] every nation of men, to dwell upon the entire surface of the earth, and he decreed the
appointed times and the set limits of the dwelling of [men],
27 for them to seek God, if they might grope for him and really find him, although, in fact, he is not far off from each one of
us (Acts 17).

He is hiding behind a thin wall of reasoning. So here is the simple way to determine which one is the true religion.
Perhaps you will see just how thin this wall of reasoning is. This is a determination that cannot be made by your priest, it
cannot be made by your best friend, it cannot by made by your relatives, it cannot be made by a BBC documentary, or by
the government or by the Sun newspaper. It cannot even be made by the Sunday Times Newspaper, and you will not find
much help in the Catholic Encyclopedia. It cannot be made by the most religious person you know, or by the most
intelligent person you know or by the most enlightened person you know. It can only be made by you.

Either we have decoded the bible or we haven't. If we haven't then we are not the true religion. If we have then we are the
true religion, because the scripture says:

33 So with many illustrations of that sort he would speak the word to them ['a great crowd' Mark 4:1], as far as they were
able to listen.
34 Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them, but privately to his disciples he would explain all things
(Mark 4).

So if we have decoded the bible, then Jesus has privately explained all things to us through our hard work and research.
This means we are his true disciples. As regards the other religions, since they do not know the symbolic code, they are
still seeing everything in illustrations, so they are just a part of the 'crowd'. They are therefore not his true disciples. Of
course one cannot correctly decode the bible unless God authorizes it. We are not in competition with God here. It is only
by the grace of God and his Glory through His Son Jesus Christ who has opened his book up to us at this time. And it
was done so that we may pass this on to you as was prophesied by Daniel at the time of the end.

I hope that these understandings have enabled you to evolve spiritually and academically enough to provoke you to take
the time and effort to persist in your quest to seek the truth. For it is said in Gen 3:19, in the sweat of thy face shalt thou
eat bread until thou return unto the ground. I entreat you now to go to our main research site at www.truebiblecode.com
and do as much personal research as possible. We have opened up a number of new scriptures since this publication and
the only way to keep up with our understanding is to visit our web site.