Evidence of Student Based Learning
Evidence of Student Based Learning
Michaela Duranti
Towson University
Evidence of Student Learning 2
Middle School, located in Reisterstown, Maryland. Franklin Middle offers enrollment in 6th, 7th,
and 8th grade, with the average class size being 27.6 students. At Franklin Middle School, there
is a wide range of students in classroom models consisting of the following: inclusion, self-
contained, general education, and resource room. There are currently 1,305 students that attend
Franklin Middle School, 55% are male, while the remaining 45% are female; 4 out of every 10
students receive a free or reduced lunch. The demographic amongst students at this school are
the following: 40.1% African American, 37.5% White, 11.4% Hispanic, 6.3% Asian, 4.6% Two
Races, and American Indian 0.1%. As far as exceptionalities go, Franklin Middle School offers
programs for students with specific special needs, students who have an IEP or 504 plan, and
students that are gifted and talented. In terms of linguistic differences, when researching Franklin
Middle School, there was no specific information regarding language diversity present in the
school. However, based on my own observations, it is evident that language diversity certainly
does exist within the school. Oral and written language development based on the English
Language Arts (ELA) exam had a passing rate of 41% at Franklin Middle School, which is
The classroom model in which this assignment was completed was a self-contained
CALS (Communication and Learning Support) program. This class consists of six students, five
of which are male and one student that is female. Each student in this class has been diagnosed
with autism. There are no linguistic differences present in this classroom. Each student speaks
English as their first and only language. As for cultural differences, one student in the class is
Evidence of Student Learning 3
White, three are African American, and two students are two or more races. Each student in this
classroom is assessed both formally and informally on their oral and written language
development on a very consistent basis throughout the school year. Based on these assessments
and observation, it is clear each student is making positive advances toward achieving their oral
and written language goals that are documented on the Individualized Educations Plans (IEPs).
multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade 1 reading and content, choosing flexibly
This unit will take place over a five-day period, incorporating three different lessons. The
pre-assessment will take place on Monday, and the first lesson will also be taught on Monday.
The second lesson will be taught on Tuesday, the third lesson on Wednesday, and the post-
assessment will also be completed on Thursday. Students will be taught new vocabulary terms
based on different types of weather. The focus will mainly be on eight specific vocabulary words
and their ability to understand these words at the end of each lesson. The meaningful and
measurable objectives that I have developed will stay consistent throughout the three lessons,
with the only difference being the story that we are reading. The objectives for the lesson will be:
Evidence of Student Learning 4
Lesson #1:
I can identify and determine meaning of key vocabulary terms from the story.
Lesson #2:
I can identify and determine meaning of key vocabulary terms from the story.
Lesson #3:
I can identify and determine meaning of key vocabulary terms from the story.
Students will demonstrate the knowledge that they have gained through both assessments
and verbal responses throughout instruction. While we are reading each story, I will constantly
be asking questions to my students to not only keep their attention/focus, but to also assess their
comprehension. A second informal method I will use for students to demonstrate the knowledge
they have learned will be through an online quiz system called “Kahoot”. “Kahoot” is an online
quiz system that asks students a series of questions and requires them to choose an answer
between two, three, or four options. In addition, multiple formative assessments will be
When the unit has been completed, each student will complete a summative assessment
that I have created based on the ability levels of each of my students. The variability that takes
place throughout each assessment does not differ in content, but only in format. For two of my
students that have a very similar reading level of <K.0, their assessment will require them to cut
out the picture of a vocabulary word that corresponds with the actual term and glue it in the
Page #1 focuses on the students’ knowledge of four specific vocabulary words, which are
Page #2 focuses on the students’ knowledge of four specific vocabulary words, which are cold,
For two of my students that have a very similar reading level of <K.0 and 1.0, their assessment
will require them to cut out a picture of a vocabulary word that can be used to complete a cloze
Page #1 focuses on the students’ knowledge of four specific vocabulary words, which are
Page #2 focuses on the students’ knowledge of four specific vocabulary words, which are cold,
For two of my students that have a very similar reading level of 1.2 and 1.0, their assessment will
require them to choose one of four words in a “Word Bank” that is listed at the bottom of the
page to successfully complete cloze sentences. A picture of this assessment has been attached
below:
Page #1 focuses on the students’ knowledge of four specific vocabulary words, which are
Page #2 focuses on the students’ knowledge of four specific vocabulary words, which are cold,
Seeing that my students would be at a disadvantage for any pre-assessment that I could
develop for them due to the fact that they have not been taught the vocabulary terms or read any
about the best possible ways to assess my students and decided to implement activities that the
students are familiar with. Based on my assessments, I delivered instruction that provided my
The formative assessments that I have developed will challenge each student to use their
knowledge of the new information we learned each day. Differentiation takes places between
each formative assessment strategy that I have chosen based on the academic level of my
students. The formative assessments for four of my students at a similar academic level will
require them to answer multiple choice questions that are not only related to the story, but also
focus on specifc vocabulary words. Two of my other students who preform at similar academic
Evidence of Student Learning 10
levels will be required to finish a cloze sentence assignment that requires them to look back in
To assess my students’ learning, I have developed a scoring tool that will be converted
into percentages once each student has been assessed. Four of my students that preform on a
similar academic level will be required to complete six questions, and my two students who
preform at a higher level will be required to answer eight questions. Due to the fact that each
assessment was multiple choice or fill in the blank, it was easy to calculate how many questions
the students answered correctly in comparison to the amount of total questions on the
assessment. Each day I collected all of my students’ work so that I could closely monitor their
Part C: Instruction
Narrative:
During this unit students will be challenged to retrain information based on vocabulary
words related to Weather. To gain the attention of my students, I begin each lesson by having
one of my students read the objectives out loud. I then do a sign language word for the day that
correlates with an impotant word in our story. We practice the sign language word a few times,
and then it is time to read! Throughout each story that we read I stop at certain points to ask my
students questions, and to keep them engaged. For example, I point to a picture and I can ask a
student “What is this up in the sky?” and they will reply with the word, “clouds!” After we have
completed the reading, we do a fun and engaging activity as a class. Each student gets there own
device, and we do a Kahoot! Kahoot is an online quiz game, that I am able to generate myself,
Evidence of Student Learning 12
based on the reading. Throughout the Kahoot game I am sure to continuously encourage my
Once the Kahoot is complete, I let each adult in the room know who they are working
with and then each student returns to their seat. While I am working with my student I can
continue to provide positive praise, while also checking on the rest of the room to make sure
everyone is “okay.” Once the student I am working with is finished, I would with a student who
is on a higher level and completing additional work. Each day there isa new set of words to be
learnd, and the assessments at the end of each lesson will idetify what students have learned. I
constantly praise my students throughout this process, and let them know at each step how well
Description-
The lesson topic will be focused on reading, specifically students' ability to read the story
"What is Weather?" while identifying key details from the story. The lesson will be taught in a
middle school CALS (Communication and Learning Support) classroom that consists of six
students. Five of these students are male and one is female. All students in this class are
Jordan is 14 years old, in 8th grade, and his Reading GE (Grade-Equivalent) level is <K.0
David is 14 years old, in 8th grade, and his Reading GE level is a 1.2
Mehki is 12 years old, in 7th grade, and his Reading GE level is <K.0
Noah is 12 years old, in 6th grade, and his Reading GE level is 1.0
Nicholas is 11 years old, in 6th grade, and his Reading GE level is <K.0
Ally is 12 years old, in 7th grade, and her Reading GE level is 1.0
During this lesson, the story that we will be reading is at a Level E. This means that the content
is appropriate for readers that are on an upper-kindergarten to first grade reading level. While the
lesson is taking place, there will be a special educator, one paraeducator, and two additional adult
Prerequisites-
For students to be able to take part in this lesson, they will need to be able to have the ability to
follow along with a text while it is being read aloud. All activities and routines that are included
in this lesson are familiar to the students. These activities and routines include identifying key
details, answering multiple choice questions with visual supports, participating in a group
activity involving cloze sentences, and determining meaning of academic vocabulary terms.
Estimated Time-
45 minutes
Evidence of Student Learning 14
Potential Use:
Standards:
multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade 1 reading and content, choosing flexibly
Goals:
Instructional Goals:
Evidence of Student Learning 15
During this lesson my goal is for students to gain a better understanding of vocabulary words that
Objectives:
• I am able to identify and determine meaning of key vocabulary terms from the story.
Variability:
Throughout this lesson there will be many different levels of variability so that each student
Nicholas and Mekhi (GE <K) will both complete a worksheet that consists of questions related to
the story. Each question will have visual supports to assist them with answering.
Jordan (GE < K) and Noah (GE 1.0) will be completing one assignment, consisting of multiple
choice questions related to the story. Both students will be asked to circle the correct answer,
Ally (GE 1.0) and David (GE 1.2) will begin by completing a cloze sentence activity that will
require them to generate their own answers. Both students will have a copy of the story so if they
Assessments:
Evidence of Student Learning 16
Formative Assessments:
Instructional Methods:
Opening:
Then we will learn a new sign language word for the day
During:
While reading the story, I will be sure to ask questions to each of the students so that their focus
remains on the story and I can assess their comprehension of the information.
Once the reading is finished, we will remain at the front table and complete a Kahoot together.
Students will be able to use their own devices to answer questions based on the reading.
Evidence of Student Learning 17
After the reading is finished, students will head back to their seats and I will pass out their assignments to
complete. One of the paraeducators (Mr. Williams) will first work with Nicholas, while Mekhi takes a
short break on the computer. Once Nicholas completes his work, Mekhi will then work with Mr.
Williams.
Mr. Milak will work in-between both Noah and Ally, assisting both of them with the work that they have
to complete.
Our adult assistant (Ms. A) will work with Jordan to assist him in completing his work.
I will begin by working with David, and providing him with assistance in completing his assignments.
Closing:
When everyone has finished their assignments, we will all come to the front table to review what
we have learned.
We will go over our objectives again, and I will ask the students a few questions about the
reading.
Materials:
• Pencil
Evidence of Student Learning 18
• Worksheets
• Devices
• Scissors
• Glue
• Kahoot Game
• Promethean Board
I felt that this lesson went very well, and I also felt very knowledgable as well as
prepared when presenting this information to my students. I enjoyed asking each student
questions while we were reading and felt that doing so was a useful way to keep their attention
and also assess what they were learning. Students enjoyed being involved in the lesson, and
questions were made accesssible to students at every ability level in my classroom. I felt each
student also enjoyed the Kahoot game, and it served as a fun way to engage the students.
When it came time to complete the assesment I noticed that several of my students were
not as confident as they usually are when completing them. The multiple choice question
assessment and the cloze sentence asssessment came from the website “News-2-You”. I felt that
I could trust this website because we have used these assessments in the past and a lot of our
stories come from this website. Once I received the assessment results from my students I knew
something was wrong because certain students scored lower then their typical preformance, even
though during the lesson when I was asking them questions they were answering them
successfully, and in addition, they did well on the Kahoot. I took it upon myself to change my
Evidence of Student Learning 19
lessons for the next two days and to create my own assessment activities for my formative
assessment, just as I had done for the summative assessment and pre-assessment.
Description:
The lesson topic will be focused on reading, specifically students' ability to read the story "Sunny
Weather" while identifying key details from the story. The lesson will be taught in a middle
school CALS (Communication and Learning Support) classroom that consists of six students.
Five of these students are male and one is female. All students in this class are diagnosed with
Jordan is 14 years old, in 8th grade, and his Reading GE (Grade-Equivalent) level is <K.0
David is 14 years old, in 8th grade, and his Reading GE level is a 1.2
Mekhi is 12 years old, in 7th grade, and his Reading GE level is <K.0
Noah is 12 years old, in 6th grade, and his Reading GE level is 1.0
Nicholas is 11 years old, in 6th grade, and his Reading GE level is <K.0
Ally is 12 years old, in 7th grade, and her Reading GE level is 1.0
Evidence of Student Learning 20
During this lesson, the story that we will be reading is at a Level E. This means that the content
is appropriate for readers that are on an upper-kindergarten to first grade reading level. While the
lesson is taking place, there will be a special educator, one paraeducator, and two additional adult
Prerequisites:
For students to be able to take part in this lesson, they will need to be able to have the ability to
follow along with a text while it is being read aloud. All activities and routines that are included
in this lesson are familiar to the students. These activities and routines include identifying key
details, answering multiple choice questions with visual supports, participating in a group
activity involving cloze sentences, and determining meaning of academic vocabulary terms.
Estimated Time:
45 minutes
Potential Use:
Standards:
multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade 1 reading and content, choosing flexibly
Goals:
Instructional Goals:
During this lesson my goal is for students to gain a better understanding of vocabulary words that
Objectives:
• I am able to identify and determine meaning of key vocabulary terms from the story
Variability:
Throughout this lesson there will be many different levels of variability so that each student
Nicholas and Mekhi (GE <K) will both complete a worksheet that consists of questions related to
the story. Each question will have visual supports to assist them with answering.
Jordan (GE < K) and Noah (GE 1.0) will be completing one assignment, consisting of multiple
choice questions related to the story. Both students will be asked to circle the correct answer,
Ally (GE 1.0) and David (GE 1.2) will begin by completing a cloze sentence activity that will
require them to generate their own answers. Both students will have a copy of the story so if they
Assessments:
Evidence of Student Learning 23
Formative Assessments
Instructional Methods:
Opening
• Then we will learn a new sign language word for the day
During
While reading the story, I will be sure to ask questions to each of the students so that their focus
remains on the story and I can assess their comprehension of the information.
Once the reading is finished, we will remain at the front table and complete a Kahoot
together. Students will be able to use their own devices to answer questions based on the
reading.
After the reading is finished, students will head back to their seats and I will pass out their
Evidence of Student Learning 24
assignments to complete. One of the paraeducators (Mr. Williams) will first work with Nicholas,
while Mekhi takes a short break on the computer. Once Nicholas completes his work, Mekhi will
Mr. Milak will work in-between both Noah and Ally, assisting both of them with the work that
Our adult assistant (Ms. A) will work with Jordan to assist him in completing his work.
I will begin by working with David, and providing him with assistance in completing his
assignments.
Closing
When everyone has finished their assignments, we will all come to the front table to review what
we have learned.
We will go over our objectives again, and I will ask the students a few questions about the
reading.
Materials:
• Pencil
Evidence of Student Learning 25
• Worksheets
• Devices
• Scissors
• Glue
• Kahoot Game
• Promethean Board
I felt that this lesson went a lot smoother then my first lesson due to the fact that I created my
own formative assessments that better fit the needs of my students. Students seemed very
engaged during the lesson while I was asking questions, and they continued to perform well on
the Kahoot. As I continue to introduce a new skill for myself, which is the ability to ask
questions during the reading, I need to make sure that I cater certain questions to my lower
students. I do not want these students to feel that their opinions are not valid, or that they are
unable to answer questions because they are difficult. I need to take it open myself to ask
Throughout this unit assessment and specifically this lesson I felt that I was better able to
control my classroom, meaning that I felt confident telling certain adults where to be and who to
work with. Being so young, it is at times difficult to give instruction to individuals that are older
than myself, but I find that I am improving with being able deliver information in an appropriate
manner. I am excited to finish the unit tomorrow, and eager to see progress on the post
assessment!
Evidence of Student Learning 26
Description:
The lesson topic will be focused on reading, specifically students' ability to read the story "Rainy
Weather" while identifying key details from the story. The lesson will be taught in a middle
school CALS (Communication and Learning Support) classroom that consists of six students.
Five of these students are male and one is female. All students in this class are diagnosed with
Jordan is 14 years old, in 8th grade, and his Reading GE (Grade-Equivalent) level is <K.0
David is 14 years old, in 8th grade, and his Reading GE level is a 1.2
Mekhi is 12 years old, in 7th grade, and his Reading GE level is <K.0
Noah is 12 years old, in 6th grade, and his Reading GE level is 1.0
Nicholas is 11 years old, in 6th grade, and his Reading GE level is <K.0
Ally is 12 years old, in 7th grade, and her Reading GE level is 1.0
During this lesson, the story that we will be reading is at a Level E. This means that the content
is appropriate for readers that are on an upper-kindergarten to first grade reading level. While the
lesson is taking place, there will be a special educator, one paraeducator, and two additional adult
Prerequisites:
For students to be able to take part in this lesson, they will need to be able to have the ability to
follow along with a text while it is being read aloud. All activities and routines that are included
in this lesson are familiar to the students. These activities and routines include identifying key
details, answering multiple choice questions with visual supports, participating in a group
activity involving cloze sentences, and determining meaning of academic vocabulary terms.
Estimated Time:
45 minutes
Potential Use:
Standards:
Evidence of Student Learning 28
multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade 1 reading and content, choosing flexibly
Goals:
Instructional Goals:
During this lesson my goal is for students to gain a better understanding of vocabulary words that
Objectives:
• I am able to identify and determine meaning of key vocabulary terms from the story
Variability:
Throughout this lesson there will be many different levels of variability so that each student
Nicholas and Mekhi (GE <K) will both complete a worksheet that consists of questions related to
the story. Each question will have visual supports to assist them with answering.
Evidence of Student Learning 29
Jordan (GE < K) and Noah (GE 1.0) will be completing one assignment, consisting of multiple
choice questions related to the story. Both students will be asked to circle the correct answer,
Ally (GE 1.0) and David (GE 1.2) will begin by completing a cloze sentence activity that will
require them to generate their own answers. Both students will have a copy of the story so if they
Assessments:
Formative Assessments:
Meth
ods
Instructional Methods:
Opening:
• Then we will learn a new sign language word for the day
During:
While reading the story, I will be sure to ask questions to each of the students so that their focus
remains on the story and I can assess their comprehension of the information.
Once the reading is finished, we will remain at the front table and complete a Kahoot
together. Students will be able to use their own devices to answer questions based on the
reading.
After the reading is finished, students will head back to their seats and I will pass out their
assignments to complete. One of the paraeducators (Mr. Williams) will first work with Nicholas,
while Mekhi takes a short break on the computer. Once Nicholas completes his work, Mekhi will
Mr. Milak will work in-between both Noah and Ally, assisting both of them with the work that
Our adult assistant (Ms. A) will work with Jordan to assist him in completing his work.
I will begin by working with David, and providing him with assistance in completing his
assignments.
Closing:
When everyone has finished their assignments, we will all come to the front table to review what
we have learned.
Evidence of Student Learning 31
We will go over our objectives again, and I will ask the students a few questions about the
reading.
Materials:
• Pencil
• Worksheets
• Devices
• Scissors
• Glue
• Kahoot Game
• Promethean Board
I was very pleased with how this lesson went and felt that reflecting on the way I taught my
first two lessons was a great tool for maximum improvement for my third. Each student was very
engaged and had equal opportunity to answer all questions about the reading. I could also see
Evidence of Student Learning 32
that this gave students more confidence as we transitioned into the Kahoot game, and students
who usually do not perform as well during the Kahoot did a very good job. Each adult in the
room knew where to go, and what to do. It felt like a very natural routine and I hope as I
continue to teach lessons in this classroom, that routine continues. As I went through each
students’ formative assessment I was very pleased again with my decision to construct my own
assessments, and students did very well. It will be interesting to go through the post assessment
to see if students retained the necessary information during these three lessons.
By having an ample amount of data through informal assessments that took place during
the lesson, asking my students for verbal responses through questioning, scoring my students’
pre-assessment / post-assessments, and also scoring their formative assessments, I was able to
examine their work samples for evidence of student achievement. I was very satisfied with the
growth that I saw in my students, and was happy to see that they learned a lot within a short
period of time. I chose the activities that I did with my students based on past assessments that I
have made for them. This ensured that my students could stay within their typical routine,
and were comfortabe with the familiar structure of each assessment. I ensured that my students
were challenged enough based on IEP goals, but they had the supports they needed to be
successful.
Evidence of Student Learning 33
Student 1 25%
Student 2 37.5%
Student 4 37.5%
Student 5 25%
Student 6 0%
Evidence of Student Learning 34
My goal for all of my students was to see any amount of positive growth between the pre-
assessment and the post-assessment. It would be an unrealistic goal, and would not fall within in
the means of any of my students’ IEPs, if I were to demand they master the skills I presented to
them. I did in fact have one student who did not show any growth at all between the pre and post
assessment. Student 6 did not master lesson objectives, but this student was absent on the second
day of instruction, so I believe that this affected her ability to master the lesson’s objective.
Pre Assessment
Post Assessment
Evidence of Student Learning 35
lesson that could take place during stations. This way that student does not miss the lesson that
we would be doing that day, but is able to catch up to her peers. Aside from Student 6 who did
not preform as well as my other students, I feel that the entire class would benefit from a whole
group re-teach lesson. During this lesson I will be sure to have an adult working closely with
both Student 1 and Student 5 due to the fact that they were the other two students that preformed
the lowest. This way I can assure that these two students will have a better understanding of the
unit. Another way to address lack of student achievement would be to provide each student with
a copy of the story that they could refer back to while completing their assessments. This way
they do not need to give up when they do not know an answer but can have a resource to help
After taking the time to reflect on all of the data I collected for this unit, I believe that my
instructional strategies were effective. Out of my six students, five of them showed at least a
25% growth increase form pre-assessment to post assessment. The strategies and interventions I
used, such as questioning while reading that required my students to share a verbal response, the
Kahoot game, my formative assessments, and the growth increase from pre to post assessment
are evidence that my strategies were effective. The specific growth I was able to see in
performance on the formative assessment from the first lesson to the second lesson proved that
my students benefit from a specific assessment structure. Changing the way they were assessd
Evidence of Student Learning 36
definitely threw them off and was not beneficial to their learning experience. I was able to
positively influence instruction for the specific learning differences of each of my students by
challenging yet academically appropriate assessments, they were able to successfully complete
One implication from the instructional activity based on student achievement data to
change for future instructional activities would definitely be to make my own assessments from
day one. Although websites and academic material can be very beneficial, I find that when you
have a routine that works for your students that you should not throw them a curve ball and
switch it up. You may adjust the content of course, but specifically in my classroom, my students
thrive off of routine. Knowing that, I would be more confident in my students’ success if they
complete assessments that are appropriate for them. A second implication from the instruction
activities based on student achievement data to change for future instructional activties would be
to have more than one assessment for my students to complete. That way I am able to determine
which assessment works better for that student. Some examples of assessments that I could try
with them would be: All About, Brief Constructed Reponses, Matching Vocabulary, or Cloze
Sentences.
Collaborating with other school based professionals could assist me in developing the
above changes to my future instructional activities. This collaboration would assist me because I
could try something knew that I never thought would work. I could also observe our other CALS
teacher conduct her lesson to see what assesments work for her students and to see if she
generates them on her own, or recieves them from an academic website. I also would like to see
if other school based professionals find it beneficial to challenege their students with more then
Evidence of Student Learning 37
one assessment after instruction or if they stick to just one. I always find in the field of education
that teamwork and collaboration is so important. It is such a useful tool to plan a lesson with a
fellow educator so that you make benefit your students to the highest degree.
The first personal professional learning goal based on CEC standards that emerged from
my reflection and experienes with this unit would be: C. Instructional Pedagogy *4. Assessment.
I find that assessment can come in many different forms so it is always beneficial as a
professional to become an expert on several different ways to assess. This not only allows you to
get to know your students better, but they may surprise you if they are asked to present their
knowledge in a new and exciting way. A second personal professional learning goal based on
CEC standards that emerged from my reflection and experiences with this unit would be: C.
Insstructional Pedagogy *5. Instructional Planning and Strategies. This goal is one that I am
always striving to achieve as I emerge as a new educator. I want to further develop my skills in
the sense of not just planning a perfect lesson for that day, but also having a back-up plan in case
that lesson goes wrong. I also want to have plenty of strategies up my sleeve if students are not
cooperating with what we are planning to learn during that lesson. I want to be able to reach all
of my students on their best days and their worst. Having more strategies up my sleeve will make
this possible and ultimately benefit each of my students. I really enjoyed doing this project and I
felt that it not only challenged me to make sure that my students performed well but also