0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views

Application 1 (Radius of Convergence) Application 2 (Frobenius Method - Case II)

1. The document contains three application problems related to series and differential equations. 2. The first application finds the radius of convergence for two series. It is found to be 5 for the first series and 2 for the second. 3. The second application involves using the Frobenius method to find the series solution to a given differential equation around x=0. It is determined that the Frobenius method can be used. 4. The third application discusses the three cases for finding the solutions y1(x) and y2(x) to a differential equation using the Frobenius method and describes the approach for each case.

Uploaded by

cherkess
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
56 views

Application 1 (Radius of Convergence) Application 2 (Frobenius Method - Case II)

1. The document contains three application problems related to series and differential equations. 2. The first application finds the radius of convergence for two series. It is found to be 5 for the first series and 2 for the second. 3. The second application involves using the Frobenius method to find the series solution to a given differential equation around x=0. It is determined that the Frobenius method can be used. 4. The third application discusses the three cases for finding the solutions y1(x) and y2(x) to a differential equation using the Frobenius method and describes the approach for each case.

Uploaded by

cherkess
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Application 1 Application 2

(Radius of convergence) (Frobenius method – Case II)

Find the radius of convergence for the Find the series solution of the given
following series. differential equation around the point
x = 0 . Should you apply the Frobenius

(−1)m ∞
1 method?
a.) ∑
m=0 5
m
( x − 5) m b.) ∑2
m=0
m
( x − 1) 2 m
x( x − 1) y ''+ (3 x − 1) y '+ y = 0

Solution Solution

We divide each side by x( x − 1) ,



(−1)m
a.) ∑
m=0 5 m
( x − 5) m
3x − 1 1
y ''+ y '+ y=0
m x( x − 1) x( x − 1)
1  1
R= → am =  −  x( x − 1) = 0 → x1 = 0 , x2 = 1(Singular points)
a  5
lim m+1 → The points which make the main equation
m →∞ a
m
infinite.
1 1
R= m +1
= =5 3x − 1 1
 1 1 p ( x) = , q( x) =
lim − x( x − 1) x( x − 1)
−  m →∞ 5
lim  5
m
m →∞
 1 The power series method :
 − 
 5 ∞
y ( x ) = ∑ am . x m
x − x0 < R → x − 5 < 5 m=0

→ 0 < x < 10 , radius = 5 The Frobenius method :




1 y ( x ) = ∑ am . x m + r
b.) ∑2
m=0
m
( x − 1) 2 m m=0

2
This is a series in powers of t = x with coefficients So the Frobenius method is an extended
1 power series method.
am =
2m Result : We can use the Frobenius method
For the convergent series, for the point x = 0 in this question.
1 1 1
R' = = = =2
am+1 1 m 1 x( x − 1) y ''+ (3 x − 1) y '+ y = 0
lim lim .2 lim
m →∞ a m →∞ 2 m +1 m →∞ 2 x 2 y ''− xy ''+ 3 xy '− y '+ y = 0
m
We write down the following correlations
Hence the series converges for t < 2, that is x < 2
into the main equation.
Re sult : R = 2
x − x0 < R → x − 1 < 2

( )
→ 1− 2 < x < 1+ 2 ( )

1
∞ then we apply the reduction of order
y = ∑ am .x m+ r
m =0
method when y1 ( x) is known, to find out
∞ y2 ( x ) .
y ' = ∑ (m + r )am .x m+ r −1 *In case III (roots differing by an integer)
m =0
∞ we use,
y '' = ∑ (m + r )(m + r − 1)am .x m+ r − 2 y1 ( x) = x r1 (a0 + a1 x + a2 x 2 + ...)
m=0

then we apply the same rule to find out
→ x .∑ (m + r )(m + r − 1)am .x
2 m+ r −2 y2 ( x) as case II.
m =0 In (*) equation, we substitute
∞ ∞
m = s transformation for 1.,3. and 5. terms,
− x.∑ (m + r )(m + r − 1)am .x m+ r −2
+ 3 x.∑ (m + r )am .x m+ r −1
m=0 m =0 and m = s + 1 transformation for 2. and 4.
∞ ∞ terms.
− ∑ (m + r )am .x m + r −1 + ∑ am .x m+ r = 0 → ( s + r )( s + r − 1)as .x s + r
m =0 m=0
∞ −( s + r + 1)( s + r )as +1.x s + r + 3( s + r )as .x s + r
→ ∑ (m + r )(m + r − 1)am .x m+ r

m=0
−( s + r + 1)as +1.x s + r + as .x s + r = 0
∞ ∞ → [( s + r )( s + r − 1) + 3( s + r ) + 1]as
− ∑ (m + r )(m + r − 1)am .x m+ r −1 + 3∑ (m + r )am .x m+ r
m =0 m=0 −[( s + r + 1)( s + r ) + ( s + r + 1)]as +1 = 0
∞ ∞
→ [( s + r )( s + r + 2) + 1]as
− ∑ (m + r )am .x m + r −1 + ∑ am .x m+ r = 0 (*)
m =0 m=0 −[( s + r + 1)( s + r + 1)]as +1 = 0
r r +1 r +2
→ r (r − 1)a0 x + (r + 1)ra1 x + (r + 2)(r + 1)a2 x + ...
− r (r − 1)a0 x r −1 − (r + 1)ra1 x r − (r + 2)(r + 1)a2 x r +1 + ...as +1 = ( s + r )( s + r + 22) + 1 as
( s + r + 1)
+3ra0 x r + 3(r + 1)a1 x r +1 + 3(r + 2)a2 x r + 2 + ...
− ra0 x r −1 − (r + 1)a1 x r − (r + 2)a2 x r +1 + ... → for y1 ( x) : r1 = 0;
r r +1 r +2
+ a0 x + a1 x + a2 x + ... = 0 r (r + 2) + 1
a1 = a0 → a1 = a0
(r + 1)2
The coefficient of the smallest power must (r + 1)(r + 3) + 1
be zero. ( x r −1 ) a2 = a1 → a2 = a0
(r + 2)2
− r (r − 1)a0 − ra0 = 0 (r + 2)(r + 4) + 1
a3 = a2 → a3 = a0
a0 [−r 2 + r − r ] = 0 → r 2 = 0 (r + 3)2
r1 = r2 = 0 (Case II) We assume a0 = 1, then a1 = a2 = a3 = 1
y1 ( x) = x 0 (1 + x + x 2 + ...)
Note : There are three cases to find out
y1 ( x) and y2 ( x) . (They are linearly y1 ( x) = 1 + x + x 2 + ...
independent) 1
→ y1 ( x) = → y2 ( x ) = ?
y1 ( x) → First solution 1− x
y2 ( x) → Second solution We will find out a second independent solution y2 ( x)
*In case I (distinct roots not differing by an by the method of reduction of order, substituting
integer) we use, y2 ( x) = u. y1 ( x) and its derivatives into the equation.
y1 ( x) = x r1 (a0 + a1 x + a2 x 2 + ...)
y2 ( x) = x r2 ( A0 + A1 x + A2 x 2 + ...) x( x − 1) y ''+ (3 x − 1) y '+ y = 0
*In case II (double root) we use, We divide each side by x( x − 1) ,
y1 ( x) = x r (a0 + a1 x + a2 x 2 + ...)

2
3x − 1 1 Application 3
y ''+ y '+ y=0
x( x − 1) x( x − 1)
(Bessel’s equation)
1 − 3x
− ∫ pdx = ∫ dx = ?
x( x − 1) Find a general solution in terms of J v and
1 − 3x A B J − v or J v and Yv .
→ = +
x( x − 1) x x − 1
a.) 4 x 2 y ''+ 4 xy '+ (100 x 2 − 9) y = 0
→ A( x − 1) + Bx = 1 − 3 x
b.) x 2 y ''+ xy '+ ( x 2 − 25) y = 0
→ Ax − A + Bx = 1 − 3 x
→ A + B = −3 , − A = 1 Solution
→ A = −1 , B = −2
a.) 4 x 2 y ''+ 4 xy '+ (100 x 2 − 9) y = 0
1 − 3x −1 2
∫ x( x − 1) = ∫ x dx − ∫ x − 1 dx
x 2 y ''+ xy '+ ( x 2 −ν 2 ) y = 0 → Bessel's equation
= − Inx − 2 In( x − 1)
We divide each side by 4,
1 − ∫ pdx 1
U= e = 2
e − Inx − 2 In ( x −1) 9
y12
 1  x 2 y ''+ xy '+ (25 x 2 − ) y = 0
  4
 1− x  3
1 1 1 ν = ∓ , z = 5x
= (1 − x)2 . . 2
= 2
x ( x − 1) x y ( x) = c1 J 3/ 2 (5 x) + c2 J −3/ 2 (5 x)
1
u = ∫ Udx = ∫ dx → u = Inx
x b.) x 2 y ''+ xy '+ ( x 2 − 25) y = 0
1
y2 ( x) = u. y1 ( x) = Inx.
1− x ν = ∓5 , z = x
Inx y ( x) = c1 J 5 ( x) + c2Y5 ( x)
y2 ( x ) =
1− x
If ν is an integer, we can not use J - v for the
general solution. We write
y ( x) = c1 J v ( x) + c2Yv ( x) or
y ( x) = c1 J n ( x) + c2Yn ( x)

You might also like