Basics of Power Amplifiers Part 1 PDF
Basics of Power Amplifiers Part 1 PDF
1. Introduction
Modern RF and microwave engineers have many more types of amplifiers at their disposal to suit
specific system needs than their predecessors ever dreamed of. Some are optimized for linearity
(for use in high-fidelity signal amplification) others for efficiency (where faithful reproduction is
not so important; e.g. for constant carrier level signals). Still other types compromise between the
two. Classes of amplifiers can more or less be lumped into two groups: the classical controlled
conduction angle amplifiers and the so-called “switching” amplifiers. The first group consists of
the high-fidelity Class-A and AB operating modes, the class-B and the reduced conduction-angle
Class-C amplifier. The switchers include Class-D, E, F and inverse F.
Class A, AB, B and C are defined by the length of their conduction state over some portion of the
waveform, such that the transistor state lies somewhere between “fully on” and “fully off”. The
waveforms of the current through the transistor collector and the voltage across the collector-
emitter (or drain-source) overlap significantly, causing a significant fraction of the DC input
power to be converted to heat instead of useful RF power. This is because the transistor
conduction state changes in step with the input waveform without any regard for the voltage or
current state of the output circuit. Namely, the transistor “switches at any old time” and suffers
heat dissipation as a result. Despite this, these amplifier modes are time-tested, reliably applied
topologies that are straight-forward to design and are found in all types of commercial
communications equipment.
The class D, E, F and inverse F switching amplifiers limit dissipation by virtue of carefully
selecting the times when the transistor switches. The output network is designed such that the
transistor switching transition takes place when the collector current or voltage is near zero, hence
reducing the overlap between the collector voltage and current waveforms. By means of “zero-
voltage” or “zero current” switching, efficiency can be improved over classical conduction-angle
defined amplifier classes (A, B, AB and C) when using real-life transistor switches. Briefly said,
unlike the class A, B, AB and C modes, most of the switching amplifiers (with the exception of
class D) rely on selecting “special” times for changing the conduction state of the transistor.
This part of the article will focus on a qualitative review of the Class A, B, AB and C amplifier
modes as well as giving some explanation on where inefficiencies appear in each. Some of the
advantages and disadvantages of each topology will be presented and the trade-offs will be briefly
elaborated in an intuitive manner. The active devices will be assumed to be ideal (i.e. no or only
Part II (to appear later) will cover the switching amplifier modes of operation.
The bias resistor sets the quiescent current (collector current when there is no input
signal/excitation). When there is no signal present, a constant DC current flows through the RFC
inductor and there is no AC power sent to the load resistor. If the AC excitation is turned on, the
collector current rises and falls in step with the input excitation. AC power is now dissipated in
the load. When the amplifier is operating at peak efficiency, the current through the collector
swings from zero to twice the quiescent (bias) current. If the quiescent current is defined as 0.5,
the maximum current will be 1. The dotted curve in Figure 2 illustrates this behavior. The
collector-emitter voltage, on the other hand, will depend on the value of the load resistor. The
solid curve in Figure 2 swings between 0 and 1 because we have assumed a load resistance of 1
ohm in the simulation.
It is interesting to note that the use of an inductive choke for the DC supply as shown in Figure 1
allows a theoretical maximum efficiency of 50%. If we look at the plot of instantaneous collector
dissipation and load resistor dissipation in Figure 3, we see that the average power dissipated in
the load and in the transistor collector are equal, hence the figure of 50%. As the transistor
collector current decreases on the falling side of the wave, the DC source “pumps” power into the
load circuit (capacitor and resistor). As the transistor collector current increases, dissipation
increases in the transistor and instantaneous power into the load decreases. The DC current from
the supply remains practically constant. This is because the RFC inductor acts to smooth the
current waveform, i.e. it is for all practical purposes an open circuit to the rapidly varying
collector wave but it allows the DC to pass unhindered.
This type of amplifier is seldom used in high power applications. Some “audiophile” high-fidelity
audio power amplifiers may use it, since it is considered the most “linear” of the amplifier
topologies. Its use in high power amplifiers would pose challenges to the designer in thermal
management and power supply design. For low-power applications, the Class-A amplifier reigns
supreme. Almost all RF low noise and low power gain blocks are based on Class-A amplifiers
because they are simple, flexible, easily matched and preserve signal fidelity to a high extent.
Pros:
• Simplicity
• Easy matching to standard impedances
• Linearity
• Wideband
• Low noise
• High gain
Cons:
• Limited efficiency
• Low power
The relationship between collector voltages and currents during operation is seen in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Collector current and collector-emitter voltage for the single-ended Class-B amplifier.
As the transistor turns on, the collector current rises, pulling the collector voltage down. The
analysis is a little more involved than that of the Class-A amplifier. However, it is fairly easy to
show that the power drawn from the DC supply is just the average collector current (in this case,
the average of the half-sine wave over a full period, or 0.318). The power lost in the transistor is
the average value of the product of the collector current and the collector-emitter voltage (the
current-voltage overlap, in this example, Ploss= 0.0684). We have assumed that the voltage
furnished by the DC supply is assumed to be normalized to 1 in this example. This means the
total power furnished by the DC power supply is Psupply = 0.318. This puts the conversion
efficiency Pload / Psupply at 78.5%: the classical result. We see that by forcing the transistor to be
“off” for a particular portion of the cycle, we can increase the amplifier efficiency significantly
over the Class-A 50%.
Figure 5: The “complementary” class B push-pull configuration. Note the need for a dual + / – DC supply. By
a suitable choice of bias resistors, Class-AB operation is also realizable with this circuit.
In Figure 5, each transistor in the amplifier is on for ½ a cycle, just like the single-ended
amplifier. However, this configuration has some notable benefits. The load resistor now
experiences a swing from –Vcc to Vcc. As in the single-ended example, this still yields a
maximum theoretical DC to AC efficiency of 78.5%. However, now the even harmonic
distortion cancels out (ideally) in the push-pull configuration. Of course, practical amplifiers will
have lower efficiencies as a result of parasitic losses and device mismatches can cause some even-
harmonic generation.
Note that the push-pull configuration can take a number of topological forms: some using
transformer coupling or power combining on the collectors (see Figure 6) as well as half- and
full-bridge designs used in power supplies, power converters, audio and high-frequency
amplifiers. The push-pull configuration is also useful in switching amplifier configurations and
Figure 6: Another form of push-pull amplifier commonly found in RF systems. This transformer-coupled form
has the benefit of requiring only a single DC supply (Vbb can be tied to VCC).
Pros:
• Good gain
• High power
• Good theoretical efficiency
• (Mostly) Linear when operated in Class-AB
• Wideband
• Balanced operation possible
• Even harmonic cancellation
Cons:
• Complexity
• Bias control
• Can exhibit significant amplitude and phase distortion at high drive levels
• Loss in combiners/transformers
Figure 7: Class-B push-pull load current showing “crossover distortion” near zero-crossing points.
In Class-B operation, the collector efficiency of practical implementations can be slightly better
than the Class-AB case, but at the expense of some non-linearity and a slight reduction in gain.
2.4 Class-C
The amplification of constant-carrier level angle modulated signals reduce the need for high-
fidelity signal reproduction. Whenever amplitude fidelity is not a major concern, but DC to RF
conversion efficiency is a dominant design goal, operating the power transistor in a reduced
conduction angle mode (less than 180 degrees) can increase efficiency over the that achievable
with Class A and B modes. Class-C is the designation used when the active device is partially
“on” for less than one-half of a wave cycle.
For a single ended Class-C amplifier operating over a 120 degree conduction angle (see Figure 8),
the collector efficiency is calculated to be roughly 80%. Smaller conduction angles yield
progressively higher collector efficiencies, but drive signal requirements tend to increase. As a
result of this, Class-C amplifiers generally have lower gain than a corresponding Class-A or AB
amplifier and require strong driving signals for proper operation. In fact, if we drive the amplifier
hard such that the top peak “clips”, collector efficiency can be improved further.
In Figure 9, the peaks are squared off, simulating the effect of high driving signal level. As a
result, the on-off transitions are steeper yielding better efficiency than in the first “truncated sine
Pros:
• Simple topology
• Highly efficient
• Suitable for constant-carrier high power amplifiers
Cons:
• Lower gain than Class-A or AB.
• Strong drive signal needed
• Abundant harmonic generation
• Band-limited because usually resonant network needed on output.
Recently, the Class-C amplifier has fallen out of favor somewhat since it was more commonly
used in high-power vacuum-tube amplifiers (where it is still used today, particularly in very high
power FM broadcast transmitters and industrial electromagnetic heating units). The reason is that
some solid-state devices can suffer damage at the high input drive levels needed for true Class-C
operation. GaAsFETs are particularly susceptible to failure when drive levels are high.
3. Summary
Briefly speaking, amplifiers fall into either classes of limited-angle conduction, classical modes
(Class A, AB, B and C) or on-off “switchers” where attempts are made to limit losses in the
switching device (Class D, E, F, Inverse F). There is a good deal of complicated mathematical
analysis that goes into the design and description of these power amplifiers. We have made no
attempt to be mathematically rigorous in this article. Instead, the purpose has been to clarify the
definitions as well as to give a qualitative “feel” for how these different amplifiers function. Of
course, to construct amplifiers that operate in the microwave bands requires a far more profound
understanding of the effects of parasitics than is presented here, but the basics of operation are still
qualitatively valid.
Naturally, these classical modes of operation are still alive and well. Careful attention to detail
can yield good efficiencies, especially when combined with enhancements like harmonic open and
short circuits. Furthermore, Class-A, B and AB amplifiers are still a good way to produce gain
well into the millimeter-wave frequency range.
Table 1 summarizes the pros and cons of the various amplifier classes and Table 2 outlines some
example output powers and efficiencies for practical amplifiers.
Table 2: Some example output power and efficiency numbers for the various amplifier classes and
technologies.
Class Technology Frequency Power Efficiency
A GaAs X-band (8.5GHz) 2W 15%
AB LDMOS S-band (2.6GHz) 320W 50%
AB LDMOS UHF (860MHz) 450W 45%
AB GaN C-band (7GHz) 50W 35%
C Vacuum tetrode VHF (100MHz) 1.4MW 70%
4. References
4.1 Simulation
All simulations in this article were carried out using Octave 3.0 [1] and/or NGSpice [2] models.
The reader is referred to the following websites for more information on these packages.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/
[2] http://ngspice.sourceforge.net/