3 Properties of Map Projections
3 Properties of Map Projections
The following properties would be present on a map projection without any scale distortions:
It is, unfortunately, impossible to have all these properties together in one map projection.
An equivalent map projection, also known as an equal-area map projection, correctly represents
areas sizes of the sphere on the map. When this type of projection is used for small-scale maps
showing large regions, the distortion of angles and shapes is considerable. The Lambert
possible only in a limited sense. That is, distances can be shown at the nominal map scale -the
given map scale- only from one or two points to any other point on the map or in certain
directions. If the scale on a map is correct along all meridians, the map is equidistant along the
meridians (e.g. the Plate Carree projection). If the scale on a map is correct along all parallels,
A conformal map projection represents angles and shapes correctly at infinitely small locations.
Shapes and angles are only slightly distorted, as the region becomes larger. At any point the
scale is the same in every direction. On a conformal map projection meridians and parallels
Note A map projection may possess one of the three properties, but can never have all three
properties. It can be proved that conformality and equivalence are mutually exclusive of each
other and that a projection can only be equidistant (true to scale) in certain places or directions.
On a minimum-error map projection the scale errors everywhere on the map as a whole are a
On the Mercator projection, all rumb lines, or lines of constant direction, are shown as straight
line, even though the shortest distance between two points on a Mercator projection - the great
all rumb lines, or lines of constant direction, are shown as straight lines.
On the Gnomonic projection, all great circle paths - the shortest routes between points on a
discribed in terms of their class (azimuthal, cylindrical, conical) and aspect (normal, transverse,
oblique).
The three classes of map projections are cylindrical, conical and azimuthal.The earth's surface
projected on a map wrapped around the globe as a cylinder produces the cylindrical map
projection. Projected on a map formed into a cone gives a conical map projection. When
orientation (whether cylinder, plane or cone) with respect to the globe. The three possible apects
of a map projection are normal, transverse and oblique. In a normal projection, the main
orientation of the projection surface is parallel to the earth's axis (as in the second figure below).
A transverse projection has its main orientation perpendicular to the earth's axis. Oblique
projections are all other, non-parallel and non-perpendicular, cases. The figure below provides
two examples.
A transverse cylindrical and an oblique conical map projection. Both are tangent to the reference surface
The terms polar, oblique and equatorial are also used. In a polar azimuthal projection the
cylindrical projection, the projection surface is tangent or secant at the equator. In an oblique
A map projection can be tangent to the globe, meaning that it is positioned so that the projection
surface just touches the globe. Alternatively, it can be secant to the globe, meaning that the
projection surface intersects the globe. The figure below provides illustrations.
Robinson, Cassini etc., but these names are not very helpful because sometimes one person
invented several projections, or several people have invented the same projection. For example
J.H.Lambert described half a dozen projections. Any of these might be called 'Lambert's
The question may arise here 'Why are there so many map projections?'. The main reason is that
there is no one projection best overall (see section 4.5 selecting a suitable map projection )
Activity The diagram below shows the developable surface of the Lambert conformal conic
Every map must begin, either consciously or unconsciously, with the choice of a map projection
and its parameters. The cartographer's task is to ensure that the right type of projection is used
for any particular map. A well choosen map projection takes care that scale distortions remain
within certain limits and that map properties match to the purpose of the map.
The choice of the class of a map projection should be made on the basis of the shape and size
of the geographical area to be mapped. Ideally, the general shape of a geographical area
should match with the distortion pattern of a specific projection. For example, if an area is small
and approximately circular it is possible to create a map that minimises distortion for that area on
the basis of an Azimuthal projection. The Cylindrical projection should be the basis for a large
rectangular area and a Conic projection for a triangular area.
The position of the geographical area determines the aspect of a projection. Optimal is when
the projection centre coincides with centre of the area, or when the projection plane is located
along the main axis of the area to be mapped (see example figure below).
Choice of position and orientation of the projection plane for a map of Alaska
Once the class and aspect of a map projection have been selected, the choice of the property of
a map projection has to be made on the basis of the purpose of the map.
In the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries, during the time of great transoceanic voyaging, there was a
need for conformal navigation charts. Mercator's projection -conformal cylindrical- met a real
need, and is still in use today when a simple,straight course is needed for navigation.
Because conformal projections show angles correctly, they are suitable for sea, air, and
meteorological charts. This is useful for displaying the flow of oceanic or atmospheric currents, for
instance.
For topographic and large-scale maps, conformality and equidistance are important properties.
The equidistant property, possible only in a limited sense, however, can be improved by using
The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection is a conformal cylindrical projection using a
secant cylinder so it meets conformality and reasonable equidistance for topographic mapping.
Other projections currently used for topographic and large-scale maps are the Transverse
Mercator ( the countries of . Argentina, Colombia, Australia, Ghana, S-Africa, Egypt use it ) and
the Lambert Conformal Conic (in use for France , Spain, Morocco, Algeria ). Also in use are the
stereographic (the Netherlands ) and even non-conformal projections such as Cassini or the
Polyconic (India).
Suitable equal-area projections for distribution maps include those developed by Lambert,
whether azimuthal, cylindrical, or conical. These do, however, have rather noticeable shape
distortions. A better projection is the Albers equal-area conic projection, which is nearly
conformal. In the polar aspect, they are excellent for mid-latitude distribution maps and do not
An equidistant map, in which the scale is correct along a certain direction, is seldom desired.
However, an equidistant map is a useful compromise between the conformal and equal-area
The projection which best fits a given country is always the minimum-error projection of the
selected class. The use of minimum-error projections is however exceptional. Their mathematical
theory is difficult and the equidistant projections of the same class will provide a very similar map.
In conclusion, the ideal map projection for any country would either be an azimuthal, cylindrical,
or conic projection, depending on the shape of the area, with a secant projection plane located
along the main axis of the country or the area of interest.The selected property of the map
Nevertheless for each country to use its own projection would make international co-operation in
data exchange difficult. There are strong arguments in favour of using an international standard
Several hundreds of map projections have been described, but only a smaller part is actually
used. Most commonly used map projections are:
• Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM),
• Transverse Mercator (also known as Gauss-Kruger),
• Polyconic,
• Lambert Confomal Conic,
• Stereographic projection.
These projections and a few other well-known map projections are briefly described and
illustrated.
Mercator projection The Mercator projection is a conformal cylindrical projection. Parallels and
meridians are straight lines intersecting at right angles, a requirement for conformality. Meridians
are equally spaced. The parallel spacing increases with distance from the Equator.
The ellipses of distortion appear as circles (indicating conformality) but increase in size away from
the equator (indicating area distortion). This exaggeration of area as latitude increases makes
Greenland appear to be as large as South America when, in fact, it is only a quarter of the size.
The Mercator projection is used for long distance navigation because of the straight rhumb-lines.
It is more convenient to steer a rumb-line course if the extra distance travelled is small. Often and
inappropriately used as a world map in atlases and for wall charts. It presents a misleading view
conformal projection.
Versions of the Transverse Mercator Projection are used in many countries as national projection
on which the topographic mapping is based. The Transverse Mercator projection is also known
as the Gauss-Kruger or Gauss Conformal projection. The figure below shows the World map in
The Transverse Mercator is the basis for the Universal Transverse Mercator projection, as well as
for the State Plane Coordinate System in some of the states of the U.S.A.
Three well-known conical projections are the Lambert Conformal Conic projection, the Albers
Polyconic projection The Polyconic projection is neither conformal nor equal-area. The
polyconic projection is projected onto cones tangent to each parallel, so the meridians are curved,
not straight.
The polyconic projection is an example of a conic projection, equidistant along the parallels
The scale is true along the central meridian and along each parallel. The distortion increases
The polyconic projection is used for early large-scale mapping of the United States until the
1950's, early coastal charts by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, early maps in the
International Map of the World (1:1,000,000 scale) series and for topographic mapping in some
countries.
The five common azimuthal (also known as Zenithal) projections are the Stereographic
projection, the Orthographic projection, the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection, the
Gnomonic projection and the azimuthal equidistant (also called Postel ) projection.
For the Gnomonic projection, the perspective point (like a source of light rays), is the centre of the
Earth. For the Stereographic this point is the opposite pole to the point of tangency, and for the
Orthographic the perspective point is an infinite point in space on the opposite side of the Earth.
The projection principle for the Gnomonic, Stereographic and Orthographic projection
Stereographic projection The Sterographic projection is a conformal azimuthal projection. All
meridians and parallels are shown as circular arcs or straight lines. Since the projection is
In the polar aspect the meridians are equally spaced straight lines, the parallels are unequally
spaced circles centered at the pole. Spacing gradually increases away from the pole.
Azimuthal Equidistant
Azimuthal, Neither conformal nor
Classification:
equal area
Aspects: Polar, oblique and equatorial
Earth Shape: Sphere
True Scale at: Center
Central
Clindrical
Cylindrical, Perspective neither
Classification:
conformal nor equal area
Aspects: Equatorial
Earth Shape: Sphere
True Scale at: Equator
Mercator
Classification: Cylindrical, Conformal
Aspects: Equatorial
Earth Shape: Sphere, Ellipsoid
True Scale at: Equator