Strategies For Qualitative Interviews: A Few General Points
Strategies For Qualitative Interviews: A Few General Points
PROS:
It helps to correct the natural limitations of our memories and of the intuitive glosses that
we might place on what people say in interviews
It allows more thorough examination of what people say
It permits repeated examinations of the interviewees’ answers
It opens up the data to public scrutiny by other researchers, who can evaluate the analysis
that is carried out by the original researchers of the data (that is, a secondary analysis)
It therefore helps to counter accusations that an analysis might have been influenced by a
researcher’s values or biases
It allows the data to be reused in other ways from those intended by the original
researcher—for example, in the light of new theoretical ideas or analytic strategies.
CONS:
It introduces a different dynamic into the social encounter of the interview, and recording
equipment may be off-putting for interviewees.
Transcribing is a very time-consuming process. It also requires good equipment, usually in
the form of a good-quality tape recorder and microphone but also, if possible, a
transcription machine. Transcription also very quickly results in a daunting pile of paper.
A Successful Interviewer is:
1. Knowledgeable: is thoroughly familiar with the focus of the interview; pilot interviews of the
kind used in survey interviewing can be useful here.
2. Structuring: gives purpose for interview; rounds it off; asks whether interviewee has
questions.
3. Clear: asks simple, easy, short questions; no jargon.
4. Gentle: lets people finish; gives them time to think; tolerates pauses.
5. Sensitive: listens attentively to what is said and how it is said; is empathetic in dealing with
the interviewee.
6. Open: responds to what is important to interviewee and is flexible.
7. Steering: knows what he/she wants to find out.
8. Critical: is prepared to challenge what is said, for example, dealing with inconsistencies in
interviewees’ replies.
9. Remembering: relates what is said to what has previously been said.
10. Interpreting: clarifies and extends meanings of interviewees’ statements, but without
imposing meaning on them.
11. Balanced: does not talk too much, which may make the interviewee passive, and does not
talk too little, which may result in the interviewee feeling he or she is not talking along the
right lines.
12. Ethically sensitive: is sensitive to the ethical dimension of interviewing, ensuring the
interviewee appreciates what the research is about, its purposes, and that his or her answers
will be treated confidentially.
The social skills of empathy, warmth, attentiveness, humor (where appropriate), and
consideration are essential for good interviewing.
Any judgmental attitudes, shock or discomfort will be immediately detected.
Never answer a question for the respondent.
One must be completely engaged with the respondent, while at the same time keeping track
of the questions one needs to ask.
Use every active listening technique at your disposal:
o Repeating back
o “Wow!
o Tell me more about that!”
o “That is really interesting.”
Don’t be afraid of silence; you can use it to prod the respondent to reflect and amplify an
answer
Don’t follow the interview guide—follow the respondent. Follow up new information that
he or she brings up without losing sense of where you are in the interview.
Try not to think about time—relax into the interview.
Guidelines for Developing Interview Questions
Questions should be simple. Do not ask more than one question at a time.
The best questions are those which elicit the longest answers from the respondent.
Do not ask questions that can be answered with one word.
Don’t ask questions that require your respondents to do your analysis for you. This
is YOUR job.
Likewise, do not ask for hearsay or opinions on behalf of the group they are a part of
“What do people around here think of x?” You rarely get anything interesting.
Don’t be afraid to ask embarrassing questions. If you don’t ask, they won’t tell.
1. Write down the larger research questions of the study. Outline the broad areas of
knowledge that are relevant to answering these questions.
2. Develop questions within each of these major areas, shaping them to fit particular
kinds of respondents. The goal here is to tap into their experiences and expertise.
5. Ask “how” questions rather than “why” questions to get stories of process rather
than acceptable “accounts” of behavior. “How did you come to join this group . . .?”
6. Develop probes that will elicit more detailed and elaborate responses to key
questions. The more detail, the better!
7. Begin the interview with a “warm-up” question—something that the respondent can
answer easily and at some length (though not too long). It doesn’t have to pertain
directly to what you are trying to find out (although it might), but this initial
rapport-building will put you more at ease with one another and thus will make the
rest of the interview flow more smoothly.
8. Think about the logical flow of the interview. What topics should come first? What
follows more or less “naturally”? This may take some adjustment after several
interviews.
10. The last question should provide some closure for the interview, and leave the
respondent feeling empowered, listened to, or otherwise glad that they talked to
you.