RRRRP
RRRRP
Jack W. Morrissey
Abstract
This paper analyzes the concept of “student-athlete” and how the evolution of the
word has changed. The research question is: how has the meaning of the word “student-
athlete” changed over time? The purpose of the research is to discover how we as society
Five areas of focus included, youth experience with sports, scholarship/recruiting aspect
of their experience, viewing their sport as a job, mentally balancing out academics and
athletics and lastly, stating if they believe in the concept of student-athlete. From
primary research including qualitative interviews from eights Spring Hill College
student-athletes, four out of the five themes matched with the secondary research in their
student-athlete experiences. The youth sports theme was the only topic that did not
match the secondary research. None of the Respondents stated they were ever forced to
continue playing their sport if they did not enjoy it. All of the student-athletes admitted
sports and education are constantly changing and continue to have impact on society.
Oberteuffer (1936) states, presidents of the Southern Conference hold that any athlete
shall be declared ineligible for competition if he “as a consideration for his athletic ability
clothes, books, charge accounts, job, loan, scholarship or any other financial aid or
some interesting facts from their book, The Case For Paying College Athletes. According
to Sanderson (2015), the financial health of athletic departments rests on four elements:
1) the demand for television broadcast rights for live programming, 2) large, stable game
attendance, 3) the desire of many universities to maintain ties with alumni and other
constituents, and 4) a cartel agreement among universities to limit compensation for the
essential input required to stage the names, namely the players. The first three elements
boost athletic department revenues, while the fourth contains costs (Sanderson and
The main points Sanderson makes that sports have a great deal of power when it
comes to bringing in money for a school. Using critical theory, it is easy to identify the
power athletics have for their colleges because of the amount of money they bring in for
the school. According to Sanderson (2015), the incremental cost of televising a college
sports event that was going to be played regardless of broadcast status is modest, making
rights. Hyman (2003) states: Men’s football – and to a lesser degree basketball – are the
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 4
economic engines that drive college athletics (Hyman, 2003, p. 1). CBS paid about $800
million to the NCAA to revise the three-week 2014 men’s basketball tournament; for
comparison as recently as 1984 that figure was just $12 million (Sanderson and Siegfried,
2015, p. 120). This indicates how the money has grown significantly over time in the
demand for college sports to be showcased on national television. The amount of money
well (Gerdy, 2002). Perhaps we have simply become numb to the business of sports
(Gerdy, 2002, p.122). The numbers have become so outlandish, almost surreal, so large
that they no longer mean anything, as if it were Monopoly money (Gerdy, 2002, p.143).
The reporting of the signing of the first $100-million-per-year player will likely be
greeted with not much more than a yawn at most breakfast tables across the country
(Gerdy, 2002). The fact is professional sports have always been about business
(Sanderson and Siegfried, 2015, p. 149). Professional sports relate to collegiate sports
more now than ever due to the amount of money involved. Gerdy (2002) explains how
the media portrays college athletes as superheroes and the money college teams bring are
essential in bringing in more money and applications for the school. Krumme (2006)
elaborates more on the amount of money involved with college athletics and how it has
caused more harm than good. Krumme (2006) states while the NCAA does not allow the
payment of players, the amount of money up for grabs has promoted unethical behavior
Krumme(2006), corruption is now an everyday affair. Every good season that concludes
in a bowl bid or tournament appearance equals more money for schools. This leads to
temptation and wrong moves made by many high-ranking college administrators, coaches
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 5
and boosters (Krumme, 2006, p. 2). Krumme’s main point is that colleges now more
than ever will do whatever it takes to win. Winning means more money. According to
Krumme (2006) the eight teams representing their schools in last year’s Bowl
Championship Series games, were paid close to $15 million each for making it to college
football’s promised land. For a school like The University of Louisville has recorded
about $6 million from the athletic department since 2000-2001, that extra money is a
huge boost to the program (Krumme, 2006, p. 1). Biden (2006) describes college sports
as, “It looks like a rigged deal” (Krumme, 2006, p. 1). Biden was just reflecting on the
recent investigations and findings in college sports. Krumme (2006) elaborates on how
college sports have become big business and schools bend the rules every year to get
paid. Money, the wellness of the school and the school’s reputation is built upon
today as the purpose to bring in money and make the school more attractive to the outside
viewer. Former Nebraska head coach Tom Osborne spoke upon the impact of money in
athletics is about money, and it’s not always aimed at the student-athlete or what’s best
for the game” (Krumme, 2006, p. 1). The interesting part about this quote is that Osborne
mentions the word “student-athlete” and describes the money as a harmful effect relating
to the commercialization of sports. Krumme (2006) informs that with the popularity of
college athletics always on the rise and the amount of money up for the taking, dishonest
and crooked actions are taken on a regular basis every year. The actions driven by the
power of money as explained by Krumme have been unethical and provided a false
Critical theory asserts that economic factors drive institutional behaviors and this
belief is being represented more often recently. Sanderson mentions some ways in which
successful athletic teams attract more students. Sanderson and Siegfried (2015) give
three reasons why this is true. Their first point is that success at intercollegiate athletics
might attract larger appropriations from state legislators concerned about their
the fact that the median voter in every state is not a college graduate and might be more
interested in the flagship state university’s football team than its library. Critical theory
would compare the power of athletics to education in this specific case. Krumme (2006)
found that those institutions fielding Division 1 football teams among a sample of 570
public universities receive about 8 percent more taxpayer funding than otherwise
university athletics may increase private donations. Participation in bowl football games
seem to result in the most contributions (Sanderson and Siegfreid, 2015, p. 120). Lastly,
Sanderson and Siegfried write that the presence of high-profile sports programs, like
various other campus features, may attract additional applicants and enrollment. An
example includes when North Carolina State enjoyed a forty percent rise in applications
after winning the NCAA men’s basketball championship in 1983 under legendary coach
Jim Valvano. Boston College enjoyed their own surge in applications when quarterback
Doug Flutie threw his famous “Hail Mary” pass to win a nationally televised regular
season game against the then-dominant University of Miami in 1984 (Sanderson and
The question of whether as a society we are losing the value of sports is brought
about by Gerdy (2002). Gerdy goes into depth about how sports have lost their meaning.
Gerdy (2002) states the purpose of his book, Sports: The All-American Addiction is not to
dwell on the negative impact of a failed system. Rather, it is to address what has been the
most significant factor preventing meaningful reform of that system: specifically, the
belief that truly significant reform is simply not possible because our addiction to big-
time sports has become complete; because the culture of elite sports in America has
become so ingrained into societal and educational institutions, it will never change,
regardless of the growing evidence of its negative impact (Gerdy, 2002, p.9). Gerdy
emphasizes the need for sports in today’s society along with how sports are being
misused. An example of sports becoming out of control is when Pat Dye of Auburn and
Gene Stallings of Alabama both wanted to move their football teams into their own
separate dorms. Gerdy (2006) elaborates on how there are too many coaches and
athletics administrators acting as if their athletic department is bigger, better, and more
important than their educational institution, conference, and even the NCAA. The
situation involving Stallings and Dye is an example of how the athletic departments had
become completely divorced from the academic community. Gerdy (2006) elaborates on
the lost art of the multi-sport athlete. He writes that there used to be many great multi-
sport athletes because the idea of playing multiple sports was encouraged. Recently that
belief has been non-existent. An example of this would be AAU. The AAU stands for
Amateur Athletic Union. Many young basketball players continue to play basketball
even when their season is over with an AAU team. The problem is that many coaches
attend these AAU games in high school so that if a basketball player is looking to play at
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 8
the next level it’s highly encouraged to play AAU. This takes away opportunities for
young adults to try and play a different sport or develop other interests besides their
specific sport. Gerdy (2006) states a major problem with AAU is that it often showcases
one player and not the team, which is a major difference from previous values of athletics
(Gerdy, 2006, p. 110). Athletics used to be about a team coming together, developing
relationships and working together to accomplish a goal (Gerdy, 2006, p. 110). Gerdy
(2006) writes about how sports has blinded society into thinking that it is more than a
game. Sports used to be a secondary tool towards education but now it has become a way
of life. The amount of money being made has a part to do with this belief but an even
bigger topic is the sacrifice people make to allow sports to use them (Gerdy 2006, p.
115). The amount of travel teams and club teams being put together is out of control. A
top notch baseball player from Michigan may travel three hours a day to practice or play
with a team in Illinois just to be noticed a little more by college scouts. The thought of
this activity thirty years ago would be considered insane (Gerdy 2006, p. 120). Looking
at sports being controlled by money, Zimbalist (2001) says it should surprise no one that
star athletes are leaving college after a year or two, or skipping college altogether to play
pro ball (Zimbalist, 2001, p. 4). The number of basketball players who left college before
their NCAA eligibility elapsed increased from 16 in 1995 to 35 in 1996. Some notable
players that left college early include Kevin Garnett, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Tracy
McGrady, Jamal Crawford and many more. These are some of the greatest players to
ever play resulting in attention from young stars looking to play in the NBA. There are
professional athletes who do struggle keeping their money once they are done playing
their sport. According to (Wachter, 2010), Sports Illustrated, however, has reported that
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 9
60 percent of professional athletes are in serious financial trouble within five years of
retirement (Wachter, 2010). Gerdy (2002) writes about the meaning of being a true
sports fan in today’s society. Like a drug addiction, being a sports fan offers little of
long-term substance or meaning. It allows us to escape our problems and ignore the
issues we face, and it undermines our attempts to solve them. We invest our effort and
emotion in sports stars and teams rather than improving our own lives by reading,
writing, learning a new skill or how to play a musical instrument, or simply engaging in
some meaningful conversation with a friend or family member (p. 22). The idea of being
obsessed with sports is constantly brought up by Gerdy. He believes the value of sports
is being lost. Gerdy (2002) explains cheating is rampant in sports. For example,
newspapers have sports pages that promote the idea of a win-at-any-cost mentality that
drives our sports culture. Cheating is very common. For example, thousands of athletes
use steroids to enhance their performance, despite the likelihood of their use causing
sterility, damaging the heart and liver, and causing psychological and emotional
instability (Gerdy, 2002, p. 30). Athletics, according to Gerdy have become obsessed
with the fame of winning and the money involved. This idea represents the
professionals are making and how players more often are just concerned about making
money rather than playing for the love of the game. Gerdy (2002) states the culture of
sport undermines academic institutions and intellectual values. In the locker room and on
the sidelines, signing a pro contract and buying a fancy sports car is valued far more than
earning a college degree (Gerdy, 2006, p. 122). To many coaches and athletes, getting to
the “Big Show,” rather than earning a college degree, is what college is all about (Gerdy,
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 10
2006, p. 111). Coaches scream at seven-year olds for committing an error in a T-ball
game. Parents attack Little League umpires or fatally beat each other at youth hockey
games (Gerdy, 2006, p. 112). Things have gotten so bad in this regard that more than
two dozen state legislatures have approved or are debating bills that stiffen penalties for
attacks on referees. School districts are forced to play games behind locked doors for
fear of spectator violence. This is what we have become, all in the name of sport. This is
interesting example of academics taking a back seat to athletics. He says, Kevin Ross a
6’9” basketball star at Creighton University, was admitted into the school after scoring a
9 out of a possible 36 on his ACT test. The average score at Creighton was a 23.2.
Initially his application was rejected by the admissions office, but the athletics
department asked admissions to take a second look with the aid of the school’s vice
president. Ross’s first year included a rigorous schedule of course work in “Squad
Ceramics.” His GPA was sufficient to qualify him to play in his sophomore year (p. 28).
Gerdy (2006) mentions the population of attendance at sporting events and the amount of
money TV companies make for each sporting event they televise. Gerdy (2002)
elaborates that the days of playing sports for fun and exercise are gone; we must elevate
any competition to epic proportions. Gerdy (2002) states that heated rivalries are recast
as holy wars. The meeting of two undefeated teams is billed as the “Game of the
Century” (Gerdy 2002, p. 90) or at least this week’s Game of the Century. Even at the
youth sport level, it is not enough to simply play within your town. Traveling all-star
teams must be formed to see which town reigns supreme. The idea of this is like a
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 11
business. It is putting the best product on the floor rather than focusing on allowing kids
to developing a love for the game (Gerdy 2002, p. 31). Kids are prevented to participate
often end up quitting the sport before ever getting the chance to love it. Gerdy (2002)
explains how it is important to distinguish between two major forms of sport in our
meeting after school to play a game of stickball is a classic example of sport as ‘free
play.” “Organized” sport is an athletic activity that has been institutionalized, such as
Little League, high school, college and professional sports. There is an emphasis on
structure, rules, and procedures, all imposed by adults. Most significant, there is an
emphasis placed upon winning (p. xii). Gerdy (2002) speaks about how youth sports in
general have become controlled by adults who take youth leagues too seriously by
pushing kids to win for the sole fact they can be a member of a winning team and live
their live through their child by trying to accomplish something they couldn't do when
These ideas early imposed by youth coaches result in many kids looking at sports
in a way that it’s all about winning. There is not enough emphasis on skill, the art of
teamwork and just playing to have fun. The stress of winning will come naturally if the
athlete wishes to continue his or her sport later in life. Gerdy (2002) mentions one of the
beauties of sports is the way you can lose yourself for hours with the aid of nothing but a
ball and your imagination. One’s ability to imagine and construct vivid mental images
and concepts is a valuable developmental characteristic, which sport can nurture. For
example, the rules when my friends and I played baseball in the school playground as
opposed to the park were different (Gerdy 2006, p. 123). They had to be because the
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 12
playing areas were so different. In the park, any decent shot to left field wound up in a
busy street. Consequently, left field was out of play. In fact, if you hit two straight balls
there, you were out. In the playground, right field butted up against the backside of a
sign labeled “School No. One”, this sign was only twenty yards behind first base. It was
our own version of Fenway Park’s Green Monster. But unlike Fenway, where a ball hit
off the wall results in a hit, in our game, a fly ball off the wall could be caught for an out
(p. 5). This is an example of the right way to learn to play sports. This is also an
example of the right way to enjoy sports. Enjoy the sport with pure love for it and if the
sport doesn’t provide fun, it may be time to find a new sport (Gerdy 2006, p. 110).
Specifically, the sport itself not being pleasurable, not a situation where a coach is telling
a kid he or she will never play because their skills are not up to par. That is just a tough
situation. Initially, as Gerdy (2002) states, kids should all be free to play any sport they
want without restrictions and somebody telling them they are not good enough to play.
Gerdy provided an example of how the college game has evolved and is now looked at as
a professional sport. Gerdy (2002) writes that he couldn’t distinguish between the
opening introductions of the Chicago Bulls or the grand entrance of former University of
Kentucky basketball coach Rick Pitino minutes before tip-off at Rupp Arena and the tag
team of Rob Van Dam and the Great Sabu. There was every bit as much preening,
pointing, chest bumpin’, and high fivin’ and every bit as much pomp, pageantry, glitter,
and glam (p. 24). This symbolizes colleges trying to imitate the pros by copying their
introduction theme that contains tons of special affects presenting the athletes as super
Renick (1974) writes about the differences between college athletics and
has been, and continues to be, a lively topic of debate. The difference between
professional and college athletics seems to be one of degree, with the college athlete
coming out at the short end of the measuring of the measuring stick. (Renick, 1974, p. 4).
College athletics are administered for the benefit of those who control them: individual
institutions, regional conferences, and national agencies (Renick, 1974, p.3). The rules
and regulations of these agencies are designed to control athletes and athletics, but the
athlete himself or herself has no voice in their design. The athlete is treated as a
commodity to be exploited for the benefit of others and is left with no viable alternatives
athletics has become more similar to professional athletics in recent years which relates
back to the statements made by Gerdy (2002). If the professional game and collegiate
game are now becoming less different, then it is easily assumed that other levels
including high school and youth athletics have become more comparable. For example,
youth sports have become much more structured with an emphasis on winning similar to
high school athletics where coaches depend on wins to keep their jobs and pay the bills
(Gerdy, 2006, p. 123). Gerdy (2002) speaks about the losing connection to sports. He
talks about all of the media involved with sports now such as, sports TV packages,
videogames and computers making it easy for a kid to not play sports but rather watch
them from their house losing the experience of having pure joy while hitting a homerun
or catching a touchdown pass. Gerdy (2006) states that he does not get the sense that
there are playgrounds and ball fields crowded with children playing stickball, touch
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 14
football, and basketball as in the past. Further, professional games are prohibitively
expensive, pricing many families out of the market. The only opportunity many children
have to watch a pro game is on television; that is, of course, if it doesn’t start too late as is
the case with the World Series. Even so, the television experience is a very shallow one
(p. 245).
Using critical theory, the media used by young kids has poisoned many young
minds in solely becoming addicted to watching instead of playing. The media keeps
allowing more opportunities to watch rather than play. Consumerism is playing a role
with protecting consumers the right to buy which is helping the economy. Consumerism
is however at times persuading people to not play sports and rather watch them or control
them through video games (Zimbalist, 2001, p. 23). The connection Gerdy (2002) is
referring to is the youth experience of sports. He speaks about how adults need to take a
step back and let kids run sports leagues. He believes the involvement of adults, mostly
males, provides a false idea of what youth sports should be about. Gerdy (2002) writes
that one of the reasons organized sport is so wildly popular is that most Americans,
particularly men, have had a very direct connection to the athletic experience. At some
point in their lives, most men, and now an increasing number of women, were involved in
for most did not last past high school (p. 244). Most youth constructors do not have a
The topic of athletics and academics is something that has caused much
controversy, especially with college athletics. The balance between the two has changed
over the years with the power sports has. Whitner (1986) states that it is redundant to note
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 15
that the educational attainment of college athletes has become a major national concern.
Purdy, Eitzel, and Hufnagel have documented from a socioeducational perspective the
problem of the student-athlete. After comparing ten years of data regarding college
athletics and the general college student population, these authors conclude that the
educational value of college athletic participation is negative rather than positive. The
reality for individuals who work with student-athletes from an academic or student
services perspective is that they are confronted daily with people who are underprepared,
unlikely to graduate, priority skewed, and manipulated by the demands of their sport (p.
659). These college counselors were not aware of the demands of playing a rigorous
athlete daily schedules are busy. Mazeika (2015) writes about the harmful effects of a
student athletes’ schedule: When the final bell rings on school days, a student-athlete is
far from done. In a span of roughly eight hours, teenagers committed to prep sports are
engaged in grueling schedules that barely leave enough time to spend with family, hang
out with friends or update their Facebook page (p. 2). Mazeika wrote about how these
busy schedules are causing more harm than good to the young student athlete. He
mentions at minimum; athletes need eight to ten hours of sleep a night in order to
maintain a healthy lifestyle. He stressed how the athletic schedule is becoming more
time consuming taking away from time to explore other interests and activities. Fletcher,
Benshoff and Richburg (2003) mention that student-athletes frequently must miss class in
order to travel to scheduled sports events and typically are required to make up missed
material, assignments, and exams (p. 36). A clinical associate professor and medical
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 16
director of the Sleep Center at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital in Palo Alto spoke on
the lack of sleep for athletes, “While there is a wage of sleep for each individual, the hope
is for boys and girls to get 8 to 10 hours of sleep at night. For those who do extraneous
activities, their bodies undergo more stress and more wear and tear, so they should
actually get more sleep to recuperate from the activity” (Mazeika, 2015, p. 2). Sports
take up a lot of time and combining that with schoolwork causes many student-athletes to
lose multiple hours of sleep. An example of this can be found from McNulty (2016),
McNulty describes a day in the life of Utah State volleyball player Erica Moscoso. At
6:30 a.m., Erica Moscoso’s day begins. First weight lifting, then she’s rushing nonstop to
classes, volleyball practice and her student athlete mentor hours. When she makes it
home after 9 p.m., it’s finally time to do her own homework. “Sleep is definitely
something I sacrifice to do well,” said Moscoso, the senior setter on the Utah State
volleyball team. “It’s basically just go go go and that’s something I had to learn about as
a freshman that time management is really important especially if you’re taking a bunch
of classes and want to do well.” For Moscoso, who is majoring in bioveterinary science,
there is more to life than volleyball and, as her time as an Aggie is dialing down, she
certainly has plans for the future (p. 2). Moscoso’s schedule allows for her minimal time
athletics in college. Gerdy explains that the educational system’s most effective vehicle
translate into upward mobility and social equality. This, however is not the case, while
athletic scholarships provide opportunities for many blacks who otherwise could not
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 17
afford to attend college, this supposed concern over the educational well-being of these
athletics as a vehicle for social advancement, the only equality of opportunity that exists
in sports is the equal opportunity to help a school or pro team win games and generate
development and equality of opportunity, but rather in short-term wins and revenue
projections (p. 185). This statement emphasizes the backseat academics take in the eyes
of athletic departments. In terms of critical theory, athletic departments have a great deal
is when North Carolina’s basketball team was taking fake classes. Smith (2015)
described the incident as a tragedy and an example of a school doing whatever it takes to
field an elite basketball team, even if that means creating classes to boost players’ GPA’s.
Rashad McCants, a North Carolina basketball player from 2005 championship team
Carolina. Rashad McCants is not the only athlete to have received false education while
in college. Ranch (2011) gives two more examples of athletes involved in college
Critical Theory can be used to explain the meaning of the term student-athlete.
Critical Theory treats society in terms of power structures (equality and inequality)
(Gerdy, 2002, p. 124). The student-athlete and regular student have many differences
that separate them from one another making each have a different level of power in the
eyes of institutions. According to (Potuto, J.R., O’Hanlon and James, 2007) Perhaps the
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 18
finding that over 60% of those who surveyed view themselves more as athletes than as
students is no surprise. Certainly athletic participation claims much of their time and
energy and, in many cases, provides important financial support. Certainly also, it seems
safe to assume that many persons with whom they come in contact - whether it be
members of the public, fellow students or even faculty and staff – view them as more
athletes than students (Potuto, J.R., O’Hanlon and James, 2007 p. 1). Critical theory can
also harp on the fact that media is becoming detrimental in relation to sports. Gerdy
(2002) states television has affected virtually every aspect of our games, distorting not
only when but also how they are played. “Because television networks make money by,
in effect, renting audiences to advertisers, they have considerably less interest in the
sport-except insofar as they affect. We have been duped into believing that unless you
are not worthy of an ESPN highlight, you are not worthy as an athlete. It is no longer
enough to play simply for the camaraderie, the intrinsic values gained, or the sheer joy of
participation (Gerdy, 2006, p. 32). Some have their confidence diminished when they
look at the superstar athlete in a sport they are playing and cave into the fact they will
never be able to do things their favorite athlete can do so they quit (Gerdy, 2006, p. 145).
The media often portrays one type of athlete without mentioning the art of the
skill involved with sports. In Gerdy’s words the impact of this ESPN mentality on the
determines his or her “success.” Most athletes are conditioned to believe that the only
successful athletic career is one which ends in the Olympics, NBA, NFL, or other major
professional leagues (Gerdy, 2002 p. 33). The media showcases professional sports to
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 19
the point people think there is only one league for each sport. There are opportunities to
play overseas and many alternative leagues such as the Canadian Football League, Minor
perspective, the financial power of major professional leagues promotes the ideology they
Methodology
of the student-athletes are from Spring Hill College. Eight student-athletes from Spring
Hill College participated and they are all confidential. All of the interviewees were
chosen at random by Dr. Almquist from a variety of different sports both male and
female. The interviews are qualitative in-depth interviews based upon their college
experience as a student-athlete and their overall viewpoint of the given questions related
to college athletics and are based of the list of questions from Appendix A. A thematic
was carried out upon the respondents of the student-athletes to discover if the respondents
share similar experiences. The eight respondents had similar answers for most of the
questions but obviously had slightly different perspectives based on their respective
sports.
Youth Aspect
The first theme is how the student-athlete got introduced to their sport. Were they
forced or did they have a love for it from the beginning. The answers were unique among
the respondents but only two out of the eight respondents were actually forced to play a
sport. However, all of the respondents admitted to eventually enjoy playing their sport.
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 20
lose weight and become more active because of the diagnosis and that's how I got
idea of running up and down the court just wasn’t in my mind. I honestly didn’t
develop a love for it until high school because I didn’t feel appreciated until I
played for my high school coach who believed in me and was really behind me
Respondent 3 stated initially that the love for her sport did not come initially. She
was not an active child and was not interested in sports that involved running.
Respondent 3 kept playing her sport for just exercise but had no joy for the sport. That
joy did not come until high school. She emphasized that she did not feel as if she was
being valued for playing her sport until she played for a coach that really believed in her
and pushed her to become the best player she could be.
Respondent 5 however answered similar to others stating, “No, I never got forced
to play, my parents told me when I was really young, I liked kicking everything so they
brought me to a soccer club and when I got older it just became more fun but I always
had that love for it at an early age” (Respondent 5, personal communication, May 15,
2018). Respondents 5 and 3 had similar answers because both of their parents assigned
them to leagues but Respondent 3 just developed her love for the sport later. Among the
other Respondents, the consistent answer was they were never forced into playing sports.
The athlete either developed a love for the sport initially or later but they all eventually
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 21
loved the sport. This love is a strong reason why some of the Respondents still play their
Respondent 4 states how at an early age he played multiple sports but eventually
was forced to choose one because of the demands that college athletics require. Gerdy
(2006) elaborates on the idea of sacrificing multiple sports to focus one sport is a tragedy
in sports. Gerdy (2006) states that focusing on one sport too early can lead to becoming
burnt out or quitting the sport rather than focusing on multiple sports which can benefit
not only the human body but also the mind. In conclusion, the student-athletes had a love
for their sport at an early age and wanted to continue playing their sport at the highest
level possible.
Recruiting
sports dramatically. Respondent 4 stated, “I had offers from three different Ivy League
schools, I wasn’t considered a scholar at the high school but by just focusing on
probably wouldn’t have gotten interest from those schools. I would get calls from
coaches all day wanting to talk and make sure I was doing the bare minimum to
coaches and the process of being recruited while being in high school. He elaborated on
college coaches were making sure he had the bare minimum in terms of grade to get
accepted into the school. The coaches were not concerned on the recruit reaching his
potential as a student but solely focusing on if he was doing just enough. Respondent 4
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 22
also emphasized the amount of times coaches would contact him. He would get calls
every day from a variety of colleges. This emphasizes how competitive college athletics
have become and how the value of acquiring a talented high school basketball player has
gone up. Respondent 4 said some nights were extremely tough his senior year because he
had so many coaches telling him different things and he didn’t know who to trust.
along with being recruited: “When I was 13 years old, I went to a professional academy
after they invited me and I played there for one year and they told me I wasn’t fast
enough, we have enough players, you should go back to your hometown club. This was a
hard point in my life. However, when I got older, one of my coaches showcased me on a
website and this allowed coaches from the U.S. to see me play” (Respondent 5, personal
Respondent 5 stressed the amount of recruiting that took place in his career. For
the respondent, soccer recruiting started at the age of 13 and continued throughout his
whole life leading to coming to the U.S. on a full-athletic scholarship. After age 13 he
speaks about the amount of hours he put in to improve and how he knew one day it would
pay off. Respondent 5 was recruited through a website and offers came from colleges
throughout the country in relation to the website. Respondent 5 gives an example of how
college athletics in the United States have broadened their horizons and are willing to
recruit players from other countries. This demonstrates how competitive the recruiting
Respondent 6 stated that he would not come to Spring Hill unless he was offered
different experience, “I wasn’t heavily recruited, I moved around a lot so I was never
really in one spot long enough for a coach to get in touch with me, if they tried to get in
touch with me I was already gone by that point” (Respondent 6, personal communication,
The fact that Respondent 6 stated he was not heavily recruited even though he
was in constant communication with his coach at the end of senior year exemplifies how
big recruiting has become in college sports. Respondent 6 made it clear it wasn’t until
his senior year that he got recognized by college coaches which to him was considered
not heavily recruited. Respondent 4 also emphasized the need for a scholarship. He
elaborated that throughout high school if he wasn’t getting any money to do track in
college he was never willing to play at that level. Respondent 6 even dropped out of a
school because he did not agree with his scholarship contract. The main reason he chose
Spring Hill was because of a scholarship. This is similar to Respondent 5 who stated he
would never have even thought of coming to Spring Hill if there was no scholarship
offered. Respondent 5 was more heavily recruited than respondent 6 but both
emphasized the importance of a scholarship in the recruiting process. Both agreed they
would not have played a sport in college without a scholarship. As Gerdy (2002)
explains how we have become numb to the business side of sports, the idea is relevant in
Respondent 5 and Respondent 6 experiences. They were numb to the money and
Respondent 2 talks about early development with Track; “I kind of played with
played with the idea of doing track in college but once I realized I was able to get college
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 24
scholarship for track I started to apply and see where I could get in and then a number of
schools contacted me after that” (Respondent 2, personal communication, May 12, 2018).
Once Respondent 2 sent out her scores that were considered good along with her track
times and shortly after got a number of responses. This shows how advanced recruiting
has become now and the technology aspect behind it. Respondent 2 was also recruited
In relation to Gerdy (2006) who states sports have become powerful as well as
much more revolved around money and Renick (1974) informing there is a slight
difference between college athletics and professional athletics. The next theme is, do
these student-athletes view their sport as a job rather than an athletic activity?
In relation to his athletic career Respondent 4 says, “I got my first college letter
the summer going into my freshman year of high school and mentally, my sport instantly
Respondent 4 mentioned how he was only in 8th grade at the time and receiving
recognition from college coaches was a major deal to him. He mentioned how at that
moment his love for the sport was still there but he looked at it more so as a job. The
reason was because the attention from college coaches intensified his focus on basketball
because he saw he had a chance to play at the next level. Coaches were telling him
things he can work on in order to play at the next and many of the coaches were in
Respondent 4 elaborated on the transition into college, “When you get into
college it’s about as a job as you can get because you’re getting paid, they’re paying you
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 25
X amount, they’re paying for your whole school which is $52,000 a year for Spring Hill
to play your sport at the highest level. If you play baseball they’re paying you $52,000 a
year to hit a ball. It’s about as job-like as possible because they are literally paying you.”
Critical Theory
Critical theory is relevant in Respondent 4’s statements when he talked about the
power of money in his sport. Respondent 4 elaborated on his scholarship and how the
schools is paying him $52,000 a year to play basketball at a high level, not to perform at a
high level academically but to play his sport at a high level. The power of becoming a
great basketball player allowed Respondent 4 to have his college education paid for. The
love for sports he explained shifted more to earning college scholarships than playing his
Respondent 2 spoke on viewing her sport as a job and a fun activity, “Some days I
am completely exhausted and I just don’t want to go but I have to. There are days that I
feel overwhelmed with schoolwork and practice. School has been really difficult at times
because there are weeks in which I have three tests and events that make balancing out
both a real challenge. Some nights I don’t get enough sleep and so forth” (Respondent 2,
Respondent 2 initially stated her sport was a job and elaborated that some days
can be fun but it is most certain a job. She mentions that she has to go to practice and
find a way to fit in everything else around it. Respondent 2 explains how practices take
up time and require preparation the day before to plan out the next day in order to
succeed academically. Just like on a job, she has to be there no matter what and plan out
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 26
her day around her sport. This is what makes most of her weeks hard with school. She
has to be participating in her sport that takes up time while also being able to perform
(2015) mentions that athletes need more sleep than anyone else and that people should
get at least 8-10 hours of sleep a night. Mazeika (2015) also emphasized athletes need
job you know, I have to put my all into it. Every time I step onto the court or every time I
need to do something extra. I believe it’s both for me” (Respondent 3, personal
Respondent 3 stated she feels at times her sport can be a job more so from the
mental perspective. Unlike Respondent 4 who looked at the situation more from a
financial side, Respondent 3 expressed her feelings and revealed that she loves basketball
but even that love requires a huge amount of energy and focus into succeeding at the
sport. The love takes up just as much time to her as any other job would. Out of the
eight respondents, six concluded that their sport was a job once he or she entered college.
Respondent 3 stated basketball can be mentally draining with the amount of time it
requires and most days when she attends practice and workout sessions it is a job like
approach.
Mental View
The next theme is about the mental view student-athletes have about their sport.
It is about how much desire they have about succeeding in their sport compared to
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 27
academics. The question provided is which is more important to them and which they
Respondent 8 says, “It is definitely more on my sport because it felt like I had less
control over that where in terms of school I was never really too worried about it. I
always felt like if I just studied a little bit I should be fine. I never had sleepless nights
This statement shows how Respondent 8 thought about his sport more than his
academics. Respondent 8 would only think about something he had less control over
which was his sport. Respondent 8 also explains that his sport demands so much time
that he constantly has to think about his sport in order to plan around it.
Respondent 1 says, “I definitely would say I think about my sport more than
anything else. I mean with traveling and the amount of attention it brings, it is constantly
on my mind whenever I’m away I try and just relax” (Respondent 1, personal
Traveling and uncertainness were key reasons why Respondent 8 stated his mind
was more on his sport rather than academics. Respondent 8 explained how his sport was
demanding throughout the year, while academics were only demanding for a couple of
weeks at a time.
Respondent 3 says, “Mentally I think more about my sport which kind of sucks
because in order to play my sport I have to be good academically but my sport demands
so much focus and attention it can be very challenging, at times more than I can handle”
their sport. She is constantly watching film and only looking at schoolwork as an
obstacle to overcome in order to continue to prepare for her sport rather than using
Respondent 3 also acknowledges the academic standards while playing a sport and how
even with the grade requirement, her sport is still the primary focus.
where I feel I feel I have way too much on my plate and my sport plays a significant role
in that. While I was choosing a major, my sport was a big influence in my decision.
Initially, I wanted to go into Bio Chemistry but trying to major in Bio Chemistry and play
a sport at the same time was way too much for me. The scheduling is hectic especially if
you are trying to maintain your GPA” (Respondent 6, personal communication, March
30, 2018).
Respondent 6 mentioned how playing his sport affected his decision in choosing a
major. This seemed to be a common theme among the respondents relating to the idea
that Respondents are thinking about their sport more than their academics. Respondents’
Respondents 4 says, “I know a ton of people, a ton of my good friends who play
sports in college and they can’t do majors like business and stuff because it’s too time
consuming resulting in them choosing majors that their not interested in. The plan is to
play professionally and when that doesn’t work out, they’re left with a degree in
something they are not interested in or don’t have a passion for” (Respondent 4, personal
The last part mentioned by Respondent 4 relates to Wachter (2010) in one of the
reasons why so many athletes go broke. Many athletes get a degree in something they
are not interested in and when they are done playing their sport they are not prepared to
apply for a job they are interested in or have a passion for. Zimbalist (2001) emphasizes
how important a college education is and how it can prevent this problem from becoming
bigger and more relevant. He elaborates the fact that many athletes are treated like
professionals while there in college and it is difficult to focus on anything else except for
Respondent 2 talks about her typical day being a student- athlete and how much
attention she draws towards her sport, “On a typical day I wake up at 7 or 6 depending on
if I have an 8 am and I will be busy until about 6:30 at night. Before the day starts I am
thinking about my sport because I have to plan around it” (Respondent 2, personal
Respondent 4 emphasized that she can’t even eat lunch because of her sport. 6
out of the 8 respondents state that they stress more about their sport than schoolwork. 6
of the 8 Respondents said mentally they think more about their sport because of the
demand it requires. Multiple Respondents state their sport is much more draining than
academics and the reason for this stress is because a lot of them feel they have to perform
well in fear of being asked to leave the school by their coach if they don’t perform up to
expectation.
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 30
Student-Athlete
The last theme that was asked of the Respondents was whether or not they
of us probably wouldn’t even be here if it wasn’t for our sport. Scholarship wise, money
wise, we wouldn’t have a chance at an education. For us we have to put our sport first in
order to stay at a school like Spring Hill” (Respondent 3, personal communication, March
13, 2018).
Spring Hill and for most that is the main reason they are there. Respondent 3 referred
back to the recruiting aspect and that when she was getting introduced to the school, most
of her vision was playing her sport and how she would enjoy playing a sport at the
school.
Respondent 5 says, “I would definitely say athlete first because it has gotten me
here. Scheduling obviously can be challenging but I always make sure my schoolwork
and other stuff is built around my athletic activities. Sports also requires more team
own with it never interfering with my sport which is my ticket here” (Respondent 5,
athletes, would not be at the school without our sport. His mindset is always on his sport
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 31
because he explains he needs to succeed in his sport in order to stay at Spring Hill
because he has a scholarship for his sport, not his academics. The team atmosphere
It’s always athlete first, that is the only reason I am at this school, it’s because I am an
athlete, my grades are not great but I am an athlete so that helps. It’s just a joke that
people say student-athlete, well its actually athlete-student no doubt, any day of the
Respondent 4 mentioned how schools depend on the athlete and his or her team to bring
one, sports were the primary source of revenue for the school. Winning was emphasized
so much because the more they won, the more money the school would make.
the total experience of most college athletes. With the time management playing a sport
requires, college athletes feel they are at a disadvantage when it comes to the classroom.
Gerdy (2006) made many points about sports becoming out of control and from talking
with the Respondents many of his observations are relevant. According to Gerdy (2006)
growing up with sports has changed, the overall meaning of sports has changed and now
of the 8 respondents feel this way strongly and believe it. Out of the 5 themes, only one
was not relevant to the secondary research. That one refers to the youth aspect of sports.
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 32
Respondents consistently stated that they were not forced to participate in sports. They
all developed love for their sport at some point. In relation to the research question,
Bibliography
1. Fletcher, T. B., Benshoff, J. M., & Richburg, M. J. (June 06, 2003). A Systems
2. Gerdy, J. R. (2006). Air ball: American education's failed experiment with elite
of Mississippi.
4. Hyman.M. (2003, July 3). Of course colleges chase the money. Business Source
5. Krumme, A. (2006, October 3). Money matters in college athletics. The Louisville
Cardinal.
6. Mazeika.V. (2015, March 18). Hectic schedules mean student-athletes lose sleep.
7. McNulty. M. (2016, October 8). A day in the life of a student athlete: balancing
8. Oberteuffer, D. (1936). The Athlete and His College. The Journal of Higher
9. Potuto, J. R., O'Hanlon, ., & James, . (December 01, 2007). National Study of
10. Purdy, D., Eitzen, D., & Hufnagel, R. (1982). Are Athletes Also Students? The
11. Renick, J. (1974). The Use and Misuse of College Athletics. The Journal of Higher
12. Sanderson, A., & Siegfried, J. (2015). The Case for Paying College Athletes. The
13. Smith, J. M., & Willingham, M. (2015). Cheated: The UNC scandal, the education
14. Whitner, P., & Myers, R. (1986). Academics and an Athelete: A Case Study. The
15. Wachter, Why Ballers Go Bust: An alarming number of star athletes end up broke.
Now leagues are trying to do something about it. (October 11, 2010). Business Week
time college sports: with a new postscript by the author. Princeton, N.J: Princeton
University Press
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 35
Appendix A:
1. How much time would you say you spend a week on athletics compared to
academics?
2. Mentally, would you say you think more about your sports or academics?
8. Have you ever been judged as just an athlete while being in college?
10. Did being an athlete affect your decision on choosing this major? How so?
11. Do you think if you didn’t play a sport you could have pursued some interests not
involving athletics?
Appendix B:
The IRB has reviewed and approved your proposal submitted on February 8, 2018 (The Meaning
of “Student-athlete”: A qualitative research paper). This approval is effective from today’s date
until March 7, 2019. Reminder: If you find it necessary to make any changes to your protocol,
you will need to submit those changes to the IRB for approval.
If you wish to renew next year, simply send a brief note requesting the renewal of IRB2017-
16. You will not need to go through the IRB approval process next year if the protocol and
measures stay the same.
We wish you the best with your project.
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 39
Appendix C:
You are being invited to participate in a research study on the meaning of the term
“student-athlete.”
Before you agree to participate, the investigator needs to tell you about (i) the purposes,
procedures, and duration of the research; (ii) any procedures which are experimental;
(iii) any reasonably foreseeable risks, discomforts, and benefits of the research; (iv) any
potentially beneficial alternative procedures or treatments; and (v) how confidentiality
will be maintained. If you agree to participate, you must be given a signed copy of this
form and a written summary of the research.
The purpose of this research is to study the experience of student-athletes. You will be
asked questions about your college experience as an athlete for 15-30 minutes depending
on the length of your answers. You will be able to chose if you want to be recorded or
not. Your participation in this research is completely voluntary. There is no anticipated
risk for participating. If you start feeling uncomfortable for any reason you will be free to
stop answering and leave. You will also be allowed to skip any question you do not wish
to answer. The interviewer is the only person who will know your name and likeness.
Your name will not be linked to your answers and will not appear in the study. Your
answers and your consent form will remain secured in the interviewer’s custody and will
be destroyed in May 2018.
You may contact Jack Morrissey at 224-545-3874 any time you have questions about the
research. If you have questions about your rights as a research subject, you may contact
the Institutional Review Board Chair at [email protected]
Your signature on this document means that this research study has been explained to
you, that the explanation includes the above information, that you are 19 or older, and
that you agree voluntarily to participate.
________________________ ________________________
Signature of Participant Signature of Witness
Running head: THE MEANING OF STUDENT-ATHLETE UNDER REVIEW 41
_________________________ ________________________
Typed/printed Name Typed/printed name
__________________________ _______________________
Date Date