0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views

Lesson 15 Potential Theory Using Complex Analysis

1) Complex analysis allows representing real potentials as the real part of a complex potential function, where the imaginary part satisfies Laplace's equation and represents lines of force. 2) Examples of real potentials between parallel plates and coaxial cylinders are given, where the complex potential leads to linear/logarithmic solutions and shows the equipotential lines and electric field lines. 3) Dirichlet problems with complicated boundaries can be solved by using a conformal mapping to transform the domain to a simpler problem that can be easily solved for the complex potential, then transforming back.

Uploaded by

Anonymous Ck5klR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views

Lesson 15 Potential Theory Using Complex Analysis

1) Complex analysis allows representing real potentials as the real part of a complex potential function, where the imaginary part satisfies Laplace's equation and represents lines of force. 2) Examples of real potentials between parallel plates and coaxial cylinders are given, where the complex potential leads to linear/logarithmic solutions and shows the equipotential lines and electric field lines. 3) Dirichlet problems with complicated boundaries can be solved by using a conformal mapping to transform the domain to a simpler problem that can be easily solved for the complex potential, then transforming back.

Uploaded by

Anonymous Ck5klR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

PDE & Complex Variables P15-1

Lesson 15 Potential Theory Using Complex Analysis (EK 18)

Introduction

“Potentials” in physics can simplify the derivation of forces. They are typically described by

solutions to Laplace’s equation ∇2Φ=0. The solutions are called “harmonic functions” if they

have continuous 2nd partial derivatives.

Why using complex analysis?

The real and imaginary parts of a complex analytic function F(z=x+iy)=Φ(x,y)+iΨ(x,y) are

satisfied with 2-D Laplace’s equation: ∇2Φ=∇2Ψ=0 (proved by CR-conditions, Lesson 9). If

Φ(x,y) represents the potential function, by working with F(z), we can: (1) handle both

equipotential lines (Φ=constant) and lines of force (Ψ=constant) simultaneously; (2) solve

Dirichlet problems with complicated boundary geometry by introducing another analytic

transformation function f(z) for conformal mapping.

Complex Potential
Examples of real potentials

1) Parallel plates: The electrostatic potential Φ between two parallel conducting plates is
 d d 
governed by: Laplace’s equation: ∇2Φ=Φ"(x)=0, and BCs: Φ −  =Φ1, Φ  =Φ2.
 2 2

Edited by: Shang-Da Yang


PDE & Complex Variables P15-2

The solution is a linear function:

Φ(x)=ax+b (15.1)
Φ1 − Φ 2 Φ + Φ2
where a= − , b= 1 . The equipotential line Φ=Φ0, is a vertical line x=x0
d 2
v
parallel to the plates. The E-field is E = − ∇Φ , ⇒
v v
E = − ax (15.2)

which is constant and perpendicular to the plates.

Note: Infinite dimension (along y-axis) causes constant potential (Φ is independent of y).

2) Coaxial cylinder: If Φ is independent of θ, ∇2Φ= r2Φrr+rΦr=0, ⇒

Φ(r)= aln r+ b (15.3)

where a, b are determined by BCs [Φ(r1)=Φ1, Φ(r2)=Φ2]. The equipotential line Φ=Φ0 is
v
a circle r=r0. The E-field is E = − ∇Φ , ⇒
v av
E =− r (15.4)
r
which is in radial direction, perpendicular to the equipotential lines.

3) Angular region: If the region of interest is confined by two plates in the radial directions

and with an included angle α, it is difficult to directly solve the potential Φ by traditional

methods. Instead, we can borrow the concept of analytic complex functions:


α α  y
(1) To be satisfied with the two BCs: u θ = −  =Φ1, u θ =  =Φ2, u(x,y)= tan −1  
 2  2  x
(=θ in the polar coordinates) is a choice. (2) u(x,y) is also satisfied with 2-D Laplace’s

equation for it is the imaginary part of an analytic function: F(z)= Ln z =ln |z|+i⋅Arg(z) [eq.

(9.7)]. By (1-2), ⇒

Φ=a+bθ (15.5)
Φ1 + Φ 2 Φ − Φ1
where a= , b= 2 . The equipotential line Φ=Φ0 is a ray θ =θ 0. The E-field
2 α
v
is E = − ∇Φ , ⇒
v bv
E =− θ (15.6)
r

Edited by: Shang-Da Yang


PDE & Complex Variables P15-3

which is in azimuthal (方位角) direction, perpendicular to the equipotential lines.

Concept of complex potential

For a given real potential Φ(x,y), we can uniquely (except for an additive constant) determine

a conjugate Ψ(x,y) by CR-equations, such that complex potential F(z=x+iy)= Φ(x,y)+iΨ(x,y)

is analytic. As a result, F(z) maps curves in the xy-plane onto curves in the ΦΨ-plane

“conformally” or vise versa, i.e. included angle is preserved during mapping (Appendix 9A).

Since Φ=Φ0 (vertical line) is always perpendicular to Ψ=Ψ0 (horizontal line) in the ΦΨ-plane,

⇒ the corresponding curves in the xy-plane: Φ(x,y)=Φ0 (equipotential line), and Ψ(x,y)=Ψ0

always make a right angle as well.

Since gradient defines the steepest ascent/descent direction, which is always perpendicular
v
with the equipotential lines (zero-variation direction), ⇒ E-field E = −∇Φ is perpendicular

with Φ(x,y)=constant, ⇒ Ψ(x,y)=Ψ0 stands for a E-field (force) line.

Edited by: Shang-Da Yang


PDE & Complex Variables P15-4

Examples of deriving lines of force by complex potential

1) Parallel plates: By eq. (15.1), Φ(x)=ax+b. By CR-equations, its conjugate is:

Ψ=ay+c (15.7)

⇒ complex potential F(z)=(ax+b)+i(ay+c)=az+d, which is analytic. The E-field lines are

Ψ= constant, ⇒ y=constant, same as eq. (15.2).

2) Coaxial cylinders: By eq. (15.3), Φ=aln r+b =aln |z|+b. By CR-equations, its conjugate is:

Ψ=aArg(z)+c (15.8)

⇒ complex potential F(z)=(a⋅ln |z|+b)+i(aArg(z)+c)=aLn z+d, which is analytic except for

0 and points on the negative real axis. The E-field lines are Ψ=constant, ⇒

Arg(z)=θ=constant, same as eq. (15.4).

3) Angular region: By eq. (15.5), Φ=a+bθ =a+bArg(z), which is the imaginary part of

(c+ia)+bLn z, or the real part of F(z)=(a+id)−ibLn z; ⇒ Ψ=Im[F(z)],

Ψ=d−b ln |z| (15.9)

The E-field lines are Ψ= constant, ⇒ |z|=r =constant, same as eq. (15.6).

Solving Dirichlet Potential Problems by Conformal Mapping (SJF 47)


Concept

Find an analytic transformation function f(z) to map a complicated domain D (in the z-plane)

onto a simpler domain D* (in the w-plane), where the complex potential F*(w) can be easily

solved [Re{F*(w)}=Φ*(w) is satisfied with 2-D Laplace’s equation and boundary conditions

in the w-plane]. Then the complex potential in the z-plane is derived by inverse transform:

F(z)=F*(w)|w=f(z), from which the real potential is: Φ(x,y)= Re{F(z=x+iy)}.

Edited by: Shang-Da Yang


PDE & Complex Variables P15-5

The strategy works because harmonic functions remain harmonic under conformal mapping.

Proof: f(z) and F*(w) are analytic (s.t. Re{F*(w)} is harmonic). By the chain rule, F(z) is also

dF *
analytic: F ′(z ) = ⋅ f ′( z ) w=f(z) exists. ⇒ Φ(x,y)=Re{F(z)} is harmonic.
dw

2 2
E.g. Non-coaxial cylinders: C1: |z|=1, C2: z − = ; U1=0, U2=110.
5 5

Direct solution in the z-plane is difficult. By using linear fractional transformation: w=


z − 1/ 2
f(z)= (EK 17.2−17.4), domain D is mapped onto D* in the w-plane, consisting of
( z / 2) − 1
1
two concentric circles: C1* : |w|=1, C 2* : |w|= ; with BCs: U1=0, U2=110.
2
The complex potential in the w-plane is: F*(w)=a⋅Ln w+k, where a, k can be solved by BCs:
 1
Φ * ( w = 1) =0, Φ *  w =  =110.
 2
 2z − 1 
The complex potential in the z-plane is: F(z)=F*(w)|w=f(z)= a ⋅ Ln  , and the real
 z−2 
 2z − 1 
potential is: Φ(x,y)=Re{F(z)}= a ⋅ ln  .
 z−2 

Edited by: Shang-Da Yang


PDE & Complex Variables P15-6

2z − 1
The equipotential lines Φ(x,y)=Φ0, ⇒ =constant, are circles (with different centers) in
z−2
the z-plane (see plot); corresponding to concentric circles in the w-plane. The lines of force

are circular arcs (see plot), corresponding to rays Arg(w)=constant in the w-plane.

Edited by: Shang-Da Yang

You might also like