This document summarizes key concepts in reasoning and proof including:
- Conditional statements and using Venn diagrams to prove them
- Biconditionals and what makes a good definition
- Deductive reasoning using laws of detachment and syllogism
- Properties of equality and reasoning in algebra
- Proving angles congruent using angle addition, substitution, and theorems about vertical, supplementary, and complementary angles.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
220 views
Unit 2
This document summarizes key concepts in reasoning and proof including:
- Conditional statements and using Venn diagrams to prove them
- Biconditionals and what makes a good definition
- Deductive reasoning using laws of detachment and syllogism
- Properties of equality and reasoning in algebra
- Proving angles congruent using angle addition, substitution, and theorems about vertical, supplementary, and complementary angles.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7
Ch 2: Reasoning
and Proof Annie Strobeck, Madi Naivar, and Sarah Nelson Sections ➔ 2.1 Conditional Statements
➔ 2.2 Biconditionals and
Definitions
➔ 2.3 Deductive Reasoning
➔ 2.4 Reasoning in Algebra
➔ 2.5 Proving Angles Congruent
2.1 Conditional Statements Vocab
Conditional Statement: If something is a carrot, then it is a veggie
An “if-then” statement Veggies Truth Value: Is it true or ● Hypothesis false? ○ Part following “if” Converse: Switch ● Conclusion Carrots position of hypothesis ○ Part following “then” and conclusion
Venn Diagram: If something is a veggie, then it is a carrot
Diagram that proves a conditional statement ● Is this true or false? ○ Counterexample: 2.2 Biconditionals and Definitions If an angles measures 90, ● One way to determine if Vocab something is a good definition Biconditional: Formed then it’s a right angle is to “reverse” it or look at the when both a conditional converse and see if it’s still true and its converse are If an angle is right then it ○ Apples are fruits that grow on true and uses phrase “if and only if” measures 90 trees and have seeds ■ When reversed, other things meet the definition An angles is right if and only ○ A triangle is a polygon with 3 Label each if it measures 90 sides A shape is a triangle if and statement as either ■ only if it’s a polygon with 3 the conditional, ● Conditional sides converse, or ● Converse biconditional: ● Biconditional 2.3 Deductive Reasoning Vocab Law of Detachment: If a conditional is Law of Syllogism: If p=q and q=r are Inductive Reasoning: true and you find yourself in a true statements, then p=r is also true Drawing conclusions situation where the hypothesis is true, based on patterns ● If something is a carrot, then it’s a then the conclusion is true veggie Deductive Reasoning: ● If something is a veggie, then it’s food Drawing conclusions ● If the pond is frozen, then it is less ● If something is a carrot, then it’s food based on true that 32ºF out statements Can we draw a conclusion if…
1. It’s 34º out
2. Parker is skating on the frozen pond Stay tuned for 2.4 Reasoning in Algebra Kahoot! Symmetric prop: If a=b then b=a Properties of Equality: Whatever you do to one side of equation, must do on other Transitive prop: If a=b and b=c then a=c
Addition prop: If a=b then a-c=b-c
● Replacing one entire side of = with another
Subtraction prop: If a=b then a-c=b-c
Substitution prop: If a=b then b can replace a in any equation or expression Multiplication prop: If a=b then a*c=b*c ● Can replace entire side or be in middle of expression/equation Division prop: If a=b then a/c=b/c Reflexive prop of cong: <A is cong. to <A Distributive prop: a(b+c)=ab+ac Symmetric prop of cong: If <A is cong. to <B then <B is congruent to Reflexive property: a=a <A
Transitive prop of cong: If WX is cong. to YZ and YZ is cong. to PA ten
WX is cong. to PA Proof:
Given: <1 and <3 are vertical <s
Prove: <1 is congruent to <3 2.5 Proving Angles Congruent Writing a proof Theorem: A statement that can be proven true Statements Reasons Vertical Angles Theorem: If you have vertical angles, then they are congruent 1. <1 and <3 are vertical Given angles Congruent Supplements Theorem: If two angles are supplements of the same angles (or 2. m<1+m<2=180 Angle addition postulate congruent angles), then the two angles are congruent 3. m<2+m<3=180 Angle addition postulate Congruent Complements Theorem: If two 4. m<1+m<2=m<2+m<3 Substitution angles are complements of the same angle (or congruent angles), then the two angles are 5. m<1=m<3 Subtraction Property congruent
2.4: All right angles are congruent
6. <1 is congruent to <3 Definition of congruence is equal in measure 2.5: If two angles are congruent and supplementary, then they each measure 90º