Model E1 - Ingress Protection Report
Model E1 - Ingress Protection Report
INTRODUCTION
This report gives the results of the tests for protection against solid foreign objects and protection against water on an
Explosion Proof Digital Intercom Station, Model E1-SM. A prototype sample in good condition was provided by the
client on August 6, 2013 and tested at Intertek’s Arlington Heights, IL facility.
AUTHORIZATION
This investigation was authorized by Signed Quotes 500472406 and 500473608, dated 08/05/13 and 08/08/13.
TEST METHOD
A sample of the Explosion Proof Digital Intercom Station, Model E1-SM was evaluated for conformance to the tests for
protection against dust & water and also was subjected to the Hosedown test to the Standards noted below.
This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are
limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss,
expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use
of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The
observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever
been under an Intertek certification program.
Report No. 101297091CHI-001 Page 2 August 12, 2013
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
GENERAL
The first character numeral Protection of the equipment against the ingress of dust
The second character numeral Protection of the equipment inside the enclosure against
harmful ingress of water
METHOD
The sample was tested in a dust chamber similar to figure 2 of the standard. Talcum power was maintained in
suspension by an air current. The chamber contained 2 kg of powder for every cubic meter of its volume. The talcum
power used was able to pass through a square meshed sieve whose nominal wire diameter is 50 µm and whose
nominal free distance between wires was 75µm. The powder was not used for more than 20 tests.
The sample under test was supported inside the test chamber and the pressure inside the enclosure was
maintained below the surrounding atmospheric pressure by a vacuum pump. The suction connection was made
to the cable inlet hole. The other holes were treated as intended for normal use on site.
The object of the test was to draw into the enclosure, by means of depression, a volume of air 80 times the
volume of the sample enclosure tested without exceeding the extraction rate of 60 volumes per hour. The
depression is not to exceed 2 kPa (20 mbar) on the manometer shown in figure 2.
If an extraction rate of 40 to 60 volumes per hour is obtained the duration of the test is 2 h.
If, with a maximum depression of 2 kPa (20 mbar), the extraction rate is less than 40 volumes per hour, the test is
continued until 80 volumes have been drawn through, or a period of 8 h has elapsed.
The results comply with the requirements since there wasn’t accumulation of talcum powder in a quantity or
location such that it could interfere with the correct operation of the equipment or impair safety.
Report No. 101297091CHI-001 Page 3 August 12, 2013
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
METHOD
During the test, the water temperature was not to differ by more than 5 K from the temperature of the sample under
test. If the water temperature is more than 5 K below the temperature of the specimen, a pressure balance was to be
provided for the enclosure.
During the test, the moisture contained inside the enclosure may partly condense. The dew which may thus deposit is
not to be mistaken for ingress of water.
The test is made by spraying the enclosure from all practicable directions with a stream of water from a standard test
nozzle as shown in figure 6.
- core of the substantial stream: circle of approximately 120 mm diameter at 2.5 m distance from nozzle;
- test duration per square meter of enclosure surface area likely to be sprayed: 1 min;
The results comply with the requirements since there wasn’t any water that entered the enclosure.
Report No. 101297091CHI-001 Page 4 August 12, 2013
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
TEST – HOSEDOWN
METHOD
The enclosure and its external mechanisms were subjected to a stream of water from a hose that has a 25 mm
inside diameter (1 inch inside diameter) nozzle that delivers at least 240 L per minute (65 gallons per minute). The
water was directed at all joints from a distance of 3.0 – 3.5 m (10 – 12 feet). The nozzle was moved along each
joint one time at a uniform nominal rate of 6 mm/s (1/4 inch per second). A conduit may be installed to equalize
internal and external pressures, but didn’t serve as a drain.
RESULTS OF TEST –
The results comply with the requirements since there wasn’t any water that entered the enclosure.
Report No. 101297091CHI-001 Page 5 August 12, 2013
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
DESCRIPTION
The sample provided is an Explosion Proof Digital Intercom Station, Model E1-SM
PHOTOS
Photo 1 – Model E1-SM following IP6X test.
CONCLUSION
The results of the tests indicate that the Explosion Proof Digital Intercom Station, Model E1-SM, met the
requirements of the degree of ingress protection rating of IP66 and also the requirements of the Type 4 Hosedown
test.
This Test Report completes our evaluation of this model, covered by Intertek Project No. G101297091. If there are
any questions regarding the results contained in this report, or any of the other services offered by Intertek, please do
not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Please note; this Test Report does not represent authorization for the use of any Intertek certification marks.