Chapter 5 Analysis and Design of T Beams and Doubly Reinforced Beams
Chapter 5 Analysis and Design of T Beams and Doubly Reinforced Beams
S1 S2
Effective Flange Width
• For T-shaped beams, lesser of
– L/4
– bw+2×8hf
– bw+(S1+S2)/2
• For L-shaped beams, lesser of
– L/12
– bw+6hf
– bw+S/2
S1 S2
Isolated T Beams
8.10.4 ― Isolated beams, in which the T-shape is
used to provide a flange for additional
compression area, shall have a flange
thickness not less than one-half the width of
web and an effective flange width not more
than four times the width of web.
ACI 318M-05
Location of neutral axis determines
whether the rectangular beam formulas
apply
Rectangular
beam
formulas can
be applied
Rectangular
beam formulas
cannot be
applied
Analysis of T Beams
• Check As,min as per ACI Section 10.5.1
using bw as the web width
• Compute T=Asfy
• Determine Ac stressed to 0.85f'c
T
Ac =
0.85 f c′
• Calculate a, c, εt
• Calculate φMn
Example 5.1 Determine the design strength of
the T beam shown below with f'c=27.6 MPa and
fy=414 MPa.
b=1524 mm
hf=100
d=610 mm
6-#29
(As=3870 mm2)
bw=254 mm
f c′ 27.6
Minimum reinforcement: As ,min = bw d = × 254 × 610 = 491.5 mm 2
4 fy 4 × 414
(ACI 318M-05 10.5.1)
1.4bw d 1.4 × 254 × 610
As ,min = = = 524 mm 2 ←
fy 414
As , provided > As ,min O.K .
Example 5.1 Determine the design strength of
the T beam shown below with f'c=27.6 MPa and
fy=414 MPa. b=1524 mm
hf=100
d=610 mm
6-#29
(As=3870 mm2)
Assuming steel yielding, bw=254 mm
T 3870 × 414
Ac = = = 68294.1 mm 2
0.85 f c′ 0.85 × 27.6
Ac 68294.1 a 44.8
a= = = 44.8 mm → c = = = 52.7 mm (neutral axis within the slab)
b 1524 β1 0.85
εt =
0.003
(d − c ) = 0.003 × (610 − 52.7 ) = 0.0317 > 0.005 → φ = 0.9
c 52.7
Design strength:
φM n = φAs f y (d − a 2 ) = 0.9 × 3871× 414 × (610 − 44.8 2 )×10 −6 = 847.5 kN − m
Method for Analyzing T Beams
d=457 mm
305 mm
3048 mm 3048 mm 3048 mm 3048 mm
Effective flange width: b = L 4 = 6100 4 = 1525 mm ← smallest
b = bw + 2 × 8h f = 305 + 16 ×100 = 1905 mm
b = bw + (S1 + S 2 ) 2 = 3048 mm
Factored moment: M u = 1.2 M D + 1.6 M L = 1.2 ×108.5 + 1.6 ×135.6 = 347.2 kN − m
Assuming steel yielding and φ=0.9, jd=0.9d,
Mu 347.2 ×106
As ,required = = = 2265.6 mm 2
φf y jd 0.9 × 414 × 0.9 × 457
→ Use 4-#25 (As,provided=2040 mm2)
Beam width: bw = 2×40+2×10+4×25+3S = 305 mm → S = 35mm > 25mm O.K.
Example 5.4 Design a T Beam for the floor system shown
below for which bw and d are given . MD=108.5 kN-m,
ML=135.6 kN-m, f'c=27.6 MPa, fy=414 MPa and simple
span=6.1 m 100 mm
d=457 mm
305 mm
3048 mm 3048 mm 3048 mm 3048 mm
f c′ 1.4bw d
As ,min = bw d As ,min = As ,max = 0.0181bw d
4 fy fy
= 0.0181× 305 × 457
27.6 1.4 × 305 × 457
= × 305 × 457 = = 2522.9 mm 2 > As , provided
4 × 414 414
= 442.2 mm 2 < As , provided = 471.4 mm 2 < As , provided
As f y 2040 × 414 a 24.4
a= = = 24.4 mm < h f → c = = = 28.7 mm → φ = 0.9
0.85 f c′b 0.85 × 26.7 ×1525 β1 0.85
φM n = φAs f y (d − a 2) = 0.9 × 2040 × 414 × (457 − 24.4 2 )×10 −6 = 338 kN − m ≈ M u
(2.7% under, say O.K.)
Example 5.5 Design T beam for the floor system below for which bw
and d are given MD=271.3 kN-m, ML=576.5 kN-m, f'c=20.7 MPa,
fy=414 MPa, and sipmle span=5.5 m
76
610
533 mm
610
533 mm
610
533 mm
f c′
× 381× 610 = 638.5 mm 2 < (As , provided )mod ified
20.7
As ,min = bw d =
18294mm
fy 4 × 414 1829 mm 1829 mm 1829 mm
1.4bw d 1.4 × 381× 610
As ,min = = = 786 mm 2 < (As , provided )mod ified
fy 414
As ,max = 0.0135bw d = 0.0135 × 381× 610 = 3138 mm 2 < As , provided N .G.
(A )
s , provided mod ified = As , provided − 0.85( f c′ f y )h f (b − bw ) = 6450 − 0.85 × (20.7 414 )× 76 × (1375 − 381) = 3239 mm 2
Since still (As , provided )mod ified > As ,max , slab thickness should be increased. Let' s use h f = 80 mm
Example 5.5 Design T beam for the floor system below for which bw
and d are given MD=271.3 kN-m, ML=576.5 kN-m, f'c=20.7 MPa,
fy=414 MPa, and sipmle span=5.5 m
80
610
533 mm
610
533 mm
610
533 mm
φM n = φ [C f (d − h f 2) + Cw (d − a 2)]
= 0.9 × [0.85 f c′(b − bw )h f (d − h f 2 ) + 0.85 f c′abw (d − a 2 )]
= 0.9 × 0.85 × 20.7 × (1375 − 381)× 80 × (610 − 80 2 )×10 −6
+ 0.9 × 0.85 × 20.7 ×189.6 × 381× (610 − 189.6 2 )×10 −6
= 1307.1 kN − m > M u
Design of T Beams for Negative Moments
tension T
compression C
Compression Steel
• Results in doubly reinforced concrete beams
– Different from the double layered steel
• Increases moment capacity by increasing
tension steel without violating the maximum
steel limit
• Makes the beam ductile and tough to be
earthquake resistant
• Reduces long-term deflection due to
shrinkage and plastic flow
• Makes the fabrication of transverse bar right
and easier by providing the supports
Design of Doubly Reinforced
Concrete Beams
Compression steel reduces the contribution of concrete
stress block. However, the existence of compression steel
does not significantly enhance the moment strength.
C = 0.85 f c′ab + As′ f s′
T = As f y
From force equilibrium and assumption that tensile steel
yields,
T = C = Cc + C s
As′
T = As f y d d′
Cc = 0.85 f c′ab As
Cs = As′ f s′ = As′ε s′ Es ≤ As′ f y b
Design of Doubly Reinforced
Concrete Beams
From strain profile,
ε s′ c − d′
=
0.003 c
ε s′ = 0.003(1 − d ′ c ) = 0.003(1 − β1d ′ a )
Substituting this into the equilibrium relation,
Cs = As′ε s′ Es = As′ ⋅ 0.003(1 − β1d ′ a )Es = 600 As′ (1 − β1d ′ a )
As f y = 0.85 f c′ab + 600 As′ (1 − β1d ′ a )
Rearranging the equilibrium equation
(0.85 f c′b )a 2 − (As f y − 600 As′ )a − 600 As′ β1d ′ = 0
Solving this quadratic equation gives the value of "a".
Make sure the tensile steel strain greater than or equal
to 0.005.
Alternative Analysis of Doubly
Reinforced Concrete Beams
Various T-Beams
Various Doubly Reinforced
Concrete Beams