80% found this document useful (5 votes)
5K views8 pages

OPCRF For School Heads

This document is an individual performance commitment review form for a school administrator. It outlines the key result areas, performance indicators, targets, and actual results that will be used to evaluate the school administrator's performance for the period of January 2017 to December 2017. The form includes sections to evaluate the administrator's performance in areas such as instructional leadership, learning environment, human resource management, school leadership, and professional growth. The administrator will be rated on a scale of 1 to 5 for each target based on the quality, efficiency, and timeliness of their work. Their overall score will be calculated by multiplying their rating by the weight assigned to each key result area.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
80% found this document useful (5 votes)
5K views8 pages

OPCRF For School Heads

This document is an individual performance commitment review form for a school administrator. It outlines the key result areas, performance indicators, targets, and actual results that will be used to evaluate the school administrator's performance for the period of January 2017 to December 2017. The form includes sections to evaluate the administrator's performance in areas such as instructional leadership, learning environment, human resource management, school leadership, and professional growth. The administrator will be rated on a scale of 1 to 5 for each target based on the quality, efficiency, and timeliness of their work. Their overall score will be calculated by multiplying their rating by the weight assigned to each key result area.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
Division of Surigao del Sur

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM FOR SCHOOL AD

Name of Employee: NILO F. TRIPOLI, MAED Name of Rater:


Position: Principal II Position:
Review Period: Jan. 2017 - Dec. 2017 Date of Review:
School:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING

PERFORMANCE
WEIGH
INDICATORS
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER
(Quality, Efficiency,
KRA
Timeliness)

March 5% NAT Result

Accounted for learning Quarterly Test &MPS


outcomes of schools and Quarterly 5%
Report
centers viz-a-viz goals and
targets School Tracking
Instructional Leadership Quarterly 10% Conducted every
(30%) quarter

Performed instructional
STAR Observation
supervision to achieve Jan-Nov 10%
reports
learning outcomes
CFFS Mechanism
Year round 5%
checklist
Provided safe and child
Learning Environment friendly learning and school
(10%) environment for
students/learners Child protection policy
Year round 5% and DRRM formulated
and communciated

Technical assisstance
Year round 7%
conducted as needed
Provided technical assistance
to teachers on matters
pertaining to enhancement of Year round Portfolios of teachers
6%
Human Resource classroom management, on file
Management and skills and instructional
Development (20%) competence and to non-
teaching personnel for
support services within the Mid-year performance
RPMS cycle October 7%
rating on file

Year round 3% Minutes of meeting

Parents’ Involvement and Established school and family Year round 3% Brigada Eskwela
Community Partnership andcommunity partnership
(10%) for school performance

Year round 4% Adopt a School Report

Jaunuary 4% AIP, APP, PPMP

Performed leadership,
Monthy 3%
Performed leadership,
management functions

School Leadership
Year round 3%
Management and
Operarions (20%)

Year round 2.50%

Year round 2.50%


Performed data-based
strategic planning
Year round 2.50%

Year round 2.50%

Conducted/Initiated/participat
ed in seminars
Year round 2.50% certificates
workshops/trainings/program
s/projects, action research

Professional Growth and Received awards, citations,


Development (10% recognition for exemplary Year round 2.50% certificates
performance
Participated actively in the
Certificate of
professional organizations
Year round 2.50% membership &
and activities organized by
attendance
DepED

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned


Ratee: Rater:

NILO F. TRIPOLI, MAED CELSA CASA


School Head Chief - C.I.D.
ATION
n

M FOR SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS/HEADS

CELSA CASA
Chief-Curriculum & Implementation Division

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS
RATIN
TARGET ACTUAL SCORE
G
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS AVERAGE

-Increase NAT by 5%
2 5 5 4 4 0.200
-Increase GSA by 2%
3 4 4 3.7 3.7 0.185

60% of
-50% of activities in
activities 5 5 4 4.7 4 0.400
SIP Conducted conducted

-Provided clinical
supervision to 50% of 8 4 5 4 4.3 4.3 0.430
the teachers (8 tchrs)
-100% of CFSS
mechanisms are
present with
100%
evidences.
without 3 3 3 3 3 0.150
evidence

CPP &
Institutionalized CPP DRRM
Teams 5 4 4 4.3 4.3 0.215
and DRRM
activated

- 10 out of 15 teachers
are provided technical
assistance 9 5 4 5 4.7 4.7 0.329

9 out of 15 teachers 12
5 4 4 4.3 4.3 0.258
have portfolio teacherS

15
Performed RPMS review teachers
among 10 out of performed 5 4 3 4 4 0.280
15teachers and staf RPMS
review

-Organized /
Functional
Functional SGC & PTA SGC & PTA 5 4 5 4.7 4.7 0.141

Prepared stakeholders
mobilization plan 5 4 4 4.3 4.3 0.129

Obtained resources Stakehold


ers
for the school through
donated 5 5 5 5 5 0.200
stakeholders resources
partnership to school

Prepared SIP, AIP, APP SIP, AIP,


& PPMP PPMP 4 4 4 4 4 0.160
implemented
Has an updated MOOE
Utilization Board MOOE
utilization
displayed in posted on 5 5 4 4.7 4.7 0.141
Conspicuous area in transparency
the school board

Utilizes MOOE for the No


entire SY and unliuquidat
5 4 5 4.7 4.3 0.129
liquidates on or before ed cash
deadline. advances

-Has a functional EMIS


functional 4 4 3 3.7 3.7 0.093

Conducted school
SWOT Analysis conducted 4 4 4 4 4 0.100

Decrease Dropout by
2% 3 3 1 2.33333 1 0.025

Increase PI's by 2% 2 2 2 2 2 0.050

2
trainings/seminars 3 5 5 4 4.7 4.7 0.118
/workshops

2 awards, citations,
1 2 2 2 2 2 0.050
recognitions

1 Organization 2 5 5 5 5 5 0.125

OVERALL
RATING FOR 3.907
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Approving Authority:

MARILOU B. DEDUMO, PhD., CESO V


Schools Division Superintendent

You might also like