The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
1
Objectives of the law
2
Meaning of industry…
3
What is industrial dispute…
•However, it does not include (i) Armed Forces i.e. those subject to Air Force
Act, Army Act or Navy Act (ii) Police or employees of prison (iii) Employed in
mainly managerial or administrative capacity or (iv) person in supervisory
capacity drawing wages exceeding Rs 1,600 per month or functions are is
mainly of managerial nature. [section 2(x)].
5
settlement machinery
6
Settlement machinery …
7
Meaning of award (judgement)
8
Meaning of settlement…
9
Duration of settlement…
11
What is lay-off?
• It is temporary
• It is due to situation beyond the control of
the employer
• Layoff compensation is given to the
employee (50%).
• It is relating to workers’ whose name is
there on the muster roll of the employer
• Employee has to come to the factory, but
is laid off in 2 hours (not given work)
13
Lay off compensation…
16
Notice for retrenchment…
17
Calculation of compensation…
18
Permission for retrenchment…
19
Meaning of closure…
21
Govt. permission required, if >=100
workers…
22
Meaning of strike…
27
No work – no pay
30
No discharge without permission (on
matters related to dispute)
• Employer shall not discharge, dismiss or punish
any workman in matter for any misconduct
concerned to dispute, without permission of
authority before whom proceedings are pending.
[section 33(1)(b)]. Punishment which is not
connected to dispute can be made in
accordance with standing orders without any
permission. However, dismissal or discharge of
workman will require approval of the action.
Application for approval should be made after
action is taken. [section 33(2)(b)].
31
Protected workmen…
33
Unfair labour practices by employer…
• Threatening workmen with discharge or dismissal, if they join a trade union
threatening a lock-out or closure, if a trade union is organised granting wage
increase to workmen at crucial periods of trade union organisation, with a view
to undermining the efforts of the trade union at organisation an employer taking
an active interest in organising a trade, union of his workmen.
• To establish employer-sponsored trade unions of workmen discharging or
punishing a workman, because he urged other workmen to join or organise a
trade union discharging or dismissing a workman for taking part in any strike
(not being a strike which it deemed to be an illegal strike under this Act)
changing seniority rating of workmen because of trade union activities.
• Refusing to promote workmen to higher posts on account of their trade union
activities giving unmerited promotions to certain workmen with a view to
creating friction amongst other workmen, or to undermine the strength of their
trade union discharging office bearers or active members of the trade union on
account of their trade union activities
34
Contd..
• To discharge or dismiss workmen – by way of victimisation; by falsely
implicating a workman in a criminal case on false or fabricated evidence;
on untrue allegations of absence without leave; in utter disregard of the
principles of natural justice in the conduct of domestic enquiry or with
undue haste; for misconduct of a minor or technical character, without
having any regard to the nature of the particular misconduct or the past
record of service of the workman.
• To abolish the work of a regular nature being done by workmen, and to
give such work to contractors as a measure of breaking a strike. To
transfer a workman mala fide from one place to another, under the
excuse of following management policy. To insist upon individual
workmen, who are on a legal strike to sign a good conduct bond, as a
precondition to allowing them to resume work.
• To show favoritism or partiality to one set of workers regardless of merit.
• To employ workmen as "badlis" casuals or temporaries and to continue
them as such for years, with the object of depriving them of the status
and privileges of permanent workmen.
35
Contd..
36
UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICES on the part of workmen :
37
Contd..
38
Case : wokmen of subong Tea estate /v/s
subong Tea Estate (1964)
• Supreme court said :
1. Management can retrench employes only for
proper reasons
2. Management can decide the number of labour
force to employ
3. Surplus workers can be retrenched
4. Workers may become surplus due to
rationalisation
5. The right to retrench cannot normally be
challenged – however, it can be questioned,
whether it was done for proper reason.
39
Mention 7 authorities under Industrial
Disputes Act…
1. Works committee (sec. 3)
2. Conciliation officer (sec. 4)
3. Board of conciliation (Sec. 5)
4. Courts of inquiry (sec. 6)
5. Labour court (sec. 7)
6. Tribunal (sec. 7 a)
7. National Tribunals (sec. 7 b)
40