The Geomorphological Assessment: 4.1 The Desk Top Exercise
The Geomorphological Assessment: 4.1 The Desk Top Exercise
The desk top exercise should also include an audit of catchment conditions as relevant to
geomorphological change (erosion potential, flow modifications etc.). Aerial photographs
should be examined for general conditions over the length of the reach as well as possible
historical changes to the channel. A scale of 1: 10 000 is necessary if channel features are to be
observed.
5
Table 1. Geomorphological Zonation of River Channels (after Rowntree and Wadeson, 1999).
6
4.2 The field survey
Field data is collected at two levels depending on the type of assessment (see Section 6.1).
Channel transect or cross-section surveys are used to quantify the channel form in terms of a
width-depth ratio and entrenchment ratio. Resurvey of these transects will also enable
monitoring of channel change. A more rapid qualitative assessment of channel type and
channel condition is undertaken using prescribed data forms. Data sheets for the field survey
are given in Appendix B. Data collection is summarised below.
General information on the site and conditions at the time of the site visit are recorded
on the first page (Sections 1-4). Basic site details (Section 1) are derived from a 1: 50 000 map
(river name, altitude, lat. long.) or from a GPS (lat. long). Photographs should be taken to
record the characteristics of the site (Section 2). Section 3 classifies the channel in terms of its
flow regime: perennial, seasonal or ephemeral (storm runoff during heavy rains). Section 4
relates to the flow condition at the time of the survey: the level of flow and the clarity of the
water. This information aids in the interpretation of certain evaluations. For example, if the
flows are high, or the clarity of the water is low, it will be difficult to observe the condition of
the stream bed.
The intrinsic geomorphological characteristics of the site required for classification are
recorded in Sections 5 through to 12. Section 5 requires the observer to make a sketch of the
channel plan. A good sketch map and cross-sections are invaluable when assessing change at
some future date. A cross-section template is provided to assist the observer in identifying the
main channel features (Section 6). The channel width dimensions should be recorded in the
appropriate table (Section 7). More accurate data on the channel width and depth can be
obtained from the cross section surveys.
The channel is assigned to a channel type in Section 8. Four channel types are
recognised: bedrock, alluvial, mixed and fixed boulder. Bedrock channels are formed in solid
rock, though there may be loose material present locally. Alluvial channels are formed in sand,
gravel, cobbles or small boulders (the material should be able to move during floods). Mixed
channels consist of alternating bedrock and alluvial sections. Fixed boulder bed channels are
dominated by large boulders which are unlikely to move except during extreme flood events.
Morphological units observed at the site are recorded in Section 9. These are the
morphological features which make up the form of the channel and which determine the type
of physical habitats that will be available to aquatic and riparian organisms. Bars, which are
important depositional features, are recorded separately in Section 17. The assemblage of
morphological units present in the site are used to assign a reach type from the list in Section
10. Where possible the observer should confirm this classification by considering the
characteristics of the reach within which the site is located.
The composition of dominant material making up the bed and bank are recorded in
Section 11 and 12. The bed and bank material are particularly important factors determining
the stability of the channel form and its associated habitats. More detailed information on the
composition of the channel bed can be recorded using the table in Section 18. Whilst the
7
entries in Section 11 and 12 will be used to classify the channels and assess potential stability,
the size distribution of sediments as given in Section 18 can be used to monitor changes in bed
condition over time.
Data recorded in Sections 13 to 18 relate to the condition of the channel and refer to
more transitory characteristics that may change during the monitoring period. Riparian and in-
channel vegetation are important factors controlling channel stability. Encroachment of
vegetation on to channel bars is a good indication of long term channel change, or channel
recovery from a major flood. Vegetation condition is recorded in Section 13. Channel
modifications and bank impacts due to external disturbance are assessed used Section 14.
Section 15 and 16 relate to the condition of the banks. Section 15 is used to assess the potential
stability of the banks in terms of their height, slope, material composition and stratification
and vegetation cover. Ratings for each of these factors is combined to derive a bank stability
score. The observed erosion is entered in Section 16.
Channel bars are the main depositional features found within the channels. They
represent local storage of sediment so that a change in the bar classification and bar material
would indicate a significant change in the sediment dynamics of the reach. Channel bars are
assessed using Section 17. Change in bed condition at a finer scale is assessed using Section
18. Bed packing can be used as an indicator of the stability of the bed in respect of erosion.
Loosely packed beds tend to be mobile during floods and probably consist of recently
deposited material. Tightly packed beds are stable under most flows. Embeddedness refers to
the deposition of fine grains around coarse particles (sand around cobble) and indicates an
environment conducive to deposition. It may be a transitory condition dependent on the
balance of the supply of fine sediment and the competence of recent floods to disturb the
larger material. Bed packing can be assessed by kicking the bed or attempting to move
material by hand. Embeddedness is assessed by direct observation. The size distribution of the
bed material requires a more time consuming assessment, but gives a good record against
which change can be assessed. It is necessary to record the diameter of at least 100 randomly
selected clasts (or fine deposits) for both the hydraulic control (riffle, rapid etc.) and the main
bar type if present.
Available habitat is assessed using Section 19 using observations of the type of flow
(depth and surface appearance) and the available cover (related to substrate, vegetation, bank
shape or snags). This rapid assessment could be replaced by a more detailed assessment of
hydraulic habitat using 3-d survey techniques that are being developed for application to the
Ecological Reserve.