Calvary Convention Centre: ARC3413 Building Science Ii
Calvary Convention Centre: ARC3413 Building Science Ii
EDWIN'S
GROUP
Calvary
Convention
Centre
ARC3413
BUILDING SCIENCE II
Auditorium :
A Case Study on
Acoustic Design
02 METHODOLOGY 7
2.1 Measuring Instruments
2.2 Data Collection Methods
03
ACOUSTICAL PHENOMENON 10
3.1 Acoustic in Architecture
3.2 Sound Intensity
3.3 Reverberation
3.4 Attenuation
3.5 Echoes
3.6 Sound Shadow
3.7 Issue of Acoustic Design Studies
3.8 Acoustical Design of Auditorium
04
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS 17
4.1 Auditorium Design Analysis
4.2 Materials and Properties
4.3 Acoustic Treatments and Components
3.4 Audio Equipments
3.5 Noise Source
3.6 Sound Propogation and Related
Phenomenon
05 REVERBERATION TIME 41
5.1 Absorption of Surface
5.2 Calculation of Reverberation Time
06 CONCLUSION 43
6.1 Observation and Conclusion
07 REFERENCES
7.1 Citation
44
01 INTRODUCTION
1.1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, we would like to express our gratitude to our beloved lecturers,
Mr. Azim Sulaiman and Ar. Edwin Chan who guide us throughout this project. They
also put much effort by organising a study trip to Malaysian Philharmonic
Orchestra (MPO) and most importantly they are always willing to answer and solve
our questions patiently. Our tutor, Ar. Edwin Chan also guided us with suggestions
that help to increase the richness of our report. Without any doubt, i would also like
to thank School of Architecture Building and Design (SABD) to provide us a
comfortable platform for discussion and gives us the opportunity to carry out our
research topics. Last but not least, we are thankful for all of our fellow friends and
groupmates that support us both physical and mentally throughout the project.
The aim and objectives of this report is to provide a concise and well-documented
analysis that can showcase our understanding of acoustical theory of our case
study, Calvary Convention Centre, situated at Bukit Jalil.
By observing and analysing the types of acoustical design theories applied in the
auditorium, we are then able to develop a better understanding on the
characteristics of architectural space and how it affects the multiplicity of design
approaches that can be taken for said space to be considered “acoustical efficient”.
It is vital to know how different types of designs and their acoustical treatments
influence the sound efficiency and the overall user experiences.
2.1.3 Smartphone
Personal smartphones were used as secondary
cameras so that the tasks can be easily divided
between the group members. Secondary
cameras allow more pictures from different
angles to be taken as evidence of our study and
for later reference.
Image 2.1.3 shows Iphone X for easy
documentary.
Two site visits were conducted to gather information and obtain the measurements
required. Many meetings were held over a one month period to analyse and
compile the data we obtained. Architectural drawings such as the floor plans and
sections were kindly provided to us by the architects at T.R. Hamzah & Yeang Sdn.
Bhd.
A second site visit followed the next sunday during the church service. We were
allowed to join in the service and experience the acoustics while the hall was
occupied. We sat in different locations to gain a better perspective and correlated
this experience with the data we collected from the first site visit. However, we
were not permitted to take any measurements at any point during the service.
Using the tools that were described above, we gathered all the data that was
required to the best of our ability, as well as observing and recording the overall
acoustical design, layout, sound proofing methods and materials as well as notable
acoustic components.
Good acoustic design takes into account such issues as reverberation time; sound
absorption of the finish materials; echoes; acoustic shadows; sound intimacy,
texture, and blend; and external noise. Architectural modifications may act as
focusing elements to improve sound quality. Typical sound paths such as wall
partitions, ceiling panels and floor/ceiling assemblies are the primary elements that
designers use to control the sound levels in a building. Technical design solutions
need to be implemented to limit and control the noise transmission from one
building space to another to ensure space functionality and speech privacy.
Surface materials are also a very important factor to the overall acoustic quality of
a building. Interior space acoustics is the science of controlling a room's surfaces
based on sound absorbing and reflecting properties. Reflective surfaces can be
angled and coordinated to provide good coverage of sound for a listener in a
concert hall or theatre.
Sound intensity is defined as the sound power per unit area. The energy of
sound is determined by measuring the intensity of sound waves that are produced
by vibrating objects. The pressure variation, amplitude, is proportional to the
intensity, therefore it is safe to say that the larger the sound wave oscillation, the
more intense the sound will be. Although the units for sound intensity are
technically watts per meter squared, it is much more common for it to be referred
to as decibels, dB. A decibel is a ratio of the observed amplitude, or intensity
level to a reference, which is 0 dB.
Since audible sound consists of pressure waves, one of the ways to quantify the
sound is to state the amount of pressure variation relative to atmospheric pressure
caused by the sound. Because of the great sensitivity of human hearing, the
threshold of hearing corresponds to a pressure variation less than a billionth of
atmospheric pressure. The standard threshold of hearing can be stated in terms of
pressure and the sound intensity in decibels can be expressed in terms of the
sound pressure.
LI = 10 log (I / Io)
Sabine Formula:
RT = 0.16V
AT
where:
RT = reverberation time (sec)
V = volume of the room (cu.m)
AT = total absorption of room
surfaces (sq.m sabins)
The reverberant sound in an auditorium dies away with time as the sound energy
is absorbed by multiple interactions with the surfaces of the room. In a more
reflective room, it will take longer for the sound to die away and the room is said to
be 'live'. But the time for reverberation to completely die away will depend upon
how loud the sound was to begin with, and will also depend upon the acuity of the
hearing of the observer. In order to provide a reproducible parameter, a standard
reverberation time has been
-
defined as the time for the sound to die away to a
level 60 decibels below its original level. The reverberation time can be modeled to
permit an approximate calculation.
3.5 ECHOES
Echo is a distinct, reflected sound wave from a surface. A reflected sound can
be heard separately from the original sound if the sound source is closer to the
receiver while the reflecting hard surface is sufficiently far from receiver. Such
reflected sound is called an echo. Flutter echo is an energy that’s trapped between
two surfaces and the angle that the sound enters between the two surfaces. This
phenomenon occurs when a short burst of sound is produced between parallel
sound-reflective surfaces. Flutter echoes can be reduced by incorporating more
non-parallel surfaces into the building design.
3.8.2 VOLUME
The size of the auditorium should remain optimum: small halls leads to irregular
distribution of sound because of the formation of standing waves. On the other
which may large halls create a weaker intensity and longer reverberation time
result in serious issues.
3.8.5 REVERBERATION
The reverberation time is the time for the sound to die away after the sound source
ceases, but that of course depends on the intensity of the sound. To achieve the
desired acoustic effects, the reverberation time in the auditorium should be
perfectly balanced. The optimum reverberation time for an auditorium or room of
course depends upon its intended use. Around 2 seconds is desirable for a
medium-sized, general purpose auditorium that is to be used for both speech and
music. The reverberation time is strongly influenced by the absorption
coefficients of the surfaces but also depends upon the volume of the room,
bigger rooms produce longer reverberation times.
4.1.2 VOLUME
The optimum size of the auditorium depends on the function of the hall and
the audience capacity. Larger volumes generally produce better acoustics for
music productions as the reverberation time would be longer. However, longer
reverberation times are unsuitable for speakers areas as the voices will sound
murky and unclear. Therefore, it is important to identify the most suitable volume to
satisfy the specific needs of the auditorium. Although the CCC auditorium is
built to accomodate a large audience capacity, the sound absorbent
materials effectively brought down the reverberation time to 0.9 seconds
which is suitable for speeches.
39136.60m³
Image 4.1.2 shows the volume of the auditorium of 39136.60m³ with 0.9s constant reverberation time.
Image 4.1.5 shows the expected sound reflection from ceiling reflector panels to all audiences.
Heavy Curtain,
Hung in Fold Against 0.14 0.55 0.72
Solid Wall
Plywood, Hardwood
Panels over 25mm 0.14 0.06 0.08
Airspace
Plasterboard on
Battens, 0.30 0.15 0.05
18mm Airspace
6mm
Panel Glass 0.18 0.04 0.03
Timber Padded
Retractable 0.08 0.15 0.00
Tip-Up Seat
LEGEND
Thick Piled Carpet,Heavy on Reinforced Concrete
Timber Padded Retractable Tip-Up Seat
Plasterboard on Battens, 18mm Airspace
Rock Wool 30mm, 200 kg/m3 over 300mm Air Gap
Upholstered Tip-Up Theatre Seat
Timber Floor on Joists
Heavy Curtain, Hung in Fold Against Solid Wall
Image 4.2.1A shows the indication of materials
on floor plan.
Image 4.3.1A shows the timber flooring Image 4.3.1B shows the indication of
of the CCC stage. timber flooring on floor plan.
Laminated Finishes
Veneer Timber
Acoustical Underlayment Material
Concrete Slab
Image 4.3.2A shows the carpet used Image 4.3.2B shows the indication of
in CCC auditorium. carpet flooring on floor plan.
Timber Veneer
Rubber Layer
Concrete
Auditorium Floor
Image 4.3.3A shows the wall panel finished by Image 4.3.3B shows the indication of
rockwool. wall panel on floor plan.
Image 4.3.4A shows the gypsum board used by CCC Image 4.3.4B shows the indication of
auditorium. gypsum board on call-out section.
4.3.5 SEATING
Timber upholstered chairs are used in the CCC to provide seating for its 5,000
capacity audience. The cushioned chairs not only provide viewers with comfort, it
is also an excellent sound absorbent, which helps reduce the overall
reverberation time in the auditorium. The hall is not only aided with acoustical
taming through the room surfaces such as the wall and ceiling, but additional
sound control is also present in the form of the padded seats. It adds to the
acoustic quality of the auditorium and allows the space to achieve a similar quality
of sound whether the auditorium is filled to partial or maximum capacity.
Image 4.3.5B shows the indication of Image 4.3.5C shows the indication of padded
uphosltered seating on floor plan. seating on floor plan.
L-Acoustics provided the three different types of speakers used in the auditorium.
The ARCS Focus is a line array loudspeaker system with the purpose of
projecting sound to the back of the hall. The sound from the bottommost speaker
projecting towards the frontmost audience is slightly delayed to make up for the
time taken for the sound to reach the back of the hall. The second speaker, the
Series 108P targets the front four seating rows. This is because the front four
rows are out of range of the ARCS Focus speakers, thus the 108P is used to
compensate for that matter. Lastly, the four P-Series 112P speakers located on
the stage are used as stage monitors. Stage performers rely on stage monitors
to listen to other instruments as well as their own voices so that they could make
vocal adjustments during the performance.
3. Wedge-shaped design
with a fixed angle setting of
30°
Table 4.4 shows the type of speakers and their sound specifications..
Image 4.5.1A shows the event organised at the Image 4.5.1B shows the closing
entrance of CCC auditorium. and opening of door.
Opening and closing of the doors and conversation taking place are the main
origin of noise outside the Calvary Church Auditorium. The noise from the waiting
and reception lobby enters the auditorium through the doors as there is no sound-
proofing. However, a sound lock is present between the inner and outer door at the
main entrance of the auditorium which serves to trap the sound waves, bringing
the noise level from the outside down to a low 25dB for the seats next to the door.
LEGEND
Image 4.5.1C shows the sound insulation lining between air-conditioning duct and carpark ceiling.
LEGEND
LEGEND
LEGEND
Image 4.5.2C shows the detailed section of the ventilation system under the floor.
51db
54db
61db
62db
55db
51db
Absorbant
Absorbancy coefficient at
500Hz > 0.1
REFLECTED
SOUND
A DIRECT SOUND
REFLECTED
SOUND
B
DIRECT SOUND
REFLECTED
SOUND
C
DIRECT SOUND
16m 18m
TIME DELAY
A 21m
DIRECT SOUND = (16m + 18m) - 21m
0.34
= 13m
0.34
= 38.2ms #
Image 4.6.3A shows a time delay of 38.2ms in Point A.
17m 31m
B TIME DELAY
40m
16m
C
45m
56m
TIME DELAY
DIRECT SOUND
Based on the materials identified on site and the measurements obtained from the
drawings, we were able to calculate the absorption of each surface and determine
the total room absorption of the auditorium.
Absorption Absorption of
Materials Area (m2) Coefficient, α Surface, as (m2
(Sabins) (500Hz) Sabins)
As = S x αs
As told by the architects from T.R. Hamzah and Yeang Sdn. Bhd., the reverberation
time of Calvary Convention Centre is approximately 0.9s.
Sabine Formula:
RT = 0.16V
AT
where:
RT = reverberation time (sec)
V = volume of the room (cu.m)
AT = total absorption of room
surfaces (sq.m sabins)
V = Volume, m3 = 39136.60 m3
AT = Total Room Absorption, m2 sabins
= 6832.45 m2 sabins
RT = 0.16V
AT
= 0.16 (39136.60)
6832.45
= 0.91 ≈ 0.9s#
Isolation from outside noise through air gaps and the restructuring of
systems is employed to reduce the transmission of sound from external and
internal sources. Choosing the most suitable materials aids the overall noise
control of the building and creates a conducive environment for event hosting.
Consideration was also taken on the type and position of speakers in the hall
as a vital factor on the overall acoustical control achieved. The designers of the
Calvary Convention Centre have successfully achieved their desired optimum
reverberation time of 0.9s, perfect for a speech-based auditorium, while still being
suitable for musical performances which were a regular feature in the auditorium.
Through working on this project, we were able to experience and understand the
complications and processes behind acoustics design in the context of our site, the
Calvary Convention Centre. There were many factors that come to play when it
comes to building acoustics which we have identified such as the shape and form,
surface materials, seat levelling and etc. We learned to appreciate the importance
of acoustics in a building design, and how it affects the function, atmosphere and
efficiency of a space.
2. Hardy, H. (2006). Building Type Basics for Performing Arts Facilities. Hoboken,
N.J. : J. Wiley.
5. Learning, L. (n.d.) Sound Intensity and Sound Level. Retrieved September 29,
2017, from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/physics/chapter/17-3-sound-
intensity-and-sound-level
10. Schmolke, B. (2011). Theatres and Concert Halls: Construction and Design
Manual. Singapore: Page One.
11. Shuai, Y. (2011). Green Office Building: Acoustic Installation, Natural Ventilation,
Green Roof, Sustainable Architecture. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic
International Pub. Ltd.
12. Sound Absorption Coefficients. (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2017, from
https://www.acousticalsurfaces.com/acoustic_IOI/101_13.htm
13. Sound Pressure: Definitions, Terms, Units and Measurement. (n.d.). Retrieved
April 25, 2017, from http://www.acoustic-glossary.co.uk/sound-pressure.htm
14. S o u n d I n t e n s i t y ( n . d . ) . R e t r i e v e d S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 1 7 , f r o m
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/intens.html
15. S o u n d S h a d o w ( n . d . ) . R e t r i e v e d S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 1 7 , f r o m
https://www.sfu.ca/sonic-studio/handbook/Sound Shadow.html