INDEX

TOPIC PAGE NO.

Abstract 6

Introduction 6

Facts About Burj Dubai 7

Current Records 7

Architecture & Design 8

Construction 9

Structural System Description 10

Structural Analysis & Design 12

Foundation & Site Conditions 14

Wind Engineering 17

Long Term & Construction Sequence Analysis 19

Construction Sequence Analysis Procedure 20

Compensation Methodology 21

Vertical Shortening 21

Gravity Induced Horizontal Sidesway 22

Suprestructure Concrete Technology 23

Construction 24

Conclusion 24

References 25

1
ABSTRACT
As with all super-tall projects, difficult structural engineering problems needed to be
addressed and resolved. This paper presents the approach to the structural system for
the Burj Dubai Tower. This paper first presents the architectural knowledge and the
comparison of the Burj Dubai tower with other tall buildings of the world. It also
describes the geotechnical procedures and structural detailing of the building besides
the wind engineering applied to the tower.

INTRODUCTION
Burj Dubai (Arabic: ‫" برج دبي‬Dubai Tower"), a supertall skyscraper under construction in
Dubai, United Arab Emirates, is the tallest man-made structure ever built, at 818 m
(2,684 ft). Construction began on 21 September 2004, and the tower is expected to be
completed and ready for occupancy by the end of 2009

Figur
e 1:Impression of Burj Dubai When Complete

2
The building is part of the 2 km2 (0.8 sq mi) flagship development called "Downtown
Burj Dubai" at the "First Interchange" along Sheikh Zayed Road, near Dubai's main
business district. The tower's architect is Adrian Smith, who worked with Skidmore,
Owings and Merrill (SOM) until 2006.The Chicago-based architecture and engineering
firm SOM is in charge of the project.The primary builders are Samsung Engineering &
Construction and Besix along with Arabtec. Turner Construction Company was chosen
as the construction manager.

The total budget for the Burj Dubai project is about US$4.1 billion, and for the entire
new "Downtown Dubai", US$20 billion.

FACTS ABOUT BURJ DUBAI

• 21 September 2004: Emaar contractors begin construction.
• February 2007: Surpasses the Sears Tower (since renamed to the Willis Tower)
as the building with the most floors.
• 13 May 2007: Sets record for vertical concrete pumping on any building at 452 m
(1,483 ft), surpassing the 449.2 m (1,474 ft) to which concrete was pumped
during the construction of Taipei 101.
• 21 July 2007: Surpasses Taipei 101, whose height of 509.2 m (1,671 ft) made it
the world’s tallest building.
• 12 August 2007: Surpasses the Sears Tower (Willis Tower) antenna, which
stands 527.3 m (1,730 ft).
• 3 September 2007: Becomes the second-tallest freestanding structure,
surpassing the 540 m (1,772 ft) Ostankino Tower in Moscow.
• 12 September 2007: At 555.3 m (1,822 ft), becomes the world's tallest
freestanding structure, surpassing the CN Tower in Toronto.
• 7 April 2008: At 629 m (2,064 ft), surpasses the KVLY-TV Mast to become the
tallest man-made structure.
• 17 June 2008: Emaar announces that Burj Dubai's height is over 636 m (2,087 ft)
and that its final height will not be given until it is completed in September 2009.
• 1 September 2008: Height tops 688 m (2,257 ft), making it the tallest man-made
structure ever built, surpassing the previous record-holder, the Warsaw Radio
Mast in Konstantynów, Poland.
• 17 January 2009: Topped out at 818 m (2,684 ft).
• 1 October 2009: Emaar announces that the exterior of the building is completed.

CURRENT RECORDS
• Tallest structure: 818 m (2,684 ft) (previously KVLY-TV mast - 628.8 m (2,063 ft))

3
 • Tallest freestanding structure: 818 m (2,684 ft) (previously CN Tower - 553.3 m
(1,815 ft))
• Building with most floors: 160 (previously World Trade Center - 110)
• World's highest elevator installation
• Worlds fastest elevators at speed of 64 km/h or 18 m/s (59 ft/s) (previously Taipei
101 – 16.83 m/s)
• Highest vertical concrete pumping (for a building): 601 m (1,972 ft) (previously
Taipei 101 - 449.2 m (1,474 ft))
• Highest vertical concrete pumping (for any construction): 601 m (1,972 ft)
(previously Riva del Garda Hydroelectric Power Plant - 532 m (1,745 ft))
• The first world's tallest structure in history to include residential space.

ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN

The tower is designed by Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, which also designed the Willis
Tower in Chicago. The design of Burj Dubai is derived from patterning system
embodied in Islamic architecture, with the triple-lobed footprint of the building based on
an abstracted version of the flower Hymenocallis. The tower is composed of three
elements arranged around a central core. As the tower rises from the flat desert base,
setbacks occur at each element in an upward spiralling pattern, decreasing the cross
section of the tower as it reaches toward the sky. There are 26 terraces in Burj Dubai.
At the top, the central core emerges and is sculpted to form a finishing spire. A Y-
shaped floor plan maximizes views of the Persian Gulf.

4
 Figure 2:Burj Dubai-Highest Building In The World

CONSTRUCTION
The tower is being constructed by a South Korean company, Samsung Engineering &
Construction, which also built the Petronas Twin Towers and the Taipei 101. Samsung
Engineering & Construction is building the tower in a joint venture with Besix from
Belgium and Arabtec from UAE. Turner is the Project Manager on the main construction
contract.

The primary structural system of Burj Dubai is reinforced concrete. Over 45,000 m3
(58,900 cu yd) of concrete, weighing more than 110,000 tonnes (120,000 ST;
110,000 LT) were used to construct the concrete and steel foundation, which features
192 piles buried more than 50 m (164 ft) deep.When completed, Burj Dubai's
construction will have used 330,000 m3 (431,600 cu yd) of concrete and 39,000 tonnes

5
(43,000 ST; 38,000 LT) of steel rebar, and construction will have taken 22 million man-
hours.

As construction of the tower progressed, it became increasingly difficult to vertically

pump the thousands of cubic metres of concrete that were required. The previous
record for pumping concrete on any project was set during the extension of the Riva del
Garda Hydroelectric Power Plant in Italy in 1994, when concrete was pumped to a
height of 532 m (1,745 ft). Burj Dubai exceeded this height on 19 August 2007, and as
of 8 November 2007 concrete was pumped to a delivery height of 601 m (1,972 ft).

In Burj Dubai, concrete was pumped to the 156th floor, while the remaining structure
was built of lighter steel. Burj Dubai is highly compartmentalised, with refuge floors built
every 30 floors, where people can shelter on their long walk down to safety in case of
an emergency.

Special mixes of concrete are made to withstand the extreme pressures of the massive
building weight; as is typical with reinforced concrete construction, each batch of
concrete used was tested to ensure it could withstand certain pressures.

The consistency of the concrete used in the project was essential. It was difficult to
create a concrete that could withstand both the thousands of tonnes bearing down on it
and Persian Gulf temperatures that can reach 50 °C (122 °F). To combat this problem,
the concrete was not poured during the day. Instead, ice was added to the mixture and
it was poured at night when the air is cooler and the humidity is higher. A cooler
concrete mixture cures evenly throughout and is therefore less likely to set too quickly
and crack. Any significant cracks could have put the entire project in jeopardy.

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

The goal of the Burj Dubai Tower is not simply to be the world's highest building; it's to
embody the world's highest aspirations.The 280 000 m2 (3 000 000 ft2) reinforced
concrete multi-use tower is utilized for retail, a Giorgio Armani Hotel, residential and
office.

6
Designers purposely shaped the structural concrete Burj Dubai—'Y' shaped in plan—to
reduce the wind forces on the tower, as well as to keep the structure simple and foster
constructability. The structural system can be described as a 'buttressed' core. Each
wing, with its own high-performance concrete corridor walls and perimeter columns,

Figure 3 - Typical Floor Plan

buttresses the others via a six-sided central core, or hexagonal hub. The result is a
tower that is extremely stiff laterally and torsionally. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM)
applied a rigorous geometry to the tower that aligned all the common central core, wall,
and column elements.

Each tier of the building sets back in a spiral stepping pattern up the building. The
setbacks are organized with the tower's grid, such that the building stepping is
accomplished by aligning columns above with walls below to provide a smooth load
path. This allows the construction to proceed without the normal difficulties associated
with column transfers.

The setbacks are organized such that the tower's width changes at each setback. The
advantage of the stepping and shaping is to 'confuse the wind'. The wind vortexes never
get organized because at each new tier the wind encounters a different building shape.

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

7
The center hexagonal reinforced concrete core walls provide the torsional resistance of
the structure similar to a closed tube or axle. The center hexagonal walls are buttressed
by the wing walls and hammerhead walls, which behave as the webs and flanges of a
beam to resist the wind shears and moments. Outriggers at the mechanical floors allow
the columns to participate in the lateral load resistance of the structure; hence, all of the
vertical concrete is utilized to support both gravity and lateral loads. The wall concrete
specified strengths ranged from C80 to C60 cube strength and utilized Portland cement
and fly ash. Local aggregates were utilized for the concrete mix design. The C80
concrete for the lower portion of the structure had a specified Young's elastic modulus
of 43 800 N/mm2 (6350 ksi) at 90 days. The wall and column sizes were optimized
using virtual work/LaGrange multiplier methodology, which results in a very efficient
structure. The reinforced concrete structure was designed in accordance with the
requirements of ACI 318-02 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete.

The wall thicknesses and column sizes were fine tuned to reduce the effects of creep
and shrinkage on the individual elements which compose the structure. To reduce the
effects of differential column shortening, due to creep, between the perimeter columns
and interior walls, the perimeter columns were sized such that the self-weight gravity
stress on the perimeter columns matched the stress on the interior corridor walls. The
five sets of outriggers, distributed up the building, tie all the vertical load- carrying
elements together, further ensuring uniform gravity stresses, hence reducing differential
creep movements. Since the shrinkage in concrete occurs more quickly in thinner walls
or columns, the perimeter column thickness of 600 mm (24 in.) matched the typical
corridor wall thickness (similar volume-to-surface ratios) (Figure 4b) to ensure the
columns and walls will generally shorten at the same rate due to concrete shrinkage.

The top section of the tower consists of a structural steel spire utilizing a diagonally
braced lateral system. The structural steel spire was designed for gravity, wind, seismic
and fatigue in accordance with the requirements of AISC Load and Resistance Factor
Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (1999). The exterior exposed steel is
protected with a flame-applied aluminum finish.

The structure was analyzed for gravity (including P-A analysis), wind, and seismic loads
using ETABS version 84. The three-dimensional analysis model consisted of the
reinforced concrete walls, link beams, slabs, raft, piles, and the spire structural steel
system (Figure 4).

The reinforced concrete structure was designed in accordance with the requirements of
ACI 318-02 (American Concrete Institute) Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete.

8
 Th
e Dubai Municipality (DM) specifies Dubai as a UBC97 Zone 2a seismic region (with a

(a)
(b)
Figure 4. Three-dimensional analysis model. (a) 3D view of analysis model.
(b) 3D view of single story
seismic zone factor Z = 015 and soil profile Sc). The seismic analysis consisted of a
site-specific response spectra analysis. Seismic loading typically did not govern the
design of the reinforced concrete tower structure. Seismic loads did govern the design
of the reinforced concrete podium buildings and the tower structural steel spire.

Dr Max Irvine (with Structural Mechanics & Dynamics Consulting Engineers located in
Sydney, Australia) developed site-specific seismic reports for the project, including a
seismic hazard analysis. The potential for liquefaction was investigated based on
several accepted methods; it was determined that liquefaction is not considered to have
any structural implications for the deep-seated tower foundations.

FOUNDATIONS AND SITE CONDITIONS

The tower foundations consist of a pile-supported raft. The solid reinforced concrete raft
is 3-7 m (12 ft) thick and was poured utilizing C50 (cube strength) self-consolidating
concrete (SCC). In addition to the standard cube tests, the raft concrete was field tested
prior to placement by flow table (Figure 6), L-box, V-box, and temperature. The raft was

9
constructed in four separate pours (three wings and the center core). Each raft pour
occurred over at least a 24-hour period. Reinforcement was typically at 300 mm spacing
in the raft, and arranged such that every 10th bar in each direction was omitted,
resulting in a series of 'pour enhancement strips' throughout the raft at which 600 mm x
600 mm openings at regular intervals facilitated access and concrete placement.

The tower raft is 3.7 m (12 ft) thick and therefore, in addition to durability, limiting peak
temperature was an important consideration. The 50 MPa raft mix incorporated 40% fly
ash and a water cement ratio of 0-34. Giant placement test cubes of the raft concrete,
3.7 m (12 ft) on a side (Figure 7) were test poured to verify the placement procedures
and monitor the concrete temperature rise.

Figure 5: Burj Dubai Foundation Raft

The tower raft is supported by 194 bored cast-in-place piles. The piles are 15 m in
diameter and approximately 43 m long, with a design capacity of 3000 tonnes each. The
tower pile load test supported over 6000 tonnes (Figure 9). The C60 (cube strength)

10
SCC concrete was placed by the tremie method utilizing polymer slurry. The friction
piles are supported in the naturally cemented calcisilt-ite/conglomeritic calcisiltite
formations, developing an ultimate pile skin friction of 250-350 kPa (2-6-3-6 tons/ft2).
When the rebar cage was placed in the piles, special attention was paid to orient the
rebar cage such that the raft bottom rebar could be threaded through the numerous pile
rebar cages without interruption, which greatly simplified the raft construction.

Figure 6: Burj Dubai foundation slab piling

The site geotechnical investigation consisted of the following phases:

Phase 1: 23 boreholes (three with pressure meter testing) with depths up to 90 m;

Phase 2: three boreholes drilled with cross-hole geophysics;

^ Phase 3: six boreholes (two with pressure meter testing) with depths up to 60m.
^ Phase 4: one borehole with cross-hole and down-hole geophysics; depth = 140 m.

11
A detailed 3D foundation settlement analysis was carried out (by Hyder Consulting Ltd,
Figure 9. Test pile (6000 tonnes)

Figure 7. SCC concrete flow table testing Figure 8. Raft concrete placement
test cubes

Figure 10. Cathodic protection

below mat

UK) based on the results of the geotechnical investigation and the pile load test results.
It was determined the maximum long-term settlement over time would be about a
maximum of 80 mm (3.1 in.). This settlement would be a gradual curvature of the top of
grade over the entire large site. When the construction was at Level 135, the average
foundation settlement was 30 mm (1.2 in.).

The groundwater in which the Burj Dubai substructure is constructed is particularly

severe, with chloride concentrations of up to 4-5% and sulfates of up to 0-6%. The
chloride and sulfate concentrations found in the groundwater are even higher than the
concentrations in sea water. Accordingly, the primary consideration in designing the
piles and raft foundation was durability. The concrete mix for the piles was a 60 MPa
mix based on a triple blend with 25% fly ash, 7% silica fume, and a water: cement ratio
of 0-32. The concrete was also designed as a fully self-consolidating concrete,

12
incorporating a viscosity-modifying admixture with a slump flow of 675 ± 75 mm to limit
the possibility of defects during construction.

Owing to the aggressive conditions present due to the extremely corrosive ground
water, a rigorous program of anti-corrosion measures was required to ensure the
durability of the foundations. Measures implemented included specialized waterproofing
systems, increased concrete cover, the addition of corrosion inhibitors to the concrete
mix, stringent crack control design criteria, and an impressed current cathodic protection
system utilizing titanium mesh (Figure 10).

WIND ENGINEERING
For a building of this height and slenderness, wind forces and the resulting motions in
the upper levels become dominant factors in the structural design. An extensive
program of wind tunnel tests and other studies were undertaken (Figure 11). The wind
tunnel program included rigid-model force balance tests, full multi-degree of freedom

CROSS WINOMQTJQW
Figure 11. Aeroelastic wind tunnel model
Figure 12. Vortex shedding behavior
aeroelastic model studies, measurements of localized pressures, pedestrian wind
environment studies, and wind climatic studies. Wind tunnel models account for the
cross-wind effects of wind-induced vortex shedding on the building (Figure 12). The
aeroelastic and force balance studies used models mostly at 1 : 500 scale.

To determine the wind loading on the main structure, wind tunnel tests were undertaken
early in the design using the high-frequency force-balance technique. The wind tunnel
data were then combined with the dynamic properties of the tower in order to compute
the tower's dynamic response and the overall effective wind force distributions at full
scale. For the Burj Dubai the results of the force balance tests were used as early input

13
for the structural design and detailed shape of the tower and allowed parametric studies
to be undertaken on the effects of varying the tower's stiffness and mass distribution.

The building has essentially six important wind directions. The principal wind directions
are when the wind is blowing into the 'nose'/'cutwater' of each of the three wings (Nose
A, Nose B, and Nose C). The other three directions are when the wind blows in between
two wings, termed the 'tail' directions (Tail A, Tail B, and Tail C). It was noticed that the
force spectra for different wind directions showed less excitation in the important
frequency range for winds impacting the pointed or nose end of a wing (Figure 13) than
from the opposite direction (tail). This was borne in mind when selecting the orientation
of the tower relative to the most frequent strong wind directions for Dubai and the
direction of the set backs.

Several rounds of force balance tests were undertaken as the geometry of the tower
evolved and was refined architecturally. The three wings set back in a clockwise
sequence, with the A wing setting back first. After each round of wind tunnel testing, the

Figure 13. Plan view

of tower
data were analyzed and the building was reshaped to minimize wind effects and
accommodate unrelated changes in the client's program. In general, the number and
spacing of the setbacks changed as did the shape of wings. This process resulted in a
substantial reduction in wind forces on the tower by 'confusing' the wind (Figure 13) by
encouraging disorganized vortex shedding over the height of the tower. Towards the
end of design more accurate aeroelastic model tests were initiated. An aeroelastic
model is flexible in the same manner as the real building, with properly scaled stiffness,
mass and damping. The aeroelastic tests were able to model several of the higher
translational modes of vibration. These higher modes dominated the structural response
and design of the tower except at the very base, where the fundamental modes
controlled. Based on the results of the aeroelastic models, the predicted building

14
motions are within the ISO standard recommended values without the need for auxiliary
damping.

LONG-TERM AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE

ANALYSIS
Historically, engineers have typically determined the behavior of concrete structures
using linear-elastic finite element analysis and/or summations of vertical column loads.
As building height increases, the results of such conventional analysis may increasingly
diverge from actual behavior. Long-term, time-dependant deformations in response to
construction sequence, creep, and shrinkage can cause redistribution of forces and
gravity-induced sidesway that would not be detected by conventional methods. When
the time-dependant effects of construction, creep, shrinkage, variation of concrete
stiffness with time, sequential loading, and foundation settlements are not considered,
the predicted forces and deflections may be inaccurate. To account for these time-
dependent concrete effects in the Burj Dubai Tower structure, a comprehensive
construction sequence analysis incorporating the effects of creep and shrinkage was
utilized to study the time-dependent behavior of the structure. The creep and shrinkage
prediction approach is based on the Gardner-Lockman GL2000 (Gardner, 2004) model

15
with additional equations to incorporate the effects of reinforcement and complex

loading history .

Construction sequence analysis procedures

The time-dependent effects of creep, shrinkage, the variation of concrete stiffness with
time, sequential loading, and foundation settlement were accounted for by analyzing 15
separate three-dimensional finite-element analysis models, each representing a discrete
time during construction (Figure 14). At each point in time, for each model, only the
incremental loads occurring in that particular time step were applied. Additional time
steps, after construction, were analyzed up to 50 years. The structural responses
occurring at each time step were stored and combined in a database to allow studying
the predicted time-dependent response of the structure.

Long-term creep and shrinkage testing, over one year in duration, have been performed
by the CTL Group (located in Skokie, IL, USA), under contract with Samsung, on

16
concrete specimens to better understand the actual behavior of the concrete utilized for
the project.

Compensation methodology
The tower is being constructed utilizing both a vertical and horizontal compensation
program. For vertical compensation, each story is being constructed incorporating a
modest increase in the typical floor-to-floor height.

For horizontal compensation, the building is being 'recentered' with each successive
center hex core jump. The recentering compensation will correct for all gravity-induced
sidesway effects (elastic, differential foundation settlement, creep, and shrinkage) which
occur up to the casting of each story.

Vertical shortening
Based on the procedures presented above, the predicted time-dependent vertical
shortening of the center of the core can be determined at each floor of the Burj Dubai
tower (Figure 15), not accounting for foundation settlements. The total predicted vertical
shortening of the walls and columns at the top of the concrete core, subsequent to
casting, is offset by the additional height added by the increased floor-to-floor height
compensation program.

Due to the compatibility requirements of strain between the rebar and the concrete in a
reinforced concrete column, as the concrete creeps and shrinks, i.e., shortens, the rebar
must attract additional compressive stress and forces to maintain the same strain as the
concrete. Since the total load is the same, over time part of the load in a reinforced
concrete column is transferred from the concrete to the rebar. This un-loading of the
concrete, therefore, also reduces the creep in the concrete (less load results in less
creep). As per Figure 16, the rebar in the columns and walls (with a rebar-to-concrete
area ratio of about 1%) at Level 135 supports about 15% of the load at the completion
of construction and the concrete supports 85%. However, after 30 years, the rebar
supports 30% of the total load and

17
the concrete supports 70%. This percent increase in force carried by the rebar
increases as the steel rho is increased and/or as the total load decreases.

Gravity-induced horizontal sidesway

Prediction of the gravity-induced horizontal sidesway is more difficult than predicting the
vertical shortening. Gravity-induced horizontal sidesway is extremely sensitive to the
following:

Differential foundation settlements

Construction sequence

• Differential gravity loading

^ Variations in the concrete material properties

18
The gravity sidesway can be thought of as the difference between the vertical
shortening at the extreme ends of the building causing curvature which is integrated
along the height of the structure. Concrete creep and shrinkage properties are variable.
Taking the difference between two variable numbers results in a value which has an
even greater variability; hence, prediction of gravity-induced horizontal sidesway is more
of an estimate than the prediction of vertical shortening alone.

Based on the construction sequence, time step, elastic, creep, shrinkage, and
foundation settlement analysis, predictions of the Burj Dubai tower gravity-induced
horizontal sidesway have been made.

SUPERSTRUCTURE CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY

The design of the concrete for the vertical elements is determined by the requirements
for a compres-sive strength of 10 MPa at 10 hours to permit the construction cycle and
a design strength/modulus of 80 MPa/44 GPa, as well as ensuring adequate
pumpability and workability. The ambient conditions in Dubai vary from a cool winter to
an extremely hot summer, with maximum temperatures occasionally exceeding 50 °C.
To accommodate the different rates of strength development and workability loss, the
dosage and retardation level is adjusted for the different seasons.

Ensuring pumpability to reach world record heights is probably the most difficult
concrete design issue, particularly considering the high summer temperatures. Four
separate basic mixes have been developed to enable reduced pumping pressure as the
building gets higher. A horizontal pumping trial equivalent to the pressure loss in
pumping to a height of 600 m (1970 ft) was conducted in February 2005 to determine
the pumpability of these mixes and establish the friction coefficients.

The current concrete mix contains 13% fly ash and 10% silica fume with a maximum
aggregate size of 20 mm (3/4 in.). The mix is virtually self-consolidating with an average
slump flow of approximately 600 mm (24 in.), and will be used until the pumping
pressure exceeds approximately 200 bar.

It is envisaged to change to a mix containing 14 mm maximum aggregate size and 20%

fly ash with full self-consolidating characteristics while maintaining the required 80 MPa.
Above Level 127, the structural requirement reduces to 60 MPa, and a mix containing
10 mm maximum aggregate may be used. Extremely high levels of quality control will
be required to ensure pumpability up to the highest concrete floor, particularly
considering the ambient temperatures. The pumps on site include two of the largest in
the world, capable of concrete pumping pressure up to a massive 350 bars through a
high-pressure 150 mm pipeline.

19
CONSTRUCTION
The Burj Dubai utilizes the latest advancements in construction techniques and material
technology. The walls are formed using Doka's SKE 100 automatic self-climbing
formwork system (Figure 19). The circular nose columns are formed with steel forms,
and the floor slabs are poured on MevaDec formwork. Wall reinforcement is
prefabricated on the ground in 8 m sections to allow for fast placement.

The construction sequence for the structure has the central core and slabs being cast
first, in three sections; the wing walls and slabs follow behind; and the wing nose
columns and slabs follow behind these (Figure 1). Concrete is pumped via specially
developed Putzmeister pumps, able to pump to heights of 600 m (1970 ft) in a single
stage and generate 350 bar pressure.

Figure 16. Self-climbing formwork

system
Due to the limitations of conventional surveying techniques, a special GPS monitoring
system has been developed to monitor the verticality of the structure.

CONCLUSION
When completed, the Burj Dubai Tower will be the world's tallest structure. It represents
a significant achievement in terms of utilizing the latest design, materials, and
construction technology and methods, in order to provide an efficient, rational structure
to rise to heights never before seen.

REFERENCES
20
William F. Baker, D.Stanton Korista and Lawrence C. Novak (2007).
Burj Dubai: Engineering The Worlds Tallest Building,
November 2007

Poulous & Bunce (2008).

Foundation Design For Burj Dubai- The Worlds Tallest Building,
August 2008

IRWIN, BAKER, KORISTA, WEISMANTLE & NOVAK (2006),

"The Burj Dubai Tower: Wind Tunnel Testing of Cladding and Pedestrian Level",
Structure Magazine, published by NCSEA, November 2006

www.Wikipedia.com
Burj_Dubai
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burj_Dubai

21