Mesh Vs Micron
Mesh Vs Micron
Ian Treviranus
[email protected]
www.horiba.com/us/particle
Q&A
SZ-100
Dynamic Light Scattering & Zeta Potential
PSA300
Static Image Analysis
SA-9600
Flowing Gas BET Surface Area
Minerals Grinding 10
Pharmaceutical
Portland Cement 5 25
Chemical
Abrasives 5 Food
Abrasives
Foods 5 Cosmetics
Mining
5
Paint and Coatings
Metals and Ceramics
Explosives and Fireworks
Q&A
10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 10-0
100 nm
Angstrom
(Å)
Electron Microscope
Optical Microscope
different different
size definitions results
Equivalent Spherical
Equivalent Spherical
Diameter
Martin’s and Diameter
Martin’s
Feret’s Diameter’s Diameter
will vary as
Martin’s particles are
Diameter
viewed in different
orientations. The
result will be a
DISTRIBUTION
from smallest to
largest.
Feret’s Diameter Feret’s Diameter
4 µm
Monodisperse Polydisperse
VOLUME
VOLUME
Particle Size Particle Size
VOLUME
0 10 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Particle Size Particle Size
Cumulative Distribution
Histogram
VOLUME
Differential
Distribution
Particle Size
Represented by series of segments or channels known as
histogram.
Number of channels based on design, practicality and
aesthetics
Q&A
Mean
Weighted Average Mean
Center of Gravity Median
and
Mode
Median
50% Point
Mode
Peak of the distribution
Most common value
Size
1
2
3
1 8 27
X sv D[ 3,2] 2.57
1 2 3
1 16 81
X vm D[ 4,3] 2.72
1 8 27
D [4,3] =
D n 4
i i
D n 3
i i
Mean Median
50% Point
D[4,3]
Mode
Peak of the distribution
Most common value
Size
Normal (Gaussian)
Distribution Curve
-1 STD DEV +1 STD DEV = distribution mean
68.27%
= standard deviation
Exp = base of natural
logarithms
95.45%
Mean
1 - (x - )2
Y= 2 Exp [ ]
22
© 2013 HORIBA, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Distribution Width
Polydispersity Index
(PI, PDI)
Span
Geometric Std. Dev.
Variance
Etc…
0
0.58
2.27
8.82
34.25
0.34
1.15
4.47
Other references:
L Neumann, T Howes, E T White (2003) Breakage can cause mean
size to increase Dev. Chem. Eng. Mineral Proc. J.
White E T, Lawrence J. (1970), Variation of volume surface mean for
growing particles, Powder Technology,4, 104 - 107
10 x1 m 10 x 1 m
79.4 m
79.4 m
100 m
breaks into two smaller particles
10 1 m 10 1 m
10 46.4 m
1 100 m
Q&A
CENTRIFUGAL SEDIMENTATION
ACOUSTIC SPECTROSCOPY
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY
LASER DIFFRACTION
10 nm 100 nm 1 µm 10 µm 100 µm 1 mm
Laser Diffraction
Equivalent Spherical Diameter
Image Analysis
Lengths, Widths, Equivalent Spherical
Acoustic Spectroscopy
Equivalent Spherical Diameter
Sensing Zone
Light Source
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Particle count available Dilution required for
USP<788> testing particle size analysis
High resolution histogram Prone to cell clogging
18 µ Vp
D=
(A - B) G
Vp = Settling velocity of discrete particle
G = Gravity constant
A = Density of Particle
B = Density of Carrier Fluid
D = Diameter of discrete particle Time
µ = Viscosity of Carrier Fluid
Frequency-Intensity
Distribution
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Simple Slow
Inexpensive Measures very few particles
Can see shape Very tedious
Signal output
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Can accommodate high
sample concentrations Need at least 1 wt% particles
(no dilution) Need to know wt%
Rheological properties Minimum sample = 15 ml
Also measure zeta potential
Q&A