Personal Rapid Transit
Personal Rapid Transit
11. Expansion
Design so that the system can be expanded indefinitely.
A typical PRT off-line station layout
Building station
Parking garage stations
and guideways
Airport concourse
station
Urban elevated guideway station
Based on three decades of operating experience at Morgagntown PRT in West
Virginia having 20 passenger vehicle and five off-line stations. The illustrated
comparison is as :
Capacity :
Can run at 2 sec headway (i.e. 1800 vehicles or 7200 passengers per hour ).
Costs:
Capital costs have been estimated as $6-8 million/km (5.0-6.5 million €/km)
and is about one third of LRT costs.
For a given investment in LRT, one therefore will get 3-4 times more coverage
and even more stations with PRT.
User acceptance:
Customer interviews and reactions of test riders show that the vast majority
believe PRT will deliver an attractive service.
The higher usage of PRT will improve revenues for the operator.
Case studies show that revenues can be sufficient to operate a PRT network
at a profit.
Networks linking parking garage and rail stations to airport terminals
stations
Networks for major shopping and office centers providing links to parking
Completed
system: 1980's
both, solid
approval for
Cabinentaxi Germany yes 3,12,18 steel rubber linear motors
federal transit
wheels
programs in
Germany and US
Infrastructure investments last for many decades, even centuries. It will be
advantageous to make decisions on PRT based on similarly long perspectives.
To assure sound decision-making, the following are recommended: