Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.

org/ on June 13, 2018

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009) 367, 1445–1486

doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0011
Published online

INTRODUCTION

Biomimetics: lessons from nature – an overview

B Y B HARAT B HUSHAN *
Nanoprobe Laboratory for Bio- & Nanotechnology and Biomimetics,
Ohio State University, 201 West 19th Avenue, Columbus,
OH 43210-1142, USA

Nature has developed materials, objects and processes that function from the macroscale
to the nanoscale. These have gone through evolution over 3.8 Gyr. The emerging field of
biomimetics allows one to mimic biology or nature to develop nanomaterials,
nanodevices and processes. Properties of biological materials and surfaces result from
a complex interplay between surface morphology and physical and chemical properties.
Hierarchical structures with dimensions of features ranging from the macroscale to the
nanoscale are extremely common in nature to provide properties of interest. Molecular-
scale devices, superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, drag reduction in fluid flow, energy
conversion and conservation, high adhesion, reversible adhesion, aerodynamic lift,
materials and fibres with high mechanical strength, biological self-assembly, antireflection,
structural coloration, thermal insulation, self-healing and sensory-aid mechanisms are
some of the examples found in nature that are of commercial interest. This paper provides
a broad overview of the various objects and processes of interest found in nature and
applications under development or available in the marketplace.
Keywords: biomimetics; bionics; biomimicry; biognosis; lessons from nature;
nanotechnology

1. Introduction

Nature has gone through evolution over the 3.8 Gyr since life is estimated to
have appeared on the Earth (Gordon 1976). Nature has evolved objects with high
performance using commonly found materials. These function on the macroscale
to the nanoscale. The understanding of the functions provided by objects and
processes found in nature can guide us to imitate and produce nanomaterials,
nanodevices and processes. Biologically inspired design or adaptation or
derivation from nature is referred to as ‘biomimetics’. It means mimicking
biology or nature. Biomimetics is derived from the Greek word biomimesis.
The word was coined by polymath Otto Schmitt in 1957, who, in his doctoral
research, developed a physical device that mimicked the electrical action of a
nerve. Other words used include bionics (coined in 1960 by Jack Steele of
*[email protected]
One contribution of 9 to a Theme Issue ‘Biomimetics I: functional biosurfaces’.

1445 This journal is q 2009 The Royal Society

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1446 B. Bhushan

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, OH), biomimicry and biognosis.

The field of biomimetics is highly interdisciplinary. It involves the under-
standing of biological functions, structures and principles of various objects
found in nature by biologists, physicists, chemists and material scientists, and
the design and fabrication of various materials and devices of commercial
interest by engineers, material scientists, chemists and others. The word
biomimetics first appeared in Webster’s dictionary in 1974 and is defined as
‘the study of the formation, structure or function of biologically produced sub-
stances and materials (as enzymes or silk) and biological mechanisms and
processes (as protein synthesis or photosynthesis) especially for the purpose of
synthesizing similar products by artificial mechanisms which mimic
natural ones’.
Biological materials are highly organized from the molecular to the nanoscale,
microscale and macroscale, often in a hierarchical manner with intricate
nanoarchitecture that ultimately makes up a myriad of different functional
elements (Alberts et al. 2008). Nature uses commonly found materials. Properties
of the materials and surfaces result from a complex interplay between the surface
structure and the morphology and physical and chemical properties. Many
materials, surfaces and devices provide multifunctionality. Molecular-scale devices,
superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, drag reduction in fluid flow, energy conver-
sion and conservation, high adhesion, reversible adhesion, aerodynamic
lift, materials and fibres with high mechanical strength, biological self-assembly,
antireflection, structural coloration, thermal insulation, self-healing and sensory-
aid mechanisms are some of the examples found in nature that are of
commercial interest.

(a ) Industrial significance
The word biomimetics is relatively new; however, our ancestors looked to nature
for inspiration and development of various materials and devices many centuries
ago (Ball 2002; Bar-Cohen 2006; Vincent et al. 2006; Anon. 2007; Meyers et al.
2008). For example, the Chinese tried to make artificial silk some 3000 years ago.
Leonardo da Vinci, a genius of his time, studied how birds fly and proposed designs
of flying machines. In the twentieth century, various products, including the design
of aircraft, have been inspired by nature. Since the 1980s, the artificial intelligence
and neural networks in information technology have been inspired by the desire to
mimic the human brain. The existence of biocells and DNA serves as a source of
inspiration for nanotechnologists, who hope to one day build self-assembled
molecular-scale devices. In molecular biomimetics, proteins are being used to
control materials formation in practical engineering towards self-assembled, hybrid,
functional materials structure (Grunwald et al. in press; Sarikaya & Tamerler
in press). Since the mid-1990s, the so-called lotus effect has been used to develop a
variety of surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, drag reduction in fluid
flow and low adhesion (Bhushan et al. in press). Replication of the dynamic
climbing and peeling ability of geckos has been carried out to develop treads of wall-
climbing robots (Cutkosky & Kim in press). Replication of shark skin has been used
to develop moving objects with low drag, e.g. whole body swimsuits. Nanoscale
architecture used in nature for optical reflection and antireflection has been
used to develop reflecting and antireflecting surfaces. In the field of biomimetic

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1447

materials, there is an area of bioinspired ceramics based on seashells and other

biomimetic materials. Inspired by furs of the polar bear, artificial furs and textiles
have been developed. Self-healing of biological systems found in nature is of
interest for self-repair. Biomimetics is also guiding in the development of sensory-
aid devices.
Various features found in nature’s objects are on the nanoscale. The major
emphasis on nanoscience and nanotechnology since the early 1990s has provided
a significant impetus in mimicking nature using nanofabrication techniques for
commercial applications (Bhushan 2007a). Biomimetics has spurred interest
across many disciplines.
It is estimated that the 100 largest biomimetic products had generated
approximately US $1.5 billion over 2005–2008. The annual sales are expected to
continue to increase dramatically.

(b ) Objective
The objective of this paper is to provide a broad overview of the field of
biomimetics. It will provide a description of objects and processes of interest
found in nature and applications under development or available in the
marketplace. The paper will end with an outlook of the field.

2. Lessons from nature and applications

There are a large number of objects, including bacteria, plants, land and
aquatic animals and seashells, with properties of commercial interest. Figure 1
provides an overview of various objects from nature and their selected
functions, whose detailed descriptions follow. Figure 2 shows a montage of
some examples from nature. These serve as the inspiration for various techno-
logical developments.

(a ) Bacteria
The flagella of bacteria rotate at over 10 000 r.p.m. (Jones & Aizawa 1991).
This is an example of a biological molecular machine. The flagella motor is driven
by the proton flow caused by the electrochemical potential differences across the
membrane. The diameter of the bearing is approximately 20–30 nm, with an
estimated clearance of approximately 1 nm.

(b ) Plants

(i) Chemical energy conversion

Several billion years ago, molecules began organizing into complex structures
that could support life. Photosynthesis harnesses solar energy to support plant
life. Molecular ensembles present in plant leaves, which include light-harvesting
molecules such as chlorophyll (green pigment) arranged within the cells (on the
nanometre to micrometre scales), capture light energy and convert it into the
chemical energy that drives the biochemical machinery of plant cells. Live organs
use chemical energy in the body. This technology is being exploited to develop
dye-sensitized polymer-based solar cells by various industries such as Konarka

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1448 B. Bhushan

overview of various objects from nature and their selected functions

bacteria plants insects, spiders, aquatic birds

lizards and frogs animals
biological chemical aerodynamic
motor energy superhydro- low hydrody- lift
conversion phobicity namic drag
light
superhydro- reversible energy coloration
phobicity, self- adhesion in dry production
cleaning, drag and wet camouflage
reduction environments
insulation

hydrophilicity

adhesion

motion

seashells, spider web moth-eye fur and skin biological

bones, teeth effect and of polar bear systems
biological structural
high self-assembly coloration thermal self-healing
mechanical insulation
strength antireflective sensory-aid
surfaces devices

structural
coloration

Figure 1. An overview of various objects from nature and their selected functions.

Technologies in the USA and Dyesol in Australia (Benniston & Harriman 2008).
These cells are not as efficient as photovoltaics, in which solar photovoltaic
arrays (solar cells) are used to convert energy from the Sun into electricity, but
they are significantly cheaper and more flexible.

(ii) Multifunctional properties and surface structures of plant leaves

Diversity in the structure and morphology of plant leaf surfaces provides
multifunctional properties (Koch et al. 2008, 2009, in press a). The outermost
layer of the primary plant surface is known as the cuticle, and its most prominent
functions are presented in figure 3. One of the most important attributes of the
cuticle is its hydrophobicity that enables plants to overcome the physical and
physiological problems connected to an ambient environment, such as
desiccation. The cuticle also stabilizes the plant tissue and has several protective

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1449

(a) (i) (b) (c) (i)

2 µm
100 µm (ii)
(ii)
(e)

20 µm

(d ) (i) (g)

0.5 mm
(ii) BR

500 µm
(f)
(h)

SP

5 µm

Figure 2. Montage of some examples from nature. (a) Lotus effect (Bhushan et al. in press),
(b) glands of carnivorous plant secrete adhesive to trap insects (Koch et al. in press c ), (c) pond
skater walking on water (Gao & Jiang 2004), (d ) gecko foot exhibiting reversible adhesion (Gao
et al. 2005), (e) scale structure of shark reducing drag (Reif 1985), (f ) wings of a bird in landing
approach, (g) spiderweb made of silk material (Bar-Cohen 2006), and (h) antireflective moth’s eye
(Genzer & Efimenko 2006).

properties. One of the most important properties is the transpiration barrier

function. This property is based on the material, made basically of a polymer
called cutin and integrated and superimposed lipids called ‘waxes’, which are
hydrophobic. In addition to the reduction of water loss, the cuticle prevents
leaching of ions from inside the cells to the environment. In plants, a wide spectra
of surface structures exist, which modify surface wettability and also have a
significant influence on particle adhesion. Evolutionary optimized wettable or
non-wettable surfaces can be found in water and wetland plants, e.g. the water-
repellent leaves of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). In submerged water growing plants
and some tropical and subtropical plants, the cuticles provide hydrophilicity by
providing a permanently wet surface or by water spreading, respectively. The
plant cuticle also plays an important role for insect and micro-organism
interaction. In some cases, it protects the plants against overheating by reflecting
radiation and/or by heat transfer via turbulent airflow and convection.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1450 B. Bhushan

(e) (g)

(a) (b) (c)

(d) (f)

Figure 3. Schematic of the most prominent functions of the boundary layer on a hydrophobic
microstructured plant surface. (a) Transport barrier limitation of uncontrolled water loss/leaching
from interior and foliar uptake, (b) surface wettability, (c) anti-adhesive, self-cleaning properties:
reduction of contamination, pathogen attack and reduction of attachment/locomotion of insects,
(d ) signalling: cues for host–pathogens/insect recognition and epidermal cell development,
(e) optical properties: protection against harmful radiation, ( f ) mechanical properties: resistance
against mechanical stress and maintenance of physiological integrity, and (g) reduction of surface
temperature by increasing turbulent air flow over the boundary air later (Koch et al. 2009).

(a) (b) (c) (d)

100µm 20 µm

(e) (f) (g) (h)

100µm 20µm

Figure 4. Macroscopically visible optical appearance of plant surfaces and their surface
microstructures, shown in scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs. In (a) leaves
(Magnolia grandiflora) appear glossy because of the flat surface structure of the surface, shown in
(b). In (c) the flower leaves (Dahlia) appear velvety, because of the microstructure of the epidermal
cells shown in (d ). In (e) the white appearance of the leaves (Leucadendron argenteum) is caused
by a dense layer of hairs, shown in (f ). (g) A white or bluish leaf surface (Eucalyptus macrocarpa)
that is densely covered with three-dimensional waxes shown in (h) (Koch et al. 2009).

The micro- and nanostructures of plant surfaces have a great influence on their
attributes as interfaces. Even in a cursory look at different plant surfaces, they
show different optical appearances, which arise from the surface structures in the
micro- and nanoscale dimension (Koch et al. 2009). The optical appearance of
selected plant surfaces and their surface microstructures are shown in figure 4.
Based on their microscopically smooth surface, the leaves of Magnolia
grandiflora appear glossy (figure 4a,b), whereas the rougher surfaces of the
flower leaves (petals) of Dahlia appear velvety and soft (figure 4c,d ). The leaves

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1451

(a) (b)

5 µm 5 µm

(c) (d)

10µm 50 µm

Figure 5. SEM micrographs of hierarchical structures on plant surfaces. (a,b) Double structured
plant surfaces with convex cell shapes and superimposed three-dimensional epicuticular waxes on
the upper (adaxial) leaf sides of (a) Colocasia esculenta and (b) N. nucifera. (c,d ) Convex cells with
cuticular folding. (c) The flower leaf of Rosa montana (adaxial side) with a rippled folded cuticle in
the central field of the cells and parallel folding. (d ) The cells of the inner side of a tube-like leaf of
the carnivorous plant Sarracenia leucophylla. These cells are downward trending hair papilla with
a parallel cuticle folding (Koch et al. 2008).

of Leucadendron argenteum appear white because of a dense layer of air-filled

hollow hairs (figure 4e,f ). The leaves of Eucalyptus macrocarpa appear bluish
due to a coverage of three-dimensional waxes (figure 4g,h). The leaves in
figure 4a–d are hydrophilic and in figure 4g,h are superhydrophobic. The great
diversity in surface structures originates from the diversity of species, combined
with the different structures found in a single plant. Today, plant biodiversity
contains approximately 270 000 different species, but recent calculations suggest
that most species on the Earth have not yet been described and will not be
because of the high rates of species extinction (50 per day; Koch et al. 2008).
Hierarchical structure is found on a large number of plant surfaces and is of much
interest to provide a large range of properties that are desirable for a given object
(Koch et al. 2008). Both the three-dimensional epicuticular waxes and cuticular
folding are able to create the double structure. In figure 5a,b, examples are
characterized by papilla and convex cells with three-dimensional waxes on top.
In Colocasia esculenta (figure 5a) the wax crystals are wax platelets, whereas the
waxes of N. nucifera (figure 5b) are nonacosan-ol tubules. Figure 5c,d shows convex
cells with cuticular folding. In a flower leaf of Rosa Montana (adaxial side), a rippled
folded cuticle forms the central field of the cells, and parallel folds occur at the
anticline field (figure 5c). Another example is the hair-papilla cells of the side of

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1452 B. Bhushan

(a) (ii) (iii)

(i)

10 µm 2µm 0.4 µm

(b)

Figure 6. (a) SEM micrographs (shown at three magnifications) of lotus (N. nucifera) leaf surface,
which consists of microstructure formed by papillose epidermal cells covered with epicuticular wax
tubules on the surface, which create nanostructure (Bhushan et al. in press) and (b) image of water
droplet sitting on the lotus leaf.

the tube-like leaf of the carnivorous plant Sarracenia leucophylla (figure 5d ). The
cells are downward trending hair papilla with a parallel cuticle folding, with larger
distances at the bases and denser arrangements at the cell tip.

Superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion

Some leaves of water-repellent plants, such as N. nucifera (lotus) and
C. esculenta, are known to be superhydrophobic and self-cleaning due to
hierarchical roughness (microbumps superimposed with nanostructure) and
the presence of a hydrophobic coating (Bhushan & Jung 2008; Koch et al.
2008, 2009, in press a; Nosonovsky & Bhushan 2008a–c). Roughness-induced
superhydrophobic and self-cleaning surfaces are of interest in various applica-
tions, including self-cleaning windows, windshields and exterior paints for
buildings, boats, ships and aircraft, utensils, roof tiles, textiles, solar panels and
applications requiring antifouling and a reduction of drag in fluid flow, e.g. in
micro/nanofluidics, boats, ships and aircraft. Superhydrophobic surfaces can also
be used for energy conversion and conservation. Non-wetting surfaces also reduce
stiction at a contacting interface in machinery (Bhushan 1999, 2002).
Surfaces are called hydrophobic if the static contact angle is greater than 908.
Surfaces are called superhydrophobic if the static contact angle is above 1508. In
addition, a low contact angle hysteresis (CAH; the difference between the
advancing and receding contact angles) plays an important role in self-cleaning
and reduction of drag in fluid flow. The CAH is a measure of energy dissipation
during the flow of a droplet along a solid surface. At a low value of CAH, the
droplet may roll in addition to slide, which facilitates the removal of contaminant
particles. A CAH of less than 108 is generally referred to as a self-cleaning
surface. Surfaces with low CAH have a low water roll-off (tilt) angle, which
denotes the angle to which a surface must be tilted for roll-off of water drops.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1453

(a) (b) (c)

1 cm 100 µm 600µm

Figure 7. Hairs on the leaves of the water fern genus Salvinia are multicellular surface structures.
In (a) a water droplet on the upper leaf side of Salvinia biloba is shown. (b,c) The crown-like
morphology of the hairs of S. biloba (Koch et al. 2009).

A model surface for superhydrophobicity and self-cleaning is provided by

the leaves of the lotus plant (N. nucifera; figure 6a; Barthlott & Neinhuis
1997; Neinhuis & Barthlott 1997; Wagner et al. 2003; Bhushan & Jung 2006;
Koch et al. 2008, 2009, in press a). The so-called papillose epidermal cells form
asperities or papillae and provide roughness on the microscale. The surface of the
leaves is usually covered with a range of waxes made from a mixture of long-
chain hydrocarbon compounds that have a strong phobia of being wet.
Submicrometre-sized asperities composed of the three-dimensional epicuticular
waxes are superimposed over microscale roughness, creating a hierarchical
structure. The wax asperities consist of different morphologies, such as tubules
on lotus or platelets on Colocasia (Koch et al. 2008, 2009, in press a). The water
droplets on these surfaces readily sit on the apex of nanostructures because air
bubbles fill in the valleys of the structure under the droplet. Therefore, these
leaves exhibit considerable superhydrophobicity (figure 6b). The water droplets
on the leaves remove any contaminant particles from their surfaces when they
roll off, leading to self-cleaning. A contact angle of 1648 and a CAH of 38 have
been reported for the lotus leaf (Bhushan et al. in press; Koch et al. in press b).
Another example of superhydrophobic leaves is floating water ferns. Within
the floating water ferns of the genus Salvinia, morphologically different kinds of
water-repellent (superhydrophobic) hairs exist (Koch et al. 2009). Depending on
the species, the hair size varies of the order of several hundreds of micrometres,
and hairs are visible with the naked eye (figure 7a). These multicellular hairs on
the upper (adaxial) side of the leaves form complex hierarchical surface
structures that are able to retain an air layer at the surface, even when the
leaves were fixed under water for several days. The hairs have the shape of tiny
crowns (figure 7b,c).
Formation of composite solid–air–liquid surfaces is critical to superhydrophob-
icity and self-cleaning. Surface roughness on a hydrophilic or hydrophobic
surface decreases or increases the contact angle, respectively, based on the
so-called Wenzel effect. Air pocket formation in the valleys can increase
the contact angle for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces based on the
so-called Cassie–Baxter effect (Bhushan & Jung 2008). Formation of air pockets,
leading to a composite interface, is the key to very high contact angle and

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1454 B. Bhushan

low CAH. Nosonovsky & Bhushan (2008a–c) reported that the composite
interface is metastable. Capillary waves may destabilize the composite interface.
Condensation and accumulation of nanodroplets and surface inhomogeneity
(with hydrophobic spots) may destroy the composite interface. Microstructures
resist capillary waves present at the liquid–air interface. Nanostructure
prevents nanodroplets from filling the valleys between asperities and pin the
droplet. Thus, a hierarchical structure is required to resist these scale-
dependent mechanisms and enlarge the liquid–air interface, resulting in a high
static contact angle and low CAH. It has been reported that all super-
hydrophobic and self-cleaning leaves consist of an intrinsic hierarchical structure
(Barthlott & Neinhuis 1997; Neinhuis & Barthlott 1997; Koch et al. 2008, 2009,
in press a).
Based on this lesson from nature, one of the ways to increase the hydrophobic
property of the surface is to increase surface roughness; so roughness-
induced hydrophobicity has become a subject of extensive investigations.
This understanding also allows us to develop superoleophobic surfaces
(which repel low surface tension liquids). This technology is being used to develop
various products.
Various superhydrophobic surfaces have been either produced in the
laboratory or are produced commercially (Bhushan et al. in press; Koch et al.
in press b; Roach et al. 2008). Self-cleaning paints, roof tiles, fabrics and glass
windows are commercially available. Some paints have been formulated to keep
barnacles from sticking to ship hulls. An exterior self-cleaning paint (Sto, AG) is
sold under the trade name Lotusan (Dendl & Interwies 2001). It consists of
particles with a controlled size to provide surface structure. A hydrophobic
titanium oxide is subsequently applied. Self-cleaning coatings for glassware,
vehicles, lighting and optical sensors have been developed by the company Ferro,
which are transparent and permanent (Baumann et al. 2003). These coatings
contain functional pigments, nanoparticles and binders in a liquid medium.
During firing after application, a special micro- and nanostructured surface is
formed. Removable coatings with a dispersion of nanoparticles are available from
Evonik Degussa, Inc., which can be removed at a later time, if needed (Mueller &
Winter 2004). Clothes can be waterproofed using plasma treatment (Hoecker
2002). Various coatings with nanostructured particles are available, which can be
applied to textiles to make them hydrophobic and self-cleaning (Nun et al. 2002;
Gao & McCarthy 2006).
Surfaces that switch between superhydrophobicity and hydrophilicity have
been developed using, for example, photoresponsive surfaces with inorganic
oxides and photoreactive organic molecules (Wang et al. 2007), copolymer films
sensitive to pH (Xia et al. 2006) or electric field (electrowetting; Bhushan & Ling
2008). These surfaces can be used, for example, to control fluid flow in micro/
nanochannel networks in micro/nanofluidic chips.

Hydrophilicity
Some plant leaves are hydrophilic or superhydrophilic (Koch et al. 2008, 2009,
in press a). Surfaces are called superhydrophilic if the contact angle is below 108.
Plant surfaces can either absorb water or let water spread over its surface. Two
leaves with water-absorbing porous surface structures are shown in figure 8.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1455

(a) (b)

100 µm 200 µm

Figure 8. SEM micrographs of superhydrophilic plant surfaces showing (a) water-absorbing

hair structure of Tillandsia usneoides and (b) the water uptaking pores of Sphagnum moss (Koch
et al. 2008).

A contact angle of the order of 08 is expected of these plant surfaces because they
are water absorbing. The structure of these plant surfaces can be used in the
development of adhesive or sticky surfaces.

Insect feeding
Two strategies used for catching insects by plants for digestion are having
sticky surfaces or sliding structures. As an example, for catching insects using
sticky surfaces, the glands of the carnivorous plants of the genus Pinguicula
(butterworts) and Drosera (sundew), shown in figure 9, secrete adhesives
and enzymes to trap and digest small insects, such as mosquitoes and fruit flies
(Koch et al. 2009). In Pinguicula, the stalked glands are the sticky ones that
trap the insects by secreting an adhesive solution. The shorter ones are those
that secrete digestive enzymes, including protease and phosphotase, and later
resorb the digested material. In Drosera, the stalked glands can effectively
enclose small flies by bringing numerous glands in contact with the prey.
Some plants use slippery wax layers in order to capture and retain insects.
Carnivorous plants in the genus Nepenthes have pitcher-like leaves formed as
traps for catching and digestion of insects (figure 10a–e; Juniper et al. 1989; Koch
et al. in press a). In these species, a layer of three-dimensional wax platelets
creates a slippery zone inside the tube, above the digestive zone. The wax plays a
crucial role in animal trapping and prey retention (Gorb et al. 2005). Insects are
not able to attach and walk on these waxy surfaces. They glide into the digestive
fluid and are restrained from further escape. The structure of these plant surfaces
can be used in the development of surfaces with self-cleaning ability or for
drag reduction.

Prevent feeding by insects

Some plants provide mechanical and chemical defence mechanisms to
prevent feeding by insects. As an example for mechanical defence, for the
surface of the common Horsetail (Equisetum arvensis), as shown in figure 11,

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1456 B. Bhushan

(a) (b)

20 µm

(c)

100 µm 20 µm

(d) (e)

100 µm 50 µm

Figure 9. SEM micrographs of multicellular glands on plant surface. (a–c) Glands of the
carnivorous plant Pinguicula gypsicola on the upper (adaxial) side of the leaf. (b) Detail of the
stalked and (c) non-stalked glands. The stalked glands secrete an adhesive to trap small insects;
unstalked glands provide the enzymes for digestion of the insects. (d,e) The sticky and also
digestive glands of the carnivorous sundew (Drosera capinsis; Koch et al. 2009).

there are subcuticular inserts of solid crystals of silica. Silicon is a bioactive

element associated with beneficial effects of mechanical and physiological
properties of plants. Silicon enhances the expression of genetically controlled
defence mechanisms in plants. This increases the resistance of plants to
pathogenic fungi (Koch et al. 2008). These leaves are also an example of
superhydrophobic surfaces.
Examples of plants that provide chemical defence include Taxus baccata,
Primula polinuri and Nicotiana tabacum with exudates of glands—terpenoids,
flavonoids and nicotine, respectively. The flavonoid exudates are morphologically
similar to waxes, but are widely referred to as ‘farina’ or ‘farinose’ due to their
chemical divergence to plant waxes (Koch et al. 2009).
Some of these defence strategies are of interest in the development of defence
strategies against insect invasions of forests and in other applications.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1457

(a) (b) (c)

peristome

100 µm

(d)

20µm

(e)

1 cm 100 µm

Figure 10. Pitcher traps of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata. (a) The complete pitcher trap of
N. alata and (b) a longitudinal cut through the trap. (c) Parallel ridges of the hydrophilic peristome.
The arrow indicates the direction towards the inside of the pitcher. (d ) The waxy and slippery
surface inside the trap, with inactive stomata. (e) Glands located in the digestive zone at the lower
part of the trap. (c) was kindly provided by Holger Bohn (Koch et al. in press a).

10 µm

Figure 11. SEM micrograph of the cell surface structures of the common Horsetail (E. arvensis). In the
middle of the figure, a stomata is shown. The stomatal cells and the surrounding cells are convex and
have a micropattern of some small enhanced spots on the cells. The latter are formed by subcuticular
inserts of bioactive silicon oxide crystals, which provide a defence mechanism. The surface consists of a
three-dimensional wax layer producing a hierarchical structure (Koch et al. 2008).

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1458 B. Bhushan

(a) (b)

200 µm 200 µm

Figure 12. SEM micrographs of hairs; (a) the shoot surface of a climbing bean plant P. vulgaris with
terminal hooks and (b) single hairs on a seed surface of Cynoglossum officinale are characterized by
terminal and lateral barbed hooks for seed dispersal (Koch et al. 2009).

(a) (b)

Figure 13. (a) The image of tiny hooks found in cockleburs and (b) a commercial Velcro
(Mueller 2008).

Hair with hooks

Many plant surfaces have hairs (also known as trichomes). The hairs are found
on the aerial surfaces of most flower plants, some conifers and mosses (Koch et al.
2009). The structures of these hairs are often complex. The function of the hairs
varies from one plant to another (Wagner et al. 2004). Many plants of dry
habitats show a dense cover of dead air-filled hairs to reflect visible light, which
makes the surface appear white (figure 4f ). They may affect the loss of water and
the wettability of surfaces. Hairs might also function as an anchor for seed
dispersal by animals or wind. Some of the hairs form hooks for climbing purposes.
On climbing kidney shoots, (Phaseolus vulgaris) hairs form hooks (figure 12a),
and in Cynoglossum officinale (figure 12b), the hairs have lateral barbed hooks for
seed dispersal (Wagner et al. 2004; Koch et al. 2009).

Velcro effect
Fruits of the burdock plant consist of hooks. Cockleburs get attached to
clothes readily. In 1948, Swiss engineer George de Mestal found that their
spines were tipped with tiny hooks that stick out from the seeds and provide

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1459

a
a

r
r

Figure 14. Schematic of a tension wood cell structure, consisting of spirally wound cellulose fibres
and parallel G-layer fibres. By exposure to high humidity, swelling of the G-layer pushes against
the spirally wound secondary cell wall and results in contraction of the cell along its length,
resulting in high-tensile stresses leading to motion (Goswami et al. 2008). sr, circumferential hoop
stress; sa, axial stress.

a hook-and-loop construction, which grips instantly, but can be ungripped with a

light force (figure 13a). This led to the invention of a zip, called Velcro (1955),
which works as a zipper (figure 13b). One side has stiff hooks as the burs and the
other has loops in the fabric. The word Velcro was derived from the French
words velour (velvet) and crochet (hook).

(iii) Plant structures for motion

Plant tissues are composite materials consisting of hierarchical structures.
Some of the structures (such as wood) exhibit high stiffness, strength and
resilience. Dead tissues on some plants can change shape in a controlled manner
with a change in external conditions, such as temperature or humidity (Elbaum
et al. 2008; Fratzl et al. 2008). The change in shape actuates movement. As an
example, wheat awns are attached to the seed, which assist in the dispersion and
mobility of the seed. The cellulose fibrils within a single awn are parallel on one
side and randomly oriented on the other. A change in humidity causes
differential swelling on either side of the awn, resulting in a reversible bending
of the awn. Repeated variations in humidity from the changes in day/night
temperature push the seed into the ground (Elbaum et al. 2008). Another
example of shape change is the tension wood fibres found in the upper parts of
the branches of hardwoods (figure 14; Fratzl et al. 2008). The tension wood fibres
can generate high-tensile stresses and pull leaning stems and branches upwards.
In comparison with regular fibres, tension wood cells are filled with an extra layer
of cellulose and consist of parallel G-layer fibres oriented along the cell and
branch axis. The outside of the tension wood consists of spirally wound cellulose.
Exposure to humidity results in swelling of the parallel G-layer fibres in the
radial direction pushing against the outer cell wall. The circumferential hoop
stress is converted into a contraction of the cell along its length, resulting in high-
tensile stresses that can actuate the movement, i.e. the change of curvature of the
axis (Goswami et al. 2008).
To provide movement in composite mimicking plant cells, Sidorenko et al.
(2007) developed a hydrogel matrix with embedded stiff parallel silicon needles.
The isotropic swelling of the matrix is hindered by the presence of the
undeformable elements, which results in anisotropic deformation. The movement
can also result from the swelling of the gel.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1460 B. Bhushan

(a) (b)

(i) (ii)

20 µm 200 nm

Figure 15. (a) Pond skater (G. remigis) walking on water and (b) SEM images of a pond skater leg
showing (i) numerous oriented microscale setae and (ii) nanoscale grooved structures on a seta
(Gao & Jiang 2004).

(a) (b)

100 µm 10 µm

(c) (d )

1 µm 100 nm

Figure 16. SEM images of (a) a single mosquito eye, (b) an HCP microhemisphere (ommatidia),
(c) two neighbouring ommatidia and (d ) hexagonally NCP nanonipples covering an ommatidial
surface (Gao et al. 2007b).

(c ) Superhydrophobicity in insects
Pond skaters (Gerris remigis) are insects that live on the surfaces of ponds,
slow streams and quiet waters. A pond skater has the ability to stand and walk
upon a water surface without getting wet (figure 15a). Even the impact of rain
droplets with a size greater than the pond skater’s size does not make it immerse
into the water. Gao & Jiang (2004) showed that the special hierarchical structure
of the pond skater’s legs, which are covered by large numbers of oriented tiny
hairs (microsetae) with fine nanogrooves and covered with cuticle wax, makes
the leg surfaces superhydrophobic, is responsible for the water resistance and
enables them to stand and walk quickly on the water surface. They measured the
contact angle of the insect’s legs with water to be approximately 1678. Scanning
electron microscope (SEM) micrographs revealed numerous oriented setae on the
legs (figure 15b). The setae are needle-shaped hairs with diameters ranging from

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1461

(a) (b)

10 mm 10 µm

Figure 17. The water-capturing surface of the fused overwings (elytra) of the desert beetle
Stenocara sp. (a) Adult female, dorsal view; peaks and valleys are evident on the surface of the
elytra and (b) SEM image of the textured surface of the depressed areas (Parker & Lawrence 2001).

3 mm down to several hundred nanometres. Most setae are roughly 50 mm in

length and arranged at an inclined angle of approximately 208 from the surface of
the leg. Many elaborate nanoscale grooves were found on each microseta, and
these form a unique hierarchical structure. This hierarchical micro- and
nanostructuring on the leg’s surface seems to be responsible for its water
resistance (Nosonovsky & Bhushan 2008a,b) and the strong supporting force.
Gao & Jiang (2004) reported that a leg does not pierce the water surface until a
dimple of 4.4 mm depth is formed. They found that the maximal supporting force
of a single leg is 1.52 mN, or approximately 15 times the total body weight of the
insect. The corresponding volume of water ejected is roughly 300 times that of
the leg itself.
Mosquito eyes exhibit superhydrophobic antifogging properties to provide
excellent vision. An SEM micrograph of a single eye is shown in figure 16a. It is
composed of hundreds of microscale microspheres (figure 16b) called ommatidia,
which act as individual sensory units. These ommatidia are 26 mm in diameter
and organize in a hexagonal closed packed (HCP) arrangement. The surface of
each microsphere is covered with nanoscale nipples (figure 16c). At increasing
magnification, it is observed that the nipples have an average diameter of 101 nm
with a pitch of 47 nm and organize in a non-close-packed (NCP) array
(figure 16d; Gao et al. 2007b). It is the hierarchical structure that is responsible
for superhydrophobicity (Nosonovsky & Bhushan 2008a,b).
Some beetles (figure 17) in the Namib Desert in South Africa, such as the
darkling beetle, collect drinking water from wind-driven morning fog by crouching
with their backs raised facing the wind (figure 17). Droplets form on the top (front)
fused ‘wings’ (elytra) and roll down the beetle’s surface to its mouthparts. These
large droplets form by virtue of the insect’s bumpy surface, which consists of
alternating hydrophobic, wax-coated and hydrophilic, non-waxy regions (Parker &
Lawrence 2001). Experiments with artificial fog showed the feasibility of this
mechanism, and artificial surfaces, consisting of altering hydrophobic and
hydrophilic regions for biomedical applications, have been suggested (Gillmor
et al. 2000). Other applications include water-trapping tents and building
coverings. For antifogging coatings, Zhai et al. (2006) fabricated hydrophilic
patterns on superhydrophobic surfaces with water-harvesting characteristics.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1462 B. Bhushan

body mass

(a)

(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) 100 µm

spiders

geckos

insects
2 mm 2 mm 2 mm 2 mm

(b)
lizards
dry adhesion,
terminal elements (per 100 µm 2)

10 setae branched (evarcha arcuata)

spiders

wet adhesion, flies bugs

10 –1 setae (mostly)
unbranched

10 –2
beetles

10 –3

10 – 6 10 –5 10 –4 10 –3 10 –2 10 –1 1 10 10 2 10 3
mass (g)

Figure 18. (a) Terminal elements of the hairy attachment pads of a (i) beetle, (ii) fly, (iii) spider,
and (iv) gecko (Arzt et al. 2003) shown at different scales (left and right) and (b) the dependence of
terminal element density on body mass ( Federle 2006).

(d ) Adhesion in insects, spiders, lizards and frogs

(i) Dry adhesion

Leg attachment pads of several animals, including many insects (e.g. beetles
and flies), spiders and lizards (e.g. geckos), are capable of attaching to a variety
of surfaces and are used for locomotion, even on vertical walls or across ceilings
(Autumn et al. 2000; Gorb 2001; Bhushan 2007b, 2008). Biological evolution over
a long period of time has led to the optimization of their leg attachment systems.
This dynamic attachment ability is referred to as reversible adhesion or smart
adhesion (Bhushan 2007b, 2008).

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1463

(a)

(i) (ii)

(b) (c)

(d ) (e)
(i) (ii)
ST
ST

SP
BR
20 µm 50 µm 5 µm

Figure 19. (a) Tokay gecko looking (i) top-down and (ii) bottom-up (Autumn et al. 2000). The
hierarchical structures of a gecko foot (b) a gecko foot (Autumn et al. 2000) and (c) a gecko toe
(Autumn 2006). Each toe contains hundreds of thousands of setae and each seta contains hundreds of
spatula. SEM micrographs (at different magnifications) of (d ) the setae (Gao et al. 2005) and (e) the
spatula (Gao et al. 2005). ST, seta; SP, spatula; BR, branch.

Attachment systems in various creatures, such as insects, spiders and lizards,

have similar structures. The microstructures used by beetles, flies, spiders and
geckos can be seen in figure 18a (Arzt et al. 2003). As the size (mass) of the
creature increases, the radius of the terminal attachment elements decreases
(Arzt et al. 2003; Federle 2006). This allows a greater number of setae to be
packed into an area, hence increasing the linear dimension of contact and the
adhesion strength (figure 18b). Based on surface energy approach, it has been
reported that adhesion force is proportional to a linear dimension of the contact
(Bhushan 1999, 2002). Therefore, it increases with the division of contacts. The
density of the terminal attachment elements, rA, per m2 strongly increases with
increasing body mass, m, in g (figure 18b). Flies and beetles have the largest

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1464 B. Bhushan

lamellae

attachment pads,
total area of
two feet ~220 mm2

to lamella
upper level of seta
lamellae length 30–130 mm
length 1–2 mm diameter 5–10 mm
~14000 mm –2

middle level (branches)

length 20 –30 µm
diameter 1–2 µm
lower level (spatulae)
length 2–5 µm
setae diameter 0.1– 0.2 µm
/seta 100 –1000
tips of spatulae
length ~0.5 µm
width 0.2 – 0.3 µm
thickness ~0.01 µm

Figure 20. Schematic structure of a Tokay gecko, including the overall body, one foot, a cross-sectional
view of the lamellae and an individual seta. r represents the number of spatula (Bhushan 2007b).

attachment pads and the lowest density of terminal attachment elements.

Spiders have highly refined attachment elements that cover their legs. Geckos
have both the highest body mass and the greatest density of terminal elements
(spatula). Spiders and geckos can generate high dry adhesion, whereas beetles
and flies increase adhesion by secreting liquids at the contacting interface.
A gecko is the largest animal that can produce high (dry) adhesion to support
its weight with a high factor of safety. The gecko skin comprises a complex
hierarchical structure of lamellae, setae, branches and spatula (Autumn et al.
2000; Bhushan 2007b). As shown in figures 19 and 20, the gecko consists of an
intricate hierarchy of structures beginning with lamellae, soft ridges that are
1–2 mm in length, located on the attachment pads (toes) that compress easily so
that contact can be made with rough bumpy surfaces. Tiny curved hairs, known
as setae, extend from the lamellae with a density of approximately 14 000 mmK2.
These setae are typically 30–130 mm in length and 5–10 mm in diameter and are
primarily composed of b-keratin with some a-keratin components. At the end of
each seta, 100–1000 spatulae, with a diameter of 0.1–0.2 mm, branch out and

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1465

form the points of contact with the surface. The tips of the spatula are
approximately 0.2–0.3 mm in width, 0.5 mm in length and 0.01 mm in thickness,
and get their name from their resemblance to a spatula.
The attachment pads on two feet of the Tokay gecko have an area of
approximately 220 mm2. Approximately 3!106 setae on their toes can produce a
clinging ability of approximately 20 N (vertical force required to pull a lizard
down a nearly vertical (858) surface) and allow them to climb vertical surfaces at
speeds of over 1 m sK1, with the capability to attach or detach their toes in
milliseconds. It should be noted that a three-level hierarchical structure allows
adaptability to surfaces with different magnitudes of roughness. The gecko uses a
peeling action to unstick itself (Bhushan 2007b, 2008).
Replication of the structure of gecko feet would enable the development of a
superadhesive polymer tape capable of clean, dry adhesion, which is
reversible (e.g. Geim et al. 2003; Bhushan 2007b, 2008; Bhushan & Sayer 2007;
Gorb et al. 2007). (It should be noted that common man-made adhesives, such as
tape or glue, involve the use of wet adhesives that permanently attach two
surfaces.) The reusable gecko-inspired adhesives have the potential for use in
everyday objects, such as tapes, fasteners and toys, and in high technology, such
as microelectronic and space applications. Replication of the dynamic climbing
and peeling ability of geckos could find use in the treads of wall-climbing robots
(Cutkosky & Kim in press).

(ii) Wet adhesion

Some amphibians, such as tree and torrent frogs and arboreal salamanders, are
able to attach to and move over wet or even flooded environments without falling
(Federle et al. 2006). Tree frog toe attachment pads consist of a hexagonal array
of flat-topped epidermal cells of approximately 10 mm in size separated by
approximately 1 mm wide mucus-filled channels; the flattened surface of each cell
consists of a submicrometre array of nanopillars or pegs of approximately
100–400 nm diameter (figure 21). The toe pads are made of an extremely soft,
inhomogeneous material; the epithelium itself has an effective elastic modulus of
approximately 15 MPa, equivalent to silicone rubber (Scholz et al. 2009). The
pads are permanently wetted by mucus secreted from glands that open into the
channels between epidermal cells. They attach to mating surfaces by wet
adhesion (Federle et al. 2006). They are capable of climbing on wet rocks even
when water is flowing over the surface (Barnes et al. 2002).
The pad structure is believed to produce high adhesion and friction by
conforming to the mating rough surface at different length scales and by
maintaining a very thin fluid film at the interface, responsible for animal
locomotion and manoeuvrability. Adhesion is believed to occur primarily by a
meniscus contribution, resulting from menisci formed around the edges of the
pads (Federle et al. 2006). The presence of static friction suggests that the fluid
film is very thin in order to have some dry contact between the tips of the
nanopillars and the mating surface. The dry contacts between the pad and
the mating surfaces are produced by squeezing out the fluid film from the
interface. Hierarchical structure and material properties facilitate the squeezing
and avoid formation of trapped liquid islands during draining, which would
favour sliding (Federle et al. 2006). During walking, the squeezing is expected to

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1466 B. Bhushan

(a) (b) (c)

100 µm 5 µm

(d ) (e)

1 µm 500 nm

Figure 21. Morphology of tree frog toe pads. (a) White tree frog (Litoria caerulea). SEM images of
(b) toe pad, (c) epidermis with hexagonal epithelial cells, (d ) high-magnification image of the
surface of a single hexagonal cell showing peg-like projections, and (e) transmission electron
microscope image of cross section through cell surface ( Federle et al. 2006).

occur rapidly. Torrent frogs can resist sliding, even on flooded surfaces.
The surface of their toe pads is similar to that of tree frogs with some changes
in the structure to handle the large flow of water (Ohler 1995).
The structure of the toe pads of tree and torrent frogs can be used in the
development of structures with reversible adhesion under wet or flooded conditions.
The treads of tyres used in transport vehicles are inspired by the patterns on the toe
pads of tree frogs. On wet roads, water/snow flows out through channels present
between the treads. This provides an intimate contact between the tyre treads and
the road leading to high adhesion, which is responsible for good grip while driving on
the wet road.

(e ) Aquatic animals

(i) Low hydrodynamic drag

Many aquatic animals can move in water at high speeds, with a low energy
input. Drag is a major hindrance to movement. Most shark species move through
water with high efficiency and maintain buoyancy. Through its ingenious design,
their skin turns out to be an essential aid in this behaviour by reducing drag
by 5–10 per cent and autocleaning ectoparasites from their surface (Bechert et al.
1997, 2000). The very small individual tooth-like scales of shark skin,
called dermal denticles (little skin teeth), are ribbed with longitudinal grooves
(aligned parallel to the local flow direction of the water), which result in water
moving very efficiently over their surface. An example of scale structure on

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1467

0.5 mm

Figure 22. Scale structure on a Galapagos shark (C. galapagensis ; Reif 1985).

the right front of a Galapagos shark (Carcharhinus galapagensis) is shown in

figure 22. The detailed structure varies from one location to another for a
given shark. The scales are present over most of the shark’s body. These are
V-shaped, approximately 200–500 mm in height, and regularly spaced
(100–300 mm).
Owing to the relatively high Reynolds number of a swimming shark, turbulent
flow occurs. The skin drag (wall shear stress) is not generally affected by surface
roughness. Longitudinal scales on the surface result in lower wall shear stresses than
that on a smooth surface and control boundary-layer separation. The longitudinal
scales result in water moving more efficiently over their surface than it would were
shark scales completely featureless. Over smooth surfaces, fast-moving water
begins to break up into turbulent vortices, or eddies, in part because the water
flowing at the surface of an object moves slower than water flowing further away
from the object with so-called low boundary slip. This difference in water speed
causes the faster water to get ‘tripped up’ by the adjacent layer of slower water
flowing around an object, just as upstream swirls form along riverbanks. The
grooves in a shark’s scales simultaneously reduce eddy formation in a surprising
number of ways: (i) the grooves reinforce the direction of flow by channelling it,
(ii) they speed up the slower water at the shark’s surface (as the same volume of
water going through a narrower channel increases in speed), reducing the difference
in speed of this surface flow and the water just beyond the shark’s surface,
(iii) conversely, they pull faster water towards the shark’s surface so that it

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1468 B. Bhushan

Figure 23. The image of a boxfish (O. meleagris).

mixes with the slower water, reducing this speed differential, and finally,
(iv) they divide up the sheet of water flowing over the shark’s surface
so that any turbulence created results in smaller, rather than larger, vortices
(www.biomimicryinstitute.org).
It is also reported that longitudinal scales influence the fluid flow in the
transverse direction by limiting the degree of momentum transfer. It is the
difference in the protrusion height in the longitudinal and transverse directions
that governs how much the scales impede the transverse flow. Bechert et al.
(1997) reported that, based on their experimental data, thin, vertical scales
result in low transverse flow and low drag. They also reported that the ratio of
scale height to tip-to-tip spacing of 0.5 is the optimum value for low drag.
In addition to reduction of drag, the shark skin surface prevents marine organisms
from being able to adhere to (‘foul’) it. It is not because of the lotus effect, but the
shark skin is hydrophilic and wets with water. There are three factors that appear to
keep the surface clean: (i) the accelerated water flow at a shark’s surface reduces the
contact time of fouling organisms, (ii) the roughened nanotexture of shark skin
reduces the available surface area for adhering organisms, and (iii) the dermal scales
themselves perpetually realign or flex in response to changes in internal and external
pressure as the shark moves through water, creating a ‘moving target’ for fouling
organisms (www.biomimicryinstitute.org).
Speedo created the whole body swimsuit called Fastskin bodysuit (TYR Trace
Rise) in 2006 for elite swimming. The suit is made of polyurethane woven fabric with
a texture based on shark scales. In the 2008 Summer Olympics, two-thirds of the
swimmers wore Speedo swim suits, and a large number of world records were broken.
Boat, ship and aircraft manufacturers are trying to mimic shark skin to reduce
friction drag and minimize the attachment of organisms on their bodies. One can
create riblets on the surface by painting or attaching a film (3M). Skin friction
contributes to about half of the total drag in an aircraft. Transparent sheets with a

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1469

(a) (b)

Figure 24. (a) Scalloped edges of a humpback whale used to make tight turns and (b) design of
turbine blades with tubercles to reduce drag in wind turbines ( Fish & Battle 1995; Fish 2006).

ribbed structure in the longitudinal direction have been used on the commercial
Airbus 340 aircraft. It is expected that riblet film on the body of the aircraft can
reduce drag of the order of 10 per cent (Fish 2006).
Mucus on the skin of aquatic animals, including sharks, acts as an osmotic
barrier against the salinity of sea water and protects the creature from parasites
and infections (Bechert et al. 2000). The mucus also operates as a drag-reducing
agent on some fast predatory fishes, which allows the fishes to attack more easily
(Hoyt 1975). The artificial derivatives of fish mucus, i.e. polymer additives for
liquids, are used in drag reduction technology, for example, to propel crude oil in
the Alaska pipeline (Motier & Carrier 1989).
The compliant skin of dolphins allows the high speed of dolphins. The
compliant skin, interacting with the water flowing over the body’s surface,
stabilizes the flow and delays transition to turbulence. The delay in the onset of
turbulence is believed to reduce skin friction and drag. It has been reported that
dolphin skin would also work under fully turbulent flow conditions; however, the
drag reduction is expected to be small, a few per cent (Bechert et al. 2000).
Dolphins possess an optimum shape for drag reduction of submerged bodies.
Submarines use the shape of dolphins.
The boxfish (Ostracion meleagris) has a streamlined form with squared-off
contours, shown in figure 23 (Mueller 2008). The body provides a low drag, and the
fish can swim up to six body lengths per second. Its shape inspired Mercedes Benz’s
bionic concept car with a low aerodynamic drag, providing high fuel economy.
Finally, in contrast to seabirds or boat surfaces, fishes are not endangered by
pollution from oil during an oil spill because their surfaces are superoleophobic.
These surfaces should be superior to the traditional approach employing
surfactant solutions to aid in the removal of oil from the surfaces, as these
surfaces would be ecologically friendly.

(ii) Energy production

Humpback whales have scalloped edges with a unique series of bumps called
tubercles on their flippers (figure 24). Fish & Battle (1995) reported that the
tubercles enable these huge whales to make very tight turns in manoeuvring to
secure their food. Inspired by this, Fish (2006) designed wind turbine blades with
tubercles approximately 0.7 m tall (figure 24). Based on wind tunnel tests, his group
reported that blades with tubercles, as compared with those without tubercles,
exhibited an increase in the angle of attack (the angle that a blade makes into the

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1470 B. Bhushan

barbs barbules
(a) barbules (b)

barb

100 µm 10 µm

Figure 25. (a,b) SEM images of pigeon feather structure at two magnifications (Bormashenko
et al. 2007).

Figure 26. The wings of a bird in landing approach.

incident wind) from 11 to 178 prior to stalling. These blades with tubercles for wind
turbines can be used to improve performance at low wind speeds by increasing the
angle of attack without stalling. Fish (2006) reported that tubercles enable the
flipper to decrease drag, which allows the humpback whale to use less energy to turn.

(f ) Birds
Bird feathers perform multiple functions—make the body water repellant, create
wings and tails for aerodynamic lift during flying, provide coloration for appearance
as well as camouflage and provide an insulating layer to keep the body warm.

(i) Hydrophobicity
Many bird feathers exhibit hydrophobicity (an apparent contact angle of
100–1408). Bormashenko et al. (2007) studied Feral Rock pigeon feathers.
An SEM image of the pigeon feather (pennae) is shown in figure 25. The
morphology consists of a network formed by barbs and barbules made of keratin.
It is the morphology that plays an important role in hydrophobicity.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1471

(a) (b)

CaCo3

0.3 mm

(d) 20–30 nm
C- axis
(c) 5 nm
0.5 µm

8–10 µm

long protein aragonite

chains 0.5 µm tiles

Figure 27. Hierarchy of the abalone structure. (a) Entire shell, (b) mesostructure with mesolayers,
(c) nanostructure showing organic interlayer comprising 5 wt% of overall shell, and (d ) micro-
structure with aragonite tiles (Meyers et al. 2006).

(ii) Aerodynamics
Birds consist of several consecutive rows of covering feathers on their wings,
which are flexible (figure 26). These movable flaps develop the lift. When a bird
lands, a few feathers are deployed in front of the leading edges of the wings,
which help to reduce the drag on the wings. Self-activated movable flaps
(artificial bird feathers) have been shown to provide an increase in lift in flight
experiments (Bechert et al. 2000). Birds serve as the inspiration for aircraft
and early developments of wing design (Jakab 1990). However, aircraft do not
flap their wings like birds to simultaneously produce lift and thrust. This is
impractical in aircraft due to limitations of scaling phenomena and high speeds.
The favourable aerodynamics of the beak of a kingfisher was used to model the
nose cone of the Japanese Shinkansen bullet train.

(iii) Hues
Various birds (e.g. peacocks) and butterflies create brilliant hues by refracting
light through millions of repeating structures that bend light to make certain colours.
They do not use pigments. For example, the only pigment in peacock feathers is
brown. These studies are being used to develop brighter screens for cellular phones.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1472 B. Bhushan

(g ) Seashells
Seashells are biominerals that are natural nanocomposites with a laminated
structure. They exhibit superior mechanical properties to their constituents
(Lowenstam & Weiner 1989; Sarikaya & Aksay 1995; Mann 2001; Meyers et al.
2006, 2008). This is because biological organisms produce composites that
contain both inorganic and organic components in complex structures. The
mineral is embedded in a complex assemblage of organic macromolecules that are
hierarchically organized. The mineral component provides the strength, and the
organic components provide the ductility. Seashells are composed of a large
fraction of inorganic minerals (typically calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate
and amorphous silica with a concentration of the order of 95%) and a small
fraction of organic biopolymers (typically keratin, collagen and chitin in the
range of 1–5%).
A large variety of shells are found in nature (Meyers et al. 2006, 2008).
The one most studied is the abalone shell (Haliotis). Abalone shells derive
their extraordinary mechanical properties (compared to monolithic CaCO3)
from a hierarchically organized structure, starting at the nanolevel with a
20–30 nm thick organic layer, proceeding with single crystals of the aragonite
polymorph of CaCO3, consisting of 0.5–10 mm thick bricks (microstructure),
and finishing with 0.3 mm thick layers (macrostructure) (figure 27) (Meyers
et al. 2006). Between the layers of shells is a 20–30 nm thick organic protein
substance, such as chitin, lustrin and silk-like proteins. This mixture of
brittle platelets and thin layers of elastic biopolymers inhibit transverse
crack propagation and make the material strong and resilient. The multiple-
length sizes significantly increase its toughness, making it equivalent to
silicon. Mechanisms for the growth and self-assembly of aragonitic calcium
carbonate found in the shell of the abalone have been studied by Lin &
Meyers (2005).
The shells of abalones have a low and open spiral structure. The thick
inner layer of the shell is composed of nacre, also known as mother of pearl.
Nacre is strong and iridescent with changeable colours, and is used for
decorative purposes. It is called mother of pearl because it is literally the
mother or creator of the pearl. The deformation mechanisms and mechanics
of nacre have been investigated by Wang et al. (2001) and Barthelat et al.
(2007). Mechanical properties of nacre have been measured ( Jackson et al.
1988; Sarikaya et al. 1990; Li et al. 2004). Jackson et al. (1988) reported an
elastic modulus of approximately 70 GPa (dry) and 60 GPa (wet) from the
shell of a bivalve mollusc, Pintada umbricata, and a tensile strength of
approximately 170 MPa (dry) and 130 MPa (wet). Sarikaya et al. (1990)
reported fracture toughness of approximately 8 MPa m1/2, measured using
four-point bending tests, and a fracture strength of approximately 185 MPa
in three-point bending tests, which are superior to that of many engineering
ceramics. Fracture toughness is reported to increase in wet conditions. The
moisture has a significant plasticizing effect on proteinaceous layers and leads
to an increase in toughness.
There have been attempts to fabricate artificial nacre (e.g. Tang et al. 2003;
Munch et al. 2008; Luz & Mano 2009).

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1473

enamel
(a)
dentin
pulp chamber

(b)
enamel
crown

pulp chamber gingiva

(nerve) (c)
dentin dentin tubules
dentinal
tubules periodontal
ligament
root canal
cementum
alveolar
apical bone
foramen spongy
bone
cortical
bone
odontoblasts

Figure 28. (a) Overall schematic of an individual human tooth, (b) detailed anatomy of the tooth
showing its hierarchical structure, and (c) structure of dentin comprising thousands of dentinal
tubules (www.doctorspiller.com).

(h ) Bones and teeth

Bones are hard biological tissues (Lowenstam & Weiner 1989; Sarikaya &
Aksay 1995; Mann 2001; Alexander & Diskin 2004). These exhibit excellent
mechanical strength, primarily because of their hierarchical structure. The
toughness of the bone originates from its ability to dissipate deformation energy
at different levels of its structure (Fratzl 2008), as well as sacrificial bonds in
organic layers around individual collage fibrils (Fantner et al. 2005).
An individual tooth consists of two major parts: the crown and the root
(Linde & Goldberg 1993; figure 28a). The tooth itself consists of a multilayered
structure with the crown as the outer layer, the dentin layer as an intermediate
layer and the pulp chamber in the core part (Schroeder 1991; figure 28b).
The outer layer of the crown is made of enamel, and the root part is covered by

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1474 B. Bhushan

Figure 29. The spiderweb made of silk material (Bar-Cohen 2006).

cementum. The enamel is the mineralized tissue. It is acellular and consists of

approximately 95 wt% inorganic hydroxyapatite crystallites, approximately
4 wt% water and approximately 1 wt% proteins. The dentin, which forms the
bulk of the tooth, is approximately 70 wt% mineralized with hydroxyapatite
crystals and also consists of approximately 20 wt% organic components
(proteins, collagens and lipids) and approximately 10 wt% water. The structure
of dentin comprises densely packed tubules, approximately 1–3 mm in diameter
and a density of approximately 15 000 tubules mmK2 (figure 28c). They originate
from the inner part of the nerve space and travel perpendicular from the point of
origin to the surface to the tooth, terminating at the understructure of the
enamel. The tubules contain tiny projections of cells called odontoblasts. The
composition and structure of the dentin provide elasticity and mechanical
strength to the teeth. Enamel, which covers the crown, is very hard and quite
resistant to mechanical and chemical attack. It protects the tooth from the oral
environment. In general, it is vulnerable to acid attack from excess sugar and
abrasion from hard objects and cutting/chewing. The teeth are worn down
continuously, but in such a way that they remain sharp and functional.
Animal jaws have teeth that are used for cutting and crushing hard objects
(food). The teeth should be self-sharpening and durable. Sea urchins have teeth
that can cut extremely hard objects and are durable. These teeth consist of
numerous magnesium-bearing calcite plates, with a small amount of organic
material. They consist of three hierarchical levels—the lantern on the centimetre
scale, tooth architecture on the millimetre scale and tooth microstructure on the
micrometre scale (Wang et al. 1997). The composition and hierarchical structure
provide a combination of high toughness and elastic modulus and are responsible
for extreme durability.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1475

The understanding of composition and structure of various teeth is being used

to develop dental implants and wear-resistant and self-sharpening structures,
including self-sharpening knives.

(i ) Spiderweb
Spiders produce a variety of proteins, among which are major ampullate silks
(MAS). MAS fibres are used by spiders as a scaffold upon which they attach
other silk fibres during the formation of the web. The spider generates the silk
fibre and, at the same time, is hanging on it. It has a sufficient supply of raw
material for its silk to span great distances ( Jin & Kaplan 2003; Bar-Cohen
2006). Spiderweb is a structure built of a one-dimensional fibre (figure 29). The
fibre is very strong and continuous and is insoluble in water. The web can hold
a significant amount of water droplets, and it is resistant to rain, wind and
sunlight (Sarikaya & Aksay 1995; Bar-Cohen 2006). Spider silk is three times
stronger than steel, having a tensile strength of approximately 1.2 GPa (Vogel
2003). Some spider silks have high stiffness with a tensile modulus of
approximately 10 GPa, while others are elastomeric with a modulus of
approximately 1 GPa and an extension to rupture of 200 per cent. The
combination of strength and extensibility is primarily derived from the domains
of crystalline b-sheets and flexible helices within the polypeptide chain,
imparting a toughness that is greater than bone, Kevlar and high strength
steel. The web is designed to catch insects (food for the spider) that cross the net
and get stuck to its stickiness and complex structure.
While mechanical properties of the web fibre are remarkable, it is also quite
interesting how a spider creates a two-dimensional web out of its silk fibre.
Krink & Vollrath (1997) analysed spiderweb-building behaviour using a
computer model that constructed artificial webs with a rule-based simulation.
They found that web characteristics, such as the spiral distances, eccentricities
and vertical hub location, were accurately simulated with the model. They later
proposed a ‘virtual spider robot’ that builds virtual webs, which perfectly mimic
the visual architecture of real webs of the garden cross spider Araneus
diadematus. They suggested that the garden spider uses web-building decision
rules that are strictly local and based on the interactions with previously placed
threads to generate global architecture. This may be interesting for the modelling
of biological self-assembly of complex material from the local rules to the overall
structure that is adaptive to the external conditions.
Researchers have used the synthesis of structural proteins to produce polymers
for fibres that may become commercially useful in the future (Gosline et al. 1995;
Reed et al. 2009). Dzenis (2004) suggested an electrospinning technique to
produce 2 mm diameter continuous fibres from polymer solutions that are
somewhat similar to the spider silk fibres.

(j ) Moth-eye effect and structural coloration

Optical reflection and antireflection is achieved in nature by using nanoscale
architecture (Parker in press). The eyes of moths are antireflective to visible
light. The so-called moth-eye effect was discovered in the 1960s as a result of the
study of insect eyes. For nocturnal insects, it is important not to reflect the light,
since the reflection makes the insect vulnerable to predators. The eyes of moths

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1476 B. Bhushan

500 µm

Figure 30. SEM image of a moth’s eye (Genzer & Efimenko 2006).

consist of hundreds of hexagonally organized nanoscopic pillars, each

approximately 200 nm in diameter and height, which result in a very low
reflectance for visible light (figure 30; Genzer & Efimenko 2006; Mueller 2008).
These nanostructures’ optical surfaces make the eye surface nearly antireflective
in any direction.
Light reflection is avoided by a continuously increasing refractive index of the
optical medium. The little protuberances upon the cornea surface increase the
refractive index. These protuberances are very small microtrichia (approx.
200 nm in diameter). For an increase in transmission and reduced reflection, a
continuous matching of the refraction index at the boundary of the adjacent
materials (cornea and air) is required. If the periodicity of the surface pattern is
smaller than the light wavelength, the light is not reflected (Gorb 2006). If this
condition is satisfied, it may be assumed that, at any depth, the effective
refraction index is the mean of that of air and the bulk material, weighted in
proportion to the amount of material present at that depth (Nosonovsky &
Bhushan 2008a). For a moth-eye surface with the height of the protuberances of
h and the spacing of d, it is expected that the reflectance is very low for
wavelengths less than approximately 2.5 hours and greater than d at normal
incidence, and for wavelengths greater than 2d for oblique incidence. For
protuberances with 220 nm depth and the same spacing (typical values for the
moth eye), a very low reflectance is expected for the wavelengths between 440
and 550 nm (Wilson & Hutley 1982).
This moth-eye effect should not be confused with the reduction of the specular
reflectance by roughening of a surface. Roughness merely redistributes the
reflected light as diffuse scattering. In the case of the moth eye, there is no
increase in diffuse scattering, the transmitted wavefront is not degraded, and the
reduction in reflection gives rise to a corresponding increase in transmission
(Wilson & Hutley 1982).

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1477

(a) (b) (c)

50 µm 5 µm 1 µm

Figure 31. (a–c) Images of Polyommatus icarus (common blue) butterfly wings at different
magnifications, showing that they are composed of thousands of scales with complex hierarchical
structures (courtesy of W. Barthlott).

Attempts are being made to incorporate microscopic corrugations in solar

panels to reduce light reflection. Attempts are also being made to produce a
glare-free computer screen by creating facets on a photosensitive lacquer using
lasers. Some 25 ! 103 dots of texture mmK2 can essentially eliminate the glare
on the screen (Mueller 2008). Hadobás et al. (2000) prepared patterned silicon
surfaces with 300 nm periodicity and depth up to 190 nm. They found a
significant reduction in reflectivity, partially due to the moth-eye effect.
Gao et al. (2007a) used epoxy and resin to replicate the antireflective surface
of a cicada’s eye. It is also possible to create transparent surfaces using the
moth-eye effect (Clapham & Hutley 1973).
In addition to nanostructures that lead to non-reflective surfaces, many
insects, such as butterflies, use structural coloration due to the presence of scales
(figure 31). The wing scales have hierarchical structure at various length scales
(Gorb 2006; Kertezs et al. 2006). Whereas red and yellow wing colours are
provided by coloured pigments, blue and green shades are provided from light
scattered off the hierarchical structure on the wing. Some insects use a
mechanism called iridescence, using a complex multilayer structure for optical
interference. Such structures can produce complicated optical effects, including
strong polarization, colour mixing and reflection angle broadening (Gorb 2006).
Textile fabric, paints and cosmetics have been developed based on the surface of
butterflies. It has been suggested to use this effect for the displays of various
devices, such as cell phones. Unlike conventional displays that require an internal
source of light and become bleak in bright light (e.g. in sunlight), the displays
using biomimetic technology would work from a reflected light, would be seen
well in the sunlight and consume little energy.

(k ) Fur and skin of polar bear

The polar bear, one of the biggest predators on the Earth, has to survive in
arctic cold, up to K508C. A fat layer up to 100 mm thick helps protect these huge
animals from cold. Owing to its black skin and white fur (figure 32a), the polar

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1478 B. Bhushan

(a) (b)

yellowish fur

black skin
fat layer
sun radiation: heat infrared
transfer to insulation blocking
skin

Figure 32. (a) Image of yellowish white fur and black skin of polar bear and (b) schematic of solar
thermal function of polar bear fur (Stegmaier et al. in press).

(a) (b)
fibrin clot (i) (ii) (iii)

crack
epidermis

blood
vessels

granulation
tissue dermis

Figure 33. (a) Schematic of an intermediate stage of biological wound healing in skin. Tissue
damage triggers bleeding, which is followed by the formation of a fibrin clot. Fibroblast cells
migrate to the wound site, enabling the creation of granulation tissue to fill the wound (Singer &
Clark 1999). (b) Demonstration of bioinspired damage-triggered release of a microencapsulated
healing agent in a polymer specimen: (i) schematic of compartmentalized healing agent stored in a
matrix, (ii) release of dyed healing agent into the crack plane, which leads to a synthetic slotting
(polymerization) process to bond the crack faces, and (iii) one-half of the fracture surface revealing
ruptured capsules ( Youngblood & Sottos 2008).

bear can capture incident sunlight. The yellowish white hollow hairs reflect the
sunlight along their length until it is transferred into heat in the black skin
(Stegmaier et al. in press). Hollow hairs in the fur, together with fat skin, provide
high thermal insulation (figure 32b). Milwich et al. (2006) and Stegmaier et al.
(in press) have developed artificial furs and textiles.

(l ) Self-healing of biological systems

There are several biological mechanisms of self-repair. At the molecular level,
there are dynamically breaking and repairing ‘sacrificial’ bonds, which allow for
material to deform in a quasi-plastic manner without fracture. In bones, there is
a cyclic replacement of material by specialized cells, which allows for a bone to
adapt to changing conditions and to repair damage. Many fractured or critically

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1479

damaged living tissues can heal themselves by the formation of an intermediate

tissue (based on the response to inflammation) followed by the scar tissue
(Fratzl & Weinkamer 2007).
A remarkable property of biological tissues is their ability of self-healing. In
biological systems, chemical signals released at the site of fracture initiate a
systemic response that transports repair agents to the site of an injury and
promotes healing. The biological processes control tissue response to injury and
repair involves inflammation, wound closure and matrix remodelling (figure 33a).
Based on Youngblood & Sottos (2008), coagulation and inflammation begin
immediately when tissue is wounded. After approximately 24 hours, the cell
proliferation and matrix deposition begin to close the wound. During the final
stage of healing (which can take several days), the extracellular matrix is
synthesized and remodelled as the tissue regains strength and function.
Ideally, synthetic reproduction of the healing process in a material requires an
initial rapid response to mitigate further damage, efficient transport of
reactive materials to the damage site and structural regeneration to recover
full performance.
Various self-healing artificial materials are being developed (Wool 2008;
van der Zwaag et al. in press). In polymers and polymer composites, based on
Youngblood & Sottos (2008), two approaches are being pursued. In the first
approach, the crack-mending process is initiated by an external thermal-, photo-,
mechanical- or chemical-induced stimulus. Crack healing is achieved through
both molecular diffusion and thermally reversible solid-state reactions. In the
second approach, damage, in the form of a crack, triggers the release of the
healing agents stored in the material, as also occurs for fracture events in
biological systems (figure 33b).

(m ) Sensory-aid devices
Animals and humans can hear or detect sound or noise by detecting frequency
domains. They use a basilar membrane that separates sounds according to their
frequency, which are then conducted to the sensory cells (hair cells) that
transform the vibration of the basilar membrane into a neural code (Moller
2006). Various nanostructures are being developed for frequency detection and
sound imaging (Barth et al. 2003; Bar-Cohen 2006).
An array of sensors can be used to analyse chemicals and can lead to an
‘artificial nose’ for sense of smell or an ‘artificial tongue’ for sense of taste.
Various techniques, such as atomic force microscope cantilever arrays, have been
suggested for this purpose. Baller et al. (2000) used a microfabricated array of
silicon cantilevers for the detection of vapours. Each of the cantilevers was
coated with a specific sensor layer to transduce a physical process or a chemical
reaction into a nanomechanical response. The response pattern of eight
cantilevers was analysed with principal component analysis and artificial
neural network techniques, which facilitates the application of the device as an
artificial chemical nose. Single-cantilever sensors can determine quantities
below the detection limits of equivalent ‘classical’ methods; thus, catalytic
processes can be observed with picojoule sensitivity in nanocalorimetry
(Gimzewski et al. 1994).

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1480 B. Bhushan

Melanophila beetle possess one infrared (IR) organ (containing 70 singly IR

receptors) on each side of the thorax (Schmitz et al. 2007). Insect-inspired IR
sensors are being developed for various applications, such as heat and smoke
detection (Schuetz et al. 1999).

(n ) Other lessons from nature

Human skin is sensitive to impact, leading to the purple colour marks in areas
that are hit. This idea inspired researchers in the mid-1980s to develop a coating,
indicating impact damage (Bar-Cohen 2006). Such a coating, on the basis of a paint
mixed with microcapsules (1–10 mm in size) with a certain chemical reagent, was
used in the aircraft industry to identify damage to components made of impact-
sensitive composite materials. An impact may lead to a significant strength loss in
such a material, without visible structural damage, so the change of colour indicates
the damage that may be potentially dangerous for the aircraft.
Human body joints consist of softer cartilage between the two bones to reduce
friction and wear. This concept is being used to develop artificial joints that
involve ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. The sandfish found in the
Sahara desert moves over the sand. The scales on its body and biomaterials used in
the body provide wear resistance. This family of materials and the scales present on
the body can be used to develop materials for abrasive wear resistance applications.
The pearl oyster uses carbon dioxide to construct its calcium carbonate shell.
This technology is being exploited to convert carbon dioxide emissions into a
water-based solution of bicarbonate ions, which can then be converted into solid
calcium carbonate. The whale heart can pump of the order of 1000 l of blood per
pulse through more than 170 km of veins and arteries. The construction of the
whale heart is used as a model to develop pacemakers for high blood circulation.
Other lessons from nature include fly wings of flying insects, ultrasonic detection
by bats and silent flying of owls. The latter occurs because of frayed feathers on the
edges of their wings, which break up turbulence and reduce sound.

(o ) Hierarchical organization in biomaterials

Nature develops biological objects by means of growth or biologically
controlled self-assembly adapting to the environmental condition and by using
the most commonly found materials. Biological materials are developed by using
the recipes contained in the genetic code. As a result, biological materials and
tissues are created by hierarchical structuring at all levels in order to adapt form
and structure to the function, which have the capability of adaptation to changing
conditions and self-healing (Fratzl & Weinkamer 2007; Nosonovsky & Bhushan
2008a). The genetic algorithm interacts with the environmental condition, which
provides flexibility. For example, a tree branch can grow differently in the direction
of the wind and in the opposite direction. The only way to provide this adaptive
self-assembly is a hierarchical self-organization of the material. Hierarchical
structuring allows adaptation and optimization of the material at each level.
It is apparent that nature uses hierarchical structures, consisting of nano-
structures in many cases, to achieve the required performance (Nosonovsky &
Bhushan 2008a–c). Understanding the role of hierarchical structure and
development of low cost and flexible fabrication techniques would facilitate
commercial applications.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1481

3. Outlook

The emerging field of biomimetics is already gaining a foothold in the scientific

and technical arena. It is clear that nature has evolved and optimized a large
number of materials and structured surfaces with rather unique characteristics.
As we understand the underlying mechanisms, we can begin to exploit them for
commercial applications.
The commercial applications include new nanomaterials, nanodevices and
processes. As for devices, these include superhydrophobic self-cleaning and/or
low drag surfaces, surfaces for energy conversion and conservation, super-
adhesives, robotics, objects that provide aerodynamic lift, materials and fibres
with high mechanical strength, antireflective surfaces and surfaces with hues,
artificial furs and textiles, various biomedical devices and implants, self-healing
materials and sensory-aid devices, to name a few.
The author would like to sincerely thank Dr Kerstin Koch of the University of Bonn for useful
suggestions and a critical reading of the paper.

References
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. & Walter, P. (eds) 2008 Molecular biology
of the cell. New York, NY: Garland Science.
Alexander, R. M. & Diskin, A. 2004 Human bones: a scientific and pictorial investigation.
New York, NY: Pi Press.
Anon. 2007 Biomimetics: strategies for product design inspired by nature. Bristol, UK: Department
of Trade and Industry.
Arzt, E., Gorb, S. & Spolenak, R. 2003 From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment
devices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10 603–10 606. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1534701100)
Autumn, K. 2006 How gecko toes stick. Am. Sci. 94, 124–132. (doi:10.1511/2006.58.124)
Autumn, K., Liang, Y. A., Hsieh, S. T., Zesch, W., Chan, W. P., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R. & Full,
R. J. 2000 Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405, 681–685. (doi:10.1038/
35015073)
Ball, P. 2002 Natural strategies for the molecular engineer. Nanotechnology 13, R15–R28. (doi:10.
1088/0957-4484/13/5/201)
Baller, M. K. et al. 2000 A cantilever array-based artificial nose. Ultramicroscopy 82, 1–9. (doi:10.
1016/S0304-3991(99)00123-0)
Bar-Cohen, Y. (ed.) 2006 Biomimetics: biologically inspired technologies. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor &
Francis.
Barnes, W. J. P., Smith, J., Oines, C. & Mundl, R. 2002 Bionics and wet grip. Tire Technol. Int.
2002, 56–60.
Barth, F. G., Humphrey, J. A. C. & Secomb, T. W. 2003 Sensors and sensing in biology and
engineering. New York, NY: Springer.
Barthelat, F., Tang, H., Zavattieri, P. D., Li, C. M. & Espinosa, H. D. 2007 On the mechanics of
mother-of-pearl: a key feature in the material hierarchical structure. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55,
306–337. (doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2006.07.007)
Barthlott, W. & Neinhuis, C. 1997 Purity of the sacred lotus, of escape from contamination in
biological surfaces. Planta 202, 1–8. (doi:10.1007/s004250050096)
Baumann, M., Sakoske, G., Poth, L. & Tuenker, T. 2003 Learning from the lotus flower—
self-cleaning coatings on glass. In Proc. 8th Int. Glass Conf., Tampere, Finland, pp. 330–333.
Glass Processing Days.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1482 B. Bhushan

Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W., van der Hoeven, J. G. T. & Hoppe, G. 1997 Experiments on
drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry. J. Fluid Mech. 338,
59–87. (doi:10.1017/S0022112096004673)
Bechert, D. W., Bruse, M., Hage, W. & Meyer, R. 2000 Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and
their technological application. Naturwissenschaften 87, 157–171. (doi:10.1007/s001140050696)
Benniston, A. C. & Harriman, A. 2008 Artificial photosynthesis. Mater. Today 11, 26–34. (doi:10.
1016/S1369-7021(08)70250-5)
Bhushan, B. 1999 Principles and applications of tribology. New York, NY: Wiley.
Bhushan, B. 2002 Introduction to tribology. New York, NY: Wiley.
Bhushan, B. 2007a Springer handbook of nanotechnology, 2nd edn. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Bhushan, B. 2007b Adhesion of multi-level hierarchical attachment systems in gecko feet. J. Adhes.
Sci. Technol. 21, 1213–1258. (doi:10.1163/156856107782328353)
Bhushan, B. (ed.) 2008 Nanotribology and nanomechanics: an introduction, 2nd edn. Heidelberg,
Germany: Springer.
Bhushan, B. & Jung, Y. C. 2006 Micro- and nanoscale characterization of hydrophobic and
hydrophilic leave surface. Nanotechnology 17, 2758–2772. (doi:10.1088/0957-4484/17/11/008)
Bhushan, B. & Jung, Y. C. 2008 Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and
hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20,
225 010. (doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/22/225010)
Bhushan, B. & Ling, X. 2008 Integrating electrowetting into micromanipulation of liquid. J. Phys.
Condens. Matter 20, 485 009. (doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/48/485009)
Bhushan, B. & Sayer, R. A. 2007 Surface characterization and friction of a bio-inspired reversible
adhesive tape. Microsyst. Technol. 13, 71–78. (doi:10.1007/s00542-006-0256-2)
Bhushan, B., Jung, Y. C. & Koch, K. In press. Micro-, nano-, and hierarchical structures for
superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367. (doi:10.1098/
rsta.2009.0014)
Bormashenko, E., Bormashenko, Y., Stein, T., Whyman, G. & Bormashenko, E. 2007 Why do
pigeon feathers repel water? Hydrophobicity of pennae, Cassie–Baxter wetting hypothesis and
Cassie–Wenzel capillarity-induced wetting transition. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 311, 212–216.
(doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2007.02.049)
Clapham, P. B. & Hutley, M. C. 1973 Reduction of length reflection by moth eye principle. Nature
244, 281–282. (doi:10.1038/244281a0)
Cutkosky, M. & Kim, S. In press. Design and fabrication of multi-material structures for bio-
inspired robots. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0013)
Dendl, P. & Interwies, J. 2001 Method for imparting a self-cleaning feature to a surface, and an
object provided with a surface of this type. German Patent no. WO 2001/079 141.
Dzenis, Y. 2004 Spinning continuous fibers for nanotechnology. Science 25, 1917–1919. (doi:10.
1126/science.1099074)
Elbaum, R., Gorb, S. & Fratzl, P. 2008 Structures in cell wall that enable hygroscopic movement of
wheat awns. J. Struct. Biol. 164, 101–107. (doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2008.06.008)
Fantner, G. E. et al. 2005 Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils
separate during bone fracture. Nat. Mater. 4, 612–616. (doi:10.1038/nmat1428)
Federle, W. 2006 Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J. Exp. Biol. 209, 2611–2621. (doi:10.
1242/jeb.02323)
Federle, W., Barnes, W. J. P., Baumgartner, W., Drechsler, P. & Smith, J. M. 2006 Wet but not
slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 689–697.
(doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0135)
Fish, F. E. 2006 Limits of nature and advances of technology: what does biomimetics have to offer
to aquatic robots? Appl. Bionics Biomech. 3, 49–60. (doi:10.1533/abbi.2004.0028)
Fish, F. E. & Battle, J. M. 1995 Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper. J. Morphol.
225, 51–60. (doi:10.1002/jmor.1052250105)
Fratzl, P. 2008 Bone fracture—when cracks begin to show. Nat. Mater. 7, 610–612. (doi:10.1038/
nmat2240)

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1483

Fratzl, P. & Weinkamer, R. 2007 Nature’s hierarchical materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 52, 1263–1334.
(doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.06.001)
Fratzl, P., Elbaum, R. & Burgert, I. 2008 Cellulose fibrils direct plant organ movement. Faraday
Discuss. 139, 275–282. (doi:10.1039/b716663j)
Gao, X. F. & Jiang, L. 2004 Biophysics: water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature 432, 36.
(doi:10.1038/432036a)
Gao, L. & McCarthy, T. J. 2006 Artificial lotus leaf prepared using a 1945 patent and a commercial
textile. Langmuir 22, 5998–6000. (doi:10.1021/la061237x)
Gao, H., Wang, X., Yao, H., Gorb, S. & Arzt, E. 2005 Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion
structures of geckos. Mech. Mater. 37, 275–285. (doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.03.008)
Gao, H., Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, G. & Xie, G. 2007a Precise replication of antireflective
nanostructures from biotemplates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 123 115. (doi:10.1063/1.2715094)
Gao, X., Yan, X., Yao, X., Xu, L., Zhang, K., Zhang, J., Yang, B. & Jiang, L. 2007b The dry-style
antifogging properties of mosquito compound eyes and artificial analogues prepared by soft
lithography. Adv. Mater. 19, 2213–2217. (doi:10.1002/adma.200601946)
Geim, A. K., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., Novoselov, K. S., Zhukov, A. A. & Shapoval, S. Y. 2003
Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nat. Mater. 2, 461–463. (doi:10.1038/nmat917)
Genzer, J. & Efimenko, K. 2006 Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their
relevance to marine fouling: a review. Biofouling 22, 339–360. (doi:10.1080/08927010600980223)
Gillmor, S. D., Thiel, A. J., Strother, T. C., Smith, L. M. & Lagally, M. G. 2000
Hydrophilic/hydrophobic patterned surfaces as templates for DNA arrays. Langmuir 16,
7223–7228. (doi:10.1021/la991026a)
Gimzewski, J. K., Gerber, C., Meyer, E. & Schlittler, R. R. 1994 Observation of a chemical
reaction using a micromechanical sensor. Chem. Phys. Lett. 217, 589–594. (doi:10.1016/0009-
2614(93)E1419-H)
Gorb, S. 2001 Attachment devices of insect cuticle. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic.
Gorb, S. 2006 Functional surfaces in biology: mechanisms and applications. In Biomimetics: biologically
inspired technologies (ed. Y. Bar-Cohen), pp. 381–397. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Gorb, E., Haas, K., Henrich, A., Enders, S., Barbakadze, N. & Gorb, S. 2005 Composite structure
of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous
plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on the insect attachment. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 4651–4662.
(doi:10.1242/jeb.01939)
Gorb, S., Varenberg, M., Peressadko, A. & Tuma, J. 2007 Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar
adhesive microstructure. J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 271–275. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0164)
Gordon, J. E. 1976 The new science of strong materials, or why you don’t fall through the floor,
2nd edn. London, UK: Pelican–Penguin.
Gosline, J., Nichols, C., Guerette, P., Chang, A. & Katz, S. 1995 The macromolecular design of spiders
silks. In Biomimetics: design and processing of materials (eds M. Sarikaya & I. A. Aksay),
pp. 237–261. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
Goswami, L., Dunlop, J. W. C., Jungniki, K., Eder, M., Gierlinger, N., Coutand, C., Jeronimidis,
G., Fratzl, P. & Burgert, I. 2008 Stress generation in the tension wood of poplar is based on the
lateral swelling power of the G-layer. Plant J. 56, 531–538. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.
03617.x)
Grunwald, I., Rischka, K., Kast, S., Scheibel, T. & Bargel, H. In press. Mimicking biopolymers on
a molecular scale: nano(bio)technology based on engineered proteins. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A
367. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0012)
Hadobás, K., Kirsch, S., Carl, A., Acet, M. & Wasserman, E. F. 2000 Reflection properties of
nanostructure-arrayed silicon surfaces. Nanotechnology 11, 161–164. (doi:10.1088/0957-4484/
11/3/304)
Hoecker, H. 2002 Plasma treatment of textile fibres. Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 423–427. (doi:10.1351/
pac200274030423)

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1484 B. Bhushan

Hoyt, J. W. 1975 Hydrodynamic drag reduction due to fish slimes. In Swimming and flying in
nature, vol. 2 (eds T. Y. T. Wu, C. J. Brokaw & C. Brennen), pp. 653–672. New York, NY:
Plenum.
Jackson, A. P., Vincent, J. F. V. & Turner, R. M. 1988 The mechanical design of nacre. Proc. R.
Soc. B 234, 415–440. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1988.0056)
Jakab, P. L. 1990 Vision of a flying machine. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Jin, H.-J. & Kaplan, D. L. 2003 Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 424,
1057–1061. (doi:10.1038/nature01809)
Jones, C. J. & Aizawa, S. 1991 The bacterial flagellum and flagellar motor: structure, assembly,
and functions. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 32, 109–172. (doi:10.1016/S0065-2911(08)60007-7)
Juniper, B. E., Robins, R. J. & Joel, D. M. 1989 The carnivorous plants. London, UK: Academic
Press.
Kertezs, K., Balint, Z., Vertesy, Z., Mark, G. I., Louse, V., Vigneron, J. P. & Biro, L. P. 2006
Photonic crystal type structures of biological origin: structural and spectral characterization.
Curr. Appl. Phys. 6, 252–258. (doi:10.1016/j.cap.2005.07.051)
Koch, K., Bhushan, B. & Barthlott, W. 2008 Diversity of structure, morphology, and wetting of
plant surfaces. Soft Matter 4, 1943–1963. (doi:10.1039/b804854a)
Koch, K., Bhushan, B. & Barthlott, W. 2009 Multifunctional surface structures of plants: an
inspiration for biomimetics. Prog. Mater. Sci. 54, 137–178. (doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.07.003)
Koch, K., Bhushan, B. & Barthlott, W. In press a. Functional plant surfaces, smart materials. In
Springer handbook of nanotechnology (ed. B. Bhushan), 3rd edn. Heidelberg, Germany:
Springer.
Koch, K., Bhushan, B., Jung, Y. C. & Barthlott, W. In press b. Fabrication of artificial lotus leaves
and significance of hierarchical structure for superhydrophobicity and low adhesion. Soft
Matter.
Koch, K., Bhushan, B., Ensikat, H.-J. & Barthlott, W. In press c. Self-healing of voids in the wax
coating on plant surfaces. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0015)
Krink, T. & Vollrath, F. 1997 Spider web-building behavior with rule based simulation and genetic
algorithms. J. Theor. Biol. 185, 321–331. (doi:10.1006/jtbi.1996.0306)
Li, X. D., Change, W.-C., Chao, Y. J., Wang, R. Z. & Change, M. 2004 Nanoscale structural and
mechanical characterization of a natural nanocomposite material: the shell of a red abalone.
Nano Lett. 4, 613–617. (doi:10.1021/nl049962k)
Lin, A. & Meyers, M. A. 2005 Growth and structure in abalone shells. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 390,
27–41. (doi:10.1016/j.msea.2004.06.072)
Linde, A. & Goldberg, M. 1993 Dentinogenesis. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 4, 679–728. (doi:10.
1177/1045441/930040050301)
Lowenstam, H. A. & Weiner, S. 1989 On biomineralization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Luz, G. M. & Mano, J. F. 2009 Biomimetic design of materials and biomaterials inspired by the
structure of nacre. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 1587–1605. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0007)
Mann, S. 2001 Biomineralization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Meyers, M. A., Lin, A. Y. M., Seki, Y., Chen, P. Y., Kad, B. K. & Bodde, S. 2006 Structural
biological composites: an overview. JOM 58, 35–41. (doi:10.1007/s11837-006-0138-1)
Meyers, M. A., Chen, P. Y., Lin, A. Y. M. & Seki, Y. 2008 Biological materials: structure and
mechanical properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 53, 1–206. (doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002)
Milwich, M., Speck, T., Speck, O., Stegmaier, T. & Planck, H. 2006 Biomimetics and technical
textiles: solving engineering problems with the help of nature’s wisdom. Am. J. Bot. 93,
1455–1465. (doi:10.3732/ajb.93.10.1455)
Moller, A. R. 2006 Hearing: anatomy, physiology and disorders of the auditory systems, 2nd edn.
London, UK: Academic Press.
Motier, J. F. & Carrier, A. M. 1989 Recent studies on polymer drag reduction in commercial
pipelines. In Drag reduction in fluid flows: techniques for friction control (eds R. H. J. Sellin &
R. T. Moses). Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
Mueller, T. 2008 Biomimetics design by natures. National Geographic, April 2008, pp. 68–90.

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

Introduction. Biomimetics 1485

Mueller, F. & Winter, P. 2004 Clean surfaces with the lotus-effect. Jornadas Comite Espanol de la
Detergencia 34, 103–111.
Munch, E., Launey, M. E., Alsem, D. H., Saiz, E., Tomsia, A. P. & Ritchie, R. O. 2008 Tough bio-
inspired hybrid materials. Science 322, 1516–1520. (doi:10.1126/science.1164865)
Neinhuis, C. & Barthlott, W. 1997 Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-
cleaning plant surfaces. Ann. Bot. 79, 667–677. (doi:10.1006/anbo.1997.0400)
Nosonovsky, M. & Bhushan, B. 2008a Multiscale dissipative mechanisms and hierarchical surfaces:
friction, superhydrophobicity, and biomimetics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Nosonovsky, M. & Bhushan, B. 2008b Roughness-induced superhydrophobicity: a way to design
non-adhesive surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 225 009. (doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/22/
225009)
Nosonovsky, M. & Bhushan, B. 2008c Biologically-inspired surfaces: broadening the scope of
roughness. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 843–855. (doi:10.1002/adfm.200701195)
Nun, E., Oles, M. & Schleich, B. 2002 Surfaces rendered self-cleaning by hydrophobic structures and
a process for their production. United States Patent no. 7211 313.
Ohler, A. 1995 Digital pad morphology in torrent-living ranid frogs. Asiat. Herpetol. Res. 6, 85–96.
Parker, A. In press. Natural photonics for industrial inspiration. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367.
(doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0016)
Parker, A. R. & Lawrence, C. R. 2001 Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414, 33–34.
(doi:10.1038/35102108)
Reed, E. J., Klumb, L., Koobatian, M. & Viney, C. 2009 Biomimicry as a route to new materials:
what kinds of lessons are useful? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 1571–1585. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.
0010)
Reif, W. E. 1985 Squamation and ecology of sharks. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 78,
1–255. (Frankfurt am Main)
Roach, P., Shirtcliffe, N. J. & Newton, M. I. 2008 Progress in superhydrophobic surface
development. Soft Matter 4, 224–240. (doi:10.1039/b712575p)
Sarikaya, M. & Aksay, I. A. (eds) 1995 Biomimetic design and processing of materials. Woodbury,
NY: American Institute of Physics.
Sarikaya, M. & Tamerler, C. In press. Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology and bionano-
technology utilizing genetically engineered peptides. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367. (doi:10.1098/
rsta.2009.0018)
Sarikaya, M., Gunnison, K. E., Yasrebi, M. & Aksay, I. A. 1990 Mechanical property–
microstructural relationship in abalone shell. In MRS Symp. Proc., vol. 174 (eds P. Rieke,
P. D. Calvert & M. Alper), pp. 109–116. Pittsburgh, PA: Materials Research Society.
Schmitz, A., Sehrbrock, A. & Schmitz, H. 2007 The analysis of the mechanosensory origin of the
infrared sensilla in Melanophila acuminata (Coeloptera; Buprestidae) adduces new insight
into the transduction mechanism. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 36, 291–303. (doi:10.1016/j.asd.
2007.02.002)
Scholz, I., Barnes, W. J. P., Smith, J. M. & Baumgartner, W. 2009 Ultrastructure and physical
properties of an adhesive surface, the toe pad epithelium of the tree frog, Litoria caerulea white.
J. Exp. Biol. 212, 155–162. (doi:10.1242/jeb.019232)
Schroeder, H. E. 1991 Oral structural biology. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publications.
Schuetz, S., Weissbecker, B., Hummel, H. E., Apel, K.-H., Schmitz, H. & Bleckmann, H. 1999
Insect antennae as a smoke detector. Nature 398, 298–299. (doi:10.1038/18585)
Sidorenko, A., Krupenkin, R., Taylor, A., Fratzl, P. & Aizenberg, J. 2007 Reversible switching of
hydrogel-actuated nanostructures into complex micropatterns. Science 315, 487–490. (doi:10.
1126/science.1135516)
Singer, A. J. & Clark, R. A. F. 1999 Cutaneous wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 738–746.
(doi:10.1056/NEJM199909023411006)
Stegmaier, T., Linke, M. & Planck, H. In press. Bionics in textiles: flexible and translucent
thermal insulations for solar thermal applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367. (doi:10.1098/rsta.
2009.0019)

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)

 Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on June 13, 2018

1486 B. Bhushan

Tang, Z., Kotov, N. A., Magonov, S. & Ozturk, B. 2003 Nanostructured artificial nacre. Nat.
Mater. 2, 413–418. (doi:10.1038/nmat906)
van der Zwaag, S., van Dijk, N., Jonkers, H., Mookhoek, S. & Sloof, W. In press. Self healing
behaviour in man-made engineering materials: bio-inspired but tasking into account their
intrinsic character. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0020)
Velcro, S. A. 1955 Improvements in or relating to a method and a device for producing velvet type
fabric. Switzerland Patent no. 721 338.
Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A. & Pahl, A. K. 2006
Biomimetics: its practice and theory. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 471–482. (doi:10.1098/rsif.
2006.0127)
Vogel, S. 2003 Comparative biomechanics: life’s physical world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Wagner, P., Furstner, R., Barthlott, W. & Neinhuis, C. 2003 Quantitative assessment to the
structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces. J. Exp. Bot. 54,
1295–1303. (doi:10.1093/jxb/erg127)
Wagner, G. J., Wang, E. & Shephers, R. W. 2004 New approaches for studying and exploiting an
old protuberance, the plant trichome. Ann. Bot. 93, 3–11. (doi:10.1093/aob/mch011)
Wang, R. Z., Addadi, L. & Weiner, S. 1997 Design strategies of sea urchin teeth: structure,
composition, and micromechanical relations to function. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 352, 469–480.
(doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0034)
Wang, R. Z., Suo, Z., Evans, A. G., Yao, N. & Aksay, I. A. 2001 Deformation mechanisms in nacre.
J. Mater. Res. 16, 2485–2493. (doi:10.1557/JMR.2001.0340)
Wang, S., Song, Y. & Jiang, L. 2007 Photoresponsive surfaces with controllable wettability.
J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 8, 18–29. (doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2007.03.001)
Wilson, S. J. & Hutley, M. C. 1982 The optical properties of the ‘moth-eye’ antireflective surfaces.
J. Modern Opt. 29, 993–1009. (doi:10.1080/713820946)
Wool, R. P. 2008 Self-healing materials: a review. Soft Matter 4, 400–418. (doi:10.1039/b711716g)
Xia, F., Feng, L., Wang, S., Sun, T., Song, W., Jiang, W. & Jiang, L. 2006 Dual-responsive
surfaces that switch between superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity. Adv. Mater. 18,
432–436. (doi:10.1002/adma.200501772)
Youngblood, J. P. & Sottos, N. R. 2008 Bioinspired materials for self-cleaning and self-healing.
MRS Bull. 33, 732–738.
Zhai, L., Berg, M. C., Cebeci, F. C., Kim, Y., Milwild, J., Rubner, M. F. & Cohen, R. E. 2006
Patterned superhydrophobic surfaces: toward a synthetic mimic of the Namib desert beetle.
Nano Lett. 6, 1213–1217. (doi:10.1021/nl060644q)

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2009)