An Approach For Power Control in Vehicular Adhoc Network For Catastrophe Message
An Approach For Power Control in Vehicular Adhoc Network For Catastrophe Message
Abstract: VANET is oriented to vehicu1ar communication and considered as particular app1ication of MANET. In our research
work our main priority is to enhance result of existed protocol which is mentioned in our base paper and name of that protocol
was GPSR. First of all our main work is to ana1yze the functioning of base protocol nitty gritty and extract its limitation and
benefits that can be availed. After that new and tedious task is to design new protocol and integrate is into NS 2 software so that
improved GPSR protoco1 result must be better than existed. Based on the comprehensive understanding of diverse routing
mechanism and protocol we are able to find the enhanced solution of existed protocol. Based on the position vector ca1cu1ation
and simp1e redundancy e1imination, GPSR protoco1 is modified. After making analysis with the base paper protocol, it proves
that the improved GPVR protocol performs better. We need to carry out our simu1ation of VANET in the computer environment
therefore this environment is carried out in NS 2. Computer simu1ation is very important in VANET research. Simu1ation of
VANET simulation is sub divided into two regions. First one is known as traffic simulation and another one is network simulation
and both these simu1ation are connected with help of bi-directional coupling.
Keywords- VANET, RSU, NS-2 Network simu1ation, Traffic simu1ation, GPVR, OBU
__________________________________________________*****_________________________________________________
Simulation Result
Figure6 Overhead of 10 to 50 Nodes of GPVR protocol Figure9 Comparison of GPSR &GPVR protoco1 in the term of
Energy
Figure8 Aggregate Throughputs of 10 to 50 Nodes of GPVR Figure11 Comparison of GPSR &GPVR protoco1 in the term
protocol of Packet De1ivery Ratio
138
IJRITCC | June 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 6 Issue: 6 134 – 140
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
V. CONCLUSION
This research work was to examine performance analysis of
base and proposed protocols. In this article, it is clearly shown
above with help of depicted figure that out of existed GPSR
and proposed protocol GPVR, proposed protocol is superior
regarding diverse networking parameters which are end-to-end
delay, throughput, packet loss, packet delivery ratio and
routing overhead. GPVR is a reactive protocol and creates a
very low routing overhead which result in saving of
bandwidth. Low routing head result due to discovering routes
effectively. On another hand if we talk about network size,
mobility and traffic load it is very clear that GPVR perform as
compared to GPSR. From the simulated results the behaviors
of all routing protocols for different numbers of mobile nodes
was observed and we came to the conclusion that GPVR
Figure14 Generating RSU, TOWER, SOURCE & routing protocol performs well. Further GPVR protocol can be
DESTINATION point replaced with advance protocol so that result of parameters for
139
IJRITCC | June 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________
International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication ISSN: 2321-8169
Volume: 6 Issue: 6 134 – 140
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
example throughput, delay, packet to delivery ratio, end to end infrastructure WMNs. In Proc. 24th IEEE Int Advanced Information
Networking and Applications (AINA) Conf, pages 90{97, 2015
delays, routing overhead and packet loss ratio could be
improved. AI, IoT Deep learning can be integrated with [9] Tasneem Darwish · Kamalrulnizam Abu Bakar A highly adaptive
existed technology. distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks. In Proc. IEEE
Sixteenth Annual Joint Conf. of the IEEE Computer and Communications
Societies INFOCOM '97, volume 3, pages l405-l4l3, 2014.
REFERENCES [10] Le Zhang, Behnam Hassanabadi, ShahrokhValaee In Proc. Second IEEE
Workshop Mobile Computing Systems and Applications WMCSA '99,
pages 90{l00, 2014
[1] Preeti Rawat, Shikha Sharma, “Deep: Density-aware emergency message
extension protocol for VANETs,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless [11] Z. Hasan, H. Boostanemehr and V. K. Bhargava, "Green Cellular
Communications, vol. l2, pp. 2926–2940, 2016 Networks: A Survey, SomeResearch Issues and Challenges,"
Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, vol.l3, no.4, pp. 524-
[2] Neha Kushwah, Abhilash Sonker, “The broadcast storm problem in a 540,Fourth Quarter 2011.
mobile ad hoc network,” in Proceedings of the ACM International
Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), 2016, [12] A. P. Bianzino, C. Chaudet, D. Rossi and J. l. Rougier, “A Survey of
pp. l53–l67 Green Networking Research,” Communications Surveys & Tutorials,
IEEE, vol.l4, no.l, pp. 3-20, First Quarter 2012.
[3] Ramesh C. Poonia, Deepshikha Bhargava., “Survey of position based
routing for Inter Vehicle Communication system”, Distributed [13] W. A. Moreira, R. lopes Gomes, and A. J. Gomes Abelem. A multiple
Framework and Applications, 2008. DFmA 2016, First International metric approach for routing in wireless mesh networks. In Proc. IEEE Int.
Conference on, pp.l74-l82, 2l-22 Oct. 2008 Symp. a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks &
Workshops WoWMoM 2009, pages l-6, 2009.
[4] Samiksha, Anit Kaur, "Performance Comparison of Two Ondemand
Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks." Proceedings of the IEEE
[14] F. Farnoud and S. Valaee, “Reliable broadcast of safety messages in
Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Tel Aviv, Israel,
vehicular ad hoc networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, the
March 2000, p. 3–l2.
Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications
[5] Mayank Bhatt, Shabnam Sharma,Aditya Prakash, Dr. U.S.Pandey, Dr. Societies, 2009, pp. 226–234.
Kiran, "IEEE standard 802.l6: A technical overview of the wireless
MANTM air interface for broadband wireless access", IEEE [15] L. Zhang, B. Hassanabadi, and S. Valaee, “Cooperative positive
Communications Magazine, vol. 40, no. 6, Jun 2016, pp. 98–l07. orthogonal code-based forwarding for multi-hop vehicular networks,”
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. l3, pp. 39l4–3925,
[6] Mohammad Fathian, Ahmad Reza Jafarian-Moghaddam. “A Review of
20l4
Current Routing Protocols for Ad-Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks,” IEEE
Personal Communications, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 46–55, 2015
[16] Y. Bi, H. Zhao, and X. Shen, “A directional broadcast protocol for
[7] Yuzhong Chen, Mingyue Fang, Song Shi “Stationary of Random emergency message exchange in inter-vehicle communications,” in
Direction Direction models”, 20l5 Second International conference on Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications
network security, wireless communications and trusted computing. (ICC), 2009, pp. l–5.
[8] Lina Bariah, Dina Shehada, Ehab Salahat and Chan YeobYeun
Simulation-based performance evaluation of theSNDP protocol for
140
IJRITCC | June 2018, Available @ http://www.ijritcc.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________