Rescheweyh Operator
Rescheweyh Operator
coefficient inequality, Hadamard products, Extreme We aim to study the class On (, , , )
points, radius of starlikeness and convexity, closure
theorem of a class of analytic and univalent function which consists of functions f S and satisfy
in the unit disc. The results obtained here are found z (( D n f ( z )) 1)
to be sharp.
KEY WORDS: Analytic functions, Univalent functions, z(( D n f ( z )) 1) {z ( D n f ( z )) D n f ( z )} ( )
Hadamard product, Starlike functions, Rescheweyh
operator.
, z U
for
1. INTRODUCTIONS: 0 1, 0 1, 0 1, 0 1, n N 0 .
Let S denote the class of function The investigation here is motivated by M.Darus [1].
f ( z ) z a2 k z 2 k which are analytic and univalent Next we characterize the class On (, , , ) by
k 2
proving the Coefficient Inequality.
in the unit disc
U {z : z 1}. For g( z ) z b2 k z 2 k the 1. COEFFICIENT INEQUALITY:
k 2 Theorem 1:
convolution or Hadamard product of f ( z ) and g(z) is Let f S.Then f On (, , , ) if and only if
defined by (f g )(z) z a
k 2
b z 2 k , z U .
2k 2k
n th
Let D f ( z ) denote the n orderderivative introduced 2k 1 n, k a
k 2
2k
n k 1
(n, k ) .
n
183 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 3, ISSUE 6, Jun.-2017
Proof:Assume inequality (1.1) is true then Thus the proof is complete.
z ( D n f ( z )) 1) Corollary:
If f On ( , , , ) then
z ( D n f ( z )) 1) {z ( D n f ( z )) D n f ( z )}
( )
( ) a2 k , k 2,3,...
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
2 k ( n, k ) a 2k z 2k with equality for
k 2 ( )
f ( z) z z 2 k , k 2,3,...
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
2 k ( n, k ) a2 k z 2 k
k 2
3. GROWTH AND DISTORTION THEOREM:
2 k ( n, k ) a2 k z 2 k Theorem 2:
k 2
If the function f ( z) On ( , , , ) then
a2 k (n, k ) z ( ) 2k
( )
z
4
k 2 z
[4(1 ) ] (n, 2)
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k ) a2 k ( ) 0
( )
f ( z) z
4
k 2 z
by maximum modulus principle, [4(1 ) ] (n, 2)
f On ( , , , ). The result is sharp for
Conversely, Let f On ( , , , ).Then ( )
f ( z) z z4
[4(1 ) ] ( n, 2)
z ( D n f ( z )) 1)
Proof: We have
z ( D n f ( z )) 1) {z ( D n f ( z )) D n f ( z )} ( )
f ( z ) z a2 k z 2 k
, z U k 2
f ( z ) z a2 k z
2k
that is
k 2 (2.1)
2k (n, k ) a 2k z 2k ( )
f ( z) z
4
k 2
[4(1 ) ] ( n, 2)
z
(2k 2k 1) (n, k ) a
k 2
2k z ( )
2k
Similarly
(1.2)
Using the fact that Re(f (z)) f ( z) f ( z ) z a2 k z
2k
k 2
( )
2k (n, k ) a2 k z 2 k
z z
4
Re k 2
[4(1 ) ] (n, 2)
(2k 2k 1) (n, k ) a2 k z 2 k ( ) Combining (2.1) and (2.2) we get the result.
k 2
Theorem 3:
Choosing z on real axis and allowing z 1 If the function f ( z ) O ( , , , ) then
n
2 k ( n, k ) a 2k
4 ( )
1 z f ( z )
k 2 3
[4(1 ) ] (n, 2)
(2k 2k 1) (n, k ) a
k 2
2k ( )
4 ( )
1
3
z
[4(1 ) ] (n, 2)
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k )a
k 2
2k ( ) 0
184 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 3, ISSUE 6, Jun.-2017
This simplifies to 1 c
2 k 1 Using the arguments similar to theorem 4,We get
(2k s 2) a2 k z
1
1
1 s (1 c)[2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) 2 k 1
k 2 z < R inf
k
2k (2k 2 c) ( )
by (1.1) we have
5. EXTREME POINTS:
( ) Theorem 6: Let f1 ( z ) z ,
a2 k ,k 2
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) (3.4) ( )
Using (3.3) and (3.4) we get fk z z 2 k , k 2,3...
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k )
2 k 1 [2k (1 ) ] ( n, k ) Then f On ( , , , ) if and only if it can be expressed in
z the form
(2k s 2) ( )
thus, f ( z ) k f k ( z ) , where k 0, and k 1.
1 k 1 k 1
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) 2 k 1
Proof: Suppose
a2 k ,
z R inf (2k s 2) ( )
k
k 2,3,... f ( z ) k f k ( z )
k 1
185 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 3, ISSUE 6, Jun.-2017
Where
( )
f ( z ) k z z 2k 2k 2 ( )
k 1 [2k (1 ) ] (n, k )
[2k (1 ) ]2 ( n, k ) 2 ( )(2k 2k 1)
( )
f ( z ) z k z 2k Proof: f , g On ( , , , ) and so
k 1 [2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
[2k (1 ) ] (n,(5.1)
k)
Now, f ( z ) On ( , , , ) since
k 2 ( )
a2 k 1 (6.1)
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) [2k (1 ) ] (n, k )
k 2 ( )
.
k 2 ( )
b2 k 1
(6.2)
( )
k
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) We need to find a smallest number such that
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
k 1 1 1.
k 2 ( )
a2 k b2 k 1 (6.3)
k 2
6. Hadamard Product
a2k b2k ( )
Theorem 7: Let f , g On ( , , , ) (6.6)
then
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k )
Therefore in view of (6.5) and (6.6) it is enough to show that
f * g z a2 k b2 k z 2 k On ( , , , ) ( ) [2k (1 ) ]
k 2
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) [2k (1 ) ]
for f ( z ) z a
k 2
2k z 2 k , g ( z ) z b2 k z 2 k
k 2 This simplifies to
2k 2 ( )
[2k (1 ) ]2 ( n, k ) 2 ( )(2k 2k 1)
186 | P a g e
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology [IJRPET]
ISSN: 2454-7875
VOLUME 3, ISSUE 6, Jun.-2017
j 1 k 2 [2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) 2
2
l a2 k 1
where c
j 1
j 1 and f j ( z ) z a2 k , j z 2 k .
k 2
k 2 ( ) (8.1)
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k ) 2
Proof: We have ( )
b2 k
l
k 2
g ( z ) c j z a2 k , j z 2 k 2
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) 2
j 1 k 2
b2 k 1
l l
k 2 ( )
g ( z) z c j c a j 2k , j z 2k (8.2)
j 1 j 1 k 2 Adding (8.1) and (8.2) we get
2
1 [2k (1 ) ] (n, k ) 2
a c j z
l
z 2k , j
2k
(a2 k b2 k ) 1
2
k 2 j 1
(7.1) k 2 2 ( ) (8.3)
We must show that h On ( , , , ) that is
z ek z 2 k 2
k 2
[2k (1 ) ] (n, k )
a2 k b2 k 1
(7.2)
l
2 2
Where, ek a2 k , j c j k 2
( ) (8.4)
j 1 In view of (8.3) and (8.4) it is enough to show that
Since f j On ( , , , ) by (1.1) [2k (1 ) ](n, k ) 1 [2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
( ) 2 ( )
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k ) This simplifies to
k 2 ( )
a2 k , j 1 2
(7.3) REFERENCES:
In view of (7.2), g ( z ) On ( , , , ) if 1) DarusM, Some subclass of analytic functions Journal of
Math. And Com. Sci., (Math ser), 16(3) (2003), 121-126.
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
k 2 ( )
ek 1 2) Duren P. L., Univalent functions, Grundiehren Math. Viss.,
Springer Verlag, 259 (1983).
Now, 3) Goodman A. W., Univalent functions, Vol.I and II, Marine
Publ. Company, Florida (1983).
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
k 2 ( )
ek 4) Lee S. K. and Johi S. B. Application of fractional calculus
operators to a class of univalent functions with negative
coefficients, Kyungpook Math. J., 39 (1999), 133-139.
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k ) l
a2 k , j c j 5) Noor K. I., Some classes of p-valent analytic functions
k 2 ( ) j 1 defined by certain integral operator, Appl. Math. Comput.,
XX (2003), XXX-XXX-1-6
l
[2k (1 ) ] ( n, k )
cj a2 k , j 6) Ruscheweyh St. New criteria for univalent functions,
j 1 k 2 ( ) Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 49 (1975),109-115.
l 7) Esa G. H. and Darus M., Application of fractional calculus
cj operators to a certain class of univalent functions with
j 1
, using (7.3) negative coecients, International Mathematical Forum,
2(57) (2007), 2807-2814.
1 8) S. Ruscheweyh, Neighborhoods of univalent functions,
Thus, g ( z ) On ( , , , ). proc, Amer. Math.Soc.,81 (1981), 521-527.
Theorem 9: Let f , g On ( , , , ) then
h( z ) z a22k b22k z 2 k is in On ( , , , )
k 2
Where 2
187 | P a g e