268 744 1 PB
268 744 1 PB
Beenish Jehan
Department of Civil Engineering, CECOS University of IT &Emerging Sciences Peshawar, Pakistan
Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT—The structures constructed in the coastal belt requires deep foundation due to the
existence of week soil which has poor Engineering properties. The soil profile about 3 to 4 meters deep,
in these areas is mostly loose sand which are then underlain by clayey soil. The structures constructed
here suffer excessive settlement. In this paper the bearing capacity of soil is improved in order to reduce
settlement and this done by grouting. Ordinary Portland cement is used. It was found that shear strength
of the grouted sand increases with the increase in cement quantity also it is found from results that
4%cement grout is effective as compared to 2% and 6% of grout.
Index Terms—Enter Cement, Grouting, Ground Improvement, Sandy soil.
1. INTRODUCTION
THE term ground improvement basically refers to the improvement to the Engineering properties of soil
which are not present in its natural state. Ground improvement refers to the increase in shear strength,
decrease in permeability, and decrease in compressibility. A number of techniques have been developed
so far to improve the ground conditions. [1]
One method is to excavate the week soil and then replace it with soil having the desired properties but this
method is used only at a depth of 3m and water table must be below 3m, otherwise it will be
uneconomical to excavate large amount of soil and replace it. [2]
Selection of ground improvement techniques basically depends upon a number of factors like the soil
condition, type of structures, time available for the project completion, material and equipment’s
availability, degree of compaction and also the transportation facility. [9]
Many of the foundation problems can be effectively solved by compaction, which will cause reduction in
total settlement. But compaction of soil depends upon the vertical effective stress and gradation of soil
etc. That is well graded soil compact more than poorly graded soil. [3] Dynamic compaction gives best
results up to depth of 10 to 20m.The relative density of Sandy soil properties cannot be increased by
compaction or by vibration, the best method is grouting. Grouting is mostly used in foundations of the
structures. It is also used in seepage control in dams, rocks, cutoff walls and tunnels. The technique of
grouting is to fill the voids between the medium by a grouting material in order, to improve the
Engineering properties. [4]
Grout is basically a liquid solution or suspension that is injected into the soil under pressure in order to fill
up the voids present between the soil particles and to bind them together. Grouts are available in two
forms one is the suspension grout. Which is basically small sized particles suspended in a liquid example
is cement grout and bentonite grout both are made in water mostly cement grout is used with a mixing
ratio of 10:1 or 2:1 and the other is solution grout, which consists of a variety of chemicals like sodium
silicate acryl amide, lingo sulphonates, amino plasts and many more. Cement grout has a number of
advantages it not only fills the voids but also sets with time, reduces the permeability and binds the soil
particles. [5]
The grout properties are; stability, permanence, grout ability, toxicity and setting time. Following are
some the grouting methods; permeation grouting, compaction grouting, hydro-fracture grouting and jet
33
grouting. [6]
II. METHADOLOGY
A. Material
The proper selection of grouting material is very important and depends upon the purpose of grouting and
the type of granular material. Here in this study sand is used as a granular material and cement is used as a
grouting material. [5]
1) Sand
In this project sand is used as a granular material, which is collected from Sardaryab, Charsadda, which is
a part of Kabul River. The grain size distribution is shown as below.
3) Specific Gravity
Pycnometer is used to determine the specific gravity of sand, and the results are shown in the following
table
34
was opened it should be used within ten days.
The physical properties of cement were calculated.
5) Fineness
The fineness of cement was determined using dry sieving. From the results it was found that percent
fineness is 91%.
6) Standard consistency
This test is performed to find out the right amount of water required to make a paste of standard
consistency and from the test results it was calculated as 28%.
Following test were performed on the grouting material to find its properties.
2) Permeability
Permeability is the property of porous material which permits the seepage of water through the void.
Stiff clay is least permeable and gravel is highly permeable. In the present study constant head test is used
to find the permeability. And from the test the hydraulic conductivity, k = 1.52 * 10-3 cm/sec was
calculated.
The efficiency of the grouting process was also verified through load tests conducted on ungrouted /
grouted sand beds.The initial tests for the assessment of improvement in load carrying capacity through
densification were conducted by filling the sand at the desired densities in small tanks of size
30cmx30cmx30cm.
35
Figure 5: Sand in mold
1) Without grouting
The sample is placed in the mold in its loosest form. Then the sample is placed in universal testing
machine. Load is applied by 6in circular plate.
The sand is compressed and the load settlement curve is obtained on the computer. The load settlement
curve is shown below:
36
Figure 7: Load settlement curve
2) With grouting
Plate load test are conducted for various ratio of grout starting from 10:1 to 4:1 water-cement ratio.
After 3 days curing the plate load test is performed on it. The following load settlement curves are
obtained.
37
Figure 9: Combined load settlement curve
III. Conclusions
The following are the conclusions drawn from plate load test:
1. The ultimate load decreases as the grout ratio increases.
2. As the cement content increases the angle of internal friction and cohesion also increases also with
curing.
3. In medium and coarse sand about 4%of cement grout is effective as compared to 2& and 6%.
4. The medium sand grouted with 4% cement grout, strength behavior is much highest than at loosest
form.
5. The shear strength of sandy soil increases with the increase in cement content.
6. Compressive strength of grouted material also increases with the increase in the cement content and
curing.
7. Moreover, the permeability reduces with the increase in cement content and it is more effective when
used along with clay.
8. As compared to lime the effect of cement along with clay is more pronounced for the reduction in
permeability.
This research proves that grouting is an effective way of improving the foundations of structures
constructed on loose sandy soil.
IV. Recommendations
It is recommended from the study that permeability should also be tested at a water cement ratio of 2.0
and 3.0. Using ultra fine cement with different ratios of water cement to check its applicability in coarse
and fine to medium sand collected from local geological formations for enhancing the application of
permeation technique in local construction industry.
Some other factors like the dimension of the box should be based on the flow measurement, the effect of
additives on the stability of cement grout and the effect of degree of saturation of soil should also be
included in future research work.
38
V. REFERENCES
[1] “A STUDY ON THE ENGINEERING BEHAVIOUR OF GROUTED LOOSE SANDY SOILS” BY SANTHOSH
KUMAR. T. G. (2010)
[3] “STUDY ON PERMEATION GROUTING USING CEMENT GROUT IN SANDY SOIL” BY P. DAYAKAR, K.
VENKAT RAMAN AND DR. K.V.B. RAJU (2012)
[4] “SOIL STABILIZATION WITH FLY ASH AND RICE HUSK ASH” BY DR. ROBERT M. BROOKS (2009)
[5] “EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FROM FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTS” BY DR. AZAD ABBAS
AHMAD,QASIM ABDUL-KAREMJASSIMAL-OBAIDI& ALI ABDUL KADHIMJASIM AL-SHAMCY (2008)
[7] “ESTIMATION THE BEHAVIOR OF USING THE GROUTING TO IMPROVE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF
THE SOIL” BY A'AMAL A. H. AL-SAIDI
[8] “USE OF GROUTING METHOD TO IMPROVE SOIL STABILITY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION—A REVIEW”
BY SANAZSAYEHVAND AND BEHZAD KALANTARI (2012)
[9] “BEARING CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT OF LOOSE SANDY FOUNDATION SOILS THROUGH GROUTING”
BY SANTHOSH KUMAR.T.G, BENNY MATHEWS ABRAHAM, A.SRIDHARAN AND BABU. T. JOSE
39