Main Generator Online Monitoring and Diagnostics
Main Generator Online Monitoring and Diagnostics
and Diagnostics
SED WARNING:
N
Please read the Export Control
A L
LICE
KEYWORDS APPROACH The project team reviewed pertinent technical literature regarding
the subject of turbine generator monitoring and diagnostics. The information
Monitoring from the literature was condensed and the experiences of generator engineers
Diagnostics at Ontario Hydro were used to add insight. The resulting document was re-
Predictive maintenance viewed by a technical advisory group composed of a select number of experi-
Generator enced generator engineers.
Turbine generator
Maintenance RESULTS A description of the various monitoring philosophies is given,
starting from simple monitoring with alarms, up to elaborate “expert systems”
with on-line trending and diagnostic capabilities. A description of common
generator and auxiliary system sensors and instrumentation is provided. Infor-
mation is furnished on the types of monitoring devices, what they measure or
sense, and the possible interpretations of the readings.
In addition to the common sensors, there are numerous specialized monitoring
devices or systems that provide information about specific generator problems
that can occur. Descriptions are provided on each of the known systems.
PROJECT
WO 3814-25
EPRI Project Manager: James Sharkey
Nuclear Power Group
Contractor: Ontario Hydro
TR-107137
Final Report
December 1996
Prepared by
Ontario Hydro
Principal Investigator
G.S. Klempner
Prepared for
Nuclear Maintenance Applications Center
1300 W.T. Harris Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Operated by
Electric Power Research Institute
3412 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
EPRI Project Manager
James Sharkey
Nuclear Power Group
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF
WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.
(EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) BELOW,
NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM:
(B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING
ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN
ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE
OF THIS REPORT OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM
DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT.
Ontario Hydro
ORDERING INFORMATION
Cost: $10,000
Requests for copies of this report should be directed to the Nuclear Maintenance
Applications Center (NMAC), 1300 W.T. Harris Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28262,
800/356-7448. There is no charge for reports requested by NMAC member utilities.
Electric Power Research Institute and EPRI are registered service marks of Electric Power
Research Institute, Inc. Copyright © 1996 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights
reserved.
EPRI Licensed Material
Main Generator On-Line Monitoring and Diagnostics
CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
1
INTRODUCTION
2
GENERATOR MONITORING
PHILOSOPHIES
such techniques allows closer tracking of sensors and the ability to diagnose
problems at a much earlier stage in their development.
The information gathered from sensor readings by the monitoring systems
can be stored as an archived history about the performance of a machine.
This can be used for long term trending and maintenance management of the
equipment.
In addition, the use of graphical user interfaces has allowed much more
meaningful presentation of the data collected so that operators can interpret
the information faster and more accurately. Readings are now presented in
both numeric and graphical form. Short term trends are used to compare
various operating parameters while operators attempt to diagnose problems
based on such things as temperature rises with load increase and so on.
Because of the significant advances in computers, generator monitoring has
become very sophisticated. Along with this sophistication comes a high price
tag to install a complex “expert system.” However, in some cases, a high level
of sophistication is not always necessary. A utility must assess its needs based
on the equipment under consideration. A large 1000 megavolt amperes (MVA)
nuclear unit might warrant the installation of an expert system, while a 100
MVA co-generation (co-gen) unit might need a more basic level of monitoring.
When deciding on the correct approach for generator monitoring, it is always a
good idea to first understand what the needs are. Then, to decide, the monitor-
ing options that can be employed must be understood and the cost to provide
them known. The following is a brief description of some of the types of moni-
toring approaches that can be used on large generators in operation today.
Basic monitoring implies that the generator itself has very few installed
2.1 Basic Monitoring
with Static sensors and that only the most necessary and basic operating parameters are
Alarm Limits selected for permanent monitoring. Alarms are usually set at predetermined
high limits.
Nearly all generators have their main electrical parameters connected to a
unit computer so that the operators are aware of the load point of the genera-
tor and where they are operating in relation to the limits of the generator. The
main electrical parameters would include such things as:
• Megawatts (MW)
• Volt-amps reactance (MVars)
• Stator phase currents
• Terminal voltage
• Frequency
• Field current
• Field voltage
All of these have operating limits that, if exceeded, can cause damage to one
or more of the generator components.
In addition to the electrical parameters, there are other operating values that
must be monitored so that the generator operating limits are adhered to.
Some of these include:
• Shaft speed
• Hydrogen gas pressure and temperature
• Lube and seal oil temperatures
• Stator cooling water temperature
• Pressure and conductivity
• Bearing vibration
• Raw service water temperature
These are some of the more critical parameters, and all of them tell the
operator something about the condition of the generator or one of its compo-
nents. In addition, all of them have specific operating limits that, when they
are exceeded, have certain consequences.
Not all parameters have the same level of priority. For example, exceeding
shaft speed limits by 10% while operating at steady load will have far greater
consequences in terms of machine damage than exceeding a component
temperature limit by 10% or a bearing vibration by 10%.
Another point is that not all parameters have to be monitored to guarantee
proper operation of the generator. For example, all of the stator cooling water
(SCW) outlet temperatures being normal during on-load condition tells an
operator that there must be water flow in the system. Therefore, it is not
absolutely necessary to monitor the SCW flow itself. Monitoring the stator
cooling water outlet temperature is sufficient to safely operate the generator
and detect when problems occur.
There is also a wide range in the number of sensors installed by the various
vendors in their generators over the years. There are some machines with no
core or stator winding thermocouples (TCs) or resistance temperature detectors
(RTDs) installed and some that have as many as two dozen core TCs and an
RTD in every stator winding slot and on every stator winding outlet hose. The
variation is extensive and is generally dependent on the vendor, but the utility
can request additional monitoring sensors to be installed during manufacture
if they are willing to pay more to get them. Most vendors will oblige.
load point, rather than waiting for an absolute high alarm limit to be reached.
Relying on static high limits can sometimes mean that a problem
has progressed too far for corrective action by the time the operator is noti-
fied by the alarm limit being exceeded.
The premise behind dynamic monitoring is to mathematically predict what a
particular sensor or group of sensors should be reading at any operating point
and compare it with the actual sensor reading. This way, the difference be-
tween the two can be closely monitored, and if the deviation is more than a
previously determined limit, it can be brought to the attention of the operator.
The obvious advantage is that much earlier warning can be obtained to look
for long-term problem trending, as well as more immediate failure modes.
To do this, a mathematical model of the generator parameter being moni-
tored must be available, and then it must be customized to the machine
being monitored. This mathematical model then becomes an artificial sensor
or an indicator of a problem. The following is a brief description of how this
type of sensor is constructed.
One of the best examples of an artificial indicator built from sensor readings
into a mathematical model is that of temperature measurement for a water-
cooled stator winding hose outlet.
To build this indicator in its simplest form, you must look at what affects the
stator winding temperature during all modes of operation, but specifically
when the generator is connected to the system and loaded. In the case of the
stator winding hose outlet sensor, you are not concerned with the stator
winding temperature when the generator is off-line because no current flows
in the winding then. Fault current could flow when the generator is on open
circuit and a failure of the ground wall insulation occurs, but this is a case
where the generator ground fault relay protection comes into play, and the
stator winding temperature monitoring is a secondary issue. The main
concern is the temperature of the stator winding when the machine is on-line
and stator current is flowing in the winding.
To begin, the stator winding hose outlet temperature is at least that of the
water inlet temperature. Therefore, the first component of a stator bar hose
outlet temperature, Tout, is the temperature of the cooling water in, Tin. (For
direct hydrogen-cooled stator windings, the coolant inlet temperature is
derived from the cold hydrogen gas temperature.)
Stator bar temperature increases as electrical current flows in the copper of
the winding. The relationship of temperature to electrical current is well
known as T∝I2. Therefore, if the generator is at full load where the stator
current is theoretically at its maximum (Iref), then the temperature of the
stator bar hose outlets will be some temperature above the cooling water
inlet temperature. The difference between the cooling water inlet and outlet
temperatures is the temperature rise, dTref, at this reference load, due to the
heat input from the stator bar I2R losses.
The temperature difference between Tout and Tin obviously changes as the
generator loading (operating stator current, Is) is increased and decreased.
Applying the relationship T∝I2, you can use Is and Iref in the form (Is / Iref )2 to
account for generator load changes. Therefore, the basic formula to calculate
stator winding hose outlet temperatures can be written as:
Tout = Tin + dTref * (Is / Iref )2
In this relationship, the portion of the function (Is / Iref)2 is equal to one, as it
should be, when fingerprinting of the stator winding temperatures is done at
the reference load. As Is becomes lower, at lower loads, the temperature
calculated for Tout decreases proportionally [1].
Using the above formula, the difference between the measured reading and
the calculated value can be closely monitored. An alarm value (for example,
5˚C) can then be added to the calculated value to produce the dynamic alarm
limit as follows.
Talarm = Tout + 5˚C
If the deviation is more than the calculated alarm limit, Talarm, as shown in
Figure 1, it is then brought to the attention of the operator.
deg C
100
60
Actual temperature
40 5 deg C measured by sensor
20
0
Time
Figure 1
Dynamic Temperature Monitoring
It should be noted that the algorithms above are in their simplest form. Other
factors must be included for complete accuracy and these are generally
known by the OEM. For example, the stator bar expected temperature
calculation can also be enhanced to include a factor to allow for variable
coolant flow in water cooled stator windings. Likewise, for direct hydrogen
cooled stator windings, this model can be enhanced to incorporate changes
in hydrogen gas pressure. When implementing these types of models, the
utility should consult the OEM before implementation.
Now consider the direct hydrogen cooled stator winding. If the gas pressure
factor is not included, the model allows diagnosis of overheating due to
drops in casing hydrogen pressure. If the factor is included, then the model
will always account for casing pressure changes and never be able to predict
temperature rises on pressure variation because the model is now dynamic
on pressure as well as coolant inlet temperature and stator current. There-
fore, to determine if one of the model variables is affecting the outlet tem-
perature, you need to either depend on separate indicators to advise the
operator that a limit has been exceeded or use combinations of the basic
model with each of the variables sequentially removed.
The distinct advantage of using this type of indicator in conjunction with
direct sensor readings is the capability to predict expected values over the
entire load and power factor range of the generator and compare them to the
actual readings. This allows a much improved and closer degree of monitor-
ing on specific generator components rather than simply relying on a maxi-
mum limit before an alarm is incurred. Using this dynamic monitoring
method, you can look for deviations of only a few degrees above normal (for
temperature relationships) at any load and be provided with much faster
warning of impending problems in the generator, long before measured
parameters get anywhere near their absolute limits.
and log the performance of the generator and make better maintenance
decisions from the data collected during operation.
There are a variety of types of expert systems in use today on large rotating
machines. Their deterministic capabilities rely on such methods as rule-based
systems, pattern recognition, neural networks, Bayesian belief networks, and
so on. Regardless of the type of expert system implemented, all of them have
a number of common elements:
• Knowledge base containing the equipment facts, component relation-
ships, mathematical models, etc.
• Data acquisition hardware
• Software for sensor inputs
• Artificial intelligence (AI) software more commonly referred to as an
inference engine to perform the reasoning function between the knowl-
edge base and sensor inputs
• Graphical user interface to allow the operator to interact with the system
• Installation software to allow changes and updates to the system by the
experts
• Simulator for off line testing and training in some cases
Within the various elements of expert systems, some interesting and novel
techniques have been developed in recent years to provide accurate analysis
of impending problems. These include mathematical modeling techniques
used for logical and probabilistic determination of large generator problems.
Additionally, methods have been developed for combining sensor inputs to
create mathematical indicators of problems, and techniques have been
developed for dynamic tracking of problem indicators over the full power
factor and load range of the generator.
An expert system generally consists of a computer for monitoring and
processing data, external data acquisition hardware for collection of the
generator and auxiliary systems sensor inputs, and the software that forms
the basis of the expert system.
The computer is usually a fairly powerful type of machine such as a worksta-
tion. This is mainly because real time expert systems have large memory
requirements and need fast CPU speeds. However, it is now possible to put
even the larger expert monitoring systems on a PC.
The data acquisition system is used to collect raw sensor data from the
generator and auxiliary systems. It can consist of a stand-alone data logger or
the equivalent, or the computer data acquisition system for the existing unit.
The number of sensors monitored varies, depending on the particular gen-
erator and how extensively it is instrumented. The expected readings of the
monitored sensors are determined during installation and configuration of
the expert system by “heat run” tests on the generator at various loads and
how the individual hose outlet temperature from one stator bar is calculated
so that it can be compared to the actual sensor reading. However, each stator
bar is also associated with a particular stator winding parallel and phase.
This is a very important to consider because some stator winding problems
are not simply related to only one stator bar, but to a particular parallel,
phase or the whole winding. An expert system can handle this complexity
extremely well as shown below.
On a two-pole, two parallel-path stator winding, for example, one of the
phase parallels could be affected if a parallel connector on the collector end
ring bus were open circuited. This would cause all the current on the associ-
ated phase to divert from the open parallel to the other parallel. In effect,
there would be no current flow in one parallel, and the other parallel would
be attempting to carry full phase current and subsequently overheat. You
would, therefore, expect to see all the bars associated with the overheated
parallel register a high temperature alarm and the other parallel go down in
temperature because no stator current is flowing.
Suppose that for the same winding configuration one phase loses all cooling
water flow due to plugging of the coolant path, sometimes made possible by
the configuration of the water delivery system to the winding. You would then
expect to see all the bars associated with this phase register a high temperature
alarm because the phase is still carrying current but is not being cooled.
Finally, consider the whole winding in the case where the cooling water flow
is greatly reduced but is still flowing. The temperature monitoring indicators
for the stator bars will see normal stator current and inlet water temperature,
but reduced flow. Therefore, all the stator bar hose outlet temperatures
should be in alarm because all will be reading higher than the calculated
expected value for each bar.
The point of the last three examples is that you do not want to have every
stator bar hose outlet temperature in alarm when the root problem is not
related to the bars themselves. Therefore, a further method is required to
establish that the problem is not with the stator bars but rather is rooted in
the connectors or the cooling water delivery system, and so on.
To do this, you can use the stator winding diagram to form a sensor network
and map out which bars belong to each of the three phases and subsequently
which of these are in each parallel as shown in Figure 2 [1]. Using the stator
bar temperature models, the expert system can then reason that the problem
is related to, for example, the red phase only because the winding mapping
tells it that only the bars in the red phase are overheating. Therefore, the
expert system would report simply that the red phase is overheating, rather
than all the stator bars in that phase. The graphing abilities of the computer
can then be used to track the temperature of the affected phase compared to
the other phases and to load changes.
Whole Stator
Winding
Figure 2
Stator Winding Hierarchy
3
SENSORS AND INSTRUMENTATION
These parameters are measured and monitored to keep track of the load point
of the machine and allow the operator to control the operation of the generator.
MW overload on the generator is the main concern in terms of monitoring.
MW overload means that the stator current limit has probably been exceeded
and will affect the condition of the stator winding. The stator terminal voltage
might also have been exceeded during overload, depending on the main
transformer tap settings. Excessive terminal voltage will affect core heating.
Transient MW events from the system or internally in the machine also show
up as transients in the stator current or terminal voltage.
The stator currents are monitored and used to provide an indication of stator
current overload and phase current unbalance, and they can be used to
calculate the negative sequence currents flowing in the rotor.
3.1.7 Frequency
Frequency, measured in cycles per second or hertz (Hz), refers to the electri-
cal frequency of the generator. It is monitored for abnormal deviation from
the system frequency, which is 60 Hz in North America.
Frequency is more a consideration for turbine blade, hydrogen (H2) seal, and
bearing operation. There are many subsynchronous vibration modes associ-
ated with low frequency operation that could fail these components and
must be avoided. In terms of generator operation, overfrequency and
underfrequency are the main concerns.
Overfrequency is most often the result of an instantaneous load reduction
when the generator is synchronized to the system or from excessive excita-
tion when the generator is in the open circuit condition at rated speed and
terminal voltage.
During on-load operation, fast load reductions cause the current in the stator
winding to decrease rapidly and the terminal voltage to increase rapidly due
to a high level of field excitation still applied. In this case automatic action is
taken to decrease the steam input to the turbine in order to match the load
requirements and to quickly reduce field current in order to keep the termi-
nal voltage within limits (for example, the AVR).
Underfrequency is generally caused by a system event rather than by the
generator itself. The effect on the generator however, is almost always an
attempt by the system to extract excessive current from the stator and to drag
the rotor speed down. This also has the effect of depressing the stator termi-
nal voltage. To offset this, the excitation system for the generator will nor-
mally go into field forcing to try and maintain rated terminal voltage. There-
fore, it can be seen that there is a possibility of sustaining overheating in both
the stator and rotor windings during this type of event. Protection against
overloading in these components is usually provided.
transient component called I22t, which refers to the degree of short term phase
unbalance that the generator can withstand.
For large steam turbine generators, a typical continuous I2 value of 8 would
be normal. This means that the generator could carry a continuous phase
unbalance in the stator winding of 8% or .08 per unit (p.u.) of the rated stator
current without damaging any of the generator components, specifically the
rotor. A typical transient value for I2 (the I22t component) would be 10. This
means that the generator could withstand 100% or 1 p.u. phase unbalance for
10 seconds (that is, 1 p.u. phase current times 10 seconds = an I22t value of 10)
[2]. The overall relationship for negative sequence capability of a generator is
expressed exponentially as shown in Figure 3.
I 2
P.U.
1
.9
.8
.7 2
I 2 t = 10
.6
.5
.4
.3
.2
.1 continuous I = 8
2
.08
0
10 40 100 120
Time (seconds)
Figure 3
Large Generator Negative Sequence Capability
temperatures increase also. The level of temperature rise in the core ends is
dependent on a variety of generator design features, and depending on the
design variations, some machines see this effect more than others.
Local core overheating is a condition that is related to a small area of the core,
usually due to a localized defect or foreign body present in the stator. It can
also be associated with a breakdown of the interlaminar insulation or short-
ing of the core laminates.
Interlaminar insulation breakdown can occur from voltage spikes due to
system- or machine-related events, fretting from loose iron, poor space block
welds, and so on. Shorts across laminates usually occur from either foreign
objects in the bore, or damage to the core from the rotor skid plate or from
hammer strikes during re-wedging activities.
of the rotor. The pole or direct axis carries the main flux while the winding or
quadrature axis carries only the leakage and stray fluxes. Therefore, a large
difference in magnetic force is inherent between the two axes. A large mag-
netic force is generated in the pole axes, and a weak magnetic force is present
in the winding axes. Because each pole has a north and a south (or a + and -)
associated with it, an unbalanced magnetic pull is generated at twice the line
frequency or 120 Hz.
The core must be maintained in a tight condition or fretting will occur
between the laminates. Minor fretting tends to deteriorate the interlaminar
insulation, but if the core becomes too loose, the laminates and the space
blocks can become fatigued, resulting in pieces of loose core material break-
ing off and causing damage.
Monitoring of core vibrations can be done with accelerometers mounted on
the core back in strategic locations to determine the magnitude and phase of
both radial and tangential vibration modes.
Reduced flow from the SCW system. Reduced flow from the SCW system
may mean a pump problem or a clogged SCW filter/strainer.
A high temperature at the cooling water inlet to the generator also implies an
SCW system problem. A likely cause is the SCW coolers not getting enough
raw service water for heat removal from the SCW itself.
Temp.
Rise
(deg C)
70
Rotor Winding Maximum Temperature Rise
60
50
Rotor Winding Average Temperature Rise
40
30
20
Rotor Winding Axial Temperature Profile
10 Above Cold H2 Gas Temperature
0
Endwinding Slot Portion Endwinding
Figure 4
Determination of Rotor Winding Hot Spot Multiplier
With the hot spot multiplier known, the rotor winding hot spot temperature
can be calculated for any load and cold operating gas temperature as follows:
Ths = ( Tave - Tcold H2 ) x M + Tcold H2
where: Tave = Rave / Rref ( K + Tref ) - K (IEEE 115) [3]
Rave = Vf / If , calculated average winding resistance from
measured field voltage, Vf, and field current, If
Rref = winding resistance measured in factory by OEM at
known reference temperature, Tref
K = 234.5 (copper constant)
Tcold H2 = measured value of the cold hydrogen gas temperature
M = Ths / Tave , hot spot multiplier from OEM winding
temperature profile data
The rotor winding temperature varies with field current, hydrogen gas
temperature, and pressure.
Rotor winding high temperatures usually occur as a result of overloading or
undercooling. They are caused mainly by excessive field current in the on-
line mode, low hydrogen gas pressure, high hydrogen cold gas temperature,
or ventilation problems in the rotor that block the hydrogen cooling gas from
flowing to part of the winding. Excessive rotor winding temperature causes
deterioration of the rotor winding inter-turn and ground wall insulation.
Advanced effects of the rotor winding exceeding its temperature limit can be
overheating or burning of the insulation or a rotor thermal unbalance.
Reducing field current to remove the energy input to the rotor winding allows
the winding temperature to come down to a tolerable level and stabilize.
Failure of the inter-turn insulation causes rotor winding shorted turns.
Failure of the ground wall or slot liner insulation causes rotor grounds. The
retaining ring is also insulated from the rotor winding and is affected by high
winding temperatures. Failure of the retaining ring insulation also constitutes
a rotor winding ground.
The differential pressure between the oil inlet to the H2 seals and the casing H2
gas pressure is continuously monitored. It is always maintained in the range of
5–15 psi, with the seal oil pressure being the higher of the two. The higher seal
oil pressure keeps the hydrogen from escaping the generator casing.
Loss of the H2 seal at either end of the generator causes hydrogen leakage at
the seal, creating a dangerous condition for both personnel and the internal
generator components.
When hydrogen under pressure is allowed to leak uncontrolled, it has the
ability to self-ignite. When it does, the flame is invisible to the eye. The only
clues to the presence of a hydrogen fire are heat given off and the formation
of water droplets because the escaping hydrogen combines with the oxygen
in air to make water.
The other problem that leaking hydrogen causes is the reduction in cooling of
the generator components due to the reduction in H2 pressure.
For a rotating exciter, this would include problems with the diode wheel or
rotating alternator.
Low raw water inlet pressure to the lube oil coolers is an indication of low
flow to the coolers, which affects the cooling of the lube oil. Low service
water flow to the lube oil coolers can be caused by either a failure of the
service water supply pump or a large leak before the coolers. Low pressure
or flow to the lube oil coolers results in reduced cooler efficiency and causes
the lube oil temperature to rise.
3.7.10 Raw Service Water Outlet Temperature from Lube Oil Coolers
The raw service water outlet temperature is monitored to assist in detecting
problems with the lube oil coolers. The service water outlet temperature
should be proportional to the inlet service water temperature.
Low service water flow to or in the lube oil coolers causes high outlet water
temperature from reduced efficiency of the coolers. This results in the tem-
perature of the lube oil rising above its normal operating level. The low flow
condition can originate from silting or fouling of the cooler tubes.
High seal oil inlet temperature to the rotor H2 seals occurs when the seal oil
outlet temperature from the seal oil system is too high. This can be caused by
reduced seal oil cooler efficiency, due to low service water flow to the seal oil
coolers or high service water inlet temperature to the seal oil coolers.
3.8.4 Seal Oil System, Oil Outlet Pressure (H2 Seal Inlets)
The seal oil system outlet pressure (inlet pressure to the H2 seals) is moni-
tored to ensure that there is oil flow to the H2 seals. The system outlet pres-
sure is also monitored to ensure that the pressure is maintained within limits
for the H2/seal oil differential pressure and proper operation of the H2 seals.
Seal oil pressure that is too high can cause excess seal oil leakage into the
generator, which will cause oil contamination problems with many of the
internal generator components.
Reduced seal oil flow to the H2 seals is an indicator of fouled or plugged seal
oil coolers. Fouled or plugged seal oil coolers on the oil side are most likely
the result of debris in the seal oil or seal oil that is in poor condition, contain-
ing sludge that has built up in the seal oil coolers.
A large leak in the seal oil system before the bearings also creates a low
pressure (low flow) problem.
Low H2 seal inlet pressure is dangerous if it goes below the hydrogen gas
pressure in the generator casing. This allows hydrogen leakage from the
generator, creating a safety hazard.
3.8.11 Raw Service Water Outlet Temperature from Seal Oil Coolers
The raw service water outlet temperature is monitored to assist in detecting
problems with the seal oil coolers. The service water outlet temperature
should be proportional to the inlet service water temperature.
Low service water flow to or in the seal oil coolers causes high outlet water
temperature from reduced efficiency of the coolers. This results in the tem-
perature of the seal oil rising above its normal operating level. The low flow
condition can originate from silting or fouling of the cooler tubes.
following are the general components that are found in all SCW systems
from the different manufacturers.
In all SCW systems, the various parameters involved are monitored at
different points in the system. The general parameters monitored are:
• SCW inlet to generator temperature
• SCW outlet from generator temperature
• SCW inlet pressure to generator
• SCW outlet pressure from generator
• Differential pressure across filters and strainers
• System SCW flow
• SCW conductivity
• Storage and make-up tank levels
In addition, the raw service water for the SCW coolers is also monitored for
the inlet and outlet temperature of the coolers.
and the other as a backup) used to deliver the cooling water to the windings. In
some instances, a dc motor-driven pump is used for emergency shutdown.
An SCW supply pump failure implies loss of SCW supply to the generator.
The loss of SCW pump outlet pressure indicates an SCW flow problem and
results in a rise in the temperature past the normal operating range for the
stator winding and other components cooled by the SCW system. The gen-
erator can be operated at some minimum specified load without stator
cooling water, but this is generally less than 25% of the rated full load (con-
sult the generator manual for the OEM-set limits). If the unit is operated
above this minimum load, the stator winding is likely to overheat.
3.10.4 Rotor
4
SPECIALIZED MONITORING DEVICES
The previous section dealt with the most common sensors and monitoring
instrumentation that are installed on a generator. This section deals with the
more specialized monitoring devices that are not normally connected to the
unit main computer or generator monitoring system. These are usually
installed as stand-alone devices that provide information to the operator
apart from the main monitoring system; however, that is not to say that some
have not been connected to the main monitoring system in some form on
some machines in service.
A failure of the stator winding insulation is very costly to fix, both in terms of
capital cost to repair or replace a stator bar and the outage time required to
complete the work. Therefore, much effort has been invested over the years
in developing techniques to identify the occurrence of PD in the stator
winding. There are methods for off-line detection of PD, but they do not
cover the operating effects that also promote PD activity, such as those due to
thermal and vibration effects.
To provide the best PD detection, an on-line method of monitoring is re-
quired. There are now three basic approaches to on-line PD monitoring,
which all have attained recognized status as viable methods. The following is
a description of each.
4.1.1 RF Monitoring
Radio frequency (RF) monitoring is a technique used to detect electrical
sparking and arcing or stator winding PD inside the generator. This type of
monitoring operates on the premise that arcing in the stator winding causes
RF currents to flow in the neutral of the winding. The types of problems or
failure mechanisms that cause these RF currents to flow are:
• Conductor bar strand cracking
• Electrical joint failure
• Partial discharges from insulation problems
To monitor these currents, a high frequency current transformer (CT) is
placed around the neutral grounding lead before the neutral grounding
transformer, as shown in Figure 5.
Main
Generator Transformer
System
RF-CT
RF
Monitor
Neutral Grounding
Transformer
Figure 5
RF Monitor
The output of the CT is fed to a RF monitor for signal processing and analy-
sis. The signals from the CT are filtered to examine those that are in the
correct frequency range for radio frequency arcing. The monitor generally
has a setpoint or an alarm limit that can be adjusted to a predetermined level
at which the RF activity is known to be excessive. When the level of RF
activity increases to where the setpoint is reached, the operator is notified of
an RF problem in the generator.
It is difficult, however, to distinguish between the sources of RF arcing, and it
is not always possible to identify the root cause. In most cases, one can only
say that arcing at a certain level is occurring. In addition, filtering does not
completely eliminate noise; therefore, this also becomes a problem in signal
discrimination. This is especially true for large turbo-generators where the
noise generated from the sliprings/brushgear and the shaft grounding
brushes is considerable.
SSC under
Stator Wedges
Stator
Core
Stator Bar
under SSC and
Wedges
Endwinding
Stator
Wedges
SSC Output
Cables
Figure 6
SSC Position in Slot, Bore View
Wedge
Wedge Slider
Depth
Packing
SSC
Top Pad
Stator
Core
Top
Bar
Side
Packing Slot
Separator
Bottom
Bar
Bottom
Pad
Figure 7
Cross-Section of Stator Slot Containing an SSC
The problem of noise is virtually eliminated with the SSC. Although the SSC has
a very wide frequency response characteristic that allows it to see almost any
signal present in the slot where it is installed, it also has the characteristic of
showing the true pulse shape of these signals. This gives it a distinct advantage
over other methods, which cannot capture the actual nature of the PD pulses.
Since PD pulses occur in the 1–5 nanosecond range and are very distinguishable
with the SSC, the level of PD activity can be more closely defined.
In addition, dedicated monitoring devices have been devised to measure the
PD activity detected in the SSC. The capability for PD detection using the
SSC and its associated monitoring interface is enhanced to include measure-
ment in terms of:
• The positive and negative characteristic of the pulses
• The number of pulses
• The magnitude of the pulses
• The phase relation of the pulses
• The direction of the pulses (that is, from the slot or from the endwinding
or actually under the SSC itself at the end of the slot)
Shorted turns in rotor windings are associated with turn-to-turn shorts on the
4.2 Rotor Winding
Shorted Turns copper winding as opposed to turn-to-ground faults (See Figure 8).
Detection
Rotor Rotor
Tooth Wedge
Slot Liner
Creepage
Block
Copper
Winding Shorted Turn
Location
Interturn
Insulation
Axial
Radial Vent
Vent
Sub
Slot
Figure 8
Rotor Winding Shorted Turn
This type of damage can propagate and worsen the fault so that more turns
are affected or the groundwall insulation becomes damaged and a rotor
winding ground occurs.
One of the most noticeable effects of shorted turns is increased rotor vibra-
tion due to thermal effects. When a short on one pole of a rotor occurs, a
condition of unequal heating in the rotor winding exists between poles. The
unequal heating causes bowing of the rotor and, hence, vibration. The extent
and location of the shorted turns and the heating produced governs the
magnitude of the vibrations produced.
Off-line methods for detecting shorted turns include winding impedance
measurements while the rotor speed is varied from zero to rated speed and
RSO (recurrent surge oscillation) tests based on the principle of time domain
reflectometry. In addition, a short of significant magnitude can be identified
by producing a open circuit (OC) saturation curve and comparing it to the
design OC saturation curve. If the field current required to produce rated
terminal voltage has increased from the original design curve, then a short is
likely present. The number of shorted turns can be identified by the ratio of
the new field current value over the design field current value.
All of the above methods of identifying shorted turns are prone to error and
indicate only that a short exists. They do little to help locate which slot the
short is in and require special conditions for collecting the data or for testing.
To better identify shorted turns and to employ a method that works on-line,
the shorted turns detector (STD) or search coil method has been perfected.
Each OEM has its own version of the STD, but all work essentially in the
same manner.
The STD is actually a search coil mounted on the stator core but located
strategically in the air gap. The search coil looks at the variation in the
magnetic field produced in the air gap by the rotor as it spins. The energized
rotor winding and the slotted effect of the winding arc causes a sinusoidal
signal to be produced in the winding face of the rotor. The pole face, on the
other hand, has no winding, and the signal is flatter because the variation in
the magnetic field is minimal (see Figure 9).
Slot Centers
Quadrature
Pole #2 Axis
Figure 9
Rotor Winding Shorted Turns Detector, Typical Flux Probe Signal On-Load
The magnitude of the sinusoidal peaks in the winding face is dependent on
the ampere-turns produced by the winding in the various slots. If there is a
short in a slot, the peak of the signal for the affected slot is reduced (see
Figure 10). The reduction is dependent on the magnitude of the short. There-
fore, as well as knowing which slot the short is in, an estimate of the number
of shorted turns can be made fairly accurately.
Quadrature
Pole #2 Axis
Figure 10
Rotor Winding Shorted Turns Detector, Typical Signal
with Shorted Turn Indicated
Problems due to saturation effects at full load can occur in analyzing the
data, and most OEMs now have a dedicated monitor connected to the STD to
automate the analysis process. This allows the STD and monitor to act as a
standalone sensor to alarm when a short turn is detected and notify the
operator for investigation.
During operation, voltages build on the generator rotor shaft. The sources of
4.4 Shaft Voltage and
Current Monitoring shaft voltage have been identified as:
• Voltage from the excitation system due to unbalanced capacitive cou-
pling
• Electrostatic voltage from the turbine due to charged water droplets
impacting the blades
The generator condition monitor (GCM), more commonly known as the core
4.5 Generator
Condition Monitor/ monitor, is a device used to detect overheated insulation inside the generator.
Tagging Compounds Although the original intent of the GCM was to provide advance warning of
stator core insulation overheating, the fact is that any overheated organic
material inside the generator (for example, insulation) creates pyrolysis
products in the form of particulates that can be detected by the GCM.
The detection of particulates occurs in an ion chamber within the GCM. The
ion chamber is designed to work in a hydrogen atmosphere under the high
pressures used in large generators. As hydrogen is passed through the ion
chamber, the detector inside the chamber produces a constant current through
the gas flow. The current is set (usually at 80%) by regulating the gas flow and
continuously monitoring it. When particulates (that is, pyrolysis products from
5
DECIDING ON A MONITORING SYSTEM
Risk is often associated with the phrase “risk of a failure.“ When a known or
5.3 Risk
generic problem exists in the generator, the probability of a failure occurring
is set higher than if no problem is suspected. Taking a risk (gambling) that
the equipment will not fail is usually done in times when the unit has a high
priority and it is desirable to defer repairs until a more convenient time.
The benefits of risk taking are the dollar value savings realized if a failure
does not occur in the timeframe specified. However, if the equipment fails
within the timeframe, the cost to the utility can be tremendous, especially if
non-performance penalties are involved.
Risk assessment should be done by highly specialized personnel with a great
deal of expertise on the equipment under consideration. This helps to mini-
mize the risk. The specialist is likely to make a more qualified judgment with
a higher probability of success.
However, one of the ways to offset risk is to depend on monitoring. With the
help of a sophisticated monitoring system, the condition of the equipment
can be watched more closely, and in many cases, a major failure can be
avoided. For many types of failure modes, no amount of monitoring will
prevent major damage, but for numerous types of slowly progressing failure
modes, increased monitoring can allow extended operation without the
machine experiencing a failure. This allows the unit to be taken out of service
gracefully and have less expensive maintenance performed rather than
suffering a forced outage.
The benefits of good monitoring in such cases are:
• Continued revenue from generating
• Lower cost to repair the problem
• No incurring replacement energy costs from forced outages
• Reduced outage times due to the avoidance of a failure
nance that is done. However, for stand-alone monitoring systems, the prob-
lem becomes more of a spare-parts-dependent situation. Monitoring systems
are not generally redundant on individual generators; therefore, if the system
goes down, monitoring is lost until it is restored.
If the problem is related to hardware, the problem component is removed
and replaced. The damaged component can then be taken away and re-
paired, if possible, or replaced with another purchased spare. It becomes
extremely important that spares are available even when the system becomes
obsolete. In today’s computer climate, this will occur rapidly. To deal with
this obsolescence, components should be chosen based on commonality of
features and the components’ availability. Alternatively, a good supply of
spares can be purchased at the time of system installation, based on pre-
dicted failure rates of the various parts of the monitoring system.
Another alternative is to employ a monitoring system that is highly depen-
dent on software that is portable from computer to computer, so that it will
operate on nearly any hardware that is installed. In this way, the obsoles-
cence of the hardware becomes less important. An additional benefit of
having a high degree of software dependence is that the monitoring program
or its generator models can be updated as improvements are available.
Reloading software is a fairly easy task and is less disruptive to the operation
of the unit than replacing hardware.
6
REFERENCES
EPRI. Electrify the World Printed on recycled paper in the United States of America
EPRI • 3412 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304 • PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303 • USA
800.313.3774 • 650.855.2121 • [email protected] • www.epri.com