Eportfolio Presentation: EDUC 4206 Professional Experience 4
Eportfolio Presentation: EDUC 4206 Professional Experience 4
• More than half of the class are able to work at a satisfactory level
• Effort over ability
• Supporting and developing students who are academically gifted is important and a programme of
withdrawal has been developed for students from Year 2 to Year 9. Students in the Gifted and Talented
programme meet with other gifted students in their year level to engage in a variety of extension
activities including units on electronics, psychology, philosophy, computer coding, energy systems,
bridge building.
LEARNER PROFILE
Curriculum Link
Plan, draft and publish imaginative, informative and persuasive texts demonstrating increasing control over text structures and language
features and selecting print, and multimodal elements appropriate to the audience and purpose (ACELY1682)
Learning intentions
Students will be able to demonstrate their knowledge of structural writing to successfully write an explanation text.
Students will
Select appropriate text structure for a writing purpose and sequencing content for clarity and audience impact
Using digital resources to gather information about a topic
Use appropriate simple, compound and complex sentences to express and combine ideas
Use vocabulary, including technical vocabulary, relevant to the text type and purpose, and appropriate sentence structures to express and
combine ideas
CURRICULUM CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
PRIOR LEARNING
Before getting into the learning experiences, through a class discussion it was
made clear that students understood:
• there are different text types
• different texts have different structures
• explanation=explaining
• punctuation: full stops, capital letters and paragraphs
• Full sentences
UNIT PLAN
LESSON 1
• Class discussion
• Prior knowledge
• Text types
CHILDREN SELF ASSESSMENT AND
FEEDBACK
Strength:
- Students were not intimidated by a simple question
- Easier than to verbally explain themselves
Weakness:
- Being in front of peers, students who did not
understand may not put their thumbs down as they did
not want to stand out.
STUDENT LEARNING
• Student 1: Maybe
Understood what an explanation text was, however was worried about writing one
• Student 2:Yes
Understood what an explanation text was
• Student 3:Yes
Understood what an explanation text was
MENTOR TEACHER FEEDBACK
Feedback on self-assessment
• Immediate feedback
• Presents students that need extra guidance
• If many students put a thumbs down it would have been a clear sign that
explanation needed to be more explicit
• Less pressure of students to ask for help
Feedback on lesson
• Students were engaged and understood what they were learning (4.2, 4.3, 4.4)
• Well communicated
REFLECTION OF LESSON: ENHANCING
STUDENT LEARNING USING PRIOR
KNOWLEDGE
• Student 1:
Struggles to read therefore able to engage in multimodal learning
Student 2 & 3:
Able to use ICT to enhance learning.
MENTOR TEACHER FEEDBACK
• Relevant scaffolding
“A PPT was used which made the learning intention clear for students. This
learning intention was clear for students and was included on their work which
scaffolded their writing.” (2.6)
• Well planned lesson, with relevant scaffolding. Good lesson structure and
learning sequence (3.2)
REFLECTION
Student 1
MENTOR TEACHER FEEDBACK
Self-assessment
Self assessment: Student becomes fully involved as insiders in the learning culture
of their classroom. It prepares students for reflection on their performance
(Groundwater-Smith et al. 2015).
• Guides future learning
ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST/RUBRIC
ASSESSMENT
Teachers should use many forms of assessment to meet the demands of schools, teachers and
student (Groundwater-Smith et al. 2015)
Feedback is effective to help students understand what they are learning and how they can
improve, and therefore should be a greater focus in the education environment (Bellon et al.
1991).
• Using a simplified rubric
• From 2 stars and a wish, checklist to simplified rubric (more specific)
• Students would use these comments to inform future learning
• In books to refer back to
• As a teacher, it was also a guide on what areas needed more focus
STUDENT 1
B E L O W S AT I S F A C T O RY : N O T M E E T I N G Y E A R 3 L E V E L
STUDENT 2
S AT I S F A C T O RY : M E E T I N G Y E A R 3 L E V E L
STUDENT 3
A B O V E S AT I S F A C T O RY : C O M P L E X T H I N K I N G , A B O V E Y E A R 3 L E V E L
SUMMARY
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) 2018, The Australian
Curriculum v8.1, English, viewed 20 Sep 2018, https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-
curriculum/english/
• Bellon, J, Bellon, E & Blank, M 1991 Teaching from a Research Knowledge Base: A Development and
Renewal Process, Facsimile edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
• Campbell, L & Campbell, B 2009, Beginning with what students know: the role of prior knowledge in
learning, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Groundwater-Smith, S, Ewing R & Cornu RL 2015, Teaching challenges and dilemmas, 5th Edn, Cengage
Learning, Victoria.
• Higgins, S 2003, Does ICT improve the learning and teaching in schools?, Newcastle University, viewed 15
Sep 2018, <https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ict-pur-mb-r-f-p-1aug03.pdf>
• Myhill, D 2004, ‘Making connections: teachers' use of Children's prior knowledge in whole class
discourse’, British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 263-275.