Bessel Processes, Asian Options, and Perpetuities: Abstract. The First One The Second Example The Third One
Bessel Processes, Asian Options, and Perpetuities: Abstract. The First One The Second Example The Third One
Abstract. Using Bessel processes, one can solve several open problems involving
the integral of an exponential of Brownian motion. This point will be illustrated
with three examples. The first one is a formula for the Laplace transform of an
Asian option which is "out of the money." The second example concerns volatility
misspecification in portfolio insurance strategies, when the stochastic volatility is
represented by the Hull and White model. The third one is the valuation of perpe-
tuities or annuities under stochastic interest rates within the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross
framework. Moreover, without using time changes or Bessel processes, but only
simple probabilistic methods, we obtain further results about Asian options: the
computation of the moments of all orders of an arithmetic average of geometric
Brownian motion; the property that, in contrast with most of what has been writ-
ten so far, the Asian option may be more expensive than the standard option
(e.g., options on currencies or oil spreads); and a simple, closed-form expression
of the Asian option price when the option is "in the money," thereby illuminating
the impact on the Asian option price of the revealed underlying asset price as
time goes by. This formula has an interesting resemblance with the Black-Scholes
formula, even though the comparison cannot be carried too far.
1. Introduction
Bessel processes possess two major features: first, besides the Ornstein-
Uhlenbeck processes, they are essentially the only diffusion processes in addi-
tion to Brownian motion (with drift), for which a relatively simple expression
for the transition probability is known; second, they appear naturally in a
number of interesting problems in finance and insurance. For instance, hyper-
geometric functions (which are related to Bessel processes) are used for the
pricing of options on zero coupon bonds in the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross general
equilibrium model of interest rates. Another key point is that the standard
hypothesis in most financial papers assumes stock price dynamics driven by
the exponential of a Brownian motion with drift, which is in turn (the square
of) a time-changed Bessel process. Moreover, the class of laws of squares of
Bessel processes is stable under the convolution operation, a property which
is not shared by the commonly used lognormal models.
We shall illustrate these points with three examples of theoretical and
practical importance: Asian options, portfolio insurance, and perpetuities or
annuities.
In this section, we collect some general results about Bessel processes. Detailed
proofs of these results may be found in the references (Shiga and Watanabe
1973, Revuz and Yor 1991, Yor 1992b). For simplicity, we first look at squares
of Bessel processes, or "Bessel squared" processes; these we denote by BESQ
(a Bessel process BES is the square root of a BESQ).
Definition. For any 6 2': 0, the 6-dimensional Bessel squared process BESQ"
is a continuous diffusion process Pt taking its values in jR+ and satisfying the
stochastic differential equation
Po = a 2: 0,
where W t is a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion.
The real v = 6/2 - 1 is called the index of the process BESQ".
As a consequence of the stochastic differential equation satisfied by
(Pt, t 2: 0), the process
pt (x, y) = t1 (Y)V
;:; yexp [x2
-
+ y2] Iv (XY)
2t t (t > O,x,y > 0). (2.2)
A key result for our applications in the following sections is due to Williams
(1974),<1)
Proposition 2.3. The exponential of Brownian motion with drift is a time-
changed Bessel process; more specifically,
(1)An earlier reference is the paper of Lamperti (1972) quoted in paper [8] in this
book; see also Postscript #1.
.
so that
exp(aW(t) + vt) =
a W(t)
exp 2 ( "2 vt)
+2
= [R(2v/a 2 ) (: 1texp2GW(S)+~S)ds)r
More generally, it is possible to write the exponential of a Brownian motion
with drift as any given power of a Bessel process, up to a time change. How-
ever, the additivity property of squares of Bessel processes makes it most
efficient to use the power 2.
Proposition 2.4. Denote by p~v) the law on C(JR+, JR+) of the Bessel process
R(v) starting at a, by (Rt, t 2 0) the canonical process on C(JR+, JR+), and by
:9t = a(Rs, s :::; t) the canonical filtration. Then, the following relationship
holds (from Girsanov's theorem):
Proposition 2.5. Using the same notations as in the definition at the begin-
ning of this section, the following relationship holds for any () > 0, a ~ 0,
JL > () - 1:
Ea
(J.t) _1_
(
(R )
t
_ _1_
)2f) - r(()) 1
1
h
f)-l
(1
_
h)
J.t-f) ()f)
~
2t exp
( -a2t h) dh.
The proof of Proposition 2.5 may be found for instance in Yor (1992a,
Chapter 6).
Proposition 2.6. (Yor 1980). For every v E lK, a> 0, x> 0, t > 0,
(and options on interest rate swaps) exhibit this Asian feature when the base
rate is an arithmetic average of spot rates.
In this paper, we shall address only the "fixed-strike" case, because the
"floating-strike" case, where the payoff depends on the relative values of the
arithmetic average and the underlying price at maturity, is less widely used in
practice. The exact pricing of fixed-strike Asian options is clearly a difficult
exercise because the distribution of an arithmetic average of stock prices is
unknown (and in particular not lognormal) when prices themselves are lognor-
mally distributed. The studies on this problem fall roughly into three groups.
The first approach is numerical: Kemna and Vorst (1990) use Monte Carlo
simulations with the corresponding geometric average option as a control vari-
able; Carverhill and Clewlow (1990) use the fast Fourier transform to calculate
the density of the sum of random variables as the convolution of individual
densities and then numerically integrate the payoff function against the den-
sity. Clearly, these methods, besides being computationally expensive, give no
information on the hedging portfolio.
A second approach, used by Ruttiens (1990) and Vorst (1992), consists of
modifying the geometric average option price. Although this method reduces
the amount of calculation, it may lead to significantly underpriced call options
and has the same shortcoming as the numerical one in terms of dynamic
hedging. Bouaziz, Bryis, and Crouhy (1991) provide an upper bound of the
error involved in their approximation of the law of the average.
A third approach, proposed by Levy (1992) and adopted by a number of
practitioners, assumes that the distribution of an arithmetic average is well
approximated-at least in some markets-by the lognormal distribution, and,
consequently, the problem is reduced to determining the necessary parameters.
This task is less complicated since the first two moments of the arithmetic
average are relatively simple to derive. In what follows, we shall give a closed-
form expression for all moments of the arithmetic average.
the maturity of the option. In what follows, we will use interchangeably the
notation Wt or W (t).
Consider the process (A(x), x ~ 0), where
A(x) = -1-
x - to
i to
X
S(u) duo
where
Ct,T(k') ~f EQ[(A(T) - k')+ ISf], A(T) = iT S(u) du, k' = k(T - to).
to
Consider the case to :::; t < T. (The case to > t of the "forward-start" Asian
option is solved in Appendix A). We have
using
rl
Finally, defining
To summarize steps 1-3, we just expressed the desired Asian option price as
where
Proposition 3.1. The Asian call option price is smaller than the standard
option price when the underlying asset is a domestic stock; i.e., v> O.
Proof. This result can be proved in the general case, without the discretiza-
tion procedure used by Kemna and Vorst (1990), who were themselves looking
at a stock Asian option. Moreover, as observed by Turnbull and Wakeman
(1991), Kemna and Vorst did not emphasize the fact that the property does
not hold when the time to maturity of the call option is shorter than the
length of the averaging period.
From the equality
T1 Jro T1 Jor
T T
exp2(Ws + vs) ds - k = [exp2(Ws + vs) - k]ds
o
We can give a more precise result and show that the crucial element in
determining whether this property holds is the sign of v + 1 = 2r / a 2 , i.e.,
the sign of the drift r of the underlying asset. For currency Asian options, for
instance, the dynamics of the underlying asset are
dS
S = (r - y) dt + a dWt , where y is the foreign spot rate.
.
exp[2(W(s) + vs)]
= 1 + 210 8
exp[2(W(u) + vu)] dWu +210 8
(v+1) exp[2(W(u)+vu)] duo
If we set
the distribution of the pair (A~v), Wt + vt) was obtained by Yor (1992b).
First, it is useful to observe that, due to Girsanov's theorem relating the laws
of (Ws + vs; s :::; t) and (Ws; s :::; t), the quantity P(A}v) E du I W t + vt = x)
depends on t, x, u, but not on v. Consequently, we can take v = 0, in which
case
where
and
(We use the French notation ch, sh, and th for, respectively, the hyperbolic
cosine, sine, and tangent functions.)
.
Given the complexity of the exact joint distribution of the pair {average,
underlying asset}, we shall look at the moments of the average A~v), which
give some partial information about its law. (However, the valuation of an
Asian option having a payoff max(A~) - ST, 0) would require the use of the
joint distribution of (A~);ST).)
The first two moments of A~v) are easily computed by integration. Higher
order moments have been computed by Dufresne (1989, 1990) using Ito's
lemma, time reversal, and a recurrence argument. A different method consists
of introducing the Laplace transform in time; see Geman and Yor (1992).
Using either procedure, one obtains the formula(1)
where
The criterion does not apply to lognormal distributions nor to the average
of geometric Brownian motion.
L E[(A~v))2ntl/2n
00
Mt(v) ~f
n=l
is finite.
Proof. (a) We first reduce the proofto the case v = O. If v ~ 0, A~v) ~ A~O)
so Mt(v)-S Mt(O). On the other hand, if v -S 0,
(b) To show that Mt(O) < 00, we use Bougerol's identity (1983). For any fixed
(law) (0)
t > 0, shBt = 'YAt' where we denote At by At and 'Y represents
a Brownian motion independent of At. From the scaling property of
Brownian motion, we deduce
Hence, in order to show that Mt(O) < 00, it remains to prove that the
series with general term en = an/b n , where an = [Ebtn)p/2n and bn =
[E(sh(Bt) )4n]1/2n, is convergent. We now observe that
an ~ (4n/e).
n-+oo
(3.6)
Assuming (3.6) for now, we deduce that, for n large enough, there exists
E E JO, 1[ such that
4n])1/2n
bn ~ (1- E) ( E [ (~exP(Bt)) ~ 1 ~ E exp(4nt).
.
C(v)(h, q) = E(At)) - q.
This quantity, plugged into (3.1) with the corresponding values of v, h, and q
1:
gives a closed-form expression of the Asian option price, namely,
X x = R(v)(A(v))
x ,
where (R(v) (u), u ;::: 0) is a Bessel process with index v, starting at R(v) (0) = l.
Moreover, if T~v) = inf{ s; A~v) > u}, then
(v) _ (U ds
Tu - io (R(v)(s))2
Now, we write
Ar) = A (~~) +
Tq
lh
(v)
Tq
exp 2(Ws + vs) ds,
on the set (Ar) ;::: q). Since A(~~) = q and denoting R~v) = [X(TJv))], in
Tq
agreement with (2.3), then the strong Markov property and the independence
of the increments of Brownian motion imply that, for all h ;::: 0 and q ;::: 0,
Consequently,
(3.8)
.
From (3.8) we can derive the Laplace transform in h of C(v)(h, q). For
>. > [),
where
Here p~v) (1, s) denotes the density at time q of the Bessel semigroup, with index
v and starting position 1 at time 0; this density is given by Proposition 2.2
(where we used pb instead of p(v), with [) = 2(1 + v)):
p(v)(l, s)
q
= sV+l exp
q
(-~(1
2q
+ s2)) Iv (~).
q
where JL = V2>' + v 2 and where the integrals in (3.10) are two representations
of confluent hypergeometric functions (see Lebedev 1972, p. 278, Exercise 12,
and p. 266, (9.11.1) and (9.11.2)).
Finally, the Laplace transform of cry) (h, q) with respect to the variable h
can be written as
1 =
o
dh
e
->"hC(v) (h )-
,q -
fl/2q
Jo
dx e- X x(/-,-v)/2-2(1 - 2qx)(/-,+v)/2+1
>.(>.-2-2v)f((JL-v)j2-1)
(3 10)
,.
where f denotes the gamma function.
The inversion of this Laplace transform for a fixed h would provide the
quantity C(v)(h, q) and, hence, the Asian option price thanks to (3.1). This
inversion is not easy, since the parameter >. also appears in the gamma func-
tion. There is now off-the-shelf software for inverting Laplace transforms,
which may be useful for a numerical solution of this problem.
.
4. Quadratic-Variation-Based Strategies
In this section, we consider the issue of portfolio insurance based on option
replication when the model of the underlying asset does not have a constant
volatility over the investment period, which is the case in practice.
The most straightforward method of insuring a portfolio of risky assets is
to purchase a put option on the portfolio, with a strike price equal to some
desired minimum value for the portfolio. Alternatively, a dynamic portfolio
of stock and cash can be created to replicate the stock-plus-put portfolio.
However, the construction of such synthetic portfolio insurance will depend
crucially on a correct estimation of the volatility of the portfolio being insured.
Rendleman and O'Brien (1990), among others, have shown that misspeci-
fication of the volatility can cause the outcome of a synthetic portfolio
insurance strategy to deviate significantly from its target. Assuming that the
Black-Scholes option pricing model (particularly the hypothesis of a con-
stant volatility over the lifetime of the option) is appropriate for determin-
ing the value of the put option, a very simple argument-which is the core
of the Black-Scholes formula-gives the number of shares of the stock one
must hold and the amount one must invest in a riskless asset (e.g., T-bills).
These numbers depend on time and on the market value of the risky asset,
and, consequently, portfolio adjustments have to be made on a continuous
basis; however, the relative amounts in stocks and T-bills also depend on the
volatility (through the coefficients d1 and d2 in the Black-Scholes formula).
Therefore, errors in volatility estimation will result in an incorrect mix during
the life of the insurance program. This issue has usually been addressed by
estimating the deviation from the target at the time horizon H (using, for
instance, simulations of volatility, as in Hill et al. 1988).
Bick (1991) offers a new approach, which is to build "quadratic-variation-
based" dynamic strategies: instead of facing an unwanted outcome of the
portfolio insurance strategy at the time H chosen as the horizon, he proposes
to stop the strategy at the first time Ta such that
the instantaneous variance, we suppose that their dynamics are driven by the
following stochastic differential equations:
dS dy
5 = 111 dt + a dW1(t); Y = 112 dt + ~ dW2(t), where y(O) = Yo,
and d(Wl' W 2)t = Pt dt; i.e., WI and W 2 are two S'[-Brownian motions with
a deterministic bracket.
It will be convenient to use the notation 11~ = 112/2 and ry = ~/2. Hence,
we have
a(t) = VYo exp{(ry) W 2(t) + (11~ - ry2)t}.
Making the change of variables t = U/ry2 and using the scaling property of
Brownian motion, we can write
(4.2)
Ta = ~ {2a'/l db
ry2 io (R~)(b))2·
The probability density fa (x) of Ta does not have a simple expression (see
Yor 1980, Sections 4-6), but its Laplace transform is relatively simple, being
precisely
.
where Lemma 2.1 was applied twice; here, JL = (2)../ry2 + v 2)1/2 and /'i, =
(JL - v)/2.
Using Proposition 2.5 we can transform the latter expectation into
perpetuity is expressed as
Z= 1 00
dtexp-(aWt+vt)
r(>.t) = ro
rAt
+ (b>.)t + a io v'r(S) dWs -
r'
2(j>. io r(>.s) ds.
where W"S represents another Brownian motion. Denoting 8 = S>., () = e>., and
r(t) = r(>.t) and choosing>. = 4/1J2, we observe that when 8 is an integer,
r(t) is the square of the norm of an Ornstein-Uhenbeck process (x(t), t ~ 0)
with dimension 8 and parameter e, i.e.,
where (Zt,
t ~ 0) is a 8-dimensional Brownian motion and Xo E ]R6. A proof
of this result is obtained by using Ito's lemma for p(t) = Ix(t)j2:
Moreover, formula (2.k) in Pitman and Yor (1982) establishes that for any a
and bin jR+,
where again the 5-dimensional Bessel process R(t) originates at Fa. Com-
bining these two results, we obtain for the bond price at time 0 that
B(O, t) == UVW,
with
U ( 20 (ro + 16M))
= exp 0'2 0'4 '
,
0'3 2 0'2 0' 2 0'2 0'3 2 0'2
A perpetuity making a continuous payment of one unit over time has the
form
=A 1 00
duexP(-A [r(As)ds), foranyA>O.
.
(5.4)
where (R(s), s 2: 0) denotes a Bessel process with dimension 8>' = 2(v + 1),
starting from Fa.
We are interested in computing the first-order moment of Z since its dis-
tribution is not simple. The details of this computation, which use roughly
the same tools as the ones used in the previous sections, are completed in
Appendix B and the result is given in (B.5):
E(Z) = J2
a
r _1_(1_
1
Jo v'h
h)(V-l)/2 exp (-brov'h)
2
dh,
r bU)
J2
E[ZTJ = -;; Jo
th(bT)
(1 - u 2 )(V-l)/2 exp
(
--T"- du
with the same notation as above. (We remark that, taking the derivative of
this expression with respect to T, we recover the bond price B(O, T) calculated
above, for 0 = 0.)
As a consequence, we obtain
2
r(n+1)=y'1fr
n
2+ 1 r + 1)
(n ) (n- 2 -'
.
we deduce
1o
+00 (()bA2
dtexp -2- t (ch wt+flshwt)
---6>../2 {-row(()+th(wt))}
exp -2- 1- + flth(wt)
where w = V2A + ()2 A2 , A = 4/ (J"2, fl = ()Ajw, and the parameters (3, b, and (J"
define the short-term rate dynamics in (5.1) with 'Y = 1/2. Introducing the
change of variables u = th(wt), we can write
_
E(Z) -A exp
(()Aro)
2
r w(l du- u2) (1+U)(0>../4W)!i
Jo
1
1- u
1 () u -0>../2 { -row ( fl + u ) }
.,. ( ~ + - V1- u 2 ) exp -2- 1 + flu .
where
6. Conclusion
We have seen how Bessel processes can be used to bring two kinds of
answers to the problem of Asian options pricing, one through the calculation
of all moments of the average of the underlying asset price, the other through
.
the expression (of the Laplace transform) of the Asian option price. In the
portfolio insurance framework, Bessel processes provide alternative answers
to the issue of deviating from the target at the time horizon in portfolio
insurance strategies when the volatility of the risky asset is stochastic. In the
same manner, Bessel processes appear to be the appropriate tool to price per-
petuities and annuities in a stochastic interest rates environment when the
dynamics of the short-term rate are defined by a particular case of the Cox-
Ingersoll-Ross model. These processes also appear very promising for other
models of the term structure dynamics.
Appendix A.
The "Forward-Start" Asian Option
We now show that for t < to < T, it is possible to reduce the valuation
problem to the case t = 0:
where
since S(u) = exp[y(u)] = S(to) exp[y(u) - y(t o)] and (y(t), t 2: 0) has inde-
pendent increments. We observe that
[ - (k)
S(tO) IS{] = X(S(t)),
E[¢(S(to)) I S{] = E S(tO) Cto,T def
.
where
When, in 1989, Dow Chemical made a tender offer on Marion Laboratory, the
shareholders of the latter company received in exchange for an old share a
"contingent value right" attached to a new share. This contingent value right
(C.V.R.), which was traded on the American Stock Exchange between 1989
and 1991, was exactly an Asian put option, since the payoff in September
1991 was $45.77 - $A where $A was the average value of the stock during the
last 60 days. The same contingent value right was used in the tender offer of
the French company Rh6ne-Poulenc on the American firm Rorer. The Rh6ne-
Poulenc-Rorer contingent value rights are currently traded on the American
Stock Exchange; their expiration date is July 1993.
Appendix B.
Valuation of a Perpetuity
in the C.LR Framework
Z = AZI = A 1 00
exp ( - b; lt [R(sWdS) dt.
(B.1)
where (Rrn(t), t ~ 0) denotes a Bessel process with index m, and 1jp+ 1jq = 1
(see Revuz and Yor 1991, Chap. 11). [Note: In this Appendix, we use the
notation Rv instead of R(v), as in the rest of the paper, because here we deal
constantly with powers of R v , and R~(t) denotes the quantity Rv(t) raised to
the power o:.J
.
U::::: 0,
This gives, with our choice of q,
U::::: 0. (B.2)
(B.3)
where we take m = v /2,0 = 1/2, Z = (ro/2)2. We then deduce from (B.3) and
(B.4) that
11 1 J2u
(B.5)
2
= -oX- dh
--(1 - h)(v-l)/2
00
-du- exp (-Zh)
- - exp (-b
-- u) .
2"fir 0 Jh 0 2u 2
We could also have avoided the time change operation with the help of
the following formula, which is an important example of a Laplace trans-
form for quadratic functionals of Brownian motion (see Revuz and Yor 1991,
Corollary 1.8, p. 414):
(Again, we use the notation ch and th for hyperbolic cosine and tangent.)
.
This gives
E[Z1J = 1
0
00 dt (rob)
(ch(bt))v+1 exp -Tth(bt)
b1
1 00 ds (rob)
= 0 (ch(s))v+1 exp -Tth(s) .
E[ZJ = ~
2b
11 Jh
0
dh (1 - h)(V-1)/2 exp( -bVzh). (B.7)
(see, for instance, Lebedev 1972, p. 119), and the important particular cases
a = 1/2 and a = 3/2:
(B.8)
E[Z1J = - 1
2y'1f
11 Jh
0
dh - h)(v-1)/2
-(1 100
0
exp (-Zh)
-
2u
exp (-b
--
2
2u) du
--;
ffu
therefore,
E[Z1J = - 1 11 - 1 ( b )
dh (1 - h)(V-1)/2_ -- -1/2 2K1/ 2(bVzh)
2y'1f Jh J2 Jdi
11 Jh
0
=-1 dh
-(1- h) (v-1)/2 -y'1f exp( -by/zh),
J
2y'1f 0 b
using (B.7). Remembering that E(Z) = AE(Zd, the last expression is pre-
cisely the righthand side of (B.7).
.
References
Postscript #5
A further discussion of this paper and perspectives in Mathematical finance
are found in H. Geman's contribution [0) at the beginning of this monograph.