Practice With Purpose
Practice With Purpose
WITH PURPOSE
The Emerging Science of
Teacher Expertise
www.deansforimpact.org
About
PRACTICE WITH PURPOSE
T he goal of this document is to connect the principles of deliberate practice to their practical
implications for teacher preparation and professional development. These principles are the result
of research in the science of expertise: the systematic study of individuals who excel in a given field.
Deliberate practice is practice that is purposeful and designed to maximize improvement. This type of
practice has proven useful in improving performance across a range of fields, and several of its principles
can help inform how teacher-preparation programs should prepare future educators. The phrase
“deliberate practice” is used to refer to activities meant to improve teaching that are based in principles
derived from research and outlined in this document.
Beginning (or preservice) teacher preparation cannot produce experts immediately. In fact, developing true
expertise likely takes more hours than any teacher-preparation program can possibly provide. But novice
teachers who have had the opportunity to practice deliberately are on the path to being ready to teach as they
begin their careers, and to develop deeper expertise over time. Our hope is that this document will serve as
a useful starting point for leaders in teacher education – including deans, teacher-educators, and others – to
analyze the design of their programs in relationship to deliberate-practice principles.
Practice with Purpose explores an area of research that is still developing, and has only recently been applied
to teaching. Moreover, deliberate practice is only one of many critical features of effective teacher preparation.
And we recognize that other groups and organizations, such as TeachingWorks and the Core Practice
Consortium, are leading efforts to identify specific competencies as well as pedagogies of teacher education
that draw upon deliberate-practice principles. Deans for Impact believes deliberate practice should play a
central role in preparing future educators for the challenging work ahead of them.
Practice with Purpose was developed by member deans of Deans for Impact in close collaboration with Anders
Ericsson, professor of psychology and researcher of expertise at Florida State University; Sarah Scott Frank,
teacher-educator and founder of Open Literacy; Dylan Kane, high school math teacher in Leadville, Colorado;
and Kristine Schutz, literacy researcher and teacher-educator at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
The present version of this document may be cited as:
Deans for Impact (2016). Practice with Purpose: The Emerging Science of Teacher Expertise.
Austin, TX: Deans for Impact.
NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY
A lthough deliberate practice can be used by any educator to improve their skills, the focus
of this document is on novice teachers. We use “novice” and “novice teacher” to refer
to both preservice teachers and early-career teachers. We use “teacher-candidate” to refer
specifically to individuals in teacher-preparation programs who are not yet licensed to teach.
We use “teacher-educator” to refer to full-time faculty of teacher-preparation programs,
and “cooperating teacher” to refer to practicing classroom teachers who serve as mentors
to teacher-candidates. We use “student” to refer to K-12 students taught in classrooms of
teachers or teacher-candidates.
T HE FI V E P RI N C I PL ES O F D EL I B ER ATE PR ACTI C E
These principles can shape the design of clinical experiences, student teaching, and ongoing professional
development to maximize the growth of teachers. There are a number of factors that influence the
effectiveness of a novice teacher, and deliberate practice is not the only method for preparing teachers.
But deliberate practice is one aspect of teacher preparation that programs have control over, and it can
be the starting point for programmatic redesign.
The following pages examine how the principles of deliberate practice can be applied to develop
teaching skill. Each principle is (1) mapped to a set of practical implications for teacher-preparation
programs; (2) illustrated in the context of a teacher-preparation program; and (3) tied to a set of questions
for programs to use to evaluate whether teacher-candidates are practicing deliberately.
1
Grossman, Compton, Igra, Ronfeldt, 3
Birman et al., 2007;
Shahan, & Williamson, 2009; Zeichner, 2012 Rivkin, Hanushek & Kain, 2005
2
Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993 4
Ericsson & Pool, 2016
D E A N S F O R I M P A C T I Practi ce w i th Pur po se 3
PRACTICE
WITH PURPOSE
5
Ericsson & Pool, 2016
6
Ball & Forzani, 2009
7
Ericsson & Pool, 2016
D E A N S F O R I M P A C T I Practi ce w i th Pur po se 5
PRACTICE
WITH PURPOSE
8
Ericsson, 2006 10
Ericsson & Pool, 2016
9
Ericsson, 2006 11
Ericsson & Pool, 2016
Are clear and specific goals established and agreed upon by all parties
– including all cooperating teachers and teacher-educators – who are
involved in designing a novice teacher’s opportunities for practice?
Can clear measures be established to track progress against these goals?
Do cooperating teachers and teacher-educators provide specific,
actionable feedback related to these goals?
D E A N S F O R I M P A C T I Practi ce w i th Pur po se 7
PRACTICE
WITH PURPOSE
An approximation of teaching
imitates a classroom situation
and provides opportunities for
practice similar to actual teaching
experiences – but with lower stakes.15
12
Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993 14
Grossman et al., 2009
13
Grossman et al., 2009 15
Grossman et al., 2009
16
Kazemi, Ghousseini, Cunard, & Turrou, 2015; Lampert et al., 2013
D E A N S F O R I M P A C T I Practi ce w i th Pur po se 9
PRACTICE
WITH PURPOSE
Respond to Feedback
17
Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993 19
Shute, 2008
18
Shute, 2008 20
Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993
Respond to Feedback
ILLUSTRATION
OF THIS PRINCIPLE IN PRACTICE
Susan, a cooperating teacher working with a university-based teacher-prep-
aration program, has been mentoring teacher-candidates for 20 years. She
typically gave feedback to teacher-candidates based on goals the candidates
individually identified, or those that came up during their student-teaching
experiences.
The program Susan works with is revamping their approach to feedback. Susan
meets with teacher-educators in the program to learn the goals they have for
teacher-candidates, such as leading a whole-group discussion and managing
group work. Susan agrees to share feedback she gives relative to these goals
with teacher-educators at the university so that all parties know the areas that
teacher-candidates are working to improve.
Susan then meets with Pascal, a teacher-candidate she is mentoring, to set
a schedule of regular feedback meetings and make a concrete plan for how
Pascal will implement Susan’s feedback on specific skills. To better focus her
feedback, Susan begins videotaping sections of Pascal’s lessons relevant to his
goals so that they can watch the video in meetings after class and talk about
how he can improve. Teacher-educators at the university use what they learn
from Susan’s feedback to Pascal to inform areas they focus on in their courses,
and provide additional opportunities to practice through simulations with
other novice teachers.
D E A N S F O R I M P A C T I Practi ce w i th Pur po se 11
PRACTICE
WITH PURPOSE
21
Ericsson & Pool, 2016 24
Deans for Impact, 2015
22
Ericsson & Pool, 2016 25
Black & Wiliam, 1998
23
Deans for Impact, 2015
Can novice teachers articulate how they will compare their ideas of
student learning with evidence of student learning?
D E A N S F O R I M P A C T I Practi ce w i th Pur po se 13
PRACTICE
WITH PURPOSE
Making a deliberate
commitment to improving teacher preparation
The five principles of deliberate practice outlined in this document can help individual programs improve the
coherence and effectiveness of the experiences they provide to teacher-candidates. An area for collective
action in the field of teacher preparation is to develop the prerequisites for two additional principles of
deliberate practice. These principles are essential to fields with well-developed methods of improvement.
Deliberate practice requires the use Teaching has not reached the consensus on
of established, effective training effective training techniques that are required
techniques, overseen by someone for deliberate practice.27
who is knowledgeable in that field.26 The development of a common language
for practice-based teacher preparation is an
important area of focus for teacher-educators.28
Deliberate practice builds skills in a care- Teaching has not reached consensus on
fully chosen order, ensuring that funda- specific foundational skills for novice teachers
mental skills are learned correctly early on, to learn early in their development, but this
work is underway and early efforts can be
and that elements of practice that teachers
used to improve practice.30
choose to improve build on each other.29
CALL TO ACTION
26
Ericsson & Pool, 2016 28
McDonald, Kazemi & Kavanagh, 2013; 29
Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993
27
Ball & Forzani, 2009 Grossman & McDonald, 2008 30
Ball & Forzani, 2011
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cunard, A., & Turrou,
and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of A. C. (2015). Getting inside rehearsals: Insights
Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511. from teacher educators to support work on
complex practice. Journal of Teacher Education:
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. (2011). Building a common core 0022487115615191.
for learning to teach, and connecting professional
learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17-21, Lampert, M., Franke, M., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H.,
38-39. Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe,
K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals
Birman, B. F., Le Floch, K. C., Klekotka, A., Ludwig, to support novice teacher learning of ambitious
M., Taylor, J., Walters, K. et al. (2007). State and teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226-
Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind 243.
Act. Volume II - Teacher Quality under NCLM:
Interim Report, US Department of Education, (ERIC McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013).
Document Reproduction Service No. ED497970). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher
education: A call for common language and
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education,
Raising standards through classroom assessment. 64(5), 378-386.
London: School of Education, King’s College.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005).
Deans for Impact (2015). The Science of Learning. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement.
Austin, TX: Deans for Impact. Econometric, 73(2), 417-458.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review
deliberate practice on the development of superior of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
expert performance. The Cambridge Handbook of
Expertise and Expert Performance, 683-703. Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward
practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). Education, 63(5), 376-382.
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of
expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3),
363-406.
D E A N S F O R I M P A C T I Practi ce w i th Pur po se 15
About
DEANS FOR IMPACT
F ounded in 2015, Deans for Impact is a national nonprofit organization representing leaders in
educator preparation who are committed to transforming educator preparation and elevating
the teaching profession. The organization is guided by four key principles:
Data-informed improvement;
Common outcomes measures;
Empirical validation of effectiveness; and
Transparency and accountability for results.
More information on the organization and its members can be found on the Deans for Impact website.
www.deansforimpact.org