Load Line Calculation For A Tanker Vessel: (A Case Study of MT Ailsa Craig 1 Vessel)
Load Line Calculation For A Tanker Vessel: (A Case Study of MT Ailsa Craig 1 Vessel)
ABSTRACT
All vessels are required to be surveyed and marked with permanent load line in accordance with the International Convention on
Load Lines, 1966 as modified in 1988. The principal purpose of load line calculation is to ensure that the ship always has sufficient
reserve buoyancy and intact stability when proceeding to sea (Load Lines, 2002). Sufficient intact stability means compliance with
standards recommended by the relevant flag state administration or those of classification societies taking into account the ship’s
size and type. A brief review of load line calculations, major features, and principal purposes of load lines for a tanker vessel were
considered. Major conditions of freeboard application to all tanker vessels are discussed. The required load line calculation was
carried out with a case study of MT AILSA CRAIG 1 of full displacement at summer 309,204MT. The following results were obtained
using appropriate formulae; summer mark = 5204mm, tropical freeboard= 487mm above the summer mark, fresh water freeboard
= 523.7mm above the summer mark, tropical freshwater =1011mm above summer mark, winter = 487mm below the summer mark
and winter North Atlantic = 437mm below the winter mark. Note the diameter of the disc is 300mm, thickness of the lines is 25.mm
and the distance from the centre of the disc to freeboard lines is 540mm. hence these values were calculated with respect to the load
line rules and regulations.
Keywords: load line, tanker vessel, reserves buoyancy, freeboard, overloading, validation, semi-empirical
1. INTRODUCTION
The potential dangers of overloading a tanker ship have been recognized by the maritime world and
international laws to be catastrophic. Taking an overloaded ship to sea has been a criminal offence in most of
the developed part of the world like Britain for over one hundred years.
At the annual meeting of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers held in 1920, a paper on the
Rules and Regulations for Freeboard was presented. At that time a compulsory load line bill which was
confidently expected to become law was under consideration by Congress. In this paper the development of
load line regulations was traced, and the report of the British Load Line Committee 1913-1915 was dealt with
at some length, but since the United States Load Line Committee 1919-1921 had not completed its
investigations, only a brief mention of its work could properly be made. Now that load line legislation is an
accomplished fact, the load line question becomes important to the various shipping interests, and it was
considered that a further contribution to our Transactions which 'dealt with the recent International Load Line
Convention and the preparatory work for that conference would be of interest to the members of this Society.
In order to provide the essential background for a proper understanding of the Convention it appears desirable
to first make some reference to the work of various load line committees during the last decade, each of which
contributed to laying the foundation for the International Load Line Convention, 1930.(Board of Trade 1906)
Ships designed specifically to carry bulk liquid cargoes are generally referred to as tankers. Tankers are
commonly associated with the carriage of oil, but a wide variety of liquids are carried in smaller tank vessels
and there are a considerable number of larger tank vessels dedicated to carrying chemicals in bulk.
Load Line is a special mark positioned amidships. All vessels of 24 meters and more are required to have this
Load line mark at the centre of the length of summer load water line. The fundamental purpose of a Load Line
is to allot a maximum legal limit up to which a ship can be loaded. By prescribing such limits, the risk of
having the vessel sailing with inadequate freeboard and buoyancy can be limited. A vessel should have
sufficient freeboard at all times. Any exceptions made will result to stability problem and create excessive
stress on the ship’s hull. This is where load lines play an important role, as it makes the task of detecting
whether the vessel is over-loaded or not. (ICLL, 1966)
However, since the buoyancy and immersion of the vessel largely depends on the type of water and its density,
it is not practical to define a standard freeboard limit for the ship at all times. For this reason, the convention
has put regulations which divide the world into different geographical zones each having different prescribed
load line. For example, a vessel sailing in winter on North Atlantic Ocean will have a greater freeboard than
on a voyage in Tropical Zones and Fresh waters. Standard load line marking (This is applicable to all types of
vessels). (Chemcode, 1971) And Timber load line markings (This is applicable to vessels carrying timber
cargo) are the basic two types of load line markings. These marks shall be punched on the surface of the hull
making it visible even if the ship side paint fades out. The marks shall again be painted with white or yellow
color on a dark background / black on a light background.
Breadth 55.0m
Depth 28.55m
Total height 65.51m
Parallel body Loaded:194.05M/Ballast:175.
55m
Max. 19.467M/19.872M
draft(summer/tropical)
Gross/Net tonnage 150,340/82,795 tons
Deadweight(summer) 274,990MT (270,647LT)
Displacement full load ( 309,204/316367 MT
summer/trop)
Light weight 34,214MT
This is due to the corresponding increase in the underwater volume, so freeboard must be increased in order
to maintain the reserve buoyancy which amounts to the same percentage of the greater displaced volume as
it would have been had when the CB is 0.68.
If CB >0∙68
∆
CB = 2
𝐿 ×𝐵×𝑑
Correction for CB is obtained as; 3
CB + 0 ∙ 68
CB =
1 ∙ 36
Where: ∆ = 𝑡ℎ 𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑡 𝑑
L = freeboard length
B = breadth
35×∆
Also, coefficient of fineness is given as, C = L ×B ×d 4
Depth Correction
The standard ship has L/D ratio of 15. If the L/D ratio is less than 15, which is usually the case, the freeboard
is increased. If the L/D ratio is greater than 15, then the freeboard may be reduced provided that the ship has
an enclosed superstructure covering at least 0∙6L amidship, a complete trunk or a combination of detached
enclosed superstructures and trunks which extends all fore and aft. (Group of Authorities, 1980)
L
Correction factor = (D − 15 ) R 6
L
Where: 15 = standard depth
Trunk:-A trunk may be considered as a structure having equivalent bulkhead strength as that of a
superstructure that opens directly into the space below the freeboard deck and having an average width of at
least 60%of the ship at the position in which they are situated.
Correction Factor
Height of trunk = h+ ℎ𝑐 – ℎ𝑟𝑐 9
h = actual height of the trunk
ℎ𝑐 = actual hatch coaming height
ℎ𝑟𝑐 = required hatch coaming height
hcmx =ℎ𝑟𝑐
Bow Height Correction
When the vessel is floating to the summer load at its design trim, a minimum allowable bow height must be
maintained. To ensure that the minimum bow height requirements are met, the assigned summer freeboard for
a vessel must be increased.
The following formulae are used to determine the minimum bow height (HB) measured at the forward
perpendicular at the summer waterline.
𝐿 1∙36
HB= 56𝐿 (1 − 500) × C mm, if L< 250𝑚 10
B +0∙68
1∙36
HB= 7000 × C mm, if L≥ 250m
B +0∙68
𝐿 1∙36
HB= 0 ∙ 672𝐿 (1 − 16400) × C mm, if L< 820𝑓𝑡
B +0∙68
1∙36
HB= 275 ∙ 6 × C mm, if L≥ 820ft
B +0∙68
Where:
L is the length of the vessel in feet or meters
Deckline Correction: Where the actual depth to the upper edge of the deck line is greater or less than Df, the
difference between the depth is to be added to or deducted from the freeboard.
Straight line chamber
𝑆
Deck line correction= 𝐶 ( 𝐼𝑠 + 𝑡
) 11
𝑐 + 𝑡
Parabola chamber
I +𝑆𝑠 + 𝑡 2
Deck line correction = ( C ) −𝐶 12
IC
Where:
C = camber(𝑚𝑚 𝑜𝑟 o𝑚)
IC = Length of camber in the moulded half breadth of the vessel
A typical set of freeboard marks is shown in Figure S is the summer watermark for water of 1.025t/m3 density.
It is determined by the Department for Transport (DfT) Tabulated Freeboard values, based on the vessel’s
freeboard length and various corrections. It is placed at the summer load water line (draft moulded).
Where:
T is the Tropical watermark and is 1/48 of the summer load draft above the S mark.
F is the Fresh watermark and F watermark is W/(4×TP𝐶𝑠𝑤 ) or 1/48 of the Summer load draft above the S
mark. W and TP𝐶𝑠𝑤 are values applicable at the summer load water line.
TF is the Tropical Fresh watermark and is the (T+F) marks above the S mark.
W is the winter watermark. It is 1/48 of the summer load draft below the S mark.
WNA is the Winter North Atlantic watermark. It is not marked on the ship sides for a vessel equal to or more
than 100 m freeboard length. If the vessel is less than 100 m floodable length, then the WNA is placed 50mm
below the W mark. Hence WNA is (W-50mm)
The loadlines and freeboard deck line must be painted in white or yellow on a dark background, or in black
on a light coloured background. The letters on each side of the load Line disc, indicating the assigning
authority, should be 115 mm in height and 75 mm in width.
Seasonal allowances depend on a DfT World zone map (at rear of their freeboard Regulations) and on three
factors, these three factors being:
Time of year.
Geographical location of the ship.
LBP the ship, relative to a demarcation value of 100 m.
𝐺𝑍
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝜃 = 𝑀𝑍
GZ
𝜃 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1 (MZ)
G Z L1
W L
W1
B B1
G the centre of gravity as shown in the fig. below, the righting lever and thus the righting moment will be
zero. The angle of heel at which this occurs is known as the angle of loll. (Society of Naval Architects and
Marine Engineers, 1988)
Hence, Angle of loll may be defined as the angle to which a ship with negative initial metacentric height will
lie at rest in still water. If the ship should have to be inclined at an angle greater than the angle of loll, as shown
in Fig. C above, the righting lever will be positive, giving a moment to return the ship to the angle of loll.
When the vessel is wall-sided between the upright and inclined waterlines, the GZ may be found using the
formula;
1
GZ= 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝜃 (𝐺𝑀 + 2 𝐵𝑀𝑡𝑎𝑛2 𝜃) 23
At the angle of loll;
GZ= 0
∴ either sin𝜃= 0
1
Or (𝐺𝑀 + 2 𝐵𝑀𝑡𝑎𝑛2 𝜃) = 0
sin𝜃 = 0
𝜃=0
But the angle of loll cannot be zero, therefore;
1
(𝐺𝑀 + 2 𝐵𝑀𝑡𝑎𝑛2 𝜃) = 0 24
1
𝐵𝑀𝑡𝑎𝑛2 𝜃 = −𝐺𝑀
2
−2𝐺𝑀
𝑡𝑎𝑛2 𝜃 = 𝐵𝑀 25
−2𝐺𝑀
tan 𝜃 = √ 𝐵𝑀
The angle of loll is caused by the negative GM, therefore;
−2(−𝐺𝑀)
tan 𝜃 = √ 26
𝐵𝑀
2𝐺𝑀
tan 𝜃 = √ 𝐵𝑀
2𝐺𝑀
𝜃 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1 (√ 𝐵𝑀 ) 27
Where 𝜃 = 𝐴𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑜𝑙𝑙
GM = A negative initial metacentric height
BM = The BM when upright
2.4.3 Angle of List
‘G’ the centroid of the loaded weight, has moved off the centre line due to a shift of cargo or bilging effects,
says to the portside of the ship or starboard side.GM is positive when the G is below ‘M’. In fact, GM will
increase at the angle of list compared to GM when the ship is upright. (Tupper, 2002)
In heavy weather conditions, the ship will roll about this fixed angle of list, say 3 0 P, but will stop at 30 S. to
bring the ship back to upright, load weight on the other side of the ship, for example if she list 30P add weight
onto starboard side of ship. (ICLL, 1966)
𝐹𝑊𝐴 4680
For FWA = x 360 = x 360 = 59.0
28571 28571
4193
For TF = 𝑇𝐹⁄28571 𝑥 360 = 28571
𝑥 360 = 52.8
5691
For W = 𝑤⁄23367 𝑥 360 = 𝑥 360 = 71.7
28571
𝑊𝑁𝐴 6128
For WNA = 𝑥 360 = 𝑥 360 = 77.
28571 28571
Calculations for KB, KM and BM at a different draft due to change in water lines.
Table 4 Result of BM, KB and KM
Load line marks Draft BM KB KM
(m) (m) (m) (m)
Summer 23.367 10.79 11.68 22.47
Tropical 23.854 10.57 11.93 22.57
FWA 23.891 10.55 11.95 22.50
TF 24.378 10.34 12.19 22.53
W 22.880 11.02 11.44 22.46
WNA 22.443 11.23 11.22 22.45
𝑑 𝐵2
KB = 2 , BM = 12𝑋𝑑 , KM = KB + BM
𝑑𝑆 23.367
KBS = = = 11.68m
2 2
𝐵2 552
BMS = =12𝑥23.367 = 10.79m
𝑑𝑠
𝑑𝐹𝑊𝐴 23.891
KBFWA= = = 11.95m
2 2
𝐵2 552
BMFWA = 12𝑥𝑑 = 12 𝑥23.891 = 10.55m
𝐹𝑊𝐴
𝐵2 552
BMTF = 12 𝑥 𝑑 = 12 𝑥24.378 = 10.34
𝑇𝐹
𝐵2 552
BMW = 12𝑑 = 12 𝑥22.880 = 11.02m
𝑤
𝐵2 552
BMWNA = 12 𝑥𝑑 = 12 𝑥 22.443 = 11.33m
𝑊𝑁𝐴
300mm
5204mm
TF
F
1011mm
T
523.7mm
487mm
L R S
487mm
W
540mm 437mm
WNA
230mm
450mm
3.1 SUMMARY
The design of load line marks on a vessel is a complex and important practice. Over some decades ago, records
of ships flooding and damages were made. This is due to some errors resulting from the computation of
freeboard or load line marks.
In order to correct or reduce these loss and expenses, the idea of freeboard computation becomes necessary.
Every sailing ships needs to be surveyed so as to know if it has the necessary loadline marks marked on the
body at the mid ship region. This is because sailing ships travel from on geographical area to another, from
one water body to another and as well travel in summer winter, tropical season to another.
In this, project, some mathematical models or equations were discussed which will provide adequate
knowledge of load line to the designer and provide adequate and reserve buoyancy to the ship and to keep the
ship afloat irrespective of the weather condition.
Also, the design of freeboard is obtained from the correction of ship’s hull form, such as, the tabulated
freeboard reduction, block coefficient correction, depth correction sheer correction and superstructure
deduction.
3.2 CONCLUSION
In order to design an adequate freeboard that can withstand and remain afloat and largely dry on its decks
under any weather condition, I ensured that all the necessary corrections in regards to the vessel’s safety were
made and requirement were also met. The required load line marks are represented in table and pie chart as
shown in chapter four.
3.3 RECOMMENDATION
The calculation and design of freeboard of tanker ship is very important in order for the ship to have reserve
buoyancy and remain afloat at any sea weather condition for the safety of the crew (officers and cadet) and of
the ship.
Safety of the ship by
1. Avoiding grounding,
2. Avoiding overloading
3. Avoiding damage condition
4. Having adequate structural strength
5. Having enough reserve buoyancy
6. Meet the regulatory standard
I hereby recommend that before any ship whether of type ‘A’ or ‘B’ be cleared to sail in both international
and inland water ways, the regulatory body should ensure that the ship meets all the standard and calculation
above.
References
Chemcode. (1971). Code for the construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous in Bulk Resolution A.
212(XII). London: IMCO.
Clark, I. C. (2002). The Management of Merchant Ship Stabilities, Trim and Strenght. London: Nautical Institute.
Group of Authorities. (1980). Ship Design and Constructiion. New York: Society of Naval Architects and Marine
Engineers.
Harold and Norton F. (1942). Principles of Naval Architecture. New York: SNAME.
Peter Y. and John K. (2001). ship stability third edition. London: Dr C.B.Barrass.
Rawson K.J. and Tupper E.C. (2001). Basic Ship theory. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. (1988). The Coastwise Load Line Act of 1935. Principles of Naval
Architects, Public law 93-115.
Vassalos D, Hamamoto M, Papanikolau A and Molyneux D. . (2000). Contemprory ideas on ship stability. Oxford:
Elsevier.