AkkaJava PDF
AkkaJava PDF
Release 2.4.20
Lightbend Inc
1 Security Announcements 1
1.1 Receiving Security Advisories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Reporting Vulnerabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.3 Security Related Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.4 Fixed Security Vulnerabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 Introduction 4
2.1 What is Akka? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Why Akka? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 Getting Started . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4 The Obligatory Hello World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.5 Use-case and Deployment Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.6 Examples of use-cases for Akka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3 General 13
3.1 Terminology, Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.2 Actor Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.3 What is an Actor? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.4 Supervision and Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.5 Actor References, Paths and Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.6 Location Transparency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.7 Akka and the Java Memory Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.8 Message Delivery Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3.9 Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4 Actors 102
4.1 Actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
4.2 Typed Actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
4.3 Fault Tolerance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
4.4 Dispatchers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
4.5 Mailboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
4.6 Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
4.7 Building Finite State Machine Actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
4.8 Persistence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
4.9 Persistence - Schema Evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
4.10 Persistence Query . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
4.11 Persistence Query for LevelDB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
4.12 Testing Actor Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
i
6 Futures and Agents 330
6.1 Futures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
6.2 Agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
7 Networking 340
7.1 Cluster Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
7.2 Cluster Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
7.3 Cluster Singleton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
7.4 Distributed Publish Subscribe in Cluster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369
7.5 Cluster Client . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
7.6 Cluster Sharding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378
7.7 Cluster Metrics Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389
7.8 Distributed Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396
7.9 Remoting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416
7.10 Remoting (codename Artery) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427
7.11 Serialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442
7.12 I/O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448
7.13 Using TCP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450
7.14 Using UDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 461
7.15 Camel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465
8 Utilities 478
8.1 Event Bus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478
8.2 Logging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485
8.3 Scheduler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492
8.4 Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494
8.5 Circuit Breaker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496
8.6 Akka Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
8.7 Use-case and Deployment Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503
9 Streams 505
9.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505
9.2 Quick Start Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506
9.3 Reactive Tweets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 508
9.4 Design Principles behind Akka Streams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513
9.5 Basics and working with Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516
9.6 Working with Graphs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 523
9.7 Modularity, Composition and Hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
9.8 Buffers and working with rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 546
9.9 Dynamic stream handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 549
9.10 Custom stream processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554
9.11 Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 574
9.12 Error Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 588
9.13 Working with streaming IO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 590
9.14 Pipelining and Parallelism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593
9.15 Testing streams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596
9.16 Overview of built-in stages and their semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 599
9.17 Streams Cookbook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 624
9.18 Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 638
9.19 Migration Guide 1.0 to 2.x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 640
9.20 Migration Guide 2.0.x to 2.4.x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 640
ii
12.1 Multi Node Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650
12.2 Actors (Java with Lambda Support) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 655
12.3 FSM (Java with Lambda Support) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 675
12.4 Persistence Query . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 684
12.5 External Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 694
iii
CHAPTER
ONE
SECURITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
The best way to receive any and all security announcements is to subscribe to the Akka security list.
The mailing list is very low traffic, and receives notifications only after security reports have been managed by the
core team and fixes are publicly available.
We strongly encourage people to report such problems to our private security mailing list first, before disclosing
them in a public forum.
Following best practice, we strongly encourage anyone to report potential security vulnerabilities to secu-
[email protected] before disclosing them in a public forum like the mailing list or as a Github issue.
Reports to this email address will be handled by our security team, who will work together with you to ensure that
a fix can be provided without delay.
• disable-java-serializer-scala
• remote-deployment-whitelist-scala
• remote-security-scala
Date
10 Feburary 2017
Description of Vulnerability
An attacker that can connect to an ActorSystem exposed via Akka Remote over TCP can gain remote code
execution capabilities in the context of the JVM process that runs the ActorSystem if:
• JavaSerializer is enabled (default in Akka 2.4.x)
1
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Severity
Affected Versions
Fixed Versions
We have prepared patches for the affected versions, and have released the following versions which resolve the
issue:
• Akka 2.4.17 (Scala 2.11, 2.12)
Binary and source compatibility has been maintained for the patched releases so the upgrade procedure is as
simple as changing the library dependency.
It will also be fixed in 2.5-M2 or 2.5.0-RC1.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Alvaro Munoz at Hewlett Packard Enterprise Security & Adrian Bravo at Workday for
their thorough investigation and bringing this issue to our attention.
Date
9 August 2017
Description of Vulnerability
Apache Camel’s Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE, as described in
CVE-2017-5643
To protect against such attacks the system should be updated to Akka 2.4.20, 2.5.4 or later. Dependencies to
Camel libraries should be updated to version 2.7.17.
Severity
Affected Versions
Fixed Versions
We have prepared patches for the affected versions, and have released the following versions which resolve the
issue:
• Akka 2.4.20 (Scala 2.11, 2.12)
• Akka 2.5.4 (Scala 2.11, 2.12)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Thomas Szymanski for bringing this issue to our attention.
TWO
INTRODUCTION
Actors
Fault Tolerance
4
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Location Transparency
Everything in Akka is designed to work in a distributed environment: all interactions of actors use pure message
passing and everything is asynchronous.
For an overview of the cluster support see the Java and Scala documentation chapters.
Persistence
State changes experienced by an actor can optionally be persisted and replayed when the actor is started or
restarted. This allows actors to recover their state, even after JVM crashes or when being migrated to another
node.
You can find more details in the respective chapter for Java or Scala.
Akka is a toolkit, not a framework: you integrate it into your build like any other library without having to follow
a particular source code layout. When expressing your systems as collaborating Actors you may feel pushed more
towards proper encapsulation of internal state, you may find that there is a natural separation between business
logic and inter-component communication.
Akka applications are typically deployed as follows:
• as a library: used as a regular JAR on the classpath or in a web app.
• packaged with sbt-native-packager.
• packaged and deployed using Lightbend ConductR.
Akka is available from Lightbend Inc. under a commercial license which includes development or production
support, read more here.
2.2.1 What features can the Akka platform offer, over the competition?
You can choose to include only the parts of Akka you need in your application. With CPUs growing more and
more cores every cycle, Akka is the alternative that provides outstanding performance even if you’re only running
it on one machine. Akka also supplies a wide array of concurrency-paradigms, allowing users to choose the right
tool for the job.
We see Akka being adopted by many large organizations in a big range of industries:
• Investment and Merchant Banking
• Retail
• Social Media
• Simulation
• Gaming and Betting
• Automobile and Traffic Systems
• Health Care
• Data Analytics
and much more. Any system with the need for high-throughput and low latency is a good candidate for using
Akka.
Actors let you manage service failures (Supervisors), load management (back-off strategies, timeouts and
processing-isolation), as well as both horizontal and vertical scalability (add more cores and/or add more ma-
chines).
Here’s what some of the Akka users have to say about how they are using Akka:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4493001/good-use-case-for-akka
All this in the ApacheV2-licensed open source project.
2.3.1 Prerequisites
Akka requires that you have Java 8 or later installed on your machine.
Lightbend Inc. provides a commercial build of Akka and related projects such as Scala or Play as part of the
Lightbend Reactive Platform which is made available for Java 6 in case your project can not upgrade to Java 8 just
yet. It also includes additional commercial features or libraries.
The best way to start learning Akka is to download Lightbend Activator and try out one of Akka Template Projects.
2.3.3 Download
There are several ways to download Akka. You can download it as part of the Lightbend Platform (as described
above). You can download the full distribution, which includes all modules. Or you can use a build tool like
Maven or SBT to download dependencies from the Akka Maven repository.
2.3.4 Modules
Akka is very modular and consists of several JARs containing different features.
• akka-actor – Classic Actors, Typed Actors, IO Actor etc.
• akka-agent – Agents, integrated with Scala STM
• akka-camel – Apache Camel integration
• akka-cluster – Cluster membership management, elastic routers.
• akka-osgi – Utilities for using Akka in OSGi containers
• akka-osgi-aries – Aries blueprint for provisioning actor systems
• akka-remote – Remote Actors
• akka-slf4j – SLF4J Logger (event bus listener)
• akka-stream – Reactive stream processing
• akka-testkit – Toolkit for testing Actor systems
In addition to these stable modules there are several which are on their way into the stable core but are still marked
“experimental” at this point. This does not mean that they do not function as intended, it primarily means that
their API has not yet solidified enough in order to be considered frozen. You can help accelerating this process by
giving feedback on these modules on our mailing list.
• akka-contrib – an assortment of contributions which may or may not be moved into core modules, see
External Contributions for more details.
The filename of the actual JAR is for example akka-actor_2.11-2.4.20.jar (and analog for the other
modules).
How to see the JARs dependencies of each Akka module is described in the Dependencies section.
Download the release you need from http://akka.io/downloads and unzip it.
The Akka nightly snapshots are published to http://repo.akka.io/snapshots/ and are versioned with both
SNAPSHOT and timestamps. You can choose a timestamped version to work with and can decide when to update
to a newer version.
Warning: The use of Akka SNAPSHOTs, nightlies and milestone releases is discouraged unless you know
what you are doing.
Akka can be used with build tools that support Maven repositories.
The simplest way to get started with Akka and Maven is to check out the Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka
Main in Java.
Since Akka is published to Maven Central (for versions since 2.1-M2), it is enough to add the Akka dependencies
to the POM. For example, here is the dependency for akka-actor:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-actor_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
Note: for snapshot versions both SNAPSHOT and timestamped versions are published.
The simplest way to get started with Akka and SBT is to use Lightbend Activator with one of the SBT templates.
Summary of the essential parts for using Akka with SBT:
SBT installation instructions on http://www.scala-sbt.org/release/tutorial/Setup.html
build.sbt file:
name := "My Project"
version := "1.0"
scalaVersion := "2.11.11"
libraryDependencies +=
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-actor" % "2.4.20"
Note: the libraryDependencies setting above is specific to SBT v0.12.x and higher. If you are using an older
version of SBT, the libraryDependencies should look like this:
libraryDependencies +=
"com.typesafe.akka" % "akka-actor_2.11" % "2.4.20"
repositories {
mavenCentral()
}
dependencies {
compile ’org.scala-lang:scala-library:2.11.11’
}
tasks.withType(ScalaCompile) {
scalaCompileOptions.useAnt = false
}
dependencies {
compile group: ’com.typesafe.akka’, name: ’akka-actor_2.11’, version: ’2.4.20’
compile group: ’org.scala-lang’, name: ’scala-library’, version: ’2.11.11’
}
Setup SBT project and then use sbteclipse to generate an Eclipse project.
Setup SBT project and then use sbt-idea to generate an IntelliJ IDEA project.
Setup SBT project and then use nbsbt to generate a NetBeans project.
You should also use nbscala for general scala support in the IDE.
Warning: Akka has not been compiled or tested with -optimize Scala compiler flag. Strange behavior has
been reported by users that have tried it.
If you have questions you can get help on the Akka Mailing List.
You can also ask for commercial support.
Thanks for being a part of the Akka community.
The actor based version of the tough problem of printing a well-known greeting to the console is introduced in a
Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka Main in Java.
The tutorial illustrates the generic launcher class akka.Main which expects only one command line argument:
the class name of the application’s main actor. This main method will then create the infrastructure needed for
running the actors, start the given main actor and arrange for the whole application to shut down once the main
actor terminates.
There is also another Lightbend Activator tutorial in the same problem domain that is named Hello Akka!. It
describes the basics of Akka in more depth.
sbt-native-packager is a tool for creating distributions of any type of application, including an Akka applications.
Define sbt version in project/build.properties file:
sbt.version=0.13.7
Use the package settings and optionally specify the mainClass in build.sbt file:
import NativePackagerHelper._
name := "akka-sample-main-scala"
version := "2.4.20"
scalaVersion := "2.11.8"
enablePlugins(JavaServerAppPackaging)
Note: Use the JavaServerAppPackaging. Don’t use the deprecated AkkaAppPackaging (previously
named packageArchetype.akka_application), since it doesn’t have the same flexibility and quality as
the JavaServerAppPackaging.
You can use both Akka remoting and Akka Cluster inside of Docker containers. But note that you will need to
take special care with the network configuration when using Docker, described here: remote-configuration-nat
For an example of how to set up a project using Akka Cluster and Docker take a look at the “akka-docker-cluster”
activator template.
We see Akka being adopted by many large organizations in a big range of industries all from investment and
merchant banking, retail and social media, simulation, gaming and betting, automobile and traffic systems, health
care, data analytics and much more. Any system that have the need for high-throughput and low latency is a good
candidate for using Akka.
There is a great discussion on use-cases for Akka with some good write-ups by production users here
2.6.1 Here are some of the areas where Akka is being deployed into production
Service REST, SOAP, Cometd, WebSockets etc Act as message hub / integration layer Scale up, scale
out, fault-tolerance / HA
Correct Simple to work with and understand Just add the jars to your existing JVM project (use Scala,
Java, Groovy or JRuby)
Simulation
Camel integration to hook up with batch data sources Actors divide and conquer the batch workloads
THREE
GENERAL
In this chapter we attempt to establish a common terminology to define a solid ground for communicating about
concurrent, distributed systems which Akka targets. Please note that, for many of these terms, there is no sin-
gle agreed definition. We simply seek to give working definitions that will be used in the scope of the Akka
documentation.
Concurrency and parallelism are related concepts, but there are small differences. Concurrency means that two or
more tasks are making progress even though they might not be executing simultaneously. This can for example
be realized with time slicing where parts of tasks are executed sequentially and mixed with parts of other tasks.
Parallelism on the other hand arise when the execution can be truly simultaneous.
A method call is considered synchronous if the caller cannot make progress until the method returns a value or
throws an exception. On the other hand, an asynchronous call allows the caller to progress after a finite number of
steps, and the completion of the method may be signalled via some additional mechanism (it might be a registered
callback, a Future, or a message).
A synchronous API may use blocking to implement synchrony, but this is not a necessity. A very CPU intensive
task might give a similar behavior as blocking. In general, it is preferred to use asynchronous APIs, as they
guarantee that the system is able to progress. Actors are asynchronous by nature: an actor can progress after a
message send without waiting for the actual delivery to happen.
We talk about blocking if the delay of one thread can indefinitely delay some of the other threads. A good example
is a resource which can be used exclusively by one thread using mutual exclusion. If a thread holds on to the
resource indefinitely (for example accidentally running an infinite loop) other threads waiting on the resource can
not progress. In contrast, non-blocking means that no thread is able to indefinitely delay others.
Non-blocking operations are preferred to blocking ones, as the overall progress of the system is not trivially
guaranteed when it contains blocking operations.
Deadlock arises when several participants are waiting on each other to reach a specific state to be able to progress.
As none of them can progress without some other participant to reach a certain state (a “Catch-22” problem) all
13
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
affected subsystems stall. Deadlock is closely related to blocking, as it is necessary that a participant thread be
able to delay the progression of other threads indefinitely.
In the case of deadlock, no participants can make progress, while in contrast Starvation happens, when there are
participants that can make progress, but there might be one or more that cannot. Typical scenario is the case
of a naive scheduling algorithm that always selects high-priority tasks over low-priority ones. If the number of
incoming high-priority tasks is constantly high enough, no low-priority ones will be ever finished.
Livelock is similar to deadlock as none of the participants make progress. The difference though is that instead
of being frozen in a state of waiting for others to progress, the participants continuously change their state. An
example scenario when two participants have two identical resources available. They each try to get the resource,
but they also check if the other needs the resource, too. If the resource is requested by the other participant, they
try to get the other instance of the resource. In the unfortunate case it might happen that the two participants
“bounce” between the two resources, never acquiring it, but always yielding to the other.
We call it a Race condition when an assumption about the ordering of a set of events might be violated by external
non-deterministic effects. Race conditions often arise when multiple threads have a shared mutable state, and the
operations of thread on the state might be interleaved causing unexpected behavior. While this is a common case,
shared state is not necessary to have race conditions. One example could be a client sending unordered packets
(e.g UDP datagrams) P1, P2 to a server. As the packets might potentially travel via different network routes, it
is possible that the server receives P2 first and P1 afterwards. If the messages contain no information about their
sending order it is impossible to determine by the server that they were sent in a different order. Depending on the
meaning of the packets this can cause race conditions.
Note: The only guarantee that Akka provides about messages sent between a given pair of actors is that their
order is always preserved. see Message Delivery Reliability
As discussed in the previous sections blocking is undesirable for several reasons, including the dangers of dead-
locks and reduced throughput in the system. In the following sections we discuss various non-blocking properties
with different strength.
Wait-freedom
A method is wait-free if every call is guaranteed to finish in a finite number of steps. If a method is bounded
wait-free then the number of steps has a finite upper bound.
From this definition it follows that wait-free methods are never blocking, therefore deadlock can not happen.
Additionally, as each participant can progress after a finite number of steps (when the call finishes), wait-free
methods are free of starvation.
Lock-freedom
Lock-freedom is a weaker property than wait-freedom. In the case of lock-free calls, infinitely often some method
finishes in a finite number of steps. This definition implies that no deadlock is possible for lock-free calls. On the
other hand, the guarantee that some call finishes in a finite number of steps is not enough to guarantee that all of
them eventually finish. In other words, lock-freedom is not enough to guarantee the lack of starvation.
Obstruction-freedom
Obstruction-freedom is the weakest non-blocking guarantee discussed here. A method is called obstruction-free if
there is a point in time after which it executes in isolation (other threads make no steps, e.g.: become suspended),
it finishes in a bounded number of steps. All lock-free objects are obstruction-free, but the opposite is generally
not true.
Optimistic concurrency control (OCC) methods are usually obstruction-free. The OCC approach is that every
participant tries to execute its operation on the shared object, but if a participant detects conflicts from others, it
rolls back the modifications, and tries again according to some schedule. If there is a point in time, where one of
the participants is the only one trying, the operation will succeed.
• The Art of Multiprocessor Programming, M. Herlihy and N Shavit, 2008. ISBN 978-0123705914
• Java Concurrency in Practice, B. Goetz, T. Peierls, J. Bloch, J. Bowbeer, D. Holmes and D. Lea, 2006.
ISBN 978-0321349606
Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages
which are placed into the recipient’s mailbox. In a sense, actors are the most stringent form of object-oriented
programming, but it serves better to view them as persons: while modeling a solution with actors, envision a group
of people and assign sub-tasks to them, arrange their functions into an organizational structure and think about
how to escalate failure (all with the benefit of not actually dealing with people, which means that we need not
concern ourselves with their emotional state or moral issues). The result can then serve as a mental scaffolding for
building the software implementation.
Note: An ActorSystem is a heavyweight structure that will allocate 1. . . N Threads, so create one per logical
application.
Like in an economic organization, actors naturally form hierarchies. One actor, which is to oversee a certain
function in the program might want to split up its task into smaller, more manageable pieces. For this purpose it
starts child actors which it supervises. While the details of supervision are explained here, we shall concentrate on
the underlying concepts in this section. The only prerequisite is to know that each actor has exactly one supervisor,
which is the actor that created it.
The quintessential feature of actor systems is that tasks are split up and delegated until they become small enough
to be handled in one piece. In doing so, not only is the task itself clearly structured, but the resulting actors can
be reasoned about in terms of which messages they should process, how they should react normally and how
failure should be handled. If one actor does not have the means for dealing with a certain situation, it sends a
corresponding failure message to its supervisor, asking for help. The recursive structure then allows to handle
failure at the right level.
Compare this to layered software design which easily devolves into defensive programming with the aim of not
leaking any failure out: if the problem is communicated to the right person, a better solution can be found than if
trying to keep everything “under the carpet”.
Now, the difficulty in designing such a system is how to decide who should supervise what. There is of course no
single best solution, but there are a few guidelines which might be helpful:
• If one actor manages the work another actor is doing, e.g. by passing on sub-tasks, then the manager should
supervise the child. The reason is that the manager knows which kind of failures are expected and how to
handle them.
• If one actor carries very important data (i.e. its state shall not be lost if avoidable), this actor should source
out any possibly dangerous sub-tasks to children it supervises and handle failures of these children as ap-
propriate. Depending on the nature of the requests, it may be best to create a new child for each request,
which simplifies state management for collecting the replies. This is known as the “Error Kernel Pattern”
from Erlang.
• If one actor depends on another actor for carrying out its duty, it should watch that other actor’s liveness
and act upon receiving a termination notice. This is different from supervision, as the watching party has
no influence on the supervisor strategy, and it should be noted that a functional dependency alone is not a
criterion for deciding where to place a certain child actor in the hierarchy.
There are of course always exceptions to these rules, but no matter whether you follow the rules or break them,
you should always have a reason.
The actor system as a collaborating ensemble of actors is the natural unit for managing shared facilities like
scheduling services, configuration, logging, etc. Several actor systems with different configuration may co-exist
within the same JVM without problems, there is no global shared state within Akka itself. Couple this with the
transparent communication between actor systems—within one node or across a network connection—to see that
actor systems themselves can be used as building blocks in a functional hierarchy.
1. Actors should be like nice co-workers: do their job efficiently without bothering everyone else needlessly
and avoid hogging resources. Translated to programming this means to process events and generate re-
sponses (or more requests) in an event-driven manner. Actors should not block (i.e. passively wait while
occupying a Thread) on some external entity—which might be a lock, a network socket, etc.—unless it is
unavoidable; in the latter case see below.
2. Do not pass mutable objects between actors. In order to ensure that, prefer immutable messages. If the
encapsulation of actors is broken by exposing their mutable state to the outside, you are back in normal Java
concurrency land with all the drawbacks.
3. Actors are made to be containers for behavior and state, embracing this means to not routinely send behavior
within messages (which may be tempting using Scala closures). One of the risks is to accidentally share
mutable state between actors, and this violation of the actor model unfortunately breaks all the properties
which make programming in actors such a nice experience.
4. Top-level actors are the innermost part of your Error Kernel, so create them sparingly and prefer truly
hierarchical systems. This has benefits with respect to fault-handling (both considering the granularity of
configuration and the performance) and it also reduces the strain on the guardian actor, which is a single
point of contention if over-used.
In some cases it is unavoidable to do blocking operations, i.e. to put a thread to sleep for an indeterminate
time, waiting for an external event to occur. Examples are legacy RDBMS drivers or messaging APIs, and the
underlying reason is typically that (network) I/O occurs under the covers. When facing this, you may be tempted
to just wrap the blocking call inside a Future and work with that instead, but this strategy is too simple: you are
quite likely to find bottlenecks or run out of memory or threads when the application runs under increased load.
The non-exhaustive list of adequate solutions to the “blocking problem” includes the following suggestions:
• Do the blocking call within an actor (or a set of actors managed by a router [Java, Scala]), making sure to
configure a thread pool which is either dedicated for this purpose or sufficiently sized.
• Do the blocking call within a Future, ensuring an upper bound on the number of such calls at any point in
time (submitting an unbounded number of tasks of this nature will exhaust your memory or thread limits).
• Do the blocking call within a Future, providing a thread pool with an upper limit on the number of threads
which is appropriate for the hardware on which the application runs.
• Dedicate a single thread to manage a set of blocking resources (e.g. a NIO selector driving multiple chan-
nels) and dispatch events as they occur as actor messages.
The first possibility is especially well-suited for resources which are single-threaded in nature, like database han-
dles which traditionally can only execute one outstanding query at a time and use internal synchronization to
ensure this. A common pattern is to create a router for N actors, each of which wraps a single DB connection and
handles queries as sent to the router. The number N must then be tuned for maximum throughput, which will vary
depending on which DBMS is deployed on what hardware.
Note: Configuring thread pools is a task best delegated to Akka, simply configure in the application.conf
and instantiate through an ActorSystem [Java, Scala]
An actor system manages the resources it is configured to use in order to run the actors which it contains. There
may be millions of actors within one such system, after all the mantra is to view them as abundant and they
weigh in at an overhead of only roughly 300 bytes per instance. Naturally, the exact order in which messages are
processed in large systems is not controllable by the application author, but this is also not intended. Take a step
back and relax while Akka does the heavy lifting under the hood.
The previous section about Actor Systems explained how actors form hierarchies and are the smallest unit when
building an application. This section looks at one such actor in isolation, explaining the concepts you encounter
while implementing it. For a more in depth reference with all the details please refer to Actors (Scala) and Untyped
Actors (Java).
An actor is a container for State, Behavior, a Mailbox, Child Actors and a Supervisor Strategy. All of this is
encapsulated behind an Actor Reference. One noteworthy aspect is that actors have an explicit lifecycle, they are
not automatically destroyed when no longer referenced; after having created one, it is your responsibility to make
sure that it will eventually be terminated as well—which also gives you control over how resources are released
When an Actor Terminates.
As detailed below, an actor object needs to be shielded from the outside in order to benefit from the actor model.
Therefore, actors are represented to the outside using actor references, which are objects that can be passed around
freely and without restriction. This split into inner and outer object enables transparency for all the desired
operations: restarting an actor without needing to update references elsewhere, placing the actual actor object on
remote hosts, sending messages to actors in completely different applications. But the most important aspect is
that it is not possible to look inside an actor and get hold of its state from the outside, unless the actor unwisely
publishes this information itself.
3.3.2 State
Actor objects will typically contain some variables which reflect possible states the actor may be in. This can be an
explicit state machine (e.g. using the fsm-scala module), or it could be a counter, set of listeners, pending requests,
etc. These data are what make an actor valuable, and they must be protected from corruption by other actors. The
good news is that Akka actors conceptually each have their own light-weight thread, which is completely shielded
from the rest of the system. This means that instead of having to synchronize access using locks you can just write
your actor code without worrying about concurrency at all.
Behind the scenes Akka will run sets of actors on sets of real threads, where typically many actors share one
thread, and subsequent invocations of one actor may end up being processed on different threads. Akka ensures
that this implementation detail does not affect the single-threadedness of handling the actor’s state.
Because the internal state is vital to an actor’s operations, having inconsistent state is fatal. Thus, when the actor
fails and is restarted by its supervisor, the state will be created from scratch, like upon first creating the actor. This
is to enable the ability of self-healing of the system.
Optionally, an actor’s state can be automatically recovered to the state before a restart by persisting received
messages and replaying them after restart (see persistence-scala).
3.3.3 Behavior
Every time a message is processed, it is matched against the current behavior of the actor. Behavior means a
function which defines the actions to be taken in reaction to the message at that point in time, say forward a
request if the client is authorized, deny it otherwise. This behavior may change over time, e.g. because different
clients obtain authorization over time, or because the actor may go into an “out-of-service” mode and later come
back. These changes are achieved by either encoding them in state variables which are read from the behavior
logic, or the function itself may be swapped out at runtime, see the become and unbecome operations. However,
the initial behavior defined during construction of the actor object is special in the sense that a restart of the actor
will reset its behavior to this initial one.
3.3.4 Mailbox
An actor’s purpose is the processing of messages, and these messages were sent to the actor from other actors (or
from outside the actor system). The piece which connects sender and receiver is the actor’s mailbox: each actor
has exactly one mailbox to which all senders enqueue their messages. Enqueuing happens in the time-order of
send operations, which means that messages sent from different actors may not have a defined order at runtime
due to the apparent randomness of distributing actors across threads. Sending multiple messages to the same target
from the same actor, on the other hand, will enqueue them in the same order.
There are different mailbox implementations to choose from, the default being a FIFO: the order of the messages
processed by the actor matches the order in which they were enqueued. This is usually a good default, but
applications may need to prioritize some messages over others. In this case, a priority mailbox will enqueue not
always at the end but at a position as given by the message priority, which might even be at the front. While using
such a queue, the order of messages processed will naturally be defined by the queue’s algorithm and in general
not be FIFO.
An important feature in which Akka differs from some other actor model implementations is that the current
behavior must always handle the next dequeued message, there is no scanning the mailbox for the next matching
one. Failure to handle a message will typically be treated as a failure, unless this behavior is overridden.
Each actor is potentially a supervisor: if it creates children for delegating sub-tasks, it will automatically supervise
them. The list of children is maintained within the actor’s context and the actor has access to it. Modifications to
the list are done by creating (context.actorOf(...)) or stopping (context.stop(child)) children
and these actions are reflected immediately. The actual creation and termination actions happen behind the scenes
in an asynchronous way, so they do not “block” their supervisor.
The final piece of an actor is its strategy for handling faults of its children. Fault handling is then done transparently
by Akka, applying one of the strategies described in Supervision and Monitoring for each incoming failure. As
this strategy is fundamental to how an actor system is structured, it cannot be changed once an actor has been
created.
Considering that there is only one such strategy for each actor, this means that if different strategies apply to
the various children of an actor, the children should be grouped beneath intermediate supervisors with matching
strategies, preferring once more the structuring of actor systems according to the splitting of tasks into sub-tasks.
Once an actor terminates, i.e. fails in a way which is not handled by a restart, stops itself or is stopped by its
supervisor, it will free up its resources, draining all remaining messages from its mailbox into the system’s “dead
letter mailbox” which will forward them to the EventStream as DeadLetters. The mailbox is then replaced within
the actor reference with a system mailbox, redirecting all new messages to the EventStream as DeadLetters. This
is done on a best effort basis, though, so do not rely on it in order to construct “guaranteed delivery”.
The reason for not just silently dumping the messages was inspired by our tests: we register the TestEventLis-
tener on the event bus to which the dead letters are forwarded, and that will log a warning for every dead letter
received—this has been very helpful for deciphering test failures more quickly. It is conceivable that this feature
may also be of use for other purposes.
This chapter outlines the concept behind supervision, the primitives offered and their semantics. For details on
how that translates into real code, please refer to the corresponding chapters for Scala and Java APIs.
As described in Actor Systems supervision describes a dependency relationship between actors: the supervisor
delegates tasks to subordinates and therefore must respond to their failures. When a subordinate detects a failure
(i.e. throws an exception), it suspends itself and all its subordinates and sends a message to its supervisor, signaling
failure. Depending on the nature of the work to be supervised and the nature of the failure, the supervisor has a
choice of the following four options:
1. Resume the subordinate, keeping its accumulated internal state
2. Restart the subordinate, clearing out its accumulated internal state
3. Stop the subordinate permanently
4. Escalate the failure, thereby failing itself
It is important to always view an actor as part of a supervision hierarchy, which explains the existence of the fourth
choice (as a supervisor also is subordinate to another supervisor higher up) and has implications on the first three:
resuming an actor resumes all its subordinates, restarting an actor entails restarting all its subordinates (but see
below for more details), similarly terminating an actor will also terminate all its subordinates. It should be noted
that the default behavior of the preRestart hook of the Actor class is to terminate all its children before
restarting, but this hook can be overridden; the recursive restart applies to all children left after this hook has been
executed.
Each supervisor is configured with a function translating all possible failure causes (i.e. exceptions) into one of
the four choices given above; notably, this function does not take the failed actor’s identity as an input. It is quite
easy to come up with examples of structures where this might not seem flexible enough, e.g. wishing for different
strategies to be applied to different subordinates. At this point it is vital to understand that supervision is about
forming a recursive fault handling structure. If you try to do too much at one level, it will become hard to reason
about, hence the recommended way in this case is to add a level of supervision.
Akka implements a specific form called “parental supervision”. Actors can only be created by other actors—where
the top-level actor is provided by the library—and each created actor is supervised by its parent. This restriction
makes the formation of actor supervision hierarchies implicit and encourages sound design decisions. It should
be noted that this also guarantees that actors cannot be orphaned or attached to supervisors from the outside,
which might otherwise catch them unawares. In addition, this yields a natural and clean shutdown procedure for
(sub-trees of) actor applications.
Warning: Supervision related parent-child communication happens by special system messages that have
their own mailboxes separate from user messages. This implies that supervision related events are not deter-
ministically ordered relative to ordinary messages. In general, the user cannot influence the order of normal
messages and failure notifications. For details and example see the Discussion: Message Ordering section.
An actor system will during its creation start at least three actors, shown in the image above. For more information
about the consequences for actor paths see Top-Level Scopes for Actor Paths.
The actor which is probably most interacted with is the parent of all user-created actors, the guardian named
"/user". Actors created using system.actorOf() are children of this actor. This means that when this
guardian terminates, all normal actors in the system will be shutdown, too. It also means that this guardian’s
supervisor strategy determines how the top-level normal actors are supervised. Since Akka 2.1 it is possible to
configure this using the setting akka.actor.guardian-supervisor-strategy, which takes the fully-
qualified class-name of a SupervisorStrategyConfigurator. When the guardian escalates a failure, the
root guardian’s response will be to terminate the guardian, which in effect will shut down the whole actor system.
This special guardian has been introduced in order to achieve an orderly shut-down sequence where logging re-
mains active while all normal actors terminate, even though logging itself is implemented using actors. This
is realized by having the system guardian watch the user guardian and initiate its own shut-down upon re-
ception of the Terminated message. The top-level system actors are supervised using a strategy which
will restart indefinitely upon all types of Exception except for ActorInitializationException and
ActorKilledException, which will terminate the child in question. All other throwables are escalated,
which will shut down the whole actor system.
The root guardian is the grand-parent of all so-called “top-level” actors and supervises all the special actors
mentioned in Top-Level Scopes for Actor Paths using the SupervisorStrategy.stoppingStrategy,
whose purpose is to terminate the child upon any type of Exception. All other throwables will be escalated
. . . but to whom? Since every real actor has a supervisor, the supervisor of the root guardian cannot be a real
actor. And because this means that it is “outside of the bubble”, it is called the “bubble-walker”. This is a
synthetic ActorRef which in effect stops its child upon the first sign of trouble and sets the actor system’s
isTerminated status to true as soon as the root guardian is fully terminated (all children recursively stopped).
When presented with an actor which failed while processing a certain message, causes for the failure fall into three
categories:
• Systematic (i.e. programming) error for the specific message received
• (Transient) failure of some external resource used during processing the message
• Corrupt internal state of the actor
Unless the failure is specifically recognizable, the third cause cannot be ruled out, which leads to the conclusion
that the internal state needs to be cleared out. If the supervisor decides that its other children or itself is not
affected by the corruption—e.g. because of conscious application of the error kernel pattern—it is therefore best
to restart the child. This is carried out by creating a new instance of the underlying Actor class and replacing
the failed instance with the fresh one inside the child’s ActorRef; the ability to do this is one of the reasons for
encapsulating actors within special references. The new actor then resumes processing its mailbox, meaning that
the restart is not visible outside of the actor itself with the notable exception that the message during which the
failure occurred is not re-processed.
The precise sequence of events during a restart is the following:
1. suspend the actor (which means that it will not process normal messages until resumed), and recursively
suspend all children
2. call the old instance’s preRestart hook (defaults to sending termination requests to all children and
calling postStop)
3. wait for all children which were requested to terminate (using context.stop()) during preRestart
to actually terminate; this—like all actor operations—is non-blocking, the termination notice from the last
killed child will effect the progression to the next step
4. create new actor instance by invoking the originally provided factory again
5. invoke postRestart on the new instance (which by default also calls preStart)
6. send restart request to all children which were not killed in step 3; restarted children will follow the same
process recursively, from step 2
7. resume the actor
In contrast to the special relationship between parent and child described above, each actor may monitor any other
actor. Since actors emerge from creation fully alive and restarts are not visible outside of the affected supervisors,
the only state change available for monitoring is the transition from alive to dead. Monitoring is thus used to tie
one actor to another so that it may react to the other actor’s termination, in contrast to supervision which reacts to
failure.
Lifecycle monitoring is implemented using a Terminated message to be received by the monitoring actor,
where the default behavior is to throw a special DeathPactException if not otherwise handled. In order to
start listening for Terminated messages, invoke ActorContext.watch(targetActorRef). To stop
listening, invoke ActorContext.unwatch(targetActorRef). One important property is that the mes-
sage will be delivered irrespective of the order in which the monitoring request and target’s termination occur, i.e.
you still get the message even if at the time of registration the target is already dead.
Monitoring is particularly useful if a supervisor cannot simply restart its children and has to terminate them, e.g.
in case of errors during actor initialization. In that case it should monitor those children and re-create them or
schedule itself to retry this at a later time.
Another common use case is that an actor needs to fail in the absence of an external resource, which may also be
one of its own children. If a third party terminates a child by way of the system.stop(child) method or
sending a PoisonPill, the supervisor might well be affected.
system.actorOf(supervisorProps, "echoSupervisor");
Using a randomFactor to add a little bit of additional variance to the backoff intervals is highly recommended,
in order to avoid multiple actors re-start at the exact same point in time, for example because they were stopped
due to a shared resource such as a database going down and re-starting after the same configured interval. By
adding additional randomness to the re-start intervals the actors will start in slightly different points in time, thus
avoiding large spikes of traffic hitting the recovering shared database or other resource that they all need to contact.
The akka.pattern.BackoffSupervisor actor can also be configured to restart the actor after a delay
when the actor crashes and the supervision strategy decides that it should restart.
The following Scala snippet shows how to create a backoff supervisor which will start the given echo actor after
it has crashed because of some exception, in increasing intervals of 3, 6, 12, 24 and finally 30 seconds:
1 A failure can be indicated in two different ways; by an actor stopping or crashing.
system.actorOf(supervisorProps, "echoSupervisor");
The akka.pattern.BackoffOptions can be used to customize the behavior of the back-off supervisor
actor, below are some examples:
val supervisor = BackoffSupervisor.props(
Backoff.onStop(
childProps,
childName = "myEcho",
minBackoff = 3.seconds,
maxBackoff = 30.seconds,
randomFactor = 0.2 // adds 20% "noise" to vary the intervals slightly
).withManualReset // the child must send BackoffSupervisor.Reset to its parent
.withDefaultStoppingStrategy // Stop at any Exception thrown
)
The above code sets up a back-off supervisor that requires the child actor to send a
akka.pattern.BackoffSupervisor.Reset message to its parent when a message is successfully
processed, resetting the back-off. It also uses a default stopping strategy, any exception will cause the child to
stop.
val supervisor = BackoffSupervisor.props(
Backoff.onFailure(
childProps,
childName = "myEcho",
minBackoff = 3.seconds,
maxBackoff = 30.seconds,
randomFactor = 0.2 // adds 20% "noise" to vary the intervals slightly
).withAutoReset(10.seconds) // the child must send BackoffSupervisor.Reset to its parent
.withSupervisorStrategy(
OneForOneStrategy() {
case _: MyException => SupervisorStrategy.Restart
case _ => SupervisorStrategy.Escalate
}))
The above code sets up a back-off supervisor that restarts the child after back-off if MyException is thrown, any
other exception will be escalated. The back-off is automatically reset if the child does not throw any errors within
10 seconds.
There are two classes of supervision strategies which come with Akka: OneForOneStrategy and
AllForOneStrategy. Both are configured with a mapping from exception type to supervision directive (see
above) and limits on how often a child is allowed to fail before terminating it. The difference between them is that
the former applies the obtained directive only to the failed child, whereas the latter applies it to all siblings as well.
Normally, you should use the OneForOneStrategy, which also is the default if none is specified explicitly.
The AllForOneStrategy is applicable in cases where the ensemble of children has such tight dependencies
among them, that a failure of one child affects the function of the others, i.e. they are inextricably linked. Since
a restart does not clear out the mailbox, it often is best to terminate the children upon failure and re-create them
explicitly from the supervisor (by watching the children’s lifecycle); otherwise you have to make sure that it is no
problem for any of the actors to receive a message which was queued before the restart but processed afterwards.
Normally stopping a child (i.e. not in response to a failure) will not automatically terminate the other children
in an all-for-one strategy; this can easily be done by watching their lifecycle: if the Terminated message is
not handled by the supervisor, it will throw a DeathPactException which (depending on its supervisor) will
restart it, and the default preRestart action will terminate all children. Of course this can be handled explicitly
as well.
Please note that creating one-off actors from an all-for-one supervisor entails that failures escalated by the tempo-
rary actor will affect all the permanent ones. If this is not desired, install an intermediate supervisor; this can very
easily be done by declaring a router of size 1 for the worker, see routing-scala or Routing.
This chapter describes how actors are identified and located within a possibly distributed actor system. It ties into
the central idea that Actor Systems form intrinsic supervision hierarchies as well as that communication between
actors is transparent with respect to their placement across multiple network nodes.
The above image displays the relationship between the most important entities within an actor system, please read
on for the details.
An actor reference is a subtype of ActorRef, whose foremost purpose is to support sending messages to the
actor it represents. Each actor has access to its canonical (local) reference through the self field; this reference
is also included as sender reference by default for all messages sent to other actors. Conversely, during message
processing the actor has access to a reference representing the sender of the current message through the sender
method.
There are several different types of actor references that are supported depending on the configuration of the actor
system:
• Purely local actor references are used by actor systems which are not configured to support networking
functions. These actor references will not function if sent across a network connection to a remote JVM.
• Local actor references when remoting is enabled are used by actor systems which support networking func-
tions for those references which represent actors within the same JVM. In order to also be reachable when
sent to other network nodes, these references include protocol and remote addressing information.
• There is a subtype of local actor references which is used for routers (i.e. actors mixing in the Router
trait). Its logical structure is the same as for the aforementioned local references, but sending a message to
them dispatches to one of their children directly instead.
• Remote actor references represent actors which are reachable using remote communication, i.e. sending
messages to them will serialize the messages transparently and send them to the remote JVM.
• There are several special types of actor references which behave like local actor references for all practical
purposes:
– PromiseActorRef is the special representation of a Promise for the purpose of being completed
by the response from an actor. akka.pattern.ask creates this actor reference.
– DeadLetterActorRef is the default implementation of the dead letters service to which Akka
routes all messages whose destinations are shut down or non-existent.
– EmptyLocalActorRef is what Akka returns when looking up a non-existent local actor path: it
is equivalent to a DeadLetterActorRef, but it retains its path so that Akka can send it over the
network and compare it to other existing actor references for that path, some of which might have been
obtained before the actor died.
• And then there are some one-off internal implementations which you should never really see:
– There is an actor reference which does not represent an actor but acts only as a pseudo-supervisor for
the root guardian, we call it “the one who walks the bubbles of space-time”.
– The first logging service started before actually firing up actor creation facilities is a fake
actor reference which accepts log events and prints them directly to standard output; it is
Logging.StandardOutLogger.
Since actors are created in a strictly hierarchical fashion, there exists a unique sequence of actor names given by
recursively following the supervision links between child and parent down towards the root of the actor system.
This sequence can be seen as enclosing folders in a file system, hence we adopted the name “path” to refer to it,
although actor hierarchy has some fundamental difference from file system hierarchy.
An actor path consists of an anchor, which identifies the actor system, followed by the concatenation of the path
elements, from root guardian to the designated actor; the path elements are the names of the traversed actors and
are separated by slashes.
An actor reference designates a single actor and the life-cycle of the reference matches that actor’s life-cycle; an
actor path represents a name which may or may not be inhabited by an actor and the path itself does not have a
life-cycle, it never becomes invalid. You can create an actor path without creating an actor, but you cannot create
an actor reference without creating corresponding actor.
You can create an actor, terminate it, and then create a new actor with the same actor path. The newly created
actor is a new incarnation of the actor. It is not the same actor. An actor reference to the old incarnation is not
valid for the new incarnation. Messages sent to the old actor reference will not be delivered to the new incarnation
even though they have the same path.
Each actor path has an address component, describing the protocol and location by which the corresponding actor
is reachable, followed by the names of the actors in the hierarchy from the root up. Examples are:
"akka://my-sys/user/service-a/worker1" // purely local
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:5678/user/service-b" // remote
Here, akka.tcp is the default remote transport for the 2.4 release; other transports are pluggable. The inter-
pretation of the host and port part (i.e. host.example.com:5678 in the example) depends on the transport
mechanism used, but it must abide by the URI structural rules.
The unique path obtained by following the parental supervision links towards the root guardian is called the logical
actor path. This path matches exactly the creation ancestry of an actor, so it is completely deterministic as soon as
the actor system’s remoting configuration (and with it the address component of the path) is set.
While the logical actor path describes the functional location within one actor system, configuration-based remote
deployment means that an actor may be created on a different network host than its parent, i.e. within a different
actor system. In this case, following the actor path from the root guardian up entails traversing the network, which
is a costly operation. Therefore, each actor also has a physical path, starting at the root guardian of the actor
system where the actual actor object resides. Using this path as sender reference when querying other actors will
let them reply directly to this actor, minimizing delays incurred by routing.
One important aspect is that a physical actor path never spans multiple actor systems or JVMs. This means that
the logical path (supervision hierarchy) and the physical path (actor deployment) of an actor may diverge if one
of its ancestors is remotely supervised.
As in some real file-systems you might think of a “path alias” or “symbolic link” for an actor, i.e. one actor
may be reachable using more than one path. However, you should note that actor hierarchy is different from file
system hierarchy. You cannot freely create actor paths like symbolic links to refer to arbitrary actors. As described
in the above logical and physical actor path sections, an actor path must be either logical path which represents
supervision hierarchy, or physical path which represents actor deployment.
There are two general categories to how actor references may be obtained: by creating actors or by looking them
up, where the latter functionality comes in the two flavours of creating actor references from concrete actor paths
and querying the logical actor hierarchy.
Creating Actors
An actor system is typically started by creating actors beneath the guardian actor using the
ActorSystem.actorOf method and then using ActorContext.actorOf from within the created
actors to spawn the actor tree. These methods return a reference to the newly created actor. Each actor has direct
access (through its ActorContext) to references for its parent, itself and its children. These references may be
sent within messages to other actors, enabling those to reply directly.
In addition, actor references may be looked up using the ActorSystem.actorSelection method. The
selection can be used for communicating with said actor and the actor corresponding to the selection is looked up
when delivering each message.
To acquire an ActorRef that is bound to the life-cycle of a specific actor you need to send a message, such as
the built-in Identify message, to the actor and use the sender() reference of a reply from the actor.
Absolute paths may of course also be looked up on context in the usual way, i.e.
context.actorSelection("/user/serviceA") ! msg
Since the actor system forms a file-system like hierarchy, matching on paths is possible in the same way as sup-
ported by Unix shells: you may replace (parts of) path element names with wildcards («*» and «?») to formulate
a selection which may match zero or more actual actors. Because the result is not a single actor reference, it has a
different type ActorSelection and does not support the full set of operations an ActorRef does. Selections
may be formulated using the ActorSystem.actorSelection and ActorContext.actorSelection
methods and do support sending messages:
context.actorSelection("../*") ! msg
will send msg to all siblings including the current actor. As for references obtained using actorSelection, a traversal
of the supervision hierarchy is done in order to perform the message send. As the exact set of actors which match
a selection may change even while a message is making its way to the recipients, it is not possible to watch a
selection for liveliness changes. In order to do that, resolve the uncertainty by sending a request and gathering all
answers, extracting the sender references, and then watch all discovered concrete actors. This scheme of resolving
a selection may be improved upon in a future release.
Note: What the above sections described in some detail can be summarized and memorized easily as follows:
• actorOf only ever creates a new actor, and it creates it as a direct child of the context on which this method
is invoked (which may be any actor or actor system).
• actorSelection only ever looks up existing actors when messages are delivered, i.e. does not create
actors, or verify existence of actors when the selection is created.
Equality of ActorRef match the intention that an ActorRef corresponds to the target actor incarnation. Two
actor references are compared equal when they have the same path and point to the same actor incarnation. A
reference pointing to a terminated actor does not compare equal to a reference pointing to another (re-created)
actor with the same path. Note that a restart of an actor caused by a failure still means that it is the same actor
incarnation, i.e. a restart is not visible for the consumer of the ActorRef.
If you need to keep track of actor references in a collection and do not care about the exact actor incarnation you
can use the ActorPath as key, because the identifier of the target actor is not taken into account when comparing
actor paths.
When an actor is terminated, its reference will point to the dead letter mailbox, DeathWatch will publish its
final transition and in general it is not expected to come back to life again (since the actor life cycle does not
allow this). While it is possible to create an actor at a later time with an identical path—simply due to it being
impossible to enforce the opposite without keeping the set of all actors ever created available—this is not good
practice: messages sent with actorSelection to an actor which “died” suddenly start to work again, but
without any guarantee of ordering between this transition and any other event, hence the new inhabitant of the
path may receive messages which were destined for the previous tenant.
It may be the right thing to do in very specific circumstances, but make sure to confine the handling of this precisely
to the actor’s supervisor, because that is the only actor which can reliably detect proper deregistration of the name,
before which creation of the new child will fail.
It may also be required during testing, when the test subject depends on being instantiated at a specific path. In
that case it is best to mock its supervisor so that it will forward the Terminated message to the appropriate point in
the test procedure, enabling the latter to await proper deregistration of the name.
When an actor creates a child, the actor system’s deployer will decide whether the new actor resides in the same
JVM or on another node. In the second case, creation of the actor will be triggered via a network connection to
happen in a different JVM and consequently within a different actor system. The remote system will place the
new actor below a special path reserved for this purpose and the supervisor of the new actor will be a remote actor
reference (representing that actor which triggered its creation). In this case, context.parent (the supervisor
reference) and context.path.parent (the parent node in the actor’s path) do not represent the same actor.
However, looking up the child’s name within the supervisor will find it on the remote node, preserving logical
structure e.g. when sending to an unresolved actor reference.
When sending an actor reference across the network, it is represented by its path. Hence, the path must fully
encode all information necessary to send messages to the underlying actor. This is achieved by encoding protocol,
host and port in the address part of the path string. When an actor system receives an actor path from a remote
node, it checks whether that path’s address matches the address of this actor system, in which case it will be
resolved to the actor’s local reference. Otherwise, it will be represented by a remote actor reference.
At the root of the path hierarchy resides the root guardian above which all other actors are found; its name is "/".
The next level consists of the following:
• "/user" is the guardian actor for all user-created top-level actors; actors created using
ActorSystem.actorOf are found below this one.
• "/system" is the guardian actor for all system-created top-level actors, e.g. logging listeners or actors
automatically deployed by configuration at the start of the actor system.
• "/deadLetters" is the dead letter actor, which is where all messages sent to stopped or non-existing
actors are re-routed (on a best-effort basis: messages may be lost even within the local JVM).
• "/temp" is the guardian for all short-lived system-created actors, e.g. those which are used in the imple-
mentation of ActorRef.ask.
• "/remote" is an artificial path below which all actors reside whose supervisors are remote actor references
The need to structure the name space for actors like this arises from a central and very simple design goal:
everything in the hierarchy is an actor, and all actors function in the same way. Hence you can not only look
up the actors you created, you can also look up the system guardian and send it a message (which it will dutifully
discard in this case). This powerful principle means that there are no quirks to remember, it makes the whole
system more uniform and consistent.
If you want to read more about the top-level structure of an actor system, have a look at The Top-Level Supervisors.
The previous section describes how actor paths are used to enable location transparency. This special feature
deserves some extra explanation, because the related term “transparent remoting” was used quite differently in the
context of programming languages, platforms and technologies.
Everything in Akka is designed to work in a distributed setting: all interactions of actors use purely message
passing and everything is asynchronous. This effort has been undertaken to ensure that all functions are available
equally when running within a single JVM or on a cluster of hundreds of machines. The key for enabling this
is to go from remote to local by way of optimization instead of trying to go from local to remote by way of
generalization. See this classic paper for a detailed discussion on why the second approach is bound to fail.
What is true of Akka need not be true of the application which uses it, since designing for distributed execution
poses some restrictions on what is possible. The most obvious one is that all messages sent over the wire must be
serializable. While being a little less obvious this includes closures which are used as actor factories (i.e. within
Props) if the actor is to be created on a remote node.
Another consequence is that everything needs to be aware of all interactions being fully asynchronous, which in
a computer network might mean that it may take several minutes for a message to reach its recipient (depending
on configuration). It also means that the probability for a message to be lost is much higher than within one JVM,
where it is close to zero (still: no hard guarantee!).
We took the idea of transparency to the limit in that there is nearly no API for the remoting layer of Akka: it is
purely driven by configuration. Just write your application according to the principles outlined in the previous
sections, then specify remote deployment of actor sub-trees in the configuration file. This way, your application
can be scaled out without having to touch the code. The only piece of the API which allows programmatic
influence on remote deployment is that Props contain a field which may be set to a specific Deploy instance; this
has the same effect as putting an equivalent deployment into the configuration file (if both are given, configuration
file wins).
Akka Remoting is a communication module for connecting actor systems in a peer-to-peer fashion, and it is the
foundation for Akka Clustering. The design of remoting is driven by two (related) design decisions:
1. Communication between involved systems is symmetric: if a system A can connect to a system B then
system B must also be able to connect to system A independently.
2. The role of the communicating systems are symmetric in regards to connection patterns: there is no system
that only accepts connections, and there is no system that only initiates connections.
The consequence of these decisions is that it is not possible to safely create pure client-server setups with prede-
fined roles (violates assumption 2). For client-server setups it is better to use HTTP or Akka I/O.
Important: Using setups involving Network Address Translation, Load Balancers or Docker containers violates
assumption 1, unless additional steps are taken in the network configuration to allow symmetric communication
between involved systems. In such situations Akka can be configured to bind to a different network address than
the one used for establishing connections between Akka nodes. See remote-configuration-nat.
In addition to being able to run different parts of an actor system on different nodes of a cluster, it is also possible
to scale up onto more cores by multiplying actor sub-trees which support parallelization (think for example a
search engine processing different queries in parallel). The clones can then be routed to in different fashions, e.g.
round-robin. The only thing necessary to achieve this is that the developer needs to declare a certain actor as
“withRouter”, then—in its stead—a router actor will be created which will spawn up a configurable number of
children of the desired type and route to them in the configured fashion. Once such a router has been declared, its
configuration can be freely overridden from the configuration file, including mixing it with the remote deployment
of (some of) the children. Read more about this in Routing (Scala) and Routing (Java).
A major benefit of using the Lightbend Platform, including Scala and Akka, is that it simplifies the process of writ-
ing concurrent software. This article discusses how the Lightbend Platform, and Akka in particular, approaches
shared memory in concurrent applications.
Prior to Java 5, the Java Memory Model (JMM) was ill defined. It was possible to get all kinds of strange results
when shared memory was accessed by multiple threads, such as:
• a thread not seeing values written by other threads: a visibility problem
• a thread observing ‘impossible’ behavior of other threads, caused by instructions not being executed in the
order expected: an instruction reordering problem.
With the implementation of JSR 133 in Java 5, a lot of these issues have been resolved. The JMM is a set of rules
based on the “happens-before” relation, which constrain when one memory access must happen before another,
and conversely, when they are allowed to happen out of order. Two examples of these rules are:
• The monitor lock rule: a release of a lock happens before every subsequent acquire of the same lock.
• The volatile variable rule: a write of a volatile variable happens before every subsequent read of the same
volatile variable
Although the JMM can seem complicated, the specification tries to find a balance between ease of use and the
ability to write performant and scalable concurrent data structures.
With the Actors implementation in Akka, there are two ways multiple threads can execute actions on shared
memory:
• if a message is sent to an actor (e.g. by another actor). In most cases messages are immutable, but if
that message is not a properly constructed immutable object, without a “happens before” rule, it would be
possible for the receiver to see partially initialized data structures and possibly even values out of thin air
(longs/doubles).
• if an actor makes changes to its internal state while processing a message, and accesses that state while
processing another message moments later. It is important to realize that with the actor model you don’t get
any guarantee that the same thread will be executing the same actor for different messages.
To prevent visibility and reordering problems on actors, Akka guarantees the following two “happens before”
rules:
• The actor send rule: the send of the message to an actor happens before the receive of that message by the
same actor.
• The actor subsequent processing rule: processing of one message happens before processing of the next
message by the same actor.
Note: In layman’s terms this means that changes to internal fields of the actor are visible when the next message
is processed by that actor. So fields in your actor need not be volatile or equivalent.
Both rules only apply for the same actor instance and are not valid if different actors are used.
The completion of a Future “happens before” the invocation of any callbacks registered to it are executed.
We recommend not to close over non-final fields (final in Java and val in Scala), and if you do choose to close
over non-final fields, they must be marked volatile in order for the current value of the field to be visible to the
callback.
If you close over a reference, you must also ensure that the instance that is referred to is thread safe. We highly
recommend staying away from objects that use locking, since it can introduce performance problems and in the
worst case, deadlocks. Such are the perils of synchronized.
Since Akka runs on the JVM there are still some rules to be followed.
• Closing over internal Actor state and exposing it to other threads
class MyActor extends Actor {
var state = ...
def receive = {
case _ =>
//Wrongs
//Rights
• Messages should be immutable, this is to avoid the shared mutable state trap.
Akka helps you build reliable applications which make use of multiple processor cores in one machine (“scaling
up”) or distributed across a computer network (“scaling out”). The key abstraction to make this work is that all
interactions between your code units—actors—happen via message passing, which is why the precise semantics
of how messages are passed between actors deserve their own chapter.
In order to give some context to the discussion below, consider an application which spans multiple network hosts.
The basic mechanism for communication is the same whether sending to an actor on the local JVM or to a remote
actor, but of course there will be observable differences in the latency of delivery (possibly also depending on the
bandwidth of the network link and the message size) and the reliability. In case of a remote message send there
are obviously more steps involved which means that more can go wrong. Another aspect is that local sending will
just pass a reference to the message inside the same JVM, without any restrictions on the underlying object which
is sent, whereas a remote transport will place a limit on the message size.
Writing your actors such that every interaction could possibly be remote is the safe, pessimistic bet. It means to
only rely on those properties which are always guaranteed and which are discussed in detail below. This has of
course some overhead in the actor’s implementation. If you are willing to sacrifice full location transparency—for
example in case of a group of closely collaborating actors—you can place them always on the same JVM and
enjoy stricter guarantees on message delivery. The details of this trade-off are discussed further below.
As a supplementary part we give a few pointers at how to build stronger reliability on top of the built-in ones. The
chapter closes by discussing the role of the “Dead Letter Office”.
These are the rules for message sends (i.e. the tell or ! method, which also underlies the ask pattern):
• at-most-once delivery, i.e. no guaranteed delivery
• message ordering per sender–receiver pair
The first rule is typically found also in other actor implementations while the second is specific to Akka.
When it comes to describing the semantics of a delivery mechanism, there are three basic categories:
• at-most-once delivery means that for each message handed to the mechanism, that message is delivered
zero or one times; in more casual terms it means that messages may be lost.
• at-least-once delivery means that for each message handed to the mechanism potentially multiple attempts
are made at delivering it, such that at least one succeeds; again, in more casual terms this means that
messages may be duplicated but not lost.
• exactly-once delivery means that for each message handed to the mechanism exactly one delivery is made
to the recipient; the message can neither be lost nor duplicated.
The first one is the cheapest—highest performance, least implementation overhead—because it can be done in
a fire-and-forget fashion without keeping state at the sending end or in the transport mechanism. The second
one requires retries to counter transport losses, which means keeping state at the sending end and having an
acknowledgement mechanism at the receiving end. The third is most expensive—and has consequently worst
performance—because in addition to the second it requires state to be kept at the receiving end in order to filter
out duplicate deliveries.
At the core of the problem lies the question what exactly this guarantee shall mean:
1. The message is sent out on the network?
The rule more specifically is that for a given pair of actors, messages sent directly from the first to the second will
not be received out-of-order. The word directly emphasizes that this guarantee only applies when sending with
the tell operator to the final destination, not when employing mediators or other message dissemination features
(unless stated otherwise).
The guarantee is illustrated in the following:
Actor A1 sends messages M1, M2, M3 to A2
Actor A3 sends messages M4, M5, M6 to A2
This means that:
1. If M1 is delivered it must be delivered before M2 and M3
2. If M2 is delivered it must be delivered before M3
3. If M4 is delivered it must be delivered before M5 and M6
4. If M5 is delivered it must be delivered before M6
5. A2 can see messages from A1 interleaved with messages from A3
6. Since there is no guaranteed delivery, any of the messages may be dropped, i.e. not arrive
at A2
Note: It is important to note that Akka’s guarantee applies to the order in which messages are enqueued into the
recipient’s mailbox. If the mailbox implementation does not respect FIFO order (e.g. a PriorityMailbox),
then the order of processing by the actor can deviate from the enqueueing order.
Note: Actor creation is treated as a message sent from the parent to the child, with the same semantics as discussed
above. Sending a message to an actor in a way which could be reordered with this initial creation message means
that the message might not arrive because the actor does not exist yet. An example where the message might arrive
too early would be to create a remote-deployed actor R1, send its reference to another remote actor R2 and have
R2 send a message to R1. An example of well-defined ordering is a parent which creates an actor and immediately
sends a message to it.
Communication of failure
Please note, that the ordering guarantees discussed above only hold for user messages between actors. Failure
of a child of an actor is communicated by special system messages that are not ordered relative to ordinary user
messages. In particular:
Child actor C sends message M to its parent P
Child actor fails with failure F
Parent actor P might receive the two events either in order M, F or F, M
The reason for this is that internal system messages has their own mailboxes therefore the ordering of enqueue
calls of a user and system message cannot guarantee the ordering of their dequeue times.
Relying on the stronger reliability in this section is not recommended since it will bind your application to local-
only deployment: an application may have to be designed differently (as opposed to just employing some message
exchange patterns local to some actors) in order to be fit for running on a cluster of machines. Our credo is “design
once, deploy any way you wish”, and to achieve this you should only rely on The General Rules.
The Akka test suite relies on not losing messages in the local context (and for non-error condition tests also for
remote deployment), meaning that we actually do apply the best effort to keep our tests stable. A local tell
operation can however fail for the same reasons as a normal method call can on the JVM:
• StackOverflowError
• OutOfMemoryError
• other VirtualMachineError
In addition, local sends can fail in Akka-specific ways:
• if the mailbox does not accept the message (e.g. full BoundedMailbox)
• if the receiving actor fails while processing the message or is already terminated
While the first is clearly a matter of configuration the second deserves some thought: the sender of a message does
not get feedback if there was an exception while processing, that notification goes to the supervisor instead. This
is in general not distinguishable from a lost message for an outside observer.
Assuming strict FIFO mailboxes the aforementioned caveat of non-transitivity of the message ordering guarantee
is eliminated under certain conditions. As you will note, these are quite subtle as it stands, and it is even possible
that future performance optimizations will invalidate this whole paragraph. The possibly non-exhaustive list of
counter-indications is:
• Before receiving the first reply from a top-level actor, there is a lock which protects an internal interim
queue, and this lock is not fair; the implication is that enqueue requests from different senders which arrive
during the actor’s construction (figuratively, the details are more involved) may be reordered depending on
low-level thread scheduling. Since completely fair locks do not exist on the JVM this is unfixable.
• The same mechanism is used during the construction of a Router, more precisely the routed ActorRef, hence
the same problem exists for actors deployed with Routers.
• As mentioned above, the problem occurs anywhere a lock is involved during enqueueing, which may also
apply to custom mailboxes.
This list has been compiled carefully, but other problematic scenarios may have escaped our analysis.
The rule that for a given pair of actors, messages sent directly from the first to the second will not be received
out-of-order holds for messages sent over the network with the TCP based Akka remote transport protocol.
As explained in the previous section local message sends obey transitive causal ordering under certain conditions.
This ordering can be violated due to different message delivery latencies. For example:
Actor A on node-1 sends message M1 to actor C on node-3
Actor A on node-1 then sends message M2 to actor B on node-2
Actor B on node-2 forwards message M2 to actor C on node-3
Actor C may receive M1 and M2 in any order
It might take longer time for M1 to “travel” to node-3 than it takes for M2 to “travel” to node-3 via node-2.
Based on a small and consistent tool set in Akka’s core, Akka also provides powerful, higher-level abstractions on
top it.
Messaging Patterns
As discussed above a straight-forward answer to the requirement of reliable delivery is an explicit ACK–RETRY
protocol. In its simplest form this requires
• a way to identify individual messages to correlate message with acknowledgement
• a retry mechanism which will resend messages if not acknowledged in time
• a way for the receiver to detect and discard duplicates
The third becomes necessary by virtue of the acknowledgements not being guaranteed to arrive either. An ACK-
RETRY protocol with business-level acknowledgements is supported by at-least-once-delivery-scala of the Akka
Persistence module. Duplicates can be detected by tracking the identifiers of messages sent via at-least-once-
delivery-scala. Another way of implementing the third part would be to make processing the messages idempotent
on the level of the business logic.
Another example of implementing all three requirements is shown at Reliable Proxy Pattern (which is now super-
seded by at-least-once-delivery-scala).
Event Sourcing
Event sourcing (and sharding) is what makes large websites scale to billions of users, and the idea is quite simple:
when a component (think actor) processes a command it will generate a list of events representing the effect of
the command. These events are stored in addition to being applied to the component’s state. The nice thing about
this scheme is that events only ever are appended to the storage, nothing is ever mutated; this enables perfect
replication and scaling of consumers of this event stream (i.e. other components may consume the event stream as
a means to replicate the component’s state on a different continent or to react to changes). If the component’s state
is lost—due to a machine failure or by being pushed out of a cache—it can easily be reconstructed by replaying
the event stream (usually employing snapshots to speed up the process). event-sourcing-scala is supported by
Akka Persistence.
By implementing a custom mailbox type it is possible to retry message processing at the receiving actor’s end
in order to handle temporary failures. This pattern is mostly useful in the local communication context where
delivery guarantees are otherwise sufficient to fulfill the application’s requirements.
Please note that the caveats for The Rules for In-JVM (Local) Message Sends do apply.
An example implementation of this pattern is shown at Mailbox with Explicit Acknowledgement.
Messages which cannot be delivered (and for which this can be ascertained) will be delivered to a synthetic actor
called /deadLetters. This delivery happens on a best-effort basis; it may fail even within the local JVM (e.g.
during actor termination). Messages sent via unreliable network transports will be lost without turning up as dead
letters.
The main use of this facility is for debugging, especially if an actor send does not arrive consistently (where
usually inspecting the dead letters will tell you that the sender or recipient was set wrong somewhere along the
way). In order to be useful for this purpose it is good practice to avoid sending to deadLetters where possible, i.e.
run your application with a suitable dead letter logger (see more below) from time to time and clean up the log
output. This exercise—like all else—requires judicious application of common sense: it may well be that avoiding
to send to a terminated actor complicates the sender’s code more than is gained in debug output clarity.
The dead letter service follows the same rules with respect to delivery guarantees as all other message sends, hence
it cannot be used to implement guaranteed delivery.
An actor can subscribe to class akka.actor.DeadLetter on the event stream, see Event Stream (Java) or
event-stream-scala (Scala) for how to do that. The subscribed actor will then receive all dead letters published
in the (local) system from that point onwards. Dead letters are not propagated over the network, if you want to
collect them in one place you will have to subscribe one actor per network node and forward them manually. Also
consider that dead letters are generated at that node which can determine that a send operation is failed, which for
a remote send can be the local system (if no network connection can be established) or the remote one (if the actor
you are sending to does not exist at that point in time).
Every time an actor does not terminate by its own decision, there is a chance that some messages which it sends
to itself are lost. There is one which happens quite easily in complex shutdown scenarios that is usually benign:
seeing a akka.dispatch.Terminate message dropped means that two termination requests were given, but
of course only one can succeed. In the same vein, you might see akka.actor.Terminated messages from
children while stopping a hierarchy of actors turning up in dead letters if the parent is still watching the child when
the parent terminates.
3.9 Configuration
You can start using Akka without defining any configuration, since sensible default values are provided. Later on
you might need to amend the settings to change the default behavior or adapt for specific runtime environments.
Typical examples of settings that you might amend:
• log level and logger backend
• enable remoting
• message serializers
• definition of routers
• tuning of dispatchers
Akka uses the Typesafe Config Library, which might also be a good choice for the configuration of your own ap-
plication or library built with or without Akka. This library is implemented in Java with no external dependencies;
you should have a look at its documentation (in particular about ConfigFactory), which is only summarized in the
following.
Warning: If you use Akka from the Scala REPL from the 2.9.x series, and you do not provide your own
ClassLoader to the ActorSystem, start the REPL with “-Yrepl-sync” to work around a deficiency in the REPLs
provided Context ClassLoader.
All configuration for Akka is held within instances of ActorSystem, or put differently, as viewed from
the outside, ActorSystem is the only consumer of configuration information. While constructing an ac-
tor system, you can either pass in a Config object or not, where the second case is equivalent to passing
ConfigFactory.load() (with the right class loader). This means roughly that the default is to parse all
application.conf, application.json and application.properties found at the root of the
class path—please refer to the aforementioned documentation for details. The actor system then merges in all
reference.conf resources found at the root of the class path to form the fallback configuration, i.e. it inter-
nally uses
appConfig.withFallback(ConfigFactory.defaultReference(classLoader))
The philosophy is that code never contains default values, but instead relies upon their presence in the
reference.conf supplied with the library in question.
Highest precedence is given to overrides given as system properties, see the HOCON specification (near the
bottom). Also noteworthy is that the application configuration—which defaults to application—may be
overridden using the config.resource property (there are more, please refer to the Config docs).
Note: If you are writing an Akka application, keep you configuration in application.conf at the root of
the class path. If you are writing an Akka-based library, keep its configuration in reference.conf at the root
of the JAR file.
3.9. Configuration 38
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Warning: Akka’s configuration approach relies heavily on the notion of every module/jar having its own
reference.conf file, all of these will be discovered by the configuration and loaded. Unfortunately this also
means that if you put/merge multiple jars into the same jar, you need to merge all the reference.confs as well.
Otherwise all defaults will be lost and Akka will not function.
If you are using Maven to package your application, you can also make use of the Apache Maven Shade Plugin
support for Resource Transformers to merge all the reference.confs on the build classpath into one.
The plugin configuration might look like this:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.5</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shade</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<shadedArtifactAttached>true</shadedArtifactAttached>
<shadedClassifierName>allinone</shadedClassifierName>
<artifactSet>
<includes>
<include>*:*</include>
</includes>
</artifactSet>
<transformers>
<transformer
implementation="org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.resource.AppendingTransformer">
<resource>reference.conf</resource>
</transformer>
<transformer
implementation="org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.resource.ManifestResourceTransformer">
<manifestEntries>
<Main-Class>akka.Main</Main-Class>
</manifestEntries>
</transformer>
</transformers>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
akka {
3.9. Configuration 39
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Log level for the very basic logger activated during ActorSystem startup.
# This logger prints the log messages to stdout (System.out).
# Options: OFF, ERROR, WARNING, INFO, DEBUG
stdout-loglevel = "DEBUG"
actor {
provider = "cluster"
default-dispatcher {
# Throughput for default Dispatcher, set to 1 for as fair as possible
throughput = 10
}
}
remote {
# The port clients should connect to. Default is 2552.
netty.tcp.port = 4711
}
}
Sometimes it can be useful to include another configuration file, for example if you have one
application.conf with all environment independent settings and then override some settings for specific
environments.
Specifying system property with -Dconfig.resource=/dev.conf will load the dev.conf file, which
includes the application.conf
dev.conf:
include "application"
akka {
loglevel = "DEBUG"
}
More advanced include and substitution mechanisms are explained in the HOCON specification.
If the system or config property akka.log-config-on-start is set to on, then the complete configuration is
logged at INFO level when the actor system is started. This is useful when you are uncertain of what configuration
is used.
If in doubt, you can also easily and nicely inspect configuration objects before or after using them to construct an
actor system:
Welcome to Scala version 2.11.11 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0).
Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
Type :help for more information.
3.9. Configuration 40
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
import com.typesafe.config._
scala> ConfigFactory.parseString("a.b=12")
res0: com.typesafe.config.Config = Config(SimpleConfigObject({"a" : {"b" : 12}}))
scala> res0.root.render
res1: java.lang.String =
{
# String: 1
"a" : {
# String: 1
"b" : 12
}
}
The comments preceding every item give detailed information about the origin of the setting (file & line number)
plus possible comments which were present, e.g. in the reference configuration. The settings as merged with the
reference and parsed by the actor system can be displayed like this:
final ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create();
System.out.println(system.settings());
// this is a shortcut for system.settings().config().root().render()
In several places of the configuration file it is possible to specify the fully-qualified class name of something to be
instantiated by Akka. This is done using Java reflection, which in turn uses a ClassLoader. Getting the right
one in challenging environments like application containers or OSGi bundles is not always trivial, the current
approach of Akka is that each ActorSystem implementation stores the current thread’s context class loader
(if available, otherwise just its own loader as in this.getClass.getClassLoader) and uses that for all
reflective accesses. This implies that putting Akka on the boot class path will yield NullPointerException
from strange places: this is simply not supported.
The configuration can also be used for application specific settings. A good practice is to place those settings in
an Extension, as described in:
• Scala API: extending-akka-scala.settings
• Java API: Application specific settings
If you have more than one ActorSystem (or you’re writing a library and have an ActorSystem that may be
separate from the application’s) you may want to separate the configuration for each system.
Given that ConfigFactory.load() merges all resources with matching name from the whole class path, it
is easiest to utilize that functionality and differentiate actor systems within the hierarchy of the configuration:
myapp1 {
akka.loglevel = "WARNING"
my.own.setting = 43
}
myapp2 {
akka.loglevel = "ERROR"
app2.setting = "appname"
}
3.9. Configuration 41
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
my.own.setting = 42
my.other.setting = "hello"
These two samples demonstrate different variations of the “lift-a-subtree” trick: in the first case, the configuration
accessible from within the actor system is this
akka.loglevel = "WARNING"
my.own.setting = 43
my.other.setting = "hello"
// plus myapp1 and myapp2 subtrees
while in the second one, only the “akka” subtree is lifted, with the following result
akka.loglevel = "ERROR"
my.own.setting = 42
my.other.setting = "hello"
// plus myapp1 and myapp2 subtrees
Note: The configuration library is really powerful, explaining all features exceeds the scope affordable here.
In particular not covered are how to include other configuration files within other files (see a small example at
Including files) and copying parts of the configuration tree by way of path substitutions.
You may also specify and parse the configuration programmatically in other ways when instantiating the
ActorSystem.
import akka.actor.ActorSystem
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
val customConf = ConfigFactory.parseString("""
akka.actor.deployment {
/my-service {
router = round-robin-pool
nr-of-instances = 3
}
}
""")
// ConfigFactory.load sandwiches customConfig between default reference
// config and default overrides, and then resolves it.
val system = ActorSystem("MySystem", ConfigFactory.load(customConf))
You can replace or supplement application.conf either in code or using system properties.
If you’re using ConfigFactory.load() (which Akka does by default) you can replace
application.conf by defining -Dconfig.resource=whatever, -Dconfig.file=whatever, or
-Dconfig.url=whatever.
From inside your replacement file specified with -Dconfig.resource and friends, you can include
"application" if you still want to use application.{conf,json,properties} as well. Settings
specified before include "application" would be overridden by the included file, while those after would
override the included file.
In code, there are many customization options.
There are several overloads of ConfigFactory.load(); these allow you to specify something to be sand-
wiched between system properties (which override) and the defaults (from reference.conf), replacing the
3.9. Configuration 42
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
When working with Config objects, keep in mind that there are three “layers” in the cake:
• ConfigFactory.defaultOverrides() (system properties)
• the app’s settings
• ConfigFactory.defaultReference() (reference.conf)
The normal goal is to customize the middle layer while leaving the other two alone.
• ConfigFactory.load() loads the whole stack
• the overloads of ConfigFactory.load() let you specify a different middle layer
• the ConfigFactory.parse() variations load single files or resources
To stack two layers, use override.withFallback(fallback); try to keep system props
(defaultOverrides()) on top and reference.conf (defaultReference()) on the bottom.
Do keep in mind, you can often just add another include statement in application.conf rather than writ-
ing code. Includes at the top of application.conf will be overridden by the rest of application.conf,
while those at the bottom will override the earlier stuff.
Deployment settings for specific actors can be defined in the akka.actor.deployment section of the con-
figuration. In the deployment section it is possible to define things like dispatcher, mailbox, router settings, and
remote deployment. Configuration of these features are described in the chapters detailing corresponding topics.
An example may look like this:
akka.actor.deployment {
3.9. Configuration 43
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
my-dispatcher {
fork-join-executor.parallelism-min = 10
fork-join-executor.parallelism-max = 10
}
prio-mailbox {
mailbox-type = "a.b.MyPrioMailbox"
}
Note: The deployment section for a specific actor is identified by the path of the actor relative to /user.
You can use asterisks as wildcard matches for the actor path sections, so you could specify: /*/sampleActor
and that would match all sampleActor on that level in the hierarchy. In addition, please note:
• you can also use wildcards in the last position to match all actors at a certain level: /someParent/*
• you can use double-wildcards in the last position to match all child actors and their children recursively:
/someParent/**
• non-wildcard matches always have higher priority to match than wildcards, and single wildcard matches
have higher priority than double-wildcards, so: /foo/bar is considered more specific than /foo/*,
which is considered more specific than /foo/**. Only the highest priority match is used
• wildcards cannot be used to partially match section, like this: /foo*/bar, /f*o/bar etc.
Each Akka module has a reference configuration file with the default values.
akka-actor
####################################
# Akka Actor Reference Config File #
####################################
3.9. Configuration 44
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
# Akka version, checked against the runtime version of Akka. Loaded from generated conf file.
include "version"
akka {
# Home directory of Akka, modules in the deploy directory will be loaded
home = ""
# Log level for the very basic logger activated during ActorSystem startup.
# This logger prints the log messages to stdout (System.out).
# Options: OFF, ERROR, WARNING, INFO, DEBUG
stdout-loglevel = "WARNING"
# Log the complete configuration at INFO level when the actor system is started.
# This is useful when you are uncertain of what configuration is used.
log-config-on-start = off
# Possibility to turn off logging of dead letters while the actor system
# is shutting down. Logging is only done when enabled by ’log-dead-letters’
# setting.
log-dead-letters-during-shutdown = on
3.9. Configuration 45
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
#
# Should not be set by end user applications in ’application.conf’, use the extensions property
#
library-extensions = ${?akka.library-extensions} []
actor {
# The guardian "/user" will use this class to obtain its supervisorStrategy.
# It needs to be a subclass of akka.actor.SupervisorStrategyConfigurator.
# In addition to the default there is akka.actor.StoppingSupervisorStrategy.
guardian-supervisor-strategy = "akka.actor.DefaultSupervisorStrategy"
# Serializes and deserializes creators (in Props) to ensure that they can be
# sent over the network, this is only intended for testing. Purely local deployments
# as marked with deploy.scope == LocalScope are exempt from verification.
serialize-creators = off
# Timeout for send operations to top-level actors which are in the process
# of being started. This is only relevant if using a bounded mailbox or the
# CallingThreadDispatcher for a top-level actor.
unstarted-push-timeout = 10s
typed {
# Default timeout for typed actor methods with non-void return type
timeout = 5s
}
3.9. Configuration 46
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
scatter-gather-pool = "akka.routing.ScatterGatherFirstCompletedPool"
scatter-gather-group = "akka.routing.ScatterGatherFirstCompletedGroup"
tail-chopping-pool = "akka.routing.TailChoppingPool"
tail-chopping-group = "akka.routing.TailChoppingGroup"
consistent-hashing-pool = "akka.routing.ConsistentHashingPool"
consistent-hashing-group = "akka.routing.ConsistentHashingGroup"
}
deployment {
tail-chopping-router {
# interval is duration between sending message to next routee
interval = 10 milliseconds
}
3.9. Configuration 47
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
routees {
# Alternatively to giving nr-of-instances you can specify the full
# paths of those actors which should be routed to. This setting takes
# precedence over nr-of-instances
paths = []
}
# To use a dedicated dispatcher for the routees of the pool you can
# define the dispatcher configuration inline with the property name
# ’pool-dispatcher’ in the deployment section of the router.
# For example:
# pool-dispatcher {
# fork-join-executor.parallelism-min = 5
# fork-join-executor.parallelism-max = 5
# }
enabled = off
3.9. Configuration 48
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
enabled = off
# If the routees have not been fully utilized (i.e. all routees busy)
# for such length, the resizer will downsize the pool.
downsize-after-underutilized-for = 72h
# Duration exploration, the ratio between the largest step size and
# current pool size. E.g. if the current pool size is 50, and the
# explore-step-size is 0.1, the maximum pool size change during
# exploration will be +- 5
explore-step-size = 0.1
# When optimizing, the resizer only considers the sizes adjacent to the
# current size. This number indicates how many adjacent sizes to consider.
optimization-range = 16
# The weight of the latest metric over old metrics when collecting
# performance metrics.
# E.g. if the last processing speed is 10 millis per message at pool
# size 5, and if the new processing speed collected is 6 millis per
# message at pool size 5. Given a weight of 0.3, the metrics
# representing pool size 5 will be 6 * 0.3 + 10 * 0.7, i.e. 8.8 millis
# Obviously, this number should be between 0 and 1.
weight-of-latest-metric = 0.5
}
}
/IO-DNS/inet-address {
mailbox = "unbounded"
router = "consistent-hashing-pool"
nr-of-instances = 4
}
3.9. Configuration 49
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
default-dispatcher {
# Must be one of the following
# Dispatcher, PinnedDispatcher, or a FQCN to a class inheriting
# MessageDispatcherConfigurator with a public constructor with
# both com.typesafe.config.Config parameter and
# akka.dispatch.DispatcherPrerequisites parameters.
# PinnedDispatcher must be used together with executor=thread-pool-executor.
type = "Dispatcher"
# The parallelism factor is used to determine thread pool size using the
# following formula: ceil(available processors * factor). Resulting size
# is then bounded by the parallelism-min and parallelism-max values.
parallelism-factor = 3.0
# Setting to "FIFO" to use queue like peeking mode which "poll" or "LIFO" to use stack
# like peeking mode which "pop".
task-peeking-mode = "FIFO"
}
# Define a fixed thread pool size with this property. The corePoolSize
# and the maximumPoolSize of the ThreadPoolExecutor will be set to this
# value, if it is defined. Then the other pool-size properties will not
# be used.
#
# Valid values are: ‘off‘ or a positive integer.
fixed-pool-size = off
3.9. Configuration 50
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# How long time the dispatcher will wait for new actors until it shuts down
shutdown-timeout = 1s
default-mailbox {
# FQCN of the MailboxType. The Class of the FQCN must have a public
# constructor with
# (akka.actor.ActorSystem.Settings, com.typesafe.config.Config) parameters.
3.9. Configuration 51
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.UnboundedMailbox"
mailbox {
# Mapping between message queue semantics and mailbox configurations.
# Used by akka.dispatch.RequiresMessageQueue[T] to enforce different
# mailbox types on actors.
# If your Actor implements RequiresMessageQueue[T], then when you create
# an instance of that actor its mailbox type will be decided by looking
# up a mailbox configuration via T in this mapping
requirements {
"akka.dispatch.UnboundedMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.unbounded-queue-based
"akka.dispatch.BoundedMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.bounded-queue-based
"akka.dispatch.DequeBasedMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.unbounded-deque-based
"akka.dispatch.UnboundedDequeBasedMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.unbounded-deque-based
"akka.dispatch.BoundedDequeBasedMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.bounded-deque-based
"akka.dispatch.MultipleConsumerSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.unbounded-queue-based
"akka.dispatch.ControlAwareMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.unbounded-control-aware-queue-based
"akka.dispatch.UnboundedControlAwareMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.unbounded-control-aware-queue-based
"akka.dispatch.BoundedControlAwareMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.bounded-control-aware-queue-based
"akka.event.LoggerMessageQueueSemantics" =
akka.actor.mailbox.logger-queue
}
unbounded-queue-based {
# FQCN of the MailboxType, The Class of the FQCN must have a public
# constructor with (akka.actor.ActorSystem.Settings,
# com.typesafe.config.Config) parameters.
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.UnboundedMailbox"
}
bounded-queue-based {
# FQCN of the MailboxType, The Class of the FQCN must have a public
# constructor with (akka.actor.ActorSystem.Settings,
# com.typesafe.config.Config) parameters.
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.BoundedMailbox"
3.9. Configuration 52
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
unbounded-deque-based {
# FQCN of the MailboxType, The Class of the FQCN must have a public
# constructor with (akka.actor.ActorSystem.Settings,
# com.typesafe.config.Config) parameters.
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.UnboundedDequeBasedMailbox"
}
bounded-deque-based {
# FQCN of the MailboxType, The Class of the FQCN must have a public
# constructor with (akka.actor.ActorSystem.Settings,
# com.typesafe.config.Config) parameters.
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.BoundedDequeBasedMailbox"
}
unbounded-control-aware-queue-based {
# FQCN of the MailboxType, The Class of the FQCN must have a public
# constructor with (akka.actor.ActorSystem.Settings,
# com.typesafe.config.Config) parameters.
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.UnboundedControlAwareMailbox"
}
bounded-control-aware-queue-based {
# FQCN of the MailboxType, The Class of the FQCN must have a public
# constructor with (akka.actor.ActorSystem.Settings,
# com.typesafe.config.Config) parameters.
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.BoundedControlAwareMailbox"
}
debug {
# enable function of Actor.loggable(), which is to log any received message
# at DEBUG level, see the “Testing Actor Systems” section of the Akka
# Documentation at http://akka.io/docs
receive = off
# enable DEBUG logging of all LoggingFSMs for events, transitions and timers
fsm = off
3.9. Configuration 53
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Log warnings when the default Java serialization is used to serialize messages.
# The default serializer uses Java serialization which is not very performant and should not
# be used in production environments unless you don’t care about performance. In that case
# you can turn this off.
warn-about-java-serializer-usage = on
3.9. Configuration 54
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
warn-on-no-serialization-verification = on
# The timer uses a circular wheel of buckets to store the timer tasks.
# This should be set such that the majority of scheduled timeouts (for high
# scheduling frequency) will be shorter than one rotation of the wheel
# (ticks-per-wheel * ticks-duration)
# THIS MUST BE A POWER OF TWO!
ticks-per-wheel = 512
# When shutting down the scheduler, there will typically be a thread which
# needs to be stopped, and this timeout determines how long to wait for
# that to happen. In case of timeout the shutdown of the actor system will
# proceed without running possibly still enqueued tasks.
shutdown-timeout = 5s
}
3.9. Configuration 55
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
io {
tcp {
# The number of bytes per direct buffer in the pool used to read or write
# network data from the kernel.
direct-buffer-size = 128 KiB
# The maximal number of direct buffers kept in the direct buffer pool for
# reuse.
direct-buffer-pool-limit = 1000
3.9. Configuration 56
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# The number of times to retry the ‘finishConnect‘ call after being notified about
# OP_CONNECT. Retries are needed if the OP_CONNECT notification doesn’t imply that
# ‘finishConnect‘ will succeed, which is the case on Android.
finish-connect-retries = 5
udp {
3.9. Configuration 57
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
receive-throughput = 3
# The number of bytes per direct buffer in the pool used to read or write
# network data from the kernel.
direct-buffer-size = 128 KiB
# The maximal number of direct buffers kept in the direct buffer pool for
# reuse.
direct-buffer-pool-limit = 1000
udp-connected {
# The number of bytes per direct buffer in the pool used to read or write
# network data from the kernel.
direct-buffer-size = 128 KiB
# The maximal number of direct buffers kept in the direct buffer pool for
3.9. Configuration 58
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# reuse.
direct-buffer-pool-limit = 1000
dns {
# Fully qualified config path which holds the dispatcher configuration
# for the manager and resolver router actors.
# For actual router configuration see akka.actor.deployment./IO-DNS/*
dispatcher = "akka.actor.default-dispatcher"
inet-address {
# Must implement akka.io.DnsProvider
provider-object = "akka.io.InetAddressDnsProvider"
akka-agent
####################################
# Akka Agent Reference Config File #
####################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
akka {
agent {
3.9. Configuration 59
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
send-off-dispatcher {
executor = thread-pool-executor
type = PinnedDispatcher
}
akka-camel
####################################
# Akka Camel Reference Config File #
####################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
akka {
camel {
# FQCN of the ContextProvider to be used to create or locate a CamelContext
# it must implement akka.camel.ContextProvider and have a no-arg constructor
# the built-in default create a fresh DefaultCamelContext
context-provider = akka.camel.DefaultContextProvider
producer {
# The id of the dispatcher to use for producer child actors, i.e. the actor that
# interacts with the Camel endpoint. Some endpoints may be blocking and then it
# can be good to define a dedicated dispatcher.
# If not defined the producer child actor is using the same dispatcher as the
# parent producer actor.
use-dispatcher = ""
}
3.9. Configuration 60
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
"file" = "java.io.InputStream"
}
}
}
akka-cluster
######################################
# Akka Cluster Reference Config File #
######################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
akka {
cluster {
# Initial contact points of the cluster.
# The nodes to join automatically at startup.
# Comma separated full URIs defined by a string on the form of
# "akka.tcp://system@hostname:port"
# Leave as empty if the node is supposed to be joined manually.
seed-nodes = []
# how long to wait for one of the seed nodes to reply to initial join request
seed-node-timeout = 5s
3.9. Configuration 61
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
downing-provider-class = ""
# By default, the leader will not move ’Joining’ members to ’Up’ during a network
# split. This feature allows the leader to accept ’Joining’ members to be ’WeaklyUp’
# so they become part of the cluster even during a network split. The leader will
# move ’WeaklyUp’ members to ’Up’ status once convergence has been reached. This
# feature must be off if some members are running Akka 2.3.X.
# WeaklyUp is an EXPERIMENTAL feature.
allow-weakly-up-members = off
# The roles of this member. List of strings, e.g. roles = ["A", "B"].
# The roles are part of the membership information and can be used by
# routers or other services to distribute work to certain member types,
# e.g. front-end and back-end nodes.
roles = []
role {
# Minimum required number of members of a certain role before the leader
# changes member status of ’Joining’ members to ’Up’. Typically used together
# with ’Cluster.registerOnMemberUp’ to defer some action, such as starting
# actors, until the cluster has reached a certain size.
# E.g. to require 2 nodes with role ’frontend’ and 3 nodes with role ’backend’:
# frontend.min-nr-of-members = 2
# backend.min-nr-of-members = 3
#<role-name>.min-nr-of-members = 1
}
# Minimum required number of members before the leader changes member status
# of ’Joining’ members to ’Up’. Typically used together with
# ’Cluster.registerOnMemberUp’ to defer some action, such as starting actors,
# until the cluster has reached a certain size.
min-nr-of-members = 1
# how long should the node wait before starting the periodic tasks
# maintenance tasks?
periodic-tasks-initial-delay = 1s
# how often should the node move nodes, marked as unreachable by the failure
# detector, out of the membership ring?
unreachable-nodes-reaper-interval = 1s
3.9. Configuration 62
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Gossip to random node with newer or older state information, if any with
# this probability. Otherwise Gossip to any random live node.
# Probability value is between 0.0 and 1.0. 0.0 means never, 1.0 means always.
gossip-different-view-probability = 0.8
# Reduced the above probability when the number of nodes in the cluster
# greater than this value.
reduce-gossip-different-view-probability = 400
# Number of member nodes that each member will send heartbeat messages to,
# i.e. each node will be monitored by this number of other nodes.
monitored-by-nr-of-members = 5
# After the heartbeat request has been sent the first failure detection
3.9. Configuration 63
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# will start after this period, even though no heartbeat message has
# been received.
expected-response-after = 1 s
metrics {
# Enable or disable metrics collector for load-balancing nodes.
enabled = on
debug {
# log heartbeat events (very verbose, useful mostly when debugging heartbeating issues)
verbose-heartbeat-logging = off
}
3.9. Configuration 64
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
enabled = off
serialization-bindings {
"akka.cluster.ClusterMessage" = akka-cluster
}
serialization-identifiers {
"akka.cluster.protobuf.ClusterMessageSerializer" = 5
}
router.type-mapping {
adaptive-pool = "akka.cluster.routing.AdaptiveLoadBalancingPool"
adaptive-group = "akka.cluster.routing.AdaptiveLoadBalancingGroup"
}
}
akka-multi-node-testkit
#############################################
# Akka Remote Testing Reference Config File #
#############################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
akka {
3.9. Configuration 65
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
testconductor {
# Timeout for joining a barrier: this is the maximum time any participants
# waits for everybody else to join a named barrier.
barrier-timeout = 30s
# Threshold for packet size in time unit above which the failure injector will
# split the packet and deliver in smaller portions; do not give value smaller
# than HashedWheelTimer resolution (would not make sense)
packet-split-threshold = 100ms
# amount of time for the ClientFSM to wait for the connection to the conductor
# to be successful
connect-timeout = 20s
netty {
# (I&O) Used to configure the number of I/O worker threads on server sockets
server-socket-worker-pool {
# Min number of threads to cap factor-based number to
pool-size-min = 1
# (I&O) Used to configure the number of I/O worker threads on client sockets
client-socket-worker-pool {
# Min number of threads to cap factor-based number to
pool-size-min = 1
3.9. Configuration 66
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
akka-persistence
###########################################################
# Akka Persistence Extension Reference Configuration File #
###########################################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits in your application.conf in order to override these settings.
# When starting many persistent actors at the same time the journal
# and its data store is protected from being overloaded by limiting number
# of recoveries that can be in progress at the same time. When
# exceeding the limit the actors will wait until other recoveries have
# been completed.
max-concurrent-recoveries = 50
# Fully qualified class name providing a default internal stash overflow strategy.
# It needs to be a subclass of akka.persistence.StashOverflowStrategyConfigurator.
# The default strategy throws StashOverflowException.
internal-stash-overflow-strategy = "akka.persistence.ThrowExceptionConfigurator"
journal {
# Absolute path to the journal plugin configuration entry used by
# persistent actor or view by default.
# Persistent actor or view can override ‘journalPluginId‘ method
# in order to rely on a different journal plugin.
plugin = ""
# List of journal plugins to start automatically. Use "" for the default journal plugin.
auto-start-journals = []
}
snapshot-store {
# Absolute path to the snapshot plugin configuration entry used by
# persistent actor or view by default.
# Persistent actor or view can override ‘snapshotPluginId‘ method
# in order to rely on a different snapshot plugin.
# It is not mandatory to specify a snapshot store plugin.
# If you don’t use snapshots you don’t have to configure it.
# Note that Cluster Sharding is using snapshots, so if you
# use Cluster Sharding you need to define a snapshot store plugin.
plugin = ""
# List of snapshot stores to start automatically. Use "" for the default snapshot store.
auto-start-snapshot-stores = []
}
# used as default-snapshot store if no plugin configured
# (see ‘akka.persistence.snapshot-store‘)
no-snapshot-store {
class = "akka.persistence.snapshot.NoSnapshotStore"
}
# Default persistent view settings.
view {
# Automated incremental view update.
auto-update = on
# Interval between incremental updates.
auto-update-interval = 5s
# Maximum number of messages to replay per incremental view update.
# Set to -1 for no upper limit.
auto-update-replay-max = -1
}
3.9. Configuration 67
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Removed: used to be the Maximum size of a persistent message batch written to the journal.
# Now this setting is without function, PersistentActor will write as many messages
# as it has accumulated since the last write.
max-message-batch-size = 200
3.9. Configuration 68
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# If there is more time in between individual events gotten from the journal
# recovery than this the recovery will fail.
# Note that it also affects reading the snapshot before replaying events on
# top of it, even though it is configured for the journal.
recovery-event-timeout = 30s
circuit-breaker {
max-failures = 10
call-timeout = 10s
reset-timeout = 30s
}
circuit-breaker {
max-failures = 5
call-timeout = 20s
reset-timeout = 60s
}
}
}
3.9. Configuration 69
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
akka-persistence-snapshot = "akka.persistence.serialization.SnapshotSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"akka.persistence.serialization.Message" = akka-persistence-message
"akka.persistence.serialization.Snapshot" = akka-persistence-snapshot
}
serialization-identifiers {
"akka.persistence.serialization.MessageSerializer" = 7
"akka.persistence.serialization.SnapshotSerializer" = 8
}
}
###################################################
# Persistence plugins included with the extension #
###################################################
3.9. Configuration 70
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
akka.persistence.journal.proxy {
# Class name of the plugin.
class = "akka.persistence.journal.PersistencePluginProxy"
# Dispatcher for the plugin actor.
plugin-dispatcher = "akka.actor.default-dispatcher"
# Set this to on in the configuration of the ActorSystem
# that will host the target journal
start-target-journal = off
# The journal plugin config path to use for the target journal
target-journal-plugin = ""
# The address of the proxy to connect to from other nodes. Optional setting.
target-journal-address = ""
# Initialization timeout of target lookup
init-timeout = 10s
}
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.proxy {
# Class name of the plugin.
class = "akka.persistence.journal.PersistencePluginProxy"
# Dispatcher for the plugin actor.
plugin-dispatcher = "akka.actor.default-dispatcher"
# Set this to on in the configuration of the ActorSystem
# that will host the target snapshot-store
start-target-snapshot-store = off
# The journal plugin config path to use for the target snapshot-store
target-snapshot-store-plugin = ""
# The address of the proxy to connect to from other nodes. Optional setting.
target-snapshot-store-address = ""
# Initialization timeout of target lookup
init-timeout = 10s
}
3.9. Configuration 71
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# <dependency>
# <groupId>org.iq80.leveldb</groupId>
# <artifactId>leveldb</artifactId>
# <version>0.7</version>
# </dependency>
# <dependency>
# <groupId>org.fusesource.leveldbjni</groupId>
# <artifactId>leveldbjni-all</artifactId>
# <version>1.8</version>
# </dependency>
akka-remote
#####################################
# Akka Remote Reference Config File #
#####################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
# comments about akka.actor settings left out where they are already in akka-
# actor.jar, because otherwise they would be repeated in config rendering.
#
# For the configuration of the new remoting implementation (Artery) please look
# at the bottom section of this file as it is listed separately.
akka {
actor {
serializers {
akka-containers = "akka.remote.serialization.MessageContainerSerializer"
akka-misc = "akka.remote.serialization.MiscMessageSerializer"
artery = "akka.remote.serialization.ArteryMessageSerializer"
proto = "akka.remote.serialization.ProtobufSerializer"
daemon-create = "akka.remote.serialization.DaemonMsgCreateSerializer"
primitive-long = "akka.remote.serialization.LongSerializer"
primitive-int = "akka.remote.serialization.IntSerializer"
primitive-string = "akka.remote.serialization.StringSerializer"
primitive-bytestring = "akka.remote.serialization.ByteStringSerializer"
akka-system-msg = "akka.remote.serialization.SystemMessageSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"akka.actor.ActorSelectionMessage" = akka-containers
"akka.remote.DaemonMsgCreate" = daemon-create
"akka.remote.artery.ArteryMessage" = artery
3.9. Configuration 72
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
"java.util.Optional" = akka-misc
}
# For the purpose of preserving protocol backward compatibility these bindings are not
# included by default. They can be enabled with enable-additional-serialization-bindings=on.
# They are enabled by default if akka.remote.artery.enabled=on or if
# akka.actor.allow-java-serialization=off.
additional-serialization-bindings {
"akka.actor.Identify" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.ActorIdentity" = akka-misc
"scala.Some" = akka-misc
"scala.None$" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.Status$Success" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.Status$Failure" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.ActorRef" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.PoisonPill$" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.Kill$" = akka-misc
"akka.remote.RemoteWatcher$Heartbeat$" = akka-misc
"akka.remote.RemoteWatcher$HeartbeatRsp" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.ActorInitializationException" = akka-misc
"akka.dispatch.sysmsg.SystemMessage" = akka-system-msg
"java.lang.String" = primitive-string
"akka.util.ByteString$ByteString1C" = primitive-bytestring
"akka.util.ByteString$ByteString1" = primitive-bytestring
"akka.util.ByteString$ByteStrings" = primitive-bytestring
"java.lang.Long" = primitive-long
"scala.Long" = primitive-long
"java.lang.Integer" = primitive-int
"scala.Int" = primitive-int
serialization-identifiers {
"akka.remote.serialization.ProtobufSerializer" = 2
"akka.remote.serialization.DaemonMsgCreateSerializer" = 3
"akka.remote.serialization.MessageContainerSerializer" = 6
"akka.remote.serialization.MiscMessageSerializer" = 16
"akka.remote.serialization.ArteryMessageSerializer" = 17
"akka.remote.serialization.LongSerializer" = 18
"akka.remote.serialization.IntSerializer" = 19
"akka.remote.serialization.StringSerializer" = 20
"akka.remote.serialization.ByteStringSerializer" = 21
"akka.remote.serialization.SystemMessageSerializer" = 22
}
deployment {
3.9. Configuration 73
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
default {
target {
}
}
}
}
remote {
### Settings shared by classic remoting and Artery (the new implementation of remoting)
# If set to a nonempty string remoting will use the given dispatcher for
# its internal actors otherwise the default dispatcher is used. Please note
# that since remoting can load arbitrary 3rd party drivers (see
# "enabled-transport" and "adapters" entries) it is not guaranteed that
# every module will respect this setting.
use-dispatcher = "akka.remote.default-remote-dispatcher"
3.9. Configuration 74
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# After the heartbeat request has been sent the first failure detection
# will start after this period, even though no heartbeat mesage has
# been received.
expected-response-after = 1 s
whitelist = []
}
3.9. Configuration 75
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Before shutting down the drivers, the remoting subsystem attempts to flush
# all pending writes. This setting controls the maximum time the remoting is
# willing to wait before moving on to shut down the drivers.
flush-wait-on-shutdown = 2 s
# Enable untrusted mode for full security of server managed actors, prevents
# system messages to be send by clients, e.g. messages like ’Create’,
# ’Suspend’, ’Resume’, ’Terminate’, ’Supervise’, ’Link’ etc.
untrusted-mode = off
# Should the remote server require that its peers share the same
# secure-cookie (defined in the ’remote’ section)? Secure cookies are passed
# between during the initial handshake. Connections are refused if the initial
# message contains a mismatching cookie or the cookie is missing.
require-cookie = off
### Logging
# If this is "on", Akka will log all inbound messages at DEBUG level,
# if off then they are not logged
log-received-messages = off
# If this is "on", Akka will log all outbound messages at DEBUG level,
# if off then they are not logged
log-sent-messages = off
# Sets the log granularity level at which Akka logs remoting events. This setting
# can take the values OFF, ERROR, WARNING, INFO, DEBUG, or ON. For compatibility
# reasons the setting "on" will default to "debug" level. Please note that the effective
# logging level is still determined by the global logging level of the actor system:
3.9. Configuration 76
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# for example debug level remoting events will be only logged if the system
# is running with debug level logging.
# Failures to deserialize received messages also fall under this flag.
log-remote-lifecycle-events = on
# Log warning if the number of messages in the backoff buffer in the endpoint
# writer exceeds this limit. It can be disabled by setting the value to off.
log-buffer-size-exceeding = 50000
# After failed to establish an outbound connection, the remoting will mark the
# address as failed. This configuration option controls how much time should
# be elapsed before reattempting a new connection. While the address is
# gated, all messages sent to the address are delivered to dead-letters.
# Since this setting limits the rate of reconnects setting it to a
# very short interval (i.e. less than a second) may result in a storm of
# reconnect attempts.
retry-gate-closed-for = 5 s
# If system messages have been exchanged between two systems (i.e. remote death
# watch or remote deployment has been used) a remote system will be marked as
# quarantined after the two system has no active association, and no
# communication happens during the time configured here.
# The only purpose of this setting is to avoid storing system message redelivery
# data (sequence number state, etc.) for an undefined amount of time leading to long
# term memory leak. Instead, if a system has been gone for this period,
# or more exactly
# - there is no association between the two systems (TCP connection, if TCP transport is used)
# - neither side has been attempting to communicate with the other
# - there are no pending system messages to deliver
# for the amount of time configured here, the remote system will be quarantined and all state
# associated with it will be dropped.
quarantine-after-silence = 2 d
3.9. Configuration 77
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# an individual ack.
system-message-ack-piggyback-timeout = 0.3 s
# WARNING: this setting should not be not changed unless all of its consequences
# are properly understood which assumes experience with remoting internals
# or expert advice.
# This setting defines the time after redelivery attempts of internal management
# signals are stopped to a remote system that has been not confirmed to be alive by
# this system before.
initial-system-message-delivery-timeout = 3 m
netty.tcp {
# The class given here must implement the akka.remote.transport.Transport
# interface and offer a public constructor which takes two arguments:
# 1) akka.actor.ExtendedActorSystem
# 2) com.typesafe.config.Config
transport-class = "akka.remote.transport.netty.NettyTransport"
3.9. Configuration 78
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
transport-protocol = tcp
3.9. Configuration 79
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Sets the high water mark for the in and outbound sockets,
# set to 0b for platform default
write-buffer-high-water-mark = 0b
# Sets the low water mark for the in and outbound sockets,
# set to 0b for platform default
write-buffer-low-water-mark = 0b
3.9. Configuration 80
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
netty.udp = ${akka.remote.netty.tcp}
netty.udp {
transport-protocol = udp
}
netty.ssl = ${akka.remote.netty.tcp}
netty.ssl = {
# Enable SSL/TLS encryption.
# This must be enabled on both the client and server to work.
enable-ssl = true
security {
# This is the Java Key Store used by the server connection
key-store = "keystore"
3.9. Configuration 81
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
gremlin {
# Enable debug logging of the failure injector transport adapter
debug = off
}
default-remote-dispatcher {
type = Dispatcher
executor = "fork-join-executor"
fork-join-executor {
parallelism-min = 2
parallelism-factor = 0.5
parallelism-max = 16
}
throughput = 10
}
backoff-remote-dispatcher {
type = Dispatcher
executor = "fork-join-executor"
fork-join-executor {
# Min number of threads to cap factor-based parallelism number to
parallelism-min = 2
parallelism-max = 2
}
}
}
}
3.9. Configuration 82
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
akka-remote (artery)
#####################################
# Akka Remote Reference Config File #
#####################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
# comments about akka.actor settings left out where they are already in akka-
# actor.jar, because otherwise they would be repeated in config rendering.
#
# For the configuration of the new remoting implementation (Artery) please look
# at the bottom section of this file as it is listed separately.
akka {
actor {
serializers {
akka-containers = "akka.remote.serialization.MessageContainerSerializer"
akka-misc = "akka.remote.serialization.MiscMessageSerializer"
artery = "akka.remote.serialization.ArteryMessageSerializer"
proto = "akka.remote.serialization.ProtobufSerializer"
daemon-create = "akka.remote.serialization.DaemonMsgCreateSerializer"
primitive-long = "akka.remote.serialization.LongSerializer"
primitive-int = "akka.remote.serialization.IntSerializer"
primitive-string = "akka.remote.serialization.StringSerializer"
primitive-bytestring = "akka.remote.serialization.ByteStringSerializer"
akka-system-msg = "akka.remote.serialization.SystemMessageSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"akka.actor.ActorSelectionMessage" = akka-containers
"akka.remote.DaemonMsgCreate" = daemon-create
"akka.remote.artery.ArteryMessage" = artery
"java.util.Optional" = akka-misc
}
# For the purpose of preserving protocol backward compatibility these bindings are not
# included by default. They can be enabled with enable-additional-serialization-bindings=on.
# They are enabled by default if akka.remote.artery.enabled=on or if
# akka.actor.allow-java-serialization=off.
additional-serialization-bindings {
"akka.actor.Identify" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.ActorIdentity" = akka-misc
"scala.Some" = akka-misc
"scala.None$" = akka-misc
3.9. Configuration 83
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
"akka.actor.Status$Success" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.Status$Failure" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.ActorRef" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.PoisonPill$" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.Kill$" = akka-misc
"akka.remote.RemoteWatcher$Heartbeat$" = akka-misc
"akka.remote.RemoteWatcher$HeartbeatRsp" = akka-misc
"akka.actor.ActorInitializationException" = akka-misc
"akka.dispatch.sysmsg.SystemMessage" = akka-system-msg
"java.lang.String" = primitive-string
"akka.util.ByteString$ByteString1C" = primitive-bytestring
"akka.util.ByteString$ByteString1" = primitive-bytestring
"akka.util.ByteString$ByteStrings" = primitive-bytestring
"java.lang.Long" = primitive-long
"scala.Long" = primitive-long
"java.lang.Integer" = primitive-int
"scala.Int" = primitive-int
serialization-identifiers {
"akka.remote.serialization.ProtobufSerializer" = 2
"akka.remote.serialization.DaemonMsgCreateSerializer" = 3
"akka.remote.serialization.MessageContainerSerializer" = 6
"akka.remote.serialization.MiscMessageSerializer" = 16
"akka.remote.serialization.ArteryMessageSerializer" = 17
"akka.remote.serialization.LongSerializer" = 18
"akka.remote.serialization.IntSerializer" = 19
"akka.remote.serialization.StringSerializer" = 20
"akka.remote.serialization.ByteStringSerializer" = 21
"akka.remote.serialization.SystemMessageSerializer" = 22
}
deployment {
default {
target {
3.9. Configuration 84
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# should connect to
# - port should be the port for the remote server on the other node
# The number of actor instances to be spawned is still taken from the
# nr-of-instances setting as for local routers; the instances will be
# distributed round-robin among the given nodes.
nodes = []
}
}
}
}
remote {
### Settings shared by classic remoting and Artery (the new implementation of remoting)
# If set to a nonempty string remoting will use the given dispatcher for
# its internal actors otherwise the default dispatcher is used. Please note
# that since remoting can load arbitrary 3rd party drivers (see
# "enabled-transport" and "adapters" entries) it is not guaranteed that
# every module will respect this setting.
use-dispatcher = "akka.remote.default-remote-dispatcher"
3.9. Configuration 85
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# After the heartbeat request has been sent the first failure detection
# will start after this period, even though no heartbeat mesage has
# been received.
expected-response-after = 1 s
whitelist = []
}
3.9. Configuration 86
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
#
hostname = "<getHostAddress>"
}
# Actor paths to use the large message stream for when a message
# is sent to them over remoting. The large message stream dedicated
# is separate from "normal" and system messages so that sending a
# large message does not interfere with them.
# Entries should be the full path to the actor. Wildcards in the form of "*"
# can be supplied at any place and matches any name at that segment -
# "/user/supervisor/actor/*" will match any direct child to actor,
# while "/supervisor/*/child" will match any grandchild to "supervisor" that
# has the name "child"
# Messages sent to ActorSelections will not be passed through the large message
# stream, to pass such messages through the large message stream the selections
# but must be resolved to ActorRefs first.
large-message-destinations = []
# Enable untrusted mode, which discards inbound system messages, PossiblyHarmful and
# ActorSelection messages. E.g. remote watch and remote deployment will not work.
# ActorSelection messages can be enabled for specific paths with the trusted-selection-paths
untrusted-mode = off
# If this is "on", all inbound remote messages will be logged at DEBUG level,
# if off then they are not logged
log-received-messages = off
# If this is "on", all outbound remote messages will be logged at DEBUG level,
# if off then they are not logged
log-sent-messages = off
advanced {
3.9. Configuration 87
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Direct byte buffers are reused in a pool with this maximum size.
# Each buffer has the size of ’maximum-frame-size’.
# This is not a hard upper limit on number of created buffers. Additional
# buffers will be created if needed, e.g. when using many outbound
# associations at the same time. Such additional buffers will be garbage
# collected, which is not as efficient as reusing buffers in the pool.
buffer-pool-size = 128
# Maximum serialized message size for the large messages, including header data.
# See ’large-message-destinations’.
maximum-large-frame-size = 2 MiB
# Direct byte buffers for the large messages are reused in a pool with this maximum size.
# Each buffer has the size of ’maximum-large-frame-size’.
# See ’large-message-destinations’.
# This is not a hard upper limit on number of created buffers. Additional
# buffers will be created if needed, e.g. when using many outbound
# associations at the same time. Such additional buffers will be garbage
# collected, which is not as efficient as reusing buffers in the pool.
large-buffer-pool-size = 32
# Settings for the materializer that is used for the remote streams.
materializer = ${akka.stream.materializer}
# If set to a nonempty string artery will use the given dispatcher for
# the ordinary and large message streams, otherwise the default dispatcher is used.
use-dispatcher = "akka.remote.default-remote-dispatcher"
# If set to a nonempty string remoting will use the given dispatcher for
# the control stream, otherwise the default dispatcher is used.
# It can be good to not use the same dispatcher for the control stream as
# the dispatcher for the ordinary message stream so that heartbeat messages
# are not disturbed.
use-control-stream-dispatcher = ""
# Controls whether to start the Aeron media driver in the same JVM or use external
# process. Set to ’off’ when using external media driver, and then also set the
# ’aeron-dir’.
embedded-media-driver = on
# Directory used by the Aeron media driver. It’s mandatory to define the ’aeron-dir’
# if using external media driver, i.e. when ’embedded-media-driver = off’.
# Embedded media driver will use a this directory, or a temporary directory if this
# property is not defined (empty).
aeron-dir = ""
# Level of CPU time used, on a scale between 1 and 10, during backoff/idle.
# The tradeoff is that to have low latency more CPU time must be used to be
# able to react quickly on incoming messages or send as fast as possible after
# backoff backpressure.
# Level 1 strongly prefer low CPU consumption over low latency.
# Level 10 strongly prefer low latency over low CPU consumption.
idle-cpu-level = 5
3.9. Configuration 88
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# WARNING: This feature is not supported yet. Don’t use other value than 1.
# It requires more hardening and performance optimizations.
# Number of outbound lanes for each outbound association. A value greater than 1
# means that serialization can be performed in parallel for different destination
# actors. The selection of lane is based on consistent hashing of the recipient
# ActorRef to preserve message ordering per receiver.
outbound-lanes = 1
# WARNING: This feature is not supported yet. Don’t use other value than 1.
# It requires more hardening and performance optimizations.
# Total number of inbound lanes, shared among all inbound associations. A value
# greater than 1 means that deserialization can be performed in parallel for
# different destination actors. The selection of lane is based on consistent
# hashing of the recipient ActorRef to preserve message ordering per receiver.
inbound-lanes = 1
# Size of the send queue for outgoing messages. Messages will be dropped if
# the queue becomes full. This may happen if you send a burst of many messages
# without end-to-end flow control. Note that there is one such queue per
# outbound association. The trade-off of using a larger queue size is that
# it consumes more memory, since the queue is based on preallocated array with
# fixed size.
outbound-message-queue-size = 3072
# Size of the send queue for outgoing control messages, such as system messages.
# If this limit is reached the remote system is declared to be dead and its UID
# marked as quarantined.
# The trade-off of using a larger queue size is that it consumes more memory,
# since the queue is based on preallocated array with fixed size.
outbound-control-queue-size = 3072
# Size of the send queue for outgoing large messages. Messages will be dropped if
# the queue becomes full. This may happen if you send a burst of many messages
# without end-to-end flow control. Note that there is one such queue per
# outbound association. The trade-off of using a larger queue size is that
# it consumes more memory, since the queue is based on preallocated array with
# fixed size.
outbound-large-message-queue-size = 256
# messages that are not accepted by Aeron are dropped after retrying for this period
give-up-message-after = 60 seconds
# System messages that are not acknowledged after re-sending for this period are
3.9. Configuration 89
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# dropped and will trigger quarantine. The value should be longer than the length
# of a network partition that you need to survive.
give-up-system-message-after = 6 hours
# during ActorSystem termination the remoting will wait this long for
# an acknowledgment by the destination system that flushing of outstanding
# remote messages has been completed
shutdown-flush-timeout = 1 second
# See ’inbound-max-restarts’
inbound-restart-timeout = 5 seconds
# See ’outbound-max-restarts’
outbound-restart-timeout = 5 seconds
# Stop outbound stream of a quarantined association after this idle timeout, i.e.
# when not used any more.
stop-quarantined-after-idle = 3 seconds
# Timeout after which aeron driver has not had keepalive messages
# from a client before it considers the client dead.
client-liveness-timeout = 20 seconds
# Timeout for each the INACTIVE and LINGER stages an aeron image
# will be retained for when it is no longer referenced.
# This timeout must be less than the ’handshake-timeout’.
image-liveness-timeout = 10 seconds
flight-recorder {
// FIXME it should be enabled by default when we have a good solution for naming the fil
enabled = off
# Controls where the flight recorder file will be written. There are three options:
# 1. Empty: a file will be generated in the temporary directory of the OS
# 2. A relative or absolute path ending with ".afr": this file will be used
# 3. A relative or absolute path: this directory will be used, the file will get a rando
destination = ""
}
actor-refs {
# Max number of compressed actor-refs
# Note that compression tables are "rolling" (i.e. a new table replaces the old
# compression table once in a while), and this setting is only about the total number
# of compressions within a single such table.
# Must be a positive natural number.
max = 256
3.9. Configuration 90
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
advertisement-interval = 1 minute
}
manifests {
# Max number of compressed manifests
# Note that compression tables are "rolling" (i.e. a new table replaces the old
# compression table once in a while), and this setting is only about the total number
# of compressions within a single such table.
# Must be a positive natural number.
max = 256
akka-testkit
######################################
# Akka Testkit Reference Config File #
######################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
akka {
test {
# factor by which to scale timeouts during tests, e.g. to account for shared
# build system load
timefactor = 1.0
calling-thread-dispatcher {
type = akka.testkit.CallingThreadDispatcherConfigurator
}
3.9. Configuration 91
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
actor.serialization-bindings {
"akka.testkit.JavaSerializable" = java
}
}
akka-cluster-metrics ~~~~~~~~~~~~——–
##############################################
# Akka Cluster Metrics Reference Config File #
##############################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits in your application.conf in order to override these settings.
# Sigar provisioning:
#
# User can provision sigar classes and native library in one of the following ways:
#
# 1) Use https://github.com/kamon-io/sigar-loader Kamon sigar-loader as a project dependency for
# Metrics extension will extract and load sigar library on demand with help of Kamon sigar provis
#
# 2) Use https://github.com/kamon-io/sigar-loader Kamon sigar-loader as java agent: ‘java -javaag
# Kamon sigar loader agent will extract and load sigar library during JVM start.
#
# 3) Place ‘sigar.jar‘ on the ‘classpath‘ and sigar native library for the o/s on the ‘java.libra
# User is required to manage both project dependency and library deployment manually.
3.9. Configuration 92
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
}
# Metrics collector actor.
collector {
# Enable or disable metrics collector for load-balancing nodes.
# Metrics collection can also be controlled at runtime by sending control messages
# to /system/cluster-metrics actor: ‘akka.cluster.metrics.{CollectionStartMessage,Collecti
enabled = on
# FQCN of the metrics collector implementation.
# It must implement ‘akka.cluster.metrics.MetricsCollector‘ and
# have public constructor with akka.actor.ActorSystem parameter.
# Will try to load in the following order of priority:
# 1) configured custom collector 2) internal ‘SigarMetricsCollector‘ 3) internal ‘JmxMetri
provider = ""
# Try all 3 available collector providers, or else fail on the configured custom collector
fallback = true
# How often metrics are sampled on a node.
# Shorter interval will collect the metrics more often.
# Also controls frequency of the metrics publication to the node system event bus.
sample-interval = 3s
# How often a node publishes metrics information to the other nodes in the cluster.
# Shorter interval will publish the metrics gossip more often.
gossip-interval = 3s
# How quickly the exponential weighting of past data is decayed compared to
# new data. Set lower to increase the bias toward newer values.
# The relevance of each data sample is halved for every passing half-life
# duration, i.e. after 4 times the half-life, a data sample’s relevance is
# reduced to 6% of its original relevance. The initial relevance of a data
# sample is given by 1 - 0.5 ^ (collect-interval / half-life).
# See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average#Exponential_moving_average
moving-average-half-life = 12s
}
}
akka-cluster-tools ~~~~~~~~~~~~——
############################################
# Akka Cluster Tools Reference Config File #
############################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
3.9. Configuration 93
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# //#pub-sub-ext-config
# Settings for the DistributedPubSub extension
akka.cluster.pub-sub {
# Actor name of the mediator actor, /system/distributedPubSubMediator
name = distributedPubSubMediator
# Maximum number of elements to transfer in one message when synchronizing the registries.
# Next chunk will be transferred in next round of gossip.
max-delta-elements = 3000
# //#receptionist-ext-config
# Settings for the ClusterClientReceptionist extension
akka.cluster.client.receptionist {
# Actor name of the ClusterReceptionist actor, /system/receptionist
name = receptionist
# The receptionist will send this number of contact points to the client
number-of-contacts = 3
# The actor that tunnel response messages to the client will be stopped
3.9. Configuration 94
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# //#cluster-client-config
# Settings for the ClusterClient
akka.cluster.client {
# Actor paths of the ClusterReceptionist actors on the servers (cluster nodes)
# that the client will try to contact initially. It is mandatory to specify
# at least one initial contact.
# Comma separated full actor paths defined by a string on the form of
# "akka.tcp://system@hostname:port/system/receptionist"
initial-contacts = []
# If connection to the receiptionist is lost and the client has not been
3.9. Configuration 95
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# able to acquire a new connection for this long the client will stop itself.
# This duration makes it possible to watch the cluster client and react on a more permanent
# loss of connection with the cluster, for example by accessing some kind of
# service registry for an updated set of initial contacts to start a new cluster client with.
# If this is not wanted it can be set to "off" to disable the timeout and retry
# forever.
reconnect-timeout = off
}
# //#cluster-client-config
# //#singleton-config
akka.cluster.singleton {
# The actor name of the child singleton actor.
singleton-name = "singleton"
# //#singleton-proxy-config
akka.cluster.singleton-proxy {
# The actor name of the singleton actor that is started by the ClusterSingletonManager
singleton-name = ${akka.cluster.singleton.singleton-name}
# The role of the cluster nodes where the singleton can be deployed.
# If the role is not specified then any node will do.
role = ""
# Interval at which the proxy will try to resolve the singleton instance.
singleton-identification-interval = 1s
# If the location of the singleton is unknown the proxy will buffer this
# number of messages and deliver them when the singleton is identified.
# When the buffer is full old messages will be dropped when new messages are
# sent via the proxy.
# Use 0 to disable buffering, i.e. messages will be dropped immediately if
# the location of the singleton is unknown.
3.9. Configuration 96
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
akka-cluster-sharding ~~~~~~~~~~~~———
###############################################
# Akka Cluster Sharding Reference Config File #
###############################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
# //#sharding-ext-config
# Settings for the ClusterShardingExtension
akka.cluster.sharding {
# The extension creates a top level actor with this name in top level system scope,
# e.g. ’/system/sharding’
guardian-name = sharding
# When this is set to ’on’ the active entity actors will automatically be restarted
# upon Shard restart. i.e. if the Shard is started on a different ShardRegion
# due to rebalance or crash.
remember-entities = off
3.9. Configuration 97
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# Timeout of waiting the initial distributed state (an initial state will be queried again if th
# works only for state-store-mode = "ddata"
waiting-for-state-timeout = 5 s
# Timeout of waiting for update the distributed state (update will be retried if the timeout hap
# works only for state-store-mode = "ddata"
updating-state-timeout = 5 s
# The shard uses this strategy to determines how to recover the underlying entity actors. The st
# by the persistent shard when rebalancing or restarting. The value can either be "all" or "cons
# strategy start all the underlying entity actors at the same time. The constant strategy will s
# entity actors at a fix rate. The default strategy "all".
entity-recovery-strategy = "all"
3.9. Configuration 98
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
akka-distributed-data ~~~~~~~~~~~~———
##############################################
# Akka Distributed DataReference Config File #
##############################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits/overrides in your application.conf.
#//#distributed-data
# Settings for the DistributedData extension
akka.cluster.distributed-data {
# Actor name of the Replicator actor, /system/ddataReplicator
name = ddataReplicator
3.9. Configuration 99
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
# How often the Replicator checks for pruning of data associated with
# removed cluster nodes.
pruning-interval = 30 s
# How long time it takes (worst case) to spread the data to all other replica nodes.
# This is used when initiating and completing the pruning process of data associated
# with removed cluster nodes. The time measurement is stopped when any replica is
# unreachable, so it should be configured to worst case in a healthy cluster.
max-pruning-dissemination = 60 s
# Serialized Write and Read messages are cached when they are sent to
# several nodes. If no further activity they are removed from the cache
# after this duration.
serializer-cache-time-to-live = 10s
durable {
# List of keys that are durable. Prefix matching is supported by using * at the
# end of a key.
keys = []
# Fully qualified class name of the durable store actor. It must be a subclass
# of akka.actor.Actor and handle the protocol defined in
# akka.cluster.ddata.DurableStore. The class must have a constructor with
# com.typesafe.config.Config parameter.
store-actor-class = akka.cluster.ddata.LmdbDurableStore
use-dispatcher = akka.cluster.distributed-data.durable.pinned-store
pinned-store {
executor = thread-pool-executor
type = PinnedDispatcher
}
}
#//#distributed-data
FOUR
ACTORS
4.1 Actors
The Actor Model provides a higher level of abstraction for writing concurrent and distributed systems. It alleviates
the developer from having to deal with explicit locking and thread management, making it easier to write correct
concurrent and parallel systems. Actors were defined in the 1973 paper by Carl Hewitt but have been popularized
by the Erlang language, and used for example at Ericsson with great success to build highly concurrent and reliable
telecom systems.
The API of Akka’s Actors is similar to Scala Actors which has borrowed some of its syntax from Erlang.
Note: Since Akka enforces parental supervision every actor is supervised and (potentially) the supervisor of its
children, it is advisable that you familiarize yourself with Actor Systems and Supervision and Monitoring and it
may also help to read Actor References, Paths and Addresses.
Actors in Java are implemented by extending the UntypedActor class and implementing the onReceive
method. This method takes the message as a parameter.
Here is an example:
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
102
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Props
Props is a configuration class to specify options for the creation of actors, think of it as an immutable and thus
freely shareable recipe for creating an actor including associated deployment information (e.g. which dispatcher
to use, see more below). Here are some examples of how to create a Props instance.
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.japi.Creator;
The second line shows how to pass constructor arguments to the Actor being created. The pres-
ence of a matching constructor is verified during construction of the Props object, resulting in an
IllegalArgumentException if no or multiple matching constructors are found.
The third line demonstrates the use of a Creator. The creator class must be static, which is verified during
Props construction. The type parameter’s upper bound is used to determine the produced actor class, falling
back to Actor if fully erased. An example of a parametric factory could be:
static class ParametricCreator<T extends MyActor> implements Creator<T> {
@Override public T create() {
// ... fabricate actor here
}
}
Note: In order for mailbox requirements—like using a deque-based mailbox for actors using the stash—to be
picked up, the actor type needs to be known before creating it, which is what the Creator type argument allows.
Therefore make sure to use the specific type for your actors wherever possible.
Recommended Practices
It is a good idea to provide static factory methods on the UntypedActor which help keeping the creation of
suitable Props as close to the actor definition as possible. This also allows usage of the Creator-based methods
which statically verify that the used constructor actually exists instead relying only on a runtime check.
public class DemoActor extends UntypedActor {
/**
* Create Props for an actor of this type.
* @param magicNumber The magic number to be passed to this actor’s constructor.
* @return a Props for creating this actor, which can then be further configured
* (e.g. calling ‘.withDispatcher()‘ on it)
*/
public static Props props(final int magicNumber) {
return Props.create(new Creator<DemoActor>() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
public DemoActor create() throws Exception {
return new DemoActor(magicNumber);
}
});
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
// some behavior here
}
system.actorOf(DemoActor.props(42), "demo");
Another good practice is to declare what messages an Actor can receive as close to the actor definition as possible
(e.g. as static classes inside the Actor or using other suitable class), which makes it easier to know what it can
receive.
public class DemoMessagesActor extends UntypedActor {
Actors are created by passing a Props instance into the actorOf factory method which is available on
ActorSystem and ActorContext.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
Using the ActorSystem will create top-level actors, supervised by the actor system’s provided guardian actor,
while using an actor’s context will create a child actor.
class A extends UntypedActor {
final ActorRef child =
getContext().actorOf(Props.create(MyUntypedActor.class), "myChild");
It is recommended to create a hierarchy of children, grand-children and so on such that it fits the logical failure-
handling structure of the application, see Actor Systems.
The call to actorOf returns an instance of ActorRef. This is a handle to the actor instance and the only way to
interact with it. The ActorRef is immutable and has a one to one relationship with the Actor it represents. The
ActorRef is also serializable and network-aware. This means that you can serialize it, send it over the wire and
use it on a remote host and it will still be representing the same Actor on the original node, across the network.
The name parameter is optional, but you should preferably name your actors, since that is used in log messages
and for identifying actors. The name must not be empty or start with $, but it may contain URL encoded char-
acters (eg. %20 for a blank space). If the given name is already in use by another child to the same parent an
InvalidActorNameException is thrown.
Actors are automatically started asynchronously when created.
Dependency Injection
If your UntypedActor has a constructor that takes parameters then those need to be part of the Props as well, as
described above. But there are cases when a factory method must be used, for example when the actual constructor
arguments are determined by a dependency injection framework.
import akka.actor.Actor;
import akka.actor.IndirectActorProducer;
@Override
public Class<? extends Actor> actorClass() {
return MyActor.class;
}
@Override
public MyActor produce() {
MyActor result;
// obtain fresh Actor instance from DI framework ...
return result;
}
}
Warning: You might be tempted at times to offer an IndirectActorProducer which always returns
the same instance, e.g. by using a static field. This is not supported, as it goes against the meaning of an actor
restart, which is described here: What Restarting Means.
When using a dependency injection framework, actor beans MUST NOT have singleton scope.
Techniques for dependency injection and integration with dependency injection frameworks are described in more
depth in the Using Akka with Dependency Injection guideline and the Akka Java Spring tutorial in Lightbend
Activator.
The Inbox
When writing code outside of actors which shall communicate with actors, the ask pattern can be a solution (see
below), but there are two things it cannot do: receiving multiple replies (e.g. by subscribing an ActorRef to a
notification service) and watching other actors’ lifecycle. For these purposes there is the Inbox class:
final Inbox inbox = Inbox.create(system);
inbox.send(target, "hello");
try {
assert inbox.receive(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)).equals("world");
} catch (java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException e) {
// timeout
}
The send method wraps a normal tell and supplies the internal actor’s reference as the sender. This allows the
reply to be received on the last line. Watching an actor is quite simple as well:
final Inbox inbox = Inbox.create(system);
inbox.watch(target);
target.tell(PoisonPill.getInstance(), ActorRef.noSender());
try {
assert inbox.receive(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) instanceof Terminated;
} catch (java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException e) {
// timeout
}
The UntypedActor class defines only one abstract method, the above mentioned onReceive(Object
message), which implements the behavior of the actor.
If the current actor behavior does not match a received message, it’s recommended that you call the unhandled
method, which by default publishes a new akka.actor.UnhandledMessage(message, sender,
recipient) on the actor system’s event stream (set configuration item akka.actor.debug.unhandled
to on to have them converted into actual Debug messages).
In addition, it offers:
• getSelf reference to the ActorRef of the actor
• getSender reference sender Actor of the last received message, typically used as described in Reply to
messages
• supervisorStrategy user overridable definition the strategy to use for supervising child actors
This strategy is typically declared inside the actor in order to have access to the actor’s internal state within
the decider function: since failure is communicated as a message sent to the supervisor and processed like
other messages (albeit outside of the normal behavior), all values and variables within the actor are available,
as is the getSender() reference (which will be the immediate child reporting the failure; if the original
failure occurred within a distant descendant it is still reported one level up at a time).
• getContext exposes contextual information for the actor and the current message, such as:
– factory methods to create child actors (actorOf)
– system that the actor belongs to
– parent supervisor
– supervised children
– lifecycle monitoring
– hotswap behavior stack as described in HotSwap
The remaining visible methods are user-overridable life-cycle hooks which are described in the following:
The implementations shown above are the defaults provided by the UntypedActor class.
Actor Lifecycle
A path in an actor system represents a “place” which might be occupied by a living actor. Initially (apart from
system initialized actors) a path is empty. When actorOf() is called it assigns an incarnation of the actor
described by the passed Props to the given path. An actor incarnation is identified by the path and a UID. A
restart only swaps the Actor instance defined by the Props but the incarnation and hence the UID remains the
same.
The lifecycle of an incarnation ends when the actor is stopped. At that point the appropriate lifecycle events are
called and watching actors are notified of the termination. After the incarnation is stopped, the path can be reused
again by creating an actor with actorOf(). In this case the name of the new incarnation will be the same
as the previous one but the UIDs will differ. An actor can be stopped by the actor itself, another actor or the
ActorSystem (see Stopping actors).
Note: It is important to note that Actors do not stop automatically when no longer referenced, every Actor that
is created must also explicitly be destroyed. The only simplification is that stopping a parent Actor will also
recursively stop all the child Actors that this parent has created.
An ActorRef always represents an incarnation (path and UID) not just a given path. Therefore if an actor is
stopped and a new one with the same name is created an ActorRef of the old incarnation will not point to the
new one.
ActorSelection on the other hand points to the path (or multiple paths if wildcards are used) and is completely
oblivious to which incarnation is currently occupying it. ActorSelection cannot be watched for this reason.
It is possible to resolve the current incarnation’s ActorRef living under the path by sending an Identify
message to the ActorSelection which will be replied to with an ActorIdentity containing the correct
reference (see Identifying Actors via Actor Selection). This can also be done with the resolveOne method of
the ActorSelection, which returns a Future of the matching ActorRef.
In order to be notified when another actor terminates (i.e. stops permanently, not temporary failure and restart), an
actor may register itself for reception of the Terminated message dispatched by the other actor upon termination
(see Stopping Actors). This service is provided by the DeathWatch component of the actor system.
Registering a monitor is easy (see fourth line, the rest is for demonstrating the whole functionality):
import akka.actor.Terminated;
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message.equals("kill")) {
getContext().stop(child);
lastSender = getSender();
} else if (message instanceof Terminated) {
final Terminated t = (Terminated) message;
if (t.getActor() == child) {
lastSender.tell("finished", getSelf());
}
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
It should be noted that the Terminated message is generated independent of the order in which registration and
termination occur. In particular, the watching actor will receive a Terminated message even if the watched
actor has already been terminated at the time of registration.
Registering multiple times does not necessarily lead to multiple messages being generated, but there is no guaran-
tee that only exactly one such message is received: if termination of the watched actor has generated and queued
the message, and another registration is done before this message has been processed, then a second message will
be queued, because registering for monitoring of an already terminated actor leads to the immediate generation of
the Terminated message.
Start Hook
This method is called when the actor is first created. During restarts it is called by the default implementation of
postRestart, which means that by overriding that method you can choose whether the initialization code in
this method is called only exactly once for this actor or for every restart. Initialization code which is part of the
actor’s constructor will always be called when an instance of the actor class is created, which happens at every
restart.
Restart Hooks
All actors are supervised, i.e. linked to another actor with a fault handling strategy. Actors may be restarted in
case an exception is thrown while processing a message (see Supervision and Monitoring). This restart involves
the hooks mentioned above:
1. The old actor is informed by calling preRestart with the exception which caused the restart and the
message which triggered that exception; the latter may be None if the restart was not caused by processing
a message, e.g. when a supervisor does not trap the exception and is restarted in turn by its supervisor, or if
an actor is restarted due to a sibling’s failure. If the message is available, then that message’s sender is also
accessible in the usual way (i.e. by calling getSender()).
This method is the best place for cleaning up, preparing hand-over to the fresh actor instance, etc. By default
it stops all children and calls postStop.
2. The initial factory from the actorOf call is used to produce the fresh instance.
3. The new actor’s postRestart method is invoked with the exception which caused the restart. By default
the preStart is called, just as in the normal start-up case.
An actor restart replaces only the actual actor object; the contents of the mailbox is unaffected by the restart,
so processing of messages will resume after the postRestart hook returns. The message that triggered the
exception will not be received again. Any message sent to an actor while it is being restarted will be queued to its
mailbox as usual.
Warning: Be aware that the ordering of failure notifications relative to user messages is not deterministic. In
particular, a parent might restart its child before it has processed the last messages sent by the child before the
failure. See Discussion: Message Ordering for details.
Stop Hook
After stopping an actor, its postStop hook is called, which may be used e.g. for deregistering this actor from
other services. This hook is guaranteed to run after message queuing has been disabled for this actor, i.e. messages
sent to a stopped actor will be redirected to the deadLetters of the ActorSystem.
As described in Actor References, Paths and Addresses, each actor has a unique logical path, which is obtained
by following the chain of actors from child to parent until reaching the root of the actor system, and it has a
physical path, which may differ if the supervision chain includes any remote supervisors. These paths are used
by the system to look up actors, e.g. when a remote message is received and the recipient is searched, but they
are also useful more directly: actors may look up other actors by specifying absolute or relative paths—logical or
physical—and receive back an ActorSelection with the result:
// will look up this absolute path
getContext().actorSelection("/user/serviceA/actor");
// will look up sibling beneath same supervisor
getContext().actorSelection("../joe");
Note: It is always preferable to communicate with other Actors using their ActorRef instead of relying upon
ActorSelection. Exceptions are
• sending messages using the At-Least-Once Delivery facility
• initiating first contact with a remote system
In all other cases ActorRefs can be provided during Actor creation or initialization, passing them from parent to
child or introducing Actors by sending their ActorRefs to other Actors within messages.
The supplied path is parsed as a java.net.URI, which basically means that it is split on / into path elements.
If the path starts with /, it is absolute and the look-up starts at the root guardian (which is the parent of "/user");
otherwise it starts at the current actor. If a path element equals .., the look-up will take a step “up” towards the
supervisor of the currently traversed actor, otherwise it will step “down” to the named child. It should be noted
that the .. in actor paths here always means the logical structure, i.e. the supervisor.
The path elements of an actor selection may contain wildcard patterns allowing for broadcasting of messages to
that section:
// will look all children to serviceB with names starting with worker
getContext().actorSelection("/user/serviceB/worker*");
// will look up all siblings beneath same supervisor
getContext().actorSelection("../*");
Messages can be sent via the ActorSelection and the path of the ActorSelection is looked up when
delivering each message. If the selection does not match any actors the message will be dropped.
To acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection you need to send a message to the selection and use the
getSender reference of the reply from the actor. There is a built-in Identify message that all Actors will
understand and automatically reply to with a ActorIdentity message containing the ActorRef. This mes-
sage is handled specially by the actors which are traversed in the sense that if a concrete name lookup fails (i.e.
a non-wildcard path element does not correspond to a live actor) then a negative result is generated. Please note
that this does not mean that delivery of that reply is guaranteed, it still is a normal message.
import akka.actor.ActorIdentity;
import akka.actor.ActorSelection;
import akka.actor.Identify;
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof ActorIdentity) {
ActorIdentity identity = (ActorIdentity) message;
if (identity.correlationId().equals(identifyId)) {
ActorRef ref = identity.getRef();
if (ref == null)
getContext().stop(getSelf());
else {
another = ref;
getContext().watch(another);
probe.tell(ref, getSelf());
}
}
} else if (message instanceof Terminated) {
final Terminated t = (Terminated) message;
if (t.getActor().equals(another)) {
getContext().stop(getSelf());
}
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
You can also acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection with the resolveOne method of the
ActorSelection. It returns a Future of the matching ActorRef if such an actor exists. It is completed
with failure [[akka.actor.ActorNotFound]] if no such actor exists or the identification didn’t complete within the
supplied timeout.
Remote actor addresses may also be looked up, if remoting is enabled:
getContext().actorSelection("akka.tcp://app@otherhost:1234/user/serviceB");
IMPORTANT: Messages can be any kind of object but have to be immutable. Akka can’t enforce immutability
(yet) so this has to be by convention.
Here is an example of an immutable message:
public class ImmutableMessage {
private final int sequenceNumber;
private final List<String> values;
}
}
Note: There are performance implications of using ask since something needs to keep track of when it times
out, there needs to be something that bridges a Promise into an ActorRef and it also needs to be reachable
through remoting. So always prefer tell for performance, and only ask if you must.
In all these methods you have the option of passing along your own ActorRef. Make it a practice of doing so
because it will allow the receiver actors to be able to respond to your message, since the sender reference is sent
along with the message.
Tell: Fire-forget
This is the preferred way of sending messages. No blocking waiting for a message. This gives the best concurrency
and scalability characteristics.
// don’t forget to think about who is the sender (2nd argument)
target.tell(message, getSelf());
The sender reference is passed along with the message and available within the receiving actor via its getSender
method while processing this message. Inside of an actor it is usually getSelf who shall be the sender, but there
can be cases where replies shall be routed to some other actor—e.g. the parent—in which the second argument to
tell would be a different one. Outside of an actor and if no reply is needed the second argument can be null;
if a reply is needed outside of an actor you can use the ask-pattern described next..
Ask: Send-And-Receive-Future
The ask pattern involves actors as well as futures, hence it is offered as a use pattern rather than a method on
ActorRef:
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.ask;
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.pipe;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.dispatch.Futures;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import akka.util.Timeout;
pipe(transformed, system.dispatcher()).to(actorC);
This example demonstrates ask together with the pipe pattern on futures, because this is likely to be a common
combination. Please note that all of the above is completely non-blocking and asynchronous: ask produces a
Future, two of which are composed into a new future using the Futures.sequence and map methods and
then pipe installs an onComplete-handler on the future to effect the submission of the aggregated Result to
another actor.
Using ask will send a message to the receiving Actor as with tell, and the receiving actor must reply with
getSender().tell(reply, getSelf()) in order to complete the returned Future with a value. The
ask operation involves creating an internal actor for handling this reply, which needs to have a timeout after
which it is destroyed in order not to leak resources; see more below.
Note: A Java 8 variant of the ask pattern that returns a CompletionStage instead of a Scala Future is
available in the akka.pattern.PatternsCS object.
Warning: To complete the future with an exception you need send a Failure message to the sender. This is
not done automatically when an actor throws an exception while processing a message.
try {
String result = operation();
getSender().tell(result, getSelf());
} catch (Exception e) {
getSender().tell(new akka.actor.Status.Failure(e), getSelf());
throw e;
}
If the actor does not complete the future, it will expire after the timeout period, specified as parameter to the ask
method; this will complete the Future with an AskTimeoutException.
See Futures for more information on how to await or query a future.
The onComplete, onSuccess, or onFailure methods of the Future can be used to register a callback to
get a notification when the Future completes. Gives you a way to avoid blocking.
Warning: When using future callbacks, inside actors you need to carefully avoid closing over the containing
actor’s reference, i.e. do not call methods or access mutable state on the enclosing actor from within the call-
back. This would break the actor encapsulation and may introduce synchronization bugs and race conditions
because the callback will be scheduled concurrently to the enclosing actor. Unfortunately there is not yet a
way to detect these illegal accesses at compile time. See also: Actors and shared mutable state
Forward message
You can forward a message from one actor to another. This means that the original sender address/reference is
maintained even though the message is going through a ‘mediator’. This can be useful when writing actors that
work as routers, load-balancers, replicators etc. You need to pass along your context variable as well.
target.forward(result, getContext());
When an actor receives a message it is passed into the onReceive method, this is an abstract method on the
UntypedActor base class that needs to be defined.
Here is an example:
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
An alternative to using if-instanceof checks is to use Apache Commons MethodUtils to invoke a named method
whose parameter type matches the message type.
If you want to have a handle for replying to a message, you can use getSender(), which gives you an ActorRef.
You can reply by sending to that ActorRef with getSender().tell(replyMsg, getSelf()). You can
also store the ActorRef for replying later, or passing on to other actors. If there is no sender (a message was sent
without an actor or future context) then the sender defaults to a ‘dead-letter’ actor ref.
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
Object result =
// calculate result ...
The UntypedActorContext setReceiveTimeout defines the inactivity timeout after which the sending of
a ReceiveTimeout message is triggered. When specified, the receive function should be able to handle an
akka.actor.ReceiveTimeout message. 1 millisecond is the minimum supported timeout.
Please note that the receive timeout might fire and enqueue the ReceiveTimeout message right after another mes-
sage was enqueued; hence it is not guaranteed that upon reception of the receive timeout there must have been
an idle period beforehand as configured via this method.
Once set, the receive timeout stays in effect (i.e. continues firing repeatedly after inactivity periods). Pass in
Duration.Undefined to switch off this feature.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ReceiveTimeout;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
public MyReceiveTimeoutUntypedActor() {
// To set an initial delay
getContext().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create("30 seconds"));
}
Messages marked with NotInfluenceReceiveTimeout will not reset the timer. This can be useful when
ReceiveTimeout should be fired by external inactivity but not influenced by internal activity, e.g. scheduled
tick messages.
Actors are stopped by invoking the stop method of a ActorRefFactory, i.e. ActorContext or
ActorSystem. Typically the context is used for stopping the actor itself or child actors and the system for
stopping top level actors. The actual termination of the actor is performed asynchronously, i.e. stop may return
before the actor is stopped.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
Processing of the current message, if any, will continue before the actor is stopped, but additional messages in the
mailbox will not be processed. By default these messages are sent to the deadLetters of the ActorSystem,
but that depends on the mailbox implementation.
Termination of an actor proceeds in two steps: first the actor suspends its mailbox processing and sends a stop
command to all its children, then it keeps processing the internal termination notifications from its children until
the last one is gone, finally terminating itself (invoking postStop, dumping mailbox, publishing Terminated
on the DeathWatch, telling its supervisor). This procedure ensures that actor system sub-trees terminate in an
orderly fashion, propagating the stop command to the leaves and collecting their confirmation back to the stopped
supervisor. If one of the actors does not respond (i.e. processing a message for extended periods of time and
therefore not receiving the stop command), this whole process will be stuck.
Upon ActorSystem.terminate, the system guardian actors will be stopped, and the aforementioned process
will ensure proper termination of the whole system.
The postStop hook is invoked after an actor is fully stopped. This enables cleaning up of resources:
@Override
public void postStop() {
// clean up resources here ...
}
Note: Since stopping an actor is asynchronous, you cannot immediately reuse the name of the child you just
stopped; this will result in an InvalidActorNameException. Instead, watch the terminating actor and
create its replacement in response to the Terminated message which will eventually arrive.
PoisonPill
You can also send an actor the akka.actor.PoisonPill message, which will stop the actor when the mes-
sage is processed. PoisonPill is enqueued as ordinary messages and will be handled after messages that were
already queued in the mailbox.
Use it like this:
myActor.tell(akka.actor.PoisonPill.getInstance(), sender);
Graceful Stop
gracefulStop is useful if you need to wait for termination or compose ordered termination of several actors:
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.gracefulStop;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.pattern.AskTimeoutException;
try {
Future<Boolean> stopped =
gracefulStop(actorRef, Duration.create(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS), Manager.SHUTDOWN);
Await.result(stopped, Duration.create(6, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
// the actor has been stopped
} catch (AskTimeoutException e) {
// the actor wasn’t stopped within 5 seconds
}
worker.tell("crunch", getSelf());
} else if (message.equals(SHUTDOWN)) {
worker.tell(PoisonPill.getInstance(), getSelf());
getContext().become(shuttingDown);
}
}
When gracefulStop() returns successfully, the actor’s postStop() hook will have been executed: there
exists a happens-before edge between the end of postStop() and the return of gracefulStop().
In the above example a custom Manager.SHUTDOWN message is sent to the target actor to initiate the process
of stopping the actor. You can use PoisonPill for this, but then you have limited possibilities to perform
interactions with other actors before stopping the target actor. Simple cleanup tasks can be handled in postStop.
Warning: Keep in mind that an actor stopping and its name being deregistered are separate events which
happen asynchronously from each other. Therefore it may be that you will find the name still in use after
gracefulStop() returned. In order to guarantee proper deregistration, only reuse names from within a
supervisor you control and only in response to a Terminated message, i.e. not for top-level actors.
4.1.10 HotSwap
Upgrade
Akka supports hotswapping the Actor’s message loop (e.g. its implementation) at runtime. Use the
getContext().become method from within the Actor. The hotswapped code is kept in a Stack which can be
pushed (replacing or adding at the top) and popped.
Warning: Please note that the actor will revert to its original behavior when restarted by its Supervisor.
@Override
public void apply(Object message) {
if (message.equals("bar")) {
getSender().tell("I am already happy :-)", getSelf());
} else if (message.equals("foo")) {
getContext().become(angry);
}
}
};
This variant of the become method is useful for many different things, such as to implement a Finite State
Machine (FSM). It will replace the current behavior (i.e. the top of the behavior stack), which means that you do
not use unbecome, instead always the next behavior is explicitly installed.
The other way of using become does not replace but add to the top of the behavior stack. In this case care must
be taken to ensure that the number of “pop” operations (i.e. unbecome) matches the number of “push” ones in
the long run, otherwise this amounts to a memory leak (which is why this behavior is not the default).
public class UntypedActorSwapper {
private Swap() {
}
}
4.1.11 Stash
The UntypedActorWithStash class enables an actor to temporarily stash away messages that can not or
should not be handled using the actor’s current behavior. Upon changing the actor’s message handler, i.e., right
before invoking getContext().become() or getContext().unbecome(), all stashed messages can
be “unstashed”, thereby prepending them to the actor’s mailbox. This way, the stashed messages can be processed
in the same order as they have been received originally. An actor that extends UntypedActorWithStash will
automatically get a deque-based mailbox.
Invoking stash() adds the current message (the message that the actor received last) to the actor’s stash.
It is typically invoked when handling the default case in the actor’s message handler to stash messages that
aren’t handled by the other cases. It is illegal to stash the same message twice; to do so results in an
IllegalStateException being thrown. The stash may also be bounded in which case invoking stash()
may lead to a capacity violation, which results in a StashOverflowException. The capacity of the stash
can be configured using the stash-capacity setting (an Int) of the mailbox’s configuration.
Invoking unstashAll() enqueues messages from the stash to the actor’s mailbox until the capacity of the mail-
box (if any) has been reached (note that messages from the stash are prepended to the mailbox). In case a bounded
mailbox overflows, a MessageQueueAppendFailedException is thrown. The stash is guaranteed to be
empty after calling unstashAll().
Note: If you want to enforce that your actor can only work with an unbounded stash, then you should use the
UntypedActorWithUnboundedStash class instead.
You can kill an actor by sending a Kill message. This will cause the actor to throw a
ActorKilledException, triggering a failure. The actor will suspend operation and its supervisor will be
asked how to handle the failure, which may mean resuming the actor, restarting it or terminating it completely.
See What Supervision Means for more information.
Use Kill like this:
victim.tell(akka.actor.Kill.getInstance(), ActorRef.noSender());
It can happen that while a message is being processed by an actor, that some kind of exception is thrown, e.g. a
database exception.
If an exception is thrown while a message is being processed (i.e. taken out of its mailbox and handed over to the
current behavior), then this message will be lost. It is important to understand that it is not put back on the mailbox.
So if you want to retry processing of a message, you need to deal with it yourself by catching the exception and
retry your flow. Make sure that you put a bound on the number of retries since you don’t want a system to livelock
(so consuming a lot of cpu cycles without making progress). Another possibility would be to have a look at the
PeekMailbox pattern.
If an exception is thrown while a message is being processed, nothing happens to the mailbox. If the actor is
restarted, the same mailbox will be there. So all messages on that mailbox will be there as well.
If code within an actor throws an exception, that actor is suspended and the supervision process is started (see Su-
pervision and Monitoring). Depending on the supervisor’s decision the actor is resumed (as if nothing happened),
restarted (wiping out its internal state and starting from scratch) or terminated.
The rich lifecycle hooks of Actors provide a useful toolkit to implement various initialization patterns. During the
lifetime of an ActorRef, an actor can potentially go through several restarts, where the old instance is replaced
by a fresh one, invisibly to the outside observer who only sees the ActorRef.
One may think about the new instances as “incarnations”. Initialization might be necessary for every incarnation
of an actor, but sometimes one needs initialization to happen only at the birth of the first instance when the
ActorRef is created. The following sections provide patterns for different initialization needs.
Using the constructor for initialization has various benefits. First of all, it makes it possible to use val fields to
store any state that does not change during the life of the actor instance, making the implementation of the actor
more robust. The constructor is invoked for every incarnation of the actor, therefore the internals of the actor can
always assume that proper initialization happened. This is also the drawback of this approach, as there are cases
when one would like to avoid reinitializing internals on restart. For example, it is often useful to preserve child
actors across restarts. The following section provides a pattern for this case.
The method preStart() of an actor is only called once directly during the initialization of the first instance,
that is, at creation of its ActorRef. In the case of restarts, preStart() is called from postRestart(),
therefore if not overridden, preStart() is called on every incarnation. However, overriding postRestart()
one can disable this behavior, and ensure that there is only one call to preStart().
One useful usage of this pattern is to disable creation of new ActorRefs for children during restarts. This can
be achieved by overriding preRestart():
@Override
public void preStart() {
// Initialize children here
}
Please note, that the child actors are still restarted, but no new ActorRef is created. One can recursively apply
the same principles for the children, ensuring that their preStart() method is called only at the creation of
their refs.
For more information see What Restarting Means.
There are cases when it is impossible to pass all the information needed for actor initialization in the constructor,
for example in the presence of circular dependencies. In this case the actor should listen for an initialization
message, and use become() or a finite state-machine state transition to encode the initialized and uninitialized
states of the actor.
private String initializeMe = null;
@Override
If the actor may receive messages before it has been initialized, a useful tool can be the Stash to save messages
until the initialization finishes, and replaying them after the actor became initialized.
Warning: This pattern should be used with care, and applied only when none of the patterns above are
applicable. One of the potential issues is that messages might be lost when sent to remote actors. Also,
publishing an ActorRef in an uninitialized state might lead to the condition that it receives a user message
before the initialization has been done.
Akka Typed Actors is an implementation of the Active Objects pattern. Essentially turning method invocations
into asynchronous dispatch instead of synchronous that has been the default way since Smalltalk came out.
Typed Actors consist of 2 “parts”, a public interface and an implementation, and if you’ve done any work in
“enterprise” Java, this will be very familiar to you. As with normal Actors you have an external API (the public
interface instance) that will delegate method calls asynchronously to a private instance of the implementation.
The advantage of Typed Actors vs. Actors is that with TypedActors you have a static contract, and don’t need to
define your own messages, the downside is that it places some limitations on what you can do and what you can’t,
i.e. you can’t use become/unbecome.
Typed Actors are implemented using JDK Proxies which provide a pretty easy-worked API to intercept method
calls.
Note: Just as with regular Akka Untyped Actors, Typed Actors process one call at a time.
Typed actors are nice for bridging between actor systems (the “inside”) and non-actor code (the “outside”), because
they allow you to write normal OO-looking code on the outside. Think of them like doors: their practicality lies
in interfacing between private sphere and the public, but you don’t want that many doors inside your house, do
you? For a longer discussion see this blog post.
A bit more background: TypedActors can easily be abused as RPC, and that is an abstraction which is well-
known to be leaky. Hence TypedActors are not what we think of first when we talk about making highly scalable
concurrent software easier to write correctly. They have their niche, use them sparingly.
Before we create our first Typed Actor we should first go through the tools that we have at our disposal, it’s located
in akka.actor.TypedActor.
//Returns the backing Akka Actor behind an external Typed Actor Proxy
TypedActor.get(system).getActorRefFor(someReference);
Warning: Same as not exposing this of an Akka Actor, it’s important not to expose this of a Typed
Actor, instead you should pass the external proxy reference, which is obtained from within your Typed Actor
as TypedActor.self(), this is your external identity, as the ActorRef is the external identity of an
Akka Actor.
To create a Typed Actor you need to have one or more interfaces, and one implementation.
The following imports are assumed:
import akka.actor.TypedActor;
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.japi.*;
import akka.dispatch.Futures;
import docs.AbstractJavaTest;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Random;
import akka.routing.RoundRobinGroup;
public class TypedActorDocTest extends AbstractJavaTest {
Object someReference = null;
ActorSystem system = null;
static
public interface Squarer {
void squareDontCare(int i); //fire-forget
static
class SquarerImpl implements Squarer {
private String name;
public SquarerImpl() {
this.name = "default";
}
try {
//Returns the backing Akka Actor behind an external Typed Actor Proxy
TypedActor.get(system).getActorRefFor(someReference);
} catch (Exception e) {
//dun care
}
}
@Test public void createATypedActor() {
try {
Squarer mySquarer =
TypedActor.get(system).typedActorOf(
new TypedProps<SquarerImpl>(Squarer.class, SquarerImpl.class));
Squarer otherSquarer =
TypedActor.get(system).typedActorOf(
new TypedProps<SquarerImpl>(Squarer.class,
new Creator<SquarerImpl>() {
public SquarerImpl create() { return new SquarerImpl("foo"); }
}),
"name");
mySquarer.squareDontCare(10);
assertEquals(100, Await.result(fSquare,
Duration.create(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS)).intValue());
assertEquals(100, oSquare.get().intValue());
assertEquals(100, iSquare);
TypedActor.get(system).stop(mySquarer);
TypedActor.get(system).poisonPill(otherSquarer);
} catch(Exception e) {
//Ignore
}
}
interface HasName {
String name();
}
Named named1 =
typed.typedActorOf(new TypedProps<Named>(Named.class));
Named named2 =
typed.typedActorOf(new TypedProps<Named>(Named.class));
typed.poisonPill(named1);
typed.poisonPill(named2);
typed.poisonPill(typedRouter);
} catch (Exception e) {
//dun care
}
}
}
public SquarerImpl() {
this.name = "default";
}
The most trivial way of creating a Typed Actor instance of our Squarer:
Squarer mySquarer =
TypedActor.get(system).typedActorOf(
new TypedProps<SquarerImpl>(Squarer.class, SquarerImpl.class));
First type is the type of the proxy, the second type is the type of the implementation. If you need to call a specific
constructor you do it like this:
Squarer otherSquarer =
TypedActor.get(system).typedActorOf(
new TypedProps<SquarerImpl>(Squarer.class,
new Creator<SquarerImpl>() {
public SquarerImpl create() { return new SquarerImpl("foo"); }
}),
"name");
Since you supply a Props, you can specify which dispatcher to use, what the default timeout should be used and
more. Now, our Squarer doesn’t have any methods, so we’d better add those.
public interface Squarer {
void squareDontCare(int i); //fire-forget
Alright, now we’ve got some methods we can call, but we need to implement those in SquarerImpl.
class SquarerImpl implements Squarer {
private String name;
public SquarerImpl() {
this.name = "default";
}
Excellent, now we have an interface and an implementation of that interface, and we know how to create a Typed
Actor from that, so let’s look at calling these methods.
Methods returning:
• void will be dispatched with fire-and-forget semantics, exactly like ActorRef.tell
• scala.concurrent.Future<?> will use send-request-reply semantics, exactly like
ActorRef.ask
• akka.japi.Option<?> will use send-request-reply semantics, but will block to wait for an
answer, and return akka.japi.Option.None if no answer was produced within the timeout, or
akka.japi.Option.Some<?> containing the result otherwise. Any exception that was thrown dur-
ing this call will be rethrown.
• Any other type of value will use send-request-reply semantics, but will block to wait
for an answer, throwing java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException if there was a time-
out or rethrow any exception that was thrown during this call. Note that due to the
Java exception and reflection mechanisms, such a TimeoutException will be wrapped in a
java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException unless the interface method explicitly
declares the TimeoutException as a thrown checked exception.
While Akka cannot enforce that the parameters to the methods of your Typed Actors are immutable, we strongly
recommend that parameters passed are immutable.
mySquarer.squareDontCare(10);
This will block for as long as the timeout that was set in the Props of the Typed Actor, if needed. It will return
None if a timeout occurs.
int iSquare = mySquarer.squareNow(10); //Int
This will block for as long as the timeout that was set in the Props of the Typed Ac-
tor, if needed. It will throw a java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException if a
timeout occurs. Note that here, such a TimeoutException will be wrapped in a
java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException by the Java reflection mechanism, because
the interface method does not explicitly declare the TimeoutException as a thrown checked exception. To get
This call is asynchronous, and the Future returned can be used for asynchronous composition.
Since Akka’s Typed Actors are backed by Akka Actors they must be stopped when they aren’t needed anymore.
TypedActor.get(system).stop(mySquarer);
This asynchronously stops the Typed Actor associated with the specified proxy ASAP.
TypedActor.get(system).poisonPill(otherSquarer);
This asynchronously stops the Typed Actor associated with the specified proxy after it’s done with all calls that
were made prior to this call.
Since you can obtain a contextual Typed Actor Extension by passing in an ActorContext you can create child
Typed Actors by invoking typedActorOf(..) on that.
Squarer childSquarer =
TypedActor.get(TypedActor.context()).
typedActorOf(
new TypedProps<SquarerImpl>(Squarer.class, SquarerImpl.class)
);
//Use "childSquarer" as a Squarer
You can also create a child Typed Actor in regular Akka Actors by giving the UntypedActorContext as an
input parameter to TypedActor.get(. . . ).
By having your Typed Actor implementation class implement TypedActor.Supervisor you can define the
strategy to use for supervising child actors, as described in Supervision and Monitoring and Fault Tolerance.
By having your Typed Actor implementation class implement any and all of the following:
• TypedActor.PreStart
• TypedActor.PostStop
• TypedActor.PreRestart
• TypedActor.PostRestart
You can hook into the lifecycle of your Typed Actor.
4.2.11 Proxying
You can use the typedActorOf that takes a TypedProps and an ActorRef to proxy the given ActorRef as a
TypedActor. This is usable if you want to communicate remotely with TypedActors on other machines, just pass
the ActorRef to typedActorOf.
Since TypedActors are backed by Akka Actors, you can use typedActorOf to proxy ActorRefs
potentially residing on remote nodes.
Squarer typedActor =
TypedActor.get(system).
typedActorOf(
new TypedProps<Squarer>(Squarer.class),
actorRefToRemoteActor
);
//Use "typedActor" as a FooBar
Sometimes you want to spread messages between multiple actors. The easiest way to achieve this in
Akka is to use a Router, which can implement a specific routing logic, such as smallest-mailbox or
consistent-hashing etc.
Routers are not provided directly for typed actors, but it is really easy to leverage an untyped router and use a
typed proxy in front of it. To showcase this let’s create typed actors that assign themselves some random id, so
we know that in fact, the router has sent the message to different actors:
@Test public void typedRouterPattern() {
try {
// prepare routees
TypedActorExtension typed = TypedActor.get(system);
Named named1 =
typed.typedActorOf(new TypedProps<Named>(Named.class));
Named named2 =
typed.typedActorOf(new TypedProps<Named>(Named.class));
typed.poisonPill(named1);
typed.poisonPill(named2);
typed.poisonPill(typedRouter);
} catch (Exception e) {
//dun care
}
}
}
In order to round robin among a few instances of such actors, you can simply create a plain untyped router,
and then facade it with a TypedActor like shown in the example below. This works because typed actors of
course communicate using the same mechanisms as normal actors, and methods calls on them get transformed
into message sends of MethodCall messages.
// prepare routees
TypedActorExtension typed = TypedActor.get(system);
Named named1 =
typed.typedActorOf(new TypedProps<Named>(Named.class));
Named named2 =
typed.typedActorOf(new TypedProps<Named>(Named.class));
As explained in Actor Systems each actor is the supervisor of its children, and as such each actor defines fault
handling supervisor strategy. This strategy cannot be changed afterwards as it is an integral part of the actor
system’s structure.
First, let us look at a sample that illustrates one way to handle data store errors, which is a typical source of failure
in real world applications. Of course it depends on the actual application what is possible to do when the data
store is unavailable, but in this sample we use a best effort re-connect approach.
Read the following source code. The inlined comments explain the different pieces of the fault handling and why
they are added. It is also highly recommended to run this sample as it is easy to follow the log output to understand
what is happening at runtime.
Step Description
1 The Storage throws StorageException.
2 The CounterService is supervisor of the Storage and restarts the Storage when
StorageException is thrown.
3, 4, The Storage continues to fail and is restarted.
5, 6
7 After 3 failures and restarts within 5 seconds the Storage is stopped by its supervisor, i.e. the
CounterService.
8 The CounterService is also watching the Storage for termination and receives the
Terminated message when the Storage has been stopped ...
9, 10, and tells the Counter that there is no Storage.
11
12 The CounterService schedules a Reconnect message to itself.
13, When it receives the Reconnect message it creates a new Storage ...
14
15, and tells the Counter to use the new Storage
16
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import akka.japi.Function;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.util.Timeout;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import com.typesafe.config.Config;
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory;
/**
* Runs the sample
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
Config config = ConfigFactory.parseString("akka.loglevel = DEBUG \n" +
"akka.actor.debug.lifecycle = on");
/**
* Listens on progress from the worker and shuts down the system when enough
* work has been done.
*/
public static class Listener extends UntypedActor {
final LoggingAdapter log = Logging.getLogger(getContext().system(), this);
@Override
public void preStart() {
// If we don’t get any progress within 15 seconds then the service
// is unavailable
getContext().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create("15 seconds"));
}
/**
* Worker performs some work when it receives the Start message. It will
* continuously notify the sender of the Start message of current Progress.
* The Worker supervise the CounterService.
*/
public static class Worker extends UntypedActor {
final LoggingAdapter log = Logging.getLogger(getContext().system(), this);
final Timeout askTimeout = new Timeout(Duration.create(5, "seconds"));
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
public Increment(long n) {
this.n = n;
}
/**
* Adds the value received in Increment message to a persistent counter.
* Replies with CurrentCount when it is asked for CurrentCount. CounterService
* supervise Storage and Counter.
*/
public static class CounterService extends UntypedActor {
// Reconnect message
static final Object Reconnect = "Reconnect";
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
@Override
public void preStart() {
initStorage();
}
/**
* The child storage is restarted in case of failure, but after 3 restarts,
* and still failing it will be stopped. Better to back-off than
* continuously failing. When it has been stopped we will schedule a
* Reconnect after a delay. Watch the child so we receive Terminated message
* when it has been terminated.
*/
void initStorage() {
storage = getContext().watch(getContext().actorOf(
Props.create(Storage.class), "storage"));
// Tell the counter, if any, to use the new storage
if (counter != null)
counter.tell(new UseStorage(storage), getSelf());
// We need the initial value to be able to operate
storage.tell(new Get(key), getSelf());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
log.debug("received message {}", msg);
if (msg instanceof Entry && ((Entry) msg).key.equals(key) &&
counter == null) {
// Reply from Storage of the initial value, now we can create the Counter
final long value = ((Entry) msg).value;
counter = getContext().actorOf(Props.create(Counter.class, key, value));
// Tell the counter to use current storage
counter.tell(new UseStorage(storage), getSelf());
// and send the buffered backlog to the counter
for (SenderMsgPair each : backlog) {
counter.tell(each.msg, each.sender);
}
backlog.clear();
} else if (msg instanceof Increment) {
forwardOrPlaceInBacklog(msg);
} else if (msg.equals(GetCurrentCount)) {
forwardOrPlaceInBacklog(msg);
} else if (msg instanceof Terminated) {
// After 3 restarts the storage child is stopped.
// We receive Terminated because we watch the child, see initStorage.
storage = null;
/**
* The in memory count variable that will send current value to the Storage,
* if there is any storage available at the moment.
*/
public static class Counter extends UntypedActor {
final LoggingAdapter log = Logging.getLogger(getContext().system(), this);
final String key;
long count;
ActorRef storage;
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
log.debug("received message {}", msg);
if (msg instanceof UseStorage) {
void storeCount() {
// Delegate dangerous work, to protect our valuable state.
// We can continue without storage.
if (storage != null) {
storage.tell(new Store(new Entry(key, count)), getSelf());
}
}
}
/**
* Saves key/value pairs to persistent storage when receiving Store message.
* Replies with current value when receiving Get message. Will throw
* StorageException if the underlying data store is out of order.
*/
public static class Storage extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
log.debug("received message {}", msg);
if (msg instanceof Store) {
Store store = (Store) msg;
db.save(store.entry.key, store.entry.value);
} else if (msg instanceof Get) {
Get get = (Get) msg;
Long value = db.load(get.key);
getSender().tell(new Entry(get.key, value == null ?
Long.valueOf(0L) : value), getSelf());
} else {
unhandled(msg);
}
}
}
private DummyDB() {
}
The following sections explain the fault handling mechanism and alternatives in more depth.
For the sake of demonstration let us consider the following strategy:
private static SupervisorStrategy strategy =
new OneForOneStrategy(10, Duration.create("1 minute"),
new Function<Throwable, Directive>() {
@Override
public Directive apply(Throwable t) {
if (t instanceof ArithmeticException) {
return resume();
} else if (t instanceof NullPointerException) {
return restart();
} else if (t instanceof IllegalArgumentException) {
return stop();
} else {
return escalate();
}
}
});
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
I have chosen a few well-known exception types in order to demonstrate the application of the fault handling
directives described in Supervision and Monitoring. First off, it is a one-for-one strategy, meaning that each child
is treated separately (an all-for-one strategy works very similarly, the only difference is that any decision is applied
to all children of the supervisor, not only the failing one). There are limits set on the restart frequency, namely
maximum 10 restarts per minute. -1 and Duration.Inf() means that the respective limit does not apply,
leaving the possibility to specify an absolute upper limit on the restarts or to make the restarts work infinitely. The
child actor is stopped if the limit is exceeded.
Note: If the strategy is declared inside the supervising actor (as opposed to a separate class) its decider has access
to all internal state of the actor in a thread-safe fashion, including obtaining a reference to the currently failed child
(available as the getSender of the failure message).
Escalate is used if the defined strategy doesn’t cover the exception that was thrown.
When the supervisor strategy is not defined for an actor the following exceptions are handled by default:
• ActorInitializationException will stop the failing child actor
• ActorKilledException will stop the failing child actor
• Exception will restart the failing child actor
• Other types of Throwable will be escalated to parent actor
If the exception escalate all the way up to the root guardian it will handle it in the same way as the default strategy
defined above.
Closer to the Erlang way is the strategy to just stop children when they fail and then take cor-
rective action in the supervisor when DeathWatch signals the loss of the child. This strategy is
also provided pre-packaged as SupervisorStrategy.stoppingStrategy with an accompanying
StoppingSupervisorStrategy configurator to be used when you want the "/user" guardian to apply it.
By default the SupervisorStrategy logs failures unless they are escalated. Escalated failures are supposed
to be handled, and potentially logged, at a level higher in the hierarchy.
You can mute the default logging of a SupervisorStrategy by setting loggingEnabled to false when
instantiating it. Customized logging can be done inside the Decider. Note that the reference to the currently
failed child is available as the getSender when the SupervisorStrategy is declared inside the supervising
actor.
You may also customize the logging in your own SupervisorStrategy implementation by overriding the
logFailure method.
Toplevel actors means those which are created using system.actorOf(), and they are children of the User
Guardian. There are no special rules applied in this case, the guardian simply applies the configured strategy.
The following section shows the effects of the different directives in practice, where a test setup is needed. First
off, we need a suitable supervisor:
public class Supervisor extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
This supervisor will be used to create a child, with which we can experiment:
public class Child extends UntypedActor {
int state = 0;
state = (Integer) o;
} else if (o.equals("get")) {
getSender().tell(state, getSelf());
} else {
unhandled(o);
}
}
}
The test is easier by using the utilities described in akka-testkit, where TestProbe provides an actor ref useful
for receiving and inspecting replies.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy;
import static akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy.resume;
import static akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy.restart;
import static akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy.stop;
import static akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy.escalate;
import akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy.Directive;
import akka.actor.OneForOneStrategy;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.actor.Terminated;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import docs.AbstractJavaTest;
import scala.collection.immutable.Seq;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.ask;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.testkit.TestProbe;
@BeforeClass
public static void start() {
system = ActorSystem.create("FaultHandlingTest");
}
@AfterClass
public static void cleanup() {
JavaTestKit.shutdownActorSystem(system);
system = null;
}
@Test
public void mustEmploySupervisorStrategy() throws Exception {
// code here
}
The first test shall demonstrate the Resume directive, so we try it out by setting some non-initial state in the actor
and have it fail:
child.tell(42, ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(42);
child.tell(new ArithmeticException(), ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(42);
As you can see the value 42 survives the fault handling directive. Now, if we change the failure to a more serious
NullPointerException, that will no longer be the case:
child.tell(new NullPointerException(), ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(0);
And finally in case of the fatal IllegalArgumentException the child will be terminated by the supervisor:
final TestProbe probe = new TestProbe(system);
probe.watch(child);
child.tell(new IllegalArgumentException(), ActorRef.noSender());
probe.expectMsgClass(Terminated.class);
Up to now the supervisor was completely unaffected by the child’s failure, because the directives set did handle it.
In case of an Exception, this is not true anymore and the supervisor escalates the failure.
child = (ActorRef) Await.result(ask(supervisor,
Props.create(Child.class), 5000), timeout);
probe.watch(child);
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(0);
child.tell(new Exception(), ActorRef.noSender());
probe.expectMsgClass(Terminated.class);
The supervisor itself is supervised by the top-level actor provided by the ActorSystem, which
has the default policy to restart in case of all Exception cases (with the notable exceptions of
ActorInitializationException and ActorKilledException). Since the default directive in case
of a restart is to kill all children, we expected our poor child not to survive this failure.
In case this is not desired (which depends on the use case), we need to use a different supervisor which overrides
this behavior.
public class Supervisor2 extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
} else {
unhandled(o);
}
}
@Override
public void preRestart(Throwable cause, Option<Object> msg) {
// do not kill all children, which is the default here
}
}
With this parent, the child survives the escalated restart, as demonstrated in the last test:
superprops = Props.create(Supervisor2.class);
supervisor = system.actorOf(superprops);
child = (ActorRef) Await.result(ask(supervisor,
Props.create(Child.class), 5000), timeout);
child.tell(23, ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(23);
child.tell(new Exception(), ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(0);
4.4 Dispatchers
An Akka MessageDispatcher is what makes Akka Actors “tick”, it is the engine of the machine so to speak.
All MessageDispatcher implementations are also an ExecutionContext, which means that they can be
used to execute arbitrary code, for instance Futures.
Every ActorSystem will have a default dispatcher that will be used in case nothing else is config-
ured for an Actor. The default dispatcher can be configured, and is by default a Dispatcher
with the specified default-executor. If an ActorSystem is created with an ExecutionCon-
text passed in, this ExecutionContext will be used as the default executor for all dispatchers in
this ActorSystem. If no ExecutionContext is given, it will fallback to the executor specified in
akka.actor.default-dispatcher.default-executor.fallback. By default this is a “fork-
join-executor”, which gives excellent performance in most cases.
Dispatchers implement the ExecutionContext interface and can thus be used to run Future invocations etc.
// this is scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
// for use with Futures, Scheduler, etc.
final ExecutionContext ex = system.dispatchers().lookup("my-dispatcher");
So in case you want to give your Actor a different dispatcher than the default, you need to do two things, of
which the first is is to configure the dispatcher:
my-dispatcher {
# Dispatcher is the name of the event-based dispatcher
type = Dispatcher
# What kind of ExecutionService to use
executor = "fork-join-executor"
Note: Note that the parallelism-max does not set the upper bound on the total number of threads allocated
by the ForkJoinPool. It is a setting specifically talking about the number of hot threads the pool keep running in
order to reduce the latency of handling a new incoming task. You can read more about parallelism in the JDK’s
ForkJoinPool documentation.
akka.actor.deployment {
/myactor {
dispatcher = my-dispatcher
}
}
An alternative to the deployment configuration is to define the dispatcher in code. If you define the dispatcher
in the deployment configuration then this value will be used instead of programmatically provided parameter.
ActorRef myActor =
system.actorOf(Props.create(MyUntypedActor.class).withDispatcher("my-dispatcher"),
"myactor3");
Note: The dispatcher you specify in withDispatcher and the dispatcher property in the deploy-
ment configuration is in fact a path into your configuration. So in this example it’s a top-level section, but
you could for instance put it as a sub-section, where you’d use periods to denote sub-sections, like this:
"foo.bar.my-dispatcher"
Configuring a dispatcher with fixed thread pool size, e.g. for actors that perform blocking IO:
blocking-io-dispatcher {
type = Dispatcher
executor = "thread-pool-executor"
thread-pool-executor {
fixed-pool-size = 32
}
throughput = 1
}
Configuring a PinnedDispatcher:
my-pinned-dispatcher {
executor = "thread-pool-executor"
type = PinnedDispatcher
}
4.5 Mailboxes
An Akka Mailbox holds the messages that are destined for an Actor. Normally each Actor has its own
mailbox, but with for example a BalancingPool all routees will share a single mailbox instance.
It is possible to require a certain type of message queue for a certain type of actor by having that actor implement
the parameterized interface RequiresMessageQueue. Here is an example:
import akka.dispatch.BoundedMessageQueueSemantics;
import akka.dispatch.RequiresMessageQueue;
The type parameter to the RequiresMessageQueue interface needs to be mapped to a mailbox in configura-
tion like this:
bounded-mailbox {
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.BoundedMailbox"
mailbox-capacity = 1000
mailbox-push-timeout-time = 10s
}
akka.actor.mailbox.requirements {
"akka.dispatch.BoundedMessageQueueSemantics" = bounded-mailbox
}
Now every time you create an actor of type MyBoundedUntypedActor it will try to get a bounded mailbox.
If the actor has a different mailbox configured in deployment, either directly or via a dispatcher with a specified
mailbox type, then that will override this mapping.
Note: The type of the queue in the mailbox created for an actor will be checked against the required type in the
interface and if the queue doesn’t implement the required type then actor creation will fail.
A dispatcher may also have a requirement for the mailbox type used by the actors running on it. An example is
the BalancingDispatcher which requires a message queue that is thread-safe for multiple concurrent consumers.
Such a requirement is formulated within the dispatcher configuration section like this:
my-dispatcher {
mailbox-requirement = org.example.MyInterface
}
The given requirement names a class or interface which will then be ensured to be a supertype of the message
queue’s implementation. In case of a conflict—e.g. if the actor requires a mailbox type which does not satisfy this
requirement—then actor creation will fail.
When an actor is created, the ActorRefProvider first determines the dispatcher which will execute it. Then
the mailbox is determined as follows:
1. If the actor’s deployment configuration section contains a mailbox key then that names a configuration
section describing the mailbox type to be used.
2. If the actor’s Props contains a mailbox selection—i.e. withMailbox was called on it—then that names
a configuration section describing the mailbox type to be used.
3. If the dispatcher’s configuration section contains a mailbox-type key the same section will be used to
configure the mailbox type.
4. If the actor requires a mailbox type as described above then the mapping for that requirement will be used
to determine the mailbox type to be used; if that fails then the dispatcher’s requirement—if any—will be
tried instead.
5. If the dispatcher requires a mailbox type as described above then the mapping for that requirement will be
used to determine the mailbox type to be used.
6. The default mailbox akka.actor.default-mailbox will be used.
Default Mailbox
When the mailbox is not specified as described above the default mailbox is used. By default it is an unbounded
mailbox, which is backed by a java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue.
SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox is an even more efficient mailbox, and it can be used as the
default mailbox, but it cannot be used with a BalancingDispatcher.
Configuration of SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox as default mailbox:
akka.actor.default-mailbox {
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.SingleConsumerOnlyUnboundedMailbox"
}
Each mailbox type is implemented by a class which extends MailboxType and takes two constructor arguments:
a ActorSystem.Settings object and a Config section. The latter is computed by obtaining the named
configuration section from the actor system’s configuration, overriding its id key with the configuration path of
the mailbox type and adding a fall-back to the default mailbox configuration section.
– Blocking: No
– Bounded: No
– Configuration name: “akka.dispatch.UnboundedPriorityMailbox”
• UnboundedStablePriorityMailbox
– Backed by a java.util.concurrent.PriorityBlockingQueue wrapped in an
akka.util.PriorityQueueStabilizer
– FIFO order is preserved for messages of equal priority - contrast with the UnboundedPriorityMailbox
– Blocking: No
– Bounded: No
– Configuration name: “akka.dispatch.UnboundedStablePriorityMailbox”
Other bounded mailbox implementations which will block the sender if the capacity is reached and configured
with non-zero mailbox-push-timeout-time.
Note: The following mailboxes should only be used with zero mailbox-push-timeout-time.
• BoundedMailbox
– Backed by a java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue
– Blocking: Yes if used with non-zero mailbox-push-timeout-time, otherwise No
– Bounded: Yes
– Configuration name: “bounded” or “akka.dispatch.BoundedMailbox”
• BoundedPriorityMailbox
– Backed by a java.util.PriorityQueue wrapped in an
akka.util.BoundedBlockingQueue
– Delivery order for messages of equal priority is undefined - contrast with the
BoundedStablePriorityMailbox
– Blocking: Yes if used with non-zero mailbox-push-timeout-time, otherwise No
– Bounded: Yes
– Configuration name: "akka.dispatch.BoundedPriorityMailbox"
• BoundedStablePriorityMailbox
– Backed by a java.util.PriorityQueue wrapped in an
akka.util.PriorityQueueStabilizer and an akka.util.BoundedBlockingQueue
– FIFO order is preserved for messages of equal priority - contrast with the BoundedPriorityMailbox
– Blocking: Yes if used with non-zero mailbox-push-timeout-time, otherwise No
– Bounded: Yes
– Configuration name: “akka.dispatch.BoundedStablePriorityMailbox”
• BoundedControlAwareMailbox
– Delivers messages that extend akka.dispatch.ControlMessage with higher priority
– Backed by two java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue and blocking on en-
queue if capacity has been reached
– Blocking: Yes if used with non-zero mailbox-push-timeout-time, otherwise No
– Bounded: Yes
– Configuration name: “akka.dispatch.BoundedControlAwareMailbox”
PriorityMailbox
/*
Logs:
’highpriority
’highpriority
’pigdog
’pigdog2
’pigdog3
’lowpriority
’lowpriority
*/
akka.actor.deployment {
/priomailboxactor {
mailbox = prio-mailbox
}
}
ControlAwareMailbox
A ControlAwareMailbox can be very useful if an actor needs to be able to receive control messages imme-
diately no matter how many other messages are already in its mailbox.
It can be configured like this:
control-aware-dispatcher {
mailbox-type = "akka.dispatch.UnboundedControlAwareMailbox"
//Other dispatcher configuration goes here
}
/*
Logs:
’MyControlMessage
’foo
’bar
*/
And then you just specify the FQCN of your MailboxType as the value of the “mailbox-type” in the dispatcher
configuration, or the mailbox configuration.
You can also use the mailbox as a requirement on the dispatcher like this:
custom-dispatcher {
mailbox-requirement =
"docs.dispatcher.MyUnboundedJMessageQueueSemantics"
}
akka.actor.mailbox.requirements {
"docs.dispatcher.MyUnboundedJMessageQueueSemantics" =
custom-dispatcher-mailbox
}
custom-dispatcher-mailbox {
mailbox-type = "docs.dispatcher.MyUnboundedJMailbox"
}
In order to make system.actorOf both synchronous and non-blocking while keeping the return type
ActorRef (and the semantics that the returned ref is fully functional), special handling takes place for this
case. Behind the scenes, a hollow kind of actor reference is constructed, which is sent to the system’s guardian
actor who actually creates the actor and its context and puts those inside the reference. Until that has happened,
messages sent to the ActorRef will be queued locally, and only upon swapping the real filling in will they be
transferred into the real mailbox. Thus,
final Props props = ...
// this actor uses MyCustomMailbox, which is assumed to be a singleton
system.actorOf(props.withDispatcher("myCustomMailbox").tell("bang", sender);
assert(MyCustomMailbox.getInstance().getLastEnqueued().equals("bang"));
will probably fail; you will have to allow for some time to pass and retry the check à la TestKit.awaitCond.
4.6 Routing
Messages can be sent via a router to efficiently route them to destination actors, known as its routees. A Router
can be used inside or outside of an actor, and you can manage the routees yourselves or use a self contained router
actor with configuration capabilities.
Different routing strategies can be used, according to your application’s needs. Akka comes with several useful
routing strategies right out of the box. But, as you will see in this chapter, it is also possible to create your own.
The following example illustrates how to use a Router and manage the routees from within an actor.
Router router;
{
List<Routee> routees = new ArrayList<Routee>();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
ActorRef r = getContext().actorOf(Props.create(Worker.class));
getContext().watch(r);
routees.add(new ActorRefRoutee(r));
}
router = new Router(new RoundRobinRoutingLogic(), routees);
}
We create a Router and specify that it should use RoundRobinRoutingLogic when routing the messages
to the routees.
The routing logic shipped with Akka are:
• akka.routing.RoundRobinRoutingLogic
• akka.routing.RandomRoutingLogic
• akka.routing.SmallestMailboxRoutingLogic
• akka.routing.BroadcastRoutingLogic
• akka.routing.ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRoutingLogic
• akka.routing.TailChoppingRoutingLogic
• akka.routing.ConsistentHashingRoutingLogic
We create the routees as ordinary child actors wrapped in ActorRefRoutee. We watch the routees to be able
to replace them if they are terminated.
Sending messages via the router is done with the route method, as is done for the Work messages in the example
above.
The Router is immutable and the RoutingLogic is thread safe; meaning that they can also be used outside
of actors.
Note: In general, any message sent to a router will be sent onwards to its routees, but there is one exception. The
special Broadcast Messages will send to all of a router’s routees. However, do not use Broadcast Messages when
you use BalancingPool for routees as described in Specially Handled Messages.
A router can also be created as a self contained actor that manages the routees itself and loads routing logic and
other settings from configuration.
This type of router actor comes in two distinct flavors:
• Pool - The router creates routees as child actors and removes them from the router if they terminate.
• Group - The routee actors are created externally to the router and the router sends messages to the specified
path using actor selection, without watching for termination.
The settings for a router actor can be defined in configuration or programmatically. In order to make an actor to
make use of an externally configurable router the FromConfig props wrapper must be used to denote that the
actor accepts routing settings from configuration. This is in contrast with Remote Deployment where such marker
props is not necessary. If the props of an actor is NOT wrapped in FromConfig it will ignore the router section
of the deployment configuration.
You send messages to the routees via the router actor in the same way as for ordinary actors, i.e. via its ActorRef.
The router actor forwards messages onto its routees without changing the original sender. When a routee replies
to a routed message, the reply will be sent to the original sender, not to the router actor.
Note: In general, any message sent to a router will be sent onwards to its routees, but there are a few exceptions.
These are documented in the Specially Handled Messages section below.
Pool
The following code and configuration snippets show how to create a round-robin router that forwards messages to
five Worker routees. The routees will be created as the router’s children.
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router1 {
router = round-robin-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
}
}
ActorRef router1 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(Props.create(Worker.class)),
"router1");
Here is the same example, but with the router configuration provided programmatically instead of from configu-
ration.
ActorRef router2 =
getContext().actorOf(new RoundRobinPool(5).props(Props.create(Worker.class)),
"router2");
In addition to being able to create local actors as routees, you can instruct the router to deploy its created children
on a set of remote hosts. Routees will be deployed in round-robin fashion. In order to deploy routees remotely,
wrap the router configuration in a RemoteRouterConfig, attaching the remote addresses of the nodes to
deploy to. Remote deployment requires the akka-remote module to be included in the classpath.
Address[] addresses = {
new Address("akka.tcp", "remotesys", "otherhost", 1234),
AddressFromURIString.parse("akka.tcp://othersys@anotherhost:1234")};
ActorRef routerRemote = system.actorOf(
Senders
However, it is often useful for routees to set the router as a sender. For example, you might want to set the router
as the sender if you want to hide the details of the routees behind the router. The following code snippet shows
how to set the parent router as sender.
getSender().tell("reply", getContext().parent());
Supervision
Routees that are created by a pool router will be created as the router’s children. The router is therefore also the
children’s supervisor.
The supervision strategy of the router actor can be configured with the supervisorStrategy property of the
Pool. If no configuration is provided, routers default to a strategy of “always escalate”. This means that errors are
passed up to the router’s supervisor for handling. The router’s supervisor will decide what to do about any errors.
Note the router’s supervisor will treat the error as an error with the router itself. Therefore a directive to stop or
restart will cause the router itself to stop or restart. The router, in turn, will cause its children to stop and restart.
It should be mentioned that the router’s restart behavior has been overridden so that a restart, while still re-creating
the children, will still preserve the same number of actors in the pool.
This means that if you have not specified supervisorStrategy of the router or its parent a failure in a routee
will escalate to the parent of the router, which will by default restart the router, which will restart all routees (it
uses Escalate and does not stop routees during restart). The reason is to make the default behave such that adding
withRouter to a child’s definition does not change the supervision strategy applied to the child. This might be
an inefficiency that you can avoid by specifying the strategy when defining the router.
Setting the strategy is easily done:
final SupervisorStrategy strategy =
new OneForOneStrategy(5, Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.MINUTES),
Collections.<Class<? extends Throwable>>singletonList(Exception.class));
final ActorRef router = system.actorOf(new RoundRobinPool(5).
withSupervisorStrategy(strategy).props(Props.create(Echo.class)));
Note: If the child of a pool router terminates, the pool router will not automatically spawn a new child. In the
event that all children of a pool router have terminated the router will terminate itself unless it is a dynamic router,
e.g. using a resizer.
Group
Sometimes, rather than having the router actor create its routees, it is desirable to create routees separately and pro-
vide them to the router for its use. You can do this by passing an paths of the routees to the router’s configuration.
Messages will be sent with ActorSelection to these paths.
The example below shows how to create a router by providing it with the path strings of three routee actors.
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router3 {
router = round-robin-group
routees.paths = ["/user/workers/w1", "/user/workers/w2", "/user/workers/w3"]
}
}
ActorRef router3 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(), "router3");
Here is the same example, but with the router configuration provided programmatically instead of from configu-
ration.
ActorRef router4 =
getContext().actorOf(new RoundRobinGroup(paths).props(), "router4");
The paths may contain protocol and address information for actors running on remote hosts. Remoting requires
the akka-remote module to be included in the classpath.
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/remoteGroup {
router = round-robin-group
routees.paths = [
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1",
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1",
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1"]
}
}
In this section we will describe how to create the different types of router actors.
The router actors in this section are created from within a top level actor named parent. Note that deployment
paths in the configuration starts with /parent/ followed by the name of the router actor.
system.actorOf(Props.create(Parent.class), "parent");
ActorRef router1 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(Props.create(Worker.class)),
"router1");
ActorRef router3 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(), "router3");
This router type selects one of its routees randomly for each message.
RandomPool defined in configuration:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router5 {
router = random-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
}
}
ActorRef router5 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router5");
ActorRef router7 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(), "router7");
BalancingPool
A Router that will try to redistribute work from busy routees to idle routees. All routees share the same mailbox.
Note: The BalancingPool has the property that its routees do not have truly distinct identity: they have different
names, but talking to them will not end up at the right actor in most cases. Therefore you cannot use it for
workflows that require state to be kept within the routee, you would in this case have to include the whole state in
the messages.
With a SmallestMailboxPool you can have a vertically scaling service that can interact in a stateful fashion with
other services in the back-end before replying to the original client. The other advantage is that it does not place
a restriction on the message queue implementation as BalancingPool does.
Note: Do not use Broadcast Messages when you use BalancingPool for routers, as described in Specially Handled
Messages.
ActorRef router9 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router9");
Addition configuration for the balancing dispatcher, which is used by the pool, can be configured in the
pool-dispatcher section of the router deployment configuration.
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router9b {
router = balancing-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
pool-dispatcher {
attempt-teamwork = off
}
}
}
The BalancingPool automatically uses a special BalancingDispatcher for its routees - disregarding
any dispatcher that is set on the routee Props object. This is needed in order to implement the balancing semantics
via sharing the same mailbox by all the routees.
While it is not possible to change the dispatcher used by the routees, it is possible to fine tune the used execu-
tor. By default the fork-join-dispatcher is used and can be configured as explained in Dispatchers. In
situations where the routees are expected to perform blocking operations it may be useful to replace it with a
thread-pool-executor hinting the number of allocated threads explicitly:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router10b {
router = balancing-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
pool-dispatcher {
executor = "thread-pool-executor"
It is also possible to change the mailbox used by the balancing dispatcher for scenarios where the default
unbounded mailbox is not well suited. An example of such a scenario could arise whether there exists the need to
manage priority for each message. You can then implement a priority mailbox and configure your dispatcher:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router10c {
router = balancing-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
pool-dispatcher {
mailbox = myapp.myprioritymailbox
}
}
}
Note: Bear in mind that BalancingDispatcher requires a message queue that must be thread-safe for
multiple concurrent consumers. So it is mandatory for the message queue backing a custom mailbox for this kind
of dispatcher to implement akka.dispatch.MultipleConsumerSemantics. See details on how to implement your
custom mailbox in Mailboxes.
SmallestMailboxPool
A Router that tries to send to the non-suspended child routee with fewest messages in mailbox. The selection is
done in this order:
• pick any idle routee (not processing message) with empty mailbox
• pick any routee with empty mailbox
• pick routee with fewest pending messages in mailbox
• pick any remote routee, remote actors are consider lowest priority, since their mailbox size is unknown
SmallestMailboxPool defined in configuration:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router11 {
router = smallest-mailbox-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
}
}
ActorRef router11 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router11");
There is no Group variant of the SmallestMailboxPool because the size of the mailbox and the internal dispatching
state of the actor is not practically available from the paths of the routees.
ActorRef router13 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router13");
ActorRef router15 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(), "router15");
Note: Broadcast routers always broadcast every message to their routees. If you do not want to broadcast every
message, then you can use a non-broadcasting router and use Broadcast Messages as needed.
The ScatterGatherFirstCompletedRouter will send the message on to all its routees. It then waits for first reply it
gets back. This result will be sent back to original sender. Other replies are discarded.
It is expecting at least one reply within a configured duration, otherwise it will reply with
akka.pattern.AskTimeoutException in a akka.actor.Status.Failure.
ScatterGatherFirstCompletedPool defined in configuration:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router17 {
router = scatter-gather-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
within = 10 seconds
}
}
ActorRef router17 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router17");
ActorRef router19 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(), "router19");
The TailChoppingRouter will first send the message to one, randomly picked, routee and then after a small delay
to a second routee (picked randomly from the remaining routees) and so on. It waits for first reply it gets back and
forwards it back to original sender. Other replies are discarded.
The goal of this router is to decrease latency by performing redundant queries to multiple routees, assuming that
one of the other actors may still be faster to respond than the initial one.
This optimisation was described nicely in a blog post by Peter Bailis: Doing redundant work to speed up dis-
tributed queries.
TailChoppingPool defined in configuration:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router21 {
router = tail-chopping-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
within = 10 seconds
tail-chopping-router.interval = 20 milliseconds
}
}
ActorRef router21 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router21");
ActorRef router23 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(), "router23");
The ConsistentHashingPool uses consistent hashing to select a routee based on the sent message. This article
gives good insight into how consistent hashing is implemented.
There is 3 ways to define what data to use for the consistent hash key.
• You can define withHashMapper of the router to map incoming messages to their consistent hash key.
This makes the decision transparent for the sender.
• The messages may implement akka.routing.ConsistentHashingRouter.ConsistentHashable.
The key is part of the message and it’s convenient to define it together with the message definition.
• The messages can be wrapped in a akka.routing.ConsistentHashingRouter.ConsistentHashableEnvelo
to define what data to use for the consistent hash key. The sender knows the key to use.
These ways to define the consistent hash key can be use together and at the same time for one router. The
withHashMapper is tried first.
Code example:
public class Cache extends UntypedActor {
Map<String, String> cache = new HashMap<String, String>();
};
cache.tell(new ConsistentHashableEnvelope(
new Entry("hello", "HELLO"), "hello"), getRef());
cache.tell(new ConsistentHashableEnvelope(
new Entry("hi", "HI"), "hi"), getRef());
In the above example you see that the Get message implements ConsistentHashable itself, while the
Entry message is wrapped in a ConsistentHashableEnvelope. The Evict message is handled by
the hashMapping partial function.
ConsistentHashingPool defined in configuration:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router25 {
router = consistent-hashing-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
virtual-nodes-factor = 10
}
}
ActorRef router25 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(Props.create(Worker.class)),
"router25");
ActorRef router27 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(), "router27");
ActorRef router28 =
getContext().actorOf(new ConsistentHashingGroup(paths).props(), "router28");
virtual-nodes-factor is the number of virtual nodes per routee that is used in the consistent hash node
ring to make the distribution more uniform.
Most messages sent to router actors will be forwarded according to the routers’ routing logic. However there are
a few types of messages that have special behavior.
Note that these special messages, except for the Broadcast message, are only handled by self contained router
actors and not by the akka.routing.Router component described in A Simple Router.
Broadcast Messages
A Broadcast message can be used to send a message to all of a router’s routees. When a router receives a
Broadcast message, it will broadcast that message’s payload to all routees, no matter how that router would
normally route its messages.
The example below shows how you would use a Broadcast message to send a very important message to every
routee of a router.
router.tell(new Broadcast("Watch out for Davy Jones’ locker"), getTestActor());
In this example the router receives the Broadcast message, extracts its payload
("Watch out for Davy Jones’ locker"), and then sends the payload on to all of the router’s
routees. It is up to each routee actor to handle the received payload message.
Note: Do not use Broadcast Messages when you use BalancingPool for routers. Routees on BalancingPool
shares the same mailbox instance, thus some routees can possibly get the broadcast message multiple times, while
other routees get no broadcast message.
PoisonPill Messages
A PoisonPill message has special handling for all actors, including for routers. When any actor receives a
PoisonPill message, that actor will be stopped. See the PoisonPill documentation for details.
router.tell(PoisonPill.getInstance(), getTestActor());
For a router, which normally passes on messages to routees, it is important to realise that PoisonPill messages
are processed by the router only. PoisonPill messages sent to a router will not be sent on to routees.
However, a PoisonPill message sent to a router may still affect its routees, because it will stop the router and
when the router stops it also stops its children. Stopping children is normal actor behavior. The router will stop
routees that it has created as children. Each child will process its current message and then stop. This may lead to
some messages being unprocessed. See the documentation on Stopping actors for more information.
If you wish to stop a router and its routees, but you would like the routees to first process all the messages
currently in their mailboxes, then you should not send a PoisonPill message to the router. Instead you should
wrap a PoisonPill message inside a Broadcast message so that each routee will receive the PoisonPill
message. Note that this will stop all routees, even if the routees aren’t children of the router, i.e. even routees
programmatically provided to the router.
router.tell(new Broadcast(PoisonPill.getInstance()), getTestActor());
With the code shown above, each routee will receive a PoisonPill message. Each routee will continue to
process its messages as normal, eventually processing the PoisonPill. This will cause the routee to stop. After
all routees have stopped the router will itself be stopped automatically unless it is a dynamic router, e.g. using a
resizer.
Note: Brendan W McAdams’ excellent blog post Distributing Akka Workloads - And Shutting Down Afterwards
discusses in more detail how PoisonPill messages can be used to shut down routers and routees.
Kill Messages
Kill messages are another type of message that has special handling. See Killing an Actor for general informa-
tion about how actors handle Kill messages.
When a Kill message is sent to a router the router processes the message internally, and does not send it on to its
routees. The router will throw an ActorKilledException and fail. It will then be either resumed, restarted
or terminated, depending how it is supervised.
Routees that are children of the router will also be suspended, and will be affected by the supervision directive
that is applied to the router. Routees that are not the routers children, i.e. those that were created externally to the
router, will not be affected.
router.tell(Kill.getInstance(), getTestActor());
As with the PoisonPill message, there is a distinction between killing a router, which indirectly kills its
children (who happen to be routees), and killing routees directly (some of whom may not be children.) To kill
routees directly the router should be sent a Kill message wrapped in a Broadcast message.
router.tell(new Broadcast(Kill.getInstance()), getTestActor());
Management Messages
• Sending akka.routing.GetRoutees to a router actor will make it send back its currently used routees
in a akka.routing.Routees message.
• Sending akka.routing.AddRoutee to a router actor will add that routee to its collection of routees.
• Sending akka.routing.RemoveRoutee to a router actor will remove that routee to its collection of
routees.
• Sending akka.routing.AdjustPoolSize to a pool router actor will add or remove that number of
routees to its collection of routees.
These management messages may be handled after other messages, so if you send AddRoutee immediately
followed by an ordinary message you are not guaranteed that the routees have been changed when the ordinary
message is routed. If you need to know when the change has been applied you can send AddRoutee followed by
GetRoutees and when you receive the Routees reply you know that the preceding change has been applied.
All pools can be used with a fixed number of routees or with a resize strategy to adjust the number of routees
dynamically.
There are two types of resizers: the default Resizer and the OptimalSizeExploringResizer.
Default Resizer
The default resizer ramps up and down pool size based on pressure, measured by the percentage of busy routees
in the pool. It ramps up pool size if the pressure is higher than a certain threshold and backs off if the pressure is
lower than certain threshold. Both thresholds are configurable.
Pool with default resizer defined in configuration:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router29 {
router = round-robin-pool
resizer {
lower-bound = 2
upper-bound = 15
messages-per-resize = 100
}
}
}
ActorRef router29 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router29");
It is also worth pointing out that if you define the ‘‘router‘‘ in the configuration file then this value will be used
instead of any programmatically sent parameters.
The OptimalSizeExploringResizer resizes the pool to an optimal size that provides the most message
throughput.
It achieves this by keeping track of message throughput at each pool size and performing one of the following
three resizing operations periodically:
• Downsize if it hasn’t seen all routees ever fully utilized for a period of time.
• Explore to a random nearby pool size to try and collect throughput metrics.
• Optimize to a nearby pool size with a better (than any other nearby sizes) throughput metrics.
When the pool is fully-utilized (i.e. all routees are busy), it randomly choose between exploring and optimizing.
When the pool has not been fully-utilized for a period of time, it will downsize the pool to the last seen max
utilization multiplied by a configurable ratio.
By constantly exploring and optimizing, the resizer will eventually walk to the optimal size and remain nearby.
When the optimal size changes it will start walking towards the new one. This resizer works best when you expect
the pool size to performance function to be a convex function. For example, when you have a CPU bound tasks,
the optimal size is bound to the number of CPU cores. When your task is IO bound, the optimal size is bound to
optimal number of concurrent connections to that IO service - e.g. a 4 node elastic search cluster may handle 4-8
concurrent requests at optimal speed.
It keeps a performance log so it’s stateful as well as having a larger memory footprint than the default Resizer.
The memory usage is O(n) where n is the number of sizes you allow, i.e. upperBound - lowerBound.
Pool with OptimalSizeExploringResizer defined in configuration:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/router31 {
router = round-robin-pool
optimal-size-exploring-resizer {
enabled = on
action-interval = 5s
downsize-after-underutilized-for = 72h
}
}
}
ActorRef router31 =
getContext().actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(
Props.create(Worker.class)), "router31");
Note: Resizing is triggered by sending messages to the actor pool, but it is not completed synchronously; instead
a message is sent to the “head” RouterActor to perform the size change. Thus you cannot rely on resizing
to instantaneously create new workers when all others are busy, because the message just sent will be queued to
the mailbox of a busy actor. To remedy this, configure the pool to use a balancing dispatcher, see Configuring
Dispatchers for more information.
On the surface routers look like normal actors, but they are actually implemented differently. Routers are designed
to be extremely efficient at receiving messages and passing them quickly on to routees.
A normal actor can be used for routing messages, but an actor’s single-threaded processing can become a bottle-
neck. Routers can achieve much higher throughput with an optimization to the usual message-processing pipeline
that allows concurrent routing. This is achieved by embedding routers’ routing logic directly in their ActorRef
rather than in the router actor. Messages sent to a router’s ActorRef can be immediately routed to the routee,
bypassing the single-threaded router actor entirely.
The cost to this is, of course, that the internals of routing code are more complicated than if routers were im-
plemented with normal actors. Fortunately all of this complexity is invisible to consumers of the routing API.
However, it is something to be aware of when implementing your own routers.
You can create your own router should you not find any of the ones provided by Akka sufficient for your needs.
In order to roll your own router you have to fulfill certain criteria which are explained in this section.
Before creating your own router you should consider whether a normal actor with router-like behavior might do
the job just as well as a full-blown router. As explained above, the primary benefit of routers over normal actors
is their higher performance. But they are somewhat more complicated to write than normal actors. Therefore if
lower maximum throughput is acceptable in your application you may wish to stick with traditional actors. This
section, however, assumes that you wish to get maximum performance and so demonstrates how you can create
your own router.
The router created in this example is replicating each message to a few destinations.
Start with the routing logic:
public class RedundancyRoutingLogic implements RoutingLogic {
private final int nbrCopies;
@Override
public Routee select(Object message, IndexedSeq<Routee> routees) {
select will be called for each message and in this example pick a few destinations by round-robin, by
reusing the existing RoundRobinRoutingLogic and wrap the result in a SeveralRoutees instance.
SeveralRoutees will send the message to all of the supplied routes.
The implementation of the routing logic must be thread safe, since it might be used outside of actors.
A unit test of the routing logic:
public final class TestRoutee implements Routee {
public final int n;
public TestRoutee(int n) {
this.n = n;
}
@Override
public void send(Object message, ActorRef sender) {
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return n;
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
return (obj instanceof TestRoutee) &&
n == ((TestRoutee) obj).n;
}
}
You could stop here and use the RedundancyRoutingLogic with a akka.routing.Router as described
in A Simple Router.
Let us continue and make this into a self contained, configurable, router actor.
Create a class that extends PoolBase, GroupBase or CustomRouterConfig. That class is a factory for
the routing logic and holds the configuration for the router. Here we make it a Group.
import java.util.List;
import scala.Option;
import scala.collection.immutable.Iterable;
import akka.actor.ActorContext;
import akka.actor.ActorPath;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.dispatch.Dispatchers;
import akka.routing.Group;
import akka.routing.Routee;
import akka.routing.Router;
import akka.routing.RouterActor;
import akka.routing.RouterConfig;
import akka.routing.RoutingLogic;
import com.typesafe.config.Config;
import akka.routing.GroupBase;
import static docs.jrouting.CustomRouterDocTest.RedundancyRoutingLogic;
@Override
public java.lang.Iterable<String> getPaths(ActorSystem system) {
return paths;
}
@Override
public Router createRouter(ActorSystem system) {
return new Router(new RedundancyRoutingLogic(nbrCopies));
}
@Override
public String routerDispatcher() {
return Dispatchers.DefaultDispatcherId();
}
ActorRef redundancy1 =
system.actorOf(new RedundancyGroup(paths, 3).props(),
"redundancy1");
redundancy1.tell("important", getTestActor());
Note that we added a constructor in RedundancyGroup that takes a Config parameter. That makes it possible
to define it in configuration.
akka.actor.deployment {
/redundancy2 {
router = "docs.jrouting.RedundancyGroup"
routees.paths = ["/user/s1", "/user/s2", "/user/s3"]
nbr-copies = 5
}
}
Note the fully qualified class name in the router property. The router class must extend
akka.routing.RouterConfig (Pool, Group or CustomRouterConfig) and have constructor with
one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter. The deployment section of the configuration is passed to
the constructor.
ActorRef redundancy2 = system.actorOf(FromConfig.getInstance().props(),
"redundancy2");
redundancy2.tell("very important", getTestActor());
The dispatcher for created children of the pool will be taken from Props as described in dispatchers-scala.
To make it easy to define the dispatcher of the routees of the pool you can define the dispatcher inline in the
deployment section of the config.
akka.actor.deployment {
/poolWithDispatcher {
router = random-pool
nr-of-instances = 5
pool-dispatcher {
fork-join-executor.parallelism-min = 5
fork-join-executor.parallelism-max = 5
}
}
}
That is the only thing you need to do enable a dedicated dispatcher for a pool.
Note: If you use a group of actors and route to their paths, then they will still use the same dispatcher that was
configured for them in their Props, it is not possible to change an actors dispatcher after it has been created.
The “head” router cannot always run on the same dispatcher, because it does not process the same type
of messages, hence this special actor does not use the dispatcher configured in Props, but takes the
routerDispatcher from the RouterConfig instead, which defaults to the actor system’s default dis-
patcher. All standard routers allow setting this property in their constructor or factory method, custom routers
have to implement the method in a suitable way.
Props props =
// “head” router actor will run on "router-dispatcher" dispatcher
// Worker routees will run on "pool-dispatcher" dispatcher
new RandomPool(5).withDispatcher("router-dispatcher").props(
Props.create(Worker.class));
ActorRef router = system.actorOf(props, "poolWithDispatcher");
4.7.1 Overview
The FSM (Finite State Machine) pattern is best described in the Erlang design principles. In short, it can be seen
as a set of relations of the form:
State(S) x Event(E) -> Actions (A), State(S’)
These relations are interpreted as meaning:
If we are in state S and the event E occurs, we should perform the actions A and make a transition to
the state S’.
While the Scala programming language enables the formulation of a nice internal DSL (domain specific lan-
guage) for formulating finite state machines (see fsm-scala), Java’s verbosity does not lend itself well to the
same approach. This chapter describes ways to effectively achieve the same separation of concerns through self-
discipline.
All mutable fields (or transitively mutable data structures) referenced by the FSM actor’s implementation should
be collected in one place and only mutated using a small well-defined set of methods. One way to achieve this is
to assemble all mutable state in a superclass which keeps it private and offers protected methods for mutating it.
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
/*
* This is the mutable state of this state machine.
*/
protected enum State {
IDLE, ACTIVE;
}
/*
* Then come all the mutator methods:
*/
protected void init(ActorRef target) {
this.target = target;
queue = new ArrayList<Object>();
}
/*
* Here are the interrogation methods:
*/
protected boolean isInitialized() {
return target != null;
}
/*
* And finally the callbacks (only one in this example: react to state change)
*/
abstract protected void transition(State old, State next);
}
The benefit of this approach is that state changes can be acted upon in one central place, which makes it impossible
to forget inserting code for reacting to state transitions when adding to the FSM’s machinery.
The base class shown above is designed to support a similar example as for the Scala FSM documentation: an
actor which receives and queues messages, to be delivered in batches to a configurable target actor. The messages
involved are:
public final class SetTarget {
final ActorRef ref;
public Queue(Object o) {
this.o = o;
}
}
This actor has only the two states IDLE and ACTIVE, making their handling quite straight-forward in the concrete
actor derived from the base class:
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
@Override
public void onReceive(Object o) {
if (getState() == State.IDLE) {
if (o instanceof SetTarget)
init(((SetTarget) o).ref);
else
whenUnhandled(o);
if (o == flush)
setState(State.IDLE);
else
whenUnhandled(o);
}
}
@Override
public void transition(State old, State next) {
if (old == State.ACTIVE) {
getTarget().tell(new Batch(drainQueue()), getSelf());
}
}
} else {
log.warning("received unknown message {} in state {}", o, getState());
}
}
}
The trick here is to factor out common functionality like whenUnhandled and transition in order to obtain
a few well-defined points for reacting to change or insert logging.
In the example above, the subjective complexity of state and events was roughly equal, making it a matter of taste
whether to choose primary dispatch on either; in the example a state-based dispatch was chosen. Depending on
how evenly the matrix of possible states and events is populated, it may be more practical to handle different events
first and distinguish the states in the second tier. An example would be a state machine which has a multitude of
internal states but handles only very few distinct events.
4.8 Persistence
Akka persistence enables stateful actors to persist their internal state so that it can be recovered when an actor is
started, restarted after a JVM crash or by a supervisor, or migrated in a cluster. The key concept behind Akka
persistence is that only changes to an actor’s internal state are persisted but never its current state directly (except
for optional snapshots). These changes are only ever appended to storage, nothing is ever mutated, which allows
for very high transaction rates and efficient replication. Stateful actors are recovered by replaying stored changes
to these actors from which they can rebuild internal state. This can be either the full history of changes or starting
from a snapshot which can dramatically reduce recovery times. Akka persistence also provides point-to-point
communication with at-least-once message delivery semantics.
Note: Java 8 lambda expressions are also supported. (See section Persistence (Java with Lambda Support))
Akka persistence is inspired by and the official replacement of the eventsourced library. It follows the same
concepts and architecture of eventsourced but significantly differs on API and implementation level. See also
Migration Guide Eventsourced to Akka Persistence 2.3.x
4.8.1 Dependencies
Akka persistence is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-persistence_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
The Akka persistence extension comes with few built-in persistence plugins, including in-memory heap based
journal, local file-system based snapshot-store and LevelDB based journal.
LevelDB based plugins will require the following additional dependency declaration:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.iq80.leveldb</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldb</artifactId>
<version>0.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.fusesource.leveldbjni</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldbjni-all</artifactId>
<version>1.8</version>
</dependency>
4.8.2 Architecture
• UntypedPersistentActor: Is a persistent, stateful actor. It is able to persist events to a journal and can react
to them in a thread-safe manner. It can be used to implement both command as well as event sourced actors.
When a persistent actor is started or restarted, journaled messages are replayed to that actor so that it can
recover internal state from these messages.
• UntypedPersistentView: A view is a persistent, stateful actor that receives journaled messages that have been
written by another persistent actor. A view itself does not journal new messages, instead, it updates internal
state only from a persistent actor’s replicated message stream.
• UntypedPersistentActorAtLeastOnceDelivery: To send messages with at-least-once delivery semantics to
destinations, also in case of sender and receiver JVM crashes.
• AsyncWriteJournal: A journal stores the sequence of messages sent to a persistent actor. An application
can control which messages are journaled and which are received by the persistent actor without being
journaled. Journal maintains highestSequenceNr that is increased on each message. The storage backend
of a journal is pluggable. The persistence extension comes with a “leveldb” journal plugin, which writes to
the local filesystem. Replicated journals are available as Community plugins.
• Snapshot store: A snapshot store persists snapshots of a persistent actor’s or a view’s internal state. Snap-
shots are used for optimizing recovery times. The storage backend of a snapshot store is pluggable. The
persistence extension comes with a “local” snapshot storage plugin, which writes to the local filesystem.
Replicated snapshot stores are available as Community plugins.
The basic idea behind Event Sourcing is quite simple. A persistent actor receives a (non-persistent) command
which is first validated if it can be applied to the current state. Here validation can mean anything from simple
inspection of a command message’s fields up to a conversation with several external services, for example. If
validation succeeds, events are generated from the command, representing the effect of the command. These
events are then persisted and, after successful persistence, used to change the actor’s state. When the persistent
actor needs to be recovered, only the persisted events are replayed of which we know that they can be successfully
applied. In other words, events cannot fail when being replayed to a persistent actor, in contrast to commands.
Event sourced actors may of course also process commands that do not change application state such as query
commands for example.
Akka persistence supports event sourcing with the UntypedPersistentActor abstract class. An ac-
tor that extends this class uses the persist method to persist and handle events. The behavior of an
UntypedPersistentActor is defined by implementing receiveRecover and receiveCommand. This
is demonstrated in the following example.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.japi.Procedure;
import akka.persistence.SnapshotOffer;
import akka.persistence.UntypedPersistentActor;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import static java.util.Arrays.asList;
public ExampleState() {
this(new ArrayList<String>());
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return events.toString();
}
}
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object msg) {
if (msg instanceof Evt) {
state.update((Evt) msg);
} else if (msg instanceof SnapshotOffer) {
state = (ExampleState)((SnapshotOffer)msg).snapshot();
} else {
unhandled(msg);
}
}
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object msg) {
if (msg instanceof Cmd) {
final String data = ((Cmd)msg).getData();
final Evt evt1 = new Evt(data + "-" + getNumEvents());
final Evt evt2 = new Evt(data + "-" + (getNumEvents() + 1));
persistAll(asList(evt1, evt2), new Procedure<Evt>() {
public void apply(Evt evt) throws Exception {
state.update(evt);
if (evt.equals(evt2)) {
getContext().system().eventStream().publish(evt);
}
}
});
} else if (msg.equals("snap")) {
// IMPORTANT: create a copy of snapshot
// because ExampleState is mutable !!!
saveSnapshot(state.copy());
} else if (msg.equals("print")) {
System.out.println(state);
} else {
unhandled(msg);
}
}
}
The example defines two data types, Cmd and Evt to represent commands and events, respectively. The state
of the ExamplePersistentActor is a list of persisted event data contained in ExampleState.
The persistent actor’s onReceiveRecover method defines how state is updated during recovery by handling
Evt and SnapshotOffer messages. The persistent actor’s onReceiveCommand method is a command
handler. In this example, a command is handled by generating two events which are then persisted and handled.
Events are persisted by calling persist with an event (or a sequence of events) as first argument and an event
handler as second argument.
The persist method persists events asynchronously and the event handler is executed for successfully persisted
events. Successfully persisted events are internally sent back to the persistent actor as individual messages that
trigger event handler executions. An event handler may close over persistent actor state and mutate it. The sender
of a persisted event is the sender of the corresponding command. This allows event handlers to reply to the sender
of a command (not shown).
The main responsibility of an event handler is changing persistent actor state using event data and notifying others
about successful state changes by publishing events.
When persisting events with persist it is guaranteed that the persistent actor will not receive further commands
between the persist call and the execution(s) of the associated event handler. This also holds for multiple
persist calls in context of a single command. Incoming messages are stashed until the persist is completed.
If persistence of an event fails, onPersistFailure will be invoked (logging the error by default), and the actor
will unconditionally be stopped. If persistence of an event is rejected before it is stored, e.g. due to serialization
error, onPersistRejected will be invoked (logging a warning by default), and the actor continues with the
next message.
The easiest way to run this example yourself is to download Lightbend Activator and open the tutorial named
Akka Persistence Samples with Java. It contains instructions on how to run the PersistentActorExample.
Note: It’s also possible to switch between different command handlers during normal processing and recovery
with getContext().become() and getContext().unbecome(). To get the actor into the same state
after recovery you need to take special care to perform the same state transitions with become and unbecome
in the receiveRecover method as you would have done in the command handler. Note that when using
become from receiveRecover it will still only use the receiveRecover behavior when replaying the
events. When replay is completed it will use the new behavior.
Identifiers
A persistent actor must have an identifier that doesn’t change across different actor incarnations. The identifier
must be defined with the persistenceId method.
@Override
public String persistenceId() {
return "my-stable-persistence-id";
}
Note: persistenceId must be unique to a given entity in the journal (database table/keyspace). When
replaying messages persisted to the journal, you query messages with a persistenceId. So, if two different
entities share the same persistenceId, message-replaying behavior is corrupted.
Recovery
By default, a persistent actor is automatically recovered on start and on restart by replaying journaled messages.
New messages sent to a persistent actor during recovery do not interfere with replayed messages. They are stashed
and received by a persistent actor after recovery phase completes.
The number of concurrent recoveries of recoveries that can be in progress at the same time is limited to not
overload the system and the backend data store. When exceeding the limit the actors will wait until other recoveries
have been completed. This is configured by:
akka.persistence.max-concurrent-recoveries = 50
Note: Accessing the sender() for replayed messages will always result in a deadLetters reference, as the
original sender is presumed to be long gone. If you indeed have to notify an actor during recovery in the future,
store its ActorPath explicitly in your persisted events.
Recovery customization
Applications may also customise how recovery is performed by returning a customised Recovery object in the
recovery method of a UntypedPersistentActor.
To skip loading snapshots and replay all events you can use SnapshotSelectionCriteria.none(). This
can be useful if snapshot serialization format has changed in an incompatible way. It should typically not be used
when events have been deleted.
@Override
public Recovery recovery() {
return Recovery.create(SnapshotSelectionCriteria.none());
}
Another example, which can be fun for experiments but probably not in a real application, is setting an upper
bound to the replay which allows the actor to be replayed to a certain point “in the past” instead to its most up
to date state. Note that after that it is a bad idea to persist new events because a later recovery will probably be
confused by the new events that follow the events that were previously skipped.
@Override
public Recovery recovery() {
return Recovery.create(457L);
}
Recovery status
A persistent actor can query its own recovery status via the methods
public boolean recoveryRunning();
public boolean recoveryFinished();
Sometimes there is a need for performing additional initialization when the recovery has completed be-
fore processing any other message sent to the persistent actor. The persistent actor will receive a special
RecoveryCompleted message right after recovery and before any other received messages.
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object message) {
if (message instanceof RecoveryCompleted) {
// perform init after recovery, before any other messages
}
}
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message instanceof String) {
// ...
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
The actor will always receive a RecoveryCompleted message, even if there are no events in the journal and
the snapshot store is empty, or if it’s a new persistent actor with a previously unused persistenceId.
If there is a problem with recovering the state of the actor from the journal, onRecoveryFailure is called
(logging the error by default) and the actor will be stopped.
Internal stash
The persistent actor has a private stash for internally caching incoming messages during recovery or the
persist\persistAll method persisting events. You can still use/inherit from the Stash interface. The
internal stash cooperates with the normal stash by hooking into unstashAll method and making sure messages
are unstashed properly to the internal stash to maintain ordering guarantees.
You should be careful to not send more messages to a persistent actor than it can keep up with, otherwise the
number of stashed messages will grow without bounds. It can be wise to protect against OutOfMemoryError
by defining a maximum stash capacity in the mailbox configuration:
akka.actor.default-mailbox.stash-capacity=10000
Note that the stash capacity is per actor. If you have many persistent actors, e.g. when using cluster
sharding, you may need to define a small stash capacity to ensure that the total number of stashed mes-
sages in the system don’t consume too much memory. Additionally, The persistent actor defines three
strategies to handle failure when the internal stash capacity is exceeded. The default overflow strategy is
the ThrowOverflowExceptionStrategy, which discards the current received message and throws a
StashOverflowException, causing actor restart if default supervision strategy is used. you can over-
ride the internalStashOverflowStrategy method to return DiscardToDeadLetterStrategy or
ReplyToStrategy for any “individual” persistent actor, or define the “default” for all persistent actors by pro-
viding FQCN, which must be a subclass of StashOverflowStrategyConfigurator, in the persistence
configuration:
akka.persistence.internal-stash-overflow-strategy=
"akka.persistence.ThrowExceptionConfigurator"
Note: The bounded mailbox should be avoided in the persistent actor, by which the messages come from storage
backends may be discarded. You can use bounded stash instead of it.
If faced with relaxed local consistency requirements and high throughput demands sometimes
PersistentActor and its persist may not be enough in terms of consuming incoming Commands
at a high rate, because it has to wait until all Events related to a given Command are processed in order to start
processing the next Command. While this abstraction is very useful for most cases, sometimes you may be faced
with relaxed requirements about consistency – for example you may want to process commands as fast as you
can, assuming that the Event will eventually be persisted and handled properly in the background, retroactively
reacting to persistence failures if needed.
The persistAsync method provides a tool for implementing high-throughput persistent actors. It will not stash
incoming Commands while the Journal is still working on persisting and/or user code is executing event callbacks.
In the below example, the event callbacks may be called “at any time”, even after the next Command has been
processed. The ordering between events is still guaranteed (“evt-b-1” will be sent after “evt-a-2”, which will be
sent after “evt-a-1” etc.).
class MyPersistentActor extends UntypedPersistentActor {
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "some-persistence-id"; }
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object msg) {
// handle recovery here
}
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object msg) {
sender().tell(msg, self());
Note: In order to implement the pattern known as “command sourcing” simply persistAsync all incoming
messages right away and handle them in the callback.
Warning: The callback will not be invoked if the actor is restarted (or stopped) in between the call to
persistAsync and the journal has confirmed the write.
Sometimes when working with persistAsync you may find that it would be nice to define some actions in
terms of ‘’happens-after the previous persistAsync handlers have been invoked’‘. PersistentActor
provides an utility method called deferAsync, which works similarly to persistAsync yet does not persist
the passed in event. It is recommended to use it for read operations, and actions which do not have corresponding
events in your domain model.
Using this method is very similar to the persist family of methods, yet it does not persist the passed in event. It
will be kept in memory and used when invoking the handler.
class MyPersistentActor extends UntypedPersistentActor {
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "some-persistence-id"; }
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object msg) {
// handle recovery here
}
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object msg) {
final Procedure<String> replyToSender = new Procedure<String>() {
@Override
public void apply(String event) throws Exception {
sender().tell(event, self());
}
};
Notice that the sender() is safe to access in the handler callback, and will be pointing to the original sender of
the command for which this deferAsync handler was called.
final ActorRef persistentActor = system.actorOf(Props.create(MyPersistentActor.class));
persistentActor.tell("a", null);
persistentActor.tell("b", null);
// b
// evt-a-1
// evt-a-2
// evt-a-3
// evt-b-1
// evt-b-2
// evt-b-3
Warning: The callback will not be invoked if the actor is restarted (or stopped) in between the call to
deferAsync and the journal has processed and confirmed all preceding writes.
It is possible to call persist and persistAsync inside their respective callback blocks and they will properly
retain both the thread safety (including the right value of sender()) as well as stashing guarantees.
In general it is encouraged to create command handlers which do not need to resort to nested event persisting,
however there are situations where it may be useful. It is important to understand the ordering of callback execution
in those situations, as well as their implication on the stashing behaviour (that persist() enforces). In the
following example two persist calls are issued, and each of them issues another persist inside its callback:
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object msg) {
final Procedure<String> replyToSender = new Procedure<String>() {
@Override
public void apply(String event) throws Exception {
sender().tell(event, self());
}
};
When sending two commands to this PersistentActor, the persist handlers will be executed in the following
order:
persistentActor.tell("a", self());
persistentActor.tell("b", self());
First the “outer layer” of persist calls is issued and their callbacks are applied. After these have successfully
completed, the inner callbacks will be invoked (once the events they are persisting have been confirmed to be
persisted by the journal). Only after all these handlers have been successfully invoked will the next command be
delivered to the persistent Actor. In other words, the stashing of incoming commands that is guaranteed by initially
calling persist() on the outer layer is extended until all nested persist callbacks have been handled.
It is also possible to nest persistAsync calls, using the same pattern:
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object msg) {
final Procedure<String> replyToSender = new Procedure<String>() {
@Override
public void apply(String event) throws Exception {
sender().tell(event, self());
}
};
In this case no stashing is happening, yet events are still persisted and callbacks are executed in the expected order:
persistentActor.tell("a", ActorRef.noSender());
persistentActor.tell("b", ActorRef.noSender());
While it is possible to nest mixed persist and persistAsync with keeping their respective semantics it is
not a recommended practice, as it may lead to overly complex nesting.
Warning: While it is possible to nest persist calls within one another, it is not legal call persist from
any other Thread than the Actors message processing Thread. For example, it is not legal to call persist
from Futures! Doing so will break the guarantees that the persist methods aim to provide. Always call
persist and persistAsync from within the Actor’s receive block (or methods synchronously invoked
from there).
Failures
If persistence of an event fails, onPersistFailure will be invoked (logging the error by default), and the
actor will unconditionally be stopped.
The reason that it cannot resume when persist fails is that it is unknown if the event was actually persisted or
not, and therefore it is in an inconsistent state. Restarting on persistent failures will most likely fail anyway since
the journal is probably unavailable. It is better to stop the actor and after a back-off timeout start it again. The
akka.pattern.BackoffSupervisor actor is provided to support such restarts.
@Override
public void preStart() throws Exception {
final Props childProps = Props.create(MyPersistentActor1.class);
final Props props = BackoffSupervisor.props(
childProps,
"myActor",
Duration.create(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
Duration.create(30, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
0.2);
getContext().actorOf(props, "mySupervisor");
super.preStart();
}
If persistence of an event is rejected before it is stored, e.g. due to serialization error, onPersistRejected
will be invoked (logging a warning by default), and the actor continues with next message.
If there is a problem with recovering the state of the actor from the journal when the actor is started,
onRecoveryFailure is called (logging the error by default), and the actor will be stopped. Note that fail-
ure to load snapshot is also treated like this, but you can disable loading of snapshots if you for example know that
serialization format has changed in an incompatible way, see Recovery customization.
Atomic writes
Each event is of course stored atomically, but it is also possible to store several events atomically by using the
persistAll or persistAllAsync method. That means that all events passed to that method are stored or
none of them are stored if there is an error.
The recovery of a persistent actor will therefore never be done partially with only a subset of events persisted by
persistAll.
Some journals may not support atomic writes of several events and they will then reject the
persistAll command, i.e. onPersistRejected is called with an exception (typically
UnsupportedOperationException).
Batch writes
In order to optimize throughput when using persistAsync, a persistent actor internally batches events to be
stored under high load before writing them to the journal (as a single batch). The batch size is dynamically
determined by how many events are emitted during the time of a journal round-trip: after sending a batch to the
journal no further batch can be sent before confirmation has been received that the previous batch has been written.
Batch writes are never timer-based which keeps latencies at a minimum.
Message deletion
It is possible to delete all messages (journaled by a single persistent actor) up to a specified sequence number;
Persistent actors may call the deleteMessages method to this end.
Deleting messages in event sourcing based applications is typically either not used at all, or used in conjunction
with snapshotting, i.e. after a snapshot has been successfully stored, a deleteMessages(toSequenceNr)
up until the sequence number of the data held by that snapshot can be issued to safely delete the previous events
while still having access to the accumulated state during replays - by loading the snapshot.
Warning: If you are using Persistence Query, query results may be missing deleted messages in a journal,
depending on how deletions are implemented in the journal plugin. Unless you use a plugin which still shows
deleted messages in persistence query results, you have to design your application so that it is not affected by
missing messages.
The result of the deleteMessages request is signaled to the persistent actor with a
DeleteMessagesSuccess message if the delete was successful or a DeleteMessagesFailure
message if it failed.
Message deletion doesn’t affect the highest sequence number of the journal, even if all messages were deleted
from it after deleteMessages invocation.
Note: Journal implementations may choose to implement a retry mechanism, e.g. such that only after a write
fails N number of times a persistence failure is signalled back to the user. In other words, once a journal returns a
failure, it is considered fatal by Akka Persistence, and the persistent actor which caused the failure will be stopped.
Check the documentation of the journal implementation you are using for details if/how it is using this technique.
Special care should be given when shutting down persistent actors from the outside. With normal Actors it is often
acceptable to use the special PoisonPill message to signal to an Actor that it should stop itself once it receives
this message – in fact this message is handled automatically by Akka, leaving the target actor no way to refuse
stopping itself when given a poison pill.
This can be dangerous when used with PersistentActor due to the fact that incoming commands are
stashed while the persistent actor is awaiting confirmation from the Journal that events have been written when
persist() was used. Since the incoming commands will be drained from the Actor’s mailbox and put into its
internal stash while awaiting the confirmation (thus, before calling the persist handlers) the Actor may receive
and (auto)handle the PoisonPill before it processes the other messages which have been put into its stash,
causing a pre-mature shutdown of the Actor.
Warning: Consider using explicit shut-down messages instead of PoisonPill when working with persis-
tent actors.
The example below highlights how messages arrive in the Actor’s mailbox and how they interact with its internal
stashing mechanism when persist() is used. Notice the early stop behaviour that occurs when PoisonPill
is used:
final class Shutdown {}
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object msg) throws Exception {
if (msg instanceof Shutdown) {
context().stop(self());
} else if (msg instanceof String) {
System.out.println(msg);
persist("handle-" + msg, new Procedure<String>() {
@Override
public void apply(String param) throws Exception {
System.out.println(param);
}
});
} else unhandled(msg);
}
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object msg) throws Exception {
// handle recovery...
}
}
// SAFE:
persistentActor.tell("a", ActorRef.noSender());
persistentActor.tell("b", ActorRef.noSender());
persistentActor.tell(new Shutdown(), ActorRef.noSender());
// order of received messages:
// a
// # b arrives at mailbox, stashing; internal-stash = [b]
// # Shutdown arrives at mailbox, stashing; internal-stash = [b, Shutdown]
// handle-a
// # unstashing; internal-stash = [Shutdown]
// b
// handle-b
// # unstashing; internal-stash = []
// Shutdown
// -- stop --
Replay Filter
There could be cases where event streams are corrupted and multiple writers (i.e. multiple persistent actor in-
stances) journaled different messages with the same sequence number. In such a case, you can configure how you
filter replayed messages from multiple writers, upon recovery.
In your configuration, under the akka.persistence.journal.xxx.replay-filter section (where
xxx is your journal plugin id), you can select the replay filter mode from one of the following values:
• repair-by-discard-old
• fail
• warn
• off
For example, if you configure the replay filter for leveldb plugin, it looks like this:
# The replay filter can detect a corrupt event stream by inspecting
# sequence numbers and writerUuid when replaying events.
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb.replay-filter {
# What the filter should do when detecting invalid events.
# Supported values:
# ‘repair-by-discard-old‘ : discard events from old writers,
# warning is logged
# ‘fail‘ : fail the replay, error is logged
# ‘warn‘ : log warning but emit events untouched
# ‘off‘ : disable this feature completely
mode = repair-by-discard-old
}
Persistent views can be implemented by extending the UntypedPersistentView trait and implementing the
onReceive and the persistenceId methods.
class MyView extends UntypedPersistentView {
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "some-persistence-id"; }
@Override
public String viewId() { return "my-stable-persistence-view-id"; }
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (isPersistent()) {
// handle message from Journal...
} else if (message instanceof String) {
// handle message from user...
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
The persistenceId identifies the persistent actor from which the view receives journaled messages. It is
not necessary that the referenced persistent actor is actually running. Views read messages from a persistent
actor’s journal directly. When a persistent actor is started later and begins to write new messages, by default the
corresponding view is updated automatically.
It is possible to determine if a message was sent from the Journal or from another actor in user-land by calling
the isPersistent method. Having that said, very often you don’t need this information at all and can simply
apply the same logic to both cases (skip the if isPersistent check).
Updates
The default update interval of all persistent views of an actor system is configurable:
akka.persistence.view.auto-update-interval = 5s
If the await parameter is set to true, messages that follow the Update request are processed when the incre-
mental message replay, triggered by that update request, completed. If set to false (default), messages following
the update request may interleave with the replayed message stream. Automated updates always run with await
= false.
Automated updates of all persistent views of an actor system can be turned off by configuration:
akka.persistence.view.auto-update = off
Implementation classes may override the configured default value by overriding the autoUpdate
method. To limit the number of replayed messages per update request, applications can con-
figure a custom akka.persistence.view.auto-update-replay-max value or override the
autoUpdateReplayMax method. The number of replayed messages for manual updates can be limited with
the replayMax parameter of the Update message.
Recovery
Initial recovery of persistent views works the very same way as for persistent actors (i.e. by sending a
Recover message to self). The maximum number of replayed messages during initial recovery is determined by
autoUpdateReplayMax. Further possibilities to customize initial recovery are explained in section Recovery.
Identifiers
A persistent view must have an identifier that doesn’t change across different actor incarnations. The identifier
must be defined with the viewId method.
The viewId must differ from the referenced persistenceId, unless Snapshots of a view and its persistent
actor should be shared (which is what applications usually do not want).
4.8.5 Snapshots
Snapshots can dramatically reduce recovery times of persistent actors and views. The following discusses snap-
shots in context of persistent actors but this is also applicable to persistent views.
Persistent actors can save snapshots of internal state by calling the saveSnapshot method. If saving
of a snapshot succeeds, the persistent actor receives a SaveSnapshotSuccess message, otherwise a
SaveSnapshotFailure message.
private Object state;
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object message) {
if (message.equals("snap")) {
saveSnapshot(state);
} else if (message instanceof SaveSnapshotSuccess) {
SnapshotMetadata metadata = ((SaveSnapshotSuccess)message).metadata();
// ...
} else if (message instanceof SaveSnapshotFailure) {
SnapshotMetadata metadata = ((SaveSnapshotFailure)message).metadata();
// ...
}
}
During recovery, the persistent actor is offered a previously saved snapshot via a SnapshotOffer message
from which it can initialize internal state.
private Object state;
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object message) {
if (message instanceof SnapshotOffer) {
state = ((SnapshotOffer)message).snapshot();
// ...
} else if (message instanceof RecoveryCompleted) {
// ...
} else {
// ...
}
}
The replayed messages that follow the SnapshotOffer message, if any, are younger than the offered snapshot.
They finally recover the persistent actor to its current (i.e. latest) state.
In general, a persistent actor is only offered a snapshot if that persistent actor has previously saved one or more
snapshots and at least one of these snapshots matches the SnapshotSelectionCriteria that can be speci-
fied for recovery.
@Override
public Recovery recovery() {
return Recovery.create(
SnapshotSelectionCriteria
.create(457L, System.currentTimeMillis()));
}
Snapshot deletion
A persistent actor can delete individual snapshots by calling the deleteSnapshot method with the sequence
number of when the snapshot was taken.
To bulk-delete a range of snapshots matching SnapshotSelectionCriteria, persistent actors should use
the deleteSnapshots method.
Saving or deleting snapshots can either succeed or fail – this information is reported back to the persistent actor
via status messages as illustrated in the following table.
Method Success Failure message
saveSnapshot(Any) SaveSnapshotSuccess SaveSnapshotFailure
deleteSnapshot(Long) DeleteSnapshotSuccess
DeleteSnapshotFailure
deleteSnapshots(SnapshotSelectionCriteria)
DeleteSnapshotsSuccess
DeleteSnapshotsFailure
To send messages with at-least-once delivery semantics to destinations you can ex-
tend the UntypedPersistentActorWithAtLeastOnceDelivery class instead of
UntypedPersistentActor on the sending side. It takes care of re-sending messages when they have
not been confirmed within a configurable timeout.
The state of the sending actor, including which messages have been sent that have not been confirmed
by the recipient must be persistent so that it can survive a crash of the sending actor or JVM. The
UntypedPersistentActorWithAtLeastOnceDelivery class does not persist anything by itself. It
is your responsibility to persist the intent that a message is sent and that a confirmation has been received.
Note: At-least-once delivery implies that original message sending order is not always preserved, and the desti-
nation may receive duplicate messages. Semantics do not match those of a normal ActorRef send operation:
• it is not at-most-once delivery
• message order for the same sender–receiver pair is not preserved due to possible resends
• after a crash and restart of the destination messages are still delivered to the new actor incarnation
These semantics are similar to what an ActorPath represents (see actor-lifecycle-scala), therefore you need
to supply a path and not a reference when delivering messages. The messages are sent to the path with an actor
selection.
Use the deliver method to send a message to a destination. Call the confirmDelivery method when the
destination has replied with a confirmation message.
To send messages to the destination path, use the deliver method after you have persisted the intent to send the
message.
The destination actor must send back a confirmation message. When the sending actor receives this con-
firmation message you should persist the fact that the message was delivered successfully and then call the
confirmDelivery method.
If the persistent actor is not currently recovering, the deliver method will send the message to the destination
actor. When recovering, messages will be buffered until they have been confirmed using confirmDelivery.
Once recovery has completed, if there are outstanding messages that have not been confirmed (during the message
replay), the persistent actor will resend these before sending any other messages.
Deliver requires a deliveryIdToMessage function to pass the provided deliveryId into the message so
that the correlation between deliver and confirmDelivery is possible. The deliveryId must do the
round trip. Upon receipt of the message, the destination actor will send the same‘‘deliveryId‘‘ wrapped in a
confirmation message back to the sender. The sender will then use it to call the confirmDelivery method to
complete the delivery routine.
class Msg implements Serializable {
public final long deliveryId;
public final String s;
this.deliveryId = deliveryId;
}
}
public MsgSent(String s) {
this.s = s;
}
}
class MsgConfirmed implements Serializable {
public final long deliveryId;
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "persistence-id"; }
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object message) {
if (message instanceof String) {
String s = (String) message;
persist(new MsgSent(s), new Procedure<MsgSent>() {
public void apply(MsgSent evt) {
updateState(evt);
}
});
} else if (message instanceof Confirm) {
Confirm confirm = (Confirm) message;
persist(new MsgConfirmed(confirm.deliveryId), new Procedure<MsgConfirmed>() {
public void apply(MsgConfirmed evt) {
updateState(evt);
}
});
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object event) {
updateState(event);
}
});
} else if (event instanceof MsgConfirmed) {
final MsgConfirmed evt = (MsgConfirmed) event;
confirmDelivery(evt.deliveryId);
}
}
}
The deliveryId generated by the persistence module is a strictly monotonically increasing sequence number
without gaps. The same sequence is used for all destinations of the actor, i.e. when sending to multiple destina-
tions the destinations will see gaps in the sequence. It is not possible to use custom deliveryId. However,
you can send a custom correlation identifier in the message to the destination. You must then retain a mapping
between the internal deliveryId (passed into the deliveryIdToMessage function) and your custom cor-
relation id (passed into the message). You can do this by storing such mapping in a Map(correlationId
-> deliveryId) from which you can retrieve the deliveryId to be passed into the confirmDelivery
method once the receiver of your message has replied with your custom correlation id.
The UntypedPersistentActorWithAtLeastOnceDelivery class has a state consisting of uncon-
firmed messages and a sequence number. It does not store this state itself. You must persist events corresponding
to the deliver and confirmDelivery invocations from your PersistentActor so that the state can be
restored by calling the same methods during the recovery phase of the PersistentActor. Sometimes these
events can be derived from other business level events, and sometimes you must create separate events. During re-
covery, calls to deliver will not send out messages, those will be sent later if no matching confirmDelivery
will have been performed.
Support for snapshots is provided by getDeliverySnapshot and setDeliverySnapshot. The
AtLeastOnceDeliverySnapshot contains the full delivery state, including unconfirmed messages.
If you need a custom snapshot for other parts of the actor state you must also include the
AtLeastOnceDeliverySnapshot. It is serialized using protobuf with the ordinary Akka serialization mech-
anism. It is easiest to include the bytes of the AtLeastOnceDeliverySnapshot as a blob in your custom
snapshot.
The interval between redelivery attempts is defined by the redeliverInterval method. The default value can
be configured with the akka.persistence.at-least-once-delivery.redeliver-interval
configuration key. The method can be overridden by implementation classes to return non-default values.
The maximum number of messages that will be sent at each redelivery burst is defined by the
redeliveryBurstLimit method (burst frequency is half of the redelivery interval). If there’s a lot
of unconfirmed messages (e.g. if the destination is not available for a long time), this helps to prevent
an overwhelming amount of messages to be sent at once. The default value can be configured with the
akka.persistence.at-least-once-delivery.redelivery-burst-limit configuration key.
The method can be overridden by implementation classes to return non-default values.
After a number of delivery attempts a AtLeastOnceDelivery.UnconfirmedWarning message will
be sent to self. The re-sending will still continue, but you can choose to call confirmDelivery
to cancel the re-sending. The number of delivery attempts before emitting the warning is defined by the
warnAfterNumberOfUnconfirmedAttempts method. The default value can be configured with the
akka.persistence.at-least-once-delivery.warn-after-number-of-unconfirmed-attempts
configuration key. The method can be overridden by implementation classes to return non-default values.
In long running projects using event sourcing sometimes the need arises to detach the data model from the domain
model completely.
Event Adapters help in situations where:
• Version Migrations – existing events stored in Version 1 should be “upcasted” to a new Version 2 rep-
resentation, and the process of doing so involves actual code, not just changes on the serialization layer.
For these scenarios the toJournal function is usually an identity function, however the fromJournal
is implemented as v1.Event=>v2.Event, performing the neccessary mapping inside the fromJournal
method. This technique is sometimes refered to as “upcasting” in other CQRS libraries.
• Separating Domain and Data models – thanks to EventAdapters it is possible to completely separate
the domain model from the model used to persist data in the Journals. For example one may want to
use case classes in the domain model, however persist their protocol-buffer (or any other binary serial-
ization format) counter-parts to the Journal. A simple toJournal:MyModel=>MyDataModel and
fromJournal:MyDataModel=>MyModel adapter can be used to implement this feature.
• Journal Specialized Data Types – exposing data types understood by the underlying Journal, for example
for data stores which understand JSON it is possible to write an EventAdapter toJournal:Any=>JSON
such that the Journal can directly store the json instead of serializing the object to its binary representation.
Implementing an EventAdapter is rather stright forward:
class MyEventAdapter implements EventAdapter {
@Override
public String manifest(Object event) {
return ""; // if no manifest needed, return ""
}
@Override
public Object toJournal(Object event) {
return event; // identity
}
@Override
public EventSeq fromJournal(Object event, String manifest) {
return EventSeq.single(event); // identity
}
}
Then in order for it to be used on events coming to and from the journal you must bind it using the below
configuration syntax:
akka.persistence.journal {
inmem {
event-adapters {
tagging = "docs.persistence.MyTaggingEventAdapter"
user-upcasting = "docs.persistence.UserUpcastingEventAdapter"
item-upcasting = "docs.persistence.ItemUpcastingEventAdapter"
}
event-adapter-bindings {
"docs.persistence.Item" = tagging
"docs.persistence.TaggedEvent" = tagging
"docs.persistence.v1.Event" = [user-upcasting, item-upcasting]
}
}
}
It is possible to bind multiple adapters to one class for recovery, in which case the fromJournal methods of all
bound adapters will be applied to a given matching event (in order of definition in the configuration). Since each
adapter may return from 0 to n adapted events (called as EventSeq), each adapter can investigate the event and if
it should indeed adapt it return the adapted event(s) for it. Other adapters which do not have anything to contribute
during this adaptation simply return EventSeq.empty. The adapted events are then delivered in-order to the
PersistentActor during replay.
Note: For more advanced schema evolution techniques refer to the persistence-schema-evolution-scala docu-
mentation.
Storage backends for journals and snapshot stores are pluggable in the Akka persistence extension.
A directory of persistence journal and snapshot store plugins is available at the Akka Community Projects page,
see Community plugins
Plugins can be selected either by “default”, for all persistent actors and views, or “individually”, when a persistent
actor or view defines its own set of plugins.
When a persistent actor or view does NOT override the journalPluginId and snapshotPluginId
methods, the persistence extension will use the “default” journal and snapshot-store plugins configured in the
reference.conf:
akka.persistence.journal.plugin = ""
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin = ""
However, these entries are provided as empty “”, and require explicit user configuration via override in the user
application.conf. For an example of a journal plugin which writes messages to LevelDB see Local LevelDB
journal. For an example of a snapshot store plugin which writes snapshots as individual files to the local filesystem
see Local snapshot store.
Applications can provide their own plugins by implementing a plugin API and activating them by configuration.
Plugin development requires the following imports:
import akka.persistence.*;
import akka.persistence.journal.japi.AsyncWriteJournal;
import akka.persistence.snapshot.japi.SnapshotStore;
By default, persistence plugins are started on-demand, as they are used. In some case, however, it
might be beneficial to start a certain plugin eagerly. In order to do that, you should first add the
akka.persistence.Persistence under the akka.extensions key. Then, specify the IDs of plug-
ins you wish to start automatically under akka.persistence.journal.auto-start-journals and
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.auto-start-snapshot-stores.
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously writes a batch (‘Iterable‘) of
* persistent messages to the journal.
*
* The batch is only for performance reasons, i.e. all messages don’t have to
* be written atomically. Higher throughput can typically be achieved by using
* batch inserts of many records compared to inserting records one-by-one, but
* this aspect depends on the underlying data store and a journal
* implementation can implement it as efficient as possible. Journals should
* aim to persist events in-order for a given ‘persistenceId‘ as otherwise in
* case of a failure, the persistent state may be end up being inconsistent.
*
* Each ‘AtomicWrite‘ message contains the single ‘PersistentRepr‘ that
* corresponds to the event that was passed to the ‘persist‘ method of the
* ‘PersistentActor‘, or it contains several ‘PersistentRepr‘ that corresponds
* to the events that were passed to the ‘persistAll‘ method of the
* ‘PersistentActor‘. All ‘PersistentRepr‘ of the ‘AtomicWrite‘ must be
* written to the data store atomically, i.e. all or none must be stored. If
* the journal (data store) cannot support atomic writes of multiple events it
* should reject such writes with an ‘Optional‘ with an
* ‘UnsupportedOperationException‘ describing the issue. This limitation
* should also be documented by the journal plugin.
*
* If there are failures when storing any of the messages in the batch the
* returned ‘Future‘ must be completed with failure. The ‘Future‘ must only be
* completed with success when all messages in the batch have been confirmed
* to be stored successfully, i.e. they will be readable, and visible, in a
* subsequent replay. If there is uncertainty about if the messages were
* stored or not the ‘Future‘ must be completed with failure.
*
* Data store connection problems must be signaled by completing the ‘Future‘
* with failure.
*
* The journal can also signal that it rejects individual messages
* (‘AtomicWrite‘) by the returned
* ‘Iterable<Optional<Exception>>‘. The returned ‘Iterable‘ must
* have as many elements as the input ‘messages‘ ‘Iterable‘. Each ‘Optional‘
* element signals if the corresponding ‘AtomicWrite‘ is rejected or not, with
* an exception describing the problem. Rejecting a message means it was not
* stored, i.e. it must not be included in a later replay. Rejecting a message
* is typically done before attempting to store it, e.g. because of
* serialization error.
*
* Data store connection problems must not be signaled as rejections.
*
* Note that it is possible to reduce number of allocations by caching some
* result ‘Iterable‘ for the happy path, i.e. when no messages are rejected.
*
* Calls to this method are serialized by the enclosing journal actor. If you spawn
* work in asynchronous tasks it is alright that they complete the futures in any order,
* but the actual writes for a specific persistenceId should be serialized to avoid
* issues such as events of a later write are visible to consumers (query side, or replay)
* before the events of an earlier write are visible. This can also be done with
* consistent hashing if it is too fine grained to do it on the persistenceId level.
* Normally a ‘PersistentActor‘ will only have one outstanding write request to the journal but
* it may emit several write requests when ‘persistAsync‘ is used and the max batch size
* is reached.
*
* This call is protected with a circuit-breaker.
*/
Future<Iterable<Optional<Exception>>> doAsyncWriteMessages(Iterable<AtomicWrite> messages);
/**
If the storage backend API only supports synchronous, blocking writes, the methods should be implemented as:
@Override
public Future<Iterable<Optional<Exception>>> doAsyncWriteMessages(
Iterable<AtomicWrite> messages) {
try {
Iterable<Optional<Exception>> result = new ArrayList<Optional<Exception>>();
// blocking call here...
// result.add(..)
return Futures.successful(result);
} catch (Exception e) {
return Futures.failed(e);
}
}
A journal plugin must also implement the methods defined in AsyncRecovery for replays and sequence number
recovery:
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously replays persistent messages.
* Implementations replay a message by calling ‘replayCallback‘. The returned
* future must be completed when all messages (matching the sequence number
* bounds) have been replayed. The future must be completed with a failure if
* any of the persistent messages could not be replayed.
*
* The ‘replayCallback‘ must also be called with messages that have been
* marked as deleted. In this case a replayed message’s ‘deleted‘ method must
* return ‘true‘.
*
* The ‘toSequenceNr‘ is the lowest of what was returned by
* {@link #doAsyncReadHighestSequenceNr} and what the user specified as
* recovery {@link akka.persistence.Recovery} parameter.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param fromSequenceNr
* sequence number where replay should start (inclusive).
* @param toSequenceNr
* sequence number where replay should end (inclusive).
* @param max
* maximum number of messages to be replayed.
* @param replayCallback
* called to replay a single message. Can be called from any thread.
*/
Future<Void> doAsyncReplayMessages(String persistenceId, long fromSequenceNr,
long toSequenceNr, long max, Consumer<PersistentRepr> replayCallback);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously reads the highest stored sequence
* number for the given ‘persistenceId‘. The persistent actor will use the
* highest sequence number after recovery as the starting point when
* persisting new events. This sequence number is also used as ‘toSequenceNr‘
* in subsequent call to [[#asyncReplayMessages]] unless the user has
* specified a lower ‘toSequenceNr‘.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param fromSequenceNr
* hint where to start searching for the highest sequence number.
*/
Future<Long> doAsyncReadHighestSequenceNr(String persistenceId, long fromSequenceNr);
The specified plugin class must have a no-arg constructor. The plugin-dispatcher
is the dispatcher used for the plugin actor. If not specified, it defaults to
akka.persistence.dispatchers.default-plugin-dispatcher.
The journal plugin instance is an actor so the methods corresponding to requests from persistent actors are exe-
cuted sequentially. It may delegate to asynchronous libraries, spawn futures, or delegate to other actors to achive
parallelism.
The journal plugin class must have a constructor with one of these signatures:
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter and a String parameter for the
config path
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter
• constructor without parameters
The plugin section of the actor system’s config will be passed in the config constructor parameter. The config path
of the plugin is passed in the String parameter.
Don’t run journal tasks/futures on the system default dispatcher, since that might starve other tasks.
A snapshot store plugin must extend the SnapshotStore actor and implement the following methods:
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously loads a snapshot.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param criteria
* selection criteria for loading.
*/
Future<Optional<SelectedSnapshot>> doLoadAsync(String persistenceId,
SnapshotSelectionCriteria criteria);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously saves a snapshot.
*
* @param metadata
* snapshot metadata.
* @param snapshot
* snapshot.
*/
Future<Void> doSaveAsync(SnapshotMetadata metadata, Object snapshot);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: deletes the snapshot identified by ‘metadata‘.
*
* @param metadata
* snapshot metadata.
*/
Future<Void> doDeleteAsync(SnapshotMetadata metadata);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: deletes all snapshots matching ‘criteria‘.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param criteria
* selection criteria for deleting.
*/
Future<Void> doDeleteAsync(String persistenceId, SnapshotSelectionCriteria criteria);
A snapshot store plugin can be activated with the following minimal configuration:
# Path to the snapshot store plugin to be used
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin = "my-snapshot-store"
The snapshot store instance is an actor so the methods corresponding to requests from persistent actors are exe-
cuted sequentially. It may delegate to asynchronous libraries, spawn futures, or delegate to other actors to achive
parallelism.
The snapshot store plugin class must have a constructor with one of these signatures:
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter and a String parameter for the
config path
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter
• constructor without parameters
The plugin section of the actor system’s config will be passed in the config constructor parameter. The config path
of the plugin is passed in the String parameter.
The plugin-dispatcher is the dispatcher used for the plugin actor. If not specified, it defaults to
akka.persistence.dispatchers.default-plugin-dispatcher.
Don’t run snapshot store tasks/futures on the system default dispatcher, since that might starve other tasks.
Plugin TCK
In order to help developers build correct and high quality storage plugins, we provide a Technology Compatibility
Kit (TCK for short).
The TCK is usable from Java as well as Scala projects. For Java you need to include the akka-persistence-tck
dependency:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-persistence-tck_${scala.version}</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
To include the Journal TCK tests in your test suite simply extend the provided JavaJournalSpec:
class MyJournalSpecTest extends JavaJournalSpec {
public MyJournalSpecTest() {
super(ConfigFactory.parseString(
"persistence.journal.plugin = " +
"\"akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared\""));
}
@Override
public CapabilityFlag supportsRejectingNonSerializableObjects() {
return CapabilityFlag.off();
}
}
Please note that some of the tests are optional, and by overriding the supports... methods you give the
TCK the needed information about which tests to run. You can implement these methods using the provided
CapabilityFlag.on / CapabilityFlag.off values.
We also provide a simple benchmarking class JavaJournalPerfSpec which includes all the tests that
JavaJournalSpec has, and also performs some longer operations on the Journal while printing its perfor-
mance stats. While it is NOT aimed to provide a proper benchmarking environment it can be used to get a rough
feel about your journal’s performance in the most typical scenarios.
In order to include the SnapshotStore TCK tests in your test suite simply extend the SnapshotStoreSpec:
class MySnapshotStoreTest extends JavaSnapshotStoreSpec {
public MySnapshotStoreTest() {
super(ConfigFactory.parseString(
"akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin = " +
"\"akka.persistence.snapshot-store.local\""));
}
}
In case your plugin requires some setting up (starting a mock database, removing temporary files etc.) you can
override the beforeAll and afterAll methods to hook into the tests lifecycle:
class MyJournalSpecTest extends JavaJournalSpec {
public MyJournalSpecTest() {
super(ConfigFactory.parseString(
"persistence.journal.plugin = " +
"\"akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared\""));
@Override
@Override
public void beforeAll() {
for (File storageLocation : storageLocations) {
FileUtils.deleteRecursively(storageLocation);
}
super.beforeAll();
}
@Override
public void afterAll() {
super.afterAll();
for (File storageLocation : storageLocations) {
FileUtils.deleteRecursively(storageLocation);
}
}
}
We highly recommend including these specifications in your test suite, as they cover a broad range of cases you
might have otherwise forgotten to test for when writing a plugin from scratch.
LevelDB based plugins will also require the following additional dependency declaration:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.iq80.leveldb</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldb</artifactId>
<version>0.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.fusesource.leveldbjni</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldbjni-all</artifactId>
<version>1.8</version>
</dependency>
The default location of the LevelDB files is a directory named journal in the current working directory. This
location can be changed by configuration where the specified path can be relative or absolute:
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb.dir = "target/journal"
With this plugin, each actor system runs its own private LevelDB instance.
A LevelDB instance can also be shared by multiple actor systems (on the same or on different nodes). This, for
example, allows persistent actors to failover to a backup node and continue using the shared journal instance from
the backup node.
Warning: A shared LevelDB instance is a single point of failure and should therefore only be used for testing
purposes. Highly-available, replicated journals are available as Community plugins.
By default, the shared instance writes journaled messages to a local directory named journal in the current
working directory. The storage location can be changed by configuration:
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared.store.dir = "target/shared"
Actor systems that use a shared LevelDB store must activate the akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared
plugin.
akka.persistence.journal.plugin = "akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared"
This plugin must be initialized by injecting the (remote) SharedLeveldbStore actor reference. Injection is
done by calling the SharedLeveldbJournal.setStore method with the actor reference as argument.
class SharedStorageUsage extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public void preStart() throws Exception {
String path = "akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/store";
ActorSelection selection = getContext().actorSelection(path);
selection.tell(new Identify(1), getSelf());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message instanceof ActorIdentity) {
ActorIdentity identity = (ActorIdentity) message;
if (identity.correlationId().equals(1)) {
ActorRef store = identity.getRef();
if (store != null) {
SharedLeveldbJournal.setStore(store, getContext().system());
}
}
}
}
}
Internal journal commands (sent by persistent actors) are buffered until injection completes. Injection is idempo-
tent i.e. only the first injection is used.
The default storage location is a directory named snapshots in the current working directory. This can be
changed by configuration where the specified path can be relative or absolute:
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.local.dir = "target/snapshots"
Note that it is not mandatory to specify a snapshot store plugin. If you don’t use snapshots you don’t have to
configure it.
A persistence plugin proxy allows sharing of journals and snapshot stores across multiple actor systems (on the
same or on different nodes). This, for example, allows persistent actors to failover to a backup node and continue
using the shared journal instance from the backup node. The proxy works by forwarding all the journal/snapshot
store messages to a single, shared, persistence plugin instance, and therefor supports any use case supported by
the proxied plugin.
Warning: A shared journal/snapshot store is a single point of failure and should therefore only be used for
testing purposes. Highly-available, replicated persistence plugins are available as Community plugins.
The journal and snapshot store proxies are controlled via the akka.persistence.journal.proxy
and akka.persistence.snapshot-store.proxy configuration entries, respectively. Set the
target-journal-plugin or target-snapshot-store-plugin keys to the underlying plugin you
wish to use (for example: akka.persistence.journal.leveldb). The start-target-journal
and start-target-snapshot-store keys should be set to on in exactly one actor system -
this is the system that will instantiate the shared persistence plugin. Next, the proxy needs to be
told how to find the shared plugin. This can be done by setting the target-journal-address
and target-snapshot-store-address configuration keys, or programmatically by calling the
PersistencePluginProxy.setTargetLocation method.
Note: Akka starts extensions lazily when they are required, and this includes the proxy. This means
that in order for the proxy to work, the persistence plugin on the target node must be instantiated. This
can be done by instantiating the PersistencePluginProxyExtension extension, or by calling the
PersistencePluginProxy.start method.
Note: The proxied persistence plugin can (and should) be configured using its original configuration keys.
Serialization of snapshots and payloads of Persistent messages is configurable with Akka’s Serialization
infrastructure. For example, if an application wants to serialize
• payloads of type MyPayload with a custom MyPayloadSerializer and
• snapshots of type MySnapshot with a custom MySnapshotSerializer
it must add
akka.actor {
serializers {
my-payload = "docs.persistence.MyPayloadSerializer"
my-snapshot = "docs.persistence.MySnapshotSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"docs.persistence.MyPayload" = my-payload
"docs.persistence.MySnapshot" = my-snapshot
}
}
4.8.11 Testing
When running tests with LevelDB default settings in sbt, make sure to set fork := true in your sbt project.
Otherwise, you’ll see an UnsatisfiedLinkError. Alternatively, you can switch to a LevelDB Java port by
setting
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb.native = off
or
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared.store.native = off
in your Akka configuration. The LevelDB Java port is for testing purposes only.
Warning: It is not possible to test persistence provided classes (i.e. PersistentActor and AtLeastOnceDelivery)
using TestActorRef due to its synchronous nature. These traits need to be able to perform asynchronous
tasks in the background in order to handle internal persistence related events.
When testing Persistence based projects always rely on asynchronous messaging using the TestKit.
4.8.12 Configuration
There are several configuration properties for the persistence module, please refer to the reference configuration.
By default, a persistent actor or view will use the “default” journal and snapshot store plugins configured in the
following sections of the reference.conf configuration resource:
# Absolute path to the default journal plugin configuration entry.
akka.persistence.journal.plugin = "akka.persistence.journal.inmem"
# Absolute path to the default snapshot store plugin configuration entry.
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin = "akka.persistence.snapshot-store.local"
Note that in this case the actor or view overrides only persistenceId method:
abstract class ActorWithDefaultPlugins extends UntypedPersistentActor {
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "123"; }
}
When a persistent actor or view overrides the journalPluginId and snapshotPluginId methods, the
actor or view will be serviced by these specific persistence plugins instead of the defaults:
abstract class ActorWithOverridePlugins extends UntypedPersistentActor {
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "123"; }
// Absolute path to the journal plugin configuration entry in the ‘reference.conf‘
@Override
public String journalPluginId() { return "akka.persistence.chronicle.journal"; }
// Absolute path to the snapshot store plugin configuration entry in the ‘reference.conf‘
@Override
public String snapshotPluginId() { return "akka.persistence.chronicle.snapshot-store"; }
}
When working on long running projects using Persistence, or any kind of Event Sourcing architectures, schema
evolution becomes one of the more important technical aspects of developing your application. The requirements
as well as our own understanding of the business domain may (and will) change in time.
In fact, if a project matures to the point where you need to evolve its schema to adapt to changing business
requirements you can view this as first signs of its success – if you wouldn’t need to adapt anything over an apps
lifecycle that could mean that no-one is really using it actively.
In this chapter we will investigate various schema evolution strategies and techniques from which you can pick
and choose the ones that match your domain and challenge at hand.
Note: This page proposes a number of possible solutions to the schema evolution problem and explains how some
of the utilities Akka provides can be used to achieve this, it is by no means a complete (closed) set of solutions.
Sometimes, based on the capabilities of your serialization formats, you may be able to evolve your schema in
different ways than outlined in the sections below. If you discover useful patterns or techniques for schema
evolution feel free to submit Pull Requests to this page to extend it.
In recent years we have observed a tremendous move towards immutable append-only datastores, with event-
sourcing being the prime technique successfully being used in these settings. For an excellent overview why and
how immutable data makes scalability and systems design much simpler you may want to read Pat Helland’s
excellent Immutability Changes Everything whitepaper.
Since with Event Sourcing the events are immutable and usually never deleted – the way schema evolution is
handled differs from how one would go about it in a mutable database setting (e.g. in typical CRUD database
applications).
The system needs to be able to continue to work in the presence of “old” events which were stored under the “old”
schema. We also want to limit complexity in the business logic layer, exposing a consistent view over all of the
events of a given type to PersistentActor s and persistence queries. This allows the business logic layer to
focus on solving business problems instead of having to explicitly deal with different schemas.
In summary, schema evolution in event sourced systems exposes the following characteristics:
• Allow the system to continue operating without large scale migrations to be applied,
• Allow the system to read “old” events from the underlying storage, however present them in a “new”
view to the application logic,
• Transparently promote events to the latest versions during recovery (or queries) such that the business
logic need not consider multiple versions of events
Before we explain the various techniques that can be used to safely evolve the schema of your persistent events
over time, we first need to define what the actual problem is, and what the typical styles of changes are.
Since events are never deleted, we need to have a way to be able to replay (read) old events, in such way that does
not force the PersistentActor to be aware of all possible versions of an event that it may have persisted in
the past. Instead, we want the Actors to work on some form of “latest” version of the event and provide some
means of either converting old “versions” of stored events into this “latest” event type, or constantly evolve the
event definition - in a backwards compatible way - such that the new deserialization code can still read old events.
The most common schema changes you will likely are:
• adding a field to an event type,
• remove or rename field in event type,
• remove event type,
• split event into multiple smaller events.
The following sections will explain some patterns which can be used to safely evolve your schema when facing
those changes.
Picking the serialization format is a very important decision you will have to make while building your application.
It affects which kind of evolutions are simple (or hard) to do, how much work is required to add a new datatype,
and, last but not least, serialization performance.
If you find yourself realising you have picked “the wrong” serialization format, it is always possible to change the
format used for storing new events, however you would have to keep the old deserialization code in order to be
able to replay events that were persisted using the old serialization scheme. It is possible to “rebuild” an event-log
from one serialization format to another one, however it may be a more involved process if you need to perform
this on a live system.
Binary serialization formats that we have seen work well for long-lived applications include the very flexible IDL
based: Google Protobuf, Apache Thrift or Apache Avro. Avro schema evolution is more “entire schema” based,
instead of single fields focused like in protobuf or thrift, and usually requires using some kind of schema registry.
Users who want their data to be human-readable directly in the write-side datastore may opt to use plain-old
JSON as the storage format, though that comes at a cost of lacking support for schema evolution and relatively
large marshalling latency.
There are plenty excellent blog posts explaining the various trade-offs between popular serialization formats, one
post we would like to highlight is the very well illustrated Schema evolution in Avro, Protocol Buffers and Thrift
by Martin Kleppmann.
Akka Persistence provides Google Protocol Buffers based serializers (using Akka Serialization) for it’s own mes-
sage types such as PersistentRepr, AtomicWrite and snapshots. Journal plugin implementations may
choose to use those provided serializers, or pick a serializer which suits the underlying database better.
Note: Serialization is NOT handled automatically by Akka Persistence itself. Instead, it only provides the above
described serializers, and in case a AsyncWriteJournal plugin implementation chooses to use them directly,
the above serialization scheme will be used.
Please refer to your write journal’s documentation to learn more about how it handles serialization!
For example, some journals may choose to not use Akka Serialization at all and instead store the data in a format
that is more “native” for the underlying datastore, e.g. using JSON or some other kind of format that the target
datastore understands directly.
The below figure explains how the default serialization scheme works, and how it fits together with serializing the
user provided message itself, which we will from here on refer to as the payload (highlighted in yellow):
Figure 4.1: Akka Persistence provided serializers wrap the user payload in an envelope containing all persistence-
relevant information. If the Journal uses provided Protobuf serializers for the wrapper types (e.g. Persis-
tentRepr), then the payload will be serialized using the user configured serializer, and if none is provided
explicitly, Java serialization will be used for it.
The blue colored regions of the PersistentMessage indicate what is serialized using the gener-
ated protocol buffers serializers, and the yellow payload indicates the user provided event (by calling
persist(payload)(...)). As you can see, the PersistentMessage acts as an envelope around the
payload, adding various fields related to the origin of the event (persistenceId, sequenceNr and more).
More advanced techniques (e.g. Remove event class and ignore events) will dive into using the manifests for
increasing the flexibility of the persisted vs. exposed types even more. However for now we will focus on the
simpler evolution techniques, concerning simply configuring the payload serializers.
By default the payload will be serialized using Java Serialization. This is fine for testing and initial phases
of your development (while you’re still figuring out things and the data will not need to stay persisted forever).
However, once you move to production you should really pick a different serializer for your payloads.
Warning: Do not rely on Java serialization (which will be picked by Akka by default if you don’t specify
any serializers) for serious application development! It does not lean itself well to evolving schemas over
long periods of time, and its performance is also not very high (it never was designed for high-throughput
scenarios).
This section aims to highlight the complete basics on how to define custom serializers using Akka Serialization.
Many journal plugin implementations use Akka Serialization, thus it is tremendously important to understand how
to configure it to work with your event classes.
Note: Read the Akka Serialization docs to learn more about defining custom serializers, to improve performance
and maintainability of your system. Do not depend on Java serialization for production deployments.
The below snippet explains in the minimal amount of lines how a custom serializer can be registered. For more
in-depth explanations on how serialization picks the serializer to use etc, please refer to its documentation.
First we start by defining our domain model class, here representing a person:
public class Person {
public final String name;
public final String surname;
public Person(String name, String surname) {
this.name = name;
this.surname = surname;
}
}
Next we implement a serializer (or extend an existing one to be able to handle the new Person class):
/**
* Simplest possible serializer, uses a string representation of the Person class.
*
* Usually a serializer like this would use a library like:
* protobuf, kryo, avro, cap’n proto, flatbuffers, SBE or some other dedicated serializer backend
* to perform the actual to/from bytes marshalling.
*/
public class SimplestPossiblePersonSerializer extends SerializerWithStringManifest {
private final Charset utf8 = Charset.forName("UTF-8");
// deserialize the object, using the manifest to indicate which logic to apply
@Override public Object fromBinary(byte[] bytes, String manifest) {
if (personManifest.equals(manifest)) {
String nameAndSurname = new String(bytes, utf8);
String[] parts = nameAndSurname.split("[|]");
return new Person(parts[0], parts[1]);
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Unable to deserialize from bytes, manifest was: " + manifest +
"! Bytes length: " + bytes.length);
}
}
And finally we register the serializer and bind it to handle the docs.persistence.Person class:
# application.conf
akka {
actor {
serializers {
person = "docs.persistence.SimplestPossiblePersonSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"docs.persistence.Person" = person
}
}
}
Deserialization will be performed by the same serializer which serialized the message initially because of the
identifier being stored together with the message.
Please refer to the Akka Serialization documentation for more advanced use of serializers, especially the Serial-
izer with String Manifest section since it is very useful for Persistence based applications dealing with schema
evolutions, as we will see in some of the examples below.
In this section we will discuss various schema evolution techniques using concrete examples and explaining some
of the various options one might go about handling the described situation. The list below is by no means a
complete guide, so feel free to adapt these techniques depending on your serializer’s capabilities and/or other
domain specific limitations.
Add fields
Situation: You need to add a field to an existing message type. For example, a SeatReservation(String
letter, int row) now needs to have an associated code which indicates if it is a window or aisle seat.
Solution: Adding fields is the most common change you’ll need to apply to your messages so make sure the
serialization format you picked for your payloads can handle it apropriately, i.e. such changes should be binary
compatible. This is easily achieved using the right serializer toolkit – we recommend something like Google
Protocol Buffers or Apache Thrift however other tools may fit your needs just as well – picking a serializer
backend is something you should research before picking one to run with. In the following examples we will be
using protobuf, mostly because we are familiar with it, it does its job well and Akka is using it internally as well.
While being able to read messages with missing fields is half of the solution, you also need to deal with the
missing values somehow. This is usually modeled as some kind of default value, or by representing the field as
an Optional<T> See below for an example how reading an optional field from a serialized protocol buffers
message might look like.
public enum SeatType {
Window("W"), Aisle("A"), Other("O"), Unknown("");
else
return Unknown;
}
}
public class SeatReserved {
public final String letter;
public final int row;
public final SeatType seatType;
Next we prepare an protocol definition using the protobuf Interface Description Language, which we’ll use to
generate the serializer code to be used on the Akka Serialization layer (notice that the schema aproach allows us
to easily rename fields, as long as the numeric identifiers of the fields do not change):
// FlightAppModels.proto
option java_package = "docs.persistence.proto";
option optimize_for = SPEED;
message SeatReserved {
required string letter = 1;
required uint32 row = 2;
optional string seatType = 3; // the new field
}
The serializer implementation uses the protobuf generated classes to marshall the payloads. Optional fields can
be handled explicitly or missing values by calling the has... methods on the protobuf object, which we do for
seatType in order to use a Unknown type in case the event was stored before we had introduced the field to
this event type:
/**
* Example serializer impl which uses protocol buffers generated classes (proto.*)
* to perform the to/from binary marshalling.
*/
public class AddedFieldsSerializerWithProtobuf extends SerializerWithStringManifest {
@Override public int identifier() {
return 67876;
}
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unable to handle: " + o);
}
}
// -- fromBinary helpers --
Rename fields
Situation: When first designing the system the SeatReverved event featured an code field. After some time
you discover that what was originally called code actually means seatNr, thus the model should be changed to
reflect this concept more accurately.
Solution 1 - using IDL based serializers: First, we will discuss the most efficient way of dealing with such kinds
of schema changes – IDL based serializers.
IDL stands for Interface Description Language, and means that the schema of the messages that will be stored is
based on this description. Most IDL based serializers also generate the serializer / deserializer code so that using
them is not too hard. Examples of such serializers are protobuf or thrift.
Using these libraries rename operations are “free”, because the field name is never actually stored in the binary
representation of the message. This is one of the advantages of schema based serializers, even though that they
add the overhead of having to maintain the schema. When using serializers like this, no additional code change
(except renaming the field and method used during serialization) is needed to perform such evolution:
This is how such a rename would look in protobuf:
// protobuf message definition, BEFORE:
message SeatReserved {
required string code = 1;
}
It is important to learn about the strengths and limitations of your serializers, in order to be able to move swiftly
and refactor your models fearlessly as you go on with the project.
Note: Learn in-depth about the serialization engine you’re using as it will impact how you can aproach schema
evolution.
Some operations are “free” in certain serialization formats (more often than not: removing/adding optional fields,
sometimes renaming fields etc.), while some other operations are strictly not possible.
Solution 2 - by manually handling the event versions: Another solution, in case your serialization format does
not support renames as easily as the above mentioned formats, is versioning your schema. For example, you could
have made your events carry an additional field called _version which was set to 1 (because it was the initial
schema), and once you change the schema you bump this number to 2, and write an adapter which can perform
the rename.
This approach is popular when your serialization format is something like JSON, where renames can not be
performed automatically by the serializer. You can do these kinds of “promotions” either manually (as shown
in the example below) or using a library like Stamina which helps to create those V1->V2->V3->...->Vn
promotion chains without much boilerplate.
The following snippet showcases how one could apply renames if working with plain JSON (using a JsObject
as an example JSON representation):
public class JsonRenamedFieldAdapter implements EventAdapter {
// use your favorite json library
private final ExampleJsonMarshaller marshaller = new ExampleJsonMarshaller();
As you can see, manually handling renames induces some boilerplate onto the EventAdapter, however much of
it you will find is common infrastructure code that can be either provided by an external library (for promotion
management) or put together in a simple helper class.
Note: The technique of versioning events and then promoting them to the latest version using JSON transforma-
tions can of course be applied to more than just field renames – it also applies to adding fields and all kinds of
changes in the message format.
Situation: While investigating app performance you notice that insane amounts of CustomerBlinked events
are being stored for every customer each time he/she blinks. Upon investigation you decide that the event does
not add any value and should be deleted. You still have to be able to replay from a journal which contains those
old CustomerBlinked events though.
Naive solution - drop events in EventAdapter:
The problem of removing an event type from the domain model is not as much its removal, as the implications
for the recovery mechanisms that this entails. For example, a naive way of filtering out certain kinds of events
from being delivered to a recovering PersistentActor is pretty simple, as one can simply filter them out in
an EventAdapter:
This however does not address the underlying cost of having to deserialize all the events during recovery, even
those which will be filtered out by the adapter. In the next section we will improve the above explained mechanism
to avoid deserializing events which would be filtered out by the adapter anyway, thus allowing to save precious
time during a recovery containing lots of such events (without actually having to delete them).
Improved solution - deserialize into tombstone:
In the just described technique we have saved the PersistentActor from receiving un-wanted events by filtering
them out in the EventAdapter, however the event itself still was deserialized and loaded into memory. This
has two notable downsides:
• first, that the deserialization was actually performed, so we spent some of out time budget on the deserial-
ization, even though the event does not contribute anything to the persistent actors state.
Figure 4.2: The EventAdapter can drop old events (O) by emitting an empty EventSeq. Other events can
simply be passed through (E).
• second, that we are unable to remove the event class from the system – since the serializer still needs to
create the actuall instance of it, as it does not know it will not be used.
The solution to these problems is to use a serializer that is aware of that event being no longer needed, and can
notice this before starting to deserialize the object.
This aproach allows us to remove the original class from our classpath, which makes for less “old” classes lying
around in the project. This can for example be implemented by using an SerializerWithStringManifest
(documented in depth in Serializer with String Manifest). By looking at the string manifest, the serializer can
notice that the type is no longer needed, and skip the deserialization all-together:
Figure 4.3: The serializer is aware of the old event types that need to be skipped (O), and can skip deserializing
them alltogether by simply returning a “tombstone” (T), which the EventAdapter converts into an empty EventSeq.
Other events (E) can simply be passed through.
The serializer detects that the string manifest points to a removed event type and skips attempting to deserialize it:
public class EventDeserializationSkipped {
public static EventDeserializationSkipped instance =
new EventDeserializationSkipped();
private EventDeserializationSkipped() {
}
}
if (o instanceof CustomerBlinked)
return customerBlinkedManifest;
else
return o.getClass().getName();
}
Situation: You want to separate the application model (often called the “domain model”) completely from the
models used to persist the corresponding events (the “data model”). For example because the data representation
may change independently of the domain model.
Another situation where this technique may be useful is when your serialization tool of choice requires generated
classes to be used for serialization and deserialization of objects, like for example Google Protocol Buffers do,
yet you do not want to leak this implementation detail into the domain model itself, which you’d like to model as
plain Java classes.
Solution: In order to detach the domain model, which is often represented using pure java (case) classes, from
the data model classes which very often may be less user-friendly yet highly optimised for throughput and schema
evolution (like the classes generated by protobuf for example), it is possible to use a simple EventAdapter which
maps between these types in a 1:1 style as illustrated below:
We will use the following domain and data models to showcase how the separation can be implemented by the
adapter:
// Domain model - highly optimised for domain language and maybe "fluent" usage
public class Customer {
public final String name;
Figure 4.4: Domain events (A) are adapted to the data model events (D) by the EventAdapter. The data model
can be a format natively understood by the journal, such that it can store it more efficiently or include additional
data for the event (e.g. tags), for ease of later querying.
this.name = name;
}
}
The EventAdapter takes care of converting from one model to the other one (in both directions), alowing the
models to be completely detached from each other, such that they can be optimised independently as long as the
mapping logic is able to convert between them:
class DetachedModelsAdapter implements EventAdapter {
@Override public String manifest(Object event) {
return "";
}
The same technique could also be used directly in the Serializer if the end result of marshalling is bytes. Then the
serializer can simply convert the bytes do the domain object by using the generated protobuf builders.
Situation: You want to keep your persisted events in a human-readable format, for example JSON.
Solution: This is a special case of the Detach domain model from data model pattern, and thus requires some
co-operation from the Journal implementation to achieve this.
An example of a Journal which may implement this pattern is MongoDB, however other databases such as Post-
greSQL and Cassandra could also do it because of their built-in JSON capabilities.
In this aproach, the EventAdapter is used as the marshalling layer: it serializes the events to/from JSON. The
journal plugin notices that the incoming event type is JSON (for example by performing a match on the incoming
event) and stores the incoming object directly.
public class JsonDataModelAdapter implements EventAdapter {
Note: This technique only applies if the Akka Persistence plugin you are using provides this capability. Check
the documentation of your favourite plugin to see if it supports this style of persistence.
If it doesn’t, you may want to skim the list of existing journal plugins, just in case some other plugin for your
favourite datastore does provide this capability.
Alternative solution:
In fact, an AsyncWriteJournal implementation could natively decide to not use binary serialization at all, and
always serialize the incoming messages as JSON - in which case the toJournal implementation of the
EventAdapter would be an identity function, and the fromJournal would need to de-serialize messages
from JSON.
Note: If in need of human-readable events on the write-side of your application reconsider whether preparing
materialized views using Persistence Query would not be an efficient way to go about this, without compromising
the write-side’s throughput characteristics.
If indeed you want to use a human-readable representation on the write-side, pick a Persistence plugin that provides
that functionality, or – implement one yourself.
Situation: While refactoring your domain events, you find that one of the events has become too large (coarse-
grained) and needs to be split up into multiple fine-grained events.
Solution: Let us consider a situation where an event represents “user details changed”. After some time we
discover that this event is too coarse, and needs to be split into “user name changed” and “user address changed”,
because somehow users keep changing their usernames a lot and we’d like to keep this as a separate event.
The write side change is very simple, we simply persist UserNameChanged or UserAddressChanged
depending on what the user actually intended to change (instead of the composite UserDetailsChanged that
we had in version 1 of our model).
Figure 4.5: The EventAdapter splits the incoming event into smaller more fine grained events during recovery.
During recovery however, we now need to convert the old V1 model into the V2 representation of the change.
Depending if the old event contains a name change, we either emit the UserNameChanged or we don’t, and the
address change is handled similarily:
interface V1 {};
interface V2 {}
// V1 event:
public class UserDetailsChanged implements V1 {
public final String name;
public final String address;
public UserDetailsChanged(String name, String address) {
this.name = name;
this.address = address;
}
}
// corresponding V2 events:
public class UserNameChanged implements V2 {
public final String name;
By returning an EventSeq from the event adapter, the recovered event can be converted to multiple events before
being delivered to the persistent actor.
Akka persistence query complements Persistence by providing a universal asynchronous stream based query in-
terface that various journal plugins can implement in order to expose their query capabilities.
The most typical use case of persistence query is implementing the so-called query side (also known as “read side”)
in the popular CQRS architecture pattern - in which the writing side of the application (e.g. implemented using
akka persistence) is completely separated from the “query side”. Akka Persistence Query itself is not directly the
query side of an application, however it can help to migrate data from the write side to the query side database. In
very simple scenarios Persistence Query may be powerful enough to fulfill the query needs of your app, however
we highly recommend (in the spirit of CQRS) of splitting up the write/read sides into separate datastores as the
need arises.
Warning: This module is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction in Akka 2.4.0. We will continue to
improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while we try to keep incompatible changes
to a minimum the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance releases does not apply to the contents of
the akka.persistence.query package.
4.10.1 Dependencies
Akka persistence query is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-persistence-query-experimental_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
Akka persistence query is purposely designed to be a very loosely specified API. This is in order to keep the
provided APIs general enough for each journal implementation to be able to expose its best features, e.g. a SQL
journal can use complex SQL queries or if a journal is able to subscribe to a live event stream this should also be
possible to expose the same API - a typed stream of events.
Each read journal must explicitly document which types of queries it supports. Refer to your journal’s plugins
documentation for details on which queries and semantics it supports.
While Akka Persistence Query does not provide actual implementations of ReadJournals, it defines a number of
pre-defined query types for the most common query scenarios, that most journals are likely to implement (however
they are not required to).
In order to issue queries one has to first obtain an instance of a ReadJournal. Read journals are implemented
as Community plugins, each targeting a specific datastore (for example Cassandra or JDBC databases). For
example, given a library that provides a akka.persistence.query.my-read-journal obtaining the
related journal is as simple as:
// obtain read journal by plugin id
final MyJavadslReadJournal readJournal =
PersistenceQuery.get(system).getReadJournalFor(MyJavadslReadJournal.class,
"akka.persistence.query.my-read-journal");
Journal implementers are encouraged to put this identifier in a variable known to the user, such that one can
access it via getJournalFor(NoopJournal.class, NoopJournal.identifier), however this is
not enforced.
Read journal implementations are available as Community plugins.
Predefined queries
Akka persistence query comes with a number of query interfaces built in and suggests Journal implementors to
implement them according to the semantics described below. It is important to notice that while these query types
are very common a journal is not obliged to implement all of them - for example because in a given journal such
query would be significantly inefficient.
Note: Refer to the documentation of the ReadJournal plugin you are using for a specific list of supported
query types. For example, Journal plugins should document their stream completion strategies.
allPersistenceIds which is designed to allow users to subscribe to a stream of all persistent ids in the
system. By default this stream should be assumed to be a “live” stream, which means that the journal should keep
emitting new persistence ids as they come into the system:
readJournal.allPersistenceIds();
If your usage does not require a live stream, you can use the currentPersistenceIds query:
readJournal.currentPersistenceIds();
Most journals will have to revert to polling in order to achieve this, which can typically be configured with a
refresh-interval configuration property.
If your usage does not require a live stream, you can use the currentEventsByPersistenceId query.
eventsByTag allows querying events regardless of which persistenceId they are associated with. This
query is hard to implement in some journals or may need some additional preparation of the used data store to be
executed efficiently. The goal of this query is to allow querying for all events which are “tagged” with a specific
tag. That includes the use case to query all domain events of an Aggregate Root type. Please refer to your read
journal plugin’s documentation to find out if and how it is supported.
Some journals may support tagging of events via an Event Adapters that wraps the events in a
akka.persistence.journal.Tagged with the given tags. The journal may support other ways of do-
ing tagging - again, how exactly this is implemented depends on the used journal. Here is an example of such a
tagging event adapter:
public class MyTaggingEventAdapter implements WriteEventAdapter {
@Override
public Object toJournal(Object event) {
if (event instanceof String) {
String s = (String) event;
Set<String> tags = new HashSet<String>();
if (s.contains("green")) tags.add("green");
if (s.contains("black")) tags.add("black");
if (s.contains("blue")) tags.add("blue");
if (tags.isEmpty())
return event;
else
return new Tagged(event, tags);
} else {
return event;
}
}
@Override
public String manifest(Object event) {
return "";
}
}
Note: A very important thing to keep in mind when using queries spanning multiple persistenceIds, such as
EventsByTag is that the order of events at which the events appear in the stream rarely is guaranteed (or stable
between materializations).
Journals may choose to opt for strict ordering of the events, and should then document explicitly what kind of
ordering guarantee they provide - for example “ordered by timestamp ascending, independently of persistenceId”
is easy to achieve on relational databases, yet may be hard to implement efficiently on plain key-value datastores.
In the example below we query all events which have been tagged (we assume this was performed by the write-
side using an EventAdapter, or that the journal is smart enough that it can figure out what we mean by this tag -
for example if the journal stored the events as json it may try to find those with the field tag set to this value etc.).
// assuming journal is able to work with numeric offsets we can:
final Source<EventEnvelope2, NotUsed> blueThings =
readJournal.eventsByTag("blue", new Sequence(0L));
As you can see, we can use all the usual stream combinators available from Akka Streams on the resulting query
stream, including for example taking the first 10 and cancelling the stream. It is worth pointing out that the built-in
EventsByTag query has an optionally supported offset parameter (of type Long) which the journals can use
to implement resumable-streams. For example a journal may be able to use a WHERE clause to begin the read
starting from a specific row, or in a datastore that is able to order events by insertion time it could treat the Long
as a timestamp and select only older events.
If your usage does not require a live stream, you can use the currentEventsByTag query.
Journals are able to provide additional information related to a query by exposing materialized values, which are
a feature of Akka Streams that allows to expose additional values at stream materialization time.
More advanced query journals may use this technique to expose information about the character of the materialized
stream, for example if it’s finite or infinite, strictly ordered or not ordered at all. The materialized value type is
defined as the second type parameter of the returned Source, which allows journals to provide users with their
specialised query object, as demonstrated in the sample below:
public class RichEvent {
public final Set<String >tags;
public final Object payload;
events.map(event -> {
System.out.println("Event payload: " + event.payload);
return event.payload;
}).runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
When building systems using Event sourcing and CQRS (Command & Query Responsibility Segregation) tech-
niques it is tremendously important to realise that the write-side has completely different needs from the read-side,
and separating those concerns into datastores that are optimised for either side makes it possible to offer the best
experience for the write and read sides independently.
For example, in a bidding system it is important to “take the write” and respond to the bidder that we have accepted
the bid as soon as possible, which means that write-throughput is of highest importance for the write-side – often
this means that data stores which are able to scale to accommodate these requirements have a less expressive query
side.
On the other hand the same application may have some complex statistics view or we may have analysts working
with the data to figure out best bidding strategies and trends – this often requires some kind of expressive query
capabilities like for example SQL or writing Spark jobs to analyse the data. Therefore the data stored in the
write-side needs to be projected into the other read-optimised datastore.
Note: When referring to Materialized Views in Akka Persistence think of it as “some persistent storage of the
result of a Query”. In other words, it means that the view is created once, in order to be afterwards queried multiple
times, as in this format it may be more efficient or interesting to query it (instead of the source events directly).
If the read datastore exposes a Reactive Streams interface then implementing a simple projection is as simple as,
using the read-journal and feeding it into the databases driver interface, for example like so:
final ReactiveStreamsCompatibleDBDriver driver = new ReactiveStreamsCompatibleDBDriver();
final Subscriber<List<Object>> dbBatchWriter = driver.batchWriter();
If the target database does not provide a reactive streams Subscriber that can perform writes, you may have to
implement the write logic using plain functions or Actors instead.
In case your write logic is state-less and you just need to convert the events from one data type to another before
writing into the alternative datastore, then the projection is as simple as:
class ExampleStore {
CompletionStage<Void> save(Object any) {
// ...
}
}
readJournal
.eventsByTag("bid", new Sequence(0L))
.mapAsync(1, store::save)
.runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
Resumable projections
Sometimes you may need to implement “resumable” projections, that will not start from the beginning of time
each time when run. In this case you will need to store the sequence number (or offset) of the processed event
and use it the next time this projection is started. This pattern is not built-in, however is rather simple to implement
yourself.
The example below additionally highlights how you would use Actors to implement the write side, in case you
need to do some complex logic that would be best handled inside an Actor before persisting the event into the
other datastore:
final Timeout timeout = Timeout.apply(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
readJournal
.eventsByTag("bid", new Sequence(startFromOffset))
.mapAsync(8, envelope -> {
final CompletionStage<Object> f = ask(writer, envelope.event(), timeout);
return f.thenApplyAsync(in -> envelope.offset(), system.dispatcher());
})
.mapAsync(1, offset -> bidProjection.saveProgress(offset))
.runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
}
public TheOneWhoWritesToQueryJournal() {
store = new ExampleStore();
receive(ReceiveBuilder.matchAny(message -> {
state = updateState(state, message);
}).build());
}
Query plugins are various (mostly community driven) ReadJournal implementations for all kinds of available
datastores. The complete list of available plugins is maintained on the Akka Persistence Query Community Plugins
page.
The plugin for LevelDB is described in Persistence Query for LevelDB.
This section aims to provide tips and guide plugin developers through implementing a custom query plugin. Most
users will not need to implement journals themselves, except if targeting a not yet supported datastore.
Note: Since different data stores provide different query capabilities journal plugins must extensively document
their exposed semantics as well as handled query scenarios.
@Override
public MyScaladslReadJournal scaladslReadJournal() {
return new MyScaladslReadJournal(javadslReadJournal);
}
@Override
public MyJavadslReadJournal javadslReadJournal() {
return this.javadslReadJournal;
}
}
public class MyJavadslReadJournal implements
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.ReadJournal,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.EventsByTagQuery2,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.EventsByPersistenceIdQuery,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.AllPersistenceIdsQuery,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.CurrentPersistenceIdsQuery {
@Override
public Source<EventEnvelope2, NotUsed> eventsByTag(String tag, Offset offset) {
if(offset instanceof Sequence){
Sequence sequenceOffset = (Sequence) offset;
final Props props = MyEventsByTagPublisher.props(tag, sequenceOffset.value(), refreshInterva
return Source.<EventEnvelope2>actorPublisher(props).
mapMaterializedValue(m -> NotUsed.getInstance());
}
else
throw new IllegalArgumentException("MyJavadslReadJournal does not support " + offset.getClas
}
@Override
public Source<EventEnvelope, NotUsed> eventsByPersistenceId(String persistenceId,
long fromSequenceNr, long toSequenceNr) {
// implement in a similar way as eventsByTag
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not implemented yet");
}
@Override
public Source<String, NotUsed> allPersistenceIds() {
// implement in a similar way as eventsByTag
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not implemented yet");
}
@Override
public Source<String, NotUsed> currentPersistenceIds() {
// implement in a similar way as eventsByTag
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not implemented yet");
}
public class MyScaladslReadJournal implements
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.ReadJournal,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.EventsByTagQuery2,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.EventsByPersistenceIdQuery,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.AllPersistenceIdsQuery,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.CurrentPersistenceIdsQuery {
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<EventEnvelope2, NotUsed> eventsByTag(
String tag, akka.persistence.query.Offset offset) {
return javadslReadJournal.eventsByTag(tag, offset).asScala();
}
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<EventEnvelope, NotUsed> eventsByPersistenceId(
String persistenceId, long fromSequenceNr, long toSequenceNr) {
return javadslReadJournal.eventsByPersistenceId(persistenceId, fromSequenceNr,
toSequenceNr).asScala();
}
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<String, NotUsed> allPersistenceIds() {
return javadslReadJournal.allPersistenceIds().asScala();
}
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<String, NotUsed> currentPersistenceIds() {
return javadslReadJournal.currentPersistenceIds().asScala();
}
receive(ReceiveBuilder
.matchEquals(CONTINUE, (in) -> {
query();
deliverBuf();
})
.match(Cancel.class, (in) -> {
context().stop(self());
})
.build());
}
@Override
public void postStop() {
continueTask.cancel();
}
if (!res.isEmpty()) {
currentOffset = res.get(res.size() - 1).first();
final PersistentRepr p =
serialization.deserialize(bytes, PersistentRepr.class).get();
The ReadJournalProvider class must have a constructor with one of these signatures:
• constructor with a ExtendedActorSystem parameter, a com.typesafe.config.Config param-
eter, and a String parameter for the config path
• constructor with a ExtendedActorSystem parameter, and a com.typesafe.config.Config pa-
rameter
• constructor with one ExtendedActorSystem parameter
• constructor without parameters
The plugin section of the actor system’s config will be passed in the config constructor parameter. The config path
of the plugin is passed in the String parameter.
If the underlying datastore only supports queries that are completed when they reach the end of the “result set”,
the journal has to submit new queries after a while in order to support “infinite” event streams that include events
stored after the initial query has completed. It is recommended that the plugin use a configuration property named
refresh-interval for defining such a refresh interval.
Plugin TCK
This is documentation for the LevelDB implementation of the Persistence Query API. Note that implementations
for other journals may have different semantics.
Warning: This module is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction in Akka 2.4.0. We will continue to
improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while we try to keep incompatible changes
to a minimum the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance releases does not apply to the contents of
the akka.persistence.query package.
4.11.1 Dependencies
LeveldbReadJournal queries =
PersistenceQuery.get(system).getReadJournalFor(LeveldbReadJournal.class,
LeveldbReadJournal.Identifier());
You can retrieve a subset of all events by specifying fromSequenceNr and toSequenceNr or use 0L and
Long.MAX_VALUE respectively to retrieve all events. Note that the corresponding sequence number of each
event is provided in the EventEnvelope, which makes it possible to resume the stream at a later point from a
given sequence number.
The returned event stream is ordered by sequence number, i.e. the same order as the PersistentActor
persisted the events. The same prefix of stream elements (in same order) are returned for multiple executions of
the query, except for when events have been deleted.
The stream is not completed when it reaches the end of the currently stored events, but it continues to push new
events when new events are persisted. Corresponding query that is completed when it reaches the end of the
currently stored events is provided by currentEventsByPersistenceId.
The LevelDB write journal is notifying the query side as soon as events are persisted, but for efficiency
reasons the query side retrieves the events in batches that sometimes can be delayed up to the configured
refresh-interval or given RefreshInterval hint.
The stream is completed with failure if there is a failure in executing the query in the backend journal.
LeveldbReadJournal queries =
PersistenceQuery.get(system).getReadJournalFor(LeveldbReadJournal.class,
LeveldbReadJournal.Identifier());
The returned event stream is unordered and you can expect different order for multiple executions of the query.
The stream is not completed when it reaches the end of the currently used persistenceIds, but it continues to push
new persistenceIds when new persistent actors are created. Corresponding query that is completed when it reaches
the end of the currently used persistenceIds is provided by currentPersistenceIds.
The LevelDB write journal is notifying the query side as soon as new persistenceIds are created and there
is no periodic polling or batching involved in this query.
The stream is completed with failure if there is a failure in executing the query in the backend journal.
eventsByTag is used for retrieving events that were marked with a given tag, e.g. all domain events of an
Aggregate Root type.
LeveldbReadJournal queries =
PersistenceQuery.get(system).getReadJournalFor(LeveldbReadJournal.class,
LeveldbReadJournal.Identifier());
To tag events you create an Event Adapters that wraps the events in a
akka.persistence.journal.Tagged with the given tags.
public class MyTaggingEventAdapter implements WriteEventAdapter {
@Override
public Object toJournal(Object event) {
if (event instanceof String) {
String s = (String) event;
Set<String> tags = new HashSet<String>();
if (s.contains("green")) tags.add("green");
if (s.contains("black")) tags.add("black");
if (s.contains("blue")) tags.add("blue");
if (tags.isEmpty())
return event;
else
return new Tagged(event, tags);
} else {
return event;
}
}
@Override
public String manifest(Object event) {
return "";
}
}
You can retrieve a subset of all events by specifying offset, or use 0L to retrieve all events with a given tag.
The offset corresponds to an ordered sequence number for the specific tag. Note that the corresponding offset
of each event is provided in the EventEnvelope, which makes it possible to resume the stream at a later point
from a given offset.
In addition to the offset the EventEnvelope also provides persistenceId and sequenceNr for each
event. The sequenceNr is the sequence number for the persistent actor with the persistenceId that per-
sisted the event. The persistenceId + sequenceNr is an unique identifier for the event.
The returned event stream is ordered by the offset (tag sequence number), which corresponds to the same order as
the write journal stored the events. The same stream elements (in same order) are returned for multiple executions
of the query. Deleted events are not deleted from the tagged event stream.
Note: Events deleted using deleteMessages(toSequenceNr) are not deleted from the “tagged stream”.
The stream is not completed when it reaches the end of the currently stored events, but it continues to push new
events when new events are persisted. Corresponding query that is completed when it reaches the end of the
currently stored events is provided by currentEventsByTag.
The LevelDB write journal is notifying the query side as soon as tagged events are persisted, but for effi-
ciency reasons the query side retrieves the events in batches that sometimes can be delayed up to the configured
refresh-interval or given RefreshInterval hint.
The stream is completed with failure if there is a failure in executing the query in the backend journal.
4.11.4 Configuration
Configuration settings can be defined in the configuration section with the absolute path correspond-
ing to the identifier, which is "akka.persistence.query.journal.leveldb" for the default
LeveldbReadJournal.Identifier.
It can be configured with the following properties:
# Configuration for the LeveldbReadJournal
akka.persistence.query.journal.leveldb {
# Implementation class of the LevelDB ReadJournalProvider
class = "akka.persistence.query.journal.leveldb.LeveldbReadJournalProvider"
# Absolute path to the write journal plugin configuration entry that this
# query journal will connect to. That must be a LeveldbJournal or SharedLeveldbJournal.
# If undefined (or "") it will connect to the default journal as specified by the
# akka.persistence.journal.plugin property.
write-plugin = ""
# The LevelDB write journal is notifying the query side as soon as things
# are persisted, but for efficiency reasons the query side retrieves the events
# in batches that sometimes can be delayed up to the configured ‘refresh-interval‘.
refresh-interval = 3s
# How many events to fetch in one query (replay) and keep buffered until they
# are delivered downstreams.
max-buffer-size = 100
}
As with any piece of software, automated tests are a very important part of the development cycle. The actor
model presents a different view on how units of code are delimited and how they interact, which has an influence
on how to perform tests.
Akka comes with a dedicated module akka-testkit for supporting tests at different levels, which fall into two
clearly distinct categories:
• Testing isolated pieces of code without involving the actor model, meaning without multiple threads; this
implies completely deterministic behavior concerning the ordering of events and no concurrency concerns
and will be called Unit Testing in the following.
• Testing (multiple) encapsulated actors including multi-threaded scheduling; this implies non-deterministic
order of events but shielding from concurrency concerns by the actor model and will be called Integration
Testing in the following.
There are of course variations on the granularity of tests in both categories, where unit testing reaches down to
white-box tests and integration testing can encompass functional tests of complete actor networks. The important
distinction lies in whether concurrency concerns are part of the test or not. The tools offered are described in detail
in the following sections.
Testing the business logic inside Actor classes can be divided into two parts: first, each atomic operation must
work in isolation, then sequences of incoming events must be processed correctly, even in the presence of some
possible variability in the ordering of events. The former is the primary use case for single-threaded unit testing,
while the latter can only be verified in integration tests.
Normally, the ActorRef shields the underlying Actor instance from the outside, the only communications
channel is the actor’s mailbox. This restriction is an impediment to unit testing, which led to the inception of the
TestActorRef. This special type of reference is designed specifically for test purposes and allows access to
the actor in two ways: either by obtaining a reference to the underlying actor instance, or by invoking or querying
the actor’s behaviour (receive). Each one warrants its own section below.
Note: It is highly recommended to stick to traditional behavioural testing (using messaging to ask the Actor to
reply with the state you want to run assertions against), instead of using TestActorRef whenever possible.
Warning: Due to the synchronous nature of TestActorRef it will not work with some support traits that
Akka provides as they require asynchronous behaviours to function properly. Examples of traits that do not
mix well with test actor refs are PersistentActor and AtLeastOnceDelivery provided by Akka Persistence.
Having access to the actual Actor object allows application of all traditional unit testing techniques on the
contained methods. Obtaining a reference is done like this:
static class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
public void onReceive(Object o) throws Exception {
if (o.equals("say42")) {
getSender().tell(42, getSelf());
} else if (o instanceof Exception) {
throw (Exception) o;
}
}
public boolean testMe() { return true; }
}
@Test
public void demonstrateTestActorRef() {
final Props props = Props.create(MyActor.class);
final TestActorRef<MyActor> ref = TestActorRef.create(system, props, "testA");
final MyActor actor = ref.underlyingActor();
assertTrue(actor.testMe());
}
Since TestActorRef is generic in the actor type it returns the underlying actor with its proper static type. From
this point on you may bring any unit testing tool to bear on your actor as usual.
When the dispatcher invokes the processing behavior of an actor on a message, it actually calls apply on the
current behavior registered for the actor. This starts out with the return value of the declared receive method,
but it may also be changed using become and unbecome in response to external messages. All of this con-
tributes to the overall actor behavior and it does not lend itself to easy testing on the Actor itself. Therefore the
TestActorRef offers a different mode of operation to complement the Actor testing: it supports all operations
also valid on normal ActorRef. Messages sent to the actor are processed synchronously on the current thread
and answers may be sent back as usual. This trick is made possible by the CallingThreadDispatcher
described below (see CallingThreadDispatcher); this dispatcher is set implicitly for any actor instantiated into a
TestActorRef.
final Props props = Props.create(MyActor.class);
final TestActorRef<MyActor> ref = TestActorRef.create(system, props, "testB");
final Future<Object> future = akka.pattern.Patterns.ask(ref, "say42", 3000);
assertTrue(future.isCompleted());
assertEquals(42, Await.result(future, Duration.Zero()));
As the TestActorRef is a subclass of LocalActorRef with a few special extras, also aspects like super-
vision and restarting work properly, but beware that execution is only strictly synchronous as long as all actors
involved use the CallingThreadDispatcher. As soon as you add elements which include more sophisti-
cated scheduling you leave the realm of unit testing as you then need to think about asynchronicity again (in most
cases the problem will be to wait until the desired effect had a chance to happen).
One more special aspect which is overridden for single-threaded tests is the receiveTimeout, as including
that would entail asynchronous queuing of ReceiveTimeout messages, violating the synchronous contract.
If you want to test the actor behavior, including hotswapping, but without involving a dispatcher and without
having the TestActorRef swallow any thrown exceptions, then there is another mode available for you: just
use the receive method on TestActorRef, which will be forwarded to the underlying actor:
final Props props = Props.create(MyActor.class);
final TestActorRef<MyActor> ref = TestActorRef.create(system, props, "myActor");
try {
ref.receive(new Exception("expected"));
fail("expected an exception to be thrown");
} catch (Exception e) {
assertEquals("expected", e.getMessage());
}
Use Cases
You may of course mix and match both modi operandi of TestActorRef as suits your test needs:
• one common use case is setting up the actor into a specific internal state before sending the test message
• another is to verify correct internal state transitions after having sent the test message
Feel free to experiment with the possibilities, and if you find useful patterns, don’t hesitate to let the Akka forums
know about them! Who knows, common operations might even be worked into nice DSLs.
When you are reasonably sure that your actor’s business logic is correct, the next step is verifying that it works
correctly within its intended environment. The definition of the environment depends of course very much on the
problem at hand and the level at which you intend to test, ranging for functional/integration tests to full system
tests. The minimal setup consists of the test procedure, which provides the desired stimuli, the actor under test,
and an actor receiving replies. Bigger systems replace the actor under test with a network of actors, apply stimuli
at varying injection points and arrange results to be sent from different emission points, but the basic principle
stays the same in that a single procedure drives the test.
The JavaTestKit class contains a collection of tools which makes this common task easy.
import org.junit.AfterClass;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
import org.junit.Test;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.testkit.JavaTestKit;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
if (msg.equals("hello")) {
getSender().tell("world", getSelf());
if (target != null) target.forward(msg, getContext());
@BeforeClass
public static void setup() {
system = ActorSystem.create();
}
@AfterClass
public static void teardown() {
JavaTestKit.shutdownActorSystem(system);
system = null;
}
@Test
public void testIt() {
/*
* Wrap the whole test procedure within a testkit constructor
subject.tell("hello", getRef());
The JavaTestKit contains an actor named testActor which is the entry point for messages to be examined
with the various expectMsg... assertions detailed below. The test actor’s reference is obtained using the
getRef method as demonstrated above. The testActor may also be passed to other actors as usual, usually
subscribing it as notification listener. There is a whole set of examination methods, e.g. receiving all consecutive
messages matching certain criteria, receiving a whole sequence of fixed messages or classes, receiving nothing for
some time, etc.
The ActorSystem passed in to the constructor of JavaTestKit is accessible via the getSystem method.
Note: Remember to shut down the actor system after the test is finished (also in case of failure) so that all
actors—including the test actor—are stopped.
Built-In Assertions
The above mentioned expectMsgEquals is not the only method for formulating assertions concerning received
messages, the full set is this:
In these examples, the maximum durations you will find mentioned below are left out, in which case they use
the default value from configuration item akka.test.single-expect-default which itself defaults to 3
seconds (or they obey the innermost enclosing Within as detailed below). The full signatures are:
• public <T> T expectMsgEquals(Duration max, T msg)
The given message object must be received within the specified time; the object will be returned.
• public Object expectMsgAnyOf(Duration max, Object... msg)
An object must be received within the given time, and it must be equal (compared with equals()) to at
least one of the passed reference objects; the received object will be returned.
• public Object[] expectMsgAllOf(Duration max, Object... msg)
A number of objects matching the size of the supplied object array must be received within the given time,
and for each of the given objects there must exist at least one among the received ones which equals it
(compared with equals()). The full sequence of received objects is returned in the order received.
• public <T> T expectMsgClass(Duration max, Class<T> c)
An object which is an instance of the given Class must be received within the allotted time frame; the
object will be returned. Note that this does a conformance check, if you need the class to be equal you need
to verify that afterwards.
• public <T> T expectMsgAnyClassOf(Duration max, Class<? extends T>... c)
An object must be received within the given time, and it must be an instance of at least one of the supplied
Class objects; the received object will be returned. Note that this does a conformance check, if you need
the class to be equal you need to verify that afterwards.
The match(Object in) method will be evaluated once a message has been received within the allotted
time (which may be given as constructor argument). If it throws noMatch() (where it is sufficient to call
that method; the throw keyword is only needed in cases where the compiler would otherwise complain
about wrong return types—Java is lacking Scala’s notion of a type which signifies “will not ever return
normally”), then the expectation fails with an AssertionError, otherwise the matched and possibly
transformed object is stored for retrieval using the get method.
• ReceiveWhile<T>
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
getRef().tell(42, ActorRef.noSender());
getRef().tell(43, ActorRef.noSender());
getRef().tell("hello", ActorRef.noSender());
final String[] out =
new ReceiveWhile<String>(String.class, duration("1 second")) {
// do not put code outside this method, will run afterwards
protected String match(Object in) {
if (in instanceof Integer) {
return in.toString();
} else {
throw noMatch();
}
}
}.get(); // this extracts the received messages
assertArrayEquals(new String[] {"42", "43"}, out);
expectMsgEquals("hello");
}};
This construct works like ExpectMsg, but it continually collects messages as long as they match the criteria,
and it does not fail when a non-matching one is encountered. Collecting messages also ends when the time
is up, when too much time passes between messages or when enough messages have been received.
new ReceiveWhile<String>( // type of array to be created must match ...
String.class, // ... this class which is needed to that end
duration("100 millis"), // maximum collect time
duration("50 millis"), // maximum time between messages
12 // maximum number of messages to collect
) {
// match elided ...
};
The need to specify the String result type twice results from the need to create a correctly typed array
and Java’s inability to infer the class’s type argument.
• AwaitCond
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
getRef().tell(42, ActorRef.noSender());
new AwaitCond(
duration("1 second"), // maximum wait time
duration("100 millis") // interval at which to check the condition
) {
// do not put code outside this method, will run afterwards
protected boolean cond() {
// typically used to wait for something to start up
return msgAvailable();
}
};
}};
This general construct is not connected with the test kit’s message reception, the embedded condition can
compute the boolean result from anything in scope.
– AwaitAssert
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
getRef().tell(42, ActorRef.noSender());
new AwaitAssert(
duration("1 second"), // maximum wait time
duration("100 millis") // interval at which to check the condition
) {
// do not put code outside this method, will run afterwards
protected void check() {
assertEquals(msgAvailable(), true);
}
};
}};
This general construct is not connected with the test kit’s message reception, the embedded assert can check
anything in scope.
There are also cases where not all messages sent to the test kit are actually relevant to the test, but removing them
would mean altering the actors under test. For this purpose it is possible to ignore certain messages:
• IgnoreMsg
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
// ignore all Strings
new IgnoreMsg() {
protected boolean ignore(Object msg) {
return msg instanceof String;
}
};
getRef().tell("hello", ActorRef.noSender());
getRef().tell(42, ActorRef.noSender());
expectMsgEquals(42);
// remove message filter
ignoreNoMsg();
getRef().tell("hello", ActorRef.noSender());
expectMsgEquals("hello");
}};
Since an integration test does not allow to the internal processing of the participating actors, verifying expected
exceptions cannot be done directly. Instead, use the logging system for this purpose: replacing the normal event
handler with the TestEventListener and using an EventFilter allows assertions on log messages, in-
cluding those which are generated by exceptions:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
assertEquals("TestKitDocTest", system.name());
final ActorRef victim = system.actorOf(Props.empty(), "victim");
assertEquals(42, result);
}};
If a number of occurrences is specific—as demonstrated above—then exec() will block until that number of
matching messages have been received or the timeout configured in akka.test.filter-leeway is used up
(time starts counting after the run() method returns). In case of a timeout the test fails.
Note: Be sure to exchange the default logger with the TestEventListener in your application.conf
to enable this function:
akka.loggers = [akka.testkit.TestEventListener]
Timing Assertions
Another important part of functional testing concerns timing: certain events must not happen immediately (like a
timer), others need to happen before a deadline. Therefore, all examination methods accept an upper time limit
within the positive or negative result must be obtained. Lower time limits need to be checked external to the
examination, which is facilitated by a new construct for managing time constraints:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
getRef().tell(42, ActorRef.noSender());
new Within(Duration.Zero(), Duration.create(1, "second")) {
// do not put code outside this method, will run afterwards
public void run() {
assertEquals((Integer) 42, expectMsgClass(Integer.class));
}
};
}};
The block in Within.run must complete after a Duration which is between min and max, where the former
defaults to zero. The deadline calculated by adding the max parameter to the block’s start time is implicitly
available within the block to all examination methods, if you do not specify it, it is inherited from the innermost
enclosing within block.
It should be noted that if the last message-receiving assertion of the block is expectNoMsg or receiveWhile,
the final check of the within is skipped in order to avoid false positives due to wake-up latencies. This means
that while individual contained assertions still use the maximum time bound, the overall block may take arbitrarily
longer in this case.
Note: All times are measured using System.nanoTime, meaning that they describe wall time, not CPU time
or system time.
The tight timeouts you use during testing on your lightning-fast notebook will invariably lead to spurious test
failures on the heavily loaded Jenkins server (or similar). To account for this situation, all maximum durations are
internally scaled by a factor taken from the Configuration, akka.test.timefactor, which defaults to 1.
You can scale other durations with the same factor by using dilated method in JavaTestKit.
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final Duration original = duration("1 second");
final Duration stretched = dilated(original);
assertTrue("dilated", stretched.gteq(original));
}};
When the actors under test are supposed to send various messages to different destinations, it may be difficult
distinguishing the message streams arriving at the testActor when using the JavaTestKit as shown until
now. Another approach is to use it for creation of simple probe actors to be inserted in the message flows. The
functionality is best explained using a small example:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
// simple actor which just forwards messages
class Forwarder extends UntypedActor {
final ActorRef target;
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
public Forwarder(ActorRef target) {
this.target = target;
}
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
target.forward(msg, getContext());
}
}
This simple test verifies an equally simple Forwarder actor by injecting a probe as the forwarder’s target. Another
example would be two actors A and B which collaborate by A sending messages to B. In order to verify this
message flow, a TestProbe could be inserted as target of A, using the forwarding capabilities or auto-pilot
described below to include a real B in the test setup.
If you have many test probes, you can name them to get meaningful actor names in test logs and assertions:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final TestProbe worker = new TestProbe(system, "worker");
final TestProbe aggregator = new TestProbe(system, "aggregator");
assertTrue(worker.ref().path().name().startsWith("worker"));
assertTrue(aggregator.ref().path().name().startsWith("aggregator"));
}};
Probes may also be equipped with custom assertions to make your test code even more concise and clear:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
class MyProbe extends JavaTestKit {
public MyProbe() {
super(system);
}
public void assertHello() {
expectMsgEquals("hello");
}
}
You have complete flexibility here in mixing and matching the JavaTestKit facilities with your own checks
and choosing an intuitive name for it. In real life your code will probably be a bit more complicated than the
example given above; just use the power!
Warning: Any message send from a TestProbe to another actor which runs on the CallingThreadDis-
patcher runs the risk of dead-lock, if that other actor might also send to this probe. The implementation of
TestProbe.watch and TestProbe.unwatch will also send a message to the watchee, which means
that it is dangerous to try watching e.g. TestActorRef from a TestProbe.
The probe stores the sender of the last dequeued message (i.e. after its expectMsg* reception), which may be
retrieved using the getLastSender method. This information can also implicitly be used for having the probe
reply to the last received message:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final JavaTestKit probe = new JavaTestKit(system);
probe.getRef().tell("hello", getRef());
probe.expectMsgEquals("hello");
probe.reply("world");
expectMsgEquals("world");
assertEquals(probe.getRef(), getLastSender());
}};
The probe can also forward a received message (i.e. after its expectMsg* reception), retaining the original
sender:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final JavaTestKit probe = new JavaTestKit(system);
probe.getRef().tell("hello", getRef());
probe.expectMsgEquals("hello");
probe.forward(getRef());
expectMsgEquals("hello");
assertEquals(getRef(), getLastSender());
}};
Auto-Pilot
Receiving messages in a queue for later inspection is nice, but in order to keep a test running and verify traces later
you can also install an AutoPilot in the participating test probes (actually in any TestKit) which is invoked
before enqueueing to the inspection queue. This code can be used to forward messages, e.g. in a chain A -->
Probe --> B, as long as a certain protocol is obeyed.
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final JavaTestKit probe = new JavaTestKit(system);
// install auto-pilot
probe.setAutoPilot(new TestActor.AutoPilot() {
public AutoPilot run(ActorRef sender, Object msg) {
sender.tell(msg, ActorRef.noSender());
return noAutoPilot();
}
});
// first one is replied to directly ...
probe.getRef().tell("hello", getRef());
expectMsgEquals("hello");
// ... but then the auto-pilot switched itself off
probe.getRef().tell("world", getRef());
expectNoMsg();
}};
The run method must return the auto-pilot for the next message, wrapped in an Option; setting it to None
terminates the auto-pilot.
The behavior of within blocks when using test probes might be perceived as counter-intuitive: you need to
remember that the nicely scoped deadline as described above is local to each probe. Hence, probes do not react to
each other’s deadlines or to the deadline set in an enclosing JavaTestKit instance:
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final JavaTestKit probe = new JavaTestKit(system);
new Within(duration("1 second")) {
public void run() {
probe.expectMsgEquals("hello");
}
};
}};
The parent of an actor is always the actor that created it. At times this leads to a coupling between the two that
may not be straightforward to test. There are several approaches to improve testability of a child actor that needs
to refer to its parent:
1. when creating a child, pass an explicit reference to its parent
2. create the child with a TestProbe as parent
3. create a fabricated parent when testing
Conversely, a parent’s binding to its child can be lessened as follows:
4. when creating a parent, tell the parent how to create its child
For example, the structure of the code you want to test may follow this pattern:
static class Parent extends UntypedActor {
final ActorRef child = context().actorOf(Props.create(Child.class), "child");
boolean ponged = false;
}
}
}
The first option is to avoid use of the context.parent function and create a child with a custom parent by
passing an explicit reference to its parent instead.
class DependentChild extends UntypedActor {
private final ActorRef parent;
The JavaTestKit class can in fact create actors that will run with the test probe as parent. This will cause any
messages the child actor sends to context().getParent() to end up in the test probe.
JavaTestKit parent = new JavaTestKit(system);
ActorRef child = parent.childActorOf(Props.create(Child.class));
parent.send(child, "ping");
parent.expectMsgEquals("pong");
If you prefer to avoid modifying the child constructor you can create a fabricated parent in your test. This, however,
does not enable you to test the parent actor in isolation.
class FabricatedParentCreator implements Creator<Actor> {
private final TestProbe proxy;
proxy.send(parent, "ping");
proxy.expectMsg("pong");
Alternatively, you can tell the parent how to create its child. There are two ways to do this: by giving it a Props
object or by giving it a function which takes care of creating the child actor:
class DependentParent extends UntypedActor {
final ActorRef child;
boolean ponged = false;
}
}
}
Creating the Actor is straightforward and the function may look like this in your test code:
Function<ActorRefFactory, ActorRef> maker = new Function<ActorRefFactory, ActorRef>() {
@Override public ActorRef apply(ActorRefFactory param) throws Exception {
return probe.ref();
}
};
ActorRef parent = system.actorOf(Props.create(GenericDependentParent.class, maker));
Which of these methods is the best depends on what is most important to test. The most generic option is to create
the parent actor by passing it a function that is responsible for the Actor creation, but using TestProbe or having a
fabricated parent is often sufficient.
4.12.3 CallingThreadDispatcher
The CallingThreadDispatcher serves good purposes in unit testing, as described above, but originally
it was conceived in order to allow contiguous stack traces to be generated in case of an error. As this special
dispatcher runs everything which would normally be queued directly on the current thread, the full history of a
message’s processing chain is recorded on the call stack, so long as all intervening actors run on this dispatcher.
How to use it
How it works
When receiving an invocation, the CallingThreadDispatcher checks whether the receiving actor is already
active on the current thread. The simplest example for this situation is an actor which sends a message to itself.
In this case, processing cannot continue immediately as that would violate the actor model, so the invocation
is queued and will be processed when the active invocation on that actor finishes its processing; thus, it will
be processed on the calling thread, but simply after the actor finishes its previous work. In the other case, the
invocation is simply processed immediately on the current thread. Futures scheduled via this dispatcher are also
executed immediately.
This scheme makes the CallingThreadDispatcher work like a general purpose dispatcher for any actors
which never block on external events.
In the presence of multiple threads it may happen that two invocations of an actor running on this dispatcher
happen on two different threads at the same time. In this case, both will be processed directly on their respective
threads, where both compete for the actor’s lock and the loser has to wait. Thus, the actor model is left intact, but
the price is loss of concurrency due to limited scheduling. In a sense this is equivalent to traditional mutex style
concurrency.
The other remaining difficulty is correct handling of suspend and resume: when an actor is suspended, subsequent
invocations will be queued in thread-local queues (the same ones used for queuing in the normal case). The call
to resume, however, is done by one specific thread, and all other threads in the system will probably not be
executing this specific actor, which leads to the problem that the thread-local queues cannot be emptied by their
native threads. Hence, the thread calling resume will collect all currently queued invocations from all threads
into its own queue and process them.
Limitations
Warning: In case the CallingThreadDispatcher is used for top-level actors, but without going through TestAc-
torRef, then there is a time window during which the actor is awaiting construction by the user guardian actor.
Sending messages to the actor during this time period will result in them being enqueued and then executed on
the guardian’s thread instead of the caller’s thread. To avoid this, use TestActorRef.
If an actor’s behavior blocks on a something which would normally be affected by the calling actor after having
sent the message, this will obviously dead-lock when using this dispatcher. This is a common scenario in actor
tests based on CountDownLatch for synchronization:
val latch = new CountDownLatch(1)
actor ! startWorkAfter(latch) // actor will call latch.await() before proceeding
doSomeSetupStuff()
latch.countDown()
The example would hang indefinitely within the message processing initiated on the second line and never reach
the fourth line, which would unblock it on a normal dispatcher.
Thus, keep in mind that the CallingThreadDispatcher is not a general-purpose replacement for the normal
dispatchers. On the other hand it may be quite useful to run your actor network on it for testing, because if it runs
without dead-locking chances are very high that it will not dead-lock in production.
Warning: The above sentence is unfortunately not a strong guarantee, because your code might directly or
indirectly change its behavior when running on a different dispatcher. If you are looking for a tool to help
you debug dead-locks, the CallingThreadDispatcher may help with certain error scenarios, but keep
in mind that it has may give false negatives as well as false positives.
Thread Interruptions
If the CallingThreadDispatcher sees that the current thread has its isInterrupted() flag set when message
processing returns, it will throw an InterruptedException after finishing all its processing (i.e. all mes-
sages which need processing as described above are processed before this happens). As tell cannot throw
exceptions due to its contract, this exception will then be caught and logged, and the thread’s interrupted status
will be set again.
If during message processing an InterruptedException is thrown then it will be caught inside the Call-
ingThreadDispatcher’s message handling loop, the thread’s interrupted flag will be set and processing continues
normally.
Note: The summary of these two paragraphs is that if the current thread is interrupted while doing work under
the CallingThreadDispatcher, then that will result in the isInterrupted flag to be true when the message
send returns and no InterruptedException will be thrown.
Benefits
To summarize, these are the features with the CallingThreadDispatcher has to offer:
• Deterministic execution of single-threaded tests while retaining nearly full actor semantics
• Full message processing history leading up to the point of failure in exception stack traces
• Exclusion of certain classes of dead-lock scenarios
The testing facilities described up to this point were aiming at formulating assertions about a system’s behavior.
If a test fails, it is usually your job to find the cause, fix it and verify the test again. This process is supported by
debuggers as well as logging, where the Akka toolkit offers the following options:
• Logging of exceptions thrown within Actor instances
This is always on; in contrast to the other logging mechanisms, this logs at ERROR level.
• Logging of special messages
Actors handle certain special messages automatically, e.g. Kill, PoisonPill, etc. Tracing of these
message invocations is enabled by the setting akka.actor.debug.autoreceive, which enables this
on all actors.
• Logging of the actor lifecycle
Actor creation, start, restart, monitor start, monitor stop and stop may be traced by enabling the setting
akka.actor.debug.lifecycle; this, too, is enabled uniformly on all actors.
All these messages are logged at DEBUG level. To summarize, you can enable full logging of actor activities using
this configuration fragment:
akka {
loglevel = "DEBUG"
actor {
debug {
autoreceive = on
lifecycle = on
}
}
}
4.12.5 Configuration
There are several configuration properties for the TestKit module, please refer to the reference configuration.
FIVE
Starting with Akka 2.4.2 we have begun to introduce Java 8 types (most prominently
java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage and java.util.Optional) where that was pos-
sible without breaking binary or source compatibility. Where this was not possible (for example in the return
type of ActorSystem.terminate()) please refer to the scala-java8-compat library that allows easy
conversion between the Scala and Java counterparts. The artifact can be included in Maven builds using:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.scala-lang.modules</groupId>
<artifactId>scala-java8-compat_2.11</artifactId>
<version>0.7.0</version>
</dependency>
We will only be able to seamlessly integrate all functional interfaces once we can rely on Scala 2.12 to provide full
interoperability—this will mean that Scala users can directly implement Java Functional Interfaces using lambda
syntax as well as that Java users can directly implement Scala functions using lambda syntax.
The Actor Model provides a higher level of abstraction for writing concurrent and distributed systems. It alleviates
the developer from having to deal with explicit locking and thread management, making it easier to write correct
concurrent and parallel systems. Actors were defined in the 1973 paper by Carl Hewitt but have been popularized
by the Erlang language, and used for example at Ericsson with great success to build highly concurrent and reliable
telecom systems.
The API of Akka’s Actors is similar to Scala Actors which has borrowed some of its syntax from Erlang.
Warning: The Java with lambda support part of Akka is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction
in Akka 2.3.0. We will continue to improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while
we try to keep incompatible changes to a minimum, but the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance
releases does not apply to the akka.actor.AbstractActor, related classes and the akka.japi.pf
package.
Note: Since Akka enforces parental supervision every actor is supervised and (potentially) the supervisor of its
children, it is advisable that you familiarize yourself with Actor Systems and Supervision and Monitoring and it
may also help to read Actor References, Paths and Addresses.
254
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Actor classes are implemented by extending the AbstractActor class and setting the “initial behavior” in the
constructor by calling the receive method in the AbstractActor.
The argument to the receive method is a PartialFunction<Object,BoxedUnit> that defines which
messages your Actor can handle, along with the implementation of how the messages should be processed.
Don’t let the type signature scare you. To allow you to easily build up a partial function there is a builder named
ReceiveBuilder that you can use.
Here is an example:
import akka.actor.AbstractActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
public MyActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, s -> {
log.info("Received String message: {}", s);
}).
matchAny(o -> log.info("received unknown message")).build()
);
}
}
In case you want to provide many match cases but want to avoid creating a long call trail, you can split the
creation of the builder into multiple statements as in the example:
import akka.actor.AbstractActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
import akka.japi.pf.UnitPFBuilder;
public GraduallyBuiltActor() {
UnitPFBuilder<Object> builder = ReceiveBuilder.create();
builder.match(String.class, s -> {
log.info("Received String message: {}", s);
});
// do some other stuff in between
builder.matchAny(o -> log.info("received unknown message"));
receive(builder.build());
}
}
Please note that the Akka Actor receive message loop is exhaustive, which is different compared to Erlang and
the late Scala Actors. This means that you need to provide a pattern match for all messages that it can accept
and if you want to be able to handle unknown messages then you need to have a default case as in the example
above. Otherwise an akka.actor.UnhandledMessage(message, sender, recipient) will be
published to the ActorSystem‘s EventStream.
Note further that the return type of the behavior defined above is Unit; if the actor shall reply to the received
message then this must be done explicitly as explained below.
The argument to the receive method is a partial function object, which is stored within the actor as its “initial
behavior”, see Become/Unbecome for further information on changing the behavior of an actor after its construc-
tion.
Props
Props is a configuration class to specify options for the creation of actors, think of it as an immutable and thus
freely shareable recipe for creating an actor including associated deployment information (e.g. which dispatcher
to use, see more below). Here are some examples of how to create a Props instance.
import akka.actor.Props;
The second variant shows how to pass constructor arguments to the Actor being created, but it should only be
used outside of actors as explained below.
The last line shows a possibility to pass constructor arguments regardless of the context it is being used in.
The presence of a matching constructor is verified during construction of the Props object, resulting in an
IllegalArgumentException if no or multiple matching constructors are found.
Dangerous Variants
This method is not recommended to be used within another actor because it encourages to close over the enclos-
ing scope, resulting in non-serializable Props and possibly race conditions (breaking the actor encapsulation).
On the other hand using this variant in a Props factory in the actor’s companion object as documented under
“Recommended Practices” below is completely fine.
There were two use-cases for these methods: passing constructor arguments to the actor—which is solved by the
newly introduced Props.create(clazz, args) method above or the recommended practice below—and
creating actors “on the spot” as anonymous classes. The latter should be solved by making these actors named
classes instead (if they are not declared within a top-level object then the enclosing instance’s this reference
needs to be passed as the first argument).
Warning: Declaring one actor within another is very dangerous and breaks actor encapsulation. Never pass
an actor’s this reference into Props!
Recommended Practices
It is a good idea to provide factory methods on the companion object of each Actor which help keeping the
creation of suitable Props as close to the actor definition as possible. This also avoids the pitfalls associated with
using the Props.create(...) method which takes a by-name argument, since within a companion object
the given code block will not retain a reference to its enclosing scope:
public class DemoActor extends AbstractActor {
/**
* Create Props for an actor of this type.
* @param magicNumber The magic number to be passed to this actor’s constructor.
* @return a Props for creating this actor, which can then be further configured
* (e.g. calling ‘.withDispatcher()‘ on it)
*/
DemoActor(Integer magicNumber) {
this.magicNumber = magicNumber;
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Integer.class, i -> {
sender().tell(i + magicNumber, self());
}).build()
);
}
}
Another good practice is to declare what messages an Actor can receive as close to the actor definition as possible
(e.g. as static classes inside the Actor or using other suitable class), which makes it easier to know what it can
receive.
public class DemoMessagesActor extends AbstractLoggingActor {
DemoMessagesActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Greeting.class, g -> {
log().info("I was greeted by {}", g.getGreeter());
}).build()
);
};
}
Actors are created by passing a Props instance into the actorOf factory method which is available on
ActorSystem and ActorContext.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
Using the ActorSystem will create top-level actors, supervised by the actor system’s provided guardian actor,
while using an actor’s context will create a child actor.
public class FirstActor extends AbstractActor {
final ActorRef child = context().actorOf(Props.create(MyActor.class), "myChild");
// plus some behavior ...
}
It is recommended to create a hierarchy of children, grand-children and so on such that it fits the logical failure-
handling structure of the application, see Actor Systems.
The call to actorOf returns an instance of ActorRef. This is a handle to the actor instance and the only way to
interact with it. The ActorRef is immutable and has a one to one relationship with the Actor it represents. The
ActorRef is also serializable and network-aware. This means that you can serialize it, send it over the wire and
use it on a remote host and it will still be representing the same Actor on the original node, across the network.
The name parameter is optional, but you should preferably name your actors, since that is used in log messages
and for identifying actors. The name must not be empty or start with $, but it may contain URL encoded char-
acters (eg. %20 for a blank space). If the given name is already in use by another child to the same parent an
InvalidActorNameException is thrown.
Actors are automatically started asynchronously when created.
Dependency Injection
If your UntypedActor has a constructor that takes parameters then those need to be part of the Props as well, as
described above. But there are cases when a factory method must be used, for example when the actual constructor
arguments are determined by a dependency injection framework.
import akka.actor.Actor;
import akka.actor.IndirectActorProducer;
@Override
public Class<? extends Actor> actorClass() {
return MyActor.class;
}
@Override
public MyActor produce() {
MyActor result;
// obtain fresh Actor instance from DI framework ...
return result;
}
}
Warning: You might be tempted at times to offer an IndirectActorProducer which always returns
the same instance, e.g. by using a static field. This is not supported, as it goes against the meaning of an actor
restart, which is described here: What Restarting Means.
When using a dependency injection framework, actor beans MUST NOT have singleton scope.
Techniques for dependency injection and integration with dependency injection frameworks are described in more
depth in the Using Akka with Dependency Injection guideline and the Akka Java Spring tutorial in Lightbend
Activator.
The Inbox
When writing code outside of actors which shall communicate with actors, the ask pattern can be a solution (see
below), but there are two things it cannot do: receiving multiple replies (e.g. by subscribing an ActorRef to a
notification service) and watching other actors’ lifecycle. For these purposes there is the Inbox class:
final Inbox inbox = Inbox.create(system);
inbox.send(target, "hello");
try {
assert inbox.receive(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)).equals("world");
} catch (java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException e) {
// timeout
}
The send method wraps a normal tell and supplies the internal actor’s reference as the sender. This allows the
reply to be received on the last line. Watching an actor is quite simple as well:
final Inbox inbox = Inbox.create(system);
inbox.watch(target);
target.tell(PoisonPill.getInstance(), ActorRef.noSender());
try {
assert inbox.receive(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) instanceof Terminated;
} catch (java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException e) {
// timeout
}
The AbstractActor class defines a method called receive, that is used to set the “initial behavior” of the
actor.
If the current actor behavior does not match a received message, unhandled is called, which by default publishes
an akka.actor.UnhandledMessage(message, sender, recipient) on the actor system’s event
stream (set configuration item akka.actor.debug.unhandled to on to have them converted into actual
Debug messages).
In addition, it offers:
• self reference to the ActorRef of the actor
• sender reference sender Actor of the last received message, typically used as described in Reply to mes-
sages
• supervisorStrategy user overridable definition the strategy to use for supervising child actors
This strategy is typically declared inside the actor in order to have access to the actor’s internal state within
the decider function: since failure is communicated as a message sent to the supervisor and processed like
other messages (albeit outside of the normal behavior), all values and variables within the actor are available,
as is the sender reference (which will be the immediate child reporting the failure; if the original failure
occurred within a distant descendant it is still reported one level up at a time).
• context exposes contextual information for the actor and the current message, such as:
– factory methods to create child actors (actorOf)
– system that the actor belongs to
– parent supervisor
– supervised children
– lifecycle monitoring
– hotswap behavior stack as described in Become/Unbecome
The remaining visible methods are user-overridable life-cycle hooks which are described in the following:
public void preStart() {
}
The implementations shown above are the defaults provided by the AbstractActor class.
Actor Lifecycle
A path in an actor system represents a “place” which might be occupied by a living actor. Initially (apart from
system initialized actors) a path is empty. When actorOf() is called it assigns an incarnation of the actor
described by the passed Props to the given path. An actor incarnation is identified by the path and a UID. A
restart only swaps the Actor instance defined by the Props but the incarnation and hence the UID remains the
same.
The lifecycle of an incarnation ends when the actor is stopped. At that point the appropriate lifecycle events are
called and watching actors are notified of the termination. After the incarnation is stopped, the path can be reused
again by creating an actor with actorOf(). In this case the name of the new incarnation will be the same as the
previous one but the UIDs will differ.
Note: It is important to note that Actors do not stop automatically when no longer referenced, every Actor that
is created must also explicitly be destroyed. The only simplification is that stopping a parent Actor will also
recursively stop all the child Actors that this parent has created.
An ActorRef always represents an incarnation (path and UID) not just a given path. Therefore if an actor is
stopped and a new one with the same name is created an ActorRef of the old incarnation will not point to the
new one.
ActorSelection on the other hand points to the path (or multiple paths if wildcards are used) and is completely
oblivious to which incarnation is currently occupying it. ActorSelection cannot be watched for this reason.
It is possible to resolve the current incarnation’s ActorRef living under the path by sending an Identify
message to the ActorSelection which will be replied to with an ActorIdentity containing the correct
reference (see Identifying Actors via Actor Selection). This can also be done with the resolveOne method of
the ActorSelection, which returns a Future of the matching ActorRef.
In order to be notified when another actor terminates (i.e. stops permanently, not temporary failure and restart), an
actor may register itself for reception of the Terminated message dispatched by the other actor upon termination
(see Stopping Actors). This service is provided by the DeathWatch component of the actor system.
Registering a monitor is easy:
public class WatchActor extends AbstractActor {
private final ActorRef child = context().actorOf(Props.empty(), "target");
private ActorRef lastSender = system.deadLetters();
public WatchActor() {
context().watch(child); // <-- this is the only call needed for registration
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("kill", s -> {
context().stop(child);
lastSender = sender();
}).
match(Terminated.class, t -> t.actor().equals(child), t -> {
lastSender.tell("finished", self());
}).build()
);
}
}
It should be noted that the Terminated message is generated independent of the order in which registration and
termination occur. In particular, the watching actor will receive a Terminated message even if the watched
actor has already been terminated at the time of registration.
Registering multiple times does not necessarily lead to multiple messages being generated, but there is no guaran-
tee that only exactly one such message is received: if termination of the watched actor has generated and queued
the message, and another registration is done before this message has been processed, then a second message will
be queued, because registering for monitoring of an already terminated actor leads to the immediate generation of
the Terminated message.
It is also possible to deregister from watching another actor’s liveliness using context.unwatch(target).
This works even if the Terminated message has already been enqueued in the mailbox; after calling unwatch
no Terminated message for that actor will be processed anymore.
Start Hook
This method is called when the actor is first created. During restarts it is called by the default implementation of
postRestart, which means that by overriding that method you can choose whether the initialization code in
this method is called only exactly once for this actor or for every restart. Initialization code which is part of the
actor’s constructor will always be called when an instance of the actor class is created, which happens at every
restart.
Restart Hooks
All actors are supervised, i.e. linked to another actor with a fault handling strategy. Actors may be restarted in
case an exception is thrown while processing a message (see Supervision and Monitoring). This restart involves
the hooks mentioned above:
1. The old actor is informed by calling preRestart with the exception which caused the restart and the
message which triggered that exception; the latter may be None if the restart was not caused by processing
a message, e.g. when a supervisor does not trap the exception and is restarted in turn by its supervisor, or if
an actor is restarted due to a sibling’s failure. If the message is available, then that message’s sender is also
accessible in the usual way (i.e. by calling sender).
This method is the best place for cleaning up, preparing hand-over to the fresh actor instance, etc. By default
it stops all children and calls postStop.
2. The initial factory from the actorOf call is used to produce the fresh instance.
3. The new actor’s postRestart method is invoked with the exception which caused the restart. By default
the preStart is called, just as in the normal start-up case.
An actor restart replaces only the actual actor object; the contents of the mailbox is unaffected by the restart,
so processing of messages will resume after the postRestart hook returns. The message that triggered the
exception will not be received again. Any message sent to an actor while it is being restarted will be queued to its
mailbox as usual.
Warning: Be aware that the ordering of failure notifications relative to user messages is not deterministic. In
particular, a parent might restart its child before it has processed the last messages sent by the child before the
failure. See Discussion: Message Ordering for details.
Stop Hook
After stopping an actor, its postStop hook is called, which may be used e.g. for deregistering this actor from
other services. This hook is guaranteed to run after message queuing has been disabled for this actor, i.e. messages
sent to a stopped actor will be redirected to the deadLetters of the ActorSystem.
As described in Actor References, Paths and Addresses, each actor has a unique logical path, which is obtained
by following the chain of actors from child to parent until reaching the root of the actor system, and it has a
physical path, which may differ if the supervision chain includes any remote supervisors. These paths are used
by the system to look up actors, e.g. when a remote message is received and the recipient is searched, but they
are also useful more directly: actors may look up other actors by specifying absolute or relative paths—logical or
physical—and receive back an ActorSelection with the result:
// will look up this absolute path
context().actorSelection("/user/serviceA/actor");
// will look up sibling beneath same supervisor
context().actorSelection("../joe");
Note: It is always preferable to communicate with other Actors using their ActorRef instead of relying upon
ActorSelection. Exceptions are
• sending messages using the At-Least-Once Delivery facility
• initiating first contact with a remote system
In all other cases ActorRefs can be provided during Actor creation or initialization, passing them from parent to
child or introducing Actors by sending their ActorRefs to other Actors within messages.
The supplied path is parsed as a java.net.URI, which basically means that it is split on / into path elements.
If the path starts with /, it is absolute and the look-up starts at the root guardian (which is the parent of "/user");
otherwise it starts at the current actor. If a path element equals .., the look-up will take a step “up” towards the
supervisor of the currently traversed actor, otherwise it will step “down” to the named child. It should be noted
that the .. in actor paths here always means the logical structure, i.e. the supervisor.
The path elements of an actor selection may contain wildcard patterns allowing for broadcasting of messages to
that section:
// will look all children to serviceB with names starting with worker
context().actorSelection("/user/serviceB/worker*");
// will look up all siblings beneath same supervisor
context().actorSelection("../*");
Messages can be sent via the ActorSelection and the path of the ActorSelection is looked up when
delivering each message. If the selection does not match any actors the message will be dropped.
To acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection you need to send a message to the selection and use the
sender() reference of the reply from the actor. There is a built-in Identify message that all Actors will
understand and automatically reply to with a ActorIdentity message containing the ActorRef. This mes-
sage is handled specially by the actors which are traversed in the sense that if a concrete name lookup fails (i.e.
a non-wildcard path element does not correspond to a live actor) then a negative result is generated. Please note
that this does not mean that delivery of that reply is guaranteed, it still is a normal message.
import akka.actor.ActorIdentity;
import akka.actor.ActorSelection;
import akka.actor.Identify;
public Follower(){
ActorSelection selection = context().actorSelection("/user/another");
selection.tell(new Identify(identifyId), self());
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(ActorIdentity.class, id -> id.getRef() != null, id -> {
ActorRef ref = id.getRef();
context().watch(ref);
context().become(active(ref));
}).
match(ActorIdentity.class, id -> id.getRef() == null, id -> {
context().stop(self());
}).build()
);
}
You can also acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection with the resolveOne method of the
ActorSelection. It returns a Future of the matching ActorRef if such an actor exists (see also Actors
(Java with Lambda Support) for Java compatibility). It is completed with failure [[akka.actor.ActorNotFound]] if
no such actor exists or the identification didn’t complete within the supplied timeout.
Remote actor addresses may also be looked up, if remoting is enabled:
context().actorSelection("akka.tcp://app@otherhost:1234/user/serviceB");
IMPORTANT: Messages can be any kind of object but have to be immutable. Akka can’t enforce immutability
(yet) so this has to be by convention.
Here is an example of an immutable message:
public class ImmutableMessage {
private final int sequenceNumber;
private final List<String> values;
Note: There are performance implications of using ask since something needs to keep track of when it times
out, there needs to be something that bridges a Promise into an ActorRef and it also needs to be reachable
through remoting. So always prefer tell for performance, and only ask if you must.
In all these methods you have the option of passing along your own ActorRef. Make it a practice of doing so
because it will allow the receiver actors to be able to respond to your message, since the sender reference is sent
along with the message.
Tell: Fire-forget
This is the preferred way of sending messages. No blocking waiting for a message. This gives the best concurrency
and scalability characteristics.
// don’t forget to think about who is the sender (2nd argument)
target.tell(message, self());
The sender reference is passed along with the message and available within the receiving actor via its sender
method while processing this message. Inside of an actor it is usually self who shall be the sender, but there
can be cases where replies shall be routed to some other actor—e.g. the parent—in which the second argument to
tell would be a different one. Outside of an actor and if no reply is needed the second argument can be null;
if a reply is needed outside of an actor you can use the ask-pattern described next..
Ask: Send-And-Receive-Future
The ask pattern involves actors as well as futures, hence it is offered as a use pattern rather than a method on
ActorRef:
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.ask;
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.pipe;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.dispatch.Futures;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import akka.util.Timeout;
pipe(transformed, system.dispatcher()).to(actorC);
This example demonstrates ask together with the pipe pattern on futures, because this is likely to be a common
combination. Please note that all of the above is completely non-blocking and asynchronous: ask produces a
Future, two of which are composed into a new future using the Futures.sequence and map methods and
then pipe installs an onComplete-handler on the future to effect the submission of the aggregated Result to
another actor.
Using ask will send a message to the receiving Actor as with tell, and the receiving actor must reply with
sender().tell(reply, self()) in order to complete the returned Future with a value. The ask
operation involves creating an internal actor for handling this reply, which needs to have a timeout after which it
is destroyed in order not to leak resources; see more below.
Warning: To complete the future with an exception you need send a Failure message to the sender. This is
not done automatically when an actor throws an exception while processing a message.
try {
String result = operation();
sender().tell(result, self());
} catch (Exception e) {
sender().tell(new akka.actor.Status.Failure(e), self());
throw e;
}
If the actor does not complete the future, it will expire after the timeout period, specified as parameter to the ask
method; this will complete the Future with an AskTimeoutException.
See Futures for more information on how to await or query a future.
The onComplete, onSuccess, or onFailure methods of the Future can be used to register a callback to
get a notification when the Future completes. Gives you a way to avoid blocking.
Warning: When using future callbacks, inside actors you need to carefully avoid closing over the containing
actor’s reference, i.e. do not call methods or access mutable state on the enclosing actor from within the call-
back. This would break the actor encapsulation and may introduce synchronization bugs and race conditions
because the callback will be scheduled concurrently to the enclosing actor. Unfortunately there is not yet a
way to detect these illegal accesses at compile time. See also: Actors and shared mutable state
Forward message
You can forward a message from one actor to another. This means that the original sender address/reference is
maintained even though the message is going through a ‘mediator’. This can be useful when writing actors that
work as routers, load-balancers, replicators etc.
target.forward(result, context());
An Actor either has to set its initial receive behavior in the constructor by calling the receive method in the
AbstractActor:
public SomeActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
// and some behavior ...
build());
}
Both the argument to the AbstractActor receive method and the return type of the Actor receive
method is a PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> that defines which messages your Actor can han-
dle, along with the implementation of how the messages should be processed.
Don’t let the type signature scare you. To allow you to easily build up a partial function there is a builder named
ReceiveBuilder that you can use.
Here is an example:
import akka.actor.AbstractActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
public MyActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, s -> {
log.info("Received String message: {}", s);
}).
matchAny(o -> log.info("received unknown message")).build()
);
}
}
If you want to have a handle for replying to a message, you can use sender(), which gives you an ActorRef.
You can reply by sending to that ActorRef with sender().tell(replyMsg, self()). You can also store
the ActorRef for replying later, or passing on to other actors. If there is no sender (a message was sent without an
actor or future context) then the sender defaults to a ‘dead-letter’ actor ref.
sender().tell(s, self());
The ActorContext setReceiveTimeout defines the inactivity timeout after which the sending of a Re-
ceiveTimeout message is triggered. When specified, the receive function should be able to handle an
akka.actor.ReceiveTimeout message. 1 millisecond is the minimum supported timeout.
Please note that the receive timeout might fire and enqueue the ReceiveTimeout message right after another mes-
sage was enqueued; hence it is not guaranteed that upon reception of the receive timeout there must have been
an idle period beforehand as configured via this method.
Once set, the receive timeout stays in effect (i.e. continues firing repeatedly after inactivity periods). Pass in
Duration.Undefined to switch off this feature.
public class ReceiveTimeoutActor extends AbstractActor {
public ReceiveTimeoutActor() {
// To set an initial delay
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create("10 seconds"));
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("Hello", s -> {
// To set in a response to a message
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create("1 second"));
}).
match(ReceiveTimeout.class, r -> {
// To turn it off
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.Undefined());
}).build()
);
}
}
Messages marked with NotInfluenceReceiveTimeout will not reset the timer. This can be useful when
ReceiveTimeout should be fired by external inactivity but not influenced by internal activity, e.g. scheduled
tick messages.
Actors are stopped by invoking the stop method of a ActorRefFactory, i.e. ActorContext or
ActorSystem. Typically the context is used for stopping child actors and the system for stopping top level
actors. The actual termination of the actor is performed asynchronously, i.e. stop may return before the actor is
stopped.
Processing of the current message, if any, will continue before the actor is stopped, but additional messages in the
mailbox will not be processed. By default these messages are sent to the deadLetters of the ActorSystem,
but that depends on the mailbox implementation.
Termination of an actor proceeds in two steps: first the actor suspends its mailbox processing and sends a stop
command to all its children, then it keeps processing the internal termination notifications from its children until
the last one is gone, finally terminating itself (invoking postStop, dumping mailbox, publishing Terminated
on the DeathWatch, telling its supervisor). This procedure ensures that actor system sub-trees terminate in an
orderly fashion, propagating the stop command to the leaves and collecting their confirmation back to the stopped
supervisor. If one of the actors does not respond (i.e. processing a message for extended periods of time and
therefore not receiving the stop command), this whole process will be stuck.
Upon ActorSystem.terminate, the system guardian actors will be stopped, and the aforementioned process
will ensure proper termination of the whole system.
The postStop hook is invoked after an actor is fully stopped. This enables cleaning up of resources:
@Override
public void postStop() {
// clean up some resources ...
}
Note: Since stopping an actor is asynchronous, you cannot immediately reuse the name of the child you just
stopped; this will result in an InvalidActorNameException. Instead, watch the terminating actor and
create its replacement in response to the Terminated message which will eventually arrive.
PoisonPill
You can also send an actor the akka.actor.PoisonPill message, which will stop the actor when the mes-
sage is processed. PoisonPill is enqueued as ordinary messages and will be handled after messages that were
already queued in the mailbox.
Graceful Stop
gracefulStop is useful if you need to wait for termination or compose ordered termination of several actors:
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.gracefulStop;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.pattern.AskTimeoutException;
try {
Future<Boolean> stopped =
gracefulStop(actorRef, Duration.create(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS), Manager.SHUTDOWN);
Await.result(stopped, Duration.create(6, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
// the actor has been stopped
} catch (AskTimeoutException e) {
// the actor wasn’t stopped within 5 seconds
}
public Manager() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("job", s -> {
worker.tell("crunch", self());
}).
matchEquals(SHUTDOWN, x -> {
worker.tell(PoisonPill.getInstance(), self());
context().become(shuttingDown);
}).build()
);
}
When gracefulStop() returns successfully, the actor’s postStop() hook will have been executed: there
exists a happens-before edge between the end of postStop() and the return of gracefulStop().
In the above example a custom Manager.Shutdown message is sent to the target actor to initiate the process
of stopping the actor. You can use PoisonPill for this, but then you have limited possibilities to perform
interactions with other actors before stopping the target actor. Simple cleanup tasks can be handled in postStop.
Warning: Keep in mind that an actor stopping and its name being deregistered are separate events which
happen asynchronously from each other. Therefore it may be that you will find the name still in use after
gracefulStop() returned. In order to guarantee proper deregistration, only reuse names from within a
supervisor you control and only in response to a Terminated message, i.e. not for top-level actors.
5.1.10 Become/Unbecome
Upgrade
Akka supports hotswapping the Actor’s message loop (e.g. its implementation) at runtime: invoke the
context.become method from within the Actor. become takes a PartialFunction<Object,
BoxedUnit> that implements the new message handler. The hotswapped code is kept in a Stack which can
be pushed and popped.
Warning: Please note that the actor will revert to its original behavior when restarted by its Supervisor.
public HotSwapActor() {
angry =
ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("foo", s -> {
sender().tell("I am already angry?", self());
}).
matchEquals("bar", s -> {
context().become(happy);
}).build();
happy = ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("bar", s -> {
sender().tell("I am already happy :-)", self());
}).
matchEquals("foo", s -> {
context().become(angry);
}).build();
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("foo", s -> {
context().become(angry);
}).
matchEquals("bar", s -> {
context().become(happy);
}).build()
);
}
}
This variant of the become method is useful for many different things, such as to implement a Finite State
Machine (FSM, for an example see Dining Hakkers). It will replace the current behavior (i.e. the top of the
behavior stack), which means that you do not use unbecome, instead always the next behavior is explicitly
installed.
The other way of using become does not replace but add to the top of the behavior stack. In this case care must
be taken to ensure that the number of “pop” operations (i.e. unbecome) matches the number of “push” ones in
the long run, otherwise this amounts to a memory leak (which is why this behavior is not the default).
public class Swapper extends AbstractLoggingActor {
public Swapper() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals(Swap, s -> {
log().info("Hi");
context().become(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals(Swap, x -> {
log().info("Ho");
context().unbecome(); // resets the latest ’become’ (just for fun)
}).build(), false); // push on top instead of replace
}).build()
);
}
}
5.1.11 Stash
The AbstractActorWithStash class enables an actor to temporarily stash away messages that can not
or should not be handled using the actor’s current behavior. Upon changing the actor’s message handler, i.e.,
right before invoking context().become() or context().unbecome(), all stashed messages can be
“unstashed”, thereby prepending them to the actor’s mailbox. This way, the stashed messages can be processed in
the same order as they have been received originally. An actor that extends AbstractActorWithStash will
automatically get a deque-based mailbox.
Invoking stash() adds the current message (the message that the actor received last) to the actor’s stash.
It is typically invoked when handling the default case in the actor’s message handler to stash messages that
aren’t handled by the other cases. It is illegal to stash the same message twice; to do so results in an
IllegalStateException being thrown. The stash may also be bounded in which case invoking stash()
may lead to a capacity violation, which results in a StashOverflowException. The capacity of the stash
can be configured using the stash-capacity setting (an Int) of the mailbox’s configuration.
Invoking unstashAll() enqueues messages from the stash to the actor’s mailbox until the capacity of the mail-
box (if any) has been reached (note that messages from the stash are prepended to the mailbox). In case a bounded
mailbox overflows, a MessageQueueAppendFailedException is thrown. The stash is guaranteed to be
empty after calling unstashAll().
The stash is backed by a scala.collection.immutable.Vector. As a result, even a very large number
of messages may be stashed without a major impact on performance.
Note that the stash is part of the ephemeral actor state, unlike the mailbox. Therefore, it should be managed like
other parts of the actor’s state which have the same property. The AbstractActorWithStash implementa-
tion of preRestart will call unstashAll(), which is usually the desired behavior.
Note: If you want to enforce that your actor can only work with an unbounded stash, then you should use the
AbstractActorWithUnboundedStash class instead.
You can kill an actor by sending a Kill message. This will cause the actor to throw a
ActorKilledException, triggering a failure. The actor will suspend operation and its supervisor will be
asked how to handle the failure, which may mean resuming the actor, restarting it or terminating it completely.
See What Supervision Means for more information.
Use Kill like this:
victim.tell(akka.actor.Kill.getInstance(), ActorRef.noSender());
It can happen that while a message is being processed by an actor, that some kind of exception is thrown, e.g. a
database exception.
If an exception is thrown while a message is being processed (i.e. taken out of its mailbox and handed over to the
current behavior), then this message will be lost. It is important to understand that it is not put back on the mailbox.
So if you want to retry processing of a message, you need to deal with it yourself by catching the exception and
retry your flow. Make sure that you put a bound on the number of retries since you don’t want a system to livelock
(so consuming a lot of cpu cycles without making progress). Another possibility would be to have a look at the
PeekMailbox pattern.
If an exception is thrown while a message is being processed, nothing happens to the mailbox. If the actor is
restarted, the same mailbox will be there. So all messages on that mailbox will be there as well.
If code within an actor throws an exception, that actor is suspended and the supervision process is started (see Su-
pervision and Monitoring). Depending on the supervisor’s decision the actor is resumed (as if nothing happened),
restarted (wiping out its internal state and starting from scratch) or terminated.
The rich lifecycle hooks of Actors provide a useful toolkit to implement various initialization patterns. During the
lifetime of an ActorRef, an actor can potentially go through several restarts, where the old instance is replaced
by a fresh one, invisibly to the outside observer who only sees the ActorRef.
One may think about the new instances as “incarnations”. Initialization might be necessary for every incarnation
of an actor, but sometimes one needs initialization to happen only at the birth of the first instance when the
ActorRef is created. The following sections provide patterns for different initialization needs.
Using the constructor for initialization has various benefits. First of all, it makes it possible to use val fields to
store any state that does not change during the life of the actor instance, making the implementation of the actor
more robust. The constructor is invoked for every incarnation of the actor, therefore the internals of the actor can
always assume that proper initialization happened. This is also the drawback of this approach, as there are cases
when one would like to avoid reinitializing internals on restart. For example, it is often useful to preserve child
actors across restarts. The following section provides a pattern for this case.
The method preStart() of an actor is only called once directly during the initialization of the first instance,
that is, at creation of its ActorRef. In the case of restarts, preStart() is called from postRestart(),
therefore if not overridden, preStart() is called on every incarnation. However, overriding postRestart()
one can disable this behavior, and ensure that there is only one call to preStart().
One useful usage of this pattern is to disable creation of new ActorRefs for children during restarts. This can
be achieved by overriding preRestart():
@Override
public void preStart() {
// Initialize children here
}
Please note, that the child actors are still restarted, but no new ActorRef is created. One can recursively apply
the same principles for the children, ensuring that their preStart() method is called only at the creation of
their refs.
For more information see What Restarting Means.
There are cases when it is impossible to pass all the information needed for actor initialization in the constructor,
for example in the presence of circular dependencies. In this case the actor should listen for an initialization
message, and use become() or a finite state-machine state transition to encode the initialized and uninitialized
states of the actor.
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("init", m1 -> {
initializeMe = "Up and running";
context().become(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("U OK?", m2 -> {
sender().tell(initializeMe, self());
}).build());
}).build()
If the actor may receive messages before it has been initialized, a useful tool can be the Stash to save messages
until the initialization finishes, and replaying them after the actor became initialized.
Warning: This pattern should be used with care, and applied only when none of the patterns above are
applicable. One of the potential issues is that messages might be lost when sent to remote actors. Also,
publishing an ActorRef in an uninitialized state might lead to the condition that it receives a user message
before the initialization has been done.
There is one big difference between the optimized partial functions created by the Scala compiler and the ones
created by the ReceiveBuilder. The partial functions created by the ReceiveBuilder consist of multiple
lambda expressions for every match statement, where each lambda is an object referencing the code to be run.
This is something that the JVM can have problems optimizing and the resulting code might not be as performant
as the Scala equivalent or the corresponding untyped actor version.
As explained in Actor Systems each actor is the supervisor of its children, and as such each actor defines fault
handling supervisor strategy. This strategy cannot be changed afterwards as it is an integral part of the actor
system’s structure.
First, let us look at a sample that illustrates one way to handle data store errors, which is a typical source of failure
in real world applications. Of course it depends on the actual application what is possible to do when the data
store is unavailable, but in this sample we use a best effort re-connect approach.
Read the following source code. The inlined comments explain the different pieces of the fault handling and why
they are added. It is also highly recommended to run this sample as it is easy to follow the log output to understand
what is happening in runtime.
Step Description
1 The Storage throws StorageException.
2 The CounterService is supervisor of the Storage and restarts the Storage when
StorageException is thrown.
3, 4, The Storage continues to fail and is restarted.
5, 6
7 After 3 failures and restarts within 5 seconds the Storage is stopped by its supervisor, i.e. the
CounterService.
8 The CounterService is also watching the Storage for termination and receives the
Terminated message when the Storage has been stopped ...
9, 10, and tells the Counter that there is no Storage.
11
12 The CounterService schedules a Reconnect message to itself.
13, When it receives the Reconnect message it creates a new Storage ...
14
15, and tells the Counter to use the new Storage
16
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import akka.event.LoggingReceive;
import akka.japi.pf.DeciderBuilder;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
import akka.util.Timeout;
import com.typesafe.config.Config;
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
/**
* Runs the sample
*/
public static void main(String[] args) {
Config config = ConfigFactory.parseString(
"akka.loglevel = \"DEBUG\"\n" +
"akka.actor.debug {\n" +
" receive = on\n" +
" lifecycle = on\n" +
"}\n");
/**
* Listens on progress from the worker and shuts down the system when enough
* work has been done.
*/
public static class Listener extends AbstractLoggingActor {
@Override
public void preStart() {
// If we don’t get any progress within 15 seconds then the service
// is unavailable
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create("15 seconds"));
}
public Listener() {
receive(LoggingReceive.create(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Progress.class, progress -> {
log().info("Current progress: {} %", progress.percent);
if (progress.percent >= 100.0) {
log().info("That’s all, shutting down");
context().system().terminate();
}
}).
matchEquals(ReceiveTimeout.getInstance(), x -> {
// No progress within 15 seconds, ServiceUnavailable
log().error("Shutting down due to unavailable service");
context().system().terminate();
}).build(), context()
));
}
}
/**
* Worker performs some work when it receives the Start message. It will
* continuously notify the sender of the Start message of current Progress.
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
public Worker() {
receive(LoggingReceive.create(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals(Start, x -> progressListener == null, x -> {
progressListener = sender();
context().system().scheduler().schedule(
Duration.Zero(), Duration.create(1, "second"), self(), Do,
context().dispatcher(), null
);
}).
matchEquals(Do, x -> {
counterService.tell(new Increment(1), self());
counterService.tell(new Increment(1), self());
counterService.tell(new Increment(1), self());
// Send current progress to the initial sender
pipe(ask(counterService, GetCurrentCount, askTimeout)
.mapTo(classTag(CurrentCount.class))
.map(new Mapper<CurrentCount, Progress>() {
public Progress apply(CurrentCount c) {
return new Progress(100.0 * c.count / totalCount);
}
}, context().dispatcher()), context().dispatcher())
.to(progressListener);
}).build(), context())
);
}
}
public Increment(long n) {
this.n = n;
}
/**
* Adds the value received in Increment message to a persistent counter.
* Replies with CurrentCount when it is asked for CurrentCount. CounterService
* supervise Storage and Counter.
*/
public static class CounterService extends AbstractLoggingActor {
// Reconnect message
static final Object Reconnect = "Reconnect";
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
@Override
public void preStart() {
initStorage();
}
/**
* The child storage is restarted in case of failure, but after 3 restarts,
* and still failing it will be stopped. Better to back-off than
* continuously failing. When it has been stopped we will schedule a
* Reconnect after a delay. Watch the child so we receive Terminated message
* when it has been terminated.
*/
void initStorage() {
storage = context().watch(context().actorOf(
Props.create(Storage.class), "storage"));
// Tell the counter, if any, to use the new storage
if (counter != null)
counter.tell(new UseStorage(storage), self());
// We need the initial value to be able to operate
storage.tell(new Get(key), self());
}
public CounterService() {
receive(LoggingReceive.create(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Entry.class, entry -> entry.key.equals(key) && counter == null, entry -> {
// Reply from Storage of the initial value, now we can create the Counter
final long value = entry.value;
counter = context().actorOf(Props.create(Counter.class, key, value));
// Tell the counter to use current storage
counter.tell(new UseStorage(storage), self());
// and send the buffered backlog to the counter
for (SenderMsgPair each : backlog) {
counter.tell(each.msg, each.sender);
}
backlog.clear();
}).
match(Increment.class, increment -> {
forwardOrPlaceInBacklog(increment);
}).
matchEquals(GetCurrentCount, gcc -> {
forwardOrPlaceInBacklog(gcc);
}).
match(Terminated.class, o -> {
// After 3 restarts the storage child is stopped.
// We receive Terminated because we watch the child, see initStorage.
storage = null;
// Tell the counter that there is no storage for the moment
counter.tell(new UseStorage(null), self());
// Try to re-establish storage after while
context().system().scheduler().scheduleOnce(
Duration.create(10, "seconds"), self(), Reconnect,
context().dispatcher(), null);
}).
matchEquals(Reconnect, o -> {
// Re-establish storage after the scheduled delay
initStorage();
}).build(), context())
);
}
// We need the initial value from storage before we can start delegate to
// the counter. Before that we place the messages in a backlog, to be sent
// to the counter when it is initialized.
if (counter == null) {
if (backlog.size() >= MAX_BACKLOG)
throw new ServiceUnavailable("CounterService not available," +
" lack of initial value");
backlog.add(new SenderMsgPair(sender(), msg));
} else {
counter.forward(msg, context());
}
}
}
/**
* The in memory count variable that will send current value to the Storage,
* if there is any storage available at the moment.
*/
public static class Counter extends AbstractLoggingActor {
final String key;
long count;
ActorRef storage;
receive(LoggingReceive.create(ReceiveBuilder.
match(UseStorage.class, useStorage -> {
storage = useStorage.storage;
storeCount();
}).
match(Increment.class, increment -> {
count += increment.n;
storeCount();
}).
matchEquals(GetCurrentCount, gcc -> {
sender().tell(new CurrentCount(key, count), self());
}).build(), context())
);
}
void storeCount() {
// Delegate dangerous work, to protect our valuable state.
// We can continue without storage.
if (storage != null) {
storage.tell(new Store(new Entry(key, count)), self());
}
}
}
/**
* Saves key/value pairs to persistent storage when receiving Store message.
* Replies with current value when receiving Get message. Will throw
* StorageException if the underlying data store is out of order.
*/
public static class Storage extends AbstractLoggingActor {
public Storage() {
receive(LoggingReceive.create(ReceiveBuilder.
private DummyDB() {
}
The following sections explain the fault handling mechanism and alternatives in more depth.
For the sake of demonstration let us consider the following strategy:
private static SupervisorStrategy strategy =
new OneForOneStrategy(10, Duration.create("1 minute"), DeciderBuilder.
match(ArithmeticException.class, e -> resume()).
match(NullPointerException.class, e -> restart()).
match(IllegalArgumentException.class, e -> stop()).
matchAny(o -> escalate()).build());
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
I have chosen a few well-known exception types in order to demonstrate the application of the fault handling
directives described in Supervision and Monitoring. First off, it is a one-for-one strategy, meaning that each child
is treated separately (an all-for-one strategy works very similarly, the only difference is that any decision is applied
to all children of the supervisor, not only the failing one). There are limits set on the restart frequency, namely
maximum 10 restarts per minute. -1 and Duration.Inf() means that the respective limit does not apply,
leaving the possibility to specify an absolute upper limit on the restarts or to make the restarts work infinitely. The
child actor is stopped if the limit is exceeded.
Note: If the strategy is declared inside the supervising actor (as opposed to a separate class) its decider has access
to all internal state of the actor in a thread-safe fashion, including obtaining a reference to the currently failed child
(available as the getSender of the failure message).
Escalate is used if the defined strategy doesn’t cover the exception that was thrown.
When the supervisor strategy is not defined for an actor the following exceptions are handled by default:
• ActorInitializationException will stop the failing child actor
• ActorKilledException will stop the failing child actor
• Exception will restart the failing child actor
• Other types of Throwable will be escalated to parent actor
If the exception escalate all the way up to the root guardian it will handle it in the same way as the default strategy
defined above.
Closer to the Erlang way is the strategy to just stop children when they fail and then take cor-
rective action in the supervisor when DeathWatch signals the loss of the child. This strategy is
also provided pre-packaged as SupervisorStrategy.stoppingStrategy with an accompanying
StoppingSupervisorStrategy configurator to be used when you want the "/user" guardian to apply it.
By default the SupervisorStrategy logs failures unless they are escalated. Escalated failures are supposed
to be handled, and potentially logged, at a level higher in the hierarchy.
You can mute the default logging of a SupervisorStrategy by setting loggingEnabled to false when
instantiating it. Customized logging can be done inside the Decider. Note that the reference to the currently
failed child is available as the getSender when the SupervisorStrategy is declared inside the supervising
actor.
You may also customize the logging in your own SupervisorStrategy implementation by overriding the
logFailure method.
Toplevel actors means those which are created using system.actorOf(), and they are children of the User
Guardian. There are no special rules applied in this case, the guardian simply applies the configured strategy.
The following section shows the effects of the different directives in practice, where a test setup is needed. First
off, we need a suitable supervisor:
public class Supervisor extends AbstractActor {
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
public Supervisor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Props.class, props -> {
sender().tell(context().actorOf(props), self());
}).build()
);
}
}
This supervisor will be used to create a child, with which we can experiment:
public class Child extends AbstractActor {
int state = 0;
public Child() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Exception.class, exception -> { throw exception; }).
match(Integer.class, i -> state = i).
matchEquals("get", s -> sender().tell(state, self())).build()
);
}
}
The test is easier by using the utilities described in akka-testkit, where TestProbe provides an actor ref useful
for receiving and inspecting replies.
import akka.actor.*;
@BeforeClass
public static void start() {
system = ActorSystem.create("FaultHandlingTest", config);
}
@AfterClass
public static void cleanup() {
JavaTestKit.shutdownActorSystem(system);
system = null;
}
@Test
public void mustEmploySupervisorStrategy() throws Exception {
// code here
}
The first test shall demonstrate the Resume directive, so we try it out by setting some non-initial state in the actor
and have it fail:
child.tell(42, ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(42);
child.tell(new ArithmeticException(), ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(42);
As you can see the value 42 survives the fault handling directive. Now, if we change the failure to a more serious
NullPointerException, that will no longer be the case:
child.tell(new NullPointerException(), ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(0);
And finally in case of the fatal IllegalArgumentException the child will be terminated by the supervisor:
final TestProbe probe = new TestProbe(system);
probe.watch(child);
child.tell(new IllegalArgumentException(), ActorRef.noSender());
probe.expectMsgClass(Terminated.class);
Up to now the supervisor was completely unaffected by the child’s failure, because the directives set did handle it.
In case of an Exception, this is not true anymore and the supervisor escalates the failure.
child = (ActorRef) Await.result(ask(supervisor,
Props.create(Child.class), 5000), timeout);
probe.watch(child);
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(0);
child.tell(new Exception(), ActorRef.noSender());
probe.expectMsgClass(Terminated.class);
The supervisor itself is supervised by the top-level actor provided by the ActorSystem, which
has the default policy to restart in case of all Exception cases (with the notable exceptions of
ActorInitializationException and ActorKilledException). Since the default directive in case
of a restart is to kill all children, we expected our poor child not to survive this failure.
In case this is not desired (which depends on the use case), we need to use a different supervisor which overrides
this behavior.
public class Supervisor2 extends AbstractActor {
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
public Supervisor2() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Props.class, props -> {
sender().tell(context().actorOf(props), self());
}).build()
);
}
@Override
public void preRestart(Throwable cause, Option<Object> msg) {
// do not kill all children, which is the default here
}
}
With this parent, the child survives the escalated restart, as demonstrated in the last test:
superprops = Props.create(Supervisor2.class);
supervisor = system.actorOf(superprops);
child = (ActorRef) Await.result(ask(supervisor,
Props.create(Child.class), 5000), timeout);
child.tell(23, ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(23);
child.tell(new Exception(), ActorRef.noSender());
assert Await.result(ask(child, "get", 5000), timeout).equals(0);
5.3.1 Overview
The FSM (Finite State Machine) is available as an abstract base class that implements an Akka Actor and is best
described in the Erlang design principles
A FSM can be described as a set of relations of the form:
State(S) x Event(E) -> Actions (A), State(S’)
These relations are interpreted as meaning:
If we are in state S and the event E occurs, we should perform the actions A and make a transition to
the state S’.
Warning: The Java with lambda support part of Akka is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction in
Akka 2.3.0. We will continue to improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while we try
to keep incompatible changes to a minimum, but the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance releases
does not apply to the akka.actor.AbstractFSM, related classes and the akka.japi.pf package.
To demonstrate most of the features of the AbstractFSM class, consider an actor which shall receive and queue
messages while they arrive in a burst and send them on after the burst ended or a flush request is received.
First, consider all of the below to use these import statements:
import akka.actor.AbstractFSM;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.japi.pf.UnitMatch;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
The contract of our “Buncher” actor is that it accepts or produces the following messages:
public final class SetTarget {
private final ActorRef ref;
SetTarget is needed for starting it up, setting the destination for the Batches to be passed on; Queue will
add to the internal queue while Flush will mark the end of a burst.
The actor can be in two states: no message queued (aka Idle) or some message queued (aka Active). The
states and the state data is defined like this:
// states
enum State {
Idle, Active
}
// state data
interface Data {
}
The actor starts out in the idle state. Once a message arrives it will go to the active state and stay there as long as
messages keep arriving and no flush is requested. The internal state data of the actor is made up of the target actor
reference to send the batches to and the actual queue of messages.
Now let’s take a look at the skeleton for our FSM actor:
public class Buncher extends AbstractFSM<State, Data> {
{
startWith(Idle, Uninitialized);
when(Idle,
matchEvent(SetTarget.class, Uninitialized.class,
(setTarget, uninitialized) ->
stay().using(new Todo(setTarget.getRef(), new LinkedList<>()))));
initialize();
}
}
The basic strategy is to declare the actor, by inheriting the AbstractFSM class and specifying the possible states
and data values as type parameters. Within the body of the actor a DSL is used for declaring the state machine:
• startWith defines the initial state and initial data
• then there is one when(<state>) { ... } declaration per state to be handled (could potentially be
multiple ones, the passed PartialFunction will be concatenated using orElse)
• finally starting it up using initialize, which performs the transition into the initial state and sets up
timers (if required).
In this case, we start out in the Idle and Uninitialized state, where only the SetTarget() message
is handled; stay prepares to end this event’s processing for not leaving the current state, while the using
modifier makes the FSM replace the internal state (which is Uninitialized at this point) with a fresh Todo()
object containing the target actor reference. The Active state has a state timeout declared, which means that
if no message is received for 1 second, a FSM.StateTimeout message will be generated. This has the same
effect as receiving the Flush command in this case, namely to transition back into the Idle state and resetting
the internal queue to the empty vector. But how do messages get queued? Since this shall work identically in
both states, we make use of the fact that any event which is not handled by the when() block is passed to the
whenUnhandled() block:
whenUnhandled(
matchEvent(Queue.class, Todo.class,
(queue, todo) -> goTo(Active).using(todo.addElement(queue.getObj()))).
anyEvent((event, state) -> {
log().warning("received unhandled request {} in state {}/{}",
event, stateName(), state);
return stay();
}));
The first case handled here is adding Queue() requests to the internal queue and going to the Active state
(this does the obvious thing of staying in the Active state if already there), but only if the FSM data are not
Uninitialized when the Queue() event is received. Otherwise—and in all other non-handled cases—the
second case just logs a warning and does not change the internal state.
The only missing piece is where the Batches are actually sent to the target, for which we use the
onTransition mechanism: you can declare multiple such blocks and all of them will be tried for matching
behavior in case a state transition occurs (i.e. only when the state actually changes).
onTransition(
matchState(Active, Idle, () -> {
// reuse this matcher
final UnitMatch<Data> m = UnitMatch.create(
matchData(Todo.class,
todo -> todo.getTarget().tell(new Batch(todo.getQueue()), self())));
m.match(stateData());
}).
state(Idle, Active, () -> {/* Do something here */}));
The transition callback is a partial function which takes as input a pair of states—the current and the next state.
During the state change, the old state data is available via stateData as shown, and the new state data would
be available as nextStateData.
To verify that this buncher actually works, it is quite easy to write a test using the akka-testkit, here using JUnit as
an example:
public class BuncherTest extends AbstractJavaTest {
@BeforeClass
public static void setup() {
system = ActorSystem.create("BuncherTest");
}
@AfterClass
public static void tearDown() {
JavaTestKit.shutdownActorSystem(system);
system = null;
}
@Test
public void testBuncherActorBatchesCorrectly() {
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final ActorRef buncher =
system.actorOf(Props.create(Buncher.class));
final ActorRef probe = getRef();
list1.add(42);
list1.add(43);
expectMsgEquals(new Batch(list1));
buncher.tell(new Queue(44), probe);
buncher.tell(Flush, probe);
buncher.tell(new Queue(45), probe);
LinkedList<Object> list2 = new LinkedList<>();
list2.add(44);
expectMsgEquals(new Batch(list2));
LinkedList<Object> list3 = new LinkedList<>();
list3.add(45);
expectMsgEquals(new Batch(list3));
system.stop(buncher);
}};
}
@Test
public void testBuncherActorDoesntBatchUninitialized() {
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final ActorRef buncher =
system.actorOf(Props.create(Buncher.class));
final ActorRef probe = getRef();
5.3.3 Reference
The AbstractFSM abstract class is the base class used to implement an FSM. It implements Actor since an
Actor is created to drive the FSM.
public class Buncher extends AbstractFSM<State, Data> {
{
// fsm body ...
}
}
Note: The AbstractFSM class defines a receive method which handles internal messages and passes everything
else through to the FSM logic (according to the current state). When overriding the receive method, keep in
mind that e.g. state timeout handling depends on actually passing the messages through the FSM logic.
Note: The state data together with the state name describe the internal state of the state machine; if you stick to
this scheme and do not add mutable fields to the FSM class you have the advantage of making all changes of the
internal state explicit in a few well-known places.
Defining States
Warning: It is required that you define handlers for each of the possible FSM states, otherwise there will be
failures when trying to switch to undeclared states.
It is recommended practice to declare the states as an enum and then verify that there is a when clause for each of
the states. If you want to leave the handling of a state “unhandled” (more below), it still needs to be declared like
this:
when(SomeState, AbstractFSM.NullFunction());
Unhandled Events
If a state doesn’t handle a received event a warning is logged. If you want to do something else in this case you
can specify that with whenUnhandled(stateFunction):
whenUnhandled(
matchEvent(X.class, (x, data) -> {
log().info("Received unhandled event: " + x);
return stay();
}).
anyEvent((event, data) -> {
log().warning("Received unknown event: " + event);
return goTo(Error);
}));
}
Within this handler the state of the FSM may be queried using the stateName method.
IMPORTANT: This handler is not stacked, meaning that each invocation of whenUnhandled replaces the
previously installed handler.
Initiating Transitions
The result of any stateFunction must be a definition of the next state unless terminating the FSM, which is
described in Termination from Inside. The state definition can either be the current state, as described by the stay
directive, or it is a different state as given by goto(state). The resulting object allows further qualification by
way of the modifiers described in the following:
• forMax(duration)
This modifier sets a state timeout on the next state. This means that a timer is started which upon expiry
sends a StateTimeout message to the FSM. This timer is canceled upon reception of any other message
in the meantime; you can rely on the fact that the StateTimeout message will not be processed after an
intervening message.
This modifier can also be used to override any default timeout which is specified for the target state. If you
want to cancel the default timeout, use Duration.Inf.
• using(data)
This modifier replaces the old state data with the new data given. If you follow the advice above, this is the
only place where internal state data are ever modified.
• replying(msg)
This modifier sends a reply to the currently processed message and otherwise does not modify the state
transition.
All modifiers can be chained to achieve a nice and concise description:
when(SomeState, matchAnyEvent((msg, data) -> {
return goTo(Processing).using(newData).
forMax(Duration.create(5, SECONDS)).replying(WillDo);
}));
The parentheses are not actually needed in all cases, but they visually distinguish between modifiers and their
arguments and therefore make the code even more pleasant to read for foreigners.
Note: Please note that the return statement may not be used in when blocks or similar; this is a Scala
restriction. Either refactor your code using if () ... else ... or move it into a method definition.
Monitoring Transitions
Transitions occur “between states” conceptually, which means after any actions you have put into the event han-
dling block; this is obvious since the next state is only defined by the value returned by the event handling logic.
You do not need to worry about the exact order with respect to setting the internal state variable, as everything
within the FSM actor is running single-threaded anyway.
Internal Monitoring
Up to this point, the FSM DSL has been centered on states and events. The dual view is to describe it as a series
of transitions. This is enabled by the method
onTransition(handler)
which associates actions with a transition instead of with a state and event. The handler is a partial function which
takes a pair of states as input; no resulting state is needed as it is not possible to modify the transition in progress.
onTransition(
matchState(Active, Idle, () -> setTimer("timeout",
Tick, Duration.create(1, SECONDS), true)).
state(Active, null, () -> cancelTimer("timeout")).
state(null, Idle, (f, t) -> log().info("entering Idle from " + f)));
It is also possible to pass a function object accepting two states to onTransition, in case your transition
handling logic is implemented as a method:
public void handler(StateType from, StateType to) {
// handle transition here
}
onTransition(this::handler);
The handlers registered with this method are stacked, so you can intersperse onTransition blocks with when
blocks as suits your design. It should be noted, however, that all handlers will be invoked for each transition,
not only the first matching one. This is designed specifically so you can put all transition handling for a certain
aspect into one place without having to worry about earlier declarations shadowing later ones; the actions are still
executed in declaration order, though.
Note: This kind of internal monitoring may be used to structure your FSM according to transitions, so that for
example the cancellation of a timer upon leaving a certain state cannot be forgot when adding new target states.
External Monitoring
Timers
Besides state timeouts, FSM manages timers identified by String names. You may set a timer using
setTimer(name, msg, interval, repeat)
where msg is the message object which will be sent after the duration interval has elapsed. If repeat is
true, then the timer is scheduled at fixed rate given by the interval parameter. Any existing timer with the
same name will automatically be canceled before adding the new timer.
Timers may be canceled using
cancelTimer(name)
which is guaranteed to work immediately, meaning that the scheduled message will not be processed after this call
even if the timer already fired and queued it. The status of any timer may be inquired with
isTimerActive(name)
These named timers complement state timeouts because they are not affected by intervening reception of other
messages.
Note: It should be noted that stop does not abort the actions and stop the FSM immediately. The stop action
must be returned from the event handler in the same way as a state transition (but note that the return statement
may not be used within a when block).
You can use onTermination(handler) to specify custom code that is executed when the FSM is stopped.
The handler is a partial function which takes a StopEvent(reason, stateName, stateData) as argu-
ment:
onTermination(
matchStop(Normal(),
(state, data) -> {/* Do something here */}).
stop(Shutdown(),
(state, data) -> {/* Do something here */}).
stop(Failure.class,
(reason, state, data) -> {/* Do something here */}));
As for the whenUnhandled case, this handler is not stacked, so each invocation of onTermination replaces
the previously installed handler.
When an ActorRef associated to a FSM is stopped using the stop method, its postStop hook will be
executed. The default implementation by the AbstractFSM class is to execute the onTermination handler
if that is prepared to handle a StopEvent(Shutdown, ...).
Warning: In case you override postStop and want to have your onTermination handler called, do not
forget to call super.postStop.
During development and for trouble shooting FSMs need care just as any other actor. There are specialized tools
available as described in TestFSMRef and in the following.
Event Tracing
The AbstractLoggingFSM class adds one more feature to the FSM: a rolling event log which may be used
during debugging (for tracing how the FSM entered a certain failure state) or for other creative uses:
public class MyFSM extends AbstractLoggingFSM<StateType, Data> {
@Override
public int logDepth() { return 12; }
{
onTermination(
matchStop(Failure.class, (reason, state, data) -> {
String lastEvents = getLog().mkString("\n\t");
log().warning("Failure in state " + state + " with data " + data + "\n" +
"Events leading up to this point:\n\t" + lastEvents);
})
);
//...
}
}
The logDepth defaults to zero, which turns off the event log.
Warning: The log buffer is allocated during actor creation, which is why the configuration is done using a
virtual method call. If you want to override with a val, make sure that its initialization happens before the
initializer of LoggingFSM runs, and do not change the value returned by logDepth after the buffer has
been allocated.
The contents of the event log are available using method getLog, which returns an IndexedSeq[LogEntry]
where the oldest entry is at index zero.
5.3.5 Examples
A bigger FSM example contrasted with Actor’s become/unbecome can be found in the Lightbend Activator
template named Akka FSM in Scala
Akka persistence enables stateful actors to persist their internal state so that it can be recovered when an actor is
started, restarted after a JVM crash or by a supervisor, or migrated in a cluster. The key concept behind Akka
persistence is that only changes to an actor’s internal state are persisted but never its current state directly (except
for optional snapshots). These changes are only ever appended to storage, nothing is ever mutated, which allows
for very high transaction rates and efficient replication. Stateful actors are recovered by replaying stored changes
to these actors from which they can rebuild internal state. This can be either the full history of changes or starting
from a snapshot which can dramatically reduce recovery times. Akka persistence also provides point-to-point
communication with at-least-once message delivery semantics.
Akka persistence is inspired by the eventsourced library. It follows the same concepts and architecture of
eventsourced but significantly differs on API and implementation level.
5.4.1 Dependencies
Akka persistence is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-persistence_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
The Akka persistence extension comes with few built-in persistence plugins, including in-memory heap based
journal, local file-system based snapshot-store and LevelDB based journal.
LevelDB based plugins will require the following additional dependency declaration:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.iq80.leveldb</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldb</artifactId>
<version>0.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.fusesource.leveldbjni</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldbjni-all</artifactId>
<version>1.8</version>
</dependency>
5.4.2 Architecture
• AbstractPersistentActor: Is a persistent, stateful actor. It is able to persist events to a journal and can react
to them in a thread-safe manner. It can be used to implement both command as well as event sourced actors.
When a persistent actor is started or restarted, journaled messages are replayed to that actor so that it can
recover internal state from these messages.
• AbstractPersistentView: A view is a persistent, stateful actor that receives journaled messages that have been
written by another persistent actor. A view itself does not journal new messages, instead, it updates internal
state only from a persistent actor’s replicated message stream.
• AbstractPersistentActorAtLeastOnceDelivery: To send messages with at-least-once delivery semantics to
destinations, also in case of sender and receiver JVM crashes.
• AsyncWriteJournal: A journal stores the sequence of messages sent to a persistent actor. An application
can control which messages are journaled and which are received by the persistent actor without being
journaled. The storage backend of a journal is pluggable. The persistence extension comes with a “leveldb”
journal plugin which writes to the local filesystem. Replicated journals are available as Community plugins.
• Snapshot store: A snapshot store persists snapshots of a persistent actor’s or a view’s internal state. Snap-
shots are used for optimizing recovery times. The storage backend of a snapshot store is pluggable. The
persistence extension comes with a “local” snapshot storage plugin which writes to the local filesystem.
Replicated snapshot stores are available as Community plugins.
• Event sourcing. Based on the building blocks described above, Akka persistence provides abstractions for
the development of event sourced applications (see section Event sourcing)
The basic idea behind Event Sourcing is quite simple. A persistent actor receives a (non-persistent) command
which is first validated if it can be applied to the current state. Here validation can mean anything, from simple
inspection of a command message’s fields up to a conversation with several external services, for example. If
validation succeeds, events are generated from the command, representing the effect of the command. These
events are then persisted and, after successful persistence, used to change the actor’s state. When the persistent
actor needs to be recovered, only the persisted events are replayed of which we know that they can be successfully
applied. In other words, events cannot fail when being replayed to a persistent actor, in contrast to commands.
Event sourced actors may of course also process commands that do not change application state such as query
commands for example.
Akka persistence supports event sourcing with the AbstractPersistentActor abstract class. An ac-
tor that extends this class uses the persist method to persist and handle events. The behavior of an
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.ArrayList;
public ExampleState() {
this(new ArrayList<>());
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return events.toString();
}
}
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "sample-id-1"; }
@Override
public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveRecover() {
return ReceiveBuilder.
match(Evt.class, state::update).
match(SnapshotOffer.class, ss -> state = (ExampleState) ss.snapshot()).build();
}
@Override
public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveCommand() {
return ReceiveBuilder.
match(Cmd.class, c -> {
final String data = c.getData();
final Evt evt1 = new Evt(data + "-" + getNumEvents());
final Evt evt2 = new Evt(data + "-" + (getNumEvents() + 1));
persistAll(asList(evt1, evt2), (Evt evt) -> {
state.update(evt);
if (evt.equals(evt2)) {
context().system().eventStream().publish(evt);
}
});
}).
match(String.class, s -> s.equals("snap"), s -> saveSnapshot(state.copy())).
match(String.class, s -> s.equals("print"), s -> System.out.println(state)).
build();
}
The example defines two data types, Cmd and Evt to represent commands and events, respectively. The state
of the ExamplePersistentActor is a list of persisted event data contained in ExampleState.
The persistent actor’s receiveRecover method defines how state is updated during recovery by handling
Evt and SnapshotOffer messages. The persistent actor’s receiveCommand method is a command handler.
In this example, a command is handled by generating two events which are then persisted and handled. Events are
persisted by calling persist with an event (or a sequence of events) as first argument and an event handler as
second argument.
The persist method persists events asynchronously and the event handler is executed for successfully persisted
events. Successfully persisted events are internally sent back to the persistent actor as individual messages that
trigger event handler executions. An event handler may close over persistent actor state and mutate it. The sender
of a persisted event is the sender of the corresponding command. This allows event handlers to reply to the sender
of a command (not shown).
The main responsibility of an event handler is changing persistent actor state using event data and notifying others
about successful state changes by publishing events.
When persisting events with persist it is guaranteed that the persistent actor will not receive further commands
between the persist call and the execution(s) of the associated event handler. This also holds for multiple
persist calls in context of a single command. Incoming messages are stashed until the persist is completed.
If persistence of an event fails, onPersistFailure will be invoked (logging the error by default), and the actor
will unconditionally be stopped. If persistence of an event is rejected before it is stored, e.g. due to serialization
error, onPersistRejected will be invoked (logging a warning by default), and the actor continues with next
message.
The easiest way to run this example yourself is to download Lightbend Activator and open the tuto-
rial named Akka Persistence Samples in Java with Lambdas. It contains instructions on how to run the
PersistentActorExample.
Note: It’s also possible to switch between different command handlers during normal processing and recovery
with context().become() and context().unbecome(). To get the actor into the same state after
recovery you need to take special care to perform the same state transitions with become and unbecome in the
receiveRecover method as you would have done in the command handler. Note that when using become
from receiveRecover it will still only use the receiveRecover behavior when replaying the events. When
replay is completed it will use the new behavior.
Identifiers
A persistent actor must have an identifier that doesn’t change across different actor incarnations. The identifier
must be defined with the persistenceId method.
@Override
public String persistenceId() {
return "my-stable-persistence-id";
}
Recovery
By default, a persistent actor is automatically recovered on start and on restart by replaying journaled messages.
New messages sent to a persistent actor during recovery do not interfere with replayed messages. They are stashed
and received by a persistent actor after recovery phase completes.
The number of concurrent recoveries of recoveries that can be in progress at the same time is limited to not
overload the system and the backend data store. When exceeding the limit the actors will wait until other recoveries
have been completed. This is configured by:
akka.persistence.max-concurrent-recoveries = 50
Note: Accessing the sender() for replayed messages will always result in a deadLetters reference, as the
original sender is presumed to be long gone. If you indeed have to notify an actor during recovery in the future,
store its ActorPath explicitly in your persisted events.
Recovery customization
Applications may also customise how recovery is performed by returning a customised Recovery object in the
recovery method of a AbstractPersistentActor.
To skip loading snapshots and replay all events you can use SnapshotSelectionCriteria.none(). This
can be useful if snapshot serialization format has changed in an incompatible way. It should typically not be used
when events have been deleted.
@Override
public Recovery recovery() {
return Recovery.create(SnapshotSelectionCriteria.none());
}
Another example, which can be fun for experiments but probably not in a real application, is setting an upper
bound to the replay which allows the actor to be replayed to a certain point “in the past” instead to its most up
to date state. Note that after that it is a bad idea to persist new events because a later recovery will probably be
confused by the new events that follow the events that were previously skipped.
@Override
public Recovery recovery() {
return Recovery.create(457L);
}
Recovery status
A persistent actor can query its own recovery status via the methods
public boolean recoveryRunning();
public boolean recoveryFinished();
Sometimes there is a need for performing additional initialization when the recovery has completed be-
fore processing any other message sent to the persistent actor. The persistent actor will receive a special
RecoveryCompleted message right after recovery and before any other received messages.
class MyPersistentActor5 extends AbstractPersistentActor {
If there is a problem with recovering the state of the actor from the journal, onRecoveryFailure is called
(logging the error by default), and the actor will be stopped.
Internal stash
The persistent actor has a private stash for internally caching incoming messages during recovery or the
persist\persistAll method persisting events. You can still use/inherit from the Stash interface. The
internal stash cooperates with the normal stash by hooking into unstashAll method and making sure messages
are unstashed properly to the internal stash to maintain ordering guarantees.
You should be careful to not send more messages to a persistent actor than it can keep up with, otherwise the
number of stashed messages will grow without bounds. It can be wise to protect against OutOfMemoryError
by defining a maximum stash capacity in the mailbox configuration:
akka.actor.default-mailbox.stash-capacity=10000
Note that the stash capacity is per actor. If you have many persistent actors, e.g. when using cluster
sharding, you may need to define a small stash capacity to ensure that the total number of stashed mes-
sages in the system don’t consume too much memory. Additionally, The persistent actor defines three
strategies to handle failure when the internal stash capacity is exceeded. The default overflow strategy is
the ThrowOverflowExceptionStrategy, which discards the current received message and throws a
StashOverflowException, causing actor restart if default supervision strategy is used. you can over-
ride the internalStashOverflowStrategy method to return DiscardToDeadLetterStrategy or
ReplyToStrategy for any “individual” persistent actor, or define the “default” for all persistent actors by pro-
viding FQCN, which must be a subclass of StashOverflowStrategyConfigurator, in the persistence
configuration:
akka.persistence.internal-stash-overflow-strategy=
"akka.persistence.ThrowExceptionConfigurator"
Note: The bounded mailbox should be avoided in the persistent actor, by which the messages come from storage
backends may be discarded. You can use bounded stash instead of it.
If faced with relaxed local consistency requirements and high throughput demands sometimes
PersistentActor and its persist may not be enough in terms of consuming incoming Commands
at a high rate, because it has to wait until all Events related to a given Command are processed in order to start
processing the next Command. While this abstraction is very useful for most cases, sometimes you may be faced
with relaxed requirements about consistency – for example you may want to process commands as fast as you
can, assuming that the Event will eventually be persisted and handled properly in the background, retroactively
reacting to persistence failures if needed.
The persistAsync method provides a tool for implementing high-throughput persistent actors. It will not stash
incoming Commands while the Journal is still working on persisting and/or user code is executing event callbacks.
In the below example, the event callbacks may be called “at any time”, even after the next Command has been
processed. The ordering between events is still guaranteed (“evt-b-1” will be sent after “evt-a-2”, which will be
sent after “evt-a-1” etc.).
class MyPersistentActor extends AbstractPersistentActor {
Note: In order to implement the pattern known as “command sourcing” simply call persistAsync on all
incoming messages right away and handle them in the callback.
Warning: The callback will not be invoked if the actor is restarted (or stopped) in between the call to
persistAsync and the journal has confirmed the write.
Sometimes when working with persistAsync you may find that it would be nice to define some actions in
terms of ‘’happens-after the previous persistAsync handlers have been invoked’‘. PersistentActor
provides an utility method called deferAsync, which works similarly to persistAsync yet does not persist
the passed in event. It is recommended to use it for read operations, and actions which do not have corresponding
events in your domain model.
Using this method is very similar to the persist family of methods, yet it does not persist the passed in event. It
will be kept in memory and used when invoking the handler.
class MyPersistentActor extends AbstractPersistentActor {
});
}
Notice that the sender() is safe to access in the handler callback, and will be pointing to the original sender of
the command for which this deferAsync handler was called.
final ActorRef persistentActor = system.actorOf(Props.create(MyPersistentActor.class));
persistentActor.tell("a", sender);
persistentActor.tell("b", sender);
Warning: The callback will not be invoked if the actor is restarted (or stopped) in between the call to
deferAsync and the journal has processed and confirmed all preceding writes.
It is possible to call persist and persistAsync inside their respective callback blocks and they will properly
retain both the thread safety (including the right value of sender()) as well as stashing guarantees.
In general it is encouraged to create command handlers which do not need to resort to nested event persisting,
however there are situations where it may be useful. It is important to understand the ordering of callback execution
in those situations, as well as their implication on the stashing behaviour (that persist() enforces). In the
following example two persist calls are issued, and each of them issues another persist inside its callback:
@Override public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveRecover() {
final Procedure<String> replyToSender = event -> sender().tell(event, self());
return ReceiveBuilder
.match(String.class, msg -> {
persist(String.format("%s-outer-1", msg), event -> {
sender().tell(event, self());
persist(String.format("%s-inner-1", event), replyToSender);
});
When sending two commands to this PersistentActor, the persist handlers will be executed in the following
order:
persistentActor.tell("a", ActorRef.noSender());
persistentActor.tell("b", ActorRef.noSender());
First the “outer layer” of persist calls is issued and their callbacks are applied. After these have successfully
completed, the inner callbacks will be invoked (once the events they are persisting have been confirmed to be
persisted by the journal). Only after all these handlers have been successfully invoked will the next command be
delivered to the persistent Actor. In other words, the stashing of incoming commands that is guaranteed by initially
calling persist() on the outer layer is extended until all nested persist callbacks have been handled.
It is also possible to nest persistAsync calls, using the same pattern:
@Override public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveRecover() {
final Procedure<String> replyToSender = event -> sender().tell(event, self());
return ReceiveBuilder
.match(String.class, msg -> {
persistAsync(String.format("%s-outer-1", msg ), event -> {
sender().tell(event, self());
persistAsync(String.format("%s-inner-1", event), replyToSender);
});
In this case no stashing is happening, yet the events are still persisted and callbacks executed in the expected order:
persistentActor.tell("a", self());
persistentActor.tell("b", self());
While it is possible to nest mixed persist and persistAsync with keeping their respective semantics it is
not a recommended practice, as it may lead to overly complex nesting.
Failures
If persistence of an event fails, onPersistFailure will be invoked (logging the error by default), and the
actor will unconditionally be stopped.
The reason that it cannot resume when persist fails is that it is unknown if the even was actually persisted or not,
and therefore it is in an inconsistent state. Restarting on persistent failures will most likely fail anyway, since
the journal is probably unavailable. It is better to stop the actor and after a back-off timeout start it again. The
akka.pattern.BackoffSupervisor actor is provided to support such restarts.
@Override
public void preStart() throws Exception {
final Props childProps = Props.create(MyPersistentActor1.class);
final Props props = BackoffSupervisor.props(
childProps,
"myActor",
Duration.create(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
Duration.create(30, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
0.2);
context().actorOf(props, "mySupervisor");
super.preStart();
}
If persistence of an event is rejected before it is stored, e.g. due to serialization error, onPersistRejected
will be invoked (logging a warning by default), and the actor continues with next message.
If there is a problem with recovering the state of the actor from the journal when the actor is started,
onRecoveryFailure is called (logging the error by default), and the actor will be stopped. Note that fail-
ure to load snapshot is also treated like this, but you can disable loading of snapshots if you for example know that
serialization format has changed in an incompatible way, see Recovery customization.
Atomic writes
Each event is of course stored atomically, but it is also possible to store several events atomically by using the
persistAll or persistAllAsync method. That means that all events passed to that method are stored or
none of them are stored if there is an error.
The recovery of a persistent actor will therefore never be done partially with only a subset of events persisted by
persistAll.
Some journals may not support atomic writes of several events and they will then reject the
persistAll command, i.e. onPersistRejected is called with an exception (typically
UnsupportedOperationException).
Batch writes
In order to optimize throughput when using persistAsync, a persistent actor internally batches events to be
stored under high load before writing them to the journal (as a single batch). The batch size is dynamically
determined by how many events are emitted during the time of a journal round-trip: after sending a batch to the
journal no further batch can be sent before confirmation has been received that the previous batch has been written.
Batch writes are never timer-based which keeps latencies at a minimum.
Message deletion
It is possible to delete all messages (journaled by a single persistent actor) up to a specified sequence number;
Persistent actors may call the deleteMessages method to this end.
Deleting messages in event sourcing based applications is typically either not used at all or used in conjunction
with snapshotting, i.e. after a snapshot has been successfully stored, a deleteMessages(toSequenceNr)
up until the sequence number of the data held by that snapshot can be issued to safely delete the previous events
while still having access to the accumulated state during replays - by loading the snapshot.
The result of the deleteMessages request is signaled to the persistent actor with a
DeleteMessagesSuccess message if the delete was successful or a DeleteMessagesFailure
message if it failed.
Note: Journal implementations may choose to implement a retry mechanism, e.g. such that only after a write
fails N number of times a persistence failure is signalled back to the user. In other words, once a journal returns a
failure, it is considered fatal by Akka Persistence, and the persistent actor which caused the failure will be stopped.
Check the documentation of the journal implementation you are using for details if/how it is using this technique.
Special care should be given when when shutting down persistent actors from the outside. With normal Actors
it is often acceptable to use the special PoisonPill message to signal to an Actor that it should stop itself once it
receives this message – in fact this message is handled automatically by Akka, leaving the target actor no way to
refuse stopping itself when given a poison pill.
This can be dangerous when used with PersistentActor due to the fact that incoming commands are
stashed while the persistent actor is awaiting confirmation from the Journal that events have been written when
persist() was used. Since the incoming commands will be drained from the Actor’s mailbox and put into its
internal stash while awaiting the confirmation (thus, before calling the persist handlers) the Actor may receive
and (auto)handle the PoisonPill before it processes the other messages which have been put into its stash,
causing a pre-mature shutdown of the Actor.
Warning: Consider using explicit shut-down messages instead of PoisonPill when working with persis-
tent actors.
The example below highlights how messages arrive in the Actor’s mailbox and how they interact with its internal
stashing mechanism when persist() is used. Notice the early stop behaviour that occurs when PoisonPill
is used:
final class Shutdown {
}
@Override
public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveCommand() {
return ReceiveBuilder
.match(Shutdown.class, shutdown -> {
context().stop(self());
})
.match(String.class, msg -> {
System.out.println(msg);
persist("handle-" + msg, e -> System.out.println(e));
})
.build();
}
@Override
public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveRecover() {
return ReceiveBuilder.matchAny(any -> {}).build();
}
// SAFE:
persistentActor.tell("a", ActorRef.noSender());
persistentActor.tell("b", ActorRef.noSender());
persistentActor.tell(new Shutdown(), ActorRef.noSender());
// order of received messages:
// a
// # b arrives at mailbox, stashing; internal-stash = [b]
// # Shutdown arrives at mailbox, stashing; internal-stash = [b, Shutdown]
// handle-a
// # unstashing; internal-stash = [Shutdown]
// b
// handle-b
// # unstashing; internal-stash = []
// Shutdown
// -- stop --
Persistent views can be implemented by extending the AbstractView abstract class, implement the
persistenceId method and setting the “initial behavior” in the constructor by calling the receive method.
class MyView extends AbstractPersistentView {
@Override public String persistenceId() { return "some-persistence-id"; }
@Override public String viewId() { return "some-persistence-id-view"; }
public MyView() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Object.class, p -> isPersistent(), persistent -> {
// ...
}).build()
);
}
}
The persistenceId identifies the persistent actor from which the view receives journaled messages. It is
not necessary that the referenced persistent actor is actually running. Views read messages from a persistent
actor’s journal directly. When a persistent actor is started later and begins to write new messages, by default the
corresponding view is updated automatically.
It is possible to determine if a message was sent from the Journal or from another actor in user-land by calling
the isPersistent method. Having that said, very often you don’t need this information at all and can simply
apply the same logic to both cases (skip the if isPersistent check).
Updates
The default update interval of all persistent views of an actor system is configurable:
akka.persistence.view.auto-update-interval = 5s
If the await parameter is set to true, messages that follow the Update request are processed when the incre-
mental message replay, triggered by that update request, completed. If set to false (default), messages following
the update request may interleave with the replayed message stream. Automated updates always run with await
= false.
Automated updates of all persistent views of an actor system can be turned off by configuration:
akka.persistence.view.auto-update = off
Implementation classes may override the configured default value by overriding the autoUpdate
method. To limit the number of replayed messages per update request, applications can con-
figure a custom akka.persistence.view.auto-update-replay-max value or override the
autoUpdateReplayMax method. The number of replayed messages for manual updates can be limited with
the replayMax parameter of the Update message.
Recovery
Initial recovery of persistent views works the very same way as for persistent actors (i.e. by sending a
Recover message to self). The maximum number of replayed messages during initial recovery is determined by
autoUpdateReplayMax. Further possibilities to customize initial recovery are explained in section Recovery.
Identifiers
A persistent view must have an identifier that doesn’t change across different actor incarnations. The identifier
must be defined with the viewId method.
The viewId must differ from the referenced persistenceId, unless Snapshots of a view and its persistent
actor should be shared (which is what applications usually do not want).
5.4.5 Snapshots
Snapshots can dramatically reduce recovery times of persistent actors and views. The following discusses snap-
shots in context of persistent actors but this is also applicable to persistent views.
Persistent actor can save snapshots of internal state by calling the saveSnapshot method. If saving
of a snapshot succeeds, the persistent actor receives a SaveSnapshotSuccess message, otherwise a
SaveSnapshotFailure message
private Object state;
During recovery, the persistent actor is offered a previously saved snapshot via a SnapshotOffer message
from which it can initialize internal state.
private Object state;
The replayed messages that follow the SnapshotOffer message, if any, are younger than the offered snapshot.
They finally recover the persistent actor to its current (i.e. latest) state.
In general, a persistent actor is only offered a snapshot if that persistent actor has previously saved one or more
snapshots and at least one of these snapshots matches the SnapshotSelectionCriteria that can be speci-
fied for recovery.
@Override
public Recovery recovery() {
return Recovery.create(
SnapshotSelectionCriteria
.create(457L, System.currentTimeMillis()));
}
Snapshot deletion
A persistent actor can delete individual snapshots by calling the deleteSnapshot method with the sequence
number of when the snapshot was taken.
To bulk-delete a range of snapshots matching SnapshotSelectionCriteria, persistent actors should use
the deleteSnapshots method.
Saving or deleting snapshots can either succeed or fail – this information is reported back to the persistent actor
via status messages as illustrated in the following table.
Method Success Failure message
saveSnapshot(Any) SaveSnapshotSuccess SaveSnapshotFailure
deleteSnapshot(Long) DeleteSnapshotSuccess
DeleteSnapshotFailure
deleteSnapshots(SnapshotSelectionCriteria)
DeleteSnapshotsSuccess
DeleteSnapshotsFailure
To send messages with at-least-once delivery semantics to destinations you can ex-
tend the AbstractPersistentActorWithAtLeastOnceDelivery class instead of
AbstractPersistentActor on the sending side. It takes care of re-sending messages when they
have not been confirmed within a configurable timeout.
The state of the sending actor, including which messages have been sent that have not been confirmed
by the recepient must be persistent so that it can survive a crash of the sending actor or JVM. The
AbstractPersistentActorWithAtLeastOnceDelivery class does not persist anything by itself. It
is your responsibility to persist the intent that a message is sent and that a confirmation has been received.
Note: At-least-once delivery implies that original message send order is not always preserved, and the destination
may receive duplicate messages. Semantics do not match those of a normal ActorRef send operation:
• it is not at-most-once delivery
• message order for the same sender–receiver pair is not preserved due to possible resends
• after a crash and restart of the destination messages are still delivered to the new actor incarnation
These semantics are similar to what an ActorPath represents (see actor-lifecycle-scala), therefore you need
to supply a path and not a reference when delivering messages. The messages are sent to the path with an actor
selection.
Use the deliver method to send a message to a destination. Call the confirmDelivery method when the
destination has replied with a confirmation message.
To send messages to the destination path, use the deliver method after you have persisted the intent to send the
message.
The destination actor must send back a confirmation message. When the sending actor receives this con-
firmation message you should persist the fact that the message was delivered successfully and then call the
confirmDelivery method.
If the persistent actor is not currently recovering, the deliver method will send the message to the destination
actor. When recovering, messages will be buffered until they have been confirmed using confirmDelivery.
Once recovery has completed, if there are outstanding messages that have not been confirmed (during the message
replay), the persistent actor will resend these before sending any other messages.
Deliver requires a deliveryIdToMessage function to pass the provided deliveryId into the message so
that the correlation between deliver and confirmDelivery is possible. The deliveryId must do the
round trip. Upon receipt of the message, the destination actor will send the same‘‘deliveryId‘‘ wrapped in a
confirmation message back to the sender. The sender will then use it to call confirmDelivery method to
complete the delivery routine.
class Msg implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public final long deliveryId;
public final String s;
public MsgSent(String s) {
this.s = s;
}
}
class MsgConfirmed implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public final long deliveryId;
@Override
public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveCommand() {
return ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, s -> {
persist(new MsgSent(s), evt -> updateState(evt));
}).
match(Confirm.class, confirm -> {
persist(new MsgConfirmed(confirm.deliveryId), evt -> updateState(evt));
}).
build();
}
@Override
public PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> receiveRecover() {
return ReceiveBuilder.
match(Object.class, evt -> updateState(evt)).build();
}
}).build()
);
}
}
The deliveryId generated by the persistence module is a strictly monotonically increasing sequence number
without gaps. The same sequence is used for all destinations of the actor, i.e. when sending to multiple destina-
tions the destinations will see gaps in the sequence. It is not possible to use custom deliveryId. However,
you can send a custom correlation identifier in the message to the destination. You must then retain a mapping
between the internal deliveryId (passed into the deliveryIdToMessage function) and your custom cor-
relation id (passed into the message). You can do this by storing such mapping in a Map(correlationId
-> deliveryId) from which you can retrieve the deliveryId to be passed into the confirmDelivery
method once the receiver of your message has replied with your custom correlation id.
The AbstractPersistentActorWithAtLeastOnceDelivery class has a state consisting of uncon-
firmed messages and a sequence number. It does not store this state itself. You must persist events corresponding
to the deliver and confirmDelivery invocations from your PersistentActor so that the state can be
restored by calling the same methods during the recovery phase of the PersistentActor. Sometimes these
events can be derived from other business level events, and sometimes you must create separate events. During re-
covery, calls to deliver will not send out messages, those will be sent later if no matching confirmDelivery
will have been performed.
Support for snapshots is provided by getDeliverySnapshot and setDeliverySnapshot. The
AtLeastOnceDeliverySnapshot contains the full delivery state, including unconfirmed messages.
If you need a custom snapshot for other parts of the actor state you must also include the
AtLeastOnceDeliverySnapshot. It is serialized using protobuf with the ordinary Akka serialization mech-
anism. It is easiest to include the bytes of the AtLeastOnceDeliverySnapshot as a blob in your custom
snapshot.
The interval between redelivery attempts is defined by the redeliverInterval method. The default value can
be configured with the akka.persistence.at-least-once-delivery.redeliver-interval
configuration key. The method can be overridden by implementation classes to return non-default values.
After a number of delivery attempts a AtLeastOnceDelivery.UnconfirmedWarning message will
be sent to self. The re-sending will still continue, but you can choose to call confirmDelivery
to cancel the re-sending. The number of delivery attempts before emitting the warning is defined by the
warnAfterNumberOfUnconfirmedAttempts method. The default value can be configured with the
akka.persistence.at-least-once-delivery.warn-after-number-of-unconfirmed-attempts
configuration key. The method can be overridden by implementation classes to return non-default values.
The AbstractPersistentActorWithAtLeastOnceDelivery class holds messages in mem-
ory until their successful delivery has been confirmed. The maximum number of unconfirmed mes-
sages that the actor is allowed to hold in memory is defined by the maxUnconfirmedMessages
method. If this limit is exceed the deliver method will not accept more messages and it will throw
AtLeastOnceDelivery.MaxUnconfirmedMessagesExceededException. The default value can
be configured with the akka.persistence.at-least-once-delivery.max-unconfirmed-messages
configuration key. The method can be overridden by implementation classes to return non-default values.
In long running projects using event sourcing sometimes the need arises to detach the data model from the domain
model completely.
Event Adapters help in situations where:
• Version Migrations – existing events stored in Version 1 should be “upcasted” to a new Version 2 rep-
resentation, and the process of doing so involves actual code, not just changes on the serialization layer.
For these scenarios the toJournal function is usually an identity function, however the fromJournal
is implemented as v1.Event=>v2.Event, performing the neccessary mapping inside the fromJournal
method. This technique is sometimes refered to as “upcasting” in other CQRS libraries.
• Separating Domain and Data models – thanks to EventAdapters it is possible to completely separate
the domain model from the model used to persist data in the Journals. For example one may want to
use case classes in the domain model, however persist their protocol-buffer (or any other binary serial-
ization format) counter-parts to the Journal. A simple toJournal:MyModel=>MyDataModel and
fromJournal:MyDataModel=>MyModel adapter can be used to implement this feature.
• Journal Specialized Data Types – exposing data types understood by the underlying Journal, for example
for data stores which understand JSON it is possible to write an EventAdapter toJournal:Any=>JSON
such that the Journal can directly store the json instead of serializing the object to its binary representation.
Implementing an EventAdapter is rather stright forward:
class MyEventAdapter implements EventAdapter {
@Override
public String manifest(Object event) {
return ""; // if no manifest needed, return ""
}
@Override
public Object toJournal(Object event) {
return event; // identity
}
@Override
public EventSeq fromJournal(Object event, String manifest) {
return EventSeq.single(event); // identity
}
}
Then in order for it to be used on events coming to and from the journal you must bind it using the below
configuration syntax:
akka.persistence.journal {
inmem {
event-adapters {
tagging = "docs.persistence.MyTaggingEventAdapter"
user-upcasting = "docs.persistence.UserUpcastingEventAdapter"
item-upcasting = "docs.persistence.ItemUpcastingEventAdapter"
}
event-adapter-bindings {
"docs.persistence.Item" = tagging
"docs.persistence.TaggedEvent" = tagging
"docs.persistence.v1.Event" = [user-upcasting, item-upcasting]
}
}
}
It is possible to bind multiple adapters to one class for recovery, in which case the fromJournal methods of all
bound adapters will be applied to a given matching event (in order of definition in the configuration). Since each
adapter may return from 0 to n adapted events (called as EventSeq), each adapter can investigate the event and if
it should indeed adapt it return the adapted event(s) for it. Other adapters which do not have anything to contribute
during this adaptation simply return EventSeq.empty. The adapted events are then delivered in-order to the
PersistentActor during replay.
Note: For more advanced schema evolution techniques refer to the persistence-schema-evolution-scala docu-
mentation.
AbstractPersistentFSM handles the incoming messages in an FSM like fashion. Its internal state is per-
sisted as a sequence of changes, later referred to as domain events. Relationship between incoming messages,
FSM’s states and transitions, persistence of domain events is defined by a DSL.
A Simple Example
To demonstrate the features of the AbstractPersistentFSM, consider an actor which represents a Web store
customer. The contract of our “WebStoreCustomerFSMActor” is that it accepts the following commands:
public static final class AddItem implements Command {
private final Item item;
AddItem sent when the customer adds an item to a shopping cart Buy - when the customer finishes the purchase
Leave - when the customer leaves the store without purchasing anything GetCurrentCart allows to query
the current state of customer’s shopping cart
The customer can be in one of the following states:
enum UserState implements PersistentFSM.FSMState {
LOOKING_AROUND("Looking Around"),
SHOPPING("Shopping"),
INACTIVE("Inactive"),
PAID("Paid");
UserState(String stateIdentifier) {
this.stateIdentifier = stateIdentifier;
}
@Override
public String identifier() {
return stateIdentifier;
}
}
LookingAround customer is browsing the site, but hasn’t added anything to the shopping cart Shopping
customer has recently added items to the shopping cart Inactive customer has items in the shopping cart, but
hasn’t added anything recently Paid customer has purchased the items
Customer’s actions are “recorded” as a sequence of “domain events” which are persisted. Those events are re-
played on actor’s start in order to restore the latest customer’s state:
public static final class ItemAdded implements DomainEvent {
private final Item item;
void empty() {
items.clear();
}
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return String.format("Item{id=%s, name=%s, price=%s}", id, price, name);
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) return true;
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
when(UserState.LOOKING_AROUND,
matchEvent(AddItem.class,
(event, data) ->
goTo(UserState.SHOPPING).applying(new ItemAdded(event.getItem()))
.forMax(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
)
.event(GetCurrentCart.class, (event, data) -> stay().replying(data))
);
when(UserState.SHOPPING,
matchEvent(AddItem.class,
(event, data) ->
stay().applying(new ItemAdded(event.getItem()))
.forMax(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)))
.event(Buy.class,
(event, data) ->
goTo(UserState.PAID).applying(OrderExecuted.INSTANCE)
.andThen(exec(cart -> {
reportActor.tell(new PurchaseWasMade(cart.getItems()), self());
saveStateSnapshot();
})))
.event(Leave.class,
(event, data) ->
stop().applying(OrderDiscarded.INSTANCE)
.andThen(exec(cart -> {
reportActor.tell(ShoppingCardDiscarded.INSTANCE, self());
saveStateSnapshot();
})))
.event(GetCurrentCart.class, (event, data) -> stay().replying(data))
.event(StateTimeout$.class,
(event, data) ->
goTo(UserState.INACTIVE).forMax(Duration.create(2, TimeUnit.SECONDS)))
);
when(UserState.INACTIVE,
matchEvent(AddItem.class,
(event, data) ->
goTo(UserState.SHOPPING).applying(new ItemAdded(event.getItem()))
.forMax(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)))
.event(GetCurrentCart.class, (event, data) -> stay().replying(data))
.event(StateTimeout$.class,
(event, data) ->
stop().applying(OrderDiscarded.INSTANCE)
.andThen(exec(cart ->
reportActor.tell(ShoppingCardDiscarded.INSTANCE, self())
)))
);
when(UserState.PAID,
matchEvent(Leave.class, (event, data) -> stop())
.event(GetCurrentCart.class, (event, data) -> stay().replying(data))
);
Note: State data can only be modified directly on initialization. Later it’s modified only as a result of applying
domain events. Override the applyEvent method to define how state data is affected by domain events, see the
example below
@Override
public ShoppingCart applyEvent(DomainEvent event, ShoppingCart currentData) {
if (event instanceof ItemAdded) {
currentData.addItem(((ItemAdded) event).getItem());
return currentData;
} else if (event instanceof OrderExecuted) {
return currentData;
} else if (event instanceof OrderDiscarded) {
currentData.empty();
return currentData;
}
throw new RuntimeException("Unhandled");
}
andThen can be used to define actions which will be executed following event’s persistence - convenient for
“side effects” like sending a message or logging. Notice that actions defined in andThen block are not executed
on recovery:
(event, data) ->
goTo(UserState.PAID).applying(OrderExecuted.INSTANCE)
.andThen(exec(cart -> {
reportActor.tell(new PurchaseWasMade(cart.getItems()), self());
})))
On recovery state data is initialized according to the latest available snapshot, then the remaining domain events
are replayed, triggering the applyEvent method.
Storage backends for journals and snapshot stores are pluggable in the Akka persistence extension.
A directory of persistence journal and snapshot store plugins is available at the Akka Community Projects page,
see Community plugins
Plugins can be selected either by “default”, for all persistent actors and views, or “individually”, when persistent
actor or view defines its own set of plugins.
When persistent actor or view does NOT override journalPluginId and snapshotPluginId methods,
persistence extension will use “default” journal and snapshot-store plugins configured in the reference.conf:
akka.persistence.journal.plugin = ""
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin = ""
However, these entries are provided as empty “”, and require explicit user configuration via override in the user
application.conf. For an example of journal plugin which writes messages to LevelDB see Local LevelDB
journal. For an example of snapshot store plugin which writes snapshots as individual files to the local filesystem
see Local snapshot store.
Applications can provide their own plugins by implementing a plugin API and activate them by configuration.
Plugin development requires the following imports:
import akka.dispatch.Futures;
import akka.persistence.*;
import akka.persistence.journal.japi.*;
import akka.persistence.snapshot.japi.*;
By default, persistence plugins are started on-demand, as they are used. In some case, however, it
might be beneficial to start a certain plugin eagerly. In order to do that, you should first add the
akka.persistence.Persistence under the akka.extensions key. Then, specify the IDs of plug-
ins you wish to start automatically under akka.persistence.journal.auto-start-journals and
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.auto-start-snapshot-stores.
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: synchronously deletes all persistent messages up to
* ‘toSequenceNr‘.
*
* This call is protected with a circuit-breaker.
*
* @see AsyncRecoveryPlugin
*/
Future<Void> doAsyncDeleteMessagesTo(String persistenceId, long toSequenceNr);
If the storage backend API only supports synchronous, blocking writes, the methods should be implemented as:
@Override
public Future<Iterable<Optional<Exception>>> doAsyncWriteMessages(
Iterable<AtomicWrite> messages) {
try {
Iterable<Optional<Exception>> result = new ArrayList<Optional<Exception>>();
// blocking call here...
// result.add(..)
return Futures.successful(result);
} catch (Exception e) {
return Futures.failed(e);
}
}
A journal plugin must also implement the methods defined in AsyncRecovery for replays and sequence number
recovery:
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously replays persistent messages.
* Implementations replay a message by calling ‘replayCallback‘. The returned
* future must be completed when all messages (matching the sequence number
* bounds) have been replayed. The future must be completed with a failure if
* any of the persistent messages could not be replayed.
*
* The ‘replayCallback‘ must also be called with messages that have been
* marked as deleted. In this case a replayed message’s ‘deleted‘ method must
* return ‘true‘.
*
* The ‘toSequenceNr‘ is the lowest of what was returned by
* {@link #doAsyncReadHighestSequenceNr} and what the user specified as
* recovery {@link akka.persistence.Recovery} parameter.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param fromSequenceNr
* sequence number where replay should start (inclusive).
* @param toSequenceNr
* sequence number where replay should end (inclusive).
* @param max
* maximum number of messages to be replayed.
* @param replayCallback
* called to replay a single message. Can be called from any thread.
*/
Future<Void> doAsyncReplayMessages(String persistenceId, long fromSequenceNr,
long toSequenceNr, long max, Consumer<PersistentRepr> replayCallback);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously reads the highest stored sequence
* number for the given ‘persistenceId‘. The persistent actor will use the
* highest sequence number after recovery as the starting point when
* persisting new events. This sequence number is also used as ‘toSequenceNr‘
* in subsequent call to [[#asyncReplayMessages]] unless the user has
* specified a lower ‘toSequenceNr‘.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param fromSequenceNr
* hint where to start searching for the highest sequence number.
*/
Future<Long> doAsyncReadHighestSequenceNr(String persistenceId, long fromSequenceNr);
The journal plugin instance is an actor so the methods corresponding to requests from persistent actors are exe-
cuted sequentially. It may delegate to asynchronous libraries, spawn futures, or delegate to other actors to achive
parallelism.
The journal plugin class must have a constructor with one of these signatures:
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter and a String parameter for the
config path
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter
• constructor without parameters
The plugin section of the actor system’s config will be passed in the config constructor parameter. The config path
of the plugin is passed in the String parameter.
The plugin-dispatcher is the dispatcher used for the plugin actor. If not specified, it defaults to
akka.persistence.dispatchers.default-plugin-dispatcher.
Don’t run journal tasks/futures on the system default dispatcher, since that might starve other tasks.
A snapshot store plugin must extend the SnapshotStore actor and implement the following methods:
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously loads a snapshot.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param criteria
* selection criteria for loading.
* /
Future<Optional<SelectedSnapshot>> doLoadAsync(String persistenceId,
SnapshotSelectionCriteria criteria);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: asynchronously saves a snapshot.
*
* @param metadata
* snapshot metadata.
* @param snapshot
* snapshot.
*/
Future<Void> doSaveAsync(SnapshotMetadata metadata, Object snapshot);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: deletes the snapshot identified by ‘metadata‘.
*
* @param metadata
* snapshot metadata.
* /
Future<Void> doDeleteAsync(SnapshotMetadata metadata);
/**
* Java API, Plugin API: deletes all snapshots matching ‘criteria‘.
*
* @param persistenceId
* id of the persistent actor.
* @param criteria
* selection criteria for deleting.
*/
Future<Void> doDeleteAsync(String persistenceId, SnapshotSelectionCriteria criteria);
A snapshot store plugin can be activated with the following minimal configuration:
# Path to the snapshot store plugin to be used
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin = "my-snapshot-store"
The snapshot store instance is an actor so the methods corresponding to requests from persistent actors are exe-
cuted sequentially. It may delegate to asynchronous libraries, spawn futures, or delegate to other actors to achive
parallelism.
The snapshot store plugin class must have a constructor with one of these signatures:
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter and a String parameter for the
config path
• constructor with one com.typesafe.config.Config parameter
• constructor without parameters
The plugin section of the actor system’s config will be passed in the config constructor parameter. The config path
of the plugin is passed in the String parameter.
The plugin-dispatcher is the dispatcher used for the plugin actor. If not specified, it defaults to
akka.persistence.dispatchers.default-plugin-dispatcher.
Don’t run snapshot store tasks/futures on the system default dispatcher, since that might starve other tasks.
LevelDB based plugins will also require the following additional dependency declaration:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.iq80.leveldb</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldb</artifactId>
<version>0.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.fusesource.leveldbjni</groupId>
<artifactId>leveldbjni-all</artifactId>
<version>1.8</version>
</dependency>
The default location of LevelDB files is a directory named journal in the current working directory. This
location can be changed by configuration where the specified path can be relative or absolute:
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb.dir = "target/journal"
With this plugin, each actor system runs its own private LevelDB instance.
A LevelDB instance can also be shared by multiple actor systems (on the same or on different nodes). This, for
example, allows persistent actors to failover to a backup node and continue using the shared journal instance from
the backup node.
Warning: A shared LevelDB instance is a single point of failure and should therefore only be used for testing
purposes. Highly-available, replicated journals are available as Community plugins.
By default, the shared instance writes journaled messages to a local directory named journal in the current
working directory. The storage location can be changed by configuration:
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared.store.dir = "target/shared"
Actor systems that use a shared LevelDB store must activate the akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared
plugin.
akka.persistence.journal.plugin = "akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared"
This plugin must be initialized by injecting the (remote) SharedLeveldbStore actor reference. Injection is
done by calling the SharedLeveldbJournal.setStore method with the actor reference as argument.
class SharedStorageUsage extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public void preStart() throws Exception {
String path = "akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/store";
ActorSelection selection = getContext().actorSelection(path);
selection.tell(new Identify(1), getSelf());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message instanceof ActorIdentity) {
ActorIdentity identity = (ActorIdentity) message;
if (identity.correlationId().equals(1)) {
ActorRef store = identity.getRef();
if (store != null) {
SharedLeveldbJournal.setStore(store, getContext().system());
}
}
}
}
}
Internal journal commands (sent by persistent actors) are buffered until injection completes. Injection is idempo-
tent i.e. only the first injection is used.
The default storage location is a directory named snapshots in the current working directory. This can be
changed by configuration where the specified path can be relative or absolute:
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.local.dir = "target/snapshots"
Note that it is not mandatory to specify a snapshot store plugin. If you don’t use snapshots you don’t have to
configure it.
A persistence plugin proxy allows sharing of journals and snapshot stores across multiple actor systems (on the
same or on different nodes). This, for example, allows persistent actors to failover to a backup node and continue
using the shared journal instance from the backup node. The proxy works by forwarding all the journal/snapshot
store messages to a single, shared, persistence plugin instance, and therefor supports any use case supported by
the proxied plugin.
Warning: A shared journal/snapshot store is a single point of failure and should therefore only be used for
testing purposes. Highly-available, replicated persistence plugins are available as Community plugins.
The journal and snapshot store proxies are controlled via the akka.persistence.journal.proxy
and akka.persistence.snapshot-store.proxy configuration entries, respectively. Set the
target-journal-plugin or target-snapshot-store-plugin keys to the underlying plugin you
wish to use (for example: akka.persistence.journal.leveldb). The start-target-journal
and start-target-snapshot-store keys should be set to on in exactly one actor system -
this is the system that will instantiate the shared persistence plugin. Next, the proxy needs to be
told how to find the shared plugin. This can be done by setting the target-journal-address
and target-snapshot-store-address configuration keys, or programmatically by calling the
PersistencePluginProxy.setTargetLocation method.
Note: Akka starts extensions lazily when they are required, and this includes the proxy. This means
that in order for the proxy to work, the persistence plugin on the target node must be instantiated. This
can be done by instantiating the PersistencePluginProxyExtension extension, or by calling the
PersistencePluginProxy.start method.
Note: The proxied persistence plugin can (and should) be configured using its original configuration keys.
Serialization of snapshots and payloads of Persistent messages is configurable with Akka’s Serialization
infrastructure. For example, if an application wants to serialize
• payloads of type MyPayload with a custom MyPayloadSerializer and
• snapshots of type MySnapshot with a custom MySnapshotSerializer
it must add
akka.actor {
serializers {
my-payload = "docs.persistence.MyPayloadSerializer"
my-snapshot = "docs.persistence.MySnapshotSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"docs.persistence.MyPayload" = my-payload
"docs.persistence.MySnapshot" = my-snapshot
}
}
5.4.12 Testing
When running tests with LevelDB default settings in sbt, make sure to set fork := true in your sbt project.
Otherwise, you’ll see an UnsatisfiedLinkError. Alternatively, you can switch to a LevelDB Java port by
setting
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb.native = off
or
akka.persistence.journal.leveldb-shared.store.native = off
in your Akka configuration. The LevelDB Java port is for testing purposes only.
Warning: It is not possible to test persistence provided classes (i.e. PersistentActor and AtLeastOnceDelivery)
using TestActorRef due to its synchronous nature. These traits need to be able to perform asynchronous
tasks in the background in order to handle internal persistence related events.
When testing Persistence based projects always rely on asynchronous messaging using the TestKit.
By default, a persistent actor or view will use “default” journal and snapshot store plugins configured in the
following sections of the reference.conf configuration resource:
# Absolute path to the default journal plugin configuration entry.
akka.persistence.journal.plugin = "akka.persistence.journal.inmem"
# Absolute path to the default snapshot store plugin configuration entry.
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin = "akka.persistence.snapshot-store.local"
Note that in this case the actor or view overrides only persistenceId method:
abstract class ActorWithDefaultPlugins extends UntypedPersistentActor {
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "123"; }
}
When a persistent actor or view overrides journalPluginId and snapshotPluginId methods, the actor
or view will be serviced by these specific persistence plugins instead of the defaults:
abstract class ActorWithOverridePlugins extends UntypedPersistentActor {
@Override
public String persistenceId() { return "123"; }
// Absolute path to the journal plugin configuration entry in the ‘reference.conf‘
@Override
public String journalPluginId() { return "akka.persistence.chronicle.journal"; }
// Absolute path to the snapshot store plugin configuration entry in the ‘reference.conf‘
@Override
public String snapshotPluginId() { return "akka.persistence.chronicle.snapshot-store"; }
}
akka.persistence.chronicle.snapshot-store {
# Standard persistence extension property: provider FQCN.
class = "akka.persistence.chronicle.ChronicleSnapshotStore"
# Custom setting specific for the snapshot store ‘ChronicleSnapshotStore‘.
folder = $${user.dir}/store/snapshot
}
SIX
6.1 Futures
6.1.1 Introduction
In the Scala Standard Library, a Future is a data structure used to retrieve the result of some concurrent operation.
This result can be accessed synchronously (blocking) or asynchronously (non-blocking). To be able to use this
from Java, Akka provides a java friendly interface in akka.dispatch.Futures.
See also Actors (Java with Lambda Support) for Java compatibility.
In order to execute callbacks and operations, Futures need something called an ExecutionContext, which
is very similar to a java.util.concurrent.Executor. if you have an ActorSystem in scope, it will
use its default dispatcher as the ExecutionContext, or you can use the factory methods provided by the
ExecutionContexts class to wrap Executors and ExecutorServices, or even create your own.
import akka.dispatch.*;
import docs.AbstractJavaTest;
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import scala.concurrent.Promise;
import akka.util.Timeout;
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext;
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext$;
ExecutionContext ec =
ExecutionContexts.fromExecutorService(yourExecutorServiceGoesHere);
// Then you shut down the ExecutorService at the end of your application.
yourExecutorServiceGoesHere.shutdown();
There are generally two ways of getting a reply from an UntypedActor: the first is by a sent message
(actorRef.tell(msg, sender)), which only works if the original sender was an UntypedActor) and
the second is through a Future.
Using the ActorRef‘s ask method to send a message will return a Future. To wait for and retrieve the actual
result the simplest method is:
330
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
import akka.dispatch.*;
import docs.AbstractJavaTest;
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import scala.concurrent.Promise;
import akka.util.Timeout;
This will cause the current thread to block and wait for the UntypedActor to ‘complete’ the Future with it’s
reply. Blocking is discouraged though as it can cause performance problem. The blocking operations are located
in Await.result and Await.ready to make it easy to spot where blocking occurs. Alternatives to blocking
are discussed further within this documentation. Also note that the Future returned by an UntypedActor is a
Future<Object> since an UntypedActor is dynamic. That is why the cast to String is used in the above
sample.
Warning: Await.result and Await.ready are provided for exceptional situations where you must
block, a good rule of thumb is to only use them if you know why you must block. For all other cases, use
asynchronous composition as described below.
To send the result of a Future to an Actor, you can use the pipe construct:
akka.pattern.Patterns.pipe(future, system.dispatcher()).to(actor);
A common use case within Akka is to have some computation performed concurrently without needing the extra
utility of an UntypedActor. If you find yourself creating a pool of UntypedActors for the sole reason of
performing a calculation in parallel, there is an easier (and faster) way:
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.japi.Function;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import static akka.dispatch.Futures.future;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
In the above code the block passed to future will be executed by the default Dispatcher, with the return
value of the block used to complete the Future (in this case, the result would be the string: “HelloWorld”).
Unlike a Future that is returned from an UntypedActor, this Future is properly typed, and we also avoid
the overhead of managing an UntypedActor.
You can also create already completed Futures using the Futures class, which can be either successes:
Future<String> future = Futures.successful("Yay!");
Or failures:
Future<String> otherFuture = Futures.failed(
new IllegalArgumentException("Bang!"));
It is also possible to create an empty Promise, to be filled later, and obtain the corresponding Future:
Promise<String> promise = Futures.promise();
Future<String> theFuture = promise.future();
promise.success("hello");
Scala’s Future has several monadic methods that are very similar to the ones used by Scala‘s collections.
These allow you to create ‘pipelines’ or ‘streams’ that the result will travel through.
Future is a Monad
The first method for working with Future functionally is map. This method takes a Mapper which performs
some operation on the result of the Future, and returning a new result. The return value of the map method is
another Future that will contain the new result:
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.japi.Function;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import static akka.dispatch.Futures.future;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
In this example we are joining two strings together within a Future. Instead of waiting for f1 to complete, we
apply our function that calculates the length of the string using the map method. Now we have a second Future,
f2, that will eventually contain an Integer. When our original Future, f1, completes, it will also apply our
function and complete the second Future with its result. When we finally get the result, it will contain the
number 10. Our original Future still contains the string “HelloWorld” and is unaffected by the map.
Something to note when using these methods: passed work is always dispatched on the provided
ExecutionContext. Even if the Future has already been completed, when one of these methods is called.
Composing Futures
It is very often desirable to be able to combine different Futures with each other, below are some examples on how
that can be done in a non-blocking fashion.
Same as with fold, the execution will be started when the last of the Futures is completed, you can also parallelize
it by chunking your futures into sub-sequences and reduce them, and then reduce the reduced results again.
This is just a sample of what can be done.
6.1.6 Callbacks
Sometimes you just want to listen to a Future being completed, and react to that not by creating a new Future,
but by side-effecting. For this Scala supports onComplete, onSuccess and onFailure, of which the last
two are specializations of the first.
final ExecutionContext ec = system.dispatcher();
future.onSuccess(new OnSuccess<String>() {
public void onSuccess(String result) {
if ("bar" == result) {
//Do something if it resulted in "bar"
} else {
//Do something if it was some other String
}
}
}, ec);
future.onFailure(new OnFailure() {
public void onFailure(Throwable failure) {
if (failure instanceof IllegalStateException) {
//Do something if it was this particular failure
} else {
//Do something if it was some other failure
}
}
}, ec);
future.onComplete(new OnComplete<String>() {
public void onComplete(Throwable failure, String result) {
if (failure != null) {
//We got a failure, handle it here
} else {
// We got a result, do something with it
}
}
}, ec);
6.1.7 Ordering
Since callbacks are executed in any order and potentially in parallel, it can be tricky at the times when you need
sequential ordering of operations. But there’s a solution! And it’s name is andThen, and it creates a new Future
with the specified callback, a Future that will have the same result as the Future it’s called on, which allows
for ordering like in the following sample:
final ExecutionContext ec = system.dispatcher();
Future<String> future1 = Futures.successful("value").andThen(
new OnComplete<String>() {
public void onComplete(Throwable failure, String result) {
if (failure != null)
sendToIssueTracker(failure);
}
}, ec).andThen(new OnComplete<String>() {
public void onComplete(Throwable failure, String result) {
if (result != null)
sendToTheInternetz(result);
}
}, ec);
Future fallbackTo combines 2 Futures into a new Future, and will hold the successful value of the second
Future if the first Future fails.
Future<String> future1 = Futures.failed(new IllegalStateException("OHNOES1"));
Future<String> future2 = Futures.failed(new IllegalStateException("OHNOES2"));
Future<String> future3 = Futures.successful("bar");
// Will have "bar" in this case
Future<String> future4 = future1.fallbackTo(future2).fallbackTo(future3);
future4.onSuccess(new PrintResult<String>(), system.dispatcher());
You can also combine two Futures into a new Future that will hold a tuple of the two Futures successful results,
using the zip operation.
final ExecutionContext ec = system.dispatcher();
Future<String> future1 = Futures.successful("foo");
Future<String> future2 = Futures.successful("bar");
Future<String> future3 = future1.zip(future2).map(
new Mapper<scala.Tuple2<String, String>, String>() {
public String apply(scala.Tuple2<String, String> zipped) {
6.1.9 Exceptions
Since the result of a Future is created concurrently to the rest of the program, exceptions must be handled dif-
ferently. It doesn’t matter if an UntypedActor or the dispatcher is completing the Future, if an Exception
is caught the Future will contain it instead of a valid result. If a Future does contain an Exception, calling
Await.result will cause it to be thrown again so it can be handled properly.
It is also possible to handle an Exception by returning a different result. This is done with the recover
method. For example:
final ExecutionContext ec = system.dispatcher();
6.1.10 After
6.2 Agents
Agents can be dereferenced (you can get an Agent’s value) by invoking the Agent with get() like this:
Integer result = agent.get();
Reading an Agent’s current value does not involve any message passing and happens immediately. So while
updates to an Agent are asynchronous, reading the state of an Agent is synchronous.
You can also get a Future to the Agents value, that will be completed after the currently queued updates have
completed:
import scala.concurrent.Future;
Future<Integer> future = agent.future();
You update an Agent by sending a function (akka.dispatch.Mapper) that transforms the current value or
by sending just a new value. The Agent will apply the new value or function atomically and asynchronously. The
update is done in a fire-forget manner and you are only guaranteed that it will be applied. There is no guarantee
of when the update will be applied but dispatches to an Agent from a single thread will occur in order. You apply
a value or a function by invoking the send function.
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
// send a value, enqueues this change
// of the value of the Agent
agent.send(7);
You can also dispatch a function to update the internal state but on its own thread. This does not use the reactive
thread pool and can be used for long-running or blocking operations. You do this with the sendOff method.
Dispatches using either sendOff or send will still be executed in order.
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
// sendOff a function
agent.sendOff(longRunningOrBlockingFunction,
theExecutionContextToExecuteItIn);
All send methods also have a corresponding alter method that returns a Future. See Futures for more
information on Futures.
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
// alter a value
Future<Integer> f1 = agent.alter(7);
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
// alterOff a function (Mapper)
Future<Integer> f3 = agent.alterOff(longRunningOrBlockingFunction,
theExecutionContextToExecuteItIn);
6.2.4 Configuration
There are several configuration properties for the agents module, please refer to the reference configuration.
SEVEN
NETWORKING
7.1.1 Intro
Akka Cluster provides a fault-tolerant decentralized peer-to-peer based cluster membership service with no single
point of failure or single point of bottleneck. It does this using gossip protocols and an automatic failure detector.
7.1.2 Terms
node A logical member of a cluster. There could be multiple nodes on a physical machine. Defined by a host-
name:port:uid tuple.
cluster A set of nodes joined together through the membership service.
leader A single node in the cluster that acts as the leader. Managing cluster convergence and membership state
transitions.
7.1.3 Membership
A cluster is made up of a set of member nodes. The identifier for each node is a hostname:port:uid tuple.
An Akka application can be distributed over a cluster with each node hosting some part of the application. Cluster
membership and the actors running on that node of the application are decoupled. A node could be a member of
a cluster without hosting any actors. Joining a cluster is initiated by issuing a Join command to one of the nodes
in the cluster to join.
The node identifier internally also contains a UID that uniquely identifies this actor system instance at that
hostname:port. Akka uses the UID to be able to reliably trigger remote death watch. This means that
the same actor system can never join a cluster again once it’s been removed from that cluster. To re-join an actor
system with the same hostname:port to a cluster you have to stop the actor system and start a new one with
the same hostname:port which will then receive a different UID.
The cluster membership state is a specialized CRDT, which means that it has a monotonic merge function. When
concurrent changes occur on different nodes the updates can always be merged and converge to the same end
result.
340
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Gossip
The cluster membership used in Akka is based on Amazon’s Dynamo system and particularly the approach taken
in Basho’s‘ Riak distributed database. Cluster membership is communicated using a Gossip Protocol, where the
current state of the cluster is gossiped randomly through the cluster, with preference to members that have not
seen the latest version.
Vector Clocks
Vector clocks are a type of data structure and algorithm for generating a partial ordering of events in a distributed
system and detecting causality violations.
We use vector clocks to reconcile and merge differences in cluster state during gossiping. A vector clock is a set
of (node, counter) pairs. Each update to the cluster state has an accompanying update to the vector clock.
Gossip Convergence
Information about the cluster converges locally at a node at certain points in time. This is when a node can
prove that the cluster state he is observing has been observed by all other nodes in the cluster. Convergence is
implemented by passing a set of nodes that have seen current state version during gossip. This information is
referred to as the seen set in the gossip overview. When all nodes are included in the seen set there is convergence.
Gossip convergence cannot occur while any nodes are unreachable. The nodes need to become reachable
again, or moved to the down and removed states (see the Membership Lifecycle section below). This only
blocks the leader from performing its cluster membership management and does not influence the application
running on top of the cluster. For example this means that during a network partition it is not possible to add more
nodes to the cluster. The nodes can join, but they will not be moved to the up state until the partition has healed
or the unreachable nodes have been downed.
Failure Detector
The failure detector is responsible for trying to detect if a node is unreachable from the rest of the cluster. For
this we are using an implementation of The Phi Accrual Failure Detector by Hayashibara et al.
An accrual failure detector decouple monitoring and interpretation. That makes them applicable to a wider area
of scenarios and more adequate to build generic failure detection services. The idea is that it is keeping a history
of failure statistics, calculated from heartbeats received from other nodes, and is trying to do educated guesses by
taking multiple factors, and how they accumulate over time, into account in order to come up with a better guess
if a specific node is up or down. Rather than just answering “yes” or “no” to the question “is the node down?” it
returns a phi value representing the likelihood that the node is down.
The threshold that is the basis for the calculation is configurable by the user. A low threshold is prone
to generate many wrong suspicions but ensures a quick detection in the event of a real crash. Conversely, a high
threshold generates fewer mistakes but needs more time to detect actual crashes. The default threshold is
8 and is appropriate for most situations. However in cloud environments, such as Amazon EC2, the value could
be increased to 12 in order to account for network issues that sometimes occur on such platforms.
In a cluster each node is monitored by a few (default maximum 5) other nodes, and when any of these detects the
node as unreachable that information will spread to the rest of the cluster through the gossip. In other words,
only one node needs to mark a node unreachable to have the rest of the cluster mark that node unreachable.
The nodes to monitor are picked out of neighbors in a hashed ordered node ring. This is to increase the likelihood
to monitor across racks and data centers, but the order is the same on all nodes, which ensures full coverage.
Heartbeats are sent out every second and every heartbeat is performed in a request/reply handshake with the replies
used as input to the failure detector.
The failure detector will also detect if the node becomes reachable again. When all nodes that monitored the
unreachable node detects it as reachable again the cluster, after gossip dissemination, will consider it as
reachable.
If system messages cannot be delivered to a node it will be quarantined and then it cannot come back from
unreachable. This can happen if the there are too many unacknowledged system messages (e.g. watch,
Terminated, remote actor deployment, failures of actors supervised by remote parent). Then the node needs to be
moved to the down or removed states (see the Membership Lifecycle section below) and the actor system must
be restarted before it can join the cluster again.
Leader
After gossip convergence a leader for the cluster can be determined. There is no leader election process,
the leader can always be recognised deterministically by any node whenever there is gossip convergence. The
leader is just a role, any node can be the leader and it can change between convergence rounds. The leader
is simply the first node in sorted order that is able to take the leadership role, where the preferred member states
for a leader are up and leaving (see the Membership Lifecycle section below for more information about
member states).
The role of the leader is to shift members in and out of the cluster, changing joining members to the up
state or exiting members to the removed state. Currently leader actions are only triggered by receiving a
new cluster state with gossip convergence.
The leader also has the power, if configured so, to “auto-down” a node that according to the Failure Detector
is considered unreachable. This means setting the unreachable node status to down automatically after a
configured time of unreachability.
Seed Nodes
The seed nodes are configured contact points for new nodes joining the cluster. When a new node is started it
sends a message to all seed nodes and then sends a join command to the seed node that answers first.
The seed nodes configuration value does not have any influence on the running cluster itself, it is only relevant for
new nodes joining the cluster as it helps them to find contact points to send the join command to; a new member
can send this command to any current member of the cluster, not only to the seed nodes.
Gossip Protocol
A variation of push-pull gossip is used to reduce the amount of gossip information sent around the cluster. In
push-pull gossip a digest is sent representing current versions but not actual values; the recipient of the gossip
can then send back any values for which it has newer versions and also request values for which it has outdated
versions. Akka uses a single shared state with a vector clock for versioning, so the variant of push-pull gossip
used in Akka makes use of this version to only push the actual state as needed.
Periodically, the default is every 1 second, each node chooses another random node to initiate a round of gossip
with. If less than ½ of the nodes resides in the seen set (have seen the new state) then the cluster gossips 3 times
instead of once every second. This adjusted gossip interval is a way to speed up the convergence process in the
early dissemination phase after a state change.
The choice of node to gossip with is random but it is biased to towards nodes that might not have seen the
current state version. During each round of gossip exchange when no convergence it uses a probability of 0.8
(configurable) to gossip to a node not part of the seen set, i.e. that probably has an older version of the state.
Otherwise gossip to any random live node.
This biased selection is a way to speed up the convergence process in the late dissemination phase after a state
change.
For clusters larger than 400 nodes (configurable, and suggested by empirical evidence) the 0.8 probability is
gradually reduced to avoid overwhelming single stragglers with too many concurrent gossip requests. The gossip
receiver also has a mechanism to protect itself from too many simultaneous gossip messages by dropping messages
that have been enqueued in the mailbox for too long time.
While the cluster is in a converged state the gossiper only sends a small gossip status message containing the
gossip version to the chosen node. As soon as there is a change to the cluster (meaning non-convergence) then it
goes back to biased gossip again.
The recipient of the gossip state or the gossip status can use the gossip version (vector clock) to determine whether:
1. it has a newer version of the gossip state, in which case it sends that back to the gossiper
2. it has an outdated version of the state, in which case the recipient requests the current state from the gossiper
by sending back its version of the gossip state
3. it has conflicting gossip versions, in which case the different versions are merged and sent back
If the recipient and the gossip have the same version then the gossip state is not sent or requested.
The periodic nature of the gossip has a nice batching effect of state changes, e.g. joining several nodes quickly
after each other to one node will result in only one state change to be spread to other members in the cluster.
The gossip messages are serialized with protobuf and also gzipped to reduce payload size.
Membership Lifecycle
A node begins in the joining state. Once all nodes have seen that the new node is joining (through gossip
convergence) the leader will set the member state to up.
If a node is leaving the cluster in a safe, expected manner then it switches to the leaving state. Once the leader
sees the convergence on the node in the leaving state, the leader will then move it to exiting. Once all
nodes have seen the exiting state (convergence) the leader will remove the node from the cluster, marking it as
removed.
If a node is unreachable then gossip convergence is not possible and therefore any leader actions are also
not possible (for instance, allowing a node to become a part of the cluster). To be able to move forward the state
of the unreachable nodes must be changed. It must become reachable again or marked as down. If the
node is to join the cluster again the actor system must be restarted and go through the joining process again. The
cluster can, through the leader, also auto-down a node after a configured time of unreachability. If new incarnation
of unreachable node tries to rejoin the cluster old incarnation will be marked as down and new incarnation can
rejoin the cluster without manual intervention.
Note: If you have auto-down enabled and the failure detector triggers, you can over time end up with a lot of
single node clusters if you don’t put measures in place to shut down nodes that have become unreachable.
This follows from the fact that the unreachable node will likely see the rest of the cluster as unreachable,
become its own leader and form its own cluster.
As mentioned before, if a node is unreachable then gossip convergence is not possible and therefore any
leader actions are also not possible. By enabling akka.cluster.allow-weakly-up-members it is
possible to let new joining nodes be promoted while convergence is not yet reached. These Joining nodes will
be promoted as WeaklyUp. Once gossip convergence is reached, the leader will move WeaklyUp members to
Up.
Note that members on the other side of a network partition have no knowledge about the existence of the new
members. You should for example not count WeaklyUp members in quorum decisions.
Member States
User Actions
• join join a single node to a cluster - can be explicit or automatic on startup if a node to join have been
specified in the configuration
• leave tell a node to leave the cluster gracefully
• down mark a node as down
Leader Actions
• fd* the failure detector of one of the monitoring nodes has triggered causing the monitored node to be
marked as unreachable
• unreachable* unreachable is not a real member states but more of a flag in addition to the state signaling
that the cluster is unable to talk to this node, after being unreachable the failure detector may detect it
as reachable again and thereby remove the flag
For introduction to the Akka Cluster concepts please see Cluster Specification.
The Akka cluster is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-cluster_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
The following configuration enables the Cluster extension to be used. It joins the cluster and an actor subscribes
to cluster membership events and logs them.
The application.conf configuration looks like this:
akka {
actor {
provider = "cluster"
}
remote {
log-remote-lifecycle-events = off
netty.tcp {
hostname = "127.0.0.1"
port = 0
}
}
cluster {
seed-nodes = [
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2551",
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552"]
To enable cluster capabilities in your Akka project you should, at a minimum, add the Remoting settings, but with
cluster. The akka.cluster.seed-nodes should normally also be added to your application.conf
file.
Note: If you are running Akka in a Docker container or the nodes for some other reason have separate internal
and external ip addresses you must configure remoting according to Akka behind NAT or in a Docker container
The seed nodes are configured contact points for initial, automatic, join of the cluster.
Note that if you are going to start the nodes on different machines you need to specify the ip-addresses or host
names of the machines in application.conf instead of 127.0.0.1
An actor that uses the cluster extension may look like this:
package sample.cluster.simple;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.cluster.Cluster;
import akka.cluster.ClusterEvent;
import akka.cluster.ClusterEvent.MemberEvent;
import akka.cluster.ClusterEvent.MemberUp;
import akka.cluster.ClusterEvent.MemberRemoved;
import akka.cluster.ClusterEvent.UnreachableMember;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof MemberUp) {
MemberUp mUp = (MemberUp) message;
log.info("Member is Up: {}", mUp.member());
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
The actor registers itself as subscriber of certain cluster events. It receives events corresponding to the current
state of the cluster when the subscription starts and then it receives events for changes that happen in the cluster.
The easiest way to run this example yourself is to download Lightbend Activator and open the tutorial named
Akka Cluster Samples with Java. It contains instructions of how to run the SimpleClusterApp.
You may decide if joining to the cluster should be done manually or automatically to configured initial contact
points, so-called seed nodes. When a new node is started it sends a message to all seed nodes and then sends join
command to the one that answers first. If no one of the seed nodes replied (might not be started yet) it retries this
procedure until successful or shutdown.
You define the seed nodes in the Configuration file (application.conf):
akka.cluster.seed-nodes = [
"akka.tcp://ClusterSystem@host1:2552",
"akka.tcp://ClusterSystem@host2:2552"]
This can also be defined as Java system properties when starting the JVM using the following syntax:
-Dakka.cluster.seed-nodes.0=akka.tcp://ClusterSystem@host1:2552
-Dakka.cluster.seed-nodes.1=akka.tcp://ClusterSystem@host2:2552
The seed nodes can be started in any order and it is not necessary to have all seed nodes running, but the node
configured as the first element in the seed-nodes configuration list must be started when initially starting a
cluster, otherwise the other seed-nodes will not become initialized and no other node can join the cluster. The
reason for the special first seed node is to avoid forming separated islands when starting from an empty cluster. It
is quickest to start all configured seed nodes at the same time (order doesn’t matter), otherwise it can take up to
the configured seed-node-timeout until the nodes can join.
Once more than two seed nodes have been started it is no problem to shut down the first seed node. If the first
seed node is restarted, it will first try to join the other seed nodes in the existing cluster.
If you don’t configure seed nodes you need to join the cluster programmatically or manually.
Manual joining can be performed by using JMX or Command Line Management. Joining programmatically can be
performed with Cluster.get(system).join. Unsuccessful join attempts are automatically retried after the
time period defined in configuration property retry-unsuccessful-join-after. Retries can be disabled
by setting the property to off.
You can join to any node in the cluster. It does not have to be configured as a seed node. Note that you can only
join to an existing cluster member, which means that for bootstrapping some node must join itself,and then the
following nodes could join them to make up a cluster.
You may also use Cluster.get(system).joinSeedNodes to join programmatically, which is attrac-
tive when dynamically discovering other nodes at startup by using some external tool or API. When using
joinSeedNodes you should not include the node itself except for the node that is supposed to be the first
seed node, and that should be placed first in parameter to joinSeedNodes.
Unsuccessful attempts to contact seed nodes are automatically retried after the time period defined in configuration
property seed-node-timeout. Unsuccessful attempt to join a specific seed node is automatically retried after
the configured retry-unsuccessful-join-after. Retrying means that it tries to contact all seed nodes
and then joins the node that answers first. The first node in the list of seed nodes will join itself if it cannot contact
any of the other seed nodes within the configured seed-node-timeout.
An actor system can only join a cluster once. Additional attempts will be ignored. When it has successfully joined
it must be restarted to be able to join another cluster or to join the same cluster again. It can use the same host
name and port after the restart, when it come up as new incarnation of existing member in the cluster, trying to
join in, then the existing one will be removed from the cluster and then it will be allowed to join.
Note: The name of the ActorSystem must be the same for all members of a cluster. The name is given when
you start the ActorSystem.
7.2.4 Downing
When a member is considered by the failure detector to be unreachable the leader is not allowed to perform its
duties, such as changing status of new joining members to ‘Up’. The node must first become reachable again, or
the status of the unreachable member must be changed to ‘Down’. Changing status to ‘Down’ can be performed
automatically or manually. By default it must be done manually, using JMX or Command Line Management.
It can also be performed programmatically with Cluster.get(system).down(address).
A pre-packaged solution for the downing problem is provided by Split Brain Resolver, which is part of the Light-
bend Reactive Platform. If you don’t use RP, you should anyway carefully read the documentation of the Split
Brain Resolver and make sure that the solution you are using handles the concerns described there.
There is an atomatic downing feature that you should not use in production. For testing purpose you can enable it
with configuration:
akka.cluster.auto-down-unreachable-after = 120s
This means that the cluster leader member will change the unreachable node status to down automatically
after the configured time of unreachability.
This is a naïve approach to remove unreachable nodes from the cluster membership. It works great for crashes
and short transient network partitions, but not for long network partitions. Both sides of the network partition will
see the other side as unreachable and after a while remove it from its cluster membership. Since this happens on
both sides the result is that two separate disconnected clusters have been created. This can also happen because of
long GC pauses or system overload.
Warning: We recommend against using the auto-down feature of Akka Cluster in production. This is crucial
for correct behavior if you use Cluster Singleton or Cluster Sharding, especially together with Akka Persis-
tence. For Akka Persistence with Cluster Sharding it can result in corrupt data in case of network partitions.
7.2.5 Leaving
Note that this command can be issued to any member in the cluster, not necessarily the one that is leaving. The
cluster extension, but not the actor system or JVM, of the leaving member will be shutdown after the leader has
changed status of the member to Exiting. Thereafter the member will be removed from the cluster. Normally this
is handled automatically, but in case of network failures during this process it might still be necessary to set the
node’s status to Down in order to complete the removal.
If a node is unreachable then gossip convergence is not possible and therefore any leader actions are also
not possible. However, we still might want new nodes to join the cluster in this scenario.
Warning: The WeaklyUp feature is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction in Akka 2.4.0. We
will continue to improve this feature based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while we try to keep
incompatible changes to a minimum the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance releases does not
apply this feature.
This feature is disabled by default. With a configuration option you can allow this behavior:
akka.cluster.allow-weakly-up-members = on
When allow-weakly-up-members is enabled and there is no gossip convergence, Joining members will
be promoted to WeaklyUp and they will become part of the cluster. Once gossip convergence is reached, the
leader will move WeaklyUp members to Up.
You can subscribe to the WeaklyUp membership event to make use of the members that are in this state, but you
should be aware of that members on the other side of a network partition have no knowledge about the existence
of the new members. You should for example not count WeaklyUp members in quorum decisions.
Warning: This feature is only available from Akka 2.4.0 and cannot be used if some of your cluster members
are running an older version of Akka.
Let’s take a look at an example that illustrates how workers, here named backend, can detect and register to new
master nodes, here named frontend.
The example application provides a service to transform text. When some text is sent to one of the frontend
services, it will be delegated to one of the backend workers, which performs the transformation job, and sends the
result back to the original client. New backend nodes, as well as new frontend nodes, can be added or removed to
the cluster dynamically.
Messages:
@Override
public String toString() {
return "TransformationResult(" + text + ")";
}
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "JobFailed(" + reason + ")";
}
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof TransformationJob) {
TransformationJob job = (TransformationJob) message;
getSender().tell(new TransformationResult(job.getText().toUpperCase()),
getSelf());
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
Note that the TransformationBackend actor subscribes to cluster events to detect new, potential, frontend
nodes, and send them a registration message so that they know that they can use the backend worker.
The frontend that receives user jobs and delegates to one of the registered backend workers:
public class TransformationFrontend extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if ((message instanceof TransformationJob) && backends.isEmpty()) {
TransformationJob job = (TransformationJob) message;
getSender().tell(
new JobFailed("Service unavailable, try again later", job),
getSender());
jobCounter++;
backends.get(jobCounter % backends.size())
.forward(job, getContext());
} else if (message.equals(BACKEND_REGISTRATION)) {
getContext().watch(getSender());
backends.add(getSender());
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
Note that the TransformationFrontend actor watch the registered backend to be able to remove it from
its list of available backend workers. Death watch uses the cluster failure detector for nodes in the cluster, i.e.
it detects network failures and JVM crashes, in addition to graceful termination of watched actor. Death watch
generates the Terminated message to the watching actor when the unreachable cluster node has been downed
and removed.
The Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka Cluster Samples with Java. contains the full source code and
instructions of how to run the Worker Dial-in Example.
Not all nodes of a cluster need to perform the same function: there might be one sub-set which runs the web
front-end, one which runs the data access layer and one for the number-crunching. Deployment of actors—for
example by cluster-aware routers—can take node roles into account to achieve this distribution of responsibilities.
The roles of a node is defined in the configuration property named akka.cluster.roles and it is typically
defined in the start script as a system property or environment variable.
The roles of the nodes is part of the membership information in MemberEvent that you can subscribe to.
A common use case is to start actors after the cluster has been initialized, members have joined, and the cluster
has reached a certain size.
With a configuration option you can define required number of members before the leader changes member status
of ‘Joining’ members to ‘Up’.
akka.cluster.min-nr-of-members = 3
In a similar way you can define required number of members of a certain role before the leader changes member
status of ‘Joining’ members to ‘Up’.
akka.cluster.role {
frontend.min-nr-of-members = 1
backend.min-nr-of-members = 2
}
You can start the actors in a registerOnMemberUp callback, which will be invoked when the current member
status is changed to ‘Up’, i.e. the cluster has at least the defined number of members.
Cluster.get(system).registerOnMemberUp(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
system.actorOf(Props.create(FactorialFrontend.class, upToN, true),
"factorialFrontend");
}
});
This callback can be used for other things than starting actors.
You can do some clean up in a registerOnMemberRemoved callback, which will be invoked when the current
member status is changed to ‘Removed’ or the cluster have been shutdown.
For example, this is how to shut down the ActorSystem and thereafter exit the JVM:
Cluster.get(system).registerOnMemberRemoved(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
// exit JVM when ActorSystem has been terminated
final Runnable exit = new Runnable() {
@Override public void run() {
System.exit(0);
}
};
system.registerOnTermination(exit);
}
}.start();
}
});
Note: Register a OnMemberRemoved callback on a cluster that have been shutdown, the callback will be invoked
immediately on the caller thread, otherwise it will be invoked later when the current member status changed to
‘Removed’. You may want to install some cleanup handling after the cluster was started up, but the cluster might
already be shutting down when you installing, and depending on the race is not healthy.
For some use cases it is convenient and sometimes also mandatory to ensure that you have exactly one actor of a
certain type running somewhere in the cluster.
This can be implemented by subscribing to member events, but there are several corner cases to consider. There-
fore, this specific use case is made easily accessible by the Cluster Singleton.
Distributes actors across several nodes in the cluster and supports interaction with the actors using their logical
identifier, but without having to care about their physical location in the cluster.
See Cluster Sharding.
Publish-subscribe messaging between actors in the cluster, and point-to-point messaging using the logical path of
the actors, i.e. the sender does not have to know on which node the destination actor is running.
See Distributed Publish Subscribe in Cluster.
Communication from an actor system that is not part of the cluster to actors running somewhere in the cluster.
The client does not have to know on which node the destination actor is running.
See Cluster Client.
Akka Distributed Data is useful when you need to share data between nodes in an Akka Cluster. The data is
accessed with an actor providing a key-value store like API.
See Distributed Data.
In a cluster each node is monitored by a few (default maximum 5) other nodes, and when any of these detects the
node as unreachable that information will spread to the rest of the cluster through the gossip. In other words,
only one node needs to mark a node unreachable to have the rest of the cluster mark that node unreachable.
The failure detector will also detect if the node becomes reachable again. When all nodes that monitored the
unreachable node detects it as reachable again the cluster, after gossip dissemination, will consider it as
reachable.
If system messages cannot be delivered to a node it will be quarantined and then it cannot come back from
unreachable. This can happen if the there are too many unacknowledged system messages (e.g. watch,
Terminated, remote actor deployment, failures of actors supervised by remote parent). Then the node needs to be
moved to the down or removed states and the actor system of the quarantined node must be restarted before it
can join the cluster again.
The nodes in the cluster monitor each other by sending heartbeats to detect if a node is unreachable from the rest
of the cluster. The heartbeat arrival times is interpreted by an implementation of The Phi Accrual Failure Detector.
The suspicion level of failure is given by a value called phi. The basic idea of the phi failure detector is to express
the value of phi on a scale that is dynamically adjusted to reflect current network conditions.
The value of phi is calculated as:
phi = -log10(1 - F(timeSinceLastHeartbeat))
where F is the cumulative distribution function of a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation estimated
from historical heartbeat inter-arrival times.
In the Configuration you can adjust the akka.cluster.failure-detector.threshold to define when
a phi value is considered to be a failure.
A low threshold is prone to generate many false positives but ensures a quick detection in the event of a real
crash. Conversely, a high threshold generates fewer mistakes but needs more time to detect actual crashes.
The default threshold is 8 and is appropriate for most situations. However in cloud environments, such as
Amazon EC2, the value could be increased to 12 in order to account for network issues that sometimes occur on
such platforms.
The following chart illustrates how phi increase with increasing time since the previous heartbeat.
Phi is calculated from the mean and standard deviation of historical inter arrival times. The previous chart is an
example for standard deviation of 200 ms. If the heartbeats arrive with less deviation the curve becomes steeper,
i.e. it is possible to determine failure more quickly. The curve looks like this for a standard deviation of 100 ms.
Death watch uses the cluster failure detector for nodes in the cluster, i.e. it detects network failures and JVM
crashes, in addition to graceful termination of watched actor. Death watch generates the Terminated message
to the watching actor when the unreachable cluster node has been downed and removed.
If you encounter suspicious false positives when the system is under load you should define a separate dispatcher
for the cluster actors as described in Cluster Dispatcher.
All routers can be made aware of member nodes in the cluster, i.e. deploying new routees or looking up routees
on nodes in the cluster. When a node becomes unreachable or leaves the cluster the routees of that node are
automatically unregistered from the router. When new nodes join the cluster additional routees are added to the
router, according to the configuration. Routees are also added when a node becomes reachable again, after having
been unreachable.
Cluster aware routers make use of members with status WeaklyUp if that feature is enabled.
There are two distinct types of routers.
• Group - router that sends messages to the specified path using actor selection The routees can be shared
between routers running on different nodes in the cluster. One example of a use case for this type of router
is a service running on some backend nodes in the cluster and used by routers running on front-end nodes
in the cluster.
• Pool - router that creates routees as child actors and deploys them on remote nodes. Each router will
have its own routee instances. For example, if you start a router on 3 nodes in a 10 nodes cluster you will
have 30 routee actors in total if the router is configured to use one instance per node. The routees created by
the different routers will not be shared between the routers. One example of a use case for this type of router
is a single master that coordinate jobs and delegates the actual work to routees running on other nodes in
the cluster.
When using a Group you must start the routee actors on the cluster member nodes. That is not done by the router.
The configuration for a group looks like this:
akka.actor.deployment {
/statsService/workerRouter {
router = consistent-hashing-group
routees.paths = ["/user/statsWorker"]
cluster {
enabled = on
allow-local-routees = on
use-role = compute
}
}
}
Note: The routee actors should be started as early as possible when starting the actor system, because the router
will try to use them as soon as the member status is changed to ‘Up’.
The actor paths without address information that are defined in routees.paths are used for selecting the
actors to which the messages will be forwarded to by the router. Messages will be forwarded to the routees using
ActorSelection, so the same delivery semantics should be expected. It is possible to limit the lookup of routees to
member nodes tagged with a certain role by specifying use-role.
max-total-nr-of-instances defines total number of routees in the cluster. By default
max-total-nr-of-instances is set to a high value (10000) that will result in new routees added to the
router when nodes join the cluster. Set it to a lower value if you want to limit total number of routees.
The same type of router could also have been defined in code:
Let’s take a look at how to use a cluster aware router with a group of routees, i.e. router sending to the paths of
the routees.
The example application provides a service to calculate statistics for a text. When some text is sent to the service
it splits it into words, and delegates the task to count number of characters in each word to a separate worker, a
routee of a router. The character count for each word is sent back to an aggregator that calculates the average
number of characters per word when all results have been collected.
Messages:
public interface StatsMessages {
@Override
public String toString() {
return "meanWordLength: " + meanWordLength;
}
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "JobFailed(" + reason + ")";
}
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof String) {
String word = (String) message;
Integer length = cache.get(word);
if (length == null) {
length = word.length();
cache.put(word, length);
}
getSender().tell(length, getSelf());
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
The service that receives text from users and splits it up into words, delegates to workers and aggregates:
public class StatsService extends UntypedActor {
// This router is used both with lookup and deploy of routees. If you
// have a router with only lookup of routees you can use Props.empty()
// instead of Props.create(StatsWorker.class).
ActorRef workerRouter = getContext().actorOf(
FromConfig.getInstance().props(Props.create(StatsWorker.class)),
"workerRouter");
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof StatsJob) {
StatsJob job = (StatsJob) message;
if (job.getText().equals("")) {
unhandled(message);
} else {
final String[] words = job.getText().split(" ");
final ActorRef replyTo = getSender();
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
@Override
public void preStart() {
getContext().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof Integer) {
Integer wordCount = (Integer) message;
results.add(wordCount);
if (results.size() == expectedResults) {
int sum = 0;
for (int c : results)
sum += c;
double meanWordLength = ((double) sum) / results.size();
replyTo.tell(new StatsResult(meanWordLength), getSelf());
getContext().stop(getSelf());
}
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
enabled = on
allow-local-routees = on
use-role = compute
}
}
}
This means that user requests can be sent to StatsService on any node and it will use StatsWorker on all
nodes.
The Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka Cluster Samples with Java. contains the full source code and
instructions of how to run the Router Example with Group of Routees.
When using a Pool with routees created and deployed on the cluster member nodes the configuration for a router
looks like this:
akka.actor.deployment {
/statsService/singleton/workerRouter {
router = consistent-hashing-pool
cluster {
enabled = on
max-nr-of-instances-per-node = 3
allow-local-routees = on
use-role = compute
}
}
}
It is possible to limit the deployment of routees to member nodes tagged with a certain role by specifying
use-role.
max-total-nr-of-instances defines total number of routees in the cluster, but the number
of routees per node, max-nr-of-instances-per-node, will not be exceeded. By default
max-total-nr-of-instances is set to a high value (10000) that will result in new routees added to the
router when nodes join the cluster. Set it to a lower value if you want to limit total number of routees.
The same type of router could also have been defined in code:
int totalInstances = 100;
int maxInstancesPerNode = 3;
boolean allowLocalRoutees = false;
String useRole = "compute";
ActorRef workerRouter = getContext().actorOf(
new ClusterRouterPool(new ConsistentHashingPool(0),
new ClusterRouterPoolSettings(totalInstances, maxInstancesPerNode,
allowLocalRoutees, useRole)).props(Props
.create(StatsWorker.class)), "workerRouter3");
Let’s take a look at how to use a cluster aware router on single master node that creates and deploys
workers. To keep track of a single master we use the Cluster Singleton in the contrib module. The
ClusterSingletonManager is started on each node.
ClusterSingletonManagerSettings settings = ClusterSingletonManagerSettings.create(system)
.withRole("compute");
system.actorOf(ClusterSingletonManager.props(
We also need an actor on each node that keeps track of where current single master exists and delegates jobs to
the StatsService. That is provided by the ClusterSingletonProxy.
ClusterSingletonProxySettings proxySettings =
ClusterSingletonProxySettings.create(system).withRole("compute");
system.actorOf(ClusterSingletonProxy.props("/user/statsService",
proxySettings), "statsServiceProxy");
The ClusterSingletonProxy receives text from users and delegates to the current StatsService, the
single master. It listens to cluster events to lookup the StatsService on the oldest node.
All nodes start ClusterSingletonProxy and the ClusterSingletonManager. The router is now
configured like this:
akka.actor.deployment {
/statsService/singleton/workerRouter {
router = consistent-hashing-pool
cluster {
enabled = on
max-nr-of-instances-per-node = 3
allow-local-routees = on
use-role = compute
}
}
}
The Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka Cluster Samples with Java. contains the full source code and
instructions of how to run the Router Example with Pool of Remote Deployed Routees.
The member nodes of the cluster can collect system health metrics and publish that to other cluster nodes and to
the registered subscribers on the system event bus with the help of Cluster Metrics Extension.
7.2.19 JMX
Information and management of the cluster is available as JMX MBeans with the root name akka.Cluster.
The JMX information can be displayed with an ordinary JMX console such as JConsole or JVisualVM.
From JMX you can:
• see what members that are part of the cluster
• see status of this node
• see roles of each member
• join this node to another node in cluster
• mark any node in the cluster as down
• tell any node in the cluster to leave
Member nodes are identified by their address, in format akka.<protocol>://<actor-system-
name>@<hostname>:<port>.
The cluster can be managed with the script bin/akka-cluster provided in the Akka distribution.
Run it without parameters to see instructions about how to use the script:
Usage: bin/akka-cluster <node-hostname> <jmx-port> <command> ...
To be able to use the script you must enable remote monitoring and management when starting the JVMs of the
cluster nodes, as described in Monitoring and Management Using JMX Technology
Example of system properties to enable remote monitoring and management:
java -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=9999 \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
7.2.21 Configuration
There are several configuration properties for the cluster. We refer to the reference configuration for more infor-
mation.
You can silence the logging of cluster events at info level with configuration property:
akka.cluster.log-info = off
Cluster Dispatcher
Under the hood the cluster extension is implemented with actors and it can be necessary to create a bulkhead
for those actors to avoid disturbance from other actors. Especially the heartbeating actors that is used for failure
detection can generate false positives if they are not given a chance to run at regular intervals. For this purpose
you can define a separate dispatcher to be used for the cluster actors:
akka.cluster.use-dispatcher = cluster-dispatcher
cluster-dispatcher {
type = "Dispatcher"
executor = "fork-join-executor"
fork-join-executor {
parallelism-min = 2
parallelism-max = 4
}
}
Note: Normally it should not be necessary to configure a separate dispatcher for the Cluster. The default-
dispatcher should be sufficient for performing the Cluster tasks, i.e. akka.cluster.use-dispatcher
should not be changed. If you have Cluster related problems when using the default-dispatcher
that is typically an indication that you are running blocking or CPU intensive actors/tasks on
the default-dispatcher. Use dedicated dispatchers for such actors/tasks instead of running them on
the default-dispatcher, because that may starve system internal tasks. Related config properties:
akka.cluster.use-dispatcher = akka.cluster.cluster-dispatcher. Corresponding de-
fault values: akka.cluster.use-dispatcher =.
For some use cases it is convenient and sometimes also mandatory to ensure that you have exactly one actor of a
certain type running somewhere in the cluster.
Some examples:
• single point of responsibility for certain cluster-wide consistent decisions, or coordination of actions across
the cluster system
• single entry point to an external system
• single master, many workers
• centralized naming service, or routing logic
Using a singleton should not be the first design choice. It has several drawbacks, such as single-point of bottleneck.
Single-point of failure is also a relevant concern, but for some cases this feature takes care of that by making sure
that another singleton instance will eventually be started.
The cluster singleton pattern is implemented by akka.cluster.singleton.ClusterSingletonManager.
It manages one singleton actor instance among all cluster nodes or a group of nodes tagged with a specific role.
ClusterSingletonManager is an actor that is supposed to be started on all nodes, or all nodes with
specified role, in the cluster. The actual singleton actor is started by the ClusterSingletonManager on the
oldest node by creating a child actor from supplied Props. ClusterSingletonManager makes sure that at
most one singleton instance is running at any point in time.
The singleton actor is always running on the oldest member with specified role. The oldest member is determined
by akka.cluster.Member#isOlderThan. This can change when removing that member from the cluster.
Be aware that there is a short time period when there is no active singleton during the hand-over process.
The cluster failure detector will notice when oldest node becomes unreachable due to things like JVM crash, hard
shut down, or network failure. Then a new oldest node will take over and a new singleton actor is created. For
these failure scenarios there will not be a graceful hand-over, but more than one active singletons is prevented by
all reasonable means. Some corner cases are eventually resolved by configurable timeouts.
You can access the singleton actor by using the provided akka.cluster.singleton.ClusterSingletonProxy,
which will route all messages to the current instance of the singleton. The proxy will keep track of the oldest node
in the cluster and resolve the singleton’s ActorRef by explicitly sending the singleton’s actorSelection
the akka.actor.Identify message and waiting for it to reply. This is performed periodically if the
singleton doesn’t reply within a certain (configurable) time. Given the implementation, there might be periods of
time during which the ActorRef is unavailable, e.g., when a node leaves the cluster. In these cases, the proxy
will buffer the messages sent to the singleton and then deliver them when the singleton is finally available. If
the buffer is full the ClusterSingletonProxy will drop old messages when new messages are sent via the
proxy. The size of the buffer is configurable and it can be disabled by using a buffer size of 0.
It’s worth noting that messages can always be lost because of the distributed nature of these actors. As always,
additional logic should be implemented in the singleton (acknowledgement) and in the client (retry) actors to
This pattern may seem to be very tempting to use at first, but it has several drawbacks, some of them are listed
below:
• the cluster singleton may quickly become a performance bottleneck,
• you can not rely on the cluster singleton to be non-stop available — e.g. when the node on which the
singleton has been running dies, it will take a few seconds for this to be noticed and the singleton be
migrated to another node,
• in the case of a network partition appearing in a Cluster that is using Automatic Downing (see docs for
Downing), it may happen that the isolated clusters each decide to spin up their own singleton, meaning that
there might be multiple singletons running in the system, yet the Clusters have no way of finding out about
them (because of the partition).
Especially the last point is something you should be aware of — in general when using the Cluster Singleton
pattern you should take care of downing nodes yourself and not rely on the timing based auto-down feature.
Warning: Don’t use Cluster Singleton together with Automatic Downing, since it allows the cluster to
split up into two separate clusters, which in turn will result in multiple Singletons being started, one in each
separate cluster!
7.3.2 An Example
Assume that we need one single entry point to an external system. An actor that receives messages from a JMS
queue with the strict requirement that only one JMS consumer must exist to be make sure that the messages are
processed in order. That is perhaps not how one would like to design things, but a typical real-world scenario
when integrating with external systems.
On each node in the cluster you need to start the ClusterSingletonManager and supply the Props of the
singleton actor, in this case the JMS queue consumer.
final ClusterSingletonManagerSettings settings =
ClusterSingletonManagerSettings.create(system).withRole("worker");
system.actorOf(ClusterSingletonManager.props(
Props.create(Consumer.class, queue, testActor),
new End(), settings), "consumer");
Here we limit the singleton to nodes tagged with the "worker" role, but all nodes, independent of role, can be
used by not specifying withRole.
Here we use an application specific terminationMessage to be able to close the resources before actually
stopping the singleton actor. Note that PoisonPill is a perfectly fine terminationMessage if you only
need to stop the actor.
With the names given above, access to the singleton can be obtained from any cluster node using a properly
configured proxy.
ClusterSingletonProxySettings proxySettings =
ClusterSingletonProxySettings.create(system).withRole("worker");
system.actorOf(ClusterSingletonProxy.props("/user/consumer", proxySettings),
"consumerProxy");
A more comprehensive sample is available in the Lightbend Activator tutorial named Distributed workers with
Akka and Java!.
7.3.3 Dependencies
To use the Cluster Singleton you must add the following dependency in your project.
sbt:
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-cluster-tools" % "2.4.20"
maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-cluster-tools_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
7.3.4 Configuration
The following configuration properties are read by the ClusterSingletonProxySettings when created
with a ActorSystem parameter. It is also possible to amend the ClusterSingletonProxySettings or
create it from another config section with the same layout as below. ClusterSingletonProxySettings
is a parameter to the ClusterSingletonProxy.props factory method, i.e. each singleton proxy can be
configured with different settings if needed.
akka.cluster.singleton-proxy {
# The actor name of the singleton actor that is started by the ClusterSingletonManager
singleton-name = ${akka.cluster.singleton.singleton-name}
# The role of the cluster nodes where the singleton can be deployed.
# If the role is not specified then any node will do.
role = ""
# Interval at which the proxy will try to resolve the singleton instance.
singleton-identification-interval = 1s
# If the location of the singleton is unknown the proxy will buffer this
# number of messages and deliver them when the singleton is identified.
# When the buffer is full old messages will be dropped when new messages are
# sent via the proxy.
# Use 0 to disable buffering, i.e. messages will be dropped immediately if
# the location of the singleton is unknown.
# Maximum allowed buffer size is 10000.
buffer-size = 1000
}
How do I send a message to an actor without knowing which node it is running on?
How do I send messages to all actors in the cluster that have registered interest in a named topic?
This pattern provides a mediator actor, akka.cluster.pubsub.DistributedPubSubMediator, that
manages a registry of actor references and replicates the entries to peer actors among all cluster nodes or a group
of nodes tagged with a specific role.
The DistributedPubSubMediator actor is supposed to be started on all nodes, or all nodes with specified
role, in the cluster. The mediator can be started with the DistributedPubSub extension or as an ordinary
actor.
The registry is eventually consistent, i.e. changes are not immediately visible at other nodes, but typically they
will be fully replicated to all other nodes after a few seconds. Changes are only performed in the own part of the
registry and those changes are versioned. Deltas are disseminated in a scalable way to other nodes with a gossip
protocol.
Cluster members with status WeaklyUp, if that feature is enabled, will participate in Distributed Publish Subscribe,
i.e. subscribers on nodes with WeaklyUp status will receive published messages if the publisher and subscriber
are on same side of a network partition.
You can send messages via the mediator on any node to registered actors on any other node.
There a two different modes of message delivery, explained in the sections Publish and Send below.
7.4.1 Publish
This is the true pub/sub mode. A typical usage of this mode is a chat room in an instant messaging application.
Actors are registered to a named topic. This enables many subscribers on each node. The message will be delivered
to all subscribers of the topic.
For efficiency the message is sent over the wire only once per node (that has a matching topic), and then delivered
to all subscribers of the local topic representation.
You register actors to the local mediator with DistributedPubSubMediator.Subscribe. Successful
Subscribe and Unsubscribe is acknowledged with DistributedPubSubMediator.SubscribeAck
and DistributedPubSubMediator.UnsubscribeAck replies. The acknowledgment means that the
subscription is registered, but it can still take some time until it is replicated to other nodes.
You publish messages by sending DistributedPubSubMediator.Publish message to the local mediator.
Actors are automatically removed from the registry when they are terminated, or you can explicitly remove entries
with DistributedPubSubMediator.Unsubscribe.
An example of a subscriber actor:
public class Subscriber extends UntypedActor {
LoggingAdapter log = Logging.getLogger(getContext().system(), this);
public Subscriber() {
ActorRef mediator =
DistributedPubSub.get(getContext().system()).mediator();
// subscribe to the topic named "content"
mediator.tell(new DistributedPubSubMediator.Subscribe("content", getSelf()),
getSelf());
}
Subscriber actors can be started on several nodes in the cluster, and all will receive messages published to the
“content” topic.
system.actorOf(Props.create(Subscriber.class), "subscriber1");
//another node
system.actorOf(Props.create(Subscriber.class), "subscriber2");
system.actorOf(Props.create(Subscriber.class), "subscriber3");
Topic Groups
Actors may also be subscribed to a named topic with a group id. If subscribing with a group id, each message
published to a topic with the sendOneMessageToEachGroup flag set to true is delivered via the supplied
RoutingLogic (default random) to one actor within each subscribing group.
If all the subscribed actors have the same group id, then this works just like Send and each message is only
delivered to one subscriber.
If all the subscribed actors have different group names, then this works like normal Publish and each message
is broadcasted to all subscribers.
Note: Note that if the group id is used it is part of the topic identifier. Messages published with
sendOneMessageToEachGroup=false will not be delivered to subscribers that subscribed with a group
id. Messages published with sendOneMessageToEachGroup=true will not be delivered to subscribers
that subscribed without a group id.
7.4.2 Send
This is a point-to-point mode where each message is delivered to one destination, but you still does not have to
know where the destination is located. A typical usage of this mode is private chat to one other user in an instant
messaging application. It can also be used for distributing tasks to registered workers, like a cluster aware router
where the routees dynamically can register themselves.
The message will be delivered to one recipient with a matching path, if any such exists in the registry. If several
entries match the path because it has been registered on several nodes the message will be sent via the supplied
RoutingLogic (default random) to one destination. The sender() of the message can specify that local affinity
is preferred, i.e. the message is sent to an actor in the same local actor system as the used mediator actor, if any
such exists, otherwise route to any other matching entry.
You register actors to the local mediator with DistributedPubSubMediator.Put. The ActorRef in
Put must belong to the same local actor system as the mediator. The path without address information is the key
to which you send messages. On each node there can only be one actor for a given path, since the path is unique
within one local actor system.
You send messages by sending DistributedPubSubMediator.Send message to the local mediator with
the path (without address information) of the destination actors.
Actors are automatically removed from the registry when they are terminated, or you can explicitly remove entries
with DistributedPubSubMediator.Remove.
An example of a destination actor:
public class Destination extends UntypedActor {
LoggingAdapter log = Logging.getLogger(getContext().system(), this);
public Destination() {
ActorRef mediator =
DistributedPubSub.get(getContext().system()).mediator();
// register to the path
mediator.tell(new DistributedPubSubMediator.Put(getSelf()), getSelf());
}
Subscriber actors can be started on several nodes in the cluster, and all will receive messages published to the
“content” topic.
system.actorOf(Props.create(Destination.class), "destination");
//another node
system.actorOf(Props.create(Destination.class), "destination");
It is also possible to broadcast messages to the actors that have been registered with Put. Send
DistributedPubSubMediator.SendToAll message to the local mediator and the wrapped message will
then be delivered to all recipients with a matching path. Actors with the same path, without address information,
can be registered on different nodes. On each node there can only be one such actor, since the path is unique
within one local actor system.
Typical usage of this mode is to broadcast messages to all replicas with the same path, e.g. 3 actors on dif-
ferent nodes that all perform the same actions, for redundancy. You can also optionally specify a property
(allButSelf) deciding if the message should be sent to a matching path on the self node or not.
In the example above the mediator is started and accessed with the
akka.cluster.pubsub.DistributedPubSub extension. That is convenient and perfectly fine in
most cases, but it can be good to know that it is possible to start the mediator actor as an ordinary actor and
you can have several different mediators at the same time to be able to divide a large number of actors/topics to
different mediators. For example you might want to use different cluster roles for different mediators.
The DistributedPubSub extension can be configured with the following properties:
# Settings for the DistributedPubSub extension
akka.cluster.pub-sub {
# Actor name of the mediator actor, /system/distributedPubSubMediator
name = distributedPubSubMediator
# Maximum number of elements to transfer in one message when synchronizing the registries.
# Next chunk will be transferred in next round of gossip.
max-delta-elements = 3000
It is recommended to load the extension when the actor system is started by defining it in akka.extensions
configuration property. Otherwise it will be activated when first used and then it takes a while for it to be populated.
akka.extensions = ["akka.cluster.pubsub.DistributedPubSub"]
As in Message Delivery Reliability of Akka, message delivery guarantee in distributed pub sub modes is at-most-
once delivery. In other words, messages can be lost over the wire.
If you are looking for at-least-once delivery guarantee, we recommend Kafka Akka Streams integration.
7.4.5 Dependencies
To use Distributed Publish Subscribe you must add the following dependency in your project.
sbt:
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-cluster-tools" % "2.4.20"
maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-cluster-tools_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
An actor system that is not part of the cluster can communicate with actors somewhere in the cluster via this
ClusterClient. The client can of course be part of another cluster. It only needs to know the location of one
(or more) nodes to use as initial contact points. It will establish a connection to a ClusterReceptionist
somewhere in the cluster. It will monitor the connection to the receptionist and establish a new connection if
the link goes down. When looking for a new receptionist it uses fresh contact points retrieved from previous
establishment, or periodically refreshed contacts, i.e. not necessarily the initial contact points.
Note: ClusterClient should not be used when sending messages to actors that run within the same clus-
ter. Similar functionality as the ClusterClient is provided in a more efficient way by Distributed Publish
Subscribe in Cluster for actors that belong to the same cluster.
Also, note it’s necessary to change akka.actor.provider from local to remote or cluster when
using the cluster client.
The receptionist is supposed to be started on all nodes, or all nodes with specified role, in the cluster. The
receptionist can be started with the ClusterClientReceptionist extension or as an ordinary actor.
You can send messages via the ClusterClient to any actor in the cluster that is regis-
tered in the DistributedPubSubMediator used by the ClusterReceptionist. The
ClusterClientReceptionist provides methods for registration of actors that should be reachable
from the client. Messages are wrapped in ClusterClient.Send, ClusterClient.SendToAll or
ClusterClient.Publish.
Both the ClusterClient and the ClusterClientReceptionist emit events that can be subscribed to.
The ClusterClient sends out notifications in relation to having received a list of contact points from the
ClusterClientReceptionist. One use of this list might be for the client to record its contact points. A
client that is restarted could then use this information to supersede any previously configured contact points.
The ClusterClientReceptionist sends out notifications in relation to having received a contact from
a ClusterClient. This notification enables the server containing the receptionist to become aware of what
clients are connected.
1. ClusterClient.Send
The message will be delivered to one recipient with a matching path, if any such exists. If several entries match
the path the message will be delivered to one random destination. The sender() of the message can specify that
local affinity is preferred, i.e. the message is sent to an actor in the same local actor system as the used receptionist
actor, if any such exists, otherwise random to any other matching entry.
2. ClusterClient.SendToAll
The message will be delivered to all recipients with a matching path.
3. ClusterClient.Publish
The message will be delivered to all recipients Actors that have been registered as subscribers to the named topic.
Response messages from the destination actor are tunneled via the receptionist to avoid inbound connections from
other cluster nodes to the client, i.e. the sender(), as seen by the destination actor, is not the client itself. The
sender() of the response messages, as seen by the client, is deadLetters since the client should normally
send subsequent messages via the ClusterClient. It is possible to pass the original sender inside the reply
messages if the client is supposed to communicate directly to the actor in the cluster.
While establishing a connection to a receptionist the ClusterClient will buffer messages and send them
when the connection is established. If the buffer is full the ClusterClient will drop old messages when new
messages are sent via the client. The size of the buffer is configurable and it can be disabled by using a buffer size
of 0.
It’s worth noting that messages can always be lost because of the distributed nature of these actors. As always,
additional logic should be implemented in the destination (acknowledgement) and in the client (retry) actors to
ensure at-least-once message delivery.
7.5.1 An Example
On the cluster nodes first start the receptionist. Note, it is recommended to load the extension when the actor
system is started by defining it in the akka.extensions configuration property:
akka.extensions = ["akka.cluster.client.ClusterClientReceptionist"]
Next, register the actors that should be available for the client.
ActorRef serviceA = system.actorOf(Props.create(Service.class), "serviceA");
ClusterClientReceptionist.get(system).registerService(serviceA);
On the client you create the ClusterClient actor and use it as a gateway for sending messages to the actors
identified by their path (without address information) somewhere in the cluster.
You will probably define the address information of the initial contact points in configuration or system property.
See also Configuration.
A more comprehensive sample is available in the Lightbend Activator tutorial named Distributed workers with
Akka and Java!.
In the example above the receptionist is started and accessed with the
akka.cluster.client.ClusterClientReceptionist extension. That is convenient
and perfectly fine in most cases, but it can be good to know that it is possible to start the
akka.cluster.client.ClusterReceptionist actor as an ordinary actor and you can have sev-
eral different receptionists at the same time, serving different types of clients.
Note that the ClusterClientReceptionist uses the DistributedPubSub extension, which is de-
scribed in Distributed Publish Subscribe in Cluster.
It is recommended to load the extension when the actor system is started by defining it in the akka.extensions
configuration property:
akka.extensions = ["akka.cluster.client.ClusterClientReceptionist"]
7.5.3 Events
As mentioned earlier, both the ClusterClient and ClusterClientReceptionist emit events that can
be subscribed to. The following code snippet declares an actor that will receive notifications on contact points
(addresses to the available receptionists), as they become available. The code illustrates subscribing to the events
and receiving the ClusterClient initial state.
static public class ClientListener extends UntypedActor {
private final ActorRef targetClient;
private final Set<ActorPath> contactPoints = new HashSet<>();
@Override
public void preStart() {
targetClient.tell(SubscribeContactPoints.getInstance(), sender());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof ContactPoints) {
ContactPoints msg = (ContactPoints)message;
contactPoints.addAll(msg.getContactPoints());
Similarly we can have an actor that behaves in a similar fashion for learning what cluster clients contact a
ClusterClientReceptionist:
static public class ReceptionistListener extends UntypedActor {
private final ActorRef targetReceptionist;
private final Set<ActorRef> clusterClients = new HashSet<>();
@Override
public void preStart() {
targetReceptionist.tell(SubscribeClusterClients.getInstance(), sender());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof ClusterClients) {
ClusterClients msg = (ClusterClients) message;
clusterClients.addAll(msg.getClusterClients());
// Now do something with an up-to-date "clusterClients"
} else if (message instanceof ClusterClientUp) {
ClusterClientUp msg = (ClusterClientUp) message;
clusterClients.add(msg.clusterClient());
// Now do something with an up-to-date "clusterClients"
} else if (message instanceof ClusterClientUnreachable) {
ClusterClientUnreachable msg = (ClusterClientUnreachable) message;
clusterClients.remove(msg.clusterClient());
// Now do something with an up-to-date "clusterClients"
}
}
}
7.5.4 Dependencies
To use the Cluster Client you must add the following dependency in your project.
sbt:
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-cluster-tools" % "2.4.20"
maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-cluster-tools_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
7.5.5 Configuration
# The receptionist will send this number of contact points to the client
number-of-contacts = 3
# The actor that tunnel response messages to the client will be stopped
# after this time of inactivity.
response-tunnel-receive-timeout = 30s
The following configuration properties are read by the ClusterClientSettings when created with a
ActorSystem parameter. It is also possible to amend the ClusterClientSettings or create it from
another config section with the same layout as below. ClusterClientSettings is a parameter to the
ClusterClient.props factory method, i.e. each client can be configured with different settings if needed.
# Settings for the ClusterClient
akka.cluster.client {
# Actor paths of the ClusterReceptionist actors on the servers (cluster nodes)
# that the client will try to contact initially. It is mandatory to specify
# at least one initial contact.
# Comma separated full actor paths defined by a string on the form of
# "akka.tcp://system@hostname:port/system/receptionist"
initial-contacts = []
# If connection to the receiptionist is lost and the client has not been
# able to acquire a new connection for this long the client will stop itself.
# This duration makes it possible to watch the cluster client and react on a more permanent
# loss of connection with the cluster, for example by accessing some kind of
# service registry for an updated set of initial contacts to start a new cluster client with.
# If this is not wanted it can be set to "off" to disable the timeout and retry
# forever.
reconnect-timeout = off
}
When the cluster client is started it must be provided with a list of initial contacts which are clus-
ter nodes where receptionists are running. It will then repeatedly (with an interval configurable by
establishing-get-contacts-interval) try to contact those until it gets in contact with one of them.
While running, the list of contacts are continuously updated with data from the receptionists (again, with an inter-
val configurable with refresh-contacts-interval), so that if there are more receptionists in the cluster
than the initial contacts provided to the client the client will learn about them.
While the client is running it will detect failures in its connection to the receptionist by heartbeats if more than a
configurable amount of heartbeats are missed the client will try to reconnect to its known set of contacts to find a
receptionist it can access.
It is possible to make the cluster client stop entirely if it cannot find a receptionist it can talk to within a configurable
interval. This is configured with the reconnect-timeout, which defaults to off. This can be useful when
initial contacts are provided from some kind of service registry, cluster node addresses are entirely dynamic and
the entire cluster might shut down or crash, be restarted on new addresses. Since the client will be stopped in that
case a monitoring actor can watch it and upon Terminate a new set of initial contacts can be fetched and a new
cluster client started.
Cluster sharding is useful when you need to distribute actors across several nodes in the cluster and want to be
able to interact with them using their logical identifier, but without having to care about their physical location in
the cluster, which might also change over time.
It could for example be actors representing Aggregate Roots in Domain-Driven Design terminology. Here we
call these actors “entities”. These actors typically have persistent (durable) state, but this feature is not limited to
actors with persistent state.
Cluster sharding is typically used when you have many stateful actors that together consume more resources (e.g.
memory) than fit on one machine. If you only have a few stateful actors it might be easier to run them on a Cluster
Singleton node.
In this context sharding means that actors with an identifier, so called entities, can be automatically distributed
across multiple nodes in the cluster. Each entity actor runs only at one place, and messages can be sent to the
entity without requiring the sender to know the location of the destination actor. This is achieved by sending the
messages via a ShardRegion actor provided by this extension, which knows how to route the message with the
entity id to the final destination.
Cluster sharding will not be active on members with status WeaklyUp if that feature is enabled.
Warning: Don’t use Cluster Sharding together with Automatic Downing, since it allows the cluster to
split up into two separate clusters, which in turn will result in multiple shards and entities being started, one in
each separate cluster! See Downing.
7.6.1 An Example
int count = 0;
@Override
public void preStart() throws Exception {
super.preStart();
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create(120, SECONDS));
}
@Override
public void onReceiveRecover(Object msg) {
if (msg instanceof CounterChanged)
updateState((CounterChanged) msg);
else
unhandled(msg);
}
@Override
public void onReceiveCommand(Object msg) {
if (msg instanceof Get)
getSender().tell(count, getSelf());
else if (msg.equals(ReceiveTimeout.getInstance()))
getContext().parent().tell(
new ShardRegion.Passivate(PoisonPill.getInstance()), getSelf());
else
unhandled(msg);
}
}
The above actor uses event sourcing and the support provided in UntypedPersistentActor to store its state.
It does not have to be a persistent actor, but in case of failure or migration of entities between nodes it must be
able to recover its state if it is valuable.
Note how the persistenceId is defined. The name of the actor is the entity identifier (utf-8 URL-encoded).
You may define it another way, but it must be unique.
When using the sharding extension you are first, typically at system startup on each node in the
cluster, supposed to register the supported entity types with the ClusterSharding.start method.
ClusterSharding.start gives you the reference which you can pass along.
Option<String> roleOption = Option.none();
ClusterShardingSettings settings = ClusterShardingSettings.create(system);
ActorRef startedCounterRegion = ClusterSharding.get(system).start("Counter",
The messageExtractor defines application specific methods to extract the entity identifier and the shard
identifier from incoming messages.
ShardRegion.MessageExtractor messageExtractor = new ShardRegion.MessageExtractor() {
@Override
public String entityId(Object message) {
if (message instanceof Counter.EntityEnvelope)
return String.valueOf(((Counter.EntityEnvelope) message).id);
else if (message instanceof Counter.Get)
return String.valueOf(((Counter.Get) message).counterId);
else
return null;
}
@Override
public Object entityMessage(Object message) {
if (message instanceof Counter.EntityEnvelope)
return ((Counter.EntityEnvelope) message).payload;
else
return message;
}
@Override
public String shardId(Object message) {
int numberOfShards = 100;
if (message instanceof Counter.EntityEnvelope) {
long id = ((Counter.EntityEnvelope) message).id;
return String.valueOf(id % numberOfShards);
} else if (message instanceof Counter.Get) {
long id = ((Counter.Get) message).counterId;
return String.valueOf(id % numberOfShards);
} else {
return null;
}
}
};
This example illustrates two different ways to define the entity identifier in the messages:
• The Get message includes the identifier itself.
• The EntityEnvelope holds the identifier, and the actual message that is sent to the entity actor is
wrapped in the envelope.
Note how these two messages types are handled in the entityId and entityMessage methods shown above.
The message sent to the entity actor is what entityMessage returns and that makes it possible to unwrap
envelopes if needed.
A shard is a group of entities that will be managed together. The grouping is defined by the extractShardId
function shown above. For a specific entity identifier the shard identifier must always be the same. Otherwise the
entity actor might accidentally be started in several places at the same time.
Creating a good sharding algorithm is an interesting challenge in itself. Try to produce a uniform distribution, i.e.
same amount of entities in each shard. As a rule of thumb, the number of shards should be a factor ten greater than
the planned maximum number of cluster nodes. Less shards than number of nodes will result in that some nodes
will not host any shards. Too many shards will result in less efficient management of the shards, e.g. rebalancing
overhead, and increased latency because the coordinator is involved in the routing of the first message for each
shard. The sharding algorithm must be the same on all nodes in a running cluster. It can be changed after stopping
all nodes in the cluster.
A simple sharding algorithm that works fine in most cases is to take the absolute value of the
hashCode of the entity identifier modulo number of shards. As a convenience this is provided by the
ShardRegion.HashCodeMessageExtractor.
Messages to the entities are always sent via the local ShardRegion. The ShardRegion actor refer-
ence for a named entity type is returned by ClusterSharding.start and it can also be retrieved with
ClusterSharding.shardRegion. The ShardRegion will lookup the location of the shard for the entity
if it does not already know its location. It will delegate the message to the right node and it will create the entity
actor on demand, i.e. when the first message for a specific entity is delivered.
ActorRef counterRegion = ClusterSharding.get(system).shardRegion("Counter");
counterRegion.tell(new Counter.Get(123), getSelf());
counterRegion.tell(new Counter.EntityEnvelope(123,
Counter.CounterOp.INCREMENT), getSelf());
counterRegion.tell(new Counter.Get(123), getSelf());
The ShardRegion actor is started on each node in the cluster, or group of nodes tagged with a specific role.
The ShardRegion is created with two application specific functions to extract the entity identifier and the shard
identifier from incoming messages. A shard is a group of entities that will be managed together. For the first
message in a specific shard the ShardRegion request the location of the shard from a central coordinator, the
ShardCoordinator.
The ShardCoordinator decides which ShardRegion shall own the Shard and informs that
ShardRegion. The region will confirm this request and create the Shard supervisor as a child actor. The
individual Entities will then be created when needed by the Shard actor. Incoming messages thus travel via
the ShardRegion and the Shard to the target Entity.
If the shard home is another ShardRegion instance messages will be forwarded to that ShardRegion in-
stance instead. While resolving the location of a shard incoming messages for that shard are buffered and later
delivered when the shard home is known. Subsequent messages to the resolved shard can be delivered to the target
destination immediately without involving the ShardCoordinator.
Scenario 1:
1. Incoming message M1 to ShardRegion instance R1.
2. M1 is mapped to shard S1. R1 doesn’t know about S1, so it asks the coordinator C for the location of S1.
3. C answers that the home of S1 is R1.
4. R1 creates child actor for the entity E1 and sends buffered messages for S1 to E1 child
5. All incoming messages for S1 which arrive at R1 can be handled by R1 without C. It creates entity children
as needed, and forwards messages to them.
Scenario 2:
1. Incoming message M2 to R1.
2. M2 is mapped to S2. R1 doesn’t know about S2, so it asks C for the location of S2.
3. C answers that the home of S2 is R2.
4. R1 sends buffered messages for S2 to R2
5. All incoming messages for S2 which arrive at R1 can be handled by R1 without C. It forwards messages to
R2.
6. R2 receives message for S2, ask C, which answers that the home of S2 is R2, and we are in Scenario 1 (but
for R2).
To make sure that at most one instance of a specific entity actor is running somewhere in the cluster it is important
that all nodes have the same view of where the shards are located. Therefore the shard allocation decisions are
taken by the central ShardCoordinator, which is running as a cluster singleton, i.e. one instance on the oldest
member among all cluster nodes or a group of nodes tagged with a specific role.
The logic that decides where a shard is to be located is defined in a pluggable shard allocation strategy. The
default implementation ShardCoordinator.LeastShardAllocationStrategy allocates new shards
to the ShardRegion with least number of previously allocated shards. This strategy can be replaced by an
application specific implementation.
To be able to use newly added members in the cluster the coordinator facilitates rebalancing of shards, i.e. migrate
entities from one node to another. In the rebalance process the coordinator first notifies all ShardRegion actors
that a handoff for a shard has started. That means they will start buffering incoming messages for that shard, in
the same way as if the shard location is unknown. During the rebalance process the coordinator will not answer
any requests for the location of shards that are being rebalanced, i.e. local buffering will continue until the handoff
is completed. The ShardRegion responsible for the rebalanced shard will stop all entities in that shard by
sending the specified handOffStopMessage (default PoisonPill) to them. When all entities have been
terminated the ShardRegion owning the entities will acknowledge the handoff as completed to the coordinator.
Thereafter the coordinator will reply to requests for the location of the shard and thereby allocate a new home for
the shard and then buffered messages in the ShardRegion actors are delivered to the new location. This means
that the state of the entities are not transferred or migrated. If the state of the entities are of importance it should
be persistent (durable), e.g. with Persistence, so that it can be recovered at the new location.
The logic that decides which shards to rebalance is defined in a pluggable shard allocation strategy. The de-
fault implementation ShardCoordinator.LeastShardAllocationStrategy picks shards for hand-
off from the ShardRegion with most number of previously allocated shards. They will then be allocated to the
ShardRegion with least number of previously allocated shards, i.e. new members in the cluster. There is a
configurable threshold of how large the difference must be to begin the rebalancing. This strategy can be replaced
by an application specific implementation.
The state of shard locations in the ShardCoordinator is persistent (durable) with Persistence to survive
failures. Since it is running in a cluster Persistence must be configured with a distributed journal. When a crashed
or unreachable coordinator node has been removed (via down) from the cluster a new ShardCoordinator
singleton actor will take over and the state is recovered. During such a failure period shards with known location
are still available, while messages for new (unknown) shards are buffered until the new ShardCoordinator
becomes available.
As long as a sender uses the same ShardRegion actor to deliver messages to an entity actor the order of the
messages is preserved. As long as the buffer limit is not reached messages are delivered on a best effort basis, with
at-most once delivery semantics, in the same way as ordinary message sending. Reliable end-to-end messaging,
with at-least-once semantics can be added by using AtLeastOnceDelivery in Persistence.
Some additional latency is introduced for messages targeted to new or previously unused shards due to the round-
trip to the coordinator. Rebalancing of shards may also add latency. This should be considered when designing
the application specific shard resolution, e.g. to avoid too fine grained shards.
Instead of using Persistence it is possible to use the Distributed Data module as storage for the state of the
sharding coordinator. In such case the state of the ShardCoordinator will be replicated inside a cluster by
the Distributed Data module with WriteMajority/ReadMajority consistency.
This mode can be enabled by setting configuration property:
akka.cluster.sharding.state-store-mode = ddata
It is using the Distributed Data extension that must be running on all nodes in the cluster. Therefore you should
add that extension to the configuration to make sure that it is started on all nodes:
akka.extensions += "akka.cluster.ddata.DistributedData"
You must explicitly add the akka-distributed-data-experimental dependency to your build if you
use this mode. It is possible to remove akka-persistence dependency from a project if it is not used in
user code and remember-entities is off. Using it together with Remember Entities shards will be
recreated after rebalancing, however will not be recreated after a clean cluster start as the Sharding Coordinator
state is empty after a clean cluster start when using ddata mode. When Remember Entities is on Sharding
Region always keeps data usig persistence, no matter how State Store Mode is set.
Warning: The ddata mode is considered as “experimental” as of its introduction in Akka 2.4.0, since it
depends on the experimental Distributed Data module.
It’s good to use Cluster Sharding with the Cluster setting akka.cluster.min-nr-of-members or
akka.cluster.role.<role-name>.min-nr-of-members. That will defer the allocation of the shards
until at least that number of regions have been started and registered to the coordinator. This avoids that many
shards are allocated to the first region that registers and only later are rebalanced to other nodes.
See How To Startup when Cluster Size Reached for more information about min-nr-of-members.
The ShardRegion actor can also be started in proxy only mode, i.e. it will not host any entities itself, but knows
how to delegate messages to the right location. A ShardRegion is started in proxy only mode with the method
ClusterSharding.startProxy method.
7.6.6 Passivation
If the state of the entities are persistent you may stop entities that are not used to reduce memory consumption.
This is done by the application specific implementation of the entity actors for example by defining receive timeout
(context.setReceiveTimeout). If a message is already enqueued to the entity when it stops itself the
enqueued message in the mailbox will be dropped. To support graceful passivation without losing such messages
the entity actor can send ShardRegion.Passivate to its parent Shard. The specified wrapped message in
Passivate will be sent back to the entity, which is then supposed to stop itself. Incoming messages will be
buffered by the Shard between reception of Passivate and termination of the entity. Such buffered messages
are thereafter delivered to a new incarnation of the entity.
The list of entities in each Shard can be made persistent (durable) by setting the rememberEntities flag
to true in ClusterShardingSettings when calling ClusterSharding.start. When configured to
remember entities, whenever a Shard is rebalanced onto another node or recovers after a crash it will recreate all
the entities which were previously running in that Shard. To permanently stop entities, a Passivate message
must be sent to the parent of the entity actor, otherwise the entity will be automatically restarted after the entity
restart backoff specified in the configuration.
When rememberEntities is set to false, a Shard will not automatically restart any entities after a rebalance
or recovering from a crash. Entities will only be started once the first message for that entity has been received in
the Shard. Entities will not be restarted if they stop without using a Passivate.
Note that the state of the entities themselves will not be restored unless they have been made persistent, e.g. with
Persistence.
7.6.8 Supervision
If you need to use another supervisorStrategy for the entity actors than the default (restarting) strategy you
need to create an intermediate parent actor that defines the supervisorStrategy to the child entity actor.
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return strategy;
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
counter.forward(msg, getContext());
}
}
You start such a supervisor in the same way as if it was the entity actor.
ClusterSharding.get(system).start("SupervisedCounter",
Props.create(CounterSupervisor.class), settings, messageExtractor);
Note that stopped entities will be started again when a new message is targeted to the entity.
public IllustrateGracefulShutdown() {
final ActorSystem system = context().system();
final Cluster cluster = Cluster.get(system);
final ActorRef region = ClusterSharding.get(system).shardRegion("Entity");
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, s -> s.equals("leave"), s -> {
context().watch(region);
region.tell(ShardRegion.gracefulShutdownInstance(), self());
}).
match(Terminated.class, t -> t.actor().equals(region), t -> {
cluster.registerOnMemberRemoved(() ->
self().tell("member-removed", self()));
cluster.leave(cluster.selfAddress());
}).
match(String.class, s -> s.equals("member-removed"), s -> {
// Let singletons hand over gracefully before stopping the system
context().system().scheduler().scheduleOnce(Duration.create(10, SECONDS),
self(), "stop-system", context().dispatcher(), self());
}).
match(String.class, s -> s.equals("stop-system"), s -> {
system.terminate();
}).
build());
}
}
The Cluster Sharding coordinator stores the locations of the shards using Akka Persistence. This data can safely
be removed when restarting the whole Akka Cluster. Note that this is not application data.
There is a utility program akka.cluster.sharding.RemoveInternalClusterShardingData that
removes this data.
Warning: Never use this program while there are running Akka Cluster nodes that are using Cluster Sharding.
Stop all Cluster nodes before using this program.
It can be needed to remove the data if the Cluster Sharding coordinator cannot startup because of corrupt data,
which may happen if accidentally two clusters were running at the same time, e.g. caused by using auto-down and
there was a network partition.
Warning: Don’t use Cluster Sharding together with Automatic Downing, since it allows the cluster to
split up into two separate clusters, which in turn will result in multiple shards and entities being started, one in
each separate cluster! See Downing.
The program is included in the akka-cluster-sharding jar file. It is easiest to run it with same classpath
and configuration as your ordinary application. It can be run from sbt or maven in similar way.
Specify the entity type names (same as you use in the start method of ClusterSharding) as program
arguments.
If you specify -2.3 as the first program argument it will also try to remove data that was stored by Cluster
Sharding in Akka 2.3.x using different persistenceId.
7.6.11 Dependencies
To use the Cluster Sharding you must add the following dependency in your project.
sbt:
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-cluster-sharding" % "2.4.20"
maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-cluster-sharding_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
7.6.12 Configuration
The ClusterSharding extension can be configured with the following properties. These configuration prop-
erties are read by the ClusterShardingSettings when created with a ActorSystem parameter. It is also
possible to amend the ClusterShardingSettings or create it from another config section with the same lay-
out as below. ClusterShardingSettings is a parameter to the start method of the ClusterSharding
extension, i.e. each each entity type can be configured with different settings if needed.
# Settings for the ClusterShardingExtension
akka.cluster.sharding {
# The extension creates a top level actor with this name in top level system scope,
# e.g. ’/system/sharding’
guardian-name = sharding
# When this is set to ’on’ the active entity actors will automatically be restarted
# upon Shard restart. i.e. if the Shard is started on a different ShardRegion
# due to rebalance or crash.
remember-entities = off
# the default snapshot plugin is used. Note that this is not related to
# persistence used by the entity actors.
snapshot-plugin-id = ""
# Timeout of waiting the initial distributed state (an initial state will be queried again if th
# works only for state-store-mode = "ddata"
waiting-for-state-timeout = 5 s
# Timeout of waiting for update the distributed state (update will be retried if the timeout hap
# works only for state-store-mode = "ddata"
updating-state-timeout = 5 s
# The shard uses this strategy to determines how to recover the underlying entity actors. The st
# by the persistent shard when rebalancing or restarting. The value can either be "all" or "cons
# strategy start all the underlying entity actors at the same time. The constant strategy will s
# entity actors at a fix rate. The default strategy "all".
entity-recovery-strategy = "all"
Custom shard allocation strategy can be defined in an optional parameter to ClusterSharding.start. See
the API documentation of AbstractShardAllocationStrategy for details of how to implement a custom
shard allocation strategy.
7.7.1 Introduction
The member nodes of the cluster can collect system health metrics and publish that to other cluster nodes and to
the registered subscribers on the system event bus with the help of Cluster Metrics Extension.
Cluster metrics information is primarily used for load-balancing routers, and can also be used to implement ad-
vanced metrics-based node life cycles, such as “Node Let-it-crash” when CPU steal time becomes excessive.
Cluster Metrics Extension is a separate Akka module delivered in akka-cluster-metrics jar.
To enable usage of the extension you need to add the following dependency to your project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-cluster-metrics_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
Metrics extension periodically publishes current snapshot of the cluster metrics to the node system event bus.
The publication period is controlled by the akka.cluster.metrics.collector.sample-period set-
ting.
The payload of the akka.cluster.metrics.ClusterMetricsChanged event will contain latest met-
rics of the node as well as other cluster member nodes metrics gossip which was received during the collector
sample period.
You can subscribe your metrics listener actors to these events in order to implement custom node lifecycle
ClusterMetricsExtension.get(system).subscribe(metricsListenerActor);
Both user-provided and built-in metrics collectors can optionally use Hyperic Sigar for a wider and more accurate
range of metrics compared to what can be retrieved from ordinary JMX MBeans.
Sigar is using a native o/s library, and requires library provisioning, i.e. deployment, extraction and loading of the
o/s native library into JVM at runtime.
User can provision Sigar classes and native library in one of the following ways:
1. Use Kamon sigar-loader as a project dependency for the user project. Metrics extension will extract and
load sigar library on demand with help of Kamon sigar provisioner.
2. Use Kamon sigar-loader as java agent: java -javaagent:/path/to/sigar-loader.jar. Ka-
mon sigar loader agent will extract and load sigar library during JVM start.
3. Place sigar.jar on the classpath and Sigar native library for the o/s on the java.library.path.
User is required to manage both project dependency and library deployment manually.
Warning: When using Kamon sigar-loader and running multiple instances of the same application on the
same host, you have to make sure that sigar library is extracted to a unique per instance directory. You can con-
trol the extract directory with the akka.cluster.metrics.native-library-extract-folder
configuration setting.
To enable usage of Sigar you can add the following dependency to the user project
<dependency>
<groupId>io.kamon</groupId>
<artifactId>sigar-loader</artifactId>
<version>1.6.6-rev002</version>
</dependency>
• heap / HeapMetricsSelector - Used and max JVM heap memory. Weights based on remaining heap
capacity; (max - used) / max
• load / SystemLoadAverageMetricsSelector - System load average for the past 1 minute, corre-
sponding value can be found in top of Linux systems. The system is possibly nearing a bottleneck if the
system load average is nearing number of cpus/cores. Weights based on remaining load capacity; 1 - (load
/ processors)
• cpu / CpuMetricsSelector - CPU utilization in percentage, sum of User + Sys + Nice + Wait. Weights
based on remaining cpu capacity; 1 - utilization
• mix / MixMetricsSelector - Combines heap, cpu and load. Weights based on mean of remaining
capacity of the combined selectors.
• Any custom implementation of akka.cluster.metrics.MetricsSelector
The collected metrics values are smoothed with exponential weighted moving average. In the Configuration you
can adjust how quickly past data is decayed compared to new data.
Let’s take a look at this router in action. What can be more demanding than calculating factorials?
The backend worker that performs the factorial calculation:
public class FactorialBackend extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof Integer) {
final Integer n = (Integer) message;
Future<BigInteger> f = future(new Callable<BigInteger>() {
public BigInteger call() {
return factorial(n);
}
}, getContext().dispatcher());
pipe(result, getContext().dispatcher()).to(getSender());
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
BigInteger factorial(int n) {
BigInteger acc = BigInteger.ONE;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) {
acc = acc.multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(i));
}
return acc;
}
}
The frontend that receives user jobs and delegates to the backends via the router:
public class FactorialFrontend extends UntypedActor {
final int upToN;
final boolean repeat;
@Override
public void preStart() {
sendJobs();
getContext().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof FactorialResult) {
FactorialResult result = (FactorialResult) message;
if (result.n == upToN) {
log.debug("{}! = {}", result.n, result.factorial);
if (repeat)
sendJobs();
else
getContext().stop(getSelf());
}
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
void sendJobs() {
log.info("Starting batch of factorials up to [{}]", upToN);
for (int n = 1; n <= upToN; n++) {
backend.tell(n, getSelf());
}
}
As you can see, the router is defined in the same way as other routers, and in this case it is configured as follows:
akka.actor.deployment {
/factorialFrontend/factorialBackendRouter = {
# Router type provided by metrics extension.
router = cluster-metrics-adaptive-group
# Router parameter specific for metrics extension.
# metrics-selector = heap
# metrics-selector = load
# metrics-selector = cpu
metrics-selector = mix
#
routees.paths = ["/user/factorialBackend"]
cluster {
enabled = on
use-role = backend
allow-local-routees = off
}
}
It is only router type and the metrics-selector parameter that is specific to this router, other things work
in the same way as other routers.
The same type of router could also have been defined in code:
int totalInstances = 100;
Iterable<String> routeesPaths = Arrays.asList("/user/factorialBackend", "");
boolean allowLocalRoutees = true;
String useRole = "backend";
ActorRef backend = getContext().actorOf(
new ClusterRouterGroup(new AdaptiveLoadBalancingGroup(
HeapMetricsSelector.getInstance(), Collections.<String> emptyList()),
new ClusterRouterGroupSettings(totalInstances, routeesPaths,
allowLocalRoutees, useRole)).props(), "factorialBackendRouter2");
The Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka Cluster Samples with Java. contains the full source code and
instructions of how to run the Adaptive Load Balancing sample.
@Override
public void postStop() {
extension.unsubscribe(getSelf());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof ClusterMetricsChanged) {
ClusterMetricsChanged clusterMetrics = (ClusterMetricsChanged) message;
for (NodeMetrics nodeMetrics : clusterMetrics.getNodeMetrics()) {
if (nodeMetrics.address().equals(cluster.selfAddress())) {
logHeap(nodeMetrics);
logCpu(nodeMetrics);
}
}
7.7.8 Configuration
The Cluster metrics extension can be configured with the following properties:
##############################################
# Akka Cluster Metrics Reference Config File #
##############################################
# This is the reference config file that contains all the default settings.
# Make your edits in your application.conf in order to override these settings.
# Sigar provisioning:
#
# User can provision sigar classes and native library in one of the following ways:
#
# 1) Use https://github.com/kamon-io/sigar-loader Kamon sigar-loader as a project dependency for
# Metrics extension will extract and load sigar library on demand with help of Kamon sigar provis
#
# 2) Use https://github.com/kamon-io/sigar-loader Kamon sigar-loader as java agent: ‘java -javaag
# Kamon sigar loader agent will extract and load sigar library during JVM start.
#
# 3) Place ‘sigar.jar‘ on the ‘classpath‘ and sigar native library for the o/s on the ‘java.libra
# User is required to manage both project dependency and library deployment manually.
# Try all 3 available collector providers, or else fail on the configured custom collector
fallback = true
# How often metrics are sampled on a node.
# Shorter interval will collect the metrics more often.
# Also controls frequency of the metrics publication to the node system event bus.
sample-interval = 3s
# How often a node publishes metrics information to the other nodes in the cluster.
# Shorter interval will publish the metrics gossip more often.
gossip-interval = 3s
# How quickly the exponential weighting of past data is decayed compared to
# new data. Set lower to increase the bias toward newer values.
# The relevance of each data sample is halved for every passing half-life
# duration, i.e. after 4 times the half-life, a data sample’s relevance is
# reduced to 6% of its original relevance. The initial relevance of a data
# sample is given by 1 - 0.5 ^ (collect-interval / half-life).
# See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average#Exponential_moving_average
moving-average-half-life = 12s
}
}
Akka Distributed Data is useful when you need to share data between nodes in an Akka Cluster. The data is
accessed with an actor providing a key-value store like API. The keys are unique identifiers with type information
of the data values. The values are Conflict Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs).
All data entries are spread to all nodes, or nodes with a certain role, in the cluster via direct replication and gossip
based dissemination. You have fine grained control of the consistency level for reads and writes.
The nature CRDTs makes it possible to perform updates from any node without coordination. Concurrent updates
from different nodes will automatically be resolved by the monotonic merge function, which all data types must
provide. The state changes always converge. Several useful data types for counters, sets, maps and registers are
provided and you can also implement your own custom data types.
It is eventually consistent and geared toward providing high read and write availability (partition tolerance), with
low latency. Note that in an eventually consistent system a read may return an out-of-date value.
Warning: This module is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction in Akka 2.4.0. We will continue to
improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while we try to keep incompatible changes
to a minimum the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance releases does not apply to the contents of
the akka.persistence package.
The akka.cluster.ddata.Replicator actor provides the API for interacting with the data. The
Replicator actor must be started on each node in the cluster, or group of nodes tagged with a specific role. It
communicates with other Replicator instances with the same path (without address) that are running on other
nodes . For convenience it can be used with the akka.cluster.ddata.DistributedData extension.
Cluster members with status WeaklyUp, if that feature is enabled, will participate in Distributed Data. This means
that the data will be replicated to the WeaklyUp nodes with the background gossip protocol. Note that it will not
participate in any actions where the consistency mode is to read/write from all nodes or the majority of nodes. The
WeaklyUp node is not counted as part of the cluster. So 3 nodes + 5 WeaklyUp is essentially a 3 node cluster as far
as consistent actions are concerned.
Below is an example of an actor that schedules tick messages to itself and for each tick adds or removes elements
from a ORSet (observed-remove set). It also subscribes to changes of this.
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadLocalRandom;
import akka.actor.AbstractActor;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.Cancellable;
import akka.cluster.Cluster;
import akka.cluster.ddata.DistributedData;
import akka.cluster.ddata.Key;
import akka.cluster.ddata.ORSet;
import akka.cluster.ddata.ORSetKey;
import akka.cluster.ddata.Replicator;
import akka.cluster.ddata.Replicator.Changed;
import akka.cluster.ddata.Replicator.Subscribe;
import akka.cluster.ddata.Replicator.Update;
import akka.cluster.ddata.Replicator.UpdateResponse;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public DataBot() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder
@Override
public void preStart() {
Subscribe<ORSet<String>> subscribe = new Subscribe<>(dataKey, self());
replicator.tell(subscribe, ActorRef.noSender());
}
@Override
public void postStop(){
tickTask.cancel();
}
Update
To modify and replicate a data value you send a Replicator.Update message to the local Replicator.
The current data value for the key of the Update is passed as parameter to the modify function of the Update.
The function is supposed to return the new value of the data, which will then be replicated according to the given
consistency level.
The modify function is called by the Replicator actor and must therefore be a pure function that only uses
the data parameter and stable fields from enclosing scope. It must for example not access sender() reference
of an enclosing actor.
Update is intended to only be sent from an actor running in same local ActorSystem as
• the Replicator, because the modify function is typically not serializable.
You supply a write consistency level which has the following meaning:
• writeLocal the value will immediately only be written to the local replica, and later disseminated with
gossip
• writeTo(n) the value will immediately be written to at least n replicas, including the local replica
• writeMajority the value will immediately be written to a majority of replicas, i.e. at least N/2 + 1
replicas, where N is the number of nodes in the cluster (or cluster role group)
• writeAll the value will immediately be written to all nodes in the cluster (or all nodes in the cluster role
group)
final Cluster node = Cluster.get(system);
final ActorRef replicator = DistributedData.get(system).replicator();
As reply of the Update a Replicator.UpdateSuccess is sent to the sender of the Update if the value
was successfully replicated according to the supplied consistency level within the supplied timeout. Otherwise a
Replicator.UpdateFailure subclass is sent back. Note that a Replicator.UpdateTimeout reply
does not mean that the update completely failed or was rolled back. It may still have been replicated to some
nodes, and will eventually be replicated to all nodes with the gossip protocol.
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(UpdateSuccess.class, a -> a.key().equals(counter1Key), a -> {
// ok
}).build());
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(UpdateSuccess.class, a -> a.key().equals(set1Key), a -> {
// ok
}).
match(UpdateTimeout.class, a -> a.key().equals(set1Key), a -> {
// write to 3 nodes failed within 1.second
}).build());
You will always see your own writes. For example if you send two Update messages changing the value of
the same key, the modify function of the second message will see the change that was performed by the first
Update message.
In the Update message you can pass an optional request context, which the Replicator does not care about,
but is included in the reply messages. This is a convenient way to pass contextual information (e.g. original
sender) without having to use ask or maintain local correlation data structures.
final Cluster node = Cluster.get(system);
final ActorRef replicator = DistributedData.get(system).replicator();
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, a -> a.equals("increment"), a -> {
// incoming command to increase the counter
Optional<Object> reqContext = Optional.of(getRef());
Replicator.Update<PNCounter> upd = new Replicator.Update<PNCounter>(counter1Key,
PNCounter.create(), writeTwo, reqContext, curr -> curr.increment(node, 1));
replicator.tell(upd, getTestActor());
}).
Get
To retrieve the current value of a data you send Replicator.Get message to the Replicator. You supply
a consistency level which has the following meaning:
• readLocal the value will only be read from the local replica
• readFrom(n) the value will be read and merged from n replicas, including the local replica
• readMajority the value will be read and merged from a majority of replicas, i.e. at least N/2 + 1 replicas,
where N is the number of nodes in the cluster (or cluster role group)
• readAll the value will be read and merged from all nodes in the cluster (or all nodes in the cluster role
group)
final ActorRef replicator = DistributedData.get(system).replicator();
final Key<PNCounter> counter1Key = PNCounterKey.create("counter1");
final Key<GSet<String>> set1Key = GSetKey.create("set1");
final Key<ORSet<String>> set2Key = ORSetKey.create("set2");
final Key<Flag> activeFlagKey = FlagKey.create("active");
replicator.tell(new Replicator.Get<PNCounter>(counter1Key,
Replicator.readLocal()), getTestActor());
replicator.tell(new Replicator.Get<Flag>(activeFlagKey,
readAll), getTestActor());
As reply of the Get a Replicator.GetSuccess is sent to the sender of the Get if the value was
successfully retrieved according to the supplied consistency level within the supplied timeout. Otherwise a
Replicator.GetFailure is sent. If the key does not exist the reply will be Replicator.NotFound.
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(GetSuccess.class, a -> a.key().equals(counter1Key), a -> {
GetSuccess<PNCounter> g = a;
BigInteger value = g.dataValue().getValue();
}).
match(NotFound.class, a -> a.key().equals(counter1Key), a -> {
// key counter1 does not exist
}).build());
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(GetSuccess.class, a -> a.key().equals(set1Key), a -> {
GetSuccess<GSet<String>> g = a;
Set<String> value = g.dataValue().getElements();
}).
match(GetFailure.class, a -> a.key().equals(set1Key), a -> {
// read from 3 nodes failed within 1.second
}).
match(NotFound.class, a -> a.key().equals(set1Key), a -> {
// key set1 does not exist
}).build());
You will always read your own writes. For example if you send a Update message followed by a Get of the
same key the Get will retrieve the change that was performed by the preceding Update message. However,
the order of the reply messages are not defined, i.e. in the previous example you may receive the GetSuccess
before the UpdateSuccess.
In the Get message you can pass an optional request context in the same way as for the Update message,
described above. For example the original sender can be passed and replied to after receiving and transforming
GetSuccess.
final ActorRef replicator = DistributedData.get(system).replicator();
final ReadConsistency readTwo = new ReadFrom(2, Duration.create(3, SECONDS));
final Key<PNCounter> counter1Key = PNCounterKey.create("counter1");
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, a -> a.equals("get-count"), a -> {
// incoming request to retrieve current value of the counter
Optional<Object> reqContext = Optional.of(getTestActor());
replicator.tell(new Replicator.Get<PNCounter>(counter1Key,
readTwo), getTestActor());
}).
replyTo.tell(0L, getTestActor());
}).build());
Consistency
The consistency level that is supplied in the Update and Get specifies per request how many replicas that must
respond successfully to a write and read request.
For low latency reads you use ReadLocal with the risk of retrieving stale data, i.e. updates from other nodes
might not be visible yet.
When using writeLocal the update is only written to the local replica and then disseminated in the background
with the gossip protocol, which can take few seconds to spread to all nodes.
writeAll and readAll is the strongest consistency level, but also the slowest and with lowest availability. For
example, it is enough that one node is unavailable for a Get request and you will not receive the value.
If consistency is important, you can ensure that a read always reflects the most recent write by using the following
formula:
(nodes_written + nodes_read) > N
where N is the total number of nodes in the cluster, or the number of nodes with the role that is used for the
Replicator.
For example, in a 7 node cluster this these consistency properties are achieved by writing to 4 nodes and reading
from 4 nodes, or writing to 5 nodes and reading from 3 nodes.
By combining writeMajority and readMajority levels a read always reflects the most recent write. The
Replicator writes and reads to a majority of replicas, i.e. N / 2 + 1. For example, in a 5 node cluster it writes
to 3 nodes and reads from 3 nodes. In a 6 node cluster it writes to 4 nodes and reads from 4 nodes.
Here is an example of using writeMajority and readMajority:
private final WriteConsistency writeMajority =
new WriteMajority(Duration.create(3, SECONDS));
private final static ReadConsistency readMajority =
new ReadMajority(Duration.create(3, SECONDS));
In some rare cases, when performing an Update it is needed to first try to fetch latest data from other nodes.
That can be done by first sending a Get with ReadMajority and then continue with the Update when the
GetSuccess, GetFailure or NotFound reply is received. This might be needed when you need to base a
decision on latest information or when removing entries from ORSet or ORMap. If an entry is added to an ORSet
or ORMap from one node and removed from another node the entry will only be removed if the added entry is
visible on the node where the removal is performed (hence the name observed-removed set).
The following example illustrates how to do that:
private void receiveRemoveItem(RemoveItem rm) {
// Try to fetch latest from a majority of nodes first, since ORMap
// remove must have seen the item to be able to remove it.
Optional<Object> ctx = Optional.of(rm);
replicator.tell(new Replicator.Get<LWWMap<LineItem>>(dataKey, readMajority, ctx),
self());
}
Warning: Caveat: Even if you use writeMajority and readMajority there is small risk that you
may read stale data if the cluster membership has changed between the Update and the Get. For example,
in cluster of 5 nodes when you Update and that change is written to 3 nodes: n1, n2, n3. Then 2 more nodes
are added and a Get request is reading from 4 nodes, which happens to be n4, n5, n6, n7, i.e. the value on n1,
n2, n3 is not seen in the response of the Get request.
Subscribe
You may also register interest in change notifications by sending Replicator.Subscribe mes-
sage to the Replicator. It will send Replicator.Changed messages to the registered sub-
scriber when the data for the subscribed key is updated. Subscribers will be notified periodically
with the configured notify-subscribers-interval, and it is also possible to send an explicit
Replicator.FlushChanges message to the Replicator to notify the subscribers immediately.
The subscriber is automatically removed if the subscriber is terminated. A subscriber can also be deregistered
with the Replicator.Unsubscribe message.
final ActorRef replicator = DistributedData.get(system).replicator();
final Key<PNCounter> counter1Key = PNCounterKey.create("counter1");
public MyActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Changed.class, a -> a.key().equals(counter1Key), a -> {
Changed<PNCounter> g = a;
currentValue = g.dataValue().getValue();
}).
Delete
A data entry can be deleted by sending a Replicator.Delete message to the local local Replicator.
As reply of the Delete a Replicator.DeleteSuccess is sent to the sender of the Delete if the value
was successfully deleted according to the supplied consistency level within the supplied timeout. Otherwise a
Replicator.ReplicationDeleteFailure is sent. Note that ReplicationDeleteFailure does
not mean that the delete completely failed or was rolled back. It may still have been replicated to some nodes, and
may eventually be replicated to all nodes.
A deleted key cannot be reused again, but it is still recommended to delete unused data entries because that reduces
the replication overhead when new nodes join the cluster. Subsequent Delete, Update and Get requests will
be replied with Replicator.DataDeleted. Subscribers will receive Replicator.DataDeleted.
replicator.tell(new Delete<PNCounter>(counter1Key,
Replicator.writeLocal()), getTestActor());
Warning: As deleted keys continue to be included in the stored data on each node as well as in gossip
messages, a continuous series of updates and deletes of top-level entities will result in growing memory usage
until an ActorSystem runs out of memory. To use Akka Distributed Data where frequent adds and removes are
required, you should use a fixed number of top-level data types that support both updates and removals, for
example ORMap or ORSet.
The data types must be convergent (stateful) CRDTs and implement the ReplicatedData trait, i.e. they
provide a monotonic merge function and the state changes always converge.
You can use your own custom ReplicatedData types, and several types are provided by this package, such
as:
• Counters: GCounter, PNCounter
• Sets: GSet, ORSet
• Maps: ORMap, ORMultiMap, LWWMap, PNCounterMap
• Registers: LWWRegister, Flag
Counters
Several related counters can be managed in a map with the PNCounterMap data type. When the counters are
placed in a PNCounterMap as opposed to placing them as separate top level values they are guaranteed to be
replicated together as one unit, which is sometimes necessary for related data.
final Cluster node = Cluster.get(system);
final PNCounterMap m0 = PNCounterMap.create();
final PNCounterMap m1 = m0.increment(node, "a", 7);
final PNCounterMap m2 = m1.decrement(node, "a", 2);
Sets
If you only need to add elements to a set and not remove elements the GSet (grow-only set) is the data type to
use. The elements can be any type of values that can be serialized. Merge is simply the union of the two sets.
final GSet<String> s0 = GSet.create();
final GSet<String> s1 = s0.add("a");
final GSet<String> s2 = s1.add("b").add("c");
if (s2.contains("a"))
System.out.println(s2.getElements()); // a, b, c
If you need add and remove operations you should use the ORSet (observed-remove set). Elements can be added
and removed any number of times. If an element is concurrently added and removed, the add will win. You cannot
remove an element that you have not seen.
The ORSet has a version vector that is incremented when an element is added to the set. The version for the node
that added the element is also tracked for each element in a so called “birth dot”. The version vector and the dots
are used by the merge function to track causality of the operations and resolve concurrent updates.
final Cluster node = Cluster.get(system);
final ORSet<String> s0 = ORSet.create();
final ORSet<String> s1 = s0.add(node, "a");
final ORSet<String> s2 = s1.add(node, "b");
final ORSet<String> s3 = s2.remove(node, "a");
System.out.println(s3.getElements()); // b
Maps
ORMap (observed-remove map) is a map with String keys and the values are ReplicatedData types them-
selves. It supports add, remove and delete any number of times for a map entry.
If an entry is concurrently added and removed, the add will win. You cannot remove an entry that you have not
seen. This is the same semantics as for the ORSet.
If an entry is concurrently updated to different values the values will be merged, hence the requirement that the
values must be ReplicatedData types.
It is rather inconvenient to use the ORMap directly since it does not expose specific types of the values. The
ORMap is intended as a low level tool for building more specific maps, such as the following specialized maps.
ORMultiMap (observed-remove multi-map) is a multi-map implementation that wraps an ORMap with an
ORSet for the map’s value.
PNCounterMap (positive negative counter map) is a map of named counters. It is a specialized ORMap with
PNCounter values.
LWWMap (last writer wins map) is a specialized ORMap with LWWRegister (last writer wins register) values.
final Cluster node = Cluster.get(system);
final ORMultiMap<Integer> m0 = ORMultiMap.create();
final ORMultiMap<Integer> m1 = m0.put(node, "a",
new HashSet<Integer>(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3)));
final ORMultiMap<Integer> m2 = m1.addBinding(node, "a", 4);
final ORMultiMap<Integer> m3 = m2.removeBinding(node, "a", 2);
final ORMultiMap<Integer> m4 = m3.addBinding(node, "b", 1);
System.out.println(m4.getEntries());
When a data entry is changed the full state of that entry is replicated to other nodes, i.e. when you update a map
the whole map is replicated. Therefore, instead of using one ORMap with 1000 elements it is more efficient to split
that up in 10 top level ORMap entries with 100 elements each. Top level entries are replicated individually, which
has the trade-off that different entries may not be replicated at the same time and you may see inconsistencies
between related entries. Separate top level entries cannot be updated atomically together.
Note that LWWRegister and therefore LWWMap relies on synchronized clocks and should only be used when the
choice of value is not important for concurrent updates occurring within the clock skew. Read more in the below
section about LWWRegister.
Flag is a data type for a boolean value that is initialized to false and can be switched to true. Thereafter it
cannot be changed. true wins over false in merge.
final Flag f0 = Flag.create();
final Flag f1 = f0.switchOn();
System.out.println(f1.enabled());
LWWRegister (last writer wins register) can hold any (serializable) value.
Merge of a LWWRegister takes the register with highest timestamp. Note that this relies on synchronized
clocks. LWWRegister should only be used when the choice of value is not important for concurrent updates
occurring within the clock skew.
Merge takes the register updated by the node with lowest address (UniqueAddress is ordered) if the timestamps
are exactly the same.
final Cluster node = Cluster.get(system);
final LWWRegister<String> r1 = LWWRegister.create(node, "Hello");
final LWWRegister<String> r2 = r1.withValue(node, "Hi");
System.out.println(r1.value() + " by " + r1.updatedBy() + " at " + r1.timestamp());
For first-write-wins semantics you can use the LWWRegister#reverseClock instead of the
LWWRegister#defaultClock.
The defaultClock is using max value of System.currentTimeMillis() and currentTimestamp
+ 1. This means that the timestamp is increased for changes on the same node that occurs within the same
millisecond. It also means that it is safe to use the LWWRegister without synchronized clocks when there is
only one active writer, e.g. a Cluster Singleton. Such a single writer should then first read current value with
ReadMajority (or more) before changing and writing the value with WriteMajority (or more).
You can rather easily implement your own data types. The only requirement is that it implements the mergeData
function of the AbstractReplicatedData class.
A nice property of stateful CRDTs is that they typically compose nicely, i.e. you can combine several smaller
data types to build richer data structures. For example, the PNCounter is composed of two internal GCounter
instances to keep track of increments and decrements separately.
Here is s simple implementation of a custom TwoPhaseSet that is using two internal GSet types to keep track
of addition and removals. A TwoPhaseSet is a set where an element may be added and removed, but never
added again thereafter.
public class TwoPhaseSet extends AbstractReplicatedData<TwoPhaseSet> {
@Override
public TwoPhaseSet mergeData(TwoPhaseSet that) {
return new TwoPhaseSet(this.adds.merge(that.adds),
this.removals.merge(that.removals));
}
}
Data types should be immutable, i.e. “modifying” methods should return a new instance.
Serialization
The data types must be serializable with an Akka Serializer. It is highly recommended that
you implement efficient serialization with Protobuf or similar for your custom data types. The
built in data types are marked with ReplicatedDataSerialization and serialized with
akka.cluster.ddata.protobuf.ReplicatedDataSerializer.
Serialization of the data types are used in remote messages and also for creating message digests (SHA-1) to
detect changes. Therefore it is important that the serialization is efficient and produce the same bytes for the same
content. For example sets and maps should be sorted deterministically in the serialization.
This is a protobuf representation of the above TwoPhaseSet:
option java_package = "docs.ddata.protobuf.msg";
option optimize_for = SPEED;
message TwoPhaseSet {
repeated string adds = 1;
repeated string removals = 2;
}
import akka.actor.ExtendedActorSystem;
import akka.cluster.ddata.GSet;
import akka.cluster.ddata.protobuf.AbstractSerializationSupport;
@Override
public ExtendedActorSystem system() {
return this.system;
}
@Override
public boolean includeManifest() {
return false;
}
@Override
public int identifier() {
return 99998;
}
@Override
public byte[] toBinary(Object obj) {
if (obj instanceof TwoPhaseSet) {
return twoPhaseSetToProto((TwoPhaseSet) obj).toByteArray();
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Can’t serialize object of type " + obj.getClass());
}
}
@Override
public Object fromBinaryJava(byte[] bytes, Class<?> manifest) {
return twoPhaseSetFromBinary(bytes);
}
Note that the elements of the sets are sorted so the SHA-1 digests are the same for the same elements.
You register the serializer in configuration:
akka.actor {
serializers {
twophaseset = "docs.ddata.japi.protobuf.TwoPhaseSetSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"docs.ddata.japi.TwoPhaseSet" = twophaseset
}
}
Using compression can sometimes be a good idea to reduce the data size. Gzip compression is provided by the
akka.cluster.ddata.protobuf.SerializationSupport trait:
@Override
public byte[] toBinary(Object obj) {
if (obj instanceof TwoPhaseSet) {
return compress(twoPhaseSetToProto((TwoPhaseSet) obj));
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
@Override
public Object fromBinaryJava(byte[] bytes, Class<?> manifest) {
return twoPhaseSetFromBinary(decompress(bytes));
}
The two embedded GSet can be serialized as illustrated above, but in general when composing new data types
from the existing built in types it is better to make use of the existing serializer for those types. This can be done
by declaring those as bytes fields in protobuf:
message TwoPhaseSet2 {
optional bytes adds = 1;
optional bytes removals = 2;
}
and use the methods otherMessageToProto and otherMessageFromBinary that are provided by the
SerializationSupport trait to serialize and deserialize the GSet instances. This works with any type that
has a registered Akka serializer. This is how such an serializer would look like for the TwoPhaseSet:
import docs.ddata.japi.TwoPhaseSet;
import docs.ddata.protobuf.msg.TwoPhaseSetMessages;
import docs.ddata.protobuf.msg.TwoPhaseSetMessages.TwoPhaseSet2.Builder;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import akka.actor.ExtendedActorSystem;
import akka.cluster.ddata.GSet;
import akka.cluster.ddata.protobuf.AbstractSerializationSupport;
import akka.cluster.ddata.protobuf.ReplicatedDataSerializer;
@Override
public ExtendedActorSystem system() {
return this.system;
}
@Override
public boolean includeManifest() {
return false;
}
@Override
public int identifier() {
return 99998;
}
@Override
public byte[] toBinary(Object obj) {
if (obj instanceof TwoPhaseSet) {
return twoPhaseSetToProto((TwoPhaseSet) obj).toByteArray();
} else {
@Override
public Object fromBinaryJava(byte[] bytes, Class<?> manifest) {
return twoPhaseSetFromBinary(bytes);
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
protected TwoPhaseSet twoPhaseSetFromBinary(byte[] bytes) {
try {
TwoPhaseSetMessages.TwoPhaseSet2 msg =
TwoPhaseSetMessages.TwoPhaseSet2.parseFrom(bytes);
Durable Storage
By default the data is only kept in memory. It is redundant since it is replicated to other nodes in the cluster, but if
you stop all nodes the data is lost, unless you have saved it elsewhere.
Entries can be configured to be durable, i.e. stored on local disk on each node. The stored data will be loaded next
time the replicator is started, i.e. when actor system is restarted. This means data will survive as long as at least
one node from the old cluster takes part in a new cluster. The keys of the durable entries are configured with:
akka.cluster.distributed-data.durable.keys = ["a", "b", "durable*"]
LMDB is the default storage implementation. It is possible to replace that with another implementation by
implementing the actor protocol described in akka.cluster.ddata.DurableStore and defining the
akka.cluster.distributed-data.durable.store-actor-class property for the new imple-
mentation.
The location of the files for the data is configured with:
Making the data durable has of course a performance cost. By default, each update is flushed to disk before the
UpdateSuccess reply is sent. For better performance, but with the risk of losing the last writes if the JVM
crashes, you can enable write behind mode. Changes are then accumulated during a time period before it is written
to LMDB and flushed to disk. Enabling write behind is especially efficient when performing many writes to the
same key, because it is only the last value for each key that will be serialized and stored. The risk of losing writes
if the JVM crashes is small since the data is typically replicated to other nodes immediately according to the given
WriteConsistency.
akka.cluster.distributed-data.lmdb.write-behind-interval = 200 ms
Note that you should be prepared to receive WriteFailure as reply to an Update of a durable entry if the
data could not be stored for some reason. When enabling write-behind-interval such errors will only be
logged and UpdateSuccess will still be the reply to the Update.
CRDT Garbage
One thing that can be problematic with CRDTs is that some data types accumulate history (garbage). For example
a GCounter keeps track of one counter per node. If a GCounter has been updated from one node it will
associate the identifier of that node forever. That can become a problem for long running systems with many
cluster nodes being added and removed. To solve this problem the Replicator performs pruning of data
associated with nodes that have been removed from the cluster. Data types that need pruning have to implement
the RemovedNodePruning trait.
7.8.3 Samples
Several interesting samples are included and described in the Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka Distributed
Data Samples with Java.
• Low Latency Voting Service
• Highly Available Shopping Cart
• Distributed Service Registry
• Replicated Cache
• Replicated Metrics
7.8.4 Limitations
When a data entry is changed the full state of that entry is replicated to other nodes. For example, if you add one
element to a Set with 100 existing elements, all 101 elements are transferred to other nodes. This means that you
cannot have too large data entries, because then the remote message size will be too large. We might be able to
make this more efficient by implementing Efficient State-based CRDTs by Delta-Mutation.
Dependencies
To use Distributed Data you must add the following dependency in your project.
sbt:
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-distributed-data-experimental" % "2.4.20"
maven:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-distributed-data-experimental_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
7.8.6 Configuration
# How often the Replicator checks for pruning of data associated with
# How long time it takes (worst case) to spread the data to all other replica nodes.
# This is used when initiating and completing the pruning process of data associated
# with removed cluster nodes. The time measurement is stopped when any replica is
# unreachable, so it should be configured to worst case in a healthy cluster.
max-pruning-dissemination = 60 s
# Serialized Write and Read messages are cached when they are sent to
# several nodes. If no further activity they are removed from the cache
# after this duration.
serializer-cache-time-to-live = 10s
durable {
# List of keys that are durable. Prefix matching is supported by using * at the
# end of a key.
keys = []
# Fully qualified class name of the durable store actor. It must be a subclass
# of akka.actor.Actor and handle the protocol defined in
# akka.cluster.ddata.DurableStore. The class must have a constructor with
# com.typesafe.config.Config parameter.
store-actor-class = akka.cluster.ddata.LmdbDurableStore
use-dispatcher = akka.cluster.distributed-data.durable.pinned-store
pinned-store {
executor = thread-pool-executor
type = PinnedDispatcher
}
7.9 Remoting
Note: As explained in that chapter Akka remoting is designed for communication in a peer-to-peer fashion and
it has limitations for client-server setups. In particular Akka Remoting does not work transparently with Network
Address Translation, Load Balancers, or in Docker containers. For symmetric communication in these situations
network and/or Akka configuration will have to be changed as described in Peer-to-Peer vs. Client-Server.
The Akka remoting is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-remote_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
To enable remote capabilities in your Akka project you should, at a minimum, add the following changes to your
application.conf file:
akka {
actor {
provider = remote
}
remote {
enabled-transports = ["akka.remote.netty.tcp"]
netty.tcp {
hostname = "127.0.0.1"
port = 2552
}
}
}
As you can see in the example above there are four things you need to add to get started:
• Change provider from local to remote
• Add host name - the machine you want to run the actor system on; this host name is exactly what is passed
to remote systems in order to identify this system and consequently used for connecting back to this system
if need be, hence set it to a reachable IP address or resolvable name in case you want to communicate across
the network.
• Add port number - the port the actor system should listen on, set to 0 to have it chosen automatically
Note: The port number needs to be unique for each actor system on the same machine even if the actor systems
have different names. This is because each actor system has its own network subsystem listening for connections
and handling messages as not to interfere with other actor systems.
The example above only illustrates the bare minimum of properties you have to add to enable remoting. All
settings are described in Remote Configuration.
ActorSelection selection =
context.actorSelection("akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/serviceA/worker");
As you can see from the example above the following pattern is used to find an actor on a remote node:
akka.<protocol>://<actorsystemname>@<hostname>:<port>/<actor path>
Once you obtained a selection to the actor you can interact with it they same way you would with a local actor,
e.g.:
selection.tell("Pretty awesome feature", getSelf());
To acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection you need to send a message to the selection and use the
getSender reference of the reply from the actor. There is a built-in Identify message that all Actors will un-
derstand and automatically reply to with a ActorIdentity message containing the ActorRef. This can also
be done with the resolveOneCS method of the ActorSelection, which returns a CompletionStage of
the matching ActorRef.
Note: For more details on how actor addresses and paths are formed and used, please refer to Actor References,
Paths and Addresses.
Note: Message sends to actors that are actually in the sending actor system do not get delivered via the remote
actor ref provider. They’re delivered directly, by the local actor ref provider.
Aside from providing better performance, this also means that if the hostname you configure remoting to listen
as cannot actually be resolved from within the very same actor system, such messages will (perhaps counterintu-
itively) be delivered just fine.
If you want to use the creation functionality in Akka remoting you have to further amend the
application.conf file in the following way (only showing deployment section):
akka {
actor {
deployment {
/sampleActor {
remote = "akka.tcp://[email protected]:2553"
}
}
}
}
The configuration above instructs Akka to react when an actor with path /sampleActor is created, i.e. us-
ing system.actorOf(new Props(...), "sampleActor"). This specific actor will not be directly
instantiated, but instead the remote daemon of the remote system will be asked to create the actor, which in this
sample corresponds to [email protected]:2553.
Once you have configured the properties above you would do the following in code:
ActorRef actor = system.actorOf(Props.create(SampleActor.class), "sampleActor");
actor.tell("Pretty slick", ActorRef.noSender());
The actor class SampleActor has to be available to the runtimes using it, i.e. the classloader of the actor systems
has to have a JAR containing the class.
Note: In order to ensure serializability of Props when passing constructor arguments to the actor being created,
do not make the factory a non-static inner class: this will inherently capture a reference to its enclosing object,
which in most cases is not serializable. It is best to make a static inner class which implements Creator.
Note: You can use asterisks as wildcard matches for the actor path sections, so you could specify:
/*/sampleActor and that would match all sampleActor on that level in the hierarchy. You can also use
wildcard in the last position to match all actors at a certain level: /someParent/*. Non-wildcard matches
always have higher priority to match than wildcards, so: /foo/bar is considered more specific than /foo/*
and only the highest priority match is used. Please note that it cannot be used to partially match section, like this:
/foo*/bar, /f*o/bar etc.
To allow dynamically deployed systems, it is also possible to include deployment configuration in the Props
which are used to create an actor: this information is the equivalent of a deployment section from the configuration
file, and if both are given, the external configuration takes precedence.
With these imports:
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.Address;
import akka.actor.AddressFromURIString;
import akka.actor.Deploy;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.remote.RemoteScope;
you can advise the system to create a child on that remote node like so:
ActorRef ref = system.actorOf(Props.create(SampleActor.class).withDeploy(
new Deploy(new RemoteScope(addr))));
As remote deployment can potentially be abused by both users and even attackers a whitelist feature is available
to guard the ActorSystem from deploying unexpected actors. Please note that remote deployment is not remote
code loading, the Actors class to be deployed onto a remote system needs to be present on that remote system.
This still however may pose a security risk, and one may want to restrict remote deployment to only a specific set
of known actors by enabling the whitelist feature.
To enable remote deployment whitelisting set the akka.remote.deployment.enable-whitelist value
to on. The list of allowed classes has to be configured on the “remote” system, in other words on the system onto
which others will be attempting to remote deploy Actors. That system, locally, knows best which Actors it should
or should not allow others to remote deploy onto it. The full settings section may for example look like this:
akka.remote.deployment {
enable-whitelist = on
whitelist = [
"NOT_ON_CLASSPATH", # verify we don’t throw if a class not on classpath is listed here
"akka.remote.RemoteDeploymentWhitelistSpec.EchoWhitelisted"
]
}
Actor classes not included in the whitelist will not be allowed to be remote deployed onto this system.
Each link with a remote system can be in one of the four states as illustrated above. Before any communication
happens with a remote system at a given Address the state of the association is Idle. The first time a message
is attempted to be sent to the remote system or an inbound connection is accepted the state of the link transitions
to Active denoting that the two systems has messages to send or receive and no failures were encountered so
far. When a communication failure happens and the connection is lost between the two systems the link becomes
Gated.
In this state the system will not attempt to connect to the remote host and all outbound mes-
sages will be dropped. The time while the link is in the Gated state is controlled by the setting
akka.remote.retry-gate-closed-for: after this time elapses the link state transitions to Idle again.
Gate is one-sided in the sense that whenever a successful inbound connection is accepted from a remote system
during Gate it automatically transitions to Active and communication resumes immediately.
In the face of communication failures that are unrecoverable because the state of the participating systems are
inconsistent, the remote system becomes Quarantined. Unlike Gate, quarantining is permanent and lasts
until one of the systems is restarted. After a restart communication can be resumed again and the link can become
Active again.
Watching a remote actor is not different than watching a local actor, as described in Lifecycle Monitoring aka
DeathWatch.
Failure Detector
Under the hood remote death watch uses heartbeat messages and a failure detector to generate Terminated
message from network failures and JVM crashes, in addition to graceful termination of watched actor.
The heartbeat arrival times is interpreted by an implementation of The Phi Accrual Failure Detector.
The suspicion level of failure is given by a value called phi. The basic idea of the phi failure detector is to express
the value of phi on a scale that is dynamically adjusted to reflect current network conditions.
The value of phi is calculated as:
phi = -log10(1 - F(timeSinceLastHeartbeat))
where F is the cumulative distribution function of a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation estimated
from historical heartbeat inter-arrival times.
In the Remote Configuration you can adjust the akka.remote.watch-failure-detector.threshold
to define when a phi value is considered to be a failure.
A low threshold is prone to generate many false positives but ensures a quick detection in the event of a real
crash. Conversely, a high threshold generates fewer mistakes but needs more time to detect actual crashes.
The default threshold is 10 and is appropriate for most situations. However in cloud environments, such as
Amazon EC2, the value could be increased to 12 in order to account for network issues that sometimes occur on
such platforms.
The following chart illustrates how phi increase with increasing time since the previous heartbeat.
Phi is calculated from the mean and standard deviation of historical inter arrival times. The previous chart is an
example for standard deviation of 200 ms. If the heartbeats arrive with less deviation the curve becomes steeper,
i.e. it is possible to determine failure more quickly. The curve looks like this for a standard deviation of 100 ms.
7.9.6 Serialization
When using remoting for actors you must ensure that the props and messages used for those actors are serial-
izable. Failing to do so will cause the system to behave in an unintended way.
For more information please see Serialization.
Since the 2.4.11 release of Akka it is possible to entirely disable the default Java Serialization mechanism.
Please note that new remoting implementation (codename Artery) does not use Java serialization for internal
messages by default. For compatibility reasons, the current remoting still uses Java serialization for some classes,
however you can disable it in this remoting implementation as well by following the steps below.
The first step is to enable some additional serializers that replace previous Java serialization of some internal
messages. This is recommended also when you can’t disable Java serialization completely. Those serializers are
enabled with this configuration:
akka.actor {
# Set this to on to enable serialization-bindings define in
# additional-serialization-bindings. Those are by default not included
# for backwards compatibility reasons. They are enabled by default if
# akka.remote.artery.enabled=on.
enable-additional-serialization-bindings = on
}
The reason these are not enabled by default is wire-level compatibility between any 2.4.x Actor Systems. If you
roll out a new cluster, all on the same Akka version that can enable these serializers it is recommended to enable
this setting. When using Remoting (codename Artery) these serializers are enabled by default.
Warning: Please note that when enabling the additional-serialization-bindings when using the old remoting,
you must do so on all nodes participating in a cluster, otherwise the mis-aligned serialization configurations
will cause deserialization errors on the receiving nodes.
Java serialization is known to be slow and prone to attacks of various kinds - it never was designed for high
throughput messaging after all. However, it is very convenient to use, thus it remained the default serialization
mechanism that Akka used to serialize user messages as well as some of its internal messages in previous ver-
sions. Since the release of Artery, Akka internals do not rely on Java serialization anymore (one exception being
java.lang.Throwable).
Note: When using the new remoting implementation (codename Artery), Akka does not use Java Serialization
for any of it’s internal messages. It is highly encouraged to disable java serialization, so please plan to do so at the
earliest possibility you have in your project.
One may think that network bandwidth and latency limit the performance of remote messaging, but serialization
is a more typical bottleneck.
For user messages, the default serializer, implemented using Java serialization, remains available and enabled in
Artery. We do however recommend to disable it entirely and utilise a proper serialization library instead in order
effectively utilise the improved performance and ability for rolling deployments using Artery. Libraries that we
recommend to use include, but are not limited to, Kryo by using the akka-kryo-serialization library or Google
Protocol Buffers if you want more control over the schema evolution of your messages.
In order to completely disable Java Serialization in your Actor system you need to add the following configuration
to your application.conf:
akka.actor.allow-java-serialization = off
This will completely disable the use of akka.serialization.JavaSerialization by the Akka Seri-
alization extension, instead DisabledJavaSerializer will be inserted which will fail explicitly if attempts
to use java serialization are made.
It will also enable the above mentioned enable-additional-serialization-bindings.
The log messages emitted by such serializer SHOULD be be treated as potential attacks which the serializer
prevented, as they MAY indicate an external operator attempting to send malicious messages intending to use java
serialization as attack vector. The attempts are logged with the SECURITY marker.
Please note that this option does not stop you from manually invoking java serialization.
Please note that this means that you will have to configure different serializers which will able to handle all of
your remote messages. Please refer to the Serialization documentation as well as ByteBuffer based serialization
to learn how to do this.
This configuration setting will clone the actor defined in the Props of the remotePool 10 times and deploy it
evenly distributed across the two given target nodes.
A group of remote actors can be configured as:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/remoteGroup {
router = round-robin-group
routees.paths = [
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1",
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1",
"akka.tcp://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1"]
}
}
This configuration setting will send messages to the defined remote actor paths. It requires that you create the
destination actors on the remote nodes with matching paths. That is not done by the router.
There is a more extensive remote example that comes with Lightbend Activator. The tutorial named Akka Remote
Samples with Java demonstrates both remote deployment and look-up of remote actors.
Remote Events
It is possible to listen to events that occur in Akka Remote, and to subscribe/unsubscribe to these events you
simply register as listener to the below described types in on the ActorSystem.eventStream.
Note: The use of term “Association” instead of “Connection” reflects that the remoting subsystem may use con-
nectionless transports, but an association similar to transport layer connections is maintained between endpoints
by the Akka protocol.
By default an event listener is registered which logs all of the events described below. This default was chosen to
help setting up a system, but it is quite common to switch this logging off once that phase of the project is finished.
To be notified when an association is over (“disconnected”) listen to DisassociatedEvent which holds the
direction of the association (inbound or outbound) and the addresses of the involved parties.
To be notified when an association is successfully established (“connected”) listen to AssociatedEvent which
holds the direction of the association (inbound or outbound) and the addresses of the involved parties.
To intercept errors directly related to associations, listen to AssociationErrorEvent which holds the direc-
tion of the association (inbound or outbound), the addresses of the involved parties and the Throwable cause.
To be notified when the remoting subsystem is ready to accept associations, listen to RemotingListenEvent
which contains the addresses the remoting listens on.
To be notified when the remoting subsystem has been shut down, listen to RemotingShutdownEvent.
To be notified when the current system is quarantined by the remote system, listen to
ThisActorSystemQuarantinedEvent, which includes the addresses of local and remote ActorSys-
tems.
To intercept generic remoting related errors, listen to RemotingErrorEvent which holds the Throwable
cause.
An ActorSystem should not be exposed via Akka Remote over plain TCP to an untrusted network (e.g. inter-
net). It should be protected by network security, such as a firewall. If that is not considered as enough protection
TLS with mutual authentication should be enabled.
Best practice is that Akka remoting nodes should only be accessible from the adjacent network. Note that if TLS
is enabled with mutual authentication there is still a risk that an attacker can gain access to a valid certificate by
by compromising any node with certificates issued by the same internal PKI tree.
It is also security best practice to disable the Java serializer because of its multiple known attack surfaces.
SSL can be used as the remote transport by adding akka.remote.netty.ssl to the enabled-transport
configuration section. An example of setting up the default Netty based SSL driver as default:
akka {
remote {
enabled-transports = [akka.remote.netty.ssl]
}
}
trust-store = "/example/path/to/mytruststore.jks"
key-store-password = "changeme"
key-password = "changeme"
trust-store-password = "changeme"
protocol = "TLSv1.2"
enabled-algorithms = [TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256]
random-number-generator = "AES128CounterSecureRNG"
}
}
}
According to RFC 7525 the recommended algorithms to use with TLS 1.2 (as of writing this document) are:
• TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
• TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
• TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
• TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Creating and working with keystores and certificates is well documented in the Generating X.509 Certificates
section of Lightbend’s SSL-Config library.
Since an Akka remoting is inherently peer-to-peer both the key-store as well as trust-store need to be configured
on each remoting node participating in the cluster.
The official Java Secure Socket Extension documentation as well as the Oracle documentation on creating Key-
Store and TrustStores are both great resources to research when setting up security on the JVM. Please consult
those resources when troubleshooting and configuring SSL.
It is strongly recommended to require mutual authentication between TLS peers and the only reason it is not
enabled by default is for backwards compatibility reasons. Enable mutual authentication with configuration prop-
erty:
akka.remote.netty.ssl.security.require-mutual-authentication = on
Without mutual authentication only the peer that actively establishes a connection (TLS client side) checks if the
passive side (TLS server side) sends over a trusted certificate. With the flag turned on, the passive side will also
request and verify a certificate from the connecting peer.
Note that if TLS is enabled with mutual authentication there is still a risk that an attacker can gain access to a valid
certificate by by compromising any node with certificates issued by the same internal PKI tree.
To prevent man-in-the-middle attacks you should enable this setting. For compatibility reasons it is still set to
‘off’ per default.
Nodes that are configured with this setting to ‘on’ might not be able to receive messages from nodes that run on
older versions of akka-remote. This is because in older versions of Akka the active side of the remoting connection
will not send over certificates.
However, even with this setting “off”, the active side (TLS client side) will use the given key-store to send over a
certificate if asked. A rolling upgrades from older versions of Akka can therefore work like this:
• upgrade all nodes to an Akka version supporting this flag, keeping it off
• then switch the flag on and do again a rolling upgrade of all nodes
The first step ensures that all nodes will send over a certificate when asked to. The second step will ensure that all
nodes finally enforce the secure checking of client certificates.
See also a description of the settings in the remote-configuration-scala section.
Untrusted Mode
As soon as an actor system can connect to another remotely, it may in principle send any possible message to any
actor contained within that remote system. One example may be sending a PoisonPill to the system guardian,
shutting that system down. This is not always desired, and it can be disabled with the following setting:
akka.remote.untrusted-mode = on
This disallows sending of system messages (actor life-cycle commands, DeathWatch, etc.) and any message
extending PossiblyHarmful to the system on which this flag is set. Should a client send them nonetheless
they are dropped and logged (at DEBUG level in order to reduce the possibilities for a denial of service attack).
PossiblyHarmful covers the predefined messages like PoisonPill and Kill, but it can also be added as
a marker trait to user-defined messages.
Warning: Untrusted mode does not give full protection against attacks by itself. It makes it slightly harder
to perform malicious or unintended actions but it should be complemented with disabled Java serializer. Ad-
ditional protection can be achieved when running in an untrusted network by network security (e.g. firewalls)
and/or enabling TLS with mutual authentication.
Messages sent with actor selection are by default discarded in untrusted mode, but permission to receive actor
selection messages can be granted to specific actors defined in configuration:
akka.remote.trusted-selection-paths = ["/user/receptionist", "/user/namingService"]
Note: Enabling the untrusted mode does not remove the capability of the client to freely choose the target of
its message sends, which means that messages not prohibited by the above rules can be sent to any actor in the
remote system. It is good practice for a client-facing system to only contain a well-defined set of entry point actors,
which then forward requests (possibly after performing validation) to another actor system containing the actual
worker actors. If messaging between these two server-side systems is done using local ActorRef (they can be
exchanged safely between actor systems within the same JVM), you can restrict the messages on this interface by
marking them PossiblyHarmful so that a client cannot forge them.
There are lots of configuration properties that are related to remoting in Akka. We refer to the reference configu-
ration for more information.
Note: Setting properties like the listening IP and port number programmatically is best done by using something
like the following:
ConfigFactory.parseString("akka.remote.netty.tcp.hostname=\"1.2.3.4\"")
.withFallback(ConfigFactory.load());
In setups involving Network Address Translation (NAT), Load Balancers or Docker containers the hostname and
port pair that Akka binds to will be different than the “logical” host name and port pair that is used to connect to
the system from the outside. This requires special configuration that sets both the logical and the bind pairs for
remoting.
akka {
remote {
netty.tcp {
hostname = my.domain.com # external (logical) hostname
port = 8000 # external (logical) port
Note: This page describes the experimental remoting subsystem, codenamed Artery that will eventually replace
the old remoting implementation. For the current stable remoting system please refer to Remoting.
Remoting enables Actor systems on different hosts or JVMs to communicate with each other. By enabling re-
moting the system will start listening on a provided network address and also gains the ability to connect to other
systems through the network. From the application’s perspective there is no API difference between local or re-
mote systems, ActorRef instances that point to remote systems look exactly the same as local ones: they can
be sent messages to, watched, etc. Every ActorRef contains hostname and port information and can be passed
around even on the network. This means that on a network every ActorRef is a unique identifier of an actor on
that network.
Remoting is not a server-client technology. All systems using remoting can contact any other system on the
network if they possess an ActorRef pointing to those system. This means that every system that is remoting
enabled acts as a “server” to which arbitrary systems on the same network can connect to.
Artery is a reimplementation of the old remoting module aimed at improving performance and stability. It is
mostly source compatible with the old implementation and it is a drop-in replacement in many cases. Main
features of Artery compared to the previous implementation:
• Based on Aeron (UDP) instead of TCP
• Focused on high-throughput, low-latency communication
• Isolation of internal control messages from user messages improving stability and reducing false failure
detection in case of heavy traffic by using a dedicated subchannel.
• Mostly allocation-free operation
• Support for a separate subchannel for large messages to avoid interference with smaller messages
• Compression of actor paths on the wire to reduce overhead for smaller messages
• Support for faster serialization/deserialization using ByteBuffers directly
• Built-in Flight-Recorder to help debugging implementation issues without polluting users logs with imple-
mentation specific events
• Providing protocol stability across major Akka versions to support rolling updates of large-scale systems
The main incompatible change from the previous implementation that the protocol field of the string representation
of an ActorRef is always akka instead of the previously used akka.tcp or akka.ssl.tcp. Configuration properties
are also different.
The Akka remoting is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-remote" % "2.4.20"
To enable remote capabilities in your Akka project you should, at a minimum, add the following changes to your
application.conf file:
akka {
actor {
provider = remote
}
remote {
artery {
enabled = on
canonical.hostname = "127.0.0.1"
canonical.port = 25520
}
}
}
As you can see in the example above there are four things you need to add to get started:
• Change provider from local to remote
• Enable Artery to use it as the remoting implementation
• Add host name - the machine you want to run the actor system on; this host name is exactly what is passed
to remote systems in order to identify this system and consequently used for connecting back to this system
if need be, hence set it to a reachable IP address or resolvable name in case you want to communicate across
the network.
• Add port number - the port the actor system should listen on, set to 0 to have it chosen automatically
Note: The port number needs to be unique for each actor system on the same machine even if the actor sys-
tems have different names. This is because each actor system has its own networking subsystem listening for
connections and handling messages as not to interfere with other actor systems.
The example above only illustrates the bare minimum of properties you have to add to enable remoting. All
settings are described in Remote Configuration.
Canonical address
In order to remoting to work properly, where each system can send messages to any other system on the same
network (for example a system forwards a message to a third system, and the third replies directly to the sender
system) it is essential for every system to have a unique, globally reachable address and port. This address is
part of the unique name of the system and will be used by other systems to open a connection to it and send
messages. This means that if a host has multiple names (different DNS records pointing to the same IP address)
then only one of these can be canonical. If a message arrives to a system but it contains a different hostname
than the expected canonical name then the message will be dropped. If multiple names for a system would be
allowed, then equality checks among ActorRef instances would no longer to be trusted and this would violate
the fundamental assumption that an actor has a globally unique reference on a given network. As a consequence,
this also means that localhost addresses (e.g. 127.0.0.1) cannot be used in general (apart from local development)
since they are not unique addresses in a real network.
In cases, where Network Address Translation (NAT) is used or other network bridging is involved, it is important
to configure the system so that it understands that there is a difference between his externally visible, canonical
address and between the host-port pair that is used to listen for connections. See Akka behind NAT or in a Docker
container for details.
In order to communicate with an actor, it is necessary to have its ActorRef. In the local case it is usually the
creator of the actor (the caller of actorOf()) is who gets the ActorRef for an actor that it can then send to
other actors. In other words:
• An Actor can get a remote Actor’s reference simply by receiving a message from it (as it’s available as
sender() then), or inside of a remote message (e.g. PleaseReply(message: String, remoteActorRef: Actor-
Ref))
Alternatively, an actor can look up another located at a known path using ActorSelection. These methods
are available even in remoting enabled systems:
• Remote Lookup : used to look up an actor on a remote node with actorSelection(path)
• Remote Creation : used to create an actor on a remote node with actorOf(Props(...),
actorName)
In the next sections the two alternatives are described in detail.
As you can see from the example above the following pattern is used to find an actor on a remote node:
akka://<actor system>@<hostname>:<port>/<actor path>
Note: Unlike with earlier remoting, the protocol field is always akka as pluggable transports are no longer
supported.
Once you obtained a selection to the actor you can interact with it in the same way you would with a local actor,
e.g.:
selection ! "Pretty awesome feature"
To acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection you need to send a message to the selection and use the
sender reference of the reply from the actor. There is a built-in Identify message that all Actors will un-
derstand and automatically reply to with a ActorIdentity message containing the ActorRef. This can also
be done with the resolveOne method of the ActorSelection, which returns a Future of the matching
ActorRef.
For more details on how actor addresses and paths are formed and used, please refer to Actor References, Paths
and Addresses.
Note: Message sends to actors that are actually in the sending actor system do not get delivered via the remote
actor ref provider. They’re delivered directly, by the local actor ref provider.
Aside from providing better performance, this also means that if the hostname you configure remoting to listen
as cannot actually be resolved from within the very same actor system, such messages will (perhaps counterintu-
itively) be delivered just fine.
If you want to use the creation functionality in Akka remoting you have to further amend the
application.conf file in the following way (only showing deployment section):
akka {
actor {
deployment {
/sampleActor {
remote = "akka://[email protected]:2553"
}
}
}
}
The configuration above instructs Akka to react when an actor with path /sampleActor is created, i.e. using
system.actorOf(Props(...), "sampleActor"). This specific actor will not be directly instantiated,
but instead the remote daemon of the remote system will be asked to create the actor, which in this sample
corresponds to [email protected]:2553.
Once you have configured the properties above you would do the following in code:
ActorRef actor = system.actorOf(Props.create(SampleActor.class), "sampleActor");
actor.tell("Pretty slick", ActorRef.noSender());
The actor class SampleActor has to be available to the runtimes using it, i.e. the classloader of the actor systems
has to have a JAR containing the class.
Note: In order to ensure serializability of Props when passing constructor arguments to the actor being created,
do not make the factory an inner class: this will inherently capture a reference to its enclosing object, which in
most cases is not serializable. It is best to create a factory method in the companion object of the actor’s class.
Serializability of all Props can be tested by setting the configuration item
akka.actor.serialize-creators=on. Only Props whose deploy has LocalScope are exempt
from this check.
You can use asterisks as wildcard matches for the actor paths, so you could specify: /*/sampleActor and
that would match all sampleActor on that level in the hierarchy. You can also use wildcard in the last position
to match all actors at a certain level: /someParent/*. Non-wildcard matches always have higher priority to
match than wildcards, so: /foo/bar is considered more specific than /foo/* and only the highest priority
match is used. Please note that it cannot be used to partially match section, like this: /foo*/bar, /f*o/bar
etc.
To allow dynamically deployed systems, it is also possible to include deployment configuration in the Props
which are used to create an actor: this information is the equivalent of a deployment section from the configuration
file, and if both are given, the external configuration takes precedence.
With these imports:
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.Address;
import akka.actor.AddressFromURIString;
import akka.actor.Deploy;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.remote.RemoteScope;
you can advise the system to create a child on that remote node like so:
ActorRef ref = system.actorOf(Props.create(SampleActor.class).withDeploy(
new Deploy(new RemoteScope(addr))));
As remote deployment can potentially be abused by both users and even attackers a whitelist feature is available
to guard the ActorSystem from deploying unexpected actors. Please note that remote deployment is not remote
code loading, the Actors class to be deployed onto a remote system needs to be present on that remote system.
This still however may pose a security risk, and one may want to restrict remote deployment to only a specific set
of known actors by enabling the whitelist feature.
To enable remote deployment whitelisting set the akka.remote.deployment.enable-whitelist value
to on. The list of allowed classes has to be configured on the “remote” system, in other words on the system onto
which others will be attempting to remote deploy Actors. That system, locally, knows best which Actors it should
or should not allow others to remote deploy onto it. The full settings section may for example look like this:
akka.remote.deployment {
enable-whitelist = on
whitelist = [
"NOT_ON_CLASSPATH", # verify we don’t throw if a class not on classpath is listed here
"akka.remote.RemoteDeploymentWhitelistSpec.EchoWhitelisted"
]
}
Actor classes not included in the whitelist will not be allowed to be remote deployed onto this system.
An ActorSystem should not be exposed via Akka Remote (Artery) over plain Aeron/UDP to an untrusted
network (e.g. internet). It should be protected by network security, such as a firewall. There is currently no support
for encryption with Artery so if network security is not considered as enough protection the classic remoting with
TLS and mutual authentication should be used.
Best practice is that Akka remoting nodes should only be accessible from the adjacent network.
It is also security best practice to disable the Java serializer because of its multiple known attack surfaces.
Untrusted Mode
As soon as an actor system can connect to another remotely, it may in principle send any possible message to any
actor contained within that remote system. One example may be sending a PoisonPill to the system guardian,
shutting that system down. This is not always desired, and it can be disabled with the following setting:
akka.remote.artery.untrusted-mode = on
This disallows sending of system messages (actor life-cycle commands, DeathWatch, etc.) and any message
extending PossiblyHarmful to the system on which this flag is set. Should a client send them nonetheless
they are dropped and logged (at DEBUG level in order to reduce the possibilities for a denial of service attack).
PossiblyHarmful covers the predefined messages like PoisonPill and Kill, but it can also be added as
a marker trait to user-defined messages.
Warning: Untrusted mode does not give full protection against attacks by itself. It makes it slightly harder to
perform malicious or unintended actions but it should be complemented with disabled Java serializer. Addi-
tional protection can be achieved when running in an untrusted network by network security (e.g. firewalls).
Messages sent with actor selection are by default discarded in untrusted mode, but permission to receive actor
selection messages can be granted to specific actors defined in configuration:
akka.remote.artery..trusted-selection-paths = ["/user/receptionist", "/user/namingService"]
Note: Enabling the untrusted mode does not remove the capability of the client to freely choose the target of
its message sends, which means that messages not prohibited by the above rules can be sent to any actor in the
remote system. It is good practice for a client-facing system to only contain a well-defined set of entry point actors,
which then forward requests (possibly after performing validation) to another actor system containing the actual
worker actors. If messaging between these two server-side systems is done using local ActorRef (they can be
exchanged safely between actor systems within the same JVM), you can restrict the messages on this interface by
marking them PossiblyHarmful so that a client cannot forge them.
7.10.5 Quarantine
Akka remoting is using Aeron as underlying message transport. Aeron is using UDP and adds among other
things reliable delivery and session semantics, very similar to TCP. This means that the order of the messages are
preserved, which is needed for the Actor message ordering guarantees. Under normal circumstances all messages
will be delivered but there are cases when messages may not be delivered to the destination:
• during a network partition and the Aeron session is broken, this automatically recovered once the partition
is over
• when sending too many messages without flow control and thereby filling up the outbound send queue
(outbound-message-queue-size config)
• if serialization or deserialization of a message fails (only that message will be dropped)
• if an unexpected exception occurs in the remoting infrastructure
In short, Actor message delivery is “at-most-once” as described in Message Delivery Reliability
Some messages in Akka are called system messages and those cannot be dropped because that would result in
an inconsistent state between the systems. Such messages are used for essentially two features; remote death
watch and remote deployment. These messages are delivered by Akka remoting with “exactly-once” guarantee by
confirming each message and resending unconfirmed messages. If a system message anyway cannot be delivered
the association with the destination system is irrecoverable failed, and Terminated is signaled for all watched
actors on the remote system. It is placed in a so called quarantined state. Quarantine usually does not happen if
remote watch or remote deployment is not used.
Each ActorSystem instance has an unique identifier (UID), which is important for differentiating between
incarnations of a system when it is restarted with the same hostname and port. It is the specific incarnation (UID)
that is quarantined. The only way to recover from this state is to restart one of the actor systems.
Messages that are sent to and received from a quarantined system will be dropped. However, it is possible to send
messages with actorSelection to the address of a quarantined system, which is useful to probe if the system
has been restarted.
An association will be quarantined when:
• Cluster node is removed from the cluster membership.
• Remote failure detector triggers, i.e. remote watch is used. This is different when Akka Cluster is used.
The unreachable observation by the cluster failure detector can go back to reachable if the network partition
heals. A cluster member is not quarantined when the failure detector triggers.
• Overflow of the system message delivery buffer, e.g. because of too many watch requests at the same time
(system-message-buffer-size config).
• Unexpected exception occurs in the control subchannel of the remoting infrastructure.
The UID of the ActorSystem is exchanged in a two-way handshake when the first message is sent to a destina-
tion. The handshake will be retried until the other system replies and no other messages will pass through until the
handshake is completed. If the handshake cannot be established within a timeout (handshake-timeout con-
fig) the association is stopped (freeing up resources). Queued messages will be dropped if the handshake cannot
be established. It will not be quarantined, because the UID is unknown. New handshake attempt will start when
next message is sent to the destination.
Handshake requests are actually also sent periodically to be able to establish a working connection when the
destination system has been restarted.
Watching a remote actor is API wise not different than watching a local actor, as described in Lifecycle Monitoring
aka DeathWatch. However, it is important to note, that unlike in the local case, remoting has to handle when a
remote actor does not terminate in a graceful way sending a system message to notify the watcher actor about the
event, but instead being hosted on a system which stopped abruptly (crashed). These situations are handled by the
built-in failure detector.
Failure Detector
Under the hood remote death watch uses heartbeat messages and a failure detector to generate Terminated
message from network failures and JVM crashes, in addition to graceful termination of watched actor.
The heartbeat arrival times is interpreted by an implementation of The Phi Accrual Failure Detector.
The suspicion level of failure is given by a value called phi. The basic idea of the phi failure detector is to express
the value of phi on a scale that is dynamically adjusted to reflect current network conditions.
The value of phi is calculated as:
phi = -log10(1 - F(timeSinceLastHeartbeat))
where F is the cumulative distribution function of a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation estimated
from historical heartbeat inter-arrival times.
In the Remote Configuration you can adjust the akka.remote.watch-failure-detector.threshold
to define when a phi value is considered to be a failure.
A low threshold is prone to generate many false positives but ensures a quick detection in the event of a real
crash. Conversely, a high threshold generates fewer mistakes but needs more time to detect actual crashes.
The default threshold is 10 and is appropriate for most situations. However in cloud environments, such as
Amazon EC2, the value could be increased to 12 in order to account for network issues that sometimes occur on
such platforms.
The following chart illustrates how phi increase with increasing time since the previous heartbeat.
Phi is calculated from the mean and standard deviation of historical inter arrival times. The previous chart is an
example for standard deviation of 200 ms. If the heartbeats arrive with less deviation the curve becomes steeper,
i.e. it is possible to determine failure more quickly. The curve looks like this for a standard deviation of 100 ms.
7.10.6 Serialization
When using remoting for actors you must ensure that the props and messages used for those actors are serial-
izable. Failing to do so will cause the system to behave in an unintended way.
For more information please see Serialization.
Artery introduces a new serialization mechanism which allows the ByteBufferSerializer to directly write
into a shared java.nio.ByteBuffer instead of being forced to allocate and return an Array[Byte] for
each serialized message. For high-throughput messaging this API change can yield significant performance ben-
efits, so we recommend changing your serializers to use this new mechanism.
This new API also plays well with new versions of Google Protocol Buffers and other serialization libraries, which
gained the ability to serialize directly into and from ByteBuffers.
As the new feature only changes how bytes are read and written, and the rest of the serializatio infrastructure
remained the same, we recommend reading the Serialization documentation first.
Implementing an akka.serialization.ByteBufferSerializer works the same way as any other se-
rializer,
interface ByteBufferSerializer {
/**
* Serializes the given object into the ‘ByteBuffer‘.
*/
void toBinary(Object o, ByteBuffer buf);
/**
* Produces an object from a ‘ByteBuffer‘, with an optional type-hint;
* the class should be loaded using ActorSystem.dynamicAccess.
*/
void fromBinary(ByteBuffer buf, String manifest);
}
Implementing a serializer for Artery is therefore as simple as implementing this interface, and binding the serializer
as usual (which is explained in Serialization).
Implementations should typically extend SerializerWithStringManifest and in addition to the
ByteBuffer based toBinary and fromBinary methods also implement the array based toBinary and
fromBinary methods. The array based methods will be used when ByteBuffer is not used, e.g. in Akka
Persistence.
Note that the array based methods can be implemented by delegation like this:
import akka.serialization.ByteBufferSerializer;
import akka.serialization.SerializerWithStringManifest;
@Override
public int identifier() {
return 1337;
}
@Override
public String manifest(Object o) {
return "serialized-" + o.getClass().getSimpleName();
}
@Override
public byte[] toBinary(Object o) {
toBinary(o, buf);
buf.flip();
final byte[] bytes = new byte[buf.remaining()];
buf.get(bytes);
return bytes;
}
@Override
public Object fromBinary(byte[] bytes, String manifest) {
return fromBinary(ByteBuffer.wrap(bytes), manifest);
}
@Override
public void toBinary(Object o, ByteBuffer buf) {
// Implement actual serialization here
}
@Override
public Object fromBinary(ByteBuffer buf, String manifest) {
// Implement actual deserialization here
return null;
}
}
With Artery it is possible to completely disable Java Serialization for the entire Actor system.
Java serialization is known to be slow and prone to attacks of various kinds - it never was designed for high
throughput messaging after all. However, it is very convenient to use, thus it remained the default serialization
mechanism that Akka used to serialize user messages as well as some of its internal messages in previous versions.
Since the release of Artery, Akka internals do not rely on Java serialization anymore (exceptions to that being
java.lang.Throwable and “remote deployment”).
Note: When using Artery, Akka does not use Java Serialization for any of it’s internal messages. It is highly
encouraged to disable java serialization, so please plan to do so at the earliest possibility you have in your project.
One may think that network bandwidth and latency limit the performance of remote messaging, but serialization
is a more typical bottleneck.
For user messages, the default serializer, implemented using Java serialization, remains available and enabled in
Artery. We do however recommend to disable it entirely and utilise a proper serialization library instead in order
effectively utilise the improved performance and ability for rolling deployments using Artery. Libraries that we
recommend to use include, but are not limited to, Kryo by using the akka-kryo-serialization library or Google
Protocol Buffers if you want more control over the schema evolution of your messages.
In order to completely disable Java Serialization in your Actor system you need to add the following configuration
to your application.conf:
akka.actor.allow-java-serialization = off
This will completely disable the use of akka.serialization.JavaSerialization by the Akka Seri-
alization extension, instead DisabledJavaSerializer will be inserted which will fail explicitly if attempts
to use java serialization are made.
It will also enable the above mentioned enable-additional-serialization-bindings.
The log messages emitted by such serializer SHOULD be be treated as potential attacks which the serializer
prevented, as they MAY indicate an external operator attempting to send malicious messages intending to use java
serialization as attack vector. The attempts are logged with the SECURITY marker.
Please note that this option does not stop you from manually invoking java serialization.
Please note that this means that you will have to configure different serializers which will able to handle all of
your remote messages. Please refer to the Serialization documentation as well as ByteBuffer based serialization
to learn how to do this.
This configuration setting will clone the actor defined in the Props of the remotePool 10 times and deploy it
evenly distributed across the two given target nodes.
A group of remote actors can be configured as:
akka.actor.deployment {
/parent/remoteGroup2 {
router = round-robin-group
routees.paths = [
"akka://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1",
"akka://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1",
"akka://[email protected]:2552/user/workers/w1"]
}
}
This configuration setting will send messages to the defined remote actor paths. It requires that you create the
destination actors on the remote nodes with matching paths. That is not done by the router.
There is a more extensive remote example that comes with Lightbend Activator. The tutorial named Akka Remote
Samples with Java demonstrates both remote deployment and look-up of remote actors.
All the communication between user defined remote actors are isolated from the channel of Akka internal mes-
sages so a large user message cannot block an urgent system message. While this provides good isolation for Akka
services, all user communications by default happen through a shared network connection (an Aeron stream).
When some actors send large messages this can cause other messages to suffer higher latency as they need to wait
until the full message has been transported on the shared channel (and hence, shared bottleneck). In these cases it
is usually helpful to separate actors that have different QoS requirements: large messages vs. low latency.
Akka remoting provides a dedicated channel for large messages if configured. Since actor message ordering must
not be violated the channel is actually dedicated for actors instead of messages, to ensure all of the messages arrive
in send order. It is possible to assign actors on given paths to use this dedicated channel by using path patterns:
akka.remote.artery.large-message-destinations = [
"/user/largeMessageActor",
"/user/largeMessagesGroup/*",
"/user/anotherGroup/*/largeMesssages",
"/user/thirdGroup/**",
]
This means that all messages sent to the following actors will pass through the dedicated, large messages channel:
• /user/largeMessageActor
• /user/largeMessageActorGroup/actor1
• /user/largeMessageActorGroup/actor2
• /user/anotherGroup/actor1/largeMessages
• /user/anotherGroup/actor2/largeMessages
• /user/thirdGroup/actor3/
• /user/thirdGroup/actor4/actor5
Messages destined for actors not matching any of these patterns are sent using the default channel as before.
The Aeron transport is running in a so called media driver. By default, Akka starts the media driver embedded in
the same JVM process as application. This is convenient and simplifies operational concerns by only having one
process to start and monitor.
The media driver may use rather much CPU resources. If you run more than one Akka application JVM on the
same machine it can therefore be wise to share the media driver by running it as a separate process.
The media driver has also different resource usage characteristics than a normal application and it can therefore
be more efficient and stable to run the media driver as a separate process.
Given that Aeron jar files are in the classpath the standalone media driver can be started with:
java io.aeron.driver.MediaDriver
You find those jar files on maven central, or you can create a package with your preferred build tool.
You can pass Aeron properties as command line -D system properties:
-Daeron.dir=/dev/shm/aeron
aeron.threading.mode=SHARED_NETWORK
The aeron-dir must match the directory you started the media driver with, i.e. the aeron.dir property.
Several Akka applications can then be configured to use the same media driver by pointing to the same directory.
Note that if the media driver process is stopped the Akka applications that are using it will also be stopped.
Aeron Tuning
Artery has been designed for low latency and as a result it can be CPU hungry when the system is mostly idle.
This is not always desirable. It is possible to tune the tradeoff between CPU usage and latency with the following
configuration:
# Values can be from 1 to 10, where 10 strongly prefers low latency # and 1 strongly prefers less CPU
usage akka.remote.artery.advanced.idle-cpu-level = 1
By setting this value to a lower number, it tells Akka to do longer “sleeping” periods on its thread dedicated for
spin-waiting and hence reducing CPU load when there is no immediate task to execute at the cost of a longer
reaction time to an event when it actually happens. It is worth to be noted though that during a continuously
high-throughput period this setting makes not much difference as the thread mostly has tasks to execute. This also
means that under high throughput (but below maximum capacity) the system might have less latency than at low
message rates.
Note: In this version (2.4.20) the flight-recorder is disabled by default because there is no automatic file name
and path calculation implemented to make it possible to reuse the same file for every restart of the same actor
system without clashing with files produced by other systems (possibly running on the same machine). Currently,
you have to set the path and file names yourself to avoid creating an unbounded number of files and enable flight
recorder manually by adding akka.remote.artery.advanced.flight-recorder.enabled=on to your configuration file.
This a limitation of the current version and will not be necessary in the future.
Emitting event information (logs) from internals is always a tradeoff. The events that are usable for the Akka
developers are usually too low level to be of any use for users and usually need to be fine-grained enough to
provide enough information to be able to debug issues in the internal implementation. This usually means that
these logs are hidden behind special flags and emitted at low log levels to not clutter the log output of the user
system. Unfortunately this means that during production or integration testing these flags are usually off and events
are not available when an actual failure happens - leaving maintainers in the dark about details of the event. To
solve this contradiction, remoting has an internal, high-performance event store for debug events which is always
on. This log and the events that it contains are highly specialized and not directly exposed to users, their primary
purpose is to help the maintainers of Akka to identify and solve issues discovered during daily usage. When you
encounter production issues involving remoting, you can include the flight recorder log file in your bug report to
give us more insight into the nature of the failure.
There are various important features of this event log:
• Flight Recorder produces a fixed size file completely encapsulating log rotation. This means that this file
will never grow in size and will not cause any unexpected disk space shortage in production.
• This file is crash resistant, i.e. its contents can be recovered even if the JVM hosting the ActorSystem
crashes unexpectedly.
• Very low overhead, specialized, binary logging that has no significant overhead and can be safely left en-
abled for production systems.
The location of the file can be controlled via the akka.remote.artery.advanced.flight-recoder.destination setting
(see akka-remote (artery) for details). By default, a file with the .afr extension is produced in the temporary
directory of the operating system. In cases where the flight recorder casuses issues, it can be disabled by adding
the setting akka.remote.artery.advanced.flight-recorder.enabled=off, although this is not recommended.
There are lots of configuration properties that are related to remoting in Akka. We refer to the reference configu-
ration for more information.
Note: Setting properties like the listening IP and port number programmatically is best done by using something
like the following:
ConfigFactory.parseString("akka.remote.artery.canonical.hostname=\"1.2.3.4\"")
.withFallback(ConfigFactory.load());
In setups involving Network Address Translation (NAT), Load Balancers or Docker containers the hostname and
port pair that Akka binds to will be different than the “logical” host name and port pair that is used to connect to
the system from the outside. This requires special configuration that sets both the logical and the bind pairs for
remoting.
akka {
remote {
artery {
canonical.hostname = my.domain.com # external (logical) hostname
canonical.port = 8000 # external (logical) port
7.11 Serialization
Akka has a built-in Extension for serialization, and it is both possible to use the built-in serializers and to write
your own.
The serialization mechanism is both used by Akka internally to serialize messages, and available for ad-hoc
serialization of whatever you might need it for.
7.11.1 Usage
Configuration
For Akka to know which Serializer to use for what, you need edit your Config-
uration, in the “akka.actor.serializers”-section you bind names to implementations of the
akka.serialization.Serializer you wish to use, like this:
akka {
actor {
serializers {
java = "akka.serialization.JavaSerializer"
proto = "akka.remote.serialization.ProtobufSerializer"
myown = "docs.serialization.MyOwnSerializer"
}
}
}
After you’ve bound names to different implementations of Serializer you need to wire which classes should
be serialized using which Serializer, this is done in the “akka.actor.serialization-bindings”-section:
akka {
actor {
serializers {
java = "akka.serialization.JavaSerializer"
proto = "akka.remote.serialization.ProtobufSerializer"
myown = "docs.serialization.MyOwnSerializer"
}
serialization-bindings {
"java.lang.String" = java
"docs.serialization.Customer" = java
"com.google.protobuf.Message" = proto
"docs.serialization.MyOwnSerializable" = myown
"java.lang.Boolean" = myown
}
}
}
You only need to specify the name of an interface or abstract base class of the messages. In case of ambigu-
ity, i.e. the message implements several of the configured classes, the most specific configured class will be
used, i.e. the one of which all other candidates are superclasses. If this condition cannot be met, because e.g.
java.io.Serializable and MyOwnSerializable both apply and neither is a subtype of the other, a
warning will be issued.
Note: If you are using Scala for your message protocol and your messages are contained inside of a Scala
object, then in order to reference those messages, you will need use the fully qualified Java class name. For a
message named Message contained inside the Scala object named Wrapper you would need to reference it as
Wrapper$Message instead of Wrapper.Message.
the akka-remote module), so normally you don’t need to add configuration for that; since
com.google.protobuf.GeneratedMessage implements java.io.Serializable, protobuf
messages will always be serialized using the protobuf protocol unless specifically overridden. In order to disable
a default serializer, map its marker type to “none”:
akka.actor.serialization-bindings {
"java.io.Serializable" = none
}
Verification
If you want to verify that your messages are serializable you can enable the following config option:
akka {
actor {
serialize-messages = on
}
}
Warning: We only recommend using the config option turned on when you’re running tests. It is completely
pointless to have it turned on in other scenarios.
If you want to verify that your Props are serializable you can enable the following config option:
akka {
actor {
serialize-creators = on
}
}
Warning: We only recommend using the config option turned on when you’re running tests. It is completely
pointless to have it turned on in other scenarios.
Programmatic
If you want to programmatically serialize/deserialize using Akka Serialization, here’s some examples:
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.serialization.*;
// Voilá!
assertEquals(original, back);
7.11.2 Customization
So, lets say that you want to create your own Serializer, you saw the
docs.serialization.MyOwnSerializer in the config example above?
First you need to create a class definition of your Serializer, which is done by extending
akka.serialization.JSerializer, like this:
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.serialization.*;
The manifest is a type hint so that the same serializer can be used for different classes. The manifest parameter in
fromBinaryJava is the class of the object that was serialized. In fromBinary you can match on the class
and deserialize the bytes to different objects.
Then you only need to fill in the blanks, bind it to a name in your Configuration and then list which classes that
should be serialized using it.
The Serializer illustrated above supports a class based manifest (type hint). For serialization of data that need
to evolve over time the SerializerWithStringManifest is recommended instead of Serializer be-
cause the manifest (type hint) is a String instead of a Class. That means that the class can be moved/removed
and the serializer can still deserialize old data by matching on the String. This is especially useful for Persis-
tence.
The manifest string can also encode a version number that can be used in fromBinary to deserialize in different
ways to migrate old data to new domain objects.
If the data was originally serialized with Serializer and in a later version of the system you change
to SerializerWithStringManifest the manifest string will be the full class name if you used
includeManifest=true, otherwise it will be the empty string.
This is how a SerializerWithStringManifest looks like:
public class MyOwnSerializer2 extends SerializerWithStringManifest {
You must also bind it to a name in your Configuration and then list which classes that should be serialized using
it.
It’s recommended to throw java.io.NotSerializableException in fromBinary if the manifest is
unknown. This makes it possible to introduce new message types and send them to nodes that don’t know about
them. This is typically needed when performing rolling upgrades, i.e. running a cluster with mixed versions for
while. NotSerializableException is treated as a transient problem in the TCP based remoting layer. The
problem will be logged and message is dropped. Other exceptions will tear down the TCP connection because it
can be an indication of corrupt bytes from the underlying transport.
Serializing ActorRefs
All ActorRefs are serializable using JavaSerializer, but in case you are writing your own serializer, you might
want to know how to serialize and deserialize them properly. In the general case, the local address to be
used depends on the type of remote address which shall be the recipient of the serialized information. Use
Serialization.serializedActorPath(actorRef) like this:
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.serialization.*;
// Serialize
// (beneath toBinary)
String identifier = Serialization.serializedActorPath(theActorRef);
// Deserialize
// (beneath fromBinary)
final ActorRef deserializedActorRef = extendedSystem.provider().resolveActorRef(
identifier);
// Then just use the ActorRef
This assumes that serialization happens in the context of sending a message through the remote transport. There
are other uses of serialization, though, e.g. storing actor references outside of an actor application (database, etc.).
In this case, it is important to keep in mind that the address part of an actor’s path determines how that actor is
communicated with. Storing a local actor path might be the right choice if the retrieval happens in the same logical
context, but it is not enough when deserializing it on a different network host: for that it would need to include
the system’s remote transport address. An actor system is not limited to having just one remote transport per
se, which makes this question a bit more interesting. To find out the appropriate address to use when sending to
remoteAddr you can use ActorRefProvider.getExternalAddressFor(remoteAddr) like this:
public class ExternalAddressExt implements Extension {
private final ExtendedActorSystem system;
This requires that you know at least which type of address will be supported by the system which will deserialize
the resulting actor reference; if you have no concrete address handy you can create a dummy one for the right pro-
tocol using new Address(protocol, "", "", 0) (assuming that the actual transport used is as lenient
as Akka’s RemoteActorRefProvider).
There is also a default remote address which is the one used by cluster support (and typical systems have just this
one); you can get it like this:
public class DefaultAddressExt implements Extension {
private final ExtendedActorSystem system;
The recommended approach to do deep serialization of internal actor state is to use Akka Persistence.
When using Java serialization without employing the JavaSerializer for the task, you must make sure to
supply a valid ExtendedActorSystem in the dynamic variable JavaSerializer.currentSystem.
This is used when reading in the representation of an ActorRef for turning the string representation into a real
reference. DynamicVariable is a thread-local variable, so be sure to have it set while deserializing anything
which might contain actor references.
It is not safe to mix major Scala versions when using the Java serialization as Scala does not guarantee compati-
bility and this could lead to very surprising errors.
If using the Akka Protobuf serializers (implicitly with akka.actor.allow-java-serialization =
off or explicitly with enable-additional-serialization-bindings = true) for the internal
Akka messages those will not require the same major Scala version however you must also ensure the serial-
izers used for your own types does not introduce the same incompatibility as Java serialization does.
7.12 I/O
7.12.1 Introduction
The akka.io package has been developed in collaboration between the Akka and spray.io teams. Its design
combines experiences from the spray-io module with improvements that were jointly developed for more
general consumption as an actor-based service.
The guiding design goal for this I/O implementation was to reach extreme scalability, make no compromises
in providing an API correctly matching the underlying transport mechanism and to be fully event-driven, non-
blocking and asynchronous. The API is meant to be a solid foundation for the implementation of network protocols
and building higher abstractions; it is not meant to be a full-service high-level NIO wrapper for end users.
The I/O API is completely actor based, meaning that all operations are implemented with message passing instead
of direct method calls. Every I/O driver (TCP, UDP) has a special actor, called a manager that serves as an entry
point for the API. I/O is broken into several drivers. The manager for a particular driver is accessible by querying
an ActorSystem. For example the following code looks up the TCP manager and returns its ActorRef:
final ActorRef tcpManager = Tcp.get(getContext().system()).manager();
The manager receives I/O command messages and instantiates worker actors in response. The worker actors
present themselves to the API user in the reply to the command that was sent. For example after a Connect
command sent to the TCP manager the manager creates an actor representing the TCP connection. All operations
related to the given TCP connections can be invoked by sending messages to the connection actor which announces
itself by sending a Connected message.
I/O worker actors receive commands and also send out events. They usually need a user-side counterpart actor
listening for these events (such events could be inbound connections, incoming bytes or acknowledgements for
writes). These worker actors watch their listener counterparts. If the listener stops then the worker will automati-
cally release any resources that it holds. This design makes the API more robust against resource leaks.
Thanks to the completely actor based approach of the I/O API the opposite direction works as well: a user actor
responsible for handling a connection can watch the connection actor to be notified if it unexpectedly terminates.
I/O devices have a maximum throughput which limits the frequency and size of writes. When an application tries
to push more data than a device can handle, the driver has to buffer bytes until the device is able to write them.
With buffering it is possible to handle short bursts of intensive writes — but no buffer is infinite. “Flow control”
is needed to avoid overwhelming device buffers.
Akka supports two types of flow control:
• Ack-based, where the driver notifies the writer when writes have succeeded.
• Nack-based, where the driver notifies the writer when writes have failed.
Each of these models is available in both the TCP and the UDP implementations of Akka I/O.
Individual writes can be acknowledged by providing an ack object in the write message (Write in the case of
TCP and Send for UDP). When the write is complete the worker will send the ack object to the writing actor. This
can be used to implement ack-based flow control; sending new data only when old data has been acknowledged.
If a write (or any other command) fails, the driver notifies the actor that sent the command with a special message
(CommandFailed in the case of UDP and TCP). This message will also notify the writer of a failed write,
serving as a nack for that write. Please note, that in a nack-based flow-control setting the writer has to be prepared
for the fact that the failed write might not be the most recent write it sent. For example, the failure notification for
a write W1 might arrive after additional write commands W2 and W3 have been sent. If the writer wants to resend
any nacked messages it may need to keep a buffer of pending messages.
Warning: An acknowledged write does not mean acknowledged delivery or storage; receiving an ack for a
write simply signals that the I/O driver has successfully processed the write. The Ack/Nack protocol described
here is a means of flow control not error handling. In other words, data may still be lost, even if every write is
acknowledged.
ByteString
To maintain isolation, actors should communicate with immutable objects only. ByteString is an immutable
container for bytes. It is used by Akka’s I/O system as an efficient, immutable alternative the traditional byte
containers used for I/O on the JVM, such as byte[] and ByteBuffer.
ByteString is a rope-like data structure that is immutable and provides fast concatenation and slicing op-
erations (perfect for I/O). When two ByteStrings are concatenated together they are both stored within the
resulting ByteString instead of copying both to a new array. Operations such as drop and take return
ByteStrings that still reference the original array, but just change the offset and length that is visible. Great
care has also been taken to make sure that the internal array cannot be modified. Whenever a potentially unsafe
array is used to create a new ByteString a defensive copy is created. If you require a ByteString that only
blocks a much memory as necessary for it’s content, use the compact method to get a CompactByteString
instance. If the ByteString represented only a slice of the original array, this will result in copying all bytes in
that slice.
ByteString inherits all methods from IndexedSeq, and it also has some new ones. For more information,
look up the akka.util.ByteString class and it’s companion object in the ScalaDoc.
ByteString also comes with its own optimized builder and iterator classes ByteStringBuilder and
ByteIterator which provide extra features in addition to those of normal builders and iterators.
For further details on the design and internal architecture see I/O Layer Design.
The code snippets through-out this section assume the following imports:
import java.net.InetSocketAddress;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.io.Tcp;
import akka.io.Tcp.Bound;
import akka.io.Tcp.CommandFailed;
import akka.io.Tcp.Connected;
import akka.io.Tcp.ConnectionClosed;
import akka.io.Tcp.Received;
import akka.io.TcpMessage;
import akka.japi.Procedure;
import akka.util.ByteString;
All of the Akka I/O APIs are accessed through manager objects. When using an I/O API, the first step is to acquire
a reference to the appropriate manager. The code below shows how to acquire a reference to the Tcp manager.
final ActorRef tcpManager = Tcp.get(getContext().system()).manager();
The manager is an actor that handles the underlying low level I/O resources (selectors, channels) and instantiates
workers for specific tasks, such as listening to incoming connections.
7.13.1 Connecting
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) throws Exception {
if (msg instanceof CommandFailed) {
listener.tell("failed", getSelf());
getContext().stop(getSelf());
} else if (msg.equals("close")) {
connection.tell(TcpMessage.close(), getSelf());
The first step of connecting to a remote address is sending a Connect message to the TCP manager; in addition
to the simplest form shown above there is also the possibility to specify a local InetSocketAddress to bind
to and a list of socket options to apply.
Note: The SO_NODELAY (TCP_NODELAY on Windows) socket option defaults to true in Akka, indepen-
dently of the OS default settings. This setting disables Nagle’s algorithm, considerably improving latency for
most applications. This setting could be overridden by passing SO.TcpNoDelay(false) in the list of socket
options of the Connect message.
The TCP manager will then reply either with a CommandFailed or it will spawn an internal actor representing
the new connection. This new actor will then send a Connected message to the original sender of the Connect
message.
In order to activate the new connection a Register message must be sent to the connection actor, informing
that one about who shall receive data from the socket. Before this step is done the connection cannot be used, and
there is an internal timeout after which the connection actor will shut itself down if no Register message is
received.
The connection actor watches the registered handler and closes the connection when that one terminates, thereby
cleaning up all internal resources associated with that connection.
The actor in the example above uses become to switch from unconnected to connected operation, demonstrating
the commands and events which are observed in that state. For a discussion on CommandFailed see Throttling
Reads and Writes below. ConnectionClosed is a trait, which marks the different connection close events.
The last line handles all connection close events in the same way. It is possible to listen for more fine-grained
connection close events, see Closing Connections below.
@Override
public void preStart() throws Exception {
final ActorRef tcp = Tcp.get(getContext().system()).manager();
tcp.tell(TcpMessage.bind(getSelf(),
new InetSocketAddress("localhost", 0), 100), getSelf());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) throws Exception {
if (msg instanceof Bound) {
manager.tell(msg, getSelf());
To create a TCP server and listen for inbound connections, a Bind command has to be sent to the TCP manager.
This will instruct the TCP manager to listen for TCP connections on a particular InetSocketAddress; the
port may be specified as 0 in order to bind to a random port.
The actor sending the Bind message will receive a Bound message signaling that the server is ready to accept
incoming connections; this message also contains the InetSocketAddress to which the socket was actually
bound (i.e. resolved IP address and correct port number).
From this point forward the process of handling connections is the same as for outgoing connections. The example
demonstrates that handling the reads from a certain connection can be delegated to another actor by naming it as
the handler when sending the Register message. Writes can be sent from any actor in the system to the
connection actor (i.e. the actor which sent the Connected message). The simplistic handler is defined as:
public class SimplisticHandler extends UntypedActor {
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) throws Exception {
For a more complete sample which also takes into account the possibility of failures when sending please see
Throttling Reads and Writes below.
The only difference to outgoing connections is that the internal actor managing the listen port—the sender of the
Bound message—watches the actor which was named as the recipient for Connected messages in the Bind
message. When that actor terminates the listen port will be closed and all resources associated with it will be
released; existing connections will not be terminated at this point.
A connection can be closed by sending one of the commands Close, ConfirmedClose or Abort to the
connection actor.
Close will close the connection by sending a FIN message, but without waiting for confirmation from the remote
endpoint. Pending writes will be flushed. If the close is successful, the listener will be notified with Closed.
ConfirmedClose will close the sending direction of the connection by sending a FIN message, but data will
continue to be received until the remote endpoint closes the connection, too. Pending writes will be flushed. If the
close is successful, the listener will be notified with ConfirmedClosed.
Abort will immediately terminate the connection by sending a RST message to the remote endpoint. Pending
writes will be not flushed. If the close is successful, the listener will be notified with Aborted.
PeerClosed will be sent to the listener if the connection has been closed by the remote endpoint. Per default,
the connection will then automatically be closed from this endpoint as well. To support half-closed connections
set the keepOpenOnPeerClosed member of the Register message to true in which case the connection
stays open until it receives one of the above close commands.
ErrorClosed will be sent to the listener whenever an error happened that forced the connection to be closed.
All close notifications are sub-types of ConnectionClosed so listeners who do not need fine-grained close
events may handle all close events in the same way.
Once a connection has been established data can be sent to it from any actor in the form of a
Tcp.WriteCommand. Tcp.WriteCommand is an abstract class with three concrete implementations:
Tcp.Write The simplest WriteCommand implementation which wraps a ByteString instance and an “ack”
event. A ByteString (as explained in this section) models one or more chunks of immutable in-memory
data with a maximum (total) size of 2 GB (2^31 bytes).
Tcp.WriteFile If you want to send “raw” data from a file you can do so efficiently with the Tcp.WriteFile
command. This allows you do designate a (contiguous) chunk of on-disk bytes for sending across the
connection without the need to first load them into the JVM memory. As such Tcp.WriteFile can
“hold” more than 2GB of data and an “ack” event if required.
Tcp.CompoundWrite Sometimes you might want to group (or interleave) several Tcp.Write and/or
Tcp.WriteFile commands into one atomic write command which gets written to the connection in
one go. The Tcp.CompoundWrite allows you to do just that and offers three benefits:
1. As explained in the following section the TCP connection actor can only handle one single write
command at a time. By combining several writes into one CompoundWrite you can have them be
sent across the connection with minimum overhead and without the need to spoon feed them to the
connection actor via an ACK-based message protocol.
2. Because a WriteCommand is atomic you can be sure that no other actor can “inject” other writes
into your series of writes if you combine them into one single CompoundWrite. In scenarios where
several actors write to the same connection this can be an important feature which can be somewhat
hard to achieve otherwise.
3. The “sub writes” of a CompoundWrite are regular Write or WriteFile commands that them-
selves can request “ack” events. These ACKs are sent out as soon as the respective “sub write” has
been completed. This allows you to attach more than one ACK to a Write or WriteFile (by com-
bining it with an empty write that itself requests an ACK) or to have the connection actor acknowledge
the progress of transmitting the CompoundWrite by sending out intermediate ACKs at arbitrary
points.
The basic model of the TCP connection actor is that it has no internal buffering (i.e. it can only process one write
at a time, meaning it can buffer one write until it has been passed on to the O/S kernel in full). Congestion needs
to be handled at the user level, for both writes and reads.
For back-pressuring writes there are three modes of operation
• ACK-based: every Write command carries an arbitrary object, and if this object is not Tcp.NoAck then
it will be returned to the sender of the Write upon successfully writing all contained data to the socket. If
no other write is initiated before having received this acknowledgement then no failures can happen due to
buffer overrun.
• NACK-based: every write which arrives while a previous write is not yet completed will be replied to with
a CommandFailed message containing the failed write. Just relying on this mechanism requires the
implemented protocol to tolerate skipping writes (e.g. if each write is a valid message on its own and it
is not required that all are delivered). This mode is enabled by setting the useResumeWriting flag to
false within the Register message during connection activation.
• NACK-based with write suspending: this mode is very similar to the NACK-based one, but once a single
write has failed no further writes will succeed until a ResumeWriting message is received. This message
will be answered with a WritingResumed message once the last accepted write has completed. If the
actor driving the connection implements buffering and resends the NACK’ed messages after having awaited
the WritingResumed signal then every message is delivered exactly once to the network socket.
These write models (with the exception of the second which is rather specialised) are demonstrated in complete
examples below. The full and contiguous source is available on GitHub.
For back-pressuring reads there are two modes of operation
• Push-reading: in this mode the connection actor sends the registered reader actor incoming data as soon as
available as Received events. Whenever the reader actor wants to signal back-pressure to the remote TCP
endpoint it can send a SuspendReading message to the connection actor to indicate that it wants to sus-
pend the reception of new data. No Received events will arrive until a corresponding ResumeReading
is sent indicating that the receiver actor is ready again.
• Pull-reading: after sending a Received event the connection actor automatically suspends accepting data
from the socket until the reader actor signals with a ResumeReading message that it is ready to process
more input data. Hence new data is “pulled” from the connection by sending ResumeReading messages.
Note: It should be obvious that all these flow control schemes only work between one writer/reader and one
connection actor; as soon as multiple actors send write commands to a single connection no consistent result can
be achieved.
For proper function of the following example it is important to configure the connection to remain half-open when
the remote side closed its writing end: this allows the example EchoHandler to write all outstanding data back
to the client before fully closing the connection. This is enabled using a flag upon connection activation (observe
the Register message):
connection.tell(TcpMessage.register(handler,
true, // <-- keepOpenOnPeerClosed flag
true), getSelf());
// sign death pact: this actor stops when the connection is closed
getContext().watch(connection);
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) throws Exception {
if (msg instanceof Received) {
final ByteString data = ((Received) msg).data();
buffer(data);
connection.tell(TcpMessage.write(data, ACK), getSelf());
// now switch behavior to “waiting for acknowledgement”
getContext().become(buffering, false);
}
}
};
The principle is simple: when having written a chunk always wait for the Ack to come back before sending the
next chunk. While waiting we switch behavior such that new incoming data are buffered. The helper functions
used are a bit lengthy but not complicated:
protected void buffer(ByteString data) {
storage.add(data);
stored += data.size();
if (storage.isEmpty()) {
if (closing) {
getContext().stop(getSelf());
} else {
getContext().unbecome();
}
} else {
connection.tell(TcpMessage.write(storage.peek(), ACK), getSelf());
}
}
The most interesting part is probably the last: an Ack removes the oldest data chunk from the buffer, and if that
was the last chunk then we either close the connection (if the peer closed its half already) or return to the idle
behavior; otherwise we just send the next buffered chunk and stay waiting for the next Ack.
Back-pressure can be propagated also across the reading side back to the writer on the other end of the connection
by sending the SuspendReading command to the connection actor. This will lead to no data being read from
the socket anymore (although this does happen after a delay because it takes some time until the connection actor
processes this command, hence appropriate head-room in the buffer should be present), which in turn will lead
to the O/S kernel buffer filling up on our end, then the TCP window mechanism will stop the remote side from
writing, filling up its write buffer, until finally the writer on the other side cannot push any data into the socket
anymore. This is how end-to-end back-pressure is realized across a TCP connection.
// sign death pact: this actor stops when the connection is closed
getContext().watch(connection);
// buffering ...
// closing ...
The principle here is to keep writing until a CommandFailed is received, using acknowledgements only to
prune the resend buffer. When a such a failure was received, transition into a different state for handling and
handle resending of all queued data:
protected Procedure<Object> buffering(final Ack nack) {
return new Procedure<Object>() {
@Override
public void apply(Object msg) throws Exception {
if (msg instanceof Received) {
buffer(((Received) msg).data());
if (storage.isEmpty()) {
if (peerClosed)
getContext().stop(getSelf());
else
getContext().become(writing);
} else {
if (toAck > 0) {
// stay in ACK-based mode for a short while
writeFirst();
--toAck;
} else {
// then return to NACK-based again
writeAll();
if (peerClosed)
getContext().become(closing);
else
getContext().become(writing);
}
}
}
}
}
};
}
It should be noted that all writes which are currently buffered have also been sent to the connection actor upon
entering this state, which means that the ResumeWriting message is enqueued after those writes, leading to
the reception of all outstanding CommandFailed messages (which are ignored in this state) before receiving
the WritingResumed signal. That latter message is sent by the connection actor only once the internally
queued write has been fully completed, meaning that a subsequent write will not fail. This is exploited by the
EchoHandler to switch to an ACK-based approach for the first ten writes after a failure before resuming the
optimistic write-through behavior.
protected Procedure<Object> closing = new Procedure<Object>() {
@Override
public void apply(Object msg) throws Exception {
if (msg instanceof CommandFailed) {
// the command can only have been a Write
connection.tell(TcpMessage.resumeWriting(), getSelf());
getContext().become(closeResend, false);
} else if (msg instanceof Integer) {
acknowledge((Integer) msg);
if (storage.isEmpty())
getContext().stop(getSelf());
}
}
};
Closing the connection while still sending all data is a bit more involved than in the ACK-based approach: the
idea is to always send all outstanding messages and acknowledge all successful writes, and if a failure happens
then switch behavior to await the WritingResumed event and start over.
The helper functions are very similar to the ACK-based case:
protected void buffer(ByteString data) {
storage.add(data);
stored += data.size();
When using push based reading, data coming from the socket is sent to the actor as soon as it is available. In the
case of the previous Echo server example this meant that we needed to maintain a buffer of incoming data to keep
it around since the rate of writing might be slower than the rate of the arrival of new data.
With the Pull mode this buffer can be completely eliminated as the following snippet demonstrates:
@Override
public void preStart() throws Exception {
connection.tell(TcpMessage.resumeReading(), getSelf());
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message instanceof Tcp.Received) {
ByteString data = ((Tcp.Received) message).data();
connection.tell(TcpMessage.write(data, new Ack()), getSelf());
} else if (message instanceof Ack) {
connection.tell(TcpMessage.resumeReading(), getSelf());
}
}
The idea here is that reading is not resumed until the previous write has been completely acknowledged by the
connection actor. Every pull mode connection actor starts from suspended state. To start the flow of data we send
a ResumeReading in the preStart method to tell the connection actor that we are ready to receive the first
chunk of data. Since we only resume reading when the previous data chunk has been completely written there is
no need for maintaining a buffer.
To enable pull reading on an outbound connection the pullMode parameter of the Connect should be set to
true:
final List<Inet.SocketOption> options = new ArrayList<Inet.SocketOption>();
tcp.tell(
TcpMessage.connect(new InetSocketAddress("localhost", 3000), null, options, null, true),
getSelf()
);
The previous section demonstrated how to enable pull reading mode for outbound connections but it is possible
to create a listener actor with this mode of reading by setting the pullMode parameter of the Bind command to
true:
tcp = Tcp.get(getContext().system()).manager();
final List<Inet.SocketOption> options = new ArrayList<Inet.SocketOption>();
tcp.tell(
TcpMessage.bind(getSelf(), new InetSocketAddress("localhost", 0), 100, options, true),
getSelf()
);
One of the effects of this setting is that all connections accepted by this listener actor will use pull mode reading.
Another effect of this setting is that in addition of setting all inbound connections to pull mode, accepting connec-
tions becomes pull based, too. This means that after handling one (or more) Connected events the listener actor
has to be resumed by sending it a ResumeAccepting message.
Listener actors with pull mode start suspended so to start accepting connections a ResumeAccepting command
has to be sent to the listener actor after binding was successful:
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message instanceof Tcp.Bound) {
listener = getSender();
// Accept connections one by one
listener.tell(TcpMessage.resumeAccepting(1), getSelf());
} else if (message instanceof Tcp.Connected) {
ActorRef handler = getContext().actorOf(Props.create(PullEcho.class, getSender()));
getSender().tell(TcpMessage.register(handler), getSelf());
// Resume accepting connections
listener.tell(TcpMessage.resumeAccepting(1), getSelf());
}
}
As shown in the example after handling an incoming connection we need to resume accepting again. The
ResumeAccepting message accepts a batchSize parameter that specifies how many new connections are
accepted before a next ResumeAccepting message is needed to resume handling of new connections.
UDP is a connectionless datagram protocol which offers two different ways of communication on the JDK level:
• sockets which are free to send datagrams to any destination and receive datagrams from any origin
• sockets which are restricted to communication with one specific remote socket address
In the low-level API the distinction is made—confusingly—by whether or not connect has been called on the
socket (even when connect has been called the protocol is still connectionless). These two forms of UDP usage
are offered using distinct IO extensions described below.
Simple Send
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
if (msg instanceof Udp.SimpleSenderReady) {
getContext().become(ready(getSender()));
} else unhandled(msg);
}
@Override
public void apply(Object msg) throws Exception {
if (msg instanceof String) {
final String str = (String) msg;
send.tell(UdpMessage.send(ByteString.fromString(str), remote), getSelf());
} else unhandled(msg);
}
};
}
}
The simplest form of UDP usage is to just send datagrams without the need of getting a reply. To this end a “simple
sender” facility is provided as demonstrated above. The UDP extension is queried using the simpleSender
message, which is answered by a SimpleSenderReady notification. The sender of this message is the newly
created sender actor which from this point onward can be used to send datagrams to arbitrary destinations; in this
example it will just send any UTF-8 encoded String it receives to a predefined remote address.
Note: The simple sender will not shut itself down because it cannot know when you are done with it. You will
need to send it a PoisonPill when you want to close the ephemeral port the sender is bound to.
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
if (msg instanceof Udp.Bound) {
final Udp.Bound b = (Udp.Bound) msg;
getContext().become(ready(getSender()));
} else unhandled(msg);
}
} else if (msg.equals(UdpMessage.unbind())) {
socket.tell(msg, getSelf());
getContext().stop(getSelf());
} else unhandled(msg);
}
};
}
}
If you want to implement a UDP server which listens on a socket for incoming datagrams then you need to use the
bind command as shown above. The local address specified may have a zero port in which case the operating
system will automatically choose a free port and assign it to the new socket. Which port was actually bound can
be found out by inspecting the Bound message.
The sender of the Bound message is the actor which manages the new socket. Sending datagrams is achieved by
using the send message type and the socket can be closed by sending a unbind command, in which case the
socket actor will reply with a Unbound notification.
Received datagrams are sent to the actor designated in the bind message, whereas the Bound message will be
sent to the sender of the bind.
The service provided by the connection based UDP API is similar to the bind-and-send service we saw earlier, but
the main difference is that a connection is only able to send to the remoteAddress it was connected to, and
will receive datagrams only from that address.
public static class Connected extends UntypedActor {
final InetSocketAddress remote;
@Override
public void onReceive(Object msg) {
if (msg instanceof UdpConnected.Connected) {
getContext().become(ready(getSender()));
} else unhandled(msg);
}
.tell(UdpConnectedMessage.send(ByteString.fromString(str)),
getSelf());
} else if (msg.equals(UdpConnectedMessage.disconnect())) {
connection.tell(msg, getSelf());
} else unhandled(msg);
}
};
}
}
Consequently the example shown here looks quite similar to the previous one, the biggest difference is the absence
of remote address information in send and Received messages.
Note: There is a small performance benefit in using connection based UDP API over the connectionless one. If
there is a SecurityManager enabled on the system, every connectionless message send has to go through a security
check, while in the case of connection-based UDP the security check is cached after connect, thus writes do not
suffer an additional performance penalty.
If you want to use UDP multicast you will need to use Java 7. Akka provides a way to control various options
of DatagramChannel through the akka.io.Inet.SocketOption interface. The example below shows
how to setup a receiver of multicast messages using IPv6 protocol.
To select a Protocol Family you must extend akka.io.Inet.DatagramChannelCreator class which
implements akka.io.Inet.SocketOption. Provide custom logic for opening a datagram channel by over-
riding create method.
public static class Inet6ProtocolFamily extends Inet.DatagramChannelCreator {
@Override
public DatagramChannel create() throws Exception {
return DatagramChannel.open(StandardProtocolFamily.INET6);
}
}
@Override
public void afterBind(DatagramSocket s) {
try {
InetAddress group = InetAddress.getByName(address);
NetworkInterface networkInterface = NetworkInterface.getByName(interf);
s.getChannel().join(group, networkInterface);
} catch (Exception ex) {
System.out.println("Unable to join multicast group.");
}
}
}
7.15 Camel
7.15.1 Introduction
The akka-camel module allows Untyped Actors to receive and send messages over a great variety of protocols and
APIs. In addition to the native Scala and Java actor API, actors can now exchange messages with other systems
over large number of protocols and APIs such as HTTP, SOAP, TCP, FTP, SMTP or JMS, to mention a few. At
the moment, approximately 80 protocols and APIs are supported.
Apache Camel
The akka-camel module is based on Apache Camel, a powerful and light-weight integration framework for the
JVM. For an introduction to Apache Camel you may want to read this Apache Camel article. Camel comes with
a large number of components that provide bindings to different protocols and APIs. The camel-extra project
provides further components.
Consumer
public MyEndpoint() {
this.uri = "mina2:tcp://localhost:6200?textline=true";
}
}
The above example exposes an actor over a TCP endpoint via Apache Camel’s Mina component. The actor
implements the getEndpointUri method to define an endpoint from which it can receive messages. After starting
the actor, TCP clients can immediately send messages to and receive responses from that actor. If the message
exchange should go over HTTP (via Camel’s Jetty component), the actor’s getEndpointUri method should return
a different URI, for instance “jetty:http://localhost:8877/example”. In the above case an extra constructor is added
that can set the endpoint URI, which would result in the getEndpointUri returning the URI that was set using this
constructor.
Producer
Actors can also trigger message exchanges with external systems i.e. produce to Camel endpoints.
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedProducerActor;
In the above example, any message sent to this actor will be sent to the JMS queue Orders. Producer actors
may choose from the same set of Camel components as Consumer actors do. Below an example of how to send a
message to the Orders producer.
ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("some-system");
Props props = Props.create(Orders.class);
ActorRef producer = system.actorOf(props, "jmsproducer");
producer.tell("<order amount=\"100\" currency=\"PLN\" itemId=\"12345\"/>",
ActorRef.noSender());
CamelMessage
The number of Camel components is constantly increasing. The akka-camel module can support these in a plug-
and-play manner. Just add them to your application’s classpath, define a component-specific endpoint URI and
use it to exchange messages over the component-specific protocols or APIs. This is possible because Camel com-
ponents bind protocol-specific message formats to a Camel-specific normalized message format. The normalized
message format hides protocol-specific details from Akka and makes it therefore very easy to support a large
number of protocols through a uniform Camel component interface. The akka-camel module further converts
mutable Camel messages into immutable representations which are used by Consumer and Producer actors for
pattern matching, transformation, serialization or storage. In the above example of the Orders Producer, the XML
message is put in the body of a newly created Camel Message with an empty set of headers. You can also create a
CamelMessage yourself with the appropriate body and headers as you see fit.
CamelExtension
The akka-camel module is implemented as an Akka Extension, the CamelExtension object. Extensions will
only be loaded once per ActorSystem, which will be managed by Akka. The CamelExtension object
provides access to the Camel interface. The Camel interface in turn provides access to two important Apache
Camel objects, the CamelContext and the ProducerTemplate. Below you can see how you can get access to these
Apache Camel objects.
ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("some-system");
Camel camel = CamelExtension.get(system);
One CamelExtension is only loaded once for every one ActorSystem, which makes it safe to call the
CamelExtension at any point in your code to get to the Apache Camel objects associated with it. There is
one CamelContext and one ProducerTemplate for every one ActorSystem that uses a CamelExtension.
By Default, a new CamelContext is created when the CamelExtension starts. If you want to inject your own
context instead, you can implement the ContextProvider interface and add the FQCN of your implementation in the
config, as the value of the “akka.camel.context-provider”. This interface define a single method getContext()
used to load the CamelContext.
Below an example on how to add the ActiveMQ component to the CamelContext, which is required when you
would like to use the ActiveMQ component.
ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("some-system");
Camel camel = CamelExtension.get(system);
CamelContext camelContext = camel.context();
// camelContext.addComponent("activemq", ActiveMQComponent.activeMQComponent(
// "vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false"));
The CamelContext joins the lifecycle of the ActorSystem and CamelExtension it is associated with;
the CamelContext is started when the CamelExtension is created, and it is shut down when the associated
ActorSystem is shut down. The same is true for the ProducerTemplate.
The CamelExtension is used by both Producer and Consumer actors to interact with Apache Camel inter-
nally. You can access the CamelExtension inside a Producer or a Consumer using the camel method, or
get straight at the CamelContext using the getCamelContext method or to the ProducerTemplate using the
getProducerTemplate method. Actors are created and started asynchronously. When a Consumer actor is created,
the Consumer is published at its Camel endpoint (more precisely, the route is added to the CamelContext from
the Endpoint to the actor). When a Producer actor is created, a SendProcessor and Endpoint are created so that
the Producer can send messages to it. Publication is done asynchronously; setting up an endpoint may still be in
progress after you have requested the actor to be created. Some Camel components can take a while to startup,
and in some cases you might want to know when the endpoints are activated and ready to be used. The Camel
interface allows you to find out when the endpoint is activated or deactivated.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.camel.Camel;
import akka.camel.CamelExtension;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedConsumerActor;
import akka.testkit.JavaTestKit;
import akka.testkit.TestKit;
import akka.util.Timeout;
import docs.AbstractJavaTest;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
// ..
ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("some-system");
Props props = Props.create(MyConsumer.class);
ActorRef producer = system.actorOf(props,"myproducer");
Camel camel = CamelExtension.get(system);
// get a future reference to the activation of the endpoint of the Consumer Actor
Timeout timeout = new Timeout(Duration.create(10, SECONDS));
Future<ActorRef> activationFuture = camel.activationFutureFor(producer,
timeout, system.dispatcher());
The above code shows that you can get a Future to the activation of the route from the endpoint to the actor,
or you can wait in a blocking fashion on the activation of the route. An ActivationTimeoutException is
thrown if the endpoint could not be activated within the specified timeout. Deactivation works in a similar fashion:
// ..
system.stop(producer);
// get a future reference to the deactivation of the endpoint of the Consumer Actor
Future<ActorRef> deactivationFuture = camel.deactivationFutureFor(producer,
timeout, system.dispatcher());
Deactivation of a Consumer or a Producer actor happens when the actor is terminated. For a Consumer, the route
to the actor is stopped. For a Producer, the SendProcessor is stopped. A DeActivationTimeoutException
is thrown if the associated camel objects could not be deactivated within the specified timeout.
For objects to receive messages, they must inherit from the UntypedConsumerActor class. For example, the
following actor class (Consumer1) implements the getEndpointUri method, which is declared in the Untyped-
ConsumerActor class, in order to receive messages from the file:data/input/actor Camel endpoint.
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedConsumerActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
Whenever a file is put into the data/input/actor directory, its content is picked up by the Camel file component and
sent as message to the actor. Messages consumed by actors from Camel endpoints are of type CamelMessage.
These are immutable representations of Camel messages.
Here’s another example that sets the endpointUri to jetty:http://localhost:8877/camel/default.
It causes Camel’s Jetty component to start an embedded Jetty server, accepting HTTP connections from localhost
on port 8877.
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedConsumerActor;
}
}
After starting the actor, clients can send messages to that actor by POSTing to
http://localhost:8877/camel/default. The actor sends a response by using the getSender().tell
method. For returning a message body and headers to the HTTP client the response type should be CamelMes-
sage. For any other response type, a new CamelMessage object is created by akka-camel with the actor response
as message body.
Delivery acknowledgements
With in-out message exchanges, clients usually know that a message exchange is done when they receive a re-
ply from a consumer actor. The reply message can be a CamelMessage (or any object which is then internally
converted to a CamelMessage) on success, and a Failure message on failure.
With in-only message exchanges, by default, an exchange is done when a message is added to the consumer actor’s
mailbox. Any failure or exception that occurs during processing of that message by the consumer actor cannot
be reported back to the endpoint in this case. To allow consumer actors to positively or negatively acknowledge
the receipt of a message from an in-only message exchange, they need to override the autoAck method to
return false. In this case, consumer actors must reply either with a special akka.camel.Ack message (positive
acknowledgement) or a akka.actor.Status.Failure (negative acknowledgement).
import akka.actor.Status;
import akka.camel.Ack;
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedConsumerActor;
@Override
public boolean autoAck() {
return false;
}
Consumer timeout
Camel Exchanges (and their corresponding endpoints) that support two-way communications need to wait for a
response from an actor before returning it to the initiating client. For some endpoint types, timeout values can be
defined in an endpoint-specific way which is described in the documentation of the individual Camel components.
Another option is to configure timeouts on the level of consumer actors.
Two-way communications between a Camel endpoint and an actor are initiated by sending the request message to
the actor with the ask pattern and the actor replies to the endpoint when the response is ready. The ask request to
the actor can timeout, which will result in the Exchange failing with a TimeoutException set on the failure of the
Exchange. The timeout on the consumer actor can be overridden with the replyTimeout, as shown below.
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedConsumerActor;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import scala.concurrent.duration.FiniteDuration;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
@Override
public FiniteDuration replyTimeout() {
return timeout;
}
For sending messages to Camel endpoints, actors need to inherit from the UntypedProducerActor class and im-
plement the getEndpointUri method.
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedProducerActor;
Producer1 inherits a default implementation of the onReceive method from the UntypedProducerActor
class. To customize a producer actor’s default behavior you must override the UntypedProducerAc-
tor.onTransformResponse and UntypedProducerActor.onTransformOutgoingMessage methods. This is explained
later in more detail. Producer Actors cannot override the UntypedProducerActor.onReceive method.
Any message sent to a Producer actor will be sent to the associated Camel endpoint, in the above example to
http://localhost:8080/news. The UntypedProducerActor always sends messages asynchronously. Re-
sponse messages (if supported by the configured endpoint) will, by default, be returned to the original sender. The
following example uses the ask pattern to send a message to a Producer actor and waits for a response.
ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("some-system");
Props props = Props.create(FirstProducer.class);
ActorRef producer = system.actorOf(props,"myproducer");
Future<Object> future = Patterns.ask(producer, "some request", 1000);
The future contains the response CamelMessage, or an AkkaCamelException when an error occurred, which
Custom Processing
Instead of replying to the initial sender, producer actors can implement custom response processing by overriding
the onRouteResponse method. In the following example, the response message is forwarded to a target actor
instead of being replied to the original sender.
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedProducerActor;
@Override
public void onRouteResponse(Object message) {
target.forward(message, getContext());
}
}
Before producing messages to endpoints, producer actors can pre-process them by overriding the UntypedProduc-
erActor.onTransformOutgoingMessage method.
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedProducerActor;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import akka.japi.Function;
this.uri = uri;
}
@Override
public Object onTransformOutgoingMessage(Object message) {
if(message instanceof CamelMessage) {
CamelMessage camelMessage = (CamelMessage) message;
return upperCase(camelMessage);
} else {
return message;
}
}
}
The interaction of producer actors with Camel endpoints can be configured to be one-way or two-way (by initiating
in-only or in-out message exchanges, respectively). By default, the producer initiates an in-out message exchange
with the endpoint. For initiating an in-only exchange, producer actors have to override the isOneway method to
return true.
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedProducerActor;
@Override
public boolean isOneway() {
return true;
}
}
Message correlation
To correlate request with response messages, applications can set the Message.MessageExchangeId message
header.
ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("some-system");
Props props = Props.create(Orders.class);
ActorRef producer = system.actorOf(props,"jmsproducer");
ProducerTemplate
The UntypedProducerActor class is a very convenient way for actors to produce messages to Camel endpoints.
Actors may also use a Camel ProducerTemplate for producing messages to endpoints.
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.camel.Camel;
import akka.camel.CamelExtension;
import org.apache.camel.ProducerTemplate;
For initiating a two-way message exchange, one of the ProducerTemplate.request* methods must be
used.
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.camel.Camel;
import akka.camel.CamelExtension;
import org.apache.camel.ProducerTemplate;
In-out message exchanges between endpoints and actors are designed to be asynchronous. This is the case for
both, consumer and producer actors.
• A consumer endpoint sends request messages to its consumer actor using the tell method and the actor
returns responses with getSender().tell once they are ready.
• A producer actor sends request messages to its endpoint using Camel’s asynchronous routing engine. Asyn-
chronous responses are wrapped and added to the producer actor’s mailbox for later processing. By default,
response messages are returned to the initial sender but this can be overridden by Producer implementations
(see also description of the onRouteResponse method in Custom Processing).
However, asynchronous two-way message exchanges, without allocating a thread for the full duration of exchange,
cannot be generically supported by Camel’s asynchronous routing engine alone. This must be supported by the
individual Camel components (from which endpoints are created) as well. They must be able to suspend any work
started for request processing (thereby freeing threads to do other work) and resume processing when the response
is ready. This is currently the case for a subset of components such as the Jetty component. All other Camel
components can still be used, of course, but they will cause allocation of a thread for the duration of an in-out
message exchange. There’s also Examples that implements both, an asynchronous consumer and an asynchronous
producer, with the jetty component.
If the used Camel component is blocking it might be necessary to use a separate dispatcher for the producer. The
Camel processor is invoked by a child actor of the producer and the dispatcher can be defined in the deployment
section of the configuration. For example, if your producer actor has path /user/integration/output the
dispatcher of the child actor can be defined with:
akka.actor.deployment {
/integration/output/* {
dispatcher = my-dispatcher
}
}
In all the examples so far, routes to consumer actors have been automatically constructed by akka-camel, when the
actor was started. Although the default route construction templates, used by akka-camel internally, are sufficient
for most use cases, some applications may require more specialized routes to actors. The akka-camel module
provides two mechanisms for customizing routes to actors, which will be explained in this section. These are:
• Usage of Akka Camel components to access actors. Any Camel route can use these components to access
Akka actors.
• Intercepting route construction to actors. This option gives you the ability to change routes that have already
been added to Camel. Consumer actors have a hook into the route definition process which can be used to
change the route.
Akka actors can be accessed from Camel routes using the actor Camel component. This component can be used
to access any Akka actor (not only consumer actors) from Camel routes, as described in the following sections.
Access to actors
To access actors from custom Camel routes, the actor Camel component should be used. It fully supports Camel’s
asynchronous routing engine.
This component accepts the following endpoint URI format:
• [<actor-path>]?<options>
where <actor-path> is the ActorPath to the actor. The <options> are name-value pairs separated by &
(i.e. name1=value1&name2=value2&...).
URI options
akka://some-system/user/myconsumer?autoAck=false&replyTimeout=100+millis
In the following example, a custom route to an actor is created, using the actor’s path.
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import akka.japi.Function;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.camel.internal.component.CamelPath;
import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder;
The CamelPath.toCamelUri converts the ActorRef to the Camel actor component URI format which points to the
actor endpoint as described above. When a message is received on the jetty endpoint, it is routed to the Responder
actor, which in return replies back to the client of the HTTP request.
The previous section, Akka Camel components, explained how to setup a route to an actor manually. It was the
application’s responsibility to define the route and add it to the current CamelContext. This section explains a
more convenient way to define custom routes: akka-camel is still setting up the routes to consumer actors (and
adds these routes to the current CamelContext) but applications can define extensions to these routes. Extensions
can be defined with Camel’s Java DSL or Scala DSL. For example, an extension could be a custom error handler
that redelivers messages from an endpoint to an actor’s bounded mailbox when the mailbox was full.
The following examples demonstrate how to extend a route to a consumer actor for handling exceptions thrown
by that actor.
import akka.actor.Status;
import akka.camel.CamelMessage;
import akka.camel.javaapi.UntypedConsumerActor;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import org.apache.camel.builder.Builder;
import org.apache.camel.model.ProcessorDefinition;
import org.apache.camel.model.RouteDefinition;
import scala.Option;
@Override
public Mapper<RouteDefinition,
ProcessorDefinition<?>> getRouteDefinitionHandler() {
return mapper;
}
@Override
public void preRestart(Throwable reason, Option<Object> message) {
getSender().tell(new Status.Failure(reason), getSelf());
}
}
The above ErrorThrowingConsumer sends the Failure back to the sender in preRestart because the Exception that
is thrown in the actor would otherwise just crash the actor, by default the actor would be restarted, and the response
would never reach the client of the Consumer.
The akka-camel module creates a RouteDefinition instance by calling from(endpointUri) on a Camel RouteBuilder
(where endpointUri is the endpoint URI of the consumer actor) and passes that instance as argument to the route
definition handler *). The route definition handler then extends the route and returns a ProcessorDefinition (in the
above example, the ProcessorDefinition returned by the end method. See the org.apache.camel.model package for
details). After executing the route definition handler, akka-camel finally calls a to(targetActorUri) on the returned
ProcessorDefinition to complete the route to the consumer actor (where targetActorUri is the actor component
URI as described in Access to actors). If the actor cannot be found, a ActorNotRegisteredException is thrown.
*) Before passing the RouteDefinition instance to the route definition handler, akka-camel may make some further
modifications to it.
7.15.6 Examples
The Lightbend Activator tutorial named Akka Camel Samples with Java contains 3 samples:
• Asynchronous routing and transformation - This example demonstrates how to implement consumer and
producer actors that support Asynchronous routing with their Camel endpoints.
• Custom Camel route - Demonstrates the combined usage of a Producer and a Consumer actor as well
as the inclusion of a custom Camel route.
• Quartz Scheduler Example - Showing how simple is to implement a cron-style scheduler by using the Camel
Quartz component
7.15.7 Configuration
There are several configuration properties for the Camel module, please refer to the reference configuration.
For an introduction to akka-camel 2, see also the Peter Gabryanczyk’s talk Migrating akka-camel module to Akka
2.x.
For an introduction to akka-camel 1, see also the Appendix E - Akka and Camel (pdf) of the book Camel in Action.
Other, more advanced external articles (for version 1) are:
• Akka Consumer Actors: New Features and Best Practices
• Akka Producer Actors: New Features and Best Practices
EIGHT
UTILITIES
Originally conceived as a way to send messages to groups of actors, the EventBus has been generalized into a
set of abstract base classes implementing a simple interface:
/**
* Attempts to register the subscriber to the specified Classifier
* @return true if successful and false if not (because it was already
* subscribed to that Classifier, or otherwise)
*/
public boolean subscribe(Subscriber subscriber, Classifier to);
/**
* Attempts to deregister the subscriber from the specified Classifier
* @return true if successful and false if not (because it wasn’t subscribed
* to that Classifier, or otherwise)
*/
public boolean unsubscribe(Subscriber subscriber, Classifier from);
/**
* Attempts to deregister the subscriber from all Classifiers it may be subscribed to
*/
public void unsubscribe(Subscriber subscriber);
/**
* Publishes the specified Event to this bus
*/
public void publish(Event event);
Note: Please note that the EventBus does not preserve the sender of the published messages. If you need a
reference to the original sender you have to provide it inside the message.
This mechanism is used in different places within Akka, e.g. the Event Stream. Implementations can make use of
the specific building blocks presented below.
An event bus must define the following three type parameters:
• Event (E) is the type of all events published on that bus
• Subscriber (S) is the type of subscribers allowed to register on that event bus
• Classifier (C) defines the classifier to be used in selecting subscribers for dispatching events
The traits below are still generic in these types, but they need to be defined for any concrete implementation.
478
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
8.1.1 Classifiers
The classifiers presented here are part of the Akka distribution, but rolling your own in case you do not find a
perfect match is not difficult, check the implementation of the existing ones on github
Lookup Classification
The simplest classification is just to extract an arbitrary classifier from each event and maintaining a set of
subscribers for each possible classifier. This can be compared to tuning in on a radio station. The trait
LookupClassification is still generic in that it abstracts over how to compare subscribers and how ex-
actly to classify.
The necessary methods to be implemented are illustrated with the following example:
import akka.event.japi.LookupEventBus;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
/**
* Publishes the payload of the MsgEnvelope when the topic of the
* MsgEnvelope equals the String specified when subscribing.
*/
public class LookupBusImpl extends LookupEventBus<MsgEnvelope, ActorRef, String> {
// will be invoked for each event for all subscribers which registered themselves
// for the event’s classifier
@Override public void publish(MsgEnvelope event, ActorRef subscriber) {
subscriber.tell(event.payload, ActorRef.noSender());
}
// must define a full order over the subscribers, expressed as expected from
// ‘java.lang.Comparable.compare‘
@Override public int compareSubscribers(ActorRef a, ActorRef b) {
return a.compareTo(b);
}
Subchannel Classification
If classifiers form a hierarchy and it is desired that subscription be possible not only at the leaf nodes, this clas-
sification may be just the right one. It can be compared to tuning in on (possibly multiple) radio channels by
genre. This classification has been developed for the case where the classifier is just the JVM class of the event
and subscribers may be interested in subscribing to all subclasses of a certain class, but it may be used with any
classifier hierarchy.
The necessary methods to be implemented are illustrated with the following example:
import akka.event.japi.SubchannelEventBus;
import akka.util.Subclassification;
/**
* Publishes the payload of the MsgEnvelope when the topic of the
* MsgEnvelope starts with the String specified when subscribing.
*/
public class SubchannelBusImpl extends SubchannelEventBus<MsgEnvelope, ActorRef, String> {
// will be invoked for each event for all subscribers which registered themselves
// for the event’s classifier
@Override public void publish(MsgEnvelope event, ActorRef subscriber) {
subscriber.tell(event.payload, ActorRef.noSender());
}
This classifier is also efficient in case no subscribers are found for an event, but it uses conventional locking to
synchronize an internal classifier cache, hence it is not well-suited to use cases in which subscriptions change
with very high frequency (keep in mind that “opening” a classifier by sending the first message will also have to
re-check all previous subscriptions).
Scanning Classification
The previous classifier was built for multi-classifier subscriptions which are strictly hierarchical, this classifier is
useful if there are overlapping classifiers which cover various parts of the event space without forming a hierarchy.
It can be compared to tuning in on (possibly multiple) radio stations by geographical reachability (for old-school
radio-wave transmission).
The necessary methods to be implemented are illustrated with the following example:
import akka.event.japi.ScanningEventBus;
/**
* Publishes String messages with length less than or equal to the length
* specified when subscribing.
*/
public class ScanningBusImpl extends ScanningEventBus<String, ActorRef, Integer> {
// will be invoked for each event for all subscribers which registered themselves
// for the event’s classifier
@Override public void publish(String event, ActorRef subscriber) {
subscriber.tell(event, ActorRef.noSender());
}
This classifier takes always a time which is proportional to the number of subscriptions, independent of how many
actually match.
Actor Classification
This classification was originally developed specifically for implementing DeathWatch: subscribers as well as
classifiers are of type ActorRef.
This classification requires an ActorSystem in order to perform book-keeping operations related to the sub-
scribers being Actors, which can terminate without first unsubscribing from the EventBus. ManagedActorClassi-
fication maintains a system Actor which takes care of unsubscribing terminated actors automatically.
The necessary methods to be implemented are illustrated with the following example:
import akka.event.japi.ManagedActorEventBus;
// the ActorSystem will be used for book-keeping operations, such as subscribers terminating
public ActorBusImpl(ActorSystem system) {
super(system);
}
This classifier is still is generic in the event type, and it is efficient for all use cases.
The event stream is the main event bus of each actor system: it is used for carrying log messages and Dead Letters
and may be used by the user code for other purposes as well. It uses Subchannel Classification which enables
registering to related sets of channels (as is used for RemotingLifecycleEvent). The following example
demonstrates how a simple subscription works. Given a simple actor:
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
It is also worth pointing out that thanks to the way the subchannel classification is implemented in the event stream,
it is possible to subscribe to a group of events, by subscribing to their common superclass as demonstrated in the
following example:
interface AllKindsOfMusic { }
// only musicListener gets this message, since it listens to *all* kinds of music:
system.eventStream().publish(new Electronic("Parov Stelar"));
Similarly to Actor Classification, EventStream will automatically remove subscribers when they terminate.
Note: The event stream is a local facility, meaning that it will not distribute events to other nodes in a clustered
environment (unless you subscribe a Remote Actor to the stream explicitly). If you need to broadcast events in an
Akka cluster, without knowing your recipients explicitly (i.e. obtaining their ActorRefs), you may want to look
into: Distributed Publish Subscribe in Cluster.
Default Handlers
Upon start-up the actor system creates and subscribes actors to the event stream for logging: these are the handlers
which are configured for example in application.conf:
akka {
loggers = ["akka.event.Logging$DefaultLogger"]
}
The handlers listed here by fully-qualified class name will be subscribed to all log event classes with priority higher
than or equal to the configured log-level and their subscriptions are kept in sync when changing the log-level at
runtime:
system.eventStream.setLogLevel(Logging.DebugLevel());
This means that log events for a level which will not be logged are typically not dispatched at all (unless manual
subscriptions to the respective event class have been done)
Dead Letters
As described at Stopping actors, messages queued when an actor terminates or sent after its death are re-routed
to the dead letter mailbox, which by default will publish the messages wrapped in DeadLetter. This wrapper
holds the original sender, receiver and message of the envelope which was redirected.
Some internal messages (marked with the DeadLetterSuppression trait) will not end up as dead letters like
normal messages. These are by design safe and expected to sometimes arrive at a terminated actor and since they
are nothing to worry about, they are suppressed from the default dead letters logging mechanism.
However, in case you find yourself in need of debugging these kinds of low level suppressed dead letters, it’s still
possible to subscribe to them explicitly:
system.eventStream().subscribe(actor, SuppressedDeadLetter.class);
Other Uses
The event stream is always there and ready to be used, just publish your own events (it accepts Object) and
subscribe listeners to the corresponding JVM classes.
8.2 Logging
Logging in Akka is not tied to a specific logging backend. By default log messages are printed to STDOUT, but
you can plug-in a SLF4J logger or your own logger. Logging is performed asynchronously to ensure that logging
has minimal performance impact. Logging generally means IO and locks, which can slow down the operations of
your code if it was performed synchronously.
Create a LoggingAdapter and use the error, warning, info, or debug methods, as illustrated in this
example:
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
@Override
public void preStart() {
log.debug("Starting");
}
@Override
public void preRestart(Throwable reason, Option<Object> message) {
log.error(reason, "Restarting due to [{}] when processing [{}]",
reason.getMessage(), message.isDefined() ? message.get() : "");
}
The Java Class of the log source is also included in the generated LogEvent. In case of a simple string this
is replaced with a “marker” class akka.event.DummyClassForStringSources in order to allow special
treatment of this case, e.g. in the SLF4J event listener which will then use the string instead of the class’ name for
looking up the logger instance to use.
By default messages sent to dead letters are logged at info level. Existence of dead letters does not necessarily
indicate a problem, but it might be, and therefore they are logged by default. After a few messages this logging
is turned off, to avoid flooding the logs. You can disable this logging completely or adjust how many dead letters
that are logged. During system shutdown it is likely that you see dead letters, since pending messages in the actor
mailboxes are sent to dead letters. You can also disable logging of dead letters during shutdown.
akka {
log-dead-letters = 10
log-dead-letters-during-shutdown = on
}
To customize the logging further or take other actions for dead letters you can subscribe to the Event Stream.
Akka has a couple of configuration options for very low level debugging, that makes most sense in for developers
and not for operations.
You almost definitely need to have logging set to DEBUG to use any of the options below:
akka {
loglevel = "DEBUG"
}
This config option is very good if you want to know what config settings are loaded by Akka:
akka {
# Log the complete configuration at INFO level when the actor system is started.
# This is useful when you are uncertain of what configuration is used.
log-config-on-start = on
}
If you want very detailed logging of all automatically received messages that are processed by Actors:
akka {
actor {
debug {
# enable DEBUG logging of all AutoReceiveMessages (Kill, PoisonPill et.c.)
autoreceive = on
}
}
}
If you want very detailed logging of all lifecycle changes of Actors (restarts, deaths etc):
akka {
actor {
debug {
# enable DEBUG logging of actor lifecycle changes
lifecycle = on
}
}
}
akka {
actor {
debug {
# enable DEBUG logging of unhandled messages
unhandled = on
}
}
}
If you want very detailed logging of all events, transitions and timers of FSM Actors that extend LoggingFSM:
akka {
actor {
debug {
# enable DEBUG logging of all LoggingFSMs for events, transitions and timers
fsm = on
}
}
}
If you want to see all messages that are sent through remoting at DEBUG log level: (This is logged as they are
sent by the transport layer, not by the Actor)
akka {
remote {
# If this is "on", Akka will log all outbound messages at DEBUG level,
# if off then they are not logged
log-sent-messages = on
}
}
If you want to see all messages that are received through remoting at DEBUG log level: (This is logged as they
are received by the transport layer, not by any Actor)
akka {
remote {
# If this is "on", Akka will log all inbound messages at DEBUG level,
# if off then they are not logged
log-received-messages = on
}
}
If you want to see message types with payload size in bytes larger than a specified limit at INFO log level:
akka {
remote {
# Logging of message types with payload size in bytes larger than
# this value. Maximum detected size per message type is logged once,
# with an increase threshold of 10%.
# By default this feature is turned off. Activate it by setting the property to
# a value in bytes, such as 1000b. Note that for all messages larger than this
# limit there will be extra performance and scalability cost.
log-frame-size-exceeding = 1000b
}
}
Also see the logging options for TestKit: Tracing Actor Invocations.
To turn off logging you can configure the log levels to be OFF like this.
akka {
stdout-loglevel = "OFF"
loglevel = "OFF"
}
The stdout-loglevel is only in effect during system startup and shutdown, and setting it to OFF as well,
ensures that nothing gets logged during system startup or shutdown.
8.2.2 Loggers
Logging is performed asynchronously through an event bus. Log events are processed by an event handler actor
and it will receive the log events in the same order as they were emitted.
Note: The event handler actor does not have a bounded inbox and is run on the default dispatcher. This means
that logging extreme amounts of data may affect your application badly. It can be somewhat mitigated by making
sure to use an async logging backend though. (See Using the SLF4J API directly)
You can configure which event handlers are created at system start-up and listen to logging events. That is done
using the loggers element in the Configuration. Here you can also define the log level. More fine grained
filtering based on the log source can be implemented in a custom LoggingFilter, which can be defined in the
logging-filter configuration property.
akka {
# Loggers to register at boot time (akka.event.Logging$DefaultLogger logs
# to STDOUT)
loggers = ["akka.event.Logging$DefaultLogger"]
# Options: OFF, ERROR, WARNING, INFO, DEBUG
loglevel = "DEBUG"
}
The default one logs to STDOUT and is registered by default. It is not intended to be used for production. There
is also an SLF4J logger available in the ‘akka-slf4j’ module.
Example of creating a listener:
import akka.actor.*;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.event.Logging.InitializeLogger;
import akka.event.Logging.Error;
import akka.event.Logging.Warning;
import akka.event.Logging.Info;
import akka.event.Logging.Debug;
getSender().tell(Logging.loggerInitialized(), getSelf());
} else if (message instanceof Error) {
// ...
} else if (message instanceof Warning) {
// ...
} else if (message instanceof Info) {
// ...
} else if (message instanceof Debug) {
// ...
}
}
}
While the actor system is starting up and shutting down the configured loggers are not used. Instead log
messages are printed to stdout (System.out). The default log level for this stdout logger is WARNING and it can be
silenced completely by setting akka.stdout-loglevel=OFF.
8.2.4 SLF4J
Akka provides a logger for SL4FJ. This module is available in the ‘akka-slf4j.jar’. It has one single dependency;
the slf4j-api jar. In runtime you also need a SLF4J backend, we recommend Logback:
<dependency>
<groupId>ch.qos.logback</groupId>
<artifactId>logback-classic</artifactId>
<version>1.2.3</version>
</dependency>
You need to enable the Slf4jLogger in the loggers element in the Configuration. Here you can also define
the log level of the event bus. More fine grained log levels can be defined in the configuration of the SLF4J
backend (e.g. logback.xml). You should also define akka.event.slf4j.Slf4jLoggingFilter in the
logging-filter configuration property. It will filter the log events using the backend configuration (e.g.
logback.xml) before they are published to the event bus.
Warning: If you set the loglevel to a higher level than “DEBUG”, any DEBUG events will be filtered out
already at the source and will never reach the logging backend, regardless of how the backend is configured.
akka {
loggers = ["akka.event.slf4j.Slf4jLogger"]
loglevel = "DEBUG"
logging-filter = "akka.event.slf4j.Slf4jLoggingFilter"
}
One gotcha is that the timestamp is attributed in the event handler, not when actually doing the logging.
The SLF4J logger selected for each log event is chosen based on the Class of the log source spec-
ified when creating the LoggingAdapter, unless that was given directly as a string in which case
that string is used (i.e. LoggerFactory.getLogger(Class c) is used in the first case and
LoggerFactory.getLogger(String s) in the second).
Note: Beware that the actor system’s name is appended to a String log source if the LoggingAdapter was
created giving an ActorSystem to the factory. If this is not intended, give a LoggingBus instead as shown
below:
If you use the SLF4J API directly in your application, remember that the logging operations will block while the
underlying infrastructure writes the log statements.
This can be avoided by configuring the logging implementation to use a non-blocking appender. Logback provides
AsyncAppender that does this. It also contains a feature which will drop INFO and DEBUG messages if the logging
load is high.
Since the logging is done asynchronously the thread in which the logging was performed is captured in Mapped
Diagnostic Context (MDC) with attribute name sourceThread. With Logback the thread name is available
with %X{sourceThread} specifier within the pattern layout configuration:
<appender name="STDOUT" class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
<encoder>
<pattern>%date{ISO8601} %-5level %logger{36} %X{sourceThread} - %msg%n</pattern>
</encoder>
</appender>
Note: It will probably be a good idea to use the sourceThread MDC value also in non-Akka parts of the
application in order to have this property consistently available in the logs.
Another helpful facility is that Akka captures the actor’s address when instantiating a logger within it, meaning
that the full instance identification is available for associating log messages e.g. with members of a router. This
information is available in the MDC with attribute name akkaSource:
<appender name="STDOUT" class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
<encoder>
<pattern>%date{ISO8601} %-5level %logger{36} %X{akkaSource} - %msg%n</pattern>
</encoder>
</appender>
Finally, the actor system in which the logging was performed is available in the MDC with attribute name
sourceActorSystem:
<appender name="STDOUT" class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
<encoder>
<pattern>%date{ISO8601} %-5level %logger{36} %X{sourceActorSystem} - %msg%n</pattern>
</encoder>
</appender>
For more details on what this attribute contains—also for non-actors—please see How to Log.
Akka’s logging is asynchronous which means that the timestamp of a log entry is taken from when the underlying
logger implementation is called, which can be surprising at first. If you want to more accurately output the
timestamp, use the MDC attribute akkaTimestamp:
<appender name="STDOUT" class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
<encoder>
<pattern>%X{akkaTimestamp} %-5level %logger{36} %X{akkaSource} - %msg%n</pattern>
</encoder>
</appender>
One useful feature available in Slf4j is MDC, Akka has a way for let the application specify custom values, you
just need to get a specialized LoggingAdapter, the DiagnosticLoggingAdapter. In order to get it you
will use the factory receiving an UntypedActor as logSource:
// Within your UntypedActor
final DiagnosticLoggingAdapter log = Logging.getLogger(this);
Once you have the logger, you just need to add the custom values before you log something. This way, the values
will be put in the SLF4J MDC right before appending the log and removed after.
Note: The cleanup (removal) should be done in the actor at the end, otherwise, next message will log with same
mdc values, if it is not set to a new map. Use log.clearMDC().
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.DiagnosticLoggingAdapter;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
log.clearMDC();
}
}
Now, the values will be available in the MDC, so you can use them in the layout pattern:
<appender name="STDOUT" class="ch.qos.logback.core.ConsoleAppender">
<encoder>
<pattern>
%-5level %logger{36} [req: %X{requestId}, visitor: %X{visitorId}] - %msg%n
</pattern>
</encoder>
</appender>
Using Markers
Some logging libraries allow, in addition to MDC data, attaching so called “markers” to log statements. These
are used to filter out rare and special events, for example you might want to mark logs that detect some malicious
activity and mark them with a SECURITY tag, and in your appender configuration make these trigger emails and
other notifications immediately.
Markers are available through the LoggingAdapters, when obtained via Logging.withMarker. The first
argument passed into all log calls then should be a akka.event.LogMarker.
The slf4j bridge provided by akka in akka-slf4j will automatically pick up this marker value and make it
available to SLF4J. For example you could use it like this:
A more advanced (including most Akka added information) example pattern would be:
<pattern>%date{ISO8601} level=[%level] marker=[%marker] logger=[%logger] akkaSource=[%X{akkaSource
8.3 Scheduler
Sometimes the need for making things happen in the future arises, and where do you go look then? Look
no further than ActorSystem! There you find the scheduler method that returns an instance of
akka.actor.Scheduler, this instance is unique per ActorSystem and is used internally for scheduling things
to happen at specific points in time.
You can schedule sending of messages to actors and execution of tasks (functions or Runnable). You will get a
Cancellable back that you can call cancel on to cancel the execution of the scheduled operation.
Warning: The default implementation of Scheduler used by Akka is based on job buckets which
are emptied according to a fixed schedule. It does not execute tasks at the exact time, but on every tick,
it will run everything that is (over)due. The accuracy of the default Scheduler can be modified by the
akka.scheduler.tick-duration configuration property.
system.scheduler().scheduleOnce(Duration.create(50, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS),
testActor, "foo", system.dispatcher(), null);
Schedule a Runnable, that sends the current time to the testActor, to be executed after 50ms:
system.scheduler().scheduleOnce(Duration.create(50, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS),
new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
testActor.tell(System.currentTimeMillis(), ActorRef.noSender());
}
}, system.dispatcher());
Warning: If you schedule Runnable instances you should be extra careful to not pass or close over unstable
references. In practice this means that you should not call methods on the enclosing Actor from within the
Runnable. If you need to schedule an invocation it is better to use the schedule() variant accepting a
message and an ActorRef to schedule a message to self (containing the necessary parameters) and then call
the method when the message is received.
Schedule to send the “Tick”-message to the tickActor after 0ms repeating every 50ms:
import akka.actor.Props;
import docs.AbstractJavaTest;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.actor.Cancellable;
/**
* Light-weight scheduler for running asynchronous tasks after some deadline
* in the future. Not terribly precise but cheap.
*/
def scheduler: Scheduler
Warning: All scheduled task will be executed when the ActorSystem is terminated, i.e. the task may
execute before its timeout.
The actual scheduler implementation is loaded reflectively upon ActorSystem start-up, which means that it is
possible to provide a different one using the akka.scheduler.implementation configuration property.
The referenced class must implement the following interface:
/**
* An Akka scheduler service. This one needs one special behavior: if
* Closeable, it MUST execute all outstanding tasks upon .close() in order
* to properly shutdown all dispatchers.
*
* Furthermore, this timer service MUST throw IllegalStateException if it
* cannot schedule a task. Once scheduled, the task MUST be executed. If
* executed upon close(), the task may execute before its timeout.
*
* Scheduler implementation are loaded reflectively at ActorSystem start-up
* with the following constructor arguments:
* 1) the system’s com.typesafe.config.Config (from system.settings.config)
* 2) a akka.event.LoggingAdapter
* 3) a java.util.concurrent.ThreadFactory
*/
public abstract class AbstractScheduler extends AbstractSchedulerBase {
/**
* Schedules a function to be run repeatedly with an initial delay and
* a frequency. E.g. if you would like the function to be run after 2
* seconds and thereafter every 100ms you would set delay = Duration(2,
* TimeUnit.SECONDS) and interval = Duration(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
*/
@Override
public abstract Cancellable schedule(FiniteDuration initialDelay,
FiniteDuration interval, Runnable runnable, ExecutionContext executor);
/**
* Schedules a Runnable to be run once with a delay, i.e. a time period that
* has to pass before the runnable is executed.
*/
@Override
public abstract Cancellable scheduleOnce(FiniteDuration delay, Runnable runnable,
ExecutionContext executor);
/**
* The maximum supported task frequency of this scheduler, i.e. the inverse
* of the minimum time interval between executions of a recurring task, in Hz.
*/
@Override
public abstract double maxFrequency();
}
Scheduling a task will result in a Cancellable (or throw an IllegalStateException if attempted after
the scheduler’s shutdown). This allows you to cancel something that has been scheduled for execution.
Warning: This does not abort the execution of the task, if it had already been started. Check the return value
of cancel to detect whether the scheduled task was canceled or will (eventually) have run.
/**
* Signifies something that can be cancelled
* There is no strict guarantee that the implementation is thread-safe,
* but it should be good practice to make it so.
*/
trait Cancellable {
/**
* Cancels this Cancellable and returns true if that was successful.
* If this cancellable was (concurrently) cancelled already, then this method
* will return false although isCancelled will return true.
*
* Java & Scala API
*/
def cancel(): Boolean
/**
* Returns true if and only if this Cancellable has been successfully cancelled
*
* Java & Scala API
*/
def isCancelled: Boolean
}
8.4 Duration
Durations are used throughout the Akka library, wherefore this concept is represented by a special data type,
scala.concurrent.duration.Duration. Values of this type may represent infinite (Duration.Inf,
Since trying to convert an infinite duration into a concrete time unit like seconds will throw an exception, there are
different types available for distinguishing the two kinds at compile time:
• FiniteDuration is guaranteed to be finite, calling toNanos and friends is safe
• Duration can be finite or infinite, so this type should only be used when finite-ness does not matter; this
is a supertype of FiniteDuration
8.4.2 Scala
In Scala durations are constructable using a mini-DSL and support all expected arithmetic operations:
import scala.concurrent.duration._
Note: You may leave out the dot if the expression is clearly delimited (e.g. within parentheses or in an argument
list), but it is recommended to use it if the time unit is the last token on a line, otherwise semi-colon inference
might go wrong, depending on what starts the next line.
8.4.3 Java
Java provides less syntactic sugar, so you have to spell out the operations as method calls instead:
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Deadline;
8.4.4 Deadline
Durations have a brother named Deadline, which is a class holding a representation of an absolute point in
time, and support deriving a duration from this by calculating the difference between now and the deadline. This
is useful when you want to keep one overall deadline without having to take care of the book-keeping wrt. the
passing of time yourself:
val deadline = 10.seconds.fromNow
// do something
val rest = deadline.timeLeft
A circuit breaker is used to provide stability and prevent cascading failures in distributed systems. These should
be used in conjunction with judicious timeouts at the interfaces between remote systems to prevent the failure of
a single component from bringing down all components.
As an example, we have a web application interacting with a remote third party web service. Let’s say the third
party has oversold their capacity and their database melts down under load. Assume that the database fails in such
a way that it takes a very long time to hand back an error to the third party web service. This in turn makes calls
fail after a long period of time. Back to our web application, the users have noticed that their form submissions
take much longer seeming to hang. Well the users do what they know to do which is use the refresh button, adding
more requests to their already running requests. This eventually causes the failure of the web application due to
resource exhaustion. This will affect all users, even those who are not using functionality dependent on this third
party web service.
Introducing circuit breakers on the web service call would cause the requests to begin to fail-fast, letting the user
know that something is wrong and that they need not refresh their request. This also confines the failure behavior
to only those users that are using functionality dependent on the third party, other users are no longer affected as
there is no resource exhaustion. Circuit breakers can also allow savvy developers to mark portions of the site that
use the functionality unavailable, or perhaps show some cached content as appropriate while the breaker is open.
The Akka library provides an implementation of a circuit breaker called akka.pattern.CircuitBreaker
which has the behavior described below.
8.5.3 Examples
Initialization
Scala
import scala.concurrent.duration._
import akka.pattern.CircuitBreaker
import akka.pattern.pipe
import akka.actor.{ Actor, ActorLogging, ActorRef }
import scala.concurrent.Future
val breaker =
new CircuitBreaker(
context.system.scheduler,
maxFailures = 5,
callTimeout = 10.seconds,
resetTimeout = 1.minute).onOpen(notifyMeOnOpen())
Java
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.pattern.CircuitBreaker;
import akka.event.Logging;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
public DangerousJavaActor() {
this.breaker = new CircuitBreaker(
getContext().dispatcher(), getContext().system().scheduler(),
5, Duration.create(10, "s"), Duration.create(1, "m"))
.onOpen(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
notifyMeOnOpen();
}
});
}
Call Protection
Here’s how the CircuitBreaker would be used to protect an asynchronous call as well as a synchronous one:
Scala
def dangerousCall: String = "This really isn’t that dangerous of a call after all"
def receive = {
case "is my middle name" =>
breaker.withCircuitBreaker(Future(dangerousCall)) pipeTo sender()
case "block for me" =>
sender() ! breaker.withSyncCircuitBreaker(dangerousCall)
}
Java
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) {
if (message instanceof String) {
String m = (String) message;
if ("is my middle name".equals(m)) {
pipe(
breaker.callWithCircuitBreaker(() ->
future(() -> dangerousCall(), getContext().dispatcher())
), getContext().dispatcher()
).to(getSender());
}
if ("block for me".equals(m)) {
getSender().tell(breaker
.callWithSyncCircuitBreaker(
() -> dangerousCall()), getSelf());
}
}
}
Note: Using the CircuitBreaker companion object’s apply or create methods will return a
CircuitBreaker where callbacks are executed in the caller’s thread. This can be useful if the asynchronous
Future behavior is unnecessary, for example invoking a synchronous-only API.
Tell Pattern
The above Call Protection pattern works well when the return from a remote call is wrapped in a Future.
However, when a remote call sends back a message or timeout to the caller Actor, the Call Protection
pattern is awkward. CircuitBreaker doesn’t support it natively at the moment, so you need to use below low-level
power-user APIs, succeed and fail methods, as well as isClose, isOpen, isHalfOpen.
Note: The below examples doesn’t make a remote call when the state is HalfOpen. Using the power-user APIs,
it is your responsibility to judge when to make remote calls in HalfOpen.
Scala
import akka.actor.ReceiveTimeout
def receive = {
case "call" if breaker.isClosed => {
recipient ! "message"
}
case "response" => {
breaker.succeed()
}
case err: Throwable => {
breaker.fail()
}
case ReceiveTimeout => {
breaker.fail()
}
}
Java
@Override
public void onReceive(Object payload) {
if ( "call".equals(payload) && breaker.isClosed() ) {
target.tell("message", getSelf());
} else if ( "response".equals(payload) ) {
breaker.succeed();
} else if ( payload instanceof Throwable ) {
breaker.fail();
} else if ( payload instanceof ReceiveTimeout ) {
breaker.fail();
}
}
If you want to add features to Akka, there is a very elegant, but powerful mechanism for doing so. It’s called Akka
Extensions and is comprised of 2 basic components: an Extension and an ExtensionId.
Extensions will only be loaded once per ActorSystem, which will be managed by Akka. You can choose
to have your Extension loaded on-demand or at ActorSystem creation time through the Akka configuration.
Details on how to make that happens are below, in the “Loading from Configuration” section.
Warning: Since an extension is a way to hook into Akka itself, the implementor of the extension needs to
ensure the thread safety of his/her extension.
So let’s create a sample extension that just lets us count the number of times something has happened.
First, we define what our Extension should do:
import akka.actor.*;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
Then we need to create an ExtensionId for our extension so we can grab a hold of it.
import akka.actor.*;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
private CountExtension() {}
To be able to load extensions from your Akka configuration you must add FQCNs of implementations of either
ExtensionId or ExtensionIdProvider in the “akka.extensions” section of the config you provide to your
ActorSystem.
akka {
extensions = ["docs.extension.ExtensionDocTest.CountExtension"]
}
8.6.3 Applicability
The sky is the limit! By the way, did you know that Akka’s Typed Actors, Serialization and other
features are implemented as Akka Extensions?
The Configuration can be used for application specific settings. A good practice is to place those settings in an
Extension.
Sample configuration:
myapp {
db {
uri = "mongodb://example1.com:27017,example2.com:27017"
}
circuit-breaker {
timeout = 30 seconds
}
}
The Extension:
import akka.actor.Extension;
import akka.actor.AbstractExtensionId;
import akka.actor.ExtensionIdProvider;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.actor.ExtendedActorSystem;
import docs.AbstractJavaTest;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import com.typesafe.config.Config;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
private Settings() {}
Use it:
public class MyActor extends UntypedActor {
// typically you would use static import of the Settings.SettingsProvider field
final SettingsImpl settings =
Settings.SettingsProvider.get(getContext().system());
Connection connection =
connect(settings.DB_URI, settings.CIRCUIT_BREAKER_TIMEOUT);
A third part library may register it’s extension for auto-loading on actor system startup by appending it to
akka.library-extensions in its reference.conf.
akka.library-extensions += "docs.extension.ExampleExtension"
As there is no way to selectively remove such extensions, it should be used with care and only when there is no
case where the user would ever want it disabled or have specific support for disabling such sub-features. One
example where this could be important is in tests.
sbt-native-packager is a tool for creating distributions of any type of application, including an Akka applications.
Define sbt version in project/build.properties file:
sbt.version=0.13.7
Use the package settings and optionally specify the mainClass in build.sbt file:
import NativePackagerHelper._
name := "akka-sample-main-scala"
version := "2.4.20"
scalaVersion := "2.11.8"
enablePlugins(JavaServerAppPackaging)
Note: Use the JavaServerAppPackaging. Don’t use the deprecated AkkaAppPackaging (previously
named packageArchetype.akka_application), since it doesn’t have the same flexibility and quality as
the JavaServerAppPackaging.
You can use both Akka remoting and Akka Cluster inside of Docker containers. But note that you will need to
take special care with the network configuration when using Docker, described here: remote-configuration-nat
For an example of how to set up a project using Akka Cluster and Docker take a look at the “akka-docker-cluster”
activator template.
NINE
STREAMS
9.1 Introduction
9.1.1 Motivation
The way we consume services from the Internet today includes many instances of streaming data, both down-
loading from a service as well as uploading to it or peer-to-peer data transfers. Regarding data as a stream of
elements instead of in its entirety is very useful because it matches the way computers send and receive them (for
example via TCP), but it is often also a necessity because data sets frequently become too large to be handled as
a whole. We spread computations or analyses over large clusters and call it “big data”, where the whole principle
of processing them is by feeding those data sequentially—as a stream—through some CPUs.
Actors can be seen as dealing with streams as well: they send and receive series of messages in order to transfer
knowledge (or data) from one place to another. We have found it tedious and error-prone to implement all the
proper measures in order to achieve stable streaming between actors, since in addition to sending and receiving
we also need to take care to not overflow any buffers or mailboxes in the process. Another pitfall is that Actor
messages can be lost and must be retransmitted in that case lest the stream have holes on the receiving side. When
dealing with streams of elements of a fixed given type, Actors also do not currently offer good static guarantees
that no wiring errors are made: type-safety could be improved in this case.
For these reasons we decided to bundle up a solution to these problems as an Akka Streams API. The purpose is to
offer an intuitive and safe way to formulate stream processing setups such that we can then execute them efficiently
and with bounded resource usage—no more OutOfMemoryErrors. In order to achieve this our streams need to be
able to limit the buffering that they employ, they need to be able to slow down producers if the consumers cannot
keep up. This feature is called back-pressure and is at the core of the Reactive Streams initiative of which Akka is a
founding member. For you this means that the hard problem of propagating and reacting to back-pressure has been
incorporated in the design of Akka Streams already, so you have one less thing to worry about; it also means that
Akka Streams interoperate seamlessly with all other Reactive Streams implementations (where Reactive Streams
interfaces define the interoperability SPI while implementations like Akka Streams offer a nice user API).
The Akka Streams API is completely decoupled from the Reactive Streams interfaces. While Akka Streams
focus on the formulation of transformations on data streams the scope of Reactive Streams is just to define a
common mechanism of how to move data across an asynchronous boundary without losses, buffering or resource
exhaustion.
The relationship between these two is that the Akka Streams API is geared towards end-users while the Akka
Streams implementation uses the Reactive Streams interfaces internally to pass data between the different pro-
cessing stages. For this reason you will not find any resemblance between the Reactive Streams interfaces and the
Akka Streams API. This is in line with the expectations of the Reactive Streams project, whose primary purpose is
to define interfaces such that different streaming implementation can interoperate; it is not the purpose of Reactive
Streams to describe an end-user API.
505
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Stream processing is a different paradigm to the Actor Model or to Future composition, therefore it may take some
careful study of this subject until you feel familiar with the tools and techniques. The documentation is here to
help and for best results we recommend the following approach:
• Read the Quick Start Guide to get a feel for how streams look like and what they can do.
• The top-down learners may want to peruse the Design Principles behind Akka Streams at this point.
• The bottom-up learners may feel more at home rummaging through the Streams Cookbook.
• For a complete overview of the built-in processing stages you can look at the table in Overview of built-in
stages and their semantics
• The other sections can be read sequentially or as needed during the previous steps, each digging deeper into
specific topics.
A stream usually begins at a source, so this is also how we start an Akka Stream. Before we create one, we import
the full complement of streaming tools:
import akka.stream.*;
import akka.stream.javadsl.*;
If you want to execute the code samples while you read through the quick start guide, you will also need the
following imports:
import akka.Done;
import akka.NotUsed;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
import akka.util.ByteString;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.util.concurrent.CompletionStage;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
Now we will start with a rather simple source, emitting the integers 1 to 100:
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> source = Source.range(1, 100);
The Source type is parameterized with two types: the first one is the type of element that this source emits and
the second one may signal that running the source produces some auxiliary value (e.g. a network source may
provide information about the bound port or the peer’s address). Where no auxiliary information is produced, the
type akka.NotUsed is used—and a simple range of integers surely falls into this category.
Having created this source means that we have a description of how to emit the first 100 natural numbers, but this
source is not yet active. In order to get those numbers out we have to run it:
source.runForeach(i -> System.out.println(i), materializer);
This line will complement the source with a consumer function—in this example we simply print out the numbers
to the console—and pass this little stream setup to an Actor that runs it. This activation is signaled by having “run”
be part of the method name; there are other methods that run Akka Streams, and they all follow this pattern.
You may wonder where the Actor gets created that runs the stream, and you are probably also asking yourself
what this materializer means. In order to get this value we first need to create an Actor system:
There are other ways to create a materializer, e.g. from an ActorContext when using streams from within Ac-
tors. The Materializer is a factory for stream execution engines, it is the thing that makes streams run—you
don’t need to worry about any of the details just now apart from that you need one for calling any of the run
methods on a Source.
The nice thing about Akka Streams is that the Source is just a description of what you want to run, and like an
architect’s blueprint it can be reused, incorporated into a larger design. We may choose to transform the source of
integers and write it to a file instead:
final Source<BigInteger, NotUsed> factorials =
source
.scan(BigInteger.ONE, (acc, next) -> acc.multiply(BigInteger.valueOf(next)));
First we use the scan combinator to run a computation over the whole stream: starting with the number 1
(BigInteger.ONE) we multiple by each of the incoming numbers, one after the other; the scan operationemits
the initial value and then every calculation result. This yields the series of factorial numbers which we stash away
as a Source for later reuse—it is important to keep in mind that nothing is actually computed yet, this is just a
description of what we want to have computed once we run the stream. Then we convert the resulting series of
numbers into a stream of ByteString objects describing lines in a text file. This stream is then run by attaching
a file as the receiver of the data. In the terminology of Akka Streams this is called a Sink. IOResult is a type
that IO operations return in Akka Streams in order to tell you how many bytes or elements were consumed and
whether the stream terminated normally or exceptionally.
One of the nice parts of Akka Streams—and something that other stream libraries do not offer—is that not only
sources can be reused like blueprints, all other elements can be as well. We can take the file-writing Sink, prepend
the processing steps necessary to get the ByteString elements from incoming strings and package that up as a
reusable piece as well. Since the language for writing these streams always flows from left to right (just like plain
English), we need a starting point that is like a source but with an “open” input. In Akka Streams this is called a
Flow:
public Sink<String, CompletionStage<IOResult>> lineSink(String filename) {
return Flow.of(String.class)
.map(s -> ByteString.fromString(s.toString() + "\n"))
.toMat(FileIO.toPath(Paths.get(filename)), Keep.right());
}
Starting from a flow of strings we convert each to ByteString and then feed to the already known file-writing
Sink. The resulting blueprint is a Sink, which means that it accepts strings as its input and when material-
ized it will create auxiliary information of type CompletionStage<IOResult> (when chaining operations
on a Source or Flow the type of the auxiliary information—called the “materialized value”—is given by the
leftmost starting point; since we want to retain what the FileIO.toPath sink has to offer, we need to say
Keep.right()).
We can use the new and shiny Sink we just created by attaching it to our factorials source—after a small
adaptation to turn the numbers into strings:
factorials.map(BigInteger::toString).runWith(lineSink("factorial2.txt"), materializer);
Before we start looking at a more involved example we explore the streaming nature of what Akka Streams can
do. Starting from the factorials source we transform the stream by zipping it together with another stream,
represented by a Source that emits the number 0 to 100: the first number emitted by the factorials source
is the factorial of zero, the second is the factorial of one, and so on. We combine these two by forming strings like
"3! = 6".
final CompletionStage<Done> done =
factorials
.zipWith(Source.range(0, 99), (num, idx) -> String.format("%d! = %s", idx, num))
.throttle(1, Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS), 1, ThrottleMode.shaping())
.runForeach(s -> System.out.println(s), materializer);
All operations so far have been time-independent and could have been performed in the same fashion on strict
collections of elements. The next line demonstrates that we are in fact dealing with streams that can flow at a
certain speed: we use the throttle combinator to slow down the stream to 1 element per second (the second 1
in the argument list is the maximum size of a burst that we want to allow—passing 1 means that the first element
gets through immediately and the second then has to wait for one second and so on).
If you run this program you will see one line printed per second. One aspect that is not immediately visible
deserves mention, though: if you try and set the streams to produce a billion numbers each then you will notice that
your JVM does not crash with an OutOfMemoryError, even though you will also notice that running the streams
happens in the background, asynchronously (this is the reason for the auxiliary information to be provided as a
CompletionStage, in the future). The secret that makes this work is that Akka Streams implicitly implement
pervasive flow control, all combinators respect back-pressure. This allows the throttle combinator to signal to all
its upstream sources of data that it can only accept elements at a certain rate—when the incoming rate is higher
than one per second the throttle combinator will assert back-pressure upstream.
This is basically all there is to Akka Streams in a nutshell—glossing over the fact that there are dozens of sources
and sinks and many more stream transformation combinators to choose from, see also Overview of built-in stages
and their semantics.
A typical use case for stream processing is consuming a live stream of data that we want to extract or aggregate
some other data from. In this example we’ll consider consuming a stream of tweets and extracting information
concerning Akka from them.
We will also consider the problem inherent to all non-blocking streaming solutions: “What if the subscriber is
too slow to consume the live stream of data?”. Traditionally the solution is often to buffer the elements, but this
can—and usually will—cause eventual buffer overflows and instability of such systems. Instead Akka Streams
depend on internal backpressure signals that allow to control what should happen in such scenarios.
Here’s the data model we’ll be working with throughout the quickstart examples:
public static class Author {
public final String handle;
// ...
this.name = name;
}
// ...
}
// ...
}
Note: If you would like to get an overview of the used vocabulary first instead of diving head-first into an actual
example you can have a look at the Core concepts and Defining and running streams sections of the docs, and
then come back to this quickstart to see it all pieced together into a simple example application.
The example application we will be looking at is a simple Twitter feed stream from which we’ll want to extract
certain information, like for example finding all twitter handles of users who tweet about #akka.
In order to prepare our environment by creating an ActorSystem and ActorMaterializer, which will be
responsible for materializing and running the streams we are about to create:
final ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("reactive-tweets");
final Materializer mat = ActorMaterializer.create(system);
The ActorMaterializer can optionally take ActorMaterializerSettings which can be used to de-
fine materialization properties, such as default buffer sizes (see also Buffers for asynchronous stages), the dis-
patcher to be used by the pipeline etc. These can be overridden with withAttributes on Flow, Source,
Sink and Graph.
Let’s assume we have a stream of tweets readily available. In Akka this is expressed as a Source:
Source<Tweet, NotUsed> tweets;
Streams always start flowing from a Source<Out,M1> then can continue through Flow<In,Out,M2> ele-
ments or more advanced graph elements to finally be consumed by a Sink<In,M3>.
The first type parameter—Tweet in this case—designates the kind of elements produced by the source while
the M type parameters describe the object that is created during materialization (see below)—NotUsed (from the
scala.runtime package) means that no value is produced, it is the generic equivalent of void.
The operations should look familiar to anyone who has used the Scala Collections library, however they operate
on streams and not collections of data (which is a very important distinction, as some operations only make sense
in streaming and vice versa):
final Source<Author, NotUsed> authors =
tweets
.filter(t -> t.hashtags().contains(AKKA))
.map(t -> t.author);
Finally in order to materialize and run the stream computation we need to attach the Flow to a Sink<T, M> that
will get the Flow running. The simplest way to do this is to call runWith(sink) on a Source<Out, M>.
For convenience a number of common Sinks are predefined and collected as static methods on the Sink class. For
now let’s simply print each author:
authors.runWith(Sink.foreach(a -> System.out.println(a)), mat);
or by using the shorthand version (which are defined only for the most popular Sinks such as Sink.fold and
Sink.foreach):
authors.runForeach(a -> System.out.println(a), mat);
Materializing and running a stream always requires a Materializer to be passed in explicitly, like this:
.run(mat).
The complete snippet looks like this:
final ActorSystem system = ActorSystem.create("reactive-tweets");
final Materializer mat = ActorMaterializer.create(system);
In the previous section we were working on 1:1 relationships of elements which is the most common case, but
sometimes we might want to map from one element to a number of elements and receive a “flattened” stream,
similarly like flatMap works on Scala Collections. In order to get a flattened stream of hashtags from our
stream of tweets we can use the mapConcat combinator:
final Source<Hashtag, NotUsed> hashtags =
tweets.mapConcat(t -> new ArrayList<Hashtag>(t.hashtags()));
Note: The name flatMap was consciously avoided due to its proximity with for-comprehensions and monadic
composition. It is problematic for two reasons: firstly, flattening by concatenation is often undesirable in bounded
stream processing due to the risk of deadlock (with merge being the preferred strategy), and secondly, the monad
laws would not hold for our implementation of flatMap (due to the liveness issues).
Please note that the mapConcat requires the supplied function to return a strict collection (Out f ->
java.util.List<T>), whereas flatMap would have to operate on streams all the way through.
Now let’s say we want to persist all hashtags, as well as all author names from this one live stream. For example
we’d like to write all author handles into one file, and all hashtags into another file on disk. This means we have
to split the source stream into two streams which will handle the writing to these different files.
Elements that can be used to form such “fan-out” (or “fan-in”) structures are referred to as “junctions” in Akka
Streams. One of these that we’ll be using in this example is called Broadcast, and it simply emits elements
from its input port to all of its output ports.
Akka Streams intentionally separate the linear stream structures (Flows) from the non-linear, branching ones
(Graphs) in order to offer the most convenient API for both of these cases. Graphs can express arbitrarily complex
stream setups at the expense of not reading as familiarly as collection transformations.
Graphs are constructed using GraphDSL like this:
Sink<Author, NotUsed> writeAuthors;
Sink<Hashtag, NotUsed> writeHashtags;
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
final UniformFanOutShape<Tweet, Tweet> bcast = b.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final FlowShape<Tweet, Author> toAuthor =
b.add(Flow.of(Tweet.class).map(t -> t.author));
final FlowShape<Tweet, Hashtag> toTags =
b.add(Flow.of(Tweet.class).mapConcat(t -> new ArrayList<Hashtag>(t.hashtags())));
final SinkShape<Author> authors = b.add(writeAuthors);
final SinkShape<Hashtag> hashtags = b.add(writeHashtags);
b.from(b.add(tweets)).viaFanOut(bcast).via(toAuthor).to(authors);
b.from(bcast).via(toTags).to(hashtags);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
})).run(mat);
As you can see, we use graph builder b to construct the graph using UniformFanOutShape and Flow s.
GraphDSL.create returns a Graph, in this example a Graph<ClosedShape,NotUsed> where
ClosedShape means that it is a fully connected graph or “closed” - there are no unconnected in-
puts or outputs. Since it is closed it is possible to transform the graph into a RunnableGraph using
RunnableGraph.fromGraph. The runnable graph can then be run() to materialize a stream out of it.
Both Graph and RunnableGraph are immutable, thread-safe, and freely shareable.
A graph can also have one of several other shapes, with one or more unconnected ports. Having unconnected ports
expresses a graph that is a partial graph. Concepts around composing and nesting graphs in large structures are
explained in detail in Modularity, Composition and Hierarchy. It is also possible to wrap complex computation
graphs as Flows, Sinks or Sources, which will be explained in detail in Constructing and combining Partial
Graphs.
One of the main advantages of Akka Streams is that they always propagate back-pressure information from stream
Sinks (Subscribers) to their Sources (Publishers). It is not an optional feature, and is enabled at all times. To
learn more about the back-pressure protocol used by Akka Streams and all other Reactive Streams compatible
implementations read Back-pressure explained.
A typical problem applications (not using Akka Streams) like this often face is that they are unable to process the
incoming data fast enough, either temporarily or by design, and will start buffering incoming data until there’s
no more space to buffer, resulting in either OutOfMemoryError s or other severe degradations of service
responsiveness. With Akka Streams buffering can and must be handled explicitly. For example, if we are only
interested in the “most recent tweets, with a buffer of 10 elements” this can be expressed using the buffer
element:
tweets
.buffer(10, OverflowStrategy.dropHead())
.map(t -> slowComputation(t))
.runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
The buffer element takes an explicit and required OverflowStrategy, which defines how the buffer should
react when it receives another element while it is full. Strategies provided include dropping the oldest element
(dropHead), dropping the entire buffer, signalling failures etc. Be sure to pick and choose the strategy that fits
your use case best.
So far we’ve been only processing data using Flows and consuming it into some kind of external Sink - be it by
printing values or storing them in some external system. However sometimes we may be interested in some value
that can be obtained from the materialized processing pipeline. For example, we want to know how many tweets
we have processed. While this question is not as obvious to give an answer to in case of an infinite stream of
tweets (one way to answer this question in a streaming setting would be to create a stream of counts described as
“up until now, we’ve processed N tweets”), but in general it is possible to deal with finite streams and come up
with a nice result such as a total count of elements.
First, let’s write such an element counter using Flow.of(Class) and Sink.fold to see how the types look
like:
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sumSink =
Sink.<Integer, Integer>fold(0, (acc, elem) -> acc + elem);
First we prepare a reusable Flow that will change each incoming tweet into an integer of value 1. We’ll use this
in order to combine those with a Sink.fold that will sum all Integer elements of the stream and make its
result available as a CompletionStage<Integer>. Next we connect the tweets stream to count with
via. Finally we connect the Flow to the previously prepared Sink using toMat.
Remember those mysterious Mat type parameters on Source<Out, Mat>, Flow<In, Out, Mat>
and Sink<In, Mat>? They represent the type of values these processing parts return when material-
ized. When you chain these together, you can explicitly combine their materialized values: in our ex-
ample we used the Keep.right predefined function, which tells the implementation to only care about
the materialized type of the stage currently appended to the right. The materialized type of sumSink is
CompletionStage<Integer> and because of using Keep.right, the resulting RunnableGraph has
also a type parameter of CompletionStage<Integer>.
This step does not yet materialize the processing pipeline, it merely prepares the description of
the Flow, which is now connected to a Sink, and therefore can be run(), as indicated by its
type: RunnableGraph<CompletionStage<Integer>>. Next we call run() which uses the
ActorMaterializer to materialize and run the Flow. The value returned by calling run() on a
RunnableGraph<T> is of type T. In our case this type is CompletionStage<Integer> which, when
completed, will contain the total length of our tweets stream. In case of the stream failing, this future would
complete with a Failure.
A RunnableGraph may be reused and materialized multiple times, because it is just the “blueprint” of the
stream. This means that if we materialize a stream, for example one that consumes a live stream of tweets within
a minute, the materialized values for those two materializations will be different, as illustrated by this example:
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sumSink =
Sink.<Integer, Integer>fold(0, (acc, elem) -> acc + elem);
final RunnableGraph<CompletionStage<Integer>> counterRunnableGraph =
tweetsInMinuteFromNow
.filter(t -> t.hashtags().contains(AKKA))
.map(t -> 1)
.toMat(sumSink, Keep.right());
Many elements in Akka Streams provide materialized values which can be used for obtaining either results of
computation or steering these elements which will be discussed in detail in Stream Materialization. Summing up
this section, now we know what happens behind the scenes when we run this one-liner, which is equivalent to the
multi line version above:
final CompletionStage<Integer> sum = tweets.map(t -> 1).runWith(sumSink, mat);
Note: runWith() is a convenience method that automatically ignores the materialized value of any other stages
except those appended by the runWith() itself. In the above example it translates to using Keep.right as
the combiner for materialized values.
It took quite a while until we were reasonably happy with the look and feel of the API and the architecture of the
implementation, and while being guided by intuition the design phase was very much exploratory research. This
section details the findings and codifies them into a set of principles that have emerged during the process.
Note: As detailed in the introduction keep in mind that the Akka Streams API is completely decoupled from
the Reactive Streams interfaces which are just an implementation detail for how to pass stream data between
individual processing stages.
Akka is built upon a conscious decision to offer APIs that are minimal and consistent—as opposed to easy or
intuitive. The credo is that we favor explicitness over magic, and if we provide a feature then it must work always,
no exceptions. Another way to say this is that we minimize the number of rules a user has to learn instead of trying
to keep the rules close to what we think users might expect.
From this follows that the principles implemented by Akka Streams are:
• all features are explicit in the API, no magic
• supreme compositionality: combined pieces retain the function of each part
• exhaustive model of the domain of distributed bounded stream processing
This means that we provide all the tools necessary to express any stream processing topology, that we model all
the essential aspects of this domain (back-pressure, buffering, transformations, failure recovery, etc.) and that
whatever the user builds is reusable in a larger context.
Akka Streams does not send dropped stream elements to the dead letter office
One important consequence of offering only features that can be relied upon is the restriction that Akka Streams
cannot ensure that all objects sent through a processing topology will be processed. Elements can be dropped for
a number of reasons:
• plain user code can consume one element in a map(...) stage and produce an entirely different one as its
result
• common stream operators drop elements intentionally, e.g. take/drop/filter/conflate/buffer/. . .
• stream failure will tear down the stream without waiting for processing to finish, all elements that are in
flight will be discarded
• stream cancellation will propagate upstream (e.g. from a take operator) leading to upstream processing steps
being terminated without having processed all of their inputs
This means that sending JVM objects into a stream that need to be cleaned up will require the user to ensure that
this happens outside of the Akka Streams facilities (e.g. by cleaning them up after a timeout or when their results
are observed on the stream output, or by using other means like finalizers etc.).
Compositionality entails reusability of partial stream topologies, which led us to the lifted approach of describing
data flows as (partial) graphs that can act as composite sources, flows (a.k.a. pipes) and sinks of data. These
building blocks shall then be freely shareable, with the ability to combine them freely to form larger graphs. The
representation of these pieces must therefore be an immutable blueprint that is materialized in an explicit step in
order to start the stream processing. The resulting stream processing engine is then also immutable in the sense of
having a fixed topology that is prescribed by the blueprint. Dynamic networks need to be modeled by explicitly
using the Reactive Streams interfaces for plugging different engines together.
The process of materialization will often create specific objects that are useful to interact with the processing
engine once it is running, for example for shutting it down or for extracting metrics. This means that the material-
ization function produces a result termed the materialized value of a graph.
Akka Streams fully implement the Reactive Streams specification and interoperate with all other conformant im-
plementations. We chose to completely separate the Reactive Streams interfaces from the user-level API because
we regard them to be an SPI that is not targeted at endusers. In order to obtain a Publisher or Subscriber
from an Akka Stream topology, a corresponding Sink.asPublisher or Source.asSubscriber element
must be used.
All stream Processors produced by the default materialization of Akka Streams are restricted to having a single
Subscriber, additional Subscribers will be rejected. The reason for this is that the stream topologies described
using our DSL never require fan-out behavior from the Publisher sides of the elements, all fan-out is done using
explicit elements like Broadcast[T].
This means that Sink.asPublisher(true) (for enabling fan-out support) must be used where broadcast
behavior is needed for interoperation with other Reactive Streams implementations.
We expect libraries to be built on top of Akka Streams, in fact Akka HTTP is one such example that lives within
the Akka project itself. In order to allow users to profit from the principles that are described for Akka Streams
above, the following rules are established:
• libraries shall provide their users with reusable pieces, i.e. expose factories that return graphs, allowing full
compositionality
• libraries may optionally and additionally provide facilities that consume and materialize graphs
The reasoning behind the first rule is that compositionality would be destroyed if different libraries only accepted
graphs and expected to materialize them: using two of these together would be impossible because materialization
can only happen once. As a consequence, the functionality of a library must be expressed such that materialization
can be done by the user, outside of the library’s control.
The second rule allows a library to additionally provide nice sugar for the common case, an example of which is
the Akka HTTP API that provides a handleWith method for convenient materialization.
Note: One important consequence of this is that a reusable flow description cannot be bound to “live” resources,
any connection to or allocation of such resources must be deferred until materialization time. Examples of “live”
resources are already existing TCP connections, a multicast Publisher, etc.; a TickSource does not fall into this
category if its timer is created only upon materialization (as is the case for our implementation).
Exceptions from this need to be well-justified and carefully documented.
Akka Streams must enable a library to express any stream processing utility in terms of immutable blueprints. The
most common building blocks are
• Source: something with exactly one output stream
• Sink: something with exactly one input stream
• Flow: something with exactly one input and one output stream
• BidiFlow: something with exactly two input streams and two output streams that conceptually behave like
two Flows of opposite direction
• Graph: a packaged stream processing topology that exposes a certain set of input and output ports, charac-
terized by an object of type Shape.
Note: A source that emits a stream of streams is still just a normal Source, the kind of elements that are produced
does not play a role in the static stream topology that is being expressed.
The starting point for this discussion is the definition given by the Reactive Manifesto. Translated to streams
this means that an error is accessible within the stream as a normal data element, while a failure means that the
stream itself has failed and is collapsing. In concrete terms, on the Reactive Streams interface level data elements
(including errors) are signaled via onNext while failures raise the onError signal.
Note: Unfortunately the method name for signaling failure to a Subscriber is called onError for historical rea-
sons. Always keep in mind that the Reactive Streams interfaces (Publisher/Subscription/Subscriber) are modeling
the low-level infrastructure for passing streams between execution units, and errors on this level are precisely the
failures that we are talking about on the higher level that is modeled by Akka Streams.
There is only limited support for treating onError in Akka Streams compared to the operators that are avail-
able for the transformation of data elements, which is intentional in the spirit of the previous paragraph. Since
onError signals that the stream is collapsing, its ordering semantics are not the same as for stream completion:
transformation stages of any kind will just collapse with the stream, possibly still holding elements in implicit or
explicit buffers. This means that data elements emitted before a failure can still be lost if the onError overtakes
them.
The ability for failures to propagate faster than data elements is essential for tearing down streams that are back-
pressured—especially since back-pressure can be the failure mode (e.g. by tripping upstream buffers which then
abort because they cannot do anything else; or if a dead-lock occurred).
A recovery element (i.e. any transformation that absorbs an onError signal and turns that into possibly more
data elements followed normal stream completion) acts as a bulkhead that confines a stream collapse to a given
region of the stream topology. Within the collapsed region buffered elements may be lost, but the outside is not
affected by the failure.
This works in the same fashion as a try–catch expression: it marks a region in which exceptions are caught, but
the exact amount of code that was skipped within this region in case of a failure might not be known precisely—the
placement of statements matters.
Akka Streams is a library to process and transfer a sequence of elements using bounded buffer space. This
latter property is what we refer to as boundedness and it is the defining feature of Akka Streams. Translated to
everyday terms it is possible to express a chain (or as we see later, graphs) of processing entities, each executing
independently (and possibly concurrently) from the others while only buffering a limited number of elements at
any given time. This property of bounded buffers is one of the differences from the actor model, where each actor
usually has an unbounded, or a bounded, but dropping mailbox. Akka Stream processing entities have bounded
“mailboxes” that do not drop.
Before we move on, let’s define some basic terminology which will be used throughout the entire documentation:
Stream An active process that involves moving and transforming data.
Element An element is the processing unit of streams. All operations transform and transfer elements from
upstream to downstream. Buffer sizes are always expressed as number of elements independently form the
actual size of the elements.
Back-pressure A means of flow-control, a way for consumers of data to notify a producer about their current
availability, effectively slowing down the upstream producer to match their consumption speeds. In the
context of Akka Streams back-pressure is always understood as non-blocking and asynchronous.
Non-Blocking Means that a certain operation does not hinder the progress of the calling thread, even if it takes
long time to finish the requested operation.
Graph A description of a stream processing topology, defining the pathways through which elements shall flow
when the stream is running.
Processing Stage The common name for all building blocks that build up a Graph. Examples of a processing
stage would be operations like map(), filter(), custom GraphStage s and graph junctions like
Merge or Broadcast. For the full list of built-in processing stages see Overview of built-in stages and
their semantics
When we talk about asynchronous, non-blocking backpressure we mean that the processing stages available in
Akka Streams will not use blocking calls but asynchronous message passing to exchange messages between each
other, and they will use asynchronous means to slow down a fast producer, without blocking its thread. This is a
thread-pool friendly design, since entities that need to wait (a fast producer waiting on a slow consumer) will not
block the thread but can hand it back for further use to an underlying thread-pool.
Linear processing pipelines can be expressed in Akka Streams using the following core abstractions:
Source A processing stage with exactly one output, emitting data elements whenever downstream processing
stages are ready to receive them.
Sink A processing stage with exactly one input, requesting and accepting data elements possibly slowing down
the upstream producer of elements
Flow A processing stage which has exactly one input and output, which connects its up- and downstreams by
transforming the data elements flowing through it.
RunnableGraph A Flow that has both ends “attached” to a Source and Sink respectively, and is ready to be
run().
It is possible to attach a Flow to a Source resulting in a composite source, and it is also possible to prepend a
Flow to a Sink to get a new sink. After a stream is properly terminated by having both a source and a sink, it
will be represented by the RunnableGraph type, indicating that it is ready to be executed.
It is important to remember that even after constructing the RunnableGraph by connecting all the source,
sink and different processing stages, no data will flow through it until it is materialized. Materialization is the
process of allocating all resources needed to run the computation described by a Graph (in Akka Streams this
will often involve starting up Actors). Thanks to Flows being simply a description of the processing pipeline they
are immutable, thread-safe, and freely shareable, which means that it is for example safe to share and send them
between actors, to have one actor prepare the work, and then have it be materialized at some completely different
place in the code.
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> source =
Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10));
// note that the Future is scala.concurrent.Future
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sink =
Sink.<Integer, Integer> fold(0, (aggr, next) -> aggr + next);
After running (materializing) the RunnableGraph we get a special container object, the MaterializedMap.
Both sources and sinks are able to put specific objects into this map. Whether they put something in or not is
implementation dependent. For example a FoldSink will make a CompletionStage available in this map
which will represent the result of the folding process over the stream. In general, a stream can expose multiple
materialized values, but it is quite common to be interested in only the value of the Source or the Sink in the
stream. For this reason there is a convenience method called runWith() available for Sink, Source or Flow
requiring, respectively, a supplied Source (in order to run a Sink), a Sink (in order to run a Source) or both
a Source and a Sink (in order to run a Flow, since it has neither attached yet).
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> source =
Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10));
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sink =
Sink.<Integer, Integer> fold(0, (aggr, next) -> aggr + next);
It is worth pointing out that since processing stages are immutable, connecting them returns a new processing
stage, instead of modifying the existing instance, so while constructing long flows, remember to assign the new
value to a variable or run it:
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> source =
Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10));
source.map(x -> 0); // has no effect on source, since it’s immutable
source.runWith(Sink.fold(0, (agg, next) -> agg + next), mat); // 55
Note: By default Akka Streams elements support exactly one downstream processing stage. Making fan-out
(supporting multiple downstream processing stages) an explicit opt-in feature allows default stream elements to
be less complex and more efficient. Also it allows for greater flexibility on how exactly to handle the multicast
scenarios, by providing named fan-out elements such as broadcast (signals all down-stream elements) or balance
(signals one of available down-stream elements).
In the above example we used the runWith method, which both materializes the stream and returns the materi-
alized value of the given sink or source.
Since a stream can be materialized multiple times, the MaterializedMap returned is different for each mate-
rialization. In the example below we create two running materialized instance of the stream that we described in
the runnable variable, and both materializations give us a different CompletionStage from the map even
though we used the same sink to refer to the future:
// connect the Source to the Sink, obtaining a RunnableGraph
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sink =
Sink.<Integer, Integer> fold(0, (aggr, next) -> aggr + next);
final RunnableGraph<CompletionStage<Integer>> runnable =
Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)).toMat(sink, Keep.right());
The objects Source and Sink define various ways to create sources and sinks of elements. The following
examples show some of the most useful constructs (refer to the API documentation for more details):
// Create a source from an Iterable
List<Integer> list = new LinkedList<Integer>();
list.add(1);
list.add(2);
list.add(3);
Source.from(list);
// an empty source
Source.empty();
// A Sink that consumes a stream without doing anything with the elements
Sink.ignore();
// A Sink that executes a side-effecting call for every element of the stream
Sink.foreach(System.out::println);
There are various ways to wire up different parts of a stream, the following examples show some of the available
options:
// Explicitly creating and wiring up a Source, Sink and Flow
Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4))
.via(Flow.of(Integer.class).map(elem -> elem * 2))
.to(Sink.foreach(System.out::println));
In accordance to the Reactive Streams specification (Rule 2.13) Akka Streams do not allow null to be passed
through the stream as an element. In case you want to model the concept of absence of a value we recommend
using java.util.Optional which is available since Java 8.
Akka Streams implement an asynchronous non-blocking back-pressure protocol standardised by the Reactive
Streams specification, which Akka is a founding member of.
The user of the library does not have to write any explicit back-pressure handling code — it is built in and dealt
with automatically by all of the provided Akka Streams processing stages. It is possible however to add explicit
buffer stages with overflow strategies that can influence the behaviour of the stream. This is especially important
in complex processing graphs which may even contain loops (which must be treated with very special care, as
explained in Graph cycles, liveness and deadlocks).
The back pressure protocol is defined in terms of the number of elements a downstream Subscriber is able to
receive and buffer, referred to as demand. The source of data, referred to as Publisher in Reactive Streams
terminology and implemented as Source in Akka Streams, guarantees that it will never emit more elements than
the received total demand for any given Subscriber.
Note: The Reactive Streams specification defines its protocol in terms of Publisher and Subscriber.
These types are not meant to be user facing API, instead they serve as the low level building blocks for different
Reactive Streams implementations.
Akka Streams implements these concepts as Source, Flow (referred to as Processor in Reactive Streams)
and Sink without exposing the Reactive Streams interfaces directly. If you need to integrate with other Reactive
Stream libraries read Integrating with Reactive Streams.
The mode in which Reactive Streams back-pressure works can be colloquially described as “dynamic push / pull
mode”, since it will switch between push and pull based back-pressure models depending on the downstream
being able to cope with the upstream production rate or not.
To illustrate this further let us consider both problem situations and how the back-pressure protocol handles them:
This is the happy case of course – we do not need to slow down the Publisher in this case. However signalling rates
are rarely constant and could change at any point in time, suddenly ending up in a situation where the Subscriber
is now slower than the Publisher. In order to safeguard from these situations, the back-pressure protocol must still
be enabled during such situations, however we do not want to pay a high penalty for this safety net being enabled.
The Reactive Streams protocol solves this by asynchronously signalling from the Subscriber to the Publisher
Request(int n) signals. The protocol guarantees that the Publisher will never signal more elements than the
signalled demand. Since the Subscriber however is currently faster, it will be signalling these Request messages at
a higher rate (and possibly also batching together the demand - requesting multiple elements in one Request sig-
nal). This means that the Publisher should not ever have to wait (be back-pressured) with publishing its incoming
elements.
As we can see, in this scenario we effectively operate in so called push-mode since the Publisher can continue
producing elements as fast as it can, since the pending demand will be recovered just-in-time while it is emitting
elements.
This is the case when back-pressuring the Publisher is required, because the Subscriber is not able to cope
with the rate at which its upstream would like to emit data elements.
Since the Publisher is not allowed to signal more elements than the pending demand signalled by the
Subscriber, it will have to abide to this back-pressure by applying one of the below strategies:
• not generate elements, if it is able to control their production rate,
• try buffering the elements in a bounded manner until more demand is signalled,
• drop elements until more demand is signalled,
• tear down the stream if unable to apply any of the above strategies.
As we can see, this scenario effectively means that the Subscriber will pull the elements from the Publisher –
this mode of operation is referred to as pull-based back-pressure.
When constructing flows and graphs in Akka Streams think of them as preparing a blueprint, an execution plan.
Stream materialization is the process of taking a stream description (the graph) and allocating all the necessary
resources it needs in order to run. In the case of Akka Streams this often means starting up Actors which power the
processing, but is not restricted to that—it could also mean opening files or socket connections etc.—depending
on what the stream needs.
Materialization is triggered at so called “terminal operations”. Most notably this includes the various forms of the
run() and runWith() methods defined on Source or Flow elements as well as a small number of special
syntactic sugars for running with well-known sinks, such as runForeach(el -> ...) (being an alias to
runWith(Sink.foreach(el -> ...)).
Materialization is currently performed synchronously on the materializing thread. The actual stream processing
is handled by actors started up during the streams materialization, which will be running on the thread pools they
have been configured to run on - which defaults to the dispatcher set in MaterializationSettings while
constructing the ActorMaterializer.
Note: Reusing instances of linear computation stages (Source, Sink, Flow) inside composite Graphs is legal, yet
will materialize that stage multiple times.
Operator Fusion
Akka Streams 2.0 contains an initial version of stream operator fusion support. This means that the processing
steps of a flow or stream graph can be executed within the same Actor and has three consequences:
• starting up a stream may take longer than before due to executing the fusion algorithm
• passing elements from one processing stage to the next is a lot faster between fused stages due to avoiding
the asynchronous messaging overhead
• fused stream processing stages do no longer run in parallel to each other, meaning that only up to one CPU
core is used for each fused part
The first point can be countered by pre-fusing and then reusing a stream blueprint as sketched below:
Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> flow =
Flow.of(Integer.class).map(x -> x * 2).filter(x -> x > 500);
Graph<FlowShape<Integer, Integer>, NotUsed> fused =
akka.stream.Fusing.aggressive(flow);
In order to balance the effects of the second and third bullet points you will have to insert asynchronous bound-
aries manually into your flows and graphs by way of adding Attributes.asyncBoundary using the method
async on Source, Sink and Flow to pieces that shall communicate with the rest of the graph in an asyn-
chronous fashion.
Source.range(1, 3)
.map(x -> x + 1).async()
.map(x -> x * 2)
.to(Sink.ignore());
In this example we create two regions within the flow which will be executed in one Actor each—assuming that
adding and multiplying integers is an extremely costly operation this will lead to a performance gain since two
CPUs can work on the tasks in parallel. It is important to note that asynchronous boundaries are not singular places
within a flow where elements are passed asynchronously (as in other streaming libraries), but instead attributes
always work by adding information to the flow graph that has been constructed up to this point:
This means that everything that is inside the red bubble will be executed by one actor and everything outside of it
by another. This scheme can be applied successively, always having one such boundary enclose the previous ones
plus all processing stages that have been added since them.
Warning: Without fusing (i.e. up to version 2.0-M2) each stream processing stage had an implicit input buffer
that holds a few elements for efficiency reasons. If your flow graphs contain cycles then these buffers may have
been crucial in order to avoid deadlocks. With fusing these implicit buffers are no longer there, data elements
are passed without buffering between fused stages. In those cases where buffering is needed in order to allow
the stream to run at all, you will have to insert explicit buffers with the .buffer() combinator—typically a
buffer of size 2 is enough to allow a feedback loop to function.
The new fusing behavior can be disabled by setting the configuration parameter
akka.stream.materializer.auto-fusing=off. In that case you can still manually fuse those
graphs which shall run on less Actors. With the exception of the SslTlsStage and the groupBy operator all
built-in processing stages can be fused.
Since every processing stage in Akka Streams can provide a materialized value after being materialized, it is
necessary to somehow express how these values should be composed to a final value when we plug these stages
together. For this, many combinator methods have variants that take an additional argument, a function, that will
be used to combine the resulting values. Some examples of using these combiners are illustrated in the example
below.
// An empty source that can be shut down explicitly from the outside
Source<Integer, CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>>> source = Source.<Integer>maybe();
// A sink that returns the first element of a stream in the returned Future
Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sink = Sink.head();
// Using runWith will always give the materialized values of the stages added
// by runWith() itself
CompletionStage<Integer> r4 = source.via(flow).runWith(sink, mat);
CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>> r5 = flow.to(sink).runWith(source, mat);
Pair<CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>>, CompletionStage<Integer>> r6 = flow.runWith(source, sin
RunnableGraph<Pair<CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>>, CompletionStage<Integer>>> r8 =
source.via(flow).toMat(sink, Keep.both());
RunnableGraph<Cancellable> r11 =
r9.mapMaterializedValue( (nestedTuple) -> {
CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>> p = nestedTuple.first().first();
Cancellable c = nestedTuple.first().second();
CompletionStage<Integer> f = nestedTuple.second();
// Picking the Cancellable, but we could also construct a domain class here
return c;
});
Note: In Graphs it is possible to access the materialized value from inside the stream processing graph. For
details see Accessing the materialized value inside the Graph.
In Akka Streams almost all computation stages preserve input order of elements. This means that if inputs
{IA1,IA2,...,IAn} “cause” outputs {OA1,OA2,...,OAk} and inputs {IB1,IB2,...,IBm} “cause”
outputs {OB1,OB2,...,OBl} and all of IAi happened before all IBi then OAi happens before OBi.
This property is even uphold by async operations such as mapAsync, however an unordered version exists called
mapAsyncUnordered which does not preserve this ordering.
However, in the case of Junctions which handle multiple input streams (e.g. Merge) the output order is, in
general, not defined for elements arriving on different input ports. That is a merge-like operation may emit Ai
before emitting Bi, and it is up to its internal logic to decide the order of emitted elements. Specialized elements
such as Zip however do guarantee their outputs order, as each output element depends on all upstream elements
having been signalled already – thus the ordering in the case of zipping is defined by this property.
If you find yourself in need of fine grained control over order of emitted elements in fan-in scenarios consider
using MergePreferred or GraphStage – which gives you full control over how the merge is performed.
In Akka Streams computation graphs are not expressed using a fluent DSL like linear computations are, instead
they are written in a more graph-resembling DSL which aims to make translating graph drawings (e.g. from notes
taken from design discussions, or illustrations in protocol specifications) to and from code simpler. In this section
we’ll dive into the multiple ways of constructing and re-using graphs, as well as explain common pitfalls and how
to avoid them.
Graphs are needed whenever you want to perform any kind of fan-in (“multiple inputs”) or fan-out (“multiple
outputs”) operations. Considering linear Flows to be like roads, we can picture graph operations as junctions:
multiple flows being connected at a single point. Some graph operations which are common enough and fit the
linear style of Flows, such as concat (which concatenates two streams, such that the second one is consumed
after the first one has completed), may have shorthand methods defined on Flow or Source themselves, however
you should keep in mind that those are also implemented as graph junctions.
Graphs are built from simple Flows which serve as the linear connections within the graphs as well as junctions
which serve as fan-in and fan-out points for Flows. Thanks to the junctions having meaningful types based on
their behaviour and making them explicit elements these elements should be rather straightforward to use.
Akka Streams currently provide these junctions (for a detailed list see Overview of built-in stages and their se-
mantics):
• Fan-out
Such graph is simple to translate to the Graph DSL since each linear element corresponds to a Flow, and each
circle corresponds to either a Junction or a Source or Sink if it is beginning or ending a Flow.
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> in = Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5));
final Sink<List<String>, CompletionStage<List<String>>> sink = Sink.head();
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> f1 = Flow.of(Integer.class).map(elem -> elem + 10);
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> f2 = Flow.of(Integer.class).map(elem -> elem + 20);
final Flow<Integer, String, NotUsed> f3 = Flow.of(Integer.class).map(elem -> elem.toString());
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> f4 = Flow.of(Integer.class).map(elem -> elem + 30);
Note: Junction reference equality defines graph node equality (i.e. the same merge instance used in a GraphDSL
refers to the same location in the resulting graph).
By looking at the snippets above, it should be apparent that the builder object is mutable. The reason for
this design choice is to enable simpler creation of complex graphs, which may even contain cycles. Once the
GraphDSL has been constructed though, the RunnableGraph instance is immutable, thread-safe, and freely
shareable. The same is true of all graph pieces—sources, sinks, and flows—once they are constructed. This
means that you can safely re-use one given Flow or junction in multiple places in a processing graph.
We have seen examples of such re-use already above: the merge and broadcast junctions were imported into the
graph using builder.add(...), an operation that will make a copy of the blueprint that is passed to it and
return the inlets and outlets of the resulting copy so that they can be wired up. Another alternative is to pass
existing graphs—of any shape—into the factory method that produces a new graph. The difference between these
approaches is that importing using builder.add(...) ignores the materialized value of the imported graph
while importing via the factory method allows its inclusion; for more details see stream-materialization-scala.
In the example below we prepare a graph that consists of two parallel streams, in which we re-use the same
instance of Flow, yet it will properly be materialized as two connections between the corresponding Sources and
Sinks:
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> topHeadSink = Sink.head();
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> bottomHeadSink = Sink.head();
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> sharedDoubler = Flow.of(Integer.class).map(elem -> elem * 2)
b.from(b.add(Source.single(1))).viaFanOut(bcast)
.via(b.add(sharedDoubler)).to(top);
b.from(bcast).via(b.add(sharedDoubler)).to(bottom);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}
)
);
Sometimes it is not possible (or needed) to construct the entire computation graph in one place, but instead con-
struct all of its different phases in different places and in the end connect them all into a complete graph and run
it.
This can be achieved by using the returned Graph from GraphDSL.create() rather than passing it to
RunnableGraph.fromGraph() to wrap it in a RunnableGraph.The reason of representing it as a dif-
ferent type is that a RunnableGraph requires all ports to be connected, and if they are not it will throw an
exception at construction time, which helps to avoid simple wiring errors while working with graphs. A partial
graph however allows you to return the set of yet to be connected ports from the code block that performs the
internal wiring.
Let’s imagine we want to provide users with a specialized element that given 3 inputs will pick the greatest
int value of each zipped triple. We’ll want to expose 3 input ports (unconnected sources) and one output port
(unconnected sink).
builder.from(zip1.out()).toInlet(zip2.in0());
// return the shape, which has three inputs and one output
return new UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer>(zip2.out(),
new Inlet[] {zip1.in0(), zip1.in1(), zip2.in1()});
});
final RunnableGraph<CompletionStage<Integer>> g =
RunnableGraph.<CompletionStage<Integer>>fromGraph(
GraphDSL.create(resultSink, (builder, sink) -> {
// import the partial graph explicitly
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> pm = builder.add(pickMaxOfThree);
builder.from(builder.add(Source.single(1))).toInlet(pm.in(0));
builder.from(builder.add(Source.single(2))).toInlet(pm.in(1));
builder.from(builder.add(Source.single(3))).toInlet(pm.in(2));
builder.from(pm.out()).to(sink);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
As you can see, first we construct the partial graph that describes how to compute the maximum of two input
streams, then we reuse that twice while constructing the partial graph that extends this to three input streams, then
we import it (all of its nodes and connections) explicitly into the last graph in which all the undefined elements
are rewired to real sources and sinks. The graph can then be run and yields the expected result.
Warning: Please note that GraphDSL is not able to provide compile time type-safety about whether or not
all elements have been properly connected—this validation is performed as a runtime check during the graph’s
instantiation.
A partial graph also verifies that all ports are either connected or part of the returned Shape.
Instead of treating a Graph as simply a collection of flows and junctions which may not yet all be connected it is
sometimes useful to expose such a complex graph as a simpler structure, such as a Source, Sink or Flow.
In fact, these concepts can be easily expressed as special cases of a partially connected graph:
• Source is a partial graph with exactly one output, that is it returns a SourceShape.
• Sink is a partial graph with exactly one input, that is it returns a SinkShape.
• Flow is a partial graph with exactly one input and exactly one output, that is it returns a FlowShape.
Being able to hide complex graphs inside of simple elements such as Sink / Source / Flow enables you to easily
create one complex element and from there on treat it as simple compound stage for linear computations.
In order to create a Source from a graph the method Source.fromGraph is used, to use it we must have
a Graph with a SourceShape. This is constructed using GraphDSL.create and providing building a
SourceShape graph. The single outlet must be provided to the SourceShape.of method and will become
“the sink that must be attached before this Source can run”.
Refer to the example below, in which we create a Source that zips together two numbers, to see this graph con-
struction in action:
// first create an indefinite source of integer numbers
class Ints implements Iterator<Integer> {
private int next = 0;
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return true;
}
@Override
public Integer next() {
return next++;
}
}
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> ints = Source.fromIterator(() -> new Ints());
return SourceShape.of(zip.out());
}));
Similarly the same can be done for a Sink<T> using SinkShape.of in which case the provided value must
be an Inlet<T>. For defining a Flow<T> we need to expose both an undefined source and sink:
final Flow<Integer, Pair<Integer, String>, NotUsed> pairs = Flow.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(
b -> {
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> bcast = b.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final FanInShape2<Integer, String, Pair<Integer, String>> zip =
b.add(Zip.create());
b.from(bcast).toInlet(zip.in0());
b.from(bcast).via(b.add(Flow.of(Integer.class).map(i -> i.toString()))).toInlet(zip.in1());
There is simplified API you can use to combine sources and sinks with junctions like: Broadcast<T>,
Balance<T>, Merge<In> and Concat<A> without the need for using the Graph DSL. The combine method
takes care of constructing the necessary graph underneath. In following example we combine two sources into
one (fan-in):
Source<Integer, NotUsed> source1 = Source.single(1);
Source<Integer, NotUsed> source2 = Source.single(2);
The same can be done for a Sink but in this case it will be fan-out:
Sink<Integer, NotUsed> sendRemotely = Sink.actorRef(actorRef, "Done");
Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Done>> localProcessing = Sink.<Integer>foreach(a -> { /*do something
Sink<Integer, NotUsed> sinks = Sink.combine(sendRemotely,localProcessing, new ArrayList<>(), a ->
A graph topology that is often useful is that of two flows going in opposite directions. Take for example a codec
stage that serializes outgoing messages and deserializes incoming octet streams. Another such stage could add a
framing protocol that attaches a length header to outgoing data and parses incoming frames back into the original
octet stream chunks. These two stages are meant to be composed, applying one atop the other as part of a protocol
stack. For this purpose exists the special type BidiFlow which is a graph that has exactly two open inlets and
two open outlets. The corresponding shape is called BidiShape and is defined like this:
/**
* A bidirectional flow of elements that consequently has two inputs and two
* outputs, arranged like this:
*
* {{{
* +------+
* In1 ~>| |~> Out1
* | bidi |
* Out2 <~| |<~ In2
* +------+
* }}}
*/
final case class BidiShape[-In1, +Out1, -In2, +Out2](
in1: Inlet[In1 @uncheckedVariance],
out1: Outlet[Out1 @uncheckedVariance],
in2: Inlet[In2 @uncheckedVariance],
out2: Outlet[Out2 @uncheckedVariance]) extends Shape {
// implementation details elided ...
}
A bidirectional flow is defined just like a unidirectional Flow as demonstrated for the codec mentioned above:
static interface Message {}
static class Ping implements Message {
final int id;
public Ping(int id) { this.id = id; }
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (o instanceof Ping) {
return ((Ping) o).id == id;
} else return false;
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return id;
}
}
static class Pong implements Message {
final int id;
public Pong(int id) { this.id = id; }
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (o instanceof Pong) {
return ((Pong) o).id == id;
} else return false;
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return id;
}
}
The first version resembles the partial graph constructor, while for the simple case of a functional 1:1 transforma-
tion there is a concise convenience method as shown on the last line. The implementation of the two functions is
not difficult either:
public static ByteString toBytes(Message msg) {
if (msg instanceof Ping) {
final int id = ((Ping) msg).id;
return new ByteStringBuilder().putByte((byte) 1)
.putInt(id, ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN).result();
} else {
final int id = ((Pong) msg).id;
return new ByteStringBuilder().putByte((byte) 2)
.putInt(id, ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN).result();
}
}
In this way you could easily integrate any other serialization library that turns an object into a sequence of bytes.
The other stage that we talked about is a little more involved since reversing a framing protocol means that any re-
ceived chunk of bytes may correspond to zero or more messages. This is best implemented using a GraphStage
(see also Custom processing with GraphStage).
public static ByteString addLengthHeader(ByteString bytes) {
final int len = bytes.size();
@Override
public FlowShape<ByteString, ByteString> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
ByteString bytes = grab(in);
stash = stash.concat(bytes);
run();
}
@Override
public void onUpstreamFinish() throws Exception {
// either we are done
if (stash.isEmpty()) completeStage();
// or we still have bytes to emit
// wait with completion and let run() complete when the
// rest of the stash has been sent downstream
else if (isAvailable(out)) run();
}
});
With these implementations we can build a protocol stack and test it:
/* construct protocol stack
* +------------------------------------+
* | stack |
* | |
* | +-------+ +---------+ |
* ~> O~~o | ~> | o~~O ~>
* Message | | codec | ByteString | framing | | ByteString
* <~ O~~o | <~ | o~~O <~
* | +-------+ +---------+ |
* +------------------------------------+
*/
final BidiFlow<Message, ByteString, ByteString, Message, NotUsed> stack =
codec.atop(framing);
// test it by plugging it into its own inverse and closing the right end
final Flow<Message, Message, NotUsed> pingpong =
Flow.of(Message.class).collect(new PFBuilder<Message, Message>()
.match(Ping.class, p -> new Pong(p.id))
.build()
);
final Flow<Message, Message, NotUsed> flow =
stack.atop(stack.reversed()).join(pingpong);
final CompletionStage<List<Message>> result = Source
.from(Arrays.asList(0, 1, 2))
.<Message> map(id -> new Ping(id))
.via(flow)
.grouped(10)
.runWith(Sink.<List<Message>> head(), mat);
assertArrayEquals(
new Message[] { new Pong(0), new Pong(1), new Pong(2) },
result.toCompletableFuture().get(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS).toArray(new Message[0]));
This example demonstrates how BidiFlow subgraphs can be hooked together and also turned around with the
.reversed() method. The test simulates both parties of a network communication protocol without actually
having to open a network connection—the flows can just be connected directly.
In certain cases it might be necessary to feed back the materialized value of a Graph (partial, closed or backing a
Source, Sink, Flow or BidiFlow). This is possible by using builder.materializedValue which gives an
Outlet that can be used in the graph as an ordinary source or outlet, and which will eventually emit the material-
ized value. If the materialized value is needed at more than one place, it is possible to call materializedValue
any number of times to acquire the necessary number of outlets.
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> foldSink = Sink.<Integer, Integer> fold(0, (a, b) ->
return a + b;
});
Be careful not to introduce a cycle where the materialized value actually contributes to the materialized value. The
following example demonstrates a case where the materialized CompletionStage of a fold is fed back to the
fold itself.
// This cannot produce any value:
final Source<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> cyclicSource = Source.fromGraph(
GraphDSL.create(foldSink,
(b, fold) -> {
// - Fold cannot complete until its upstream mapAsync completes
// - mapAsync cannot complete until the materialized Future produced by
// fold completes
// As a result this Source will never emit anything, and its materialited
// Future will never complete
b.from(b.materializedValue()).via(b.add(flatten)).to(fold);
return SourceShape.of(b.from(b.materializedValue()).via(b.add(flatten)).out());
}));
Cycles in bounded stream topologies need special considerations to avoid potential deadlocks and other liveness
issues. This section shows several examples of problems that can arise from the presence of feedback arcs in
stream processing graphs.
In the following examples runnable graphs are created but do not run because each have some issue and will
deadlock after start. Source variable is not defined as the nature and number of element does not matter for
described problems.
The first example demonstrates a graph that contains a naive cycle. The graph takes elements from the source,
prints them, then broadcasts those elements to a consumer (we just used Sink.ignore for now) and to a
feedback arc that is merged back into the main via a Merge junction.
// WARNING! The graph below deadlocks!
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> printFlow =
Flow.of(Integer.class).map(s -> {
System.out.println(s);
return s;
});
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> merge = b.add(Merge.create(2));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> bcast = b.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final Outlet<Integer> src = b.add(source).out();
final FlowShape<Integer, Integer> printer = b.add(printFlow);
final SinkShape<Integer> ignore = b.add(Sink.ignore());
b.from(src).viaFanIn(merge).via(printer).viaFanOut(bcast).to(ignore);
b.to(merge) .fromFanOut(bcast);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
Running this we observe that after a few numbers have been printed, no more elements are logged to the console
- all processing stops after some time. After some investigation we observe that:
• through merging from source we increase the number of elements flowing in the cycle
• by broadcasting back to the cycle we do not decrease the number of elements in the cycle
Since Akka Streams (and Reactive Streams in general) guarantee bounded processing (see the “Buffering” section
for more details) it means that only a bounded number of elements are buffered over any time span. Since our
cycle gains more and more elements, eventually all of its internal buffers become full, backpressuring source
forever. To be able to process more elements from source elements would need to leave the cycle somehow.
If we modify our feedback loop by replacing the Merge junction with a MergePreferred we can avoid the
deadlock. MergePreferred is unfair as it always tries to consume from a preferred input port if there are
elements available before trying the other lower priority input ports. Since we feed back through the preferred
port it is always guaranteed that the elements in the cycles can flow.
// WARNING! The graph below stops consuming from "source" after a few steps
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
final MergePreferredShape<Integer> merge = b.add(MergePreferred.create(1));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> bcast = b.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final Outlet<Integer> src = b.add(source).out();
final FlowShape<Integer, Integer> printer = b.add(printFlow);
final SinkShape<Integer> ignore = b.add(Sink.ignore());
b.from(src).viaFanIn(merge).via(printer).viaFanOut(bcast).to(ignore);
b.to(merge.preferred()).fromFanOut(bcast);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
If we run the example we see that the same sequence of numbers are printed over and over again, but the processing
does not stop. Hence, we avoided the deadlock, but source is still back-pressured forever, because buffer space
is never recovered: the only action we see is the circulation of a couple of initial elements from source.
Note: What we see here is that in certain cases we need to choose between boundedness and liveness. Our first
example would not deadlock if there would be an infinite buffer in the loop, or vice versa, if the elements in the
cycle would be balanced (as many elements are removed as many are injected) then there would be no deadlock.
To make our cycle both live (not deadlocking) and fair we can introduce a dropping element on the feedback arc. In
this case we chose the buffer() operation giving it a dropping strategy OverflowStrategy.dropHead.
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> merge = b.add(Merge.create(2));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> bcast = b.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final FlowShape<Integer, Integer> droppyFlow = b.add(
Flow.of(Integer.class).buffer(10, OverflowStrategy.dropHead()));
final Outlet<Integer> src = b.add(source).out();
final FlowShape<Integer, Integer> printer = b.add(printFlow);
b.from(src).viaFanIn(merge).via(printer).viaFanOut(bcast).to(ignore);
b.to(merge).via(droppyFlow).fromFanOut(bcast);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
b.from(b.add(source)).toInlet(zip.in0());
b.from(zip.out()).via(printer).viaFanOut(bcast).to(ignore);
b.to(zip.in1()) .fromFanOut(bcast);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
Still, when we try to run the example it turns out that no element is printed at all! After some investigation we
realize that:
• In order to get the first element from source into the cycle we need an already existing element in the
cycle
• In order to get an initial element in the cycle we need an element from source
These two conditions are a typical “chicken-and-egg” problem. The solution is to inject an initial element into the
cycle that is independent from source. We do this by using a Concat junction on the backwards arc that injects
a single element using Source.single.
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
final FanInShape2<Integer, Integer, Integer> zip =
b.add(ZipWith.create((Integer left, Integer right) -> left));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> bcast = b.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> concat = b.add(Concat.create());
final FlowShape<Integer, Integer> printer = b.add(printFlow);
final SinkShape<Integer> ignore = b.add(Sink.ignore());
b.from(b.add(source)).toInlet(zip.in0());
b.from(zip.out()).via(printer).viaFanOut(bcast).to(ignore);
b.to(zip.in1()).viaFanIn(concat).from(b.add(Source.single(1)));
b.to(concat).fromFanOut(bcast);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
When we run the above example we see that processing starts and never stops. The important takeaway from this
example is that balanced cycles often need an initial “kick-off” element to be injected into the cycle.
Akka Streams provide a uniform model of stream processing graphs, which allows flexible composition of reusable
components. In this chapter we show how these look like from the conceptual and API perspective, demonstrating
the modularity aspects of the library.
Every processing stage used in Akka Streams can be imagined as a “box” with input and output ports where
elements to be processed arrive and leave the stage. In this view, a Source is nothing else than a “box” with a
single output port, or, a BidiFlow is a “box” with exactly two input and two output ports. In the figure below
we illustrate the most common used stages viewed as “boxes”.
The linear stages are Source, Sink and Flow, as these can be used to compose strict chains of processing
stages. Fan-in and Fan-out stages have usually multiple input or multiple output ports, therefore they allow to
build more complex graph layouts, not just chains. BidiFlow stages are usually useful in IO related tasks,
where there are input and output channels to be handled. Due to the specific shape of BidiFlow it is easy to
stack them on top of each other to build a layered protocol for example. The TLS support in Akka is for example
implemented as a BidiFlow.
These reusable components already allow the creation of complex processing networks. What we have seen
so far does not implement modularity though. It is desirable for example to package up a larger graph entity
into a reusable component which hides its internals only exposing the ports that are meant to the users of the
module to interact with. One good example is the Http server component, which is encoded internally as a
BidiFlow which interfaces with the client TCP connection using an input-output port pair accepting and sending
ByteString s, while its upper ports emit and receive HttpRequest and HttpResponse instances.
The following figure demonstrates various composite stages, that contain various other type of stages internally,
but hiding them behind a shape that looks like a Source, Flow, etc.
One interesting example above is a Flow which is composed of a disconnected Sink and Source. This can
be achieved by using the fromSinkAndSource() constructor method on Flow which takes the two parts as
parameters.
Please note that when combining a Flow using that method, the termination signals are not carried
“through” as the Sink and Source are assumed to be fully independent. If however you want to con-
struct a Flow like this but need the termination events to trigger “the other side” of the composite flow,
you can use CoupledTerminationFlow.fromSinkAndSource which does just that. For example
the cancelation of the composite flows source-side will then lead to completion of its sink-side. Read
CoupledTerminationFlow‘s scaladoc for a detailed explanation how this works.
The example BidiFlow demonstrates that internally a module can be of arbitrary complexity, and the exposed
ports can be wired in flexible ways. The only constraint is that all the ports of enclosed modules must be either
connected to each other, or exposed as interface ports, and the number of such ports needs to match the requirement
of the shape, for example a Source allows only one exposed output port, the rest of the internal ports must be
properly connected.
These mechanics allow arbitrary nesting of modules. For example the following figure demonstrates a
RunnableGraph that is built from a composite Source and a composite Sink (which in turn contains a
composite Flow).
The above diagram contains one more shape that we have not seen yet, which is called RunnableGraph. It
turns out, that if we wire all exposed ports together, so that no more open ports remain, we get a module that
is closed. This is what the RunnableGraph class represents. This is the shape that a Materializer can
take and turn into a network of running entities that perform the task described. In fact, a RunnableGraph is
a module itself, and (maybe somewhat surprisingly) it can be used as part of larger graphs. It is rarely useful to
embed a closed graph shape in a larger graph (since it becomes an isolated island as there are no open port for
communication with the rest of the graph), but this demonstrates the uniform underlying model.
If we try to build a code snippet that corresponds to the above diagram, our first try might look like this:
Source.single(0)
.map(i -> i + 1)
.filter(i -> i != 0)
.map(i -> i - 2)
.to(Sink.fold(0, (acc, i) -> acc + i));
It is clear however that there is no nesting present in our first attempt, since the library cannot figure out where
we intended to put composite module boundaries, it is our responsibility to do that. If we are using the DSL
provided by the Flow, Source, Sink classes then nesting can be achieved by calling one of the methods
withAttributes() or named() (where the latter is just a shorthand for adding a name attribute).
The following code demonstrates how to achieve the desired nesting:
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> nestedSource =
Source.single(0) // An atomic source
.map(i -> i + 1) // an atomic processing stage
.named("nestedSource"); // wraps up the current Source and gives it a name
// Create a RunnableGraph
final RunnableGraph<NotUsed> runnableGraph = nestedSource.to(nestedSink);
Once we have hidden the internals of our components, they act like any other built-in component of similar shape.
If we hide some of the internals of our composites, the result looks just like if any other predefine component has
been used:
If we look at usage of built-in components, and our custom components, there is no difference in usage as the code
snippet below demonstrates.
// Create a RunnableGraph from our components
final RunnableGraph<NotUsed> runnableGraph = nestedSource.to(nestedSink);
In the previous section we explored the possibility of composition, and hierarchy, but we stayed away from non-
linear, generalized graph components. There is nothing in Akka Streams though that enforces that stream process-
ing layouts can only be linear. The DSL for Source and friends is optimized for creating such linear chains, as
they are the most common in practice. There is a more advanced DSL for building complex graphs, that can be
used if more flexibility is needed. We will see that the difference between the two DSLs is only on the surface:
the concepts they operate on are uniform across all DSLs and fit together nicely.
As a first example, let’s look at a more complex layout:
The diagram shows a RunnableGraph (remember, if there are no unwired ports, the graph is closed, and
therefore can be materialized) that encapsulates a non-trivial stream processing network. It contains fan-in, fan-
out stages, directed and non-directed cycles. The runnable() method of the GraphDSL factory object allows
the creation of a general, closed, and runnable graph. For example the network on the diagram can be realized like
this:
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(
GraphDSL.create(builder -> {
final Outlet<Integer> A = builder.add(Source.single(0)).out();
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> B = builder.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> C = builder.add(Merge.create(2));
final FlowShape<Integer, Integer> D =
builder.add(Flow.of(Integer.class).map(i -> i + 1));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> E = builder.add(Balance.create(2));
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> F = builder.add(Merge.create(2));
final Inlet<Integer> G = builder.add(Sink.<Integer> foreach(System.out::println)).in();
builder.from(F).toFanIn(C);
builder.from(A).viaFanOut(B).viaFanIn(C).toFanIn(F);
builder.from(B).via(D).viaFanOut(E).toFanIn(F);
builder.from(E).toInlet(G);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
In the code above we used the implicit port numbering feature to make the graph more readable and similar to the
diagram. It is possible to refer to the ports, so another version might look like this:
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(
GraphDSL.create(builder -> {
final SourceShape<Integer> A = builder.add(Source.single(0));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> B = builder.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> C = builder.add(Merge.create(2));
final FlowShape<Integer, Integer> D =
builder.add(Flow.of(Integer.class).map(i -> i + 1));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> E = builder.add(Balance.create(2));
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> F = builder.add(Merge.create(2));
final SinkShape<Integer> G = builder.add(Sink.foreach(System.out::println));
builder.from(F.out()).toInlet(C.in(0));
builder.from(A).toInlet(B.in());
builder.from(B.out(0)).toInlet(C.in(1));
builder.from(C.out()).toInlet(F.in(0));
builder.from(B.out(1)).via(D).toInlet(E.in());
builder.from(E.out(0)).toInlet(F.in(1));
builder.from(E.out(1)).to(G);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
Similar to the case in the first section, so far we have not considered modularity. We created a complex graph, but
the layout is flat, not modularized. We will modify our example, and create a reusable component with the graph
DSL. The way to do it is to use the create() method on GraphDSL factory. If we remove the sources and
sinks from the previous example, what remains is a partial graph:
We can recreate a similar graph in code, using the DSL in a similar way than before:
final Graph<FlowShape<Integer, Integer>, NotUsed> partial =
GraphDSL.create(builder -> {
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> B = builder.add(Broadcast.create(2));
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> C = builder.add(Merge.create(2));
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> E = builder.add(Balance.create(2));
final UniformFanInShape<Integer, Integer> F = builder.add(Merge.create(2));
builder.from(F.out()).toInlet(C.in(0));
builder.from(B).viaFanIn(C).toFanIn(F);
builder.from(B).via(builder.add(Flow.of(Integer.class).map(i -> i + 1))).viaFanOut(E).toFanIn(
The only new addition is the return value of the builder block, which is a Shape. All graphs (including Source,
BidiFlow, etc) have a shape, which encodes the typed ports of the module. In our example there is exactly one
input and output port left, so we can declare it to have a FlowShape by returning an instance of it. While it is
possible to create new Shape types, it is usually recommended to use one of the matching built-in ones.
The resulting graph is already a properly wrapped module, so there is no need to call named() to encapsulate the
graph, but it is a good practice to give names to modules to help debugging.
Since our partial graph has the right shape, it can be already used in the simpler, linear DSL:
Source.single(0).via(partial).to(Sink.ignore());
It is not possible to use it as a Flow yet, though (i.e. we cannot call .filter() on it), but Flow has a
fromGraph() method that just adds the DSL to a FlowShape. There are similar methods on Source, Sink
and BidiShape, so it is easy to get back to the simpler DSL if a graph has the right shape. For convenience, it is
also possible to skip the partial graph creation, and use one of the convenience creator methods. To demonstrate
this, we will create the following graph:
The code version of the above closed graph might look like this:
// Convert the partial graph of FlowShape to a Flow to get
// access to the fluid DSL (for example to be able to call .filter())
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> flow = Flow.fromGraph(partial);
Note: All graph builder sections check if the resulting graph has all ports connected except the exposed ones and
will throw an exception if this is violated.
We are still in debt of demonstrating that RunnableGraph is a component just like any other, which can be
embedded in graphs. In the following snippet we embed one closed graph in another:
final RunnableGraph<NotUsed> closed1 =
Source.single(0).to(Sink.foreach(System.out::println));
final RunnableGraph<NotUsed> closed2 =
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(
GraphDSL.create(builder -> {
final ClosedShape embeddedClosed = builder.add(closed1);
return embeddedClosed; // Could return ClosedShape.getInstance()
}));
The type of the imported module indicates that the imported module has a ClosedShape, and so we are not able
to wire it to anything else inside the enclosing closed graph. Nevertheless, this “island” is embedded properly, and
will be materialized just like any other module that is part of the graph.
As we have demonstrated, the two DSLs are fully interoperable, as they encode a similar nested structure of “boxes
with ports”, it is only the DSLs that differ to be as much powerful as possible on the given abstraction level. It is
possible to embed complex graphs in the fluid DSL, and it is just as easy to import and embed a Flow, etc, in a
larger, complex structure.
We have also seen, that every module has a Shape (for example a Sink has a SinkShape) independently
which DSL was used to create it. This uniform representation enables the rich composability of various stream
processing entities in a convenient way.
After realizing that RunnableGraph is nothing more than a module with no unused ports (it is an island), it
becomes clear that after materialization the only way to communicate with the running stream processing logic is
via some side-channel. This side channel is represented as a materialized value. The situation is similar to Actor
s, where the Props instance describes the actor logic, but it is the call to actorOf() that creates an actually
running actor, and returns an ActorRef that can be used to communicate with the running actor itself. Since the
Props can be reused, each call will return a different reference.
When it comes to streams, each materialization creates a new running network corresponding to the blueprint
that was encoded in the provided RunnableGraph. To be able to interact with the running network, each
materialization needs to return a different object that provides the necessary interaction capabilities. In other
words, the RunnableGraph can be seen as a factory, which creates:
• a network of running processing entities, inaccessible from the outside
• a materialized value, optionally providing a controlled interaction capability with the network
Unlike actors though, each of the processing stages might provide a materialized value, so when we compose
multiple stages or modules, we need to combine the materialized value as well (there are default rules which make
this easier, for example to() and via() takes care of the most common case of taking the materialized value to the
left. See flow-combine-mat-scala for details). We demonstrate how this works by a code example and a diagram
which graphically demonstrates what is happening.
The propagation of the individual materialized values from the enclosed modules towards the top will look like
this:
To implement the above, first, we create a composite Source, where the enclosed Source have a materialized
type of CompletableFuture. By using the combiner function Keep.left(), the resulting materialized
type is of the nested module (indicated by the color red on the diagram):
// Materializes to CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>> (red)
final Source<Integer, CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>>> source = Source.<Integer>maybe();
Next, we create a composite Flow from two smaller components. Here, the second enclosed Flow has a ma-
terialized type of CompletionStage, and we propagate this to the parent by using Keep.right() as the
As a third step, we create a composite Sink, using our nestedFlow as a building block. In this snippet, both the
enclosed Flow and the folding Sink has a materialized value that is interesting for us, so we use Keep.both()
to get a Pair of them as the materialized type of nestedSink (indicated by the color blue on the diagram)
// Materializes to Future<String> (green)
final Sink<ByteString, CompletionStage<String>> sink =
Sink.<String, ByteString> fold("", (acc, i) -> acc + i.utf8String());
As the last example, we wire together nestedSource and nestedSink and we use a custom combiner
function to create a yet another materialized type of the resulting RunnableGraph. This combiner function
just ignores the CompletionStage part, and wraps the other two values in a custom case class MyClass
(indicated by color purple on the diagram):
static class MyClass {
private CompletableFuture<Optional<Integer>> p;
private OutgoingConnection conn;
Note: The nested structure in the above example is not necessary for combining the materialized values, it
just demonstrates how the two features work together. See Operator Fusion for further examples of combining
materialized values without nesting and hierarchy involved.
9.7.4 Attributes
We have seen that we can use named() to introduce a nesting level in the fluid DSL (and also explicit nesting by
using create() from GraphDSL). Apart from having the effect of adding a nesting level, named() is actually
a shorthand for calling withAttributes(Attributes.name("someName")). Attributes provide a way
to fine-tune certain aspects of the materialized running entity. For example buffer sizes for asynchronous stagescan
be controlled via attributes (see Buffers for asynchronous stages). When it comes to hierarchic composition,
attributes are inherited by nested modules, unless they override them with a custom value.
The code below, a modification of an earlier example sets the inputBuffer attribute on certain modules, but
not on others:
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> nestedSource =
Source.single(0)
.map(i -> i + 1)
.named("nestedSource"); // Wrap, no inputBuffer set
The effect is, that each module inherits the inputBuffer attribute from its enclosing parent, unless it has
the same attribute explicitly set. nestedSource gets the default attributes from the materializer itself.
nestedSink on the other hand has this attribute set, so it will be used by all nested modules. nestedFlow
will inherit from nestedSink except the map stage which has again an explicitly provided attribute overriding
the inherited one.
This diagram illustrates the inheritance process for the example code (representing the materializer default at-
tributes as the color red, the attributes set on nestedSink as blue and the attributes set on nestedFlow as
green).
When upstream and downstream rates differ, especially when the throughput has spikes, it can be useful to intro-
duce buffers in a stream. In this chapter we cover how buffers are used in Akka Streams.
In this section we will discuss internal buffers that are introduced as an optimization when using asynchronous
stages.
To run a stage asynchronously it has to be marked explicitly as such using the .async() method. Being run
asynchronously means that a stage, after handing out an element to its downstream consumer is able to immedi-
ately process the next message. To demonstrate what we mean by this, let’s take a look at the following example:
Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3))
.map(i -> {System.out.println("A: " + i); return i;}).async()
.map(i -> {System.out.println("B: " + i); return i;}).async()
.map(i -> {System.out.println("C: " + i); return i;}).async()
.runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
Running the above example, one of the possible outputs looks like this:
A: 1
A: 2
B: 1
A: 3
B: 2
C: 1
B: 3
C: 2
C: 3
Note that the order is not A:1, B:1, C:1, A:2, B:2, C:2, which would correspond to the normal fused
synchronous execution model of flows where an element completely passes through the processing pipeline before
the next element enters the flow. The next element is processed by an asynchronous stage as soon as it is emitted
the previous one.
While pipelining in general increases throughput, in practice there is a cost of passing an element through the
asynchronous (and therefore thread crossing) boundary which is significant. To amortize this cost Akka Streams
uses a windowed, batching backpressure strategy internally. It is windowed because as opposed to a Stop-And-
Wait protocol multiple elements might be “in-flight” concurrently with requests for elements. It is also batching
because a new element is not immediately requested once an element has been drained from the window-buffer
but multiple elements are requested after multiple elements have been drained. This batching strategy reduces the
communication cost of propagating the backpressure signal through the asynchronous boundary.
While this internal protocol is mostly invisible to the user (apart form its throughput increasing effects) there are
situations when these details get exposed. In all of our previous examples we always assumed that the rate of
the processing chain is strictly coordinated through the backpressure signal causing all stages to process no faster
than the throughput of the connected chain. There are tools in Akka Streams however that enable the rates of
different segments of a processing chain to be “detached” or to define the maximum throughput of the stream
through external timing sources. These situations are exactly those where the internal batching buffering strategy
suddenly becomes non-transparent.
As we have explained, for performance reasons Akka Streams introduces a buffer for every asynchronous pro-
cessing stage. The purpose of these buffers is solely optimization, in fact the size of 1 would be the most natural
choice if there would be no need for throughput improvements. Therefore it is recommended to keep these buffer
sizes small, and increase them only to a level suitable for the throughput requirements of the application. Default
buffer sizes can be set through configuration:
akka.stream.materializer.max-input-buffer-size = 16
If the buffer size needs to be set for segments of a Flow only, it is possible by defining a separate Flow with these
attributes:
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> flow1 =
Flow.of(Integer.class)
.map(elem -> elem * 2).async()
.addAttributes(Attributes.inputBuffer(1, 1)); // the buffer size of this map is 1
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> flow2 =
flow1.via(
Flow.of(Integer.class)
.map(elem -> elem / 2)).async(); // the buffer size of this map is the default
Here is an example of a code that demonstrate some of the issues caused by internal buffers:
final FiniteDuration oneSecond =
FiniteDuration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
final Source<String, Cancellable> msgSource =
Source.tick(oneSecond, oneSecond, "message!");
final Source<String, Cancellable> tickSource =
Source.tick(oneSecond.mul(3), oneSecond.mul(3), "tick");
final Flow<String, Integer, NotUsed> conflate =
Flow.of(String.class).conflateWithSeed(
first -> 1, (count, elem) -> count + 1);
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
// this is the asynchronous stage in this graph
final FanInShape2<String, Integer, Integer> zipper =
b.add(ZipWith.create((String tick, Integer count) -> count).async());
b.from(b.add(msgSource)).via(b.add(conflate)).toInlet(zipper.in1());
b.from(b.add(tickSource)).toInlet(zipper.in0());
b.from(zipper.out()).to(b.add(Sink.foreach(elem -> System.out.println(elem))));
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
})).run(mat);
Running the above example one would expect the number 3 to be printed in every 3 seconds (the
conflateWithSeed step here is configured so that it counts the number of elements received before the down-
stream ZipWith consumes them). What is being printed is different though, we will see the number 1. The
reason for this is the internal buffer which is by default 16 elements large, and prefetches elements before the
ZipWith starts consuming them. It is possible to fix this issue by changing the buffer size of ZipWith (or the
whole graph) to 1. We will still see a leading 1 though which is caused by an initial prefetch of the ZipWith
element.
Note: In general, when time or rate driven processing stages exhibit strange behavior, one of the first solutions to
try should be to decrease the input buffer of the affected elements to 1.
In this section we will discuss explicit user defined buffers that are part of the domain logic of the stream processing
pipeline of an application.
The example below will ensure that 1000 jobs (but not more) are dequeued from an external (imaginary) system
and stored locally in memory - relieving the external system:
// Getting a stream of jobs from an imaginary external system as a Source
final Source<Job, NotUsed> jobs = inboundJobsConnector;
jobs.buffer(1000, OverflowStrategy.backpressure());
The next example will also queue up 1000 jobs locally, but if there are more jobs waiting in the imaginary external
systems, it makes space for the new element by dropping one element from the tail of the buffer. Dropping from
the tail is a very common strategy but it must be noted that this will drop the youngest waiting job. If some
“fairness” is desired in the sense that we want to be nice to jobs that has been waiting for long, then this option
can be useful.
jobs.buffer(1000, OverflowStrategy.dropTail());
Instead of dropping the youngest element from the tail of the buffer a new element can be dropped without
enqueueing it to the buffer at all.
jobs.buffer(1000, OverflowStrategy.dropNew());
Here is another example with a queue of 1000 jobs, but it makes space for the new element by dropping one
element from the head of the buffer. This is the oldest waiting job. This is the preferred strategy if jobs are
expected to be resent if not processed in a certain period. The oldest element will be retransmitted soon, (in fact a
retransmitted duplicate might be already in the queue!) so it makes sense to drop it first.
jobs.buffer(1000, OverflowStrategy.dropHead());
Compared to the dropping strategies above, dropBuffer drops all the 1000 jobs it has enqueued once the buffer
gets full. This aggressive strategy is useful when dropping jobs is preferred to delaying jobs.
jobs.buffer(1000, OverflowStrategy.dropBuffer());
If our imaginary external job provider is a client using our API, we might want to enforce that the client cannot
have more than 1000 queued jobs otherwise we consider it flooding and terminate the connection. This is easily
achievable by the error strategy which simply fails the stream once the buffer gets full.
jobs.buffer(1000, OverflowStrategy.fail());
Understanding conflate
When a fast producer can not be informed to slow down by backpressure or some other signal, conflate might
be useful to combine elements from a producer until a demand signal comes from a consumer.
Below is an example snippet that summarizes fast stream of elements to a standard deviation, mean and count of
elements that have arrived while the stats have been calculated.
final Flow<Double, Tuple3<Double, Double, Integer>, NotUsed> statsFlow =
Flow.of(Double.class)
.conflateWithSeed(elem -> Collections.singletonList(elem), (acc, elem) -> {
return Stream
.concat(acc.stream(), Collections.singletonList(elem).stream())
.collect(Collectors.toList());
})
.map(s -> {
final Double mean = s.stream().mapToDouble(d -> d).sum() / s.size();
This example demonstrates that such flow’s rate is decoupled. The element rate at the start of the flow can be
much higher that the element rate at the end of the flow.
Another possible use of conflate is to not consider all elements for summary when producer starts getting too
fast. Example below demonstrates how conflate can be used to implement random drop of elements when
consumer is not able to keep up with the producer.
final Double p = 0.01;
final Flow<Double, Double, NotUsed> sampleFlow = Flow.of(Double.class)
.conflateWithSeed(elem -> Collections.singletonList(elem), (acc, elem) -> {
if (r.nextDouble() < p) {
return Stream
.concat(acc.stream(), Collections.singletonList(elem).stream())
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}
return acc;
})
.mapConcat(d -> d);
Understanding expand
Expand helps to deal with slow producers which are unable to keep up with the demand coming from consumers.
Expand allows to extrapolate a value to be sent as an element to a consumer.
As a simple use of expand here is a flow that sends the same element to consumer when producer does not send
any new elements.
final Flow<Double, Double, NotUsed> lastFlow = Flow.of(Double.class)
.expand(in -> Stream.iterate(in, i -> i).iterator());
Expand also allows to keep some state between demand requests from the downstream. Leveraging this, here is a
flow that tracks and reports a drift between fast consumer and slow producer.
final Flow<Double, Pair<Double, Integer>, NotUsed> driftFlow = Flow.of(Double.class)
.expand(d -> Stream.iterate(0, i -> i + 1).map(i -> new Pair<>(d, i)).iterator());
Note that all of the elements coming from upstream will go through expand at least once. This means that the
output of this flow is going to report a drift of zero if producer is fast enough, or a larger drift otherwise.
A KillSwitch allows the completion of graphs of FlowShape from the outside. It consists of a flow element
that can be linked to a graph of FlowShape needing completion control. The KillSwitch interface allows to:
• complete the graph(s) via shutdown()
• fail the graph(s) via abort(Throwable error)
After the first call to either shutdown or abort, all subsequent calls to any of these methods will be ignored.
Graph completion is performed by both
• completing its downstream
• cancelling (in case of shutdown) or failing (in case of abort) its upstream.
A KillSwitch can control the completion of one or multiple streams, and therefore comes in two different
flavours.
UniqueKillSwitch
UniqueKillSwitch allows to control the completion of one materialized Graph of FlowShape. Refer to
the below for usage examples.
• Shutdown
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> countingSrc =
Source.from(new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4)))
.delay(FiniteDuration.apply(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS), DelayOverflowStrategy.backpressure());
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> lastSnk = Sink.last();
doSomethingElse();
killSwitch.shutdown();
• Abort
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> countingSrc =
Source.from(new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4)))
.delay(FiniteDuration.apply(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS), DelayOverflowStrategy.backpressure());
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> lastSnk = Sink.last();
SharedKillSwitch
A SharedKillSwitch allows to control the completion of an arbitrary number graphs of FlowShape. It can
be materialized multiple times via its flow method, and all materialized graphs linked to it are controlled by the
switch. Refer to the below for usage examples.
• Shutdown
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> countingSrc =
Source.from(new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4)))
.delay(FiniteDuration.apply(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS), DelayOverflowStrategy.backpressure());
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> lastSnk = Sink.last();
doSomethingElse();
killSwitch.shutdown();
assertEquals(2, finalCount);
assertEquals(1, finalCountDelayed);
• Abort
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> countingSrc =
Source.from(new ArrayList<>(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4)))
.delay(FiniteDuration.apply(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS), DelayOverflowStrategy.backpressure());
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> lastSnk = Sink.last();
final SharedKillSwitch killSwitch = KillSwitches.shared("my-kill-switch");
assertEquals(-1, result1);
assertEquals(-1, result2);
There are many cases when consumers or producers of a certain service (represented as a Sink, Source, or possibly
Flow) are dynamic and not known in advance. The Graph DSL does not allow to represent this, all connections
of the graph must be known in advance and must be connected upfront. To allow dynamic fan-in and fan-out
streaming, the Hubs should be used. They provide means to construct Sink and Source pairs that are “attached”
to each other, but one of them can be materialized multiple times to implement dynamic fan-in or fan-out.
A MergeHub allows to implement a dynamic fan-in junction point in a graph where elements coming from
different producers are emitted in a First-Comes-First-Served fashion. If the consumer cannot keep up then all of
the producers are backpressured. The hub itself comes as a Source to which the single consumer can be attached.
It is not possible to attach any producers until this Source has been materialized (started). This is ensured by the
fact that we only get the corresponding Sink as a materialized value. Usage might look like this:
// A simple consumer that will print to the console for now
Sink<String, CompletionStage<Done>> consumer = Sink.foreach(System.out::println);
Source.single("Hello!").runWith(toConsumer, materializer);
Source.single("Hub!").runWith(toConsumer, materializer);
This sequence, while might look odd at first, ensures proper startup order. Once we get the Sink, we can use it as
many times as wanted. Everything that is fed to it will be delivered to the consumer we attached previously until
it cancels.
A BroadcastHub can be used to consume elements from a common producer by a dynamic set of consumers.
The rate of the producer will be automatically adapted to the slowest consumer. In this case, the hub is a Sink
to which the single producer must be attached first. Consumers can only be attached once the Sink has been
materialized (i.e. the producer has been started). One example of using the BroadcastHub:
// A simple producer that publishes a new "message" every second
Source<String, Cancellable> producer = Source.tick(
FiniteDuration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
FiniteDuration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
"New message"
);
The resulting Source can be materialized any number of times, each materialization effectively attaching a new
subscriber. If there are no subscribers attached to this hub then it will not drop any elements but instead back-
pressure the upstream producer until subscribers arrive. This behavior can be tweaked by using the combinators
.buffer for example with a drop strategy, or just attaching a subscriber that drops all messages. If there are
no other subscribers, this will ensure that the producer is kept drained (dropping all elements) and once a new
subscriber arrives it will adaptively slow down, ensuring no more messages are dropped.
The features provided by the Hub implementations are limited by default. This is by design, as various combina-
tions can be used to express additional features like unsubscribing producers or consumers externally. We show
here an example that builds a Flow representing a publish-subscribe channel. The input of the Flow is published
to all subscribers while the output streams all the elements published.
First, we connect a MergeHub and a BroadcastHub together to form a publish-subscribe channel. Once
we materialize this small stream, we get back a pair of Source and Sink that together define the publish and
subscribe sides of our channel.
// Obtain a Sink and Source which will publish and receive from the "bus" respectively.
Pair<Sink<String, NotUsed>, Source<String, NotUsed>> sinkAndSource =
MergeHub.of(String.class, 16)
.toMat(BroadcastHub.of(String.class, 256), Keep.both())
.run(materializer);
We now use a few tricks to add more features. First of all, we attach a Sink.ignore at the broadcast side of
the channel to keep it drained when there are no subscribers. If this behavior is not the desired one this line can be
simply dropped.
// Ensure that the Broadcast output is dropped if there are no listening parties.
// If this dropping Sink is not attached, then the broadcast hub will not drop any
// elements itself when there are no subscribers, backpressuring the producer instead.
source.runWith(Sink.ignore(), materializer);
We now wrap the Sink and Source in a Flow using Flow.fromSinkAndSource. This bundles up the
two sides of the channel into one and forces users of it to always define a publisher and subscriber side (even if
the subscriber side is just dropping). It also allows us to very simply attach a KillSwitch as a BidiStage
which in turn makes it possible to close both the original Sink and Source at the same time. Finally, we add
backpressureTimeout on the consumer side to ensure that subscribers that block the channel for more than
3 seconds are forcefully removed (and their stream failed).
// We create now a Flow that represents a publish-subscribe channel using the above
// started stream as its "topic". We add two more features, external cancellation of
// the registration and automatic cleanup for very slow subscribers.
Flow<String, String, UniqueKillSwitch> busFlow =
Flow.fromSinkAndSource(sink, source)
.joinMat(KillSwitches.singleBidi(), Keep.right())
.backpressureTimeout(FiniteDuration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
The resulting Flow now has a type of Flow[String, String, UniqueKillSwitch] representing a
publish-subscribe channel which can be used any number of times to attach new producers or consumers. In
addition, it materializes to a UniqueKillSwitch (see UniqueKillSwitch) that can be used to deregister a single
user externally:
UniqueKillSwitch killSwitch =
Source.repeat("Hello World!")
.viaMat(busFlow, Keep.right())
.to(Sink.foreach(System.out::println))
.run(materializer);
While the processing vocabulary of Akka Streams is quite rich (see the Streams Cookbook for examples) it is
sometimes necessary to define new transformation stages either because some functionality is missing from the
stock operations, or for performance reasons. In this part we show how to build custom processing stages and
graph junctions of various kinds.
Note: A custom graph stage should not be the first tool you reach for, defining graphs using flows and the graph
DSL is in general easier and does to a larger extent protect you from mistakes that might be easy to make with a
custom GraphStage
The GraphStage abstraction can be used to create arbitrary graph processing stages with any number of input
or output ports. It is a counterpart of the GraphDSL.create() method which creates new stream processing
stages by composing others. Where GraphStage differs is that it creates a stage that is itself not divisible into
smaller ones, and allows state to be maintained inside it in a safe way.
As a first motivating example, we will build a new Source that will simply emit numbers from 1 until it is can-
celled. To start, we need to define the “interface” of our stage, which is called shape in Akka Streams terminology
(this is explained in more detail in the section Modularity, Composition and Hierarchy).
public class NumbersSource extends GraphStage<SourceShape<Integer>> {
// Define the (sole) output port of this stage
public final Outlet<Integer> out = Outlet.create("NumbersSource.out");
// Define the shape of this stage, which is SourceShape with the port we defined above
private final SourceShape<Integer> shape = SourceShape.of(out);
@Override
public SourceShape<Integer> shape() {
return shape;
}
{
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
push(out, counter);
counter += 1;
}
});
}
};
}
As you see, in itself the GraphStage only defines the ports of this stage and a shape that contains the ports.
It also has a user implemented method called createLogic. If you recall, stages are reusable in multiple
materializations, each resulting in a different executing entity. In the case of GraphStage the actual running
logic is modeled as an instance of a GraphStageLogic which will be created by the materializer by calling the
createLogic method. In other words, all we need to do is to create a suitable logic that will emit the numbers
we want.
Note: It is very important to keep the GraphStage object itself immutable and reusable. All mutable state needs
to be confined to the GraphStageLogic that is created for every materialization.
In order to emit from a Source in a backpressured stream one needs first to have demand from downstream.
To receive the necessary events one needs to register a subclass of AbstractOutHandler with the out-
put port (Outlet). This handler will receive events related to the lifecycle of the port. In our case we need
to override onPull() which indicates that we are free to emit a single element. There is another callback,
onDownstreamFinish() which is called if the downstream cancelled. Since the default behavior of that
callback is to stop the stage, we don’t need to override it. In the onPull callback we simply emit the next
number.
Instances of the above GraphStage are subclasses of Graph<SourceShape<Integer>,NotUsed>
which means that they are already usable in many situations, but do not provide the DSL methods we usu-
ally have for other Source s. In order to convert this Graph to a proper Source we need to wrap it using
Source.fromGraph (see Modularity, Composition and Hierarchy for more details about graphs and DSLs).
Now we can use the source as any other built-in one:
// A GraphStage is a proper Graph, just like what GraphDSL.create would return
Graph<SourceShape<Integer>, NotUsed> sourceGraph = new NumbersSource();
// Returns 55
CompletionStage<Integer> result1 = mySource.take(10).runFold(0, (sum, next) -> sum + next, mat);
Similarly, to create a custom Sink one can register a subclass InHandler with the stage Inlet. The
onPush() callback is used to signal the handler a new element has been pushed to the stage, and can hence
be grabbed and used. onPush() can be overridden to provide custom behaviour. Please note, most Sinks would
need to request upstream elements as soon as they are created: this can be done by calling pull(inlet) in the
preStart() callback.
public class StdoutSink extends GraphStage<SinkShape<Integer>> {
public final Inlet<Integer> in = Inlet.create("StdoutSink.in");
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape()) {
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
Integer element = grab(in);
System.out.println(element);
pull(in);
}
});
}
};
}
}
In order to interact with a port (Inlet or Outlet) of the stage we need to be able to receive events and generate
new events belonging to the port. From the GraphStageLogic the following operations are available on an
output port:
• push(out,elem) pushes an element to the output port. Only possible after the port has been pulled by
downstream.
• complete(out) closes the output port normally.
• fail(out,exception) closes the port with a failure signal.
The events corresponding to an output port can be received in an AbstractOutHandler instance registered
to the output port using setHandler(out,handler). This handler has two callbacks:
• onPull() is called when the output port is ready to emit the next element, push(out, elem) is now
allowed to be called on this port.
• onDownstreamFinish() is called once the downstream has cancelled and no longer allows messages
to be pushed to it. No more onPull() will arrive after this event. If not overridden this will default to
stopping the stage.
Also, there are two query methods available for output ports:
• isAvailable(out) returns true if the port can be pushed.
• isClosed(out) returns true if the port is closed. At this point the port can not be pushed and will not be
pulled anymore.
The relationship of the above operations, events and queries are summarized in the state machine below. Green
shows the initial state while orange indicates the end state. If an operation is not listed for a state, then it is invalid
to call it while the port is in that state. If an event is not listed for a state, then that event cannot happen in that
state.
Finally, there are two methods available for convenience to complete the stage and all of its ports:
• completeStage() is equivalent to closing all output ports and cancelling all input ports.
• failStage(exception) is equivalent to failing all output ports and cancelling all input ports.
In some cases it is inconvenient and error prone to react on the regular state machine events with the signal based
API described above. For those cases there is an API which allows for a more declarative sequencing of actions
which will greatly simplify some use cases at the cost of some extra allocations. The difference between the two
APIs could be described as that the first one is signal driven from the outside, while this API is more active and
drives its surroundings.
The operations of this part of the :class:GraphStage API are:
• emit(out, elem) and emitMultiple(out, Iterable(elem1, elem2)) replaces the
OutHandler with a handler that emits one or more elements when there is demand, and then reinstalls
the current handlers
• read(in)(andThen) and readN(in, n)(andThen) replaces the InHandler with a handler that
reads one or more elements as they are pushed and allows the handler to react once the requested number
of elements has been read.
• abortEmitting() and abortReading() which will cancel an ongoing emit or read
Note that since the above methods are implemented by temporarily replacing the handlers of the stage you should
never call setHandler while they are running emit or read as that interferes with how they are imple-
mented. The following methods are safe to call after invoking emit and read (and will lead to actually run-
ning the operation when those are done): complete(out), completeStage(), emit, emitMultiple,
abortEmitting() and abortReading()
An example of how this API simplifies a stage can be found below in the second version of the
:class:Duplicator.
Graph stages allows for custom linear processing stages through letting them have one input and one output and
using FlowShape as their shape.
Such a stage can be illustrated as a box with two flows as it is seen in the illustration below. Demand flowing
upstream leading to elements flowing downstream.
To illustrate these concepts we create a small GraphStage that implements the map transformation.
Map calls push(out) from the onPush() handler and it also calls pull() from the onPull handler result-
ing in the conceptual wiring above, and fully expressed in code below:
public class Map<A, B> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<A, B>> {
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
push(out, f.apply(grab(in)));
}
});
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
pull(in);
}
});
}
};
}
Map is a typical example of a one-to-one transformation of a stream where demand is passed along upstream
elements passed on downstream.
To demonstrate a many-to-one stage we will implement filter. The conceptual wiring of Filter looks like this:
As we see above, if the given predicate matches the current element we are propagating it downwards, otherwise
we return the “ball” to our upstream so that we get the new element. This is achieved by modifying the map
example by adding a conditional in the onPush handler and decide between a pull(in) or push(out) call
(and of course not having a mapping f function).
public final class Filter<A> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<A, A>> {
public Filter(Predicate<A> p) {
this.p = p;
}
@Override
public FlowShape<A, A> shape() {
return shape;
}
To complete the picture we define a one-to-many transformation as the next step. We chose a straightforward
example stage that emits every upstream element twice downstream. The conceptual wiring of this stage looks
like this:
This is a stage that has state: an option with the last element it has seen indicating if it has duplicated this last
element already or not. We must also make sure to emit the extra element if the upstream completes.
public class Duplicator<A> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<A, A>> {
@Override
public FlowShape<A, A> shape() {
return shape;
}
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() {
A elem = grab(in);
lastElem = Option.some(elem);
push(out, elem);
}
@Override
public void onUpstreamFinish() {
if (lastElem.isDefined()) {
emit(out, lastElem.get());
}
complete(out);
}
});
In this case a pull from downstream might be consumed by the stage itself rather than passed along upstream as
the stage might contain an element it wants to push. Note that we also need to handle the case where the upstream
closes while the stage still has elements it wants to push downstream. This is done by overriding onUpstreamFinish
in the AbstractInHandler and provide custom logic that should happen when the upstream has been finished.
This example can be simplified by replacing the usage of a mutable state with calls to emitMultiple which
will replace the handlers, emit each of multiple elements and then reinstate the original handlers:
public class Duplicator2<A> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<A, A>> {
@Override
public FlowShape<A, A> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() {
A elem = grab(in);
// this will temporarily suspend this handler until the two elems
Finally, to demonstrate all of the stages above, we put them together into a processing chain, which conceptually
would correspond to the following structure:
In code this is only a few lines, using the via use our custom stages in a stream:
CompletionStage<String> resultFuture = Source.from(Arrays.asList(1,2,3,4,5))
.via(new Filter<Integer>((n) -> n % 2 == 0))
.via(new Duplicator<Integer>())
.via(new Map<Integer, Integer>((n) -> n / 2))
.runWith(sink, mat);
If we attempt to draw the sequence of events, it shows that there is one “event token” in circulation in a potential
chain of stages, just like our conceptual “railroad tracks” representation predicts.
Completion
Completion handling usually (but not exclusively) comes into the picture when processing stages need to emit
a few more elements after their upstream source has been completed. We have seen an example of this in
our first Duplicator implementation where the last element needs to be doubled even after the upstream
neighbor stage has been completed. This can be done by overriding the onUpstreamFinish method in
AbstractInHandler.
Stages by default automatically stop once all of their ports (input and output) have been closed externally or inter-
nally. It is possible to opt out from this behavior by invoking setKeepGoing(true) (which is not supported
from the stage’s constructor and usually done in preStart). In this case the stage must be explicitly closed by
calling completeStage() or failStage(exception). This feature carries the risk of leaking streams
and actors, therefore it should be used with care.
Logging debug or other important information in your stages is often a very good idea, especially when developing
more advances stages which may need to be debugged at some point.
You can extend the akka.stream.stage.GraphStageWithLogging or
akka.strea.stage.TimerGraphStageWithLogging classes instead of the usual GraphStage
to enable you to easily obtain a LoggingAdapter inside your stage as long as the Materializer you’re
using is able to provide you with a logger.
Note: Please note that you can always simply use a logging library directly inside a Stage. Make sure to use
an asynchronous appender however, to not accidentally block the stage when writing to files etc. See Using the
SLF4J API directly for more details on setting up async appenders in SLF4J.
The stage then gets access to the log field which it can safely use from any GraphStage callbacks:
public class RandomLettersSource extends GraphStage<SourceShape<String>> {
public final Outlet<String> out = Outlet.create("RandomLettersSource.in");
@Override
public SourceShape<String> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogicWithLogging(shape()) {
{
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
final String s = nextChar();// ASCII lower case letters
push(out, s);
}
});
}
};
}
}
Note: SPI Note: If you’re implementing a Materializer, you can add this ability to your materializer by imple-
menting MaterializerLoggingProvider in your Materializer.
Using timers
Timers can not be scheduled from the constructor of the logic, but it is possible to schedule them from the
preStart() lifecycle hook.
In this sample the stage toggles between open and closed, where open means no elements are passed through. The
stage starts out as closed but as soon as an element is pushed downstream the gate becomes open for a duration of
time during which it will consume and drop upstream messages:
// each time an event is pushed through it will trigger a period of silence
public class TimedGate<A> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<A, A>> {
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new TimerGraphStageLogic(shape) {
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
A elem = grab(in);
if (open) pull(in);
else {
push(out, elem);
open = true;
scheduleOnce("key", silencePeriod);
}
}
});
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
pull(in);
}
});
}
@Override
public void onTimer(Object key) {
if (key.equals("key")) {
open = false;
}
}
};
}
}
In order to receive asynchronous events that are not arriving as stream elements (for example a comple-
tion of a future or a callback from a 3rd party API) one must acquire a AsyncCallback by calling
getAsyncCallback() from the stage logic. The method getAsyncCallback takes as a parameter a
callback that will be called once the asynchronous event fires. It is important to not call the callback directly,
instead, the external API must call the invoke(event) method on the returned AsyncCallback. The exe-
cution engine will take care of calling the provided callback in a thread-safe way. The callback can safely access
the state of the GraphStageLogic implementation.
Sharing the AsyncCallback from the constructor risks race conditions, therefore it is recommended to use the
preStart() lifecycle hook instead.
This example shows an asynchronous side channel graph stage that starts dropping elements when a future com-
pletes:
// will close upstream in all materializations of the stage instance
// when the completion stage completes
public class KillSwitch<A> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<A, A>> {
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() {
push(out, grab(in));
}
});
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
pull(in);
}
});
}
@Override
public void preStart() {
AsyncCallback<Done> callback = createAsyncCallback(new Procedure<Done>() {
@Override
public void apply(Done param) throws Exception {
completeStage();
}
});
ExecutionContext ec = system.dispatcher();
switchF.thenAccept(callback::invoke);
}
};
}
}
This section is a stub and will be extended in the next release This is an experimental feature*
It is possible to acquire an ActorRef that can be addressed from the outside of the stage, similarly how
AsyncCallback allows injecting asynchronous events into a stage logic. This reference can be obtained by
calling getStageActorRef(receive) passing in a function that takes a Pair of the sender ActorRef
and the received message. This reference can be used to watch other actors by calling its watch(ref) or
unwatch(ref) methods. The reference can be also watched by external actors. The current limitations of this
ActorRef are:
• they are not location transparent, they cannot be accessed via remoting.
• they cannot be returned as materialized values.
• they cannot be accessed from the constructor of the GraphStageLogic, but they can be accessed from
the preStart() method.
Custom stages can return materialized values instead of NotUsed by inheriting from
GraphStageWithMaterializedValue instead of the simpler GraphStage. The difference is that
in this case the method createLogicAndMaterializedValue(inheritedAttributes) needs to be
overridden, and in addition to the stage logic the materialized value must be provided
Warning: There is no built-in synchronization of accessing this value from both of the thread where the logic
runs and the thread that got hold of the materialized value. It is the responsibility of the programmer to add the
necessary (non-blocking) synchronization and visibility guarantees to this shared object.
In this sample the materialized value is a future containing the first element to go through the stream:
public class FirstValue<A> extends GraphStageWithMaterializedValue<FlowShape<A, A>, CompletionStag
@Override
public Tuple2<GraphStageLogic, CompletionStage<A>> createLogicAndMaterializedValue(Attributes in
Promise<A> promise = Futures.promise();
push(out, elem);
Sometimes it is desirable to decouple the rate of the upstream and downstream of a stage, synchronizing only
when needed.
This is achieved in the model by representing a GraphStage as a boundary between two regions where the
demand sent upstream is decoupled from the demand that arrives from downstream. One immediate consequence
of this difference is that an onPush call does not always lead to calling push and an onPull call does not
always lead to calling pull.
One of the important use-case for this is to build buffer-like entities, that allow independent progress of upstream
and downstream stages when the buffer is not full or empty, and slowing down the appropriate side if the buffer
becomes empty or full.
The next diagram illustrates the event sequence for a buffer with capacity of two elements in a setting where the
downstream demand is slow to start and the buffer will fill up with upstream elements before any demand is seen
from downstream.
Another scenario would be where the demand from downstream starts coming in before any element is pushed
into the buffer stage.
The first difference we can notice is that our Buffer stage is automatically pulling its upstream on initialization.
The buffer has demand for up to two elements without any downstream demand.
The following code example demonstrates a buffer class corresponding to the message sequence chart above.
public class TwoBuffer<A> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<A, A>> {
@Override
public FlowShape<A, A> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
@Override
public void preStart() {
// a detached stage needs to start upstream demand
// itself as it is not triggered by downstream demand
pull(in);
}
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() {
A elem = grab(in);
buffer.add(elem);
if (downstreamWaiting) {
downstreamWaiting = false;
A bufferedElem = buffer.poll();
push(out, bufferedElem);
}
if (!isBufferFull()) {
pull(in);
}
}
@Override
public void onUpstreamFinish() {
if (!buffer.isEmpty()) {
// emit the rest if possible
emitMultiple(out, buffer.iterator());
}
completeStage();
}
});
}
}
All of the above custom stages (linear or graph) provide a few simple guarantees that implementors can rely on.
• The callbacks exposed by all of these classes are never called concurrently.
• The state encapsulated by these classes can be safely modified from the provided callbacks, without
Warning: It is not safe to access the state of any custom stage outside of the callbacks that it provides, just
like it is unsafe to access the state of an actor from the outside. This means that Future callbacks should not
close over internal state of custom stages because such access can be concurrent with the provided callbacks,
leading to undefined behavior.
If a stage manages a resource with a lifecycle, for example objects that need to be shutdown when they are not
used anymore it is important to make sure this will happen in all circumstances when the stage shuts down.
Cleaning up resources should be done in GraphStageLogic.postStop and not in the InHandler and
OutHandler callbacks. The reason for this is that when the stage itself completes or is failed there is no signal
from the upstreams or the downstreams. Even for stages that do not complete or fail in this manner, this can happen
when the Materializer is shutdown or the ActorSystem is terminated while a stream is still running, what
is called an “abrupt termination”.
9.11 Integration
For piping the elements of a stream as messages to an ordinary actor you can use ask in a mapAsync or use
Sink.actorRefWithAck.
Messages can be sent to a stream with Source.queue or via the ActorRef that is materialized by
Source.actorRef.
mapAsync + ask
A nice way to delegate some processing of elements in a stream to an actor is to use ask in mapAsync. The
back-pressure of the stream is maintained by the CompletionStage of the ask and the mailbox of the actor
will not be filled with more messages than the given parallelism of the mapAsync stage.
Source<String, NotUsed> words =
Source.from(Arrays.asList("hello", "hi"));
Timeout askTimeout = Timeout.apply(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
words
.mapAsync(5, elem -> ask(ref, elem, askTimeout))
.map(elem -> (String) elem)
// continue processing of the replies from the actor
.map(elem -> elem.toLowerCase())
.runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
Note that the messages received in the actor will be in the same order as the stream elements, i.e. the
parallelism does not change the ordering of the messages. There is a performance advantage of using paral-
lelism > 1 even though the actor will only process one message at a time because then there is already a message
in the mailbox when the actor has completed previous message.
The actor must reply to the getSender() for each message from the stream. That reply will complete the
CompletionStage of the ask and it will be the element that is emitted downstreams from mapAsync.
The stream can be completed with failure by sending akka.actor.Status.Failure as reply from the actor.
If the ask fails due to timeout the stream will be completed with TimeoutException failure. If that is not
desired outcome you can use recover on the ask CompletionStage.
If you don’t care about the reply values and only use them as back-pressure signals you can use Sink.ignore
after the mapAsync stage and then actor is effectively a sink of the stream.
The same pattern can be used with Actor routers. Then you can use mapAsyncUnordered for better efficiency
if you don’t care about the order of the emitted downstream elements (the replies).
Sink.actorRefWithAck
The sink sends the elements of the stream to the given ActorRef that sends back back-pressure signal. First
element is always onInitMessage, then stream is waiting for the given acknowledgement message from the given
actor which means that it is ready to process elements. It also requires the given acknowledgement message after
each stream element to make back-pressure work.
If the target actor terminates the stream will be cancelled. When the stream is completed successfully the given
onCompleteMessage will be sent to the destination actor. When the stream is completed with failure a
akka.actor.Status.Failure message will be sent to the destination actor.
Note: Using Sink.actorRef or ordinary tell from a map or foreach stage means that there is no back-
pressure signal from the destination actor, i.e. if the actor is not consuming the messages fast enough the mailbox
of the actor will grow, unless you use a bounded mailbox with zero mailbox-push-timeout-time or use a rate
limiting stage in front. It’s often better to use Sink.actorRefWithAck or ask in mapAsync, though.
Source.queue
Source.queue can be used for emitting elements to a stream from an actor (or from anything running outside
the stream). The elements will be buffered until the stream can process them. You can offer elements to the
queue and they will be emitted to the stream if there is demand from downstream, otherwise they will be buffered
until request for demand is received.
Use overflow strategy akka.stream.OverflowStrategy.backpressure to avoid dropping of elements
if the buffer is full.
SourceQueue.offer returns CompletionStage<QueueOfferResult> which completes with
QueueOfferResult.enqueued if element was added to buffer or sent downstream. It com-
pletes with QueueOfferResult.dropped if element was dropped. Can also complete with
QueueOfferResult.Failure - when stream failed or QueueOfferResult.QueueClosed when
downstream is completed.
When used from an actor you typically pipe the result of the CompletionStage back to the actor to continue
processing.
Source.actorRef
Messages sent to the actor that is materialized by Source.actorRef will be emitted to the stream if there is
demand from downstream, otherwise they will be buffered until request for demand is received.
Depending on the defined OverflowStrategy it might drop elements if there is no space available in the
buffer. The strategy OverflowStrategy.backpressure is not supported for this Source type, i.e. elements
will be dropped if the buffer is filled by sending at a rate that is faster than the stream can consume. You should
consider using Source.queue if you want a backpressured actor interface.
The stream can be completed successfully by sending akka.actor.PoisonPill or
akka.actor.Status.Success to the actor reference.
The stream can be completed with failure by sending akka.actor.Status.Failure to the actor reference.
The actor will be stopped when the stream is completed, failed or cancelled from downstream, i.e. you can watch
it to get notified when that happens.
Stream transformations and side effects involving external non-stream based services can be performed with
mapAsync or mapAsyncUnordered.
For example, sending emails to the authors of selected tweets using an external email service:
public CompletionStage<Email> send(Email email) {
// ...
}
Transforming the stream of authors to a stream of email addresses by using the lookupEmail service can be
done with mapAsync:
final Source<String, NotUsed> emailAddresses = authors
.mapAsync(4, author -> addressSystem.lookupEmail(author.handle))
.filter(o -> o.isPresent())
.map(o -> o.get());
sendEmails.run(mat);
mapAsync is applying the given function that is calling out to the external service to each of the elements as
they pass through this processing step. The function returns a CompletionStage and the value of that future
will be emitted downstreams. The number of Futures that shall run in parallel is given as the first argument to
mapAsync. These Futures may complete in any order, but the elements that are emitted downstream are in the
same order as received from upstream.
That means that back-pressure works as expected. For example if the emailServer.send is the bottleneck it
will limit the rate at which incoming tweets are retrieved and email addresses looked up.
The final piece of this pipeline is to generate the demand that pulls the tweet authors information through the
emailing pipeline: we attach a Sink.ignore which makes it all run. If our email process would return some
interesting data for further transformation then we would of course not ignore it but send that result stream onwards
for further processing or storage.
Note that mapAsync preserves the order of the stream elements. In this example the order is not important and
then we can use the more efficient mapAsyncUnordered:
final Source<Author, NotUsed> authors =
tweets
.filter(t -> t.hashtags().contains(AKKA))
.map(t -> t.author);
sendEmails.run(mat);
In the above example the services conveniently returned a CompletionStage of the result. If that is not the
case you need to wrap the call in a CompletionStage. If the service call involves blocking you must also
make sure that you run it on a dedicated execution context, to avoid starvation and disturbance of other tasks in
the system.
final Executor blockingEc = system.dispatchers().lookup("blocking-dispatcher");
sendTextMessages.run(mat);
An alternative for blocking calls is to perform them in a map operation, still using a dedicated dispatcher for that
operation.
final Flow<String, Boolean, NotUsed> send =
Flow.of(String.class)
.map(phoneNo -> smsServer.send(new TextMessage(phoneNo, "I like your tweet")))
.withAttributes(ActorAttributes.dispatcher("blocking-dispatcher"));
final RunnableGraph<?> sendTextMessages =
phoneNumbers.via(send).to(Sink.ignore());
sendTextMessages.run(mat);
However, that is not exactly the same as mapAsync, since the mapAsync may run several calls concurrently,
but map performs them one at a time.
For a service that is exposed as an actor, or if an actor is used as a gateway in front of an external service, you can
use ask:
final Source<Tweet, NotUsed> akkaTweets = tweets.filter(t -> t.hashtags().contains(AKKA));
Note that if the ask is not completed within the given timeout the stream is completed with failure. If that is not
desired outcome you can use recover on the ask CompletionStage.
Let us look at another example to get a better understanding of the ordering and parallelism characteristics of
mapAsync and mapAsyncUnordered.
Several mapAsync and mapAsyncUnordered futures may run concurrently. The number of concurrent fu-
tures are limited by the downstream demand. For example, if 5 elements have been requested by downstream
there will be at most 5 futures in progress.
mapAsync emits the future results in the same order as the input elements were received. That means that
completed results are only emitted downstream when earlier results have been completed and emitted. One slow
call will thereby delay the results of all successive calls, even though they are completed before the slow call.
mapAsyncUnordered emits the future results as soon as they are completed, i.e. it is possible that the elements
are not emitted downstream in the same order as received from upstream. One slow call will thereby not delay the
results of faster successive calls as long as there is downstream demand of several elements.
Here is a fictive service that we can use to illustrate these aspects.
static class SometimesSlowService {
private final Executor ec;
Elements starting with a lower case character are simulated to take longer time to process.
Here is how we can use it with mapAsync:
final Executor blockingEc = system.dispatchers().lookup("blocking-dispatcher");
final SometimesSlowService service = new SometimesSlowService(blockingEc);
Source.from(Arrays.asList("a", "B", "C", "D", "e", "F", "g", "H", "i", "J"))
.map(elem -> { System.out.println("before: " + elem); return elem; })
.mapAsync(4, service::convert)
.runForeach(elem -> System.out.println("after: " + elem), mat);
Note that after lines are in the same order as the before lines even though elements are completed in a
different order. For example H is completed before g, but still emitted afterwards.
The numbers in parenthesis illustrates how many calls that are in progress at the same time. Here the
downstream demand and thereby the number of concurrent calls are limited by the buffer size (4) of the
ActorMaterializerSettings.
Here is how we can use the same service with mapAsyncUnordered:
final Executor blockingEc = system.dispatchers().lookup("blocking-dispatcher");
final SometimesSlowService service = new SometimesSlowService(blockingEc);
Source.from(Arrays.asList("a", "B", "C", "D", "e", "F", "g", "H", "i", "J"))
.map(elem -> { System.out.println("before: " + elem); return elem; })
.mapAsyncUnordered(4, service::convert)
.runForeach(elem -> System.out.println("after: " + elem), mat);
Note that after lines are not in the same order as the before lines. For example H overtakes the slow G.
The numbers in parenthesis illustrates how many calls that are in progress at the same time. Here the
downstream demand and thereby the number of concurrent calls are limited by the buffer size (4) of the
ActorMaterializerSettings.
Reactive Streams defines a standard for asynchronous stream processing with non-blocking back pressure. It
makes it possible to plug together stream libraries that adhere to the standard. Akka Streams is one such library.
An incomplete list of other implementations:
• Reactor (1.1+)
• RxJava
• Ratpack
• Slick
The two most important interfaces in Reactive Streams are the Publisher and Subscriber.
import org.reactivestreams.Publisher;
import org.reactivestreams.Subscriber;
import org.reactivestreams.Processor;
Using an Akka Streams Flow we can transform the stream and connect those:
final Flow<Tweet, Author, NotUsed> authors = Flow.of(Tweet.class)
.filter(t -> t.hashtags().contains(AKKA))
.map(t -> t.author);
Source.fromPublisher(rs.tweets())
.via(authors)
.to(Sink.fromSubscriber(rs.storage()));
The Publisher is used as an input Source to the flow and the Subscriber is used as an output Sink.
A Flow can also be also converted to a RunnableGraph[Processor[In, Out]] which materializes to a
Processor when run() is called. run() itself can be called multiple times, resulting in a new Processor
instance each time.
final Processor<Tweet, Author> processor =
authors.toProcessor().run(mat);
rs.tweets().subscribe(processor);
processor.subscribe(rs.storage());
authorPublisher.subscribe(rs.storage());
.runWith(Sink.asPublisher(AsPublisher.WITH_FANOUT), mat);
authorPublisher.subscribe(rs.storage());
authorPublisher.subscribe(rs.alert());
The input buffer size of the stage controls how far apart the slowest subscriber can be from the fastest subscriber
before slowing down the stream.
To make the picture complete, it is also possible to expose a Sink as a Subscriber by using the Subscriber-
Source:
final Subscriber<Author> storage = rs.storage();
rs.tweets().subscribe(tweetSubscriber);
It is also possible to use re-wrap Processor instances as a Flow by passing a factory function that will create
the Processor instances:
// An example Processor factory
final Creator<Processor<Integer, Integer>> factory =
new Creator<Processor<Integer, Integer>>() {
public Processor<Integer, Integer> create() {
return Flow.of(Integer.class).toProcessor().run(mat);
}
};
Please note that a factory is necessary to achieve reusability of the resulting Flow.
As described above any Akka Streams Source can be exposed as a Reactive Streams Publisher and any Sink
can be exposed as a Reactive Streams Subscriber. Therefore we recommend that you implement Reactive
Streams integrations with built-in stages or custom stages.
For historical reasons the ActorPublisher and ActorSubscriber traits are provided to support imple-
menting Reactive Streams Publisher and Subscriber with an Actor.
These can be consumed by other Reactive Stream libraries or used as an Akka Streams Source or Sink.
Warning: ActorPublisher and ActorSubscriber cannot be used with remote actors, because if
signals of the Reactive Streams protocol (e.g. request) are lost the the stream may deadlock.
ActorPublisher
public JobManager() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(JobManagerProtocol.Job.class, job -> buf.size() == MAX_BUFFER_SIZE, job -> {
sender().tell(JobManagerProtocol.JobDenied, self());
}).
match(JobManagerProtocol.Job.class, job -> {
sender().tell(JobManagerProtocol.JobAccepted, self());
void deliverBuf() {
while (totalDemand() > 0) {
/*
* totalDemand is a Long and could be larger than
* what buf.splitAt can accept
*/
if (totalDemand() <= Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
final List<JobManagerProtocol.Job> took =
buf.subList(0, Math.min(buf.size(), (int) totalDemand()));
took.forEach(this::onNext);
buf.removeAll(took);
break;
} else {
final List<JobManagerProtocol.Job> took =
buf.subList(0, Math.min(buf.size(), Integer.MAX_VALUE));
took.forEach(this::onNext);
buf.removeAll(took);
}
}
}
}
You send elements to the stream by calling onNext. You are allowed to send as many elements as
have been requested by the stream subscriber. This amount can be inquired with totalDemand. It
is only allowed to use onNext when isActive and totalDemand>0, otherwise onNext will throw
IllegalStateException.
When the stream subscriber requests more elements the ActorPublisherMessage.Request message is
delivered to this actor, and you can act on that event. The totalDemand is updated automatically.
When the stream subscriber cancels the subscription the ActorPublisherMessage.Cancel message is
delivered to this actor. After that subsequent calls to onNext will be ignored.
You can complete the stream by calling onComplete. After that you are not allowed to call onNext, onError
and onComplete.
You can terminate the stream with failure by calling onError. After that you are not allowed to call onNext,
onError and onComplete.
If you suspect that this AbstractActorPublisher may never get subscribed to, you can
override the subscriptionTimeout method to provide a timeout after which this Publisher
should be considered canceled. The actor will be notified when the timeout triggers via an
ActorPublisherMessage.SubscriptionTimeoutExceeded message and MUST then perform
cleanup and stop itself.
If the actor is stopped the stream will be completed, unless it was not already terminated with failure, completed
or canceled.
More detailed information can be found in the API documentation.
This is how it can be used as input Source to a Flow:
final Source<JobManagerProtocol.Job, ActorRef> jobManagerSource =
Source.actorPublisher(JobManager.props());
You can only attach one subscriber to this publisher. Use a Broadcast-element or attach a
Sink.asPublisher(AsPublisher.WITH_FANOUT) to enable multiple subscribers.
ActorSubscriber
@Override
public String toString() {
return String.format("Msg(%s, %s)", id, replyTo);
}
}
public static Msg msg(int id, ActorRef replyTo) {
return new Msg(id, replyTo);
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return String.format("Work(%s)", id);
}
}
public static Work work(int id) {
return new Work(id);
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return String.format("Reply(%s)", id);
}
}
public static Reply reply(int id) {
return new Reply(id);
}
@Override
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) {
return true;
}
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) {
return false;
}
if (id != done.id) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return id;
}
}
public static Done done(int id) {
return new Done(id);
}
@Override
public RequestStrategy requestStrategy() {
return new MaxInFlightRequestStrategy(MAX_QUEUE_SIZE) {
@Override
public int inFlightInternally() {
return queue.size();
}
};
}
public WorkerPool() {
final List<Routee> routees = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
routees.add(new ActorRefRoutee(context().actorOf(Props.create(Worker.class))));
router = new Router(new RoundRobinRoutingLogic(), routees);
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(ActorSubscriberMessage.OnNext.class, on -> on.element() instanceof WorkerPoolProtocol.Ms
onNext -> {
WorkerPoolProtocol.Msg msg = (WorkerPoolProtocol.Msg) onNext.element();
queue.put(msg.id, msg.replyTo);
router.route(WorkerPoolProtocol.work(msg.id), self());
}).
match(ActorSubscriberMessage.onCompleteInstance().getClass(), complete -> {
if (queue.isEmpty()) {
context().stop(self());
}
}).
match(WorkerPoolProtocol.Reply.class, reply -> {
int id = reply.id;
queue.get(id).tell(WorkerPoolProtocol.done(id), self());
queue.remove(id);
if (canceled() && queue.isEmpty()) {
context().stop(self());
}
}).
build());
}
}
Subclass must define the RequestStrategy to control stream back pressure. After each incoming message the
AbstractActorSubscriber will automatically invoke the RequestStrategy.requestDemand and
propagate the returned demand to the stream.
• The provided WatermarkRequestStrategy is a good strategy if the actor performs work itself.
• The provided MaxInFlightRequestStrategy is useful if messages are queued internally or dele-
gated to other actors.
• You can also implement a custom RequestStrategy or call request manually together with
ZeroRequestStrategy or some other strategy. In that case you must also call request when the
actor is started or when it is ready, otherwise it will not receive any elements.
More detailed information can be found in the API documentation.
This is how it can be used as output Sink to a Flow:
final int N = 117;
final List<Integer> data = new ArrayList<>(N);
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
data.add(i);
}
Strategies for how to handle exceptions from processing stream elements can be defined when materializing the
stream. The error handling strategies are inspired by actor supervision strategies, but the semantics have been
adapted to the domain of stream processing.
Warning: ZipWith, GraphStage junction, ActorPublisher source and ActorSubscriber sink components do
not honour the supervision strategy attribute yet.
The default supervision strategy for a stream can be defined on the settings of the materializer.
final Function<Throwable, Supervision.Directive> decider = exc -> {
if (exc instanceof ArithmeticException)
return Supervision.resume();
else
return Supervision.stop();
};
final Materializer mat = ActorMaterializer.create(
ActorMaterializerSettings.create(system).withSupervisionStrategy(decider),
system);
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> source = Source.from(Arrays.asList(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5))
.map(elem -> 100 / elem);
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> fold =
Sink.fold(0, (acc, elem) -> acc + elem);
final CompletionStage<Integer> result = source.runWith(fold, mat);
// the element causing division by zero will be dropped
// result here will be a Future completed with Success(228)
Here you can see that all ArithmeticException will resume the processing, i.e. the elements that cause the
division by zero are effectively dropped.
Note: Be aware that dropping elements may result in deadlocks in graphs with cycles, as explained in Graph
cycles, liveness and deadlocks.
The supervision strategy can also be defined for all operators of a flow.
Restart works in a similar way as Resume with the addition that accumulated state, if any, of the failing
processing stage will be reset.
final Materializer mat = ActorMaterializer.create(system);
final Function<Throwable, Supervision.Directive> decider = exc -> {
if (exc instanceof IllegalArgumentException)
return Supervision.restart();
else
return Supervision.stop();
};
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> flow =
Flow.of(Integer.class).scan(0, (acc, elem) -> {
if (elem < 0) throw new IllegalArgumentException("negative not allowed");
else return acc + elem;
})
.withAttributes(ActorAttributes.withSupervisionStrategy(decider));
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> source = Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 3, -1, 5, 7))
.via(flow);
final CompletionStage<List<Integer>> result = source.grouped(1000)
.runWith(Sink.<List<Integer>>head(), mat);
// the negative element cause the scan stage to be restarted,
// i.e. start from 0 again
// result here will be a Future completed with Success(List(0, 1, 4, 0, 5, 12))
If we would not use Resume the default stopping strategy would complete the stream with failure on the first
CompletionStage that was completed exceptionally.
Akka Streams provides a way of handling File IO and TCP connections with Streams. While the general approach
is very similar to the Actor based TCP handling using Akka IO, by using Akka Streams you are freed of having
to manually react to back-pressure signals, as the library does it transparently for you.
Next, we simply handle each incoming connection using a Flow which will be used as the processing stage
to handle and emit ByteString s from and to the TCP Socket. Since one ByteString does not have to
necessarily correspond to exactly one line of text (the client might be sending the line in chunks) we use the
delimiter helper Flow from akka.stream.javadsl.Framing to chunk the inputs up into actual lines
of text. The last boolean argument indicates that we require an explicit line ending even for the last message before
the connection is closed. In this example we simply add exclamation marks to each incoming text message and
push it through the flow:
connections.runForeach(connection -> {
System.out.println("New connection from: " + connection.remoteAddress());
connection.handleWith(echo, mat);
}, mat);
Notice that while most building blocks in Akka Streams are reusable and freely shareable, this is not the case
for the incoming connection Flow, since it directly corresponds to an existing, already accepted connection its
handling can only ever be materialized once.
Closing connections is possible by cancelling the incoming connection Flow from your server logic (e.g. by
connecting its downstream to a Sink.cancelled() and its upstream to a Source.empty()). It is also
possible to shut down the server’s socket by cancelling the IncomingConnection source connections.
We can then test the TCP server by sending data to the TCP Socket using netcat:
$ echo -n "Hello World" | netcat 127.0.0.1 8889
Hello World!!!
In this example we implement a rather naive Read Evaluate Print Loop client over TCP. Let’s say we know a server
has exposed a simple command line interface over TCP, and would like to interact with it using Akka Streams
over TCP. To open an outgoing connection socket we use the outgoingConnection method:
final Flow<ByteString, ByteString, CompletionStage<OutgoingConnection>> connection =
Tcp.get(system).outgoingConnection("127.0.0.1", 8889);
final Flow<String, ByteString, NotUsed> replParser =
Flow.<String>create()
.takeWhile(elem -> !elem.equals("q"))
.concat(Source.single("BYE")) // will run after the original flow completes
.map(elem -> ByteString.fromString(elem + "\n"));
connection.join(repl).run(mat);
The repl flow we use to handle the server interaction first prints the servers response, then awaits on input from
the command line (this blocking call is used here just for the sake of simplicity) and converts it to a ByteString
which is then sent over the wire to the server. Then we simply connect the TCP pipeline to this processing stage–at
this point it will be materialized and start processing data once the server responds with an initial message.
A resilient REPL client would be more sophisticated than this, for example it should split out the input reading
into a separate mapAsync step and have a way to let the server write more data than one ByteString chunk at any
given time, these improvements however are left as exercise for the reader.
When writing such end-to-end back-pressured systems you may sometimes end up in a situation of a loop, in
which either side is waiting for the other one to start the conversation. One does not need to look far to find
examples of such back-pressure loops. In the two examples shown previously, we always assumed that the side
we are connecting to would start the conversation, which effectively means both sides are back-pressured and can
not get the conversation started. There are multiple ways of dealing with this which are explained in depth in
Graph cycles, liveness and deadlocks, however in client-server scenarios it is often the simplest to make either
side simply send an initial message.
Note: In case of back-pressured cycles (which can occur even between different systems) sometimes you have to
decide which of the sides has start the conversation in order to kick it off. This can be often done by injecting an
initial message from one of the sides–a conversation starter.
To break this back-pressure cycle we need to inject some initial message, a “conversation starter”. First, we need
to decide which side of the connection should remain passive and which active. Thankfully in most situations
finding the right spot to start the conversation is rather simple, as it often is inherent to the protocol we are trying
to implement using Streams. In chat-like applications, which our examples resemble, it makes sense to make the
Server initiate the conversation by emitting a “hello” message:
connections.runForeach(connection -> {
// server logic, parses incoming commands
final Flow<String, String, NotUsed> commandParser =
Flow.<String>create()
.takeWhile(elem -> !elem.equals("BYE"))
.map(elem -> elem + "!");
connection.handleWith(serverLogic, mat);
}, mat);
To emit the initial message we merge a Source with a single element, after the command processing but before
the framing and transformation to ByteString s this way we do not have to repeat such logic.
In this example both client and server may need to close the stream based on a parsed command - BYE in the
case of the server, and q in the case of the client. This is implemented by using a custom GraphStage which
completes the stream once it encounters such command.
Akka Streams provide simple Sources and Sinks that can work with ByteString instances to perform IO
operations on files.
Streaming data from a file is as easy as creating a FileIO.fromPath given a target path, and an optional chunkSize
which determines the buffer size determined as one “element” in such stream:
final Path file = Paths.get("example.csv");
Sink<ByteString, CompletionStage<Done>> printlnSink =
Sink.<ByteString> foreach(chunk -> System.out.println(chunk.utf8String()));
CompletionStage<IOResult> ioResult =
FileIO.fromPath(file)
.to(printlnSink)
.run(mat);
Please note that these processing stages are backed by Actors and by default are configured to run on a pre-
configured threadpool-backed dispatcher dedicated for File IO. This is very important as it isolates the blocking
file IO operations from the rest of the ActorSystem allowing each dispatcher to be utilised in the most efficient
way. If you want to configure a custom dispatcher for file IO operations globally, you can do so by changing the
akka.stream.blocking-io-dispatcher, or for a specific stage by specifying a custom Dispatcher in
code, like this:
FileIO.toPath(file)
.withAttributes(ActorAttributes.dispatcher("custom-blocking-io-dispatcher"));
Akka Streams processing stages (be it simple operators on Flows and Sources or graph junctions) are “fused” to-
gether and executed sequentially by default. This avoids the overhead of events crossing asynchronous boundaries
but limits the flow to execute at most one stage at any given time.
In many cases it is useful to be able to concurrently execute the stages of a flow, this is done by explicitly marking
them as asynchronous using the async() method. Each processing stage marked as asynchronous will run in a
dedicated actor internally, while all stages not marked asynchronous will run in one single actor.
We will illustrate through the example of pancake cooking how streams can be used for various processing pat-
terns, exploiting the available parallelism on modern computers. The setting is the following: both Patrik and
Roland like to make pancakes, but they need to produce sufficient amount in a cooking session to make all of the
children happy. To increase their pancake production throughput they use two frying pans. How they organize
their pancake processing is markedly different.
9.14.1 Pipelining
Roland uses the two frying pans in an asymmetric fashion. The first pan is only used to fry one side of the pancake
then the half-finished pancake is flipped into the second pan for the finishing fry on the other side. Once the first
frying pan becomes available it gets a new scoop of batter. As an effect, most of the time there are two pancakes
being cooked at the same time, one being cooked on its first side and the second being cooked to completion. This
is how this setup would look like implemented as a stream:
Flow<ScoopOfBatter, HalfCookedPancake, NotUsed> fryingPan1 =
Flow.of(ScoopOfBatter.class).map(batter -> new HalfCookedPancake());
The two map stages in sequence (encapsulated in the “frying pan” flows) will be executed in a pipelined way,
basically doing the same as Roland with his frying pans:
1. A ScoopOfBatter enters fryingPan1
2. fryingPan1 emits a HalfCookedPancake once fryingPan2 becomes available
3. fryingPan2 takes the HalfCookedPancake
4. at this point fryingPan1 already takes the next scoop, without waiting for fryingPan2 to finish
The benefit of pipelining is that it can be applied to any sequence of processing steps that are otherwise not
parallelisable (for example because the result of a processing step depends on all the information from the previous
step). One drawback is that if the processing times of the stages are very different then some of the stages will
not be able to operate at full throughput because they will wait on a previous or subsequent stage most of the
time. In the pancake example frying the second half of the pancake is usually faster than frying the first half,
fryingPan2 will not be able to operate at full capacity 1 .
note:: Asynchronous stream processing stages have internal buffers to make communication between them more
efficient. For more details about the behavior of these and how to add additional buffers refer to stream-
rate-scala.
Patrik uses the two frying pans symmetrically. He uses both pans to fully fry a pancake on both sides, then puts
the results on a shared plate. Whenever a pan becomes empty, he takes the next scoop from the shared bowl of
batter. In essence he parallelizes the same process over multiple pans. This is how this setup will look like if
implemented using streams:
Flow<ScoopOfBatter, Pancake, NotUsed> fryingPan =
Flow.of(ScoopOfBatter.class).map(batter -> new Pancake());
// Using two frying pans in parallel, both fully cooking a pancake from the batter.
// We always put the next scoop of batter to the first frying pan that becomes available.
b.from(dispatchBatter.out(0)).via(b.add(fryingPan.async())).toInlet(mergePancakes.in(0));
// Notice that we used the "fryingPan" flow without importing it via builder.add().
// Flows used this way are auto-imported, which in this case means that the two
// uses of "fryingPan" mean actually different stages in the graph.
b.from(dispatchBatter.out(1)).via(b.add(fryingPan.async())).toInlet(mergePancakes.in(1));
The benefit of parallelizing is that it is easy to scale. In the pancake example it is easy to add a third frying pan
with Patrik’s method, but Roland cannot add a third frying pan, since that would require a third processing step,
which is not practically possible in the case of frying pancakes.
One drawback of the example code above that it does not preserve the ordering of pancakes. This might be a
problem if children like to track their “own” pancakes. In those cases the Balance and Merge stages should be
replaced by strict-round robing balancing and merging stages that put in and take out pancakes in a strict order.
1 Roland’s reason for this seemingly suboptimal procedure is that he prefers the temperature of the second pan to be slightly lower than the
A more detailed example of creating a worker pool can be found in the cookbook: cookbook-balance-scala
The two concurrency patterns that we demonstrated as means to increase throughput are not exclusive. In fact,
it is rather simple to combine the two approaches and streams provide a nice unifying language to express and
compose them.
First, let’s look at how we can parallelize pipelined processing stages. In the case of pancakes this means that we
will employ two chefs, each working using Roland’s pipelining method, but we use the two chefs in parallel, just
like Patrik used the two frying pans. This is how it looks like if expressed as streams:
Flow<ScoopOfBatter, Pancake, NotUsed> pancakeChef =
Flow.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
final UniformFanInShape<Pancake, Pancake> mergePancakes =
b.add(Merge.create(2));
final UniformFanOutShape<ScoopOfBatter, ScoopOfBatter> dispatchBatter =
b.add(Balance.create(2));
// Using two pipelines, having two frying pans each, in total using
// four frying pans
b.from(dispatchBatter.out(0))
.via(b.add(fryingPan1.async()))
.via(b.add(fryingPan2.async()))
.toInlet(mergePancakes.in(0));
b.from(dispatchBatter.out(1))
.via(b.add(fryingPan1.async()))
.via(b.add(fryingPan2.async()))
.toInlet(mergePancakes.in(1));
The above pattern works well if there are many independent jobs that do not depend on the results of each other,
but the jobs themselves need multiple processing steps where each step builds on the result of the previous one. In
our case individual pancakes do not depend on each other, they can be cooked in parallel, on the other hand it is
not possible to fry both sides of the same pancake at the same time, so the two sides have to be fried in sequence.
It is also possible to organize parallelized stages into pipelines. This would mean employing four chefs:
• the first two chefs prepare half-cooked pancakes from batter, in parallel, then putting those on a large enough
flat surface.
• the second two chefs take these and fry their other side in their own pans, then they put the pancakes on a
shared plate.
This is again straightforward to implement with the streams API:
Flow<ScoopOfBatter, HalfCookedPancake, NotUsed> pancakeChefs1 =
Flow.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
final UniformFanInShape<HalfCookedPancake, HalfCookedPancake> mergeHalfCooked =
b.add(Merge.create(2));
final UniformFanOutShape<ScoopOfBatter, ScoopOfBatter> dispatchBatter =
b.add(Balance.create(2));
// Two chefs work with one frying pan for each, half-frying the pancakes then putting
// them into a common pool
b.from(dispatchBatter.out(0)).via(b.add(fryingPan1.async())).toInlet(mergeHalfCooked.in(0));
b.from(dispatchBatter.out(1)).via(b.add(fryingPan1.async())).toInlet(mergeHalfCooked.in(1));
// Two chefs work with one frying pan for each, finishing the pancakes then putting
// them into a common pool
b.from(dispatchHalfCooked.out(0)).via(b.add(fryingPan2.async())).toInlet(mergePancakes.in(0));
b.from(dispatchHalfCooked.out(1)).via(b.add(fryingPan2.async())).toInlet(mergePancakes.in(1));
This usage pattern is less common but might be usable if a certain step in the pipeline might take wildly different
times to finish different jobs. The reason is that there are more balance-merge steps in this pattern compared to
the parallel pipelines. This pattern rebalances after each step, while the previous pattern only balances at the entry
point of the pipeline. This only matters however if the processing time distribution has a large deviation.
Verifying behaviour of Akka Stream sources, flows and sinks can be done using various code patterns and libraries.
Here we will discuss testing these elements using:
• simple sources, sinks and flows;
• sources and sinks in combination with TestProbe from the akka-testkit module;
• sources and sinks specifically crafted for writing tests from the akka-stream-testkit module.
It is important to keep your data processing pipeline as separate sources, flows and sinks. This makes them
easily testable by wiring them up to other sources or sinks, or some test harnesses that akka-testkit or
akka-stream-testkit provide.
Testing a custom sink can be as simple as attaching a source that emits elements from a predefined collection,
running a constructed test flow and asserting on the results that sink produced. Here is an example of a test for a
sink:
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sinkUnderTest = Flow.of(Integer.class)
.map(i -> i * 2)
.toMat(Sink.fold(0, (agg, next) -> agg + next), Keep.right());
The same strategy can be applied for sources as well. In the next example we have a source that produces an
infinite stream of elements. Such source can be tested by asserting that first arbitrary number of elements hold
some condition. Here the take combinator and Sink.seq are very useful.
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> sourceUnderTest = Source.repeat(1)
.map(i -> i * 2);
When testing a flow we need to attach a source and a sink. As both stream ends are under our control, we can
choose sources that tests various edge cases of the flow and sinks that ease assertions.
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> flowUnderTest = Flow.of(Integer.class)
.takeWhile(i -> i < 5);
9.15.2 TestKit
Akka Stream offers integration with Actors out of the box. This support can be used for writing stream tests that
use familiar TestProbe from the akka-testkit API.
One of the more straightforward tests would be to materialize stream to a CompletionStage and then use
PatternsCS.pipe pattern to pipe the result of that future to the probe.
final Source<List<Integer>, NotUsed> sourceUnderTest = Source
.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4))
.grouped(2);
Instead of materializing to a future, we can use a Sink.actorRef that sends all incoming elements to the
given ActorRef. Now we can use assertion methods on TestProbe and expect elements one by one as
they arrive. We can also assert stream completion by expecting for onCompleteMessage which was given to
Sink.actorRef.
final Source<Tick, Cancellable> sourceUnderTest = Source.tick(
FiniteDuration.create(0, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS),
FiniteDuration.create(200, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS),
Tick.TOCK);
Similarly to Sink.actorRef that provides control over received elements, we can use Source.actorRef
and have full control over elements to be sent.
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<String>> sinkUnderTest = Flow.of(Integer.class)
.map(i -> i.toString())
ref.tell(1, ActorRef.noSender());
ref.tell(2, ActorRef.noSender());
ref.tell(3, ActorRef.noSender());
ref.tell(new akka.actor.Status.Success("done"), ActorRef.noSender());
You may have noticed various code patterns that emerge when testing stream pipelines. Akka Stream has a
separate akka-stream-testkit module that provides tools specifically for writing stream tests. This module
comes with two main components that are TestSource and TestSink which provide sources and sinks that
materialize to probes that allow fluent API.
A sink returned by TestSink.probe allows manual control over demand and assertions over elements coming
downstream.
final Source<Integer, NotUsed> sourceUnderTest = Source.from(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4))
.filter(elem -> elem % 2 == 0)
.map(elem -> elem * 2);
sourceUnderTest
.runWith(TestSink.probe(system), mat)
.request(2)
.expectNext(4, 8)
.expectComplete();
A source returned by TestSource.probe can be used for asserting demand or controlling when stream is
completed or ended with an error.
final Sink<Integer, NotUsed> sinkUnderTest = Sink.cancelled();
TestSource.<Integer>probe(system)
.toMat(sinkUnderTest, Keep.left())
.run(mat)
.expectCancellation();
You can also inject exceptions and test sink behaviour on error conditions.
final Sink<Integer, CompletionStage<Integer>> sinkUnderTest = Sink.head();
try {
future.toCompletableFuture().get(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
assert false;
} catch (ExecutionException ee) {
final Throwable exception = ee.getCause();
assertEquals(exception.getMessage(), "boom");
}
Test source and sink can be used together in combination when testing flows.
final Flow<Integer, Integer, NotUsed> flowUnderTest = Flow.of(Integer.class)
.mapAsyncUnordered(2, sleep -> akka.pattern.PatternsCS.after(
Duration.create(10, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS),
system.scheduler(),
system.dispatcher(),
CompletableFuture.completedFuture(sleep)
));
sub.request(3);
pub.sendNext(3);
pub.sendNext(2);
pub.sendNext(1);
sub.expectNextUnordered(1, 2, 3);
fromIterator
Stream the values from an Iterator, requesting the next value when there is demand. The iterator will be
created anew on each materialization of the source which is the reason the factory takes a Creator rather than
an Iterator directly.
If the iterator perform blocking operations, make sure to run it on a separate dispatcher.
emits the next value returned from the iterator
completes when the iterator reaches its end
from
Stream the values of an Iterable. Make sure the Iterable is immutable or at least not modified after being
used as a source.
single
repeat
cycle
Stream iterator in cycled manner. Internally new iterator is being created to cycle the one provided via argument
meaning when original iterator runs out of elements process will start all over again from the beginning of the
iterator provided by the evaluation of provided parameter. If method argument provides empty iterator stream will
be terminated with exception.
emits the next value returned from cycled iterator
completes never
tick
A periodical repetition of an arbitrary object. Delay of first tick is specified separately from interval of the follow-
ing ticks.
emits periodically, if there is downstream backpressure ticks are skipped
completes never
fromCompletionStage
Send the single value of the CompletionStage when it completes and there is demand. If the
CompletionStage fails the stream is failed with that exception.
emits when the CompletionStage completes
completes after the CompletionStage has completed or when it fails
fromFuture
Send the single value of the Scala Future when it completes and there is demand. If the future fails the stream
is failed with that exception.
emits the future completes
completes after the future has completed
unfold
Stream the result of a function as long as it returns a Optional, the value inside the optional consists of a pair
where the first value is a state passed back into the next call to the function allowing to pass a state. The first
invocation of the provided fold function will receive the zero state.
Can be used to implement many stateful sources without having to touch the more low level GraphStage API.
emits when there is demand and the unfold function over the previous state returns non empty value
completes when the unfold function returns an empty value
unfoldAsync
Just like unfold but the fold function returns a CompletionStage which will cause the source to complete
or emit when it completes.
Can be used to implement many stateful sources without having to touch the more low level GraphStage API.
emits when there is demand and unfold state returned CompletionStage completes with some value
completes when the CompletionStage returned by the unfold function completes with an empty value
empty
Complete right away without ever emitting any elements. Useful when you have to provide a source to an API but
there are no elements to emit.
emits never
completes directly
maybe
Materialize a CompletionStage that can be completed with an Optional. If it is completed with a value it
will be eimitted from the source if it is an empty Optional it will complete directly.
emits when the returned promise is completed with some value
completes after emitting some value, or directly if the promise is completed with no value
failed
lazily
actorPublisher
actorRef
Materialize an ActorRef, sending messages to it will emit them on the stream. The actor contain a buffer but
since communication is one way, there is no back pressure. Handling overflow is done by either dropping elements
or failing the stream, the strategy is chosen by the user.
emits when there is demand and there are messages in the buffer or a message is sent to the actorref
completes when the ActorRef is sent akka.actor.Status.Success or PoisonPill
combine
Combine several sources, using a given strategy such as merge or concat, into one source.
emits when there is demand, but depending on the strategy
completes when all sources has completed
range
Emit each integer in a range, with an option to take bigger steps than 1.
emits when there is demand, the next value
completes when the end of the range has been reached
unfoldResource
Wrap any resource that can be opened, queried for next element (in a blocking way) and closed using three distinct
functions into a source.
emits when there is demand and read method returns value
completes when read function returns None
unfoldAsyncResource
Wrap any resource that can be opened, queried for next element and closed using three distinct functions into a
source. Functions return CompletionStage result to achieve asynchronous processing
emits when there is demand and CompletionStage from read function returns value
completes when CompletionStage from read function returns None
queue
Materialize a SourceQueue onto which elements can be pushed for emitting from the source. The queue
contains a buffer, if elements are pushed onto the queue faster than the source is consumed the overflow will be
handled with a strategy specified by the user. Functionality for tracking when an element has been emitted is
available through SourceQueue.offer.
emits when there is demand and the queue contains elements
asSubscriber
fromPublisher
zipN
zipWithN
Combine the elements of multiple streams into a stream of sequences using a combiner function.
emits when all of the inputs has an element available
completes when any upstream completes
head
Materializes into a CompletionStage which completes with the first value arriving, after this the stream is
canceled. If no element is emitted, the CompletionStage is be failed.
cancels after receiving one element
backpressures never
headOption
Materializes into a CompletionStage<Optional<T>> which completes with the first value arriving
wrapped in optional, or an empty optional if the stream completes without any elements emitted.
cancels after receiving one element
backpressures never
last
Materializes into a CompletionStage which will complete with the last value emitted when the stream com-
pletes. If the stream completes with no elements the CompletionStage is failed.
cancels never
backpressures never
lastOption
Materialize a CompletionStage<Optional<T>> which completes with the last value emitted wrapped in
an optional when the stream completes. if the stream completes with no elements the CompletionStage is
completed with an empty optional.
cancels never
backpressures never
ignore
Consume all elements but discards them. Useful when a stream has to be consumed but there is no use to actually
do anything with the elements.
cancels never
backpressures never
cancelled
seq
Collect values emitted from the stream into a collection, the collection is available through a CompletionStage
or which completes when the stream completes. Note that the collection is bounded to Integer.MAX_VALUE,
if more element are emitted the sink will cancel the stream
cancels If too many values are collected
foreach
Invoke a given procedure for each element received. Note that it is not safe to mutate shared state from the
procedure.
The sink materializes into a CompletionStage<Optional<Done>> which completes when the stream
completes, or fails if the stream fails.
Note that it is not safe to mutate state from the procedure.
cancels never
backpressures when the previous procedure invocation has not yet completed
foreachParallel
onComplete
lazyInit
Invoke sinkFactory function to create a real sink upon receiving the first element. Internal Sink will not be
created if there are no elements, because of completion or error. fallback will be invoked if there was no elements
and completed is received from upstream.
cancels never
backpressures when initialized and when created sink backpressures
queue
Materialize a SinkQueue that can be pulled to trigger demand through the sink. The queue contains a buffer in
case stream emitting elements faster than queue pulling them.
cancels when SinkQueue.cancel is called
backpressures when buffer has some space
fold
Fold over emitted element with a function, where each invocation will get the new element and the result from the
previous fold invocation. The first invocation will be provided the zero value.
Materializes into a CompletionStage that will complete with the last state when the stream has completed.
This stage allows combining values into a result without a global mutable state by instead passing the state along
between invocations.
cancels never
backpressures when the previous fold function invocation has not yet completed
reduce
Apply a reduction function on the incoming elements and pass the result to the next invocation. The first invocation
receives the two first elements of the flow.
Materializes into a CompletionStage that will be completed by the last result of the reduction function.
cancels never
backpressures when the previous reduction function invocation has not yet completed
combine
actorRef
Send the elements from the stream to an ActorRef. No backpressure so care must be taken to not overflow the
inbox.
cancels when the actor terminates
backpressures never
actorRefWithAck
Send the elements from the stream to an ActorRef which must then acknowledge reception after completing a
message, to provide back pressure onto the sink.
cancels when the actor terminates
backpressures when the actor acknowledgement has not arrived
actorSubscriber
Create an actor from a Props upon materialization, where the actor implements ActorSubscriber, which
will receive the elements from the stream.
Materializes into an ActorRef to the created actor.
cancels when the actor terminates
backpressures depends on the actor implementation
asPublisher
fromSubscriber
Sources and sinks for integrating with java.io.InputStream and java.io.OutputStream can be
found on StreamConverters. As they are blocking APIs the implementations of these stages are run on
a separate dispatcher configured through the akka.stream.blocking-io-dispatcher.
fromOutputStream
Create a sink that wraps an OutputStream. Takes a function that produces an OutputStream, when
the sink is materialized the function will be called and bytes sent to the sink will be written to the returned
OutputStream.
Materializes into a CompletionStage which will complete with a IOResult when the stream completes.
Note that a flow can be materialized multiple times, so the function producing the OutputStream must be able
to handle multiple invocations.
The OutputStream will be closed when the stream that flows into the Sink is completed, and the Sink will
cancel its inflow when the OutputStream is no longer writable.
asInputStream
Create a sink which materializes into an InputStream that can be read to trigger demand through the sink.
Bytes emitted through the stream will be available for reading through the InputStream
The InputStream will be ended when the stream flowing into this Sink completes, and the closing the
InputStream will cancel the inflow of this Sink.
fromInputStream
Create a source that wraps an InputStream. Takes a function that produces an InputStream, when the
source is materialized the function will be called and bytes from the InputStream will be emitted into the
stream.
Materializes into a CompletionStage which will complete with a IOResult when the stream completes.
Note that a flow can be materialized multiple times, so the function producing the InputStream must be able
to handle multiple invocations.
The InputStream will be closed when the Source is canceled from its downstream, and reaching the end of
the InputStream will complete the Source.
asOutputStream
Create a source that materializes into an OutputStream. When bytes are written to the OutputStream they
are emitted from the source.
The OutputStream will no longer be writable when the Source has been canceled from its downstream, and
closing the OutputStream will complete the Source.
asJavaStream
Create a sink which materializes into Java 8 Stream that can be run to trigger demand through the sink. Elements
emitted through the stream will be available for reading through the Java 8 Stream.
The Java 8 a Stream will be ended when the stream flowing into this Sink completes, and closing the Java
Stream will cancel the inflow of this Sink. Java Stream throws exception in case reactive stream failed.
Be aware that Java 8 Stream blocks current thread while waiting on next element from downstream.
fromJavaStream
Create a source that wraps Java 8 Stream. Source uses a stream iterator to get all its elements and send them
downstream on demand.
javaCollector
Create a sink which materializes into a CompletionStage which will be completed with a result of the Java
8 Collector transformation and reduction operations. This allows usage of Java 8 streams transformations
for reactive streams. The Collector will trigger demand downstream. Elements emitted through the stream
will be accumulated into a mutable result container, optionally transformed into a final representation after all
input elements have been processed. The Collector can also do reduction at the end. Reduction processing is
performed sequentially
Note that a flow can be materialized multiple times, so the function producing the Collector must be able to
handle multiple invocations.
javaCollectorParallelUnordered
Create a sink which materializes into a CompletionStage which will be completed with a result of the Java
8 Collector transformation and reduction operations. This allows usage of Java 8 streams transformations for
reactive streams. The Collector will trigger demand downstream.. Elements emitted through the stream will
be accumulated into a mutable result container, optionally transformed into a final representation after all input
elements have been processed. The Collector can also do reduction at the end. Reduction processing is
performed in parallel based on graph Balance.
Note that a flow can be materialized multiple times, so the function producing the Collector must be able to
handle multiple invocations.
Sources and sinks for reading and writing files can be found on FileIO.
fromPath
Emit the contents of a file, as ByteString s, materializes into a CompletionStage which will be completed
with a IOResult upon reaching the end of the file or if there is a failure.
toPath
Create a sink which will write incoming ByteString s to a given file path.
All flows by default backpressure if the computation they encapsulate is not fast enough to keep up with the rate of
incoming elements from the preceding stage. There are differences though how the different stages handle when
some of their downstream stages backpressure them.
Most stages stop and propagate the failure downstream as soon as any of their upstreams emit a failure. This
happens to ensure reliable teardown of streams and cleanup when failures happen. Failures are meant to be to
model unrecoverable conditions, therefore they are always eagerly propagated. For in-band error handling of
normal errors (dropping elements if a map fails for example) you should use the supervision support, or explicitly
wrap your element types in a proper container that can express error or success states.
These stages can transform the rate of incoming elements since there are stages that emit multiple elements for a
single input (e.g. mapConcat’) or consume multiple elements before emitting one output (e.g. ‘‘filter‘). However,
these rate transformations are data-driven, i.e. it is the incoming elements that define how the rate is affected. This
is in contrast with Backpressure aware stages which can change their processing behavior depending on being
backpressured by downstream or not.
map
Transform each element in the stream by calling a mapping function with it and passing the returned value down-
stream.
emits when the mapping function returns an element
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
mapConcat
Transform each element into zero or more elements that are individually passed downstream.
emits when the mapping function returns an element or there are still remaining elements from the previously
calculated collection
backpressures when downstream backpressures or there are still available elements from the previously calculated
collection
completes when upstream completes and all remaining elements has been emitted
statefulMapConcat
Transform each element into zero or more elements that are individually passed downstream. The difference to
mapConcat is that the transformation function is created from a factory for every materialization of the flow.
emits when the mapping function returns an element or there are still remaining elements from the previously
calculated collection
backpressures when downstream backpressures or there are still available elements from the previously calculated
collection
completes when upstream completes and all remaining elements has been emitted
filter
Filter the incoming elements using a predicate. If the predicate returns true the element is passed downstream, if
it returns false the element is discarded.
emits when the given predicate returns true for the element
backpressures when the given predicate returns true for the element and downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
filterNot
Filter the incoming elements using a predicate. If the predicate returns false the element is passed downstream, if
it returns true the element is discarded.
emits when the given predicate returns false for the element
backpressures when the given predicate returns false for the element and downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
collect
Apply a partial function to each incoming element, if the partial function is defined for a value the returned value
is passed downstream. Can often replace filter followed by map to achieve the same in one single stage.
emits when the provided partial function is defined for the element
backpressures the partial function is defined for the element and downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
grouped
Accumulate incoming events until the specified number of elements have been accumulated and then pass the
collection of elements downstream.
emits when the specified number of elements has been accumulated or upstream completed
backpressures when a group has been assembled and downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
sliding
Provide a sliding window over the incoming stream and pass the windows as groups of elements downstream.
Note: the last window might be smaller than the requested size due to end of stream.
emits the specified number of elements has been accumulated or upstream completed
backpressures when a group has been assembled and downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
scan
Emit its current value which starts at zero and then applies the current and next value to the given function
emitting the next current value.
Note that this means that scan emits one element downstream before and upstream elements will not be requested
until the second element is required from downstream.
emits when the function scanning the element returns a new element
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
scanAsync
Just like scan but receiving a function that results in a CompletionStage to the next value.
emits when the CompletionStage resulting from the function scanning the element resolves to the next value
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes and the last CompletionStage is resolved
fold
Start with current value zero and then apply the current and next value to the given function, when upstream
complete the current value is emitted downstream.
emits when upstream completes
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
foldAsync
Just like fold but receiving a function that results in a CompletionStage to the next value.
emits when upstream completes and the last CompletionStage is resolved
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes and the last CompletionStage is resolved
reduce
Start with first element and then apply the current and next value to the given function, when upstream complete
the current value is emitted downstream. Similar to fold.
emits when upstream completes
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
drop
take
takeWhile
Pass elements downstream as long as a predicate function return true for the element include the element when
the predicate first return false and then complete.
emits while the predicate is true and until the first false result
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when predicate returned false or upstream completes
dropWhile
Drop elements as long as a predicate function return true for the element
emits when the predicate returned false and for all following stream elements
backpressures predicate returned false and downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
recover
Allow sending of one last element downstream when a failure has happened upstream.
Throwing an exception inside recover _will_ be logged on ERROR level automatically.
emits when the element is available from the upstream or upstream is failed and pf returns an element
backpressures when downstream backpressures, not when failure happened
completes when upstream completes or upstream failed with exception pf can handle
recoverWith
recoverWithRetries
RecoverWithRetries allows to switch to alternative Source on flow failure. It will stay in effect after a failure has
been recovered up to attempts number of times so that each time there is a failure it is fed into the pf and a new
Source may be materialized. Note that if you pass in 0, this won’t attempt to recover at all. Passing -1 will behave
exactly the same as recoverWith.
Since the underlying failure signal onError arrives out-of-band, it might jump over existing elements. This stage
can recover the failure signal, but not the skipped elements, which will be dropped.
emits when element is available from the upstream or upstream is failed and element is available from alternative
Source
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes or upstream failed with exception pf can handle
mapError
While similar to recover this stage can be used to transform an error signal to a different one without logging it
as an error in the process. So in that sense it is NOT exactly equivalent to recover(t -> throw t2) since
recover would log the t2 error.
Since the underlying failure signal onError arrives out-of-band, it might jump over existing elements. This stage
can recover the failure signal, but not the skipped elements, which will be dropped.
Similarily to recover throwing an exception inside mapError _will_ be logged on ERROR level automatically.
emits when element is available from the upstream or upstream is failed and pf returns an element backpressures
when downstream backpressures completes when upstream completes or upstream failed with exception pf can
handle
detach
Detach upstream demand from downstream demand without detaching the stream rates.
emits when the upstream stage has emitted and there is demand
backpressures when downstream backpressures
throttle
Limit the throughput to a specific number of elements per time unit, or a specific total cost per time unit, where a
function has to be provided to calculate the individual cost of each element.
emits when upstream emits an element and configured time per each element elapsed
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
intersperse
Intersperse stream with provided element similar to List.mkString. It can inject start and end marker ele-
ments to stream.
emits when upstream emits an element or before with the start element if provided
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
limit
limitWeighted
Ensure stream boundedness by evaluating the cost of incoming elements using a cost function. Evaluated cost of
each element defines how many elements will be allowed to travel downstream.
emits when upstream emits and the number of emitted elements has not reached max
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes and the number of emitted elements has not reached max
log
Log elements flowing through the stream as well as completion and erroring. By default element and comple-
tion signals are logged on debug level, and errors are logged on Error level. This can be changed by calling
Attributes.createLogLevels(...) on the given Flow.
emits when upstream emits
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
recoverWithRetries
Switch to alternative Source on flow failure. It stays in effect after a failure has been recovered up to attempts
number of times. Each time a failure is fed into the partial function and a new Source may be materialized.
emits when element is available from the upstream or upstream is failed and element is available from alternative
Source
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes or upstream failed with exception partial function can handle
Flow.fromSinkAndSource
Creates a Flow from a Sink and a Source where the Flow’s input will be sent to the Sink and the Flow ‘s
output will come from the Source.
Note that termination events, like completion and cancelation is not automatically propagated through to the
“other-side” of the such-composed Flow. Use CoupledTerminationFlow if you want to couple termination
of both of the ends, for example most useful in handling websocket connections.
CoupledTerminationFlow.fromSinkAndSource
Allows coupling termination (cancellation, completion, erroring) of Sinks and Sources while creating a Flow them
them. Similar to Flow.fromSinkAndSource however that API does not connect the completion signals of
the wrapped stages.
Similar to Flow.fromSinkAndSource however couples the termination of these two stages.
E.g. if the emitted Flow gets a cancellation, the Source of course is cancelled, however the Sink will also be
completed. The table below illustrates the effects in detail:
Returned Flow Sink (in) Source (out)
cause: upstream (sink-side) receives completion effect: receives completion effect: receives cancel
cause: upstream (sink-side) receives error effect: receives error effect: receives cancel
cause: downstream (source-side) receives cancel effect: completes effect: receives cancel
effect: cancels upstream, completes downstream effect: completes cause: signals complete
effect: cancels upstream, errors downstream effect: receives error cause: signals error or throws
effect: cancels upstream, errors downstream | effect: receives error | cause: signals error or throws |
The order in which the in and out sides receive their respective completion signals is not defined, do not rely on
its ordering.
These stages encapsulate an asynchronous computation, properly handling backpressure while taking care of the
asynchronous operation at the same time (usually handling the completion of a CompletionStage).
mapAsync
Pass incoming elements to a function that return a CompletionStage result. When the CompletionStage
arrives the result is passed downstream. Up to n elements can be processed concurrently, but regardless of their
completion time the incoming order will be kept when results complete. For use cases where order does not
mather mapAsyncUnordered can be used.
If a CompletionStage fails, the stream also fails (unless a different supervision strategy is applied)
emits when the CompletionStage returned by the provided function finishes for the next element in sequence
backpressures when the number of CompletionStage s reaches the configured parallelism and the down-
stream backpressures
completes when upstream completes and all CompletionStage s has been completed and all elements has
been emitted
mapAsyncUnordered
Like mapAsync but CompletionStage results are passed downstream as they arrive regardless of the order
of the elements that triggered them.
If a CompletionStage fails, the stream also fails (unless a different supervision strategy is applied)
emits any of the CompletionStage s returned by the provided function complete
backpressures when the number of CompletionStage s reaches the configured parallelism and the down-
stream backpressures
completes upstream completes and all CompletionStages has been completed and all elements has been emitted
These stages process elements using timers, delaying, dropping or grouping elements for certain time durations.
takeWithin
dropWithin
groupedWithin
Chunk up the stream into groups of elements received within a time window, or limited by the given number of
elements, whichever happens first.
emits when the configured time elapses since the last group has been emitted
backpressures when the group has been assembled (the duration elapsed) and downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
initialDelay
Delay the initial element by a user specified duration from stream materialization.
emits upstream emits an element if the initial delay already elapsed
backpressures downstream backpressures or initial delay not yet elapsed
completes when upstream completes
delay
These stages are aware of the backpressure provided by their downstreams and able to adapt their behavior to that
signal.
conflate
Allow for a slower downstream by passing incoming elements and a summary into an aggregate function as long
as there is backpressure. The summary value must be of the same type as the incoming elements, for example the
sum or average of incoming numbers, if aggregation should lead to a different type conflateWithSeed can
be used:
emits when downstream stops backpressuring and there is a conflated element available
backpressures when the aggregate function cannot keep up with incoming elements
completes when upstream completes
conflateWithSeed
Allow for a slower downstream by passing incoming elements and a summary into an aggregate function as long
as there is backpressure. When backpressure starts or there is no backpressure element is passed into a seed
function to transform it to the summary type.
emits when downstream stops backpressuring and there is a conflated element available
backpressures when the aggregate or seed functions cannot keep up with incoming elements
completes when upstream completes
batch
Allow for a slower downstream by passing incoming elements and a summary into an aggregate function as long
as there is backpressure and a maximum number of batched elements is not yet reached. When the maximum
number is reached and downstream still backpressures batch will also backpressure.
When backpressure starts or there is no backpressure element is passed into a seed function to transform it to the
summary type.
Will eagerly pull elements, this behavior may result in a single pending (i.e. buffered) element which cannot be
aggregated to the batched value.
emits when downstream stops backpressuring and there is a batched element available
backpressures when batched elements reached the max limit of allowed batched elements & downstream back-
pressures
completes when upstream completes and a “possibly pending” element was drained
batchWeighted
Allow for a slower downstream by passing incoming elements and a summary into an aggregate function as long
as there is backpressure and a maximum weight batched elements is not yet reached. The weight of each element is
determined by applying costFn. When the maximum total weight is reached and downstream still backpressures
batch will also backpressure.
Will eagerly pull elements, this behavior may result in a single pending (i.e. buffered) element which cannot be
aggregated to the batched value.
emits downstream stops backpressuring and there is a batched element available
backpressures batched elements reached the max weight limit of allowed batched elements & downstream back-
pressures
completes upstream completes and a “possibly pending” element was drained
expand
Allow for a faster downstream by expanding the last incoming element to an Iterator. For example
Iterator.continually(element) to keep repating the last incoming element.
emits when downstream stops backpressuring
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
buffer (Backpressure)
Allow for a temporarily faster upstream events by buffering size elements. When the buffer is full backpressure
is applied.
emits when downstream stops backpressuring and there is a pending element in the buffer
backpressures when buffer is full
completes when upstream completes and buffered elements has been drained
buffer (Drop)
Allow for a temporarily faster upstream events by buffering size elements. When the buffer is full elements are
dropped according to the specified OverflowStrategy:
• dropHead() drops the oldest element in the buffer to make space for the new element
• dropTail() drops the youngest element in the buffer to make space for the new element
• dropBuffer() drops the entire buffer and buffers the new element
• dropNew() drops the new element
emits when downstream stops backpressuring and there is a pending element in the buffer
backpressures never (when dropping cannot keep up with incoming elements)
completes upstream completes and buffered elements has been drained
buffer (Fail)
Allow for a temporarily faster upstream events by buffering size elements. When the buffer is full the stage fails
the flow with a BufferOverflowException.
emits when downstream stops backpressuring and there is a pending element in the buffer
backpressures never, fails the stream instead of backpressuring when buffer is full
completes when upstream completes and buffered elements has been drained
These stages either take a stream and turn it into a stream of streams (nesting) or they take a stream that contains
nested streams and turn them into a stream of elements instead (flattening).
prefixAndTail
Take up to n elements from the stream (less than n only if the upstream completes before emitting n elements) and
returns a pair containing a strict sequence of the taken element and a stream representing the remaining elements.
emits when the configured number of prefix elements are available. Emits this prefix, and the rest as a substream
backpressures when downstream backpressures or substream backpressures
completes when prefix elements has been consumed and substream has been consumed
groupBy
splitWhen
Split off elements into a new substream whenever a predicate function return true.
emits an element for which the provided predicate is true, opening and emitting a new substream for subsequent
elements
backpressures when there is an element pending for the next substream, but the previous is not fully consumed
yet, or the substream backpressures
completes when upstream completes (Until the end of stream it is not possible to know whether new substreams
will be needed or not)
splitAfter
End the current substream whenever a predicate returns true, starting a new substream for the next element.
emits when an element passes through. When the provided predicate is true it emits the element * and opens a
new substream for subsequent element
backpressures when there is an element pending for the next substream, but the previous is not fully consumed
yet, or the substream backpressures
completes when upstream completes (Until the end of stream it is not possible to know whether new substreams
will be needed or not)
flatMapConcat
Transform each input element into a Source whose elements are then flattened into the output stream through
concatenation. This means each source is fully consumed before consumption of the next source starts.
emits when the current consumed substream has an element available
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes and all consumed substreams complete
flatMapMerge
Transform each input element into a Source whose elements are then flattened into the output stream through
merging. The maximum number of merged sources has to be specified.
emits when one of the currently consumed substreams has an element available
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes and all consumed substreams complete
initialTimeout
If the first element has not passed through this stage before the provided timeout, the stream is failed with a
TimeoutException.
emits when upstream emits an element
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes or fails if timeout elapses before first element arrives
cancels when downstream cancels
completionTimeout
If the completion of the stream does not happen until the provided timeout, the stream is failed with a
TimeoutException.
emits when upstream emits an element
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes or fails if timeout elapses before upstream completes
cancels when downstream cancels
idleTimeout
If the time between two processed elements exceeds the provided timeout, the stream is failed with a
TimeoutException. The timeout is checked periodically, so the resolution of the check is one period (equals
to timeout value).
emits when upstream emits an element
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes or fails if timeout elapses between two emitted elements
backpressureTimeout
If the time between the emission of an element and the following downstream demand exceeds the provided
timeout, the stream is failed with a TimeoutException. The timeout is checked periodically, so the resolution
of the check is one period (equals to timeout value).
emits when upstream emits an element
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes or fails if timeout elapses between element emission and downstream de-
mand.
cancels when downstream cancels
keepAlive
Injects additional (configured) elements if upstream does not emit for a configured amount of time.
emits when upstream emits an element or if the upstream was idle for the configured period
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when upstream completes
cancels when downstream cancels
initialDelay
These stages take multiple streams as their input and provide a single output combining the elements from all of
the inputs in different ways.
merge
Merge multiple sources. Picks elements randomly if all sources has elements ready.
emits when one of the inputs has an element available
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when all upstreams complete (This behavior is changeable to completing when any upstream completes
by setting eagerComplete=true.)
mergeSorted
Merge multiple sources. Waits for one element to be ready from each input stream and emits the smallest element.
emits when all of the inputs have an element available
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when all upstreams complete
mergePreferred
Merge multiple sources. Prefer one source if all sources has elements ready.
emits when one of the inputs has an element available, preferring a defined input if multiple have elements avail-
able
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when all upstreams complete (This behavior is changeable to completing when any upstream completes
by setting eagerComplete=true.)
zip
Combines elements from each of multiple sources into Pair s and passes the pairs downstream.
emits when all of the inputs have an element available
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when any upstream completes
zipWith
Combines elements from multiple sources through a combine function and passes the returned value down-
stream.
emits when all of the inputs have an element available
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when any upstream completes
zipWithIndex
concat
After completion of the original upstream the elements of the given source will be emitted.
emits when the current stream has an element available; if the current input completes, it tries the next one
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when all upstreams complete
prepend
Prepends the given source to the flow, consuming it until completion before the original source is consumed.
If materialized values needs to be collected prependMat is available.
emits when the given stream has an element available; if the given input completes, it tries the current one
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes when all upstreams complete
orElse
If the primary source completes without emitting any elements, the elements from the secondary source are emit-
ted. If the primary source emits any elements the secondary source is cancelled.
Note that both sources are materialized directly and the secondary source is backpressured until it becomes the
source of elements or is cancelled.
Signal errors downstream, regardless which of the two sources emitted the error.
emits when an element is available from first stream or first stream closed without emitting any elements and an
element is available from the second stream
backpressures when downstream backpressures
completes the primary stream completes after emitting at least one element, when the primary stream completes
without emitting and the secondary stream already has completed or when the secondary stream completes
interleave
Emits a specifiable number of elements from the original source, then from the provided source and repeats. If
one source completes the rest of the other stream will be emitted.
emits when element is available from the currently consumed upstream
backpressures when upstream backpressures
completes when both upstreams have completed
These have one input and multiple outputs. They might route the elements between different outputs, or emit
elements on multiple outputs at the same time.
unzip
Takes a stream of two element tuples and unzips the two elements ino two different downstreams.
emits when all of the outputs stops backpressuring and there is an input element available
backpressures when any of the outputs backpressures
completes when upstream completes
unzipWith
broadcast
balance
Fan-out the stream to several streams. Each upstream element is emitted to the first available downstream con-
sumer.
emits when any of the outputs stops backpressuring; emits the element to the first available output
backpressures when all of the outputs backpressure
completes when upstream completes
partition
Fan-out the stream to several streams. Each upstream element is emitted to one downstream consumer according
to the partitioner function applied to the element.
emits when the chosen output stops backpressuring and there is an input element available
backpressures when the chosen output backpressures
completes when upstream completes and no output is pending
watchTermination
Materializes to a CompletionStage that will be completed with Done or failed depending whether the up-
stream of the stage has been completed or failed. The stage otherwise passes through elements unchanged.
emits when input has an element available
backpressures when output backpressures
completes when upstream completes
monitor
Materializes to a FlowMonitor that monitors messages flowing through or completion of the stage. The stage
otherwise passes through elements unchanged. Note that the FlowMonitor inserts a memory barrier every time
it processes an event, and may therefore affect performance.
emits when upstream emits an element
9.17.1 Introduction
This is a collection of patterns to demonstrate various usage of the Akka Streams API by solving small targeted
problems in the format of “recipes”. The purpose of this page is to give inspiration and ideas how to approach
various small tasks involving streams. The recipes in this page can be used directly as-is, but they are most
powerful as starting points: customization of the code snippets is warmly encouraged.
This part also serves as supplementary material for the main body of documentation. It is a good idea to have
this page open while reading the manual and look for examples demonstrating various streaming concepts as they
appear in the main body of documentation.
If you need a quick reference of the available processing stages used in the recipes see Overview of built-in stages
and their semantics.
In this collection we show simple recipes that involve linear flows. The recipes in this section are rather general,
more targeted recipes are available as separate sections (Buffers and working with rate, Working with streaming
IO).
Situation: During development it is sometimes helpful to see what happens in a particular section of a stream.
The simplest solution is to simply use a map operation and use println to print the elements received to the
console. While this recipe is rather simplistic, it is often suitable for a quick debug session.
mySource.map(elem -> {
System.out.println(elem);
return elem;
});
Another approach to logging is to use log() operation which allows configuring logging for elements flowing
through the stream as well as completion and erroring.
// customise log levels
mySource.log("before-map")
.withAttributes(Attributes.createLogLevels(onElement, onFinish, onFailure))
.map(i -> analyse(i));
Situation: A stream is given as a stream of sequence of elements, but a stream of elements needed instead,
streaming all the nested elements inside the sequences separately.
The mapConcat operation can be used to implement a one-to-many transformation of elements using a mapper
function in the form of In -> List<Out>. In this case we want to map a List of elements to the elements in
the collection itself, so we can just call mapConcat(l -> l).
Situation: A possibly unbounded sequence of elements is given as a stream, which needs to be collected into a
Scala collection while ensuring boundedness
A common situation when working with streams is one where we need to collect incoming ele-
ments into a Scala collection. This operation is supported via Sink.seq which materializes into a
CompletionStage<List<T>>.
The function limit or take should always be used in conjunction in order to guarantee stream boundedness,
thus preventing the program from running out of memory.
For example, this is best avoided:
// Dangerous: might produce a collection with 2 billion elements!
final CompletionStage<List<String>> strings = mySource.runWith(Sink.seq(), mat);
Rather, use limit or take to ensure that the resulting List will contain only up to MAX_ALLOWED_SIZE
elements:
final int MAX_ALLOWED_SIZE = 100;
Situation: A stream of bytes is given as a stream of ByteString s and we want to calculate the cryptographic
digest of the stream.
This recipe uses a GraphStage to host a mutable MessageDigest class (part of the Java Cryptography API)
and update it with the bytes arriving from the stream. When the stream starts, the onPull handler of the stage is
called, which just bubbles up the pull event to its upstream. As a response to this pull, a ByteString chunk will
arrive (onPush) which we use to update the digest, then it will pull for the next chunk.
Eventually the stream of ByteString s depletes and we get a notification about this event via
onUpstreamFinish. At this point we want to emit the digest value, but we cannot do it with push in this
handler directly since there may be no downstream demand. Instead we call emit which will temporarily replace
the handlers, emit the provided value when demand comes in and then reset the stage state. It will then complete
the stage.
class DigestCalculator extends GraphStage<FlowShape<ByteString, ByteString>> {
private final String algorithm;
public Inlet<ByteString> in = Inlet.<ByteString>create("DigestCalculator.in");
public Outlet<ByteString> out = Outlet.<ByteString>create("DigestCalculator.out");
private FlowShape<ByteString, ByteString> shape = FlowShape.of(in, out);
@Override
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
final MessageDigest digest;
{
try {
digest = MessageDigest.getInstance(algorithm);
} catch(NoSuchAlgorithmException ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
@Override
public void onUpstreamFinish() throws Exception {
// If the stream is finished, we need to emit the digest
// before completing
emit(out, ByteString.fromArray(digest.digest()));
completeStage();
}
});
}
};
}
Situation: A stream of bytes is given as a stream of ByteString s containing lines terminated by line ending
characters (or, alternatively, containing binary frames delimited by a special delimiter byte sequence) which needs
to be parsed.
The Framing helper class contains a convenience method to parse messages from a stream of ByteString s:
final Source<String, NotUsed> lines = rawData
.via(Framing.delimiter(ByteString.fromString("\r\n"), 100, FramingTruncation.ALLOW))
.map(b -> b.utf8String());
Situation: A gzipped stream of bytes is given as a stream of ByteString s, for example from a FileIO
source.
The Compression helper class contains convenience methods for decompressing data streams compressed with
Gzip or Deflate.
final Source<String, NotUsed> uncompressed = compressed
.via(Compression.gunzip(100))
.map(b -> b.utf8String());
Implementing reduce-by-key
Situation: Given a stream of elements, we want to calculate some aggregated value on different subgroups of the
elements.
The “hello world” of reduce-by-key style operations is wordcount which we demonstrate below. Given a stream
of words we first create a new stream that groups the words according to the i -> i function, i.e. now we have
a stream of streams, where every substream will serve identical words.
To count the words, we need to process the stream of streams (the actual groups containing identical words).
groupBy returns a SubSource, which means that we transform the resulting substreams directly. In this case
we use the reduce combinator to aggregate the word itself and the number of its occurrences within a Pair.
Each substream will then emit one final value—precisely such a pair—when the overall input completes. As a last
step we merge back these values from the substreams into one single output stream.
One noteworthy detail pertains to the MAXIMUM_DISTINCT_WORDS parameter: this defines the breadth of the
merge operation. Akka Streams is focused on bounded resource consumption and the number of concurrently
open inputs to the merge operator describes the amount of resources needed by the merge itself. Therefore only
a finite number of substreams can be active at any given time. If the groupBy operator encounters more keys
than this number then the stream cannot continue without violating its resource bound, in this case groupBy will
terminate with a failure.
final int MAXIMUM_DISTINCT_WORDS = 1000;
Note: Please note that the reduce-by-key version we discussed above is sequential in reading the overall input
stream, in other words it is NOT a parallelization pattern like MapReduce and similar frameworks.
Situation: The groupBy operation strictly partitions incoming elements, each element belongs to exactly one
group. Sometimes we want to map elements into multiple groups simultaneously.
To achieve the desired result, we attack the problem in two steps:
• first, using a function topicMapper that gives a list of topics (groups) a message belongs to, we transform
our stream of Message to a stream of Pair<Message, Topic>‘ where for each topic the message
belongs to a separate pair will be emitted. This is achieved by using mapConcat
• Then we take this new stream of message topic pairs (containing a separate pair for each topic a given
message belongs to) and feed it into groupBy, using the topic as the group key.
final Function<Message, List<Topic>> topicMapper = m -> extractTopics(m);
In this collection we show recipes that use stream graph elements to achieve various goals.
Situation: Given a stream of elements we want to control the emission of those elements according to a trigger
signal. In other words, even if the stream would be able to flow (not being backpressured) we want to hold back
elements until a trigger signal arrives.
This recipe solves the problem by simply zipping the stream of Message elements with the stream of Trigger
signals. Since Zip produces pairs, we simply map the output stream selecting the first element of the pair.
final RunnableGraph<Pair<TestPublisher.Probe<Trigger>, TestSubscriber.Probe<Message>>> g =
RunnableGraph.<Pair<TestPublisher.Probe<Trigger>, TestSubscriber.Probe<Message>>>fromGraph(
GraphDSL.create(
triggerSource,
messageSink,
(p, s) -> new Pair<>(p, s),
(builder, source, sink) -> {
SourceShape<Message> elements =
builder.add(Source.from(Arrays.asList("1", "2", "3", "4")).map(t -> new Message(t)));
FlowShape<Pair<Message, Trigger>, Message> takeMessage =
builder.add(Flow.<Pair<Message, Trigger>>create().map(p -> p.first()));
final FanInShape2<Message, Trigger, Pair<Message, Trigger>> zip =
builder.add(Zip.create());
builder.from(elements).toInlet(zip.in0());
builder.from(source).toInlet(zip.in1());
builder.from(zip.out()).via(takeMessage).to(sink);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}
)
);
Alternatively, instead of using a Zip, and then using map to get the first element of the pairs, we can avoid creating
the pairs in the first place by using ZipWith which takes a two argument function to produce the output element.
If this function would return a pair of the two argument it would be exactly the behavior of Zip so ZipWith is a
generalization of zipping.
final RunnableGraph<Pair<TestPublisher.Probe<Trigger>, TestSubscriber.Probe<Message>>> g =
RunnableGraph.<Pair<TestPublisher.Probe<Trigger>, TestSubscriber.Probe<Message>>>fromGraph(
GraphDSL.create(
triggerSource,
messageSink,
(p, s) -> new Pair<>(p, s),
(builder, source, sink) -> {
final SourceShape<Message> elements =
builder.add(Source.from(Arrays.asList("1", "2", "3", "4")).map(t -> new Message(t)));
final FanInShape2<Message, Trigger, Message> zipWith =
builder.add(ZipWith.create((msg, trigger) -> msg));
builder.from(elements).toInlet(zipWith.in0());
builder.from(source).toInlet(zipWith.in1());
builder.from(zipWith.out()).to(sink);
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}
)
);
Situation: Given a stream of jobs and a worker process expressed as a Flow create a pool of workers that
automatically balances incoming jobs to available workers, then merges the results.
We will express our solution as a function that takes a worker flow and the number of workers to be allocated and
gives a flow that internally contains a pool of these workers. To achieve the desired result we will create a Flow
from a graph.
The graph consists of a Balance node which is a special fan-out operation that tries to route elements to available
downstream consumers. In a for loop we wire all of our desired workers as outputs of this balancer element,
then we wire the outputs of these workers to a Merge element that will collect the results from the workers.
To make the worker stages run in parallel we mark them as asynchronous with async().
public static <In, Out> Flow<In, Out, NotUsed> balancer(
Flow<In, Out, NotUsed> worker, int workerCount) {
return Flow.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(b -> {
boolean waitForAllDownstreams = true;
final UniformFanOutShape<In, In> balance =
b.add(Balance.<In>create(workerCount, waitForAllDownstreams));
final UniformFanInShape<Out, Out> merge =
b.add(Merge.<Out>create(workerCount));
This collection of recipes demonstrate various patterns where rate differences between upstream and downstream
needs to be handled by other strategies than simple backpressure.
Dropping elements
Situation: Given a fast producer and a slow consumer, we want to drop elements if necessary to not slow down
the producer too much.
This can be solved by using a versatile rate-transforming operation, conflate. Conflate can be thought as a
special reduce operation that collapses multiple upstream elements into one aggregate element if needed to
keep the speed of the upstream unaffected by the downstream.
When the upstream is faster, the reducing process of the conflate starts. Our reducer function simply takes the
freshest element. This in a simple dropping operation.
final Flow<Message, Message, NotUsed> droppyStream =
Flow.of(Message.class).conflate((lastMessage, newMessage) -> newMessage);
There is a version of conflate named conflateWithSeed that allows to express more complex aggrega-
tions, more similar to a fold.
Dropping broadcast
Situation: The default Broadcast graph element is properly backpressured, but that means that a slow down-
stream consumer can hold back the other downstream consumers resulting in lowered throughput. In other words
the rate of Broadcast is the rate of its slowest downstream consumer. In certain cases it is desirable to allow
faster consumers to progress independently of their slower siblings by dropping elements if necessary.
One solution to this problem is to append a buffer element in front of all of the downstream consumers defining
a dropping strategy instead of the default Backpressure. This allows small temporary rate differences between
the different consumers (the buffer smooths out small rate variances), but also allows faster consumers to progress
by dropping from the buffer of the slow consumers if necessary.
RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create(builder -> {
final int outputCount = 3;
final UniformFanOutShape<Integer, Integer> bcast =
builder.add(Broadcast.create(outputCount));
builder.from(builder.add(myData)).toFanOut(bcast);
builder.from(bcast).to(builder.add(droppySink(mySink1, 10)));
builder.from(bcast).to(builder.add(droppySink(mySink2, 10)));
builder.from(bcast).to(builder.add(droppySink(mySink3, 10)));
return ClosedShape.getInstance();
}));
Situation: Given a regular (stream) source of ticks, instead of trying to backpressure the producer of the ticks we
want to keep a counter of the missed ticks instead and pass it down when possible.
We will use conflateWithSeed to solve the problem. Conflate takes two functions:
• A seed function that produces the zero element for the folding process that happens when the upstream is
faster than the downstream. In our case the seed function is a constant function that returns 0 since there
were no missed ticks at that point.
• A fold function that is invoked when multiple upstream messages needs to be collapsed to an aggregate
value due to the insufficient processing rate of the downstream. Our folding function simply increments the
currently stored count of the missed ticks so far.
As a result, we have a flow of Int where the number represents the missed ticks. A number 0 means that we were
able to consume the tick fast enough (i.e. zero means: 1 non-missed tick + 0 missed ticks)
final Flow<Tick, Integer, NotUsed> missedTicks =
Flow.of(Tick.class).conflateWithSeed(tick -> 0, (missed, tick) -> missed + 1);
Situation: Given a producer and consumer, where the rate of neither is known in advance, we want to ensure that
none of them is slowing down the other by dropping earlier unconsumed elements from the upstream if necessary,
and repeating the last value for the downstream if necessary.
We have two options to implement this feature. In both cases we will use GraphStage to build our custom
element. In the first version we will use a provided initial value initial that will be used to feed the downstream
if no upstream element is ready yet. In the onPush() handler we just overwrite the currentValue variable
and immediately relieve the upstream by calling pull(). The downstream onPull handler is very similar, we
immediately relieve the downstream by emitting currentValue.
class HoldWithInitial<T> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<T, T>> {
@Override
public FlowShape<T, T> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
private T currentValue = initial;
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
currentValue = grab(in);
pull(in);
}
});
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
push(out, currentValue);
}
});
}
@Override
public void preStart() {
pull(in);
}
};
}
}
While it is relatively simple, the drawback of the first version is that it needs an arbitrary initial element which is
not always possible to provide. Hence, we create a second version where the downstream might need to wait in
one single case: if the very first element is not yet available.
We introduce a boolean variable waitingFirstValue to denote whether the first element has been provided
or not (alternatively an Optional can be used for currentValue or if the element type is a subclass of Object
a null can be used with the same purpose). In the downstream onPull() handler the difference from the previous
version is that we check if we have received the first value and only emit if we have. This leads to that when the
first element comes in we must check if there possibly already was demand from downstream so that we in that
case can push the element directly.
class HoldWithWait<T> extends GraphStage<FlowShape<T, T>> {
public Inlet<T> in = Inlet.<T>create("HoldWithInitial.in");
public Outlet<T> out = Outlet.<T>create("HoldWithInitial.out");
private FlowShape<T, T> shape = FlowShape.of(in, out);
@Override
public FlowShape<T, T> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
private T currentValue = null;
private boolean waitingFirstValue = true;
{
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
currentValue = grab(in);
if (waitingFirstValue) {
waitingFirstValue = false;
if (isAvailable(out)) push(out, currentValue);
}
pull(in);
}
});
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
if (!waitingFirstValue) push(out, currentValue);
}
});
}
@Override
public void preStart() {
pull(in);
}
};
}
}
Situation: Given a set of independent streams that we cannot merge, we want to globally limit the aggregate
throughput of the set of streams.
One possible solution uses a shared actor as the global limiter combined with mapAsync to create a reusable Flow
that can be plugged into a stream to limit its rate.
As the first step we define an actor that will do the accounting for the global rate limit. The actor maintains a
timer, a counter for pending permit tokens and a queue for possibly waiting participants. The actor has an open
and closed state. The actor is in the open state while it has still pending permits. Whenever a request for
permit arrives as a WantToPass message to the actor the number of available permits is decremented and we
notify the sender that it can pass by answering with a MayPass message. If the amount of permits reaches
zero, the actor transitions to the closed state. In this state requests are not immediately answered, instead the
reference of the sender is added to a queue. Once the timer for replenishing the pending permits fires by sending a
ReplenishTokens message, we increment the pending permits counter and send a reply to each of the waiting
senders. If there are more waiting senders than permits available we will stay in the closed state.
public class Limiter extends AbstractActor {
this.replenishTimer = system.scheduler().schedule(
this.tokenRefreshPeriod,
this.tokenRefreshPeriod,
self(),
REPLENISH_TOKENS,
context().system().dispatcher(),
self());
receive(open());
}
permitTokens -= toBeReleased.size();
@Override
public void postStop() {
replenishTimer.cancel();
waitQueue.stream().forEach(ref -> {
ref.tell(new Status.Failure(new IllegalStateException("limiter stopped")), self());
});
}
}
To create a Flow that uses this global limiter actor we use the mapAsync function with the combination of the
ask pattern. We also define a timeout, so if a reply is not received during the configured maximum wait period
the returned future from ask will fail, which will fail the corresponding stream as well.
public <T> Flow<T, T, NotUsed> limitGlobal(ActorRef limiter, FiniteDuration maxAllowedWait) {
final int parallelism = 4;
final Flow<T, T, NotUsed> f = Flow.create();
Note: The global actor used for limiting introduces a global bottleneck. You might want to assign a dedicated
dispatcher for this actor.
Situation: Given a stream of ByteString s we want to produce a stream of ByteString s containing the
same bytes in the same sequence, but capping the size of ByteString s. In other words we want to slice up
ByteString s into smaller chunks if they exceed a size threshold.
This can be achieved with a single GraphStage. The main logic of our stage is in emitChunk() which
implements the following logic:
• if the buffer is empty, and upstream is not closed we pull for more bytes, if it is closed we complete
• if the buffer is nonEmpty, we split it according to the chunkSize. This will give a next chunk that we will
emit, and an empty or nonempty remaining buffer.
Both onPush() and onPull() calls emitChunk() the only difference is that the push handler also stores
the incoming chunk by appending to the end of the buffer.
class Chunker extends GraphStage<FlowShape<ByteString, ByteString>> {
@Override
public FlowShape<ByteString, ByteString> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
private ByteString buffer = ByteString.empty();
{
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler(){
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
if (isClosed(in)) emitChunk();
else pull(in);
}
});
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
ByteString elem = grab(in);
buffer = buffer.concat(elem);
emitChunk();
}
@Override
public void onUpstreamFinish() throws Exception {
if (buffer.isEmpty()) completeStage();
else {
// There are elements left in buffer, so
// we keep accepting downstream pulls and push from buffer until emptied.
//
// It might be though, that the upstream finished while it was pulled, in which
// case we will not get an onPull from the downstream, because we already had one.
// In that case we need to emit from the buffer.
if (isAvailable(out)) emitChunk();
}
}
});
}
Situation: Given a stream of ByteString s we want to fail the stream if more than a given maximum of bytes
has been consumed.
This recipe uses a GraphStage to implement the desired feature. In the only handler we override, onPush()
we just update a counter and see if it gets larger than maximumBytes. If a violation happens we signal failure,
otherwise we forward the chunk we have received.
class ByteLimiter extends GraphStage<FlowShape<ByteString, ByteString>> {
@Override
public FlowShape<ByteString, ByteString> shape() {
return shape;
}
@Override
public GraphStageLogic createLogic(Attributes inheritedAttributes) {
return new GraphStageLogic(shape) {
private int count = 0;
{
setHandler(out, new AbstractOutHandler() {
@Override
public void onPull() throws Exception {
pull(in);
}
});
setHandler(in, new AbstractInHandler() {
@Override
public void onPush() throws Exception {
ByteString chunk = grab(in);
count += chunk.size();
if (count > maximumBytes) {
failStage(new IllegalStateException("Too much bytes"));
} else {
push(out, chunk);
}
}
});
}
};
}
}
Situation: After a long stream of transformations, due to their immutable, structural sharing nature ByteString
s may refer to multiple original ByteString instances unnecessarily retaining memory. As the final step of a
transformation chain we want to have clean copies that are no longer referencing the original ByteString s.
The recipe is a simple use of map, calling the compact() method of the ByteString elements. This does
copying of the underlying arrays, so this should be the last element of a long chain if used.
Source<ByteString, NotUsed> compacted = rawBytes.map(ByteString::compact);
Situation: Given a communication channel expressed as a stream of ByteString s we want to inject keep-alive
messages but only if this does not interfere with normal traffic.
There is a built-in operation that allows to do this directly:
Flow<ByteString, ByteString, NotUsed> keepAliveInject =
Flow.of(ByteString.class).keepAlive(
scala.concurrent.duration.Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
() -> keepAliveMessage);
9.18 Configuration
#####################################
# Akka Stream Reference Config File #
#####################################
akka {
stream {
# Cleanup leaked publishers and subscribers when they are not used within a given
# deadline
subscription-timeout {
# when the subscription timeout is reached one of the following strategies on
# the "stale" publisher:
# cancel - cancel it (via ‘onError‘ or subscribing to the publisher and
# ‘cancel()‘ing the subscription right away
# warn - log a warning statement about the stale element (then drop the
# reference to it)
# noop - do nothing (not recommended)
mode = cancel
# Enable automatic fusing of all graphs that are run. For short-lived streams
# this may cause an initial runtime overhead, but most of the time fusing is
# desirable since it reduces the number of Actors that are created.
auto-fusing = on
# Those stream elements which have explicit buffers (like mapAsync, mapAsyncUnordered,
# buffer, flatMapMerge, Source.actorRef, Source.queue, etc.) will preallocate a fixed
# buffer upon stream materialization if the requested buffer size is less than this
# configuration parameter. The default is very high because failing early is better
# than failing under load.
#
# Buffers sized larger than this will dynamically grow/shrink and consume more memory
# per element than the fixed size buffers.
max-fixed-buffer-size = 1000000000
# Maximum number of sync messages that actor can process for stream to substream communicati
# Parameter allows to interrupt synchronous processing to get upsteam/downstream messages.
# Allows to accelerate message processing that happening withing same actor but keep system
sync-processing-limit = 1000
debug {
# Enables the fuzzing mode which increases the chance of race conditions
# by aggressively reordering events and making certain operations more
# concurrent than usual.
# This setting is for testing purposes, NEVER enable this in a production
# environment!
# To get the best results, try combining this setting with a throughput
# of 1 on the corresponding dispatchers.
fuzzing-mode = off
}
}
default-blocking-io-dispatcher {
type = "Dispatcher"
executor = "thread-pool-executor"
throughput = 1
thread-pool-executor {
core-pool-size-min = 2
core-pool-size-factor = 2.0
core-pool-size-max = 16
}
}
}
# configure overrides to ssl-configuration here (to be used by akka-streams, and akka-http - i.e
ssl-config {
protocol = "TLSv1.2"
}
}
# ssl configuration
# folded in from former ssl-config-akka module
ssl-config {
logger = "com.typesafe.sslconfig.akka.util.AkkaLoggerBridge"
}
For this migration guide see the documentation for Akka Streams 2.0.
In order to provide a top-notch Java API we switched from Scala’s Future and Akka’s akka.japi.Option in-
terim solutions to the JDK’s own types for deferred computation and optional results. This has been done through-
out Streams & HTTP, most notably changing most materialized types, but also the signature of the mapAsync
combinator and the asynchronous route result combinators in the HTTP DSL.
The akka.pattern package has been updated with a new set of implementations within the PatternCS class
that provide the ability to interact between Actors and Futures (or streams) for CompletionStage.
Should you have the need to use Scala Futures with these new Java APIs please use the scala-java8-compat
library that comes as a dependency of Akka. For more information see the documentation.
To provide more clear signatures and have a unified API for both Java and Scala two new types have been intro-
duced:
akka.NotUsed is meant to be used instead of Unit in Scala and BoxedUnit in Java to signify that the type
parameter is required but not actually used. This is commonly the case with Source, Flow and Sink that do
not materialize into any value.
akka.Done is added for the use case where it is boxed inside another object to signify completion but there is
no actual value attached to the completion. It is used to replace occurrences of Future<BoxedUnit> with
Future<Done> in Java and Future[Unit] with Future[Done] in Scala.
All previous usage of Unit and BoxedUnit for these two cases in the Akka Streams APIs has been updated.
This means that Java code like this:
Source<String, BoxedUnit> source = Source.from(Arrays.asList("1", "2", "3"));
Sink<String, Future<BoxedUnit>> sink = Sink.ignore();
These changes apply to all the places where streams are used, which means that signatures in the persistent query
APIs also are affected.
Previously the expand combinator required two functions as input: the first one lifted incoming values into an
extrapolation state and the second one extracted values from that, possibly evolving that state. This has been
simplified into a single function that turns the incoming element into an Iterator.
The most prominent use-case previously was to just repeat the previously received value:
// This no longer works!
Flow.of(Integer.class).expand(i -> i)(i -> new Pair<>(i, i));
If state needs to be be kept during the expansion process then this state will need to be managed by the Iterator.
The example of counting the number of expansions might previously have looked like:
// This no longer works!
Flow.of(Integer.class).expand(i -> new Pair<>(i, 0))(
pair -> new Pair<>(new Pair<>(pair.first(), pair.second()),
new Pair<>(pair.first(), pair.second() + 1)));
The new conflate operator is a special case of the original behavior (renamed to conflateWithSeed) that
does not change the type of the stream. The usage of the new operator is as simple as:
Flow.of(Integer.class).conflate((a, b) -> a + b) // Add numbers while downstream is not ready
async() is available from Sink, Source, Flow and the sub flows. It provides a shortcut for setting
the attribute Attributes.asyncBoundary on a flow. The existing methods Flow.viaAsync and
Flow.viaAsyncMat has been removed to make marking out asynchronous boundaries more consistent:
// This no longer works
source.viaAsync(flow)
In order to not use a meaningless boolean parameter we have changed the signature to:
import static akka.stream.javadsl.AsPublisher.*;
The PushStage PushPullStage and DetachedStage classes have been deprecated and should be re-
placed by GraphStage (Custom processing with GraphStage) which is now a single powerful API for custom
stream processing.
Update procedure
Please consult the GraphStage documentation (Custom processing with GraphStage) and the previous migra-
tion guide on migrating from AsyncStage to GraphStage.
RoutingSettings were previously the only setting available on RequestContext, and were accessible via
settings. We now made it possible to configure the parsers settings as well, so RoutingSettings is now
routingSettings and ParserSettings is now accessible via parserSettings.
Previously if request or response were cancelled or consumed only partially (e.g. by using take combinator)
the remaining data was silently drained to prevent stalling the connection, since there could still be more requests
/ responses incoming. Now the default behaviour is to close the connection in order to prevent using excessive
resource usage in case of huge entities.
The old behaviour can be achieved by explicitly draining the entity:
response.entity().getDataBytes().runWith(Sink.ignore())
The DSL to access a TLS (or SSL) BidiFlow have now split between the javadsl and scaladsl pack-
ages and have been renamed to TLS. Common option types (closing modes, authentication modes, etc.) have
been moved to the top level stream package, and the common message types are accessible in the class
akka.stream.TLSProtocol
Previously we had a mix of methods and classes called websocket or Websocket, which was in contradiction
with how the word is spelled in the spec and some other places of Akka HTTP.
Methods and classes using the word WebSocket now consistently use it as WebSocket, so updating is as simple
as find-and-replacing the lower-case s to an upper-case S wherever the word WebSocket appeared.
In order to minimise the number of needed overloads for each method defined on the Http extension a new mini-
DSL has been introduced for connecting to hosts given a hostname, port and optional ConnectionContext.
The availability of the connection context (if it’s set to HttpsConnectionContext) makes the server be
bound as an HTTPS server, and for outgoing connections those settings are used instead of the default ones if
provided.
Was:
http.cachedHostConnectionPool(toHost("akka.io"), materializer());
http.cachedHostConnectionPool("akka.io", 80, httpsConnectionContext, materializer()); // does not
Replace with:
http.cachedHostConnectionPool(toHostHttps("akka.io", 8081), materializer());
http.cachedHostConnectionPool(toHostHttps("akka.io", 8081).withCustomHttpsContext(httpsContext), m
The Framing object which can be used to chunk up ByteString streams into framing dependent chunks (such
as lines) has moved to akka.stream.scaladsl.Framing, and has gotten a Java DSL equivalent type in
akka.stream.javadsl.Framing.
TEN
Akka HTTP has been released as independent stable module (from Akka HTTP 3.x onwards). The documentation
is available under doc.akka.io/akka-http/current/.
644
CHAPTER
ELEVEN
This section lists common actor patterns which have been found to be useful, elegant or instructive. Anything is
welcome, example topics being message routing strategies, supervision patterns, restart handling, etc. As a special
bonus, additions to this section are marked with the contributor’s name, and it would be nice if every Akka user
who finds a recurring pattern in his or her code could share it for the profit of all. Where applicable it might also
make sense to add to the akka.pattern package for creating an OTP-like library.
You might find some of the patterns described in the Scala chapter of howto-scala useful even though the example
code is written in Scala.
This pattern describes how to schedule periodic messages to yourself in two different ways.
The first way is to set up periodic message scheduling in the constructor of the actor, and cancel that scheduled
sending in postStop or else we might have multiple registered message sends to the same actor.
Note: With this approach the scheduled periodic message send will be restarted with the actor on restarts. This
also means that the time period that elapses between two tick messages during a restart may drift off based on
when you restart the scheduled message sends relative to the time that the last message was sent, and how long
the initial delay is. Worst case scenario is interval plus initialDelay.
@Override
public void postStop() {
tick.cancel();
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message.equals("tick")) {
// do something useful here
}
else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
645
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
The second variant sets up an initial one shot message send in the preStart method of the actor, and the
then the actor when it receives this message sets up a new one shot message send. You also have to override
postRestart so we don’t call preStart and schedule the initial message send again.
Note: With this approach we won’t fill up the mailbox with tick messages if the actor is under pressure, but only
schedule a new tick message when we have seen the previous one.
@Override
public void preStart() {
getContext().system().scheduler().scheduleOnce(
Duration.create(500, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS),
getSelf(), "tick", getContext().dispatcher(), null);
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message.equals("tick")) {
// send another periodic tick after the specified delay
getContext().system().scheduler().scheduleOnce(
Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
getSelf(), "tick", getContext().dispatcher(), null);
// do something useful here
}
else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.actor.Actor;
import akka.actor.ActorKilledException;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorRefFactory;
import akka.actor.Cancellable;
import akka.actor.OneForOneStrategy;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.actor.Scheduler;
import akka.actor.Status;
import akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy;
import akka.actor.SupervisorStrategy.Directive;
import akka.actor.Terminated;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.japi.Function;
import akka.pattern.Patterns;
import akka.util.Timeout;
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message instanceof AskParam) {
ActorRef supervisor = getContext().actorOf(
Props.create(AskSupervisor.class));
supervisor.forward(message, getContext());
} else {
unhandled(message);
}
}
}
@Override
public SupervisorStrategy supervisorStrategy() {
return new OneForOneStrategy(0, Duration.Zero(),
new Function<Throwable, Directive>() {
public Directive apply(Throwable cause) {
caller.tell(new Status.Failure(cause), self());
return SupervisorStrategy.stop();
}
});
}
@Override
public void onReceive(Object message) throws Exception {
if (message instanceof AskParam) {
askParam = (AskParam) message;
caller = getSender();
targetActor = getContext().actorOf(askParam.props);
getContext().watch(targetActor);
targetActor.forward(askParam.message, getContext());
Scheduler scheduler = getContext().system().scheduler();
timeoutMessage = scheduler.scheduleOnce(askParam.timeout.duration(),
self(), new AskTimeout(), context().dispatcher(), null);
} else if (message instanceof Terminated) {
Throwable ex = new ActorKilledException("Target actor terminated.");
caller.tell(new Status.Failure(ex), self());
timeoutMessage.cancel();
getContext().stop(self());
} else if (message instanceof AskTimeout) {
Throwable ex = new TimeoutException("Target actor timed out after "
+ askParam.timeout.toString());
caller.tell(new Status.Failure(ex), self());
getContext().stop(self());
} else
unhandled(message);
}
}
In the askOf method the SupervisorCreator is sent the user message. The SupervisorCreator creates a Super-
visorActor and forwards the message. This prevents the actor system from overloading due to actor creations.
The SupervisorActor is responsible to create the user actor, forwards the message, handles actor termination and
supervision. Additionally the SupervisorActor stops the user actor if execution time expired.
In case of an exception the supervisor tells the temporary actor which exception was thrown. Afterwards the actor
hierarchy is stopped.
Finally we are able to execute an actor and receive the results or exceptions.
package docs.pattern;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorRefFactory;
import akka.actor.Props;
import akka.actor.UntypedActor;
import akka.util.Timeout;
TWELVE
EXPERIMENTAL MODULES
The following modules of Akka are marked as experimental, which means that they are in early access mode,
which also means that they are not covered by commercial support. The purpose of releasing them early, as
experimental, is to make them easily available and improve based on feedback, or even discover that the module
wasn’t useful.
An experimental module doesn’t have to obey the rule of staying binary compatible between micro releases.
Breaking API changes may be introduced in minor releases without notice as we refine and simplify based on
your feedback. An experimental module may be dropped in minor releases without prior deprecation.
When we talk about multi node testing in Akka we mean the process of running coordinated tests on multiple
actor systems in different JVMs. The multi node testing kit consist of three main parts.
• The Test Conductor. that coordinates and controls the nodes under test.
• The Multi Node Spec. that is a convenience wrapper for starting the TestConductor and letting all
nodes connect to it.
• The SbtMultiJvm Plugin. that starts tests in multiple JVMs possibly on multiple machines.
The basis for the multi node testing is the TestConductor. It is an Akka Extension that plugs in to the network
stack and it is used to coordinate the nodes participating in the test and provides several features including:
• Node Address Lookup: Finding out the full path to another test node (No need to share configuration
between test nodes)
• Node Barrier Coordination: Waiting for other nodes at named barriers.
• Network Failure Injection: Throttling traffic, dropping packets, unplugging and plugging nodes back in.
This is a schematic overview of the test conductor.
650
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
The test conductor server is responsible for coordinating barriers and sending commands to the test conductor
clients that act upon them, e.g. throttling network traffic to/from another client. More information on the possible
operations is available in the akka.remote.testconductor.Conductor API documentation.
The Multi Node Spec consists of two parts. The MultiNodeConfig that is responsible for common con-
figuration and enumerating and naming the nodes under test. The MultiNodeSpec that contains a number
of convenience functions for making the test nodes interact with each other. More information on the possible
operations is available in the akka.remote.testkit.MultiNodeSpec API documentation.
The setup of the MultiNodeSpec is configured through java system properties that you set on all JVMs that’s
going to run a node under test. These can easily be set on the JVM command line with -Dproperty=value.
These are the available properties:
• multinode.max-nodes
The maximum number of nodes that a test can have.
• multinode.host
The host name or IP for this node. Must be resolvable using InetAddress.getByName.
• multinode.port
The port number for this node. Defaults to 0 which will use a random port.
• multinode.server-host
The host name or IP for the server node. Must be resolvable using InetAddress.getByName.
• multinode.server-port
The port number for the server node. Defaults to 4711.
• multinode.index
The index of this node in the sequence of roles defined for the test. The index 0 is special and that
machine will be the server. All failure injection and throttling must be done from this node.
The SbtMultiJvm Plugin has been updated to be able to run multi node tests, by automatically generating the
relevant multinode.* properties. This means that you can easily run multi node tests on a single machine
without any special configuration by just running them as normal multi-jvm tests. These tests can then be run
distributed over multiple machines without any changes simply by using the multi-node additions to the plugin.
The plugin also has a number of new multi-node-* sbt tasks and settings to support run-
ning tests on multiple machines. The necessary test classes and dependencies are packaged
for distribution to other machines with SbtAssembly into a jar file with a name on the format
<projectName>_<scalaVersion>-<projectVersion>-multi-jvm-assembly.jar
Note: To be able to distribute and kick off the tests on multiple machines, it is assumed that both host and target
systems are POSIX like systems with ssh and rsync available.
To run all the multi node test in multi-node mode (i.e. distributing the jar files and kicking off the tests remotely)
from inside sbt, use the multi-node-test task:
multi-node-test
To run all of them in multi-jvm mode (i.e. all JVMs on the local machine) do:
multi-jvm:test
More than one test name can be listed to run multiple specific tests. Tab completion in sbt makes it easy to
complete the test names.
The multi node testing kit is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
"com.typesafe.akka" %% "akka-multi-node-testkit" % "2.4.20"
If you are using the latest nightly build you should pick a timestamped Akka version from
http://repo.akka.io/snapshots/com/typesafe/akka/akka-multi-node-testkit_2.11/. We recommend against using
SNAPSHOT in order to obtain stable builds.
First we need some scaffolding to hook up the MultiNodeSpec with your favorite test framework. Lets define
a trait STMultiNodeSpec that uses ScalaTest to start and stop MultiNodeSpec.
package sample.multinode
/**
* Hooks up MultiNodeSpec with ScalaTest
*/
trait STMultiNodeSpec extends MultiNodeSpecCallbacks
with WordSpecLike with Matchers with BeforeAndAfterAll {
Then we need to define a configuration. Lets use two nodes "node1 and "node2" and call it
MultiNodeSampleConfig.
package sample.multinode
import akka.remote.testkit.MultiNodeConfig
And then finally to the node test code. That starts the two nodes, and demonstrates a barrier, and a remote actor
message send/receive.
package sample.multinode
import akka.remote.testkit.MultiNodeSpec
import akka.testkit.ImplicitSender
import akka.actor.{ Props, Actor }
object MultiNodeSample {
class Ponger extends Actor {
def receive = {
case "ping" => sender() ! "pong"
}
}
}
import MultiNodeSampleConfig._
import MultiNodeSample._
runOn(node2) {
system.actorOf(Props[Ponger], "ponger")
enterBarrier("deployed")
}
enterBarrier("finished")
}
}
}
The easiest way to run this example yourself is to download Lightbend Activator and open the tutorial named
Akka Multi-Node Testing Sample with Scala.
There are a couple of things to keep in mind when writing multi node tests or else your tests might behave in
surprising ways.
• Don’t issue a shutdown of the first node. The first node is the controller and if it shuts down your test will
break.
• To be able to use blackhole, passThrough, and throttle you must activate the failure injector and
throttler transport adapters by specifying testTransport(on = true) in your MultiNodeConfig.
• Throttling, shutdown and other failure injections can only be done from the first node, which again is the
controller.
• Don’t ask for the address of a node using node(address) after the node has been shut down. Grab the
address before shutting down the node.
• Don’t use MultiNodeSpec methods like address lookup, barrier entry et.c. from other threads than the main
test thread. This also means that you shouldn’t use them from inside an actor, a future, or a scheduled task.
12.1.8 Configuration
There are several configuration properties for the Multi-Node Testing module, please refer to the reference config-
uration.
The Actor Model provides a higher level of abstraction for writing concurrent and distributed systems. It alleviates
the developer from having to deal with explicit locking and thread management, making it easier to write correct
concurrent and parallel systems. Actors were defined in the 1973 paper by Carl Hewitt but have been popularized
by the Erlang language, and used for example at Ericsson with great success to build highly concurrent and reliable
telecom systems.
The API of Akka’s Actors is similar to Scala Actors which has borrowed some of its syntax from Erlang.
Warning: The Java with lambda support part of Akka is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction
in Akka 2.3.0. We will continue to improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while
we try to keep incompatible changes to a minimum, but the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance
releases does not apply to the akka.actor.AbstractActor, related classes and the akka.japi.pf
package.
Note: Since Akka enforces parental supervision every actor is supervised and (potentially) the supervisor of its
children, it is advisable that you familiarize yourself with Actor Systems and Supervision and Monitoring and it
may also help to read Actor References, Paths and Addresses.
Actor classes are implemented by extending the AbstractActor class and setting the “initial behavior” in the
constructor by calling the receive method in the AbstractActor.
The argument to the receive method is a PartialFunction<Object,BoxedUnit> that defines which
messages your Actor can handle, along with the implementation of how the messages should be processed.
Don’t let the type signature scare you. To allow you to easily build up a partial function there is a builder named
ReceiveBuilder that you can use.
Here is an example:
import akka.actor.AbstractActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
public MyActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, s -> {
log.info("Received String message: {}", s);
}).
matchAny(o -> log.info("received unknown message")).build()
);
}
}
In case you want to provide many match cases but want to avoid creating a long call trail, you can split the
creation of the builder into multiple statements as in the example:
import akka.actor.AbstractActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
import akka.japi.pf.UnitPFBuilder;
public GraduallyBuiltActor() {
UnitPFBuilder<Object> builder = ReceiveBuilder.create();
builder.match(String.class, s -> {
log.info("Received String message: {}", s);
});
// do some other stuff in between
builder.matchAny(o -> log.info("received unknown message"));
receive(builder.build());
}
}
Please note that the Akka Actor receive message loop is exhaustive, which is different compared to Erlang and
the late Scala Actors. This means that you need to provide a pattern match for all messages that it can accept
and if you want to be able to handle unknown messages then you need to have a default case as in the example
above. Otherwise an akka.actor.UnhandledMessage(message, sender, recipient) will be
published to the ActorSystem‘s EventStream.
Note further that the return type of the behavior defined above is Unit; if the actor shall reply to the received
message then this must be done explicitly as explained below.
The argument to the receive method is a partial function object, which is stored within the actor as its “initial
behavior”, see Become/Unbecome for further information on changing the behavior of an actor after its construc-
tion.
Props
Props is a configuration class to specify options for the creation of actors, think of it as an immutable and thus
freely shareable recipe for creating an actor including associated deployment information (e.g. which dispatcher
to use, see more below). Here are some examples of how to create a Props instance.
import akka.actor.Props;
The second variant shows how to pass constructor arguments to the Actor being created, but it should only be
used outside of actors as explained below.
The last line shows a possibility to pass constructor arguments regardless of the context it is being used in.
The presence of a matching constructor is verified during construction of the Props object, resulting in an
IllegalArgumentException if no or multiple matching constructors are found.
Dangerous Variants
This method is not recommended to be used within another actor because it encourages to close over the enclos-
ing scope, resulting in non-serializable Props and possibly race conditions (breaking the actor encapsulation).
On the other hand using this variant in a Props factory in the actor’s companion object as documented under
“Recommended Practices” below is completely fine.
There were two use-cases for these methods: passing constructor arguments to the actor—which is solved by the
newly introduced Props.create(clazz, args) method above or the recommended practice below—and
creating actors “on the spot” as anonymous classes. The latter should be solved by making these actors named
classes instead (if they are not declared within a top-level object then the enclosing instance’s this reference
needs to be passed as the first argument).
Warning: Declaring one actor within another is very dangerous and breaks actor encapsulation. Never pass
an actor’s this reference into Props!
Recommended Practices
It is a good idea to provide factory methods on the companion object of each Actor which help keeping the
creation of suitable Props as close to the actor definition as possible. This also avoids the pitfalls associated with
using the Props.create(...) method which takes a by-name argument, since within a companion object
the given code block will not retain a reference to its enclosing scope:
public class DemoActor extends AbstractActor {
/**
* Create Props for an actor of this type.
* @param magicNumber The magic number to be passed to this actor’s constructor.
* @return a Props for creating this actor, which can then be further configured
* (e.g. calling ‘.withDispatcher()‘ on it)
*/
static Props props(Integer magicNumber) {
// You need to specify the actual type of the returned actor
// since Java 8 lambdas have some runtime type information erased
return Props.create(DemoActor.class, () -> new DemoActor(magicNumber));
}
DemoActor(Integer magicNumber) {
this.magicNumber = magicNumber;
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Integer.class, i -> {
sender().tell(i + magicNumber, self());
}).build()
);
}
}
Another good practice is to declare what messages an Actor can receive as close to the actor definition as possible
(e.g. as static classes inside the Actor or using other suitable class), which makes it easier to know what it can
receive.
public class DemoMessagesActor extends AbstractLoggingActor {
DemoMessagesActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(Greeting.class, g -> {
log().info("I was greeted by {}", g.getGreeter());
}).build()
);
};
}
Actors are created by passing a Props instance into the actorOf factory method which is available on
ActorSystem and ActorContext.
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.actor.ActorSystem;
Using the ActorSystem will create top-level actors, supervised by the actor system’s provided guardian actor,
while using an actor’s context will create a child actor.
public class FirstActor extends AbstractActor {
final ActorRef child = context().actorOf(Props.create(MyActor.class), "myChild");
// plus some behavior ...
}
It is recommended to create a hierarchy of children, grand-children and so on such that it fits the logical failure-
handling structure of the application, see Actor Systems.
The call to actorOf returns an instance of ActorRef. This is a handle to the actor instance and the only way to
interact with it. The ActorRef is immutable and has a one to one relationship with the Actor it represents. The
ActorRef is also serializable and network-aware. This means that you can serialize it, send it over the wire and
use it on a remote host and it will still be representing the same Actor on the original node, across the network.
The name parameter is optional, but you should preferably name your actors, since that is used in log messages
and for identifying actors. The name must not be empty or start with $, but it may contain URL encoded char-
acters (eg. %20 for a blank space). If the given name is already in use by another child to the same parent an
InvalidActorNameException is thrown.
Actors are automatically started asynchronously when created.
Dependency Injection
If your UntypedActor has a constructor that takes parameters then those need to be part of the Props as well, as
described above. But there are cases when a factory method must be used, for example when the actual constructor
arguments are determined by a dependency injection framework.
import akka.actor.Actor;
import akka.actor.IndirectActorProducer;
@Override
public Class<? extends Actor> actorClass() {
return MyActor.class;
}
@Override
public MyActor produce() {
MyActor result;
// obtain fresh Actor instance from DI framework ...
return result;
}
}
Warning: You might be tempted at times to offer an IndirectActorProducer which always returns
the same instance, e.g. by using a static field. This is not supported, as it goes against the meaning of an actor
restart, which is described here: What Restarting Means.
When using a dependency injection framework, actor beans MUST NOT have singleton scope.
Techniques for dependency injection and integration with dependency injection frameworks are described in more
depth in the Using Akka with Dependency Injection guideline and the Akka Java Spring tutorial in Lightbend
Activator.
The Inbox
When writing code outside of actors which shall communicate with actors, the ask pattern can be a solution (see
below), but there are two things it cannot do: receiving multiple replies (e.g. by subscribing an ActorRef to a
notification service) and watching other actors’ lifecycle. For these purposes there is the Inbox class:
final Inbox inbox = Inbox.create(system);
inbox.send(target, "hello");
try {
assert inbox.receive(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)).equals("world");
} catch (java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException e) {
// timeout
}
The send method wraps a normal tell and supplies the internal actor’s reference as the sender. This allows the
reply to be received on the last line. Watching an actor is quite simple as well:
final Inbox inbox = Inbox.create(system);
inbox.watch(target);
target.tell(PoisonPill.getInstance(), ActorRef.noSender());
try {
assert inbox.receive(Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) instanceof Terminated;
} catch (java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException e) {
// timeout
}
The AbstractActor class defines a method called receive, that is used to set the “initial behavior” of the
actor.
If the current actor behavior does not match a received message, unhandled is called, which by default publishes
an akka.actor.UnhandledMessage(message, sender, recipient) on the actor system’s event
stream (set configuration item akka.actor.debug.unhandled to on to have them converted into actual
Debug messages).
In addition, it offers:
• self reference to the ActorRef of the actor
• sender reference sender Actor of the last received message, typically used as described in Reply to mes-
sages
• supervisorStrategy user overridable definition the strategy to use for supervising child actors
This strategy is typically declared inside the actor in order to have access to the actor’s internal state within
the decider function: since failure is communicated as a message sent to the supervisor and processed like
other messages (albeit outside of the normal behavior), all values and variables within the actor are available,
as is the sender reference (which will be the immediate child reporting the failure; if the original failure
occurred within a distant descendant it is still reported one level up at a time).
• context exposes contextual information for the actor and the current message, such as:
– factory methods to create child actors (actorOf)
– system that the actor belongs to
– parent supervisor
– supervised children
– lifecycle monitoring
– hotswap behavior stack as described in Become/Unbecome
The remaining visible methods are user-overridable life-cycle hooks which are described in the following:
public void preStart() {
}
The implementations shown above are the defaults provided by the AbstractActor class.
Actor Lifecycle
A path in an actor system represents a “place” which might be occupied by a living actor. Initially (apart from
system initialized actors) a path is empty. When actorOf() is called it assigns an incarnation of the actor
described by the passed Props to the given path. An actor incarnation is identified by the path and a UID. A
restart only swaps the Actor instance defined by the Props but the incarnation and hence the UID remains the
same.
The lifecycle of an incarnation ends when the actor is stopped. At that point the appropriate lifecycle events are
called and watching actors are notified of the termination. After the incarnation is stopped, the path can be reused
again by creating an actor with actorOf(). In this case the name of the new incarnation will be the same as the
previous one but the UIDs will differ.
Note: It is important to note that Actors do not stop automatically when no longer referenced, every Actor that
is created must also explicitly be destroyed. The only simplification is that stopping a parent Actor will also
recursively stop all the child Actors that this parent has created.
An ActorRef always represents an incarnation (path and UID) not just a given path. Therefore if an actor is
stopped and a new one with the same name is created an ActorRef of the old incarnation will not point to the
new one.
ActorSelection on the other hand points to the path (or multiple paths if wildcards are used) and is completely
oblivious to which incarnation is currently occupying it. ActorSelection cannot be watched for this reason.
It is possible to resolve the current incarnation’s ActorRef living under the path by sending an Identify
message to the ActorSelection which will be replied to with an ActorIdentity containing the correct
reference (see Identifying Actors via Actor Selection). This can also be done with the resolveOne method of
the ActorSelection, which returns a Future of the matching ActorRef.
In order to be notified when another actor terminates (i.e. stops permanently, not temporary failure and restart), an
actor may register itself for reception of the Terminated message dispatched by the other actor upon termination
(see Stopping Actors). This service is provided by the DeathWatch component of the actor system.
Registering a monitor is easy:
public class WatchActor extends AbstractActor {
private final ActorRef child = context().actorOf(Props.empty(), "target");
private ActorRef lastSender = system.deadLetters();
public WatchActor() {
context().watch(child); // <-- this is the only call needed for registration
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("kill", s -> {
context().stop(child);
lastSender = sender();
}).
match(Terminated.class, t -> t.actor().equals(child), t -> {
lastSender.tell("finished", self());
}).build()
);
}
}
It should be noted that the Terminated message is generated independent of the order in which registration and
termination occur. In particular, the watching actor will receive a Terminated message even if the watched
actor has already been terminated at the time of registration.
Registering multiple times does not necessarily lead to multiple messages being generated, but there is no guaran-
tee that only exactly one such message is received: if termination of the watched actor has generated and queued
the message, and another registration is done before this message has been processed, then a second message will
be queued, because registering for monitoring of an already terminated actor leads to the immediate generation of
the Terminated message.
It is also possible to deregister from watching another actor’s liveliness using context.unwatch(target).
This works even if the Terminated message has already been enqueued in the mailbox; after calling unwatch
no Terminated message for that actor will be processed anymore.
Start Hook
This method is called when the actor is first created. During restarts it is called by the default implementation of
postRestart, which means that by overriding that method you can choose whether the initialization code in
this method is called only exactly once for this actor or for every restart. Initialization code which is part of the
actor’s constructor will always be called when an instance of the actor class is created, which happens at every
restart.
Restart Hooks
All actors are supervised, i.e. linked to another actor with a fault handling strategy. Actors may be restarted in
case an exception is thrown while processing a message (see Supervision and Monitoring). This restart involves
the hooks mentioned above:
1. The old actor is informed by calling preRestart with the exception which caused the restart and the
message which triggered that exception; the latter may be None if the restart was not caused by processing
a message, e.g. when a supervisor does not trap the exception and is restarted in turn by its supervisor, or if
an actor is restarted due to a sibling’s failure. If the message is available, then that message’s sender is also
accessible in the usual way (i.e. by calling sender).
This method is the best place for cleaning up, preparing hand-over to the fresh actor instance, etc. By default
it stops all children and calls postStop.
2. The initial factory from the actorOf call is used to produce the fresh instance.
3. The new actor’s postRestart method is invoked with the exception which caused the restart. By default
the preStart is called, just as in the normal start-up case.
An actor restart replaces only the actual actor object; the contents of the mailbox is unaffected by the restart,
so processing of messages will resume after the postRestart hook returns. The message that triggered the
exception will not be received again. Any message sent to an actor while it is being restarted will be queued to its
mailbox as usual.
Warning: Be aware that the ordering of failure notifications relative to user messages is not deterministic. In
particular, a parent might restart its child before it has processed the last messages sent by the child before the
failure. See Discussion: Message Ordering for details.
Stop Hook
After stopping an actor, its postStop hook is called, which may be used e.g. for deregistering this actor from
other services. This hook is guaranteed to run after message queuing has been disabled for this actor, i.e. messages
sent to a stopped actor will be redirected to the deadLetters of the ActorSystem.
As described in Actor References, Paths and Addresses, each actor has a unique logical path, which is obtained
by following the chain of actors from child to parent until reaching the root of the actor system, and it has a
physical path, which may differ if the supervision chain includes any remote supervisors. These paths are used
by the system to look up actors, e.g. when a remote message is received and the recipient is searched, but they
are also useful more directly: actors may look up other actors by specifying absolute or relative paths—logical or
physical—and receive back an ActorSelection with the result:
// will look up this absolute path
context().actorSelection("/user/serviceA/actor");
// will look up sibling beneath same supervisor
context().actorSelection("../joe");
Note: It is always preferable to communicate with other Actors using their ActorRef instead of relying upon
ActorSelection. Exceptions are
• sending messages using the At-Least-Once Delivery facility
• initiating first contact with a remote system
In all other cases ActorRefs can be provided during Actor creation or initialization, passing them from parent to
child or introducing Actors by sending their ActorRefs to other Actors within messages.
The supplied path is parsed as a java.net.URI, which basically means that it is split on / into path elements.
If the path starts with /, it is absolute and the look-up starts at the root guardian (which is the parent of "/user");
otherwise it starts at the current actor. If a path element equals .., the look-up will take a step “up” towards the
supervisor of the currently traversed actor, otherwise it will step “down” to the named child. It should be noted
that the .. in actor paths here always means the logical structure, i.e. the supervisor.
The path elements of an actor selection may contain wildcard patterns allowing for broadcasting of messages to
that section:
// will look all children to serviceB with names starting with worker
context().actorSelection("/user/serviceB/worker*");
// will look up all siblings beneath same supervisor
context().actorSelection("../*");
Messages can be sent via the ActorSelection and the path of the ActorSelection is looked up when
delivering each message. If the selection does not match any actors the message will be dropped.
To acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection you need to send a message to the selection and use the
sender() reference of the reply from the actor. There is a built-in Identify message that all Actors will
understand and automatically reply to with a ActorIdentity message containing the ActorRef. This mes-
sage is handled specially by the actors which are traversed in the sense that if a concrete name lookup fails (i.e.
a non-wildcard path element does not correspond to a live actor) then a negative result is generated. Please note
that this does not mean that delivery of that reply is guaranteed, it still is a normal message.
import akka.actor.ActorIdentity;
import akka.actor.ActorSelection;
import akka.actor.Identify;
public Follower(){
ActorSelection selection = context().actorSelection("/user/another");
selection.tell(new Identify(identifyId), self());
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(ActorIdentity.class, id -> id.getRef() != null, id -> {
ActorRef ref = id.getRef();
context().watch(ref);
context().become(active(ref));
}).
match(ActorIdentity.class, id -> id.getRef() == null, id -> {
context().stop(self());
}).build()
);
}
You can also acquire an ActorRef for an ActorSelection with the resolveOne method of the
ActorSelection. It returns a Future of the matching ActorRef if such an actor exists (see also Actors
(Java with Lambda Support) for Java compatibility). It is completed with failure [[akka.actor.ActorNotFound]] if
no such actor exists or the identification didn’t complete within the supplied timeout.
IMPORTANT: Messages can be any kind of object but have to be immutable. Akka can’t enforce immutability
(yet) so this has to be by convention.
Here is an example of an immutable message:
public class ImmutableMessage {
private final int sequenceNumber;
private final List<String> values;
Note: There are performance implications of using ask since something needs to keep track of when it times
out, there needs to be something that bridges a Promise into an ActorRef and it also needs to be reachable
through remoting. So always prefer tell for performance, and only ask if you must.
In all these methods you have the option of passing along your own ActorRef. Make it a practice of doing so
because it will allow the receiver actors to be able to respond to your message, since the sender reference is sent
along with the message.
Tell: Fire-forget
This is the preferred way of sending messages. No blocking waiting for a message. This gives the best concurrency
and scalability characteristics.
// don’t forget to think about who is the sender (2nd argument)
target.tell(message, self());
The sender reference is passed along with the message and available within the receiving actor via its sender
method while processing this message. Inside of an actor it is usually self who shall be the sender, but there
can be cases where replies shall be routed to some other actor—e.g. the parent—in which the second argument to
tell would be a different one. Outside of an actor and if no reply is needed the second argument can be null;
if a reply is needed outside of an actor you can use the ask-pattern described next..
Ask: Send-And-Receive-Future
The ask pattern involves actors as well as futures, hence it is offered as a use pattern rather than a method on
ActorRef:
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.ask;
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.pipe;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.dispatch.Futures;
import akka.dispatch.Mapper;
import akka.util.Timeout;
pipe(transformed, system.dispatcher()).to(actorC);
This example demonstrates ask together with the pipe pattern on futures, because this is likely to be a common
combination. Please note that all of the above is completely non-blocking and asynchronous: ask produces a
Future, two of which are composed into a new future using the Futures.sequence and map methods and
then pipe installs an onComplete-handler on the future to effect the submission of the aggregated Result to
another actor.
Using ask will send a message to the receiving Actor as with tell, and the receiving actor must reply with
sender().tell(reply, self()) in order to complete the returned Future with a value. The ask
operation involves creating an internal actor for handling this reply, which needs to have a timeout after which it
is destroyed in order not to leak resources; see more below.
Warning: To complete the future with an exception you need send a Failure message to the sender. This is
not done automatically when an actor throws an exception while processing a message.
try {
String result = operation();
sender().tell(result, self());
} catch (Exception e) {
sender().tell(new akka.actor.Status.Failure(e), self());
throw e;
}
If the actor does not complete the future, it will expire after the timeout period, specified as parameter to the ask
method; this will complete the Future with an AskTimeoutException.
See Futures for more information on how to await or query a future.
The onComplete, onSuccess, or onFailure methods of the Future can be used to register a callback to
get a notification when the Future completes. Gives you a way to avoid blocking.
Warning: When using future callbacks, inside actors you need to carefully avoid closing over the containing
actor’s reference, i.e. do not call methods or access mutable state on the enclosing actor from within the call-
back. This would break the actor encapsulation and may introduce synchronization bugs and race conditions
because the callback will be scheduled concurrently to the enclosing actor. Unfortunately there is not yet a
way to detect these illegal accesses at compile time. See also: Actors and shared mutable state
Forward message
You can forward a message from one actor to another. This means that the original sender address/reference is
maintained even though the message is going through a ‘mediator’. This can be useful when writing actors that
work as routers, load-balancers, replicators etc.
target.forward(result, context());
An Actor either has to set its initial receive behavior in the constructor by calling the receive method in the
AbstractActor:
public SomeActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
// and some behavior ...
build());
}
Both the argument to the AbstractActor receive method and the return type of the Actor receive
method is a PartialFunction<Object, BoxedUnit> that defines which messages your Actor can han-
dle, along with the implementation of how the messages should be processed.
Don’t let the type signature scare you. To allow you to easily build up a partial function there is a builder named
ReceiveBuilder that you can use.
Here is an example:
import akka.actor.AbstractActor;
import akka.event.Logging;
import akka.event.LoggingAdapter;
import akka.japi.pf.ReceiveBuilder;
public MyActor() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
match(String.class, s -> {
log.info("Received String message: {}", s);
}).
matchAny(o -> log.info("received unknown message")).build()
);
}
}
If you want to have a handle for replying to a message, you can use sender(), which gives you an ActorRef.
You can reply by sending to that ActorRef with sender().tell(replyMsg, self()). You can also store
the ActorRef for replying later, or passing on to other actors. If there is no sender (a message was sent without an
actor or future context) then the sender defaults to a ‘dead-letter’ actor ref.
sender().tell(s, self());
The ActorContext setReceiveTimeout defines the inactivity timeout after which the sending of a Re-
ceiveTimeout message is triggered. When specified, the receive function should be able to handle an
akka.actor.ReceiveTimeout message. 1 millisecond is the minimum supported timeout.
Please note that the receive timeout might fire and enqueue the ReceiveTimeout message right after another mes-
sage was enqueued; hence it is not guaranteed that upon reception of the receive timeout there must have been
an idle period beforehand as configured via this method.
Once set, the receive timeout stays in effect (i.e. continues firing repeatedly after inactivity periods). Pass in
Duration.Undefined to switch off this feature.
public class ReceiveTimeoutActor extends AbstractActor {
public ReceiveTimeoutActor() {
// To set an initial delay
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create("10 seconds"));
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("Hello", s -> {
// To set in a response to a message
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.create("1 second"));
}).
match(ReceiveTimeout.class, r -> {
// To turn it off
context().setReceiveTimeout(Duration.Undefined());
}).build()
);
}
}
Messages marked with NotInfluenceReceiveTimeout will not reset the timer. This can be useful when
ReceiveTimeout should be fired by external inactivity but not influenced by internal activity, e.g. scheduled
tick messages.
Actors are stopped by invoking the stop method of a ActorRefFactory, i.e. ActorContext or
ActorSystem. Typically the context is used for stopping child actors and the system for stopping top level
actors. The actual termination of the actor is performed asynchronously, i.e. stop may return before the actor is
stopped.
Processing of the current message, if any, will continue before the actor is stopped, but additional messages in the
mailbox will not be processed. By default these messages are sent to the deadLetters of the ActorSystem,
but that depends on the mailbox implementation.
Termination of an actor proceeds in two steps: first the actor suspends its mailbox processing and sends a stop
command to all its children, then it keeps processing the internal termination notifications from its children until
the last one is gone, finally terminating itself (invoking postStop, dumping mailbox, publishing Terminated
on the DeathWatch, telling its supervisor). This procedure ensures that actor system sub-trees terminate in an
orderly fashion, propagating the stop command to the leaves and collecting their confirmation back to the stopped
supervisor. If one of the actors does not respond (i.e. processing a message for extended periods of time and
therefore not receiving the stop command), this whole process will be stuck.
Upon ActorSystem.terminate, the system guardian actors will be stopped, and the aforementioned process
will ensure proper termination of the whole system.
The postStop hook is invoked after an actor is fully stopped. This enables cleaning up of resources:
@Override
public void postStop() {
// clean up some resources ...
}
Note: Since stopping an actor is asynchronous, you cannot immediately reuse the name of the child you just
stopped; this will result in an InvalidActorNameException. Instead, watch the terminating actor and
create its replacement in response to the Terminated message which will eventually arrive.
PoisonPill
You can also send an actor the akka.actor.PoisonPill message, which will stop the actor when the mes-
sage is processed. PoisonPill is enqueued as ordinary messages and will be handled after messages that were
already queued in the mailbox.
Graceful Stop
gracefulStop is useful if you need to wait for termination or compose ordered termination of several actors:
import static akka.pattern.Patterns.gracefulStop;
import scala.concurrent.Await;
import scala.concurrent.Future;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
import akka.pattern.AskTimeoutException;
try {
Future<Boolean> stopped =
gracefulStop(actorRef, Duration.create(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS), Manager.SHUTDOWN);
Await.result(stopped, Duration.create(6, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
// the actor has been stopped
} catch (AskTimeoutException e) {
// the actor wasn’t stopped within 5 seconds
}
public Manager() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("job", s -> {
worker.tell("crunch", self());
}).
matchEquals(SHUTDOWN, x -> {
worker.tell(PoisonPill.getInstance(), self());
context().become(shuttingDown);
}).build()
);
}
When gracefulStop() returns successfully, the actor’s postStop() hook will have been executed: there
exists a happens-before edge between the end of postStop() and the return of gracefulStop().
In the above example a custom Manager.Shutdown message is sent to the target actor to initiate the process
of stopping the actor. You can use PoisonPill for this, but then you have limited possibilities to perform
interactions with other actors before stopping the target actor. Simple cleanup tasks can be handled in postStop.
Warning: Keep in mind that an actor stopping and its name being deregistered are separate events which
happen asynchronously from each other. Therefore it may be that you will find the name still in use after
gracefulStop() returned. In order to guarantee proper deregistration, only reuse names from within a
supervisor you control and only in response to a Terminated message, i.e. not for top-level actors.
12.2.10 Become/Unbecome
Upgrade
Akka supports hotswapping the Actor’s message loop (e.g. its implementation) at runtime: invoke the
context.become method from within the Actor. become takes a PartialFunction<Object,
BoxedUnit> that implements the new message handler. The hotswapped code is kept in a Stack which can
be pushed and popped.
Warning: Please note that the actor will revert to its original behavior when restarted by its Supervisor.
public HotSwapActor() {
angry =
ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("foo", s -> {
sender().tell("I am already angry?", self());
}).
matchEquals("bar", s -> {
context().become(happy);
}).build();
happy = ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("bar", s -> {
sender().tell("I am already happy :-)", self());
}).
matchEquals("foo", s -> {
context().become(angry);
}).build();
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("foo", s -> {
context().become(angry);
}).
matchEquals("bar", s -> {
context().become(happy);
}).build()
);
}
}
This variant of the become method is useful for many different things, such as to implement a Finite State
Machine (FSM, for an example see Dining Hakkers). It will replace the current behavior (i.e. the top of the
behavior stack), which means that you do not use unbecome, instead always the next behavior is explicitly
installed.
The other way of using become does not replace but add to the top of the behavior stack. In this case care must
be taken to ensure that the number of “pop” operations (i.e. unbecome) matches the number of “push” ones in
the long run, otherwise this amounts to a memory leak (which is why this behavior is not the default).
public class Swapper extends AbstractLoggingActor {
public Swapper() {
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals(Swap, s -> {
log().info("Hi");
context().become(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals(Swap, x -> {
log().info("Ho");
context().unbecome(); // resets the latest ’become’ (just for fun)
}).build(), false); // push on top instead of replace
}).build()
);
}
}
12.2.11 Stash
The AbstractActorWithStash class enables an actor to temporarily stash away messages that can not
or should not be handled using the actor’s current behavior. Upon changing the actor’s message handler, i.e.,
right before invoking context().become() or context().unbecome(), all stashed messages can be
“unstashed”, thereby prepending them to the actor’s mailbox. This way, the stashed messages can be processed in
the same order as they have been received originally. An actor that extends AbstractActorWithStash will
automatically get a deque-based mailbox.
Invoking stash() adds the current message (the message that the actor received last) to the actor’s stash.
It is typically invoked when handling the default case in the actor’s message handler to stash messages that
aren’t handled by the other cases. It is illegal to stash the same message twice; to do so results in an
IllegalStateException being thrown. The stash may also be bounded in which case invoking stash()
may lead to a capacity violation, which results in a StashOverflowException. The capacity of the stash
can be configured using the stash-capacity setting (an Int) of the mailbox’s configuration.
Invoking unstashAll() enqueues messages from the stash to the actor’s mailbox until the capacity of the mail-
box (if any) has been reached (note that messages from the stash are prepended to the mailbox). In case a bounded
mailbox overflows, a MessageQueueAppendFailedException is thrown. The stash is guaranteed to be
empty after calling unstashAll().
The stash is backed by a scala.collection.immutable.Vector. As a result, even a very large number
of messages may be stashed without a major impact on performance.
Note that the stash is part of the ephemeral actor state, unlike the mailbox. Therefore, it should be managed like
other parts of the actor’s state which have the same property. The AbstractActorWithStash implementa-
tion of preRestart will call unstashAll(), which is usually the desired behavior.
Note: If you want to enforce that your actor can only work with an unbounded stash, then you should use the
AbstractActorWithUnboundedStash class instead.
You can kill an actor by sending a Kill message. This will cause the actor to throw a
ActorKilledException, triggering a failure. The actor will suspend operation and its supervisor will be
asked how to handle the failure, which may mean resuming the actor, restarting it or terminating it completely.
See What Supervision Means for more information.
Use Kill like this:
victim.tell(akka.actor.Kill.getInstance(), ActorRef.noSender());
It can happen that while a message is being processed by an actor, that some kind of exception is thrown, e.g. a
database exception.
If an exception is thrown while a message is being processed (i.e. taken out of its mailbox and handed over to the
current behavior), then this message will be lost. It is important to understand that it is not put back on the mailbox.
So if you want to retry processing of a message, you need to deal with it yourself by catching the exception and
retry your flow. Make sure that you put a bound on the number of retries since you don’t want a system to livelock
(so consuming a lot of cpu cycles without making progress). Another possibility would be to have a look at the
PeekMailbox pattern.
If an exception is thrown while a message is being processed, nothing happens to the mailbox. If the actor is
restarted, the same mailbox will be there. So all messages on that mailbox will be there as well.
If code within an actor throws an exception, that actor is suspended and the supervision process is started (see Su-
pervision and Monitoring). Depending on the supervisor’s decision the actor is resumed (as if nothing happened),
restarted (wiping out its internal state and starting from scratch) or terminated.
The rich lifecycle hooks of Actors provide a useful toolkit to implement various initialization patterns. During the
lifetime of an ActorRef, an actor can potentially go through several restarts, where the old instance is replaced
by a fresh one, invisibly to the outside observer who only sees the ActorRef.
One may think about the new instances as “incarnations”. Initialization might be necessary for every incarnation
of an actor, but sometimes one needs initialization to happen only at the birth of the first instance when the
ActorRef is created. The following sections provide patterns for different initialization needs.
Using the constructor for initialization has various benefits. First of all, it makes it possible to use val fields to
store any state that does not change during the life of the actor instance, making the implementation of the actor
more robust. The constructor is invoked for every incarnation of the actor, therefore the internals of the actor can
always assume that proper initialization happened. This is also the drawback of this approach, as there are cases
when one would like to avoid reinitializing internals on restart. For example, it is often useful to preserve child
actors across restarts. The following section provides a pattern for this case.
The method preStart() of an actor is only called once directly during the initialization of the first instance,
that is, at creation of its ActorRef. In the case of restarts, preStart() is called from postRestart(),
therefore if not overridden, preStart() is called on every incarnation. However, overriding postRestart()
one can disable this behavior, and ensure that there is only one call to preStart().
One useful usage of this pattern is to disable creation of new ActorRefs for children during restarts. This can
be achieved by overriding preRestart():
@Override
public void preStart() {
// Initialize children here
}
Please note, that the child actors are still restarted, but no new ActorRef is created. One can recursively apply
the same principles for the children, ensuring that their preStart() method is called only at the creation of
their refs.
For more information see What Restarting Means.
There are cases when it is impossible to pass all the information needed for actor initialization in the constructor,
for example in the presence of circular dependencies. In this case the actor should listen for an initialization
message, and use become() or a finite state-machine state transition to encode the initialized and uninitialized
states of the actor.
receive(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("init", m1 -> {
initializeMe = "Up and running";
context().become(ReceiveBuilder.
matchEquals("U OK?", m2 -> {
sender().tell(initializeMe, self());
}).build());
}).build()
If the actor may receive messages before it has been initialized, a useful tool can be the Stash to save messages
until the initialization finishes, and replaying them after the actor became initialized.
Warning: This pattern should be used with care, and applied only when none of the patterns above are
applicable. One of the potential issues is that messages might be lost when sent to remote actors. Also,
publishing an ActorRef in an uninitialized state might lead to the condition that it receives a user message
before the initialization has been done.
There is one big difference between the optimized partial functions created by the Scala compiler and the ones
created by the ReceiveBuilder. The partial functions created by the ReceiveBuilder consist of multiple
lambda expressions for every match statement, where each lambda is an object referencing the code to be run.
This is something that the JVM can have problems optimizing and the resulting code might not be as performant
as the Scala equivalent or the corresponding untyped actor version.
12.3.1 Overview
The FSM (Finite State Machine) is available as an abstract base class that implements an Akka Actor and is best
described in the Erlang design principles
A FSM can be described as a set of relations of the form:
State(S) x Event(E) -> Actions (A), State(S’)
These relations are interpreted as meaning:
If we are in state S and the event E occurs, we should perform the actions A and make a transition to
the state S’.
Warning: The Java with lambda support part of Akka is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction in
Akka 2.3.0. We will continue to improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while we try
to keep incompatible changes to a minimum, but the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance releases
does not apply to the akka.actor.AbstractFSM, related classes and the akka.japi.pf package.
To demonstrate most of the features of the AbstractFSM class, consider an actor which shall receive and queue
messages while they arrive in a burst and send them on after the burst ended or a flush request is received.
First, consider all of the below to use these import statements:
import akka.actor.AbstractFSM;
import akka.actor.ActorRef;
import akka.japi.pf.UnitMatch;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import scala.concurrent.duration.Duration;
The contract of our “Buncher” actor is that it accepts or produces the following messages:
public final class SetTarget {
private final ActorRef ref;
SetTarget is needed for starting it up, setting the destination for the Batches to be passed on; Queue will
add to the internal queue while Flush will mark the end of a burst.
The actor can be in two states: no message queued (aka Idle) or some message queued (aka Active). The
states and the state data is defined like this:
// states
enum State {
Idle, Active
}
// state data
interface Data {
}
The actor starts out in the idle state. Once a message arrives it will go to the active state and stay there as long as
messages keep arriving and no flush is requested. The internal state data of the actor is made up of the target actor
when(Idle,
matchEvent(SetTarget.class, Uninitialized.class,
(setTarget, uninitialized) ->
stay().using(new Todo(setTarget.getRef(), new LinkedList<>()))));
initialize();
}
}
The basic strategy is to declare the actor, by inheriting the AbstractFSM class and specifying the possible states
and data values as type parameters. Within the body of the actor a DSL is used for declaring the state machine:
• startWith defines the initial state and initial data
• then there is one when(<state>) { ... } declaration per state to be handled (could potentially be
multiple ones, the passed PartialFunction will be concatenated using orElse)
• finally starting it up using initialize, which performs the transition into the initial state and sets up
timers (if required).
In this case, we start out in the Idle and Uninitialized state, where only the SetTarget() message
is handled; stay prepares to end this event’s processing for not leaving the current state, while the using
modifier makes the FSM replace the internal state (which is Uninitialized at this point) with a fresh Todo()
object containing the target actor reference. The Active state has a state timeout declared, which means that
if no message is received for 1 second, a FSM.StateTimeout message will be generated. This has the same
effect as receiving the Flush command in this case, namely to transition back into the Idle state and resetting
the internal queue to the empty vector. But how do messages get queued? Since this shall work identically in
both states, we make use of the fact that any event which is not handled by the when() block is passed to the
whenUnhandled() block:
whenUnhandled(
matchEvent(Queue.class, Todo.class,
(queue, todo) -> goTo(Active).using(todo.addElement(queue.getObj()))).
anyEvent((event, state) -> {
log().warning("received unhandled request {} in state {}/{}",
event, stateName(), state);
return stay();
}));
The first case handled here is adding Queue() requests to the internal queue and going to the Active state
(this does the obvious thing of staying in the Active state if already there), but only if the FSM data are not
Uninitialized when the Queue() event is received. Otherwise—and in all other non-handled cases—the
second case just logs a warning and does not change the internal state.
The only missing piece is where the Batches are actually sent to the target, for which we use the
onTransition mechanism: you can declare multiple such blocks and all of them will be tried for matching
behavior in case a state transition occurs (i.e. only when the state actually changes).
onTransition(
matchState(Active, Idle, () -> {
// reuse this matcher
final UnitMatch<Data> m = UnitMatch.create(
matchData(Todo.class,
todo -> todo.getTarget().tell(new Batch(todo.getQueue()), self())));
m.match(stateData());
}).
state(Idle, Active, () -> {/* Do something here */}));
The transition callback is a partial function which takes as input a pair of states—the current and the next state.
During the state change, the old state data is available via stateData as shown, and the new state data would
be available as nextStateData.
To verify that this buncher actually works, it is quite easy to write a test using the akka-testkit, here using JUnit as
an example:
public class BuncherTest extends AbstractJavaTest {
@BeforeClass
public static void setup() {
system = ActorSystem.create("BuncherTest");
}
@AfterClass
public static void tearDown() {
JavaTestKit.shutdownActorSystem(system);
system = null;
}
@Test
public void testBuncherActorBatchesCorrectly() {
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final ActorRef buncher =
system.actorOf(Props.create(Buncher.class));
final ActorRef probe = getRef();
@Test
public void testBuncherActorDoesntBatchUninitialized() {
new JavaTestKit(system) {{
final ActorRef buncher =
system.actorOf(Props.create(Buncher.class));
final ActorRef probe = getRef();
12.3.3 Reference
The AbstractFSM abstract class is the base class used to implement an FSM. It implements Actor since an
Actor is created to drive the FSM.
public class Buncher extends AbstractFSM<State, Data> {
{
// fsm body ...
}
}
Note: The AbstractFSM class defines a receive method which handles internal messages and passes everything
else through to the FSM logic (according to the current state). When overriding the receive method, keep in
mind that e.g. state timeout handling depends on actually passing the messages through the FSM logic.
Note: The state data together with the state name describe the internal state of the state machine; if you stick to
this scheme and do not add mutable fields to the FSM class you have the advantage of making all changes of the
internal state explicit in a few well-known places.
Defining States
Warning: It is required that you define handlers for each of the possible FSM states, otherwise there will be
failures when trying to switch to undeclared states.
It is recommended practice to declare the states as an enum and then verify that there is a when clause for each of
the states. If you want to leave the handling of a state “unhandled” (more below), it still needs to be declared like
this:
when(SomeState, AbstractFSM.NullFunction());
Unhandled Events
If a state doesn’t handle a received event a warning is logged. If you want to do something else in this case you
can specify that with whenUnhandled(stateFunction):
whenUnhandled(
matchEvent(X.class, (x, data) -> {
log().info("Received unhandled event: " + x);
return stay();
}).
anyEvent((event, data) -> {
log().warning("Received unknown event: " + event);
return goTo(Error);
}));
}
Within this handler the state of the FSM may be queried using the stateName method.
IMPORTANT: This handler is not stacked, meaning that each invocation of whenUnhandled replaces the
previously installed handler.
Initiating Transitions
The result of any stateFunction must be a definition of the next state unless terminating the FSM, which is
described in Termination from Inside. The state definition can either be the current state, as described by the stay
directive, or it is a different state as given by goto(state). The resulting object allows further qualification by
way of the modifiers described in the following:
• forMax(duration)
This modifier sets a state timeout on the next state. This means that a timer is started which upon expiry
sends a StateTimeout message to the FSM. This timer is canceled upon reception of any other message
in the meantime; you can rely on the fact that the StateTimeout message will not be processed after an
intervening message.
This modifier can also be used to override any default timeout which is specified for the target state. If you
want to cancel the default timeout, use Duration.Inf.
• using(data)
This modifier replaces the old state data with the new data given. If you follow the advice above, this is the
only place where internal state data are ever modified.
• replying(msg)
This modifier sends a reply to the currently processed message and otherwise does not modify the state
transition.
All modifiers can be chained to achieve a nice and concise description:
when(SomeState, matchAnyEvent((msg, data) -> {
return goTo(Processing).using(newData).
forMax(Duration.create(5, SECONDS)).replying(WillDo);
}));
The parentheses are not actually needed in all cases, but they visually distinguish between modifiers and their
arguments and therefore make the code even more pleasant to read for foreigners.
Note: Please note that the return statement may not be used in when blocks or similar; this is a Scala
restriction. Either refactor your code using if () ... else ... or move it into a method definition.
Monitoring Transitions
Transitions occur “between states” conceptually, which means after any actions you have put into the event han-
dling block; this is obvious since the next state is only defined by the value returned by the event handling logic.
You do not need to worry about the exact order with respect to setting the internal state variable, as everything
within the FSM actor is running single-threaded anyway.
Internal Monitoring
Up to this point, the FSM DSL has been centered on states and events. The dual view is to describe it as a series
of transitions. This is enabled by the method
onTransition(handler)
which associates actions with a transition instead of with a state and event. The handler is a partial function which
takes a pair of states as input; no resulting state is needed as it is not possible to modify the transition in progress.
onTransition(
matchState(Active, Idle, () -> setTimer("timeout",
Tick, Duration.create(1, SECONDS), true)).
state(Active, null, () -> cancelTimer("timeout")).
state(null, Idle, (f, t) -> log().info("entering Idle from " + f)));
It is also possible to pass a function object accepting two states to onTransition, in case your transition
handling logic is implemented as a method:
public void handler(StateType from, StateType to) {
// handle transition here
}
onTransition(this::handler);
The handlers registered with this method are stacked, so you can intersperse onTransition blocks with when
blocks as suits your design. It should be noted, however, that all handlers will be invoked for each transition,
not only the first matching one. This is designed specifically so you can put all transition handling for a certain
aspect into one place without having to worry about earlier declarations shadowing later ones; the actions are still
executed in declaration order, though.
Note: This kind of internal monitoring may be used to structure your FSM according to transitions, so that for
example the cancellation of a timer upon leaving a certain state cannot be forgot when adding new target states.
External Monitoring
Timers
Besides state timeouts, FSM manages timers identified by String names. You may set a timer using
setTimer(name, msg, interval, repeat)
where msg is the message object which will be sent after the duration interval has elapsed. If repeat is
true, then the timer is scheduled at fixed rate given by the interval parameter. Any existing timer with the
same name will automatically be canceled before adding the new timer.
Timers may be canceled using
cancelTimer(name)
which is guaranteed to work immediately, meaning that the scheduled message will not be processed after this call
even if the timer already fired and queued it. The status of any timer may be inquired with
isTimerActive(name)
These named timers complement state timeouts because they are not affected by intervening reception of other
messages.
Note: It should be noted that stop does not abort the actions and stop the FSM immediately. The stop action
must be returned from the event handler in the same way as a state transition (but note that the return statement
may not be used within a when block).
You can use onTermination(handler) to specify custom code that is executed when the FSM is stopped.
The handler is a partial function which takes a StopEvent(reason, stateName, stateData) as argu-
ment:
onTermination(
matchStop(Normal(),
(state, data) -> {/* Do something here */}).
stop(Shutdown(),
(state, data) -> {/* Do something here */}).
stop(Failure.class,
(reason, state, data) -> {/* Do something here */}));
As for the whenUnhandled case, this handler is not stacked, so each invocation of onTermination replaces
the previously installed handler.
When an ActorRef associated to a FSM is stopped using the stop method, its postStop hook will be
executed. The default implementation by the AbstractFSM class is to execute the onTermination handler
if that is prepared to handle a StopEvent(Shutdown, ...).
Warning: In case you override postStop and want to have your onTermination handler called, do not
forget to call super.postStop.
During development and for trouble shooting FSMs need care just as any other actor. There are specialized tools
available as described in TestFSMRef and in the following.
Event Tracing
The AbstractLoggingFSM class adds one more feature to the FSM: a rolling event log which may be used
during debugging (for tracing how the FSM entered a certain failure state) or for other creative uses:
public class MyFSM extends AbstractLoggingFSM<StateType, Data> {
@Override
public int logDepth() { return 12; }
{
onTermination(
matchStop(Failure.class, (reason, state, data) -> {
String lastEvents = getLog().mkString("\n\t");
log().warning("Failure in state " + state + " with data " + data + "\n" +
"Events leading up to this point:\n\t" + lastEvents);
})
);
//...
}
}
The logDepth defaults to zero, which turns off the event log.
Warning: The log buffer is allocated during actor creation, which is why the configuration is done using a
virtual method call. If you want to override with a val, make sure that its initialization happens before the
initializer of LoggingFSM runs, and do not change the value returned by logDepth after the buffer has
been allocated.
The contents of the event log are available using method getLog, which returns an IndexedSeq[LogEntry]
where the oldest entry is at index zero.
12.3.5 Examples
A bigger FSM example contrasted with Actor’s become/unbecome can be found in the Lightbend Activator
template named Akka FSM in Scala
Akka persistence query complements Persistence by providing a universal asynchronous stream based query in-
terface that various journal plugins can implement in order to expose their query capabilities.
The most typical use case of persistence query is implementing the so-called query side (also known as “read side”)
in the popular CQRS architecture pattern - in which the writing side of the application (e.g. implemented using
akka persistence) is completely separated from the “query side”. Akka Persistence Query itself is not directly the
query side of an application, however it can help to migrate data from the write side to the query side database. In
very simple scenarios Persistence Query may be powerful enough to fulfill the query needs of your app, however
we highly recommend (in the spirit of CQRS) of splitting up the write/read sides into separate datastores as the
need arises.
Warning: This module is marked as “experimental” as of its introduction in Akka 2.4.0. We will continue to
improve this API based on our users’ feedback, which implies that while we try to keep incompatible changes
to a minimum the binary compatibility guarantee for maintenance releases does not apply to the contents of
the akka.persistence.query package.
12.4.1 Dependencies
Akka persistence query is a separate jar file. Make sure that you have the following dependency in your project:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-persistence-query-experimental_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
Akka persistence query is purposely designed to be a very loosely specified API. This is in order to keep the
provided APIs general enough for each journal implementation to be able to expose its best features, e.g. a SQL
journal can use complex SQL queries or if a journal is able to subscribe to a live event stream this should also be
possible to expose the same API - a typed stream of events.
Each read journal must explicitly document which types of queries it supports. Refer to your journal’s plugins
documentation for details on which queries and semantics it supports.
While Akka Persistence Query does not provide actual implementations of ReadJournals, it defines a number of
pre-defined query types for the most common query scenarios, that most journals are likely to implement (however
they are not required to).
In order to issue queries one has to first obtain an instance of a ReadJournal. Read journals are implemented
as Community plugins, each targeting a specific datastore (for example Cassandra or JDBC databases). For
example, given a library that provides a akka.persistence.query.my-read-journal obtaining the
related journal is as simple as:
// obtain read journal by plugin id
final MyJavadslReadJournal readJournal =
PersistenceQuery.get(system).getReadJournalFor(MyJavadslReadJournal.class,
"akka.persistence.query.my-read-journal");
Journal implementers are encouraged to put this identifier in a variable known to the user, such that one can
access it via getJournalFor(NoopJournal.class, NoopJournal.identifier), however this is
not enforced.
Read journal implementations are available as Community plugins.
Predefined queries
Akka persistence query comes with a number of query interfaces built in and suggests Journal implementors to
implement them according to the semantics described below. It is important to notice that while these query types
are very common a journal is not obliged to implement all of them - for example because in a given journal such
query would be significantly inefficient.
Note: Refer to the documentation of the ReadJournal plugin you are using for a specific list of supported
query types. For example, Journal plugins should document their stream completion strategies.
allPersistenceIds which is designed to allow users to subscribe to a stream of all persistent ids in the
system. By default this stream should be assumed to be a “live” stream, which means that the journal should keep
emitting new persistence ids as they come into the system:
readJournal.allPersistenceIds();
If your usage does not require a live stream, you can use the currentPersistenceIds query:
readJournal.currentPersistenceIds();
Most journals will have to revert to polling in order to achieve this, which can typically be configured with a
refresh-interval configuration property.
If your usage does not require a live stream, you can use the currentEventsByPersistenceId query.
eventsByTag allows querying events regardless of which persistenceId they are associated with. This
query is hard to implement in some journals or may need some additional preparation of the used data store to be
executed efficiently. The goal of this query is to allow querying for all events which are “tagged” with a specific
tag. That includes the use case to query all domain events of an Aggregate Root type. Please refer to your read
journal plugin’s documentation to find out if and how it is supported.
Some journals may support tagging of events via an Event Adapters that wraps the events in a
akka.persistence.journal.Tagged with the given tags. The journal may support other ways of do-
ing tagging - again, how exactly this is implemented depends on the used journal. Here is an example of such a
tagging event adapter:
public class MyTaggingEventAdapter implements WriteEventAdapter {
@Override
public Object toJournal(Object event) {
if (event instanceof String) {
String s = (String) event;
Set<String> tags = new HashSet<String>();
if (s.contains("green")) tags.add("green");
if (s.contains("black")) tags.add("black");
if (s.contains("blue")) tags.add("blue");
if (tags.isEmpty())
return event;
else
return new Tagged(event, tags);
} else {
return event;
}
}
@Override
public String manifest(Object event) {
return "";
}
}
Note: A very important thing to keep in mind when using queries spanning multiple persistenceIds, such as
EventsByTag is that the order of events at which the events appear in the stream rarely is guaranteed (or stable
between materializations).
Journals may choose to opt for strict ordering of the events, and should then document explicitly what kind of
ordering guarantee they provide - for example “ordered by timestamp ascending, independently of persistenceId”
is easy to achieve on relational databases, yet may be hard to implement efficiently on plain key-value datastores.
In the example below we query all events which have been tagged (we assume this was performed by the write-
side using an EventAdapter, or that the journal is smart enough that it can figure out what we mean by this tag -
for example if the journal stored the events as json it may try to find those with the field tag set to this value etc.).
// assuming journal is able to work with numeric offsets we can:
final Source<EventEnvelope2, NotUsed> blueThings =
readJournal.eventsByTag("blue", new Sequence(0L));
As you can see, we can use all the usual stream combinators available from Akka Streams on the resulting query
stream, including for example taking the first 10 and cancelling the stream. It is worth pointing out that the built-in
EventsByTag query has an optionally supported offset parameter (of type Long) which the journals can use
to implement resumable-streams. For example a journal may be able to use a WHERE clause to begin the read
starting from a specific row, or in a datastore that is able to order events by insertion time it could treat the Long
as a timestamp and select only older events.
If your usage does not require a live stream, you can use the currentEventsByTag query.
Journals are able to provide additional information related to a query by exposing materialized values, which are
a feature of Akka Streams that allows to expose additional values at stream materialization time.
More advanced query journals may use this technique to expose information about the character of the materialized
stream, for example if it’s finite or infinite, strictly ordered or not ordered at all. The materialized value type is
defined as the second type parameter of the returned Source, which allows journals to provide users with their
specialised query object, as demonstrated in the sample below:
public class RichEvent {
public final Set<String >tags;
public final Object payload;
events.map(event -> {
System.out.println("Event payload: " + event.payload);
return event.payload;
}).runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
When building systems using Event sourcing and CQRS (Command & Query Responsibility Segregation) tech-
niques it is tremendously important to realise that the write-side has completely different needs from the read-side,
and separating those concerns into datastores that are optimised for either side makes it possible to offer the best
experience for the write and read sides independently.
For example, in a bidding system it is important to “take the write” and respond to the bidder that we have accepted
the bid as soon as possible, which means that write-throughput is of highest importance for the write-side – often
this means that data stores which are able to scale to accommodate these requirements have a less expressive query
side.
On the other hand the same application may have some complex statistics view or we may have analysts working
with the data to figure out best bidding strategies and trends – this often requires some kind of expressive query
capabilities like for example SQL or writing Spark jobs to analyse the data. Therefore the data stored in the
write-side needs to be projected into the other read-optimised datastore.
Note: When referring to Materialized Views in Akka Persistence think of it as “some persistent storage of the
result of a Query”. In other words, it means that the view is created once, in order to be afterwards queried multiple
times, as in this format it may be more efficient or interesting to query it (instead of the source events directly).
If the read datastore exposes a Reactive Streams interface then implementing a simple projection is as simple as,
using the read-journal and feeding it into the databases driver interface, for example like so:
final ReactiveStreamsCompatibleDBDriver driver = new ReactiveStreamsCompatibleDBDriver();
final Subscriber<List<Object>> dbBatchWriter = driver.batchWriter();
If the target database does not provide a reactive streams Subscriber that can perform writes, you may have to
implement the write logic using plain functions or Actors instead.
In case your write logic is state-less and you just need to convert the events from one data type to another before
writing into the alternative datastore, then the projection is as simple as:
class ExampleStore {
CompletionStage<Void> save(Object any) {
// ...
}
}
readJournal
.eventsByTag("bid", new Sequence(0L))
.mapAsync(1, store::save)
.runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
Resumable projections
Sometimes you may need to implement “resumable” projections, that will not start from the beginning of time
each time when run. In this case you will need to store the sequence number (or offset) of the processed event
and use it the next time this projection is started. This pattern is not built-in, however is rather simple to implement
yourself.
The example below additionally highlights how you would use Actors to implement the write side, in case you
need to do some complex logic that would be best handled inside an Actor before persisting the event into the
other datastore:
final Timeout timeout = Timeout.apply(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
readJournal
.eventsByTag("bid", new Sequence(startFromOffset))
.mapAsync(8, envelope -> {
final CompletionStage<Object> f = ask(writer, envelope.event(), timeout);
return f.thenApplyAsync(in -> envelope.offset(), system.dispatcher());
})
.mapAsync(1, offset -> bidProjection.saveProgress(offset))
.runWith(Sink.ignore(), mat);
}
public TheOneWhoWritesToQueryJournal() {
store = new ExampleStore();
receive(ReceiveBuilder.matchAny(message -> {
state = updateState(state, message);
}).build());
Query plugins are various (mostly community driven) ReadJournal implementations for all kinds of available
datastores. The complete list of available plugins is maintained on the Akka Persistence Query Community Plugins
page.
The plugin for LevelDB is described in Persistence Query for LevelDB.
This section aims to provide tips and guide plugin developers through implementing a custom query plugin. Most
users will not need to implement journals themselves, except if targeting a not yet supported datastore.
Note: Since different data stores provide different query capabilities journal plugins must extensively document
their exposed semantics as well as handled query scenarios.
@Override
public MyScaladslReadJournal scaladslReadJournal() {
return new MyScaladslReadJournal(javadslReadJournal);
}
@Override
public MyJavadslReadJournal javadslReadJournal() {
return this.javadslReadJournal;
}
}
public class MyJavadslReadJournal implements
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.ReadJournal,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.EventsByTagQuery2,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.EventsByPersistenceIdQuery,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.AllPersistenceIdsQuery,
akka.persistence.query.javadsl.CurrentPersistenceIdsQuery {
@Override
public Source<EventEnvelope2, NotUsed> eventsByTag(String tag, Offset offset) {
if(offset instanceof Sequence){
Sequence sequenceOffset = (Sequence) offset;
final Props props = MyEventsByTagPublisher.props(tag, sequenceOffset.value(), refreshInterva
return Source.<EventEnvelope2>actorPublisher(props).
mapMaterializedValue(m -> NotUsed.getInstance());
}
else
throw new IllegalArgumentException("MyJavadslReadJournal does not support " + offset.getClas
}
@Override
public Source<EventEnvelope, NotUsed> eventsByPersistenceId(String persistenceId,
long fromSequenceNr, long toSequenceNr) {
// implement in a similar way as eventsByTag
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not implemented yet");
}
@Override
public Source<String, NotUsed> allPersistenceIds() {
// implement in a similar way as eventsByTag
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not implemented yet");
}
@Override
public Source<String, NotUsed> currentPersistenceIds() {
// implement in a similar way as eventsByTag
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not implemented yet");
}
}
public class MyScaladslReadJournal implements
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.ReadJournal,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.EventsByTagQuery2,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.EventsByPersistenceIdQuery,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.AllPersistenceIdsQuery,
akka.persistence.query.scaladsl.CurrentPersistenceIdsQuery {
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<EventEnvelope2, NotUsed> eventsByTag(
String tag, akka.persistence.query.Offset offset) {
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<EventEnvelope, NotUsed> eventsByPersistenceId(
String persistenceId, long fromSequenceNr, long toSequenceNr) {
return javadslReadJournal.eventsByPersistenceId(persistenceId, fromSequenceNr,
toSequenceNr).asScala();
}
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<String, NotUsed> allPersistenceIds() {
return javadslReadJournal.allPersistenceIds().asScala();
}
@Override
public akka.stream.scaladsl.Source<String, NotUsed> currentPersistenceIds() {
return javadslReadJournal.currentPersistenceIds().asScala();
}
receive(ReceiveBuilder
.matchEquals(CONTINUE, (in) -> {
query();
deliverBuf();
})
.match(Cancel.class, (in) -> {
context().stop(self());
})
.build());
}
@Override
public void postStop() {
continueTask.cancel();
}
if (!res.isEmpty()) {
currentOffset = res.get(res.size() - 1).first();
}
final PersistentRepr p =
serialization.deserialize(bytes, PersistentRepr.class).get();
The ReadJournalProvider class must have a constructor with one of these signatures:
Plugin TCK
This subproject provides a home to modules contributed by external developers which may or may not move into
the officially supported code base over time. The conditions under which this transition can occur include:
• there must be enough interest in the module to warrant inclusion in the standard distribution,
• the module must be actively maintained and
• code quality must be good enough to allow efficient maintenance by the Akka core development team
If a contributions turns out to not “take off” it may be removed again at a later time.
A module in this subproject doesn’t have to obey the rule of staying binary compatible between minor releases.
Breaking API changes may be introduced in minor releases without notice as we refine and simplify based on
your feedback. A module may be dropped in any release without prior deprecation. The Lightbend subscription
does not cover support for these modules.
Looking at Message Delivery Reliability one might come to the conclusion that Akka actors are made for blue-sky
scenarios: sending messages is the only way for actors to communicate, and then that is not even guaranteed to
work. Is the whole paradigm built on sand? Of course the answer is an emphatic “No!”.
A local message send—within the same JVM instance—is not likely to fail, and if it does the reason was one of
• it was meant to fail (due to consciously choosing a bounded mailbox, which upon overflow will have to
drop messages)
• or it failed due to a catastrophic VM error, e.g. an OutOfMemoryError, a memory access violation
(“segmentation fault”, GPF, etc.), JVM bug—or someone calling System.exit().
In all of these cases, the actor was very likely not in a position to process the message anyway, so this part of the
non-guarantee is not problematic.
It is a lot more likely for an unintended message delivery failure to occur when a message send crosses JVM
boundaries, i.e. an intermediate unreliable network is involved. If someone unplugs an ethernet cable, or a power
failure shuts down a router, messages will be lost while the actors would be able to process them just fine.
Note: This does not mean that message send semantics are different between local and remote operations, it just
means that in practice there is a difference between how good the “best effort” is.
To bridge the disparity between “local” and “remote” sends is the goal of this pattern. When sending from A to
B must be as reliable as in-JVM, regardless of the deployment, then you can interject a reliable tunnel and send
through that instead. The tunnel consists of two end-points, where the ingress point P (the “proxy”) is a child of A
and the egress point E is a child of P, deployed onto the same network node where B lives. Messages sent to P will
be wrapped in an envelope, tagged with a sequence number and sent to E, who verifies that the received envelope
has the right sequence number (the next expected one) and forwards the contained message to B. When B receives
this message, the sender() will be a reference to the sender() of the original message to P. Reliability is added
by E replying to orderly received messages with an ACK, so that P can tick those messages off its resend list. If
ACKs do not come in a timely fashion, P will try to resend until successful.
Sending via a ReliableProxy makes the message send exactly as reliable as if the represented target were to
live within the same JVM, provided that the remote actor system does not terminate. In effect, both ends (i.e. JVM
and actor system) must be considered as one when evaluating the reliability of this communication channel. The
benefit is that the network in-between is taken out of that equation.
Connecting to the target The proxy tries to connect to the target using the mechanism outlined in
actorSelection-scala. Once connected, if the tunnel terminates the proxy will optionally try to reconnect
to the target using using the same process.
Note that during the reconnection process there is a possibility that a message could be delivered to the target
more than once. Consider the case where a message is delivered to the target and the target system crashes
before the ACK is sent to the sender. After the proxy reconnects to the target it will start resending all of
the messages that it has not received an ACK for, and the message that it never got an ACK for will be redelivered.
Either this possibility should be considered in the design of the target or reconnection should be disabled.
How to use it
Since this implementation does not offer much in the way of configuration, simply instantiate a proxy wrapping a
target ActorPath. From Java it looks like this:
import akka.contrib.pattern.ReliableProxy;
def receive = {
case "hello" ⇒ proxy ! "world!"
}
}
Since the ReliableProxy actor is an fsm-scala, it also offers the capability to subscribe to state transitions.
If you need to know when all enqueued messages have been received by the remote end-point (and consequently
been forwarded to the target), you can subscribe to the FSM notifications and observe a transition from state
ReliableProxy.Active to state ReliableProxy.Idle.
public class ProxyTransitionParent extends UntypedActor {
private final ActorRef proxy;
private ActorRef client = null;
if (transition.from().equals(ReliableProxy.active()) &&
transition.to().equals(ReliableProxy.idle())) {
client.tell("done", getSelf());
}
}
}
}
def receive = {
case "go" ⇒
proxy ! 42
client = sender()
case FSM.CurrentState(‘proxy‘, initial) ⇒
case FSM.Transition(‘proxy‘, from, to) ⇒
if (to == ReliableProxy.Idle)
client ! "done"
}
}
Configuration
• Set akka.reliable-proxy.debug to on to turn on extra debug logging for your ReliableProxy
actors.
• akka.reliable-proxy.default-connect-interval is used only if you create a
ReliableProxy with no reconnections (that is, reconnectAfter == None). The default
value is the value of the configuration property akka.remote.retry-gate-closed-for. For
example, if akka.remote.retry-gate-closed-for is 5 s case the ReliableProxy will send
an Identify message to the target every 5 seconds to try to resolve the ActorPath to an ActorRef
so that messages can be sent to the target.
Message it Processes
• FSM.SubscribeTransitionCallBack and FSM.UnsubscribeTransitionCallBack, see
fsm-scala
• ReliableProxy.Unsent, see the API documentation for details.
• any other message is transferred through the reliable tunnel and forwarded to the designated target actor
Messages it Sends
• FSM.CurrentState and FSM.Transition, see fsm-scala
• ReliableProxy.TargetChanged is sent to the FSM transition subscribers if the proxy reconnects to
a new target.
• ReliableProxy.ProxyTerminated is sent to the FSM transition subscribers if the proxy is stopped.
Exceptions it Escalates
• no specific exception types
• any exception encountered by either the local or remote end-point are escalated (only fatal VM errors)
Arguments it Takes
• target is the ActorPath to the actor to which the tunnel shall reliably deliver messages, B in the above
illustration.
• retryAfter is the timeout for receiving ACK messages from the remote end-point; once it fires, all outstanding
message sends will be retried.
• reconnectAfter is an optional interval between connection attempts. It is also used as the interval between
receiving a Terminated for the tunnel and attempting to reconnect to the target actor.
• maxConnectAttempts is an optional maximum number of attempts to connect to the target while in the
Connecting state.
Introduction
Suppose you are writing an application that makes HTTP requests to an external web service and that this web
service has a restriction in place: you may not make more than 10 requests in 1 minute. You will get blocked or
need to pay if you don’t stay under this limit. In such a scenario you will want to employ a message throttler.
This extension module provides a simple implementation of a throttling actor, the TimerBasedThrottler.
How to use it
You can use a TimerBasedThrottler as follows. From Java it looks like this:
// A simple actor that prints whatever it receives
ActorRef printer = system.actorOf(Props.create(Printer.class));
// The throttler for this example, setting the rate
ActorRef throttler = system.actorOf(Props.create(TimerBasedThrottler.class,
new Throttler.Rate(3, Duration.create(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS))));
// Set the target
throttler.tell(new Throttler.SetTarget(printer), null);
// These three messages will be sent to the target immediately
throttler.tell("1", null);
throttler.tell("2", null);
throttler.tell("3", null);
// These two will wait until a second has passed
throttler.tell("4", null);
throttler.tell("5", null);
case x ⇒ println(x)
}
}
The guarantees
TimerBasedThrottler uses a timer internally. When the throttler’s rate is 3 msg/s, for example, the throttler
will start a timer that triggers every second and each time will give the throttler exactly three “vouchers”; each
voucher gives the throttler a right to deliver a message. In this way, at most 3 messages will be sent out by the
throttler in each interval.
It should be noted that such timer-based throttlers provide relatively weak guarantees:
• Only start times are taken into account. This may be a problem if, for example, the throttler is used to
throttle requests to an external web service. If a web request takes very long on the server then the rate
observed on the server may be higher.
• A timer-based throttler only makes guarantees for the intervals of its own timer. In our example, no more
than 3 messages are delivered within such intervals. Other intervals on the timeline, however, may contain
more calls.
The two cases are illustrated in the two figures below, each showing a timeline and three intervals of the timer. The
message delivery times chosen by the throttler are indicated by dots, and as you can see, each interval contains
at most 3 point, so the throttler works correctly. Still, there is in each example an interval (the red one) that is
problematic. In the first scenario, this is because the delivery times are merely the start times of longer requests
(indicated by the four bars above the timeline that start at the dots), so that the server observes four requests during
the red interval. In the second scenario, the messages are centered around one of the points in time where the timer
triggers, causing the red interval to contain too many messages.
For some application scenarios, the guarantees provided by a timer-based throttler might be too weak. Charles
Cordingley’s blog post discusses a throttler with stronger guarantees (it solves problem 2 from above). Future
This extension module provides a logging backend which uses the java.util.logging (j.u.l) API to do the endpoint
logging for akka.event.Logging.
Provided with this module is an implementation of akka.event.LoggingAdapter which is independent of any Ac-
torSystem being in place. This means that j.u.l can be used as the backend, via the Akka Logging API, for both
Actor and non-Actor codebases.
To enable j.u.l as the akka.event.Logging backend, use the following Akka config:
loggers = [”akka.contrib.jul.JavaLogger”]
To access the akka.event.Logging API from non-Actor code, mix in akka.contrib.jul.JavaLogging.
This module is preferred over SLF4J with its JDK14 backend, due to integration issues resulting in the incorrect
handling of threadId, className and methodName.
This extension module was contributed by Sam Halliday.
When an Akka actor is processing a message and an exception occurs, the normal behavior is for the actor to drop
that message, and then continue with the next message after it has been restarted. This is in some cases not the
desired solution, e.g. when using failure and supervision to manage a connection to an unreliable resource; the
actor could after the restart go into a buffering mode (i.e. change its behavior) and retry the real processing later,
when the unreliable resource is back online.
One way to do this is by sending all messages through the supervisor and buffering them there, acknowledging
successful processing in the child; another way is to build an explicit acknowledgement mechanism into the
mailbox. The idea with the latter is that a message is reprocessed in case of failure until the mailbox is told that
processing was successful.
The pattern is implemented here. A demonstration of how to use it (although for brevity not a perfect example) is
the following:
class MyActor extends Actor {
def receive = {
case msg ⇒
println(msg)
doStuff(msg) // may fail
PeekMailboxExtension.ack()
}
myActor ! "Hello"
myActor ! "World"
myActor ! PoisonPill
}
Running this application (try it in the Akka sources by saying sbt akka-contrib/test:run) may produce
the following output (note the processing of “World” on lines 2 and 16):
Hello
World
[ERROR] [12/17/2012 16:28:36.581] [MySystem-peek-dispatcher-5] [akka://MySystem/user/myActor] DONT
java.lang.Exception: DONTWANNA
at akka.contrib.mailbox.MyActor.doStuff(PeekMailbox.scala:105)
at akka.contrib.mailbox.MyActor$$anonfun$receive$1.applyOrElse(PeekMailbox.scala:98)
at akka.actor.ActorCell.receiveMessage(ActorCell.scala:425)
at akka.actor.ActorCell.invoke(ActorCell.scala:386)
at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.processMailbox(Mailbox.scala:230)
at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.run(Mailbox.scala:212)
at akka.dispatch.ForkJoinExecutorConfigurator$MailboxExecutionTask.exec(AbstractDispatcher.sc
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:262)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:975)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1478)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:104)
World
Normally one would want to make processing idempotent (i.e. it does not matter if a message is processed twice)
or context.become a different behavior upon restart; the above example included the println(msg) call
just to demonstrate the re-processing.
Aggregator Pattern
The aggregator pattern supports writing actors that aggregate data from multiple other actors and updates its state
based on those responses. It is even harder to optionally aggregate more data based on the runtime state of the
actor or take certain actions (sending another message and get another response) based on two or more previous
responses.
A common thought is to use the ask pattern to request information from other actors. However, ask creates another
actor specifically for the ask. We cannot use a callback from the future to update the state as the thread executing
the callback is not defined. This will likely close-over the current actor.
The aggregator pattern solves such scenarios. It makes sure we’re acting from the same actor in the scope of the
actor receive.
Introduction
The aggregator pattern allows match patterns to be dynamically added to and removed from an actor from inside
the message handling logic. All match patterns are called from the receive loop and run in the thread handling
the incoming message. These dynamically added patterns and logic can safely read and/or modify this actor’s
mutable state without risking integrity or concurrency issues.
Usage
To use the aggregator pattern, you need to extend the Aggregator trait. The trait takes care of receive and
actors extending this trait should not override receive. The trait provides the expect, expectOnce, and
unexpect calls. The expect and expectOnce calls return a handle that can be used for later de-registration
by passing the handle to unexpect.
expect is often used for standing matches such as catching error messages or timeouts.
expect {
case TimedOut ⇒ collectBalances(force = true)
}
expectOnce is used for matching the initial message as well as other requested messages
expectOnce {
case GetCustomerAccountBalances(id, types) ⇒
new AccountAggregator(sender(), id, types)
case _ ⇒
sender() ! CantUnderstand
context.stop(self)
}
def fetchCheckingAccountsBalance() {
context.actorOf(Props[CheckingAccountProxy]) ! GetAccountBalances(id)
expectOnce {
case CheckingAccountBalances(balances) ⇒
results += (Checking → balances)
collectBalances()
}
}
unexpect can be used for expecting multiple responses until a timeout or when the logic dictates such an
expect no longer applies.
val handle = expect {
case Response(name, value) ⇒
values += value
if (values.size > 3) processList()
case TimedOut ⇒ processList()
}
def processList() {
unexpect(handle)
if (values.size > 0) {
context.actorSelection("/user/evaluator") ! values.toList
expectOnce {
case EvaluationResults(name, eval) ⇒ processFinal(eval)
}
} else processFinal(List.empty[Int])
}
As the name eludes, expect keeps the partial function matching any received messages until unexpect is
called or the actor terminates, whichever comes first. On the other hand, expectOnce removes the partial
function once a match has been established.
It is a common pattern to register the initial expectOnce from the construction of the actor to accept the initial
message. Once that message is received, the actor starts doing all aggregations and sends the response back to the
original requester. The aggregator should terminate after the response is sent (or timed out). A different original
request should use a different actor instance.
As you can see, aggregator actors are generally stateful, short lived actors.
This example below shows a typical and intended use of the aggregator pattern.
final case class InitialRequest(name: String)
final case class Request(name: String)
final case class Response(name: String, value: String)
final case class EvaluationResults(name: String, eval: List[Int])
final case class FinalResponse(qualifiedValues: List[String])
/**
* An actor sample demonstrating use of unexpect and chaining.
* This is just an example and not a complete test case.
*/
class ChainingSample extends Actor with Aggregator {
expectOnce {
case InitialRequest(name) ⇒ new MultipleResponseHandler(sender(), name)
}
import context.dispatcher
import collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
context.actorSelection("/user/request_proxies") ! Request(propName)
context.system.scheduler.scheduleOnce(50.milliseconds, self, TimedOut)
def processList() {
unexpect(handle)
if (values.size > 0) {
context.actorSelection("/user/evaluator") ! values.toList
expectOnce {
case EvaluationResults(name, eval) ⇒ processFinal(eval)
}
} else processFinal(List.empty[Int])
}
system.actorOf(Props[AccountBalanceRetriever]) !
GetCustomerAccountBalances(1, Set(Checking, Savings, MoneyMarket))
receiveOne(10.seconds) match {
case result: List[_] ⇒
result should have size 3
case result ⇒
assert(false, s"Expect List, got ${result.getClass}")
}
}
}
assert(workList.head.next != null)
assert(workList.tail === workList.head.next)
assert(workList.tail.ref.get === entry0)
assert(workList.head.next != workList.tail)
assert(workList.head.next.ref.get === entry0)
assert(workList.tail.ref.get === entry1)
entry2 = TestEntry(2)
workList.add(entry2, permanent = false)
val processed =
workList process {
case TestEntry(2) ⇒ true
case _ ⇒ false
}
assert(!processed)
val processed2 =
workList process {
case TestEntry(5) ⇒ true
case _ ⇒ false
}
assert(!processed2)
workList addAll l2
@tailrec
def checkEntries(id: Int, entry: WorkList.Entry[TestEntry]): Int = {
if (entry == null) id
else {
assert(entry.ref.get.id === id)
checkEntries(id + 1, entry.next)
}
}
test("Clear list") {
workList.removeAll()
assert(workList.head.next === null)
assert(workList.tail === workList.head)
}
test("Reentrant insert") {
workList2.add(fn2, permanent = false)
assert(workList2.head.next != null)
assert(workList2.tail == workList2.head.next)
test("Reentrant delete") {
// Processing inserted fn2, should delete itself
workList2 process { fn ⇒
var processed = true
fn.applyOrElse("Foo", (_: Any) ⇒ processed = false)
processed
}
}
}
/**
* An actor sample demonstrating use of unexpect and chaining.
* This is just an example and not a complete test case.
*/
class ChainingSample extends Actor with Aggregator {
expectOnce {
case InitialRequest(name) ⇒ new MultipleResponseHandler(sender(), name)
}
import context.dispatcher
import collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
context.actorSelection("/user/request_proxies") ! Request(propName)
context.system.scheduler.scheduleOnce(50.milliseconds, self, TimedOut)
def processList() {
unexpect(handle)
if (values.size > 0) {
context.actorSelection("/user/evaluator") ! values.toList
expectOnce {
case EvaluationResults(name, eval) ⇒ processFinal(eval)
}
} else processFinal(List.empty[Int])
}
Pitfalls
• The current implementation does not match the sender of the message. This is designed to work with
ActorSelection as well as ActorRef. Without the sender(), there is a chance a received message
can be matched by more than one partial function. The partial function that was registered via expect
or expectOnce first (chronologically) and is not yet de-registered by unexpect takes precedence in
this case. Developers should make sure the messages can be uniquely matched or the wrong logic can be
executed for a certain message.
• The sender referenced in any expect or expectOnce logic refers to the sender() of that particular
message and not the sender() of the original message. The original sender() still needs to be saved so a final
response can be sent back.
• context.become is not supported when extending the Aggregator trait.
• We strongly recommend against overriding receive. If your use case really dictates, you may do so with
extreme caution. Always provide a pattern match handling aggregator messages among your receive
pattern matches, as follows:
case msg if handleMessage(msg) ⇒ // noop
// side effects of handleMessage does the actual match
Sorry, there is not yet a Java implementation of the aggregator pattern available.
The Receive Pipeline Pattern lets you define general interceptors for your messages and plug an arbitrary amount
of them into your Actors. It’s useful for defining cross aspects to be applied to all or many of your Actors.
Interceptors
Multiple interceptors can be added to actors that mixin the ReceivePipeline trait. These interceptors inter-
nally define layers of decorators around the actor’s behavior. The first interceptor defines an outer decorator which
delegates to a decorator corresponding to the second interceptor and so on, until the last interceptor which defines
a decorator for the actor’s Receive.
The first or outermost interceptor receives messages sent to the actor.
For each message received by an interceptor, the interceptor will typically perform some processing based on the
message and decide whether or not to pass the received message (or some other message) to the next interceptor.
An Interceptor is a type alias for PartialFunction[Any, Delegation]. The Any input is the
message it receives from the previous interceptor (or, in the case of the first interceptor, the message that was sent
to the actor). The Delegation return type is used to control what (if any) message is passed on to the next
interceptor.
A simple example
To pass a transformed message to the actor (or next inner interceptor) an interceptor can return Inner(newMsg)
where newMsg is the transformed message.
The following interceptor shows this. It intercepts Int messages, adds one to them and passes on the incremented
value to the next interceptor.
To give your Actor the ability to pipeline received messages in this way, you’ll need to mixin with
the ReceivePipeline trait. It has two methods for controlling the pipeline, pipelineOuter and
pipelineInner, both receiving an Interceptor. The first one adds the interceptor at the beginning of
the pipeline and the second one adds it at the end, just before the current Actor’s behavior.
In this example we mixin our Actor with the ReceivePipeline trait and we add Increment and Double
interceptors with pipelineInner. They will be applied in this very order.
class PipelinedActor extends Actor with ReceivePipeline {
// Increment
pipelineInner { case i: Int ⇒ Inner(i + 1) }
// Double
pipelineInner { case i: Int ⇒ Inner(i * 2) }
actor ! 5 // prints 12 = (5 + 1) * 2
If we add Double with pipelineOuter it will be applied before Increment so the output is 11
// Increment
pipelineInner { case i: Int ⇒ Inner(i + 1) }
// Double
pipelineOuter { case i: Int ⇒ Inner(i * 2) }
// prints 11 = (5 * 2) + 1
Interceptors Mixin
Defining all the pipeline inside the Actor implementation is good for showing up the pattern, but it isn’t very
practical. The real flexibility of this pattern comes when you define every interceptor in its own trait and then you
mixin any of them into your Actors.
Let’s see it in an example. We have the following model:
val texts = Map(
"that.rug_EN" → "That rug really tied the room together.",
"your.opinion_EN" → "Yeah, well, you know, that’s just, like, your opinion, man.",
"that.rug_ES" → "Esa alfombra realmente completaba la sala.",
"your.opinion_ES" → "Sí, bueno, ya sabes, eso es solo, como, tu opinion, amigo.")
and these two interceptors defined, each one in its own trait:
trait I18nInterceptor {
this: ReceivePipeline ⇒
pipelineInner {
case m @ Message(_, I18nText(loc, key)) ⇒
Inner(m.copy(text = texts(s"${key}_$loc")))
}
trait AuditInterceptor {
this: ReceivePipeline ⇒
pipelineOuter {
case m @ Message(Some(author), text) ⇒
println(s"$author is about to say: $text")
Inner(m)
}
}
The first one intercepts any messages having an internationalized text and replaces it with the resolved text before
resuming with the chain. The second one intercepts any message with an author defined and prints it before
resuming the chain with the message unchanged. But since I18n adds the interceptor with pipelineInner
and Audit adds it with pipelineOuter, the audit will happen before the internationalization.
So if we mixin both interceptors in our Actor, we will see the following output for these example messages:
class PrinterActor extends Actor with ReceivePipeline
with I18nInterceptor with AuditInterceptor {
Unhandled Messages
With all that behaviors chaining occurring, what happens to unhandled messages? Let me explain it with a simple
rule.
Note: Every message not handled by an interceptor will be passed to the next one in the chain. If none of the
interceptors handles a message, the current Actor’s behavior will receive it, and if the behavior doesn’t handle it
either, it will be treated as usual with the unhandled method.
But sometimes it is desired for interceptors to break the chain. You can do it by explicitly indicating that the
message has been completely handled by the interceptor by returning HandledCompletely.
case class PrivateMessage(userId: Option[Long], msg: Any)
trait PrivateInterceptor {
this: ReceivePipeline ⇒
pipelineInner {
case PrivateMessage(Some(userId), msg) ⇒
if (isGranted(userId))
Inner(msg)
else
HandledCompletely
}
}
But what if you want to perform some action after the actor has processed the message (for example to measure
the message processing time)?
In order to support such use cases, the Inner return type has a method andAfter which accepts a code block
that can perform some action after the message has been processed by subsequent inner interceptors.
The following is a simple interceptor that times message processing:
trait TimerInterceptor extends ActorLogging {
this: ReceivePipeline ⇒
pipelineOuter {
case e ⇒
val start = System.nanoTime
Inner(e).andAfter {
val end = System.nanoTime
logTimeTaken(end - start)
}
}
}
Note: The andAfter code blocks are run on return from handling the message with the next inner handler and
on the same thread. It is therefore safe for the andAfter logic to close over the interceptor’s state.
When using ReceivePipeline together with PersistentActor make sure to mix-in the traits in the following
order for them to properly co-operate:
class ExampleActor extends PersistentActor with ReceivePipeline {
/* ... */
}
The order is important here because of how both traits use internal “around” methods to implement their features,
and if mixed-in the other way around it would not work as expected. If you want to learn more about how exactly
this works, you can read up on Scala’s type linearization mechanism;
Circuit-Breaker Actor
This is an alternative implementation of the Akka Circuit Breaker Pattern. The main difference is that it is intended
to be used only for request-reply interactions with an actor using the Circuit-Breaker as a proxy of the target one
in order to provide the same failfast functionalities and a protocol similar to the circuit-breaker implementation in
Akka.
### Usage
Let’s assume we have an actor wrapping a back-end service and able to respond to Request calls with a
Response object containing an Either[String, String] to map successful and failed responses. The
service is also potentially slowing down because of the workload.
A simple implementation can be given by this class
object SimpleService {
case class Request(content: String)
case class Response(content: Either[String, String])
case object ResetCount
}
/**
* This is a simple actor simulating a service
* - Becoming slower with the increase of frequency of input requests
* - Failing around 30% of the requests
*/
class SimpleService extends Actor with ActorLogging {
import SimpleService._
var messageCount = 0
import context.dispatcher
case Request(content) ⇒
messageCount += 1
// simulate workload
Thread.sleep(100 * messageCount)
// Fails around 30% of the times
if (Random.nextInt(100) < 70) {
sender ! Response(Right(s"Successfully processed $content"))
} else {
sender ! Response(Left(s"Failure processing $content"))
}
}
}
If we want to interface with this service using the Circuit Breaker we can use two approaches:
Using a non-conversational approach:
class CircuitBreaker(potentiallyFailingService: ActorRef) extends Actor with ActorLogging {
import SimpleService._
val serviceCircuitBreaker =
context.actorOf(
CircuitBreakerPropsBuilder(maxFailures = 3, callTimeout = 2.seconds, resetTimeout = 30.secon
.copy(
failureDetector = {
_ match {
case Response(Left(_)) ⇒ true
case _ ⇒ false
}
})
.props(potentiallyFailingService),
"serviceCircuitBreaker")
case Right(Response(content)) ⇒
//handle response
log.info("Got successful response {}", content)
case Response(Right(content)) ⇒
//handle response
log.info("Got successful response {}", content)
case Response(Left(content)) ⇒
//handle response
log.info("Got failed response {}", content)
case CircuitOpenFailure(failedMsg) ⇒
log.warning("Unable to send message {}", failedMsg)
}
}
Using the ask pattern, in this case it is useful to be able to map circuit open failures to the same type of failures
returned by the service (a Left[String] in our case):
class CircuitBreakerAsk(potentiallyFailingService: ActorRef) extends Actor with ActorLogging {
import SimpleService._
import akka.pattern._
val serviceCircuitBreaker =
context.actorOf(
CircuitBreakerPropsBuilder(maxFailures = 3, callTimeout = askTimeout, resetTimeout = 30.seco
.copy(
failureDetector = {
_ match {
case Response(Left(_)) ⇒ true
case _ ⇒ false
}
})
.copy(
openCircuitFailureConverter = { failure ⇒
Left(s"Circuit open when processing ${failure.failedMsg}")
})
.props(potentiallyFailingService),
"serviceCircuitBreaker")
import context.dispatcher
case Success(Left(failureResponse)) ⇒
//handle response
log.info("Got successful response {}", failureResponse)
case Failure(exception) ⇒
//handle response
log.info("Got successful response {}", exception)
}
}
}
If it is not possible to define define a specific error response, you can map the Open Circuit notification to a
failure. That also means that your CircuitBreakerActor will be useful to protect you from time out for
extra workload or temporary failures in the target actor. You can decide to do that in two ways:
The first is to use the askWithCircuitBreaker method on the ActorRef or
ActorSelection instance pointing to your circuit breaker proxy (enabled by importing import
akka.contrib.circuitbreaker.Implicits.askWithCircuitBreaker)
class CircuitBreakerAskWithCircuitBreaker(potentiallyFailingService: ActorRef) extends Actor with
import SimpleService._
import akka.contrib.circuitbreaker.Implicits.askWithCircuitBreaker
val serviceCircuitBreaker =
context.actorOf(
CircuitBreakerPropsBuilder(maxFailures = 3, callTimeout = askTimeout, resetTimeout = 30.seco
.props(target = potentiallyFailingService),
"serviceCircuitBreaker")
import context.dispatcher
case Failure(exception) ⇒
//handle response
log.info("Got successful response {}", exception)
}
}
}
The second is to map the future response of your ask pattern application with the failForOpenCircuit
enabled by importing import akka.contrib.circuitbreaker.Implicits.futureExtensions
class CircuitBreakerAskWithFailure(potentiallyFailingService: ActorRef) extends Actor with ActorLo
import SimpleService._
import akka.pattern._
import akka.contrib.circuitbreaker.Implicits.futureExtensions
val serviceCircuitBreaker =
context.actorOf(
CircuitBreakerPropsBuilder(maxFailures = 3, callTimeout = askTimeout, resetTimeout = 30.seco
.props(target = potentiallyFailingService),
"serviceCircuitBreaker")
import context.dispatcher
case Failure(exception) ⇒
//handle response
}
}
}
Since the Akka team does not restrict updates to this subproject even during otherwise binary compatible releases,
and modules may be removed without deprecation, it is suggested to copy the source files into your own code
base, changing the package name. This way you can choose when to update or which fixes to include (to keep
binary compatibility if needed) and later releases of Akka do not potentially break your application.
Each contribution should be a self-contained unit, consisting of one source file or one exclusively used package,
without dependencies to other modules in this subproject; it may depend on everything else in the Akka distri-
bution, though. This ensures that contributions may be moved into the standard distribution individually. The
module shall be within a subpackage of akka.contrib.
Each module must be accompanied by a test suite which verifies that the provided features work, possibly
complemented by integration and unit tests. The tests should follow the Developer Guidelines and go into the
src/test/scala or src/test/java directories (with package name matching the module which is being
tested). As an example, if the module were called akka.contrib.pattern.ReliableProxy, then the
test suite should be called akka.contrib.pattern.ReliableProxySpec.
Each module must also have proper documentation in reStructured Text format. The documentation should be a
single <module>.rst file in the akka-contrib/docs directory, including a link from index.rst (this
file).
THIRTEEN
This page describes how to build and run Akka from the latest source code.
If you have already cloned the repository previously then you can update the code with git pull:
git pull origin master
13.1.2 sbt
Akka is using the excellent sbt build system. So the first thing you have to do is to download and install sbt. You
can read more about how to do that in the sbt setup documentation.
The sbt commands that you’ll need to build Akka are all included below. If you want to find out more about sbt
and using it for your own projects do read the sbt documentation.
The main Akka sbt build file is project/AkkaBuild.scala, with a build.sbt in each subproject’s directory.
It is advisable to allocate at least 2GB of heap size to the JVM that runs sbt, otherwise you may experience some
spurious failures when running the tests.
First make sure that you are in the akka code directory:
cd akka
716
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
Building
To compile all the Akka core modules use the compile command:
sbt compile
If compiling and testing are successful then you have everything working for the latest Akka development version.
Parallel Execution
By default the tests are executed sequentially. They can be executed in parallel to reduce build times, if hardware
can handle the increased memory and cpu usage. Add the following system property to sbt launch script to activate
parallel execution:
-Dakka.parallelExecution=true
By default are the long running tests (mainly cluster tests) and time sensitive tests (dependent on the performance
of the machine it is running on) disabled. You can enable them by adding one of the flags:
-Dakka.test.tags.include=long-running
-Dakka.test.tags.include=timing
If you want to deploy the artifacts to your local Ivy repository (for example, to use from an sbt project) use the
publish-local command:
sbt publish-local
Note that in the examples above we are calling sbt compile and sbt test and so on, but sbt also has an
interactive mode. If you just run sbt you enter the interactive sbt prompt and can enter the commands directly.
This saves starting up a new JVM instance for each command and can be much faster and more convenient.
For example, building Akka as above is more commonly done like this:
% sbt
[info] Set current project to default (in build file:/.../akka/project/plugins/)
[info] Set current project to akka (in build file:/.../akka/)
> compile
...
> test
...
It’s also possible to combine commands in a single call. For example, testing, and publishing Akka to the local
Ivy repository can be done with:
sbt test publish-local
13.1.4 Dependencies
You can look at the Ivy dependency resolution information that is cre-
ated on sbt update and found in ~/.ivy2/cache. For example, the
~/.ivy2/cache/com.typesafe.akka-akka-remote-compile.xml file contains the resolu-
tion information for the akka-remote module compile dependencies. If you open this file in a web browser you
will get an easy to navigate view of dependencies.
Akka generates class diagrams for the API documentation using ScalaDoc. This needs the dot command from
the Graphviz software package to be installed to avoid errors. You can disable the diagram generation by adding
the flag -Dakka.scaladoc.diagrams=false. After installing Graphviz, make sure you add the toolset to
the PATH (definitely on Windows).
Supports running applications (objects with main methods) and ScalaTest tests in multiple JVMs at the same time.
Useful for integration testing where multiple systems communicate with each other.
13.2.1 Setup
The multi-JVM testing is an sbt plugin that you can find at http://github.com/typesafehub/sbt-multi-jvm.
You can add it as a plugin by adding the following to your project/plugins.sbt:
addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbt" % "sbt-multi-jvm" % "0.3.8")
You can then add multi-JVM testing to build.sbt or project/Build.scala by including the MultiJvm
settings and config. Please note that MultiJvm test sources are located in src/multi-jvm/..., and not in
src/test/....
Here is an example build.sbt file for sbt 0.13 that uses the MultiJvm plugin:
import com.typesafe.sbt.SbtMultiJvm
import com.typesafe.sbt.SbtMultiJvm.MultiJvmKeys.MultiJvm
The multi-JVM tasks are similar to the normal tasks: test, test-only, and run, but are under the
multi-jvm configuration.
So in Akka, to run all the multi-JVM tests in the akka-remote project use (at the sbt prompt):
akka-remote-tests/multi-jvm:test
Or one can change to the akka-remote-tests project first, and then run the tests:
project akka-remote-tests
multi-jvm:test
More than one test name can be listed to run multiple specific tests. Tab-completion in sbt makes it easy to
complete the test names.
It’s also possible to specify JVM options with test-only by including those options after the test names and
--. For example:
multi-jvm:test-only akka.remote.RandomRoutedRemoteActor -- -Dsome.option=something
The tests are discovered, and combined, through a naming convention. MultiJvm test sources are located in
src/multi-jvm/.... A test is named with the following pattern:
{TestName}MultiJvm{NodeName}
That is, each test has MultiJvm in the middle of its name. The part before it groups together tests/applications
under a single TestName that will run together. The part after, the NodeName, is a distinguishing name for each
forked JVM.
So to create a 3-node test called Sample, you can create three applications like the following:
package sample
object SampleMultiJvmNode1 {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
println("Hello from node 1")
}
}
object SampleMultiJvmNode2 {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
println("Hello from node 2")
}
}
object SampleMultiJvmNode3 {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
println("Hello from node 3")
}
}
When you call multi-jvm:run sample.Sample at the sbt prompt, three JVMs will be spawned, one for
each node. It will look like this:
> multi-jvm:run sample.Sample
...
[info] * sample.Sample
[JVM-1] Hello from node 1
[JVM-2] Hello from node 2
[JVM-3] Hello from node 3
[success] Total time: ...
You can change the name of the multi-JVM test source directory by adding the following configuration to your
project:
unmanagedSourceDirectories in MultiJvm <<=
Seq(baseDirectory(_ / "src/some_directory_here")).join
You can change what the MultiJvm identifier is. For example, to change it to ClusterTest use the
multiJvmMarker setting:
multiJvmMarker in MultiJvm := "ClusterTest"
You can define specific JVM options for each of the spawned JVMs. You do that by creating a file named after
the node in the test with suffix .opts and put them in the same directory as the test.
For example, to feed the JVM options -Dakka.remote.port=9991 and -Xmx256m to the
SampleMultiJvmNode1 let’s create three *.opts files and add the options to them. Separate multiple op-
tions with space.
SampleMultiJvmNode1.opts:
-Dakka.remote.port=9991 -Xmx256m
SampleMultiJvmNode2.opts:
-Dakka.remote.port=9992 -Xmx256m
SampleMultiJvmNode3.opts:
-Dakka.remote.port=9993 -Xmx256m
13.2.6 ScalaTest
There is also support for creating ScalaTest tests rather than applications. To do this use the same naming conven-
tion as above, but create ScalaTest suites rather than objects with main methods. You need to have ScalaTest on
the classpath. Here is a similar example to the one above but using ScalaTest:
package sample
import org.scalatest.WordSpec
import org.scalatest.matchers.MustMatchers
To run just these tests you would call multi-jvm:test-only sample.Spec at the sbt prompt.
There has also been some additions made to the SbtMultiJvm plugin to accommodate the experimental module
multi node testing, described in that section.
The akka.io package has been developed in collaboration between the Akka and spray.io teams. Its design
incorporates the experiences with the spray-io module along with improvements that were jointly developed
for more general consumption as an actor-based service.
13.3.1 Requirements
In order to form a general and extensible IO layer basis for a wide range of applications, with Akka remoting and
spray HTTP being the initial ones, the following requirements were established as key drivers for the design:
Each transport implementation will be made available as a separate Akka extension, offering an ActorRef
representing the initial point of contact for client code. This “manager” accepts requests for establishing a com-
munications channel (e.g. connect or listen on a TCP socket). Each communications channel is represented by
one dedicated actor, which is exposed to client code for all interaction with this channel over its entire lifetime.
The central element of the implementation is the transport-specific “selector” actor; in the case of TCP this would
wrap a java.nio.channels.Selector. The channel actors register their interest in readability or writabil-
ity of their channel by sending corresponding messages to their assigned selector actor. However, the actual
channel reading and writing is performed by the channel actors themselves, which frees the selector actors from
time-consuming tasks and thereby ensures low latency. The selector actor’s only responsibility is the management
of the underlying selector’s key set and the actual select operation, which is the only operation to typically block.
The assignment of channels to selectors is performed by the manager actor and remains unchanged for the entire
lifetime of a channel. Thereby the management actor “stripes” new channels across one or more selector actors
based on some implementation-specific distribution logic. This logic may be delegated (in part) to the selectors
actors, which could, for example, choose to reject the assignment of a new channel when they consider themselves
to be at capacity.
The manager actor creates (and therefore supervises) the selector actors, which in turn create and supervise their
channel actors. The actor hierarchy of one single transport implementation therefore consists of three distinct
actor levels, with the management actor at the top-, the channel actors at the leaf- and the selector actors at the
mid-level.
Back-pressure for output is enabled by allowing the user to specify within its Write messages whether it wants
to receive an acknowledgement for enqueuing that write to the O/S kernel. Back-pressure for input is enabled
by sending the channel actor a message which temporarily disables read interest for the channel until reading is
re-enabled with a corresponding resume command. In the case of transports with flow control—like TCP—the
act of not consuming data at the receiving end (thereby causing them to remain in the kernels read buffers) is
propagated back to the sender, linking these two mechanisms across the network.
Staying within the actor model for the whole implementation allows us to remove the need for explicit thread
handling logic, and it also means that there are no locks involved (besides those which are part of the underlying
transport library). Writing only actor code results in a cleaner implementation, while Akka’s efficient actor mes-
saging does not impose a high tax for this benefit. In fact the event-based nature of I/O maps so well to the actor
model that we expect clear performance and especially scalability benefits over traditional solutions with explicit
thread management and synchronization.
Another benefit of supervision hierarchies is that clean-up of resources comes naturally: shutting down a selector
actor will automatically clean up all channel actors, allowing proper closing of the channels and sending the
appropriate messages to user-level client actors. DeathWatch allows the channel actors to notice the demise of
their user-level handler actors and terminate in an orderly fashion in that case as well; this naturally reduces the
chances of leaking open channels.
The choice of using ActorRef for exposing all functionality entails that these references can be distributed or
delegated freely and in general handled as the user sees fit, including the use of remoting and life-cycle monitoring
(just to name two).
The best start is to study the TCP reference implementation to get a good grip on the basic working principle and
then design an implementation, which is similar in spirit, but adapted to the new protocol in question. There are
vast differences between I/O mechanisms (e.g. compare file I/O to a message broker) and the goal of this I/O layer
is explicitly not to shoehorn all of them into a uniform API, which is why only the basic architecture ideas are
documented here.
The Akka code style follows the Scala Style Guide . The only exception is the style of block comments:
/**
* Style mandated by "Scala Style Guide"
*/
/**
* Style adopted in the Akka codebase
*/
Akka is using Scalariform to format the source code as part of the build. So just hack away and then run sbt
compile and it will reformat the code according to Akka standards.
13.4.2 Process
Please follow the conventions described in The Akka Contributor Guidelines when creating public commits and
writing commit messages.
13.4.4 Testing
All code that is checked in should have tests. All testing is done with ScalaTest and ScalaCheck.
• Name tests as Test.scala if they do not depend on any external stuff. That keeps surefire happy.
• Name tests as Spec.scala if they have external dependencies.
Actor TestKit
There is a useful test kit for testing actors: akka.util.TestKit. It enables assertions concerning replies received and
their timing, there is more documentation in the akka-testkit module.
Multi-JVM Testing
Included in the example is an sbt trait for multi-JVM testing which will fork JVMs for multi-node testing. There
is support for running applications (objects with main methods) and running ScalaTest tests.
NetworkFailureTest
The Akka documentation uses reStructuredText as its markup language and is built using Sphinx.
13.5.1 Sphinx
13.5.2 reStructuredText
Sections
Section headings are very flexible in reST. We use the following convention in the Akka documentation:
• # (over and under) for module headings
• = for sections
• - for subsections
• ^ for subsubsections
• ~ for subsubsubsections
Cross-referencing
Sections that may be cross-referenced across the documentation should be marked with a reference. To
mark a section use .. _ref-name: before the section heading. The section can then be linked with
:ref:‘ref-name‘. These are unique references across the entire documentation.
For example:
.. _akka-module:
#############
Akka Module
#############
.. _akka-section:
Akka Section
============
Akka Subsection
---------------
Building
open <project-dir>/akka-docs/target/sphinx/html/index.html
open <project-dir>/akka-docs/target/sphinx/latex/AkkaJava.pdf
or
open <project-dir>/akka-docs/target/sphinx/latex/AkkaScala.pdf
Installing Sphinx on OS X
Install Homebrew
Install Python with Homebrew:
brew install python
Homebrew will automatically add Python executable to your $PATH and pip is a part of the default Python
installation with Homebrew.
More information in case of trouble: https://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/wiki/Homebrew-and-Python
Install sphinx:
If you get the error “unknown locale: UTF-8” when generating the documentation the solution is to define the
following environment variables:
export LANG=en_US.UTF-8
export LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8
FOURTEEN
PROJECT INFORMATION
14.1.5 Migration Guide Akka Persistence (experimental) 2.3.3 to 2.3.4 (and 2.4.x)
Akka Persistence is an experimental module, which means that neither Binary Compatibility nor API stability
is provided for Persistence while under the experimental flag. The goal of this phase is to gather user feedback
before we freeze the APIs in a major release.
The defer method in PersistentActor was renamed to deferAsync as it matches the semantics of
persistAsync more closely than persist, which was causing confusion for users.
Its semantics remain unchanged.
727
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
To extend PersistentActor:
class NewPersistentProcessor extends PersistentActor {
def persistenceId = "id"
/*...*/
}
Read more about the persistent actor in the documentation for Scala and documentation for Java.
In Akka Persistence 2.3.3 and previously, the main building block of applications were Processors. Persistent
messages, as well as processors implemented the processorId method to identify which persistent entity a
message belonged to.
This concept remains the same in Akka 2.3.4, yet we rename processorId to persistenceId be-
cause Processors will be removed, and persistent messages can be used from different classes not only
PersistentActor (Views, directly from Journals etc).
Please note that persistenceId is abstract in the new API classes (PersistentActor and
PersistentView), and we do not provide a default (actor-path derived) value for it like we did for
processorId. The rationale behind this change being stricter de-coupling of your Actor hierarchy and the
logical “which persistent entity this actor represents”. A longer discussion on this subject can be found on issue
#15436 on github.
In case you want to preserve the old behavior of providing the actor’s path as the default persistenceId, you
can easily implement it yourself either as a helper trait or simply by overriding persistenceId as follows:
override def persistenceId = self.path.toStringWithoutAddress
We provided the renamed method also on already deprecated classes (Channels), so you can simply apply a global
rename of processorId to persistenceId.
The Processor is now deprecated since 2.3.4 and will be removed in 2.4.x. It’s semantics replicated in
PersistentActor in the form of an additional persist method: persistAsync.
In essence, the difference between persist and persistAsync is that the former will stash all incoming
commands until all persist callbacks have been processed, whereas the latter does not stash any commands. The
new persistAsync should be used in cases of low consistency yet high responsiveness requirements, the Actor
can keep processing incoming commands, even though not all previous events have been handled.
When these persist and persistAsync are used together in the same PersistentActor, the persist
logic will win over the async version so that all guarantees concerning persist still hold. This will however lower
the throughput
Now deprecated code using Processor:
class OldProcessor extends Processor {
override def processorId = "user-wallet-1337"
def receive = {
case Persistent(cmd) => sender() ! cmd
}
}
def receiveCommand = {
case cmd =>
persistAsync(cmd) { e => sender() ! e }
}
def receiveRecover = {
case _ => // logic for handling replay
}
}
It is worth pointing out that using sender() inside the persistAsync callback block is valid, and does not suffer
any of the problems Futures have when closing over the sender reference.
Using the PersistentActor instead of Processor also shifts the responsibility of deciding if a message
should be persisted to the receiver instead of the sender of the message. Previously, using Processor, clients
would have to wrap messages as Persistent(cmd) manually, as well as have to be aware of the receiver being
a Processor, which didn’t play well with transparency of the ActorRefs in general.
The recommended approach for migrating persisted messages from a Processor to events that can be re-
played by a PersistentActor is to write a custom migration tool with a PersistentView and a
PersistentActor. Connect the PersistentView to the persistenceId of the old Processor
to replay the stored persistent messages. Send the messages from the view to a PersistentActor
with another persistenceId. There you can transform the old messages to domain events that the real
PersistentActor will be able to understand. Store the events with persistAsync.
Note that you can implement back-pressure between the writing PersistentActor and the reading
PersistentView by turning off auto-update in the view and send custom Update messages to the view
with a limited replayMax value.
Removed deleteMessage
deleteMessage is deprecated and will be removed. When using command sourced Processor the command
was stored before it was received and could be validated and then there was a reason to remove faulty commands to
avoid repeating the error during replay. When using PersistentActor you can always validate the command
before persisting and therefore the stored event (or command) should always be valid for replay.
deleteMessages can still be used for pruning of all messages up to a sequence number.
Renamed View to PersistentView, which receives plain messages (Persistent() wrapper is gone)
Views used to receive messages wrapped as Persistent(payload, seqNr), this is no longer the case
and views receive the payload as message from the Journal directly. The rationale here is that the wrapper
approach was inconsistent with the other Akka Persistence APIs and also is not easily “discoverable” (you have
to know you will be getting this Persistent wrapper).
Instead, since 2.3.4, views get plain messages, and can use additional methods provided by the View to identify
if a message was sent from the Journal (had been played back to the view). So if you had code like this:
class AverageView extends View {
override def processorId = "average-view"
def receive = {
case Persistent(msg, seqNr) =>
// from Journal
def receive = {
case msg if isPersistent =>
// from Journal
val seqNr = lastSequenceNr // in case you require the sequence number
In case you need to obtain the current sequence number the view is looking at, you can use the lastSequenceNr
method. It is equivalent to “current sequence number”, when isPersistent returns true, otherwise it yields
the sequence number of the last persistent message that this view was updated with.
One of the primary tasks of a Channel was to de-duplicate messages that were sent from a Processor during
recovery. Performing external side effects during recovery is not encouraged with event sourcing and therefore
the Channel is not needed for this purpose.
The Channel and PersistentChannel also performed at-least-once delivery of messages, but it did
not free a sending actor from implementing retransmission or timeouts, since the acknowledgement from
the channel is needed to guarantee safe hand-off. Therefore at-least-once delivery is provided in a new
AtLeastOnceDelivery trait that is mixed-in to the persistent actor on the sending side.
Read more about at-least-once delivery in the documentation for Scala and documentation for Java.
Persistence extension uses LevelDB based plugins for own development and keeps related code in the published
jar. However previously LevelDB was a compile scope dependency, and now it is an optional;provided
dependency. To continue using LevelDB based persistence plugins it is now required for related user projects to in-
clude an additional explicit dependency declaration for the LevelDB artifacts. This change allows production Akka
deployments to avoid need for the LevelDB provisioning. Please see persistence extension reference.conf
for details.
General notes
Eventsourced and Akka persistence-scala share many high-level concepts but strongly differ on design, imple-
mentation and usage level. This migration guide is more a higher-level comparison of Eventsourced and Akka
Persistence rather than a sequence of low-level instructions how to transform Eventsourced application code into
Akka Persistence application code. This should provide a good starting point for a migration effort. Development
teams should consult the user documentation of both projects for further details.
Scope of this migration guide is code migration, not journal migration. Journals written by Eventsourced can
neither be used directly Akka Persistence nor migrated to Akka Persistence compatible journals. Journal migration
tools may be provided in the future but do not exist at the moment.
Extensions
Processors / PersistentActor
Eventsourced: Eventsourced
• Stackable trait that adds journaling (write-ahead-logging) to actors (see processor definition and creation).
Name Eventsourced caused some confusion in the past as many examples used Eventsourced pro-
cessors for command sourcing. See also this FAQ entry for clarification.
• Must be explicitly recovered using recovery methods on EventsourcingExtension. Applications are
responsible for avoiding an interference of replayed messages and new messages i.e. applications have to
explicitly wait for recovery to complete. Recovery on processor re-start is not supported out-of-the box.
• Journaling-preserving behavior changes are only possible with special-purpose methods become
and unbecome, in addition to non-journaling-preserving behavior changes with default methods
context.become and context.unbecome.
• Writes messages of type Message to the journal (see processor usage). Sender references are not stored in
the journal i.e. the sender reference of a replayed message is always system.deadLetters.
• Supports snapshots.
• Identifiers are of type Int and must be application-defined.
• Does not support batch-writes of messages to the journal.
• Does not support stashing of messages.
Channels
Eventsourced: DefaultChannel
• Prevents redundant delivery of messages to a destination (see usage example and default channel).
• Is associated with a single destination actor reference. A new incarnation of the destination is not automati-
cally resolved by the channel. In this case a new channel must be created.
• Must be explicitly activated using methods deliver or recover defined on
EventsourcingExtension.
• Must be activated after all processors have been activated. Depending on the recovery method, this is either
done automatically or must be followed by the application (see non-blocking recovery). This is necessary
for a network of processors and channels to recover consistently.
• Does not redeliver messages on missing or negative delivery confirmation.
• Cannot be used standalone.
Eventsourced: ReliableChannel
• Provides DefaultChannel functionality plus persistence and recovery from sender JVM crashes (see
ReliableChannel). Also provides message redelivery in case of missing or negative delivery confirmations.
• Delivers next message to a destination only if previous message has been successfully delivered (flow con-
trol is done by destination).
• Stops itself when the maximum number of redelivery attempts has been reached.
• Cannot reply on persistence.
• Can be used standalone.
Akka Persistence: AtLeastOnceDelivery
• AtLeastOnceDelivery trait is mixed in to a PersistentActor
• Does not prevent redundant delivery of messages to a destination entirely, but won’t re-send messages whose
delivery is confirmed during recovery.
• Is not associated with a single destination. A destination can be specified with each deliver request and
is referred to by an actor path. A destination path is resolved to the current destination incarnation during
delivery (via actorSelection).
Views
Eventsourced:
• No direct support for views. Only way to maintain a view is to use a channel and a processor as destination.
Akka Persistence: View
• Receives the message stream written by a PersistentActor by reading it directly from the journal (see
persistent-views). Alternative to using channels. Useful in situations where actors shall receive a persistent
message stream in correct order without duplicates.
• Supports snapshots.
Serializers
Eventsourced:
• Uses a protobuf serializer for serializing Message objects.
• Delegates to a configurable Akka serializer for serializing Message payloads.
• Delegates to a configurable, proprietary (stream) serializer for serializing snapshots.
• See Serialization.
Akka Persistence:
• Uses a protobuf serializer for serializing Persistent objects.
• Delegates to a configurable Akka serializer for serializing Persistent payloads.
• Delegates to a configurable Akka serializer for serializing snapshots.
• See custom-serialization.
Sequence numbers
Eventsourced:
• Generated on a per-journal basis.
Akka Persistence:
• Generated on a per persistent actor basis.
Storage plugins
Eventsourced:
• Plugin API: SynchronousWriteReplaySupport and AsynchronousWriteReplaySupport
• No separation between journal and snapshot storage plugins.
• All plugins pre-packaged with project (see journals and snapshot configuration)
Akka Persistence:
• Plugin API: SyncWriteJournal, AsyncWriteJournal, AsyncRecovery, SnapshotStore
(see storage-plugins).
• Clear separation between journal and snapshot storage plugins.
The 2.4 release contains some structural changes that require some simple, mechanical source-level changes in
client code.
When migrating from earlier versions you should first follow the instructions for migrating 1.3.x to 2.0.x and then
2.0.x to 2.1.x and then 2.1.x to 2.2.x and then 2.2.x to 2.3.x.
Binary Compatibility
Akka 2.4.x is backwards binary compatible with previous 2.3.x versions apart from the following exceptions. This
means that the new JARs are a drop-in replacement for the old one (but not the other way around) as long as your
build does not enable the inliner (Scala-only restriction).
The following parts are not binary compatible with 2.3.x:
• akka-testkit and akka-remote-testkit
• experimental modules, such as akka-persistence and akka-contrib
• features, classes, methods that were deprecated in 2.3.x and removed in 2.4.x
The dependency to Netty has been updated from version 3.8.0.Final to 3.10.3.Final. The changes in those versions
might not be fully binary compatible, but we believe that it will not be a problem in practice. No changes were
needed to the Akka source code for this update. Users of libraries that depend on 3.8.0.Final that break with
3.10.3.Final should be able to manually downgrade the dependency to 3.8.0.Final and Akka will still work with
that version.
While technically not yet deprecated, the current akka.actor.TypedActor support will be superseded by the
typed-scala project that is currently being developed in open preview mode. If you are using TypedActors in your
projects you are advised to look into this, as it is superior to the Active Object pattern expressed in TypedActors.
The generic ActorRefs in Akka Typed allow the same type-safety that is afforded by TypedActors while retaining
all the other benefits of an explicit actor model (including the ability to change behaviors etc.).
It is likely that TypedActors will be officially deprecated in the next major update of Akka and subsequently
removed.
Protobuf Dependency
The transitive dependency to Protobuf has been removed to make it possible to use any version of Protobuf for
the application messages. If you use Protobuf in your application you need to add the following dependency with
desired version number:
"com.google.protobuf" % "protobuf-java" % "2.5.0"
Previously akka.actor.RootActorPath allowed passing in arbitrary strings into its name parameter, which
is meant to be the name of the root Actor. Subsequently, if constructed with an invalid name such as a full
path for example (/user/Full/Path) some features using this path may transparently fail - such as using
actorSelection on such invalid path.
In Akka 2.4.x the RootActorPath validates the input and may throw an IllegalArgumentException if
the passed in name string is illegal (contains / elsewhere than in the begining of the string or contains #).
In earlier versions of Akka TestKit.remaining returned the default timeout configurable under “akka.test.single-
expect-default”. This was a bit confusing and thus it has been changed to throw an AssertionError if called outside
of within. The old behavior however can still be achieved by calling TestKit.remainingOrDefault instead.
class ActorBusImpl(val system: ActorSystem) extends ActorEventBus with ActorClassifier with Manage
type Event = Notification
If you have been creating EventStreams manually, you now have to provide an actor system and start the unsub-
scriber:
val bus = new EventStream(system, true)
bus.startUnsubscriber()
Please note that this change affects you only if you have implemented your own buses, Akka’s own
context.eventStream is still there and does not require any attention from you concerning this change.
When changing states in an Finite-State-Machine Actor (FSM), state transition events are emitted and can be
handled by the user either by registering onTransition handlers or by subscribing to these events by sending
it an SubscribeTransitionCallBack message.
Previously in 2.3.x when an FSM was in state A and performed a goto(A) transition, no state transition
notification would be sent. This is because it would effectively stay in the same state, and was deemed to be
semantically equivalent to calling stay().
In 2.4.x when an FSM performs an any goto(X) transition, it will always trigger state transition events. Which
turns out to be useful in many systems where same-state transitions actually should have an effect.
In case you do not want to trigger a state transition event when effectively performing an X->X transition, use
stay() instead.
In 2.3.x calls protected by the CircuitBreaker were allowed to run indefinitely and the check to see if the
timeout had been exceeded was done after the call had returned.
In 2.4.x the failureCount of the Breaker will be increased as soon as the timeout is reached and a
Failure[TimeoutException] will be returned immediately for asynchronous calls. Synchronous calls
will now throw a TimeoutException after the call is finished.
It will filter the log events using the backend configuration (e.g. logback.xml) before they are published to the
event bus.
In order to make cluster routers smarter about when they can start local routees, nrOfInstances defined on
Pool now takes ActorSystem as an argument. In case you have implemented a custom Pool you will have to
update the method’s signature, however the implementation can remain the same if you don’t need to rely on an
ActorSystem in your logic.
In order to make cluster routers smarter about when they can start local routees, paths defined on Group now
takes ActorSystem as an argument. In case you have implemented a custom Group you will have to update the
method’s signature, however the implementation can remain the same if you don’t need to rely on an ActorSystem
in your logic.
In 2.3.x the deployment configuration property nr-of-instances was used for cluster aware routers to specify
total number of routees in the cluster. This was confusing, especially since the default value is 1.
In 2.4.x there is a new deployement property cluster.max-total-nr-of-instances that defines total
number of routees in the cluster. By default max-total-nr-of-instances is set to a high value (10000)
that will result in new routees added to the router when nodes join the cluster. Set it to a lower value if you want
to limit total number of routees.
For backwards compatibility reasons nr-of-instances is still used if defined by user, i.e. if defined it takes
precedence over max-total-nr-of-instances.
Previously, few places in Akka used “simple” logger names, such as Cluster or Remoting. Now they
use full class names, such as akka.cluster.Cluster or akka.remote.Remoting, in order to al-
low package level log level definitions and ease source code lookup. In case you used specific “sim-
ple” logger name based rules in your logback.xml configurations, please change them to reflect ap-
propriate package name, such as <logger name=’akka.cluster’ level=’warn’ /> or <logger
name=’akka.remote’ level=’error’ />
Default check interval changed from 800 ms to 100 ms. You can define the interval explicitly if you need a longer
interval.
Secure Cookies
Microkernel is Deprecated
Akka Microkernel is deprecated and will be removed. It is replaced by using an ordinary user defined main class
and packaging with sbt-native-packager or Lightbend ConductR. Please see Use-case and Deployment Scenarios
for more information.
Previously, cluster metrics functionality was located in the akka-cluster jar. Now it is split out and
moved into a separate Akka module: akka-cluster-metrics jar. The module comes with few enhance-
ments, such as use of Kamon sigar-loader for native library provisioning as well as use of statistical aver-
aging of metrics data. Note that both old and new metrics configuration entries in the reference.conf
are still in the same name space akka.cluster.metrics but are not compatible. Make sure to dis-
able legacy metrics in akka-cluster: akka.cluster.metrics.enabled=off, since it is still enabled
in akka-cluster by default (for compatibility with past releases). Router configuration entries have also
changed for the module, they use prefix cluster-metrics-: cluster-metrics-adaptive-pool and
cluster-metrics-adaptive-group Metrics extension classes and objects are located in the new package
akka.cluster.metrics. Please see Scala, Java for more information.
The Cluster Singleton, Distributed Pub-Sub, and Cluster Client previously located in the akka-contrib jar is
now moved to a separate module named akka-cluster-tools. You need to replace this dependency if you
use any of these tools.
The classes changed package name from akka.contrib.pattern to akka.cluster.singleton,
akka.cluster.pubsub and akka.cluster.client.
The configuration properties changed name to akka.cluster.pub-sub and akka.cluster.client.
The Cluster Sharding previously located in the akka-contrib jar is now moved to a separate module named
akka-cluster-sharding. You need to replace this dependency if you use Cluster Sharding.
The classes changed package name from akka.contrib.pattern to akka.cluster.sharding.
The configuration properties changed name to akka.cluster.sharding.
ClusterSharding construction
Several parameters of the start method of the ClusterSharding extension are now defined in a settings ob-
ject ClusterShardingSettings. It can be created from system configuration properties and also amended
with API. These settings can be defined differently per entry type if needed.
Starting the ShardRegion in proxy mode is now done with the startProxy method of the
ClusterSharding extension instead of the optional entryProps parameter.
Entry was renamed to Entity, for example in the MessagesExtractor in the Java API and the EntityId
type in the Scala API.
idExtractor function was renamed to extractEntityId. shardResolver function was renamed to
extractShardId.
Previously in 2.3.x entries were direct children of the local ShardRegion. In examples the
persistenceId of entries included self.path.parent.name to include the cluster type name.
In 2.4.x entries are now children of a Shard, which in turn is a child of the local ShardRegion. To include
the shard type in the persistenceId it is now accessed by self.path.parent.parent.name from
each entry.
Asynchronous ShardAllocationStrategy
The Cluster Sharding coordinator stores the locations of the shards using Akka Persistence. This data can safely
be removed when restarting the whole Akka Cluster.
The serialization format of the internal persistent events stored by the Cluster Sharding coordinator has been
changed and it cannot load old data from 2.3.x or some 2.4 milestone.
The persistenceId of the Cluster Sharding coordinator has been changed since 2.3.x so it should not load
such old data, but it can be a problem if you have used a 2.4 milestone release. In that case you should remove the
persistent data that the Cluster Sharding coordinator stored. Note that this is not application data.
You can use the RemoveInternalClusterShardingData utility program to remove this data.
The new persistenceId is s"/sharding/${typeName}Coordinator". The old persistenceId
is s"/user/sharding/${typeName}Coordinator/singleton/coordinator".
Parameters to the Props factory methods have been moved to settings object
ClusterSingletonManagerSettings and ClusterSingletonProxySettings. These can
be created from system configuration properties and also amended with API as needed.
The buffer size of the ClusterSingletonProxy can be defined in the
ClusterSingletonProxySettings instead of defining stash-capacity of the mailbox. Buffering
can be disabled by using a buffer size of 0.
The singletonPath parameter of ClusterSingletonProxy.props has changed. It is
now named singletonManagerPath and is the logical path of the singleton manager, e.g.
/user/singletonManager, which ends with the name you defined in actorOf when creating the
ClusterSingletonManager. In 2.3.x it was the path to singleton instance, which was error-prone because
one had to provide both the name of the singleton manager and the singleton actor.
DistributedPubSub construction
ClusterClient construction
The parameters of the Props factory methods in the ClusterClient companion has been moved to set-
tings object ClusterClientSettings. This can be created from system configuration properties and also
amended with API as needed.
The buffer size of the ClusterClient can be defined in the ClusterClientSettings instead of defining
stash-capacity of the mailbox. Buffering can be disabled by using a buffer size of 0.
ClusterClient sender
In 2.3 the sender() of the response messages, as seen by the client, was the actor in cluster.
In 2.4 the sender() of the response messages, as seen by the client, is deadLetters since the client should
normally send subsequent messages via the ClusterClient. It is possible to pass the original sender inside
the reply messages if the client is supposed to communicate directly to the actor in the cluster.
Akka Persistence
Experimental removed
The artefact name of the Persistent TCK has changed from akka-persistence-tck-experimental
(akka-persistence-experimental-tck) to akka-persistence-tck.
Mandatory persistenceId
Failures
Backend journal failures during recovery and persist are treated differently than in 2.3.x. The
PersistenceFailure message is removed and the actor is unconditionally stopped. The new behavior and
reasons for it is explained in failures-scala.
The persist method that takes a Seq (Scala) or Iterable (Java) of events parameter was deprecated and
renamed to persistAll to avoid mistakes of persisting other collection types as one single event by calling the
overloaded persist(event) method.
non-permanent deletion
The permanent flag in deleteMessages was removed. non-permanent deletes are not supported any more.
Events that were deleted with permanent=false with older version will still not be replayed in this version.
Previously the way to cause recover in PersistentActors was sending them a Recover() message. Most of the
time it was the actor itself sending such message to self in its preStart method, however it was possible to
send this message from an external source to any PersistentActor or PresistentView to make it start
recovering.
This style of starting recovery does not fit well with usual Actor best practices: an Actor should be independent
and know about its internal state, and also about its recovery or lack thereof. In order to guide users towards more
independent Actors, the Recovery() object is now not used as a message, but as configuration option used by
the Actor when it starts. In order to migrate previous code which customised its recovery mode use this example
as reference:
// previously
class OldCookieMonster extends PersistentActor {
def preStart() = self ! Recover(toSequenceNr = 42L)
// ...
}
// now:
class NewCookieMonster extends PersistentActor {
override def recovery = Recovery(toSequenceNr = 42L)
// ...
}
While undocumented, previously the sender() of the replayed messages would be the same sender that orig-
inally had sent the message. Since sender is an ActorRef and those events are often replayed in different
incarnations of actor systems and during the entire lifetime of the app, relying on the existence of this reference
is most likely not going to succeed. In order to avoid bugs in the style of “it worked last week”, the sender()
reference is now not stored, in order to avoid potential bugs which this could have provoked.
The previous behaviour was never documented explicitly (nor was it a design goal), so it is unlikely that applica-
tions have explicitly relied on this behaviour, however if you find yourself with an application that did exploit this
you should rewrite it to explicitly store the ActorPath of where such replies during replay may have to be sent
to, instead of relying on the sender reference during replay.
max-message-batch-size config
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin config
PersistentView is deprecated
SyncWriteJournal removed
Previously the SnapshotStore plugin SPI did not allow for asynchronous deletion of snapshots, and failures
of deleting a snapshot may have been even silently ignored.
Now SnapshotStore must return a Future representing the deletion of the snapshot. If this future
completes successfully the PersistentActor which initiated the snapshotting will be notified via an
DeleteSnapshotSuccess message. If the deletion fails for some reason a DeleteSnapshotFailure
will be sent to the actor instead.
For criteria based deletion of snapshots (def deleteSnapshots(criteria:
SnapshotSelectionCriteria)) equivalent DeleteSnapshotsSuccess and
DeleteSnapshotsFailure messages are sent, which contain the specified criteria, instead of
SnapshotMetadata as is the case with the single snapshot deletion messages.
However, this feature was not used by many plugins, and expanding the API to accomodate all callbacks would
have grown the API a lot. Instead, Akka Persistence 2.4.x introduces an additional (optionally overrideable)
receivePluginInternal:Actor.Receive method in the plugin API, which can be used for handling
those as well as any custom messages that are sent to the plugin Actor (imagine use cases like “wake up and
continue reading” or custom protocols which your specialised journal can implement).
Implementations using the previous feature should adjust their code as follows:
// previously
class MySnapshots extends SnapshotStore {
// old API:
// def saved(meta: SnapshotMetadata): Unit = doThings()
// new API:
def saveAsync(metadata: SnapshotMetadata, snapshot: Any): Future[Unit] = {
// completion or failure of the returned future triggers internal messages in receivePluginIn
val f: Future[Unit] = ???
f
}
def receivePluginInternal = {
case SaveSnapshotSuccess(metadata) => doThings()
case MyCustomMessage(data) => doOtherThings()
}
// ...
}
In places where previously akka.japi.Option was used in Java APIs, including the return type of
doLoadAsync, the Java 8 provided Optional type is used now.
Please remember that when creating an java.util.Optional instance from a (possibly) null value you
will want to use the non-throwing Optional.fromNullable method, which converts a null into a None
value - which is slightly different than its Scala counterpart (where Option.apply(null) returns None).
Atomic writes
Rejecting writes
The journal can signal that it rejects individual messages (AtomicWrite) by the returned im-
mutable.Seq[Try[Unit]]. The returned Seq must have as many elements as the input messages Seq. Each
Try element signals if the corresponding AtomicWrite is rejected or not, with an exception describing the
problem. Rejecting a message means it was not stored, i.e. it must not be included in a later replay. Rejecting a
message is typically done before attempting to store it, e.g. because of serialization error.
Read the API documentation of this method for more information about the semantics of rejections and failures.
asyncDeleteMessagesTo
The permanent deletion flag was removed. Support for non-permanent deletions was removed. Events that
were deleted with permanent=false with older version will still not be replayed in this version.
Previously a number of classes and methods used the word “replay” interchangeably with the word “recover”.
This lead to slight inconsistencies in APIs, where a method would be called recovery, yet the signal for a
completed recovery was named ReplayMessagesSuccess.
This is now fixed, and all methods use the same “recovery” wording consistently across the entire API.
The old ReplayMessagesSuccess is now called RecoverySuccess, and an additional method called
onRecoveryFailure has been introduced.
The signature of deliver changed slightly in order to allow both ActorSelection and ActorPath to be
used with it.
Previously:
def deliver(destination: ActorPath, deliveryIdToMessage: Long ⇒ Any): Unit
Now:
def deliver(destination: ActorSelection)(deliveryIdToMessage: Long ⇒ Any): Unit def de-
liver(destination: ActorPath)(deliveryIdToMessage: Long ⇒ Any): Unit
The Java API remains unchanged and has simply gained the 2nd overload which allows ActorSelection to
be passed in directly (without converting to ActorPath).
system.terminate().foreach { _ =>
println("Actor system was shut down")
}
Akka Persistence
A new persistence plugin proxy was added, that allows sharing of an otherwise non-sharable jour-
nal or snapshot store. The proxy is available by setting akka.persistence.journal.plugin
or akka.persistence.snapshot-store.plugin to akka.persistence.journal.proxy or
akka.persistence.snapshot-store.proxy, respectively. The proxy supplants the Shared LevelDB
journal.
14.2.1 Browsing
Tickets
Before filing a ticket, please check the existing Akka tickets for earlier reports of the same problem. You are very
welcome to comment on existing tickets, especially if you have reproducible test cases that you can share.
Roadmaps
Please include the versions of Scala and Akka and relevant configuration files.
You can create a new ticket if you have registered a GitHub user account.
Thanks a lot for reporting bugs and suggesting features!
Pull Requests fixing issues or adding functionality are very welcome. Please read CONTRIBUTING.md for more
information about contributing to Akka.
14.3 Licenses
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not
use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of
the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Each dependency and its license can be seen in the project build file (the comment on the side of each dependency):
AkkaBuild.scala
14.4 Sponsors
14.4.1 Lightbend
Lightbend is the company behind the Akka Project, Scala Programming Language, Play Web Framework, Scala
IDE, sbt and many other open source projects. It also provides the Lightbend Stack, a full-featured development
stack consisting of AKka, Play and Scala. Learn more at lightbend.com.
14.4.2 YourKit
YourKit is kindly supporting open source projects with its full-featured Java Profiler.
YourKit, LLC is the creator of innovative and intelligent tools for profiling Java and .NET applications. Take a
look at YourKit’s leading software products: YourKit Java Profiler and YourKit .NET Profiler
14.5 Project
Commercial support is provided by Lightbend. Akka is part of the Lightbend Reactive Platform.
14.5.3 Downloads
http://akka.io/downloads
All Akka releases are published via Sonatype to Maven Central, see search.maven.org or search.maven.org (Akka
versions before 2.4.3)
Nightly builds are available in http://repo.akka.io/snapshots/ as both SNAPSHOT and timestamped versions.
For timestamped versions, pick a timestamp from http://repo.akka.io/snapshots/com/lightbend/akka/akka-
actor_2.11/. All Akka modules that belong to the same build have the same timestamp.
Make sure that you add the repository to the sbt resolvers:
resolvers += "Lightbend Snapshots" at "http://repo.akka.io/snapshots/"
Define the library dependencies with the timestamp as version. For example:
libraryDependencies += "com.typesafe.akka" % "akka-remote_2.11" %
"2.1-20121016-001042"
Make sure that you add the repository to the maven repositories in pom.xml:
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>akka-snapshots</id>
<name>Akka Snapshots</name>
<url>http://repo.akka.io/snapshots/</url>
<layout>default</layout>
</repository>
</repositories>
Define the library dependencies with the timestamp as version. For example:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-remote_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.1-20121016-001042</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
FIFTEEN
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Akka maintains and verifies backwards binary compatibility across versions of modules.
In the rest of this document whenever binary compatibility is mentioned “backwards binary compatibility” is
meant (as opposed to forward compatibility).
This means that the new JARs are a drop-in replacement for the old one (but not the other way around) as long as
your build does not enable the inliner (Scala-only restriction).
Some modules are excluded from the binary compatibility guarantees, such as:
749
Akka Java Documentation, Release 2.4.20
• *-testkit modules - since these are to be used only in tests, which usually are re-compiled and run on
demand
• *-tck modules - since they may want to add new tests (or force configuring something), in order to discover possible
failures in an existing implementation that the TCK is supposed to be testing. Compatibility here is
not guaranteed, however it is attempted to make the upgrade prosess as smooth as possible.
• all experimental modules - which by definition are subject to rapid iteration and change. Read more about
them in The meaning of “experimental”
Modules that are released together under the Akka project are intended to be upgraded together. For example, it is
not legal to mix Akka Actor 2.4.2 with Akka Cluster 2.4.5 even though “Akka 2.4.2” and “Akka 2.4.5”
are binary compatible.
This is because modules may assume internals changes across module boundaries, for example some feature in
Clustering may have required an internals change in Actor, however it is not public API, thus such change is
considered safe.
Note: We recommend keeping an akkaVersion variable in your build file, and re-use it for all included
modules, so when you upgrade you can simply change it in this one place.
Experimental is a keyword used in module descriptions as well as their artifact names, in order to signify that the
API that they contain is subject to change without any prior warning.
Experimental modules are are not covered by Lightbend’s Commercial Support, unless specifically stated other-
wise. The purpose of releasing them early, as experimental, is to make them easily available and improve based
on feedback, or even discover that the module wasn’t useful.
An experimental module doesn’t have to obey the rule of staying binary compatible between micro releases.
Breaking API changes may be introduced in minor releases without notice as we refine and simplify based on
your feedback. An experimental module may be dropped in minor releases without prior deprecation.
Best effort migration guides may be provided, but this is decided on a case-by-case basis for experimental mod-
ules.
Akka gives a very strong binary compatibility promise to end-users. However some parts of Akka are excluded
from these rules, for example internal or known evolving APIs may be marked as such and shipped as part of
an overall stable module. As general rule any breakage is avoided and handled via deprecation and additional
method, however certain APIs which are known to not yet be fully frozen (or are fully internal) are marked as
such and subject to change at any time (even if best-effort is taken to keep them compatible).
When browsing the source code and/or looking for methods available to be called, especially from Java which does
not have as rich of an access protection system as Scala has, you may sometimes find methods or classes annotated
with the /** INTERNAL API */ comment or the @akka.annotation.InternalApi annotation.
No compatibility guarantees are given about these classes, they may change or even disapear in minor versions,
and user code is not supposed to be calling (or even touching) them.
Side-note on JVM representation details of the Scala private[akka] pattern that Akka is using extensively
in it’s internals: Such methods or classes, which act as “accessible only from the given package” in Scala, are
compiled down to public (!) in raw Java bytecode, and the access restriction, that Scala understands is carried
along as metadata stored in the classfile. Thus, such methods are safely guarded from being accessed from Scala,
however Java users will not be warned about this fact by the javac compiler. Please be aware of this and do not
call into Internal APIs, as they are subject to change without any warning.
In addition to the special internal API marker two annotations exist in Akka and specifically address the following
use cases:
• @ApiMayChange – which marks APIs which are known to be not fully stable yet. For example, when
while introducing “new” Java 8 APIs into existing stable modules, these APIs may be marked with this
annotation to signal that they are not frozen yet. Please use such methods and classes with care, however
if you see such APIs that is the best point in time to try them out and provide feedback (e.g. using the
akka-user mailing list, github issues or gitter) before they are frozen as fully stable API.
• @DoNotInherit – which marks APIs that are designed under an closed-world assumption, and thus must
not be extended outside Akka itself (or such code will risk facing binary incompatibilities). E.g. an interface
may be marked using this annotation, and while the type is public, it is not meant for extension by user-code.
This allows adding new methods to these interfaces without risking to break client code. Examples of such
API are the FlowOps trait or the Akka HTTP domain model.
Please note that a best-effort approach is always taken when having to change APIs and breakage is avoided as
much as possible, however these markers allow to experiment, gather feedback and stabilize the best possible APIs
we could build.
Akka uses the Lightbend maintained Migration Manager, called MiMa for short, for enforcing binary compatibility
is kept where it was promised.
All Pull Requests must pass MiMa validation (which happens automatically), and if failures are detected, manual
exception overrides may be put in place if the change happened to be in an Internal API for example.
Scala does not maintain serialization compatibility across major versions. This means that if Java serialization is
used there is no guarantee objects can be cleanly deserialized if serialized with a different version of Scala.
The internal Akka Protobuf serializers that can be enabled explicitly
with enable-additional-serialization-bindings or implicitly with
akka.actor.allow-java-serialization = off (which is preferable from a security standpoint)
does not suffer from this problem.
It is the name of a beautiful Swedish mountain up in the northern part of Sweden called Laponia. The mountain is
also sometimes called ‘The Queen of Laponia’.
Akka is also the name of a goddess in the Sámi (the native Swedish population) mythology. She is the goddess
that stands for all the beauty and good in the world. The mountain can be seen as the symbol of this goddess.
Also, the name AKKA is the a palindrome of letters A and K as in Actor Kernel.
Akka is also:
• the name of the goose that Nils traveled across Sweden on in The Wonderful Adventures of Nils by the
Swedish writer Selma Lagerlöf.
• the Finnish word for ‘nasty elderly woman’ and the word for ‘elder sister’ in the Indian languages Tamil,
Telugu, Kannada and Marathi.
• a font
• a town in Morocco
• a near-earth asteroid
Actors, ActorSystems, ActorMaterializers (for streams), all these types of objects bind resources that must be
released explicitly. The reason is that Actors are meant to have a life of their own, existing independently of
whether messages are currently en route to them. Therefore you should always make sure that for every creation
of such an object you have a matching stop, terminate, or shutdown call implemented.
In particular you typically want to bind such values to immutable references, i.e. final ActorSystem
system in Java or val system: ActorSystem in Scala.
Due to an ActorSystem’s explicit lifecycle the JVM will not exit until it is stopped. Therefore it is necessary to
shutdown all ActorSystems within a running application or Scala REPL session in order to allow these processes
to terminate.
Shutting down an ActorSystem will properly terminate all Actors and ActorMaterializers that were created within
it.
When using future callbacks, inside actors you need to carefully avoid closing over the containing actor’s refer-
ence, i.e. do not call methods or access mutable state on the enclosing actor from within the callback. This breaks
the actor encapsulation and may introduce synchronization bugs and race conditions because the callback will be
scheduled concurrently to the enclosing actor. Unfortunately there is not yet a way to detect these illegal accesses
at compile time.
Read more about it in the docs for Actors and shared mutable state.
Why OutOfMemoryError?
It can be many reasons for OutOfMemoryError. For example, in a pure push based system with message con-
sumers that are potentially slower than corresponding message producers you must add some kind of message
flow control. Otherwise messages will be queued in the consumers’ mailboxes and thereby filling up the heap
memory.
Some articles for inspiration:
• Balancing Workload across Nodes with Akka 2.
• Work Pulling Pattern to prevent mailbox overflow, throttle and distribute work
How can I get compile time errors for missing messages in receive?
One solution to help you get a compile time warning for not handling a message that you should be handling is
to define your actors input and output messages implementing base traits, and then do a match that the will be
checked for exhaustiveness.
Here is an example where the compiler will warn you that the match in receive isn’t exhaustive:
object MyActor {
// these are the messages we accept
sealed abstract trait Message
final case class FooMessage(foo: String) extends Message
final case class BarMessage(bar: Int) extends Message
15.2.5 Remoting
Make sure that you have remoting enabled on both ends: client and server. Both do need hostname and port
configured, and you will need to know the port of the server; the client can use an automatic port in most cases
(i.e. configure port zero). If both systems are running on the same network host, their ports must be different
If you still do not see anything, look at what the logging of remote life-cycle events tells you (normally logged
at INFO level) or switch on Auxiliary remote logging options to see all sent and received messages (logged at
DEBUG level).
• akka.remote.log-sent-messages
• akka.remote.log-received-messages
• akka.remote.log-remote-lifecycle-events (this also includes deserialization errors)
When you want to send messages to an actor on a remote host, you need to know its full path, which is of the
form:
akka.protocol://system@host:1234/user/my/actor/hierarchy/path
The most common reason is that the local system’s name (i.e. the system@host:1234 part in the answer
above) is not reachable from the remote system’s network location, e.g. because host was configured to be
0.0.0.0, localhost or a NAT’ed IP address.
If you are running an ActorSystem under a NAT or inside a docker container, make sure to set
akka.remote.netty.tcp.hostname and akka.remote.netty.tcp.port to the address it is reachable at from other Ac-
torSystems. If you need to bind your network interface to a different address - use akka.remote.netty.tcp.bind-
hostname and akka.remote.netty.tcp.bind-port settings. Also make sure your network is configured to translate
from the address your ActorSystem is reachable at to the address your ActorSystem network interface is bound to.
The general rule is at-most-once delivery, i.e. no guaranteed delivery. Stronger reliability can be built on top,
and Akka provides tools to do so.
Read more in Message Delivery Reliability.
15.2.6 Debugging
To turn on debug logging in your actor system add the following to your configuration:
akka.loglevel = DEBUG
To enable different types of debug logging add the following to your configuration:
• akka.actor.debug.receive will log all messages sent to an actor if that actors receive method is a
LoggingReceive
• akka.actor.debug.autoreceive will log all special messages like Kill, PoisonPill e.t.c.
sent to all actors
• akka.actor.debug.lifecycle will log all actor lifecycle events of all actors
Read more about it in the docs for Logging and actor.logging-scala.
15.3 Books
• Mastering Akka, by Christian Baxter, PACKT Publishing, ISBN: 9781786465023, October 2016
• Learning Akka, by Jason Goodwin, PACKT Publishing, ISBN: 9781784393007, December 2015
• Akka in Action, by Raymond Roestenburg and Rob Bakker, Manning Publications Co., ISBN:
9781617291012, estimated in 2016
• Reactive Messaging Patterns with the Actor Model, by Vaughn Vernon, Addison-Wesley Professional,
ISBN: 0133846830, August 2015
• Developing an Akka Edge, by Thomas Lockney and Raymond Tay, Bleeding Edge Press, ISBN:
9781939902054, April 2014
• Effective Akka, by Jamie Allen, O’Reilly Media, ISBN: 1449360076, August 2013
• Akka Concurrency, by Derek Wyatt, artima developer, ISBN: 0981531660, May 2013
• Akka Essentials, by Munish K. Gupta, PACKT Publishing, ISBN: 1849518289, October 2012
15.4 Videos
• Learning Akka Videos, by Salma Khater, PACKT Publishing, ISBN: 9781784391836, January 2016
15.5.1 Background
OSGi is a mature packaging and deployment standard for component-based systems. It has similar capabilities as
Project Jigsaw (originally scheduled for JDK 1.8), but has far stronger facilities to support legacy Java code. This
is to say that while Jigsaw-ready modules require significant changes to most source files and on occasion to the
structure of the overall application, OSGi can be used to modularize almost any Java code as far back as JDK 1.2,
usually with no changes at all to the binaries.
These legacy capabilities are OSGi’s major strength and its major weakness. The creators of OSGi realized early
on that implementors would be unlikely to rush to support OSGi metadata in existing JARs. There were already a
handful of new concepts to learn in the JRE and the added value to teams that were managing well with straight
J2EE was not obvious. Facilities emerged to “wrap” binary JARs so they could be used as bundles, but this
functionality was only used in limited situations. An application of the “80/20 Rule” here would have that “80%
of the complexity is with 20% of the configuration”, but it was enough to give OSGi a reputation that has stuck
with it to this day.
This document aims to the productivity basics folks need to use it with Akka, the 20% that users need to get 80%
of what they want. For more information than is provided here, OSGi In Action is worth exploring.
The fundamental unit of deployment in OSGi is the Bundle. A bundle is a Java JAR with additional entries
<https://www.osgi.org/bundle-headers-reference/> in MANIFEST.MF that minimally expose the name and ver-
sion of the bundle and packages for import and export. Since these manifest entries are ignored outside OSGi
deployments, a bundle can interchangeably be used as a JAR in the JRE.
When a bundle is loaded, a specialized implementation of the Java ClassLoader is instantiated for each
bundle. Each classloader reads the manifest entries and publishes both capabilities (in the form of the
Bundle-Exports) and requirements (as Bundle-Imports) in a container singleton for discovery by other
bundles. The process of matching imports to exports across bundles through these classloaders is the process of
resolution, one of six discrete steps in the lifecycle FSM of a bundle in an OSGi container:
1. INSTALLED: A bundle that is installed has been loaded from disk and a classloader instantiated with its
capabilities. Bundles are iteratively installed manually or through container-specific descriptors. For those
familiar with legacy packging such as EJB, the modular nature of OSGi means that bundles may be used
by multiple applications with overlapping dependencies. By resolving them individually from repositories,
these overlaps can be de-duplicated across multiple deployemnts to the same container.
2. RESOLVED: A bundle that has been resolved is one that has had its requirements (imports) satisfied. Res-
olution does mean that a bundle can be started.
3. STARTING: A bundle that is started can be used by other bundles. For an otherwise complete application
closure of resolved bundles, the implication here is they must be started in the order directed by a depth-first
search for all to be started. When a bundle is starting, any exposed lifecycle interfaces in the bundle are
called, giving the bundle the opportunity to start its own service endpoints and threads.
4. ACTIVE: Once a bundle’s lifecycle interfaces return without error, a bundle is marked as active.
5. STOPPING: A bundle that is stopping is in the process of calling the bundle’s stop lifecycle and transitions
back to the RESOLVED state when complete. Any long running services or threads that were created while
STARTING should be shut down when the bundle’s stop lifecycle is called.
6. UNINSTALLED: A bundle can only transition to this state from the INSTALLED state, meaning it cannot
be uninstalled before it is stopped.
Note the dependency in this FSM on lifecycle interfaces. While there is no requirement that a bundle publishes
these interfaces or accepts such callbacks, the lifecycle interfaces provide the semantics of a main() method and
allow the bundle to start and stop long-running services such as REST web services, ActorSystems, Clusters, etc.
Secondly, note when considering requirements and capabilities, it’s a common misconception to equate these with
repository dependencies as might be found in Maven or Ivy. While they provide similar practical functionality,
OSGi has several parallel type of dependency (such as Blueprint Services) that cannot be easily mapped to repos-
itory capabilities. In fact, the core specification leaves these facilities up to the container in use. In turn, some
containers have tooling to generate application load descriptors from repository metadata.
Combined with understanding the bundle lifecycle, the OSGi developer must pay attention to sometimes unex-
pected behaviors that are introduced. These are generally within the JVM specification, but are unexpected and
can lead to frustration.
• Bundles should not export overlapping package spaces. It is not uncommon for legacy JVM frameworks
to expect plugins in an application composed of multiple JARs to reside under a single package name. For
example, a frontend application might scan all classes from com.example.plugins for specific service
implementations with that package existing in several contributed JARs.
While it is possible to support overlapping packages with complex manifest headers, it’s much better to
use non-overlapping package spaces and facilities such as Akka Cluster for service discovery. Stylistically,
many organizations opt to use the root package path as the name of the bundle distribution file.
• Resources are not shared across bundles unless they are explicitly exported, as with classes. The common
case of this is expecting that getClass().getClassLoader().getResources("foo") will re-
turn all files on the classpath named foo. The getResources() method only returns resources from
the current classloader, and since there are separate classloaders for every bundle, resource files such as
configurations are no longer searchable in this manner.
To use Akka in an OSGi environment, the container must be configured such that the
org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation property delegates the sun.misc package to the boot
classloader instead of resolving it through the normal OSGi class space.
Akka only supports the usage of an ActorSystem strictly confined to a single OSGi bundle, where that bundle con-
tains or imports all of the actor system’s requirements. This means that the approach of offering an ActorSystem
as a service to which Actors can be deployed dynamically via other bundles is not recommended — an ActorSys-
tem and its contained actors are not meant to be dynamic in this way. ActorRefs may safely be exposed to other
bundles.
15.5.6 Activator
To bootstrap Akka inside an OSGi environment, you can use the akka.osgi.ActorSystemActivator
class to conveniently set up the ActorSystem.
import akka.actor.{ Props, ActorSystem }
import org.osgi.framework.BundleContext
import akka.osgi.ActorSystemActivator
The goal here is to map the OSGi lifecycle more directly to the Akka lifecycle. The ActorSystemActivator
creates the actor system with a class loader that finds resources (application.conf and reference.conf
files) and classes from the application bundle and all transitive dependencies.
The ActorSystemActivator class is included in the akka-osgi artifact:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.typesafe.akka</groupId>
<artifactId>akka-osgi_2.11</artifactId>
<version>2.4.20</version>
</dependency>
15.5.7 Sample