Engineering Portfolios Value Use and Examples
Engineering Portfolios Value Use and Examples
American
c Society for Engineering Education, 2016
Engineering Portfolios: Value, Use, and Examples
Abstract
An engineering portfolio is a valuable tool when applying to an engineering position in industry.
Web-based portfolios compliment an applicant’s résumé and provide insight into an engineering
student’s skills as a designer, creator, fabricator, and problem-solver. While the use of
professional portfolios is well established in some fields, such as art, film, graphics design, and
architecture, the concept is not commonly used within the engineering disciplines. This paper
outlines the value and typical content of an engineering portfolio. A process to develop an
engineering portfolio will also be presented. The paper will document the efforts of graduate and
undergraduate engineering students to (1) archive professional academic work for display in a
portfolio, (2) curate their archived collection to present a concise and cogent display of their
professional skills, and (3) organize the portfolio to demonstrate job skills.
Introduction
Modern communication methods have dramatically changed yet some processes are grounded in
the past. One of those processes is the employment application process, in this case for
engineering positions. Typically this process involves an applicant responding to an open
position with a cover letter and résumé (or curriculum vitae) often submitted electronically. It is
proposed that an engineering portfolio format allows engineering students to showcase
accomplishments and provides potential employers with greater insight into their competencies
and abilities. The material presented in an applicant’s professional portfolio may include
research findings, artifacts from course work, results from extracurricular activities, and personal
endeavors. It is proposed that an applicant with a high quality professional portfolio also has high
degrees of creativity, innovation, and initiative, all of which may resonate with future employers
and increase their employability competitiveness.
This paper examines the history of portfolios in the employment market and in engineering
education, and presents a methodology for undergraduate and graduate students to develop their
personal engineering portfolio. Modeled after approaches used in other creative professions such
as art and architecture, the engineering portfolio is a record of an individual’s skills documented
by examples from projects they have worked on. In this context, the engineering portfolio can be
viewed as a tool to demonstrate one’s ability to solve engineering problems.
The use of engineering portfolios as a component of a job application addresses emerging trends
in education and business. While the pursuit of an education is primarily an individualistic “self-
centered” activity, employment within an organization is team-based. Also, much of the
education process centers on the achievement of objectives (often by demonstrating what an
individual knows) while industry focuses on applied problem solving. As such, applicants must
shape their internal views of “what I can do” to align with industry needs of “what can you do
for our company.” The traditional tools of the application process – the cover letter and résumé –
require the employer map the alignment between an individual’s skills and the company’s
requirements. An engineering portfolio makes this mapping more direct, with the applicant
directly aligning examples of problem solving to the corporate needs.
A review of the employer’s desirable factors in employees include an ability to work in teams,
make decisions, solve problems, plan, organize and prioritize work, analyze quantitative data,
and convey results to influence others. 1 This list of attributes highlight a desire for employees
who can “do” tasks that help the organization, in turn, accomplish its mission. Often this mission
involves “doing” and employers need to find (and hire) “doers.” An effective engineering
portfolio is an excellent tool to demonstrate an individual’s potential contribution to an
organization.
A similar shift in perspective (from a candidate’s focus on what they know to what they have
done) is underway within the college admission process. Under the umbrella of a new
organization – the Coalition for Access, Affordability and Success – a new format for college
admissions has been developed. In this new system, high school students assemble a portfolio of
their experiences as a component of their college application. The portfolios are intended to
cover experiences from as early as a student’s first year. Students can share their portfolios with
teachers, counselors and family members. It is hoped that this group provide advice not only on
the portfolio but also on the student’s educational trajectory by suggesting courses and activities
that will best prepare the students for college.2
While the results of this new college application process will play out over the next few years,
the students who participate in this process will soon be applying to jobs in industry with the
benefit of previously using portfolios as a component of an application. This factor alone signals
a need for engineering educators to become more aware of the value of engineering portfolios.
The portfolio concept has been used within engineering education in two distinct areas:
outcomes assessment and as a tool for employment. Before presenting a methodology for
engineering portfolio development, these areas of application are reviewed.
Williams suggests that portfolios of student work can be a valuable tool to document and assess
student learning.3 Principally driven by a need to assess the attainment of communication skills
(needed for accreditation purposes), portfolios are presented as a tool to define educational
objectives, correlate documented material to a program's educational objectives, facilitate an
opportunity for students to reflect on their learning, and assess the attainment of objectives.
While the author does not present the mechanics of assembling individual portfolios (over a
student's academic career), the author illustrates how portfolios have been used to assess and
improve the learning process.
Bhattacharya and Hartnett extend the use of student portfolios in engineering education beyond
communications and into all aspects of engineering professional knowledge and skills. 4 The
portfolio serves both as a collection of a student’s best work and as a forum to encourage
personal reflection. This perspective on portfolios also promotes portfolios as a mechanism that
demonstrates the interaction between distinct components of an individual's education. Similar to
the newly proposed college admissions portfolios, the engineering education portfolios can be
used with peer review, feedback and improvement.
Wilczynski and Colella report on an approach to create “institutional portfolio” as a tool for
programs to use when reviewing the curriculum’s ability and performance teaching design
skills.5 The collected information, while useful for structuring course improvements, is also
presented as a document to share with accreditation reviewers, benefactors, students and faculty
members that illustrates a sequential accumulation of design skills. In this version of the
engineering portfolio, design artifacts from courses throughout the curriculum are documented
with the reflection component of the portfolio emphasized as a path for future improvements.
This approach is similar to that reported by Kajfez, Kecskemety, and Kross who document how
team-based electronic portfolios can be used by design groups to collaborate, share information
with others, document the design process, and showcase work. 6 Examples illustrate how
computer models, photographs, and text are combined to produce a team’s portfolio. Student
surveys document student awareness of the potential benefit of a course-based portfolio when
applying for jobs.
Online information technology (IT) focused portfolios were presented by Crowley and
Miertschin as a means to increase student awareness of the IT profession. In addition to
increased awareness, the use of portfolios amplified student understanding of connections
between academic applications and professional goals.8 As a result of this initiative, engineering
faculty recognized the value of portfolios for assessing student skills. In this application,
portfolio development was initially used as the basis of a term-long capstone project in the major
before the concept was moved to become a sophomore level course. The components of an
individual portfolio included a biography, statement of employment objectives, downloadable
résumé, summary of technical skills, and documentation of projects that demonstrated the
application of technical skills (and explanations of how the project demonstrates proficiency in
specific skills). In addition to helping students compete for jobs, university-archived electronic
portfolios were also proposed by Jwaifell as a mechanism for employers to search for
employees.9
Creating Engineering Portfolios: A Four-Step Process
An engineering portfolio is a valuable mechanism to present materials, collected over a period of
time, that demonstrate a person’s ability within a specific subject area. This section identifies
four-steps to create an engineering portfolio: collecting content, organizing content, creating
narratives (including reflection), and displaying content. The authors do not favor either a
specific format (hardcopy or digital) of the portfolio, leaving that decision to the individual
applying to specific employers. For the sake of this discussion, the development of a web-based
portfolio will be detailed, noting that the collected contents could be converted to a hardcopy
format. This process was developed from personal experience and the review of best practices
from a variety of resources.10,11 An example of a typical engineering portfolio (entry page) is
presented in Figure 1.
1. Adams, S., “The 10 Skills Employers Most Want in 2015”, Forbes Online, November 12, 2014.
2. Pappano, L., “A New Coalition of Elite Colleges Tries to Reshape Admissions”, New York Times Education
Life, November 1, 2015, page ED14.
3. Williams, J.M., “The Engineering Portfolio: Communication, Reflection, and Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 197-207, 2002.
4. Bhattacharya, M. and Hartnett, M., “E-portfolio Assessment in Higher Education”, 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers
in Education Conference, 2007.
5. Wilczynski, V., and Colella, K.J., "Using Design Portfolios to Improve Design Education," ASEE Annual
Conference Proceedings, 1996.
6. Kajfez, R.L., Kecskemety, K.M., and Kross, M., “Electronic Notebooks to Document the Engineering Design
Process: From Platform to Impact”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2015.
7. Estell, J.K., “The Interactive Programming Portfolio”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1999.
8. Crowley, E., and Miertschin, S.L., “Developing Information Technology Career Path Awareness through
Student Online Portfolios”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2004.
9. Jwaifell, M., “A Proposed Model for Electronic Portfolio to Increase Both Validating Skills and Employment”,
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol, 103, pp 256-364, 2013.
10. MIT Ideation Lab Portfolio Resources: https://sites.google.com/site/ideationportfolioresources/, accessed
January 15, 2016.
11. McNair, L.D. and Garrison, W., “Portfolios to Professoriate: Helping Students Integrate Professional Identities
through Portfolios”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2012.
12. Portfolio Example One: http://www.otlamos.com/ , accessed January 15, 2016.
13. Portfolio Example Two: http://www.patrick-wilczynski.com/, accessed January 15, 2016.
14. Portfolio Example Three http://www.ngoctdoan.com/, accessed January 15, 2016.
15. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs – 2014-2015
Accreditation Cycle”, 2015, retrieved from www.abet.org, accessed January 15, 2016.