Refining Processes Handbook 2006 PDF
Refining Processes Handbook 2006 PDF
Sponsored by:
Technology Solutions
Processes index - 1 [next page]
Alkylation Desulfurization Hydrocracking (ISOCRACKING)
Alkylation, catalytic Dewaxing Hydrocracking (LC-FINING)
Alkylation--feed preparation Dewaxing/wax deoiling Hydrocracking-residue
Alkylation-HF Diesel-ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD) Hydrodearmatization
Alkylation-sulfuric acid Diesel-upgrading Hydrofinishing
Aromatics Ethers Hydrofinishing/hydrotreating
Aromatics extractive distillation Ethers-ETBE Hydrogen
Aromatics recovery Ethers-MTBE Hydrogenation
Benzene reduction Flue gas denitrification Hydrogen-HTCT and HTCR twin plants
Biodiesel Flue gas desulfurization-SNOX Hydrogen-HTER-p
Catalytic dewaxing Fluid catalytic cracking Hydrogen-methanol-to-shift
Catalytic reforming Fluid catalytic cracking-pretreatment Hydrogen-recovery
Coking Gas treating-H2S removal Hydrogen-steam reforming
Coking, fluid Gasification Hydrogen-steam-methane
Coking,flexi Gasoline desulfurization reforming (SMR)
Crude distillation Gasoline desulfurization, ultra deep Hydroprocessing, residue
Crude topping units H2S and SWS gas conversion Hydroprocessing, ULSD
Deasphalting H2S removal Hydrotreating
Deep catalytic cracking Hydroconversion-VGO & DAO Hydrotreating (ISOTREATING)
Deep thermal conversion Hydrocracking Hydrotreating diesel
Sponsored by:
Technology Solutions
Processes index - 2 [previous page]
Hydrotreating/desulfurization Olefins-butenes extractive distillation Treating-gases
Hydrotreating-aromatic saturation Olefins-dehydrogenation of Treating-gasoline and LPG
Hydrotreating-lube and wax light parraffins to olefins Treating-gasoline desulfurization,
Hydrotreating-RDS/VRDS/UFR/OCR Oligomerization-C3/C4 cuts ultra deep
Hydrotreating-resid Oligomerization-polynaphtha Treating-gasoline sweetening
Hydrotreating-residue Paraxylene Treating-kerosine and heavy naphtha
Prereforming with feed ultra purification sweetening
Isomerization
Pressure swing adsorption-rapid cycle Treating-phenolic caustic
Isooctene/isooctane
Refinery offgas-purification and Treating-pressure swing adsorption
Lube and wax processing
olefins recovery Treating-propane
Lube extraction
Resid catalytic cracking Treating-reformer products
Lube hydrotreating
Slack wax deoiling Treating-spent caustic deep neutralization
Lube oil refining, spent
SO2 removal, regenerative Vacuum distillation
Lube treating
Sour gas treatment Visbreaking
Mercaptan removal
Spent acid regneration Wax hydrotreating
NOx abatement
Spent lube oil re-refining Wet gas scrubbing
NOx reduction, low-temperature
Sulfur processing Wet Scrubbing system, EDV
O2 enrichment for Claus units
Sulfur recovery White oil and wax hydrotreating
O2 enrichment for FCC units
Thermal gasoil
Olefin etherfication
Treating jet fuel/kerosine
Olefins recovery
Sponsored by:
Technology Solutions
Company index
ABB Lummus Global GTC Technology Inc.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Haldor Topsoe
Axens Kobe Steel Ltd.
Bechtel Linde AG
Belco Technologies Corp. Lurgi
CB&I Merichem Chemicals & Refinery Services LLC
CDTECH Process Dynamics, Inc.
Chevron Lummus Global LLC. Refining Hydrocarbon Technology LLC
ConocoPhillips Shaw Stone &Webster
Davy Process Technology Shell Global Solutions International BV
DuPont Technip
ExxonMobil Engineering & Research Uhde GmbH
Foster Wheeler UOP LLC
Gas Technology Products
Genoil Inc.
Goar, Allison & Associates
Sponsored by:
Technology Solutions
ABB Lummus Global
Alkylation
Coking
Fluid catalytic cracking
Hydrotreating
Hydrotreating-aromatic saturation
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Hydrogen-recovery
Olefins recovery
Axens
Alkylation-feed preparation
Benzene reduction
Catalytic reforming
Ethers
Gasoline desulfurization, ultra deep
Hydroconversion-VGO & DAO
Hydrocracking
Hydrocracking-residue
Hydrotreating diesel
Hydrotreating-resid
Isomerization
Lube oil refining, spent
Oligomerization-C3/C4 cuts
Oligomerization-polynaphtha
Spent lube oil re-refining
Bechtel
Dewaxing
Dewaxing/wax deoiling
Lube extraction
Lube extraction
Lube hydrotreating
Lube hydrotreating
Wax hydrotreating
Belco Technologies Corp.
NOx reduction, low-temperature
SO2 removal, regenerative
Wet Scrubbing system, EDV
CB&I
Catalytic reforming
Crude topping units
Hydrogen-steam reforming
Hydrotreating
CDTECH
Alkylation, catalytic
Hydrogenation
Hydrotreating
Isomerization
Chevron Lummus Global LLC.
Dewaxing
Hydrocracking (ISOCRACKING)
Hydrocracking (LC-FINING)
Hydrofinishing
Hydrotreating (ISOTREATING)
Hydrotreating-RDS/VRDS/UFR/OCR
Processes:
Alkylation
Coking Technology Solutions
Gasoline desulfurization Technology Solutions, a division of ConocoPhillips, is a premier provider of technology solutions for
the vehicles of today and the oilfields and energy systems of tomorrow. Backed by modern research facilities
Isomerization and a strong tradition of innovation, we develop, commercialize and license technologies that help oil and
gas producers, refiners and manufacturers reach their business and operational. From enhanced production
methods, to gasoline sulfur removal processes to valuable catalysts that enhance fuel cell operation, Tech-
nology Solutions prepares producers, refiners and consumers alike for a cleaner, more beneficial future.
Strengths of Our Business
• Focused efforts on developing and commercializing technologies that enable refiners to economically
produce clean fuels and upgrade hydrocarbons into higher value products
• Strategic alignment with both Upstream and Downstream energy segments to effectively capitalize on
extensive R&D, commercial and operational expertise
• Strong relationship-building and problem-solving abilities
• Customer inter-facing and advocacy
Industries Served
Technology Solutions supports both Upstream and Downstream energy segments, including:
• Carbon and petroleum coke
• Gasification
• Sulfur chemistry
• Hydrocarbon processing and upgrading
• Upstream technologies
• Enhanced recovery
Corporate Overview
ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) is an international, integrated energy company. It is the third-largest integrat-
ed energy company in the United States, based on market capitalization, and oil and gas proved reserves
and production; and the second largest refiner in the United States. Worldwide, of non government-con-
trolled companies, ConocoPhillips has the fifth-largest total of proved reserves and is the fourth-largest
refiner. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, ConocoPhillips operates in more than 40 countries. As of March
31, 2006, the company had approximately 38,000 employees worldwide and assets of $160 billion.
Technical articles: visbreaking, and providing cost-effective solutions for the refining industry.
Services:
• Integrated hydrogen solutions: • Market studies
• Master planning
Combining hydrogen recovery • Feasibility studies
and optimized steam • Concept screening
• Environmental engineering
• Upgrade refinery residuals into • Front-end design (FEED)
value-added products • Project management (PMC)
• Engineering (E)
• Optimize turnaround projects • Procurement (P)
• Drivers for additional delayed • Construction (C) & construction management (Cm)
• Commissioning & start-up
coking capacity in the refining • Validation
industry • Plant operations & maintenance
• Training
• When solvent deasphalting is
the most appropriate technology Our Global Power Group, world-leading experts in combustion technology, designs, manufactures and
for upgrading residue erects steam generating and auxiliary equipment for power stations and industrial markets worldwide, and
also provides a range of after-market services.
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.fosterwheeler.com
Gas Technology Products
H2S removal
H2S removal
H2S removal
Genoil Inc.
Hydrotreating-residue
Goar, Allison & Associates
Sulfur processing
Sulfur recovery
GTC Technology Inc.
Aromatics
Aromatics recovery
Desulfurization
Paraxylene
Haldor Topsoe
Diesel-ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD)
Diesel-upgrading
Flue gas denitrification
Flue gas desulfurization-SNOX
Fluid catalytic cracking-pretreatment
H2S and SWS gas conversion
Hydrocracking
Hydrodearmatization
Hydrogen-HTCT and HTCR twin plants
Hydrogen-HTER-p
Hydrogen-methanol-to-shift
Hydrogen-steam-methane reforming (SMR)
Hydrotreating
Sour gas treatment
Spent acid regneration
Kobe Steel Ltd.
Hydrocracking
Linde AG
O2 enrichment for Claus units
O2 enrichment for FCC units
Lurgi
Biodiesel
Merichem Chemicals & Refinery Services LLC
Treating jet fuel/kerosine
Treating-gases
Treating-gasoline and LPG
Treating-gasoline desulfurization, ultra deep
Treating-gasoline sweetening
Treating-kerosine and heavy naphtha sweetening
Treating-phenolic caustic
Treating-propane
Treating-reformer products
Treating-spent caustic deep neutralization
Process Dynamics, Inc.
Hydrotreating
Hydrotreating-lube and wax
Lube and wax processing
Refining Hydrocarbon Technology LLC
Alkylation
Isooctene/isooctane
Olefin etherfication
Shaw Stone & Webster
Deep catalytic cracking
Fluid catalytic cracking
Refinery offgas-purification and olefins recovery
Resid catalytic cracking
Shell Global Solutions International BV
Crude distillation
Deep thermal conversion
Fluid catalytic cracking
Gasification
Hydrocracking
Hydroprocessing, residue
Thermal gasoil
Visbreaking
Technip
Crude distillation
Hydrogen
Uhde GmbH
Aromatics extractive distillation
Ethers-ETBE
Ethers-MTBE
Hydrofinishing/hydrotreating
Hydrogen
Lube treating
Olefins-butenes extractive distillation
Olefins-dehydrogenation of light parraffins to olefins
Slack wax deoiling
Vacuum distillation
White oil and wax hydrotreating
Processes:
Alkylation (2)
Alkylation-HF For more than 90 years, UOP LLC, a Honeywell company, has been a leader in developing and com-
mercializing technology for license to the oil refining, petrochemical and gas processing industries. Starting
Catalytic reforming with its first breakthrough technology, UOP has contributed processes and technology that have led to ad-
vances in such diverse industries as motor fuels, plastics, detergents, synthetic fibers and food preservatives.
Fluid catalytic cracking UOP is the largest process licensing organization in the world, providing more than 50 licensed processes
Hydrocracking for the hydrocarbon processing industries and holding more than 2,500 active patents.
UOP offices are in Des Plaines, Illinois, USA (a northwest suburb of Chicago). The company employs
Hydrotreating (2) nearly 3,000 people in its facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia.
The petroleum refining industry is the largest market for UOP technology, products and services. UOP
Hydrotreating/desulfurization processes are used throughout the industry to produce clean-burning, high-performance fuels from a vari-
ety of hydrocarbon products. For example, for 60 years our Platforming process has been used to upgrade
Isomerization (3) low-octane naphtha to high-octane unleaded gasoline, a higher performance fuel. Other technologies con-
vert mercaptans to innocuous disulfides, remove sulfur from fuel, and recover high-purity hydrogen from
Mercaptan removal impure gas streams.
Technologies developed by UOP are almost entirely responsible for providing the fundamental raw
Treating-pressure swing materials – benzene, toluene and xylene (BTX) – of the aromatics-based petrochemicals industry. These
products form the basis of such familiar products as synthetic rubber, polyester fibers, polystyrene foam,
adsorption glues and pharmaceuticals. UOP technologies produce such olefins as ethylene and propylene, used in a
range of products from contact lenses to food packaging. UOP has been active in the development of syn-
thetic detergent chemicals since 1947, and today almost half of the world’s soft (biodegradable) detergents
Technical articles: are produced through UOP-developed processes.
UOP’s gas processing technologies are used for separating, drying and treating gases produced from oil
• Concepts for an overall refinery and gas wells and atmospheric gases.
energy solution through novel in- UOP is the world’s leading producer of synthetic molecular sieve adsorbents used in purifying natural gas,
separating paraffins and drying air through cryogenic separation. Molecular sieves also are used in insulat-
tegration of FCC flue gas power ing glass, refrigeration systems, air brake systems, automotive mufflers and deodorizing products.
recovery UOP provides engineering designs for its processes, and produces key mechanical equipment for some of
its processes. It also offers project management, cost estimation, procurement and facility-design services.
• Changing refinery configura- UOP’s staff of engineers provides customers with a wide range of services, including start-up assistance,
tion for heavy and synthetic operating technical services such as process monitoring and optimization, training of customer personnel,
crude processing catalyst and product testing, equipment inspection, and project management.
For more information:
[email protected]
Alkylation
Application: The AlkyClean process converts light olefins into alkylate
by reacting the olefins with isobutane over a true solid acid catalyst.
AlkyClean’s unique catalyst, reactor design and process scheme allow ��������� ��������
operation at low external isobutane-to-olefin ratios while maintaining
excellent product quality. ��������������
������� �������
����������
Products: Alkylate is a high-octane, low-Rvp gasoline component used ������ ������������
��������
��� ���
for blending in all grades of gasoline. ��������
�������
Description: The light olefin feed is combined with the isobutane make-
��������
up and recycle and sent to the alkylation reactors which convert the ��������
������������
olefins into alkylate using a solid acid catalyst (1). The AlkyClean process ���
uses a true solid acid catalyst to produce alkylate, eliminating the safety
and environmental hazards associated with liquid acid technologies. Si-
multaneously, reactors are undergoing a mild liquid-phase regeneration
using isobutane and hydrogen and, periodically, a reactor undergoes a
higher temperature vapor phase hydrogen strip (2). The reactor and mild
regeneration effluent is sent to the product-fractionation section, which
produces n-butane and alkylate products, while also recycling isobutane
and recovering hydrogen used in regeneration for reuse in other refinery Installation: Demonstration unit at Neste Oil’s Porvoo, Finland Refinery.
hydroprocessing units (3). The AlkyClean process does not produce any
acid soluble oils (ASO) or require post treatment of the reactor effluent or Reference: “The AlkyClean process: New technology eliminates liquid
final products. acids,” NPRA 2006 Annual Meeting, March 19–21, 2006.
D’Amico, V., J. Gieseman, E. von Broekhoven, E. van Rooijen and
Product: The C5+ alkylate has a RON of 93–98 depending on processing H. Nousiainen, “Consider new methods to debottleneck clean alkylate
conditions and feed composition. production,” Hydrocarbon Processing, February 2006, pp. 65–70.
Economics: Licensor: ABB Lummus Global, Albemarle Catalysts and Neste Oil.
Investment (2006 USGC basis 10,000-bpsd unit) $/bpsd 4,200
Operating cost, $/gal 0.08
Alkylation
Application: Convert propylene, butylenes, amylenes and isobutane to
the highest quality motor fuel using ReVAP (Reduce Volatility Alkylation
�����������������
Process) alkylation.
�
Products: An ultra-low-sulfur, high-octane and low-Rvp blending stock
�������
for motor and aviation fuels.
���������� �
Description: Dry liquid feed containing olefins and isobutane is charged �����
�
to a combined reactor-settler (1). The reactor uses the principle of dif-
ferential gravity head to effect catalyst circulation through a cooler pri- �����������������
or to contacting highly dispersed hydrocarbon in the reactor pipe. The
���������
hydrocarbon phase that is produced in the settler is fed to the main
��������
fractionator (2), which separates LPG-quality propane, isobutane recycle, �����
��������
Description: Plants are designed to process a mixture of propylene, �������
butylenes and amylenes. Olefins and isobutane-rich streams along with ����������
a recycle stream of H2SO4 are charged to the STRATCO Contactor reac- �����
tor (1). The liquid contents of the Contactor reactor are circulated at high
velocities and an extremely large amount of interfacial area is exposed ��������
between the reacting hydrocarbons and the acid catalyst from the acid �����
settler (2). The entire volume of the liquid in the Contactor reactor is main-
tained at a uniform temperature, less than 1°F between any two points
within the reaction mass. Contactor reactor products pass through a flash
drum (3) and deisobutanizer (4). The refrigeration section consists of a
compressor (5) and depropanizer (6).
The overhead from the deisobutanizer (4) and effluent refrigerant Utilities, typical per bbl alkylate:
recycle (6) constitutes the total isobutane recycle to the reaction zone. Electricity, kWh 13.5
This total quantity of isobutane and all other hydrocarbons is maintained Steam, 150 psig, lb 180
in the liquid phase throughout the Contactor reactor, thereby serving to Water, cooling (20°F rise), 103 gal 1.85
promote the alkylation reaction. Onsite acid regeneration technology is Acid, lb 15
also available. Caustic, lb 0.1
Product quality: The total debutanized alkylate has RON of 92 to 96 Installation: Over 600,000 bpsd installed capacity.
clear and MON of 90 to 94 clear. When processing straight butylenes,
Reference: Hydrocarbon Processing, Vol. 64, No. 9, September 1985,
the debutanized total alkylate has RON as high as 98 clear. Endpoint of
pp. 67–71.
the total alkylate from straight butylene feeds is less than 390°F, and less
than 420°F for mixed feeds containing amylenes in most cases. Licensor: DuPont.
Economics (basis: butylene feed):
Investment (basis: 10,000-bpsd unit), $ per bpsd 4,500
Alkylation
Application: The RHT-Alkylation process is an improved method to react ��������������
C3– C5 olefins with isobutane using the classical sulfuric acid alkylation
��������
process. This process uses a unique mixing device — eductor(s) — that
��������� ��
provides low-temperature (25 – 30°F) operations at isothermal condi- ���
�
�������
�
����������� ��������� ������������
tions. This eductor mixing device is more cost-effective than other de-
vices being used or proposed. It is maintenance free and does not re- ���
��������������������� ���������
quire replacement every two to three years. This mixing device can be a
�
retrofit replacement for existing contactors. In addition, the auto refrig- ������� ������� � ����� �
������ ������� ��������� �������� ��������
eration vapor can be condensed by enhancing pressure and then easily ������� �������������
��������
���� ��������� ����������
absorbed in hydrocarbon liquid, without revamping the compressor. ������������
����������������
�����������
Description: In the RHT-Alkylation, C3– C5 feed from FCC or any other �����������
����������
source including steam cracker, etc., with isobutane make-up, recycle
isobutene, and recovered hydrocarbons from the depropanizer bottom ���������������
and refrigeration vapors are collected in a surge drum — the C4 system
(5). The mixture is pumped to the reactor (1) to the eductor suction port.
The motive fluid is sent to the eductor nozzle from the bottom of reac-
tor, which is essentially sulfuric acid, through pumps to mix the reactants
with the sulfuric-acid catalyst.
The mixing is vigorous to move the reaction to completion. The The hydrocarbon is sent to distillation column(s) (7), to separate alkyl-
makeup acid and acid-soluble oil (ASO) is removed from the pump dis- ate product and isobutane, which is recycled. The butane is sent to offsites
charge. The process has provisions to install a static mixer at the pump or can be converted back to isobutane for processing units requirements.
discharge. Some feed can be injected here to provide higher OSV, which The auto refrigeration occurs in the reactor at temperatures 25–30°F. The
is required for C3 alkylation. Reactor effluent is withdrawn from the isothermal condition lowers acid consumption and yields higher octane
reactor as a side draw and is sent to acid/ hydrocarbon coalescer (2) product due to improved selectivity of 2,4,4 trimethylpentane.
where most of the acid is removed and recycled to the reactor (1). The The auto-refrigeration vapor is compressed (or first enhanced the
coalescers are being used by conventional process to reduce the acid in pressure by the ejector and then absorbed in a heavy liquid — alkylate,
the hydrocarbon phase to 7–15 wppm. The enhanced coalescer design which provides a low-cost option) and then condensed. Some liquid is
RHT can reduce the sulfuric acid content in the hydrocarbon phase to sent to depropanizer (6); propane and light ends are removed. The bot-
negligible levels (below <1 wppm). toms are recycled to C4 system and sent to the reactor.
After the coalescer, the hydrocarbon phase is heated and flashed The major advances of RHT process are threefold: eductor mixing
increasing the alkylate concentration in the hydrocarbon, which is sent device, advance coalescer system to remove acid from hydrocarbon (dry
through the finishing coalescer where essentially all of the remaining system), and C4 autorefrigeration vapors recovery by absorption, mak-
acid is removed. ing compressor redundant.
Continued
Alkylation, continued Commercial units: Technology is ready for commercialization.
References:
Economics: For a US Gulf Coast unit 1Q 2006 with a capacity of 10,000 US patent 5,095168.
bpd alkylate unit US Patent 4,130593.
CAPEX ISBL, MM USD 31.2 Kranz, K., “Alkylation Chemistry,” Stratco, Inc., 2001.
Utilities ISBL costs, USD/ bbl alkylate 3,000 Branzaru, J., “Introduction to Sulfuric Acid Alkylation,” Stratco, Inc.,
Power, kWh 4,050* 2001.
Water, cooling, m3/ h 1,950 Nelson, Handbook of Refining.
Steam, kg / h 25,600 Meyers, R. A., Handbook of Refining, McGraw Hill, New York,
1997.
* Power could be less for absorption application
FCC Feed (about 15% isobutelene in C4 mixed stream) Licensor: Refining Hydrocarbon Technologies LLC.
Product properties: Octane (R+M) / 2:94.8 – 95.4
Alkylation
Application: The Alkad process is used with HF alkylation technology to �����������������
�����������������������
reduce aerosol formation in the event of an HF release, while maintain-
����������������
ing unit operability and product quality. The Alkad process is a passive
mitigation system that will reduce aerosol from any leak that occurs
while additive is in the system. ��������
��������
����� ����
Description: The additive stripper sends acid, water and light-acid sol- ������� �������� ������������
uble oils overhead and on to the acid regenerator. Heavy acid soluble ���������� ������
oils and the concentrated HF-additive complex are sent to the additive
���������� ����
stripper bottoms separator. From this separator the polymer is sent to ����
��������������
neutralization, and the HF-additive complex is recycled to the reactor
section. The acid regenerator removes water and light-acid soluble oils
from the additive stripper overhead stream. The water is in the form of ����������
a constant boiling mixture (CBM) of water and HF. ��������������������
��������������������������� �����������������
There is no expected increase in the need for operator manpower.
Maintenance requirements are similar to equipment currently in stan-
dard operation in an HF alkylation unit in similar service.
duction.
Good hydrogen distribution and reactor design eliminate channeling
���������������
while enabling high turndown ratios. Butene yields are maximized, hy- ������� �����������������
drogen is completely consumed and, essentially, no gaseous byproducts
or heavier compounds are formed. Additional savings are possible when
pure hydrogen is available, eliminating the need for a stabilizer. The pro-
cess integrates easily with the C3/C4 splitter.
Alkyfining performance and impact on HF alkylation product:
The results of an Alkyfining unit treating an FCC C4 HF alkylation Annual savings for a 10,000-bpsd alkylation unit:
unit feed containing 0.8% 1,3-butadiene are: HF unit, US$ 4.1 million
Butadiene in alkylate, ppm < 10 H2SO4 unit, US$ 5.5 million
1-butene isomerization, % 70
Butenes yield, % 100.5
Installation: Over 90 units are operating with a total installed capacity
of 800,000 bpsd.
RON increase in alkylate 2
MON increase in alkylate 1 Licensor: Axens.
Alkylate end point reduction, °C –20
The increases in MON, RON and butenes yield are reflected in a
substantial octane-barrel increase while the lower alkylate end point re-
duces ASO production and HF consumption.
Economics:
Investment:
New unit ISBL cost:
For an HF unit, $/bpsd 430
For an H2SO4 unit, $/bpsd 210
Alkylation—HF
Application: HF Alkylation improves gasoline quality by adding clean-
burning, mid-boiling-range isoparaffins and reducing gasoline pool va-
por pressure and olefin content by conversion of C3– C5 olefin compo- �������
�����
nents to alkylate.
Description: The alkylation reaction catalytically combines C3– C5 olefins ��������
with isobutane to produce motor-fuel alkylate. Alkylation takes place in ����
����������
the presence of HF catalyst under conditions selected to maximize alkyl-
ate yield and quality.
The reactor system is carefully designed to ensure efficient contact- �������
����
����
ing and mixing of hydrocarbon feed with the acid catalyst. Efficient heat ������� �������
�������
transfer conserves cooling water supply. Acid inventory in the reactor
system is minimized by combining high heat-transfer rates and lower ��������
total acid circulation.
Acid regeneration occurs in the acid regenerator or via a patented
internal-acid-regeneration method. Internal regeneration allows the
refiner to shutdown the acid regenerator, thereby realizing a utility
savings as well as reducing acid consumption and eliminating polymer
disposal.
Feed: Alkylation feedstocks are typically treated to remove sulfur and
water. In cases where MTBE and TAME raffinates are still being pro-
cessed, an oxygenate removal unit (ORU) may be desirable.
Selective hydrogenation of butylene feedstock is recommended to
reduce acid regeneration requirements, catalyst (acid) consumption and
increase alkylate octane by isomerizing 1-butene to 2-butene.
Efficiency: HF Alkylation remains the most economically viable method
for the production of alkylate. The acid consumption rate for HF Alkyla-
tion is less than 1/100th the rate for sulfuric alkylation units. And un-
like sulfuric alkylation units, HF Alkylation does not require refrigeration
equipment to maintain a low reactor temperature.
Installations: Over 20 UOP licensed HF alkylation units are in operation.
Licensor: UOP LLC.
Alkylation, sulfuric acid
Application: Autorefrigerated sulfuric-acid catalyzed process that com- Propane product
bines butylene (and propylene or pentylene if desired) with isobutane
to produce high-octane gasoline components that are particularly at-
tractive in locations that are MON limited. Technology can be installed 3
2
grassroots or retrofit into existing alkylation facilities. Recycle
Refrigerant Butane
isobutane product
Products: A low-sulfur, low-Rvp, highly isoparaffinic, high-octane (espe-
cially MON) gasoline blendstock is produced from this alkylation process.
1
4
Description: Olefin feed and recycled isobutane are introduced into the 5 6
stirred, autorefrigerated reactor (1). Mixers provide intimate contact be-
Olefin feed
tween the reactants and acid catalyst. Highly efficient autorefrigeration
removes heat of reaction heat from the reactor. Hydrocarbons, vaporized START
Alkylate
Makeup
from the reactor to provide cooling, are compressed (2) and returned to Recycle acid isobutane product
the reactor. A depropanizer (3), which is fed by a slipstream from the
refrigeration section, is designed to remove any propane introduced to
the plant with the feeds.
Hydrocarbon products are separated from the acid in the settler
containing proprietary internals (4). In the deisobutanizer (5) isobutane
is recovered and recycled along with makeup isobutane to the reactor. Steam, lb 200
Butane is removed from alkylate in the debutanizer (6) to produce a H2SO4, lb 19
low-Rvp, high-octane alkylate product. A small acid stream containing NaOH, 100%, lb 0.1
acid soluble oil byproducts is removed from the unit and is either regen-
erated on site or sent to an off-site sulfuric acid regeneration facility to
Operating experience: Extensive commercial experience in both
ExxonMobil and licensee refineries, with a total operating capacity of
recover acid strength.
119,000-bpsd at 11 locations worldwide. Unit capacities currently range
Yields: from 2,000 to 30,000 bpd. The license of the world’s largest alkylation
Alkylate yield 1.8 bbl C5+/ bbl butylene feed unit, with a capacity of 83,000 bpd, was recently announced at Reliance
Isobutane required 1.2 bbl / bbl butylene feed Petroleum Limited’s Export Refinery in Jamnagar, India. A revamp has
Alkylate quality 97 RON / 94 MON been completed at ExxonMobil’s Altona, Australia refinery and a new
Rvp, psi 3 unit at TNK-BP’s Ryazan, Russia refinery is scheduled to start-up in mid-
2006. The larger units take advantage of the single reactor/settler trains
Utilities: typical per barrel of alkylate produced: with capacities up to 9,500 bpsd.
Water, cooling, M gal 2
Power, kWH 9 Continued
Alkylation, sulfuric acid, continued Economic advantages:
• Lower capital investment—Simple reactor/settler configura-
tion, less compression requirements translate into a significant invest-
Technical advantages: ment savings compared to indirect refrigeration systems
• Autorefridgeration is thermodynamically more efficient, allows
• Lower operating costs—Autorefrigeration, lower mixing and
lower reactor temperatures, which favor better product quality, and
compression power requirements translate into lower operating costs
lowers energy usage.
• Better economy of scale —Reactor system is simple and easily
• Staged reactor results in a high average isobutane concentra-
expandable with 9,500 bpsd single train capacities easily achievable.
tion, which favors high product quality.
• Low space velocity results in high product quality and reduced Reference: Lerner, H., “Exxon sulfuric acid alkylation technology,” Hand-
ester formation eliminating corrosion problems in fractionation equip- book of Petroleum Refining Processes, 2nd Ed., R. A. Meyers, Ed., pp.
ment. 1.3–1.14.
• Low reactor operating pressure translates into high reliabil-
ity for the mechanical seals for the mixers, which operate in the vapor Licensor: ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Co.
phase.
Aromatics
������������
Application: The GT-TransAlk technology produces benzene and xylenes ����������
from toluene and/or heavy aromatics streams. The technology features �������
����������
a proprietary catalyst and can accommodate varying ratios of feedstock,
while maintaining high activity and selectivity.
������
Description: The GT-TransAlk technology encompasses three main pro-
������
cessing areas: feed preparation, reactor and product stabilization sec- ����� ������ ��������
��������� ������
tions. The heavy aromatics stream (usually derived from catalytic refor-
mate) is fed to a C10/C11 splitter. The overhead portion, along with any ����
�������� ����������
toluene that may be available, is the feed to the transalkylation reactor �������
section. The combined feed is mixed with hydrogen, vaporized, and fed ���������
to the reactor. The un-reacted hydrogen is recycled for re-use. The prod-
����
uct stream is stabilized to remove fuel gas and other light components. ������������
The process reactor is charged with a proprietary catalyst, which �������
�������������
exhibits good flexibility to feed stream variations, including 100% C9+
aromatics. Depending on the feed composition, the xylene yield can
vary from 27 to 35% and C9 conversion from 53 to 67%.
Process advantages include:
• Simple, low cost fixed-bed reactor design
• Selective toward xylene production, with high toluene/C9 conver-
sion rates
• Physically stable catalyst
• Flexible to handle up to 100% C9+ components in feed
• Flexible to handle benzene recycle to increase xylene yields
• Moderate operating parameters; catalyst can be used as replace-
ment to other transalkylation units, or in grassroots designs
• Decreased hydrogen consumption due to low cracking rates
• Efficient heat integration scheme, reduces energy consumption.
Continued
Aromatics extractive distillation, continued
Emmrich, G., U. Ranke and H. Gehrke, “Working with an extractive dis-
tillation process,” Petroleum Technology Quarterly, Summer 2001, p. 125.
and with low pressure drop in the hydrogen loop, the product is 90 to 100 �
� �
RONC. With its higher selectivity, trimetallic catalysts RG582 and RG682 �
make an excellent catalyst replacement for semi-regenerative reformers.
The second, the advanced Octanizing process, uses continuous cata-
lyst regeneration allowing operating pressures as low as 3.5 kg /cm2 (50
psig). This is made possible by smooth-flowing moving bed reactors (1–3)
which use a highly stable and selective catalyst suitable for continuous
regeneration (4). Main features of Axens’ regenerative technology are: ���������
Licensor: Axens.
Catalytic dewaxing
Application: Use the ExxonMobil Selective Catalytic Dewaxing (MSDW) ����� �����������������������
process to make high VI lube base stock. ���������
����� ������������
Products: High VI / low-aromatics lube base oils (light neutral through ��� ����
��
����������
bright stocks). Byproducts include fuel gas, naphtha and low-pour diesel. ��������
��� ��� ��� ��������
��� ��� ����� �������������
Description: MSDW is targeted for hydrocracked or severely hydrotreated ����
stocks. The improved selectivity of MSDW for the highly isoparaffinic-lube ����� ���
��������� ������ ����
components results in higher lube yields and VIs. The process uses mul- �� ���� �����
tiple catalyst systems with multiple reactors. Internals are proprietary (the �� ��� �����
���
Spider Vortex Quench Zone technology is used). Feed and recycle gases
are preheated and contact the catalyst in a down-flow-fixed-bed reactor. ����������
Reactor effluent is cooled, and the remaining aromatics are saturated in a ��������
post-treat reactor. The process can be integrated into a lube hydrocracker ������������ ���
or lube hydrotreater. Post-fractionation is targeted for client needs. �����
Operating conditions:
Temperatures, ° F 550 – 800
Hydrogen partial pressures, psig 500 – 2,500
LHSV 0.4 – 3.0
Conversion depends on feed wax content Installation: Eight units are operating and four are in design.
Pour point reduction as needed. Licensor: ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co.
Yields:
Light neutral Heavy neutral
Lube yield, wt% 94.5 96.5
C1– C4, wt% 1.5 1.0
C5– 400°F, wt% 2.7 1.8
400°F – Lube, wt% 1.5 1.0
H2 cons, scf / bbl 100 – 300 100 – 300
Economics: $3,000 – 5,500 per bpsd installed cost (US Gulf Coast).
Catalytic reforming
Application: Increase the octane of straight-run or cracked naphthas for
��� �����
gasoline production.
�������
Products: High-octane gasoline and hydrogen-rich gas. Byproducts may
be LPG, fuel gas and steam.
��������
Description: Semi-regenerative multibed reforming over platinum or bi-
metallic catalysts. Hydrogen recycled to reactors at the rate of 3 mols / ��������
mol to 7 mols /mol of feed. Straight-run and /or cracked feeds are typi- �����
cally hydrotreated, but low-sulfur feeds (<10 ppm) may be reformed
without hydrotreatment. ������� ����
��������
�� ����
Operating conditions: 875°F to 1,000°F and 150 psig to 400 psig reac- �����
��������
tor conditions. ����
��������������������
Yields: Depend on feed characteristics, product octane and reactor pres-
sure. The following yields are one example. The feed contains 51.4%
paraffins, 41.5% naphthenes and 7.1% aromatics, and boils from 208°F
to 375°F (ASTM D86). Product octane is 99.7 RONC and average reactor
pressure is 200 psig.
Economics:
Utilities, (per bbl feed)
Fuel, 103 Btu release 275
Component wt% vol%
Electricity, kWh 7.2
H2 2.3 1,150 scf/bbl
Water, cooling (20°F rise), gal 216
C1 1.1 —
Steam produced (175 psig sat), lb 100
C2 1.8 —
C3 3.2 — Licensor: CB&I Howe-Baker.
iC4 1.6 —
nC4 2.3 —
C5+ 87.1 —
LPG — 3.7
Reformate — 83.2
Catalytic reforming
Application: The CCR Platforming process is used throughout the world ������
in the petroleum and petrochemical industries. It produces feed for an ������� ������
������������ ��������
aromatics complex or a high-octane gasoline blending product and a ������������� �������
��� ��������
significant amount of hydrogen. ����������� �������� ����������
��������
���� �������
Description: Hydrotreated naphtha feed is combined with recycle hy- ���������
drogen gas and heat exchanged against reactor effluent. The combined
feed is then raised to reaction temperature in the charge heater and sent ����������
Conradson
carbon, wt% 20.0 27.6 48
Continued
Coking, continued
Economics (continued):
Utilities, typical/bbl of feed:
Fuel, 103 Btu 123
Electricity, kWh 3.6
Steam (exported), lb 1
Water, cooling, gal 58
Boiler feedwater, lbs 38
Condensate (exported), lbs 24
� ��� �����
Application: Upgrade residues to lighter hydrocarbon fractions using the
Selective Yield Delayed Coking (SYDEC) process.
� �
Description: Charge is fed directly to the fractionator (1) where it com- �������
bines with recycle and is pumped to the coker heater. The mixture is
heated to coking temperature, causing partial vaporization and mild
cracking. The vapor-liquid mix enters a coke drum (2 or 3) for further � �����
cracking. Drum overhead enters the fractionator (1) to be separated into �������������
gas, naphtha, and light and heavy gas oils. Gas and naphtha enter the
vapor recovery unit (VRU)(4). There are at least two coking drums, one
�������������
coking while the other is decoked using high-pressure water jets. The ����
coking unit also includes a coke handling, coke cutting, water recovery
�����
and blowdown system. Vent gas from the blowdown system is recov-
ered in the VRU.
Operating conditions: Typical ranges are: Utilities, typical per bbl feed:
Heater outlet temperature, ºF 900 – 950 Fuel, 103 Btu 120
Coke drum pressure, psig 15 – 100 Electricity, kWh 3
Recycle ratio, equiv. fresh feed 0 – 1.0 Steam (exported), lb 35
Increased coking temperature decreases coke production; increases Water, cooling, gal 36
liquid yield and gas oil end point. Increasing pressure and/or recycle ra-
Installations: Currently, 52 delayed cokers are installed worldwide with
tio increases gas and coke make, decreases liquid yield and gas oil end
a total installed capacity over 2.5 million bpsd
point.
References: Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes, Third Ed., Mc-
Yields:
Graw-Hill, pp. 12.33 –12.89.
Operation:
“Delayed coking revamps,” Hydrocarbon Processing, September 2004.
Products, wt% Max dist. Anode coke Needle coke
“Residue upgrading with SYDEC Delayed Coking: Benefits & Eco-
Gas 8.7 8.4 9.8
nomics,” AIChE Spring National Meeting, April 23–27, 2006, Orlando.
Naphtha 14.0 21.6 8.4
“Upgrade refinery residuals into value-added products,” Hydrocar-
Gas oil 48.3 43.8 41.6
bon Processing, June 2006.
Coke 29.3 26.2 40.2
Licensor: Foster Wheeler/UOP LLC.
Economics:
Investment (basis 65,000 –10,000 bpsd)
2Q 2005 US Gulf), $ per bpsd 3,000 –5,200
Coking, fluid
Application: Continuous fluid, bed coking technology to convert heavy
hydrocarbons (vacuum residuum, extra heavy oil or bitumen) to full- Reactor products
range lighter liquid products and fluid coke. Product coke can be sold to fractionator
as fuel or burned in an integrated fluid bed boiler to produce steam and Flue gas to CO boiler
power.
START 1
Products: Liquid products can be upgraded through conventional 3
hydrotreating. Fluid coke is widely used as a solid fuel, with particular 2
Net coke
advantages in cement kilns and in fluid-bed boilers.
Air
Description: Feed (typically 1,050°F+ vacuum resid) enters the scrubber blower
(1) for heat exchange with reactor overhead effluent vapors. The scrub- Air
ber typically cuts 975°F+ higher boiling reactor effluent hydrocarbons Cold Hot
coke coke
for recycle back to the reactor with fresh feed. Alternative scrubber con-
figurations provide process flexibility by integrating the recycle stream
with the VPS or by operating once-through which produces higher liq-
uid yields. Lighter overhead vapors from the scrubber are sent to con-
ventional fractionation and light ends recovery. In the reactor (2), feed
is thermally cracked to a full range of lighter products and coke.
The heat for the thermal cracking reactions is supplied by circulating C5+ liquids, wt% 58.1 62.3
coke between the burner (3) and reactor (2). About 20% of the coke
is burned with air to supply process heat requirements, eliminating the Net product coke, wt % 25.7 23.9
need for an external fuel supply. The rest of the coke is withdrawn and Coke consumed for heat, wt% 4.4 3.4
either sold as a product or burned in a fluid bed boiler. Properties of the
fluid coke enable ease of transport and direct use in fuel applications, Investment: TPC, US Gulf Coast, 2Q 2003 estimate including gas pro-
including stand alone or integrated cogeneration facilities. cessing, coke handling and wet gas scrubbing for removing SOx from
the burner overhead
Yields: Example, typical Middle East vacuum resid (~25 wt% Concar- Capital investment, $/bp/sd 3,300
bon, ~5 wt% sulfur):
Recycle Once-Through Competitive advantages:
Light ends, wt% 11.8 10.4 • Single train capacities >100 Mbpsd; greater than other processes
Naphtha (C5-350°F), wt% 11.5 9.5 • Process wide range of feeds, especially high metals, sulfur and CCR
Distillate (350 – 650°F), wt% 14.5 13.1 • Internally heat integrated, minimal use of fuel gas, and lower coke
Heavy gas oil (650°F+), wt% 32.1 39.7 production than delayed coking
Continued
Coking, fluid, continued
• Lower investment and better economy of scale than delayed cok-
ing
• Efficient integration with fluid bed boilers for cogeneration of
steam and electric power.
Description: The crude is preheated and desalted (1). It is fed to a first ������
�������
dry reboiled pre-flash tower (2) and then to a wet pre-flash tower (3).
The overhead products of the two pre-flash towers are then fraction-
ated as required in a gas plant and rectification towers (4).
The topped crude typically reduced by 2/3 of the total naphtha cut is
then heated in a conventional heater and conventional topping column
(5). If necessary the reduced crude is fractionated in one deep vacuum Utility requirements, typical per bbl of crude feed:
column designed for a sharp fractionation between vacuum gas oil, two Fuel fired, 103 btu 50–65
vacuum distillates (6) and a vacuum residue, which could be also a road Power, kWh 0.9–1.2
bitumen. Steam 65 psig, lb 0–5
Extensive use of pinch technology minimizes heat supplied by heat- Water cooling, (15°C rise) gal 50–100
ers and heat removed by air and water coolers. Total primary energy consumption:
This process is particularly suitable for large crude capacity from for Arabian Light or Russian Export Blend: 1.25 tons of fuel
150,000 to 250,000 bpsd. per 100 tons of Crude
It is also available for condensates and light crudes progressive distil- for Arabian Heavy 1.15 tons of fuel
lation with a slightly adapted scheme. per 100 tons of Crude
Economics: Installation: Technip has designed and constructed one crude unit and
Investment (basis 230,000 bpsd including atmospheric and one condensate unit with the D2000 concept. The latest revamp proj-
vacuum distillation, gas plant and rectification tower) $750 to
$950 per bpsd (US Gulf Coast 2000).
Continued
Crude distillation, continued
ect currently in operation shows an increase of capacity of the existing
crude unit of 30% without heater addition.
Products: Diesel is typically the desired product, but kerosine, turbine ������������
fuel and naphtha are also produced. �����
Operating conditions:
Column pressure, psig 0 – 20
Temperature, °F 550 – 650
Products: Deasphalted oil (DAO) for catalytic cracking and hydrocracking ������ �������
�
���
feedstocks, resins for specification asphalts, and pitch for specification ������� ���������
������ � ���������
asphalts and residue fuels.
�����
Description: Feed and light paraffinic solvent are mixed and then ��������
charged to the extractor (1). The DAO and pitch phases, both containing
solvents, exit the extractor. The DAO and solvent mixture is separated � � ���
under supercritical conditions (2). Both the pitch and DAO products are
������� ��������
stripped of entrained solvent (3,4). A second extraction stage is utililized
if resins are to be produced.
����� ���
Economics:
Investment (Basis: 7,000-bpsd feedrate
capacity, 2006 US Gulf Coast), $/bpsd 11,200
Utilities, typical per bbl feed:
Fuel, 103 Btu (absorbed) 160
Electricity, kWh 15
Steam, lb 35
Water, cooling (25°F rise), gal 1,100
References:
Low, G., J. Townsend and T. Shooter, “Systematic approach for the
revamp of a low-pressure hydrotreater to produce 10-ppm, sulfur-free
diesel at BP Conyton Refinery,” 7th ERTC, Paris, November 2002.
Sarup, B., M. Johansen, L. Skyum and B. Cooper, “ULSD Production
in Practice,” 9th ERTC, Prague, November 2004.
Diesel upgrading
Application: Topsøe’s Diesel Upgrading process can be applied for im- ��������������� �����������
provement of a variety of diesel properties, including reduction of diesel ����������
specific gravity, reduction of T90 and T95 distillation (Back-end-shift),
reduction of aromatics, and improvements of cetane, cold-flow prop- ������� ���������
������� ����������
erties, (pour point, clouds point, viscosity and CFPP) and diesel color �������� ��������
reduction (poly shift). Feeds can range from blends of straight-run and �������
cracked gas oils up to heavy distillates, including light vacuum gas oil. ����������
Economics: Plants and their operations are simple. The same inexpen-
sive (purchased in bulk quantities) and long-lived, non-sophisticated cat-
alysts are used in the main reactor section catalytic region of the Catacol
column, if any.
Ethers—ETBE
Application: The Uhde (Edeleanu) ETBE process combines ethanol and
���� ����������� ����� �������������
isobutene to produce the high-octane oxygenate ethyl tertiary butyl ������� ���� ����������
ether (ETBE).
�����������
Feeds: C4 cuts from steam cracker and FCC units with isobutene con-
tents ranging from 12% to 30%.
Products: ETBE and other tertiary alkyl ethers are primarily used in gas- �������������
���������
oline blending as an octane enhancer to improve hydrocarbon com-
bustion efficiency. Moreover, blending of ETBE to the gasoline pool will
lower vapor pressure (Rvp). ������������
base of the riser via proprietary Micro-Jet feed injection nozzles (1). �
Catalyst and oil vapor flow upwards through a short-contact time,
all-vertical riser (2) where raw oil feedstock is cracked under opti-
mum conditions.
Reaction products exiting the riser are separated from the spent line (7). This arrangement provides the lowest overall unit elevation.
catalyst in a patented, direct-coupled cyclone system (3). Product Catalyst is regenerated by efficient contacting with air for complete
vapors are routed directly to fractionation, thereby eliminating non- combustion of coke. For resid-containing feeds, the optional cata-
selective, post-riser cracking and maintaining the optimum prod- lyst cooler is integrated with the regenerator. The resulting flue gas
uct yield slate. Spent catalyst containing only minute quantities of exits via cyclones (9) to energy recovery/flue gas treating. The hot
hydrocarbon is discharged from the diplegs of the direct-coupled regenerated catalyst is withdrawn via an external withdrawal well
cyclones into the cyclone containment vessel (4). The catalyst flows (10). The well allows independent optimization of catalyst density
down into the stripper containing proprietary modular grid (MG) in the regenerated catalyst standpipe, maximizes slide valve (11)
baffles (5). pressure drop and ensures stable catalyst flow back to the riser feed
Trace hydrocarbons entrained with spent catalyst are removed injection zone.
in the MG stripper using stripping steam. The MG stripper efficient- The catalyst formulation can be tailored to maximize the most
ly removes hydrocarbons at low steam rate. The net stripper vapors desired product. For example, the formulation for maximizing light
are routed to the fractionator via specially designed vents in the olefins (Indmax operation) is a multi-component mixture that pro-
direct-coupled cyclones. Catalyst from the stripper flows down the motes the selective cracking of molecules of different sizes and
spent-catalyst standpipe and through the slide valve (6). The spent shapes to provide very high conversion and yield of light olefins.
catalyst is then transported in dilute phase to the center of the re-
generator (8) through a unique square-bend-spent catalyst transfer
Continued
Fluid catalytic cracking, continued
Economics:
Investment (basis: 30,000 bpsd including reaction/regeneration
system and product recovery. Excluding offsites, power recovery
and flue gas scrubbing US Gulf Coast 2006.)
$/bpsd (typical) 2,400–3,500
Utilities, typical per bbl fresh feed:
Electricity, kWh 0.8–1.0
Steam, 600 psig (produced) 50–200
Maintenance, % of investment per year 2–3
Continued
Fluid catalytic cracking, continued
Installation: More than 70 units with a design capacity of over 2.5-mil-
lion bpd fresh feed.
um gas oils and coker streams to resids. This pretreatment process can
������� ��������
maximize FCC unit performance. ����������
Description: A typical amine system flow scheme is used. The feed gas
contacts the treating solvent in the absorber (1). The resulting rich sol-
vent bottom stream is heated and sent to the regenerator (2). Regen-
erator heat is supplied by any suitable heat source. Lean solvent from
the regenerator is sent through rich/lean solvent exchangers and coolers
before returning to the absorber.
Reference: Garrison, J., et al., “Keyspan Energy Canada Rimbey acid gas
FLEXSORB SE solvent is an aqueous solution of a hindered amine.
enrichment with FLEXSORB SE Plus technology,” 2002 Laurance Reid
FLEXSORB SE Plus solvent is an enhanced aqueous solution, which has
Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, Oklahoma.
improved H2S regenerability yielding <10 vppm H2S in the treated gas.
Adams-Smith, J., et al., Chevron USA Production Company, “Carter
Hybrid FLEXSORB SE solvent is a hybrid solution containing FLEXSORB SE
Creek Gas Plant FLEXSORB tail gas treating unit,” 2002 GPA Annual
amine, a physical solvent and water.
Meeting, Dallas.
Economics: Lower investment and energy requirements based primarily Connock, L., et al., “High recovery tail gas treating,” Sulphur, No.
on requiring 30% to 50% lower solution circulation rates, compared to 296, November/ December 2004.
conventional amines. Fedich, R., et al., “Selective H2S Removal,” Hydrocarbon Engineer-
ing, May 2004.
Installations: Total gases treated by FLEXSORB solvents are about 2 bil- Fedich, R. B., et al., “Solvent changeover benefits,” Hydrocarbon
lion scfd and the total sulfur recovery is about 900 long tpd. Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 5, May 2005.
FLEXSORB SE—31 plants operating, three in design “Gas Processes 2006,” Hydrocarbon Processing, January 2006.
FLEXSORB SE Plus—19 plants operating, nine in design
Hybrid FLEXSORB SE—two plants operating, three in design Licensor: ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co.
Over 60 plants operating or in design.
Gasification
Application: The Shell Gasification Process (SGP) converts the heaviest
���
residual liquid hydrocarbon streams with high-sulfur and metals content
�������
into a clean synthesis gas and valuable metal oxides. Sulfur (S) is re- �����
������
�����
moved by normal gas treating processes and sold as elemental S.
The process converts residual streams with virtually zero value as ������ ��������
������
fuel-blending components into valuable, clean gas and byproducts. ��� ������������
This gas can be used to generate power in gas turbines and for making
H2 by the well-known shift and PSA technology. It is one of the few ul-
timate, environmentally acceptable solutions for residual hydrocarbon
streams. ������� ������� ���������� ��������
������ �������
Products: Synthesis gas (CO+H2), sulfur and metal oxides. ����������� ����������
������ ��������
Products: Load-sulfur blending stock for gasoline motor fuels.
Description: Gasoline from the fluid catalytic cracker unit is combined
with a small hydrogen stream and heated. Vaporized gasoline is injected
����������
into the fluid-bed reactor (1), where the proprietary sorbent removes ������ �������
��������
sulfur from the feed. A disengaging zone in the reactor removes sus- ������ ����������
pended sorbent from the vapor, which exits the reactor to be cooled. �����
����
Regeneration: The sorbent (catalyst) is continuously withdrawn from the �������� ������������
reactor and transferred to the regenerator section (2), where the sulfur ������� �������
���������
is removed as SO2 and sent to a sulfur-recovery unit. The cleansed sor-
bent is reconditioned and returned to the reactor. The rate of sorbent
circulation is controlled to help maintain the desired sulfur concentra-
tion in the product.
Economics:
Typical operating conditions: Results:
Temperature, °F 750 – 825 C5+ yield, vol% of feed >100%
Pressure, psig 100 – 500 Lights yield, wt% of feed < 0.1
Space velocity, whsv 4–8 (R+M) loss
Hydrogen purity, % 70 – 99 2 <0.3
Total H2 usage, scf / bbl 40 – 60 Operating cost, ¢/gal* 0.9
Case study premises: * Includes utilities, 4% per year maintenance and sorbent costs.
25,000 - bpd feed
Installation: Forty-three sites licensed as of 1Q 2004.
775 - ppm feed sulfur
25 - ppm product sulfur ( 97% removal ) Licensor: ConocoPhillips.
No cat gasoline splitter
Gasoline desulfurization, ultra-deep
Application: Ultra-deep desulfurization of FCC gasoline with minimal
�������������������������
octane penalty using Prime-G+ process.
��������
Description: FCC debutanizer bottoms are fed directly to a first reactor ��������
����������
wherein, under mild conditions, diolefins are selectively hydrogenated
and mercaptans are converted to heavier sulfur species. The selective
�������� ����������
hydrogenation reactor effluent is then usually split to produce an LCN ��������� �������������
(light cat naphtha) cut and an HCN (heavy cat naphtha). ������ ��������������
The LCN stream is mercaptans-free with a low-sulfur and diolefin ���� ���������
concentration, enabling further processing in an etherification or al- ������
����� ��� ��������
kylation unit. The HCN then enters the main Prime-G+ section where
it undergoes in a dual catalyst reactor system; a deep HDS with very
limited olefins saturation and no aromatics losses produces an ultra- ��������
low-sulfur gasoline. ������
Description: The feed is mixed with hydrogen, heated with reactor efflu- �����
ent exchange and passed through a pretreat reactor for diolefin satura- ����������
������������� ������ ����
tion. After further heat exchange with reactor effluent and preheat using �����������
���
a utility, the hydrocarbon/hydrogen mixture enters the main reaction sec- ��������� �������
���� ��������
tion which features ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co. (EMRE)
proprietary selective catalyst systems. In this section of the plant, sulfur ������� �����������
is removed in the form of H2S under tailored process conditions, which �����������
�����������
strongly favor hydrodesulfurization while minimizing olefin saturation. ��������
The feed may be full-range, intermediate or heavy FCC-naphtha ����������������
fraction. Other sulfur-containing streams such as light-coker naphtha, ���������
steam cracker or light straight-run naphthas can also be processed with
FCC naphthas. SCANfining technology can be retrofitted to existing
units such as naphtha or diesel hydrotreaters and reformers. SCANfining
technology also features ExxonMobil’s proprietary reactor internals such
as Automatic Bed Bypass Technology for onstream mitigation of reactor
plugging/pressure drop buildup. References: Sapre, A.V., et al., “Case History: Desulfurization of FCC
For high-sulfur feeds and/or very low-sulfur product, with low levels naphtha,” Hydrocarbon Processing, February 2004.
of product mercaptans variations in the plant design from SCANfining I Ellis, E. S., et al., “Meeting the Low Sulfur Mogas Challenge,” World
Process to the SCANfining II Process for greater HDS selectivity, or addi- Refining Association Third European Fuels Conference, March 2002.
tion of a ZEROMER process step for mercaptan conversion, or addition
of an EXOMER process unit for mercaptan extraction. Licensor: ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co.
EMRE has an alliance with Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) to pro-
vide SCANfining technology to refiners and an alliance with Merichem
Chemicals & Refinery Services LLC to provide EXOMER technology to
refiners.
Application: LO-CAT removes H2S from gas streams and produces el-
��������� ������������
emental sulfur. LO-CAT units are in service treating refinery fuel gas,
hydrodesulfurization offgas, sour-water-stripper gas, amine acid gas,
����
claus tail gas and sulfur tank vent gas. Sulfur capacities are typically less ��������
than 25 ltpd down to several pounds per day. Key benefits of operation � �
are high (99.9%) H2S removal efficiency, and flexible operation, with vir- ��������
tually 100% turndown capability of H2S composition and total gas flow.
��������
Sulfur is recovered as a slurry, filter cake or high-purity molten sulfur.
The sulfur cake is increasingly being used in agriculture, but can also be ����
deposited in a nonhazardous landfill.
��������
����������
Description: The conventional configuration is used to process combus-
tible gas and product gas streams. Sour gas contacts the dilute, propri-
etary, iron chelate catalyst solution in an absorber (1), where the H2S is
absorbed and oxidized to solid sulfur. Sweet gas leaves the absorber for
use by the refinery. The reduced catalyst solution returns to the oxidizer restrictions on type of gas to be treated; however, some contaminants,
(2), where sparged air reoxidizes the catalyst solution. The catalyst solu- such as SO2, may increase operating costs.
tion is returned to the absorber. Continuous regeneration of the catalyst Installations: Presently, 160 licensed units are in operation with four
solution allows for very low chemical operating costs. units under construction.
In the patented autocirculation configuration, the absorber (1) and
oxidizer (2) are combined in one vessel, but separated internally by baf- Reference: Nagl, G., W. Rouleau and J. Watson,, “Consider optimized
fles. Sparging of the sour gas and regeneration air into the specially Iron-Redox processes to remove sulfur,” Hydrocarbon Processing, Janu-
designed baffle system creates a series of “gas lift” pumps, eliminating ary 2003, pp. 53–57.
the external circulation pumps. This configuration is ideally suited for
treating amine acid gas and sour-water-stripper gas streams. Licensor: Gas Technology Products, a division of Merichem Chemical &
In both configurations, sulfur is concentrated in the oxidizer cone Refinery Services LLC.
and sent to a sulfur filter, which can produce filter cake as high as 85%
sulfur. If desired, the filter cake can be further washed and melted to
produce pure molten sulfur.
vessel top, flows over media where H2S is removed and reacted. Sweet ������
gas exits the bottom of vessel. In the single-vessel configuration, when
the H2S level exceeds the level allowed, the vessel must be bypassed,
media removed through the lower manway, fresh media installed and
vessel returned to service.
For continuous operation, a dual “lead-lag” configuration is desir-
able. The two vessels operate in series, with one vessel in the lead posi-
tion, the other in the lag position. When the H2S level at the outlet of
the lead vessel equals the inlet H2S level (the media is completely spent),
the gas flow is changed and the vessels reverse rolls, so that the “lag”
vessel becomes the “lead” vessel. The vessel with the spent media is
bypassed. The media is replaced, and the vessel with fresh media is re-
turned to service in the “lag” position.
Licensor: Axens.
Hydrocracking
��������
Application: Upgrade vacuum gas oil alone or blended with various
feedstocks (light-cycle oil, deasphalted oil, visbreaker or coker gasoil). ���������
Products: Jet fuel, diesel, very-low-sulfur fuel oil, extra-quality FCC �����
�������
feed with limited or no FCC gasoline post-treatment or high VI lube
base stocks. ��������
�
� � � �
������
Description: This process uses a refining catalyst usually followed by
an amorphous and/or zeolite-type hydrocracking catalyst. Main features ������������
of this process are:
• High tolerance toward feedstock nitrogen
• High selectivity toward middle distillates ����
• High activity of the zeolite, allowing for 3–4 year cycle lengths and �����
��������������
products with low aromatics content until end of cycle.
Three different process arrangements are available: single-step/
once-through; single-step/total conversion with liquid recycle; and two-
step hydrocracking. The process consists of: reaction section (1, 2), gas
separator (3), stripper (4) and product fractionator (5). Economics:
Investment: (Basis: 40,000-bpsd unit, once-through, 90% con-
Product quality: Typical for HVGO (50/50 Arabian light/heavy):
version, battery limits, erected, engineering fees included, 2000
Feed, Jet Gulf Coast), $ per bpsd 2,500 –3,500
HVGO fuel Diesel Utilities, typical per bbl feed:
Sp. gr. 0.932 0.800 0.826 Fuel oil, kg 5.3
TBP cut point, °C 405– 565 140 –225 225 –360 Electricity, kWh 6.9
Sulfur, ppm 31,700 <10 <10 Water, cooling, m 3 0.64
Nitrogen, ppm 853 <5 <5 Steam, MP balance
Metals, ppm <2 – –
Cetane index – – 62 Installation: More than 50 references, cumulative capacity exceeding
Flash pt., °C – 40 125 1 million bpsd, conversions up to 99%.
Smoke pt., mm, EOR – 26–28 – Licensor: Axens.
Aromatics, vol%, EOR – < 12 <8
Viscosity @ 38°C, cSt 110 – 5.3
PAH, wt%, EOR <2
Hydrocracking ��������
Application: Convert a wide variety of feedstocks including vacuum
deep-cut gas oil, coker gas oils, de-asphalted oil (DAO), and FCC cy-
cle oils into high-quality, low-sulfur fuels using ExxonMobil Research ������� ����������
and Engineering Company’s (EMRE) moderate pressure hydrocracking ����������
(MPHC) process. ��������
����
�������
Products: Products include a wide range of high-quality, low-sulfur dis- ���
���� ���� ��������
tillates and blending stocks including LPG, high-octane gasoline, high- �����
quality reformer naphtha. Unconverted bottoms product from the MPHC ������ ����������� ������
unit is very low in sulfur and is an excellent feedstock for fluid catalytic ������� ��� ������������
cracking (FCC), lube-oil basestock production, steam cracking and low- ���
sulfur fuel oil.
�������������
Description: The process uses a multiple catalyst system in multi-bed ��������
reactor(s) that incorporates proprietary advanced quench and redistri-
bution internals (Spider Vortex). Heavy hydrocarbons and recycle gas
are preheated and contact the catalyst in the trickle-phase fixed-bed
reactor(s). Reactor effluent is flashed in high- and low-temperature
separators. An amine scrubber removes H2S from the recycle gas be-
fore it gets compressed and re-circulated back to the unit. An opti-
mized, low cost stripper/fractionator arrangement is used for product Yields:
recovery. Naphtha, wt% 4 10 10
When higher-quality distillates are required, the addition of a low- Kero/jet, wt% 6 10 10
cost, highly integrated distillate post-treating unit (PTU) can be incor- Diesel, wt% 22 26 27
porated in the design to meet or exceed high-pressure hydrocracking LSGO (FCC feed), wt% 65 50 50
product quality at lower capital cost and hydrogen consumption H2 consumption, wt% 1.0 –1.5 1.3 –1.8 1.5 – 2.0
Product quality:
Operating conditions and yields: Typical operating conditions on a Mid-
Kero sulfur, wppm 20 – 200 20 – 200 20 – 200
dle East VGO for a once-through MPHC operation are shown:
Kero smoke Pt, mm 13 – 18 15 – 20 17 – 22
Operation conditions: Diesel sulfur, wppm 30 – 500 30 – 300 30 – 200
Configuration MPHC MPHC MPHC Diesel cetane no. 45 – 50 47 – 52 50 – 55
Nominal conversion, % 35 50 50
H2 pressure, psig 800 800 1,250
Continued
Hydrocracking, continued
Utilities, per bbl of feed:
Electric power, kW 4.1 7.2
Fuel (absorbed), Btu 67,100 69,600
Steam, MP (export), lb (15.9) (21.1)
Water, cooling, gal 101 178
Wash water, gal 1.5 2.2
Lean amine, gal 36.1 36.1
are sent to an inline hydrotreating (HT) step and a solid-liquid separation ���������������
als are removed from the residual. The solid-free fraction from the top ������������� �������
of the TI-remover is combined with the heavy fraction from the vacuum �������������
Continued
Hydrocracking, continued
Feed VGO VGO VGO VGO
Product quality
Kerosine smoke, mm 29–32 29–32 29–32
Diesel cetane number 58–64 58–64 58–64
UCO BMCI 6–8
UCO Waxy V.I. 143–145
UCO Dewaxed V.I. 131–133
Operating conditions:
Temperature, °F 770– 820 Economics: Basis 2005 US Gulf Coast
Hydrogen partial pressure, psi 1,600 –1,950 Investment in $ per bpsd 4,500 – 6,500
LHSV, hr –1 0.25– 0.6 Utilities, per bbl of feed
Conversion, wt% 50 – 80 Fuel, 103 Btu 70
Power, kWh 11
Examples: Ural VR feed: a 540°C+ cut from Ural crude is processed at Catalyst makeup, lb 0.2– 0.8
66% conversion to obtain a stable fuel oil containing less than 1%wt
sulfur, 25% diesel and 30% VGO. The diesel cut is further hydrotreated Installation: There are seven H-OilRC units in operation with a total capac-
to meet ULSD specifications using an integrated Prime-D unit. Arab Me- ity of 300,000 bpsd. Two additional references for H-OilDC, the ebullated
dium VR feed: a vacuum residue from a blend 70% Arab Light-30% bed technology for VGO and DAO, add another 139,900 bpsd.
Arab Heavy containing 5.5wt% sulfur is processed at above 75% con- Licensor: Axens.
version to obtain a stable fuel oil with 2wt% sulfur.
Hydrocracking
Application: Desulfurization, demetalization, CCR reduction and hydro-
cracking of atmospheric and vacuum resids using the LC-FINING Pro- ���������������
cess. ����������
��������� �����
Products: Full range of high-quality distillates. Residual products can ������� � �
be used as fuel oil, synthetic crude or feedstock for a resid FCC, coker, �
visbreaker or solvent deasphalter.
�
�
Description: Fresh hydrocarbon liquid feed is mixed with hydrogen and �����������
reacted within an expanded catalyst bed (1) maintained in turbulence by ����
liquid upflow to achieve efficient isothermal operation. Product quality is ����� �
maintained constant and at a high level by intermittent catalyst addition
and withdrawal. Reactor products flow to a high-pressure separator (2), ��������
low-pressure separator (3) and product fractionator (4). Recycle hydro-
gen is separated (5) and purified (6).
Process features include onstream catalyst addition and withdrawal.
Recovering and purifying the recycled H2 at low pressure rather than at high
pressure can reduce capital cost and allows design at lower gas rates.
Operating conditions:
Reactor temperature, °F 725 – 840
Atm. resid Vac. resid
Reactor pressure, psig 1,400 – 3,500 Feed
Gravity, °API 12.40 4.73 4.73 4.73
H2 partial pressure, psig 1,000 – 2,700
Sulfur, wt % 3.90 4.97 4.97 4.97
LSHV 0.1 to 0.6
Ni / V, ppmw 18 /65 39 /142 39 /142 39 /142
Conversion, % 40 – 97+ Conversion, vol% 45 60 75 95
Desulfurization, % 60 – 90 (1,022°F+)
Demetalization, % 50 – 98 Products, vol%
CCR reduction, % 35 – 80 C4 1.11 2.35 3.57 5.53
C5–350°F 6.89 12.60 18.25 23.86
Yields: For Arabian heavy/Arabian light blends: 350 –700°F (650°F) (15.24) 30.62 42.65 64.81
700 (650°F) –1,022°F (55.27) 21.46 19.32 11.92
1,022°F+ 25.33 40.00 25.00 5.0
C5+, °API / wt% S 23.70 / 0.54 22.5 / 0.71 26.6 / 0.66 33.3 / 0.33
Continued
Hydrocracking, continued
Economics:
Investment, estimated (US Gulf Coast, 2006)
Size, bpsd fresh feed 92,000 49,000
$/bpsd typical fresh feed 3,000 5,000 5,800 7,200
Utilities, per bbl fresh feed
Fuel fired, 103 Btu 56.1 62.8 69.8 88.6
Electricity, kWh 8.4 13.9 16.5 22.9
Steam (export), lb 35.5 69.2 97.0 97.7
Water, cooling, gal. 64.2 163 164 248
Typical feedstocks are the effluent from a dewaxing reactor, effluent from
hydrated feeds or solvent-dewaxed feedstocks. The products are highly
stabilized base-oil, technical-grade white oil or food-grade white oil. ����������
As shown in the simplified flow diagram, feedstocks are mixed with ������������� �
�
recycle hydrogen and fresh makeup hydrogen, heated and charged to a ����
�
reactor containing ISOFINISHING Catalyst (1). Effluent from the finishing �����
���������
stock flexibility. ������ ���������
���
������� ����� �������
�����
����� ������� ��������
Description: The generic flowsheet consists of feed pretreatment, pre- ����������
��
reforming (optional), steam-HC reforming, shift conversion and hydro- ��� �����
�������� �������
gen purification by pressure swing adsorption (PSA). However, it is often ��� ����� ����� ����
tailored to satisfy specific requirements.
�������������
Feed pretreatment normally involves removal of sulfur, chlorine and ����� ����������
other catalyst poisons after preheating to 350°C to 400°C.
The treated feed gas mixed with process steam is reformed in a fired
reformer (with adiadatic pre-reformer upstream, if used) after neces-
sary superheating. The net reforming reactions are strongly endother-
mic. Heat is supplied by combusting PSA purge gas, supplemented by
drogen recovery and generation, and recuperative (post-)reforming also
makeup fuel in multiple burners in a top-fired furnace.
for capacity retrofits.
Reforming severity is optimized for each specific case. Waste heat
from reformed gas is recovered through steam generation before the Installations: TECHNIP has been involved in over 240 hydrogen plants
water-gas shift conversion. Most of the carbon monoxide is further con- worldwide, covering a wide range of capacities. Most installations are
verted to hydrogen. Process condensate resulting from heat recovery for refinery application with basic features for high reliability and opti-
and cooling is separated and generally reused in the steam system after mized cost.
necessary treatment. The entire steam generation is usually on natural
circulation, which adds to higher reliability. The gas flows to the PSA unit Licensor: Technip.
that provides high-purity hydrogen product (up to < 1ppm CO) at near
inlet pressures.
Typical specific energy consumption based on feed + fuel – export
steam ranges between 3.0 and 3.5 Gcal / KNm 3 ( 330 – 370 Btu / scf ) LHV,
depending upon feedstock, plant capacity, optimization criteria and
steam-export requirements. Recent advances include integration of hy-
Hydrogen
Application: Production of hydrogen for refinery applications (e.g., ��������������
hydrotreating and hydrocracking) as well as for petrochemical and other ���� �����
industrial uses. ����
���������� � ��������
Feed: Natural gas, refinery offgases, LPG, naphtha or mixtures thereof. ������ �
� �
��
Product: High-purity hydrogen (typically >99.9%), CO, CO2, HP steam
and/or electricity may be produced as separate creditable byproduct.
����������
Description: The plant generally comprises four process units. The feed
is desulfurized (1), mixed with steam and converted to synthesis gas in a ������������
steam reformer (2) over a nickel-containing catalyst at 20 – 40 bar pres- ���� ���
��������
sure and outlet temperatures of 800 – 900°C. �������������� �
zone. These factors combine to give a long catalyst life. Additionally, ������������
mercaptans can react with diolefins to make heavy, thermally-stable sul-
fides. The sulfides are fractionated to the bottoms product. This can
eliminate the need for a separate mercaptan removal step. The distillate
product is ideal feedstock for alkylation or etherification processes.
The heat of reaction evaporates liquid, and the resulting vapor is
condensed in the overhead condenser (2) to provide additional reflux.
Economics: Fixed-bed hydrogenation requires a distillation column fol-
lowed by a fixed-bed hydrogenation unit. The CDHydro process elimi-
The natural temperature profile in the fractionation column results in a
nates the fixed-bed unit by incorporating catalyst in the column. When
virtually isothermal catalyst bed rather than the temperature increase
a new distillation column is used, capital cost of the column is only 5%
typical of conventional reactors.
to 20% more than for a standard column depending on the CDHydro
The CDHydro process can operate at much lower pressure than
application. Elimination of the fixed-bed reactor and stripper can reduce
conventional processes. Pressures for the CDHydro process are typically
capital cost by as much as 50%.
set by the fractionation requirements. Additionally, the elimination of a
separate hydrogenation reactor and hydrogen stripper offers significant Installation: Forty-five CDHydro units are in commercial operation for
capital cost reduction relative to conventional technologies. C4, C5, C6 and benzene hydrogenation applications. Nineteen units
Feeding the CDHydro process with reformate and light-straight run have been in operation for more than five years and total commer-
for benzene saturation provides the refiner with increased flexibility to cial operating time now exceeds 100 years for CDHydro technologies.
produce low-benzene gasoline. Isomerization of the resulting C5 / C6 Twelve additional units are currently in engineering / construction.
overhead stream provides higher octane and yield due to reduced ben-
zene and C7+ content compared to typical isomerization feedstocks. Licensor: CDTECH.
Hydrogen—HTCR and HTCR twin
plants
��������� ����������� ������������������ ����� ���
Application: Produce hydrogen from hydrocarbon feedstocks such as:
natural gas, LPG, naphtha, refinery offgases, etc., using the Haldor Top-
søe Convective Reformer (HTCR). Plant capacities range from approxi-
mately 5,000 Nm3/ h to 25,000+ Nm3/ h (5 MM scfd to 25+ MMscfd) and �����
��
hydrogen purity from about 99.5 – 99.999+%. This is achieved without
��
any steam export.
Description: The HTER-p is installed in parallel with the tubular steam �����������������
methane reformer (SMR) and fed independently with desulfurized �����������
feed taken upstream the reformer section. This enables individual ad- ���������
��������
justment of feedrate and steam- and process steam-to-carbon ratio to
obtain the desired conversion. The hydrocarbon feed is reformed over
a catalyst bed installed in the HTER-p. Process effluent from the SMR ����
is transferred to the HTER-p and mixed internally with the product gas
from the HTER-p catalyst. The process gas supplies the required heat
for the reforming reaction in the tubes of the HTER-p. Thus, no addi-
tional firing is required for the reforming reactions in the HTER-p.
Description: Typical PRISM membrane systems consist of a pretreatment Economics: Economic benefits are derived from high-product recoveries
(1) section to remove entrained liquids and preheat feed before gas en- and purities, from high reliability and low capital cost. Additional ben-
ters the membrane separators (2). Various membrane separator con- efits include relative ease of operation with minimal maintenance. Also,
figurations are possible to optimize purity and recovery, and operating systems are expandable and adaptable to changing requirements.
and capital costs such as adding a second stage membrane separator
Installations: Over 270 PRISM H2 membrane systems have been com-
(3). Pretreatment options include water scrubbing to recover ammonia
missioned or are in design. These systems include over 54 systems in re-
from ammonia synthesis purge stream.
finery applications, 124 in ammonia synthesis purge and 30 in synthesis
Membrane separators are compact bundles of hollow fibers contained in
gas applications.
a coded pressure vessel. The pressurized feed enters the vessel and flows on
the outside of the fibers (shell side). Hydrogen selectively permeates through Licensor: Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
the membrane to the inside of the hollow fibers (tube side), which is at lower
pressure. PRISM membrane separators’ key benefits include resistance to wa-
ter exposure, particulates and low feed to nonpermeate pressure drop.
Membrane systems consist of a pre-assembled skid unit with pres-
sure vessels, interconnecting piping, and instrumentation and are fac-
tory tested for ease of installation and commissioning.
Hydrogen—steam reforming ���������
�������������
Application: Production of hydrogen for refinery hydrotreating and hydro- ���� ��
cracking or other refinery, petrochemical and other uses.
�
Feedstock: Light hydrocarbons such as natural gas, refinery fuel gas, LPG/bu- �
tane mixed pentanes and light naphtha.
�
Product: High-purity hydrogen (99.9+%) at any required pressure. �
Description: The feed is heated in the feed preheater and passed through
the hydrotreater (1). The hydrotreater converts sulfur compounds to H2S and �
saturates any unsaturated hydrocarbons in the feed. The gas is then sent to
the desulfurizers (2). These adsorb the H2S from the gas.
The desulfurized feed gas is mixed with steam and superheated in the
feed preheat coil. The feed mixture then passes through catalyst-filled tubes in ����� �
the reformer (3). In the presence of nickel catalyst, the feed reacts with steam
to produce hydrogen and carbon oxides. Heat for the endothermic reform-
ing reaction is provided by carefully controlled external firing in the reformer. Economics: Typical utilities per Mscf of hydrogen production based on a
Combustion air preheat is used, if applicable to limit export steam. natural gas feedstock and maximum export steam:
Gas leaving the reformer is cooled by the process steam generator (4). Gas Feed and fuel, MM Btu LHV 0.44
is then fed to the shift converter (5), which contains a bed of copper-promoted Export steam, lb 75
iron-chromium catalyst. This converts CO and water vapor to additional H2 Boiler feedwater, lb 115
and CO2. Shift converter effluent gas is cooled, condensate is separated and Power, kW 0.5
the gas is sent to a PSA hydrogen purification system (6). Water, cooling, gal 10
The PSA system operates on a repeated cycle having two basic steps: ad-
sorption and regeneration. PSA offgas is sent to the reformer, where it provides Installations: Over 175 plants worldwide — ranging in size from less than
most of the fuel requirement. Hydrogen from the PSA unit is sent off plot. A 1 MMscfd to over 120 MMscfd capacities. Plant designs for capacities
small hydrogen stream is recycled to the feed of the plant for hydrotreating. from 1 to 200 MMscfd.
The thermal efficiency of the plant is optimized by recovery of heat
from the reformer flue gas stream and from the reformer effluent process Supplier: CB&I Howe Baker.
gas stream. This energy is utilized to preheat reformer feed gas and generate
steam for reforming and export. The process design is customized for each
application depending on project economics and export steam demand.
Hydrogen—steam reforming
Application: Manufacture hydrogen for hydrotreating, hydrocracking or
other refinery or chemical use. �
����������������
�����
Feedstock: Light saturated hydrocarbons: refinery gas or natural gas,
�����
LPG or light naphtha.
� �
Products: Typical purity 99.99%; pressure 300 psig, with steam or CO2
as byproducts.
Operating conditions: 550°F to 750°F and 400 psig to 1,500 psig reac-
tor conditions.
Economics:
Utilities, (per bbl feed) Naphtha Diesel
Fuel, 103 Btu release 48 59.5
Electricity, kWh 0.65 1.60
Water, cooling (20°F rise), gal 35 42
Description: The light, mid and heavy cat naphthas (LCN, MCN, HCN)
�����
are treated separately, under optimal conditions for each. The full- �������
range FCC gasoline sulfur reduction begins with fractionation of the
light naphtha overhead in a CDHydro column. Mercaptan sulfur re-
��������
acts quantitatively with excess diolefins to produce heavier sulfur com-
pounds, and the remaining diolefins are partially saturated to olefins ���
by reaction with hydrogen. Bottoms from the CDHydro column, con-
taining the reacted mercaptans, are fed to the CDHDS column where
the MCN and HCN are catalytically desulfurized in two separate zones.
HDS conditions are optimized for each fraction to achieve the desired
or to replace catalyst. Typical fixed-bed processes will require a mid FCC
sulfur reduction with minimal olefin saturation. Olefins are concentrat-
shutdown to regenerate/replace catalyst, requiring higher capital cost
ed at the top of the column, where conditions are mild, while sulfur
for feed, storage, pumping and additional feed capacity.
is concentrated at the bottom where the conditions result in very high
levels of HDS. Economics: The estimated ISBL capital cost for a 50,000-bpd CDHydro/
No cracking reactions occur at the mild conditions, so that yield CDHDS unit with 95% desulfurization is $40 million (2005 US Gulf Coast).
losses are easily minimized with vent-gas recovery. The three product Direct operating costs—including utilities, catalyst, hydrogen and octane
streams are stabilized together or separately, as desired, resulting in replacement—are estimated at $0.04/gal of full-range FCC gasoline.
product streams appropriate for their subsequent use. The two columns
are heat integrated to minimize energy requirements. Typical reformer Installation: Twenty-one CDHydro/CDHDS units are in operation treating
hydrogen is used in both columns without makeup compression. The FCC gasoline and 12 more units are currently in engineering/construc-
sulfur reduction achieved will allow the blending of gasoline that meets tion. Total licensed capacity exceeds 1.3 million bpd.
current and future regulations.
Catalytic distillation essentially eliminates catalyst fouling because Licensor: CDTECH.
the fractionation removes heavy-coke precursors from the catalyst zone
before coke can form and foul the catalyst pores. Thus, catalyst life in
catalytic distillation is increased significantly beyond typical fixed-bed
life. The CDHydro/CDHDS units can operate throughout an FCC turn-
around cycle up to six years without requiring a shutdown to regenerate
Hydrotreating �����������
Application: Topsøe hydrotreating technology has a wide range of ap- ������ ����������
��������
plications, including the purification of naphtha, distillates and residue,
as well as the deep desulfurization and color improvement of diesel fuel ��������
������� ����������
and pretreatment of FCC and hydrocracker feedstocks.
Products: Ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel, and clean feedstocks for FCC and �������
hydrocracker units.
����������
Description: Topsøe’s hydrotreating process design incorporates our in- ���������� �����������
dustrially proven high-activity TK catalysts with optimized graded-bed
loading and high-performance, patented reactor internals. The combi- �����
�����������
nation of these features and custom design of grassroots and revamp ������������� �������������
���������
hydrotreating units result in process solutions that meet the refiner’s ������������
objectives in the most economic way. ���������
In the Topsøe hydrotreater, feed is mixed with hydrogen, heated
and partially evaporated in a feed/effluent exchanger before it enters
the reactor. In the reactor, Topsøe’s high-efficiency internals have a
low sensitivity to unlevelness and are designed to ensure the most Operating conditions: Typical operating pressures range from 20 to 80
effective mixing of liquid and vapor streams and the maximum utili- barg (300 to 1,200 psig), and typical operating temperatures range from
zation of the catalyst volume. These internals are effective at a high 320°C to 400°C (600°F to 750°F).
range of liquid loadings, thereby enabling high turndown ratios. Top-
References: Cooper, B. H. and K. G. Knudsen, “Production of ULSD: Cat-
søe’s graded-bed technology and the use of shape-optimized inert
alyst, kinetics and reactor design,” World Petroleum Congress, 2002.
topping and catalysts minimize the build-up of pressure drop, there-
Patel, R. and K. G. Knudsen, “How are refiners meeting the ul-
by enabling longer catalyst cycle length. The hydrotreating catalysts
tra-low-sulfur diesel challenge,” NPRA Annual Meeting, San Antonio,
themselves are of the Topsøe TK series, and have proven their high
March 2003.
activities and outstanding performance in numerous operating units
Topsøe, H., K. Knudsen, L. Skyum and B. Cooper, “ULSD with BRIM
throughout the world. The reactor effluent is cooled in the feed-ef-
catalyst technology,” NPRA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, March 2005.
fluent exchanger, and the gas and liquid are separated. The hydro-
gen gas is sent to an amine wash for removal of hydrogen sulfide Installation: More than 60 Topsøe hydrotreating units for the various ap-
and is then recycled to the reactor. Cold hydrogen recycle is used as plications above are in operation or in the design phase.
quench gas between the catalyst beds, if required. The liquid product
is steam stripped in a product stripper column to remove hydrogen Licensor: Haldor Topsøe A/S.
sulfide, dissolved gases and light ends.
Hydrotreating
Application: The IsoTherming process provides refiners an economical ��������
means to produce ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD), low-sulfur and low-
nitrogen FCC feedstocks, and other very low-sulfur hydrocarbon prod- � �
����
ucts. In addition, IsoTherming can provide a cost-effective approach to
wax and petrolatum hydrogenation to produce food-grade or pharma-
ceutical-grade oil and wax products, and lubestock hydroprocessing for
sulfur reduction and VI improvement. � � �
Continued
Hydrotreating, continued
Economics: Revamp investment (basis 15,000 –20,000 bpsd, 1Q 2004,
US Gulf Coast) $400/bpsd diesel
Installation: Four units have been licensed for ULSD; two units licensed
for gasoil mild hydrocracking.
removal (6) and recycled to the reactor. The liquid phase is sent to the ���� ���������� ����� ���������
�������� ��������
stripper (7) where small amounts of gas and naphtha are removed and �����������
high-quality product diesel is recovered. ��������
���
Whether the need is for a new unit or for maximum reuse of existing
diesel HDS units, the Prime-D hydrotreating toolbox of solutions meets
the challenge. Process objectives ranging from low-sulfur, ultra-low-sul-
fur, low-aromatics, and/or high cetane number are met with minimum
cost by:
• Selection of the proper catalyst from the HR 500 Series, based on and technical service feedback to ensure the right application of the
the feed analysis and processing objectives. HR 500 catalysts cover the right technology for new and revamp projects.
range of ULSD requirements with highly active and stable catalysts. HR Whatever the diesel quality goals—ULSD, high cetane or low aro-
526 CoMo exhibits high desulfurization rates at low to medium pres- matics—Prime-D’s Hydrotreating Toolbox approach will attain your goals
sures; HR 538/HR 548 NiMo have higher hydrogenation activities at in a cost-effective manner.
higher pressures. Installation: Over 150 middle distillate hydrotreaters have been li-
• Use of proven, efficient reactor internals, EquiFlow, that allow censed or revamped. They include 56 low- and ultra-low-sulfur diesel
near-perfect gas and liquid distribution and outstanding radial tempera- units (<50 ppm), as well as a number of cetane boosting units. Most
ture profiles. of those units are equipped with Equiflow internals.
• Loading catalyst in the reactor(s) with the Catapac dense loading
technique for up to 20% more reactor capacity. Over 10,000 tons of References: “Getting Total Performance with Hydrotreating,” Petroleum
catalyst have been loaded quickly, easily and safely in recent years using Technology Quarterly, Spring 2002.
the Catapac technique. “Premium Performance Hydrotreating with Axens HR 400 Series
• Application of Advanced Process Control for dependable opera- Hydrotreating Catalysts,” NPRA Annual Meeting, March 2002, San
tion and longer catalyst life. Antonio.
• Sound engineering design based on years of R&D, process design Continued
Hydrotreating, diesel, continued
“The Hydrotreating Toolbox Approach,” Hart’s European Fuel News,
May 29, 2002.
“Squeezing the most from hydrotreaters,” Hydrocarbon Asia, April/
May 2004.
Licensor: Axens.
Hydrotreating/desulfurization
Application: The SelectFining process is a gasoline desulfurization tech- �����������
nology developed to produce ultra-low-sulfur gasoline by removing ���������
more than 99% of the sulfur present in olefinic naphtha while: ���������������� ����
• Minimizing octane loss �������
Description: Oil feed and hydrogen are charged to the reactors in a suited to revamp existing RDS/VRDS units for additional throughput or
once-through operation. The catalyst combination can be varied signifi- heavier feedstock.
cantly according to feedstock properties to meet the required product
Installation: Over 26 RDS/VRDS units are in operation. Six units have ex-
qualities. Product separation is done by the hot separator, cold separator
tensive experience with VR feedstocks. Sixteen units prepare feedstock
and fractionator. Recycle hydrogen passes through an H2S absorber.
for RFCC units. Four OCR units and two UFR unit are in operation, with
A wide range of AR, VR and DAO feedstocks can be processed. Ex-
another six in engineering. Total current operating capacity is about 1.1
isting units have processed feedstocks with viscosities as high as 6,000
million bpsd
cSt at 100°C and feed-metals contents of 500 ppm.
Onstream Catalyst Replacement (OCR) reactor technology has been References: Reynolds, “Resid Hydroprocessing With Chevron Technol-
commercialized to improve catalyst utilization and increase run length ogy,” JPI, Tokyo, Japan, Fall 1998.
with high-metals, heavy feedstocks. This technology allows spent cata- Reynolds and Brossard, “RDS/VRDS Hydrotreating Broadens Appli-
lyst to be removed from one or more reactors and replaced with fresh cation of RFCC,” HTI Quarterly, Winter 1995/96.
while the reactors continue to operate normally. The novel use of up- Reynolds, et al., “VRDS for conversion to middle distillate,” NPRA
flow reactors in OCR provides greatly increased tolerance of feed solids Annual Meetng, March 1998, Paper AM-98-23.
while maintaining low-pressure drop.
A related technology called UFR (upflow reactor) uses a multibed Licensor: Chevron Lummus Global LLC.
upflow reactor for minimum pressure drop in cases where onstream
catalyst replacement is not necessary. OCR and UFR are particularly well
Hydrotreating—resid
����
Application: Upgrade or convert atmospheric and vacuum residues us-
ing the Hyvahl fixed-bed process.
Products: Low-sulfur fuels (0.3% to 1.0% sulfur) and RFCC feeds (re-
moval of metals, sulfur and nitrogen, reduction of carbon residue). Thirty �������
percent to 50% conversion of the 565°C+ fraction into distillates. ��������
�������
Description: Residue feed and hydrogen, heated in a feed/effluent ex-
changer and furnace, enter a reactor section—typically comprising of a
guard-reactor section, main HDM and HDS reactors.
The guard reactors are onstream at the same time in series, and they �������
Licensor: Axens.
Hydrotreating—residue
Application: Upgrading or converting atmospheric and vacuum residues �������
using the Genoil GHU process.
Products: Removal of metals, maximize desulfurization (>90%), deni- ��
trogenation (>70%), reduction of carbon residue (>90%) with API in- �� ������� ���������
���������
crease during the conversion process. Up to 90% conversion of 350°C+
fraction into distillates.
Description: Genoil has developed devices that enhance the mixing of
�������� ������������
liquid hydrocarbons as well as highly efficient reactor internals. These
modifications have contributed to the high level of residue conversion,
desulfurization, denitrogenation and turnaround time.
Residue feed and hydrogen are heated in feed effluent exchanger
and furnace and enter the reactor section. The reactor section is typically
Investment: Based on 20,000 bpd, atmospheric or vacuum or VR feeds,
comprised of a guard-section hydrodemineralization (HDM) reactor, and
$3,000 – 5,000/bbl based of Gulf Coast rates.
sulfur-removal section—hydrodesulfurization (HDS).
The guard-reactor section protects the downstream HDS reactors by Installations: Genoil owns and operates a 10 BPD demonstration plant
removing metals and asphaltenes. Catalyst and operational objectives can at Two Hill, Alberta where we have conducted testing on several differ-
be adjusted according to feed metals content through different mechani- ent types of residue and crudes shipped to our facility by various com-
cal means to insure longer runtimes and constant protection for down- panies. We are currently working with several companies to get first
stream reactors. commercial installation of the GHU process.
After the guard section carries out the final removal of metals and
conversion, the HDS section removes the sulfur to design specifications. Reference: Asia Pacific Refining Conference Bangkok, Thailand, Sep-
With these factors in mind, Genoil has come up with a hydroconversion tember, 2005.
process that provides higher conversion, higher desulfurization and de- RPBC Moscow, Russia, April Conference 2006.
nitrogenation rates at lower pressure by using a simple, easy to operate Middle East Refining Conference, Doha, Qatar, May 2006.
process. America Oil and Gas Reporter, October 2005.
The upgrading process can be used as a field upgrader where heavy Energy Magazine, June 2005, Petroleum Technology Quarterly, Jan-
oil can be upgraded to WTI specification, pipeline specifications and pipe- uary 2006.
lined to refineries. Unconverted oil from the GHUunit can be sold as a Oil & Gas Product News, “Surge Global Announcement,” Jan./Feb.
stable, low-sulfur fuel oil or sent to another heavy-oil conversion unit for 2005.
further upgrading.
Licensor: Genoil Inc.
Yields: Net increase in production from 0 –10% naphtha, 1–20% kero-
sine and 21– 47% diesel.
Isomerization
Application: C5 /C6 paraffin-rich hydrocarbon streams are isomerized to
produce high RON and MON product suitable for addition to the gaso-
line pool. ��
������
Description: Several variations of the C5 / C6 isomerization process are ����������
available. The choice can be a once-through reaction for an inexpensive-
but-limited octane boost, or, for substantial octane improvement and as �����
�
an alternate (in addition) to the conventional DIH recycle option, the Ip- ���������
� �
sorb Isom scheme shown to recycle the normal paraffins for their com-
plete conversion. The Hexorb Isom configuration achieves a complete
normal paraffin conversion plus substantial conversion of low (75) oc- ��������
tane methyl pentanes gives the maximum octane results. With the most
active isomerization catalyst (chlorinated alumina), particularly with the �������
Albemarle /Axens jointly developed ATIS2L catalyst, the isomerization
performance varies from 84 to 92: once-through isomerization -84,
isomerization with DIH recycle -88, Ipsorb -90, Hexorb-92.
Description:
C4 olefin skeletal isomerization (ISOMPLUS)
�
A zeolite-based catalyst especially developed for this process pro-
vides near equilibrium conversion of normal butenes to isobutylene at � �
high selectivity and long process cycle times. A simple process scheme
and moderate process conditions result in low capital and operating
costs. Hydrocarbon feed containing n-butenes, such as C4 raffinate, can ���
be processed without steam or other diluents, nor the addition of cata- ������������������
lyst activation agents to promote the reaction. Near-equilibrium con-
version levels up to 44% of the contained n-butenes are achieved at
greater than 90% selectivity to isobutylene. During the process cycle,
coke gradually builds up on the catalyst, reducing the isomerization ac-
tivity. At the end of the process cycle, the feed is switched to a fresh
catalyst bed, and the spent catalyst bed is regenerated by oxidizing the Total installed cost: Feedrate, Mbpd ISBL cost, $MM
coke with an air/nitrogen mixture. The butene isomerate is suitable for 10 8
making high purity isobutylene product. 15 11
30 20
C5 olefin skeletal isomerization (ISOMPLUS) Utility consumption: per barrel of feed (assuming an electric-motor-
A zeolite-based catalyst especially developed for this process pro- driven compressor) are:
vides near-equilibrium conversion of normal pentenes to isoamylene at Power, kWh 3.2
high selectivity and long process cycle times. Hydrocarbon feeds con- Fuel gas, MMBtu 0.44
taining n-pentenes, such as C5 raffinate, are processed in the skeletal Steam, MP, MMBtu 0.002
isomerization reactor without steam or other diluents, nor the addition Water, cooling, MMBtu 0.051
of catalyst activation agents to promote the reaction. Near-equilibrium Nitrogen, scf 57–250
conversion levels up to 72% of the contained normal pentenes are ob-
served at greater than 95% selectivity to isoamylenes. Installation: Two plants are in operation. Two licensed units are in vari-
ous stages of design.
Economics: The ISOMPLUS process offers the advantages of low capital
investment and operating costs coupled with a high yield of isobutylene Licensor: CDTECH and Lyondell Chemical Co.
or isoamylene. Also, the small quantity of heavy byproducts formed can
easily be blended into the gasoline pool. Capital costs (equipment, labor
and detailed engineering) for three different plant sizes are:
Isomerization
Application: Hydrisom is the ConocoPhillips selective diolefin hydroge-
nation process, with specific isomerization of butene-1 to butene-2 and ����������
��������� �������� ����
3-methyl-butene-1 to 2-methyl-butene-1 and 2-methyl-butene-2. The ���������
Hydrisom Process uses a liquid-phase reaction over a commercially avail-
able catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor.
Description: The fresh C5/ C6 feed is combined with make-up and re- ����������
Feed: Typical feed sources for the Par-Isom process include hydrotreated
light straight-run naphtha, light natural gasoline or condensate and light Installation: The first commercial Par-Isom process unit was placed in
raffinate from benzene extraction units. operation in 1996. There are currently 10 units in operation. The first
Water and oxygenates at concentrations of typical hydrotreated commercial application of PI-242 catalyst was in 2003, and the unit has
naphtha are not detrimental, although free water in the feedstock must demonstrated successful performance meeting all expectations.
be avoided. Sulfur suppresses activity, as expected, for any noble-metal
based catalyst. However, the suppression effect is fully reversible by sub- Licensor: UOP LLC.
sequent processing with clean feedstocks.
Yield: Typical product C5+ yields are 97 wt% of the fresh feed. The
product octane is 81 to 87, depending on the flow configuration and
feedstock qualities.
Isomerization
Application: Most of the implemented legislation requires limiting ��������������� ����������������
benzene concentration in the gasoline pool. This has increased the ��������
demand for high-performance C5 and C6 naphtha isomerization tech-
��������
nology because of its ability to reduce the benzene concentration in �����
the gasoline pool while maintaining or increasing the pool octane. The
Penex process has served as the primary isomerization technology for ����������
upgrading C5 / C6 light straight-run naphtha.
in the first and finishing reactors. The process operates at lower pressure �� � �
���������
and provides lower costs for the hydrogenation unit. ������� �
�
Description: The feed is water washed to remove any basic compounds
that can poison the catalyst system. Most applications will be directed �
toward isooctene production. However as olefin specifications are re- ��
�����������������
�������� �
quired, the isooctene can be hydrogenated to isooctane, which is an
excellent gasoline blending stock.
The RHT isooctene process has a unique configuration; it is flexible
and can provide low per pass conversion through dilution, using a new provides the dilution, and reactor effluent is fed to the column at mul-
selectivator. The dual catalyst system also provides multiple advantages. tiple locations. Recycling does not increase column size due to the
The isobutylene conversion is 97–99 %, with better selectivity and yield unique configuration of the process. The isooctene is taken from the
together with enhanced catalyst life. The product is over 91% C8 olefins, debutanizer column bottom and is sent to OSBL after cooling or as is
and 5 – 9% C12 olefins, with very small amount of C16 olefins. sent to hydrogenation unit. The C4s are taken as overhead stream and
The feed after water wash, is mixed with recycle stream, which sent to OSBL or alkylation unit. Isooctene/product, octane (R+M)/2 is
provides the dilution (also some unreacted isobutylene) and is mixed expected to be about 105.
with a small amount of hydrogen. The feed is sent to the dual-bed re- If isooctane is to be produced the debutanizer bottom, isooctene
actor for isooctene reaction in which most of isobutylene is converted product is sent to hydrogenation unit. The isooctene is pumped to the
to isooctene and codimer. The residual conversion is done with single- required pressure (which is much lower than conventional processes),
resin catalyst via a side reactor. The feed to the side reactor is taken as mixed with recycle stream and hydrogen and is heated to the reaction
a side draw from the column and does contain unreacted isobutylene,
selectivator, normal olefins and non-reactive C4s. The recycle stream Continued
Isooctene/Isooctane, continued Economics:
Isooctene Isooctane1
temperature before sending it the first hydrogenation reactor. This reac- CAPEX ISBL, MM USD
tor uses a nickel (Ni) or palladium (Pd) catalyst. (US Gulf Coast 1Q 06, 1,000 bpd) 8.15 5.5
If feed is coming directly from the isooctene unit, only a start-up Utilities basis 1,000-bpd isooctene/isooctane
heater is required. The reactor effluent is flashed, and the vent is sent Power, kWh 65 105
to OSBL. The liquid stream is recycled to the reactor after cooling (to Water, cooling, m /h 3 154 243
remove heat of reaction) and a portion is forwarded to the finishing Steam, HP, kg/h 3,870 4,650
reactor—which also applies a Ni or Pd catalyst (preferably Pd catalyst) — Basis: FCC feed (about 15 –20% isobutelene in C4 mixed stream)
and residual hydrogenation to isooctane reaction occurs. The isooctane 1These utilities are for isooctene / isooctane cumulative.
product, octane (R+M)/2 is >98.
The reaction occurs in liquid phase or two phase (preferably two Installation: Technology is ready for commercial application.
phases), which results in lower pressure option. The olefins in isooctene
product are hydrogenated to over 99%. The finishing reactor effluent is Licensor: Refining Hydrocarbon Technologies LLC.
sent to isooctane stripper, which removes all light ends, and the product
is stabilized and can be stored easily.
Lube and wax processing
Application: Vacuum gas oils (VGOs) are simultaneously extracted and ������� ���������
���� ����
dewaxed on a single unit to produce low-pour aromatic extracts and
lube-base stocks having low-pour points. Low viscosity grades (60 SUS)
to bright stocks can be produced. With additional stages of filtration,
waxes can be deoiled to produce fully refined paraffin waxes.
Products: Lube-base stocks having low pour points (– 20°C). Very low
��������
pour point aromatic extracts. Slack waxes or low-oil content waxes.
���������
Description: Process Dynamics’ integrated extraction/dewaxing technol-
ogy is a revolutionary process combining solvent extraction and solvent
dewaxing onto a single unit, using a common solvent system, for extrac-
tion and dewaxing steps. This process offers the advantage of operating
a single unit rather than separate extraction and dewaxing units; thus, ��������� ��������
reducing both capitol and operating costs. The more selective solvent
system produces lube-base stocks of higher quality and higher yields
when compared to other technologies.
Primary solvent and warm feed are mixed together; temperature is
controlled by adding the cosolvent solvent. Filtrate or wax may be re-
cycled for solids adjustment. Cold cosolvent is added, and the slurry is Installation: Basic engineering package for the first commercial unit has
filtered (or separated by other means). Solvents are recovered from the been completed.
primary filtrate producing an aromatic extract. The wax cake is repulped
with additional solvent/cosolvent mix and refiltered. Solvents are recov- Licensor: P. D. Licensing, LLC (Process Dynamics, Inc.).
ered from the filtrate producing a lube-base stock.
Extraction/dewaxing comparisons of 90 SUS stock
Furfural/MEK Process Dynamics
A B
Raffinate yields, vol% 53 60 71
Dewaxed oil properties:
Viscosity @40°C, cSt 16.5 18.7 20
Viscosity index 92 98 92
Pour pt., °F 5 5 5
Lube extraction
Application: Bechtel’s MP Refining process is a solvent-extraction pro-
�
cess that uses N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as the solvent to selec- ���� � �
tively remove the undesirable components of low-quality lubrication oil,
����� �
which are naturally present in crude oil distillate and residual stocks. �
The unit produces paraffinic or naphthenic raffinates suitable for further
processing into lube-base stocks. This process selectively removes aro- ���� �����
matics and compounds containing heteroatoms (e.g., oxygen, nitrogen ����
and sulfur).
����������
Products: A raffinate that may be dewaxed to produce a high-qual-
�������
ity lube-base oil, characterized by high viscosity index, good thermal
and oxidation stability, light color and excellent additive response. The
byproduct extracts, being high in aromatic content, can be used, in
some cases, for carbon black feedstocks, rubber extender oils and other
nonlube applications where this feature is desirable. Economics:
Description: The distillate or residual feedstock and solvent are contact- Investment (Basis: 10,000-bpsd feedrate
ed in the extraction tower (1) at controlled temperatures and flowrates capacity, 2006 US Gulf Coast), $/bpsd 3,000
required for optimum countercurrent, liquid-liquid extraction of the Utilities, typical per bbl feed:
feedstock. The extract stream, containing the bulk of the solvent, exits Fuel, 103 Btu (absorbed) 100
the bottom of the extraction tower. It is routed to a recovery section Electricity, kWh 2
to remove solvent contained in this stream. Solvent is separated from Steam, lb 5
the extract oil by multiple-effect evaporation (2) at various pressures, Water, cooling (25°F rise), gal 600
followed by vacuum flashing and steam stripping (3) under vacuum. Installation: This process is being used in 15 licensed units to produce high-
The raffinate stream exits the overhead of the extraction tower and is quality lubricating oils. Of this number, eight are units converted from phe-
routed to a recovery section to remove the NMP solvent contained in nol or furfural, with another three units under license for conversion.
this stream by flashing and steam stripping (4) under vacuum.
Overhead vapors from the steam strippers are condensed and com- Licensor: Bechtel Corp.
bined with solvent condensate from the recovery sections and are dis-
tilled at low pressure to remove water from the solvent (5). Solvent is
recovered in a single tower because NMP does not form an azeotrope
with water, as does furfural. The water is drained to the oily-water sew-
er. The solvent is cooled and recycled to the extraction section.
Continued
Lube extraction
Application: Bechtel’s Furfural Refining process is a solvent-extraction
process that uses furfural as the solvent to selectively remove undesir-
�
able components of low lubrication oil quality, which are naturally pres- ���� � �
ent in crude oil distillate and residual stocks. This process selectively re-
����� � �
moves aromatics and compounds containing heteroatoms (e.g., oxygen, �
nitrogen and sulfur). The unit produces paraffinic raffinates suitable for ����
further processing into lube base stocks. ����
����
Products: A raffinate that may be dewaxed to produce a high-qual- �����
ity lube-base oil, characterized by high viscosity index, good thermal ����������
and oxidation stability, light color and excellent additive response. The
�������
byproduct extracts, being high in aromatic content, can be used, in
some cases, for carbon black feedstocks, rubber extender oils and other
nonlube applications where this feature is desirable.
Economics:
Investment (Basis 7,000-bpsd feedrate capacity,
2006 U.S. Gulf Coast), $/bpsd 7,100
Utilitiies, typical per bbl feed:
Fuel, 103 Btu (absorbed) 70
Electricity, kWh 5
Steam, lb 15
Water, cooling (25°F rise), gal 200
Continued
Lube oil refining, spent, continued
Utilities: Basis one metric ton of water-free feedstock
Config. 1 Config. 2
Electrical power, kWh 45 55
Fuel, million kcal 0.62 0.72
Steam, LP, kg — 23.2
Steam, MP, kg 872 890
Water, cooling, m3 54 59
Installation: Ten units have been licensed using all or part of the Revivoil
Technology.
Products: Lube oil raffinates of high viscosity indices. The raffinates con- �������
������
�������
tain substantially all of the desirable lubricating oil components present ������� ���� ��������
in the feedstock. The extract contains a concentrate of aromatics that ��� ������
�������
may be utilized as rubber oil or cracker feed. ���
�������
pounds. In the extraction tower, the feed oil is introduced below the top
at a predetermined temperature. The raffinate phase leaves at the top
of the tower, and the extract, which contains the bulk of the furfural, is
withdrawn from the bottom. The extract phase is cooled and a so-called
“pseudo raffinate“ may be sent back to the extraction tower. Multi-
stage solvent recovery systems for raffinate and extract solutions secure
energy efficient operation.
Utility requirements (typical, Middle East Crude), units per m3 of feed:
Electricity, kWh 10
Steam, MP, kg 10
Steam, LP, kg 35
Fuel oil, kg 20
Water, cooling, m3 20
Installation: Numerous installations using the Uhde (Edeleanu) propri-
etary technology are in operation worldwide. The most recent is a com-
plete lube-oil production facility licensed to the state of Turkmenistan.
Licensor: Uhde GmbH.
Mercaptan removal
����������
Application: Extraction of mercaptans from gases, LPG, lower boiling
fractions and gasolines, or sweetening of gasoline, jet fuel and diesel by ����������������� ��������
in situ conversion of mercaptans into disulfides.
�
Products: Essentially mercaptan sulfur-free, i.e., less than 5 ppmw, and
concomitant reduced total sulfur content when treated by Merox ex- �
���
������������� �
traction technique.
Products: If conditions are appropriate, the flue gas is treated to achieve ���������
NOx reductions of 40% to 70%+ with minimal NH3 slip or leakage. �������������
�������
Description: The technology involves the gas-phase reaction of NO with ��� ������
��������� ���������������
NH3 (either aqueous or anhydrous) to produce elemental nitrogen if con-
�����������
ditions are favorable. Ammonia is injected into the flue gas using steam
or air as a carrier gas into a zone where the temperature is 1,600°F ����
to 2,000°F. This range can be extended down to 1,300°F with a small �������������� ��������������
amount of hydrogen added to the injected gas. For most applications,
wall injectors are used for simplicity of operation.
Yield: Cleaned flue gas with 40% to 70%+ NOx reduction and less than
10-ppm NH3 slip.
Economics: Considerably less costly than catalytic systems but relatively McIntyre, A. D., “Applications of the THERMAL DeNOx process to
variable depending on scale and site specifics. Third-party studies have FBC boilers,” CIBO 13th Annual Fluidized Bed Conference, Lake Charles,
estimated the all-in cost at about 600 US$ / ton of NOx removed. Louisiana, 1997.
Installation: Over 135 applications on all types of fired heaters, boilers Licensor: ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co., via an alliance with
and incinerators with a wide variety of fuels (gas, oil, coal, coke, wood Engineers India Ltd. (for India) and Hamon Research-Cottrell (for the rest
and waste). The technology can also be applied to full-burn FCCU re- of the world).
generators.
Operating conditions: Ozone injection typically occurs in the flue-gas Reference: Confuorto, et al., “LoTOx technology demonstration at Mar-
stream upstream of the scrubber, near atmospheric pressure and at athon Ashland Petroleum LLC’s refinery at Texas City, Texas,” NPRA An-
temperatures up to roughly 150°C. For higher-temperature streams, the nual Meeting, March 2004, San Antonio.
ozone is injected after a quench section of the scrubber, at adiabatic
Licensor: Belco Technologies Corp., as a sub-licensor for The BOC
saturation, typically 60°C to 75°C. High-particulate saturated gas and
Group, Inc.
sulfur loading (SOx or TRS) do not cause problems.
Economics: The costs for NOx control using this technology are espe-
cially low when used as a part of a multi-pollutant control scenario.
Sulfurous and particulate-laden streams can be treated attractively as no
pretreatment is required by the LoTOx system.
can be achieved via oxygen enrichment in the FCC regeneration. ���������������������������� �������������
In the FCC reactor, long-chain hydrocarbons are cleaved into shorter ������������������������������������� �������������
�������������������������������������� ��������������
chains in a fluidized-bed reactor at 450 –550°C. This reaction produces ��������������������������� ��������������
coke as a byproduct that deposits on the catalyst. To remove the coke ������������������������������������ ���������������������
from the catalyst, it is burned off at 650 –750°C in the regenerator. The
regenerated catalyst is returned to the reactor.
Oxygen enrichment, typically up to 27 vol% oxygen, intensifies cata- products, such as naphtha. Likewise, lower value products increased
lyst regeneration and can substantially raise throughput capacity and/or only 5%, as fuel gas. The net profit increased substantially. Installed cost
conversion of the FCC unit. Oxygen sources can be liquid oxygen tanks, for oxygen enrichment is typically below $250,000.
onsite ASUs or pipeline supply. Oxygen consumption in FCC units fluctu- Operating costs will depend on the cost for oxygen and the duration
ates widely in most cases; thus, tanks are the best choice with respect to of oxygen enrichment. Economical oxygen usage can be calculated on
ease of operation, flexibility and economy. a case-by-case basis and should include increased yields of higher-value
For oxygen addition into the CS air duct, a number of safety rules products and optional usage of lower-value feeds.
must be observed. The oxygen metering device FLOWTRAIN contains all
necessary safety features, including flow control, low-temperature and Installations: Currently, four units are in operation, plus test installations
low-pressure alarm and switch-off, and safe standby operation. All of to quantify the effects of higher capacity and conversion levels.
these features are connected to the FCC units’ process control system.
Reference: Heisel, M. P., C. Morén, A. Reichhold, A. Krause, A. Berlanga,
An efficient mixing device ensures even oxygen distribution in the air
“Cracking with Oxygen,” Linde Technology 1, 2004.
feed to the FCC regeneration.
Contributor: Linde AG, Division Gas and Engineering.
Economics: Oxygen enrichment in FCC regeneration is economically
favorable in many plants. For example, one refinery increased through-
put by 15%. The net improvement was a 26% increase in higher-value
Olefin etherification
Application: New processing methods improve etherification of C4– C7
reactive olefins including light catalytic naphtha (LCN) with alcohol (e.g., �����������������
����������������
���
�������
������������ ��������� ���������
�������
�������
����������
����������������
������
methanol and ethanol). The processes, RHT-MixedEthers, RHT-MTBE, ������������ ��������
RHT-ETBE, RHT-TAME and RHT-TAEE, use unique concepts to achieve the ������� �������������
�����
��������������� ���
maximum conversion without applying cumbersome catalyst in the col- �����������
�����
�� ��
umn. The processing economics provide improvements over other avail-
�
able ether technologies currently available. The technology suite can ���������� �
�
��
�������
� �� �������
be applied to ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) production in which wet ���������� ����������
������ � �
ethanol can be used in place of dry ethanol. The drier can be eliminated,
�
which is approximately half the cost for an etherification unit. The RHT �����
��� ��������
���������� ��
ethers processes can provide the highest conversion with unique mul-
������������������
tiple equilibrium stages. ������������� ������� ������������
������������������������������������������
Description: The feed is water washed to remove basic compounds
that are poisons for the resin catalyst of the etherification reaction. The
C4 ethers—methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)/ETBE), C5– tertiary amyl
methyl ether (TAME/ tertiary amyl ethyl ether (TAEE) and C6 /C7 ethers
are made in this process separately. The reaction is difficult; heavier
ethers conversion of the reactive olefins are equilibrium conversion of separate the ether and heavy hydrocarbons from C4 or C5 hydrocarbons,
about 97% for MTBE and 70% for TAME and much lower for C6/C7 which are taken as overhead. Single or multiple draw offs are taken from
ethers are expected. the fractionation column. In the fractionation column, unreacted olefins
Higher alcohols have similar effects (azeotrope hydrocarbon/alcohol (C4 or C5) are sent to the finishing reactor (5). This stream normally does
relationship decreases when using methanol over ethanol). The equilib- not require alcohol, since azeotrope levels are available. But, some ad-
rium conversions and azeotrope effects for higher ethers are lower, as is ditional alcohol is added for the equilibrium-stage reaction. Depending
expected. After the hydrocarbon feed is washed, it is mixed with alcohol on the liquid withdrawn (number of side draws), the conversion can be
with reactive olefin ratio control with alcohol. enhanced to a higher level than via other conventional or unconven-
The feed mixture is heated to reaction temperature (and mixed with tional processes.
recycle stream (for MTBE/ETBE only) and is sent to the first reactor (1), By installing multiple reactors, it is possible to extinct the olefins
where equilibrium conversion is done in the presence of sulfonated resin within the raffinate. The cost of side draws and reactors can achieve
catalyst, e.g. Amberlyst 15 or 35 or equivalent from other vendors. pay-off in 6 to 18 months by the higher catalyst cost as compared to
Major vaporization is detrimental to this reaction. Vapor-phase re- other processes. This process could provide 97– 99.9% isobutene con-
active olefins are not available for reaction. Additionally at higher tem- version in C4 feed (depending on the configuration) and 95 – 98+% of
peratures, there is slight thermal degradation of the catalyst occurs. The isoamylenes in C5 stream.
reactor effluent is sent to fractionator (debutanizer or depentanizer) to Continued
catalyst. Distillation is done at optimum conditions. Much lower steam
Olefin etherification, continued consumption for alcohol recovery. For example, the C5 feed case requires
less alcohol with RHT configuration (azeotropic alcohol is not required)
The ether product is taken from the bottom, cooled and sent to the
and lowers lower steam consumption.
storage. The raffinate is washed in extractor column (6) with and is sent
to the OSBL. The water/alcohol mixture is sent to alcohol recovery col- Economics:
umn (7) where the alcohol is recovered and recycled as feed. CAPEX ISBL, MM USD (US Gulf Coast 1Q06,
For ETBE and TAEE, ethanol dehydration is required for most of the 1,000-bpd ether product) 9.1
processes, whereas for RHT process, wet ethanol can be used providing Utilities Basis 1,000 bpd ether
maximum conversions. If need be, the TBA specification can be met by Power kWh 45.0
optimum design with additional equipment providing high ETBE yield Water, cooling m3/ h 250
and conversion. Cost of ethanol dehydration is much more than the Steam MP, Kg / h 6,000
present configuration for the RHT wet-ethanol process. Basis: FCC Feed (about 15–20% isobutylene in C4 mixed stream)
The total capital cost /economics is lower with conventional catalyst
usage, compared to other technologies, which use complicated struc- Commercial units: Technology is ready for commercialization.
ture, require installing a manway (cumbersome) and require frequently
catalyst changes outs.
Licensor: Refining Hydrocarbon Technologies LLC.
The RHT ether processes can provide maximum conversion as com-
pared to other technologies with better economics. No complicated or
proprietary internals for the column including single source expensive
Olefins recovery
Application: Recover high-purity hydrogen (H2) and C2+ liquid products
from refinery offgases using cryogenics.
�
Description: Cryogenic separation of refinery offgases and purges con-
taining 10– 80% H2 and 15 – 40% hydrocarbon liquids such as ethylene, �������
���������
ethane, propylene, propane and butanes. Refinery offgases are option-
ally compressed and then pretreated (1) to remove sulfur, carbon di-
oxide ( CO2), H2 O and other trace impurities. Treated feed is partially � �
condensed in an integrated multi-passage exchanger system (2) against �
Economics:
Consumption per metric ton of FCC C4 fraction feedstock:
Steam, t / t 0.5 – 0.8
Water, cooling ( T = 10°C ), m3/ t 15.0
Electric power, kWh/t 25.0
Product purity:
n - Butene content 99.+ wt.– % min.
Solvent content 1 wt.– ppm max.
cycle and internally generated steam. After preheating, the feed is sent
to the reaction section. This section consists of an externally fired tubular
fixed-bed reactor (Uhde reformer) connected in series with an adiabat-
ic fixed-bed oxyreactor (secondary reformer type). In the reformer, the
Apart from light-ends, which are internally used as fuel gas, the
endothermic dehydrogenation reaction takes place over a proprietary,
olefin is the only product. High-purity H2 may optionally be recovered
noble metal catalyst.
from light-ends in the gas separation section.
In the adiabatic oxyreactor, part of the hydrogen from the intermediate
product leaving the reformer is selectively converted with added oxygen Economics: Typical specific consumption figures (for polymer-grade
or air, thereby forming steam. This is followed by further dehydrogenation propylene production) are shown (per metric ton of propylene product,
over the same noble-metal catalyst. Exothermic selective H2 conversion including production of oxygen and all steam required):
in the oxyreactor increases olefin product space-time yield and supplies
Propane, kg/metric ton 1,200
heat for further endothermic dehydrogenation. The reaction takes place Fuel gas, GJ/metric ton 6.4
at temperatures between 500– 600°C and at 4 – 6 bar. Circul. cooling water, m3/metric ton 170
The Uhde reformer is top-fired and has a proprietary “cold” out- Electrical energy, kWh/metric ton 100
let manifold system to enhance reliability. Heat recovery utilizes process
heat for high-pressure steam generation, feed preheat and for heat re- Installation: Two commercial plants using the STAR process for dehydro-
quired in the fractionation section. genation of isobutane to isobutylene have been commissioned (in the
After cooling and condensate separation, the product is subse- US and Argentina). More than 60 Uhde reformers and 25 Uhde second-
quently compressed, light-ends are separated and the olefin product is ary reformers have been constructed worldwide.
separated from unconverted paraffins in the fractionation section. Continued
Olefins, continued
References: Heinritz-Adrian, M., “Advanced technology for C3/C4 dehy-
drogenation, “ First Russian & CIS GasTechnology Conference, Moscow,
Russia, September 2004.
Heinritz-Adrian, M., N. Thiagarajan, S. Wenzel and H. Gehrke,
“STAR—Uhde’s dehydrogenation technology (an alternative route to
C3- and C4-olefins),” ERTC Petrochemical 2003, Paris, France, March
2003.
Thiagarajan, N., U. Ranke and F. Ennenbach, “Propane/butane de-
hydrogenation by steam active reforming,” Achema 2000, Frankfurt,
Germany, May 2000.
Description: Sulfur components contained in the hydrocarbon feed are ������� �������
converted to H 2 S in the HDS vessel and then fed to two desulfurization
vessels in series. Each vessel contains two catalyst types—the first for
bulk sulfur removal and the second for ultrapurification down to sulfur �������
levels of less than 1 ppb. ���
The two-desulfurization vessels are arranged in series in such a way ���������� ���� ��� ���
that either may be located in the lead position allowing online change ��������������� ��������������� �����������
������ ������
out of the catalysts. The novel interchanger between the two vessels ����������������
allows for the lead and lag vessels to work under different optimized
conditions for the duties that require two catalyst types. This arrange-
ment may be retrofitted to existing units.
Desulfurized feed is then fed to a fixed bed of nickel-based catalyst
that converts the hydrocarbon feed, in the presence of steam, to a prod-
uct stream containing only methane together with H 2, CO, CO 2 and Installation: CRG process technology covers 40 years of experience with
unreacted steam which is suitable for further processing in a conven- over 150 plants built and operated. Ongoing development of the cata-
tional fired reformer. The CRG prereformer enables capital cost savings lyst has lead to almost 50 such units since 1990.
in primary reforming due to reductions in the radiant box heat load. It
also allows high-activity gas-reforming catalyst to be used. The ability to Catalyst: The CRG catalyst is manufactured under license by Johnson
increase preheat temperatures and transfer radiant duty to the convec- Matthey Catalysts.
tion section of the primary reformer can minimize involuntary steam
production. Licensor: The process and CRG catalyst are licensed by Davy Process
Technology.
Operating conditions: The desulfurization section typically operates be-
tween 170 ° C and 420 ° C and the CRG prereformer will operate over a
wide range of temperatures from 250 ° C to 650 ° C and at pressures up
to 75 bara.
Pressure swing adsorption—rapid
cycle
Application: Hydrogen recovery from fuel gas and hydrogen contain-
ing offgas streams in refinery and chemical processes offers many po-
tential benefits, including process uplift, reduced H2 costs, avoided
H2 plant expansion and emissions reductions. It also requires a cost-
effective separation technology to be economical. Rapid-cycle pres-
sure swing adsorption (RCPSA) technology offers a more-compact,
less-expensive and more-energy-efficient solution for H2 recovery
compared to conventional PSA technology. This technology has been
jointly developed by ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co. (EMRE)
and QuestAir Technologies. The resulting product—the “QuestAir H- ���������������� ���������������
�����������������
6200”— will have its first large-scale commercial application in 2007 �������������������������������������������
in an ExxonMobil Refinery.
Installation: Three units are currently operating. Several units are under
construction, and many units are under design.
ing macrocrystalline (paraffinic) and microcrystalline wax (from residual ���������� �������
oil). Oil contents typically range from 5–25 wt%. ����
����������
Installations: One SRU tail-gas system and two FCCU scrubbing systems.
Reference: Confuorto, Weaver and Pedersen, “LABSORB regenerative
Sour gas treatment
���������
Application: The WSA process (Wet gas Sulfuric Acid) treats all types of ������
��������������
sulfur-containing gases such as amine and Rectisol regenerator offgas,
���
SWS gas and Claus plant tail gas in refineries, gas treatment plants, ���������
petrochemicals and coke chemicals plants. The WSA process can also be ������� ������
���
applied for SOx removal and regeneration of spent sulfuric acid.
Sulfur, in any form, is efficiently recovered as concentrated commer- �����������
���
cial-quality sulfuric acid. ���������
Installation: Ten units have been licensed using all or part of the Revivoil
Technology.
Economics: D’GAASS achieves 10 ppmw combined H2S/H2Sx in product Reference: US Patent 5,632,967.
sulfur without using catalyst. Elevated pressure results in the following Nasato, E. and T. A. Allison, “Sulfur degasification—The D’GAASS
benefits: low capital investment, very small footprint, low operating cost process,” Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, Okla-
and low air requirement. Operation is simple, requiring minimal opera- homa, March, 1998.
tor and maintenance time. No chemicals, catalysts, etc., are required. Fenderson, S., “Continued development of the D’GAASS sulfur de-
gasification process,” Brimstone Sulfur Recovery Symposium, Canmore,
Installations: Twenty-one D’GAASS units in operation. Twenty-six ad-
Alberta, May 2001.
ditional trains in engineering and construction phase with total capacity
over 25,000 long ton per day (LTPD). Licensor: Goar, Allison & Associates, Inc.
Sulfur recovery
Application: The COPE Oxygen Enrichment Process allows existing Claus ������������
��� �����������
sulfur recovery/tail gas cleanup units to increase capacity and recov- ������������� ��� ���
ery, can provide redundant sulfur processing capacity, and can improve ���� ���
������ ������ ���
combustion performance of units processing lean acid gas. � �� � ��
�����
Description: The sulfur processing capacity of typical Claus sulfur re- ��� �� �������
���
��
covery units can be increased to more than 200% of the base capacity ���������� ��� ��
��� ��
through partial to complete replacement of combustion air with pure ��� ���
oxygen (O2). SRU capacity is typically limited by hydraulic pressure drop. ��� ���
���
As O2 replaces combustion air, the quantity of inert nitrogen is reduced ���
allowing additional acid gas to be processed. � �� �������������������
�� � ��
The process can be implemented in two stages. As the O2 enrich-
��
ment level increases, the combustion temperature (1) increases. COPE ��
Phase I, which does not use a recycle stream, can often achieve 50% ��� �� ��� ��
capacity increase through O2 enrichment to the maximum reaction fur-
nace refractory temperature limit of 2,700ºF – 2,800ºF. Higher O2 enrich-
ment levels are possible with COPE Phase II which uses an internal pro-
cess recycle stream to moderate the combustion temperature allowing
enrichment up to 100% O2. Operating costs are a function of O2 cost, reduced incinerator fuel, and
Flow through the remainder of the SRU (2, 3, and 4) and the tail reduced operating and maintenance labor costs.
gas cleanup unit is greatly reduced. Ammonia and hydrocarbon acid
gas impurity destruction and thermal stage conversion are improved at Installations: Twenty-nine COPE trains at 17 locations.
the higher O2 enriched combustion temperatures. Overall SRU sulfur Reference: US Patents 4,552,747 and 6,508,998.
recovery is typically increased by 0.5% to 1%. A single proprietary COPE Sala, L., W. P. Ferrell and P. Morris, “The COPE process—Increase
burner handles acid gas, recycle gas, air and O2. sulfur recovery capacity to meet changing needs,” European Fuels Week
Operating conditions: Combustion pressure is from 6 psig to 12 psig; Conference, Giardini Naxos, Taormina, Italy, April 2000.
combustion temperature is up to 2,800ºF. Oxygen concentration is from Nasato, E. and T. A. Allison, “COPE Ejector—Proven technology,”
21% to 100%. Sulphur 2002, Vienna, Austria, October 2002.
Licensor: Goar, Allison & Associates, Inc., and Air Products and Chemi-
Economics: Expanded SRU and tail gas unit retrofit sulfur processing
cals, Inc.
capacity at capital cost of 15% – 25% of new plant cost. New plant sav-
ings of up to 25%, and redundant capacity at 15% of base capital cost.
Thermal gasoil
Application: The Shell Thermal Gasoil process is a combined residue and
waxy distillate conversion unit. The process is an attractive low-cost con- ���
version option for hydroskimming refineries in gasoil-driven markets or �������
for complex refineries with constrained waxy distillate conversion capac-
ity. The typical feedstock is atmospheric residue, which eliminates the � �����
������
need for an upstream vacuum flasher. This process features Shell Soaker
Visbreaking technology for residue conversion and an integrated recycle
heater system for the conversion of waxy distillate.
����
� � ����������
Description: The preheated atmospheric (or vacuum) residue is charged
to the visbreaker heater (1) and from there to the soaker (2). The con- ����� �
�
version takes place in both the heater and soaker and is controlled by
the operating temperature and pressure. The soaker effluent is routed ������ � �������������
to a cyclone (3). The cyclone overheads are charged to an atmospheric ���������������
fractionator (4) to produce the desired products including a light waxy
distillate. The cyclone and fractionator bottoms are routed to a vacuum
flasher (6), where waxy distillate is recovered. The combined waxy distil-
lates are fully converted in the distillate heater (5) at elevated pressure. Utilities, typical consumption/production for a 25,000-bpd unit,
Yields: Depend on feed type and product specifications. dependent on configuration and a site’s marginal economic values for
steam and fuel:
Feed atmospheric residue Middle East
Fuel as fuel oil equivalent, bpd 675
Viscosity, cSt @ 100°C 31
Power, MW 1.7
Products, % wt. Net steam production (18 bar), tpd 370
Gas 6.4
Gasoline, ECP 165°C 12.9 Installation: To date, 12 Shell Thermal Gasoil units have been built. Post
Gasoil, ECP 350°C 38.6 startup services and technical services for existing units are available
Residue, ECP 520°C+ 42.1 from Shell Global Solutions..
Economics: The typical investment for a 25,000-bpd unit will be about Licensor: Shell Global Solutions International B.V., and ABB Lummus
$2,400 to $3,000/bbl installed, excluding treating facilities. (Basis: West- Global B.V.
ern Euope, 2004.)
Treating—jet fuel/kerosine
Application: NAPFINING / MERICAT II / AQUAFINING systems eliminate ���
�������������������
naphthenic acids and mercaptans from kerosine to meet acid number ���������
and mercaptan jet fuel specifications. Caustic, air and catalyst are used ��������
along with FIBER-FILM Contactor technology and an upflow catalyst im- �����
pregnated carbon bed saturated with caustic.
Description: In a MERICAT system, the caustic phase flows along the fi- �������������
bers of the FIBER-FILM Contactor as it preferentially wets the fibers. Prior
to entering the FIBER-FILM Contactor the gasoline phase mixes with air
through a proprietary air sparger. The gasoline then flows through the
caustic-wetted fibers in the Contactor where the mercaptans are ex- ��������
�������������
tracted and converted to disulfides in the caustic phase. The disulfides
are immediately absorbed back into the gasoline phase. The two phases
disengage and the caustic is recycled back to the FIBER-FILM Contactor
until spent. �������������
Competitive advantages:
• Minimal caustic and catalyst consumption
• Operating simplicity
• Minimal capital investment
• Recausticizing of the carbon bed without interruption of treating.
The FIBER-FILM section keeps organic acids from entering the carbon
bed. This conserves caustic and avoids fouling of the bed with sodium
naphthenate soaps. Competitive downflow reactors need frequent car-
bon bed hot water washings to remove these soaps whereas MERICAT
II does not require hot water washes.
The MERICAT II onstream factor is 100% while competitive systems
requiring periodic cleaning have unpredictable onstream factors.
Contactor.
content.
���������������������
Competitive advantages: �����
����������� �����
• Minimizes spent caustic disposal cost �����������
• Reduces the phenol content of spent caustic and increases the ��������
�������
phenol content of sweetened gasoline thus adding value
• Operates over a wide pH range ��������
�������
• Simple to operate
• No corrosion problems due to the buffering effect of CO2.
Continued
Treating—pressure swing adsorption, continued
Installation: Since commercialization in 1966, UOP has provided over
700 PSA systems in more than 60 countries in the refining, petrochemi-
cal, polymer, steel and power-generation industries. The Polybed PSA
system has demonstrated exceptional economic value in many appli-
cations, such as hydrogen recovery from refinery off-gases, monomer
recovery monomers in polyolefin plants, hydrogen extraction from gas-
ification syngas, helium purification for industrial gas use, adjustment
of synthesis gas for ammonia production, methane purification for pet-
rochemicals production, and H2/CO ratio adjustment for syngas used in
the manufacture of oxo-alcohols. Feed conditions typically range from
(7–70 kg/cm2g) (100 to 1,000 psig), with concentrations of the desired
component from 30 – 98+ mol %. System capacities range from less than
1 to more than 350 MMscfd (less than 1,100 to more than 390,000
Nm3/h).
Product: Vacuum distillates of precisely defined viscosities and flash points ���������
���
(for lube production) and low metals content (for FCC and hydrocracker ������������
units) as well as vacuum residue with specified softening point, penetra- ��� ����������
tion and flash point. ����������
ing units for wax treatment. Standard sizes are 500, 1,000, 2,000 and �
3,000-bpsd feedrate.
�� � �
The core of the unit is standardized; however, individual modules are
modified as needed for specific client needs. This unit will be fabricated
to industry standards in a shop environment and delivered to the plant �����������
site as an essentially complete unit. Cost and schedule reductions of at
least 20% over conventional stick-built units are expected. The standard
licensor’s process guarantees and contractor’s performance guarantees
(hydraulic and mechanical) come with the modules.
Economics:
Investment (Basis 2,000-bpsd feedrate capacity,
2006 US Gulf Coast), $/bpsd 7,300
Wet gas scrubbing (WGS) ���
condensed SO 2 stream.
Description: The flue gas enters the spray tower through the quench
section where it is immediately quenched to saturation temperature.
It proceeds to the absorber section for particulate and SO2 reduction. Economics: The EDV wet scrubbing system has been extremely suc-
The spray tower is an open tower with multiple levels of BELCO-G- cessful in the incineration and refining industries due to the very high
Nozzles. These nonplugging and abrasion-resistant nozzles remove scrubbing capabilities, very reliable operation and reasonable price.
particulates by impacting on the water/reagent curtains. At the same Installation: More than 200 applications worldwide on various pro-
time, these curtains also reduce SO 2 and SO 3 emissions. The BELCO- cesses including 43 FCCU applications, 5 heater applications, 1 SRU
G-Nozzles are designed not to produce mist; thus a conventional mist tailgas unit and 1 fluidized coker application to date.
eliminator is not required.
Upon leaving the absorber section, the saturated gases are direct- Reference: Confuorto and Weaver, “Flue gas scrubbing of FCCU re-
ed to the EDV filtering modules to remove the fine particulates and ad- generator flue gas—performance, reliability, and flexibility—a case his-
ditional SO3. The filtering module is designed to cause condensation of tory,” Hydrocarbon Engineering, 1999.
the saturated gas onto the fine particles and onto the acid mist, thus Eagleson and Dharia, “Controlling FCCU emissions,” 11th Refin-
allowing it to be collected by the BELCO-F-Nozzle located at the top. ing Technology Meeting, HPCL, Hyderabad, 2000.
To ensure droplet-free stack, the flue gas enters a droplet separa-
tor. This is an open design that contains fixed-spin vanes that induce a Licensor: Belco Technologies Corp.
cyclonic flow of the gas. As the gases spiral down the droplet separa-
tor, the centrifugal forces drive any free droplets to the wall, separat-
ing them from the gas stream.
White oil and wax hydrotreating
��������������� �����
Application: Process to produce white oils and waxes.
�������
Feeds: Nonrefined as well as solvent- or hydrogen-refined naphthenic or ������� ��� �������
�����
paraffinic vacuum distillates or deoiled waxes. �� �������� ��
������� �������
Products: Technical- and medical-grade white oils and waxes for plasti-
cizer, textile, cosmetic, pharmaceutical and food industries. Products are
in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regula-
���
tions and the German Pharmacopoeia (DAB 8 and DAB 9) specifications. �������
����������
Description: This catalytic hydrotreating process uses two reactors. Hydro- �����
���������
gen and feed are heated upstream of the first reaction zone (containing a
���� ������������
special presulfided NiMo/alumina catalyst) and are separated downstream
of the reactors into the main product and byproducts (hydrogen sulfide ����������� ������������ ���������������������
������������������� ������������������ �����������������������
and light hydrocarbons). A stripping column permits adjusting product ������������������� ���������������
specifications for technical-grade white oil or feed to the second hydro-
genation stage.
When hydrotreating waxes, however, medical quality is obtained
in the one-stage process. In the second reactor, the feed is passed
over a highly active hydrogenation catalyst to achieve a very low level
of aromatics, especially of polynuclear compounds. This scheme per-
Installation: Four installations use the Uhde (Edeleanu) proprietary tech-
nology, one of which has the largest capacity worldwide.
mits each stage to operate independently and to produce technical- or
medical-grade white oils separately. Yields after the first stage range Licensor: Uhde GmbH.
from 85% to 99% depending on feedstock. Yields from the second
hydrogenation step are nearly 100%. When treating waxes, the yield
is approximately 98%.