Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan - Adopted June 7 2017
Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan - Adopted June 7 2017
Redevelopment Plan
For the Southwest Rehabilitation Area
Blocks 3, 3.1, 3.2, 139.1, 4, 5, 6, 8.1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 23
City of Hoboken
Hudson County, NJ
Acknowledgements
Planning Board
Frank Magaletta, Chairman, Class IV
Ryan Peene, Vice Chairman, Class IV
Caleb Stratton, Mayoral Designee, Class I
Brandy Forbes, Community Development Director, Class II
James Doyle, Class III Member (Council appointee)
Ann Graham, Class IV
Gary Holtzman, Class IV
Rami Pinchevsky, Class IV
Caleb McKenzie, Class IV
Tom Jacobson, 1st Alternate
Kelly O’Connor, 2nd Alternate
City of Hoboken
Brandy Forbes, AICP, PP, Director of Community Development
Stephen D. Marks, AICP, PP, CFM, LEED GA, Business Administrator
City of Hoboken
Redevelopment Consultants
Maser Consulting P.A.
David G. Roberts, AICP, PP, LLA, LEED AP ND, Project Manager
Daniel Bloch, AICP, PP, GIS Mapping
Kristin Russell, AICP, PP, Redevelopment Planner
Zachary Zeilman, Planner
John J. Jahr, TSOS, Transportation Planner
Gerald DeFelicis, LLA, PP, Green Infrastructure
Joseph J. Layton, AICP, PP, Quality Assurance
Camoin Associates
Michael N’dolo, Economic Market Analyst
Thomas Dworetsky, Economic Market Analyst
Contents
1. Introduction 1
2. Rehabilitation Area 3
2.1 Property Description 6
2.2 Existing Zoning 22
3. The Need for Rehabilitation 29
4. Visions, Goals and Objectives 31
4.1 Master Plan Visioning 31
4.2 Redevelopment Visioning Process 32
5. Traffic & Circulation Recommendations 36
5.1 Traffic Improvements Authorized for Southwest Hoboken 36
5.2 Additional Pedestrian Safety Improvements Adjacent to the Area 39
5.3 Subregional Recommendations for Long Term Circulation Improvements 40
5.4 Additional Traffic Concepts Part of Redevelopment Plan 41
6. Redevelopment Plan 42
6.1 General Plan Components 42
6.2 Rear Alley and Supplemental Accesses 43
6.3 Expansion of the Southwest Resiliency Park 47
6.4 Land Uses - General 48
6.5 Plan Subareas 49
6.6 Parking Regulations 67
6.7 Affordable Housing 67
6.8 Flood Damage Prevention 67
6.9 Design Standards for Rehabilitation & New Construction 67
6.10 Guidelines for Buildings, Structures, and Related Elements 68
6.11 Guidelines for the Subareas 69
6.12 Signage 70
6.13 Sustainability 70
6.14 Design Standards for Green Infrastructure 71
7. Implementation 76
7.1 Relationship to Zoning - Overlay 76
7.2 Redevelopment in Accordance with the Plan 76
7.3 Acquisition 76
7.4 Other Actions 76
7.5 Role of City 77
7.6 City Designation of Redeveloper 77
7.7 Approvals Process 79
7.8 Relocation Plan 81
1. Introduction
This Redevelopment Plan has been prepared for the Southwest Rehabilitation Area
(“Rehabilitation Area”) within the City of Hoboken, Hudson County, New Jersey pursuant to the
New Jersey Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (“LRHL” codified at N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 et
seq.). The Rehabilitation Area includes 14 blocks located in the southwest corner of Hoboken
adjacent to Jersey City. The area is generally south and west of Paterson Avenue extending
from Paterson Avenue to the Jersey City border.
This Redevelopment Plan is designed to build upon some of the existing uses of the
Rehabilitation Area, from wallpaper manufacturing to art galleries to gyms and dance studios to
co-working business spaces. The Redevelopment Plan envisions a dynamic neighborhood in
which to live, work, and play. The area is to have additional open space to bring people
together and retail and microbrewery type of businesses for gathering. As well, circulation
improvements will ensure safe travel for all modes of transportation.
In 2006 the City of Hoboken Council initially directed the City’s Planning Board to study the area
in order to determine whether it was an “Area in Need of Redevelopment” in accordance with
the criteria specified at N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5. The City Council then renewed its authorization on
October 21, 2009 to have the Planning Board undertake a Preliminary Investigation and
conduct a public hearing in order to determine whether the area of the City known as the
“Southwest Area” fulfilled the criteria for declaration as an “area in need of redevelopment”.
In 2011 Clarke Caton Hintz was retained by the Hoboken Planning Board to conduct a study in
order to determine whether the properties within the Study Area met the statutory
requirements for designation as an “area in need of redevelopment” pursuant to the LRHL.
Additionally, the scope of the studies was expanded to include a determination of whether the
properties within the Study Area met the statutory requirements for an “area in need of
rehabilitation” pursuant to the LRHL. Although the Clarke Caton Hintz study concluded that
only 26.7% of the acreage in the Study Area satisfied the criteria for a determination of an area
in need of redevelopment, the study also concluded that the entire Study Area meets the
criteria for an area in need of rehabilitation As such, the City Council directed the Planning
Board to consider this southwest area as an Area in Need of Rehabilitation. On June 5, 2012,
the Planning Board found that the area satisfied the criteria to be designated as an Area in
Need of Rehabilitation under Section 14 of the Redevelopment Law N.J.S.A. 40:12A-14(a). By
resolution on June 20, 2012, the City Council then designated the area as an Area in Need of
Rehabilitation.
2. Rehabilitation Area
The Rehabilitation Area encompasses 14 blocks in the southwest corner of Hoboken directly
adjacent to the Jersey City border, including Blocks 3, 3.1, 3.2, 139.1, 4, 5, 6, 8.1, 9, 10, 11, 12,
14 and 23.
Generally the Rehabilitation Area lies south and west of Paterson Avenue extending to the
Jersey City border and lies south of Newark Street between the Jersey City border and
Henderson Street. Twelve blocks of the rehabilitation area are within the confines as described
above with two other blocks (Blocks 11 and 8.1) lying on the north side of Paterson Avenue and
Newark Street. Block 11 is bounded by Paterson Avenue, First Street and Harrison Street while
Block 8.1 is bounded by Newark Street, Madison Street and Observer Highway. However, this
Redevelopment Plan only applies to the blocks to the south of First Street and Paterson
Avenue, as Block 11 is already zoned R-3, which permits mixed use development; Block 23, a
portion of which is the light rail ROW and the remainder is trailer storage; and Block 8.1 is the
historic firehouse that will remain unchanged. Blocks 11, 23, and 8.1 will be covered by the
existing zoning and not this Redevelopment Plan.
The Rehabilitation Area contains numerous small lots, many of which are 25’ x 100’. There are
a total of 157 lots in the 14 blocks in the Rehabilitation Area. However, many of the lots are in
common ownership such that there are approximately 20 separate ownerships that can be
identified. In total there are approximately 17.64 acres within the full Rehabilitation Area.
This area of Hoboken serves as the gateway to the City from the south via Newark Street, Grove
Street and Henderson Street that connect to Jersey City by crossing under the NJ Transit tracks
leading to and from Hoboken Terminal. Observer Highway also connects to Jersey City to the
west while Paterson Avenue provides a connection to Jersey City and Union City to the west. All
told, these access points in the southwest corner of Hoboken represent five of the nine street
access points between Hoboken and surrounding communities. Rail travelers also enter
Hoboken through this area on the NJ Transit main lines and the Hudson Bergen Light Rail Line.
Therefore the land uses and development pattern in the southwest help to form the first
impression for many travelers arriving in Hoboken which makes the Southwest Hoboken
Redevelopment Plan that much more significant.
23
4 9
10
5
11
6 12
14
3
3.1
3.2 8.1
139.1
Although the City of Hoboken has experienced a development boom in the last two decades,
much of the southwest area of the City has not, and there are still some remnants of the City’s
industrial past in the form of small, antiquated industrial buildings. There are also large areas
either underutilized or devoted to surface parking. Immediately adjacent to the Rehabilitation
Area, new multi-family high rise buildings have been constructed in both Hoboken and nearby
areas of Jersey City.
Newark Street
Newark Street is the southernmost street in the Rehabilitation Area. It connects to Jersey
Avenue in Jersey City and serves as one of three links between Hoboken and Jersey City to the
south across the NJ Transit rail lines that feed into Hoboken Terminal. In fact, the other two
links, Grove Street and Henderson Street, intersect Newark Street. Newark Street runs parallel
to the boundary between Hoboken and Jersey City. The lots on the south side of Newark Street
back up to the Jersey City boundary and have a depth of only 86 ft. The lots are also only 25 ft.
wide although there are groups of lots under the same ownership which can achieve additional
potential site width. For example, Block 3, Lots 3-11 are all under the same ownership.
Although the lots are each 25 feet wide, the total site under this one ownership is 225 feet
wide.
As a result of the shallow depth and generally small size of the lots on the south side of Newark
Street, the lots have been previously developed with small scale uses. The zoning of all lots is I-2
Mixed Use Industrial, and most lots are developed consistent with the zoning. Most of the
opposite (north side) of Newark Street is not within the Rehabilitation Area as new, high
residential developments have been constructed on the two blocks bounded by Jackson Street,
Madison Street, Observer Highway, and Newark Street. Only the westernmost block on the
north side of Newark Street, between Harrison Street and Jackson Street, is within the
Rehabilitation Area.
Figure 3: North side of Newark Street between Harrison Street and Jackson Street
The next property to the east consists of Lots 8 and 9 in Block 3 and is used for parking of
vehicles and equipment by a construction company. Some bulk construction material is also
stored on the site. The use is not a permitted use in the I-2 Industrial District.
To the east of the construction company parking lot on Block 3, Lots 10 and 11 and Block 3.1,
Lot 1 is a former antique/second-hand furniture store named the “Frayed Knot”. The building
is in generally good condition, and the retail use is permitted in the I-2 District.
Figure 4: The Beer & Soda Outlet on Newark Street. The building on the right was recently added to the Outlet and the entire property
was renovated.
The building on Lot 2 was formerly used as an auto service establishment and had become
substandard before its renovation by the Beer & Soda Outlet. The Beer & Soda Outlet occupies
the southwest corner of Newark Street and Grove Street.
To the east of Rey Foods, Lots 10 and 11 in Block 3.2 (under the same ownership as Rey Foods)
each contain a late 19th century Italianate structure. The building on Lot 10 is four stories and
the building on Lot 11 is three stories. Both buildings are vacant and windows have been filled
in with brick or concrete block (see photo Figure 5)
These two lots were included in the 511-521 Newark application whose Zoning Board of
Adjustment approval was overturned by the City Council. These properties are directly across
Newark Street from a restored 19th Century brick firehouse owned and operated by the City of
Hoboken.
Block 8.1
The firehouse sits on Block 8.1, which is a small triangular block formed by the intersections of
Newark Street, Madison Street and Observer Highway. The firehouse occupies the entire lot
and block and is a very attractive restoration (see photo Figure 6).
Because the firehouse is City-owned and occupies the entire tiny triangular block, this
Redevelopment Plan simply designates it under the “Community Facility” land use category, but
there are no overlay regulations for Community Facility, and the property would continue to fall
under the existing I-2 Zoning District standards.
commercial building and adjacent parking, is on the southwest corner of Newark Street and
Henderson Street. The building is an adaptive reuse of a former industrial building into offices
with the exterior and interior having been renovated.
Behind the commercial office building are two irregular shaped lots (Lots 3 and 4 of Block
139.1) that front on Henderson Street. Lot 3 consists of 0.26 acres and contains several
structures, including a two-story brick structure and a one-story concrete block structure. The
brick structure is in good condition and has most recently been used as an office. The one-story
concrete block building is without windows and has a loading dock and steel entry door facing
Henderson Street. It is used as accessory storage. The building uses are permitted in the I-2
district. Block 139.1 Lot 4 (under separate ownership) is a small wedge of vacant land adjacent
to the boundary with Jersey City. Lot 4 is only four feet wide and contains approximately 60
square feet in total. The lots at the corner of Henderson Street represent the eastern extent of
the Rehabilitation Area along Newark Street.
Paterson Avenue
Paterson Avenue, which runs in a northwest-southeast direction, generally forms the northern
and eastern border of the Rehabilitation Area. At its western end Paterson Avenue connects to
Paterson Plank Road in Jersey City. At its eastern end Paterson Avenue terminates at Observer
Highway at its intersection with Monroe Street. Only the properties to the south and west of
Paterson Avenue fall within the Rehabilitation Area with the exception of Block 11, a triangular
block bounded by Paterson Avenue, First Street, and Harrison Street.
As Paterson Avenue enters Hoboken from the west it crosses the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Line
located just inside the Jersey City-Hoboken border.
Block 11
Heading from west to east, the first developed block to the north of Paterson Avenue is Block
11, which contains three properties. Block 11 is within the City’s R-3 Residential District and is
the only block in the Rehabilitation Area not in the I-2 Mixed Use Industrial Zone.
The first property under one ownership occupies Block 11, Lots 1, 2, and 3 with a small parking
area on Lot 1 and a one-story masonry building on Lots 2 and 3 that is used for a hand carwash
business (see photo Figure 7). Car washes are not permitted in the R-3 Zone District. The
building itself is in poor condition and has drive-in and queuing facilities located at a major
access point to Hoboken.
Block 11 Lots 4-8 is a 0.17 acre site located at the southwest corner of First Street and Harrison
Street. These lots are under one ownership and contain an automobile service business that is a
non-conforming use in the R-3 Zone District. The entire site is covered with building and
pavement, and the building is in good condition.
Lot 9 in Block 11 is under separate ownership from the other lots in the block. Lot 9 is 0.14
acres and is at the northwest corner of the intersection of Harrison Street with Paterson
Avenue. The lot contains a group of one-story masonry buildings that are used by an HVAC
contractor. The condition of the structures range from poor to fair. Graffiti is on the exterior of
the buildings, and rust is evident on the exterior doors. Some on-site surface parking is located
on this property also. The site is bounded by a combination of permanent metal picket fencing
and temporary chain link fencing. The property is unkept, and the use is prohibited in the R-3
Zone District.
For purposes of this Redevelopment Plan, the entirety of Block 11 will remain governed under
the R-3 regulations, which already permit mixed-use development.
Block 23
On the south side of Paterson Avenue as one enters Hoboken from the west is a small lot (Block
23, Lot 1) which is part of a property mostly in Jersey City. Block 23, Lot 1 contains only 0.08
acres and is used for trailer storage. Adjacent Lot 2 in Block 23 is only 734 sq. ft. and is part of
the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail right-of-way. Both lots are separated from other lots in Hoboken
to the west by the First Street right-of-way and are essentially unusable except for their current
use. These are the only two lots in Block 23.
For the purposes of this Redevelopment Plan, the entirety of Block 23 will remain governed
under the I-2 regulations.
Blocks 9 and 10
To the west of the NJ Transit Hudson Bergen-Light Rail Line right-of-way lies Lot 6 in Block 9. Lot
6 is associated with Block 23, Lot 1 (same ownership), and like in Block 23, Lot 6 of Block 9 is
also used for trailer storage for a principal use in Jersey City. It is separated from the rest of
Block 9 and Hoboken by the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Line which is located on Lots 5.1 and 5.2
in Block 9.
Across the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Line as one proceeds east on Paterson Avenue, on the
south side of Paterson Avenue are a number of lots in both Blocks 9 and 10 owned by Academy
Bus which occupy most of the area bounded by Hudson-Bergen Light Rail, Paterson Avenue,
Harrison Street and Observer Highway. The property owned by Academy Bus (Block 9, Lots 2, 3,
4, 7 and Block 10, Lots 1-37) is the largest in the Southwest Rehabilitation Area at 3.55 acres.
There are several buildings on the property used for offices, vehicle storage, and vehicle
maintenance. The offices are in an attractive two-story building. All buildings and the grounds
are well-maintained.
Block 12
The next block to the east along Paterson Avenue within the Rehabilitation Area is Block 12
bounded by Paterson Avenue, Harrison Street, Observer Highway and Jackson Street. At the
intersection of Harrison Street with Paterson Avenue there is a small triangular lot (Lot 9) that
contains both a curbed area of trees and grass as well as a cobblestone paved area some 50
feet in length that connects Harrison Street and Paterson Avenue. Lot 9 is owned by the City of
Hoboken. In addition to Lot 9, the City also owns Lots 1-7 and 12-18 that is being developed
comprehensively as the first phase of the Southwest Resiliency Park in Hoboken.
In accordance with the Hoboken 2004 Master Plan and the 2010 Master Plan Re-examination,
the City envisions expanding the Southwest Resiliency Park to at least a 2 acre park through the
direct purchase of Block 10 Lots 1-7 and 30-36 that are immediately west of this first phase of
the park on Block 12. This acquisition is being effectuated through a separate acquisition on a
parallel tract to this Redevelopment Plan process to ensure that a long-desired 2-acre park in
southwest Hoboken will be completed in the near term.
Adjacent to the cobblestone portion of Lot 9 is Lot 8 that also has frontage on Harrison Street.
This lot is the site of a 2 ½ story frame two-family residential dwelling which is occupied and in
fair condition. It is located in the I-2 Industrial Mixed Use District, and to the extent it is being
utilized as a residential use, it is a non-conforming use.
Proceeding east on Paterson Avenue, Lot 10 is a 25 foot wide property which contains a small
metal fabrication company, Mola Iron Works (see photo Figure 8). Lots 8 and 10 are under the
same ownership. There is a two-story building with a large garage door in front for truck access
on Lot 10. Maneuvering of trucks for access must take place on Paterson Avenue. There is no
public sidewalk in front of the building and no clear delineation of the edge of pavement of
Paterson Avenue. The area in front of the building is used to park vehicles. Public circulation
improvements and access to the new Southwest Resiliency Park will be reviewed as part of the
park improvements, which should address some of these conditions in Block 12.
Figure 8: Mola Iron Works, Block 12 Lot 10 with Block 12 Lot 8 on the right and Block 12 Lot 11 on left.
To the east side of Mola Iron Works is a two-story wood frame dwelling on Lot 11 under
separate ownership. This dwelling is in fair condition. On this block the Mola Iron Works is
positioned between two residential properties.
Block 14
Proceeding east the next block encountered on the south side on Paterson Avenue within the
Rehabilitation Area is Block 14. Block 14 is a small triangular block formed by the intersection of
Paterson Avenue with Jackson Street and Observer Highway. This block contains only one lot
and one use - Jack’s Cabin restaurant/bar. The building was recently refurbished and expanded
and is in excellent condition.
Observer Highway
Observer Highway is the third street in the Rehabilitation Area that provides a linkage to Jersey
City. It runs east-west through the heart of the Southwest Rehabilitation Area from the Jersey
City boundary to Block 14, as discussed above.
Blocks 4 and 5
Starting in the west adjacent to Jersey City, the first property in the Rehabilitation Area is Block
4, Lot 1. This 7,514 SF property is located at the southeast corner of Marshall Street and
Observer Highway. The property has no improvements, other than asphalt pavement and
chain-link fencing and gates. Off-street parking and temporary offices (trailers) are on the site.
This property, although separated from the nearby Hoboken Business Center by the Marshall
Street right-of-way, is under the same ownership and functions as part of the Hoboken Business
Center. Hoboken Business Center has installed fencing and gates across Marshall Street to close
off the parking from Observer Highway.
The “Hoboken Business Center” is a four-story commercial office building on the south side of
Observer Highway between Marshall Street and Harrison Street, occupying Block 5, Lots 3-14. A
former industrial building that was converted into office space in the early 2000’s, it has been
recently renovated to address the changing market of the business environment. It is occupied
by a range of small-to medium-sized businesses as well as a day care facility, and the building is
in good condition. Parking is provided adjacent to the building on the same Block, on property
across Marshall Street, and in the Marshall Street right-of-way. The parking lot, which is located
partially in Hoboken and partially in Jersey City, occupies lots 1-2 and 15-17 in Block 5 in
Hoboken. The frontages of Observer Highway and Harrison Street are attractive and well
maintained.
20 Rehabilitation Area | Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
Block 6
Beyond the Hoboken Business Center to the east along the south side of Observer Highway is
Block 6, which is 1.7 acres. The entire block is under one ownership and contains five buildings.
The building on the southernmost portion of this block, fronting on Newark Street (Block 6, Lots
1-7) was described earlier. Contamination has been documented on the property. There has
been localized impact to the soils by hydrocarbons (fuels) from underground storage tanks;
however no target environmental compounds are above New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection Soil Remediation Standards.
The remainder of Block 6 is described in the following paragraphs based on the buildings
located in each.
Block 6, Lots 8 to 16 contain a three story brick structure known as "Chambord Center". The
building, fronting on Harrison Street, appears to have been built in the late 19th century. The
interior structure consists of heavy timber columns and joists with steel reinforcing. This
structure contains a number of retail, artisan, artist, light industrial uses, gyms, and dance
studios. The exterior brickwork shows some damage and the need for re-pointing. The exterior
wood windows are in poor condition. There is no on-site parking to serve the building. Various
extensions of the loading docks extend into the public right-of-way. Loading occurs on public
sidewalks.
Lots 17 to 21 of Block 6 contain a five-story building that fronts on Observer Highway. The
ground floor is primarily a series of loading docks protected by a steel awning. The exterior of
the building is brick and concrete. The interior has large open spaces with reinforced concrete
columns and floor structure. The exterior of the building is in fair to poor condition. There is
spalling of the concrete at most of the windows. The windows themselves are in poor
condition; most are not operable and are leaky. Loading door and vehicular access is located
directly on Observer Highway. Most of the building is occupied by "Chambord" and "Studio
Printworks”, manufacturers of designer wall paper and graphics. The top floor has been
nominally divided into studio spaces.
The structure on Lots 22 through 27 of Block 6 fronts onto Jackson Street. It is primarily two
stories with a tan brick exterior; there is a portion that is four stories and clad with metal siding.
Parking and loading occurs on public sidewalks. The interior has a steel frame structure with
concrete floors. There are several permitted uses in the building, including "Carpet Smart" and
a gym. Portions of the structure are vacant, particularly on the upper floors.
The building on Block 6, Lots 28 and 29 faces Jackson Street. It is five stories with a tan brick
exterior. The building is partially occupied with small commercial tenants occupying each floor
or a portion of a floor. The existing retail goods and service uses are permitted in the zone
district. The overall structure appears to be in fair to good condition, although the interior is in
poor shape with peeling paint. The building occupies the entire lot area.
As mentioned above, Block 11 is the only tax block within the Rehabilitation Area that is within
the R-3 zoning district. As this Redevelopment Plan will only affect (and be an overlay on top of)
the portion of the Rehabilitation Area zoned I-2, there is no need to modify the zoning on Block
11.
Accessory uses customarily incidental to principal permitted uses and on the same tract.
Signs.
Automotive sales.
Automobile laundries.
Bars.
Accessory use customarily incidental to a principal permitted use, but not located on the
same lot or parcel or, if contiguous, within the same zoning district.
o For principal buildings, two stories, but not more than 40 feet.
o For accessory buildings, 1 1/2 stories, but not more than 30 feet.
o Rear: 15 feet.
Residential buildings.
Public buildings and uses, such as schools, recreation centers, places of assembly, parks,
and playgrounds.
o The block frontage on which the proposed activity wishes to be situated contains
at least two other retail businesses.
o If located in a building of two or more stories, the retail business or service will,
except as otherwise specified in this chapter, be located on the ground floor or
basement of the building with a separate exterior entryway permitting access
only to the retail area.
o It will contain no more than 1,000 square feet of customer sales or service area.
Garages.
Home occupations.
Signs.
Other uses customarily incidental to principal uses and on the same lot.
Other uses customarily incidental to hospital uses (such as related clinics, health
treatment and administrative uses; offices and labs for private doctors and/or health
maintenance organizations, pharmacies, flower and gift shops) located on a lot within
100 feet of the lot on which the principal use is located.
Pedestrian bridge.
Bars.
Loft buildings.
Restaurants.
Accessory uses customarily incident to principal permitted uses, but not on the same
lot.
o Where adjacent grade exceeds the design flood elevation, building height shall
be permitted up to 40 feet above the elevation of finished grade surrounding the
structure.
o On a lot where no more than 50 feet of frontage exists between two existing
adjacent buildings that both exceed the maximum height permitted for the
district (as measured in feet), the new structure may match but shall not exceed
the height of the lower of the two buildings. Final height in such a case shall
include any front parapet.
o In all areas of special flood hazard, as established in Chapter 104 [of the City’s
Municipal Code], Flood Damage Prevention, enclosed areas below design flood
elevation of a new or substantially improved structure shall be usable only for
vehicle parking (where otherwise permitted by this chapter), building access, and
storage. Where otherwise permitted pursuant to this chapter, a commercial use
may also occupy the ground floor, provided that the floor meets the
floodproofing standards set forth in Chapter 104.
Density: residential density of development of a site will be determined by site area per
dwelling unit and maximum number of dwelling units adjusted where necessary for
other on-site principal uses as calculated below:
o Site area per dwelling unit (SA/DU), minimum: 660 square feet per dwelling unit.
o Where principal uses in addition to residential are proposed for the subject
building (such as retail or office), the percentage of total permitted floor area
occupied by the nonresidential use shall be applied against the maximum
number of dwelling units and the residential units shall be reduced thereby,
except as specified below. Any fraction shall be equivalent to a whole dwelling
unit. On First Street, Newark Street and Observer Highway, nonresidential
principal uses located on the ground floor and basement (as permitted
elsewhere in this chapter) shall not be deducted from the maximum permitted
number of residential units.
o Front: Front yard setback shall be either 0 feet or shall match the setback of the
adjoining lots on either side except that no front yard setback shall exceed 10
feet. On a lot with less than 50 feet of frontage between two existing adjacent
buildings that both have a front yard setback greater than 0 feet but equal to or
less than 10 feet, the new structure shall match the lesser setback of the two
adjacent buildings. Where the lot frontage of a new building is 50 feet or more,
the front yard setback may match the lesser adjacent setback or be 0 feet. In any
instance, if there are no adjacent structures or both are set back more than 10
feet, the new structure shall be set back 0 feet.
o Rear: 30 feet or 30% of the lot depth, whichever is less. In no event shall the rear
wall of the principal building, whether created by new construction or an
extension to an existing building, be permitted at a depth greater than 70 feet
from the front lot line. Rear yard areas are to be landscaped and accessible to
occupants and for maintenance purposes.
In 2006 the City of Hoboken Council initially directed the City’s Planning Board to study the area
in order to determine whether it was an “Area in Need of Redevelopment” in accordance with
the criteria specified at N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5. On October 21, 2009, City Council renewed its
authorization of the Planning Board to undertake a Preliminary Investigation and conduct a
public hearing in order to determine whether the area of the City known as the “Southwest
Area” fulfilled the criteria for declaration as an “area in need of redevelopment”. This
resolution expanded the Study Area to include additional properties (Tax Block 11) that were
not included in the 2006 authorization. Further, on October 20, 2010, City Council again passed
a resolution that modified the extent of the lands subject to the Planning Board’s evaluation.
This modification removed Tax Blocks 7 and 8 from the Study Area since both of these blocks
had recently been developed with mid-rise residential condominiums. The current
Rehabilitation Area reflects these changes.
In 2011 Clarke Caton Hintz was retained by the Hoboken Planning Board to conduct a study in
order to determine whether the properties within the Study Area met the statutory
requirements for designation as an “area in need of redevelopment” pursuant to the LRHL.
Additionally, the scope of the studies was expanded to include a determination of whether the
properties within the Study Area met the statutory requirements for an “area in need of
rehabilitation” pursuant to the LRHL. The Clarke Caton Hintz study concluded that 26 of 35
properties in the Study Area satisfied the criteria for a determination of an area in need of
redevelopment. These properties represented 26.7% of the property acreage within the Study
Area. The study also concluded that the entire Study Area meets the criteria for an area in need
of rehabilitation based on the fact that the water and sewer infrastructure in the Study Area is
more than 50 years old and in need of repair and/or substantial maintenance. Also the entire
City was previously determined to be an area that qualified as being in need of rehabilitation by
P.L. 1975, c 104 and P.L. 1977, c 12.
As a result of the determinations made above, the City Council adopted a resolution on May 16,
2012 directing the Planning Board to consider this southwest area as an Area in Need of
Rehabilitation. On June 5, 2012, the Planning Board found that the area satisfied the criteria to
Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan | The Need for Rehabilitation 29
City of Hoboken
Since the adoption of the Master Plan Reexamination Report in 2010, the City has acquired
property on Block 12 to create a park. Due to the various types of flooding from rain events and
storm surge, the City envisioned and implemented the southwest park as a resiliency park, built
with green infrastructure to hold back stormwater. As a result of this park being built with the
dual purpose of flood mitigation, it is referred to as the Southwest Resiliency Park.
Figure 9: Construction underway for Southwest Resiliency Park, with stormwater storage being installed and rain garden areas being
formed.
The City is now in the process of acquiring a portion of Block 10 to expand the Southwest
Resiliency Park and continue these dual efforts of flood reduction and provision of community
park space.
Additionally, the City is implementing traffic improvement measures to ensure that connections
throughout this area are safer and more effective, including pedestrian access to the new park.
Figure 10: Landscape Architect's rendering of Southwest Resiliency Park and diagram of flood storage design.
Also, throughout the planning process for this Redevelopment Plan, all property owners were
provided with the opportunity to share their concerns and ideas with the planning professionals
working on the Plan.
The description of each alternative development scenario was provided on the comment sheet
and a key aerial map with block and lot lines shown and labeled. Common themes of all of the
scenarios included the following:
Circulation Improvements – Short term GPS syncing of traffic signals and longer term
improvements with additional signals and creation of a “loop” circulation pattern.
Park Expansion – A desire to acquire part of Block 10 to expand SW Park to the west
(Park Expansion Area 1).
The descriptions of each alternative development scenario presented at the October 13, 2016
public meeting and the full summary of comments are available in Appendix 10.4.
The majority of respondents favored the scenarios with the expansion of the SW Park to
include all of Block 10. Based on the overall number of responses, Scenario #2 received
the most responses as the “preferred” scenario (this scenario is the basis of the
Redevelopment Plan).
There was strong support for the concept of the alleyways for the properties on the
south side of Newark Street.
There was strong support for the one-way “loop” circulation system proposed in the
Maser traffic study.
There was strong support for the clustering of density in taller buildings on Block 9 in
exchange for park expansion to the rest of Block 10. Some suggested that the buildings
on Block 9 be allowed be higher than 80 feet above DFE if it meant expanding the park
to include all of Block 10.
There was strong support for the parking structure behind the Hoboken Business
Center, with some suggestions that it include street level retail and residential on the
upper floors.
The City has chosen Scenario #2 as the concept on which to base this Southwest
Redevelopment Plan. This scenario best meets the vision, goals, and aspirations of a proposed
redevelopment plan.
Improvement alternatives were analyzed to mitigate congestion while improving safety for all
modes of transportation. Based on the analysis recommendations, the improvements approved
by the City that will be installed starting in 2017 include the following (note: the plans to
address gridlock at Monroe with the directional changes to Paterson Avenue must be approved
by Hudson County):
Opening up Jackson Street to two lanes by removing on-street parking and the bicycle
lane.
Creating safe pedestrian access to the Southwest Resiliency Park, businesses, and
residences in the area while improving traffic flow by adding new traffic signals at
Jackson Street at Observer Highway, Harrison Street at Observer Highway, and Madison
Street at Observer Highway.
Fixing the gridlock at Monroe Street and Observer Highway that affects the entire
southwest area. The three-way intersection of Monroe Street, Observer Highway, and
Paterson Avenue requires longer traffic signal cycle lengths, creating significant traffic
Opening Madison Street to create more options for entering Hoboken. The addition of a
second turning lane on Madison Street between Newark Street and Observer Highway
and allowing vehicles to go left, right, or straight from Madison Street by removing the
existing bollards, will create a new option for entering Hoboken and greatly reduce
vehicular volumes turning onto Jackson Street.
Converting the Jersey Avenue/Newark Street gateway into Hoboken from two to four
lanes to improve circulation into and out of Hoboken, adding a dedicated right turn lane
from Harrison Street onto Newark Street, and creating a second lane on Harrison Street
for traffic turning east onto Observer Highway.
Optimizing the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail signal at the intersection of Paterson Avenue
and Marshall Street to improve coordination with other southwest traffic signals and
reduce delays caused by light rail crossings.
Adding parking along the south side of Paterson Avenue and west side of Jackson Street
will help buffer the Southwest Resiliency Park from traffic.
Currently in this area, a low percentage of drivers are stopping for pedestrians in crosswalks.
There are skewed intersection geometries with wide pedestrian crossings, missing crosswalks
(especially across Newark Street), no dedicated bicycle facilities, and no loading zones for
deliveries. To address this, there are several proposed improvements, including the following:
Studies show that curb extensions (concrete, landscaped, and painted) achieve the
following:
Pedestrian island w/mid-block crosswalk (between Jefferson St. and Adams St.) to
create an Observer Hwy crossing at Henderson St
o Studies have shown that pedestrian collisions are reduced by as much as 46%
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) signs (2 locations – mid-block crosswalk east
of Jefferson St and Grand St)
o Studies have shown that RRFBs increase the rate of drivers stopping for
pedestrians in crosswalks to between 80-90%
To make the connector road more attractive for motorist with origins and destinations outside
the Rehabilitation Area, the Hoboken-Jersey City Connectivity Study also recommends
constructing new ramps to the major highways, including an exit ramp from I-78 eastbound to
Hoboken Avenue, an entrance ramp either from Hoboken Avenue to I-78 westbound or from
Coles Street to I-78 westbound, and an entrance ramp from Coles Street to Route 1 & 9
southbound.
Although such a connector road would be a long term improvement project and is a costly
alternative, the City, working with Jersey City and Hudson County, can pursue funding sources
to eventually implement such a project.
Figure 12: Jersey City/Hoboken Connectivity Study long term traffic improvement recommendation.
6. Redevelopment Plan
6.1 General Plan Components
This Redevelopment Plan is designed to build upon some of the existing uses of the Southwest
Rehabilitation Area, from wallpaper manufacturing to art galleries to gyms and dance studios to
co-working business spaces. The Plan envisions a dynamic neighborhood in which to live, work,
and play. The area is to have additional open space to bring people together and retail and
microbrewery type of businesses for gathering. As well, circulation improvements will ensure
safe travel for all modes of transportation.
The final development scenario of this Redevelopment Plan is based on Alternative Scenario #2,
which is outlined as follows:
through the block, though accessory uses such as garages and other types of off-street parking
are common. This alleyway is an important community asset and identifying feature of the
neighborhood. As evident in the photos in Figure 14 and 16, the alleyway can be an attractive
streetscape feature with interesting paving patterns, sunlight, and an intimate scale. The
pocket neighborhood concept would use the alleyway as a linear open space.
Blocks 3, 3.01, 3.02, and 139.1 consist mostly of lots 25 feet wide and 86 feet deep in the I-2
zone. Some lots have been combined with adjacent lots, while others are irregular. The 25’x86’
lots do not meet the minimum size requirements of the I-2 zone.
Moreover, the intersection of two heavily-trafficked streets in the Rehabilitation Area results in
significant congestion. When these Subareas undergo redevelopment, curb cuts along Newark
Street should be avoided to prevent any additional congestion or unsafe traffic conditions.
However, the absence of curb cuts along Newark Street does not foreclose upon access to new
developments. As a result, vehicular access to the alley may be allowed at periodic intervals
along the street frontage and increased building heights may be allowed to accommodate the
allowed density where these accesses are allowed, as negotiated in a redevelopment
agreement. As well, concentrating parking into multiple levels on one portion of a project site in
this area may be allowed to optimize the building square footage for mixed use, as negotiated
in a redevelopment agreement.
Figure 14: Illustrations of the design concept for the alleyway behind residential buildings along Newark Street that doubles as
neighborhood open space.
Figure 15: Court Street streetscape (Image © Google). The alley would provide access to parking or retail, but would also serve as a
linear open space for a “pocket neighborhood”.
The combination of short blocks and heavy volume of traffic cutting through the Rehabilitation
Area to get to Paterson (Plank) Avenue results in significant congestion at the intersection of
Newark Street and Jackson Street. As a result, the idea of the rear access alley or service road to
prevent curb cuts along Newark Street (a similar concept as was employed in the Hoboken Yard
Redevelopment Plan) was expanded to other blocks to create the pocket green spaces and
additional potential to expand the Southwest Resiliency Park through clustering density to
higher buildings in exchange for parkland.
Because the Redevelopment Plan applies to a Rehabilitation Area, the implementation of the
alley or service road would need to be addressed as private property owners pursue
development approvals after the Redevelopment Plan is adopted. Other issues include:
The neighborhood alleyway will be privately owned and maintained, although the alley’s
access to Newark Street would likely be adjacent to property owned by New Jersey
Transit that is furthest west along Newark Street. The redevelopment agreement(s)
would need to include a shared access/shared services agreement and ensure proper
maintenance of the alleyway area.
Alley access to Newark Street, Grove Street, and Henderson Street should discourage
through traffic from those streets through the use of pedestrian-friendly streetscape
design and “private road” markings.
Figure 16: Image illustrating one approach to a pocket neighborhood pedestrian alley or "mews". The alleyway in this Redevelopment
Plan is to be designed to accommodate cars for the purpose of this Plan.
On-site redevelopment might not occur simultaneously, so the alleyway may need to be
constructed on a project by project basis. To accommodate this, vehicular access to the
alley may be allowed to be provided to a project from Newark Street, as negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement.
The provision of a 20’ wide alleyway and 6 foot wide landscaped walkway would result
in a small private space of about 10’ depth and general building depth of approximately
52’ (considering percentage of lot coverage).
A pocket neighborhood alleyway running the length of Subareas A and B is feasible given the
conditions to be described in this section. The alleyway would effectively begin near the
intersection with Jackson Street and Newark Street. Rather than intersect directly with the
streets, the alleyway’s westernmost access point from Newark Street would be located due
west of the Jackson Street intersection. The alley would then run for about 100 feet due south
to the Jersey City border, whereby it would make a sharp turn towards the east and run along
the southern boundary of the parcels in Blocks 3 and 3.01 to the intersection with Grove Street
(representing a distance of about 400 feet). The eastern section of the alleyway would consist
of roughly 450 linear feet from Grove Street east to Marin Boulevard. The majority of this
section of the alley would run in line with the western section of the alleyway, parallel to
Newark Street to Block 3.02, Lot 13. At that lot, the alleyway would follow the municipal
boundary line to intersect Henderson Street at a right angle at the furthest distance possible
from the intersection of Henderson Street and Newark Street. Again, alternative access points
to the alleyway may be allowed to address the multiple ownerships of property in these
Subareas, as negotiated in a redevelopment agreement.
As a result of the input from such stakeholders, the Redevelopment Plan allows for access to
neighborhood parking in the residential areas, reservation for loading behind/adjacent to the
Chambord Place Building and Hoboken Business Center buildings on supplemental accesses,
and a shared parking structure behind the Hoboken Business Center that may be used to serve
infill development within Block 6, any expansion of the Hoboken Business Center on Block 5,
and general parking demand. The details of the supplemental accesses may be negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement.
portion of Block 10 is shown as PARK EXPANSION AREA 1 in Figure 13: Redevelopment Plan
Concept Map.
Figure 17: Rendering of potential park expansion and development per Redevelopment Plan
Low Density Mixed Use (Based generally on R-3 density, height, and building depth)
Clustered Density Mixed Use (Based on same R-3 density, but shifted into taller
buildings on Block 9 to enable expansion of Southwest Resiliency Park on Block 10).
Park Space (Southwest Resiliency Park and neighborhood parks and mews)
Urban Industrial
Neighborhood Commercial/Hotel
Neighborhood Commercial/Retail
Office-Commercial
Parking Garage
SUBAREA A
Subarea A consists of Blocks 3, 3.1, and a portion of 3.2 (Lots 1-11), the area south of Newark
Street. The designated use is Lower Density Mixed Use.
Residential: Based generally on R-3 residential density (calculated by dividing total lot
area by 660 SF of lot area per dwelling unit; equal to 66 dwelling units/acre).
Retail: Retail is permitted throughout Subarea A. Ground level and first floor retail is
permitted and encouraged without restrictions regarding a maximum of customer floor
area or minimum number of other uses on the block. Retail is allowed on upper floors,
as negotiated in a redevelopment agreement. Permitted retail uses are the same as in
the R-3 zone, as well as restaurants as a permitted use.
To optimize ground level and/or first floor retail, parking may be allowed to be
concentrated into multiple levels on one portion of a project site in an area along with
additional residential height to optimize the building square footage for mixed use and
to provide the allowed residential density, as negotiated in a redevelopment agreement.
Lot area, minimum: 2,000 SF. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot area, it may
be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
Building height, maximum: The general height is to be 40 ft above DFE. For this area,
DFE is between 13 and 14 ft, so it is expected up to 4 stories over a ground story of
retail.
o Where retail is proposed below DFE or on the first level above DFE, additional
height may be allowed for taller ceilings in the retail space, as negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement. This additional height would be in addition to any
additional amount allowed for residential as noted above.
General Observations
Under these regulations, the maximum floor area would be 56,116 SF of lot area * 60% lot
coverage * 4 stories, or up to approximately 134,678 SF of residential.
If 120,000 SF were to be used to accommodate the residential above DFE, this would leave
14,678 SF of floor area for non-residential retail use. Additional space below DFE on the ground
level may also be used for retail.
SUBAREA B
Subarea B consists of Blocks 139.1 and the remaining portion of 3.2 (Lots 12-15), on the corner
of Newark Street and Henderson Street. The designated use is Neighborhood
Commercial/Hotel.
Hotel: The land use allowed in this subarea at the corner of Henderson and Newark
Streets is a specialized hotel (somewhat like an extended stay format) that may be
combined with a “we-work” style office environment.
Neighborhood Commercial: Commercial and retail uses in accordance with the non-
residential uses permitted in the CBD Zoning District.
o Restaurants/Bars.
Lot area, minimum: 5,000 SF. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot area, it may
be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
Lot coverage, maximum: 80% for principal buildings, 10% for accessory buildings
o For Hotel with both ground-level retail and three levels of office space, 160 ft
above DFE (incentive if providing complementary office space as part of
development).
o Hotel with ground level retail and at least three levels of office space: 8.00
Figure 19: Rendering of Subarea B with maximum height in comparison to adjacent existing residential building in Jersey City and
potential development of Subarea A.
General Observations
The total lot area of Subarea B is 24,661 SF, all under the same ownership. Under these
constraints, the maximum developable lot area would be 24,661 SF * 80%, or about 19,729 SF.
Assuming the use for this area to be a hotel with both ground-level retail and 3 levels of office
space, with an applicable building FAR of 8.00, this would allow for 197,288 SF of floor area.
Assumptions for square footage by use are as follows:
Hotel: 118,374 SF (6 stories). Assuming a building efficiency ratio of 75% and an average
room size of 500 SF, this would accommodate approximately 178 rooms.
The applicable FAR for a hotel without retail/office space is 4.00, allowing for 98,644 SF
of floor area. Using the same efficiency ratio of 75% and average room size of 500 SF,
the hotel could accommodate approximately 148 rooms.
SUBAREA C
Subarea C consists of Block 4 (Lot 1) and Block 5 (Lots 1-17), the site of the Hoboken Business
Center. In the Redevelopment Plan, this area is designated as Office-Commercial and would
also be the site of a parking garage in addition to the existing Hoboken Business Center facility.
This area would permit all uses permitted in the Urban Manufacturing/Industrial land use
category, as well as conventional office use, technology and research, studios, retail, business
and professional, and educational space.
In April 2016 the Hoboken Business Center received Zoning Board Approval for additional
height totaling 77 feet, added stories (5 proposed), reduced setbacks, increase FAR of 2.28, and
ground level retail. The property owner may choose to develop this portion of the site as
approved by the Zoning Board.
It is assumed that the Hoboken Business Center (the “northern portion” of Block 5, consisting of
Lots 3-14 / total lot area of 30,000 SF) would remain as is or redesigned in conjunction with the
Zoning Board Approval. Block 5, Lots 1-2 and 15-17 (the “southern portion” / total lot area of
25,275 SF) and Block 4 Lot 1 (total area of 7,514 SF) could be developed as a parking garage /
loading zone with some Lower Density Mixed Use development allowed on the Block 4 site and
on the “southern portion” in conjunction with the parking garage, as described below.
Office-Commercial is proposed for the site that currently includes the Hoboken Business
Center complex: Block 5, Lots 3-14. This land use category would permit the uses
permitted in the Urban Manufacturing/Industrial land use category (see Subarea D
below for Urban Manufacturing/Industrial uses), as well as conventional office use and
the following:
Lot area, minimum: 5,000 SF. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot area, it may
be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
Lot coverage, maximum: 90% for principal buildings with onsite parking; 70% for
principal buildings without onsite parking; 10% for accessory buildings
If the redeveloper is maintaining the existing structure and that structure does not
comply with the bulk requirements, the existing building may be permitted to remain
with the current bulk dimensions, as negotiated in a redevelopment agreement.
Retail is required to wrap the ground level of the garage. If residential development is
proposed on Block 4, Lot 1, retail is required to be provided in that structure. Permitted
retail uses are the same as in the R-3 zone, as well as restaurants as a permitted use.
Rooftop uses may be allowed, in line with the Commercial-Office and Retail Uses
allowed in this Subarea, as deemed appropriate by the City and negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement.
Lot area, minimum: 5,000 square feet. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot
area, it may be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
Lot coverage, maximum: 90% for principal buildings with onsite parking; 70% for
principal buildings without onsite parking; 10% for accessory buildings. For the purposes
of this site, the existing Hoboken Business Center and the Parking Garage Structure
would both be considered principal buildings.
o Office-Commercial uses may be permitted for an additional two stories over the
parking garage, to be negotiated in a redevelopment agreement.
o Residential use may be permitted for an additional three stories over the parking
garage in lieu of any Office-Commercial above the garage, to be negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement.
General Observations
The total lot area of the southern portion of Block 5 is approximately 25,275 SF, plus another
7,514 SF for Block 4 Lot 1; however, there is additional lot area constituting the existing surface
parking lot onsite that is within Jersey City. It is assumed that the parking garage would be built
on the 25,275 SF of Block 5, but recognize that it may be allowed to straddle the two
municipalities to best take advantage of the site topography, which would require necessary
approvals from Hoboken and Jersey City. The Plan was modeled considering 500 parking
spaces.
As noted previously, there is a recognized need for parking access circulation and loading zone
improvements for the commercial office uses to remain viable in Subarea C. The
Redevelopment Plan allows for access for these purposes via supplemental accesses; the details
of the supplemental accesses are to be negotiated in a redevelopment agreement.
SUBAREA D
This subarea consists of the entirety of Block 6. Only the northern part of the block (Lots 14-25 /
30,000 SF) would be dedicated to Urban Manufacturing/Industrial uses, while the remainder of
the block (Lots 1-13 and 26-29 / 43,600 SF) would be Lower Density Mixed Use (similar bulk
requirements as Subarea A).
Figure 20: The retention and attraction of businesses like wallpaper manufacturer at Chambord Place at 38 Jackson Street is an objective
of this Redevelopment Plan
Permitted Uses include those uses permitted in the I-2 Industrial Zone.
The following additional uses shall be permitted in the areas designated for Urban
Manufacturing/Industrial, subject to compliance with the requirements of this
Redevelopment Plan:
o Indoor Recreation:
Retail: Ground level and first floor retail is permitted and encouraged without
restrictions regarding a maximum of customer floor area or minimum number of other
uses on the block. Permitted retail uses in Block 6, Lots 14-25 are the same as in Central
Business District (CBD) Zoning District, as well as restaurants as a permitted use.
Lot area, minimum: 5,000 square feet. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot
area, it may be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
o For principal buildings, not more than 40 feet above Design Flood Elevation.
o For accessory buildings, not more than 30 feet above Design Flood Elevation.
o Where retail is proposed at the ground level or first floor, additional height may
be allowed for taller ceilings in the retail space, as negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement.
If the redeveloper is maintaining the existing structure and that structure does not
comply with the bulk requirements, the existing building may be permitted to remain
with the current bulk dimensions, as negotiated in a redevelopment agreement.
Land Use - Low Density Mixed Use
Residential: Based generally on R-3 residential density (calculated by dividing total lot
area by 660 SF of lot area per dwelling unit; equal to 66 dwelling units/acre).
Retail: Ground level and first floor retail is permitted and encouraged without
restrictions regarding a maximum of customer floor area or minimum number of other
uses on the block. Non-residential/retail is allowed on upper floors, as negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement. Permitted retail uses are the same as in the R-3 zone, as
well as restaurants as a permitted use.
To optimize ground level and/or first floor retail, parking may be allowed to be
concentrated into multiple levels on one portion of a project site in an area to provide
the allowed residential density and to optimize non-residential/retail space, as
negotiated in a redevelopment agreement.
Lot area, minimum: 2,000 SF. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot area, it may
be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
General Observations
Maximum developable area on the residential portion would be 43,600 SF * 60% maximum
coverage * 4 stories = 104,640 SF.
The maximum allowable residential is 66 dwelling units, calculated by dividing total lot area
(43,600 SF) by 660 SF of lot area per dwelling unit. At an average unit size of 1,200 SF and
assuming a building efficiency of 85%, the residential component would consist of
approximately 93,175 SF of floor space, although larger dwelling units are allowed and could be
accommodated in the Subarea. Seven of the 66 dwelling units would be treated as affordable
units.
If 93,175 SF were to be used to accommodate the residential above DFE, this would leave
11,465 SF of floor area for non-residential/retail use. Additional space below DFE on the ground
level may also be used for non-residential/retail.
SUBAREA E
Subarea E consists of all of Block 9 and a portion of Block 10 (Lots 8-29 and 37). The portion of
Block 10 not included in Subarea E is Block 10, Lots 1-7 and 30-36 that the City intends to
acquire directly for additional park land. Block 9, Lots 1-4 would be designated Clustered
Density Mixed Use developable area. The density of the portion of Block 10 within Subarea E
(Lots 8-29 and 37) and Block 9, Lot 7 can be clustered with the developable area of Block 9, so
that this portion of Block 10 may be utilized as public use/open space.
Block 9, Lot 6 (west of the rail ROW), is designated as Urban Manufacturing/Industrial uses, as
defined in Subarea D.
Residential: Based generally on R-3 residential density (calculated by dividing total lot
area by 660 SF of lot area per dwelling unit; equal to 66 dwelling units/acre), but must
be consolidated/shifted into taller buildings on Block 9 to enable expansion of
Southwest Resiliency Park on Block 10 Lots 8-29 and 37 and Block 9, Lot 7 for public use
and/or open space.
Retail: Ground level and first floor retail is permitted and encouraged without
restrictions regarding a maximum of customer floor area or minimum number of other
uses on the block. Retail is allowed on upper floors, as negotiated in a redevelopment
agreement. Permitted retail uses are the same as in the R-3 zone, as well as restaurants
as a permitted use.
Lot area, minimum: 2,500 SF. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot area, it may
be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
Building height, maximum: 110 feet of residential above DFE, since dwelling units
generated by land area in Block 10 (excluding the portion the City will be acquiring
directly in Lots 1-7 and 30-36) to be clustered to Block 9.
o Where retail is proposed below DFE or on the first level above DFE, additional
height may be allowed for taller ceilings in the retail space, as negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement. The retail height would be in addition to any
additional amount allowed for residential height averaging as noted above.
Residential density: 660 SF of lot area per dwelling unit, with allowable units from the
portion of Block 10 consolidated/shifted to Block 9 (excluding the portion of Block 10
the City will be acquiring directly).
Access points and curb cuts should be minimized from existing roadways. This may be
accommodated by an alleyway or supplemental access, to be negotiated in a
redevelopment agreement.
General Observations
The total lot area of Subarea E, excluding Block 9, Lot 6 and Block 10 Lots 1-7 and 30-36, is
126,533 SF. The maximum allowable residential in this subarea is 192 dwelling units, calculated
by dividing total developable lot area (126,533 SF) by 660 SF of lot area per dwelling unit. At an
average unit size of 1,200 SF and assuming a building efficiency of 85%, the residential
component would consist of 271,059 SF of floor space. Of these units, 19 would be treated as
affordable units.
All residential would occupy Block 9 Lots 1-4, a total lot area of 43,103 SF. Under the bulk
requirements, the maximum floor area would be 43,103 SF of lot area * 60% lot coverage * 11
stories, or 284,480SF.
If only 271,059 SF were to be used to accommodate the residential above DFE, this would leave
13,420 SF of floor area for retail use. Additional space below DFE on the ground level may also
be used for retail.
Lot area, minimum: 5,000 square feet. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot
area, it may be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
o For principal buildings, not more than 40 feet above Design Flood Elevation.
o For accessory buildings, not more than 30 feet above Design Flood Elevation.
Lot area, minimum: 5,000 square feet. If an existing lot is less than the minimum lot
area, it may be developed in conjunction with adjacent lots in order to comply.
o For Neighborhood Commercial, not more than 40 feet above Design Flood
Elevation.
Provide quality new development incorporating materials, scale, rhythm, form, and
detail that complement original built fabric and character.
1. Guiding Principles
a. Buildings that are being adaptively reused shall be designed to be compatible with
new construction.
b. Existing buildings, structures, and features to remain shall be maintained.
“Demolition by neglect” is not permitted.
c. Industrial elements and historic components that define the practical and historical
use of the site are encouraged to be integrated into the design of redevelopment
projects, including but not limited to smokestacks, vents, fire escapes, loading docks,
original sliding warehouse doors, roof mounted structures, water towers, hydrants,
hardware, signage (including all painted and ghost signs), and other defining
architectural features.
d. Retain framing structures and other original built elements, even if no longer in use,
to the greatest extent possible for continued service or as interpretive features to
describe and mark the history of use.
e. Where a Subarea has buildings being adaptively reused, any new buildings in that
Subarea shall be compatible in design with, but not replicate, historic fabric and shall
include: facades of rational composition that respect and complement original
industrial facades; massing that frames or contrasts with adjacent adaptively reused
structures; windows and doors that reflect the regular rhythm of fenestration found
in existing structures, as appropriate to the uses within the new buildings; screening
of new rooftop equipment; sustainable design including stormwater detention
systems and engineered green roofs and terraces; door hardware, railings, and
lighting fixtures of finish and style appropriate to the character of the site; wood and
steel configurations scaled to and compatible with industrial references.
1. Guiding Principles
a. Provision of visually pleasing, inviting, and safe pedestrian circulation.
b. Provision of clear delineation between vehicular/ loading access and pedestrian
access.
c. Provision of expanded flexible, varied outdoor open space, and landscaped green
space at grade levels and at roof and balcony levels.
d. Site improvements shall incorporate and support bicycle use and public transit.
2. Requirements
a. When adaptively reusing buildings, original historic features of interpretive value
shall be preserved, replaced-in-kind, and be retained or relocated to the extent
possible for continued use or creative interpretation.
b. Materials and finishes should be consistent with historic context when adaptively
reusing buildings.
c. Pedestrian access along interior site pathways and pathways to interior frontages
shall be well lit and secure.
d. New street furnishings, lighting, awnings, and signage, etc., shall be compatible with
the historic character of any adaptively reused buildings in design, materials, color,
and scale. Loading docks, alleys, remnants of rails, and other historical features
should be preserved in place or expressed in rehabilitated conditions.
e. Creative use of materials should be implemented to provide pedestrian scale in the
texture and form of hardscape and softscape, in pavement, trees and plantings,
amenities (i.e. transit shelters, site lighting, benches, bicycle racks, furnishings,
planters, bollards, waste receptacles, etc.), along all municipal street frontages to
protect and enhance safe and pleasant pedestrian movement, and in the interior
site as appropriate. Street trees shall not obscure entryways.
f. Original building entries are to be maintained and improved when adaptively reusing
buildings and clearly define primary points of access and use. Loading areas and
truck accesses should be clearly delineated. All pathways shall incorporate measures
for pedestrian and vehicular safety and shall comply with State and Federally
mandated ADA requirements.
g. Open space shall be provided with park-like features for shade and passive
enjoyment, support for new non-residential activity, play space, and flexible
gathering and event use.
6.12 Signage
Existing historic signs can contribute to the character of the redevelopment project and may be
maintained and preserved, as deemed appropriate in the redevelopment agreement. New
signage should respond to context in compliance with municipal regulations. Deviations from
the signage may be permitted to address the size and scale of buildings and to address project-
wide signage that may be developed in accordance with this Redevelopment Plan, as
negotiated as a signage plan in a redevelopment agreement(s).
1. Guiding Principals
a. Preserve historic signage when appropriate.
b. Respect historic context; utilize historically appropriate materials when adaptively
reusing buildings.
c. Reinforce pedestrian scale.
d. Avoid sign clutter.
2. Requirements
a. New signage shall comply with municipal standards but shall be fabricated in
materials and styles consistent with and compatible to the historic industrial
character of any adaptively reused buildings.
b. No new signage shall obscure historic features.
c. New directional signage and public signage shall comply with the City of Hoboken
adopted Wayfinding Signage Guidelines.
6.13 Sustainability
Environmentally conscious strategies and the adaptive reuse of existing buildings reduce the
consumption of resources and support municipal policies for sustainability.
1. Guiding Principals
a. Retain and rehabilitate existing buildings within the Redevelopment Area when
consistent with the Goals and Objectives of this Redevelopment Plan.
b. Provide new construction for buildings and structures that advance high
performance reduction in energy use and address sustainability in all aspects of
design.
2. Requirements
a. Design for rehabilitation and redevelopment shall be consistent with referenced
standards and LEED for Neighborhood Development Sustainability Checklist
appendix, and shall address: reduction of wastewater and storm water and contain
strategies for obtaining minimum standards to achieve credits, such as: Certified
Green Building, Minimum Building Energy Efficiency and Innovation Credits.
b. All new buildings shall be designed to the Silver standard or better under the LEED
for New Construction and Major Renovation Rating System.
c. New construction shall incorporate the use of salvaged materials, recycled materials,
regionally produced materials, renewable materials, and materials with low or no
VOCs in accordance with referenced standards.
d. Design shall incorporate appropriate areas for collection and storage of recyclable
materials and refuse.
e. Parking garage areas shall accommodate alternate energy vehicles and secure
bicycle racks. Bicycle racks should also be located in open site areas convenient to
primary entries. Weather protection/shelters shall be provided as integrated site
elements, to support public transit and alternative transportation modes.
One of the major goals of stormwater management is an attempt to retain and/or infiltrate the
first 1” inch of rainfall in the immediate area. This can be achieved by numerous methods to
integrate green streets concepts into the redesign of urban corridors and spaces, and to
improve infrastructure sustainability and assist the regional utility authority in its attempt to
reduce peak stormwater flows into the combined system. This includes using a variety of
applications to divert and reduce the volume of stormwater flowing initially into the system,
such as underground storage, permeable pavement, and green roof structures.
As stated earlier; the intent is that the Redevelopment Plan will retain rather than increase
stormwater from the site, lessening site and localized flood conditions; with remediation of the
site to the extent necessary. The Rehabilitation Area is a prime location for flood water
retention and to incorporate engineered solutions to achieve retention and discharge,
incorporating green street technology to all redevelopment-related street improvements to aid
infiltration of excess stormwater.
The first step is to investigate the level of stormwater management initiatives and techniques in
conjunction with the appropriate improvements associated with redevelopment. This provides
an approach that incorporates green infrastructure design standards that can be fully
integrated with the redesign of the entire area.
The planning process must include an evaluation of the existing sewer utilities throughout the
designated area, and an evaluation of the ability of the runoff to be stored or infiltrate the
ground within the existing rights of way. The use of Test Borings and percolation testing should
be done within any project area to determine both the current conditions of the subgrade
material and the potential to provide storage and infiltration.
Redevelopment and rehabilitation areas are generally in the lower portions of the city, and
previous investigations have indicated little to no ability of the subgrade to provide storage and
infiltration. Therefore, new redevelopment projects, street reconstruction and park design will
need to provide storage volumes through methods such as green roof applications and surface
and subsurface storage systems in cisterns or stone trenches capable of slow release of
stormwater back into the CSO system at non-peak flow times.
For the Southwest Rehabilitation Area, this Redevelopment Plan also anticipates that
redevelopment will provide an opportunity to combine flood resiliency design with green
infrastructure so roadways or supplemental accesses, at minimum, can be
developed/reconstructed in such a way to separate the storm from the sanitary lines and
become part of the underground flood storage strategy.
The following are general design criteria and methodology to be used to determine the
volumes to be addressed, and the ability of an area to support green infrastructure and to
provide for effective stormwater management.
Methodology
It has been the intent of most green stormwater systems to evaluate the possibility of
intercepting the initial 1” to 1 ½” of rainfall, and divert it to an alternative drain system that can
infiltrate and / or store the potential runoff.
Present design standards encourage the introduction of innovative approaches as to how this
can be achieved, but have generally led to the installation of green roof systems, combined
with porous and pervious surface systems, which include rain garden areas, shade trees and
landscaping to mitigate stormwater prior to it reaching the existing inlets and CSO systems.
These standards encourage the introduction of green inlets, which can capture water for
distribution to a trench stone or other manufactured drain system, such as, storm crates,
upstream of existing City inlets (which are connected to the citywide CSO system), to divert and
intercept runoff. As illustrated in Figure 22, the general idea is to intercept rainfall and to
develop sufficient systems for storage and potential reuse of the stormwater.
Typically the calculations have been based upon the capacity of any given area to handle
volumes generated by a 1½” of rain from a storm event, but for planning purposes both 1” and
2” events should be considered by the following formula:
It is important with this Redevelopment Plan to retain rather than increase stormwater from
the various sites, lessening site and localized flood conditions, with remediation of the site to
the extent necessary.
7. Implementation
7.1 Relationship to Zoning - Overlay
The Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan constitutes an overlay to permit the
redevelopment of the Southwest Rehabilitation Area. The provisions of this Redevelopment
Plan shall not apply to any other use other than those allowed in this Plan. The underlying I-2
Industrial and R-3 Residential Zones shall continue to subsist and act as the primary zoning
designation for the Southwest Rehabilitation Area.
Because this Redevelopment Plan constitutes an overlay and does not supersede the
underlying zoning, the Official Zoning Map of the City of Hoboken is not required to be
amended. However, in order to differentiate the Southwest Rehabilitation Area from
surrounding areas, the zoning map is hereby amended to illustrate the Rehabilitation Area in its
entirety as the “Southwest Redevelopment Plan Overlay Zone.”
7.3 Acquisition
Private property included within the Southwest Rehabilitation Area and covered by this
Redevelopment Plan is not subject to acquisition by Eminent Domain action for private
redevelopment purposes as authorized by the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law. (N.J.S.A.
40A:12A-15). Nevertheless, the other Eminent Domain powers of the City to acquire private
property for public purposes will remain un-diminished by this Plan.
of ways necessary for redevelopment. The costs for these actions shall be borne by the
designated redeveloper(s) in accordance with the provisions of a negotiated redevelopment
agreement.
Redevelopment Agreement
All designated redeveloper(s) will be required to negotiate and execute a redevelopment
agreement acceptable to the Mayor and authorized by resolution of the City Council. The
procedural standards described here will guide redeveloper selection. The City, acting as the
Redevelopment Entity, may, at any time, proactively solicit potential redevelopers by utilizing
appropriate methods of advertisement and other forms of communication, or may, in its
discretion, entertain unsolicited proposal(s) from a prospective redeveloper(s) for
redevelopment of one or more redevelopment parcels. The City may require the information to
be submitted on forms that it may prepare from time to time. Any owner or contract purchaser
of property situated within the Rehabilitation Area may seek designation by the City, in
accordance with this chapter, as a redeveloper of said property. A prospective redeveloper will
be required to submit materials to the City that specify their qualifications, financial resources,
experience and design approach to the proposed redevelopment project. The selection process
will likely include the submission of some or all of the following materials (additional
submission materials may be requested by the City as deemed appropriate to the particular
project sites.):
Conceptual plans and elevations sufficient in scope to demonstrate that the design
approach, architectural concepts, number, estimated size, and type of dwelling units,
retail and or non-residential uses, parking, traffic circulation, transportation
infrastructure improvements or funding for same, flood mitigation, landscaping,
recreational space and other elements are consistent with the objectives and standards
of this Redevelopment Plan as well as anticipated construction schedule, including
estimated pre-construction time period to secure permits and approvals, and other
elements that are consistent with the objectives and standards of this Redevelopment
Plan.
Typically, the City will identify a conditional redeveloper pending the negotiation of the
redevelopment agreement. In such case, an Interim Cost and Conditional Designation
Agreement will be approved by the City Council for such purpose.
The following provisions regarding redevelopment are included in connection with the
designation of redeveloper(s) for any property or properties included in the Redevelopment
Plan and shall be addressed in a negotiated redevelopment agreement and shall apply
notwithstanding the provisions of any zoning or building ordinance or other regulations to the
contrary:
The redeveloper and its successor and/or assigns shall develop the property in
accordance with the uses and building requirements specified in the Redevelopment
Plan and shall comply with all the terms and obligations of a redevelopment agreement.
Any redevelopment agreement(s) shall include a provision that requires the redeveloper
to provide all inclusionary affordable housing in accordance with applicable ordinances
of the City, law or regulation or as required by the Redevelopment Plan to the extent
that the Redevelopment Plan requires inclusionary affordable housing units in excess of
the minimum requirements of such laws.
All infrastructure improvements shall comply with applicable local, state and federal law
and regulations. All utilities shall be placed underground.
In addition to the provisions set forth herein, any redevelopment agreement may provide that
the redeveloper(s) will agree to provide amenities, benefits, fees, and payments in addition to
those authorized under the Municipal Land Use Law. At a minimum, any redevelopment
agreement shall provide that the redeveloper shall be responsible to post sufficient escrows to
cover any and all costs of the City and the professional consultants retained by the City to
review the proposed redevelopment project and advise the City on any and all aspects of the
redevelopment process and as otherwise set forth in such a redevelopment agreement.
City Review
The City, acting as the Redevelopment Entity, shall review all proposed redevelopment projects
within the Rehabilitation Area to ensure that such project(s) is consistent with the
Redevelopment Plan and relevant redevelopment agreement(s). Such review shall occur prior
to the submission of an application for Site Plan and/or subdivision approval of the
redevelopment project(s) to the Planning Board. As part of its review, the City may require the
redeveloper(s) to submit proposed site plan applications to the City Administration prior to the
submission of such applications to the Planning Board. In undertaking its review, the City shall
determine whether the proposal is consistent with this Redevelopment Plan and relevant
redevelopment agreement(s). In addition, the review may address the site and building design
elements of the project to ensure that the project adequately addresses the goals and
objectives of this Redevelopment Plan.
Easements
No building, parking, or vehicle circulation area shall be constructed over a public easement or
public right-of-way in the Rehabilitation Area without prior written approval of the City of
Hoboken.
licensed in the State of New Jersey and other additional professionals as may be required by
the City.
7.14 Infrastructure
The redeveloper, at the redeveloper's cost and expense, shall provide all necessary engineering
studies for, and construct or install all on- and off-site municipal infrastructure improvements
and capacity enhancements or upgrades required in connection with, the provision of open
space or parks, traffic, water, sanitary sewer, flood mitigation measures, and stormwater sewer
service to the project, in addition to all required tie-in or connection fees. The redeveloper may
also be responsible for providing, at the redeveloper's cost and expense, all sidewalks, curbs,
streetscape improvements (street trees and other landscaping), street lighting, and on- and off-
site traffic controls and road improvements for the project or as required as a result of the
impacts of the project. The redevelopment agreement between the City and the redeveloper
will contain the terms, conditions, specifications, and a description of required performance
guarantees (such as performance bonds, parent guarantee, or other acceptable performance
security) pertaining to a redeveloper's obligation to provide the infrastructure and
improvements required for the project.
Nothing in this Plan shall limit the ability of the City to negotiate a redevelopment agreement
with the designated redeveloper that requires that the designated redeveloper provide benefits
and amenities for the City that do not directly relate to the needs generated by its
redevelopment project.
applicable ordinances of the City. Affordable units equal to but not less than 10% of the total
proposed residential units, including Live-Work units, shall be provided.
N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-7(a)(6) and N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-7(a)(7) require that a redevelopment plan include
(i) as of the date of the adoption of the resolution finding the area to be in need of
redevelopment, an inventory of all existing affordable housing units that are to be removed as a
result of implementation of the redevelopment plan; and (ii) a plan for the provision, through
new construction or substantial rehabilitation of one comparable, affordable replacement
housing unit for each affordable housing unit that has been occupied at any time within the last
18 months, that is subject to affordability controls, and that is identified as to be removed as a
result of the redevelopment plan.
The following subsections (1) and (2) satisfy the affordable housing “inventory” and
“replacement unit plan” requirements of the law.
As of June 20, 2012, which is the date upon which the Council of the City of Hoboken adopted a
resolution finding the subject properties to be in need of rehabilitation, there were a total of
three housing units in the Redevelopment Area. These include:
The Redevelopment Plan envisions that the three identified housing units will remain in place.
7.16 Conflict/Severability
Any word, phrase, clause, section, or provision of this Redevelopment Plan found by a court or
other jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional, such word, phrase, section, or
provision shall be deemed servable, and the remainder of the Redevelopment Plan shall remain
in full force and effect.
The 2004 Master Plan and 2010 Master Plan Reexamination Report provide the basis for the
long-range planning and zoning efforts for the City. The information provided in these
documents provides insight into the Rehabilitation Area with both specific and general
recommendations.
The following statements from the City of Hoboken’s 2004 Master Plan and the 2010
Reexamination Report are relative to the Southwest Rehabilitation Area:
Notable park sites in the project area shown on the Master Plan Open Space Concept Map
include all of Blocks 10, 12 and 14 between Paterson Avenue and Observer highway.
Involve the private sector in creating open space. Possible methods include requiring the
provision of mini-parks and other publicly accessible open space amenities in any new
development.
86 Relationship to Local Objectives | Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
Provide more recreation and parks through better utilization of land. Addressing the City’s
open space deficit requires creative thinking and intelligent use of limited resources. Possible
ways to increase open space in conjunction with new development and redevelopment include
creating parks and recreation over parking garages, requiring “green” rooftops of new, large
buildings, and requiring developers to provide new public open space as part of new
construction.
Create a green circuit in the City to link recreational and other amenities. The City should take
a bold step by creating a multi-use path around Hoboken’s periphery that would eventually
connect a series of parks, as shown on the Open Space Concept map. A portion of this effort is
the completion of the Hudson River waterfront walkway in the City, which would be linked to
new paths and open spaces created on City property and private land, as well as New Jersey
Transit’s property adjacent to the light rail tracks.
In the Southwest Rehabilitation Area, Observer Highway and Paterson Avenue are shown as
links in the “Green Circuit” on the Open Space Concept Map.
Promote public acquisition of undeveloped parcels on the circuit. There are opportunities to
construct new parks, particularly in the northwest section of the City. The City should identify
which properties are appropriate for open space, as well as determined methods of acquisition.
Priority should be given to vacant or underutilized sites adjacent to the proposed trail network.
The parks proposed on the Open Space Concept Map adjacent to Paterson Avenue are on the
proposed “Green Circuit”.
that reduces environmental impacts and encourage applicants and approving authorities to
consider these impacts when preparing and evaluating site plans.
Promote the creation of green roofs and parking lots. Roofs planted with vegetation collect
runoff, provide shade, decrease glare and mitigate the urban “heat island” effect. The City
should work with local developers to investigate the most cost-effective and technologically
advanced specifications for such roofs, as well as for large exposed parking areas.
Address drainage problems in the City’s flood zones. The City should rigorously enforce
requirements that new development in areas prone to flooding mitigate flooding problems and
improve drainage. In areas where systems are failing, innovative solutions such as tax increment
financing for sewer and drainage improvements should be considered.
Develop a set of stormwater management policies and regulations for new development.
Consider requiring that all site plans and redevelopment plans include stormwater management
plans. Require that underground stormwater detention facilities be created in new parks to
handle runoff from new development surrounding the parks.
Encourage the replacement of the existing combined sanitary and storm sewer system. The
existing system is currently being upgraded to reduce the amount of waste that escapes into the
Hudson River during storm events. Over the long term, consideration should be given to creating
separate storm and sanitary sewer systems in portions of the system.
Due to its age and design, Hoboken’s sewer system poses a number of challenges. The system
was originally designed to handle both stormwater and sanitary sewage, which it carried
without treatment directly into the Hudson River. When the first treatment plant was
constructed in 1958, a system of interceptor sewers and pump stations was built to direct
wastewater to the plan, and a system of regulator chambers was installed to reduce the
amount of waste that drains into the river during storms. The regulators are currently being
consolidated and upgraded in accordance with the Long Term Solids/Floatables Facilities Plan.
Hoboken’s sewers are quite old - in many cases, they date to the Civil War era. The sewerage
authority is engaged in a program to clean-out and rehabilitate these wooden sewers to
prevent backups.
Create a multi-use circuit around the City, if possible adjacent to the light rail tracks.
Information regarding this recommendation is included in the Open Space, Recreation, and
Conservation Plan Element.
Part of this circuit would pass through the Southwest Rehabilitation Area along Observer
Highway and Paterson Avenue.
Parking
Promote shared parking for multiple uses. The use of existing parking spaces can be increased
by opening them up for use at more times by more groups. These methods should also include
shared off-site parking and provision of public parking spaces in new private development.
Single-use private parking over a minimum size should be prohibited in the future.
Consider promoting the construction of additional remote parking facilities in areas not
located proximate to existing public parking garages. The Midtown and Garden Street garages
have added parking spaces for residents in neighborhoods where there were no large-scale off-
street parking options. Residents in areas proximate to the three older garages located on lower
Hudson and River Streets already had this option available. The Hoboken Parking Utility should
look for additional opportunities to create garages in other areas.
Traffic
Reduce the ability of traffic to cut through Hoboken. Some traffic congestion in Hoboken is
caused in part by vehicles cutting through the City. Reducing this cut-through traffic could
improve conditions for Hoboken residents and workers trying to get in and out of the City. This
objective could be accomplished through improved signage, but could likely primarily require
cooperative efforts with adjacent municipalities, Hudson County, and the Port Authority, which
currently has signs directing traffic between the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels via Hoboken.
In the Southwest Area the linkage of Jersey Avenue in Jersey City with Newark Street and then
via Jackson Street to Paterson Avenue is particularly problematic during the evening rush hour,
requiring traffic control officers. The City is implementing improvements.
Promote methods of diverting traffic around Hoboken. Whether or not cut-through traffic is
the primary cause of traffic congestion in Hoboken, the limited number of vehicular access
points to and from Hoboken clearly limits the amount of traffic that can enter and leave the City
at certain times.
A majority of the access points to the City are located in the Southwest Rehabilitation Area.
Specifically lobby for the creation of a road to connect Paterson Avenue to Coles Street in
Jersey City. This connection would further the above recommendations by siphoning off traffic
now passing through southwest Hoboken on its way to Newport or the Holland Tunnel. It could
be made on the west side of the light rail tracks, and would require assistance from New Jersey
Transit, Hudson County, and Jersey City.
Keep non-local trucks off Hoboken’s streets. Signage can be used to direct non-local truck
traffic, particularly large tractor-trailers, to routes outside Hoboken, and to prohibit large trucks
from certain streets.
Employ traffic calming. These techniques help to reduce speeding and limit the amount of
through-traffic on residential streets. Particular attention should be paid to areas where traffic
enters residential areas from major roads, such as the streets that intersect with Observer
Highway (east of the Rehabilitation Area) or Fourteenth Street. This approach also should be
focused on Madison, Monroe and Jackson Streets, which often handle cut-through traffic
avoiding the eastern part of the City.
Revise traffic patterns in the southwest corner of the City. The series of streets and
intersections in this area are currently a confusing mess that is burdened with a number of
unsafe conflicting traffic movements. A redesign of this area should be undertaken with the
following three goals: improving safety for drivers and pedestrians, reducing congestion for
drivers, and discouraging non-local traffic from entering the interior Hoboken street system. A
possible series of improvement is shown in the Land Use Plan Element.
Mandate street level retail in "Retail Core" areas. Maintaining street life is a key to retail
vitality, and maintaining interesting and active uses at street level is important to keeping life
on the street. The definition of "retail" for the purposes of this recommendation should include
restaurants, bars, and real estate offices, as they add to street life.
Continue to permit street level retail uses to occupy upper floors in specified areas. There is
limited space at street level in most buildings in Hoboken’s retail areas. Allowing ground floor
retail to be combined with space on upper floors allows for larger stores without negatively
impacting the historic character at sidewalk level.
Consider increasing the maximum permitted floor area of ground floor retail uses in certain
mixed-use areas. The Zoning Ordinance currently limits retail or restaurant area to 1,000 square
feet in most areas of the City. Allowing somewhat larger floor areas for these uses could help
make provide a broader mix of commercial uses and allow existing businesses to expand within
Hoboken.
Promote convenience retail at the new light rail transit stops. Transit stations are appropriate
locations for commercial development, both to serve transit riders as well as the increased
concentrations of population in the surrounding area. The area around the planned light rail
stations at Second Street and Ninth Street are therefore logical places for small business districts
to be created.
Encourage additional office space in appropriate locations. The land use mix in Hoboken is
skewed towards residential and other non-commercial uses. Even with the recent growth in
office space, it appears the office market in the Hoboken area can accommodate additional
space. The mix of spaces should include larger, "prime" office space around Hoboken Terminal,
as well as smaller scale offices around light rail stations and in other commercial areas.
Encourage a mix of uses in new developments to provide supporting services to workers and
residents. Housing and offices alone do not make a city. Retail space and services are an
integral part of a community that has not been included in many new developments. The City
should encourage a mix of uses in any larger scale new development.
Housing Element (2004 Master Plan—the 2005 Element did not have recommendations)
The Housing Element of the 2004 Master Plan has the following recommendations:
Protect and increase the City’s existing affordable housing stock. Hoboken already has a
significant number of affordable dwelling units. However, the supply of affordable housing units
is threatened to be reduced as affordability controls expire. Maintaining the affordable housing
stock requires vigilance on the part of the City and community to ensure that affordability
controls remain in place.
Provide additional affordable units in new residential developments. As noted above, the City
currently requires the provision of affordable units, or payment in lieu of creation, for most
residential new construction or substantial rehabilitation. These regulations should be enforced,
particularly for larger developments.
Require a minimum average unit size in new developments. This would allow developers to
choose the mix of apartments, without permitting only smaller units that are not conducive to
families.
Properties Needing Further Investigation for Potential National Register and State Register
Eligibility, Local Recognition or Neighborhood Rehabilitation Program Eligibility
701-715 Observer Highway
851 Observer Highway
Safeguard the heritage of Hoboken by preserving buildings and other features within the City
that reflect elements of its cultural, social, economic, and architectural history. Hoboken’s
historic character is one of its defining elements, and provides a window to its past. The City
should continue and expand its efforts to protect existing historic sites and districts.
Encourage contemporary building designs for new construction that complement Hoboken’s
historic buildings without mimicking them. New development and redevelopment should take
into account the surrounding context. However, it is not always desirable to have new
construction consist solely of faux historical reconstructions.
Encourage the continued use of historic and/or noteworthy buildings, structures, objects, and
sites and facilitate their appropriate reuse. When possible, structures should continue to be
used for their original functions. When not possible, adaptive reuse should be strongly
encouraged.
Maintain an appropriate mix of land uses. For much of the Twentieth Century, it was common
planning practice to promote the separation of incompatible land uses from one another. But
most older communities, particularly those in urban areas, were developed with a mix of uses.
Hoboken is proof that a wide range of land uses can coexist in a small area, with certain
limitations. New development in Hoboken should generally continue this type of arrangement,
with uses limited to those permitted in the zone district in which a project is located.
Enact "green architecture" requirements for new construction. Small changes to building
design can go a long way to creating sustainable development in Hoboken; that is, construction
that reduces energy use and impacts such as stormwater runoff. Additional detail is provided in
the Utility Service section of the Community Facilities Plan Element.
Restrict new curb cuts. The creation of new curb cuts (or driveway openings) is limited by the
Zoning Ordinance. These regulations have been helpful in limiting creation of new driveways,
but consideration should be given to expanding their reach.
Redesign the street system in the southwest corner of the City. This area is a bottleneck due to
the confluence of five of the nine vehicular access points to Hoboken here. The objectives of any
modifications to traffic patterns are to reduce conflicts and improve traffic flow, yet to
discourage vehicles from entering Hoboken to cut through the City. A schematic design of
possible changes is included on the Southwest Area Concept Plan.
This map shows four new traffic signals while Observer Highway and Newark Street becomes a
one-way pair west of Madison Street and the firehouse.
Recognize Paterson Plank Road as a historic road. As described in the Historic Preservation Plan
Element, this road was Hoboken’s original connection to inland New Jersey. Increased
recognition of its history would recognize a landmark in this portion of the City.
Promote redevelopment that is more industrial in character. The design standards for any new
construction in this area should not be the same as in other, more historically residential areas
of the City. Good design can also be more industrial in nature, and it would be more in keeping
with the historic uses in the west side of Hoboken.
Reuse existing older buildings in the area when possible. Although this section of the City may
not have a large number or concentration of historic buildings, there are some notable
structures in the area. Reusing these where possible would help to maintain some connections
to the area’s industrial past.
Provide additional open space and community facilities as other development occurs. As
discussed elsewhere in the Master Plan, Hoboken is in need of additional open space and
community facilities. To the greatest extent possible, new development - particularly in this
section of the City - should contribute to the provision of these elements. Providing open space
and community facilities in this area also would make this area more balanced for residents of
new (and existing) buildings in the area.
As to the extent to which 2004 Master Plan problems and objectives have been reduced or
increased, the 2010 Reexamination Report reports as follows:
Transportation
Make it safer to walk and bicycle with new facilities, intersection improvements, etc.
Dedicated bike lanes, sharrows, pavement changes, intersection improvements have been made
around town.
Redesign the street system in the southwest corner of the city; recognize Paterson Plank
Road as a historic road.
The City is participating in a Jersey City/Hoboken Sub-Regional Transportation Study sponsored
by Hudson County to improve the connectivity between the two cities in this area.
Community Facilities
Make parks the focal points of neighborhoods with community and cultural facilities grouped
around them.
Open space and recreational fields and possible school facilities are still being pursued
Parks
Unify the entire park system via a pedestrian and bicycle “circuit” – an urban greenway.
The waterfront portion of such a circuit is almost complete. A bicycle/pedestrian connectivity
study is under way, funded by the New Jersey Department of Transportation.
Provide additional open space and community facilities wherever development occurs.
No zoning or redevelopment plan amendments have been adopted to date to accomplish this
objective
96 Relationship to Local Objectives | Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
Economic Development
Permit retail uses above street level in the Retail Core area and permit larger maximum floor
area where permitted above the ground floor.
No zoning amendments or zoning map amendments have been adopted to date to accomplish
this objective.
Promote ground floor retail around Light Rail Transit stops; encourage additional office space
in appropriate locations; encourage a mix of uses in new developments; promote a better
mix of retail uses.
No zoning amendments have been adopted to date to accomplish this objective.
Promote redevelopment that is more industrial in character; reuse existing older buildings in
the area when possible; save and highlight remaining industrial features; encourage use of
cobblestone streets.
No regulations have been put into place which would protect existing buildings and features,
encourage their preservation and reuse or require new buildings to be designed in an industrial
style.
In the section of the Reexamination Report that deals with changes in Assumptions, Policies
and Objectives it states:
Land Use
Eliminate the previously recommended Industrial Transition (IT) zone districts and maintain the
existing Industrial (I-1, I-2) zone designations. Over the past six years there has been no action
to change the zoning. The recommendations of the 2004 Master Plan to create transitional
zones with high-rise residential and mixed-use has been called into question and is no longer
recommended. However, changes to the industrial zoning definitions and ordinances are
recommended to include uses such as industrial arts and artisans, many of whom are currently
not recognized in the ordinance.
Open Space
The Appendix to the Reexamination Report includes information on the parks proposed in the
Southwest Rehabilitation Area as originally discussed in the 2004 Master Plan. A map in the
Appendix shows the proposed park areas that are referred to as the Southwest Six, and the
location and area are as follows:
NAME LOCATION SIZE - Acres
SOUTHWEST SIX (SW 6) w/s/o Marshall St., First St. to boundary 2.18
Harrison to Marshall, Observer to Paterson 2.37
Paterson to First St., w/o Harrison 0.43
Jackson to Harrison, Observer to Peterson 0.95
65-69 Paterson Avenue 0.05
Observer to Paterson w/o Monroe 0.08
Within the Rehabilitation Area the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan indicates that there are seven
intersections that are difficult for bicycles and pedestrians, more than any other area of the City
with the exception of the Terminal Area. These difficult intersections include every intersection
along Paterson Avenue and three intersections along Observer highway within the
Rehabilitation Area.
The Action Implementation Menu in the 2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan includes the
following action items specific to the Rehabilitation Area:
Gateways. Enhance gateway treatments into Hoboken and use to coordinate linkages to
bicycle and pedestrian accommodations in Jersey City, Union City and Weehawken.
Gateway treatments should be established at the following entrances to Hoboken
located in the Rehabilitation Area:
o Marin Boulevard
o Grove Street
o Jersey Avenue
o Observer Highway
o Paterson Plank Road
A two-way bike path or cycle track should be constructed along the north side of
Newark Street between Grove Street and Madison Street. The balance of Newark Street
should have a 5 foot wide bike lane.
Madison Street between Newark Street and Observer Highway. Extend the
northbound bicycle lane along Madison Street from Newark Street to connect with the
existing bicycle lane beginning at Observer Highway. The parking configuration adjacent
to the firehouse should be formalized with striping and designed to avoid conflicts with
the new bicycle lane segment. Wayfinding signs should be installed leading from the
Grove Street and Marin Boulevard gateways from Jersey City.
Madison Street between Newark Street and Observer Highway. Install bollards or a
large curb extension to replace the existing temporary fencing and more permanently
restrict motor vehicle traffic from entering Madison Street from Newark Street.
Paterson Avenue at Hudson Bergen Light Rail. Relocate crosswalks and stop lines, and
provide pavement treatments. Coordinate with other on-going efforts.
South side of Paterson Avenue between Harrison Street and Jackson Street. Construct
sidewalk along the south side of Paterson Avenue between Harrison Street and Jackson
Street.
Concept level plans were presented in the 2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for four target
areas in Hoboken, two of which were in the Southwest Rehabilitation Area. One concept plan
was presented for Paterson Avenue between the Jersey City border and Marshall Street. This
area was chosen because of issues with high pedestrian and bicycle activities that conflict with
vehicular traffic. The concept plan included the re-striping of existing crosswalks and stop bars,
adding new crosswalks, using colorized and/or textured pavement, and continuing sidewalks
across wide driveway aprons.
A second concept plan in the Southwest Area was developed for Madison Street between
Newark Street and Observer Highway, and for Newark Street between Grove Street and
Madison Street. The concept plan for this area was developed to illustrate better connectivity
to the Madison Street bicycle facility from Jersey City. The proposed design solutions include:
Extend the northbound bicycle lane on Madison Street south to Newark Street.
Formalize and design the parking configuration adjacent to the firehouse to avoid
conflicts with the proposed bicycle lane segment.
Widen the sidewalk along the north side of Newark Street between Grove Street and
Madison Street to create a side path to accommodate bicyclists accessing the proposed
bicycle lane segment.
Install wayfinding signs leading from the Jersey City gateways along Grove Street and
Marin Boulevard/Henderson Street.
The Rehabilitation Area is located entirely in the Blue Zone where constructed wetlands along
the foot of the Palisades are shown as an example of the stormwater retention strategy. The
Blue Zone emphasizes retention best practices; whereas the Green Zone emphasizes infiltration
best practices. Subsurface storage is emphasized in this Redevelopment Plan both in park
development and through required retention of stormwater. More details are found in the
Section 6.14, Design Standards for Green Infrastructure.
The City has acquired and is currently constructing the Southwest Resiliency Park on Block 12 as
a first phase for a new park within the Rehabilitation Area. With Hoboken’s growing population
including more young families and senior citizens, additional park space is viewed as essential
to accommodate an active community. The Block 12 site not only represents a significant
potential open space resource but also provides an excellent opportunity to increase the
Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan | Relationship to Local Objectives 101
City of Hoboken
capture and treatment of rainfall. Because of shallow slopes and deeper bedrock, the amount
of rainfall retained on this site can be increased by 30% through the use of infiltration planters
and rain gardens and by reducing impervious coverage to 50% of the lot area, which was
previously close to 100% impervious. The park is under construction as of the time of the
preparation of this Redevelopment Plan.
Improvements to the perimeter include landscaping, traffic calming, and a park “mall” turning
Observer Highway into a boulevard. The interior space includes a raised lawn, sunken
amphitheater, and extensive landscaping. This park is designed to be fully functional, but it is
also easily modified in the event that additional adjacent properties can be acquired to increase
the overall size of the park. The “high performance” green space proposed will greatly increase
the stormwater retention on site, lessening the impact that Block 12 has on its surrounds.
Southwest Park
Figure 24: The Rebuild by Design strategy recommends a linear greenway along the light rail line and a “store” strategy for Southwest
Hoboken.
The Redevelopment Plan promotes the following goals of the Hudson County Master Plan:
LU-10 Encourage zoning and land uses that are compatible with flood zone designations
and regulations.
C-9 Provide technical guidance and financial resources through grants to Hudson County
municipalities to encourage the integration of green stormwater infrastructure into
streetscape design.
C-10 Encourage flexibility in roadway design from NJDOT standards and incorporate
National Association City Transportation Official (NACTO) design guidelines where
possible. Use the Urban Street Design Guide, Urban Bikeway Design Guide, and Transit
Share Design Guide as resources.
C-19 Ensure county roads are well maintained, including stormwater drains, to mitigate
the impacts of flooding and can be utilized for emergency access and evacuation.
C-44 Ensure that roadway improvements include at least the minimum provisions for
bicyclists, such as “sharrows” or signage like “Share the Road” or “Bikes may use full
lane”.
C-45 Continue to advance projects that address missing links for key greenways
throughout Hudson County. These greenways include the Hudson River Waterfront
Walkway, Hackensack River Waterfront Greenway, Passaic River Waterfront Walkway,
East Coast Greenway, and the Liberty-Watergap Trail.
I-2 Identify areas where current utility infrastructure is not sufficient for future
development.
I-3 Encourage the use of new technologies and GSI techniques to improve infiltration of
ground water.
Conservation Checklist
CO-21 Encourage the development and certification of LEED certified buildings to help
reduce consumption and energy usage.
HP-4 Maximize access to cultural and historic facilities and districts through public
transportation and pedestrian walkway improvements through the implementation of
Street Typologies in Historic Districts and at historic sites.
HP-10 Encourage the adaptive reuse of historically significant structures, districts and
sites.
Economic Goals
E-10 Encourage the construction of additional cultural and recreational amenities such
as hotels, convention centers and waterfront walkways to build on the region’s tourist
industry.
E-40 Promote the use of flood-resistant material and construction above ABFE by new
businesses locating within a flood hazard area.
Secondly, the Redevelopment Plan has the potential to advance the following three of the eight
goals of the SDRP:
Revitalize the State’s Cities and Town Centers – Revitalize New Jersey’s cities and
towns by investing wisely and sufficiently in improvements in their infrastructure
systems, public spending programs, tax incentives and regulatory programs to leverage
private investment and to encourage infill and redevelopment in ways that are
consistent with the State Plan’s vision and goals.
Conserve the State’s Natural Resources and Systems – Conserve the State’s natural
resources and systems by planning the location and intensity of growth in ways to
maintain natural resources and systems capacities and make the necessary
infrastructure investments to protect natural resources and systems in ways that guide
growth and development that are consistent with the State Plan’s vision and goals.
The overall goal of the SSP is to guide future growth by balancing development and
conservation objectives best suited to meet the needs of New Jersey.
Goal 2 of the SSP is to “guide and inform regional planning, enabling each region of the State to
experience appropriate growth, preservation and protection based on its assets and desires.”
The SSP no longer relies on the 2001 SDRP Policy Map. Instead, the SSP has developed a system
of investment areas to identify areas for the growth, agriculture, open space conservation and
other appropriate designations.
Priority Growth Investment Areas are where more significant development and redevelopment
is preferred to occur and where public and private investment to support such development
and redevelopment will be prioritized. Priority Growth Investment Areas include former PA1
areas, transfer of development rights receiving areas, urban enterprise zones, designated areas
in need of rehabilitation or redevelopment, foreign trade zones, transit villages, urban transit
hubs, and other identified areas. The Goal 2 objectives and strategies direct various state
agencies to focus their investments and planning efforts into the Priority Growth Investment
Areas.
10. APPENDICES
10.1 Summary of Online Survey
10.2 Meeting Notes – Stakeholders’ Meeting of August 18, 2015
10.3 PowerPoint Presentation – Public Meeting #2 – October 18, 2016
10.4 Description of Scenarios from Comment Sheets and Summary of Comments
10.5 Hoboken Maker Industries & Industrial Redevelopment Analysis – July 3, 2015 Prepared
By Recast City
Meeting Notes
Stakeholders’ Meeting 8-18-15
1. The context: What is happening globally, nationally and locally that has significant impact
on our redevelopment efforts in this area of Hoboken, e.g. lifestyle trends, hurricane Sandy?
Please give as much detail as you can.
Influx of $ into NYC tri state area; rise in communal workspaces; preservation of industrial and
manufacturing buildings;
The region of greater NYC including Hoboken is somewhat more insulated from the ups and
downs of the national economy
Flooding has always been a challenge in Hoboken specifically the west and southwest. Reality is
it is not every day and periodic
The Skyclub was impactful in the infill housing that grew around that higher density building.
People have asked, since the development of the buildings in the southwest are still concerned
with the sketchy feel of the area
The street system is not on the grid and is not pedestrian friendly
A destination has to be created similar to the Beirgarten which made north of the viaduct a
destination to go to and infill housing then took place. This needs to happen in the southwest
The trend is residential but I believe that we should maintain the industrial buildings that are
left in Hoboken and to subsidize with residential
NJ Transit is building 16-storey building that flow into the rehab area.
2. What are we doing well we would like to KEEP? What is getting in our way that we would
like to ABANDON? What might we INVENT or REINVENT that, if we did, would make us more
successful and enhance the vibrancy/economic success of the SW area of Hoboken?
KEEP:
Small business
Industrial flavor
Residential
ABANDON
Flooding issues
Crumbling facades
Dilapidated buildings
Parking facilities
Traffic patterns
Access to the Recycling plants located in JC that gain access with 53' trailers driving over the
sidewalks
Create some sort of land partnership where no one property owner feels slighted as we all
want to maximize our properties.
A good blend of buildings and greenspace. A look that is new but still feels like Hoboken
Residential extension of LCOR project, office space, retail, restaurants, perimeter parking,
park(recreational use)
Most property owners historically have attempted to get residential zoning approved due to
demand. Who bears the burden of mixed use unknown demand?
4. Thinking about the park area, what facilities/features should this area have and how
should it connect/relate to the immediate neighborhood?
I don’t think the current street grid, traffic signals and pedestrian walkways make this park safe
to get to
The park going vertical with multiple floors with agriculture and playgrounds
I like the passive features of the park like sheep meadow in central park
The location close to the light rail could attract loitering, how will that be managed
There is a Catch 22 of traffic calming for the park and the heavy traffic on the surrounding
streets
5. What could be done to improve the gateways to Hoboken through the redevelopment of
properties along Newark Street, Harrison Street and Paterson Avenue?
Specific architecture that is unique to Hoboken. Brightly lit and vibrant buildings
Out of the 8 vehicular access points 5 are in the southwest and out of the 5 in the southwest, all
are visually unappealing. Monument? Pocket Park? Signage? At minimum no vacant buildings
For Hoboken’s known status that it keeps getting throughout different media sources when you
enter in the southwest it’s disgraceful
Encourage new mixed use, newer buildings that look more appealing than the current
SCENARIO #1
This Scenario provides for the option of clustering residential units on Block 9 property under
common ownership based on the land area of a portion of Block 10 that would be dedicated for
the further expansion of the Southwest Resiliency Park (Park Expansion Area 3). The Chambord
block (Block 6) is shown as to be infilled with urban manufacturing and office uses.
SCENARIO #2
This Scenario differs from Scenario 1 only in that a portion of the Chambord block (Block 6) is
shown as an extension of the “low density” residential. This residential infill would be oriented
around an interior green space opposite “Our Park” as a “pocket neighborhood”.
SCENARIO #3
This Scenario assumes that the residential clustering from the northern portion of Block 10 to
Block 9 does not occur and that northern portion of Block 10 is developed as a low density
“pocket neighborhood” adjacent to the expanded SW Park and Block 9 is developed for office
uses. The Chambord block (Block 6) is shown as expanded urban manufacturing and office.
SCENARIO #4
Scenario 4 is similar to Scenario 3 except that the uses on the northern half of Block 10 remain
designated for office use, which is the current use. The Chambord block (Block 6) is shown as a
pocket neighborhood (as in Scenario 2).
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
There were several common threads running through the comments:
Of the respondents who disfavored the expansion of the park, there was a split between
those favoring Scenario 3 and 4 depending on their feelings about additional residential
in the SW area.
Those favoring Scenarios #4 liked the pocket neighborhood behind the Chambord
Building on Block 6.
There was strong support for the one-way “loop” circulation system proposed in the
Maser traffic study.
There was strong support for the clustering of density in taller buildings on Block 9 in
exchange for park expansion to include all of Block 10. Some suggested that the
148 APPENDICES | Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
Southwest Hoboken Redevelopment Plan
buildings on Block 9 be allowed be higher than 80 feet above DFE if it meant expanding
the park to include all of Block 10.
For those favoring either Scenario #3 or #4 there was a dissenting opinion that they
prefer less of a park expansion (half of Block 10) and lower buildings to more park
expansion and higher buildings (from clustering).
There was strong support for the parking structure behind the Hoboken Business
Center, although some suggested that it include street level retail and residential on the
upper floors.
Those that favored Scenario #1 over #2 the most common comment was the expansion
of the park with minimal additional residential development because the City is already
“congested”.
Those that favored Scenario #2 over #1 the expanded park was coupled with the
creation of new residential neighborhoods (“pocket neighborhoods”).
Those that preferred Scenario #3 stated the balance between expanded park, office and
mixed-use that would add more services and conveniences to the area.
Those that preferred Scenario #4 stated that the limited size of the park expansion
would make it less likely to be used for large recreational fields that only a few residents
would use as opposed to more traditional park space. They attributed a greater amount
of commercial and office space to minimizing school expenses and increasing activity
during the day.
Of those favoring either Scenario #3 or #4, several indicated that they would favor more
mixed-use, low density residential if it were condo rather than rental.
The City has chosen Scenario #2 as the concept on which to base the Southwest Hoboken
Redevelopment Plan.
10.5 Hoboken Maker Industries & Industrial Redevelopment Analysis – July 3, 2015
Prepared By Recast City