0% found this document useful (0 votes)
141 views

6.protection 500 KV

This document discusses relay replacement and testing for a 500kV transmission line at PG&E. It describes designing relay settings using steady-state fault studies and validating them through RTDS transient testing. The testing ensured the relays would operate properly for faults on the target line and neighboring lines with different capacitor bypass configurations. It also developed custom logic to address challenges of series compensation like voltage and current inversion.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
141 views

6.protection 500 KV

This document discusses relay replacement and testing for a 500kV transmission line at PG&E. It describes designing relay settings using steady-state fault studies and validating them through RTDS transient testing. The testing ensured the relays would operate properly for faults on the target line and neighboring lines with different capacitor bypass configurations. It also developed custom logic to address challenges of series compensation like voltage and current inversion.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 41

PG&E 500 kV Series-Compensated Transmission Line

Relay Replacement: Design Requirements and RTDS


Testing

PG&E

Davis Erwin
Rafael Pineda
Monica Anderson

SEL, Inc.

Demetrios A.Tziouvaras
Rick Turner

1
Present Reliability of 500kV Protection

• Existing solid-state relay systems reached


the end of their useful life
• Systems placed out-of-service because of
• Misoperations and
• Lack of replacement parts
• Risk of forcing 500kV lines out of service
• NERC could impose substantial monetary
fines
2
Mitigation Plan

• Six lines required immediate relay system


replacement to:
• Improve reliability
• Maintain maximum availability
• Used existing protection design philosophy
on 5 of the 6 lines
• The 6th line required special considerations
not covered by this paper
3
Project Flow

Engineering Design

Define Develop Settings


Project Scope Field Work
Based on steady-
Targeted relay state fault studies RTDS Testing
Obtain
replacement, clearances;
maintain Prove and
Develop adjust settings install and
existing commission
scheme RTDS Model
test devices
philosophy
Gather detailed
system data;
determine
boundaries

4
Relay Replacement Project

Permissive Overreaching Transfer Trip (POTT)


Set A- Dedicated Microwave
Set B or C- Switchable Carrier
Project Replacement
No high speed communication
Set D- Time Delayed Back-Up

552 -1

Set A Set B
552 -2

Set D Set C

5
Justification for High-Speed Protection

• Improve system transient stability


• Maintain 500kV system availability
• Reduce damage to insulators and
conductors
• Permit high-speed reclosing
• Reduced Zone 1 reach in SC lines
• One level of high-speed pilot protection is
required at all times for coordination
6
Series-Compensated Line Protection Challenges
Voltage Inversion

7
Series-Compensated Line Protection Challenges
Current Inversion

8
Series-Compensated Line Protection Challenges
Subharmonic Oscillations

Zone 1 distance element overreach


X (Ohms)
4

0
-2 -1 0 1 2
R (Ohms) 9
Options to Prevent Zone 1 Overreach

• Introduce a Zone -1 time delay – not


recommended
• Further reduce Zone 1 reach and use
RTDS testing to validate setting
• Enable SC logic to block Zone 1 for faults
beyond a SC located in front of the relay

10
Relay Setting Considerations and Criteria

• Used steady-state short circuit fault data


to develop initial relay settings
• Steady-state short circuit program cannot
model series compensation transients
• Relay settings for SC lines should be
verified using RTDS transient testing

11
West-Generator Station Line Under Study

Line under study

12
West-Generator Station Line
Steady-State Settings

• Used multiple short circuit study base


cases to calculate relay settings
• Determined the required base cases
using all possible bypass combinations
on neighboring line series capacitors

13
Bypassed Capacitors

14
Steady-State Settings for West-Generator Station Line

• Determined minimum and maximum fault


currents and apparent impedances for
the line under study
• Considered additional cases because a
generator or transformer can be off-line
for extended periods
• Used an Excel macro to tabulate all of
the single outage contingencies
15
Cases Created for West-Generator Station Line

Fault Data
North – North – West –
Case South Path South West South
1
2 BP
3 BP
4 BP BP
5 BP
6 BP BP
7 BP BP
8 BP BP BP
9 BP
10 BP BP
11 BP BP
12 BP BP BP
13 BP BP
14 BP BP BP
15 BP BP BP
16 BP BP BP BP 16
External Faults Past Capacitors

17
Series Compensation Logic
Generator Station

• Observed lower apparent impedances at


the GS for faults beyond the SCs on the
• North-West and
• South-West lines

• Used the series compensation logic to


block Zone 1 for a fault beyond a capacitor
• Applied a capacitor setting equal to the
highest XC value at the West bus
18
Series Compensation Logic
West Station

• Enabled series compensation logic


• Set XC to “OFF”
• Allows setting the Zone 1 element to
• Desired sensitivity
• Be secure during voltage inversions for
faults on neighboring SC lines

19
Custom Secure Echo Back POTT Logic

20
Custom Secure Echo Back POTT Logic

• Supervised logic by all poles being open


• Prohibits echo keying for subsequent out-
of-section faults that occur during single-
pole open conditions
• Feedback loop ensures that a 4-cycle
echo only occurs once per 10-cycle
period

21
RTDS Modeling

• Accurately modeled network around the


line under test
• Created reduced network model

• Matched load flow and short circuit currents

• Modeled SC MOV and TPSC protection


• SC bypass breakers and their controls
• High-MOV energy and current bypass
• SC reinsertion controls 22
RTDS Modeling

• Simulated single- and three-pole reclosing


controls for line under test
• Simulated relay operation and reclosing
controls for adjacent lines
• Modeled CCVT transient response
• Modeled frequency dependence of lines

23
RTDS Testing

24
RTDS Testing

• Continuous real time with a 50 – 70 µsec


time step
• Simulator is connected directly to relays
• COMTRADE files
• Analog voltages and currents
• Monitored pertinent digital elements to
capture as discrete points in time
25
RTDS Testing Order

• Compare RTDS fault currents with short


circuit steady-state base case
• Verify proper connections to the relays
and RTDS
• Perform manual tests for extreme
conditions
• Perform scripted tests for
• External faults
• Internal faults
26
RTDS Manual Testing

• Verify relay operation for


• Switch on to fault
• Loss of potential and
• Faults during a single-pole trip open
interval
• Apply ground faults with varying fault
resistance
• At the zero-sequence center of the line
• Determine relay sensitivity for High-R faults
27
RTDS Testing
Variation of Fault Inception Angle

• Tests relays with different level of dc transients


• Generates different levels of subharmonic
frequency transients

0º 90º

VA

45º
28
Automatic RTDS Scripting

• Automates fault simulation and data


collection
• Generates thousands of test cases in a
relatively short period of time
• Software analysis tools simplify the
analysis of the large amount of data

29
Faults for One RTDS Script Test

Power Flow Cases & 4


Contingencies
Fault Locations 10

Fault Types 10

Fault Inception Angles 3

Total (4 • 10 • 10 • 3) = 1,200

30
RTDS ASCII File Discrete Points

– Reclose block and initiate


– Zone 1 pickup (phase or ground)
– Zone 2 pickup (phase or ground)
– POTT forward ground overcurrent pickup
– POTT key permissive
– POTT receive permissive
– POTT reverse element pickup
– Series compensation block Zone 1
– Out-of-step blocking (if utilizing this element)

31
RTDS Data Capture

• Captured the operating time of the


monitored points in a text file
• Created a file for each fault location within
each tested scenario

32
RTDS Data Manipulation

• Created an Excel workbook to assist in


the data analysis
• The workbook utilizes a VB macro
• Analyzed internal and external fault
simulation data
• Graphs illustrate important data results

33
RTDS Internal Fault Data Manipulation
• Formatted cells indicate relay tripping
action (green) and nonaction (red)

34
RTDS Internal Fault Data Manipulation
Relay Operating Time – Left Terminal
0.049
0.042
Seconds

0.033
0.025
0.017
0.008

Fault Location 5 (30 faults per case, 10% from generator bus)
Left Generator Terminal Zone 1 Statistics
30 30
Number of Zone 1

25 25
Operations

20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
1I_G 2U_A 2U_C 2U_E 35
Case
RTDS Internal Fault Data Manipulation

• Formulas calculate the results of the


Zone 1 elements for each line terminal
as a percentage of all faults simulated at
each location
• The histogram displays the effect of the
right terminal adjacent line series
capacitors on the Zone 1 reach of the
left terminal

36
RTDS Internal Fault Data Manipulation

37
RTDS External Fault Data Manipulation

38
RTDS External Fault Data Manipulation

• The summary worksheet has two tables


• One table displays the results of the relays
for faults behind the left terminal
• The other presents the results for faults
behind the right terminal
• For each fault location, a column is
created with four rows of data

39
RTDS External Fault Data Manipulation

40
Conclusions

• RTDS transient testing is the best method


to verify relay settings and custom logic
• Increases familiarity with applied relays
and 500kV SC system transients
• Helps to identify and improve relay designs
• Provides updated 500kV transient model
for future project work
• Ready pool of COMTRADE files for
accurate field End-to-End testing 41

You might also like