Drought Proofing Windows
Drought Proofing Windows
Historic Buildings
Draught-proofing Windows and Doors
This guidance note has been prepared and edited by David Pickles. It forms one of a
series of thirteen guidance notes covering the thermal upgrading of building elements
www.HistoricEngland.org.uk/energyefficiency
Front cover
A brush pile seal being inserted into a window sash.
© Core sash windows.
Summary
This guidance note provides advice on the principles, risks, materials and methods
for improving the thermal performance of existing windows and doors by draught-
proofing. Draught-proofing is one of the most cost effective and least intrusive ways of
improving the comfort of occupants and reducing energy used for heating with little
or no change to a building’s appearance. It also has the added benefit of helping to
reduce noise and keeping out dust. Research has shown draught-proofing can reduce
air leakage from windows by between 33% and 50%, therefore significantly reducing
the heating requirement needed for the room.
Historic windows and doors make a major contribution to the significance and
character of historic buildings and areas so every effort should be made to retain them
rather than replace them. Windows and doors can tell us a lot about the history of a
building, changing architectural taste and style, social hierarchy, building economics,
craft skills and technical advances.
Older buildings are prone to heat loss through cracks and gaps which develop as
various building elements move and distort over a long period. This is often the case
for windows and doors which can be a major source of heat loss. However, less than
a quarter of the heat lost through a typical traditional window escapes by conduction
through the glass, the rest is by draughts (air infiltration). Since draughts make people
feel colder, the occupants often turn up the heating and run it for longer.
Windows and doors should be assessed for repairs before embarking on any draught-
proofing measures. Traditional windows and doors can almost always be repaired,
even if in very poor condition.
Contents
Introduction.........................................1 3
Issues To Consider Before
Draught-Proofing ........................9
Technical Details......................................................2
4
Draught-Proofing And The
6
Where To Get Advice ..................18
Introduction
Before contemplating measures to enhance the Altering the thermal performance of older
thermal performance of a historic building it is buildings is not without risks. The most significant
important to assess the building and the way it is risk is that of creating condensation which can
used in order to understand: be on the surface of a building component or
between layers of the building fabric, which
the heritage values (significance) is referred to as ‘interstitial condensation’.
of the building Condensation can give rise to mould forming and
potential health problems for occupants. It can
the construction and condition of the also damage the building fabric through decay.
building fabric and building services Avoiding the risk of condensation can be complex
as a wide range of variables come into play.
the existing hygrothermal behaviour
of the building Where advice is given in this series of guidance
notes on adding insulation into existing
the likely effectiveness and value for money permeable construction, we generally consider
of measures to improve energy performance that insulation which has hygroscopic properties
is used as this offers a beneficial ‘buffering’ effect
the impact of the measures on significance during fluctuations in temperature and vapour
pressure, thus reducing the risk of surface and
the technical risks associated interstitial condensation occurring. However, high
with the measures levels of humidity can still pose problems even
when the insulation is hygroscopic. Insulation
This will help to identify the measures best suited materials with low permeability are not entirely
to an individual building or household, taking incompatible with older construction but careful
behaviour into consideration as well as the thought needs to be given to reducing levels of
building envelope and services. water vapour moving through such construction
either by means of effectively ventilated cavities
or through vapour control layers.
Technical Details
Figure 1
Historic glass should be retained in any programme
of repair.
© Clive Murgatroyd.
Traditional timber and metal windows and doors Before windows are removed for repair they
can almost always be repaired usually at a cost should be carefully recorded, at least with
significantly less than replacement. Repaired photographs and some basic measurements.
originals will also have character and historic Sashes, casements and other parts should
value which a replica window would not have. be labelled to ensure that they go back in the
Total replacement of a window or a door even correct positions. Before stripping many layers
as an exact replica may require consent if the of accumulated paint, think about having a paint
building is listed. analysis. This might reveal information about
the previous colour schemes which could inspire
Historic glass should be retained in any future paint schemes. If possible consider leaving
programme of repair. Modern glass is made a small section of existing paint layers in situ for
by a float process that produces precisely flat, future analysis.
optically perfect glass. Historic glass, which was
produced by one of several different processes, The timber used in the past to make windows
has a quite different character. The imperfections and doors was of a high quality and very durable.
in hand-made glass are a feature that makes Many Georgian and Victorian windows are still in
many older windows so attractive. place today whereas modern softwood windows
can need replacement after only twenty years.
Repairing windows is the best way of maintaining
1.3 Loosening stuck windows the visual character and architectural significance
of a building’s elevation and can add to its value.
Windows that are firmly stuck in place may
have assumed a structural role and be taking Before starting any upgrading work such as
the weight of the wall above. This is usually draught-stripping or the addition of secondary
because a lintel has failed or moved. They should glazing, assess what repairs are needed to make
not be forced open as they might break and it the windows fully operational. Windows decay
has been known for parts of a wall to collapse over time so regular maintenance, cleaning and
when windows are opened. First assess what painting is always a good investment.
is happening structurally. If there is any doubt,
insert props into the window frame before For listed buildings, the total replacement of a
attempting to open them. window or door is likely to require Listed
Building Consent.
Particular care should be taken when removing
a window frame for repairs. Even where the
window is still operable, its frame may carry some
structural loads. Some early 20th century bay
windows were specifically designed to
be structural.
Figures 2‑3
Before installing any draught-proofing to windows
identify and make any repairs that are needed.
The base of doors and their frames are Many surfaces in historic buildings have
particularly susceptible to wet rot as are the lower been over-coated many times during their
horizontal rails and sills of windows but such history without stripping of the layers
decay can be repaired using carpentry techniques. beneath. These layers form an important
Repairs will usually be weaker than the original archaeological record.
joint and repaired sections may also expand and
contract at slightly different rates, putting strain Often a fragment of the surface coatings
on the junctions and leading to cracks which may can be removed containing all of the
then foster further decay. Regular maintenance of accumulated layers. This composite piece
repaired windows is particularly important. can be sent away for analysis in a specialist
laboratory, where each of the layers can
The approach to the repair will depend upon be revealed by analysing the material and
the extent of the decay, the performance colour of each layer. This can reveal a
requirements, and the significance of the original wealth of information about the history and
material. If a window or door is historically or presentation of the building. In the past
visually important, and not likely to be subject these techniques have led to the discovery
to heavy wear and tear, it is usually best to keep of hidden wall paintings beneath plain
as much as possible of the original material and surfaces. More frequently they provide the
splice in sections of new timber. Where a decayed evidence to justify a change in presentation
window or door is in poor condition and not of the outside of a building from a modern
important historically, it may be appropriate and paint scheme to a traditional scheme which
more economical to replicate it completely in has proven historical precedent.
carefully selected, good quality new timber. The
decision will depend on how effective and long- Fragments of coatings sent for analysis
lasting the repair is likely to be. Repairs using need only be very small and should only be
epoxy resin can in many cases be used alongside taken from an inconspicuous section of the
carpentry repairs to prolong the life of doors window or door.
and windows.
Figure 4 (top)
Metal windows can suffer from surface rust, distortion
and excessive build-up of paint but they are capable
of repair.
Figure 5 (above)
Leaded light windows can be difficult to make draught
be considered.
© Oxley Conservation.
The replacement of existing windows with double In terms of noise reduction, the important criteria
glazed units can in many cases lead to a change are that the windows are well fitted and draught-
in appearance, particularly the flatness of new proofed. Secondary glazing, with its larger gap
glass and the need for thicker timber sections and (ideally 100 mm) between the panes, is a better
glazing bars. The additional weight of glass (up to sound insulator. Shutters and heavy curtains also
four times more than the weight of single glazing) work well.
and the balancing of the opening sashes pose
added problems. Further details on double glazing can be found in
our publication: Traditional Windows: their care
In historic buildings, there should be a strong repair and upgrading.
preference for repair rather than replacement as
the use of double glazing will often lead to a loss
of significant historic fabric. Adding secondary
glazing would often be the preferred option.
Figure 6
A fan pressurisation test is the most effective way of
quantifying the amount of air infiltration and locating
draughts that may not be immediately evident.
© Oxley Conservation.
The draughtiness of a building depends upon the amount of air that can pass through its external
envelope – walls, floor and roof. This is referred to as the air permeability. The industry standard
is to express the permeability of a wall, roof, or whole building envelope assuming a pressure
difference of 50 Pascals across the wall. The permeability is then measured as the amount of air
(in cubic metres) that will pass in an hour through a square metre of wall (or roof, or floor) and
expressed as m³/h/m² (m³/hm² or m/h) at a pressure difference of 50 Pascals (50 Pa).
While permeability is what causes draughts and ventilation, what is more important for the
building and its occupants is the rate at which air moves through the building. This is most simply
measured as the number of times that the air in the building changes each hour (written “ac/h”
or sometimes “ach”). Again this will depend upon the pressure difference between the outside and
the inside of the building, and again the industry standard is to assume a pressure difference of
50 Pa.
The relationship between these two measures is given by the following formula:
The conversion from air changes per hour at 50 Pa to air changes per hours under normal
conditions (around 4 Pa) is complex, depending upon the location of the building, its orientation
and its geometry. A very approximate rule of thumb is to divide the ac/h @50Pa by 20 to obtain
ac/h (typical).
Typical draught seal profiles
Plastic
parting bead
timber parting bead
incorporating
brush seal
carrier
high density
‘Qlon’
polyethylene skin
low density
polyurethane core
polypropylene pile
brush/pile
fin
PVC carrier
bulb
high density Staff bead
polyethylene skin
flipper low density
polyurethane core
stiles, top and
polyethylene bottom rails
reinforcer
spring seal
meeting rails
Examples of draughtproofing for casements or doors
‘Batwing’
aluminium
carrier
elastomeric
seal
Figure 7
Draught-proofing options for sash windows.
Materials
Compression strips are available in a range of
materials. The simplest to install are self-adhesive
strips of EDPM rubber. These are available in a
variety of profiles and thicknesses to cater for
different gap widths. Foam strips are cheaper still
but have a short life.
Applications
Wiper seals are the only way of sealing the sides
and meeting rails of sliding sash windows and
sliding doors.
Materials
The most common wiper seals are brush pile
seals. These are capable of sealing a range of gap
sizes, and adapt to fill uneven gaps well. Some
include a thin plastic fin or fins in the centre to
make a better seal.
door beads.
Figure 10 (bottom)
A brush pile seal being inserted into a window sash.
© Core sash windows.
Figure 12 (above)
Shutters can be draught-stripped which will minimise
heat loss when the shutters are closed at night.
© Linda Hall.
North West
3rd Floor, Canada House
3 Chepstow Street
Manchester M1 5FW
Tel: 0161 242 1416
Email: [email protected]
Please contact
[email protected]
with any questions about this document.
HistoricEngland.org.uk
HEAG084
Publication date: v1.0 March 2012 © English Heritage
Reissue date: v1.1 April 2016 © Historic England
Design: Gale & Hayes/Historic England