Scribd
Upload
204 views

2018-2019 Ams Data Math Reflection Updated

This document contains data and reflections from a math teacher on their former and current students' performance on MAP and SC Ready assessments. For former students from 2017-2018, it provides the percentage of students who scored exemplary, met, approached, and did not meet expectations on SC Ready, as well as the percentage who met fall-to-spring and spring-to-spring growth targets on MAP. For current 2018-2019 students, it includes fall, winter, and spring MAP performance data and growth targets. The teacher is asked to reflect on strategies that worked well/could be improved and to identify skills and supports needed for groups of students.

Uploaded by

api-338803088
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
204 views

2018-2019 Ams Data Math Reflection Updated

This document contains data and reflections from a math teacher on their former and current students' performance on MAP and SC Ready assessments. For former students from 2017-2018, it provides the percentage of students who scored exemplary, met, approached, and did not meet expectations on SC Ready, as well as the percentage who met fall-to-spring and spring-to-spring growth targets on MAP. For current 2018-2019 students, it includes fall, winter, and spring MAP performance data and growth targets. The teacher is asked to reflect on strategies that worked well/could be improved and to identify skills and supports needed for groups of students.

Uploaded by

api-338803088
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

2018-2019 Data MATH Reflection

Teacher: Grade/Subject:

*Percentile Cut Scores Chart is located at the bottom of the document.

 
FORMER STUDENTS:  
*​USE THE DATA FROM YOUR ​FORMER​ ​STUDENTS (2017-2018) FOR THE FOLLOWING REFLECTION.
MATH SC Ready 2017-2018
% MAP Fall to Spring % MAP Spring to Spring
Class % Exemplary % Met % Approaches % Not Met Met Projected Growth Projected Growth Target
Target
Example 3/26= 11.5% 11/26= 42.3% 5/26= 19.2% 7/26=27% 13/26= 50% 13/26= 50%
Academic 1
Academic 2
Academic 3
Academic 4
Total
How did the the percentage of students that met their spring MAP growth target in each class compare with the class’
performance on SC Ready?

Based on this data, your observations, and general reflection of last year, what strategies do you feel worked well last year and
what do you wish to change for this year?
What
worked
well?
What
would you
change?

CURRENT STUDENTS:  
*USE THE DATA FROM YOUR ​CURRENT​ STUDENTS (2018-2019) FOR THE FOLLOWING REFLECTION.
% MAP Fall to Spring Met % MAP Spring to Spring Met
Class % Exemplary % Met % Approaches % Not Met
Projected Growth Target Projected Growth Target
Example 3/26= 11.5% 11/26= 42.3% 5/26= 19.2% 7/26=27% 13/26= 50% 13/26= 50%
Academic 1
Academic 2
Academic 3
Academic 4
Total

2018-2019 AMS MAP MATH Reflection


It is our goal that 65% of students in grades 6-8 will achieve a score of Met or Exceeded as measured ​by the spring 2019
MAP MATH Score (State Goal 70% by 2035). All students will maintain or exceed their current percentile. ​Please use the
sheets below to reflect on your MAP scores in 2018-2019.
MATH MAP levels 
*​LEVELS ARE BASED ON CUT SCORES FROM NWEA PREDICTION CHART AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DOCUMENT. 
ACADEMIC 1 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding
MATH Fall
% of Class

Skills & Copy from Learning Continuum


Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 2 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Fall

% of Class

Skills & Copy from Learning Continuum


Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 3 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Fall

% of Class

Skills & Copy from Learning Continuum


Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 4 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Fall

% of Class

Skills & Copy from Learning Continuum


Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension
 
ACADEMIC 1 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding
MATH Winter

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met
Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 2 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Winter

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met

Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 3 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Winter

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met

Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 4 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Winter

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met
Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 1 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Spring

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met

Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 2 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Spring

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met

Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 3 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Spring

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met
Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

ACADEMIC 4 Not Met Approaching Met Exceeding


MATH Spring

% of Class

Students
Growth Target
Not​ Met

Skills &
Strategies for
Remediation/
Extension

MATH MAP RIT & PERCENTILES


MATH MAP RIT and Percentiles 2018-2019

Fall 2018-19 Winter 2018-19 Spring 2018-19

% of
% of students
RIT RIT students RIT
Class Percentile Percentile Percentile maintaining
(Median) (Median) maintaining (Median)
percentile
percentile

Academic 1

Academic 2

Academic 3

Academic 4

IEP/EL/LOWER QUINTILE
List individual students with IEPs, EL, Lower Quintile
Lower quintile is identified as students that scored ​below 27th percentile rank​ on the 2018 SC Ready MATH.
Class IEPs EL Lower Quintile

Academic 1

Academic 2

Academic 3

Academic 4
Cut Scores chart 

You might also like