2014ijetae 0114 01
2014ijetae 0114 01
net/publication/319392427
Effect of Depth of Cut, Cutting Speed and Feed Rate on Induced Vibration and
Surface Roughness in the Turning of 41Cr4 Alloy Steel
CITATIONS READS
0 93
4 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Cost Optimization of Dual Source Multi-Destination Outbound System using Artificial Neural Network View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Benjamin Ufuoma Oreko on 29 April 2018.
1
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2014)
II. EXPERIMENTATION AND METHOD OF ANALYSIS Chatter always gives rise to defects on the machined
surface; vibration especially self-excited vibration is
A. Materials and Equipment
associated with the machined surface roughness A
The following Materials and equipment are used to Vibration Meter 908Be series type measurement devise
perform the experiment; Work-piece type 41Cr4 alloy steel (Fig 4), was used for measuring the amplitude and velocity
round bar of 25Ø x 150 mm with the following of a point on the cutting tool. The tool vibration level was
specifications; (UTS = 902.83 N/mmm2, BHN = 278.55 measured using a vertical data of a transducer mounted
and chemical composition of 0.4%C, 0.25 S, 0.65 Mn, 1.0 near to the tip and connected to the devices. The data
Cr) (Fig 1); conventional lathe Machine (Fig 2) with include displacement and velocity of the indicated point on
carbide (F30 Type) cutting tool (Fig 3) of dimension the tool for each sample. The acceleration was calculated
(25x25x12.5mm) type (HSS-718) with the following by using general equation relating amplitude to
angles; back and side rake angle is 10o, 12o respectively, acceleration.
side relief angle is 5o and side cutting edge angle is 15o
using the stardard angle given in Jaton N.W[11].
2
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2014)
D. Response Surface Method The constant variables are given in Table III. The
A third order composite factorial design and Response dependent variables are the resulting surface finish and the
Surface Methodology RSM were chosen, so that different acceleration in both radial and feed directions. In order to
interactions between independent variables could be minimize the effect of tool wear, which could affect the
effectively investigated. The levels of the independent surface roughness, the tool was changed after 4 cuts. The
variables are as shown in Table I. The independent newly installed tool was run for a few machining times to
variables considered in the study are dept of cut F1, cutting eliminate rapid tool wear.
speed F2, and work-piece overhang F6 as shown in Table II.
Table I
Levels of Independent Variables
Levels
S/N Factor Design Design of Exp. Notation Symbol Unit Low Medium High
1 Depth of cut F1 T mm 1.0 2.0 3.0
2 Cutting speed F2 N rpm 260 320 400
3 Feed rate F3 F mm/rev 0.15 0.20 0.30
4 Tool nose radius F4 R mm 0 1 2
5 Tool overhang F5 ht mm 50 55 60
6 Work-piece overhang F6 hw mm 80 100 120
3
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2014)
The design of experiment took into consideration 27 From experimental results, turning variables (dept of cut,
experimental run consist of three (3) levels (low, medium, cutting speed and work piece overhang) has significant
high) (Table III) of the following independent variables; effect on the surface roughness of work piece and to a
depth of cut F1 (1.0, 2.0, 3.0 mm), cutting speed F2 (260, relative degree influences induced vibration. It also shows
320, 400 rpm) and work piece overhang F6(80, 100, 120 that the induced vibration and surface roughness of work-
mm), to produce different response surface roughness as piece is proportional to the depth of cut, cutting speed and
shown in Table IV. work piece overhang.
Table IV
Third Order Composite Factorial Design
Induced Vibration Surface Roughness
Experimental Factor
Amplitude
Run Acceleration Predicted Ra Value (mm) Predicted
F1 F2 F6
1 1.0 260 80 0.15 0.17 7.712 8.14
2 1.0 260 100 0.15 0.19 10.781 9.43
3 1.0 260 120 0.18 0.17 7.612 7.47
4 1.0 320 80 0.14 0.12 5.579 5.25
5 1.0 320 100 0.18 0.17 5.209 6.83
6 1.0 320 120 0.24 0.18 5.867 5.16
7 1.0 400 80 0.14 0.11 6.044 5.57
8 1.0 400 100 0.21 0.19 5.869 7.44
9 1.0 400 120 0.14 0.23 6.673 6.05
10 2.0 260 80 0.13 0.15 8.441 9.13
11 2.0 260 100 0.06 0.14 12.857 10.37
12 2.0 260 120 0.13 0.09 6.02 8.36
13 2.0 320 80 0.13 0.15 5.613 6.57
14 2.0 320 100 0.20 0.17 8.213 8.10
15 2.0 320 120 0.24 0.15 5.237 6.38
16 2.0 400 80 0.16 0.19 6.519 7.21
17 2.0 400 100 0.33 0.25 13.300 9.04
18 2.0 400 120 0.16 0.26 6.562 7.60
19 3.0 260 80 0.37 0.28 6.275 6.46
20 3.0 260 100 0.37 0.24 6.551 7.66
21 3.0 260 120 0.05 0.17 6.374 5.60
22 3.0 320 80 0.25 0.33 5.988 4.23
23 3.0 320 100 0.19 0.33 4.701 5.72
24 3.0 320 120 0.29 0.28 5.789 3.95
25 3.0 400 80 0.46 0.43 5.579 5.20
26 3.0 400 100 0.43 0.46 4.093 6.98
27 3.0 400 120 0.54 0.44 5.944 5.50
The average values of induced vibration and surface The actual amplitude of the induced vibration between
roughness (Ra) result were also plotted on a graph to give a tool and work-piece was measured using a displacement
better understanding of the results. The relationship sensor.
between depth of cut ( F1), Cutting speed (F2) and work-
piece overhang (F4) with acceleration amplitude and the
surface roughness of work piece for cutting condition is
plotted in Figs. 8 and 9 respectively.
4
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2014)
REFERENCES
Induced Vibration as Predicted by the
[1] Sayeed Ahmed G.M, Hakeemuddin Ahmed, Syed Safiuddin Samad,
Depth of Cut, Cutting Speed and 2013. „Experimental Investigation of Effect of Tool Length on
Workpiece Overhang Surface Roughness during Turning Operation and its Optimization‟
IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-
ISSN: 2278 1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 7, Issue 2), PP 73-80
A (Acceleration Amplitude)
1.00 [2] Thomas L. Lago, Sven Olsson, Lars Hakansson and Ingvar
0.50 F2 Claesson., 2002, “Performance of a Chatter Control System For
0.00 Turning and Boring Applications”, 4th GRACM Congress on
2 (Cutting Computational Mechanics, GRACM, Patras 27-29 June, PP. 3-4
-0.50 -2 -1 Speed)
0 1 2 [3] Keraita J. N., Oyango H. J. and Misoi G. K., 2001, “Lathe Stability
F1 (Depth of Cut) and F6 (Workpiece Charts Via Acoustic Emission Monitering”, African Journal of
Overhang) Science and Technology (AJST), Science and Engineering Series.,
Vol. 2, No.2, PP. 81-93.
[4] Chen, J.C. & Smith, R., 1997, “Experimental Design and Analysis
Figure 8: Response Surface plot of the induced vibration data in Understanding Machining Mechanisms". Journal of Industrial
Technology
[5] Kalpac J. and Bahor M. 1999, “Interaction of Technological History
Surface Roughness as Predicted by the of a work piesce material and machining parameters on the desired
depth of Cut, Cutting Speed and qualityof surface roughness of a product” Journal of Materials
Processing Technology, 145, PP. 381-387.
Workpiece Overhang
[6] Choudhry I.A. and El-Baradie M.A., 1997, “Surface Roughness
Prediction in the turning of high strength steelby factorial design in
Ra (Surface Roughness)