International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)

ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887

Volume 7 Issue I, Jan 2019- Available at www.ijraset.com

An Optimal Cloud Resource Provisioning (OCRP)

Algorithm on-Demand and Reservation Plans
U. Surya1, N. Aarthi2, S. Dhivya3, Sherlin Suresh4
1, 2, 3, 4
Assistant Professors Department of computer science and Engineering, Avinashilingam Institute of Home Science and Higher
,

Education for Women- School of Engineering, Coimbatore, India

Abstract: In cloud computing, cloud providers can offer cloud consumers two provisioning plans for computing resources,
namely reservation and on-demand plans. In general, cost of utilizing computing resources provisioned by reservation plan is
cheaper than that provisioned by on-demand plan, since cloud consumer has to pay to the provider in advance. With the
reservation plan, the consumer can reduce the total cost of the resource provisioning. However, the best advance reservation of
resources is difficult to be achieved due to the uncertainty of consumer’s future demand as the reservation may lead to either
under provisioning or over provisioning and providers’ resource costs. The on-demand resource provisioning is very expensive.
To address this problem, an optimal cloud resource provisioning (OCRP) algorithm is adopted. The demand and price
uncertainty is reviewed
Keywords: OCRP, Cloud Computing, Resource Provisioning

I. INTRODUCTION
A. Cloud Computing
Cloud computing is a large-scale distributed computing paradigm in which a pool of computing resources is available to users called
cloud consumers via the Internet. Computing resources, e.g., processing power, storage, software, and network bandwidth, are
represented to cloud consumers as the accessible public utility services. Infrastructure- as-a-Service (IaaS) is a computational
service model widely applied in the cloud computing par diagram .In this model, virtualization technologies can be used to provide
resources to cloud consumers. The consumers can specify the required software stack, e.g., operating systems and applications; then
package them all together into virtual machines (VMs). The hardware requirement of VMs can also be adjusted by the consumers.
Finally, those VMs will be outsourced to host in computing environments operated by third-party sites owned by cloud providers. A
cloud provider is responsible for guaranteeing the Quality of Services (QoS) for running the VMs. Since the computing resources
are maintained by the provider, the total cost of ownership to the consumers can be reduced.

B. Resource Provisioning
In cloud computing, cloud providers can offer cloud consumers, provisioning plans for computing resources. E.g., processing
power, storage, software, and network bandwidth, are represented to cloud consumers as the accessible public utility services.
Modality of computing characterized by on demand availability of resources in a dynamic and scalable fashion are achieved by
cloud computing. The term resource here represents infrastructure, platforms, software, services, or storage [2]. This cloud
computing services allow users to lease computing resources from large scale data centres operated by service providers.
Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is providing general on-demand computing resources such as virtualized servers or various forms
of storage. To manage its resources in inefficient way is the responsibility of the cloud service provider, so that the cloud user needs
can be met when needed.

II. REQUIRNMENT ANALYSIS AND SYSTEM DESIGN

A. Existing System
The main focus of this project is search logs, our results apply to other scenarios as well. For example, consider a retailer who
collects customer transactions. Each transaction consists of a basket of products together with their prices, and a time-stamp. This
case can be applied to publish frequently purchased products or sets of products. This information can also be used in a
recommended system or in a market basket analysis to decide on the goods and promotions in a store.
1) Disadvantages: The results show that yields comparable utility to OPSE while at the same time achieving much stronger
privacy guarantees.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 8

 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887
Volume 7 Issue I, Jan 2019- Available at www.ijraset.com

B. Adopted System
The adopted system is an optimal cloud resource provisioning (OCRP) algorithm to provision resources offered by multiple cloud
providers. The optimal solution obtained from OCRP is obtained by formulating and solving stochastic integer programming with
multistage recourse. We have also used Benders decomposition approach to divide an OCRP problem into sub problems which can
be solved parallel. Furthermore, we have used the SAA approach for solving the OCRP problem with a large set of scenarios. The
SAA approach can effectively achieve an estimated optimal solution even the problem size is greatly large. From the results, the
algorithm can optimally adjust the trade-off between reservation of resources and allocation of on-demand resources.

Fig 2.1 Overall Flow diagram

C. System Design
The DFD is also called as bubble chart. It is a simple graphical formalism that can be used to represent a system in terms of input
data to the system, various processes are carried out on the data, and the output is generated by the system.
1) Data Flow Diagram: Data flow diagram describes the flow in which the project works. The first step is login by either admin,
broker (OCRP), provider or user. The OCRP does the file verification directly or by download verification. The OCRP decides
the authority to both the user and the provider. The admin acts as the overall administrator of the cloud. Provider is the one who
provisions the data for the cloud. There can be multiple providers for a cloud. The users are simply the end recipients who
access the file. They only have the authority to download and not to upload files

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 9

 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887
Volume 7 Issue I, Jan 2019- Available at www.ijraset.com

III. SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION

A. System Implementation
Implementation is that stage of the project when the theoretical design is turned into a working system. After testing the modules
successfully, the necessary privileges are given to the users. All the users are requested to handle the system carefully. The real time
problems that occur are successfully solved. The objective is to put the tested system into operation.
1) OCRP Algorithm: The Optimal Cloud Resource Provisioning algorithm is adopted for the virtual machine management. The
optimization formulation of stochastic integer programming is adopted to obtain the decision of the OCRP algorithm as such
the total efficiency of resource provisioning in cloud computing environments is improved. The formulation considers multiple
provisioning stages with on demand uncertainties. The solution methods based on Benders decomposition and sample-average
approximation algorithms are used to solve the optimization formulation in an efficient way. The performance evaluation
reveals the importance of optimal computing resource provisioning. The analysis will be useful to the cloud consumers (e.g.,
organization and company) for the management of virtual machines in cloud computing environment. The proposed OCRP
algorithm will facilitate the adoption of cloud computing.

B. Modules Description
1) Cloud Storage: Data outsourcing on cloud storage servers is raising trend among many firms and users owing to its economic
advantages. This essentially means that the provider (client) moves his data to a third party cloud storage server, who faithfully
stores the data and provide it back to the provider whenever required.
2) Cloud storage Archives: This problem tries to obtain and verify a proof that the data stored by a provider at remote data storage
in the cloud (called cloud storage archives or simply archives) is not modified by the archive and thereby the integrity of the
data is assured. Cloud archive should not cheat the provider. If cheating, in this context, means that the storage archive might
delete some of the data or may modify some of the data. While developing proofs for data possession at unauthorised cloud
storage servers we are often limited by the resources at the cloud server as well as the client.
3) Sentinels: In this scheme, unlike in the key-hash approach, only a single key can be used irrespective of the size of the file or
the number of files whose retrieval is to be verified. Also the archive needs to access only a small portion of the file F unlike in
the key-has scheme which requires the archive to process the entire file F for each protocol verification. If the provider has
modified or deleted a substantial portion of F, then with high probability it will also have suppressed a number of sentinels.
4) Verification Phase: The verifier before storing the file at the archive pre-processes the file and appends some Meta data to the
file and stores at the archive. At the time of verification the verifier uses this Meta data to verify the integrity of the data. It is
important to note that our proof of data integrity protocol just checks the integrity of data i.e. if the data has been illegally
modified or deleted. It does not prevent the archive from modifying the data.

IV. TESTING AND RESULTS

A. Testing Objectives
The main objective of testing is to uncover a host of errors, systematically and with minimum effort and time. Stating formally, we
can say,
1) Testing is a process of executing a program with the intent of finding an error.
2) A successful test is one that uncovers a yet undiscovered error.
3) A good test case is one that has a high probability of finding error, if it exists.
4) The tests should be adequate to detect errors present.
B. Testing Strategies
A strategy for software testing integrates software test case design methods into a well-planned series of steps that result in the
successful construction of software.
1) Unit Testing: Unit testing focuses verification effort on the smallest unit of software that is the module. Using the detailed
design and the process specifications testing is done to uncover errors within the boundary of the module. In this project each
service can be thought of a module. There are so many modules like Login, New Registration, and Change Password. When
developing the module as well as finishing the development so that each module works without any error. The inputs are
validated when accepting from the user. The table 4.1 shows the Unit testing.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 10

 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887
Volume 7 Issue I, Jan 2019- Available at www.ijraset.com

The table 4.1 shows the unit testing

Unit tested Remarks
Login of the admin Enters the admin profile
Admin profile Shows the details of provider and user
OCR login Enters the OCR profile
OCR profile Shows the file verification and file details
File verify in OCR Verifies the file uploaded by the provider
Provider login Enters the provider profile
Upload in provider Uploads the file by the provider
User login Enters the file search area
User search key After entering the secret key, file is downloaded by the
user.
2) Login and password Testing
The Table 4.2 Shows The Login And Password Verification
User Name Password Verification Navigation
Admin Admin Yes Admin Profile
Ocr Ocr Yes Ocr profile
Provider Provider Yes Provider profile
User User Yes User Profile
The table 4.3 shows the search box results
File Name Number of matches Availability
Cloud 4 Found
Unknown - Not found
a) Step 1
The Table 4.4 Shows The Sample Snapshot Of Database Of Wildlife
File File Name File Subject File File Owner Date Verify View
Id Type Status
19 SNAKES.docx Snakes .docx Ministry 20-04-2013 NO View
20 Lions.docx Lion .docx Ministry 20-04-2013 NO View
21 Peacock.docx Peacock .docx Ministry 20-04-2013 YES View
22 fox.docx Fox .docx Ministry 20-04-2013 NO View
23 Monkeys.docx Monkey .docx Ministry 20-04-2013 NO View
b) Step 2: The user requests for the data and enters the search data in enter search data tab. If the data is available all related
matches will be displayed and it can be downloaded by using the user’s secret key. If there is no match regarding the search
area, then the message ‘no files found’ will be displayed.
The table 4.5 shows the user request for an available resource
User Search Area Status No. of Files Available
lion Available 2
cat No files found -
Peacock Available 1

V. CONCLUSION
An Optimal Cloud Resource Provisioning (OCRP) algorithm to provision resources offered by multiple cloud providers. The
obtained results provide resource for the consumers with more efficiency. Various inputs have been given and tested for their
acceptance. The approach can be used as a resource provisioning tool for emerging the cloud computing market in which the tool
improves the efficiency to optimize the resources

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 11

 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887
Volume 7 Issue I, Jan 2019- Available at www.ijraset.com

REFRENCES
[1] I. Foster, Y. Zhao, and S. Lu, “Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared,” Proc. Grid Computing Environments Workshop (GCE ’08),
2008.
[2] G. Juve and E. Deelman, “Resource Provisioning Options for Large-Scale Scientific Workflows,” Proc. IEEE Fourth Int’l Conf. e-Science, 2008
[3] .Amazon EC2, http://aws.amazon.com/ec2, 2012.
[4] Amazon EC2 Reserved Instances, http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/reserved-instances, 2012.
[5] GoGrid, http://www.gogrid.com, 2012.
[6] Z. Huang, C. He, and J. Wu, “On-Demand Service in Grid: Architecture Design, and Implementation,” Proc. 11th Int’l Conf. Parallel and Distributed Systems
(ICPADS ’05), 2005.
[7] S. Chaisiri, B.S. Lee, and D. Niyato, “Optimal Virtual Machine Placement across Multiple Cloud Providers,” Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing
Conf. (APSCC), 2009.
[8] N. Bobroff, A. Kochut, and K. Beaty, “Dynamic Placement ofVirtual Machines for Managing SLA Violations,” Proc. IFIP/IEEEInt’lSymp. Integrated Network
Management (IM ’07), pp. 119-128,May 2007.
[9] SivadonChaisiri, Student Member, IEEE, Bu-Sung Lee, Member, IEEE, and DusitNiyato, Member, IEEE “Optimization of Resource Provisioning Cost in
Cloud Computing” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, VOL. 5, NO. 2, APRIL-JUNE 2012
[10] D. Kusic and N. Kandasamy, “Risk-Aware Limited Lookahead Control for Dynamic Resource Provisioning in Enterprise Computing Systems,” Proc. IEEE
Int’l Conf. Autonomic Computing, 2006.
[11] J. Chen, G. Soundararajan, and C. Amza, “Autonomic Provisioning of Backend Databases in Dynamic Content Web Servers,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf.
Autonomic Computing, 2006.
[12] D. X. Song, D. Wagner, and A. Perrig, “Practical techniques for searches on encrypted data,” in SP ’00: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security
and Privacy. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2000
[13] A.Agrawal et al. Ws-bpel extension for people (bpel4people), version 1.0., 2007.
[14] M. Amend et al. Web services human task (ws-humantask), version 1.0., 2007.
[15] D. Brabham. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases.
[16] Data Communications and Networking, by Behrouz A Forouzan.
[17] E. Mykletun, M. Narasimha, and G. Tsudik, “Authentication and integrity in outsourced databases,” Trans. Storage, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 107–138, 2006.
[18] D. X. Song, D. Wagner, and A. Perrig, “Practical techniques for searches on encrypted data,” in SP ’00: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security
and Privacy. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2000
[19] A. Juels and B. S. Kaliski, Jr., “Pors: proofs of retrievability for large files,” in CCS ’07: Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and
communications security. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 584–597.
[20] G. Ateniese, R. Burns, R. Curtmola, J. Herring, L. Kissner, Z. Peterson, and D. Song, “Provable data possession at untrusted stores,” in CCS ’07: Proceedings of
the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 598–609.

Ms. U. Surya B.E.,M.E., Ms. N. Aarthi B.E.,M.E.,

Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor,
Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science and
and Engineering, Engineering,
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Avinashilingam Institute for Home
Science and Higher Education for Science and Higher Education for
Women-School of Engineering, Women-School of Engineering,
Coimbatore. Coimbatore.

Ms. S. Dhivya B.E.,M.E., Ms.Sherlin Suresh B.E., Mtech.,

Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor,
Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science and
and Engineering, Engineering,
Avinashilingam Institute for Home Avinashilingam Institute for Home
Science and Higher Education for Science and Higher Education for
Women-School of Engineering, Women-School of Engineering,
Coimbatore. Coimbatore.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved 12