Reduced Relative Clauses
Reduced Relative Clauses
byKenneth Beare
Updated April 23, 2018
Reduced relative clauses refer to the shortening of a relative clause which modifies the
subject of a sentence. Reduced relative clauses modify the subject and not the object of a
sentence.
Relative clauses, also known as adjective clauses, modify nouns much like
adjectives:
The man who works at Costco lives in Seattle.
I gave a book, which was written by Hemingway, to Mary last week.
The second example sentence cannot be reduced because the relative clause
"which was written by Hemingway" modifies an object of the verb 'give.'
Relative clauses can also be reduced to shorter forms if the relative clause
modifies the subject of a sentence. Relative clause reduction refers to removing a
relative pronounto reduce:
Reduce to an Adjective
Examples:
The children who were happy played until nine in the evening.
Reduced: The happy children played until nine in the evening.
Examples:
The product, which seemed perfect in many ways, failed to succeed in the
market.
Reduced: The product, perfect in many ways, failed to succeed in the market.
The boy who was pleased by his grades went out with his friends to celebrate.
Reduced: The boy, pleased by his grades, went out with his friends to
celebrate.
Examples:
The woman who was at the meeting spoke about business in Europe.
Reduced: The woman at the meeting spoke about business in Europe.
Examples:
Examples:
Examples:
Some action verbs reduce to the present participle (ing form) especially when the
present tense is used:
Examples:
The man who lives near my home walks to work every day.
Reduced: The man living near my home walks to work every day.
The girl who attends my school lives at the end of the street.
Reduced: The girl attending my school lives at the end of the street.
My last article for English Harmony was about when you can and can’t omit
relative pronouns such as “who” and “that” from sentences. What we
concluded is that you can omit the pronoun when it acts as an object, as in
the sentence below:
The dog (that) Mary is petting has brown fur. (The relative pronoun “that” is
optional here.)
But you cannot omit the pronoun when it acts as a subject, as in this
sentence:
However, astute reader Juhapekka pointed out that in examples like the above
sentence, you can’t omit only the pronoun, but you canomit the pronoun plus
the form of “to be” (in this case, “is”):
The dog eating a biscuit has brown fur. (This is a well-formed sentence!)
Before we get into reducing clauses into phrases, it’s a good idea to be clear
about what we mean when we say clause and phrase.
Simply put, a clause is a group of related words that contains a subject and a
verb. We’ll be looking in particular at clauses that modify nouns. The
underlined words below all form clauses that modify nouns:
The grammar points that are presented in the article are complicated.
The woman who was riding the subway is late for work.
Clauses are different from phrases, which also modify nouns but do not
contain a subject-verb relationship. Below, I’ll rewrite the above sentences,
using phrases instead of clauses:
Now, you might be asking — hey, can you really do that? Can you really just
omit words from clauses, turn them into phrases, and end up with real
sentences? The answer is a resounding yes: but only in special circumstances.
Let’s see what exactly those circumstances are.
At the beginning of this post, I mentioned the difference between subject and
object relative clauses. If that last sentence isn’t crystal-clear to you, I
recommend that you take a look at this article, because it’s important to
understand that concept before we continue.
It’s that simple – you just take away the relative pronoun and the conjugated
form of “to be”, and you’ve got a new, clause-to-phrase-reduced sentence!
Now, you might be asking: What do I do if the relative clause doesn’t contain
the verb “to be”? Great question! Let’s take a look at one of these sentences:
Note, however, that you can only do this when the relative pronoun acts as a
subject. When the pronoun is an object, you cannot reduce clauses to phrases:
The dog that Mary is petting has brown fur. (This makes sense.)
The dog Mary petting has brown fur. (This does not make sense.)