Developmentally-Appropriate Instruction Riffle 1
Developmentally-Appropriate Instruction Riffle 1
Developmentally-Appropriate Instruction
Ronald Riffle
Regent University
Introduction
Students want to learn; teachers love to teach and introduce new ideas. This relationship
creates the necessity of the classroom. When working with elementary school students as an
adult, it is sometimes difficult to remember that students are still students, and that we should not
require them to meet us on our level. Teachers should meet them where they are at
To create lessons that are effective, teachers must remember that students are not all the
same. Albert Einstein once said, “If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its
whole life believing that it is stupid.” Students are sometimes compared to being the fish, or
maybe be a different animal as a whole, with a new topic or assessment as the tree. Students need
to be met at their level and shown the way of success. Developing content that allows students to
grasp topics at their own level, allows learning to become something that can be attained for the
students.
The artifacts that were chosen help highlight different activities that meet students at
their level. Ultimately, these are activities that allow students to work with one another. Student
collaboration creates so much opportunity for students to practice social skills, get the wiggles
out, and also an opportunity to work with students and be taught by them as well. Student to
student learning/teaching sometimes is better than teacher to student because students understand
each other more, and can explain things in simpler terms to one another. Collaboration makes the
room feel alive, and they are so excited about their work that they end up working on quite a bit.
DEVELOPMENTALLY-APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION Riffle 3
In this artifact, we see examples of an activity that was made as a review for non-fiction
text structures. Students were asked to find a partner and work with them throughout the two-day
activity in whole group instruction. In this activity, there were 32 different cards with short
passages placed around the room. With their partner, they were to identify which nonfiction text
structure the passage was about. This two-day whole group activity required students to complete
16 passages and answers to keep at pace, but it wasn’t taken as a grade but more or less
participation. The Walk Around was used as a review from talking about non-fiction text
structures, and in preparation for the quiz the next day, and the Benchmark test the week after.
This artifact is a lesson plan that was used early on in my student teaching at Bettie F.
Williams. This lesson was created to teach about defining author’s purpose from a text, Uncle
Jed’s Barbershop. In this lesson, students collaborated in the anticipatory set doing a Stand-Up,
Hand-Up, Pair-Up to share the most memorable part of the book to each other. After that, the
teacher led whole group instruction, modeling how to input information in the organizer, along
with introducing theme. This took about 5 minutes, and the students began working with one
another with their table groups to complete a graphic organizer defining theme, conflict, plot,
author’s purpose, and theme statements. While this was a new practice for them, many students
seem to grasp the information presented, because they were teaching each other.
Kinesthetic learning is an approach that reaches a majority of students that makes them
move and interact with one another. Soon enough, kinesthetic learning seeps into auditory, visual
DEVELOPMENTALLY-APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION Riffle 4
and the other learning realms. We have to “realize that kids need to move!” (Clark, 2012). Doing
the small and simple thing of allowing them to get up and talk about a subject, helps them
remember it, and even make personal connections about it. The importance of making a personal
any society,” (Knight, 2006) then why not make it fun and connected to everyday life?
school, not only racially, but economically as well. At my first placement, a majority of the
students had free and reduced lunch. When working with students in this community, I am often
reminded of my childhood and growing up in Title I schools, being one of the students on
free/reduced lunches. One thing I have noticed is that many teachers have a prejudice against
Title I schools due to the “bad conditions,” or “the students are all mean,” or “they’re all
entitled,” or, my favorite, “this is a place where bad teachers are sent as penance”. These are all
bad assumptions because this is our future. To reach these students, I’m reminded of the book
Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind in which it says “The upcoming school year might be
the year when a few students decide whether they will stay in school or drop out and become a
drain on society. They deserve nothing less than your best effort” (Jensen, 2013). We need to
erase the prejudice against Title I schools, and have students realize their worth, no matter what.
References
Clark, R. (2012). The End of Molasses Classes: Getting our Kids Unstuck - 101 Extraordinary
Jensen, E. (2013). Engaging Students with Poverty in Mind: Practical Strategies for Raising