Wireless Intraocular Pressure Sensor Using Stretchable Variable Inductor
Wireless Intraocular Pressure Sensor Using Stretchable Variable Inductor
VARIABLE INDUCTOR
Mohammad Hossein Mazaheri Kouhani1, Arthur Weber2, and Wen Li1
1
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
2
Physiology Department and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
978-1-5090-5078-9/17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEE 557 MEMS 2017, Las Vegas, NV, USA, January 22-26, 2017
DESIGN AND FABRICATION The fabrication process is schematically shown in Fig.
3. The fabrication of the sensor prototype is carried out
A concept diagram of the sensor is shown in Fig. 1 using two masks. First, a 3-inch glass wafer is coated with 5
along with its equivalent circuit. The wireless passive µm Parylene-C, a 20 nm layer of titanium and 700 nm of
sensing used in this work is based on the mutual inductance copper (Fig. 3A and 3B) respectively. Parylene-C is
between two coils: the reader and the sensor. The reader deposited in a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system
(transmitter) coil is connected to an impedance analyzer. (PDS2010 Parylene Coater, Specialty Coating System).
The diameter of the reader coil is comparable to the Metal is evaporated using a thermal evaporator. After that,
diameter of the sensor coil which is coupled with. The mask one is used to pattern the geometric shape of the
sensor can be modeled as a planar and circular LC passive device metal core using ultra-violet (UV) photolithography
resonator that has a constant capacitor and a stretchable and then wet etching (Fig. 3C and 3D). At this point, surface
variable inductor. The self-inductance of the inductor, the mounted (SMD) capacitor is soldered to the contacts of the
parasitic capacitance between the segments, and the Q- inductor using silver epoxy. After the full wafer is coated
factor are all changeable by the expansion of the sensor with another 5 µm Parylene-C, aluminum is deposited on
diameter. This phenomenon is employed to measure the top of Parylene-C and patterned using the second mask to
strain in the eye tissues induced by IOP elevation. The form an aluminum mask to protect the sealed metal core
change of self-inductance and parasitic capacitance result in during plasma dry etching of Parylene-C (Fig. 3 E-G).
the change of resonance frequency of the LC loop. Eventually, devices are released from the glass substrate
Therefore, we are able to read the pressure variance by before implantation (Fig. 3H). Fig. 4 show the photo image
means of frequency drift. of a fabricated device and the microscope image of the “S-
Finite element simulation is performed in the Magnetic shape” stretchable wire.
and Electric Fields (mef) module of COMSOL Multiphysics
(Ver. 5.2 COMSOL, Inc.). The shift of the mutual
inductance between the reader and sensory coils is studied
in response to the diameter expansion of the sensory coil
(Fig. 2). The geometries of the reader and sensory coils are
provided in Table I. Simulation results show a decreasing
mutual inductance as the diameter of the sensory coil
expands, suggesting an upshift of the resonance frequency
based on the resonance frequency equation shown in Fig. 1.
Table I details the inductance decrease by the increase of
diameter of the sensory coil.
558
CHARACTERIZATION AND RESULTS higher than the eye tissue. As a result, the strain gauge
sensor expands way larger, faster, and easier in response to
Device is characterized under two circumstances. One lower pressure elevations comparing with the eye.
uses a latex balloon as a model for eye. The pressure of the Therefore, the pressure sensitivity measured using the
balloon is controlled by adjusting the air pressure inside of it balloon is higher than the one characterized later using a pig
using a syringe pump. Fig. 5 shows the experimental setup eye. A pressure sensitivity of 2667 KHz/mmHg is observed
for device characterization using the balloon. The detected in case of balloon. The Q-factor of the sensory coil is
resonant frequency versus the separation between the coils measured as the sharpness of the resonant peak. As shown
and the chamber pressure are shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, in Fig. 6, the Q-factor drops as the separation of the two
respectively. The elasticity the balloon membrane is much coils increases, mainly due to the weakening of the
electromagnetic coupling between the two coils.
Figure 7: Resonance frequency shift due to pressure Figure 9: Resonance frequency drift due to pressure
elevation. elevation.
559
Table II: Summary of device design and pressure CONCLUSION
sensing performance. In this work, we design and implement a variable
Properties Device on Device inductive sensor that can non-linearly respond to pressure
balloon on pig variation by changing its geometry due to the strain caused
eye by the pressure elevation in the eye. We demonstrate that an
Coil diameter (cm) 1.4 1.4 upshift of resonant frequency occurs in the sensing LC tank
Overall thickness (µm) 10.8 10.1 when the pressure is elevated. We analytically speculate and
Capacitance (pF) 2.2 1.8 verify with simulation results that this frequency shift is
Inductance (nH) 50 50 caused by the diameter increase of the sensory coil.
Parasitic resistance (Ω) 50 25 However, we do not yet exactly know the detailed equation
Theoretical resonant freq. 411 551 ruling this relationship. Indeed, the parasitic capacitance
(MHz) between the “S-shape” winding segments of the sensory coil
also play an important role, along with the variations of the
Pressure sensitivity 2667 57
overall Q-factor and mutual inductance. Further work is in
(kHz/mmHg)
progress to study various other designs and their EM
response to precisely explain the fundamentals behind this
In order to become one step closer to in-vivo studies, relationship and optimize the sensing mechanism.
we report a characterization experiment on a pig eye. Fig. 8
illustrates the experimental setup for device testing and Fig.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
9 shows the frequency shift versus the pressure elevation. In
this case, a small conjunctival flap is cut around the cornea. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial
The inductor wire is embedded under the conjunctival flap support from the Michigan State University Foundation
of the eye. The eye is pressurized with an initial IOP of under the Strategic Partnership Grant.
around 15 mmHg. A small needle is inserted to the bottom
of the eye in order to inject saline to the interior chamber of REFERENCES
the eye through a syring pump. This enables us to mimic the
pressure elevation that occurs in the human eye. Since the [1] S. Kingman, “Glaucoma is second leading cause of
outflow of the liquid is limited, we are able to control he blindness globally” Bulletin World Health Organization,
pressure by only increasing the inflow of saline. This vol. 82 pp. 887–8.
experiment shows a pressure sensitivity of 57 KHz/mmHg [2] S. Melki, et al., "An implantable intraocular pressure
based on the frequency shift correlated with the eye pressure transducer: initial safety outcomes.” JAMA ophthalmology,
in Fig. 9. 2014, vol. 132(10), pp. 1221-1225.
Table II summarizes the performance of the sensor [3] P. J. Chen et al., “Implantable micromechanical
characterized under different conditions. Results from both parylene-based pressure sensors for unpowered intraocular
balloon and pig eye are in agreement with each other, in a pressure sensing.” Journal of Micromechanics and
way that, they both present an upshift of resonant frequency Microengineering, 2007, vol. 17(10), pp. 1931.
when the pressure elevates (Fig. 7 and Fig. 9). The elasticity [4] K. C. Katuri et al. “Intraocular pressure monitoring
of the balloon membrane is significantly higher than the eye sensors,” Sensors, IEEE Journal of, 2008, vol. 8, no.1, pp.
tissue, therefore, exhibiting a much higher sensitivity. The 12-19.
Q-factor of the sensor drops when moving from the balloon [5] P. J. Chen et al., “Microfabricated implantable parylene-
to the pig eye due to the electromagnetic absorption of the based wireless passive intraocular pressure sensors,”
tissue. The change in Q-factor may act as an additional Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2008, vol. 17,
indicator signal correlated with pressure variation in our no. 6, pp. 1342-1351.
further studies.
[6] B. Crum et al., “A Flexible Parylene-Based Intraocular
When the sensor expands, the upshift of the resonant Pressure Sensor,” Proceeding of the 9th IEEE International
frequency is speculated to be caused by two main factors. Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular
The mutual inductance between the reader and sensory coils Systems, 2014.
decreases as indicated in Table I. This might be due to the [7] B. Kang, et al., “A wireless intraocular pressure sensor
variation of the overall magnetic flux density through the with variable inductance using a ferrite material.” Journal of
coil loops, as a result of the change in the air core area. Semiconductor Technology and Science, vol. 13(4), pp. 355-
Another important factor is the parasitic capacitor between 360.
adjacent winding segments, which decreases as the
separation of the segments increases. The ruling analytical
equation has not yet completely understood and will be CONTACT
investigated in the future work. *M. H. M. Kouhani, tel: +1-517-9748327;
[email protected]
560