Scribd
Upload
1K views

Communication Evaluation Form Example

This document is a speech evaluation form used to assess public speaking skills based on criteria from the Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR) and the National Communication Association (NCA). It contains sections to evaluate the organization of speeches, body/content, language/delivery, and visual aids. Ratings of excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor are provided to assess competencies in areas like clear purpose, effective introduction/conclusion, well-organized main points, use of examples/evidence, appropriate language, delivery, non-verbal communication, visual aids, and ability to answer questions.

Uploaded by

Fery Citra Febriyanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views

Communication Evaluation Form Example

This document is a speech evaluation form used to assess public speaking skills based on criteria from the Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR) and the National Communication Association (NCA). It contains sections to evaluate the organization of speeches, body/content, language/delivery, and visual aids. Ratings of excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor are provided to assess competencies in areas like clear purpose, effective introduction/conclusion, well-organized main points, use of examples/evidence, appropriate language, delivery, non-verbal communication, visual aids, and ability to answer questions.

Uploaded by

Fery Citra Febriyanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

TTU Speech Communication Evaluation Form

(SPCH 2410)
Speaker ___________________________________________________ Semester _________________

T
B Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
ORGANIZATION R
Clear purpose throughout the speech [TBR Outcome A, NCA] A 5 4 3 2 1

Effective introduction – Gained attention, stated thesis, stated 5 4 3 2 1


relevance, previewed main points [NCA]

Main points well organized – Related to the thesis, logical B 5 4 3 2 1


organization, transition and signposted as necessary [TBR Outcome B,
NCA]

Effective conclusion – Restated thesis, reviewed main points, 5 4 3 2 1


effectively closed

BODY/CONTENT
Main points elaborated clearly using effective rhetorical strategies C 5 4 3 2 1
– Examples and explanations used as necessary [TBR Outcome C]

Useful evidence cited – Orally cited sources, sufficient evidence used, E 5 4 3 2 1


evidence established credibility [TBR Outcome E, NCA]

LANGUAGE AND DELIVERY


Appropriate language – Used professional language in a style fitting D 5 4 3 2 1
to the topic and context, fluid and correct grammar and syntax, avoided
disfluencies, e.g., “uhm” [TBR Outcome D, NCA]

Effective oral delivery – Spoke audibly and clearly at an appropriate 5 4 3 2 1


rate, demonstrated interest in the topic [NCA]

Effective non-oral delivery – Effectively used gesture and bodily 5 4 3 2 1


movement, maintained eye contact [NCA]

Effective visual aid used – Guidelines followed for creating and using 5 4 3 2 1
presentational software, poster-boards, handouts, white boards, etc.

Question and Answer/Cross Examination – Sufficiently prepared to 5 4 3 2 1


answer questions, provided clear and useful answers

Outline of the speech – Followed the format provided by the 5 4 3 2 1


department/class, included typed bibliography in appropriate format
(APA or MLA)

# Excellent & Very Good = Exceeds TBR and NCA Competencies; Good & Fair = Meets TBR and NCA Competencies; Poor = Does
not meet TBR or NCA Competencies
[NCA] National Communication Association Public Speaking Competencies

* This form was adapted from Burkel, Cutspec, Oliveria, & Kirkwood 2007

You might also like