MATH 307 Subspaces: V W V W W W W W W
MATH 307 Subspaces: V W V W W W W W W
(i) W is non-empty
(ii) W is closed under scalar multiplication, and
€ €
(iii) W is closed under addition. €
€ In other words, W is just a smaller vector space within the larger space V . But
€ adding elements from W keeps them in W as does multiplying by a scalar.
€
€ 2
Example 1. Let € V = R (the x y€plane). Let W = {( x , y ) : y = m x }. Then W is simply a
straight line through the origin. Is W a subspace?
Example
€€ € 2. Let V €be the vector space of all 3 × 3 matrices. Let W = { A ∈ V : A−1 exists}.
Is W a suspace of V ? In this vector space, the 0 element is the 3 × 3 zero matrix, which
is non-invertible. Thus, 0 ∉ W , and W is not a subspace of V .
€ € € € € €
€ € € €
€€ € € €
Dr. Neal, Fall 2008
Let W be a subset of a vector space V . Then W must have some defining property that
distinguishes its elements from the other elements in V . To show that W is actually a
subspace, we must verify three properties: (i) W must be non-empty; (ii) W must be
closed under scalar multiplication; and (iii) W must be closed under addition.
€ € €
€ €
(i) The zero vector 0 must always
be in any subspace. So to show W is non-empty, it is
€ €
usually easiest to show that 0 is in€ W . That is, you must argue that the specific zero
vector of the vector space V under consideration has the defining property of the set
W . Then conclude
€ that W is non-empty.
€
€
(ii) To show W is closed €
under scalar multiplication, (a) Let w ∈ W . (b) Then state
what it means for€w to be in W ; i.e., explain the defining property. (c) Let c be any
€ scalar (i.e., real€number). (d) Argue that c w has the defining property of W . (e)
Conclude that W is closed under scalar multiplication.
€ €
(iii) To show W is closed under addition, (a) Let w1 and w 2 be in W€. (b) Then state
€ €
what it means for w1 and w 2 to be € the defining
€ in W ; i.e., explain that they have
€ (c) Argue that w + w has the defining property of W . (e) Conclude that W
property. 1 2
is closed under addition.
€ € € €
(iv) Conclude€ that W € of V .
€ is a subspace
€ € €
Throughout, you may use different symbols that are more appropriate to the
context of the problem. But throughout, use complete sentences to explain what you are
doing, use€correct mathematical€ logic, do not skip steps, and give conclusions.
Note: We also can combine requirements (ii) and (iii) and show instead that for any
scalar c and vectors w1 and w 2 in W , that c w1 + w 2 ∈ W .
Example 2. Let V = C[a, b] be the set of continuous functions over [a, b], where a < b .
€ € €
Let a < d < b€and let€D = { f ∈ V f €
′(d) exists} . Then D is a subspace of V .
Proof. Let f 0 be the zero function (i.e., f 0 (x) = 0 for all x ∈ [a, b]). Then f€0′ (x) = 0 for all
€
x ∈ (a, b) ; thus, f 0 (d)
′ exists (and equals 0). So f0 ∈ D and D€ is non-empty.
€ € € €
Let f ∈ D . Then f ′(d) exists. For any scalar c , cf is still a continuous function and
€)′(d) = c( f ′(d)) still exists. Thus,
(cf € cf ∈ D and€D is closed under € scalar multiplication.
€ € € €
Let f , g ∈ D so that f ′(d) and g′(d) exist. Then f + g is still a continuous function and
€ €
( f + g)′(d)€= f ′(d) + g′(d) still exists. Thus, €f + g ∈ D and D is closed under addition.
€ € €
Whence, D is a subspace of C[a, b] .
€ - - - - - - - - -€
- - - - - - - -€- - - - - - - - - - - - - -€- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
€ 3 € €
Example 3. Let V = R and let W = {( x , y , z ) : z = 0} . Then (0, 0, 0) ∈ W ; so W is non-
empty. For vectors (x1, y€1, 0) and (x 2 , y 2 , 0) in W and for any scalar c , we have
€ 3
c (x1, y1, 0) + (x 2 , y 2 , 0) = (c x1 + x 2 , c y1 + y 2 , 0) ∈ W . Hence, W is a subspace of R .
€ € € € € € € €
€ € € €
€ € €
Dr. Neal, Fall 2008
n m n
Example 4. Let T : R → R be a linear transformation. Then ker T is a subspace of R .
n m
Recall: For T : R → R , ker T = {x ∈ R n T(x) = 0 m } .
€
n m
Proof. Let 0 n be the zero vector in R and let 0 m be the zero vector in R . Then for any
n m
linear transformation T : R → R € , we have T(0 n ) = 0 m . Thus, 0 n ∈ ker T . Hence, ker T
is non-empty.
n
€ Let x ∈ ker T . Then T(x) = 0 m .€ If c is any scalar, then c x is still in R and
T(c x) = c T(x) = c 0 m = 0 m ; hence, c€x ∈ ker T . Thus,€ ker T is closed €under scalar
multiplication.
Let u, v ∈ ker T . Then T(u)€= 0 m = T(v) . Then T(u + v) = T(u) + T(v) = 0 m + 0 m = 0 m ;
€ € n
€ hence, u + v ∈ ker T and ker T is closed under addition.
€ Ergo, ker T is a subspace of R .
-------------------------------------------------------------------
€ € n € m
Recall that a linear transformation T : R → R has an m × n matrix representation A .
€ Then in matrix€form, ker T is simply all solutions to€the homogeneous system AX = 0 .
Thus, we can re-state Example 4 in matrix form as:
€ €
Dr. Neal, Fall 2008
(ii) Let F(–∞, ∞) be the vector space of all real-valued functions f with domain (–∞, ∞).
(b) Fix one x0 . The subset of functions f such that f (x0 ) = 0 is a subspace of
F(–∞, ∞) . Indeed, the function f (x) = x − x0 is in the subset, and
(c f + g)(x 0 ) = c f (x0 ) + g(x 0 ) = 0 for functions f and g in the subset; hence, the subset is
non-empty and closed.
(c) The subset of functions f such that lim f (x) = b is not a subspace for b ≠ 0.
x →a
Clearly, this subset is not closed under scalar multiplication for c ≠ 1. But is it a
subspace for b = 0?
€
3. Determine if the subsets W are subspaces of the vector space V . If so, prove it. If
not, give an example of a vector or vectors in the subset for which scalar multiplication
or addition fails to be closed.
€ 2 x 2 matrices; Subset W = { A ∈ V : €
(a) Vector space V = det( A ) = 10}.
T
(b) Vector space V = n × n matrices; Subset W = { A ∈ V : A = – A }.
€ € € €
(c) Vector space V = All Real Numbers; Subset W = the rational numbers.