Appendix III

Table 1
Assessment Criteria and Methodology for University/College Teachers
S.No. Activity Grading Criteria
1. Teaching: (Number of classes taught/total 80% & above------Good
classes assigned): 100% Below 80% but 70% & above—
(Classes taught includes sessions on Satisfactory
tutorials, lab and other teaching related Less than 70%----Not satisfactory
activities)
2. Involvement in the University/College Good—Involved in at least 3
students related activities/research activities
activities: Satisfactory—1-2 activities
(a) Administrative responsibilities such Not-satisfactory-Not involved /
as Head, Chairperson/ Dean/ undertaken any of the activities
Director/ Co-ordinator, Warden etc. Note:
(b) Examination and evaluation duties Number of activities can be within or
assigned by the college / university across the broad categories of
or attending the examination paper activities
evaluation.
(c) Student related co-curricular,
extension and field based activities
such as student clubs, career
counselling, study visits, student
seminars and other events, cultural,
sports, NCC, NSS and community
services.
(d) Organising
seminars/conferences/workshops,
other college/university activities.
(e) Evidence of actively involved in
guiding Ph.D students.
(f) Conducting minor or major research
project sponsored by national or
international agencies.
(g) At least one single or joint
73
 publication in peer reviewed/UGC
list of Journals.
Overall Grading:
Good: Good in teaching and satisfactory or good in activity at Sl.No.2.
Or
Satisfactory: Satisfactory in teaching and good or satisfactory in activity at Sl.No.2.
Not Satisfactory: If neither good nor satisfactory in overall grading
Note: For the purpose of assessing the grading of Activity at Serial No. 1 i.e. Teaching all
such periods of duration which have been spent by the teacher on different kinds of paid
leaves such as Maternity Leave, Child Care Leave, Study Leave, Medical Leave etc. and
Deputation shall be excluded from the grading assessment. The teacher shall be assessed
for the remaining period of duration and the same shall be extrapolated for the entire
period of assessment to arrive at the grading of the teacher. The teacher on such leaves or
deputation as mentioned above shall not be put to any disadvantage due to his/her
absence from his/her teaching responsibilities subject to such leaves/deputation was
undertaken with the prior approval of the competent authority following all procedures laid
down in these regulations and as the acts, statutes and ordinances of the parent institution.

Table 2 Assessment Criteria and Methodology for University Teachers

(Academic/Research)
74
(Assessment must be based on evidence produced by the teacher such as: copy of publications,
project sanction letter, utilization and completion certificates issued by the University and
acknowledgements for patent filing and approval letters, students‘ Ph.D. award letter, etc,.)
Academic/Research Faculty of Faculty of
Activity Sciences/Engineering/Agriculture/ languages/Humanities/Arts/So
Medical /Veterinary Sciences cial Science
/Library/Education/Physical
Education/Commerce/Manage
ment & other related
discipline
1.Research Papers 08 per paper 10 per paper
Published in Peer
Reviewed/UGC listed
Journals
2.Books/ e-
booksauthored which
are published by
International publishers 10 10
National publishers 08 08
Chapter in Edited Book 05 05
Editor of Book by
International Publisher 10 10
Editor of Book by
National Publisher 08 08
*e-content (developed in
4 quadrants) per module 05 05
MOOCs (developed) per
module/lecture 05 05
3. Research Projects
Completed:
More than 10 lakhs 10 10
Less than 10 lakhs 05 05
Ongoing:
More than 10 lakhs 05 05
Less than 10 lakhs 02 02

Consultancy: 03 03
4.
Patents
International 10 10
75
National 07 07

*Policy Document
International 10 10
National 07 07
State 04 04

5. Research Guidance

Ph.D. 10/per degree awarded 10/per degree awarded

05/per thesis submitted
05/thesis submitted

M.Phil./PG dissertation 02/degree awarded

02/per degree awarded
6. *Invited lectures /
Resource Person
/paper presentation

International (Abroad) 7 7

International (within 5 5
country)

National 3 3

State / University 2 2
The Research Score for papers would be augmented as follows:
Peer reviewed /UGC listed journals
i) Paper in referred journals without impact factor - 5 Points
ii) Paper with impact factor less than 1 - 10 Points
iii) Paper with impact factor between 1 and 2 - 15 Points
iv) Paper with impact factor between 2 and 5 - 20 Points
v) Paper with impact factor between 5 and 10 - 25 Points
vi) Paper with impact factor >10 - 30 Points
Joint Publication:
(a) Two authors: 50% of total value of publication for each author
(b) More than two authors: 70% of total value of publication for the
First/Principal/Corresponding authorand 30% of total value of publication for each of the
joint authors.
Joint Projects: Principal Investigator and Co-investigator would get 50% each.
* Note:

76
  Paper presented if part of edited book or proceeding then it can be claimed only once.
 For joint supervision of research students the formula shall be 70/30. First Supervisor
shall get 7 marks and co-supervisor 3 marks.
 In development of e-content in 4 quadrants for a complete course/e-book may be
assigned points equivalent to authoring a book at national level, contribution to
development of e-content modules in complete course/paper/e-book may be awarded
points same as that of contributed chapters in edited book and editor of e-content for
complete course/paper/e-book may be awarded points same as that for editor of a book
by National Publisher.
 Development of various quadrants of complete MOOCs may be given the weightage
similar to authoring a book, contribution to development of modules in a complete
MOOCs may be awarded points same as contributed chapters in edited book and
coordinator of MOOCs for complete course may be awarded points same as that for
editor of a book by National Publisher.
 For the purpose of calculating research score of the person, the combined research
score from the categories of Policy Document and Invited lectures / Resource
Person /paper presentation shall have an upper capping of 30% of the total research
score of the person.
 The research score shall be from the minimum of 3 categories out of 6 categories.

Table: 3 A
Criteria for Short listing of candidates for Interview for the Post of Assistant Professors
in Universities
77
 S.No. Academic Record Score
1. Graduation 80% and 60%to less 55% to less
above = 15 than 80% = than 60% = 10
13
2. Post Graduation 80% and 60%to less 55% to less
above = 28 than 80% = than 60% = 20
25
3. M.Phil. 60% and above = 07 55% to less than 60%
= 05

4. Ph.D. 30

5. NET with JRF 07

NET or equivalent 5

6. Research Publications 10
(2 marks for each
research publications
published in Peer
Reviewed/UGC listed
Journals)
7. Teaching/Post 10
Doctoral Experience (2
marks for one year
each)#

# However, if the period of teaching/Post-doctoral experience is less than one year then
the marks shall be reduced proportionately.
Note:
(A) (i)M.Phil + Ph.D Maximum– 30 Marks
(ii) JRF/NET/SET Maximum - 07 Marks
(B) Number of candidates to be called for interview shall be decided by the concerned
universities.
(C) Academic Score - 80
Research Publications - 10
Teaching Experience - 10
Total : -100
(D)SET/SLET score shall be valid for appointment in respective State
Universities/Colleges/Institutions only

Table: 3 B
Criteria for Short listing of candidates for Interview for the Post of Assistant Professors in
Colleges
78
S.No. Academic Record Score
1. Graduation 80% and 60%to less 55% to less
above = 21 than 80% = 19 than 60% = 16
2. Post Graduation 80% and 60%to less 55% to less
above = 33 than 80% = 30 than 60% = 25
3. M.Phil. 60% and above = 07 55% to less than60%
= 05
4. Ph.D. 20
5. NET with JRF 10
NET or equivalent 08

6. Research Publications (2 06
marks for each research
publications published in
Peer Reviewed/UGC listed
Journals)
7. Teaching/Post Doctoral 10
Experience (2 marks for
one year each)#

# However, if the period of teaching/Post-doctoral experience is less than one year

then the marks shall be reduced proportionately.
Note:
(A) (i)M.Phil + Ph.D Maximum- 20 Marks
(ii)JRF/NET/SET Maximum - 10 Marks
(B) Number of candidates to be called for interview shall be decided by the concerned
universities.
(C) Academic Score - 84
Research Publications - 06
Teaching Experience - 10
Total : -100
(D)SET/SLET score shall be valid for appointment in respective State
Universities/Colleges/Institutions only

Table 4 Assessment Criteria and Methodology for Librarians

S.No. Activity Grading Criteria
1 Regularity of attending library 90% and above – Good
79