0% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views

Nine-Cell Matrix - Starbucks

The document contains two industry attractiveness assessments and two competitive strength assessments for the coffee and food industries. The coffee industry has a higher overall attractiveness score of 7.25 compared to 5.8 for the food industry. For competitive strength, Starbucks has a higher score of 8 compared to 4.55 for its breakfast sandwich. This information is plotted on a nine-cell matrix showing Starbucks coffee in the high attractiveness/strong competitive position quadrant.

Uploaded by

Nexhi Duka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views

Nine-Cell Matrix - Starbucks

The document contains two industry attractiveness assessments and two competitive strength assessments for the coffee and food industries. The coffee industry has a higher overall attractiveness score of 7.25 compared to 5.8 for the food industry. For competitive strength, Starbucks has a higher score of 8 compared to 4.55 for its breakfast sandwich. This information is plotted on a nine-cell matrix showing Starbucks coffee in the high attractiveness/strong competitive position quadrant.

Uploaded by

Nexhi Duka
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Industry-Attractiveess Assessments

Coffee Industy Food Industry


Industry Attractiveness Importance Attractivness Weighted Attractivness Weighted
Measure Weight Rating Score Rating Score
Market Size and projected
growth rate 0.10 8 0.80 8 0.80
Intensity of Competition 0.30 5 1.50 5 1.50
Emerging opportunities and
threats 0.15 8 1.20 8 1.20

Cross-industry strategic fit 0.20 9 1.80 5 1.00

Pesource requirements 0.10 8 0.80 3 0.30


Social, political, regulatory
and environmental factors 0.05 7 0.35 6 0.30

Industry profitability 0.10 8 0.80 7 0.70

Sum of importace weights 1.00

Weighted overall industry-


attractiveness scores 7.25 5.80

Competitive-Strenght Assessments
Breakfast sandwich -
Starbucks Cofee Starbucks
Coffee Industy Food Industry
Competitive-Strenght Importance Strength Weighted Strength Weighted
Measures Weight Rating Score Rating Score
Relative Market share 0.15 10 1.50 3 0.45
Costs relative to
competitor's costs 0.25 6 1.50 5 1.25
Ability to match rivals on
key product attributes 0.05 10 0.50 4 0.20
Ability to benefit from
strategic fit 0.10 6 0.60 5 0.50
Bargaining leverage with
suppliers/customers 0.05 8 0.40 4 0.20

Brand image and reputation 0.15 10 1.50 4 0.60


Other valuable resources 0.10 8 0.80 6 0.60
Profitability relative to
competitors 0.15 8 1.20 5 0.75

Sum of importace weights 1.00

Weighted overall industry-


attractiveness scores 8.00 4.55

A Nine-Cell Industry-Atractiveness-Competitive Mat

7.25 6.15 5.8


9

High
Starbucks
Coffee

Tazo Tea
6

Medium Sandwich

Low
9 6
Strong Average

Competitive Strength/ Market Position


s Assessments
Specialty Tea Brand
Attractivness Weighted
Rating Score

7 0.70
6 1.80

5 0.75

7 1.40

5 0.50

8 0.40

6 0.60

6.15

Assessments

Tazo Tea
Specialty Tea Brand
Weighted
Strength Rating Score
6 0.90

5 1.25

6 0.30

5 0.50

5 0.25

7 1.05
8 0.80

6 0.90

5.95

-Competitive Matrix

5.95

4.55
3
Weak

You might also like