2005 Report PDF
2005 Report PDF
A SURVEY
..
--::.~
.... ::'. . _ -
l.~~··
~'t_.
2005
'ttICA~Cb ~~
Occasional Paper - 39
A SURVEY
,
.. "
.~"
.......... .
. ".\
" ""J ,~"" )
'" "
i
"
"- 1
!
.-.,
",0
.....
2005
Authors
Dr. K.G. Karmakar
Executive Director. NABARD. Mumbai
(,?.>~ .~()C
A'I)/s"'<'
~ ':' r
~ 2 .n ...;'.~,~
- _, '1..
., .. ltp'l4 ~ )_
\'~ ;~:....
............... _....__..........
.. _-- ' .
~~ 3itr ~r imP-m iCfi. 3m2fui m~~ 3itr 3~Wiil fa~, 'fM) ~, ~1l' fcrn, ~
of ~-24, 'UYt' Gi'IlCll, m.iilT. oj 8121, ~-~ CbICRd<fCl, ~ (~a), ~ - 400 051, 8RI ~1O
Published by the National Bank for Agriculture & Rural Development, Department of
Economic Analysis & Research, 4th Floor, 'C' Wing. Plot No, C-24. G-Block.
PB No. 8121, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East). Mumbai - 400 051.
Ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No •
Foreword .zill
Acknowledgement xlv
Part One : Evolution of Tea Industry. Tea in India and the World.
Features of the Indian Tea Industry. Deuelopment of Tea Industry
during 1850-2002. Outlook upto 2007
1_ Evolution of Tea Industry
i. History of Tea Leaf 1
it. Beginning qI Tea In India 1
iii. Birth of VIe Indian Tea Industry 2
iv. Tea Trade 2
v. Formation of Tea Association 2
vi. Tea Research 3
vii. International Tea Regulation Scheme 3
viii. International Tea Agreement Scheme 3
ix. Tea Control Act and its Amendment 3
x. Tea Board 3
2. Tea in Inclla and the World 4
i. Introduction 4
ii. Plantation Industry 4
iii. Tea - Agriculture as well as lnc1w;try 4
iv. India's place in the World Tea 5
a. Area under Tea - India and the World 5
b. Production of Tea . India and the World 6
c. Export of Tea - India and the World 7
v. Tea Industry : Earner oJ Foreign Exchange 7
vi. Tea Industry: Source qJ Employment 8
vii. Contribution q.f Tea Industry to Total Revenue 9
lJiit. Tea as (l Supporter of Allied Activities 9
3. Featurea of Tea Induatry It)
i. Fanning (md Maru.-!facturlng 10
a. Withering 10
b. Rolling and fi'emlt!rtling 10
c. Gradillg and Packing 11
Ii. Geographical Locations. etc. II
a. Area. Production and Yield oj Tea 1I
b. ZonC!-wise Clnss!JicntioTl qI Tca etc.. 11
c. Area-wL..e Distribution 12
d. Age-wise CiClss!Jication of States 12
U1
Page No.
tv
Page No.
UL Selection Cr1terla for Quality 40
a. Pubescence 40
b. Colour of Leaf 41
c. Anatomical Character 41
tv. Clonal vs Seed Propagation 41
v. Selection Procedures/Criteria 41
7. AgrocUmatlc Conclltlons of Tea Growing Regions In the North East 41
Part Three : Planting and Processing Technology. Manuring.
Research & Development. Thrust Area of Tea
v
Page No.
Part Four : Marketing systems. Aspects of Tea Markets.
Domestic Market. Export Markets. Promotion
11. Tea Marketing - Signs of Maturity 47
12. Loss of London Market 47
13. Marketing System of Tea 48
14. Modes of Disposal 49
15. Marketing Models of Tea 50
L Direct Consignment to London Auction 50
ii Direct Sale by Forward Contract to Overseas Buyers 50
iii. Consignment to Indinn Auctions 50
Lv. Direct Ex-Jactory Sale to Indian Buyer 50
I). Direct Sale by Fonvard Contract to Indian Buyers 51
I)L Direct Marketing (loose tea) in Wholesale Markets 51
I)ii Self-packeting and Export oj Packets Overseas 51
16. Primary Marketing 51
17. Development of Auction Markets In the World 52
18. Auction Centres Abroad 52
19. Tea Auction FaciUties 53
20. Tea Auction System 53
21. Advantage of Auction Sale 54
22. Tandon Committee on Marketing 55
23. Ez-garden Sale 55
24. Mini Auction 56
25. Auction for Blended and Packet Teas 57
26. New Tea Auction Rules 58
L Auction Day 59
ii Catalogue 59
UL Prompt Data 59
Ill. Brokerage 60
I). Size oj I..at.s 60
I)i. Dil)ision ~r Lots 60
1)11. Withrlrawal oj I..ats 60
"iii. Sale Int Outlets 61
Ix. Warehouse Rent and In..'iurance 61
x. Closing Catalogue 62
xi. Distribution oj Samples 62
27. Quantum of Samples 62
28. Bidding Rates 62
29. Claims for Shortages. Non-deUvery. Damaged Teas 6:3
30. Supervision 63
31. Collaboration 63
32. Tea Market Trend 64
33. Production 64
vi
Page No.
34. Domestic Market 65
35. Ezport 65
36. The Auction System 66
37. Import of Tea 66
38. Promotion 66
39. Quality 66
40. Culture Products 66
41. Bulk Packaging 67
42. Marketing of Indian Tea - Domestic V. Export 67
43. Unrestricted Import of Tea 72
44. Production vis-a-vis Consumption 73
45. Imports for Re-export 74
46. Standard of Quality 75
47. Conclusidn 75
Part Five : Oolong and Other Teas - World Production,
World Exports & Imports, Producers and Importers of Green Tea etc.
48. Introduction 77
L Distinct Quality 77
iL Manlifactwillg Process 77
ilL Conversion Ratto 78
49. World Production 78
50. World Ezports 79
51. World Imports 80
52. Producers of Green Tea 81
53. Process Chart of Indian Green Tea 87
54. Importers of Green Tea - Consumer Preferences 88
55. Oolong Tea - China. Taiwan 90
Part Six : Current Tea Trends, FAO Projections, Domestic
Consumption, Imports, Research & Development etc.
56. Current Tea Trends 91
57. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) Projections for 2005 92
58. Decline In the rate of Domestic Consumption 92
59. Imports 92
60. Present status of Research and Development in Tea 93
i. HighltrJlltS q{ Rescclrch & Dt'l'elopml'nl Contributions on Tea 93
iL Approach to XIII Plan Period 94
61. New Proposals for Research during Xth Five Year Plan 95
vii
Page No.
83. Competitor ADa1:ysta of 16 Specific Markets 98
64. Area Production and Export of Tea of Different Countries 99
Part Eight : Constraints, Suggestions and Remedial Measures
viii
Page No.
91. OpeDlDg and Maintenance of Accounts 120
92. Calculation and Contributions from. Govt. of India and Membel'll 120
93. Defaulters 121
94. New Membership - Wustl'lltions 121
95. Price Stabilisation Fund Accounts 122
Ix
Pale No.
112. Export of Packet Tea 140
113. Direction - Reglon-wlee Packet Tea Export 142
114. Ezport of Tea Bags 142
lU5. Direction of Tea Bag Ezporta 143
118. Value Added Concept 144
117. Forms of Value Addition 144
118. Sharing of Value Added Tea 144
119. Instant Tea - It. development 146
120. Ezport Market for Indian Tea 147
121. Incentives to Value Added Teas 147
122. Problems of Value Added Instant Tea 149
123. Long Term StratelY for Marketing of Value Added Ite. . 149
124. Potential and Scope for Instant Teas 151
125. Tea Powder 151
x
Page No.
L Unorgan(sed Growth 157
iL Land. Patta. and 1ltles 158
UL Teclmtcal Requirements 158
tv. Ecological Imbalance 158
v. FInance 158
vi. Marketing 158
vii Case (n Ilandlfng 158
198. Conclusions &: RecollllllendatloDS 159
197. Polley Issues 160 .
xi
FOREWORD
It has been a long journey for the Tea industry in India since
the 18th Centu:ry. Tea has had a longer history in China where it
was reselVed for the royal family and wealthy nobles. The growth
of the industry has been a fascinating one, with innovations and
tremendous growth with some problem years. As a plantation
crop with enormous profits, tea has been a favoured crop. From
the kings to the lowly peasant, all have been partial to tea, in
different fla~ours and concoctions!.
A sUlVey which covers the entire Tea Industry Is a gigantic task and
would not have been possible without the help of colleagues and
friends whose suggestions have enriched the presentation.
For all the risks of omission and commission, the authors alone are
responsible. We are grateful to Smt. Ranjana Kumar, Chairperson,
NABARD for having agreed to wrlte the Foreword to this compilation
of exhaustive data on the Tea industry in India.
xiv
Part One : Evolution of Tea Industry, Tea in India
and the World, Features of the Indian
Tea Industry, Development of Tea
Industry during 1850-2002, Outlook
upto 2007
1. Evolution of the Tea Industry
i. History of Tea Leqf - The ongln of the tea bush has been
contested by scholars. It is native to certain areas ranging
from the intertor of Southern China to the border of Assam.
Tea has only one species which is called "Camellia Sino sis
((L).O.~.mtze]. It came to the light in Fourth century and by
about 650 A.D. during the TS'ang dynasty the growing
popularity of tea induced farmers in most provinces in China
to cultivate Tea and subsequently became an article of
commerce. In the early years of 780 A.D., LuYu commis-
sioned the first book on tea entitled "Chaching" a tea classic.
The first printed reference by a European writer about the
mysterious Chinese drink was dated to 1559 A.D. The
knowledge of tea travelled slowly from East to West. The
Dutch Merchants established a trading base at Benton by
1596. The first consignment of tea from China was
transported to Benton in 1606 and from there it was shipped
to-non-tea-conscious Europe. By the mid-1650s, a quick brisk
trade in tea was made with Holland. In France, the future of
tea was linked with the Sterling Company.
1
iii. Birth of Indian Tea Industry - The birth of Indian tea
industry was marked by the discovery of indigenous teas
plant in Assam in 1823 by Robert Bush. This received
momentum when the East India Company in 1833 lost the
tea trading monopoly in China. In 1835. a sCientific
deputation was sent to Assam to report on prospects of the
tea industry and the team saw tea plants in many parts in
the hills between Assam and Burma. In 1836. C.A. Bruce
was made the Superintendent of Tea Forests. Among others,
he formed the Bengal Tea Company at Calcutta with the
objective of purchasing the produce from the East India
Company's tea plantations in India. A Similar Company was
also established in the same year in London with the same
objectives.
In 1839 the first conSignment of tea from India (eight chests)
was shipped to London and it was auctioned at a price
ranging from six to thirty four shillings per pound. In 1840,
two thirds of experimental teas were handed over to new
company. In 1852. the first tea company in India paid its
final dividends. The second limited company in 1859 was
formed in Assam called Jorhat Company. During 1862-67. tea
cultivation started in Chittagong and Chotta Nagpur.
Ultimately tea cultivation was commissioned in many districts
in India wherever there was some hope of a success.Within a
few months. India along with Sri Lanka dominated the world
tea trade/market.
iv. Tea Trade - In 1874 the land located in the East of Teesta
river was explored with the foreign liability of growing tea
plants. By 1876 as many as 13 gardens had started
cultivating tea. In 1878 the first two Indian tea gardens by
name Megalkat Tea Estate and Indian Tea Company Ltd. were
established though the Company actually received a grant of
741 acres on 19 March 1981. The first tea auction sta.rted on
May 26. 1841 in London under the pioneering leadership of
Lyal & Co .. Mincing Lane. London was the centre of World
Tea activities prior to World War II. The first tea auction in
Calcutta in December 27, 1861 and the second in Cochin in
1947 for South Indian teas were held. Subsequently. many
tea auction centres were opened in Coonoor, Guwahatt.
Amritsar. Siliguri etc. ..
v. Formation of Tea Association - The Tea planters formed
an association named Indian Tea AsSOCiation (ITA) In 18 May
2
1881. with its headquarters at Calcutta for promoting their
common interest and objectives. Subsequently many
associations were formed in various tea regions of North and
South India.
vi. Tea Research - For greater interest of the industry. the Tea
Research Association was established in 1964 at Tocklai.
Assam and was fundcd jointly by Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research [CSIR) and Tea Board of India. Subscrip-
tions of member tea estates and other associate members
were called for to cany out the research work. United Planters
Association of South India [UPASI) Tea Research Institute had
its origin in the year 1926 at Coimbatore District. Tamil
Nadu.
I
vii. International Tea Regulation Scheme - During the second
half of the 191h century and first half of the 20th century. four
major slumps [1866. 1879. 1896-1904. and 1920) took place.
To counteract the situation India. Sri Lanka. Nethcrlands and
East Indies reached an agreement on voluntary basis to
curtail tea production. The world economic depression resulted
in dccllne in tca consumption and stocks continued to pile up
till 1932
3
1953 which came Into effect from 01 st April 1954. The
functioning of the Central Tea Board and Indian Tea licensing
committee were entrusted with the Tea Board which was
responsible for promoting development of tea industry under
the control of Central Government.
2. Tea in India and World
i. Introduction - The 'Plantation Industry'. which was
developed over 150 years. has a colonial origin. It is now a
valuable asset to the nation. Plantation industry is a branch
of agriculture in the broader sense. The organization of
modern plantation relates more to the factory than to the
farm. Generally. there is a specialization in one crop. which is
produced on a large scale for export and for maintenance
work. The output is continuous through out the year. The
major plantation crops like tea. coffee. rubber and cardamom
have now developed to a large extent.
4
sense that tea is a processed and manufactured commodity.
which is subject to excise duty and cess. It is also an
agricultural crop because it is grown on land and thus
agricultural income tax is also levied on it. Moreover. tea
plantation is governed by both agricultural and industrial
rules and regulatlons. The tea crop involves both agricultural
and industrial operations. Agricultural operations like
cultivation, plucking, manuring, irrigation, weed control.
disease control. pest control. transportation of green leaf and
uprooting are undertaken for growing tea. The final product of
tea comes through various processing and manufacturing
stages like withering, rolling, fermenting, drying, weighing.
sorting. cutting that place it under industry. Thus the tea
plantation, though a big agricultural enterprise, has also some
characteristlcs of industIy. The establish-ments and operations
of such industry require massive investment of capital.
Modern technical equipment is also necessary for processing
the product. An outstanding feature of the plantatlon economy
is that a large portion of tea has been sold in the internal
markets from the very inception of this industry. This has.
therefore. made it necessary to have well-organised marketing
services. The requirement of capital, technical know-how and
organized marketing services explain why, the unit of
production of tea has taken the shape of a large industrial
establishment.
5
Table 1 : India's share in World Tea Area during
1961-2002 (Area in thousand hectare)
-
I
World India India's
Year Area Absolute Area Absolute share 8S
increase/decrease increase/decrease percent-
age world
area
..-
1961 964 - 331 34_:i3
1971 1386 (+)422 357 (+)26 25.75
1981 2358 (+)972 384 (+)27 16.28
1991 2569 (+)211 420 (+)36 16.35
1997 2572 I+J 3 4::$4 (+)14 16.87
1998 2597 1+) 25 474 (+)40 18.25
1999 2692 I+J 95 490 1+)16 18.20
2000 2668 1-) 24 507 ·(+)17 19.00
2001 2735 (T) 67 510 (+) 3 18.05
2002 2756 (+) 21 511 (+J 1 18.54
Source : Tea SICltL"tics. TI'(l BOflrrJ. Kolk(lln. unriDlIs iSSII(,<;.
Note : (+/ Illdicates Increase mul (-J Indicates deerellse III (lbsolutc amount.
6
c. Export of Tea : India and the World - India is the
largest exporter of tea in the world. However, Sri Lanka
has been closely following India's footsteps. India's share in
world export expressed in terms of percentage has declined
between 1961 and 2002, but there is only marginal decline
in absolute quantum of exports. Tea has remained, on an
average, at 200 million kgs. during the period. The main
reason for fall of India's share for the last 40 years is that
a large quantum of tea has been retained for domestic
consumption. World exports increased by 158 per cent and
India's exports reduced by 2.43 per cent during the period
from 1961 to 2002. India's share in the world exports
declined from 37.18 to 14.04 per cent during the same
period (Table - 3).
7
Table 4 : Value of Exports of Tea to Total Value of
Exports of All Commodities
(b. in crore)
Year Value of Absolute Value of Absolute Share of tea
exports change exports change to value of
of an of tea@ ezports of
commo- aU com-
ditle.· moditles
1961-62 661 - 122 - 18.46
1971-72 1608 (+) 947 184 (+) 62 11.44
1981-82 7808 (+) 6200 406 (+)222 5.20
1991-92 33452 (+)25644 1194 (+)788 3.57
1997-98 38752 (+) 5300 1945 (+)751 5.01
1998-99 39892 (+) 1140 2129 (+)184 5.33
1999-2000 41285 (+) 1393 1867 (+)262 4.52
2000-01 41875 (+) 590 1967 (+)100 4.70
2001-02 .,42453 (+) 578 2157 (+)190 5.08
8
vli. Contribution of Tea industry to Total Revenue - Tea is a
commodity which is subject to direct taxation in the form of
excise duty, export duty, and cess. under Tea Act 1951. In
addition to these, various state levies are also imposed on the
tea industry and these varied from State to State. Revenue
earned by way of export duty, excise duty and cess is
presented in Table-6 below :
• Source: Dlredor Genc.·ml oj Commercial Illtelligence and Statistics. Tea Statistics. Various
Issues. Tea Bourd. I\olkata.
9
3. Features of Tea Industry
The essential features of the tea industry include (I) Farming and
Manufacturing. (ti) Geographical Locations. (iii) Marketing. (iv)
Exports. (v) Internal Consumption. (vi) Imposts. (vii) Labour and
(viii) Development Measures.
10
fermented leaves are put. The nature of drying and intensity
of heat affects the quality of tea.
11
c. Area-wise Distribution - Tea estates are distributed
according to the various size groups. Ninety eight per cent
of the total tea estates belong to the size group of upto
10.12 hectares and the remaining 2 per cent falls in the
size group of above 10.12 hectares. Out of this size group.
as many as 200 tea estates have average size holdings
between 50 to 100 hectares while about 300 tea estates
have holding between 100 to 200 hectares and 400 tea
estates are in the size group of above 200 to 400 hectares.
Moreover. a little less than 400 tea estates have size
holding above 400 hectares.
12
Table 7 PrImary Marketing of Indian Tea
1999 2000 2001
YEAR Qty. In .~ to Total Qty. In ~ to Total Qty. In j% to Total
Tb.kp Sale. Tb.kg. Sale. Tb.kg. Sales
NORTH INDIA
Calcutta Auction 87801 14.09 95926 14.97 94482 14.52
GuwahaU Auction 145072 23.28 159427 24.88 137794 21.18
Slligurl Auction 86789 13.93 79145 12.36 71791 11.03
Amr1tsar Auction 556 0.09 388 0.06 319 0.05
Teaauctioll.com - - 80 0.01 340 0.05
Sub total North India 320218 51.39 334966 52.28 304726 46.83
London Auction - - - - - -
Total Auctioll 320218 51.38 334966 52.28 304726 46.83
Export under Fe 32886 5.28 36032 5.62 34145 5.25
Ex-Garden Sale 270155 43.34 269758 42.1 311936 47.92
Total flale 623259 100 640756 100 650807 100.00
SOUTH INDIA
Cochln Auction 59632 29.42 66132 32.08 58995 29.04
Coonoor Auction 79285 39.12 70967 34.42 74555 36.71
Coimbatore Auction 20262 10 33274 16.14 2511B 12.37
Calcutta Auction 1371 0.68 2188 1.06 294 0.14
Sub total South India 160550 79.22 172561 83.7 158962 78.26
London Au(·tlon - - - - - -
Total Audlon 160550 79.22 172561 83.7 158962 78.26
Export under Fe 5543 2.73 6995 3.39 4850 2.39
Ex-Garden Sale 36583 18.05 26610 12.91 39304 19.35
Total Sale 202676 100 206166 100 203116 100.00
ALL INDIA
Indian Allcllon 480768 58.32 507527 59.93 463688 54.30
London Am'tlon - - - - - -
Total Auction 480768 58.21 507527 59.9:i 463688 54.30
Export under Fe 38429 4.65 43027 5.08 38995 4.57
Ex-Garden Sale 306738 :17.14 296368 34.99 351240 4113.00
Total Sale 825935 100 846922 100 853923 100.00
Source: Teu Statistics 2000·2001 i."slwd IJU Tea Bocml Q{ India. Koikala
13
Table 8 Quantity and Value of Tea Exports from India
[E%cludlng Instant Tea)
Year Quantlt)' Value 'Unit Price Year Quantity Value 'Unit Price
Th. Kgs Tb.Ra Ra./Kg Tb.Kgs Th.Ra Rs./Kg
1fl!'14-511 208462 1482316 7.11 1954 203195 1:107523 6.43
1955-56 IR:m39 1096448 5.97 1955 166708 1136132 6.82
1~56-::;7 2:nOf-lb 1451344 6.23 1956 237484 1428249 6.01
1~157-511
I ~58 :;!J
! }I t: .;~.):-)
21i".::.o:2
I 143fi435 7.49 1957 200786 1233859 6.15
1296!J53 5.97 1958 229503 1365859 5.95
IY5H-''0 21:')'I!j!J 12901:H6 5.99 1959 213680 1:.160135 5.9
19fiO-GI 1 19G47:1 6.22 1960 19:i063 1199883 6.21
l!l(j 1-62 ! 20532!) 122i(iHO 5.95 1961 206292 1242513 6.02
1962-63 220kfl() I 12\11;000 5.H7 1962 211826 1235339 5.83
1963-64 20!):l:.!H ! 12:JHiH5 5.88 I 96:} 223542 I 32a7 10 5.92
1964-65 212:1:1:; 121()(iri7 5.137 1964 2101123 1249012 5.93
1965-66 Hl73~:; 114f!:J74 o,.f!2 1!)65 19!X165 114(1747 5.77
1966-67 1903Wl 15621H9 k.21 W60 I 7~J205 1565921 8.74
1967·('18 2033:S:S 1801974 lum Iq67 21:JG76 1800384 8.85
1968-69 2ooB24 156:>092 7.7\'1 19fj8 208440 Imi4H25 7.99
1969-70 174112 1245029 7.15 l!)(j9 16H709 1205371 7.14
1970·71 199139 1k42470 !).25 1970 202016 14fi7533 7.36
1971·72 214:l17 1609204 7.51 1971 202052 1536678 7.61
1972-73 1932211 14729:35 7.62 I!J72 I!JHI95 1511439 7.63
1973-74 1902fjfj 14484!.l0 7.61 1!j~':1 IHHI92 1-\27072 7.58
1974-75 225057 22:35355 !1.93 1\174 :~ 11),):,3 1!l27972 9.16
1975-76 21140!) 2382!l4R 11.27 I 'rio, I :~ I"; I:.!'l 24411592 11.22
1976-77 242418 2954777 12.l!J W7Ii I ~,: l;'l"i I1 27:11364 11.69
':!: ;,';:i7
1977-7B
1978-79
1979-80
221522
177:127
20844H
56:17117
35!111!J3
37fJH!.I(i 1
25.45
20.25
18.08
IB77
Ifl7B
1U7!l
I Iii j(l;) 1
1~)' I~ .: " ,
I 54IGI57
:if,2H916
I '11' IH401
23.59
20.61
1H.12
1980-81 2317:~G 4:1527:\0 IS.7!! WHO 2:.!.·1()~~·1 I :·/.:'I)'l.n- I!U5
1981-82 224200 40r.8252 11-1.15 I!~HI 2412-1';
IWIV:I:}
I :",",,',:i2:,
1:' 1'2541 18
18.72
1,982-83 194090 369-\4H2 19.0:1 1!IH:.!
1983-84 202312 5575549 27.56 191:1:1 20H47£l II :dUiI ~,j 24.79
19H4-85
1985-86
198(;-87
217401
2142:14
196232
771:.11-189
647!17!16
57f)4783
:15.48
30.25
29.53
19H4
IH85
IUI:I6
217()40 7,1(>.:);,1
21·1021 I fi·I:,.~~lfi(J
20a14!1 I !i:-<'I'(:,)O
II :14.12
:12.49
28.59
1987-88 20lKlO 6277()k8 :H.I IHH7 20lHOI 1;; ";"IflG ~II.()()
Sollr("(~: Tea Slntfslics 20()()·:.w0 I Lo;SUl'U IJ!J Tt,(1 Docml (!( [lidin. KCllkata
14
v. Internal Consumption - Internal consumption of tea grew
appreciably. It was 31 per cent of total production in 1947
which went up to 78 per cent of the total production in 2004.
Thus the task before the government is to fix up trade
priorities. If the priority Is to make available tea in the
domestic market. the export front is neglected. On the other
hand. if the priority is to ensure maximization of export
earnings. the tea may not be available in the internal market
at reasonable prices.
There are various demographic. economic. social and
psychological factors that determine demand for a commodity
like tea in a developing economy like India. Income. prices of
tea and its substitutes and complements. change in consumer
.taste. preferences. population. social satisfaction. and health
aspects are some of the important factors in this regard.
Another factor is urbanization. the pace of which in the
developing countries is very rapid. The details of internal
consumption are given below.
Table 9 : Estimates of Internal Consumption of Tea in India
Year Internal Actual Increase Percentage
Consumption or decrease [Increase or
{in million kg} {in mllllon kg} decrease)
1971 221 - -
1980 340 125 56.56
1981 360 14 4.04
1982 372 12 3.33
1983 386 14 3.76
1984 400 14 3.62
1985 415 15 3.75
1986 431 16 3.85
1987 446 15 3.85
1988 462 16 3.42
1989 480 18 3.58
1990 500 20 5.65
19~-)} 511 11 4.1
1992 524 13 2.54
1993 537 13 2.48
1994 550 13 2.42
1995 562 12 2.18
1996 580 18 3.2
1997 597 17 2.93
1998 615 18 3.01
1999 633 18 2.92
2000 653 20 3.14
2001 673 20 3.06
2002 693 20 2.97
Sourc(' : Variou..'l issues q( tea Statistics. Tea Bot-ml. Kolkatu
i r OJ
.'11, \, L}-. ~.
'-:---:-~",,':~'.~,
~ \. I , _..
...
, .. ' ~
~. T S-'ENI..~rs 1 15
• •• .... &..
Central Levy
1. Tea Cess
(a) 30 paise per kg on .tea produced except in Darjeeling
Plantation Oist.
(b) 12 paise per kg on tea produced in Darjeeling Plantation
district.
2. Excise Duty
(a) Re. 1 per kg on tea imposed on 01.03.2002 has been
abolished w.eJ 01.03.2003. However. an additional excise duty
of Re.l/-per kg has been introduced w.e.f.01.03.2003 for
development purposes.
(b) 16% ad valorem on Instant Tea falling under heading 2101.20
,
3. Ezp0r:t Duty - NIL -
4. Import Duty
(a) 100% ad valorem on teas falling under heading 09.02
(b) 35% on Instant Tea falling under heading 210 1.20F
(c) 7.5% on teas Imported under Indo Sri Lanka FTA
(d) NIL - when imported for re-export under Duty Exemption
Scheme and/or by EOU/EPZ/SEZ units
5. Corporation Tax 35% plus 2% surcharge
6. Central Sales Tax
(a] 2% on teas sold at Kolkat.a/Siltgurt/Coonoor and Coimbatore
Auctions.
(b) NIL on teas sold at Guwahati Auction.
.
(c) 4% on ex-garden sale against Form - C
(d) 8% on teas sold to unreg~_,tered dealers.
16
State Levy
[A)Assam :
1. Assam Sales Tax
Ca) 2% on all teas sold through Guwahati Auction, Orthodox
teas are exenapted.
(b) 8% on sales outside auction but within Assana.
17
2) Inter-State ~e
3) Purchase Tu
Tea purchased for blending/packing but disposed of
otherwise than by way of sale in West Bengal : 1%
C) Tamil Nadu
1. Sales Tax
(a) 4% on sale through Auction
(b) 8% on sale through other than Auction
Infrastructure Surcharge 5% on Sales Tax
18
D) Kerala
E) Karnataka
19
4. Agricultural Income Tax
(a) Upto Hs. 1 lakh - 30%
(b) Above 1<5. 1 lakh to Us. 5 lakh - Rs. 30.000 plus 40% of
the amount by which total income exceeds Rs. 1 lakh
(c) Where the total income exceeds Rs 5 lakh - Rs 190.00
plus 40% of the amount by which total income exceeds
Rs. 5lakhs.
Source - Various issues of Tea Statistics
20
vii. Labour - Tea plantation in the country provides
employment opportunities to the rural poor living in the
remotest areas. It is a highly labour intensive industry and
engages maximum employment per household. Labourers are
employed in the tea industry both in fields and factory
operations. They are mainly resident and also outside
workers. Resident workers are the permanent labourers of
the estate whereas outside workers are temporruy and casual
labourers. Both resident and outside workers are again
divided into male. female. children and adolescent depending
upon the nature of the work involved. Productivity and
labour per hectare is given below.
21
State Dlatrict No. of Area Prod. £at AVI. Lab. Prodn. ProdD.
ERtate. lD. ba. lD. Dally per per perlab.
Tll,Kg Labour Ila. Ila. (kg)
Olissa 1 214 105 279 1.3 491 376
Hima.:hal
j-'n1desh 3(179 2325 1247 1033 0.44 536 1207
t
..
ChkkmallgahlJ"
---- --.-- -t-
..
2D
-----
14:lH
..-
:~!i21
-- - I-- . - ._-.--- ..
2!):11 1.77 24()(; I:ml
._--- ' - - - ' - -
Ilassall
-_.--
1
1 - - - - _.._ - - --
"95 ... .11 ""
..--. . .. -- -6ll
- -
... --_
],55 ..
:lO:S!)
f--- ...--.... _
- .. 1!J62
37 5407 3789 1.79
-1427
li:"';~x_;i"~\ :nUl,';;;;
Kamataka 2122 2548
.-
South India . 66"""' 2.9" IHI7 1112
Total All India i
112010 S04:I(j(j 8·lW22 121 O()~iS 2.4 W7!) 700
22
construction of new labour houses and ancillary buildings.
23
Ite.... Year Avg.
annual
1850 1890 growth
rate
Area under C'ulUvation (In Th. ha.) 0.75 152 504
Production [In million kgsl 0.1 57 1466
Avera~e yield (kg/ha.) 130 373 5
Source . Various Issues oj Tea SLaLlstlcs. Tea Board. Kolkala
24
The factors which accelerated the growth of the industry
during the period were mainly development of tea into an
industry in South India towards the end of 1895. formation of
United Planters Associations of South India [UPASII at
Coonnoor in 1894 and other Associations in Assam and
Bengal; appointment of Dr. Mann as the SCientific Officer in
the laboratory of the Indian Museum in Calcutta to cany out
SCientific Research enactment of Tea Cess Act in 1903 by the
Govt.. of India to raise funds for tea propaganda abroad.
imposition of a levy of 28 paise per 100 kg of tea construction
of Assam-Bengal metre gauge railway line in 1910. setting up
of Scientific Department in 1909 by UPASI undertaking tea
research exclusively in 1924. shifting of research station from
'Assam to Tocklai in 191] importance of developing domestic
market for tea in 1918. direction of making provision in the
India Tea Cess Act for propaganda in India and formation of
Indian Tea Planters Association in Jalpaigurt in 1918.
Per hcad consumption (In million kg) 0.1 0.13 25.00 1.20
26
IteDUl/putlculan Pollitiod as at the Percentagr ' Avg.
Increase llIUluaJ
commence- end of over growth
ment of plan Plan on 1951 rate
on 1.4.1961 31.3.1958
Area under cultivation 317 321 1.30 0.30
(In Th.ha.]
Production (In million kgs] 285 309 8.40 1.70
Avera!(e yield Ikg/ha.] 901 963 6.90 1.40
Export oftca (In million kg) 195 233 19.50 3.90
Value of export of lea 91 141 54.90 11.00
(in. crore R:;]
Unit vallie IRs. per kg] 4.7 6 27.70 5.50
f---.
Intcmal ronsumpllon 73 97 8.20 1.60
Ih) million kg]
Revenue from central 1.4 2.4 71.40 14.30
excise [In crore Rs]
Source . Vurious issues qf 1"eu SlatisUcs. Tea IJoa.rd. Kolkata
27
The major factors affected the growth of tea Industry during
the period were (1 J prevalence of long lasting Suez Canal
crisis in 1956 12) submission of Report on Plantation Inquiry
Commission [PIC) to the Govt.. of India 13) Issuance of Tea
Distribution and Export Control order ITDECR). 1957 141 Tea
Waste Control Order IlWCR). 1959 and (5) Formation of Tea
Association of India in 1956. The long pending Suez Canal
crisis hd~ nn adverse effect on tea industry causing hardship
1n transpeJrting tea to U K i.e. the highest buyer of Indian tea
and this resulted in conSiderable suffering to the interest of
the tea manufacturers.
28
Item./particulars Po.ition End of Pereentage Avg•
.. at the plan in IDcrealle annual
commen· March over growth
cement of 31.3.1988 1981 rate
plan on
1.4.1981
Area under cultivation (In Th.ha.1 331 345 4.20 ._
0.80
Produdlon (In million kgsl 355 376 5.90 1.20
Average yield [kg/ha.1 1070 1089 1.80 0.40
Export of tea (In million kg) 205 197 -3.90 -0.80
Value of export. of tea 124 157 26.60 5.30
(In crore R.,I
Unit value IRs. per kg! 6 8.7 45.00 9.00
Percentage of foreign exchange 18.5 13.5 -5.50 -1.10
canllngs from tea
Internal consumption 140 184 31.40 6.30
(In million kg!
Central excise revenue from 10.8 15.6 44.40 8.90
tea (In crprc Rsl
Sourre . Various Issues q( Tea Statistics, Tea Boar,t. Kolkata
29
e. Fourth Five Year Plan 1969-70 to 1973-74J - The average
annual rates of growth of area. production. yield. export.
internal consumption. central excise. were 0.5 per cent. 4.8
per cent. 4.2 per cent. 4.2 per cent. 5.6 per cent. 40.6 per
cent respectively.
Unit value (Rs. per kg) 7.1 9.2 ' 26.00 5.60
-- ---~-
Pcrccnla~c
(~arnings
of foreign
from tea
exchan~c ~.8 fi.7 I ·5.00 -0.50
-1-- ----
Intcrllill c:olllsumplion 203 2GO :t.G.OO 5.60
[In million kg)
1----
- ___ • __ R ___
----
Central (~xclse revenue from 13.2 40 20: tOO 40.GO
t.ea (In crorc RsJ
30
Items/particulars Position End of Percentage Avg.
as at the plan In Increase annual
commen- March over growth
cement of 31.3.1979 1974 rate
plan on
1.4.1974
Area under cultivation 362 374 3.30 0.60
[In TIl.ha.)
Production [in million kgs) 489 544 11.00 2.20
Average yield [kg/ha.] 1353 1455 2.00 1.50
f<;xport of tea (in million kg) 211 200 5.00 -1.80
Value of export of tea 193 362 87.00 17.40
(in. c:rore I~)
Unit value IRs.per kg) 9.16 18.12 97.00 19.40
Percentage of foreign exchange 6.7 5.9 -0.86 -0.20
carnings from tea
Central excise revenue 40 58.9 47.80 9.40
from tea [in crore Rs)
Source : Vwious issues oj Tt.'Cl Statistics. Tea Board. Kolkata
31
s... ·.", ...~. ,'._
32
During the Sixth Plan period. there was overall growth of the Tea
Industry. which was the cumulative effect on various policies or
strategies implemented by the Govt.. some of which are as follows:
1. A National Level meet was held on 3rd August 1981 under the
chairmanship of Mr P K Kaul. the then Secretary. Ministry of
Commerce. Govt. of India. and was also attended by the
representatives of Govt. of Assam. Wedt Bengal, Tripura. Kerala.
TamilNadu. Karnataka. Himachal Pradesh and the Association of
Tea Producers including small tea growers. Discussions were held
on the present and future prospects of the Tea Industry and
recommendations made for substantial reduction in excise duty
rates on both bulk and packet tea. reduction in agricultural
1m/orne tax rates. exemption from rural employment cess.
suspension of sales tax on auctions. full credit requirements at
concessional rates of interest to the Govt. of India. State Govt ..
and tea producers.
34
The industcy made progress during the Plan period except quantum
of tea exports and percentage of foreign exchange earnings. The
progress was the cumulative effects of various strategies. policies.
programmes. etc .. adopted during the Plan period. These are as
follows:
iii.
•
appOintment of Venkatachalam Committee of Tea Auction.
suggesting modification of stipulation of selling 70% of total
production through auction.
vii. convening of Tea ScIentists Meet from all over the World at
Coonoor under the aegis of UPASI to study the impact of
plant density & manuring of soil groups in tea gardens.
35
xii. setting up of new projects worth Rs. 7.55 crore covering an
area of 8000 hectares in Western Ghats in joint sector by
Govt. of Karnataka.
During the Plan period. the tea industry had undertaken various
development actlviUes which enabled step up of production. The
strategy of raising tea production includes. short. medium and long
term measures. Short term measures included cultural and
cultivation practtces. medium measures Incorporated new planting.
rejuvenation. pruning. replanting. infilling ctc .. while long term
measures includes attainment of 1100 m kg of tea in 2000 and
extension of planted area by another 53600 hectares. carrying out
infilling of about 38.500 hectare and 44600 hectares.
..
36
IteDlS/paJ1icular. Position End of Percentage Av,.
as at the plan in increase annual
commen- March over growth
cement 31.3.1996 1991 rate
of plan on
1.4.1991
Area under cultivation [in Th.ha.) 420 433 3.00 0.60
Production [1n million kgs) 754 795 5.50 1.10
Average yield [kg/ha.) 1794 1839 2.50 0.50
f----_
Export of tea (in mUlton kg) 201 205 2.40 0.50
Value of export of tea 1120 1165 0.40 1.80
(in. crore Rs)
Unit value IRs.per kg] 55.15 58.7 6.50 1.30
Average percentage of foreign 3.8 3.6 -5.30 -1.00
exclmn~e earnings from tea
Internal consumption 520 560 11.50 2.30
[in million kgs)
Central excise revenue from tea 75.5 79.4 5.20 1.00
[in crore Rs)
Source : Vanous Issues of Tea Statlst:cs. Tea Board. Kolkata
1950 31G 271'l.21 til'll 200.70 80.42 4.10 113.64 4.23 0.94859
._--
1960 331 :iI2.07 \171 193.00 119.99 6.21 173.79 5.28 0.84516
- -- .•._
1970 354 418.~~J_.11 H~ __ -_._-
202.00 148.75 7.36 241.31 6.47 0.75964
1980 381 5B!).17 1494 224.00 429.03 19.15 306.95 13.60 0.84665
.'_ f------ --"- f--..
1990 416 720.33 17:11 209.10 1104.15 52.HI 482.25 43.23 0.98678
'--- - - -----
.. --
1991 420 754.19 17~14 201.70 1120.31 55.51\ 501.58 40.31 0.99673
_ -- ... f-.----.-
1995 427 756.01 1770 167.10 IIDO.87 71.24 42H.:m 47.U9 1.02878
--f----. ---
1997 434 810.03 I1-1G5 202.!10 1721.1-14 1-15.7f) 4fj!J.02 66.89 1.03226
r---
1998 474 870.40 IH44 210.:10 22:3H,31 107.HO 442.35 76.43 1.03500
------
lBI.70 1902.44 100.131
1999 490 826.00 11385
f---
.. _f - - - - - - 4HO.71 72.80 1.03600
2000 504 847.00 11m) 206.90 11-198.62 91.HO 507.53 1-14.50 1.03700
_.
2001 510 854.00 1675 I 1-12. flO UlH2.11 92.13 463.69 86.70 1.03900
2002 511 826.00 I ;;').() 201.00 175:U9 H7.13 456.54 88.15 1.03956
Area in Ih.kg .• l'rodudlorl In Ill.KI-( .. Yield kg per hr.. Sale Qly In Ill.kg•. Sale price Rs per kg ..
labour In million lIumber
•
Source: Tea Statistics. Tea BcJl -ri. Knlkuln
38
Part Two : Nomenclature and Classiftcation, Flora
Biology and Embryology, Pollination,
Artificial Pollination, Genetics, Deve-
lopment in Plant Improvement,
Climatic Condition.s for Tea Growing
Districts in India .
5. Nomenclature, Classification and Botany of Tea
f. . Nomenclature and Classiftcation
Tea (camellia sincsis (L). O. Kuntze) is a highly heterozygous and
outbre~ding crop, exhibiting great diversity with form and shape.
The scientific description as wcll as nomenclature dates baek to the
early part of the eighteenth ccntury. Tea plant is broadly classified
as Assam, China and Cambodia types. The SCientific nomenclature 1s
as follows:
A. The China Plant Camellia Sinesis (L),
B. The Assam Plant Camellia Assamica (Maston)
C. The Cambodia plant: Camellia Assamica suI sp. lasiocalyx
(Planch. M.S.)
if. Flora Biology and Embryology
The morphological vegetative organs of tea plant are affected by the
parent plants and environmcntal C'Onditions but flora characteristics
are relatively stable and provide reliable basis for specific
identification. There is significant diffen'nce in flora characteristics
between Chinese and Assam tea varieties. For example, in length of
style and style ann; the number and length of outer stamens; size of
inter petals etc .
.
a. Pollination Tea plants showed an appreciable degree of self
sterility and invariably set a better crop of seeds with pollen
from another bush nearly four times that of self-fed seeds.
With efficient cross transfer of pollen, more than 3 percent of
total seeds formed will be self fertilized
b. Artificial Pollination / Hand Cross Pollination Healthy
flowering branches are chosen for artificial pollination. To avoid
contamination. open flowers and immature fruits are removed.
iii. Genetics
a. Cytology Chromosome number ts the bastc criterion for
differentiation between species. Cytological investigation on tea
, 39
i
studies the somatic chromosome (If different species and
varieties which shows a constant number (2n = 30).
b. Inbreeding Continuous inbreeding of a cross pollinated crop
species increases homozygosity. Homozygous diplOids are of
immense importance in plant improvement particularly in
crops like tea where genetic study is scanty.
c. Compatibility A study conducted by TRA. Tocklal revealed
that the degree of self-mcompatabillty was generally prominent
in China and Assam varieties than in Combodia. The inbred
progenies in all the varieties also showed segregation of
characters w1th loss of vigour which was maximum for China
plants.
d. Inheritance Because of non-availability of homogenous lines.
most of the characteristics of tea are polygenic in nature. The
pattern of inheritance is quantitative. Observations on the
inheri-tance of yield in biclonal crosses showed that positive
correlation existed between mean yield of parents and
progenies In crosses Involving widely different clones. But the
relationship broke down when morphologically similar clones
are used.
6. Development in Plant Improvement
i. Mass Selection Seeds were the only source of propagating tea
during the early years of tea cultivation. The first scientific attempt
to select inputs in North East India was made in 1860 by establish-
ing standard sources of tea seeds. The seeds from the particular
seed garden were known by the name of that garden or locality and
was called JAT.
it Selection Criteria for Yield Initial selection was done based on
visual characteristics of a plant like leaf and branching patt(~m. The
size of leaf is directly proportional to its weight.. The yield of a tea
bush is the product of the number of shoots multiplied by weight of
individual shoots. Further. area of plucking surface. density of
plucking pOints and weight of prunings are responsible for yield.
iii. Selection Criteria for Quality The following morphologIcal
characters related to quality are used for selections :
a. Pubescence - It Js the amount of hair on the under surface of
a young leaf. It has been found to have a Significant relation
with qualtty of black orthodox tea in various parIs of Iht>
world. However. no correlation could be observed between
pubescence and CTC.
40
b. Colour of Leaf - A better tea quality was produced by light
green leaved type. For liquor. colour and strength. over quality
and flavour. light leaved sections were better than dark leave
ones. •
Iv. Clqnal Vs. Seed Propagation The seed grown plants are not
uniform as their characteristics were governed by genotypes of their
parents and soil conditions. In some cases. yield and quality were
unpredictable. But. as the planters want a uniform plantation both
for morphological features and quality. tea plants were propagated
vegetatively. These were propagated by means of layering. budding C'r
grafting on root stocks to obtain seed gardens on selected bushes.
The standardization of the technique of single leaf internode cuttings.
practiced today. took a long time to be successful.
41
North East
Tea growing areas in this region lie between 24 degree and 27
degree latitude and 88 degree and 95 degree lengitude. Tea growing
areas can be divided among several distinct regions viz.
Brahmaputra and Barak Valley in Assam, North Bengal Plains of
Dooars and Terai as well as Darjeeling Hills. In the Brahmaputra
valley. tea is grown on both the banks of the river on flat land
between 50 and 120 m (160 - 400 ft) above Mean Sea Level (MSL).
In South India, tea area lies between BOC and 13°C on the slopes of
Western Ghat mountains and adjoining plateaus at elevations
rangIng from 800 to 2000 MSL. Some tea areas are, however,
situated above or below this. Climatic conditions of different tea
districts are gIven below :
42
Part Three : Planting and Processing Technology,
Manuring, Research & Development,
Thrust Area of Tea
8. Field and Processing Technology - The Changing Trends Over
The Years
44
h. Pests and diseases : Bio-control and integrated pest
management systems:
i. Tea chemistry : Quality parameters. increased cuppage
and pharmacokinetics; and
45
Part Four: Marketing systems, Aspects of Tea
Markets, Domestic Market, Export
Markets, Promotion
11. Tea Marketing - Signs of Maturity
Signs of maturity were obseIVed in the tea- marketing scene. which
was. perhaps. partly due to the effects of disintegration of the former
USSR and partly to the economic liberalization move stoutly pursued
by the then Finance Minister. Dr. Manmohan Sing. Early glorious
period of Indian tea marketing was restricted to production of teas
on Indian soil to suit the needs of British Blenders. Indian tea-
sahibs were happy to satisfy the visiting agents. pack the produce in
plywood' chests and put them on to the holds of vessels sailing for
London Port. The estates were largely owned by the Britishers (at
least the rich ones) and the accountants in London determined
prices. It was happy time. But. frankly. no marketing was involved.
It merely served as commodity suppliers for big business. This
situation continued for a long time through independence. !<'irst
shock came from Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERAl. which
was renamed as Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). A great
deal of hesitation regarding permissible share of foreign holdings.
lack of decisions usually with Govt. of India. led to shifting of
ownership of gardens. British planters were losing interest and
started developing an alternative source of supply for which Kenya
was found to be suitable location. That is. however. another story.
12. Loss of London Market
With the loss of London market. former USSR and East European
countries appeared on the scene. strengthened by a long- term
friendship treaty involving rupee trade agreement. Tea became an
important item in this pact. Within a short time. the share of former
USSR and East European countries surpassed 50 per cent of Indian
export quantum. So the need for exporting more than what India
could conveniently do was not strong. However. an ambitious
projection of 370 m. kg export by the tum of century. kept the tea
industry busy all the whIle. The slogan of need for exporting more
value added products like packet tea: tea bag and instant tea was
heard from all comers. It was all for Increasing the foreign exchange
earnings. Some meek attempts were made to popularize Indian tea
in foreign markets by way of subsiding advertising expenditure on
India exporters for their packs with the mention of Indian tea on it.
Foreign packers would also receive subsidy if they used a certain
47
percentage of Indian tea in their blends and advertised that point.
Funds for such activity were small and mechanism of payment was
complicated. As a result. real big tea marketers hardly cared for
such schemes. But year after year some money. which appeared
large in Indian context. but chicken feed in the context of global
operations. used to be dissipated. After the loss of USSR market
when exports fell sharply. there was hardly any scope for toying with
such experiments. Collaboration with global operators. attempts to
establish brand image. realizing need for consumer research.
production of Bio-tea and specialties etc. gave Indian tea industry a
smart appearance Convertibility of rupee as a part of liberalization
plan provided necessary support for taking right steps. Devalued
rupees had positively encouraged larger interest from general
currency areas. Indian tea was found more competitive in the world
markets. Breakdown of the buying system in CIS countries created
such an impact in the international trade that the normal rules of
demand and supply did not work. Export projection called for
substantial efforts in the field of marketing.
48
deals with marketing channels and Govt. regulations on tea disposal.
It refers to the complex system of institutions and operations. which
intervene between the producer of tea on one hand and ultimate
consumer who drinks his cup of tea, on the other hand. Among the
alternative means of disposal. the producer chooses the channel.
which brings the best price to him within the purview of Govt.
regulations. The marketing channel in tea is the pathway of
movement of teas through intermediaries from production in the
garden to the hands of the ultimate consumers within or outside the
country. Das committee in its study early in 1974 found that
marketing of Indian tea was done by a two stage process in which
the first stage was the passage of Indian tea as a primary product
via the various channels to (i) Indian blender packers (ti) Indian
loose tea wholesalers (iit) U.K. importers. (Iv) rupee country
importers. and (v) non-rupee-non-U.K. importers overseas. In the
domestic market. the second stage of tea marketing was two
compartment affairs. one of which was the marketing of packets in
India by Indian blender packers and the other was the loose tea
marketing system.
49
15. Marketlug Models of Tea
The seven marketing modes are discussed below:
i. Direct Consignment to London Auction:
London auction is the oldest and pioneer of institutional
marketing of tea in the world. Though over the years. the
quantity of Indian tea sent directly for auction to London is
corning down. still a good quantity of quality Indian tea is
shipped directly to London for sale.
ii. Direct Sale by Fonvard Contract to Overseas Buyers
This practice was very common in the first quarter of the
present century. Large buyers in the United Kingdom or the
East negotiated forward for the purchase of the whole output
of an estate, or for a part there of, over a period of one year
or more. The eventual disposal might take many forms. It
might be shipped direct to the buyers for general trade
distribution: it might be transported in varying qualltities to
different parts of the world. some of it might find Us way to
London auction: it might be retained at the port of shipment
to be blended and possible packeted there and reshipped to
various consuming countries.
iii. Consignment to Indian Auctions
Most of the tea produced in India is sold through the seven
auction centers situated in different part.s of the country. Here
tea is sold to t.he buyers through brokers. a middleman. who
sells tea on behalf of the #!rowers. The tea Is sold t.o highest
bidder under the usual Til les of sale governing such auction.
The seven auction cenlers of the country are Guwahati.
Kolkata. Silignri. Cochin. Coonoor. Coimbatore. and Amritsar.
iv. Direct Ex;/actory Sale to Indian Buyer
By this systcm tea is sold in the garden ilself. This applies to
sales from bought leaf factory. Tea produced in such factories
is more regularly sold ex-fadory to local collectors or dealers
through whom it passe& t.o merchants. from whom It lTlay be
sold in auction or by private treaty or be shipped. Some
estates located on the main road sell tca rather loose or in
packets to retail buyer .. at the factory door, although the
amount is less. This gives a quick return to the garden.
50
v. Direct Sale by Fonuard Contract to Indian Buyers
Buyers and sellers make a contract even before tea is
produced to sell it at a fIxed price later. This producer has to
sell the teas to the buyers at the agreed price, irrespective of
the price of tea later.
London AucUon 31.73 5.57 8.13 1.13 3.31 0.44 3.42 0.36
Singapore Auction - - - - - - - -
Total AU(~tI(}n 338.69 59.46 490.38 68.08 431.66 57.10 506.83 53.13
Export under 22.29 3.92 25.61 ~t55 30.02 3.97 45.31 4.77
forward contrad
Ex-garden sale 208.56 36.62 204.35 28.37 294.33 38.93 397.86 42.10
Total Production 1569.54 100.00 702.34 100.00 756.01 100.00 950.00 100.00
Source : Various Issues oj Tea SlalLo;lics. Tea lJoarrl. India
Notf! -Quantit!l In million kgs. (1). Percentage to total salt.' (2).
The buyers at the other end ~.f each of these channels are not dis-
tinct groups. There is considerable overlap and inter mixture among
them. To describe this inter linkage the buyers are categorized into
several main types viz. (I) Indian packeters (Ii) Indian (loose tea)
Whole sellers, (iii) rupee country buyers (iv) U.K. importers/buyers
and (v) non-nlpce overseas importers. Out of India's total production
of 950.00 m kg in 2004, quantity sold through auction was 506.83
m kg (53.13 per cent), export under forward contract 45.31 m kg
51
(4.11 percent), and ex-garden sale 391.86 m kg representing 42.10
per cent.
The frrst organized sale of tea through auction took place at Mincing
Lane in London. The East India Company sold its tea in India
House. privately till 1838 but after it lost its monopoly of the Indian
trade, all tea was sold in the commercial sale- room at Mincing
Lane. For the first five years after 1834 tea sold at Mincing Lane
was exclusively from China. On 10 lh January 1839 the first
commercial consignment of Indian Tea was sold in the commercial
sale-room by the east India Company. which was an event of great
importance in the history of Indian tea. As Sir Percival Griffiths in
The History of the Indian Tea Industry said. ''The first importance of
tea from the British territmies in Assam. consisting of eight chests.
containing about 350 pounds. was put up by the East Indian
Company in public sale in the commercial sale rooms. Mincing Lane.
on the 10Ih January. 1839 and exdted much cllliosity". This was the
first auction of Indian Tea. The first Indian Tea Auction Center was
established in Kolkata on 27 th December 1861. KoJkata Tea Broker's
association at tlrst conducted the auction. Since 1947. auctions have
been held in Kolkata under the auspices at the Calcutta Tea Traders
Association ICTfA). There are 13 auction centers in the world at
present out of whieh seven are in India. Tahle - 2 shows the dates
of establishment of the t(,<1 auction cCllters of India
52
deal in teas of then East Paktstan. now Bangladesh. Nairobi auction
market began sale on 7 November 1956 for the sale of African teas.
Nairobi auction market has since moved to Mombassa on 14 July
1959. Before the War. Amsterdam was an important auction center
for Indonesian tea. Sale ceased in that auction cenler in April 1940
but was resumed in January 1949 and then again suspended in
July 1958. Auction sale was inaugurated in Antwerp in 1959 and
later suspended in 1966. In 1960 auction started in Hamburg and
suspended in 1965. These two auction centers handled Indonesian
tea. Limbo auction market started operation in February 1970 and
Djakarta auction on 11 December 1972. Thus while London auction
market is "cosmopolitan" in nature. other markets handle tea of the
local producers.
,
19. Tea Auction Facilities
53
This is not the case with other products where marketing is an
essential input. The tea industry has attracted many investors
because it is in business straight away. without searching for
markets. The producers receive the sale proceeds timely. 14 days
after the sale. through a well established. system of ·prompts·. The
buyers have found the auctions benetlcial as they cannot only buy
at a central point but can watch the operation of their competitors.
They do not have to go from door to door for their requirements.
Even for private transactions auctions are the barometer. The
brokers have been ahle to evolve an effective system whereby
services are efficiently provided to both buyers and sellers. They have
been providing market intelligence. manufacturing and agricultural
advice to the producers and have regularly compiled useful data for
the tea industry. including statistical informat.ion. However. as the
countdown to the 21"' century begins. there appear to be some
cracks In the system. More and more producers are going in for
direct marketing. by passing the auction system. This trend is likely
to continue. as producers would like to exercise personal control
over their production. The major buyers have supported the auction
system in past. The former USSR bought the bulk of its quantity
through the auctions but the disintegration of the former Russia has
meant a change in Uwir buying policies and purchases for the
Russian Federation and CIS countries today are being done
substantially through private sales. Similarly other buyers. to secure
quantities. are buying tcas privately. In fact. the main supporters of
DaIjecling tca have shown a clear preference for private sales during
quality periods. The Tea Marketing Control Order of 1984 prescribes
that the producers must sell 75 per cent of their production through
seven recognized auction centers of India-Guwahati. Siliguri. Cochin.
Coonoor. Coimbatore and Amrilsar. This order. however. has no
teeth and. in any case. it is withdrawn as India moved towards a
free economy.
54
samples to buyers and printing information catalogue originated in
London. TIle same system. therefore. have been adoptcd in other tea
auction centers also. The auction mechanism has some definite
advantages: (1) the producers is assured of the fair price on the
prevailing market. (ii) assurance of continual flow of sale to the
producers without fear of a buildup in unsold stocks which may
happen in case of other selling modes in times of recession (iii) no
problem of bid collection as payment i~ automatically collected on
the 14th day (iv) the pushing nature of bidding in tea auction
improves price and helps in maintaining a similar price level for
comparable lots of tea (v) free sampling. which costs less than 2
percent. is a vehicle of salcs promotion ideal for a commodity of
such variety (vi) as the auction takes place publicity. the integrity of
sale in,implicit to a producer regardless of his situation from the
auction center or unfamiliarity with mechanics of trading.
22. Tandon Committee on Marketing
TIms the system of tea auctions. which Is more than a century old.
Inspite of views occasionally expressed to the contrary. all
committees and commissions set up in India and abroad have
recommended the continuation of the auction system as the most
efficient method of disposal of bulk commodity like tea. The last
committee to examine the auction system in India was the Tandon
committee. which submitted its report in November 1978. After very
careful examination of all aspects of the matter the committee
confirmed the need to allow auctions to progress freely. The
committee also recommended that efforts should be made to
introduce in different auction centers useful practices followed in
other auction centers and to achieve uniformity in rules in different
auction centers as far as possible.
23. Ex-garden Sale
The Tea Board constituted a committee to examine the role of mini
auction and recommended that experiments to be watched and
modus-oparandi and their impact on tea trade should be carefully
examined to decide the advantages and disadvantages. The
committee clearly envisaged the possibility of Mini Auction assuming
bigger role in coming years. What is more remarkable is the
committee did not decry ex-garden sale and took a certain portion of
teas produced being sold at ex-garden as a fait accompli and
indispensable from the point of view of products. particularly the
weaker section. The need for ex-garden sale arose from the common
wisdom of not putting all the eggs in the same basket. which
55
inevitably reduce price. Moreover. having some volume of ex-garden
sale is also important for maintaining a satisfactory cash flow
position since the sale through auctions it takes 3 t.o 6 months for
the sellers to receive the sale proceeds. In this back-ground the
stipulation under the Tea Marketin~ Control order 1984 that 70 per
cent of crop in 1984 and 75 per cent of crop in 1985 onwards
should be sold through pubHc auctions in India has been causing
serious financial problems for the products apart from reducing the
prices realized at auctions. Stipulation of minimum of crop for sale
through auctions in India was held good for two years Le. 1985 and
1986 but form 1987 on wards. the proportion started declining.
This was due to considerable delay in sale through auctions on the
one hand and reduction in prices as a result of too much tea being
available at. auctions. on the other. The existing auctions will also
find it extremely difficult to handle the largely increased volume of
tea smoothly and promptly unless their facilities are augmented. It
is. therefore, proved that other method of disposal of tea should be
allowed to playa growing rolc.
Tata, which organized mini auction. filled the gap to some extent. It
should be encouraged. Simultaneously ex-garden sale. which in 1995
and 2004 accounted for 38.93 per cent and 42.04 per cent to total
production. should be allowed to ('onUnue and if necessary to increase
depending on circumstances so that producers may receive the best
possible prices for their produce and sale proceeds may also be
received as early as possible which is essential in view of their tight
cash-flow pOSition. The quantity sold through auction in 2004
constituted 53.13 per cent of total crop. Over the ycars, the sale
through public auction in percentage terms started fluctuating and it
could be able to handle 45 per (~ent of the crop in immediate future
and still lower proportion in the following years. As a result. a bigger
role will be played by mini-auctions. LOlldon auctions. ex-garden sales
as well as C and F Export. Any dogmatic insistence on increasing
sales through public auctions in India without ('onsidering the
capacity of the auction centers on the one hand and effects of such a
policy on tea prices and financial position of tea producers. on the
other hand. wi1l only create utter mnfuslon In Ih(' tea Industry and
trade and an inevitable slump in t(~a prices. Mini auctions in
particular have a big role to playas a method. which lies in between
public auction and ex-garden sale. T7~il Board had drawn up a set of
model niles to govern. these mini-auctioJl so a~ 10 remove the scope
for undcr invoking and evils associatrd with public auctions.
56
25. AUCtlOD for BleDded aDd Packet Teas
There is a need for other innovative approaches. Auctioning of
blended teas and packeted tcas would be one such approach. It
should cover not only teas blended and or packeted by tea
producers but also tcas blendcd and or packeted by buyers of loose
tea. In fact traders rather than producers may take the lead in
organizing auctions of blended and packcted teas, which may be
purchased by second stage traders for either domestic consumption
or export. On immediate beneficiary effect of this approach would be
elimination of the oligopalistic hold on the matter for packcr teas
enjoyed by few packcrs with consequent reduction in prices for the
ultimately consumcrs who have to pay exorbitant priees for the teas
purch'lscd by them because of high profit margin enjoyed by traders
at different levels of distribution channels and do not p;et any rellef
even when auction prices decline. Table 3 indicates the percentage of
offerings through auctions since 1990.
Table 3 : Production aDd Sales of Tea
(Quantity in million kgs)
Year Production Sold through auctions Per cent sold in auctions
1900
[-._ ._--- 89.60
-----_._ 24.60 27.45
1910 119.60 34.50 28.85
1920 i56.60 37.50 23.96
1930 177.40 42.00 23.67
1940 2 fOAO .- 45.20 21.48
----
1950 275.50 113.60 41.23
.--.
1960 321.10 173.80 54. 1 ~\
-
1970 418.50
..- ..
241.30 57.66
1980 ~~j!:}.:lO :ill7.00 53.93
.. -
1985 656.20 fi05.:iO 77.00
1986 620.80 4(i8.40 75.45
19~7 0_I'!.:.=!9_ 4-72.50'- 70.07
1988 701. 1() :;04.40 71.9~ _ _ _ _
57
The tea market control order came into force from 19th April 1984.
It will be seen from the data that quantity of offerings went up to
1991. It however. showed steady decline. except 2004. With the ever-
expanding middle class in India. packets and branded goods •. ;·e
becoming more and more popular. The number of producer packet.
the sale of which privately permitted under the tea marketing control
order. has increased. The poly pouch with the "garden fresh" slogan
is popularizing packet teas in India. The consumer packets. packed
at the gardens. are sold directly and do not go through the auctions.
Improved communications have also helped expanding the private
sale market.
58
daUons in the third week of April 1990. As its first task. the
Committee identified eleven areas. These are (a) auction day. (b)
catalogues. (c) prompt date, (d) broker's commission. (e) size of lots. (f)
brokers commissions. (g) division of lots. (h) withdrawal of lots. (i) sale
of outlets, OJ warehouse rent and insurance. [k) closing of catalogues
and (1) distribution of samples. tor details examination. The Ahuja
Committee submitted four interim repo'l'ts and a final report. the
recommendations of which were accepted by the Chairman. tea board.
The main features of this report were as appended below:
59
seller by the broker should be the next working day Immediately
after the stipulated prompt date of the buyer. The committee
has also recommended that the auction committee should not
extend prompts unless the circumstances are exceptional.
iv. Brokerage - The sellers pay 1 per cent of the selling price
to the brokers as commission. However. in South India. the
brokerage is calculated on the selling price minus excise duty.
Furthennore. buyers pay to the brokers, for various services
rendered at. the rat.e of Rs 5 per 100 kg in Siliguri and
Guwahati. In the South there is no commission payable by
the buyers to the brokers but there is a system of "Jot money"
According to this report. henc.eforth. brokerage paid hy the
sel1er will be calculated on the "knocked down" prlee, thus
changing the current practice in the South.
60
viii. Sale Lot Outlets -: The Tea Board had earlier directed that
teas remaining unsold in the auction room should not be sold
as outlcts. The Auction Committees have the option either to
supplement the unsold teas in the following week's auction
without re-sampling or reprinting them in subsequent
auctions with fresh sampling. This practice is to continue.
The quantity of Indian tca sold through different auction centers in
India are presented below:-
Table 4 : Disposal of North and South Indian Tea Through
Various Auctions During 1984 to 2004
(Quantity in million kg)
61
the system prevalent in SUiguri and Guwahati finds
acceptance in due course and progressively.
Up to Rs 26.99 20 paise/kg
Rs. 27.00 to 49.99 50 paise/kg
Rs 50.00 to 99.00 I Re. Per kg
Rs 100 & above 5 Rs/ kg
62
29. Claims for Shortages, Non-Delivery, Damaged Teas - The
committee recommended that no claim for short weight will be
admissible unless the shortage exceeds 0.1 per cent of the declared
weight per lot purchased by any buyer. The committee recommends
that where lots purchased by the buyers are not to be found at the
ware house at all either wholly or in part, a compensation
amounting to 30 per cent of value of such teas should be payable to
the buyer.
63
be depended upon until demand for a particular brand arises from
consumer level. going alone in the world market to establish a blend
Is a tough job. Indian big business houses are glancIng at tea for
diversification for example lTC-who can use their overseas
connections not only for bulk exports but marketing a brand as well.
Internally most of the big tca companies are buying for better share
of their brands at the consumer level. As a result number of packs
have appeared in the domestic market leading a hcalthy compctition.
A commendable slep was taken by Bombay Burmah group by
creating production facilities for ecologically cultivated tea at
Singampatti-southem tip of India. There is a Wide-open area in
the speciality market.. taping of which calls for marketing skill.
There is no more a fashionable sloAan shouting and bureau tic
luxuries. It is hopeful sign that mature marketing activity is seen
today in Indian tea scene. Hopefully 2010 would begin with a boom
of innovative marketing process.
33. Production
In 2004. the Indian production should reach 950 million kg. which
will be second highest ever. Quality consciousness and the widening
price concertina have put bral~es on rapid growth of production. In
2007. if the weather is right. India should harvest a crop of 1000
million kg. It is also dear that_ unless new areas are brought under
tea cultivation. tea production will grow at a small rate of around 3
per cent per annum. Again, it is Ilecessary to renovate tea arcas.
which arc more than sixty years of age. A replanting programme of
64
two per cent per annum win ensure a rotation over fifty years. An
attempt was made in Union Budget of 2005 to go for Special
Purpose Vehicle for replantation/rejuvenation of tea areas by Tea
Board. It has however not taken a concrete shape.
35. Export
It has now become clear that the government of India will not
hinder. in any way. exports of Indian tea. Procedures are being
Simplified and restrictions have been eased or fully removed. The
Government of India and the tea industry have been working
towards improving per unit: returns from exports and value added
products have been gaining ground. Whilst it is unlikely that the
government will impose any resliictions on exports in the foreseeable
future. the pressure from the domestic market will limit the
quantum of Indian tea exports in the years to come. A strategy.
therefore. has to be evolved so that even through the export
quantities remain around 200 million kg. the value will go on
increasing. Barter deals and government-to-government buying
appear to be thing of the past and trading. in future will be done in
hard currency. The former USSR is today an open market and
although there is a preference for Indian teas in the Russian
Federation and CIS countries. other producers especially China.
which has a vast common border. would exploit the large potential
of this market. The producer exporters are already playing a major
role in certain importing countries and this trend is likely to spread
further.
65
36. The Auction System
The major tea groups. today, are increasingly marketing their own
teas either through domestic packers or direct exports. Whilst the
auctions will continue to be the barometer for price levels. more and
more producers are likely to go in for direct marketing. The smaller
producers who have gone in for direct marketing through soft packs
may find the going rough unless they start putting in the essential
marketing inputs like advertising ctc. as well. Their present method
of sale is Virtually bulk- marketing through a third party. The
quantity from these producers is likely to revert back to the
auctions.
37. Import of Tea
From time to time idea of importing tea into India has been mooted.
Importing cheap teas for domestic consumption will not solve the
problem. Indians drink good qual1ty tea and the imported varieties
will not suit their taste. Furthermore, if 40 to 50 million kg of tea
were to be imported. there would be a phenomenal price increase in
the world markets. India has to be very careful so as not to upset
the apple cart.
38. Promotion - Healthfulness
As consumption of tea in certain developed countries Is not
increasing, the time has come to give a new "position" to tea. The
world is today more health conscious than ever before and
"healthfulness" could be the new slogan for tea. The "cheapness"
slogan has to be discarded.
39. Quality
One way of increasing tea consumption, in the world market. is to
ensure that the consumer is served good quality teas. Producers and
importers of tca will have to make sure that sub-standard tcas are
neither produced nor imported. Universal acceptance of intematlonal
standard ISO 3720 wlll help in lifting quality standards of all
growths. India is perhaps the only country today, which strictly
follows rigid quality standards.
40. Culture Products
All the tea bagging machincli, in India is busy fulfilling export-orders
and some domestic needs. Out thc product of the future is instant
tea. Time is not far when a "drinkablc" pure Instant tea, which is
both hot and cold water soluble. will be on the shelves.
66
41. Bulk Packaging
While bulk packaging is still searching for an alternative to the tea
chest, paper sacks are being used more and more. The real answer
Ues in convincing the tea importers to accept gunny bags, which are
already popular in the domestic market.
In the overall. the future prospects of tea appear to be bright and
the tea industry in India is ready to face the challenges of the 21 st
century.
42. Marketing of indian Tea - Domestic Verses Ezport
Indian tea's popular slogan since Independence has been "world's
largest producer, consumer and exporter of Tea". In 2004, however,
Sri Lanka forged ahead and exported 238 million kg against Indian
exports of 205 million kg. AgaIn, in 1991 and 2003 Sri Lanka
exported more than India. Sri Lankan exports for these years were
212 million kg and 235 million kg respectively, agaInst IndIan
exports of 201 million kg and 202 million kg. Another feature of
Indian exports has been the sea change in its profile between 1947
and 2004. In 1947 U.K's share of Indian exports was 66 per cent
and in 2004 it has declined to 12 per cent. On the other hand, the
former Soviet Union, which bought no Indian teas till the 60's
became the major Importer of Indian tea, it accounted for 44.9 per
cent of Indian tea exports in 2004.
Table 5 : Country Wise Exports from India DUI'ing 1947 to 2004
(In mWon kI)
Country I year 1947 1957 1967 1977 1987 1991 1997 1999 2004
United Kingdom 127.20 135.40 117.20 74.30 22.40 22.50 25.40 25.00 25.10
% Of export 66.30 68.00 53.80 32.40 11.09 11.09 12.70 12.10 12.11
Ireland 9.00 8.30 6.20 6.40 2.10 2.50 2.60 2.50 2.50
% Of export 4.70 4.20 2.80 2.80 1.04 1.23 1.28 1.20 1.19
Netherlands 1.50 0.90 3.70 3.40 1.60 1.90 2.70 2.60 2.60
% Of exPort 0.80 0.50 1.70 1.50 0.79 0.90 1.33 1.27 1.26
West Gennany NlI 1.:Kl 2.20 5.80 4.70 4.70 6.90 6.60 6.65
% Of export Nil 0.90 1.00 2.50 2.33 2.30 3.40 3.20 3.21
Rest of West Europe 0.60 0.10 0.50 0.90 0.50 0.60 0.80 0.80 0.80
% Of export 0.30 0.05 0.20 0.40 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.40
Poland NIL NIL 1.80 5.30 10.70 11.90 14.00 14.70 14.75
% Of export NIL NIL 0.80 2.80 5.30 5.90 6.90 7.10 7.11
Yugoslavia NIL Nil 0.50 4.70 1.40 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.40
% Of export NIL NIL 0.20 2.00 0.70 0.10 0.15 0.17 0.16
67
Coautry I year UM7 1957 1967 1977 1987 1991 1997 1999 2004
Rest of East Europe NIL 0.10 1.70 1.40 3.30 1.00 1.60 1.40 1.40
% Of export NIL 0.05 0.80 0.60 1.60 0.50 0.80 0.70 0.70
USSR 4.00 7.30 20.70 47.70 96.60 1D4.5C 90.70 92.80 94.10
% Of export 2.10 3.60 9.50 20.80 47.80 51.50 44.70 44.90 44.95
Afghanistan NIL NIL 5.70 8.60 3.60 1.60 0.80 1.20 1.20
% Of export NIL NIL 2.60 3.70 1.80 0.80 0.40 0.60 0.60
Iran 3.90 5.60 1.80 6.60 18.90 14.80 11.70 12.80 12.80
% Of export 2.00 2.80 1.10 2.90 9.40 7.30 5.80 6.20 6.15
Iraq 1.40 0.02 2.50 4.60 8.80 - 0.10 0.04 0.40
% Of export 0.70 0.00 1.10 2.00 4.30 -. 0.01 0.02 0.02
Persian Gulf Ports 4.40 2.60 3.00 6.20 7.00 5.20 6.80 7.02 7.02
% Of export 2.30 1.30 1.40 2.70 3.50 2.60 3.35 3.40 3.40
Jordan NIL NIL 1.40 0.60 - 0.50 0.10 0.60 0.60
% or export - - 0.60 0.30 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.36
Rest of Middle East 0.60 0.30 0.05 0.07 0.30 - 0.20 0.20 0.20
% Of export 0.30 0.10 0.02 0.03 0.10 - 0.10 0.10 0.10
Pakistan NIL NIL Nil. 4.60 0.60 0.30 0.40 0.4 0.40
% Of export - - - 2.00 0.30 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.26
Japan NIL NIL 0.30 0.80 1.40 2.00 1.90 2.30 2.30
% Of export - - 0.10 0.30 0.30 1.00 0.90 1.10 1.10
Arab Rep. Of Egypt 1.80 7.30 16.60 14.10 7.80 7.90 7.20 7.60 7.60
% Of export 0.90 3.70 7.60 6.10 3.90 3.90 3.50 3.70 3.76
.-
Sudan 0.70 2.00 10.00 13.60 0.10 - 0.10 0.10 0.10
% Of export 0.40 1.00 4.60 5.70 0.05 - 0.05 0.06 0.06
--
Tunisia NIL NIL 3.80 1.20 1.00 1.70 1.50 1.90 1.90
% or export - - 1.70 0.50 0.50 0.80 0.70 0.90 0.90
Rest of Africa NIL NIL - 0.10 3.70
- - -.
7.00 9.80 9.50 9.50
% or export - - - 0.20 1.80 :1.40 4.80 4.60 4.60
-
Canada 8.20 7.70 3.90 2.50 I). SO 0.60 0.10 0.15 0.15
% Of export 4.30
- :i.90 1.80
-
1.10 0.40 0.30 0.05 0.07 0.07
USA 17.30 10.60 8.40 10.00 I.RO 2.50 2.90 3.30 3.30
% or export 9.00
_. 5.:30 :i.90 4.40 0.90 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.60
Australta 7.00 3.40 5.40 4.60 0.70 0.80 0.50 0.60 0.60
% Of export 3.70 1.70 2.50 2.00 0.30 0.40 0.25 0.30 0.30
--1-.
New Zealand 0.50 0.70 0.40 1.:,0 -- - - - -
% Of export 0.30 0.40 0.20 0.60 - - - - -
All other countrtes 3.60 5.00 0.10 0.50 4.30 8.10 13.40 11.95 11.95
% or export 1.90 1:50 0.05 0.20 2.10 4.00 6.63 5.81 5.81
Total 191.70 199.20 217.80 229.60 :101.90 202.90 203.00 208.1S0 201S.00
Same as Table ·1
68
Countries like Poland, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Japan, Tunisia and
even Germany bought no teas from India in 1947 but today are
strong supporters of the Indian produce. Iraq. Iran. Gulf. ARE have
been buying more but Canada. USA. Australia, New Zealand and the
UK. have reduced their purchased from India substantially. In the
57 years period since 1947. African Countries. particularly Kenya.
have been giving stiff competition to Indian eTe teas and have
gained popularity in the hard currency areas. Sri Lanka, on the
other hand. a major producer of orthodox. has been stepping into
the Indian orthodox exports and took credit for catering to the entire
expansion and demand in the orthodox segment. The only exception
has been the former USSR who has supported Indian orthodox
varieties strongly. Sri Lanka has been catering to the growing
markets, of ARE. Iran. USA. and Pakistan.
CoUDtry/yeu 1947 1957 1967 1977 1987 1991 1997 1999 2004
India 191.70 199.20 217.80 229.60 201.90 202.90 203.00 204.20 205.60
% Share 53.30 39.90 35.60 28.20 20.70 17.90 13.20 lR.50 IR.25
Sri Lanka 130.30 166.80 216.50 185.50 201.20 212.40 234.85 2~R.05 242.50
% Share 36.30 33.40 35.40 22.70 20.60 18.80 21.24 21.52 21.60
IndoneSia 3.90 38.80 26.60 51.30 90.40 109.6(J 103.90 102.5(J 104.20
% Share 1.10 7.80 4.30 6.30 9.20 9.70 9.40 9.60 9.70
69
Ccnmtly/yfIIII' 1947 1957 1967 1977 1987 1991 1997 1999 2004
lU:nya 4.40 8.20 19.70 70.20 135.00 191.60 245.50 251.10 255.20
%Share 1.20 1.60 3.20 8.60 13.80 16.90 22.20 22.70 22.73
Uganda 1.10 2.80 9.60 .14.70 2.10 4.70 15.20 15.10 16.10
% Shan! 0.30 0.60 1.60 1.80 0.20 0.40 1.40 1.40 1.42
Tanzania 0.50 2.40 6.20 12.00 11.40 15.00 18.80 19.90 20.95
% Share 0.10 0.50 1.00 1.50 1.20 1.30 1.70 1.80 1.82
Malawi 5.90 8.80 16.80 29.90 33.40 41.20 36.50 35.40 36.20
% Share 1.70 1.80 2.70 3.70 3.40 3.60 3.30 3.20 3.21
Mozambique 1.50 5.90 14.40 15.60 2.10 1.00 0.42 0.95 0.97
% Share 0.40 1.20 2.40 1.90 0.20 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.08
Others 20.20 61.70 84.40 180.60 277.50 338.40 223.23 213.60 216.15
% Share 5.60 12.30 13.80 22.10 28.40 29.90 25.12 18.93 19.25
Total sse.1SO 481UO 812.00 8111.40 878.80 1132.10 1108.70 1108.20 1122.72
In the domestic front also. the scene has changed. In 1947. Indian
consumption was only 39 per cent of production and in 1999 this
figure reached 76 per cent. In the past. the equation was "Indian
consumption equals production minus exports". In the eighties. this
equation was reversed and on several occasions. the government
restricted export to conserve tea for the domestic market. The details
of Indian consumption of tea in given below:
Partlcu- 1947 1957 1967 1977 1987 1991 1997 1999 2004
lara/Year
Consum- 98.5 112.9 180.7 302.0 446.0 520.0 635 670 740
pUon
Growth - 14.6 60.1 67.1 47.6 16.6 22.1 5.5 10.5
(% age)
70
indian Tea CODsumption - As Percentage of ProductioD
Partlcu- 1947 1957 1967 1977 1987 1991 1997 1999 2004
lIad/year
Consum- 98.5 112.9 180.7 302.0 446.0 520.0 635.0 670.0 740.0
pHon in
m. kg
Production 254.8 . 310.8 384.8 556.3 674.3 741.7 810.6 880.2 950.0
in m kg
% Of pro- 38.7 36.3 47.0 54.3 66.0 70.1 78.3 76.1 77.9
ductlon
The break-up of the Soviet Union has therefore had a strong impact
. on the Indian tea market. However. it gl'lined momentum over the
years. Russia and other CIS members did not cross 45 million kg.
Total IndIan exports thus touched 205 million kg. IndIan domestic
market continues to grow at around 2 per cent per annum. the
1999 domestic consumption was about 670 million kg. By 2004 this
figure was 725 m1ll10n kg. If export of 205 million kg is added,
production in 2004 was about 940 mUllon kg. The ere element of
Indian consumption is over 94 per cent. It is estimated that in 2010
the Indian requirement for eTC teas has been estimated at 1034
million kg. which would go up to 1050 million kg in 2012. State
Wise split of estimatcd consumption of tea is furnished below:
71
Partlculan/year 1991 1995 1999 2004
Kerala 33 37 40 44
Assam 18 20 23 25
Punjab 40 45 50 55
Haryana 18 20 22 24
Jammu & Kashmir 10 15 20 22
Kamataka 26 30 34 36
Others 30 35 40 44
Total 520 1595 870 740
Source same as Table - J
73
consumers w1ll not be strangulated with severe pressure of demand-
pull inflation? Where Is the guarantee that the industry will be able
to maintain exportable' surplus, as expected? These matters are,
indeed, related with the industry's social obllgatIon to two segments-
first, obligations to domestic consumers in terms of right price for
the right product at the right time; second, obligation to the nation
in terms of help1ng earn foreign exchange. Contextually, the
observation of Mr Jimmy Hilditch may be referred to. In course of
summing up the convention papers presented at the U.K. Tea
convention held in May 1993, the following table shows the future of
India's exportable surplus of tea.
India
Partlculan/year 1950 1960 1970 1980 1992 1995 1997 1998 1999 2004
Exports (m/kg) 181 193 200 224 190 167 203 205 206 205
Production 1m/kg) 278 321 419 570 704 756 810 870 880 950
Population (million) 354 429 539 675 869 915 935 937 952 1005
Per Capita (kg) 0,21 0,29 0,39 0,57 0,61 0,68 0,74 0,79 0,87 0.95
There are countries llke U.K. U.S.A., importing huge quantity of teas,
of course, high grade. to re-export them in the value added from. It
should not go unnoticed that international buyers are fast leaning
towards packet tea, instant tea and tea bags. So, it Is high time to
catch them young. Indian tea barons should realize this fact. They
should further appreciate that endeavour to re-export value added
teas will help to find new markets and to contribute more foreign
exchange in the national exchequer through nontraditional way.
This is likely to attract new investment also. This besides, two other
significant matter should not go un-escaped from our view. First,
India's overwhelming depcnder.ce on traditional buyers - RUSSia and
CIS, who were the principal buyers of Indian tea? Although, at the
moment, India enjoys comfortaqle posHlon the possibility of creating
discomfort by the Infiltrated s('Uers in these markets should not be
over~looked. The 'seller's market' at t.hat time was turned to 'buyer's
market'. Second. China Is preparing vigorously to exert Us pressure
74
in the international market. Tea is listed as one of the key export
commodities. Due to over-whelming importance of hard currency
earnings it was very likely that the China government proVided all
sorts of incentive to the tea Industzy. It is worth noting that between
1950 and 2004 total tea area in that country increased by more
than 7 times, 155,000 hectares to 1,115,300 hectares. Output
increased by more than 3 times over the same period from 255 m
kg to 950 m kg. Export-increase accounted for 10 times from 18 m
kg. in 1950 to 205 m kg in 2004. Nevertheless, China has the
greatest range of tea in different grades and varieties. China intends
to be at the top of the list of tea traders in the world market. And
no denying the fact, China may, at the earliest opportunity,
penetrate in the Russian and CIS market. Keeping in view this
possibility, the industry should right now find new market, which
may easily be possible with selling value-added teas.
47. Conclusion
75
world prices. And It is to be noted further that in volume terms
India is the largest consumer. Evidently, in the perspective of the
country's consumer behaviour it is doubtful that to what extent
importers will be able to sell the low grade imported stuff to increase
their profits and be able to exert dominant voice in the domestic
market.
It was unwise to view that once India started buying of low priced
tea, the price of its produce in the international market would have
fallen. Some Asian sellers would have been benefited out of this
transaction. From the viewpoint of open market economy, however, it
was felt that the aforesaid promise was not correct. In an open
market mechanIsm only the appropriate substitute and its price
played a dominant role in determining the demand of the principal
product the vice-versa. Since Indian importers intended to import
only cheap variety of teas, the price of Indian tea was likely too
remain unaffected until now suppliers entered the market. And in
this matter the only threat was likely to come from China- the Asian
Dragon-having a large variety and quantity of tea at its disposal.
In the light of the above study It was viewcd that there was no point
of becoming shaky even though the Ministry of Commerce allowed
free import of teas for re-exports in bulk as well. The only necessity
Is to remain alert against the unscrupulous traders who may take
the advantage of import liberalization policy of the Government of
India Just to further their own interest.
76
Part· Five: Oolong and Other Teas - World
Production, World Exports & Imports,
Producers and Importers of Green
Tea etc.
48. Introduction
Thc origin of green tea dates back to 1611 when the East India·s
Company established a factory for manufacturing green tea in
Hirado Island in Japan. Until about a decade ago, green tca was
mostly consumed in the producing countries in Asia and North
Africa. China is the main producer and consumer of green tea.
Green tea is getting increasingly more attention in the world markets
becahse of its health benefits. It ('ontains more vitamins and
minerals than black tea and produces many effects that can fight
infection and disease in human bodies. World green tea production.
consumption and exports are mainly dominated by China followed by
Japan. Indonesia. Vietnam. India. Bangladesh. Sri Lanka etc.
io Distinct Quality - Green tea is distinct from black tea in as
much as the brew from it on infusion of water is nearly
similar to the brew from fresh green tca leaves. This
characteristic Is maintained because of killing of enzymes
which cause oxidisatlon of phenolIc components. As a result
of aclton of bacterla and other micro-organisms. the green tea
leaf as also the black tea leaf. spoils easily. TIlerefore. It has to
be pt'eserved for use during off-season and transportation to
distant markets. The most prlmitive. and by far the cheapest.
method of preservation is sun drying which removes moisture
from tea leaves thereby preventing spoilage. Unlike black tea.
green tea is not fermented during its manufacture and the
green colour and the chemical composition is maintained to
retain the original characteristics. Green teas rich in caffeine
and tannins are qUite distinct because of their bItter or
astringent taste due to polyphenol1cs.
ii. Mantifacturing Processes - There are two distinct and
prominent methods of making green tea. De-enzymtng Is
typical of green tea processing which can be done through
either steaming or pan- heating. Rolling and tWisting can be
done either through baking or roasting. The Japanese method
uses the steaming process to deactivate the enzymes whereas
the Chinese follow the pan heating method. In both cases,
raw materials used are high quallty leaves and buds. freshly
harvested from green bushes.
77
iii. Conservation Ratio - On an average 4.2 to 4.8 kg of green
tea leaves are required to manufacture 1 kg of manufactured
black tea, whereas 4.6 kg to 6.1 kg of leaf are required for
making 1 kg of made green tea. Green tea is more vulnerable to
spoUage under adverse keeping conditions than black tea and it
has to be stored under controlled atmospheric conditions.
The share of green tea produced in total tea has been conSistently
increasing from 9.35 per cent in 1978 to 23.45 per cent in 1999.
Itables 13 and 141. However, green tea has less than 10 per cent
share in world exports of tea and that share has been fluctuating.
More and more green tea production js retained in producing
countries for domestic consumption.
Russian Fed
ti.56
C).OO
0.00
t9.55 ...4.52
0.00
-- f-------
0.(':(\
0.00
0.00
4.40
0.00
0.00
4.36
0.00
n eo
0.00
0.00
5.06
._-
0.00
0.00
5.30
f-.
0.00
0.00
--
5.01
0.00
0.00
4.42
0.00
0.00
4.27
--
0.00
0.00
---
USSR/CIS
Total Green
-to
13.29 14.40' '1.39
.. -
7.08 I 1l.60
.--- ---t_.--
i
_
f--- .
6.75
..
7.10 7.03 6.5H
167.06 162.32 3:)2.00 38tJ.b!l ·j:l4.21 431.26 425.15 432.17 445.32 486.50 514.72
4.93 4.55
Tea produc-
Uon 'Il! kg! I
78
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 ·1983 1984 1985 1988 1987 1988
% share of 9.35 8.93 19.05 20.53 21.79 21.00 19.39 18.88 19.56 20.78 20.79
Green Tea
In total tea
produced
IIJ118.00 1890.00 1991.00 1992.00 1993.00 1994.00 1995.00 1998.00 1997.00 1998.00 1998.00
India 1.62 1.59 1.82 1.67 1.27 1.25 1.43 1.41 1.35 1.34 1.23
Bangladesh 0.19 0.27 0.24 0.20 0.16 0.19 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04
SrUanka (Med) 0.19 0.18 0.15 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.06
Indonesia 6.57 6.58 6.13 6.22 5.62 5.66 5.76 6.13 5.88 5.90 5.54
China 63.51 64.32 66.46 69.04 71.61 71.67 72.28 71.89 72.41 74.61 74.44
Japan 18.29 17.39 16.35 16.36 15.68 15.35 14.8] 15.10 14.90 ]2.83 ]3.26
Vietnam 4.51 4.60 4.54 4.48 4.41 5.00 5.17 5.04 5.07 4.82 5.09
Georgia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.29 0.26 0.36 0.33
Russian Fed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01
USSR/CIS 5.13 5.07 4.31 1.96 1.02 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Green 494.91 5]6.91 537.73 562.46 587.54 562.10 572.44 587.32 612.02 643.62 667.61
Tea Produc-
Uon (mkg)
% share of 20.24 20.:"6 20.84 23.09 23.04 22.32 22.70 22.23 22.53 21.73 23.45
Green Tea In
total tea
produced
Source : various Issues oj rrc Bulletin. London
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1988 1987 1988
Indla(e( 3.77 3.27 1.44 4.58 4.32 4.93 1.58 2.23 2.59 5.72 3.21
Srllanka 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 ] 1.33 1.10 1.74 1.89 1.23 1.35
Indonesia 0.05. 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.31 0.15 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.21 0.14
China 60.75 61.82 67.57 64.82 70.96 69.96 83.40 83.22 85.07 84.41 84.07
(Mainland)
Taiwan 20.38 19.10 14.66 12.18 5.25 6.46 3.66 3.37 3.05 1.70 2.11
Japan 4.55 3.99 3.70 4.18 3.90 2.96 3.80 2.42 1.69 1.27 1.32
Vietnam 10.50 11.65 12.48 14.09 15.16 14.22 6.27 6.86 5.57 5.46 7.81
79
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1988 1987 1988
Total Green 74.25 76.38 72.10 63.88 62.67 70.33 71.80 72.69 71.77 82.38 93.51
Tea Exports
mkgl
% of Green 9.24 8.98 8.39 7.50 7.64 8.08 7.63 7.65 7.38 8.47 9.03
Tea
% of Green 44.46 47.1!i 20.48 16.51 14.78 16.32 16.89 16.87 16.13 16.92 18.16
Tea Prod'n
exported
% of Green 55.54 52.85 79.52 83.49 85.22 83.58 83.11 83.13 83.87 83.08 81.84
Tea Prod'n
retained
1889.00 1990.00 1981.00 1993.00 1983,00 UIIH.oo 1991S.00 11198.00 1997.00 1998.00 1899.00
Indla(e! 2.93 3.15 3.09 2.47 2.69 2.94 3.65 4.10 3.08 2.30 2.07
Srtlanka 0.02 0.44 0.03 0.40 0.62 0.73 097 0.55 0.49 0.36 0.38
Indonesia 1.48 1.82 2.67 4.48 10.08 7.43 3.93 5.91 4.51 2.71 5.06
China 85.83 86.92 86.86 85.41 79.36 81.00 81.38 76.34 80.94 85.78 83.99
(Matnland!
Taiwan 1.78 1.06 0.91 1.05 0.69 0.74 0.99 1.59 0.71 0.27 0.38
Japan 0.62 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.27 0.30 0.56 0.58 0.51 0.50 0.52
Vietnam 7.33 6.30 6.18 5.94 6.28 6.B5 8.52 10.93 9.76 8.06 7.60
Total Green 74.25 76.38 72.10 63.88 62.67 70.33 71.80 72.89 71.77 82.38 93.51
Tea Exports
(mkgJ
% of Green 9.10 8.39 9.02 9.95 9.67 9.91 7.53 6.51 8.13 10.05 11.64
Tea
% of Green 20.66 18.41 18.05 17.98 18.95 18.17 14.37 12.47 15.90 20.22 21.68
Tea Prod'n
exported
% of Green 79.34 81.59 81.95 82.02 81.05 81.83 85.63 87.53 84.10 79.78 78.32
Tea Prod'n
retained
RO
Table U5 : Countries Importing Green Tea
1% 8hare)
81
Fresh leaves
~
Spreading
~
De-enzyming
~
Rolling and twisting
+ ~
Pan Roast Drying Bake drying machine
~ ~
Roasted Green Tea Baked Green Tea
+ +
Long shaped Round shaped
82
Table: 16 Analysis of Per Cent Share of Exports of Green Tea
from China 82.80 Per Cent Share of World Exports of Green Tea
{l990-99 averages}
83
Table 17 : Quantity-wise Analysis of Green Tea Ezports from
China 82.80 Per Cent Share of World Ezports of Green Tea
{1990-99 mkg average.}
Average CV Growth Rate MIn. Maz.
France 3.63 96.76 8.59 0.41 12.51
USSR/CIS 12.11 49.34 3.67 1.33 18.91
USA 4.6 16.11 -2.61 3.31 5.66
Afghanistan 4.15 50.11 -5.2 2.14 8.93
Hong Kong 4.48 61.54 -17.19 0.7 8.64
J!:tpan 2.71 40.21 0.21 0.83 4.28
Pakistan 3.61 37.63 11.61 0.91 5.38
Algeria 2.54 90.05 0.16 5.85
Libya 2.44 98.19 0.53 7.83
Mali 2.57 106.37 46.96 0.15 6.96
Morocco 19.82 39.46 -6 8.23 31.23
NiR;eria 3.82 36.62 1.42 6.33
Senegal 5.32 52.82 16.05 2.59 11.67
Tango 2.23 50.08 7.45 0.95 4.19
Other countries 13.3 43.44 8.2 7.52 24.18
Total Exports 85.94 22.23 0 55.87 121.63
Source: Variow; issues qf rrc: Bulletin. London
USA
_- --
(I)
4.57
(2)
5.58
(3)
5.80
(4)
4.00
(5)
2.33
(6)
2.11
(7)
2.56
(8)
3.47
Afghanistan 1.23 4.12 1.68 1.43 3.81 3.61
Hongkong 32.45 30.95 27.11 22.41 18.61 17.08 15.48 18.54
Japan 40.35 48.96 44.JO 36.12 44.64 57.47 57.67 49.95
MalaYSia 3.36 3.37 I.Yl 2.32 2.18 2.43 2.43 2.33
Mon!l;oUa !1l9 0.00 2.94 I:um 0.04 0.25 0.02
Singapore 2.30 3.\9 4.03 4.19 6.44 6.48 3.46 4.07
Other countries 7.79 7.87 12.8R 12.95 24.07 12.74 14.57 18.03
Total exports ImkgJ 23.1G 25.72 24.76 27.08 :i2.12 31.69 32.83 36.54
84
Table 19 : Ezporta of Other Tea from China
{1990-99 average.}
Quantity-wise (mkg)
Country Average CV Growth Rate Min. Max.
USA 1.19 30.7 2.24 0.67 1.73
Mghanlstan 0.8 51.48 0.3 1.32
Hongkong 6.52 15.38 -1.43 5.08 7.96
Japan 15.5 31.68 10.19 9.35 24.57
Malaysia 0.87 41.5 8.06 0.47 1.81
Mongolia 0.96 151.45 0 3.76
Singapore 1.21 43.78 3.94 0.53 2.07
Other countries 4.84 47.03 16.83 1.8 7.73
Total 31.44 20.75 6.73 23.16 44.38
Source : Various Issues oj rrc Bulletin. London
85
materta11s the same as In Sen-cha, but the first process Is
parching in place of steaming. It has a curly appearance.
Bancha is coarse tea, made of coarser leaves, or by separating
from raw Sen-cha in the refining process.
Source: Kunio 0 Tea Industry in Japan "Tea Science and Human
Health" Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tea
Technology. Kolkata.
Table 20 : Exports of Green Tea from Japan
{1990-99 _e...,e.}
1984 198& 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Green Tea % 98.03 97.62 96.03 94.49 97.62 94.63 87.89 87.54 88.62 92.99 90.14
Green Tea 2.73 1.76 1.21 1.05 1.23 0.64 0.28 0.25 0.26 0.31 0.31
[mkg]
Total tmkg) 2.79 1.81 1.26 1.11 1.26 0.S7 0.32 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.35
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 AVI· CV Growth MID. Maz.
Rate
Green Tea % 93.7 86.21 86.03 86.47 91.18 89.08 3.14 -0.02 86.03 93.7
Green Tea 0.46 0.43 0.5 0.65 0.76 0.42 41.41 5.45 0.25 0.76
fmkgl
Total [mkg) 0.49 0.49 0.58 0.75 0.83 0.47 41.46 5.48 0.29 0.83
Source : various Issues oj rrc Bulletin. l..ondon
fif. India - India produces only a small quantity of green tea. Its
share in green tea production has been declining from 4.72
per cent in 1978 to 1.23 per cent In 1999. During 1993-94
India exported 3.36 m kg (nearly 84 per cent of green tea
production) to Afghanistan and Russia. In 1999 India exported
around 3 m kg having a 2.07 per cent share in world exports.
Although India is not a large consumer of green tea, In the
hilly regions of Kangra and Kashmir valleys. green tea goes
well with low temperatures. In some Indian markets green tea
is also sold as herbal tea usually mixed with aromatic
condiments.
86
53. Process chart of Incllan Green Tea
+
Made Sin Cha
+
Storage
87
Table 21 : Percentage share .and unit value of exports of greeD
tea from Indonesia 4.86 Per Cent share of World GreeD Tea
Exports
{1990-99 aye...,_}
Quantity-wise (mkg)
Avg CV Growth Rate Min. Max.
Green Tea 5.05 56.67 7.06 1.73 11.23
ii. Morocco - Morocco has the largest market for green tea
having Import.eci as much as 35.23 m kg in 1999 and almost
88
all of that came from mainland China. Imports of green tea in
Morocco have been rising and so also its share in the world
imports. During 1990-99, Morocco imported an average of
33.67 m kg having a 51.62 per cent share at a moderate unit
import price of US ~ 2.10. Imports from China have been
consistently increasing [98.4 per cent share In 1999J. Per head
consumption of tea in Morocco is in excess of 1 kg.
89
vii. canada - In 1999 Canada imported 2.58 m kg of green tea.
Imports have been increasing consistently and exhibiting a
good growth. rate. China. Hong Kong. Japan and Taiwan are
the main sources although US also had nearly 34 per cent
share. Green tea from Taiwan fetched the highest price at
USS 4.49 per kg whereas China. Hong Kong and USA teas
fetched under US$ 3.5 per kg.
90
Part Six : Current Tea Trends, FAO Projections
Domestic Consumption, Imports,
Research & Development etc.
56. Current Tea Trends
Next to water. tea is the most widely consumed non-alchoholic
beverage world over and it is grown in more than 32 countries.
Amongst them. India is the largest producer (28% of the world
production). World Tea Trade is going through a significant change.
While developed markets stagnate. growth is expected in the
developing countries. These markets have now been opened in the
wake of wro regime. This Will facllitate increasing global competition
In the areas of cost, price. quaUty. supply schedules. packagIng.
market focus and customer satisfaction.
In India. tea is grown in 13 States with diverse agro-cItmaUc
conditions. Tea productlon in India has been increasing and so also
has domestic consumption. Increased production in tea was achieved
by enhanced productivity through introduction of high-yielding clonal
material. improved water management and transferring results of
research to the field. Further. cultural practices such as pruning
cycles. proper use of fertilizers and foliar applications of nutrients
and plant protection measures using safe chemicals have increased
yields. Production also increased on account of increased plant
density and rehabilitation of old tea lands through replanting. using
the best available planting materials and better husbandry. Vast
resources of skilled and motivated workers. competent managerial
manpower. strong research backing. modernized and upgraded
manufacture etc .. have all contributed to a sound base and
progressive industry. The growth profile in terms of compound
growth rate of area. production. productivity. yield and exports
during the last five decades is given below :
Table 23 : Growth rates of area, production,
yield and export of tea
Period Area Production Yield Export
-
1950-60 0.45 1.16 0.98 -0.39
1960-70 0.74 2.98 1.98 +0.47
1970-80 0.67 3.48 2.37 +1.06
1980-90 0.96 2.03 1.48 -0.68
1990-00 0.53 1.35 0.83 -0.34
2000-01 0.67 2.19 1.53 -0.03
Sourc:e : X PWe Year Ran. Report Oft sub-group on Plantation Crops n - Ministry oj Commerce
91
57. Food and AgrIculture Organisation (FAO) Projections for 2005
59. Imports
92
domestic market. Protecting the home market is going to be a
challenging task and the Tea IndusUy has to evolve some strategy to
counter the new competing forces unleashed by globalization.
93
Quality Improvement In Tea has been achieved through
training, modernization of factory, upgrading of plucking
standard and Improving sanitation and hygienic situations.
ISO-9000 and HACCP as a package for quality improvement.
have been introduced.
-
Sustainablllty is a rna_lor prohlem in Tea. It Is observed that
Tea productivity is not Increasing In the replanted areas. This
has been linked to soil Sickness. reasons for which are not
94
well established. Bio-agriculture Is a new research area, which
can give answers to the problems as indicated, in organic tea
estates with stable yields.
95
Part Seven : Exports Markets & Competitiveness
62. Introduction
97
IDdia Sri Lanka Kenya
Infrastructure
Transport and communications Weak Average Weak
Marketing Average Weak Strong
R&D Average Weak Average
Extension Average Weak Strong
Marketing Environment
Key market's size and growth rate Strong Average Average
Income and growth of income tn key markets Weak Average Strong
Price position In key markets Weak Strong Strong
Competitive strength Weak Average Average
Micro-marketing and co-ordination
Prod uction I Marketing co-ordination Strong Weak Strong
Local Processing and linked industries Strong Strong Average
Quality control - Strong Strong
Risk shartng - Strong Strong
Technical. finanCial and managerial skills Weak Average Strong
Cost structure Average Weak Strong
Marketing strength Average Average Average
Product Innovation Strong Average Weak
Source: ReproducedJrom World Bank (1997/. Sri Lanka's Tea Industry. Discussion
Paper No. 368 Wa.shington DC. August p.86
98
Comparing relative position in terms of market share rate of growth in
market share and unit value realisation yields a good understanding of
competitive position which are summarized in Annexure-m.
For illustration, Kenya is the market leader with 28 per cent of the
total World Tea Market. comprising UK. Pakistan. Egypt and Ireland.
In contrast, India is a market leader only in 16 per cent of World
tea market which includes Russian Federation. Poland and Germany.
For Sri Lanka leadership is of 2.5 per cent markets. China leads in
7.5 per cent for markets but a large share of that is in green tea.
Argentina has a market leadership in USA. which commands a 7.53
per ccnt share in the world imports (Annexure-ID).
Analyzing markets in this framework. an understanding of and
evaillating the competitive pOSition. would help the tea industry to
develop competitive products and market strategy. After all.
Paulskrugman puts it. "A country does not loose in the competitive-
ness game but performance of firms do. An individual firm is
competitive and it can "sell its goods at the market price and make
money". Otherwise the firm goes bust but the economy does not.
However, in case of tea. economies of small nations would also falter
if their firms fail to compete. Thus consequences of uncompetitive-
ness could be a disaster for both countries as well as firms
depending upon how important tea imports are to their economies.
To that extent. India. as a nation. has a large cushion and that is
probably the reason for our complacency and lack of competitiveness
in world markets.
64. Area, Production and Exports of Tea of Different Countries
Although as many as 34 countries are producing tea in the world,
the major countries are India, China, SriLanka. Indonesia. Kenya,
Uganda. Myanmar etc. On an average. India has an area of 498
thousand hectare with an average annual production of 830 million
kg showing an average yield of 1666 kg per hectare. Sri Lanka. on
an average. cultivates tea to the extent of 191 thousand hectare
producing average an annual crop of 295 million kg with the yield
rate of 1545 kg per hectare. In spite of the fact that China occupies
more than twice the area (average of I 115 thousand hectare) held by
India, the production was not Significant it was only 689 million kg
on an average. This was due to low yield rate [618 kg per hectare).
On the export front. Kenya exports 93 per cent of total production
followed by Sri Lanka at 83 per cent. Indonesia 66 per cent. China
36 per cent. India 24 per cent etc. There are various reasons for low
exports from India and these are discussed separately in Part VII.
99
Table 26 : Area, Production and Export. of
Tea of Different Countries
a. Area Under Tea In Different Countrle. (Area In '000 hectare.,
Year Inella Srl Lanka Cblna IadoDeUa KeDy& Ueanda MyaDJIUII' athe.... Total
1989 415 221 0 129 87 21 58 555 2551
1990 416 221 1061 135 97 21 59 550 2560
1991 420 222 1061 137 100 21 58 551 2570
1997 434 194 1076 154 118 20 67 627 2690
1998 474 195 1056 157 118 20 68 604 2692
1999 490 195 1130 157 120 20 68 512 2692
2000 504 189 1089 157 122 21 68 515 2665
1141 161 132 21 514 2735
.1
2001 509 189 68
2002 512 189 1155 162 132 21 68 517 2756
b. Production of Tea In Different Countrle. [gty In mWion
Year Inella Srl Lanka Chlna IDdoDuia KeD,.a U,anda Myanmar athe.... Total
1989 688 208 525 147 181 5 50 689 2503
1990 720 234 540 161 197 7 36 689 2584
1997 731 278 665 158 240 20 54 738 2883
1998 798 280 670 159 245 22 57 721 2952
1999 825 284 676 161 249 25 60 693 2973
2000 847 307 683 157 236 29 60 673 2992
2001 853 296 702 161 294 33 60 692 3091
2002 826 310 715 166 287 34 60 701 3099
c. Ezport. of Tea from DlfIerent Countrle. IQty In mWion kg.)
Year India Srl Lanka China Indone.l. Kenya Uganda MyanlDU ptheno· Total
1989 213 204 204 115 163 3 5 218 1125
1990 210 215 195 111 170 5 5 224 1135
1997 188 256 194 105 220 18 25 244 1250
1998 189 260 195 102 230 20 25 234 1255
1999 191 262 194 99 242 22 25 225 1265
2000 207 280 228 106 217 26 25 245 1334
2001 183 288 250 99 258 30 25 262 1395
2002 201 290 253 100 268 31 25 264 1432
Source : T(.'Q statistics. T(."Q Board oj India. Kolkata
Note : CD Others' Indude I3anWadesh. Taiwan. Japan. Vietnam. Papua & New Guinea. USSR!
CIS. Iran. Turkey. Tanzania. Malawi. Mozambique. Zaire. Mauritius. Rwanda.
Burundi. Cameroon. Argentina Brazil. PI·ru. Ecuador. Zimbabwe. Thailand. Malaysia.
South Africa. Australia. Ethiopia and Nepal.
Others' Indude Bangladesh. Taiwan. Japan. Malaysia. Vietnam. Papua & New
Guinea. Iran. Turkey. Mala~. Mozumblque. Zaire. Mauritius. Rwanda. Brundl.
Argentina. Brazil. Peru. Ecqu...!or. Zimbabwe. Cameroon. Thailand. Nepal. Myanmar.
Geor~la. Ethiopia and South Afrl(·a.
100
Part Eight : Constraints, Suggestions & Remedial
Measures
65. CODstraints
Viewed from long-term perspectives. the Indian Tea Industry has
several constraints that are directly affecting both production and
productivity. The following are some of the important constraints.
)- Old age of tea bushes - Nearly 40 per cent of present tea plants
in India have exceeded the economic threshold age limit of 40
years. This has been affecting productivity.
» Umited availability of land for extension in traditional areas of tea
cultivation.
» Slower pace of replantation. the rate of replantation Is less than
0.4 per cent as against the desired level of 2 per cent
» Fluctuations in tea prices.
» Higher rate of taxation on income from tea.
» The dual structure (agriculture and industIy) of Tea IndustIy has
resulted in the IncIdence of hIgh taxes. some of which are not
applicable to non-plantation agriculture.
• Stiff competition from soft drinks is needed to position tea as a
health drink.
)- Poor drainage and lack of irrigation when needed greatly reduces
yield.
)- There Is consIderable gap between potential and current tea
yields.
)- Low productivity and high cost of production on account of high
input cost particularly wages and the social benefits that always
with wages. reduce attractiveness of tea production.
)- Untrammeled growth of small growers and poor adherence to
quality production norms.
66. Cost of Production
Labour cost accounts for a major part of the total cost of production
of tea which has been Jising sharply. The stagnation in productivity
101
levels Is compounded by high land labour ratios. The productivity
and cost of production matters the most in determining the
profitability of tea estate. Considering the high cost and inadequate
resources. the owners of tea gardens prefer to continue with the
existing tea bushes for reasons of economy.
102
)0 Indian teas are getting edged out of emerging higher growth
markets by competing produce from Sri Lanka, Kenya and China.
)0 A large market l1ke Pakistan which accounts for 9% of world
imports remains closed to India. Black eTC tea from Kenya
dominates consumption in Pakistan. Though Indian Tea would
work out cheaper on landed cost basis in Pakistan, trade in tea
remains marginal because of political sensitivities.
)0 Stagnant export reaUsation.
)0 Limited presence in emerging markets.
)- Market share depleting in matured markets.
)0 Tea'exports constitute less than 2 per cent of India's export revenues
and hence it has not been covered under the priority list.
» Given policIes and regulations are oriented towards protection of
domestic market: availability of tea in domestic market and price
stabJlity are the over riding concerns dictating policy fonnulation.
India's competitive position has weakened in the world tea trade due
to various reasons which are discussed in various interaction meets/
work shops/seminars etc of national and international nature. The
following factors are held responsible for such weakness:-
);> India's tea exports are facing a double crunch with a production
slow down and loss of share in major markets sezved and inability to
make significant headway in potential/emerging markets.
)0 World export growth @5.3 per cent Compound Annual Growth
Rate (CAGR) was higher than India's export growth @3.4 per cent
- CAGR during the period 1995-99.
)0> Export realisations in dollar terms have been stagnant during the
1990·s.
)0> Region-wise trends indicate that other than the CIS countries,
India's share has been declining (in North America. India
continues to be a marginal player).
)0> In UK, the second largest importer after the CIS group, Indian
tea has lost significant market share to Kenyan produce.
103
» In green tea China has registered a much higher growth rate
(@15.3 per cent CAGR) than Indian tea exports (@3.4 per cent
CAGR) during 1~95-99.
104
71. Schemes during the Xth Five Year Plan
For effectively dealing with the constraints, the following five schemes
have been taken up for the X Plan period [2002-07).
i. Plantation Development Scheme - Under this Scheme,
extension of loans will be continued for undertaking extension
planting, replanting/replacement planting and procuring
irrigation equipments. Similarly, subsidy support for
replanting/replacement planting, rejuvenation pruning and
consolidation will also be continued. Renovation of the existing
field assets rather than expansion would be the thrust area
during the X Plan. Further, subsidy for irrigation and subsidy
for new planting at different scales Is possible under the
scheme.
,
if. Quality Upgradation and Product Diversification Scheme -
Under this scheme, loan will be advanced for procuring tea
processing machinery, tractors, Ught commercial vehicles,
packaging machinery and setting up of cooperative factOries.
During the X Plan period. t.hrust would be on more value
realisation. For this purpose. the factories are required to be
equipped with adequate machinery for undertaking dual
manufacture of orthodox or ere type as the market demands.
Further. proper infrastructure needs to be created for
improving the volume of value added teas and specialties such
as green teas. flavoured teas. ready to drink teas. etc. In
order to ensure quality of tea, the process of manufacture
needs to undergo changes to suit the emerging new markets.
To facilitate this tea growers and manufacturers may
participate in the quality improvement programmes such as
capital HACCP and ISO certification.
iii. Market Promotion Scheme - The scheme would continue to
support activities such as market research sUIVey. uninational
campaign for Indian tea in selected markets. brand promotion
support to Indian companies for launching the brands in
inter-national markets. genetic campaign for tea in new
markets and setUng up of an umbrella unit in Indja to meet
the requirements of product and packaging standards in
international markets. There is an all round realisation that
the growth rate of the domestic markets need a step up for
sustainability of the tea industry. Towards this end. there is a
need to make special provisions for launching domestic
schemes under the scheme.
105
· The market for tea Is changing. Tea Is now facing Increased
competitioJ;1 from soft drinks. In view of this, tea needs to
protect its carefully nurtured market. It also needs to make
forays into soft drink markets with a view to creating
competition rather than merely reacting to it. This can be
done through further value addition and development of new
products
106
The innovative idea of a Mothers Club being tested ill Dooars
region provides a new model for improving workers' health at
the estate level. This model needs to be extended to all other
tea growing regions for which additional funds need to be
eannarked under this scheme. A new approach is required to
tap local talent and internal training in estate management. In
addition. continuing development of the managerial skills of
eXisting managers is also reqUired. The existing status of
small and marginal fanners and identifying their basic needs
for development of these sub sectors and evolving strategies to
make them more active participants in overall development
may be given priority. Organizing training programmes on
modem aspects of tea growing and manufacture. cstablish-
, ment of demonstration plots in the important areas of small
growers concentration and supply of high yielding planting
materials at subsidized rates.
107
under tea in the small growers sector. The land poUcy of the
Government is also conducive to this development. Growing of
tea especially in the North Eastern region would help in
generation of sufficient income to sustain rural households.
creation of employment oppor-tuniUes for unemployed youth
and landless labourers. conservation of natural resources
through control of shifting cultivation and degradation of
forest areas. and providing a means of harmonious living by
minimizing the social unrest in the rural areas.
All activities will be carried out by the Tea Board through Its
regional offices and In collaboration with reSI)('ctive State
Governments.
108
Propagation of tea includes release of high yielding clones, bi-clonal
seed stock and grafted plants. These planting materials have shown
extremely satisfactory results. However, existing materials and
techniques need to be Improved. Standardisation of package for
cultivation of organiC tea is yet to be made. High density planting is
sufficient for obtaining higher yield from an unit area. Any further
increase in the density would only lead to uneconomic production in
the long run.
Source: Xth Five Year Plan· Report of Sub'group on Plantation Crops· II . Tea. Coffee and
Rubber . Ministry oj Commerce
109
Black Tea eouat..,. Without tariff With tariff
reduction reduction
m.kg % share lD'.kg % share
Production India 1015 36.11 1018 35.96
Sri Lanka 285 10.14 287 10.12
Kenya 278 9.80 280 9.94
China 220 7.83 224 7.92
- -1-------
Indonesia 210 7.47 213 7.51
- - r-- -
Turkey 215 7.65 j·15 7.60
Exports India 245.8 17.12 249.8 172.20
---
Sri l..mka 254.5 18.22 262.6 18.09
Kenya 254.0 17.69 256.8 17.68
China 192.0 13.37 201.2 13.85
Indonesia 200.0 13.93 214.0 7.51
Source; FAO. (1995). Impact oj the URA 011 tIll' World Tea Economy : Projections 10 2005.
Commltl.·c 011 COlllmrxlil!} Problem.~. ICG Ilf Tea. Home
110
77. Strategies for the Tenth PIau Period
The strategies of the Tenth Five Year Plan are to : (1) enhance
production through vertical development measures such as
replantation. rejuvenation. pruning. infill1ng of vacancies With better
varieties. etc. (l1)improve the productivity of small tea gardens. (111)
emphasize special attention on irrigation and drainage (iii)
manufacture additional crop; tea processing facilities are to be
augmented by construction of new tea factories (iv) modernize the
existing tea factories for ensuring production of clean teas Without
any trace of foreign material In end products. (v) encourage product
diversification and creation of facilities for dual manufacture of tea
(orthodox and CTC). (v) encourage value addition and production of
instant. ready-to-drink tea. decaffeinated tea and specialty teas. (vi)
ensute adherence to the prescribed international and domestic SPS
(Sanitary and Phyto-sanitary) standards for tea. (vii) make higher
investment on R&D and transfer of technology. (viii) reach
technological advances to smaller estates where potential for
improvement is the best, (Ix) reduce packaging costs and use
alternative and inexpensive packaging materials, (x) explore the
possibility of setting up of modern packaging and blending units
within India with foreign collaboration. (xi) support for promotion of
value added teas in overseas market by exporters. importers to take
advantage of IT tools for promotion vigorously. (xii) encourage organic
tea cultivation and production of green teas, (xiii) initiate special
promotional programmes in thrust countries, (xiv) need to continue
an intensive generic promotion campaign Within the country so as to
increase per capita consumption and to arrest declining trend in
domestic demand. A strong and vibrant internal market will create
the necessary synergy's for expanding the export market, (xv) reduce
the cost of production by improving productivity and minimizing
wasteful expenditure to increase profits from the existing plantation
The competitive advantage of tea industry depends primarily on
quality of manpower. Therefore, HRD inputs are critical to future
development of the tea Industry.
III
percentage to world production and also increase exportable surplus,
(0 reducing cost of production by educating workers at garden levels
through workshops while maintaining targets for replanting,
rejuvenation planting. etc .. (g) narrowing down in number of grades
produced which lead to confUSion in importers' mind and (h)
exploring the possibtlity of providing zero interest/low interest loans
for purchase of roll1ng machines for orthodox, especially in the
context of the crisis in South India.
112
shiftted from product to quaUty based on appearance. cuppage,
ecology, sensitivity to bio chemicals. health benefits and lifestyle.
There is a need to project India as a stable. reliable producer and
supplier which will honour commitments. .
113
83. Investment Activities during Xth Plan Period 2002-07
(Ra. in crore)
Sr. Sources of Fund Amount
No.
I Tea Board
Loan 29.00
Subsidy 130.00
2 33 AB a/c. Under Tea Development 405.00
Account Scheme
3 Tea Industry's own resources 81.00
4 Bank/Institutional loan 294.00
Total : 939.00
114
related activities and quaUty upgradation and product
diversification programmes would be covered under a new
scheme viz. Quality Upgradation and Product Diversification
Scheme. The estimated requirement of funds adds up to
Rs.811 crores with the following sources of funds :
(Re. In crore)
115
be In the region of Rs. 225 crores with the following source of
funds:
The estimated outlay and the sources of fund for each of the scheme
Is summarized in the table below :
116
Sl. Nam. of the Eetlma- Tea Board 33 AB Indu- Bank I
No. achem. ted fund Depo.lts try'. wtltu-
requlre- Loan Sub- resou- Uoll8l
ment aid,. rce. flnance
1 Plantation develop- 939 29 130 405 81 294
ment scheme
2 Qual1ty upgradation 811 24 100 250 109 328
and product diversi-
fication scheme
3 Market promotion 300 - 150 - 150 -
scheme
4 Research and
development
225 - 125 - 100 -
5 HRD 30 - 30 - -
Total: 2305 53 535 655 440 622
Source: X .Flue Year Plan. Report on Sub-Group on Plantation Crops II - Ministry oj
Corrunerce.
117
Part Nine : Pri~e Stabilization Fund, Price Stabi-
lization Fund Account, Guidelines
85. Background
Deeply concerned with the problems being faced by the growers of
coffee. tea. rubber and tobacco due to continued low prtces of these
commodities (both domestic/export). for quite some time. Government
of India (GOI) has taken a series of measures to ameliorate the
hardshIps being faced by the growers of these crops. The Price
Stabilization Fund Scheme (PSFS) is yet another step in the direction
by GOI to safeguard the interests of the growers.
86. Objective
119
the members on first come first serve basis with preference being
given to the members With the least holding size. The Commodity
Boards will thereafter enroll the eligible growers as member who will
be required to deposit an amount of Rs 500 with the Commodity
Board.
Govt. of India will announce a price band for each commodity based
on the seven year moving average of International prices as the mid
point with the lower bound and upper bound as 20 per cent (-) and
20 per cent (+), respectively.
When the average prices fall below the lower bound of the band in a
particular year, Govt .. of India will contribute upto Rs.IOOO to the
account of the member. In that year the member will not be
required to contribute any amount to his/her account.
In those years when the average price pierces the upper bound of
the band, the member will have to contribute Rs.lOOO to his/her
account while the Govt. .of India will not contribute any amount
In the normal years when the price remains within the price band,
the member will be required to deposit Rs.500 each year to his/her
account within a specified .. date. The Govt..or India will also
contribute upto Rs.500 to the member's account during the normal
year.
120
During years when the average market price falls below the lower
bound of the price band. the member would be allowed to draw
Rs. 1000 from the account.
At the end of the ten year period. the balance outstanding can be
Withdrawn by the grower including the Govt .. of India's contribution
and the interest earnings. The initial contribution of Rs. 500 as an
entry fee however. Will not be refunded.
The Scheme will be implemented through a Trust Fund to be set up
jointly by Ministry of Commerce and NABARD and the operations
will be monitored by a High Powered Committee set up by the
Ministry of Commerce.
93. Defaulten
In case a member defaults in making his contribution Within the
stipulated date. he will be deemed as a defaulter. The PSF account
maintained with the bank would be closed and no further deposits
either from the Govt. of India or the member. would be' credited to
the account.
mustratlon
The operation of the Scheme is illustrated below. Let us presume
that the 7 years moving average price of the commodity is Rs. 43/.
The lower bound of the band would be Rs. 34.40 and the upper
bound of the band would be Rs. 51.60. If the prevailing price of the
commodity is Rs. 31/- per kg the position will be as under.
121
95. Price StabUizatloD Fund Account
,,/ The accounts would be opened with the deposit of Rs. 100/-
which will be the minimum balance in respect of these
accounts. The accounts would be deSignated as PSF
Accounts.
122
.t No further deposits of the grower members should be
accepted for credit to a defaulter's account.
.t No Government contributions could be credited to the
defaulter's account.
123
Part Ten : Madhukar Committee - Report of the
Working Groups on Problems of the
Industry
98. Background
125
98. For Bauks
i. The major problems currently being faced by the tea IndusUy
are due to the high cost of production. and sharp decline in
sale price as a result of which many tea borrowers are
findiIH;s it difficult to maintain their cash budgets prepared by
th('lIl at the heginning of the season. Since this projected cash
hl:d~\! .<; the basts of providin~ working capital limit to the
t.' . bOlTuwns. operations in their accounts become difficult
lJt:~ :m: ,~ of low cash inflow resulting in irregularity in the
accounts. Normally. the borrowers are required to liquidate
their ollls1 Il'riinf,!f; in their tea hypothf'cation acc:ount by the
enc! of the ~';'. iISOII. BlIt failure on the part of the borrowers to
liquidate tILt hypoli:u'ai:o(l dues by the end of the season,
results in further diflkully for the borrowers as they are not
in a posiiioll to avail fl t::jh working capital limit for the next
season. In view of this. it. W.1S J'('l'{)mmendeu that
126
iii. In order to enable the borrowers to operate the tea garden
during the current season after aforesaid conversion/
restructuring of the account. a iresh working capital may be_
extended and it was recommended that
Release of needbased working capital finance for current
season based on realistic position, keeping in view the
production track record, accepted price levels. market
demand etc. may be allowed in accounts classified as
standard assets.
iv. Many tea borrowers are enjoying term loan facilities from
banks. which were taken earlier to meet various project costs
undertaken for development and expansion of tea garden/
, processing units and they are not in a position to service their
installments of such loans as per the earlier terms stipulated
at the time of sanctioning such loans. In view of genuine
problems of tea industry. it is recommen-ded that
Reschedulement of existing term loans repayment
schedule on the basis of borrowers' future position and
repayment capacity, may be allowed.
v. As the banks are required to undertake the aforesaid
converslon/restructuring/reschedulement in many tea
accounts. such accounts should not be treated as NPA
because the borrower could not service in time on
installments or liqUidate tea hypothecation dues and the
account w~s otherwise treated as standard asset. In the light
of the above discussions. it Is recommended that
127
in respect of advances granted for agriculture purpose,
interest and! or installment of principle remains unpaid for
two harvest season but for a pertod not exceeding two and
half years. such an advance will be treated as NPA. The crop
cycle for tea plantation is one year and hence in terms of the
above gUidelines issued by the RBI. the tea accounts are not
getting full ~enefits because of the existing ceiling period not
exceeding two and half years, whereas for tea plantations crop
cycles are equivalent to two years. In view of the above and
considering the current crisis through which the tea Industry
currently passing. it is recommended that
128
expenditure incurred by the borrower during the last
three years for development lex tension of tea estates
processing units etc. without arranging corresponding
long term funds reSUlting in asset liability mismatch,
aJ'fecting the net working capital position of the
borrowers. This facility would be granted to genuine,
good borrowers with satisfactory track records having a
minimum debt equity ratio of 3:1 and who have not
diverted funds by way of investment in other companies.
transferring fund to the subsidiaries group company or
created assets other than for productive purposes.
viii. There Is a continuous demand from the Industry that the rate
of interest being charged by the lending banks Is required to
, be reduced at this hour of crisis, for enabling them to become
more competitive. In this respect it was mentioned that all the
individual banks have their own credit rating system which is
linked with the prices i.e. credit of interest and does not
justify to allow a rate of interest not commensurate with its
credit rating. However, considering the difficult time through
which industry passing. it is recommended
129
incurred during the last 3 years arranging the corresponding long
term funds and which has created productive assets towards such
borrowers enhancing its production capacity and if such subsidy is
allowed by the Tea Board, there will be mrresponding reduction in
the long term loan re'luiremcnts from banks. It is recommended that
Tea Board may provide 20% capital subsidy in respect of those
capital expenditure incurred during the last three years in
creating assets for enhancing the pJ'oduction capacity of the
borrowers, where such borrowers could not arrange for the food
tie-up of such capital costs provided the borrower is having
satisfactory track record. Such release of su.bsidy should have
linkages with the term loan from the ban.k for the same
purpose, if auailed, the subsidy should be released to the
lending of such. borrower.
101. For Central and State Governments
The representatives of Ministry of Commerce, Govt .. of India
mentioned that the Central Govt. is llkely to set up a Price
Stabilization Fund for plantation including tea industry, and its
modalities of operation is now laking final shape. All members of the
Group appreCiated the efforts tak('n by the Government and
requested for expanding the creation of the Fund because the benefit
should accrue to the industry as soon as possible. It was further
discussed that the respective State Govts. may avail the facility
under Rural Infrast.ructure Development Fund being provided by
NABARD for the purpose of development of infrast.ructure at the tea
estates such as housing, irrigation.etc. which will ease t.he financial
burden of the borrower who are at present supporting these
expenses.
The Stat.e Govt .. may also consider re-imhursement (by aVaillng RIDFJ
of the capital expenses Incurred by tea borrowers during the last
three years for meeting these reqUirements of infrastructure of tea
estates. The Working Group therefore recommends.
tal The formation of Price Stabilization Fund for plantation
including tea industry is to be expedited.
fbI The State Gout. may avail the RIDF Fund from NABARD to
meet the expenses towards development of irifrastructure at
tea estates and reimbursement of earlier expenditure
incurred by the tea borrowers during last three years for
the purpose of building up required irifrastructure at tea
estates.
130
102. For Tea Associations
At present the Associations do not communicate with the banks as a
result of which their views on the latest development in the indusUy
is not forthcoming. Many policy decisions in respect of efficacy of
auction system, review of various benchmark parameters like average
yield. coverage of tea cultivable land, replantation, conversion ratio of
green leaves, wastages. etc are not being regularly communicated by
the Associations. It is expected that there should be continuous
interface between the associations and the banks. Moreover, the
ASSOCiation shall bear the moral responsibility for fostering for
improved performance among its members and assist them towards
this objective in every possible way.
The Tea Associations will have to take a more active role for
development for both domestic and global tea markets through
publicity in different media and thwart the challenge posed by
contemporary beverages. It should carry out continuous efforts
to improve the tea price in the domestic as well as interna-
tional market.
The small tea growers and bought leaf factOries are facing certain
specific "Problems due to price differentiation, non-realisation of
receivable in time, etc. As more in-depth study Is required for these
problems. separate working groups may be formed under the
chairmanship of the convener bank of SLBCs of the respective States
131
with members from SBI. Tea Board and the Industry to study the
problem in-depth and come out with their recommendations within a
month. In the light of these discussions it is recommended that :
..
132
Part Eleven : Package of Relief Measures for Tea
Industry
105. Introduction
FollOwing a request received from the Chairman, Tea Board, IBA had
arranged a meeting between senior bankers and representatives of
Tea Board/Tea Association of Kolkata on January 12, 2004. At the
meeting the Chairman, Tea Board and representatives of major Tea
Associations presented difficulties faced by them both in the
domestic and the export market. the current state of tea industry,
the challenges and opportunities in the global market, efforts being
made by the tea industry to overcome their weaknesses, and their
expectations of relief measures from the banking industIy. Based on
the discussions in the meeting. this package of relief measures was
prepared and was approved by the Managing Committee of the
Association in its meeting held on 31 October 2004.
India is the largest producer of tea in the world and the country has
retained its leadership in production over the last 150 years. India is
also the largest consumer of tea in the world. Tea has been an
important foreign exchange earner contributing to about Rs. 2000
crore to the export basket even though in terms of share in the
world market, we lag behind Sri Lanka, Kenya and China. The
fragmentation of USSR, strained relationship with Pakistan and the
problems in Iraq had adversely affected Indian tea exports in the last
decade. The relatively higher cost of production and poorer quality of
133
our output has affected the competitiveness of our tea industry.
High cost of labour coupled with low productivity has been the
primary reason for the high cost of production. Productivity and
quality of tea produced in the country is also affected due to
existence of ageing plantations in the country. A significant portion
of our tea plantations is aged beyond economic life of tea bushes.
The tea gardens of Sri Lanka and Kenya are of relatively younger
origins. It is therefore felt that the Indian tea industry needs to take
drastic measures to improve productivity and also take up
replantation/rejuvenation on a war footing. to improve competitive-
ness and long term viability.
There has been a pick up in the demand for tea and consequentry
prices since December 2003. The tea industry representatives view
the developments as a turn around and expect the positive
sentiment.s to continue over the next 4-5 years. The prospects of
reviving business with Iraq and Pakistan. add to the optimism. The
Government has also initiated promotional measures aimed at
developing new export markets and encouraging consumption of tea
in the country. The Government has also earmarked more funds for
development of this sector in the Tenth Plan. This could encourage
tea growers to take up replantation/rejuvenation on a larger scale.
134
improVing measures like implementation of voluntary retirement
schemes. etc. While in respect of small tea growers. a standardized
approach could be taken. it is felt that decision on restructuring of
larger units should be on the basis of case-by-case evaluation. In
the prevailing market conditions and interest rates scenario. banks
could consider converting existing rupee loans into foreign currency
denominated funding. This would enable the units to enjoy the
benefit of lower interest rates without the banking system having to
make saCrifices.
135
category may be considered on a case-to-case basis on meIit.
The position of accounts as on 31 December 2003 may be
considered for restructuring. Irregular portion of outstanding
in term/working capital loan accounts as on 31 December
2003 may be calVed out into a Special Tea Term Loan (STILI.
As part of the restructuring exercise, funding reqUirements for
carrying out a VRS exercise or such other measures for
improving productivity could also be conSidered depending on
the viability of the proposal and suitable repayment fixed on
the basis of cash flow projections. The repayment of STIL
may be allowed over a period of 5 to 7 years Including a
moratorium of one year based on the cash flow projection.
Interest on STfL may be charged at the Benchmark Rate of
the bank. Banks may examine feasibility of converting Rupee
Loans including restructured loans into Foreign Currency
Loans to pass on the beneflt of lower interest rates to the
borrowers. Fresh working capital limit may be conSidered
based on assessment of requirements. Interest on fresh
working capital would be as per the pricing policy of the
bank. In cases where the asset cover is insufficient. banks
may seck additional collateral security from the borrowers.
110. Conclusion
Tea growing regions. because of the use of shade trees in West
Bengal and the Northeast, can be classed as forests. In KeraJa. they
are converting potato and other available land to lca and the
findings of the experts are that tea areas cany out the same positive
functions as forest land, so far as ecology and land erosion are
concerned. Industry's plea is simple, tea areas with shade arc almost
as good as forests and certainly much better than the degraded
forest.s. As such, degraded forests can be given to the industry for
growing tca not only In the national int.erest but also In the
eculogical interest. And It is the industry has formed partnership
with the Govemmcnt to extend its wings and gives effective support
to the industry by allotting land, a big portion of which can be
degraded forests. Pragmatism is called for not le~alism or
bureaucratism. As these forests 'on papcr' cannot claim any standing
trecs. it would be bctter to plant thcse areas with tca and shade
trees! We may classify shaded tea areas as forests and the ratios
laid down for forest -land. will be cffectively maintained. We may
have to only amcr.d tht' definition of a forest! Taking about the
Government. as an act.."c partner. the first partnership contribution
industry seeks from the Government is maintenance of law and
136
order and rationalization of taxation. The Industry and Government
have gone into a genuine partnership where It is in the interest of
both parties to see that the industry keeps on growing and
generates increasingly more wealth. so that the Government can
partake of it and get bigger revenue amounts in comIng years. As a
good partner. it is industry's duty to see that both the Center and
the State earn increasingly more revenue from the tea industry.
Government should consider by taking a smaller percentage of a big
and growing cake. rather than a big percentage of a stagnating and
slowly diminishing smaller cake. Hence there is a necessity for
continuous growth of production through increased productivity of
both land and labor and increased production with more land
coming under tea.
,
While the Industry understands that the Government has certain
baSic fiscal needs. and is willing to do Its best, the Government also
has to appreCiate that if the industry is to prosper. taxes have to be
rationalised, more lands have to be allotted and law and order must
be maintained. However. even with all the help and understanding
from the Government. the industry will not be able to hold its own
in the new climate of free market economy and globalization. unless
its productivity improves most of which will have to come from the
workers. through industry's efforts. Demanding productivity from
workers as a qUid pro quo for Increase in wages does not work. It Is
industry's responsibility to ensure that workers are trained and
motivated to use this training in the overall interests of all
concerned.
137
Part 1Welve : Product Diversification, Exports of
Packet Teas, Tea Bags, Instant Teas
111. Background
Even 50 years ago. tea drinkers abroad used to buy 'pure' tea from
the producing country of his choice from among the neighbouring
grocers. The teas of different origins were being sold under well
advertised brand names by trading companies located in the
importing countries. These companies got their merchandise from a
number of tea producing countries. In other words. there was a so-
called international diVision of labour under which tea was grown
by poor developing countries especially for the purpose of exports in
bulk a~ raw materials to various developed countries. The imported
tea was then sold by the developed countries through a network of
large Sized companies with substantial capital investment who were
marketing the tea in attractive consumer packs under different
brand names built up by intensive campaigns. This diVision of
labour was not based on any natural advantage as understood in
the theory of international trade. It was based on historical factors
and on advantages artificially created for different companies by
virtue of dominant position of their countries over the erstwhile
colonies. The companies not only controlled over 40 or 50 per cent
of the markets of developed countries but also controlled trade
channels for marketing and distribution of tea. Moreover. there were
some bigger companies which owned plantations and controlled a
large part of retail marketing of packaged tea. Thus, it is of vital
importance that an attitudinal change must precede our attempts
towards boosting of tea exports by the developing countries. This
would work as catalyst to mark a departure from the traditional
POSition of tea producing countries being content With export of tea
as a primary product to value added items. This change covers the
diversification into blending of tea and its packaging would enable
the tea producing countries to free themselves from the vagaries of
the wholesale market of tea and enter the consumer markets directly
where prices are more stable compared to wholesale markets. Packet
tea can help the producing countries to earn added value on
account of blending and packaging and thereby earn more foreign
exchange. Similar is the case of instant tea and tea bags.
139
and in earning more foreign exchange. Besides, this would enable
the developing countries to be known not only as exporters of
'primary' products but also as exporters of 'convenient' products or
manufactured goods which can directly find place in the display
counters of the consumer stores tn the developed countries. In other
words. a switch over from 'primacy' to 'processed' goods might open
up new vistas of economic growth for the developing countries
through increased exports. India, which is one of the developing
countries. has progressively ushered in diverSification in many of its
agricultural commodities in recent years. India started by exporting
groundnut seeds and then moved to export of oilseeds and thereafter
to products like meal. In case of leather products. India has moved
from raw hides to tanned, semi-processed to processed and finished
leather. and for over a decadl~. India has been developing markets
for shoe uppers. shoes and leather as well as leather garments and
goods. The same could happen in the case of tea. The question is
what type of structural changes In tea exports i.e. product
diversification has been achieved in India so far.
112. Export of Packet tea
India Is the largest producer and exporter of tea in the world and is
expected to produce 850 million kgs in 2004 assuming an average
annual growth rate in tea production to Uw extent of a little over 3
per cent. other things remaining constanl. On an average. India
produced about 820 million kgs annually during the last five years.
India produced 826 million kgs of tea in 2002 and her share in
world production was 27 per cent. The volume of her tea exports
was 201 m kg in 2002 which accounted for 14 per cent of world
exports and these are mostly in bulk form. India has been trying to
maximise exports particularly in the form of processed tea such as
packets, tea bags, and instant tea.
In India. tea packets contaIning loose tea are still the normal fonn of
packaging. India for the first time started the export of packet tea [in
consumer pack upto a size of I kgl in 1965. Six years lall'r she
ventured into export of tea bags. instant tea, etc. Sincc then lndia
has been making steady and consistent progress in llH~ exporl of
packet tea. In 1965. wit h only lw() firms in the field. she had
exported 2 111 kgs of packet tea and at the end of fivc years. with
entry of few lIlore firm". her h'a exports doubled to 4 III kgs 1971-
72 and in another 4 years. ('xports reached the level of about 11 m
kgs (1975-76). The prooi·css. sinn' thc..~n. 110tewortllY wit.h the entry of
more than 200 firms in the I"it-lei.
140
The year-wise growth of exports of packet tea in India for the last
two and a half decades since 1973-74. is given below:
141
and accounts for 60 percent of world trade in packet tea. It is
interestlng to note that packet tea imports constituted nearly 20 per
cent of total world imports and India constitutes for nearly half of it
by way of direct export of this item during the year.
During the last 4 decades major changes have already taken place
in the tea market in the world. Countries like USA, UK, Canada
and others have preference for packet tea, tea bags, instant tea in
recent years. The countries in the region of West ASia and North
Africa place their order mostly for these items. The exports of packet
tea in the countries of West Europe (United Kingdom, Irish,
Netherland, Germcmy. Austria. Finland etc.) are also gradually falling.
On an average, about 4 m kgs are exported to West Europe, 21 m
kg to East Europe. 1.5 m kg to America {North & Latin AmericaJ.
142
Year Qwmtlty [th kg] value [Ra.J Uolt value [Ra/kg]
1987-88 498 32424.00 65.11
1988-89 626 44409.00 70.94
1989-90 546 46875.00 85.85
1990-91 496 43715.00 89.20
1991-92 483 71408.00 147.84
1992-93 520 72536.00 139.49
1993-94 1007 101456.00 100.75
1994-95 1008 144180.00 . 143.04
1995-96 861 125811.00 146.15
1996-97 1716 252479.00 147.16
1997-98 2169 449957.00 207.45
1998-99 2415 498180.00 206.29
199~-2000 2305 557207.00 241.74
2000-2001 1917 385332.00 200.96
2001-2002 2542 597103.00 234.89
2002-2003
exports of tea bag in 1973-74 was 144 thousand kgs which went up
to 2524 tho kgs In 2001-02 showing an increase of 17.6 times. There
was an appreciable increase of this item from 1994-95 on wards.
Except 1995-96, exports of packet tea boosted up from 1716 tho kg
in 1996-97 to 2169 th kgs in 1997-98. It further improved from
2415 tho kgs. in 1998-99 to 2542 tho kgs. in 2001-02. Average
export of packet tea during last five years was to the level of 2270
tho Kgs. fetching Rs 219 per kg. It is also obseIVed that average unit
price stands at Rs 201 per kg.
115. Direction of Tea Bag Exports - Region-wise
Tea bags are exported to mainly countries like Untted Kingdom, Irish
RepUblic, Germany. France. Belgium & Luxemberg of West Europe.
A substantial quantity is also exported to east Europe i.e CIS
countries (Russian Federation, Ukraine. LaMa. Kazakhasthan. etc.)
and Poland. Meagre quantities are exported to USA. Canada and
Brazil of America as well as Iran, UAE, Kwait, Bahrain, Muscat
,Yemen of West Asia and North Africa. Further less quantity in the
level of 20 thousand is exported to Asia other than West (Japan),
Africa other than North (Angola, South Africa) and Australia and
Oceania (Australia). It is interesting to note that over the last three
years quantities exported to East Europe has increased from 1816
th.kg in 1999-00 to 2115 in 2001-02. while it was 16 tho kg 84 tho
kg dUring the period in America. There was fall in exports from 207
tho kg to 106 tho kg in West Asia and north Africa.
143
116. Value Added Concept
There are three methods by which valucs are added to tea. These are
(1) Breaking bulk and blending Involving no technology but require
skills that we possess. (ii) Consumer packing in attractivc packets,
cans or bags using modern packing materials, if sold in other brand
names (to devote attention towards marketing and promotional skills)
and cost, if sold under own brand name (iii) Product processing and
qualltattve improvement extracting tea solubles i.e., solids and
flavour. The country which exports tea in bulk quantities without
rccourse to value added system is, thercforc. not only deprived of
legitimate share or value added but also fails to reach the consumer
directly. The value added items of tea which are sold in the rctail
market. are In the forms of tea in consumer package and tca bags.
The sharing of value added which could be seen from the price
differentials in respect of packet tcas and tea bags as compared to
bulk teas is shown bellJw:
. "'
144
Table 29 : Price dlfferentials during 1988-87 to 2001-02
(fob as./ke)
Year Packet tea Tea bag Bulk tea Percentage of value addition
In packet/bag to bulk tea
1966-67 9.88 - 8.18 20.80
1971-72 9.48 20.39 7.47 26.90 173
1973-74 10.58 24.80 7.63 27.90 225
1974-75 13.76 25.48 9.16 50.20 178
1975-76 15.99 37.67 11.22 42.50 178
1976-77 15.36 37.05 12.01 27.90 235
1917-78 20.64 47.49 23.29 -14.00 208
1978-79 20.40 44.41 20.61 -1.90 113
1979-sb 19.34 41.13 18.12 6.70 127
1980-81 21.65 43.22 19.15 12.80 122
1981-82 22.85 43.15 18.15 25.90 138
1982-83 26.06 37.50 18.72 39.20 101
1983-84 30.01 47.20 24.79 21.00 91
1984-85 42.61 57.93 34.12 24.80 70
1985-86 38.69 64.23 30.25 27.70 112
1986-87 37.42 63.84 29.53 26.50 116
1987-88 37.18 65.11 31.10 19.50 109
1988-89 34.45 70.94 31.13 10.60 128
1989-90 46.80 85.81) 42.97 8.90 100
1990-91 54.64 89.20 53.58 3.50 69
1991-92 57.72 147.84 55.61 3.80 62
1992-93 61.92 139.49 56.05 10.50 148
1993-94 72.18 100.75 65.19 10.70 55
1994-95 68.75 143.05 64.64 6.40 0
1995-96 73.39 146.15 71.25 3.lD 105
1996-97 70.53 147.13 75.44 -6.50 95
1997-98 97.89 207.45 85.79 14.10 142
1998·99 108.57 207.45 107.81 -0.70 91
1999-2000 106.16 241.74 100.61 5.60 143
2000-01 103.81 200.96 89.41 16.10 125
2001-02 121.99 234.89 89.98 36.90 164
The data presented in the above table showed that packet tea and
tea bags added more value approximately 27% and 173% respec-
tively than the bulk tea during 1971 - 72. Value addition in respect
of packet tea and tea bags stood at 37% and 164% respectively in
145
2001-02. Value addition for packet tea ranged from 3% to 39%
during the period from 1966-67 to 2001-02, while it ranged from
55% to 235% during the same period in respect of tea bags. Value
addition was reduced to minimum during 1990-91 and 1992-93 in
respect of packet tea and tea bags as compared to bulk tea because
of increase in the price per kg of bulk tea.
146
Year Quantity (Th,.kg) Value (lb.) UDlt Value (lb./Kg)
1985-86 938 80428.00 85.74
1986-87 1134 94896.00 83.68
1987-88 8661 66611.00 7.36
1988-89 1147 100986.00 88.04
1989-90 925 90068.00 97.39
1990-91 1283 158039.00 123.18
.-
1991-92 1740 270592.00 155.51
1992-93 1122 221463.00 197.56
1993-94 1320 228667.00 173.23
1994-95 1230 260940.00 212.15
1995-96 1868 446403.00 238.97
1996-97 2483 578336.00 232.92
1997-98 2428 629703.00 259.35
199~-99 2602 653770.00 252.26
1999-2000 2783 831013.00 298.60
2000-01 2574 741979.00 286.04
2001-02
Source : Vanous issues oj Tea Statistics. Tea Board. KoUcata
It will be seen from the above table that the export of instant tea
increased from 295000 kg in 1973-74 to 2594000 kg in 2001-02
showing an improvement of less than 10 times. Similarly, in value
terms it was Rs. 92.17 lakh in 1973-74 and 7419.79 lakh in 2001-
02.
120. Export Market for Indian Tea
Indian instant tea is exported to 23 countries. Among those
countries USA accounts for about 71% of the total followed by
SWitzerland 9%, Canada 6%, Italy 5%, etc. It Is interesting to note
that instant tea is gaining popularity in United Kingdom, France,
Austria, Netherlands. UAE. Japan etc.
A. Package Tea
Rate of duty Rs/Kg
(a) Tea packed in unit containers Rs. 0.44 + duty for the time
of content not exceeding 25 being leviable for loose tea
147
grams and ordinartly inten- which has not already been
ded to sell to consumers in paid (w.eJ. 11.3.86)
those pack.
(b) Tea packed in unit containers Rs. 1.10 + duty for the time
of content exceeding 25 grams being leviable for loose tea
but not exceeding 20 kgs whe- which has not already been
ther or not ordinarily intended paid (w.eJ. 11.3.86)
for sale to consumers in that
pack.
(c) The packed in bags for retail There Is no excise duty on Tea
consumption known as "Tea Bags. but duty leviable for loose
Bags". tea should be paid if such loose
tea is used for manufacture of
tea bags (w.e.f. 15.5.86)
B. Instant Tea
Rebate allowed on export (w.e.f. 9.9.86)
a. Loose Tea:
A rebate on excise duty @50 paisa per kg on loose un-blended/
blended tea exported out of India Is granted w.e.f 9.9.1986
With effect from 4.12.1986 the rebate is granted on export @50
paise per kg on loose un- blended/blended tea exported out of India
provided the duty of excise so paid is not less than 50 paisa per kg.
Full rebate of excise duty has been granted on loose tea
exported out of India w.e.f. 27.4.1988.
b. Package Tea:
(I) A rebate on Excise Duty @ 50 paisa per kg on loose un-blended
tea which is used in the manufacture of blended tea and packet
tea exported out of India is granted w.eJ. 9.9.1986.
(it) A rebate of additlonal.exctse duly on export of packet tea at the
following rates are ak') granted w.e.f. 9.9.1986
148
(a) Tea packed in any kind of container not more than 25 grams
net of tea - Rs. 0.44 per kg
(b) Tea packed in any kind of container more than 25 grams but
not more than lkg net of tea - Rs. 1.10 pel kg.
c. Instant Tea
The whole of the duty of excise leviable on instant tea provided that
the duty of excise has already been paid on loose tea used in the
manufacture of such Instant tea w.eJ. 1.3.1986.
W.e.f. 27.4.1988 the whole of the duty of excise leviable on instant
tea.
C. Loos'e Tea
Rebate of Excise Duty granted on exports of Bulk tea w.e.f.
23.7.1983 has been withdrawn w.e.f. 1.2.1985.
D. Cash Compensatory support : W.e.f. 1.4.1989 the C.C.S. Has
been granted at the following rates on f.o.b. Value of exports (valid
upto 31.3.1992.).
149
In the first phase packet tea export should be confined to our
neighbouring countrIes through local collaboration particularly in
those cases where there are no packeting facilities and tea is
imported in packages espectally in premium range. ThIs would mean
less investment. no clash of interest among own customers and a
prtce advantage on account of lower freight. On both sides of India
upto Africa and South East Asia, there is great demand for imported
packet teas where our exported tea could successfully compete with
others.
First. research into new tea products and tea blending continues.
Second, to support export of value added tea abroad in the form of
packets, bags and inst.ant tea. we should first encourage and
organise markets at home. It was noted by the Committee that exact
strategy would depend on three factors like creating favourable
market conditions. increasing Investment on export promotion and
building of organisational marketing strengths.
150
124. Potential and Scope for Instant Teas
151
Part Thirteen : Small Tea Growers - Problems
and Prospects
128. IDtroductioD
153
the formation of all Assam Small Tea Growers Association during
1987 was another landmark for extension of Small Tea Cultivation in
Assam. In 1991. the Tea Board of India approved the proposal of the
Agriculture University to provide financial support to the Advisory-
Cell of the Department of Tea Husbandry and Technology and the
Cell was reconstituted as "Small Tea Growers Advisory- Programme"
to the broad mandate. Apart from Self Employment the cultivation of
tea has opened a wide vista of business opportunities by providing
not only indirect employment but also creating a sound base for
farm income. In a nutshell tea cultivation could act as a catalyst for
the overall economic changes in the rural scenario of Assam
especially in tea growing districts. There are 38.393 small tea
growers in the State. The Small holdings are spread over all the
districts. however concentration is in the five upper Assam districts
viz. Dibrugarh. Tinsukia. Slbsagar. Jorhat and Golaghat.
154
hectare. About 2 kg of fann yard manure, 30 gm SSP, 30 gIn
rock phosphate and 2 gm thymate are mixed with excavated
soil and the pits are refilled with natural compaction.
115
tea growers are nowadays adopting sprinkler irrigation to
increase the green leaf yield during the dry perlod. It is done
in the morning or night.
x. Drainage - The drains of 2 ft wide and 3 ft deep are
sprayed over the area of 40 ft. inteIValS along with the slope of
the land.
Out of the farmers visited only a few small tea growers had availed
of loan from banks. All others raised plantation with their own funds
or borrowed from relatives. Many of them did not approach bank for
loan with the apprehension that they will have to waste their time
running after bank officials without any effective results. It was
learnt that most of the Lea growers did not have patta land. Further.
in many cases title waf> not. dear which was a handicap in obtaining
loan. The growth of small l~a sector has slowed down on account of
limited availability of further suitable land as major portion of the
land has already been put under cultivation. Further. as most of the
156
plantations are 8 to 10 years old. there is hardly any possibility of
rejuvenation or replantation. Requirement of loans for such opera-
tions may arise after another 5-6 years. A field study reveals that
fanners expressed their requirement for working capital for purchase
of fertilser. pesticides and payment of wages including advance
during puja season.
134. Marketing
All the small tea growers sell their green leaf either to nearby big
gardens or to bought leaf factories and average price varies from
Rs. 6.70 to Rs. 9.35 for depending upon the quality. It was learnt
that during 1998-99, the green leaf was maximum at Rs. 11.50 to
Rs. 12.00 per kg. and in some cases it was Rs. 13.00 per kg.
The major problems in marketing of green leaf is the poor handling
in transportation. etc. The factory owners buy on 'first come first
served' basis or at competitive price and growers had to be at the
receiving end.
The situation has now been solved through the price sharing scheme
of Tea Board. The scheme states that the growers must be paid
minimum @ 60% of the average auction price upto Rs. 70 per kg of
made tea. Beyond this. if auction price is more. then tht: amount
should be shared @ 50:50 basts.
157
market. Further. the production of green leaf is not properly
channeUsed to tea processing fac1l1ties. In many cases.
unsuitable land and marginal lands were utilised for
cultivation of tea affecting the quality as well the productivity
of the plantations.
ii. Land Patta and Title - Most of the small tea gardens
established on government land. ceiling surplus land, grazing
land or annual patta land are deprived of being registered
with tea board. As a result they could not avail the benefit of
plantation subsidy scheme and the bank loan. Although. there
is a provision for issuing provisional regIstration to the
growers with annual patta. normal land, etc. on the basis of
certificate of enjoyment of holding for tea plantation, the
revenue authorities are making in ordinate delay in this
regard.
iff. Technical Backup - There is a vide technological gap
between the trained and untrained small tea growers. Small
tea growers may be imparted training in certain areas like
drainage. manuring. weed/pest control. pruning, etc. This may
help in enhancing lhe producti-vily of tea crop.
iv. Ecological Imbalance - The mushrooming growth of tea
plantation has reported a large scale ecological problem by
way of clearing village wood lots. The commercial forestry
(bamboo plantation, etc.) has vanished and crops like orange,
pineapple. sugarcane. citronella have been replaced by tea.
The indiscriminate use of pesticides and agro chemicals have
brought in havoc to liver and waterline population.
v. Finance - About 98% of small tea cultivation has been
developed through self finance or finance arranged by growers
themselves from informal sources. In absence of tlnancial back
up most of the plantation could not be developed on scientific
Unes.
vi. Marketing - In the absence of well knit marketing channel
for the produce of small tea growers. the term is ,many a
time, dictated by factory owners and growers are at the
receiving end. The problem is aggravated due to the fact that
some growers tend tn supply inferior leaf.
vii. Uncareful handling - The growers and the transport agents
do not appreCiate the utmost need of maintaining the ultimate
158
product quality to realise better option market and take llttle
care to maintain high standard in parking and avoid damage
in handUng and transport.
159
Arrangements for training on sCientific and cultural operations as
well as organisation of awareness camps.
Maintenance of ecological balance through utilising high lands for
tea plantation and not destrOying village wood lots.
Developing viable mixed cropping system to be adopted by small
growers.
Carrying out research on developing a prototype processing unit
capable of manufacturing small quantity of green leaf.
Streamlining the marketing system and developing market linkages
in a scientific and systematic manner.
Allowing only registered agents to transport and supply green leaves
to factory and implementation of price sharing scheme during
slumps in the market.
160
• Government may issue land holding certificates to the effect that
the farmer is a small tea grower having holding with government
land/annual patta land under his possession so as to enable him
to get provisional regislration with the Tea Board. All these will
help farmers to avail of benefits of the price subsidy scheme.
• For ensuring quality tea from the small tea growers sector. an
effective co-ordination mechanism amongst small tea growers.
green leaf transporter and bought leaf factory may be evolved.
• The Small Tea Growers may take up organic tea cultivation in a later
stage after gaining experience in tea cultivation for few years .
161
5. KunIo O. Tea Industly In Japan. Tea Science and Human Help. proceedings of
the international symposium Tea technology. Kolkata 1950-54
6. Sarkar Gautam K. 1972 . The World Tea Economy. New Delhi Oxford University
Press
7. Banerjee G D : Tea Marketing is no Longer a Fashionable Slogan. published in
IASSI Journal Aprll- June 2001
10. FAO 1995. 1999 : Impact of Uruguay round agreement on the World
Economists position to 2005 and current situation and short term outlook.
paper presented to Inter Government Group on Tea Ottawa September.
11. Assam Review and' Tea News. Kolkata - various Issues
12. Tea Statistics. Tea Boards of India. various issues
13. Tea Directory. Tea Boards of India. various Issues
14. V N Asopa - 2004 Competitiveness of Global Tea Trade - Oxford and IBH
Publishing Company Pvt Ltd. New Delhi
----,._------_
.. ..... , '. ~
..,
... , .......
Z 0 DE C ?~:~5
" 'f'!'fI.
'.
I
.1,. l;d""
.!
,. . . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
, . .........................
~
162
ANNEXURE - I
Mtzoram - - - - 12 12
North India Total 2305 2521 2517 2933 5340 45202 46860
(a) Including Karbl Anglong & North Cachar upto 1989.
(b) Includtng West DlnaJpur.
(c) Includtng Cooch Behar.
+ Break up by district are not available
@ Figures prior to 1981 Included wtth Lakhlmpur.
• Provisional
163
ANNEXURE - I continued
164
ANNEX1JRB - I (continued)
ill Area under Tea In blella - a) North Inella
165