Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

Sustainable Green Banking: The Case of

Greece
Angelos Papastergiou
[email protected]

George Blanas
TEI of Larisa
[email protected]

Abstract

This paper examines the issue of sustainable development of

banks in Greece and approaches this new area in an integrated and
innovative way. It tries to analyze the situation, using the model of
Jeucken. The study adopted the model, as resulted from the
international study of 34 banks. The aim of this study is after the
presentation of the recent literature and the information provided by
banks to get clear the picture of sustainable banking in Greece. In
the theoretical review the study presents the previous researches
about sustainability and the main framework. It approached the
subject from a geographical perspective. Next, the current situation
in Greece is presented. The sustainable attitude of banks is
categorized in financing risks, in product development, in
environmental care, and in communication-organization. Based on the
Jeucken’s point system, it evaluates the sustainability performance.

Keywords: sustainable development, triple bottom line, corporate

social responsibility, sustainable banking, green market.

JEL Classification: G21, Q56.

Methodology

The methodology was based in literature review and secondary

data. The main theoretical model was the model towards sustainable
banking by Jeucken (2004). The research took place in two phases: The
first phase was an up-to-date literature review on corporate social
responsibility in the banking sector and particularly in sustainable
banking, that identified results, methodologies used and suggested
future research. The second phase included data collection about
Greek banks through secondary published sources in relation to the
issues analyzed in the model. Secondary published sources were the
reports on corporate social responsibility and other relative
information published on the banks’ and other internet sites.

Literature review

Given the need for change it would be agreed that transformation

in the usual model for the sustainable development is essential
(Hopwood, 2005). In order to understand the banks towards
sustainability Jeucken identified four stages: defensive, preventive,
offensive and sustainable banking. Jeucken (2001) highlighted
important differences between regions, countries and banks with
regard to sustainable banking. Fenchel (2003) highlighted the
influence a credit default has on the economic success of the
business and identified differences among the banks in the credit

MIBES 2011 – Oral 204

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

management. Thompson (2004) concluded that although banks might seem

to occupy a privileged informational position, they might be
supportive of extensions in environmental disclosure practise,
whether it is voluntarily or required by legislation. From January to
March 2005, fifty international CSR finance thought leaders were
interviewed for their views of the future of CSR-sustainability in
finance in a decade from then and they most believed the ethical
consumer market will grow driven by product awareness, pricing, and
social and environmental deterioration (Strandberg, 2005). Human
resource management benefits derived from CSR are a key way through
it can lead to improved financial performance (Branco, 2006). IFC
(2007) found that: (a) individual banks had to devise their own
business case for sustainable banking, (b) reputation and branding
had become the top reason for many banks to integrate sustainability,
(c) the benefits outweighed the costs, and social and environmental
risk management improved the quality of a bank’s portfolio and
lowered insurance liabilities and compensation claims. Douglas (2008)
found four key findings: (a) banks are increasingly discussing
climate change business opportunities in their annual reports, (b)
twenty eight of the forty banks have calculated and disclosed their
greenhouse gas emissions from operations, (c) growing demand for
climate friendly financial products and services is leading banks
into new markets, and (d) investment banks have taken a leading role
in supporting emissions trading mechanisms and introducing new risk
management products. Other findings indicated that the Equator
Principles contribute to long term sustainable investment (Seuren,
2009). Hoepner (2010) highlighted the importance of social,
environmental and ethical issues for the risk management, reputation
and performance of banks and other financial institutions.

Studies generally pointed that banks in Western Europe countries

obeyed to the rules and took initiatives to improve their
sustainability (they put the three indicators of society, environment
and economy almost at same value). The RARE organization study showed
that the majority of European banks didn’t measure performance
related to indirect aspects (customers and financial products)
(Vigano, 2006). The conclusion of EIRIS organization (2007) was that
OECD-Europe region was most advanced on products and services
beneficial to the environment. The results of the sustainable
assessment of six UK banks by Amacanin (2005) indicated that majority
of the banks had reached the preventive banking phase in Jeucken’s
model while only two banks had reached the higher phase of offensive
banking. In Spain, it was shown that in the presence of a positive
valuation of social responsibility practises by consumers, a firm may
obtain a better strategic position, along with higher margin, demand,
and profit, and the empirical analysis confirmed that consumers
significantly value other features apart from price in making deposit
and mortgage decisions, particularly a financial institution’s social
responsibility (Callado, 2006). Zappi (2007) presented the modular
approach given to CSR and the need for integrating CSR into the
fundamental strategic orientation of an Italian bank, in order to
mainstream CSR into the heart of business theory and practice. In
Portugal, a study suggested that legitimacy theory may be an
explanation of social responsibility disclosure by banks (Branco,
2006). In Ireland, research has revealed discrepancies in corporate
social reporting. The experience of the top five Romanian banks
confirms the theoretical assumptions: the highest rated banks,
considering their total assets, were also socially and
environmentally responsible corporate banks (Cosmin, 2008). The
results of the UNEP-FI survey (2006) among financial institutions and
stakeholders in Greece have revealed many good approaches regarding

MIBES 2011 – Oral 205

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

sustainability in the Greek financial sector but the most surprising

was the low engagement of Greek subsidiaries of large international
banks that are very advanced in sustainability. Greek banks show
weakness in the internal organizational culture in relation to CSR,
they do not have mechanisms of action, and morality is not separate
of the regulatory-legislative practices (Antonakakis, 2006). The
results gathered from a study indicate that information disclosed by
Greek banks in relation to sustainability has been fragmentary in
their nature and it shows that Greek banks do not cover these issues
widely (Evangelinos, 2009). They have low compliance level with the
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Deloitte Touché Tohmatsu
(DTT) guidelines, scoring less than 50% by each scoring system
(Evangelinos, 2009).

The study by Ji-Ming (2007) showed that corporate social

responsibility of China banking companies, listed in Shanghai and
Shenzhen Stock Exchange, is positively related with their competitive
advantage based on five variables. This relation, however, was not
very strong. CSR in Thailand is related with the brand effect
(Poulthong, 2009). In Taiwan, the ranking of the customer-preferred
initiative agrees that consumer’s humanistic CSR concerns were ranked
higher than environmental concerns, and that consumers’ consideration
for personal well being outweigh their consideration for initiatives
with societal impact (Mc Donald, 2010). The Indian banking industry
has an integrated approach by combining CSR with the customer
satisfaction (Narwal, 2007). In Bangladesh, the findings by Khan
(2009) were: (a) the selected banking companies did some CSR
reporting on a voluntary basis, and (b) the user groups were in
favour of CSR reporting, and would like to see more disclosure.

In Nigeria, a recent paper identified self-induced vices,

regulatory laxity, inauspicious macro-economic environment, and
corruption in the economy, as the constraints to the discharge of CSR
in the banking system (Achua, 2008). In 2007, the fundamentals of
sustainable banking existed in the South African banking market
(Tsele, 2007).

The study of Lloyd (2008) pointed the importance of trust to an

American financial institution although it would be a mistake to
attribute the success of Canandaigua National Bank & Trust, which is
a community bank in New York, wholly to its policies of corporate
social responsibility. In the growing economy of Brazil some points
for improvement were identified: (a) to reinforce the awareness of
employees and other stakeholders on the subject of sustainability,
(b) to upgrade the tools used by institutions, (c) to improve the
transparency in disclosing socio-environmental information (Lins,
2008).

While the adoption of CSR reporting is linked to higher

reputation indices, it is not necessarily adopted as a strategy by
members of the Australian banking industry to address questions of
legitimacy (Bartlett, 2005). The business case appeared to be a major
motivation in New Zealand banks for reporting on CSR issues along
with industry influences and motivations related to increasing image
and reputation (Thien, 2010).

Jeucken (2004) in his thesis took an inquiry into

sustainability. The main research question was “which sustainability
issues exist for banks and what has been the response by them?”.
Banks faced sustainability issues ranging from local environmental
legislation to social pressures in developing countries (Jeucken,

MIBES 2011 – Oral 206

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

2004). The seven layers in the analytical framework were as follows:

sustainable development layer, stakeholder layer, innovation layer,
drivers’ layer, banking and sustainability typology layer, banking
and sustainability activities layer, conventional banking activities
layer. Banks have been setting up internal guidelines and management
systems to prevent losses due to sustainability issues in financing
(Jeucken, 2004). When sufficient investors, consumers, and businesses
want to invest in sustainability, banks develop products that meet
their requirements (Jeucken, 2004). The scale of banking operations
nonetheless gives rise to important environmental effects and banks
are increasingly focusing on environmental care but the degree of
internal environmental care differs. The thesis was a multi-layered
research strategy by means of source and method triangulation
(Jeucken, 2004). The thesis pointed many themes for further research:
(a) a research strategy aimed at the relationship between banks and
their business clients with respect environmental risk assessment,
(b) a research strategy aimed at testing the use of international
codes of conduct (Equator Principles) for project finance activities
in developing countries, (c) literature on environmental management
in the services sector was lacking, (d) the same holded for
innovation literature, (e) the revised analytical framework had been
developed for studying activities and policies at the corporate level
of banks and further research could look at a lower aggregation
level, such as sustainability risk assessment in project finance, (f)
no correlation was found for the level of profitability and the level
of sustainability of a bank (further research could deep into such
correlations and definition of such entities as profits and
efficiency), (g) research in the quality of the data reported, (h)
research on activities of banks from developing countries and smaller
banks, comparing their activities with those from developed countries
and bigger banks, (i) theoretical possibilities and empirical
realities of product development within banks with regard to the
social dimension, (j) the distinction between the economic and the
social dimension, (k) which explanatory factors exist for common
behaviour in sustainability (Jeucken, 2004).

Analysis of sustainable banking in Greece

Financing risks

Alpha Bank1 recognizes the importance of environmental response.

Citibank2 has a green procurement policy. Bank of Cyprus3 states that
continuously inform its customers about the environmental matters
through targeted actions. Commercial bank4 takes measures to external
environmental threats: integration of environmental considerations in
the financing system, integration of environmental criteria in credit
scoring, evaluation of environmental credit risks in the current
process of risk assessment and management, integration of
environmental criteria in the supply system. Eurobank5 applies
environmental risk management process to finance. Societe Generale
group6 (parent company of Geniki Bank) has developed the “General
Guidelines and Sector Policies” along with the relevant internal

1
http://www.alpha.gr/page/
2
http://www.citibank.com/us/home.htm
3
http://www.bankofcyprus.gr/default.asp?lang=GR
4
http://www.emporiki.gr/cbg/gr/cbg_index.jsp
5
http://www.eurobank.gr/online/home/
6
http://www.sgcib.com/

MIBES 2011 – Oral 207

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

processes. HSBC7 has environment sector policy. Marfin Egnatia bank8

is trying to work with suppliers who meet the criteria for
environmental protection. Millenium bank9 group has subscribed to the
the Equator Principles. National Bank of Greece10 recognizes the
impact of business clients in the environment and places it between
the evaluations of their borrowing capacity. Piraeus bank11 evaluates
qualitatively and quantitatively the risks and opportunities by
sector of ICAP for managing the environmental impacts of their
activities. The situation in numbers: there is analysis of
environmental risk at the 50% of banks, 15% do political exclusion of
certain harmful environmental and social sectors and 25% adopts
international guidelines of responsible financing.

Product development

Products

Alpha bank: “Saving at Home”, “Loan for photovoltaic systems”,

“Alpha house green energy solutions”, "Alpha Mortgage green
Solutions-green movement", ”Alpha Green Business Solutions-
ecological". ATEbank: "Home green energy step-up”, “Financing of
photovoltaic systems”, “Green house repair”, “Organic agriculture
loan”. Attica bank: "Power house of Attica bank”. Bank of Cyprus:
“Eco loans”. Emporiki bank: “Eco-home”. Eurobank: “Saving at home”,
“Green home loan”, “Eurobank EFG Equity Partners”, other green
products. Marfin bank: “Marfin like your home”. Millennium bank: The
bank offers a loan to finance and install natural gas. NBG: “Saving
at home”, “Green loan”, the new "Loan to install a photovoltaic
system", “II EPOS, environmental insurance to its customers.
Panellinia bank: "Loans for photovoltaic systems in roofs”. Piraeus
bank: “Saving at home”, business loans for large investments in
renewable energy projects: (a) business loans for investment in
photovoltaic power stations up to 150KW, and (b) business loans for
investment in photovoltaic power plants from 150KW to 5MW, mortgage
loans, loans for repair, green loans, leasing finance. Hellenic post
bank: "Solar roof”, “Eco foreign capital”. 60% of banks have
environmental loans, 20% have environmental investment funds, 5% have
environmental leasing, 10% provide insurance in case of environmental
damage, 15% have counselling process on environmental matters to
customers. For very special products, such as micro-credit and debt
for nature swaps, there is no activity in Greece.

Environmental care

In 2009, Alpha bank12 increased the use of natural gas (20%

reduction in electricity consumption through the use of gas). ATE
bank13 in cooperation with the social club "Scale plus” implemented a
recycling program, which ran in 2009, in six buildings. In
Citibank14, there is energy saving and integrated waste management.
In Bank of Cyprus15, there is a paper recycling program in

7
http://www.hsbc.com/1/2/.
8
http://www.marfinbank.gr/GR/Pages/Home.aspx
9
http://www.millenniumbcp.pt/
10
http://www.nbg.gr/
11
http://www.piraeusbank.gr/
12
http://www.alpha.gr/page/
13
http://www.atebank.gr/atebank
14
http://www.citibank.com/greece/homepage/index.htm
15
http://www.bankofcyprus.gr/default.asp?lang=GR

MIBES 2011 – Oral 208

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

administration and in some units. Hellenic’s Bank16 environmental

management system includes saving energy (lighting stops
automatically when there is no movement in the workplace), and
reduction in paper use. In Commercial Bank17, there is calculation
and control of CO2 emissions resulting from energy use, transport and
use of paper, calculation and publication of eco-efficiency
indicators, main energy saving measures, paper and water recycling,
paper packaging, electronics and plastic waste management,
integration of environmental criteria in building construction,
expansion within the control system of environmental criteria and
adaptation to global environmental management systems to achieve
certification. From 2009, Eurobank18 is among businesses in the EMAS
(companies that respect the EU 761/2001 on environmental management).
Geniki bank19, through the electronic services "Geniki e-Banking” and
“Geniki e-cards”, allows customers to make transactions via internet.
Marfin Egnatia bank20 has a paper recycling program in its
administration buildings and branches in Athens. The current internal
consumption system of Millenium group21 has been redesigned so as to
permit a more efficient, fair, and responsible use of resources which
has led to the development of measures involving: (a) reformation of
the current systems of consumption of resources such as water energy
and paper, (b) reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, (c) reduction
of the volume of waste produced, (d) raising of awareness and
training of employees on the subject of sustainability and the
environment. National Bank of Greece22 uses (from 2004) its
environmental management system in accordance with the international
pattern of ISO 14001. In 2009, in Piraeus bank23, the paper
consumption reduced by 28% in comparison with 2008, thanks to process
changes. Hellenic Post Bank24 states that cares for the environment
and invests in environmentally friendly actions and that the green
banking is in the heart of the bank philosophy. In 2009, in Proton
bank25, the training was among basic priorities as it was stated in
internet site. In T bank26, there are accessional benefits like
insurance team contract, team capital management contract aiming at
pension, low-interest rate home and consuming loans to employees,
expenses support for baby farm, having many children families’
financial support, monetary awards to students, financial support to
married. About 70% of banks are interested in the environment with a
variety of actions (such as reducing paper, reducing travel) but only
half of them provide quantitative data about internal environmental
care. 70% of banks contribute either money or free services in
activities that contribute to sustainable development.

Communication-organization

Alpha bank’s27 environmental policy is guided from principles

about energy saving work offices, environmental principles keeping

16
http://www.hellenicbank.gr/HB/content/gr/index.jsp?lang=gr
17
http://www.credit-agricole.com/en
18
http://www.eurobank.gr/online/home/
19
http://www.geniki.gr/
20
http://www.marfinbank.gr/GR/Pages/Home.aspx
21
http://www.millenniumbcp.pt/
22
http://www.nbg.gr/
23
http://www.piraeusbank.gr/
24
http://www.ttbank.gr/
25
https://www.proton.gr/
26
http://www.tbank.com.gr/tbank/
27
http://www.alpha.gr/page/

MIBES 2011 – Oral 209

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

from suppliers, employee’ informing, results publishing and dialogue

with social associates. ATE bank28 believes that the responsibility
for environment and the environmental policy enforcement are basic
parts in sustainable development and climate change confrontation in
companies. Attica bank29 aiming at environment protection, supports
the non profit company “Always Mainalon” which operates in Arcadia
County and develops the natural resources of the area. Citibank’s30
global vision is a friendly “home” for all. There is an environment
section in the financial report of Bank of Cyprus. Hellenic bank31
has a social responsibility report. The objectives of the
environmental policy of Commercial Bank32 are to improve its
corporate ecological efficiency, to minimize environmental impact,
and take advantage of new business opportunities for financing
sustainable development. Eurobank33 adopts a formal environmental
policy aiming to reduce environmental impact. Geniki bank34 seeks to
take a responsible stance in the way it carries out its corporate and
investment banking activities. In HSBC35, they believe it is a duty
to share environmental responsibility with governments and citizens
to minimize the harmful effects of human activities: pollution of
soil, water, and air and resource depletion. Marfin Egnatia bank36
states that it acts so as not to adversely affect the environment.
The global CSR report of the Millenium group37 aims to respond to the
expectations of the stakeholders regarding the material subjects and
is prepared in accordance with the G3 guidelines established by the
GRI standards for level A+ and the AA 1000AS principles. The NBG38
participates in the Greek Network for Corporate Social Responsibility
(EDEK). National Bank participates in the FTSE4Good Global and Europe
since 2004. In 2004, NBG developed and implemented the Environmental
Management System in accordance with international standard ISO
14001. In 2002, Piraeus Bank39 met the criteria of the FTSE4Good and
in 2004, participated in United Nations Global Compact which covers
ten principles on human rights and labour rights, protection of
environment and fight corruption. In 2007, Piraeus bank signed the
declaration to join UNEP FI (United Nations Environment Programme
Finance Initiative). Underlining the sensitivity of the environment,
Hellenic Post bank40 states that it operates through a series of
separate actions designed to support effective programs that protect
the environment. 50% has an environmental policy and 15% has some
references of this. 50% has corporate social responsibility report
(either autonomous or across the banking group owned), 5% has a piece
dedicated to the economic environment report, 30% signed the
declaration on sustainable development of United Nations and only 15%
signed the internationally recognized environmental certification
ISO-14001.

Criteria

28
http://www.atebank.gr/atebank
29
http://www.atticabank.gr/index.asp?a_id=46
30
http://www.citibank.com/us/home.htm
31
http://www.hellenicbank.gr/HB/content/gr/index.jsp?lang=gr
32
http://www.credit-agricole.com/en
33
http://www.eurobank.gr/online/home/
34
http://www.sgcib.com/
35
http://www.hsbc.com/1/2/
36
http://www.marfinbank.gr/GR/Pages/Home.aspx
37
http://www.millenniumbcp.pt/
38
http://www.nbg.gr/
39
http://www.piraeusbank.gr/
40
http://www.ttbank.gr/

MIBES 2011 – Oral 210

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

The criteria of sustainability measurement were adopted from

Jeucken (2004). Communication (10% weighted): environmental policy,
environmental reporting, WBCSD membership, signatory to UNEP
declaration, signatory to ICC declaration, ISO-14001 certification.
Generic published information (25% weighted): quantitative data about
internal environmental care, qualitative data about internal
environmental care, objectives for internal environmental care for
the future, quantitative data about external environmental care,
qualitative data about external environmental care, objectives for
external environmental care for the future. Generic financing (15%
weighted): environmental risk analyses, sector exclusions, adherence
to World Bank guidelines for financing, adherence to OECD guidelines
for business activities. Special products (40% weighted):
environmental loans, sustainable investment funds or advice,
environmental leasing, environmental savings products, environmental
damage insurance, advisorial services impacting on the environmental
care, venture capital for environmental innovations, microcredit,
debt-for-nature swaps, climate products. Social issues and charity
(10% weighted): credit cards/cheques for gifts benefiting nature and
environment, sponsoring benefiting nature and the environment,
community involvement, internal socio-economic aspects.

Table 1: Integrated score for Greek sustainable banking

Bank Points
Piraeus bank 13
NBG 10,9
Eurobank 9,95
Alpha bank 9,05
Emporiki 8,6
Millenium 6,95
Citibank 6,75
Geniki bank 5,85
Hellenic Post bank 5,3
Marfin Egnatia bank 5,25
HSBC 3,85
Bank of Cyprus 3,3
ATE bank 3,1
Hellenic bank 2,15
Attica bank 2,05
Panellinia bank 0,8
Proton bank 0
T bank 0
Pro bank 0
FB bank 0

MIBES 2011 – Oral 211

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

Sustainability typology: defensive banking (0-5 points),

preventive banking (5-10 points), offensive banking (10-15 points),
sustainable banking (15-20 points).

Conclusions

The traditional model of sustainable development divided into

three sectors (environment, society, economy) can’t help to develop
sustainability because of the complexity of the concept. Corporate
social responsibility and sustainable development in particular, play
a growing role in the processes of banks. Risk management and the
creation of environmental reputation appear from the literature to be
important factors for economic success of the bank. European banks
are leaders in the international green market. Based in research done
in the past decade, they seem to be more advanced than those of other
continents as a whole, and have developed an environmental
philosophy. Especially in Greece, positive developments in
sustainable banking have been reported from surveys in previous
years. There are potential customers who could ignore the economic
characteristics of banking products in the case of products with
beneficial effects on the environment, but this should be considered
due to the era of the economic crisis. In the other world, there is
an increasing traffic on sustainability but major problems such as
political instability, limited demand for environmentally friendly
products and the absence of strict laws, are a hindrance. In the
growing economy of China, in the last years, the changes to the legal
level and international competition have been achieved and
opportunities for socially responsible investments are very high.

Banks of Greece in the field of risk management haven’t a

uniform picture. The banks that are subsidiaries of multinationals
are well placed in the evaluation point system, because the risk
policies implemented by the parent companies are transferred
necessarily to their own procedures. It is remarkable that the
signing of the Equator Principles, one of the most important
standards for responsible financing, has been made mainly by banks
that are under the umbrella of other large banks in the global
market.

In the development of green products, the majority of banks

provide loans (with a significant proportion being subsidized by the
state) for the home energy upgrade and photovoltaic systems
installing. Most of the subsidiaries of international banks do not
have any activity on green products which is strange because the
parent companies in countries of origin have come into this business
a long time ago.

Regarding environmental concerns, the majority of banks are

quite active, especially in the internal environmental care and in
social issues, such as economic benefits to employees and society.
Only the largest Greek banks and some subsidiaries of foreign banks
provide detailed information on environmental performance and
measures applied. The smaller banks have activities which can not be
controlled easily.

In the field of organizational and communication the picture is

quite neutral.

The general picture presents a transition from some notable

individual actions in a consistent and measurable environmental

MIBES 2011 – Oral 212

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

performance for most banks. According to the evaluation, 50% of banks

are in the defensive phase, 40% in the preventive, 10% in the
offensive phase and none bank in Greece belongs to the final and
ideal phase of sustainability.

References

Αντωνακάκης Ε., 2006, “Ηθική των Επιχειρήσεων και Τραπεζική Κοινωνική

Ευθύνη, Η Περίπτωση της Ελληνικής Αγοράς”,
http://class.eap.gr/LotusQuickr/info/Main.nsf/h_Toc/5e340c7055b43e
8fc225777e0042a9fb/?OpenDocument
Achua J., 2008, “Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigerian Banking
System”,http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=16630
68&show=abstract
Amacanin M.C., 2005, “The Strategic Implications of Corporate
Responsibility and Sustainability in the UK Banking Sector”,
http://edissertations.nottingham.ac.uk/91/1/05MBAlixmca.pdf
Bartlett J.L., 2005, “Addressing Concerns About Legitimacy: A Case
Study of Social Responsibility Reporting in the Australian Banking
Industry”, http://eprints.qut.edu.au/3484/1/3484.pdf
Branco A., 2006, “Essays on Corporate Social Responsibility and
Disclosure”,http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/8578
/1/MCB_PhD_Thesis_Final.pdf
Branco A., and L. Rodrigues, 2006, “Communication of Corporate Social
Responsibility by Portuguese Banks: A Legitimacy Theory
Perspective”,
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1563569&show=
pdf
Callado M.F., and N.U. Gonzalez, 2006, “Does it Pay to be Socially
Responsible? Evidence from Spain’s Retail Banking Sector”,
http://www3.udg.edu/fcee/economia/n16.pdf
Cosmin J., Mihaela B., and E. Iamandi, 2008, “Corporate Social
Responsibility in the Romanian Banking Sector”,
http://steconomice.uoradea.ro/anale/volume/2008/v2-economy-and-
business-administration/121.pdf
Douglas A., 2008, “Corporate Governance and Climate Change: The
Banking Sector”, http://www.ceres.org/Document.Doc?id=269
EIRIS, 2007, “Corporate Responsibility Practices of Financial
Institutions in OECD and Important Non-OECD Countries”,
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/27/38569307.pdf
Evangelinos K., Skouloudis A., Nikolaou I., and W. Filho, 2009, “An
Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and
Sustainability Reporting Assessment in the Greek Banking Sector”,
http://www.springerlink.com/content/k6m56045g64n4nnk/fulltext.pdf
Fenchel M., Scholz R.W., and O. Weber, 2003, “Does Good Environmental
Performance Reduce Credit Risk? Empirical Evidence from Europe’s
Banking Sector”,http://e-
collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:26709/eth-26709-01.pdf
Hoepner A., and J. Wilson, 2010, “Social, Environmental, Ethical and
Trust (SEET) Issues in Banking: An Overview”,
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1686240
Hopwood B., Mellor M., and G. O’Brien, 2005, Sustainable Development:
Mapping Different Approaches,
http://www.geography.ryerson.ca/jmaurer/030_108art/030_108SustDeve
l.pdf

MIBES 2011 – Oral 213

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

IFC, 2007, “Banking on Sustainability: Financing Environmental and

Social Opportunities in Emerging Markets”,
http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/p_Bankingo
nSustainability/$FILE/FINAL_IFC_BankingOnSustainability_web.pdf
Jeucken M., 2004, “Sustainability in Finance”, Eburon Academic
Publishers, 1st edition, Delft
Jeucken M., 2001, “Sustainable Finance and Banking: Slow Starters are
Gaining Pace”, http://www.sustainability-in-finance.com/ifi.pdf
Ji-Ming L., and W. Hao-Bai, 2007, “An Empirical Examination of
Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility: A
Chinese Banking Industry Investigation”,
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4340591
Khan H., Halabi A., and M. Samy, 2009, “Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) Reporting: A Study of Selected Banking
Companies in Bangladesh”,
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1806164&show=
abstract
Lins C., Wajnberg D., Steger U., and A. Ionescu, 2008, “Corporate
Sustainability in the Brazilian Banking Sector”,
http://www.imd.org/research/publications/upload/WP_2008_07_Steger_
Lins_Wajnberg_Ionescu_Somers_Level_1.pdf
Lloyd J.D., 2008, “Using Corporate Social Responsibility to Build
Trust in a Financial Institution:The Case of Canandaigua National
Bank & Trust”, http://www.julietlloyd.com/eportfolio/CNB_Final.pdf
McDonald L., and C. Hung-Lai, 2010, “Impact of Corporate Social
Responsibility Initiatives on Taiwanese Banking Customers”,
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1906003&show=
html
Narwal M., 2007, “CSR Initiatives of Indian Banking Industry”,
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1641938&show=
pdf
Poolthong Y., and R. Mandhachitara, 2009, “Customer Expectations of
CSR, Perceived Service Quality and Brand Effect in Thai Retail
Banking”,http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1811
798&show=pdf&
Seuren T., 2009, “The Corporate Social Responsibility of Project
Finance Lenders: An Investigation into the Lending Behaviour of
the Equator Principles Financial” Institutions,
http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=16773
Strandberg C., 2005, “The Future of Sustainable Finance: Thought
Leaders Study”,
http://cleanerproduction.com/Training/Banks/Refs/Future_of_Sustain
able_Finance3.pdf
Thien G., Tregidga H., and K. Kearins, 2010, “CSR Reporting by New
Zealand Financial Services Institutions: Analysing Understandings
and
Motivations”,http://apira2010.econ.usyd.edu.au/conference_proceedi
ngs/APIRA-2010-185-Thien-CSR-reporting.pdf
Thompson P., and C.J. Cowton, 2004, “Bringing the Environment into
Bank Lending: Implications for Environmental Reporting”,
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6WC3-
4BMC7RP13&_cdi=6727&_user=1750782&_pii=S0890838903000969&_origin=s
earch&_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2004&_sk=999639997&view=c&wchp=dGLbVtz-
zSkWA&md5=b980d510f2422671a8127acb47234856&ie=/sdarticle.pd
Tsele J., Mokuena O., Charova T., and R. Ramsundhar, 2007,
“Sustainable Banking: Opportunities and Challenges”,
http://www.bankseta.org.za/downloads/IEDP_UK_2007_Sustainable_Bank
ing_Research_Report.pdf
UNEP-FI Central and Eastern European Task Force, 2006, “Scratching on
the Surface of Sustainable Finance: A Survey on Sustainable
Finance Practises in Greece”,

MIBES 2011 – Oral 214

 Papastergiou-Blanas, 204-215

http://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/events/2007/athens/greece_survey.p
df
Vigano F., and D. Nicolai, 2006, “CSR in the European Banking Sector:
Evidence from a Sector Survey”, http://www.rare-
eu.net/fileadmin/user_upload/internal/project_documents/Sector_Sur
vey/RARE_CSR_Survey_-_Banking_Sector.pdf
Zappi G., 2007, “Corporate Responsibility in the Italian Banking
Industry: Creating Value through Listening to Stakeholders”,
http://www.eabis.org/uploads/media/Zappi-
CR_Italian_banking_industry.pdf

MIBES 2011 – Oral 215