0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views4 pages

Case Processing Summary

This document contains three case processing summaries that examine the relationship between various childcare habits (feeding, parenting, healthcare) and stunting in 60 cases. Chi-square tests were performed and show significant relationships between poor feeding/parenting habits and stunting, and between poor healthcare habits and stunting. All expected cell counts were greater than 5.

Uploaded by

rena hardianty
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views4 pages

Case Processing Summary

This document contains three case processing summaries that examine the relationship between various childcare habits (feeding, parenting, healthcare) and stunting in 60 cases. Chi-square tests were performed and show significant relationships between poor feeding/parenting habits and stunting, and between poor healthcare habits and stunting. All expected cell counts were greater than 5.

Uploaded by

rena hardianty
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
kebiasaan_pemberian_maka 60 100.0% 0 0.0% 60 100.0%
n * stunting

kebiasaan_pemberian_makan * stunting Crosstabulation


stunting
stunting normal Total
kebiasaan_pemberian_maka kurang Count 26 0 26
n Expected Count 11.7 14.3 26.0
baik Count 1 33 34
Expected Count 15.3 18.7 34.0
Total Count 27 33 60
Expected Count 27.0 33.0 60.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 56.078a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 52.225 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 73.554 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 55.144 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 60
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.70.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Approximate
Value Significance
Nominal by Nominal Phi .967 .000
Cramer's V .967 .000
N of Valid Cases 60

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
kebiasaan_pengasuhan * 60 100.0% 0 0.0% 60 100.0%
stunting

kebiasaan_pengasuhan * stunting Crosstabulation


stunting
stunting normal Total
kebiasaan_pengasuhan kurang Count 26 0 26
Expected Count 11.7 14.3 26.0
baik Count 1 33 34
Expected Count 15.3 18.7 34.0
Total Count 27 33 60
Expected Count 27.0 33.0 60.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 56.078a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 52.225 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 73.554 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 55.144 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 60
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.70.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Approximate
Value Significance
Nominal by Nominal Phi .967 .000
Cramer's V .967 .000
N of Valid Cases 60

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
kebiasaan_pelayanan_keseh 60 100.0% 0 0.0% 60 100.0%
atan * stunting

kebiasaan_pelayanan_kesehatan * stunting Crosstabulation


stunting
stunting normal Total
kebiasaan_pelayanan_keseh kurang Count 13 0 13
atan Expected Count 5.9 7.2 13.0
baik Count 14 33 47
Expected Count 21.2 25.9 47.0
Total Count 27 33 60
Expected Count 27.0 33.0 60.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 20.284a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 17.546 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 25.326 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 19.946 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 60
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.85.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Approximate
Value Significance
Nominal by Nominal Phi .581 .000
Cramer's V .581 .000
N of Valid Cases 60

You might also like