Scribd
Upload
51 views2 pages

Lokpal Act

The document provides a critical analysis of the Lokpal Act in India. It discusses the history of failed attempts to pass a Lokpal bill since 1969. The objectives of the Lokpal Act were to provide a watchdog institution to check corruption among politicians and allow for speedy justice for corruption cases against public officials. However, setting up the Lokpal institution has faced significant delays despite Supreme Court orders due to lack of infrastructure and support from the government. The Supreme Court has again pushed the government to expedite the process of selecting members for the Lokpal body.

Uploaded by

harshad nick
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
51 views2 pages

Lokpal Act

The document provides a critical analysis of the Lokpal Act in India. It discusses the history of failed attempts to pass a Lokpal bill since 1969. The objectives of the Lokpal Act were to provide a watchdog institution to check corruption among politicians and allow for speedy justice for corruption cases against public officials. However, setting up the Lokpal institution has faced significant delays despite Supreme Court orders due to lack of infrastructure and support from the government. The Supreme Court has again pushed the government to expedite the process of selecting members for the Lokpal body.

Uploaded by

harshad nick
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

LOKPAL ACT : CRITICAL ANALYSIS

AIM AND SCOPE

Critical evaluation of current lokpal Act : How effective it is ?

INTRODUCTION

The first Lokpal Bill was passed in the 4th Lok Sabha in 1969 but could not get through in
Rajya Sabha,subsequently, Lokpal bills were introduced in 1971, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1996,
1998, 2001, and 2005 andin 2008, yet they were never passed. The Lokpal Bill was
visualized as the watchdog institution orministerial probity. Broadly the provisions of
different bills empowered the Lokpal to investigatecorruption cases against political persons
at the central level. The Main objective of the bill is to providespeedy, cheaper form of justice
to people. In the proposed system Lokpal will have complete powers todismiss a corrupt
official. LokPal will have powers to probe or prosecute any judge, even CJI, withoutany
permission while in present scenario CJI permission is required even to register FIR against
any judge.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

1. To study the differences between Lokpal Bill and Jan Lokpal Bill
2. To study the latest updates on Lokpal Bill in India.
3. To study the advantages and disadvantages of Lokpal Bill in India.

METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

The method of research study would be descriptive using the secondary sources of data. The
secondarydata has been collected from various references which already existed in published
form.
HYPOTHESIS

Lokpal is an ombudsman in India conferred with powers to check corruption in India.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the current suitation of the lokpal Act?

LITERATURE REVIEW

Nudged into action: on the Lokpal Act

It should have never come to this on the Lokpal. That it requires a Supreme Court order to
nudge the government to make any progress towards establishing the anti-graft institution is a
poor commentary on its functioning. The court has asked the eight-member Search
Committee under the Lokpal Act to recommend a panel of names before the end of February.
This shortlist has to be sent to the Selection Committee, headed by the Prime Minister. It has
taken five years since the Lokpal Act, 2013, received the President’s assent on January 1,
2014, for a Search Committee to even begin its work. It was formed only on September 27,
2018, after Common Cause, an NGO, filed a contempt petition against the government over
the delay in constituting the authority despite a Supreme Court verdict in April 2017. It is true
that setting up the Search Committee requires some groundwork, as its composition should be
drawn from diverse fields such as anti-corruption policy, public administration, law, banking
and insurance; also, half its membership should consist of women, backward class, minority
and SC/ST candidates. However, it is the government’s duty to expedite this process and not
cite it as a reason for delay. Even after it was formed, the Search Committee has been
handicapped because of lack of office space, manpower, infrastructure and a secretariat. The
court has now asked the government to provide the required infrastructure. In the past too, the
court has admonished the Centre for the delay in creating the institution. In its April 2017
verdict, the court brushed aside the reason that the government was awaiting the passage of
an amendment based on a parliamentary committee report and said there was no legal bar on
the Selection Committee moving ahead with its work even if there was a vacancy in it.

You might also like