Style and Language Analysis Guide
Style and Language Analysis Guide
Guide
A Guide for
Analyzing Style and Language
AN EXPLANATION OF WRITING STYLE
An author’s writing style is not incidental, superficial, or supplementary: style identifies
how ideas are embodied in language. In other words, the effect of how an author uses
words and literary elements is important for understanding the meaning of a text.
An author’s writing style includes all of the items on the list below, including specific
word choice (diction), kind of tone, use of formal or informal language, etc.
The author adopts a variety of style elements depending on his or her purpose,
audience, and genre. Analyzing an author's style involves understanding the particular
way a text is written. Style in writing is not what is said but how it is said. Analyzing an
author's style involves analyzing the writer's unique way of communicating ideas. Styles
in writing are created deliberately by the author to convey a specific mood or effect.
Style is often aligned with pathos, since its figures of speech are often employed to
persuade through emotional appeals. However, style has just as much to do with ethos,
for an author’s style often establishes or mitigates one's authority and credibility. But it
should not be assumed, either, that style simply adds on a pathetic or ethical appeal to
the core, logical content. Style is very much part of the appeal through logos (appeal to
logic and reason), especially considering the fact that schemes of repetition (e.g.
outlines) serve to produce coherence and clarity, which are attributes of the appeal to
reason. In other words, most pieces of writing have all three appeals (pathos, ethos,
logos), but one or the other may be more dominate depending on the purpose of the
piece of writing.
WHAT DO I DO NOW?
In order to analyze a piece of writing, go through this list to evaluate how an author is
using these styles elements. Then, choose which ones are most dominate in a
particular piece that will help you to interpret the meaning of the piece, which is
ultimately the entire point of doing a close evaluation of a piece of writing.
8. Characters: A character is what he does. How does the author characterize the
people in his novel? Characterization is the presentation of character, whether by
direct description, by showing the character in action, or by the presentation of other
characters that help define each other.
9. Allusions: How often and how does the author refer to other texts, myths, symbols,
famous figures, historical events, quotations, and so on?
14. Rhetorical strategies: Has the rhetor appealed to pathos and/or logos? In what
way has the rhetor established his or her ethos? Is there a rhetorical use of humor?
An appeal to an authority? The use of a logical fallacy?
15. Tone (the writer’s implied relationship to the reader and the subject
matter): What is the author’s attitude? Does the author seem sarcastic?
Remorseful? Fearful? Condescending? Praising? Critical/satirical? Wistful?
Pessimistic? Academic? Philosophically detached? Hopeful? Bitter? Sad?
Intimate/distant? Angry/calm? Informative/entertaining? Humorous/serious?
Ironic/literal? Passionately involved/aloof? Is the tone consistent or does it shift?
What feeling is evoked in the reader by the language used by the author? What type
of tone shifts exist that impact meaning?
16. Most Importantly, how do all of these elements create meaning? What does
the passage mean and how does it contribute to the meaning of the piece of
writing?